The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310039_2023 Q4 - Digester Influent/Effluent Samples_20240117ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Post Office Box 856 Warsaw NC 28398 Attention: Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/ Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/ Fax infoenvironmentalchemists.com Date of Report: Nov 15, 2023 Customer PO #: Customer ID: 08110011 Report #: 2023-24060 Project ID: Wastewater/Digester Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 23-58449 Site: Effluent - Benson 10/16/2023 8:50 AM Water Derek Brown Test Method Results Date Analyzed Sulfur EPA 200.7 Copper EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4 1994 Zinc EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4 1994 Fecal Coliform idexx Coluert 18 pH SM4500 H 8 2011 Result estimated Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time Ammonia Nitrogen SM4500 NH3 C-2011 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM4500 Norg B-2011 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 Total Nitrogen (Calc) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA 353 2. Rev 2.0. 1993 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 76.0 mg/L 7.56 mg/L 6.86 mg/L >24196 MPNI100mi 7.3 units 802 mg/L 878 mg/L 105 mg/L 4.99 mg1L 883 mg/L 11 /10/2023 11 /02/2023 11 /02/2023 10/16/2023 10/25/2023 10/18/2023 10/19/2023 10/25/2023 10/18/2023 10/27/2023 Report #. 2023-24060 Page 1 of 2 e nvirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Post Office Box 856 Warsaw NC 28398 Attention; Lab ID Sample ID: 23-58450 Site: Influent- Benson Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ■ 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info@environmentalchemismcom Date of Report: Nov 15, 2023 Customer PO #: Customer ID: 08110011 Report #: 2023-24060 Project ID: Wastewater/Digester Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 10/16/2023 8:40 AM Water Derek Brown Test Method Sulfur EPA 200 7 Copper EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4 1994 Zinc EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4 1994 Fecal Conform Idexx Cohlert-18 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 Result estimated. Analyzed aut of 15 minutes hold time Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C 2011 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM 4500 Norg B 2011 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P fF-H1-2011 Total Nitrogen (Calc) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA 353 2. Rev 2.0. 1993 Total Nitrogen Totai Nitrogen Comment: Reviewed by: Results Date Analyzed 85.4 mg/L 3.13 mg/L 5.80 mg/L >24196 MPN/100ml 7.5 units 930 mg1L 1140 mg/L 50.9 mg1L 4.69 mg/L 1150 mg1L 11110/2023 11 /0212023 11 /02/2023 10/16/2023 10/25/2023 10/18/2023 10/19/2023 10/25/2023 10/18/2023 10/27/2023 Report #. _ 2023-24060 Page 2 of 2 Environmental Chemist, Inc-, v"Irn+1+6tw I'- __ VVIIIJJJltgw-y __ 910.392.0223 Sample Receipt Checklist Date:AWU�A Report Number: Client: U� Delivery ❑ UPS ❑ FedEx u IJiTICI ,� ECHEM Pickup Client Receipt of sample: ❑ N/A 1 ere custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES NO x intact/unbroken? x N/A 2. if custody seals were present, were they "C ❑ YES ❑ NO / eC Corrected temperature upon receipt Original temperature upon receipt erature Blank 0 Against Bottles How temperature taken: ❑ m Tep VR Gun Correction Factor `C: 0.0 IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 2108$6869 Project was g notified? x YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler e adored ei squished/rece followed? custody proced x❑ YES ❑ NO 4. Were proper N YES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? N YES ❑ NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers. N YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date rfofined listed on the COC? N YES ❑ NO me I-sted on the C? B. Were tests to be pe 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? ❑x YES ❑ NO ood condition for each test? N YES ❑ NO 10. Did samples arrive in g N YES Cl NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?' ❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding i <2o * request tests? ❑x YES reserved samples received at a p YES ❑ NO 13. Were acid p YES ❑ NO 14• Were cyanide samples received at a ceived ptH 12? ❑ YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples reat a p d at a NH3/TKN/PhenoV receivechlo�eeesidua YES /� l of <OS mI? ❑ NO 16. Were ** ❑ YES ❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a ch o ❑ YES ❑ NO 1I3. Were orthophosphate samples filtered 'in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time analysis at time of analysis and he orded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for chlorine Sample Preservation: (Must be comp feted for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) were received incorrectlyOHeserved and were adjusted accordingly Samples) H2SO4 HNO3 HCl Na by adding (circle one): If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Time of preservation: samples.ed le or Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly p {esery Who, as notified, date and time: notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by were received with headspace � Volatiles Sampie(s] Li COMMENTS: L Y11101* r�i Q --I .0 N tb w CL Olt = i/ A a(D CL t7 i� jl c y Kao M m � a R W ' � o a� tD � ce � n a f O � m N d CD c N C CL i v m u c co N ty CL 0 7 4 wl, k a ro M of � u Sample Type Composite t7 G) 0 G) 0 G) c) G7 n 0 0 G) 0 G) C) 0 0 G) 0 or n Grab .n 9 m Container (P or G) >G Z -n C!1} Z !; W Nr 0 F Chlorine II mg/L — - s LAB ID NUMBER M NONE II M HCL X H2SO4 rn X HNO3 I� C� NAOH V1 Z p X THIO -- OTHER 0 c Z to w o' V) Z a CA U) � c w r N u N N N n m c CL O rrl S Q ; z C� a C z v M n o p o r m Z I-n ; °�z D z Z v A n z 2 1 O Z O a 'N uri 0 0 rn � m N � o n cl) z � V V �