20150994 Ver 1_More Info Received_20150928

Strickland, Bev
From: David Homans<[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September Z8'ZUl50:37AK4
To: Strickland, Bev
Dave Ho0Oans
Natural Resources /o|a Project Professional
ENGINEERING INTEGRITY.
auMe.|nu.
orn1 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte NC28273NIM
Ph: 704 -523-4726 em. 11633
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
u»omana(a)amemu.uom
www.amemu.uom
This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com/email. If you received this message in error please advise the
sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Joey Lawler
Sent: Monday, September ZO 2015 9:25 AM
To: David [e-mail]>
Subject: FW: DWR# 150994 PSNC Energy - Line T-01 pipe line replacement
\\charnc\Actve\Pnoi 7335Pnoiect (1-25)\7335-15-005 Line T-01 PernmitdnWhase06 Section 404.
&401 PernmittinR\�C�\���\T-01 PCN PackaRe.pdf
:4 ROM10119:4A.-V 10 1;CJl 0 19 N*[CJV 1 6r,
1751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273 Map
Ph: 704.523.4726
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]

ilawler aa,smeinc.com
www.smeinc.com
1& 2m Inc. moves elm twelve scoots in 2015 ENR Top 500 to 89.
This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com /email. If you received this message in error please advise the sender by reply
and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Strickland, Bev [ mailto :bev.strickland(@ncdenr.Rov]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:14 AM
To: Joey Lawler <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: DWR# 150994 PSNC Energy - Line T -01 pipe line replacement
ssr l /
Beverly Strickland, Laseirfiiche Administrator
NCDEQ- Division of Water Resources
Physical: Suite 1219, 512 N Salisbury, NC
Mailing: Mail Service Center 1617, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Phone# 919 - 707 -8789
Email Address: Bev.Strickland(@ncdenr.l nv
From: Joey Lawler [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:12 AM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: RE: DWR# 150994 PSNC Energy - Line T -01 pipe line replacement
901c] w�
0*1e]
.�
Southern - Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273 Map
704.523.4726
0 4 I '= + !G
Mobile:
ilawler aa,smeinc.com
www.smeinc.com
1& 2m Inc. moves elm twelve scoots in 2015 ENR Top 500 to 89.
This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com /email. If you received this message in error please advise the sender by reply
and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: Strickland, Bev [nmai|to:bev.sLhcNand(@ncdenr.Rov
Sent: Monday, September ZO,ZU1S9:11AM
To: Joey Lavx|er"JLavv|er@snmeinccom>
Subject: DVVR#1SU994P3NCEnergy Line T'U1 pipe line replacement
Mr. Lawler,
Can you email me a pdf copy of the application you submitted for the above project?
Thanks
Bev
�
��wv�� �� S*kHa"
Beverly Strickland, LamairfichaAdmmUnistrator
NCDEQ - Division of Water Resources
Physical: Suite 1229,512N Salisbury, N[
Mailing: Mail Service Center 1617, Raleigh, N[ 27699'1617
Phone#919'7O7f8789
Email Address: Bev.StricNand(@ncdenr.F,��

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP- 12 /WQC 3884
Line T -01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Polk, Henderson and Buncombe
Counties, N.C.
S &ME Project No. 7335 -15 -005
Prepared on behalf of:
PSNC Energy
100 SCANA Parkway, MC 202
Cayce, S.C. 29033
Prepared by:
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28054

u - V-71
Eam
September 23, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Attention: Mr. David Brown, P.G
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC No. 3884
Line T -01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Polk, Henderson and Buncombe Counties, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 7335 -15 -005
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, PSNC Energy (PSNC), S &ME, Inc. (S &ME) is pleased to submit this application for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the corresponding
North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884. The proposed project will involve
replacement of approximately 26 miles of natural gas pipeline with a new line that is compliant with
current federally- mandated requirements.
This PCN is being provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for approval, and complies with
all applicable conditions of NWP No. 12. Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) is also required in part because the proposed project does not meet condition
numbers 10 and 16 of WQC No. 3884, as specified below:
Condition No. 10: The proposed gas line will not cross all streams within the project corridor at a near -
perpendicular angle because a majority of the project will be installed within the existing Line T -01 utility
easement. Because the existing utility easement does not cross all streams within the tolerance identified
in the aforementioned WQC, the proposed project will also not meet this requirement.
Condition No. 16: The proposed project will require a combined temporary and permanent construction
easement greater than 40 -foot wide at stream and wetland crossings where the pipe will be installed. In
upland areas, the work will occur within a 75 -100 foot corridor, which will be narrowed to the
aforementioned 50 feet at stream /wetland crossings. In these areas, a 50 -foot wide easement is required
to safely accommodate the equipment and work space necessary to install the 20 -inch pipe. Up to two
other existing pipelines are present within portions of the existing maintained easement. The 50 -foot
S &ME, Inc. 19751 Southern Pine Boulevard I Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704.523.4726 1 f 704.525.3953 1 www.smeinc.com

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC 3884
Line T -01 Replacement Proiect
September 22, 2015
Paae 2
wide proposed working corridor is necessary to maintain safe distances between the existing pipelines
and the proposed replacement pipeline, as well as provide additional space for equipment to work safely
over the existing pipelines. While there is no formal guidance regarding the distance that must be
maintained between installed pipelines, the industry standard is a minimum of 10 feet. Where the new
easement will parallel an existing easement, a portion of the proposed 50 feet will lie within the existing
corridor, based on the proximity of the existing pipeline to the edge of the existing easement.
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence with this
NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
5 &ME
f
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager
jlawler @smeinc.com
Senior Reviewed by Jason Reeves, P.E.
Do, /�- P��
Darrin Peine, Q.E.P.
Project Professional
S &ME, Inc.

CONTENTS
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 1
GeneralVegetative Conditions ............................................................................. ............................... 2
JurisdictionalAreas .................................................................................................. ..............................2
❖ DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK .......................................... ..............................3
General Pipeline Construction .............................................................................. ............................... 3
Stream /Wetland Crossing Methods ...................................................................... ..............................4
Conventional Bore and HDD ................................................................................ ............................... 4
Conventional Isolation Installation ....................................................................... ............................... 5
AdditionalConstruction ........................................................................................ ............................... 7
❖ PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS ............................................................... ..............................8
❖ AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION ...................................................... ..............................9
❖ ADDITIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS ............................ ..............................9
Federally- Protected Species ................................................................................... .............................10
TroutMoratorium ................................................................................................... .............................12
Historic and Cultural Resources ........................................................................... .............................12
Sediment and Erosion Control .............................................................................. .............................13
Mitigation................................................................................................................. .............................14
SEPACompliance ................................................................................................... .............................14
FIGURES
Figure 1 — Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 -5 — USGS Topographic Map
Figures 6 -21— Aerial Photographs
APPENDICES
Appendix I —
Completed PCN and Agent Authorization Letter
Appendix II —
Representative Site Photographs
Appendix III
— Impact Tables
Appendix IV
— Jurisdictional Impact Drawings (Figures 22 -154)
Appendix V —
Typical Stream and Wetland Impact Detail Drawings
Appendix VI
— Agency Correspondence
Appendix VII
— General Restoration Plan

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T -01 Replacement Proiect Paae 1
❖ GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
The proposed project consists of replacement of an aging segment of 8 -inch pipeline with a new 20 -inch
diameter steel pipeline, approximately 26 miles in length, beginning near Arden, North Carolina and
ending near an existing station site near Mill Spring, North Carolina. Safe, reliable operation of PSNC's
pipeline system, along with the safety of their customers and employees, are PSNC's main goals. Like any
natural gas utility, the operation and maintenance of PSNC's pipeline system is subject to extensive state
and federal regulations and requirements. At the Federal level, these regulations fall under the
Department of Transportation (D.O.T.), specifically — the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA). To that end, the primary purpose of the proposed project is to replace the old
pipeline with a new one that is compatible with current federally- mandated safety and inspection
requirements, and is capable of increasing service capabilities and reliability for PSNC's customers in
western North Carolina.
In general, the project route extends from an existing station near the terminus of Old Christ School Road
in Arden, Buncombe County (35.45807N, - 82.50846W), south to another station located approximately
one mile west of the intersection of N.C. State Highway 9 and N.C. State Highway 108, adjacent to Silver
Creek Road near Mill Spring in Polk County (35.3032N, - 82.1746W). A majority of the new pipeline will be
installed within the existing, maintained, 50 -foot or 75 -foot wide easement. In addition to the T -01
pipeline that will be replaced, approximately 16 miles of the subject 26 -mile easement contains either one
or two additional natural gas pipelines, which must remain in service during the replacement.
The location of the project corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic
Maps (Figures 2 -5) and 2010 Aerial Photographs (Figures 6 -21).
Of the proposed 26 -miles to be replaced, a majority will be installed within the existing, maintained
gasline easement. The proposed new gasline will only deviate from the existing easement at one location
(totaling less than one mile) in order to avoid existing orchards. In these areas, work will be conducted in
a "virgin" easement, largely through open fields, that will not exceed 50 feet in width. PSNC proposes to
maintain a 50 -feet easement in these areas for visibility concerns, as previously noted, and for consistency
with maintenance of existing pipeline easement. Aside from one stream and one wetland crossing in this
area, all remaining stream and wetland impacts will occur to previously- affected features located within
the existing easement.
❖ EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
The project area is located in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge physiographic provinces in portions of the
Upper Broad (03050105) and French Broad (06010105) River Basins. General land use in the vicinity of the
project corridor consists of a mix of low density residential areas, agriculture, pasture, and forest. Portions
of the project corridor are located close to areas composed of commercial and light industrial
development.
Photographs of typical project area conditions are included in Appendix II. The project corridor consists
of the stabilized disturbance area of the existing pipeline easement, and is abutted by young successional
forest, mature hardwood forest, forested rocky slopes and bluffs, agricultural fields and maintained lawn
areas.
S &ME, Inc.

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T -01 Replacement Proiect Paae 2
General Vegetative Conditions
A majority of the work will occur within the maintained, non - forested utility easement. Although
vegetation within this area varied greatly, general species observed included fescue (Festuca sp.),
Allegheny blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis), dogfennel (Eupotorium capillifolium), chicory (Cichorium
intybus), annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), sericea lespedeza (Lespedezo cuneato), winged sumac
(Rhus copollina), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), wineberry (R. phoenicolasius), little bluestem
(Schizochyrium scoparium), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota),
goldenrod (Solidago sp.), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), juncus (Juncus canadensis), and a number of
other grasses and volunteer species. Woody saplings observed within less- frequently maintained portions
of the utility easements included black cherry (Prunus serotina), dogwood(s) (Cornus spp.), sassafras
(Sassafras albidum), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), red maple (Acer rubrum), red oak (Quercus rubra),
and sugar maple (A. saccharum).
Areas adjacent to the easement are typically dominated by American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red maple,
southern red oak (Q. falcata), loblolly pine (Pinus toeda), shortleaf pine (P. echinata) and tulip tree in the
canopy, with American holly (Ilex opaca), flowering dogwood (C. Florida), persimmon (Diospyros
virginiana), Virginia pine (P. virginiona), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiona), great laurel
(Rhododendron catowbiense) and sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum) in the subcanopy. Shrubs include
highland doghobble (Leucothoe fontanesiona) and mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia). Dominant vines in
deciduous wooded areas include crossvine (Anisostichus capreolatus), roundleaf greenbriar (Smilax
rotundifolia) and posion ivy . Herbaceous vegetation includes winged sumac, Allegheny blackberry,
wineberry, little bluestem, goldenrod, giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), partridge berry (Mitchella repens), cranefly orchid (Tipularia discolor), ebony spleenwort
(Asplenium platyneuron), fan clubmoss (Lycopodium flabelliforme), spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila
maculata) and downy rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera pubescens).
In addition to the adjacent forested area identified above, the project corridor also passes through large
areas of active agricultural land. A majority of these areas consisted of cultivated cropland that had been
planted with pasture grasses, corn, apple, peach and nectarines. Additional areas of rough active cattle,
horse or goat pasture were also observed along the route. Species located in pastureland and at the
periphery of cultivated areas included fescue, Allegheny blackberry, dogfennel, crabgrass (Digitaria
sanguinalis), goldenrod, American pokeberry (Phytolacca americana), partridge pea (Chamaecrista
fasciculato), morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea), ragweed, little bluestem and various grasses.
A variety of other land use areas were observed along the project corridor, but occupy an insignificant
portion relative to the habitat types identified above. Such portions of the project corridor include
residential land, active recreational land including golf courses and parks, maintained lawns, roadway
easements or lightly - developed areas with typical ornamental landscape or playing surface related native
and non - native vegetation.
Jurisdictional Areas
S &ME wetland professionals delineated Waters of the U.S. within a majority of the project corridor in
March 2014 through April 2014. Additional field visits were subsequently conducted through May 2014
to delineate re- routed areas, access roads, and laydown areas. The delineation was conducted utilizing
currently accepted methods for wetland determination, as set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual and the corresponding Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region USACE
Regional Supplement Guide, which states that under normal circumstances, an area must demonstrate the
S &ME, Inc.

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T -01 Replacement Proiect Paae 3
presence of 3 components to be considered jurisdictional: 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2) hydric soils, and
3) wetland hydrology. When necessary, stream assessments were conducted in accordance with NCDWR
and USACE guidelines. The boundaries of jurisdictional areas were identified in the field using
conventional surveying equipment or Global Positioning System (GPS) units capable of sub -meter
accuracy. The field review resulted in delineation of 55 wetland or open water areas and 79 streams
within the proposed work area. Of these, 53 of the wetland areas and 67 of the streams will be affected
by the project. Jurisdictional features are depicted on the Jurisdictional Impact drawings, included in
Appendix IV.
A Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination package that included USACE Stream Assessment
Sheets, NCDENR Stream Identification Sheets, and Routine Wetland Determination Data forms for each
general type of wetland observed was provided to the USACE separately on July 14, 2015.
Representatives of the USACE (Craig Brown) and NCDWR (Andrew Moore) visited the project site on
September 15, 2015 to approve the delineation and verify the location /classification of affected features.
❖ DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
General Pipeline Construction
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries,
and other associated workspaces, etc. In high ground areas, up to an additional 50 feet of temporary
workspace (TWS) adjacent to the existing easement will be required to safely install the new pipe. At
stream and wetland crossings, the TWS will be eliminated, and work will be conducted only within the
existing, maintained easement. In wetland areas, efforts will be made to remove surface vegetation in a
manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents exposure of soil. If necessary,
temporary equipment crossings will be installed along one side of the easement to facilitate equipment
passage, cross over streams, and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control (S &EC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to
prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features.
No grubbing or below - ground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands or along stream banks
outside of the construction corridor. Where the pipe will be installed by conventional means (e.g. "open -
trench" or "isolation "), grubbing will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the trench line. Select upland
portions of the easement may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to
prepare a suitably -level work surface. Within wetland areas where extensive rutting or soil disturbance
may occur, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space for equipment.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E &SC measures, the trench will be
excavated along the "non- working" side of the easement. Subsurface disturbance will only be conducted
within the trench line at wetlands and stream crossings. Stump removal or light grading may occur on the
working side of the easement if required for safety reasons. The work will be performed from the timber
mats placed along the working side of the easement. In certain areas, including wetlands and fields
supporting crops, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If necessary, trench breakers
(temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed
within the trench to slow the flow of subsurface water.
S &ME, Inc.

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T -01 Replacement Proiect Paae 4
In general, approximately 40 -foot lengths of the 20 -inch pipe will be trucked to the site from temporary
storage yards, strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines
will be used to bend individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The
pipe segments will be welded together, x- rayed, the structural integrity and surface coating inspected,
and then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may require dewatering or "padding" to
prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent trench breakers will
then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil
and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by
rough - grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and
mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre- disturbance contours and conditions.
All work within wetlands and streams will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permits. Best
Management Practices (BMP's) will be employed at all stream and wetland crossings to help prevent
siltation or inadvertent discharges to a Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Impact drawings associated with
each individual stream and wetland crossing are included in Appendix IV.
Stream /Wetland Crossing Methods
There are many factors that affect selection of an appropriate and constructible installation method for a
natural gas pipeline. Typical methods of installation include HDD (horizontal directional drilling),
conventional bores, and /or conventional isolation. Regulatory implications, environmental impacts, cost,
constructability, and pipeline integrity are considered during the design and maintenance of pipelines and
thus the selection of crossing methodology. In the western part of the state, topography and geology
(the presence of subsurface rock) are major factors that often contribute to making "trenchless"
installation an option that is not practicable or infeasible.
The use of conventional trench construction is often the preferred method, as it allows the pipeline to be
installed at a consistent 4 -5 feet depth below land surface for a far greater length when compared to
trenchless installation. Maintaining a normal depth is critical to the safety and integrity of the pipeline. As
the depth of cover increases, so does the difficulty in locating, exposing, and performing routine
maintenance required for transmission pipelines.
Less environmentally invasive installation methods, such as HDD and bores, are considered during the
design process. However, estimates from leading industry contractors indicate that the use of HDD
construction in areas where conventional trench construction is feasible increases the anticipated cost of
each crossing by 500% to 800 %, depending on a number of site - specific factors. Location specific
conditions, such as topography, physical barriers, subsurface conditions, etc. dictate how much cost
savings will be achieved at any stream or wetland crossing and those factors can significantly increase the
cost and risk of HDD as a crossing methodology. Additionally, the physical characteristics of the pipe,
such as the bending radius on a 20" pipeline, require any bore to traverse at a minimum distance around
800 feet, which is well beyond the area of concern.
Conventional Bore and HDD
All named and major stream channels that will be affected by the proposed replacement project were
assessed for suitability of bore or HDD pipe installation. It was determined that such methods of
installation were practicable at 11 locations. In addition, impacts to a large wetland (WC19) will also be
avoided by use of HDD. Factors used to determine the most appropriate method of installation included:
S &ME, Inc.

Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 /WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T -01 Replacement Proiect Paae S
• Physical limitations with respect to bending radius (flexibility) of the 20 -inch pipe
• Existing subsurface geologic conditions
• Existing topography and slope to accommodate acceptable entry and exit angle
• Availability of suitable additional workspace necessary to construct bore pits or set up drill rig and
associated equipment
• Presence of existing utilities /infrastructure in relation to the new pipe
• Accessibility of the site for the specialized equipment
• Availability of additional land for pipe stringing, welding and pullback operations
• Additional costs associated with use of "trenchless" technology given the project scale
Additionally, it should be noted that use of HDD increases the risk of an inadvertent release of drilling
fluid to the stream, and the amount of time required to complete the operation. Inadvertent returns are
difficult to anticipate, can be difficult to locate, and can be difficult to remediate. They typically occur as a
result of fractures in subsurface rock or unconsolidated materials located in the subsurface environment.
While geotechnical investigations can provide a narrow window of understanding with respect to the
surrounding subsurface conditions, they cannot detect all conditions. Once drilling fluid has found
fractures, water columns, or unconsolidated material within which to move, there is no way to predict
where surface releases may occur. Inadvertent returns are often detected visually for smaller returns near
the easement; however, larger returns are typically detected as a loss of pressure in the fluid being
pumped through the annulus of the drill. Fluid pressure and easement conditions are constantly
monitored by trained pipeline professionals; however, dependent on site geological conditions adjacent
to the annulus of the drill, high volume /high pressure fluid can be lost quickly, and oftentimes occur in
areas within which it is difficult to assess and /or access for clean -up (e.g. densely forested areas outside of
the easement).
As previously stated, the cost associated with HDD technology is significantly more than conventional
methodology due to limited specialist drilling companies, the aforementioned sub - surface conditions, and
the cost of specialized equipment (e.g. drilling bits for varying conditions, and specialized pipe and pipe
coatings). The likelihood of inadvertent return also adds to the cost and risk of a HHD crossing due to the
resulting extended drilling duration, additional costs for remediation, and potential for discharge to
sensitive areas that can occur with inadvertent returns.
Conventional bore installation will be employed for several stream crossings, but was not considered a
viable option for many locations. Because the new line will be installed within an existing maintained
easement for the most part, the proximity to the additional PSNC pipelines precludes the safe excavation
of the required bored pits. In other areas, and in general for the project overall, many of the streams
crossed are incised or located at the bottom of steep, relatively narrow valleys, making excavation of the
bore pit and stockpiling of the soils within the corridor difficult. As the bore pit must be excavated to a
depth at which the bore can extend beneath the substrate of a stream or wetland, additional shoring of
the pit would be necessary to meet safety standards.
Conventional Isolation Installation
Throughout the project corridor where conventional isolation construction is proposed at stream
crossings, dam and pumps or flume systems will be used to divert clean water flow around the work area
until the crossing is completed. Typically, crossings of minor streams (less than 10 -feet wide) can be
completed within 24 -hours of initiation. For larger waterbodies or those where specialized equipment for
excavations in rock are required, it may be necessary to extend this time frame. But in any event, once
S &ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 6
work affecting streams or wetlands is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to
minimize the period of disturbance. Affected stream banks will then be restored to near pre -construction
contour. Coir matting and a native riparian seed mix will be applied to restore vegetation. Typical details
for a dam and pump and flume methodology for isolation of the trench excavation are included in
Appendix V.
Typical BMPs used in connection with conventional isolation methodology include the following:
• Crossings will be executed in as minimal amount of time necessary. Where possible, 24-hour
installation and restoration will be required.
• Sufficient equipment to execute the crossing in an expeditious, environmentally responsible
manner will be available on site prior to initiation of the crossing.
• All crossings will be conducted during anticipated low flow conditions.
• Local weather conditions will be monitored such that, to the extent possible, stormwater
events will be avoided during and immediately following installation of the pipe.
• The crossings will be monitored during installation by personnel experienced in stream and
wetland crossing procedures, familiar with site conditions, and knowledgeable in North
Carolina environmental regulations. The monitor shall have the authority to stop work should
conditions change and additional or different measures be needed. This professional will be
on-site from the initiation (preparatory stages) through to the completion (e.g.
implementation of the restoration plan).
• Sufficient qualified staffing will be maintained for the project duration such that compliance
monitoring activities associated with pipeline installation in other locations do not take
precedence over crossings.
• The upstream and downstream crossing points will be sealed to isolate the crossing for
pipeline installation "in the dry." Clean steel plates, sand bags, or similar measures will be
inserted to temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be cleaned prior to use on streams
using biodegradable products or heat. On both sides of the installed plates (both upstream
and downstream) sandbags will additionally be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the
damming of water, and provide a secondary barrier to seepage. The excavated trench will be
monitored for groundwater intrusion and, if noted, excess water will be pumped to a
discharge site located 50'-100' from the top of bank of the receiving stream. Discharged
water from the trench will be filtered through an appropriate E&SC measure.
• Where possible, the top 6-12 inches of streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately from
the subgrade material and kept saturated during the installation.
• Pumps shall be obtained and staged prior to executing the crossing. Back-up pumps shall be
kept on-site should the primary pump(s) malfunction, or to control high flows. All pumps will
have screened intakes and will be placed in secondary -containment for the duration of the
installation. In the event an unforeseen weather event occurs during installation, pumps near
the crossing will be monitored 24 -hours a day until normal flow conditions are present.
• Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that water
neither accumulates behind the upstream dam nor is discharged too rapidly on the
downstream side. At the downstream discharge location, flow discharge rates shall be
controlled such that scouring of the stream bed and/or banks does not occur. Efforts will be
made to aerate the water prior to its downstream discharge into the receiving stream.
• Removal of in -stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to allow a
gradual re -introduction of flowing water into the channel.
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 7
• Banks will be restored in a careful manner, achieving pre -construction contours to the extent
practical.
A cover crop and specialized riparian seed mix will be applied for the entire length of banks
disturbed by the crossing. Coir matting with appropriate shear strength will additionally be
installed to anchor the seeding and the banks.
• Stream crossings will be monitored for stability following construction and for the duration of
the pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered complete when herbaceous
vegetation reaches 80 -percent coverage.
• Where HDD methodology is employed, the crossing will be monitored in the event an
inadvertent return of drilling fluid occurs. All such occurrences that affect jurisdictional waters
will be immediately contained using hay bales or other similar physical barrier, remediated to
the extent practical, and reported to the USACE within 48 -hours of detection. Please note
that in the event an inadvertent release occurs outside of the proposed construction corridor,
additional coordination with land -owners, regulatory agents, contractors, etc. may be
required, and cleanup will be initiated as soon as possible.
All disturbed areas within wetlands or on stream banks will be seeded with a customized seed mix, for
wetlands seed mix will extend 10 -feet landward of the jurisdictional boundary and for streams seed mix
will extend 50 -feet landward of the top of bank. Stream banks temporarily affected by trenching or
placement of equipment bridges will be stabilized with a native seed mix specifically designed for riparian
areas, and will be stabilized with biodegradable coir matting. Affected wetland areas will be seeded with a
native wetland seed mix; however, no heavy mulching will occur within wetlands.
Please note that particular importance was placed on designing a trenchless method of construction for
the Green River crossing, where the original pipeline was likely installed by conventional methods in the
1950s. However, the project engineers were unable to design either an HDD or bore at this location due
to the extremely steep terrain on the east side of the river. As such, the pipe will be installed by
conventional isolation methods using a staged coffer dam or aqua -barrier system such that the work can
be conducted "in the dry." The height and dimensions of the proposed coffer dam will be based on
results of a hydrologic analysis currently being conducted, and will be provided to the USACE/NCDWR for
approval prior to construction.
Additional Construction
Project -wide, permanent impacts associated with placement of pipes and/or fill material will total 25 linear
feet of stream and 0.02 acre of wetland associated with improvement of existing access roads.
PSNC also plans to fill a small pond (0.11 acre) that was excavated by a landowner on the easement
sometime after the original pipeline was installed. The pond is considered "in-line" as culverted portions
of a nearby stream serve as its inlets and outlet. To conduct the work, a coffer dam will be constructed
upstream of the inlet pipe, and clean streamflow pumped to a point below a second coffer dam
constructed downstream of the outlet pipe. Once the clean water bypass is established, water remaining
within the pond will be pumped -out through a filter bag or dewatering structure constructed in high
ground, and the pond filled to original grade with clean fill material. The former inlet and outlet culverts
will then be relocated and connected near the edge of the existing easement to reestablish the normal
flow and circulation patterns of the stream.
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 8
❖ PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
Project -wide wetland impacts are summarized in Table 1 below:
Table 1: Summary of Proiect-wide Wetland Im
Temporary Impacts Permanent Open Water Impacts Permanent Wetland Impacts (Fill
(Fill placement) Placement and Conversion)
3.82 0.11 0.06
Total, project -wide construction of the project will result in impacts to 3.99 acres of wetlands or open
waters. Of these impacts, 3.82 acres will be temporary, and 0.17 acres will be permanent. The permanent
impacts will result from conversion of forested wetlands to emergent wetlands through periodic mowing.
Permanent loss of Waters of the U.S. will occur through placement of fill material into the small pond
previously constructed on the existing easement without PSNC's consent, and for improvement of a
permanent access road. The remaining wetland impacts associated with the project are temporary in
nature, and will occur as a result of trench excavation, temporary side casting of material and placement
of timber mats for the equipment crossings. It should be noted that temporary workspace (TWS) has
been eliminated at stream and wetland crossings. Work in wetlands and streams has generally been
limited to the existing 50 -foot wide corridor throughout the project, and disturbed areas will be seeded
and restored to their original grade and contour. Impacts associated with each individually -identified
wetland area within the proposed project disturbance limits are identified in Appendix III and depicted
on the figures in Appendix IV.
The project will result in impacts to 5,578 If of jurisdictional streams. These impacts are broken down by
type in Table 2 below:
Table 2: Summary of Project -wide Stream Impacts
Stream Impacts (if)
Pipeline Construction Activities/Crossings Culvert Placement for Access Roads
Temporary Permanent Permanent Temporary
5,412 0 25 141
As indicated, a majority of the impacts are associated with placement of equipment bridges and isolation
crossing methods (clean water bypass via dam -and -pump or dam -and -flume) around a segment of bank
that will be excavated to accommodate placement of the pipe. Twenty-five linear feet (If) of permanent
impact will result from replacement of an unserviceable pipe at an existing access road, and 141 If will
result from temporary culvert placement or access road improvements.
Following construction, disturbed wetlands within the permanent easement will be vegetated with
herbaceous cover, while those within the TWS will be seeded and allowed to return to a forested
condition. Affected portions of the streams will be reconstructed to their pre -disturbance dimension and
profile, and stabilized using coir matting and vegetative plantings, without use of riprap or hard armoring,
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 9
unless such material was their prior to construction. Typical stream and wetland crossings details (Figures
Dl through 1137) are included in Appendix V of this submittal.
❖ AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PSNC proposes to install
the new gas pipeline within their existing, maintained easement to the extent practicable. Where PSNC
was not able to install in existing maintained easement (the apple orchard), the proposed new easement
was routed through open areas and an agricultural field for less than one mile before tying back into the
existing easement.
Where streams are trenched for pipe installation, impacts will be minimized by stabilizing the temporarily -
affected banks with coir matting and seeding with a native riparian seed mix. Stream sedimentation
impacts will be minimized through the use of the dry -ditch construction methods, such as bypass
pumping though silt bags or temporary de -watering structures, or by use of dam and flumes. Wetland
impacts will be minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench
plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that equipment
necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation will be
cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re -growth. To the extent
practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the underlying subsoil in areas disturbed by
trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Total
disturbance through streams and wetlands is limited to the existing 50 -foot easement for a majority of
the route. Where a new virgin 50 -foot easement will be established, impacts are limited to one stream and
one wetland.
❖ ADDITIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
The project will comply with all applicable conditions of NWP 12 and WQC 3884, with the exception of
those noted previously. The width of the TWS and the permanent easement will not exceed 50 feet in
wetlands and at stream crossings. The proposed alignment makes use of existing easement to the
maximum extent practicable. As mentioned, PSNC has endeavored to limit the clearing of "virgin" 50 -foot
easement. Of the proposed 26 -miles to be constructed, less than one mile will be established as virgin
easement. Where the new easement will be established, the route was selected to avoid work in a historic
apple orchard operation. The route around the orchard will pass primarily through open areas and an
agricultural field, affecting only one wetland (WD47) and one stream (SD08) that are not otherwise
located in the existing easement.
All stream work will be performed "in the dry' by isolating the work area through use of dam and pump -
around or dam and flume systems. The selected streams outlined in Table 1 will additionally require more
stringent oversight during construction. To address potential concerns regarding stabilization of the
crossings, coir matting will be installed along affected banks of these streams.
Following construction, stream and wetland crossings will be restored to original grade and contour. The
proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre -construction elevation contours or stream
dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material will be removed to a high ground disposal area. Affected
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 10
wetland areas will be restored in accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix VII) following
completion of the work.
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts authorized under NWP No. 12, it is our
understanding that pipeline construction impacts to streams and emergent wetlands will be considered
temporary if these areas are restored to original pre -construction contours once construction is
completed, and do not involve the permanent placement of hard armor in streams.
Federally -Protected Species
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543),
S&ME initially consulted with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP). S&ME provided scoping packages to both agencies on January 27, 2015.
The scoping packages included depictions of the route overlain on the appropriate USGS topographic
maps and aerial photographs in digital format, along with a Google Earth® kmz file of the proposed
alignment. The scoping packages requested that each agency review records they may have relating to
rare, endangered, or threatened species, or high quality natural communities within the vicinity of the
project corridor, and provide comment.
The NCNHP responded with a February 10, 2015 letter and provided a list of their records relating to rare,
listed species, significant natural communities or habitat areas/managed conservation lands within one
mile of the project route. Of the records, those relating to federally protected species are listed below:
• EO ID No. 32130: Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentriona(is) — last observed in 2001
• EO ID No. 32144: Northern long-eared bat — last observed in 1933
• EO ID No. 17819: Mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia jonesii) — last observed in 1987
• EO ID No. 16561: White irisette (Sisyrinchium dichotomum) — last observed in 2001
With respect to significant natural communities or habitat areas/managed conservation lands, the NCNHP
identified the following sites within a one -mile radius of the project route:
• Cliffield Mountain/Upper Hungry River
• Mud Creek/Hickory Hill Floodplain
• Walnut Flats
• White Oak Mountain/Tryon Peak
• Buncombe County Open Space
• Green River Game Land (NCWRC)
• Henderson County Open Space
• Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy Easement
• NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement
• NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Easement
The NCWRC responded with a February 23, 2015, letter that did not identify federally -protected species,
but did list a number of streams with significant aquatic resources and notable adjacent features that
could be affected by the project:
Cane Creek in Henderson County. Cane Creek contains the Creeper [NC Threatened (T)], French
Broad River Crayfish [US Federal Species of Concern (FSC), NC Significantly Rare (SR)], and
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 11
Southern Blotched Chub (NC SR). It is also Hatchery Supported Trout Waters. There is Henderson
County Open Space adjacent to the river, as well.
• Clear Creek in Henderson County. Southern Blotched Chub (NC SR) inhabits Clear Creek.
• Little Hungry River and Hungry River in Henderson County. Both of these streams contain wild
Rainbow Trout and are Hatchery Supported Trout Waters.
• Green River in Polk County. The Seagreen Darter (NC SR) inhabits the Green River.
• Ostin Creek in Polk County. The Seagreen Darter (NC SR) and Carolina Foothills Crayfish (NC SR)
inhabit Ostin Creek.
Although the USFWS did not respond with written comment, Bryan Tompkins with the USFWS attended
an agency pre -application meeting with S&ME and PSNC personnel on March 25, 2015, and provided the
following general comments. Mr. Tompkins indicated that he considered three principal species of
concern associated with the project: dwarf -flowered heartleaf, white irisette, and northern long-eared bat.
He requested that surveys and counts of these plants, if any, were identified. He indicated that there was
a good chance that white irisette may be present, but not in large numbers. In regard to the northern
long-eared bat, Mr. Tompkins stated that he anticipated promulgation of a 4d rule exempting utility lines
where clearing occurs within 100 feet of existing easement. He requested surveys on areas where
significant tree clearing occurs on virgin easement, or rocky areas where portals or other suitable habitat
exist. He stated that there were no records of known hibernacula along the project corridor.
The NCNHP and NCWRC correspondence is included in Appendix VI.
Following the agency scoping and literature review, S&ME conducted pedestrian reviews for terrestrial
species along the project corridor over a period ranging from March 2015 through June 2015, primarily to
accommodate blooming periods of some of the plant species. Additional, small-scale field investigations
were conducted at targeted areas, as minor route changes were implemented, or further assessment was
deemed necessary. To assist with the survey for gray bat (Myotis grisescens) and northern long-eared bat,
S&ME contracted Environmental Solutions and Innovations Inc. (ESI), a firm experienced in conducting
such assessments in connection with large-scale linear corridor projects in the eastern United States, to
conduct a portal survey. Results of the pedestrian assessment and portal survey were incorporated into a
July 1, 2015 report that was provided to the USFWS for review.
S&ME concluded that the proposed project is unlikely to adversely affect populations of federally -
protected flora and fauna listed for Polk, Henderson and Buncombe Counties. No individuals of the
federally protected flora or faunal species identified for the survey above were observed during the
pedestrian reconnaissance of the project corridor.
Similarly, the proposed project is unlikely to adversely affect federally -protected aquatic species (spotfin
chub or Appalachian elktoe). The proposed pipeline will either: 1) cross waterbodies that may be capable
of providing suitable habitat for these aquatic species via bore or HDD, 2) no suitable habitat is located
within the project corridor, or 3) potential affects will be minimized by dry isolation techniques.
Habitat for one terrestrial faunal species, Carolina northern flying squirrel, does exist in the project area.
Because of the species crepuscular nature and its use of elevated cavities and crevices during the day, a
thorough pedestrian survey for the flying squirrel is not practicable. Accordingly, individuals of this
species may be affected by the minimal clearing, but the abundant adjacent habitat suggests it would not
be a significant affect to the species.
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 12
One terrestrial floral species, dwarf -flowered heartleaf, by association through numerous occurrences of
its genus in the eastern third of the forested edges of the proposed pipeline replacement route, may also
be affected. Though S&ME carried out focused and appropriately -timed survey during the appropriate
bloom season, no species of dwarf -flowered heartleaf were observed. However, in areas adjacent to the
active easement it is possible that a small number of unidentified dwarf -flowered heartleaf may be
affected incidentally by the project.
In the event that any of these species are encountered during construction, work in that area will be
temporarily stopped and the USFWS will be contacted for consultation.
Following USFWS review of the July 1, 2015 report, the agency responded with an August 25, 2015 letter
stating that they concurred with S&ME's findings, and concluded that the requirements under section 7 of
the Act are fulfilled. A copy of the August 25, 2015 USFWS letter is included in Appendix VI.
Trout Moratorium
Additional follow-up consultation was also conducted with Andrea Leslie of NCWRC in order to determine
which streams affected by the pipeline installation are subject to the trout moratorium. Ms. Leslie
reviewed a list of streams identified within the project corridor, and through integration of both existing
and new on-site data collected by NCWRC biologists in September 2015, determined which would be
subject to the January 1- April 15 Rainbow Trout construction moratorium, as indicated in the table below:
Table 3: Streams Subject to Rainbow Trout Moratorium
"i .-I `ii_ e
SC07
: s
Unnamed Tributary to Harm Creek
SC09/SC09A
Hungry River
SC10
Unnamed Tributary to Hungry River
SC11
Unnamed Tributary to Hungry River
SC12
Unnamed Tributary to Hungry River
SC14 — Existing Crossing at Access Road
Unnamed Tributary to Hungry River
SC15
Unnamed Tributary to Hungry River
SD01/SD01A
Little Hungry River
None of the on-site streams are subject to the moratorium associated with brown or brook trout
(beginning October 15). A copy of this PCN will be provided to the NCWRC for any additional comment
or input.
Historic and Cultural Resources
S&ME submitted an agency scoping letter to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
on January 27, 2015. The SHPO responded in a March 23, 2015 letter recommending a comprehensive
survey of the project corridor be conducted by an experienced archaeologist. Accordingly, S&ME
archaeologists conducted an archaeological survey of the project corridor intermittently from April 6
through June 4, 2015. As a result of the investigations, no previously recorded archaeological sites were
re -located, and 15 new archaeological sites and isolated finds were identified. The 15 archaeological sites
were recommended to be ineligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP).
Results of the investigation were presented to SHPO in a June 2015 report. S&ME concluded that the
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 13
archaeological sites and isolated finds are ineligible for the NRHP, that the project area does not contain
significant archaeological resources, and no further archaeological investigations were warranted.
SHPO responded with a July 20, 2015 letter stating that they had reviewed the report and concurred with
S&ME's findings that the project should not affect archaeological resources. Copies of SHPO letters are
included in Appendix VI.
Sediment and Erosion Control
A separate Erosion and Sedimentation Control (E&SC) Plan will be prepared and submitted to the North
Carolina Division of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Land Resources (NCDENR-DLR). The
E&SC plan will specify the appropriate E&SC and Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the most
recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual."
Through early cooperation and planning with NCDENR-DLR staff, PSNC and S&ME are currently designing
an E&SC plan to employ numerous measures that meet or exceed specifications governing the proper
design, installation, operation, and maintenance of S&EC measures and BMPs. The E&SC plan will be
submitted to NCDENR — DLR, and approval received prior to initiation of construction.
Construction supervisors directing crews responsible for installation and maintenance of erosion control
measures will be experienced in North Carolina S&EC measures, pipeline construction as it relates to
E&SC measures and BMPs, and will be responsible for completing the required NCDENR — DWR self -
inspection forms. These forms will be completed for disturbed areas at least once per 7 calendar days and
within 24 hours of a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inch per 24-hour period. Multiple rain gauges will be
located along the construction corridor and monitored daily.
Per current NCDENR guidance, areas disturbed during clearing or construction operations will be
temporarily or permanently seeded and mulched when construction activities will not occur within a
period of 7 or 14 days on a particular section of the pipeline.
Waterbars will be spaced at appropriate intervals based on existing slope. Sediment tubes (Filtrexx
FilterSoxx, or Engineer approved equivalent) will be spaced at similar intervals in areas where construction
occurs within, or partially within, existing natural gas easements. Due to the presence of 1 or more
existing below -ground natural gas pipelines, mass grading above the existing lines is not feasible, so the
denuded portion of these areas should be limited to the pipeline trench and areas immediately adjacent
to it. Water bars and sediment tubes will be installed at the base of slopes up -gradient of streams or
wetlands.
Silt fence will be installed along the top -of -bank at streams and at wetland boundaries maintaining a 10 -
foot buffer between the silt fence and the jurisdictional feature. Silt fence will be installed such that it, in
combination with other measures approaching streams and wetlands, dissipates and directs flow away
from the crossing. Additionally, sediment tubes or wattles will be utilized at stream and wetland crossings
to provide a sediment barrier that can be temporarily removed to allow equipment access to bridges or
timber mats. Dewatering of trenches within streams and wetlands will be discharged through a filter bag
or other temporary S&EC control structure.
Construction activities within wetlands will be conducted from timber mats. Where clearing operations
occur in wetlands, low ground pressure equipment will be used in areas beyond those protected by
timber mats. Construction activities within streams will be conducted "in the dry" through the use of
S&ME, Inc.

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884 September 23, 2015
Line T-01 Replacement Project Page 14
either flumes or a pump -around bypass. Temporary spoil piles associated with stream crossings will be
set back a minimum of 10 feet from the top of bank and protected with a row of silt fence on the down -
gradient portions of the stockpile. Temporary bridges will be utilized at stream crossings so that
equipment can safely cross the stream. Bridges will be wrapped in geotextile fabric and have plywood
sideboards to prevent sediment from entering the stream being crossed.
Mitigation
A majority of the proposed project impacts are temporary. Streams and wetlands affected by installation
of the pipe will be restored to their original grade and contour upon completion of the work. However,
approximately 25 linear feet of stream and 0.02 acre of wetland will be permanently affected by fill or
culvert placement for improvement of existing access roads. In addition, approximately 0.04 acre of
forested wetland (WD47) will be converted to herbaceous wetlands. The wetland is located within the
new easement that has been re-routed to avoid an apple orchard, and represents the only such
conversion that will occur. Permanent impacts associated with filling the pond (0.11 acre) will not require
mitigation, per our September 15, 2015 site visit with the USACE.
As such, project -wide "mitigatable" impacts are limited to 0.4 acre of wetlands and 25 If of stream. These
amounts are below the 0.10 -acre and 125 -If thresholds, respectively, where compensatory mitigation is
required. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that purchase of mitigation credit through a private bank or
in -lieu fee program will be required.
General mitigation has been provided by avoidance and minimization procedures implemented during
the design phase of the proposed project. Impacts to streams and wetlands within the project corridor
will be minimized by: 1) extensive installation of the pipe within the existing, maintained easement 2)
reduction of impacts within new virgin easement through avoidance; 3) Use of trenchless crossing
methodology where feasible; and 4) by eliminating temporary workspace through wetlands and streams.
SEPA Compliance
The proposed project does not involve use of public monies. A small portion of the project will take place
on state-owned land (Green River Gameland), but does not meet the minimum criteria established by the
State Environmental Policy Act, and as such, does not require preparation of an environmental document.
S&ME, Inc.

Figures

�� 0.{.-'l e`er • g3-. d �I:l -I .�.,� � { d'X,� � � •i. _--e �, - , -._. r gym, , .__ a� Lsxa�,y �S i->f= _ .... •-_s.• _. �F_ p 9• �A
" •...3, 1� ''--� �' s*.: .. i i � � ..��° A � X 1 - i I -�✓, }.. 1 •'1. I �•�''•-3r ='N _ _ - • -�r�' ' LO
_ I
Af of .. ,+•'.. - y�,, ... I ' J A,;`I.: •,A a . E s �'".a ' ; •" . C,a}�7 O m 2
_ -
� it 'r,ti=•'S �•7 _ ile I'° - X. E q�
ly
i 11—
C,
' -� r - ! 1 XX rL. _��+ �a --• �7, _ _YAP' EF, Y`' 0
• -' L+ , ' r
LO
- Ate_ r� _ • ._ _ i.... �4 _ �Y i° ,.� .. - •' � , ~ •"°11 S - - O
AI _ 1�: :•`'•._y..a - r_ b 'F'� C�' 1°X e LfE.rt'i !4 LSA
M1a
:. -
• ' I "f _.� ,.. Q Barn . a�''+c Y a _.� Ir _ ••_� '� , U M
.. 1
- . ' ... r - Iii � r`
w
ai`
—,♦' • j' I �'_4^tl6179�4}r r, r aX _I - _ 4_"' 4- U IY
" ","�.. +. _- _._-:_ tl a 1• - _ .:rya ; tl Cn
+
2 �-. snr � A -` {'•. ' - 1 p _ .. Int . ,.Ld ,r,i ��.
U _ ..
- I, ,_ ;i a I_ - 1 "u .:. - r 1 .� .: ,.. a i' _ _ .• + A A '', a _ ^'s'�'
r +
.:'•. ' _ ! _; o- rr• `r• i� _ 5 �� f
+
o.
r�
f
--: — a
-4 Wil
' .-.. -_- ._� - 4-_ '..�" ^..•., 1. _ Ff Nhlll :I%��'—"�^� ffLL�11aa _ _ - , .!� ,t u�Yl`+
_ YYYYYYMMMMMM r A �
_ 1
A,y _ _ I 1.. �Fi:�rr _ • l.�F - ''y �Jp `-.�;s"' .:'+•� _.�+ �•..`_�4_9° e.. P �',• `':�N
4•. I _ _-{�"'."1 6k . -. � '*�, f' ,�1 t, •. "v , II + - ! -. �y I •ti � ,F • � ~ � t. _ �-*a t"-�
',^°- "� ''time, � `-�. .` ' '-,,en- e ,.r ;li _rl� •r.° * � : 'A• A �r ��• `° i-- _ I _
ff
_ +.
-
r r
-- f• ti -,, X, ,� 1, r ...�`- N�. — . :fit.=- ''C`<�- -� +- �_
" S
1'
. - � f+ : .b I �. y. _ _fie . ; $ y � �'n 4 � 'i �,i.9 � P . f _ � • �l
LL i
r
Y
r
,!
Ar
film T-
w O u
X _
��`. - 71 'M' ' a, tlF/� fi`� • +, I'. _y.>-+,lt F �f 1.11 � ,� � _� O C
N r Q
3
F 3,•'-_. _,� j'" 1. �I is X f {' .j �'... 4 - T 'r�� �! w' - C
fir. , '-''i' I ✓ ° r X" I ,X�. �,- • 4 +' { - IU a c
9}� t;_.e�� IP w w' O 7
W Q„
W
r
I^ �)
A
fIr a, ;
3
-
e ~ •I F fl''r.„} a 'r--=;c:^•. __ - _,,-ti._r U f
,• _ y.,
I � H
r _ u
,- w o
Permanent Access Roads - '` r - "I �`- �: z_ w
+IL J
___ PROPOSED
Temporary Access Roads `' - `:yi --a I_ _ — _ _ a
— ='''r•. �' *�� - ` �-- ..,:. �,,, MILL SPRING-1�� fi
II ,L` I. �,5 -f 1
COMPRESSOR W
NWI Wetlands t- t , tf �. R • o
x_ + `
z
--- USGS 1:24,000 Quad Sheet Boundaries e �' 41�r�'
Proposed T-01 Pipeline Replacement _ -�
i':- -. ,• •• ,•• W .. - - X --. -�''` -'� FIGURE NO. -
-_. 0 • 2,000 `'-. `^; 4,000
REFERENCE:
GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS -a, N a I - C P,:'v..,o;'�A it r;' • ^I �V f - i,,_i r
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. _ IN FEET):'-` e•T�`•� y' �,�"4� �• '� +`jN + 3'.x'4 ,� A.r; - °
r •Af h f �_

WA18
Seep o
See Fig. 107 p 9
SA19
Perennial RPW
See Fig. 35
WA17
Headwater Forest
1 See Fig. 106
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BETWEEN 3-3-2015 AND 9-14-
2015 BY S&ME SCIENTISTS. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE LOCATED USING GPS UNITS
CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. FEATURES WERE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE USACE AND
NCDWR ON 9-15-2015. FEATURES THAT WERE DELINEATED OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT BOUNDARY
ARE DEPICTED, ONLY FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROJECTAREAARE LABELED.
SA17
Perennial RPW
See Fig. 34
}
� son � sun
SB02
Perennial RPW
See Fig. 33
— waoz
Headwater Forest '
See Fig. 105 '
Proposed Permanent Access Roads
— Proposed Temporary Access Roads
SA14 (Green River)
WB01 -
TNW
- JUfISdICtlOnal Streams
" -
"" Headwater Forest
See Fig. 32
See Fig. 104
a
wao9
® Jurisdictional Wetlands
Bottomland Hardwood
See Fig. 103
r Stream Banks
Proposed Project Area
''.�
WA08
Bott Hardwood
III I Bored Pipe Installation
,.
srnland
ee Fig. 102
as 1
sA15
Intermittent RPW
Open Trenched Pipe Installation'`
Fig. 31
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 500 1,000. I r wt h'. a,'
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS q
.p`_�J�
DISPLAYEDARE PPROXIMATED, THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. (IN FEET)•'�'� �•'�-r* 4°`���'+Y#'-.'� -.
LO
O
O
LO O LO
2� II z
LO
MM T U M
0 LLj W M
S
J � �
Z U
r� C o
02
W
z
A IL
Q
Z
J
O
GEUI E WuRD Q
U
W F_
x. W Oz
LL O
O a
U
CO 1-- } y
W 2w0_
Q U W
¢z¢
W �a0
Q U)
H �
W
Z
Z_ W
N Lf
\ a m
k' \U a 2
O
?1� -A
` FIGURE NO.
9

9110
SD01 (Little Hungry River)
Perennial RPW
See Fig. 46
a
WD02
Seep
See Fig. 115
Proposed Permanent Access Roads
Proposed Temporary Access Roads
Jurisdictional Streams
® Jurisdictional Wetlands
Stream Banks
Proposed Project Area
Bored Pipe Installation
Open Trenched Pipe Installation
F
WD03Seep Fig. 114
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BETWEEN 3-3-2015 AND 9-14-
2015 BY S&ME SCIENTISTS. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE LOCATED USING GPS UNITS
CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. FEATURES WERE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE USACE AND
NCDWR ON 9-15-2015. FEATURES THAT WERE DELINEATED OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT BOUNDARY
ARE DEPICTED, ONLY FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREAARE LABELED.
SD01A (Little Hungry River) ��.
Perennial RPW
See Fig. 99-
1
i
n
nr
;Lp
a 3 �
Iwo
�•.
w�� r
4f k
T t
I ! 9
I
,. qqqq r T
WCU7
Headwater Forest y •)' n �t + '-
See Fig. 113+ I 4IF
r
N
Ln
O
m
Z
~
Q
O1
0_
D
0
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
O
LO O
II z
F- LOU M
M
ILL T ILL r1_
U
U) o
n
t j
Q
Z
J
O
N IY
Q
U
LU F_
O
LL O
O a
CO } Y
W
mow°
Z
a Wwz
¢¢
W LU
a O
Q rn
o
LU
� w
X w z
O z w
J =
a UL
a
in
Q o
U
Z
m
FIGURE NO.
12

I 8
Se
See p.
CHIMNE
Ir
Jurisdictional Streams
c -N
Q
Fl9 56
® Jurisdictional Wetlands
=BUCKEYEoR
Ilk
ON
J
O
S p/a/n P
_ Se P.
N
z Stream Banks
t
Proposed Project Area
Fsr
W
'9Tt
=RED=CED;q,p,OR
�
Bored Pipe Installation
\ See Seep 5
P
o
Open Trenched Pipe Installation
O
CHEST .,
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
} Y
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
ONLY, ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED
OTHERWISE.
,Iy •It
STRgWRct,_
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BETWEEN 3-3-2015 AND 9-14-
2015 BY S&ME SCIENTISTS. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE LOCATED USING GPS UNITS
STti� CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. FEATURES WERE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE USACE AND
TG NCDWR ON 9-15-2015. FEATURES THAT WERE DELINEATED OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT BOUNDARY
ARE DEPICTED, ONLY FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREAARE LABELED.
A A CD Q
P,-,e—
RP
erealgin Cr
SeP.
58 W
�x . r' 1.130L
0 500 1,0001
(IN FEET),
STNVT
N
PSre S\RPW
Q
Fl9 56
z
Ilk
ON
J
O
S p/a/n P
_ Se P.
N
m
t
z
Fsr
W
'9Tt
�
o
\ See Seep 5
P
o
ti/n i
EM
-- 3 r r ' - +t of. s -
P3
t dd
PSre S\RPW
Q
Fl9 56
z
Ilk
is F/oo�\8
J
O
S p/a/n P
_ Se P.
N
4? 7260/
�
U
Fsr
W
'9Tt
C
Ik
\ See Seep 5
P
W
ti/n i
P3
t dd
FIGURE NO.
15
Q
z
J
O
N
<
Q
�
U
W
F_
O
W
O
O
a U
cf)
} Y
r
W
2wa
Q0
w �
Q z Q
W
w a O
C/)
Q
o w
w
X
w z
0
z w
J =
i -L -N
d
L1
a
in
Q
o
U
z
FIGURE NO.
15

v
p s
I—
GPQ
Q CO
Jurisdictional Streams
CgNFC
O
Stream Banks
0
e�
Proposed Project Area
RFFKR
-
1Z qJ
Q01 �
n
Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD) Pipe Installation
FcTcyFRq
O
Open Trenched Pipe Installation
a
Q
QJ
LU
2 Ui
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED, THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
~U
w
i
V
Q U Q
d ro
LU
w
M
U
H
r �
c�
M� Q
LU
Qm
Z w
O
3U1i
QJ
_J =
SFT.
Ui
Q
in
o
O/(/ lift
f
Z
m
fir•
q°
�i
Q [n
I,
C'
-TANNER,
0
N
PRESSLEY'HIL=L=RDS
OI D: S p�'
p s
I—
Proposed Temporary Access Roads
Jurisdictional Streams
® Jurisdictional Wetlands
O
Stream Banks
0
e�
Proposed Project Area
Bored Pipe Installation
n
Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD) Pipe Installation
FcTcyFRq
Open Trenched Pipe Installation
a
REFERENCE: 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
LU
2 Ui
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED, THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
~U
0
(IN
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BETWEEN 3-3-2015 AND 9-14-
2015 BY S&ME SCIENTISTS. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE LOCATED USING GPS UNITS �' LO
CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. FEATURES WERE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE USACE AND y
NCDWR ON 9-15-2015. FEATURES THAT WERE DELINEATED OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT BOUNDARY �P m
ARE DEPICTED, ONLY FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREAARE LABELED. �O Z
W N
LO
- O
O �
LOO LO
II Z
F LO
o T U M
K W LU
Z J
Q
O
Q0 c C) 0
N Q ^ Uco
a
Q/�
'I V
Q � Mco _
co
i
40 4 o
CC
r ate' v,
/ w c o
CCD
D� OM ID
�
0 S�/mom.. Z
O
Q
Z �;• ui
♦ U
1,000
FIGURE NO.
20
W
I—
w O
LL
O
0
a
n
cf)
H >- y
a
w
LU
2 Ui
v
~U
w
Q U Q
LU
w
M
U
H
a 0
LU
Qm
Z w
O
_J =
Ui
Q
in
o
f
Z
m
FIGURE NO.
20

Appendix I:
Completed PCN and Agent Authorization Letter

O dF W A7E'q
0 -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FE Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Line T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
2b.
County:
Polk, Henderson and Buncombe
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mill Spring, Hendersonville and Fletcher
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Project area is a linear utility easement that crosses multiple parcels
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Company
4b.
Name:
Craig Bodie
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
PSNC - A SCANA Company
4d. Street address:
100 SCANA Parkway, MC 202
4e. City, state, zip:
Cayce, SC 29033-3712
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler, PWS.
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S&ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e. Telephone no.:
704.523.4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project area is a linear utility easement that crosses
multiple parcels
Latitude: Center: 35.347101' Longitude: -
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Center: -82.366103°
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
316 acres
2.
Surface Waters
Multiple waterbodies, including Little White Oka Creek,
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Silver Creek, Ostin Creek, Green River, Harm Creek,
proposed project:
Hungry River, Little Hungry River, Scannon Creek, Devils
Fork, Clear Creek, Featherstone Creek, Byers Creek and
Pinner Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Multiple classifications
2c.
River basin:
Upper Broad (03050105) and French Broad (06010105)
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the work will take place within an existing, maintained natural gas pipeline easement. General land use in the
vicinity of the project corridor consists of a mix of low density residential areas, agriculture, pasture, and forest. Portions
of the project corridor are located close to areas composed of commercial and light industrial development.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Over four acres of wetlands/open waters are located within the project area.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
6,245 LF of perennial and intermittent streams are located within the project area.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to replace an aging segment of 8 -inch diameter pipeline with a new 20 -
inch diameter pipeline that is compatible with current federally -mandated safety and inspection requirements, and is
capable of increasing service capabilities and reliability for PSNC's customers in western North Carolina.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other
associated workspaces etc. In high ground areas, up to an additional 50 feet of temporary workspace (TWS) adjacent to
the existing easement will be required to safely install the new pipe. At stream and wetland crossings, the TWS will be
eliminated, and work will be conducted only within the existing, maintained easement. Appropriate sediment and erosion
control (S&EC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features.
No grubbing or below -ground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands or along stream banks outside of the
construction corridor. Where the pipe will be installed by conventional means (e.g. "open -trench" or "isolation"), grubbing
will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the trench line. Select upland portions of the easement may require rough
grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -level work surface. Within wetland areas where
extensive rutting or soil disturbance may occur, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space for
equipment.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary S&EC measures, the trench will be excavated along
the "non -working" side of the easement. Subsurface disturbance will only be conducted within the trench line at wetlands
and stream crossings. Stump removal or light grading may occur on the working side of the easement if required for
safety reasons. The work will be performed from the timber mats placed along the working side of the easement. In
certain areas, including wetlands and fields supporting crops, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If
necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be
installed within the trench to slow the flow of subsurface water.
In general, approximately 40 -foot lengths of the 20 -inch pipe will then be trucked to the site from temporary storage yards,
strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to bend
individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The pipe segments will be welded together,
x-rayed, and inspected coating and structural integrity, and then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may
require dewatering or "padding" to prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent
trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the
subsoil and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -grading
and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the
easement as closely as possible to pre -disturbance contours and conditions.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: A Request for Pre=JD was provided to the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
USACE separately on July 14, 2015. Representatives of the
USACE (Craig Brown) and NCDWR (Andrew Moore) visited
the project site on September 15 to approve the delineation
and verify the location/classification of affected features.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Written verification of the Pre --JD is currently pending with the
USACE.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: See Wetland/Open Water Impact Table in Appendix III.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: See Stream Impact Table in Appendix III
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: See Wetland/Open Water Impact Table in Appendix III.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled I Excavated Flooded I Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
B1 ❑P❑T
B2 ❑P❑T
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e. I 6f. I 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No riparian buffer impacts will occur.
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See cover letter for details.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See cover letter for details.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Buffer mitigation is not required.
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: .
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is an underground utility.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
El USMP❑
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: Project does not meet the minimum criteria established by the State
Environmental Policy Act, and as such, does not require preparation of an
environmental document.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered "growth -inducing" in that its purpose to replace an segment of existing natural gas pipleine,
and while providing additonal service capacity, is not expected to serve as an impetus for development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project conditions will specify that hydrotest water will be appropriately discharged through a dewatering structure located
in well-vegeted area in high ground so as not to create a water quality violation.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS concurrence with field suirveys and conclusions received with on August 25, 2015. Requirements under section 7
of the Act are fulfilled. A copy of the August 25, 2015 USFWS letter is included in Appendix VI.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
S&ME archaeologists conducted the survey of the project corridor intermittently from April 6 through June 4, 2015. As a
result of the investigations, no previously recorded archaeological sites were re -located, and 15 new archaeological sites
and isolated finds were identified. The 15 archaeological sites were recommended ineligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places (NRNP). Results of the investigation were presented to SHPO in a June 2015 report. S&ME
concluded that the archaeological sites and isolated finds are ineligible for the NRHP, that the project area does not
contain significant archaeological resources and no further archaeological investigations were warranted.
SHPO responded with a July 20, 2015 letter stating that they had reviewed the report and concurred with S&ME's
findings that the project should not affect archaeological resources. A copy of SHPO letter is included in Appendix VI.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: All necessary floddplain encroachment permits will be obtained
from the respective county/municipal floodplain administrators prior to project construction.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA mappping
Joey Lawler, PWS
09.23.15
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

$S&ME
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: 01.15.2015
rroject inrormation
S&ME Project Name: Line T-001 Pipeline Replacement Project
Type of Project: Permit Authorization, Delineation, Agency Coordination
Location: Hendersonville, North Carolina
Property Uwner/Kepresentative 1ntormatlon
Business Name: PSNC Energy
Mailing Address: 800 Gaston Road
City, State, Zip Code: Gastonia, North Carolina 28056
Telephone No. 704.834.6621
Contact: Craig Bodie, P.E.
lntormatlon
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone No.
Contact:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
Crystal Fox, C.E.
Authorization: I, C'4-ia i /1"/of PSNC
hereby a thorize S&ME, Inc. to act as agent with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources
pursuant to communications, coordination and obtaining the
necessary Section 10/404/401/Buffer permits, if applicable, related to
the above -referenced on-going projects.
Signature:
2
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 /p 704.523.4726f 704.525.3953 / www.smeine.com

Appendix II:
Representative Site Photographs

Representative Photographs
PSNC T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Project #: 7335-15-005
Sheet 1 of 6
T
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
2 This is a typical ROW on the west
Remarks side of project after passing through
ag field next to stream and mowed
wetland
IAV► ~`.� .-A _ �� �• H ---. ., k, _------. � -� --
Co
�
.-� - �' ,
•'-
`, :T v r _{ �G- r.. - sem. - „s -
Co
CL
Representative of the active ROW areas
This is a typical mix of ag and forested
Remarks
slope area
T
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
2 This is a typical ROW on the west
Remarks side of project after passing through
ag field next to stream and mowed
wetland

Representative Photographs
PSNC T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Project #: 7335-15-005
Sheet 2 of 6
N,
2
Q
12
L
0)
0
^�
LL
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
3 This is a typical mix of forested
Remarks slope area encountered on the
east side of route
E;
T�,
O
N
L
L
cM
G
Co
0
M(0
W
G
Q
III Q
I
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
This is a typical mix of forested
Remarks slope area encountered on the
east side of route

Representative Photographs
PSNC T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Project #: 7335-15-005
Sheet 3 of 6
l ,r
L � i
' (9
2!
Co
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
6 This is a typical ROW with small
Remarks seep and slope complex on east
side of route
04
Co
}
y lL
_ 1
v
y� ,v
'�C ^�''4 , 1� tom_. �'. +■:`.
CL
`.r i �.� �.V:k. .3!J�1��•1.•.-S:.a�"is311..,dli �' "�`�x" !
0_
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
5
Remarks This is a typical ROW crossing of a
stream on the east side of route
l ,r
L � i
' (9
2!
Co
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
6 This is a typical ROW with small
Remarks seep and slope complex on east
side of route

Representative Photographs *S&ME
PSNC T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Project #: 7335-15-005
Sheet 4 of 6
0
N
L
L
c�
G
. T
m
CM
CL
O
O
LL
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
7 Remarks This is a typical ROW in a well
maintained area
T
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
$ Remarks This is a typical ROW crossing of
herbaceous wetland

Representative Photographs
PSNC T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Project #: 7335-15-005
Sheet 5 of 6
,loll.
Location Orientation RepresentativeROW
1This is a typicalROW at road
crossing • • mix of • • •
LO
N
I - IF
Q
ti • , ���
i - J
��e� �° ` i�JW�jdIIh1 .��ry _ 4 � ���I 1
T
, i�+Y��
t
Q
re
O
Location / Orientation
Representative active ROW edge
9
Remarks
This is a typical ROW with seep
slope wetland on east side of route
,loll.
Location Orientation RepresentativeROW
1This is a typicalROW at road
crossing • • mix of • • •

Representative Photographs
PSNC T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Project #: 7335-15-005
Sheet 6 of 6
—low V.y �r 1 ,
T
1�
I
_ .�.
YYYIItIIt ��
O
_
N
CL
Q
s'^�-��- �� V _ � ; x'� is...1 {M'. tit •- � �.r- T-_'-c�� J�y�_,-��,`
•
Co
Location Orientation
RepresentativeROW
typicalThis is a ROW on
Co
♦ `ice`•
.�y,.
c
bYr
L
.p K
L
•
CL
'�
• *. i i. ti �' k •�
��� �-
�- ","
O
O
•
�PA
� %idly �1j�� i �r i� R!,f
'�i� ��t��.F. �q�.��;:.��.;'.�ieY]i�.34'!��
pyA��
.•Jf. /. .•. .�,
/,. f 1 a�. �I�S...:. � � �.. 11�.
�
t� L .K 4.i 1 �. %-?
Location / Orientation
Representative active ROW
11
Remarks
This is a typical ROW on the west
side of project; mix of conditions
—low V.y �r 1 ,
_ .�.
o_
s'^�-��- �� V _ � ; x'� is...1 {M'. tit •- � �.r- T-_'-c�� J�y�_,-��,`
•
Location Orientation
RepresentativeROW
typicalThis is a ROW on

Appendix III:
Impact Tables

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Name
Map No.
Flow Regime
Impact Type
Temporary
Impact (LF)
PermanentLatitude
Impact (LF)
Longitude
SA01
22
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
50
0
35.306692
82.174284
SA03 (Little White Oak
Creek)
23
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
51
0
35.31003
82.185002
SA04
24
Perennial
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.312414
82.194188
SA05
25
Perennial
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.312534
82.194544
SA07 (Silver Creek)
26
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
68
0
35.31424
82.203389
SA08
27
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
55
0
35.31548
82.215646
SA09 (Ostin Creek)
28
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
53
0
35.315614
82.216655
SA11
29
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
50
0
35.316369
82.223516
SA12
30
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
84
0
35.322976
82.24365
SA15
31
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance
88
0
35.323324
82.246783
SA14 (Green River)
32
TNW
Temporary disturbance / trenching
169
0
35.323753
82.24685
51302
33
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
69
0
35.326406
82.259587
SA17
34
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
52
0
35.328741
82.261666
SA19
35
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
251
0
35.332824
82.267816
SA20 (Harm Creek)
36
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
66
0
35.333638
82.277597
SA22
37
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
64
0
35.333863
82.286201
SC04
38
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
59
0
35.330499
82.301789
SC01 (Harm Creek)
39
Perennial
Temporary bank disturbance
156
0
35.330675
82.303472
SC07
40
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
under culvert
74
0
35.333473
82.308484
SC09 (Hungry River)
41
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
103
0
35.337241
82.316491
SC10
42
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance
61
0
35.337338
82.316549
SC11
43
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance / trenching
77
0
35.337785
82.31776
SC12
44
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
94
0
35.337833
82.318345
SC15
45
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
80
0
35.338341
82.324347
SDO1 (Little Hungry River)
46
Perennial
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.343713
82.335869
SD46 (Sconon Creek)
47
1 Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
52
0
35.345882
82.346229
SD03 (Tumblebug Creek)
48
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
51
0
35.34525
82.350941

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Name
Map No.
Flow Regime
Impact Type
Temporary
Impact (LF)
PermanentLatitude
Impact (LF)
Longitude
SC19
49
Perennial
Temporary disturbance /trenching
under culvert
17
0
35.34732
82.364006
SC16
50
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
54
0
35.347417
82.368213
SC17
51
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance
6
0
35.347647
82.370139
SC18
52
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
69
0
35.347711
82.371049
SC21
53
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
13
0
35.350175
82.382257
SD05
54
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
under culvert
33
0
35.351009
82.387365
SD06 (Devils Fork)
55
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
53
0
35.351185
82.38852
SD07
56
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
32
0
35.353455
82.39956
SC24
57
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
62
0
35.353482
82.400321
SD08 (Wolfpen Creek)
58
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
64
0
35.352528
82.408053
SC25
59
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
31
0
35.355077
82.413805
SC27
60
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.358824
82.427138
SD10 (Clear Creek)
61
TNW
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.359179
82.429092
SD11
62
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
56
0
35.360303
82.436653
SD12
63
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
570
0
35.361196
82.437822
SD13
64
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
53
0
35.366091
82.443904
SD14
65
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
81
0
35.370213
82.449443
SD15
66
Perennial
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.370648
82.45158
SD15
67
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
95
0
35.370835
82.451941
SD16
68
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
109
0
35.377888
82.461806
SD18 (Featherstone
Creek)
69
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
62
0
35.378132
82.465188
SD19A
70
Perennial
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.381757
82.467729
SD19B
71
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
166
0
35.384162
82.469401
SD19C
72
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
99
0
35.384807
82.469764
SD22
73
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
64
0
35.387551
82.470529
SD24 (Byers Creek)
74
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
57
0
35.397547
82.482856
SD25
1 75
lIntermittent
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.397952
82.484921
SD27
1 76
1 Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
320
0
35.401195
82.486936

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Name
Map No.
Flow Regime
Impact Type
Temporary
Impact (LF)
PermanentLatitude
Impact (LF)
Longitude
SD30
77
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
53
0
35.407617
82.490215
SD31
78
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
under culvert
53
0
35.411807
82.491547
SD32A
79
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance / trenching
52
0
35.413022
82.491882
SD34
80
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance / trenching
171
0
35.417601
82.493307
SD35
81
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
102
0
35.42056
82.493543
SD36
82
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
50
0
35.422939
82.493249
SC29 (Cane Creek)
83
TNW
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.426333
82.493041
SC30
84
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
51
0
35.428942
82.492813
SC31
85
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
248
0
35.432472
82.492128
SC32
86
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
53
0
35.436007
82.49163
SD38 (Pinner Creek)
87
Perennial
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.439326
82.491617
SD39
88
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
under culvert
14
0
35.445048
82.494754
SD40
89
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
161
0
35.449233
82.498524
SD41 (Pinner Creek)
90
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
under culvert
74
0
35.449743
82.498737
SD42
91
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
61
0
35.456215
82.50478
SD43
92
Intermittent
Avoided (bore)
0
0
35.45628
82.505233
SD44
93
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
71
0
35.457468
82.50765
SD45
94
Perennial
Temporary disturbance / trenching
80
0
35.457595
82.507841
SEA01
95
Perennial
Permanent Culverting
0
25
35.311285
82.204383
SC01A (Hungry River)
96
Perennial
Temporary access road crossing
72
0
35.332515
82.317429
UTl
97
Intermittent
Temporary access road crossing
27
0
35.333516
82.316721
SC14
98
Perennial
Temporary access road crossing
32
0
35.337625
82.318508
SD01A (Little Hungry
River)
99
Perennial
Avoided (bridged)
0
0
35.344945
82.333683
SC27A
100
Perennial
Temporary disturbance for culvert
upgrades
10
0
35.357965
82.427496
Totals:1
5578
25

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Permant
Temp ImpactLatitude
Wetland ID
Map No.
WAM Class
Impact Type
Longitude
Impact (Acre)
(Acre)
WA07
101
Seep
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
<0.01
35.316423
82.223561
Temporary ground disturbance / clearing
WA08
102
Bottomland Hardwood
0.00
0.03
35.32337
82.246852
of forested ve eation
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA09
103
Bottomland Hardwood
0.00
0.02
35.32358
82.246873
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
W1301
104
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.01
35.325046
82.253067
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
W1302
105
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.01
35.324688
82.255786
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA17
106
Headwater Forest
0.00
<0.01
35.33281
82.268162
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA18
107
Seep
0.00
0.05
35.332893
82.268183
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA20
108
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.17
35.333341
82.287375
trenched pipeline crossing
WC03
109
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
0.01
35.333449
82.308518
WC04
110
Seep
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
0.02
35.333661
82.308898
WC06
111
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
0.03
35.337359
82.316523
Temporary ground disturbance /
WDO1
112
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.12
35.337781
82.317524
trenched pipeline crossing
WC07
113
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
<0.01
35.338443
82.324354
WD03
114
Seep
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
0.02
35.343413
82.334894
WD02
115
Seep
Avoided (bore)
0.00
0.09
35.343752
82.336047
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC11
116
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.04
35.347178
82.361332
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC08
117
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.01
35.347568
82.370106
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC09
118
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.05
35.347679
82.371
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC12
119
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.03
35.350224
82.382124
trenched pipeline crossing

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Permant
Temp ImpactLatitude
Wetland ID
Map No.
WAM Class
Impact Type
Longitude
Impact (Acre)
(Acre)
WC13
120
Seep
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
<0.01
35.350321
82.382406
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC14
121
Seep
0.00
0.07
35.350368
82.383231
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD04
122
Seep
0.00
0.07
35.350968
82.38729
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD06
123
Seep
0.00
0.07
35.351902
82.391109
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD07
124
Seep
0.00
0.05
35.35209
82.39169
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC15
125
Seep
0.00
0.11
35.353247
82.39659
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD08
126
Floodplain Pool
0.00
0.01
35.353501
82.399427
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC16
127
Seep
0.00
0.09
35.353484
82.400301
trenched pipeline crossing
Permanent conversion of forested
wetland to emergent wetland; temporary
WD47
128
Headwater Forest
0.04
0.04
35.352194
82.405647
ground disturbance of existing emergent
wetland
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC18
129
Seep
0.00
0.03
35.357821
82.421186
trenched pipeline crossing
Bottomland Hardwood
WC19
130
Avoided (HDD)
0.00
0.75
35.358485
82.42548
Forest
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD10
131
Seep
0.00
0.02
35.359493
82.430754
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD11
132
Seep
0.00
0.05
35.360663
82.437581
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD12
133
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.16
35.362161
82.438147
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD13
134
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.04
35.370219
82.449432
trenched pipeline crossing

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Permant
Temp Impact
Wetland ID
Map No.
WAM Class
Impact Type
Latitude
Longitude
Impact (Acre)
(Acre)
OWD1
135
Open Water
Permanent fill
0.11
0.00
35.37115
82.452404
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD19
136
Seep
0.00
0.03
35.378002
82.461874
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD20
137
Seep
0.00
0.13
35.377904
82.464419
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD21
138
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.10
35.384579
82.469603
trenched pipeline crossing
WD23
139
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
0.01
35.400659
82.486548
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD26
140
Seep
0.00
0.03
35.402245
82.487546
trenched pipeline crossing
WD25
141
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
0.01
35.405565
82.489471
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD29
142
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.14
35.411965
82.491547
trenched pipeline crossing
WD32
143
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
<0.01
35.422002
82.493286
WD33
144
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.00
<0.01
35.422317
82.493242
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD35
145
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.03
35.423771
82.493152
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC21
146
Seep
0.00
0.02
35.431134
82.49241
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC22
147
Seep
0.00
0.04
35.431395
82.492335
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC23
148
Seep
0.00
0.05
35.431732
82.492288
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD41
149
Seep
0.00
0.19
35.446989
82.496759
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD42
150
Seep
0.00
0.13
35.447567
82.497313
trenched pipeline crossing
Bottomland Hardwood
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD43
151
0.00
0.30
35.449469
82.498573
Forest
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD44
152
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.14
35.456163
82.504733
trenched pipeline crossing

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Permant
Temp ImpactLatitude
Wetland ID
Map No.
WAM Class
Impact Type
Longitude
Impact (Acre)
(Acre)
Temporary ground disturbance /
WD46
153
Headwater Forest
0.00
0.20
35.457613
82.5078
trenched pipeline crossing
WAE
154
Headwater Forest
Permanent fill
0.02
0.00
35.321437
82.242024
Totals:
0.17
3.82

Appendix IV:
Jurisdictional Impact Drawings

� I
'4 ti
'I
1
11 ,I ,• ter=
S
111...........................................................................
I
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
5,
•til
LON
s
•y �
• �o
..•°'O a� 4.M1
'i
0 40 80 °.
t,
L (IN FEET)+
` ♦ � 4"4 °I
♦
7
4
k♦♦ WA06 y 4
�� ♦C) ♦ 4
-- PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
LON
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
f �
m o
Stream Crossing ID
N
z
r J PARCELS
6i
Q
Silver Creek
-
Longitude
35.314240°N
r/
rr�
I
>- - - STREAM CENTERLINE
82.203389°W
7
4
k♦♦ WA06 y 4
�� ♦C) ♦ 4
-- PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
LON
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
oN
m o
Stream Crossing ID
N
z
r J PARCELS
6i
Q
Silver Creek
-
Longitude
35.314240°N
>- - - STREAM CENTERLINE
82.203389°W
STREAM BANKS
L,
z
0
Perennial RPW
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
0
0 L�
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
U)
1-- M
Cowardin Classification
R3
U)
<U a
U
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
HGM Code
0
o
LF Permanent Impact
PERMANENT EASEMENT
U U LU o
7
4
k♦♦ WA06 y 4
�� ♦C) ♦ 4
-- PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID
SA07
Local Waterway
Silver Creek
�.
Longitude
35.314240°N
Latitude
82.203389°W
z
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
o
Cowardin Classification
R3
Q
� U
S
.N
HGM Code
Riverine
LF Permanent Impact
0
U U LU o
Cn
LF Temporary Impact
68
O LU
a E a
Temporary disturbance / trenched
-j L.
LU � O
Impact Description
i eline crossing
p p g
U
Z�
U W m
O m < C)
z0
U a
Designated trout stream: work
� Z
Q
Trout Status
moratoriam not required per WRC
L.
>
determination
w z
U) z O
J C/)
None
' Q o
CO w
Additional Notes
=
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT 26
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

rr
I
0
I'
50
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
Trout stream tributary: work moratoriam
Trout Status
not required per WRC determination
None
1
I
II
I
YI
I
I I � Iti I
0 40 80
(IN FEET) I ti
LEGEND
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
I - J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
CULVERTS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID SA11
Local Waterway UT to Ostin Creek
Longitude 35.316369°N
Latitude 82.223516°W
Rapa nos Classification Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication R3
HGM Code Riverine
LF Permanent Impact
0
LF Temporary Impact
50
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
Trout stream tributary: work moratoriam
Trout Status
not required per WRC determination
None
Additional Notes
z `r'
O
o
O o
2 z
U) F- M
U) U
6i Q W
U
U) a
z_
J
O
Q
U
S
U �w z
Q •� ° w
(L Na
p z
Q U 2wOv
zz Uwm
Q
F- aZ0
U U) � a z
DOr
in a 025
LU z
z O
J U)
w
0
z
ILL!
Y
J
O
a
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED ��
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

0y
u
�� '3!, �'i�'i
co
-----------------------------------------------------
r
-- ::, - ----------- ------
�
11 F- r
,I r
ry7, 4L
0 40{= w '80
r
(IN FEET)
y r- 4r
ell
LEGEND
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
I _ J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID
SA20
Local Waterway
Harm Creek
Longitude
35.333638°N
w,
82.277597°W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classification
HGM Code
R3
Riverine
moratoriam not required per WRC
determination
None
Additional Notes
.k
y r- 4r
ell
LEGEND
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
I _ J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID
SA20
Local Waterway
Harm Creek
Longitude
35.333638°N
Latitude
82.277597°W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classification
HGM Code
R3
Riverine
LF Permanent Impact
p
LF Temporary Impact
66
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
Designated trout stream: work
Trout Status
moratoriam not required per WRC
determination
None
Additional Notes
z `O
o
0
O o �
z
F- M
U) U
Q W
U
U) a
z_
J
O
U
co U U w O
O Cn
d E a�
D
J w O
Q 2Uuv
Z Y v w m
O a zU
U U
aa z
E
W z
= z_ O
CD
O J CD
< 0
co z
w
Y
J
O
a
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, PROPOSED 36
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
/ INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
9'a - BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

WCo.I\_♦', ---2520.
a _ _
Co''Ha`-4
m_ •`.
Creek'
�,
LEGEND
LON
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
z o
PARCELS
w
N
a
0
0
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
z
L,
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
0
O
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEM
0 L�
PERMANENT EASEMENT
<
U)
Q
U
ILL
0
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
U
C
o
TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID
SC01
Local Waterway
Harm Creek
�.
Longitude
35.330675°N
Latitude I 82.303472°W
Rapa nos Classification I Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classification I R3
HGM Code I Riverine
LF Permanent Impact p
LF Temporary Impact 156
_ z Temporary bank disturbance
Impact Description
- Designated trout stream: work
Trout Status moratoriam not required per WRC
-------_—_ �_ -- determination
s�- Minor bank disturbance required due to
-, work space constraints and
-�, Additional Notestopography.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 80 METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
— - �' • �`�Sz �� �" WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
116—(IN FEET) - -- -- -, ''.y BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
H
U
a
J
Z
0
U
z_
J
0
U
C =
0
U w z
O
Ew
d W
a�iz}D
UJ 0 0
fq 2wU
�.wzw
Y U W m
G1
EL-
L. U LLJa z
E Do
o m
L FL 06
ca LIJ z
= z_ O
J �
O W
z
ILL!
Y
J
0
a
FIGURE NO.
39

r� II
D 40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
o
W
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
�TRENCHED
LON
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
oN
z
o
• �^
�
t
PARCELS
35.333473°N
w
N
a
Rapanos Classification
Cowardin ClassFication
0
0
o•
,
>- - - STREAM CENTERLINE
=
•
I
O
a Nif
.
•
Temporary disturbance /trenched
4g
Impact Description
pipeline crossing under existing culvertQ
w z
z
♦o
I
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Trout Status
�
,
0
April 15
CULVERTS
o
0
=
z
F
M
�
6JUJ
(n
Q
0
Cry
ti
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
<
0
i
U
Cn
N,
�
0 -
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
•
- —2460— -
a
•.
o
•
- m
•••
j
,
WC03♦•
::�SCJ08!
_ •
i
"k, .
r
♦
lr
r� II
D 40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
o
W
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
�TRENCHED
LON
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
oN
z
o
Local Waterway
UT to Hungry River
PARCELS
35.333473°N
w
N
a
Rapanos Classification
Cowardin ClassFication
0
0
L)UJ
>- - - STREAM CENTERLINE
=
LF Temporary Impact
74
O
a Nif
STREAM BANKS
Temporary disturbance /trenched
J U LU I)f
Impact Description
pipeline crossing under existing culvertQ
w z
z
o
0
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Trout Status
moratorium between January 1 and
0
0
April 15
CULVERTS
=
z
F
M
r-1
6JUJ
(n
Q
0
Cry
ti
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
<
0
U
Cn
�
0 -
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENTEASEMENT
o
W
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
�TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID
SC07
Local Waterway
UT to Hungry River
Longitude
35.333473°N
Latitude
82.308484°W
Perennial RPW
R3
Riverine
Rapanos Classification
Cowardin ClassFication
HGM Code
0
L)UJ
LF Permanent Impact
=
LF Temporary Impact
74
O
a Nif
O
Temporary disturbance /trenched
J U LU I)f
Impact Description
pipeline crossing under existing culvertQ
w z
Z O J
Og�
z
Trout stream tributary: subject to work
+r a-
U � a
Trout Status
moratorium between January 1 and
o 0
�—a,
April 15
LU
None
� J
Additional Notes
Yry� ff
4 4 REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
+I METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
40
ry' • WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
I •
♦ INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
,o
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z_
J
O
Q
O
O
z
ai
J
I=
z
D
O
O
J
Go
2
O
O
z
D
Go
06
z
O
CO
Of
J
0
z
J
Y
J
O
D_

-t
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
■ ■ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
- J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENTEASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
Stream Crossing ID
SC09
Local Waterway
Hungry River
Longitude
35.337241 ON
Latitude
82.316491 °W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication
R3
Riverine
0
HGM Code
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
103
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description pipeline crossing
Designated trout stream: subject to
Trout Status work moratorium between January 1
and April 15
None
Additional Notes
z L'
C:>
0
p o Ln
= z
U) U M
Q LL] r1-
< �
rn o_
Q
z_
J
O
<
cn ~
0
UU LU o
Q E ° c/)JU
a a
z
QCn 2w0
z ` U Lu w m
O U)v
Lou
U D_z
L �
U) o .6
J z
J cf)
W
CD p
U z
U) w
Y
J
O
D_
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 41
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

I i I i I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I A
I I I i A I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I VV
I I �
II I
r
40 80
(IN FEET)
07
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
�
I
01
I o
p
O
I
�
I I
I
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
I
z
I
ti
Longitude
35.338341 ON
41
N
PARCELS
r�
r
I'
'III
a
I
HGM Code
0
�
I
LF Permanent Impact
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
LF Temporary Impact
80
o
a Nof
o
STREAM BANKS
Temporary disturbance / trenched
J L- w
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
Q w Z
Z M v J
O Q0
z
z
Trout stream tributary: subject to work
40 80
(IN FEET)
07
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
LEGEND
N
z
01
I o
p
O
I
I r
I
I I
ti ti
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
I
z
I
ti
Longitude
35.338341 ON
Latitude
PARCELS
I'
'III
a
I
HGM Code
0
0
0
LF Permanent Impact
LEGEND
N
z
01
Ln
Stream Crossing ID
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
z
o
UT to Hungry River
Longitude
35.338341 ON
Latitude
PARCELS
w
N
a
Cowardin Classfication
HGM Code
0
0
0
LF Permanent Impact
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
LF Temporary Impact
80
o
a Nof
o
STREAM BANKS
Temporary disturbance / trenched
J L- w
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
Q w Z
Z M v J
O Q0
z
z
Trout stream tributary: subject to work
o
0
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
moratorium between January 1 and
0 � o
0
0
0— U) LuZ
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEF
None
M
<
(n
¢
U
~
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
Q
0
o
o
PERMANENTEASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
W
z
01
Stream Crossing ID
SC15
Local Waterway
UT to Hungry River
Longitude
35.338341 ON
Latitude
82.324347°W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
R3
Riverine
Cowardin Classfication
HGM Code
0
U as
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
80
o
a Nof
o
Temporary disturbance / trenched
J L- w
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
Q w Z
Z M v J
O Q0
z
Trout stream tributary: subject to work
+r D_
U LO � a
Trout Status
moratorium between January 1 and
0 � o
April 15
0— U) LuZ
None
� J
Additional Notes
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 45
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z_
J
0
Q
0
0
z
CO
J
E-
z
D
0
0
J
Go
2
0
0
z
D
Go
06
z
0
CO
Of
J
0
z
J
Y
J
0
D_

i
I
1
II
1
I
I�
n�
v� I
�, II
1 I
1 I
1 I
I p
I
1 I
1 I
I I
1 I ti
I
1
I
!
I
'II
D 40 80 y
I
(IN FEET) 5
II
II
II
I
II
II
II
I
LEGEND
N
Ln
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
■ ■ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
C�'
z o
PARCELS
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
w
N
0
a
0
0
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
z
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
0
o
0
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEF
0
M
•---'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
w
a
fn
¢
U
Uj ~
o
PERMANENTEASEMENT
U
rn
�
o_
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
W .
z
01
Stream Crossing ID
SD06
Local Waterway
Devils Fork
Longitude
35.351185°N
Latitude 82.388520°W
Rapanos Classification Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication I R3
HGM Code I Riverine
LF Permanent Impact 0
LF Temporary Impact 53
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description pipeline crossing
Non -trout stream
Trout Status
None
Additional Notes
o w
U
O
Ecar
z
LU c7
to 2LU
LU z
Y U J
0 Q Z
a-
u- J C/)
N cif D_
m �
p LU
... z_
J
0
0
Cn
F
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
55
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
O
Q
U
O
z
CO
J
z
D
O
U
J
Go
2
O
U
z
Go
06
z
O
CO
Of
J
0
z
J
Y
J
O
D_

vCCC'' ♦41
M
SD,1:7
0 40 80 1
k
(IN FEET)
LEGEND N
r
TEMPORARY ACCESS
ROADS
a
Ln
\4
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
z o
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
PARCELS
w N
a
SD,1:7
0 40 80 1
k
(IN FEET)
LEGEND N
TEMPORARY ACCESS
ROADS
Ln
\4
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
z o
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
PARCELS
w N
a
0
0
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
Stream Crossing ID
SD16
z
k
ti
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
p
=
o Ln
'~
CULVERTS
35.377888°N
F M
82.461806'W
(n
w Q
0 M
w ti
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication
0
tY
o
R3
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
Riverine
0
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
109
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
N.
��
�`
Non -trout stream
C
Trout Status
m
Equipment access to occur along
q p ment 9
O ;a
O D � �,
,
`�
� v
��
SD,1:7
0 40 80 1
k
(IN FEET)
PERMANENTEASEMENT
LEGEND N
TEMPORARY ACCESS
ROADS
Ln
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
z o
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
PARCELS
w N
a
0
0
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
Stream Crossing ID
SD16
z
o
q
ti
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
p
=
o Ln
'~
CULVERTS
35.377888°N
F M
82.461806'W
(n
w Q
0 M
w ti
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication
0
tY
o
R3
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENTEASEMENT
Q
z_
J
0
Q
0
_
ULU z
Q = 0 w
d N a
oZz
Q2 2 w Ov
Z M v w m
OQ Z 0
D_ Z
(� i/iLU a Z
0 FL o6
U) J z
z_ 0
J C/)
J
0
z
J
Y
J
0
D_
FIGURE NO.
68
TEMPORARY ACCESS
ROADS
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
\
Stream Crossing ID
SD16
,�.
Local Waterway
UT to Featherstone Creek
Longitude
35.377888°N
Latitude
82.461806'W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication
\
\
R3
HGM Code
Riverine
0
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
109
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
N.
��
�`
Non -trout stream
C
Trout Status
m
Equipment access to occur along
q p ment 9
O ;a
O D � �,
,
`�
� v
��
`,
Academy Farm Trl./PSNC station
3 z
�,
��
Additional Notes
access road, resulting in no
-n
'.
��
jurisdictional impact.
O
I
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE
LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN
SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
.
�
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE
LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
�V
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE
LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
\
I
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION,
UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z_
J
0
Q
0
_
ULU z
Q = 0 w
d N a
oZz
Q2 2 w Ov
Z M v w m
OQ Z 0
D_ Z
(� i/iLU a Z
0 FL o6
U) J z
z_ 0
J C/)
J
0
z
J
Y
J
0
D_
FIGURE NO.
68

LEGEND N
Ln
''•� '�. / �`'w I
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
o
2
z o
• �. I I
o
♦
• N/ I
PARCELS
W N
a
I•
STREAM CENTERLINE
�`� �•� I
STREAM BANKS
L,
�• `' ,', a I G
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
z
0
o
0
k
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
U
M
• , I I , +
fn
W ¢
U M
W
PERMANENT EASEMENT
a
o
\ 7•
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
'� �• �, ly II
TRENCHED
� , I
,
` I
Stream Crossing ID
SD22
Local Waterway
UT to Featherstone Creek
�.
Longitude
35.387551°N
'a '♦-�' •, `, ` __
Latitude
82.470529°W
¢
z
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
'\, .� 1 �.�
o
,,•�'`,
0
Cowardin Classfication
R3
'•�
4. - _ �� , `,
HGM Code
Riverine
H w z
LF Permanent Impact
p
0
.N0 w
LF Temporary Impact
64
a to a
`
M 0
Temporary disturbance / trenchedJ
V w (D 0
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
2 ILL]
z E ILL]w
'� '� ,,
m
O U
/ •
�'4
L J
1 ' '♦ '•
Non -trout stream
N of a z
I '•� �`�
Trout Status
_U
N o m
y ,'
FL 06
.
U) W z
CD
None
w
♦, ,
z
Additional Notes
=
.,
♦
J
a
�,
LOCATION DETERMINED LE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO.
0 40 80 ,
METERRRAC'CURACY, BJURISDICTIONAL
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BWAS
A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, PROPOSED
- •
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
��
`
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) •
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

� I
LEGEND N LO
I, 1
i1111f41
• 1 0 > 2
IITEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA N z I - J PARCELS Q 6N,
WD3'5
STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS z �,
C)
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS 0 0
z
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS F M
I fn U M
Uj
CULVERTS a ¢ o ~
r 1 U
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE o
1
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENTEASEMENT W
I ;
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
1 ,
I ,
1 Stream Crossing ID SD36
1 ,
Local Waterway UT to Cane Creek
D36 ; Longitude 35.422939°N
Latitude 82.493249°W Q
I I -�--- z
WD34 <�' ,<- _ _ ( Rapanos Classification Perennial RPW o
1 �
1 1
Cowardin Classfication R3 Q
I � U
1 1
' 1
HGM Code Riverine
O
LF Permanent Impact 0 as _j z
' Q•N° w
LF Temporary Impact 50 a
Oz
Temporary disturbance / trenched J U w I)f O
Impact Description pipeline crossing Z2 w U
Lu ¢U:E
E z o
Non -trout stream U_ U a z
Trout Status 0 M o m
Q FL Orj
I ,
Lu z
' O
1 , z
1 ,_J Of
1 ,
None w
1 I
I 1 z
1 1 w
Additional Notes =
I � Y
1 , J
1 1 O
1 I D_
1 ,
I I
I ,
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF BUB -
FIGURE NO.
O 40 80 1 ; METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED ��
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
1 1

40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
LON
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT AREA
z
w
N
o
PARCELS
a
af
0
0
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
L,
z
O
09
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
0
0
--' PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
U
LO
M
U)
Q
U
W
J
U
U)
a
Stream Crossing ID
Local Waterway
Longitude
Latitude
Rapanos Classification
SEA01
UT to Silver Creek
35.311285°N
82.204383°W
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classification I R3
HGM Code I Riverine
LF Permanent Impact 25
LF Temporary Impact 0
Access road crossing / permanent
Impact Description culverting
Trout stream tributary: work moratoriam
Trout Status not required per WRC determination
Permanent access road will cross the
stream using a culvert sized to convey
Additional Notes a 25 year storm event and properly
buried to pass aquatic life.
I—
U
a
J
Z
O
U
�J
Z
J
O
a
U
S
o
�w
c
�VJ w
o�}j
L) 0
�U
Q Ww Do
J z O
LU U)
z
r
O o m
W
V% z_ O
J U)
Lu
0
Z
ILLI
Y
J
O
a
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO,
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT 95
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

LEGEND hJ
LO
0
Of
/�
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
6i N
JPARCELS
STREAM CENTERLINE
8\
STREAM BANKS
LO
�L|[W|TS
9
OF DISTURBANCE
LO
M
z
,
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS
m
// ^/, ,. ,,~ /
,~,~ /
0
Of
ell'
"I
Local Waterway
Hungry River
A.
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Of
HGM Code
Riverine
L) Z
LF Permanent Impact
o
< E UJ
LIF Temporary Impact
72
z
U) Ui 0
Temp orary disturbance for access road
Impact Description
crossing
2 UJ Q
Designated trout stream: subject to
a- z
Trout Status
work moratorium between January 1
tM
Z
and April 15
1- z
None
UJ
oil&
I
Additional Notes
f
IF
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO.
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
96
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
(1,NFEET)

• ••
k 4 k '
LEGEND
N
h
ti� 41�
•
•,•• •. •�,
••
I
k� 4 X h h
h h h 1 i �� ��
■ ■ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
LO
o
z6i
I
I 4 I I
•
`•
•.
h k hI, I
PARCELS
N
�r'
h"I
_
a
II fl I
•••
••
••• h
•• II
I
i� Ih ���, �ti,
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
o
I I I I ,�,�
•.•
••,
h
I
a o I I
,� ti X�
STREAM BANKS
LO
I
I
••
I
s
h I°
z
0
o
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
o
o Ln
f
r
h4 i h
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS
=
z 7
M
U
WW
Q
0
N
J
Q
O
r 5
I I
I
I
f
Stream Crossing ID
UT1
�� �� r � � i r t
��•
Local Waterway
UT to Hungry River
, .
',
I I
;
�,r F
Longitude
35.333516°N
f �i�
.
�`
Latitude
82.316721 °W
+I
Q
I
?
Rapanos Classification
Intermittent RPW
Cowardin Classfication
R3
Q
'
HGM Code
Riverine
z
U� z
LF Permanent Impact
0
- O W
LF Temporary Impact
27
.r
a a UJ
N H z
Temporary disturbance for access roadJ
r
w o
Impact Description
crossing
Q U w Z W
z E cj W m
�
Q 02
O
Trout stream tributary: work moratoriam
'a
w CD
_U of �
Trout Status
not required per WRC determination��
:D
rr o 00
I
v_/ F- F1 -$
LLI z
J+ I ♦
o I r
N
I
ICp
z O
None
w
0
W
r'
r�
J" �c i I"I
Additional Notes
=
�; ,;
�r
�"
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO.
_�' ,♦ �,�
7+• o
40 80
i�
Fr
° �"'•1
Ar
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
! Q ,♦
♦/!V,
'
•
f '
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
V
♦!
f f
Pr
f' f'
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
. (IN FEET) i ♦
+f ?'
.r *{�2,
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

j
9
110,�ER R� ^2 ,o-� -T
1 —
iv A—L
- -
-. — — — — — -2100_ —
, , I
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
1
-- 1
1 ,
SD01A Little Hungry River '
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
1 '
� 1
1`
I .
1
_ 1
1 ,
1 ,
. 1
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
1
LEGEND
STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
r - J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
CULVERTS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
-- PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS
Stream Crossing ID
SD01A
Local Waterway
Little Hungry River
Longitude
35.344945°N
Latitude
82.333683°W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
-
_
z
-
�- -
Y♦� __
-.. - --� ' . , - _- -_ -
—2140.,
--
-
v�
♦ -.. - -sawX21
_
j
9
110,�ER R� ^2 ,o-� -T
1 —
iv A—L
- -
-. — — — — — -2100_ —
, , I
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
1
-- 1
1 ,
SD01A Little Hungry River '
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
1 '
� 1
1`
I .
1
_ 1
1 ,
1 ,
. 1
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
1
LEGEND
STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
r - J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
CULVERTS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
-- PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS
Stream Crossing ID
SD01A
Local Waterway
Little Hungry River
Longitude
35.344945°N
Latitude
82.333683°W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
LEGEND
STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
r - J PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
CULVERTS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
-- PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS
Stream Crossing ID
SD01A
Local Waterway
Little Hungry River
Longitude
35.344945°N
Latitude
82.333683°W
Rapanos Classification
Perennial RPW
Cowardin Classfication I R3
HGM Code
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
Impact Description
Riverine
0
0
Avoided (bridged)
Designated trout stream: subject to
♦♦` %I Trout Status work moratorium between January 1
ti and April 15
,
Temporary clear -span bridge to be
used for crossing resulting in no
Additional Notes jurisdictional impacts.
♦ ♦ I 1
♦ ` � I D
` o
♦` ♦.REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, PROPOSED
1
♦ ♦. , WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
`. ♦ l ♦� I INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
z `O
C)
0
O
= o
U) F_ M
U) U
W Q W
U
U) a
z
c 00N
� LL
O U
L =
. U ~
Ew z
U
00
W
z
L w C7 O
J j 2w U
Z W v w m
O >, g U 2
L a Z O
_U a z
o m
W z
Z_ O
J U)
W
Q o
r Z
v/ J
O
a
FIGURE NO.
99

LEGEND N LO
m o
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT z
W N Q
I _ J PARCELS o o
>- - STREAM CENTERLINE
,I STREAM BANKS z o
0
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS = o
- - Ln
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEJ Q w
Y^otio I �+ TEMPORARY WORKSPACE a
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION: "
t ,
TRENCHED Uj
14 I `I I
y I i WBU1
!I I I 4144' k
__- Wetland Crossing ID W1301
_ -
- - Local Waterway UT to Green River
Longitude 82.253067°W
Latitude z
35.325046°N
I -J
WAM Classification Headwater Forest °
Q
II Cowardin Classfication PEM =
HGM Code Riverine H w o
vi
Acres Permanent Impact 0 U o
0/ I - ........
_ _ { Acres Temporary Impact 0.01 g 16- > z
LU c7 O
-------- �` I I I Temporary ground disturbance / Q w Z w
trenched pipeline crossing Z Q w
I �o
i Impact Description d a- z 0
' 11 I , i U � LU C/)
o I D e o m
p i to m FL.6
LU z
I z o
None J o
� I I
z
f �
I i Additional Notes =
J
0
0_
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 80 METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 104
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

s��
f
1
t
i
Local Waterway
r
Longitude
82.371000°W
Latitude
35.347679°N
WAM Classification
Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication
PEM
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
I _ J PARCELS
�- - STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENTEASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
TRENCHED
Wetland Crossing ID
WC09
Local Waterway
UT to Henderson Creek
Longitude
82.371000°W
Latitude
35.347679°N
WAM Classification
Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication
PEM
HGM Code
Acres Permanent Impact
Riverine
0
Acres Temporary Impact 10.05
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing
Impact Description
None
Additional Notes
Ln
z CD
0 0
= z
U U M
ili U w ti
Q ¢ o
U Q�
Cl) a
Q
z_
J
O
Q
U
_
cn o
H �w z
L) —)
Q V)° CO
a N a- E-
2 E-> -z
_j Of
a
w
ZO v w m
d ii z o
L) aaz
Oo m
to V FL °u
?� LUL
z_ o
J Ct)
w
0
z
w
Y
J
O
D_
."� REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
% METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 118
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

a
,P
`- -
f'
f
f _
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND N
LO
m o
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
z
J PARCELS
W
o
N
Q
o
I _
�- - STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
z
o
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
o
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEJ
_
Ln
w
Q
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
0
a
PERMANENTEASEMENT
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
W
TRENCHED
01
Wetland Crossing ID
WC12
Local Waterway
UT to Devils Fork
Longitude
82.382124°W
Latitude
35.350224°N
z
J
WAM Classification
Headwater Forest
Q
Cowardin Classfication
PEM
=
HGM Code
Riverine
o
Acres Permanent Impact
0
Q
w
N o w
Acres Temporary Impact0.03
z
JU
oo
Temporary ground disturbance /
Q
w LU w
trenched pipeline crossing
Q w M
Impact Description
U_
ii z o
� a a z
O
N o m
U FL.6
?, w z
z_ o
None
J C/)
o
Additional Notes
z
w
Y
J
0
D_
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 119
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

1 ,
1 ,
LEGEND N
LO
1 '
o
m o
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
z
_ J PARCELS
o
0
1
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS
,
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
z
LO
o
CULVERTS
O
o LO
1 ,
_
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
2
U)
z
LO
W
w
PERMANENT EASEMENT
0
a
1 ,
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATION:
1 ,
TRENCHED
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
1
,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
I ,
1 ,
Wetland Crossing ID
WD33
'
Local Waterway
UT to Cane Creek
Longitude
82.493242°W
z
' WD33
Latitude
35.422317°N
OWD01 '
J
WAM Classification
Headwater Forest
I I
Q
Cowardin Classfication
PEM
=
HGM Code
Riverine
w o
Q 'y o w
Acres Permanent Impact
0
Acres Temporary Impact
<0.01
�_ o }'^ j
1 ,
V O
U z Of
Temporary ground disturbance
Q w Z W
, '
Z 0 W m
O1 Q G
Impact Description
}, -
a z O
U a z
_
c` 1 11332
I
FL 06
Lu z
O
z_
1 '
None
w
,
o
1 1
'
Additional Notes
z
=
I
I ,
� ,
Y
, ,
1 ,
J
O
1
1 ,
a
1 ,
FEATURE WERE USING OF SUB -
FIGURE NO.
0
0 40 80 , ;
D BYA REGIISEEREDILAND SURVENED
NOT BEEN SURVEYEIONS
METERRRAC'CURACY, BIUTIHAVENAL
YOR. PITS LE
1
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY WILBROS. THIS MAP IS FOR
144
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET)
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

Appendix V:
Typical Stream and Wetland Impact Detail Drawings

DECK WIDTH FOR WIDEST EQUIPMENT
DECK MUST BE SEALED TO PREVENT
SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS FROM PUSHING
THROUGH THE CRACKS IN BETWEEN 1
DECK TIMBERS. 141
2.
ALL BRIDGES TO
Al L-1HAVE CURBS 6" OR
HIGHER TO CONTAIN
STRINGERS TO BE DESIGNED BY SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS.
AN ENGINEER TO SUPPORT
EXPECTED LOADS
SECTION 'A -A'
FOR INFORMATION ON BUILDING CRIBS 3
ROCK OR COARSE REFER TO FERC "LOG BRIDGE HANDBOOK", 1980
GRAVEL FILL l CURB
� LOGS TO HOLD GRAVEL
i SILLL OR LUG SIRINGER
BOULDER OR ROCK FILL
RIP -RAP TOE PROTECTION 4.
(WHERE NECESSARY)
LOG CRIB SUPPORTS _
POSSIBLE CONFIGURATION FOR
TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENT
TRENCH
OR
LOG
UNDISTURBED CREEK
THE FOLLOWING IS A SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION AND MITIGATION
MEASURES TO BE FOLLOWED AT ALL TEMPORARY BRIDGE CROSSINGS.
A PRE -FABRICATED BRIDGE OR FLATBED RAILCAR , FLEXI-FLOAT OR
FLUMED VEHICLE CROSSING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE TEMPORARY
BRIDGE.
INSTALL THE BRIDGE IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE SEDIMENT
ENTERING THE WATER. STRINGERS MUST BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE
LOADS EXPECTED ON THE BRIDGE. CURBS AT LEAST 6 IN. HIGH MUST
BE INSTALLED ALONG THE EDGE OF THE DECK TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT
AND DEBRIS ON THE BRIDGE. FASTENERS CONNECTING COMPONENTS
MUST BE STRONG ENOUGH TO HOLD THEM IN POSITION DURING THE
LIFE OF THE BRIDGE. CRIBS MAY BE FILLED WITH ROCK OR COBBLE,
OR MAY BE SOLID TIMBER ROTATED 90' IN ALTERNATIVE LAYERS.
RIP -RAP EROSION PROTECTION IS TO BE PLACED AROUND THE CRIBS
AND ON ANY FILL SLOPES PROJECTING INTO THE WATER.
ROAD APPROACHES LEADING TO THE BRIDGE MUST BE RAISED AND
STABLE SO EQUIPMENT LOADS ARE SUPPORTED A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE
BACK FROM THE WATER TO REDUCE SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ENTERING
THE STREAM FROM EQUIPMENT TRACKS. DO NOT USE SOIL TO
CONSTRUCT OR STABILIZE EQUIPMENT BRIDGES. IF CUTS ARE NEEDED
TO OBTAIN A SATISFACTORY GRADE, THEY ARE TO BE DUG WITH SIDE
DITCHES AND STABLE SLOPES. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP SEDIMENT ON LAND
(E.G., SILT FENCING, FILTER CLOTH, RIP -RAP, SEED AND MULCH, ETC.).
PERIODICALLY CHECK BRIDGE INSTALLATION AND REMOVE ANY BUILD-UP
OF SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ON THE BRIDGE.
BRIDGE LENGTH (40 FT. MAX.)
CURB
STRINGER LONG POLES
TO HOLD GRAVEL
BRIDGE PROFILE
LOCATE SO TRENCHING NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (TYP.)
DOES NOT
AFFECT BRIDGE ,; :,f •. y TEMPORARY BRIDGE
SILT FENCE- p m)
USE ROCK CORDUROY, OR COARSE GRAVEL
PLACED OVER A NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE,
SUCH AS SUPAC 8NP OR EQUIVALENT
BRIDGE APPROACH TOB TO FORM STABLE APPROACH ROADS
ADEQUATELY STABILIZED PLAN WHERE NECESSARY.
NTS
DATE: 9/15/2015
DRAWN BY: ELH
7335-15-005, PH 6
SET BACK A MIN. OF 6.5 FT.
(2m) FROM TOP OF BANK
(UNDISTURBED GROUND)
ENSURE ADEQUATE OPENING TO
ALLOW ANTICIPATED INCREASE IN
STREAM DISCHARGE (REFER TO
"SIZING OF WATER OPENING-)
TEMPORARY BRIDGE
���� TYPICAL DETAILS
PSNC ENERGY
T -001A REPLACEMENT
MULTIPLE COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE NO.
D1

20 -FEET MIN. DIFFUSER
1
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON
CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
SILT FENCE OR
WATTLES
WATTLE OR
EARTHEN BERM
SCREENED —
INTAKE
I /
1 1
I 1
I I
\
STREAM
FLOW
COFFERt7ATVr -
DURING CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING
20 -FEET MIN.
PLUG
20 -FEET MIN.
50 -FOOT CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
TRENCH
7. THE PUMP(S) SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONVEY NORMAL STREAM FLOW. HAVE STANDBY PUMPS AND GENERATORS CAPABLE OF HANDLING
100% OF ANTICIPATED FLOW ON-SITE IN CASE OF PUMP FAILURE OR A RAIN EVENT. CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR THE DAM AND PUMPS TO ENSURE
PROPER OPERATION THROUGHOUT THE WATERBODY CROSSING. ALL PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE
POTENTIAL FOR FUEL SPILLS.
8. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS SHOWN ON PERMITTED PLANS.
INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH
SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
9. LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS WITHIN 30, OF
TOP OF BANK.
10. STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" WITHIN 24 HOURS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE
MORNING TO ALLOW FOR 24 TO 48 HOUR INSTALLATION (OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL). CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM
SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE. INITIATE CONSTRUCTION ONLY AFTER CONFIRMING THAT INCLEMENT WEATHER IS NOT ANTICIPATED. LIMIT
DISTURBANCE TO STREAM BANKS TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL AND PER PERMITTED PLANS.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS, WETLANDS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON
THE DRAWINGS.
12. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED.
13. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM, TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED.
14. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
SPECIAL NOTES:
1. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY INSTALL THE CROSSING SHALL BE MOBILIZED
TO THE CROSSING SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CROSSING INSTALLATION. WHERE FEASIBLE, ONE DEDICATED WORK CREW
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS LISTED IN TABLE A
2. CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; WHERE POSSIBLE INSTALLATION AND
RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION
EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.
3. ALL CROSSINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE
MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY ANTICIPATED STORM WATER EVENTS DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.
4. ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS SHALL BE MONITORED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR (EM) FROM
THE INITIATION (PREPARATORY STAGES) THROUGH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION.
A) MONITORS MUST BE EXPERIENCED IN STREAM AND WETLAND CROSSING PROCEDURES, FAMILIAR WITH SITE
CONDITIONS, AND HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.
B) MONITORS SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO STOP WORK SHOULD CONDITIONS CHANGE AND ADDITIONAL OR
DIFFERENT MEASURES BE REQUIRED.
C) MONITORS SHALL ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING ONE INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING IN A
24-HOUR PERIOD. IF MORE THAN ONE OF THESE CROSSINGS OCCUR WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME, ADDITIONAL QUALIFIED
MONITORS SHALL BE USED.
D) INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING MONITORING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENT OVER OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL
INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITIES. SUFFICIENT QUALIFIED STAFFING SHALL BE RETAINED TO COVER ADDITIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION TASKS OCCURRING SIMULTANEOUSLY.
V
Z
U)
U)
w
U
a
W
w
U)
Z
O
Q
ca
G
11
Q
z
J
O
I- U
z=
W
Iwo
L.LJ U Z
Q
Z J
W a_ U)
z 2 Fz
U) Q
a 00
OU
I- W
J
a_
I --
F_
-
FIGURE NO.
D3
Lo
PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
p
CV
m
=
J
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Ltd
z
LLI
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES.
07
<
Q
cl
r)
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN
20 MIL HDPE LINER OR CLEAN STEEL PLATE DRIVEN INTO THE STREAM BANKS AND STREAM BED. USE SANDBAGS TO SHORE STEEL PLATE IF NEEDED.
CONTRACTOR MAY USE OTHER MATERIALS FOLLOWING APPROVAL FROM GAS COMPANY OR THEIR AGENT.
4. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4 + V WHERE H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK IN FEET WITH A 2 -FEET MINIMUM DAM
=
HEIGHT. ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
L
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
Cn
OZ
O
RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATER WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A SILT BAG PLACED ON APPROPRIATE E/SE MEASURE.*
I–
O
INSTALL SILT FENCE ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF SILT BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.
z
Ln
LU
6. SCREEN PUMP INTAKES TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE. PLACE PUMP INTAKE UPSTREAM OF UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. PLACE BYPASS
w
LU
LC)
HOSE OUTSIDE OF STREAM BANKS WITH DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM BEFORE COMMENCING BYPASS. TAKE MEASURESQ
O
M
TO PREVENT STREAMBED SCOUR AT PUMP DISCHARGE. TAKE REASONABLE MEASURES TO PREVENT INTAKE FROM SUCTIONING THE STREAM
U
0
�
SUBSTRATE.
U)
0-
7. THE PUMP(S) SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONVEY NORMAL STREAM FLOW. HAVE STANDBY PUMPS AND GENERATORS CAPABLE OF HANDLING
100% OF ANTICIPATED FLOW ON-SITE IN CASE OF PUMP FAILURE OR A RAIN EVENT. CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR THE DAM AND PUMPS TO ENSURE
PROPER OPERATION THROUGHOUT THE WATERBODY CROSSING. ALL PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE
POTENTIAL FOR FUEL SPILLS.
8. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS SHOWN ON PERMITTED PLANS.
INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH
SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
9. LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS WITHIN 30, OF
TOP OF BANK.
10. STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" WITHIN 24 HOURS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE
MORNING TO ALLOW FOR 24 TO 48 HOUR INSTALLATION (OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL). CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM
SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE. INITIATE CONSTRUCTION ONLY AFTER CONFIRMING THAT INCLEMENT WEATHER IS NOT ANTICIPATED. LIMIT
DISTURBANCE TO STREAM BANKS TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL AND PER PERMITTED PLANS.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS, WETLANDS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON
THE DRAWINGS.
12. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED.
13. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM, TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED.
14. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
SPECIAL NOTES:
1. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY INSTALL THE CROSSING SHALL BE MOBILIZED
TO THE CROSSING SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CROSSING INSTALLATION. WHERE FEASIBLE, ONE DEDICATED WORK CREW
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS LISTED IN TABLE A
2. CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; WHERE POSSIBLE INSTALLATION AND
RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION
EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.
3. ALL CROSSINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE
MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY ANTICIPATED STORM WATER EVENTS DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.
4. ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS SHALL BE MONITORED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR (EM) FROM
THE INITIATION (PREPARATORY STAGES) THROUGH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION.
A) MONITORS MUST BE EXPERIENCED IN STREAM AND WETLAND CROSSING PROCEDURES, FAMILIAR WITH SITE
CONDITIONS, AND HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.
B) MONITORS SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO STOP WORK SHOULD CONDITIONS CHANGE AND ADDITIONAL OR
DIFFERENT MEASURES BE REQUIRED.
C) MONITORS SHALL ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING ONE INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING IN A
24-HOUR PERIOD. IF MORE THAN ONE OF THESE CROSSINGS OCCUR WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME, ADDITIONAL QUALIFIED
MONITORS SHALL BE USED.
D) INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING MONITORING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENT OVER OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL
INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITIES. SUFFICIENT QUALIFIED STAFFING SHALL BE RETAINED TO COVER ADDITIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION TASKS OCCURRING SIMULTANEOUSLY.
V
Z
U)
U)
w
U
a
W
w
U)
Z
O
Q
ca
G
11
Q
z
J
O
I- U
z=
W
Iwo
L.LJ U Z
Q
Z J
W a_ U)
z 2 Fz
U) Q
a 00
OU
I- W
J
a_
I --
F_
-
FIGURE NO.
D3

20—FEET MIN
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON
CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
SILT FENCE OR
WATTLES
WATTLE OR
EARTHEN BERM
I I � 20—FEET MIN.
I 1
A Al 1
% 1
O
50—FOOT CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
STREAM
FLOW
DURING CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL FLUME STREAM CROSSING
Lo
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR
OP
AS SHOWN PLANS.
T
1
ui
!pili
m
,7777-1
OF BANK.
*
Lo
z
W
FLUME STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
Q
<
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
cl
cl
,.M,iORAR
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS,WETLANDS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON
THE DRAWINGS.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 20
12. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED,
=
MIL HDPE LINER. CONTRACTOR MAY USE OTHER METHODS FOLLOWING APPROVAL FROM GAS COMPANY OR THEIR AGENT.
14. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
4. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4 + V WHERE H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK WITH A 2' MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT.
SPECIAL NOTES:
ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
�
OZ
p
1. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY INSTALL THE CROSSING SHALL BE MOBILIZED
z
50—FOOT CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
STREAM
FLOW
DURING CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL FLUME STREAM CROSSING
7. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
Lo
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR
OP
AS SHOWN PLANS.
T
1
ui
�
m
J
OF BANK.
*
Lo
z
W
FLUME STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
Q
<
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
cl
cl
ca
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS,WETLANDS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON
THE DRAWINGS.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 20
12. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED,
=
MIL HDPE LINER. CONTRACTOR MAY USE OTHER METHODS FOLLOWING APPROVAL FROM GAS COMPANY OR THEIR AGENT.
14. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
4. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4 + V WHERE H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK WITH A 2' MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT.
SPECIAL NOTES:
ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
�
OZ
p
1. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY INSTALL THE CROSSING SHALL BE MOBILIZED
z
I
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
P
FOR PASSING ALL WATER WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A SILT BAG. INSTALL SILT FENCE ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF SILT BAG.
U
(DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE POTENTIAL FOR FUEL SPILLS.)
U-1
J
W
LU
c+D
RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN A24 -HOUR PERIOD. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION
Q
O
ch
6. INSTALL FLUME PIPE AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12 -INCHES OF COVER OR Y3 DIAMETER OF PIPE FOR FLUMES GREATER THAN 36 -INCH IN DIAMETER.
U
U)
w
D -
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SIZE FLUME PIPE TO ADEQUATELY ACCOMMODATE BANK FULL FLOWS. ALIGN FLUME PIPE(S) TO PREVENT BANK
J
EROSION AND STREAMBED SCOUR.
7. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR
AS SHOWN PLANS.
ui
S.LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS WITHIN 30' OF TO
OF BANK.
*
9. * STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" WITHIN 24 HOURS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE
MORNING TO ALLOW FOR 24 TO 48 HOUR INSTALLATION (OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL). CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM
SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE. INITIATE CONSTRUCTION ONLY AFTER CONFIRMING THAT INCLEMENT WEATHER IS NOT ANTICIPATED.
ca
10. DO NOT REMOVE FLUME PIPE DURING TRENCHING, PIPELAYING, OR BACKFILLING ACTIVITIES, OR INITIAL STREAMBED RESTORATION EFFORTS.
11. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS,WETLANDS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON
THE DRAWINGS.
12. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED,
i
i4
13. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM, TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED.
14. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
SPECIAL NOTES:
1. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY INSTALL THE CROSSING SHALL BE MOBILIZED
TO THE CROSSING SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CROSSING INSTALLATION. WHERE FEASIBLE, ONE DEDICATED WORK CREW
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS LISTED IN TABLE A
2. CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; WHERE POSSIBLE INSTALLATION AND
Q
RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN A24 -HOUR PERIOD. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION
z
EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.
J
3. ALL CROSSINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE
V
O
MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY ANTICIPATED STORM WATER EVENTS DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
Z
INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.
4. ALL INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN -CUT CROSSINGS SHALL BE MONITORED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR (EM) FROM~
U
THE INITIATION (PREPARATORY STAGES) THROUGH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION.
O
J
W T_
A) MONITORS MUST BE EXPERIENCED IN STREAM AND WETLAND CROSSING PROCEDURES, FAMILIAR WITH SITE
>_
CONDITIONS, AND HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.()
W
0 U Q
B) MONITORS SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO STOP WORK SHOULD CONDITIONS CHANGE AND ADDITIONAL OR
C�
W Q Z
DIFFERENT MEASURES BE REQUIRED.
Z JW
JW
ILJ
W
C) MONITORS SHALL ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING ONE INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING IN A
�,�J
Q
U
24-HOUR PERIOD. IF MORE THAN ONE OF THESE CROSSINGS OCCUR WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME, ADDITIONAL QUALIFIED
(IfF--
MONITORS SHALL BE USED.
(,�
U) Q
D) INTERMEDIATE -SIZED OPEN CUT CROSSING MONITORING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENT OVER OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL
V%
FL
d O O
INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITIES. SUFFICIENT QUALIFIED STAFFING SHALL BE RETAINED TO COVER ADDITIONAL
W
>-O
(..)
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION TASKS OCCURRING SIMULTANEOUSLY.
C
W
J
J
LL
J
FIGURE NO.
D4

L0
P
O [D
� J
Lf> z W
Lu
Q ry
cl r)
CD
20 -FEET MIN. � f / i � 20 -FEET MIN.
I I U
I — —
Z Oz I
P
w
Lu Lu
Ln
Q O c
U D_ (—
RIPARIAN SEEDING ARE ��� vy RIPARIAN SEEDING AREA U) D -
TO EXTEND A MIN. OF TO EXTEND A MIN. OF
10 -FEET LANDWARD r 10 -FEET LANDWARD
' W
SILT FENCE
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF 10 -FEET 10 -FEET 50 -FOOT CONSTRUCTION
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON MIN. MIN. EASEMENT
CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) 5-FEET5-FEET
'ca
MIN. MIN. POST -CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
� 7. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP REQUIREMENTS.
- LNC( w
PLUG 2. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
3. ONCE ORIGINAL STREAM BANK CONTOURS HAVE BEEN RE-ESTABLISHED, DISTURBED STREAM BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH RIPARIAN SEED
MIX (SEE RIPARIAN SEED SPECIFICATIONS), AND COIR MATTING. TEMPORARY MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM FIVE FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP OF
BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK. DO NOT INSTALL MATTING IN STREAM BED. RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL EXTEND FROM FIFTY FEET aG
LANDWARD OF THE TOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK. REFER TO TABLE 1 OF E&SC DETAIL FOR TYPE OF TEMPORARY MATTING TO BE
INSTALL COIR MATTING
INSTALLED AT EACH STREAM CROSSING.
��/
O [ 4. ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STREAM CROSSING ARE COMPLETE, EXTEND SILT FENCE ACROSS THE ENTIRE
COQ O/ EASEMENT ALONG THE TOP OF THE BANK AND PARALLEL TO THE STREAM.
�O7
/ 5. PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 -FEET IN
WIDTH.
1 1
20 -FEET MIN. 20 -FEET MIN. Fn
U) Q
O
STREAM \ CUC <
FLOW G U
Q J W=
Lu
INSTALL COIR MATTING Q }
(REFER TO TABLE 1) EXTEND TEMPORARY MATTING 5 -FEET LU
5 -FEET LANDWARD FROM TOP OF BANK (j J w U 0
Q
Z J
MIN. POST -CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING FIGURE 0 Q z � LU
V V U)Q?
FL P
Lei o OU
F_ Lu
(n J
SEE DETAIL Z d
5 -FE (MUM TEMPORARY MATTING
(SLOPES) j
BACKFILLED PROPOSED PIPELINE _ TPrf - raeUGrl_ _ F
— f 0
CROSS-SECTION d
POST -CONSTRUCTION
FIGURE NO.
D5

20 -FEET MIN
20 -FEET MIN
PRE -CONSTRUCTION
20 -FEET MIN
20 -FEET MIN.
FIGURE NO.
D6
OP
T
1
�
m
J
Lo
W
Lu
z
WETLAND CROSSING NOTES:ry
Q
cl
r)
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL
LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP
REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE
_
�-
WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS
WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES
L
WHEN STREAMS OCCUR WITHIN A WETLAND
Cn
O
OZ
COMPLEX.
z
O
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
1 --
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND
U
CROSSINGS PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBINGLC)
J
W M
(PRE -CONSTRUCTION).
0 co
U
D_ I-
4. INSTALL TIMBER MATS THROUGHOUT WETLAND
U)
0_
AREA AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10' LANDWARD
FROM THE EDGE OF WETLAND. CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLANDS WILL BE
CONDUCTED FROM TIMBER MATS. WHERE
CLEARING OPERATIONS OCCUR IN WETLANDS,
LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT WILL BE
USED AND MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL
PREVENTED IN AREAS BEYOND THOSE
FRUGTION PROTECTED BY TIMBER MATS.
NT 5. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE
PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS, WATERS OR RIPARIAN
AREAS. DEWATERING SHALL BE CONDUCTED
THROUGH SILT BAG OR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURE THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT AND OUTSIDE OF ANY WETLANDS
AREA.
6. SEGREGATE TOPSOIL WHEN STOCKPILING
EXCAVATED WETLAND SOIL. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE
STORED IN A MANNER TO MAINTAIN SEED BANK.
P,
REPLACE TOPSOIL AFTER BACK FILLING TRENCH.
7. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, WETLAND
CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL.
8. FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT
FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS.
9. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS
ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY WETLAND
CROSSINGS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE
SEED MIX (SEE WETLAND SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS). THIS SEED MIX WILL BE
Q
INSTALLED WITH A TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER
z
SPECIES AND WILL COVER THE DISTURBED
J
WETLANDS FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
o
EXTENDING TEN FEET LANDWARD.
ll�
10. DO NOT APPLY MULCH OR SOIL AMENDMENTS
C7
U
WITHIN WETLANDS.
Z
J
w =
US
WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES:
Vi Q
>_- �
O
� �o
Z
1. INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY
Q
LLjz J
SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. MAKE ANY
V
NECESSARY REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
Q J
ww
Q
uJ
U F -
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO
Z
ry
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THEQ
(�
z Q Z
NEXT RAIN.
J 0.
d P D
00 0
3. REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE AND UNSTABLE
SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO
Lu
~ LU
GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN
J
d
PROPERLY STABILIZED.
J
FIGURE NO.
D6

20 -FEET MIN.
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON
CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
WATTLE OR
EARTHEN BERM
20 -FEET MIN. —ir�-
-4, 1,
a 14
f 10' i
20 -FEET MIN.
WETLAND
PLUG
r
i;%i /j✓j=//i WETLAND Sk1BSOtL PILE
WETLAND TOPSOIL PILE
,
DURING CONSTRUCTION
PLUG
50 -FOOT CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
TRENCH
20 -FEET MIN.
WETLAND CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL
LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP
REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE
WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS
WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES
WHEN STREAMS OCCUR WITHIN A WETLAND
COMPLEX.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND
CROSSINGS PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING
(PRE -CONSTRUCTION).
4. INSTALL TIMBER MATS THROUGHOUT WETLAND
AREA AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10' LANDWARD
FROM THE EDGE OF WETLAND. CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLANDS WILL BE
CONDUCTED FROM TIMBER MATS. WHERE
CLEARING OPERATIONS OCCUR IN WETLANDS,
LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT WILL BE
USED AND MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL
PREVENTED IN AREAS BEYOND THOSE
PROTECTED BY TIMBER MATS.
5. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE
PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS, WATERS OR RIPARIAN
AREAS. DEWATERING SHALL BE CONDUCTED
THROUGH SILT BAG OR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURE THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT AND OUTSIDE OF ANY WETLANDS
AREA.
6. SEGREGATE TOPSOIL WHEN STOCKPILING
EXCAVATED WETLAND SOIL. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE
STORED IN A MANNER TO MAINTAIN SEED BANK.
REPLACE TOPSOIL AFTER BACK FILLING TRENCH.
7. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, WETLAND
CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL.
8. FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT
FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS.
9. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS
ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY WETLAND
CROSSINGS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE
SEED MIX (SEE WETLAND SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS). THIS SEED MIX WILL BE
INSTALLED WITH A TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER
SPECIES AND WILL COVER THE DISTURBED
WETLANDS FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
EXTENDING TEN FEET LANDWARD.
10. DO NOT APPLY MULCH OR SOIL AMENDMENTS
WITHIN WETLANDS.
WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY
SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. MAKE ANY
NECESSARY REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE
NEXT RAIN.
3. REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE AND UNSTABLE
SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO
GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN
PROPERLY STABILIZED.
r
� m
=
� J
Lo z W
6i Q
0
7ol
Ln
C2 0
z O Ln
C)
J W LOM
Q O M
U w I-
rn a
Q
Z
J
'^ O
V Q
Z U
V) J W =
ry
O w
� o
W U
(� Z �Z
J wwW
Z Q z ry
U
d Opo
W F- LLI
J
a_
I--
FIGURE
—
FIGURE NO.
D7
IIN
20 -FEET MIN.
WETLAND
PLUG
r
i;%i /j✓j=//i WETLAND Sk1BSOtL PILE
WETLAND TOPSOIL PILE
,
DURING CONSTRUCTION
PLUG
50 -FOOT CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
TRENCH
20 -FEET MIN.
WETLAND CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL
LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP
REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE
WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS
WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES
WHEN STREAMS OCCUR WITHIN A WETLAND
COMPLEX.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND
CROSSINGS PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING
(PRE -CONSTRUCTION).
4. INSTALL TIMBER MATS THROUGHOUT WETLAND
AREA AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10' LANDWARD
FROM THE EDGE OF WETLAND. CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLANDS WILL BE
CONDUCTED FROM TIMBER MATS. WHERE
CLEARING OPERATIONS OCCUR IN WETLANDS,
LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT WILL BE
USED AND MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL
PREVENTED IN AREAS BEYOND THOSE
PROTECTED BY TIMBER MATS.
5. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE
PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS, WATERS OR RIPARIAN
AREAS. DEWATERING SHALL BE CONDUCTED
THROUGH SILT BAG OR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURE THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT AND OUTSIDE OF ANY WETLANDS
AREA.
6. SEGREGATE TOPSOIL WHEN STOCKPILING
EXCAVATED WETLAND SOIL. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE
STORED IN A MANNER TO MAINTAIN SEED BANK.
REPLACE TOPSOIL AFTER BACK FILLING TRENCH.
7. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, WETLAND
CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL.
8. FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT
FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS.
9. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS
ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY WETLAND
CROSSINGS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE
SEED MIX (SEE WETLAND SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS). THIS SEED MIX WILL BE
INSTALLED WITH A TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER
SPECIES AND WILL COVER THE DISTURBED
WETLANDS FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
EXTENDING TEN FEET LANDWARD.
10. DO NOT APPLY MULCH OR SOIL AMENDMENTS
WITHIN WETLANDS.
WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY
SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. MAKE ANY
NECESSARY REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE
NEXT RAIN.
3. REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE AND UNSTABLE
SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO
GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN
PROPERLY STABILIZED.
r
� m
=
� J
Lo z W
6i Q
0
7ol
Ln
C2 0
z O Ln
C)
J W LOM
Q O M
U w I-
rn a
Q
Z
J
'^ O
V Q
Z U
V) J W =
ry
O w
� o
W U
(� Z �Z
J wwW
Z Q z ry
U
d Opo
W F- LLI
J
a_
I--
FIGURE
—
FIGURE NO.
D7

Appendix VI:
Agency Correspondence

ALT X_ WA
vL4*rA*
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory
Governor
Ms. Crystal Fox
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[e-mail]
Bryan Gossage
Director
February 10, 2015
RE: PSNC Natural Gas Pipeline - Line T01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-15-005, Phase 06
Dear Ms. Fox:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database shows several
records for rare species, a natural area, and conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
area. The proposed project area was analyzed by using the Geographic Inforamation System (GIS) line
data submitted with your request, buffered by 100 feet. The project area was then intersected with the
NCNHP database via the Natural Heritage Data Explorer(https://ncnhde.natureserve.or) to provide the
attached tables that show natural heritage resources documented within the project area and also
within a one -mile radius of the project area.
The locations of the natural areas and conservation/managed areas within and near the project area
may be viewed by accessing the Natural Heritage Data Explorer online map viewer, or by downloading
and using Geographic Information System (GIS) data; both options are available from the NCNHP Data
Services webpage (www.ncnhp.org).
Please note that occurrences of rare species documented within one mile of the proposed project area
increase the likelihood that these species may be present within the project area if suitable habitat
exists. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if
needed, particularly if the project area contains documented occurrences of rare species or contains
suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found during field surveys, the NCNHP would
appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database.
Thank you for your inquiry, and please feel free to contact me at [e-mail] or 919-
707-8629 if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
PSNC Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement Project - Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties
Project No. SAME#7335-15-005 Phase 06
February 10, 2015
NCNHDE-59
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Group
Status
2010-07-14
Current
Crustacean
31033
Cambarus johni
Carolina Foothills
2010-09-07
Current
S3
Crayfish
Crustacean
33500
Cambarus lenati
Broad River Stream
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
Crayfish
Crustacean
32836
Cambarus reburrus
French Broad River
3 - Medium
Crayfish
Freshwater
29692
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper
Bivalve
Rare
Freshwater Fish
5893
Erimystax insignis
Southern Blotched Chub
S2
eristigma
Freshwater Fish
32485
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
Freshwater Fish 32488 Etheostoma thalassinum Seagreen Darter
Vascular Plant 23867 Thermopsis mollis Appalachian Golden -
banner
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Last
Element
Observation
Occurrence
Date
Status
2010-07-14
Current
2010-06-08
Current
1997-09-16
Current
2010-09-07
Current
2005-08-25
2012-04-26
2010-07-14
2000 -PRE
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G3
S3
Rare
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G2
S2
Rare
3 - Medium
Species of
Significantly
G3
S3
Concern
Rare
3 - Medium
---
Threatened
G5
S2
Current
3 -Medium Species of
Significantly
G4TNR
S2
Concern
Rare
Current
3 - Medium ---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Current
3 - Medium ---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Current
3 - Medium ---
Special
G3G4
S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Site Name = Representational Rating Collective Rating
Cliffield Mountain/Upper Hungry River R4 (Moderate) C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Green River Game Land NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
Henderson County Open Space Henderson County: multiple local government Local Government
Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy Easement Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Page 2 of 8

Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at www.ncnhp.org. Data query generated on February 10, 2015; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2014. Please resubmit your information request if more
than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 8

Page 4 of 8
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
PSNC Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement Project -
Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties
Project No. S&ME#7335-15-005 Phase 06
February 10,
2015
NCNHDE-59
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project
Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Status
Arachnid
755
Hypochilus coylei
a Lampshade Weaver
1988-09-03
Current
4 - Low
---
Significantly
G3?
S3?
Rare
Bird
21622
Setophaga cerulea
Cerulean Warbler
2005-05-25
Current
3 -Medium
Species of
Special
G4
S2B
Concern
Concern
Bird
5035
Vireo gilvus
Warbling Vireo
2002-06-21
Current
4 - Low
---
Significantly
G5
S2B
Rare
Crustacean
31032
Cambarus johni
Carolina Foothills
2011-07-08
Current
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G3
S3
Crayfish
Rare
Crustacean
31033
Cambarus johni
Carolina Foothills
2010-07-14
Current
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G3
S3
Crayfish
Rare
Crustacean
33500
Cambarus lenati
Broad River Stream
2010-06-08
Current
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G2
S2
Crayfish
Rare
Crustacean
32836
Cambarus reburrus
French Broad River
1997-09-16
Current
3 - Medium
Species of
Significantly
G3
S3
Crayfish
Concern
Rare
Dragonfly or
33442
Calopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
2004 -PRE
Historical
5 - Very
---
Significantly
G4
S1 S2
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
33444
Calopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
2004 -PRE
Historical
5 - Very
---
Significantly
G4
S1S2
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Freshwater
29693
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper
2010-08-25
Current
3 - Medium
---
Threatened
G5
S2
Bivalve
Freshwater
29692
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper
2010-09-07
Current
3 - Medium
---
Threatened
G5
S2
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish
29521
Carpiodes sp. cf. cyprinusa Carpsucker
2010-05-19
Current
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
GNR
S2
Rare
Freshwater Fish
5893
Erimystax insignis
Southern Blotched Chub
2005-08-25
Current
3 - Medium
Species of
Significantly
G4TNR
S2
eristigma
Concern
Rare
Freshwater Fish
32485
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2012-04-26
Current
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish
32488
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2010-07-14
Current
3 - Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Page 4 of 8

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Group
Status
Rank
Rank
Observation
Occurrence
Game Animal
G5
S2
Low
Date
Status
Mammal
28617
Mustela nivalis
Least Weasel
2008-07-29
Current
Mammal
6492
Mustela nivalis
Least Weasel
1965-11-17
Current
Mammal
32130
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern Myotis
2001
Current
Mammal
32144
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern Myotis
1933-08-14
Historical
Mammal
32983
Spilogale putorius
Eastern Spotted Skunk
1982 -PRE
Historical
Natural
28200
Acidic Cove Forest (Typic---
---
2010
Current
Community
Low
Subtype)
Natural
5259
Chestnut Oak Forest (Dry---
G5
2010
Current
Community
---
Heath Subtype)
S5
6-
---
Natural
1597
Chestnut Oak Forest (Dry---
Unknown
2010
Current
Community
Heath Subtype)
---
---
G5
Natural
28202
Chestnut Oak Forest (Dry---
---
2010
Current
Community
---
Heath Subtype)
G4?
S4?
3 - Medium
Natural
30295
Chestnut Oak Forest
---
2010
Current
Community
G1
(Herb Subtype)
4 - Low
---
---
Natural
30121
Low Montane Red Oak
---
2010
Current
Community
Unknown
Forest
Natural
12739
Montane Alluvial Forest
---
1995-02-21
Current
Community
---
(Large River Subtype)
S3
Unknown
Natural
28854
Montane Floodplain
---
---
Current
Community
S3
Slough Forest
Natural
18098
Montane Oak --Hickory
---
2010
Current
Community
Forest (Acidic Subtype)
Natural
6166
Montane Oak --Hickory
---
2010
Current
Community
Forest (Acidic Subtype)
Natural
30120
Montane Oak --Hickory
---
2010
Current
Community
Forest (Basic Subtype)
Natural
30187
Montane Oak --Hickory
---
2010
Current
Community
Forest (Basic Subtype)
Natural
3491
Pine--Oak/Heath (Typic
---
2010
Current
Community
Subtype)
Page 5 of 8
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
5 - Very
---
Game Animal
G5
S2
Low
5 - Very
---
Game Animal
G5
S2
Low
5 - Very
PE
Significantly
G2G3
S2S3
Low
Rare
4 - Low
PE
Significantly
G2G3
S2S3
Rare
5 - Very
---
Game Animal
G4
S2
Low
3 - Medium
---
---
G5
S4
4 - Low
---
---
G5
S5
6-
---
---
G5
S5
Unknown
3 - Medium
---
---
G5
S5
4 - Low
---
---
G4G5
S4
4 - Low
---
---
G4?
S4?
3 - Medium
---
---
G2?
S1
3 - Medium
---
---
G1
S1
4 - Low
---
---
G4G5
S4S5
6-
---
---
G4G5
S4S5
Unknown
3 - Medium
---
---
G3
S3
6-
---
---
G3
S3
Unknown
3 - Medium
---
---
G3
S3

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element Accuracy Federal
State
Global State
Group
Observation
Occurrence Status
Status
Rank Rank
JW
Date
Status
Reptile 12809 Apalone spinifera
Eastern Spiny Softshell
1947-06-24
Historical 3 - Medium ---
Special
G5T5 S1
spinifera
Concern
Vascular Plant 25168 Dendrolycopodium
Prickly Ground -pine
1949 -PRE
Historical 5 - Very ---
Significantly
G5 S2
dendroideum
Low
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant 23935 Hackelia virginiana
Virginia Stickseed
1968 -PRE
Historical 5 - Very ---
Significantly
G5 S1S2
Low
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant 2641 Hexastylis contracta
Mountain Heartleaf
1986-05
Current 3 -Medium Species of
Endangered
G3 S1
Concern
Vascular Plant 5509 Orbexilum macrophyllum
Bigleaf Scurfpea
1899
Historical 4 - Low Species of
Special
GX SX
Concern
Concern
Historical
Vascular Plant 17819 Sarracenia jonesii
Mountain Sweet Pitcher
1987 -PRE
Historical 4 - Low Endangered
Endangered
G2Q S1
Plant
Vascular Plant 16561 Sisyrinchium dichotomum White Irisette
2001-06-17
Current 3 - Medium Endangered
Endangered
G2 S2
Vascular Plant 23244 Symphyotrichum laeve
Smooth Blue Aster
1936-10-07
Historical 5 - Very ---
Significantly
G5T5 SH
var. laeve
Low
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant 23867 Thermopsis mollis
Appalachian Golden-
2000 -PRE
Current 3 - Medium ---
Special
G3G4 S2
banner
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant 33379 Vandenboschia
Appalachian Filmy -fern
1953
Historical 5 - Very ---
Endangered
G4 S1
boschiana
Low
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name
Representational Rating
Collective Rating
Cliffield Mountain/Upper Hungry River
R4 (Moderate)
C4 (Moderate)
Mud Creek/Hickory Hill Floodplain
R2 (Very High)
C5 (General)
Walnut Flats
R3 (High)
C5 (General)
White Oak Mountain/Tryon Peak
R2 (Very High)
C1 (Exceptional)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Pro'eJ a
Managed Area Name
Owner
Owner Type
Buncombe County Open Space
Buncombe County:
multiple local government
Local Government
Green River Game Land
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
State
Henderson County Open Space
Henderson County:
multiple local government
Local Government
Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy Easement
Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy
Private
Page 6 of 8

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement NC DENR, Clean Water Management Trust State
Fund
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Easement NC DENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program State
Green River Game Land DNP NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at www.ncnhp.org. Data query generated on February 10, 2015; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2014. Please resubmit your information request if more
than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 7 of 8

IHDE-59: PSNC Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement Project - Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Cow
February 10, 2015 1:139,390
0 1 2 4 m
Project Boundary E) NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
I --I 0 1.75 3.5 7 km
Buffered Project Boundary E] Managed Area (MAREA)
Sources: Esri,HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
Natural Heritage Element Occurrence (NHEO)
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,
Page 8 of 8
so�f
4t a
;
714.
hi1:1`t�7F1z-
pw _..:_
�'�Y�I
X1111711 tt'
1
�..
ock`
a
:.:. ,.
:. :: 1d
z
_
.. . .. ..: ..
i:.: ...'. ;l
Roc
p - e
jkaLure
February 10, 2015 1:139,390
0 1 2 4 m
Project Boundary E) NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
I --I 0 1.75 3.5 7 km
Buffered Project Boundary E] Managed Area (MAREA)
Sources: Esri,HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
Natural Heritage Element Occurrence (NHEO)
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,
Page 8 of 8

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
August 25, 2015
Mr. Joey Lawler
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Subject: Federally Listed Species Assessment, PSNC Energy's (PSNC) Proposed 26 -Mile T-01
Gas Pipeline Replacement Project, located in Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk
Counties, North Carolina (S&ME Project No. 7335-15-005)
Dear Mr. Lawler:
On March 25, 2015, Mr. Bryan Tompkins of this office met with you (and representatives from
the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), North Carolina Division of Water Resources, and
PSNC) at a pre -application meeting held at the NCDENR office. In that meeting Mr. Tompkins
informed you of the potential impacts that the project could have on federally listed species. He
requested that surveys for federally listed species be conducted within suitable habitat areas
along the pipeline corridor. On July 6, 2015, we received a copy of your Protected Species
Assessment for the subject project. We have reviewed the information you presented and are
providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§4321 et seq.) (NEPA); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
According to the information that you presented, PSNC is proposing to replace about 26 -miles of
8 -inch natural gas pipeline with a 16 -inch pipeline. The pipeline replacement will extend from
Arden, North Carolina to Mill Spring, North Carolina. A majority of the pipeline replacement
will occur within the existing, maintained right-of-way. Installation of the new pipeline will
deviate from the existing corridor at three separate locations totaling just over mile in length. The

areas adjacent to the existing pipeline corridor consists of wooded areas, open fields, agricultural
areas, and commercial/residential/light industrial development. The pipeline replacement will
require numerous stream and wetland crossings and PSNC will be applying for a Nationwide
Permit from the Corps to authorize the impacts.
Federally Listed Species — According to the information provided, S&ME personnel conducted
surveys within areas of potentially suitable habitat for federally listed species known to occur in
Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties. Surveys and assessments were conducted over a
period ranging from March 2015 to June 2015. Though your letter indicates the proposed project
is "not likely to adversely affect" Appalchian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana), spruce fir moss
spider (Microhexura montivaga) Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus
coloratus) and gray bat (Myotis grisescens), all of which are currently listed as endangered
species, we believe these species will be unaffected by the proposed project and our concurrence
is not necessary. Surveys were conducted for the federally threatened swamp pink (Helonias
bullata), dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora), small -whorled pogonia (Isotria
medeloides), and Virginia spiraea (Spiraea virginiana), as well as the federally endangered, rock
gnome lichen (Gymnoderma lineare), bunched arrowhead (Sagittaria fasciculata), mountain
sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia rubra spp. Jonesii), and white irisette (Sisyrinchium
dichotomum). Although habitat was found to be present for these species, no individuals were
found to occur within the project area. You determined that the project "may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect" these species.
Habitat for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrianalis) was also
found to be present within the project area. Surveys for potential hibernacula (i.e. caves) for this
species were conducted. Several small openings were found but after further survey, it was
determined that none of the openings were suitable hibernacula and no evidence of past use was
observed. Though the project will require some tree clearing, tree clearing activities will be
conducted outside of the recommended maternity roosting moratorium of May 15 -August 15
except for some areas that will be cleared that are within 100 -feet of the existing pipeline
corridor. For these reasons a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination was also
made for northern long-eared bat.
We concur with your "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for the above
listed species. Further, we believe that a "no effect" determination is warranted for all other
federally listed species known to occur in Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk counties. Therefore,
we believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under
section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this
identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the
identified action.
Project Recommendations - We are concerned about the introduction and spread of invasive
exotic species in association with the proposed project. Without active management, including
2

the revegetation of disturbed areas with native species, project corridors will likely be sources of
(and corridors for) the movement of invasive exotic plant species. Exotic species are a major
contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to habitat loss. Exotics are a factor
contributing to the endangered or threatened status of more than 40 percent of the animals and
plants on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.a It is estimated
that at least 4,000 exotic plant species and 2,300 exotic animal species are now established in the
United States, costing more than $130 billion a year to control.b Additionally, the
U.S. Government has many programs and laws in place to combat invasive species (see
www.invasivespecies.gov). Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of Executive Order 13112 - Invasive
Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to "not authorize, fund, or carry out actions
that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of invasive species in the
United States or elsewhere." Despite their short-term erosion -control benefits, many exotic
species used in soil stabilization seed mixes are persistent once they are established, thereby
preventing the reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotic plants are also
aggressive invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing
already -established native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only species native
to the natural communities within the project area be used in association with all aspects of this
project. We also recommend that seeds for native plants that are beneficial to pollinators be
included in the seed mixes. We can provide seed list/mixes that accomplish both soil
stabilization and benefits to pollinators upon request.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions, please contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 240.
In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number
4-2-15-475.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
E -copy:
Mr. David Brown, US Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
aD.S. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in
the United States. BioScience 48:607-615.
bD. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous
species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65.
°Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found at http://www.tneppc.org/and http://www. invasive.org/eastern/srs/
(exotic wildlife links) on the Internet.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
April 21, 2015
Ms. Crystal Fox
S&ME
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28723
SUBJECT: Additional Comments on PSNC Line TO1 Pipeline Replacement Project
Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties
Dear Ms. Fox,
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) submitted comments on February
23, 2015 on the TO1 Pipeline Replacement Project. We also attended a scoping meeting in
Swannanoa on March 25, 2015. We offer the following additional comments regarding rare and
listed species and their habitats:
1. Cane Creek in Henderson County. As mentioned in our 2/23/2015 letter, Cane Creek
contains the Creeper [NC Threatened (T)], French Broad River Crayfish [US Federal Species
of Concern (FSC), NC Significantly Rare (SR)], and Southern Blotched Chub (NC SR). In
addition, it is habitat for the Eastern Hellbender (US FSC, NC Special Concern).
2. We recommend avoiding direct disturbance to rock outcrops, a priority habitat named in the
North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan, as well as the soils in the vicinity of these outcrops.
Protection of canopy cover/shading of rock outcrops will help conserve amphibian priority
species like green salamander. Removal of canopy/shading of rock outcrops will conserve
priority reptile species.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator, Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
February 23, 2015
Ms. Crystal Fox
S&ME
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28723
SUBJECT: Comments on PSNC Line TO1 Pipeline Replacement Project
Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties
Dear Ms. Fox,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your
January 27, 2015 letter about the T01 Pipeline Replacement Project. You requested records
relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species, protected/managed lands, conservation
easements, or high quality natural areas in the vicinity of the project corridor and
recommendations and comments in the interests of NCWRC. Our comments are offered for your
consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
PSNC intends to replace 26 miles of gas pipeline in or adjacent to existing easements. The line
crosses multiple streams in Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties in the French Broad and
Broad River basins. It crosses a number of streams with significant aquatic resources and
notable adjacent features, including the following:
1. Cane Creek in Henderson County. Cane Creek contains the Creeper [NC Threatened (T)],
French Broad River Crayfish [US Federal Species of Concern (FSC), NC Significantly Rare
(SR)], and Southern Blotched Chub (NC SR). It is also Hatchery Supported Trout Waters.
There is Henderson County Open Space adjacent to the river, as well.
2. Clear Creek in Henderson County. Southern Blotched Chub (NC SR) is found in Clear
Creek.
3. Little Hungry River and Hungry River in Henderson County. Both of these streams contain
wild Rainbow Trout and are Hatchery Supported Trout Waters.
4. Green River in Polk County. The Seagreen Darter (NC SR) is found in the Green River.
5. Ostin Creek in Polk County. The Seagreen Darter (NC SR) and Carolina Foothills Crayfish
(NC SR) are found in Ostin Creek.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

PSNC Line T01 Pipeline Replacement Page 2 February 23, 2015
Buncombe, Henderson, Polk Counties
Line T-01 crosses through the Cliffield Mountain/Little Hungry Natural Area, rated Moderate by
the NC Natural Heritage Program.
We have the following general recommendations:
1. Wetlands and streams within the site boundaries should be identified through on-site
surveys prior to any land disturbing activities. If wetlands and/or streams will be
impacted by construction activities, then the project should be coordinated with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources.
2. Avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands during construction. In addition to providing
wildlife habitat, wetland areas perform important functions of flood control and water
quality protection. Temporarily disturbed wetland areas should be returned to original
soils and contours, and reseeded with annual small grains appropriate for the season (e.g.
oats, millet, rye, or wheat) and should be allowed to revert to natural wetland vegetation.
3. Avoid or minimize stream crossings. Where the line does cross streams, the crossings
should be near perpendicular (75to 105) to stream flow. Disturbed stream banks and
wetlands should be restored to original contours and re -vegetated with native plant
species.
4. The directional bore (installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding impacts to the
stream and buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever
practicable. The open cut stream crossing method should be used only when water level
is low and stream flow is minimal.
5. Where new pipeline crosses streams containing Rainbow Trout, avoid in -stream work
during the trout spawning period of January 1 to April 15.
6. Avoid equipment maintenance in the immediate vicinity of streams, make stream
crossings as narrow as possible, minimize stream bank disturbance, avoid spraying of
herbicides, and cut woody vegetation so that stumps can resprout.
7. Sediment and erosion controls measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained.
Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic
resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of
gills of aquatic species.
8. If any right -of way vegetation maintenance work is performed a part of this replacement
project, we recommend that it generally be avoided between April 1 and October 1 to
minimize impacts to ground nesting birds.
9. Where feasible, work within the existing easement to minimize impacts to terrestrial
wildlife habitat. Avoid the removal of large trees at the edges of easement corridors. Use
woody debris and logs from any corridor clearing to establish brush piles and downed
logs adjacent to the cleared right-of-way to improve habitat for wildlife.
10. Re -seed all disturbed areas with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife; avoid fescue
based mixtures because fescue is invasive and provides little benefit to wildlife. Native,
annual small grains appropriate for the season are preferred and recommended. Allowing
the corridor area to re -vegetate into a brush/scrub habitat would maximize benefits to
wildlife. For areas adjacent to residential areas, a native shrub/grass option may be
beneficial.

PSNC Line TO1 Pipeline Replacement Page 3 February 23, 2015
Buncombe, Henderson, Polk Counties
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator, Habitat Conservation Program

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Barnes, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Muttz
July 20, 2015
Kimberly Nagle
S&ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: T-01 Pipeline from Arden to Mill Spring, Buncombe, Henderson, and Polk Counties, ER 15-0209
Dear Ms. Nagle:
Thank you for your letter of June 26, 2015, transmitting the archaeological survey report by S&ME for the
above project. The report meets our Guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior.
During the course of the survey, fifteen archaeological sites were located within the project area. For purposes
of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that archaeological sites
31HN296--31HN303 and 31PL73-31PL79 are not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places. These sites do not retain sufficient subsurface integrity or artifact density to yield information important
to history or prehistory.
S&ME has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this
project. We concur with this recommendation since the project will not involve significant archaeological
resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Appendix VII:
General Restoration Plan

GENERAL RESTORATION PLAN
Line T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Polk, Henderson and Buncombe Counties, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts where
practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan shall be
implemented to restore temporarily -affected wetlands and streams. This plan entails restoration
of temporarily -disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions to the degree
practicable upon project completion. No fills or spoils of any kind will be permanently placed
within wetlands or along the stream banks. Further, disturbed wetland areas and streambanks
will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover. The measures outlined below will
be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and restoration of
original pre -disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to the trench to the
extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an upland site. Excavated
topsoil will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then replaced uniformly over the area of
excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be
utilized within temporarily -disturbed streambanks and riparian areas (trout buffers).
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species Common Name Percentage of Mix
Chasmanthium (atifo(ium
River oates
20
E(ymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
20
Panicum anceps
Beaked panicgrass
17
Sorghastrum nutans
Indiangrass
15
Panicum rigidu(um
Redtop panicgrass
15
Arrostis hyema(is
Winter bentgrass
5
Chamaecrista fascicu(ata
Partridge pea
4
He(enium f(exuosum
Purple sneezeweed
2
Vernonia noveboracensis
New York ironweed
1
Monarda fistufosa
Wild bergamot
1
100
* Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending 25 feet landward. Recommended application rate: 20 lbs.
per acre
Substitutions to the species identified in Table 1 may be made based on availability and
approval of an S&ME Biologist.
S&ME, Inc. 19751 Southern Pine Boulevard I Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704.523.4726 1 f 704.525.3953 1 www.smeinc.com

General Restoration Plan
Line T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Page 2
The native seed mix identified in Table 2 below will be utilized within temporarily -disturbed
wetlands.
Table 2: Wetland Seed Mix*
Panicum rigidu(um
Redtop paniocgrass
35
Panicum anceps
Beaked panicgrass
23
E(ymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
20
Carex lurida
Lurid (Shallow) sedge
12
Juncus effuses
Soft rush
3
Scirpus cyperinus
Woolgrass
2
He(enium f(exuosum
Purple sneezeweed
2
Hibiscus moscheutos
Crimson rosemallow
2
Juncus tenuis
Path rush
1
Good germination; dies off
100
* Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed wetland areas. In the event of overlap, Riparian mix (Table 1) should be used.
Recommended application rate: 20 lbs. per acre.
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 and 2 should also be augmented with
the appropriate cover/companion species, as identified in Table 3.
Table 2: Cover/Companion Crons
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the Typical
Stream and Wetland Crossing Details.
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S&M E, Inc.
9711 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
704.523.4726
Contact: Joey Lawler, PWS
[e-mail]
S&ME, Inc.
Seca(e cereafe
Cereal or
Early Spring or
30 lbs/acre
Grows 3-4' tall, but not a
Winter rye
Fall
strong a competitor.
Lolium perenne
Perennial rye
Early Fall or
20-50%
Shorter rye; lasts about 2
Spring
years, then dies out.
Brown Top
Spring,
Good germination; dies off
Uroc(oa ramose
Millet
Summer
20-50%
with frost; does not tolerate
mowing.
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the Typical
Stream and Wetland Crossing Details.
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S&M E, Inc.
9711 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
704.523.4726
Contact: Joey Lawler, PWS
[e-mail]
S&ME, Inc.

General Restoration Plan
Line T-01 Pipeline Replacement Project
Riparian (ERNMX-304) and wetland (ERNMX-305) seed mixes are available at:
Ernst Seeds
8884 Mercer Pike
Meadville, PA 16335
800.873.3321
814.336.2404
http://www.ernstseed.com/
Local Suppliers of suitable alternative native seed mixes and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
688.527.1133
plants@ plantnative.net
SWE, Inc.
Page 3