20240084 Ver 1_Beaufort - CLNA 2023 Bridge Repairs PCN Br 9.80_20240108

PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) FORM
FOR
CAROLINA COASTAL RAILWAY INC.
2023 BRIDGE REPAIRS
1700 BLACK CREEK ROAD
WILSON, NC 27893
BRIDGE #9.80
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
3 JANUARY 2024
I:jN =1:7_1N=111:Y0
F D C E P.C.
IIFIRM LICENSE NO. � -4723
II

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PCN Form
PCN Form Section B3e Supplement
Topographic Map of Area
NCRS Soil Survey Map of Area
Bridge Repair Plans
FEMA Flood Map
USFW IPaC Results
Authorization Form

O '4411::� ^Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑X Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
CLNA 2023 Bridge Repairs - Bridge 9.80
2b.
County:
Beaufort
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Pantego
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Carolina Coastal Railway Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Alan Bridgers
3d.
Street address:
1700 Black Creek Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Wilson, INC 27893
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Drew Bessette
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
FDCE, P.C.
4d.
Street address:
19 Ocean Ave, Unit 5
4e.
City, state, zip:
Portland, ME 04103
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Drew Bessette
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
FDCE, P.C.
5c.
Street address:
19 Ocean Ave, Unit 5
5d.
City, state, zip:
Portland, ME 04103
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.607833 Longitude:-76.697856
1 c.
Property size:
acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Pentego Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C / SW, NSW
2c.
River basin:
Tar -Pamlico
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Bridge 9.80 Carolina Coastal Railway runs over Pentego Creek primarily along cultivated land: non -grow crops, hay and pasture land, and other
cropland, rotation or permanent pasture. The west and east ends of the bridge are surrounded by cultivated land, unmanaged herbaceous Cover, and
broadleaf deciduous forest land. South of the project is low density detached residential dwellings.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Perform necessary repairs to maintain the bridge in operable condition without load restrictions.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Attached Document.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
No wetland impacts due to construction.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
No stream and tributary impacts due to construction.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: o open water impacts due to construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6I. Comments: No impacts to the riparian buffer because no work will be performed from the ground or in the water.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Construction entails steel superstructure repairs. No work will be done that involves earth disturbance activities and no direct or indirect impacts are
anticipated to wetlands or streams.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
NCDOT Storm water Best Management Practices will be followed. Site access will be from the Railroad R-O-W. Work will be performed from the
bridge deck or scaffolding hung from the bridge deck. Material will be brought in via rail.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
A diffuse flow plan is not necessary because the project does not impact any riparian buffer, the work will
be done from the deck the bridge.
❑ Yes ❑X NO
of
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This
project does not require a Stormwater Management Plan because the entirety of the scope of work falls
within the natural drainage area
boundary and does not increase impervious surface area, the total built upon area is not changing. This project does not require activities that result in
fill,
dredging or excavation of waters or wetlands below the normal high water level.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Beaufort County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes 0 No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes 0 No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
0 Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes 0 No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes 0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NOAA fisheries resource was used to determine any impact. See supplemental information.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service Mapper and US Fish and Wildlife IPaC.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCState Historic Preservation office National register of historic places has no listings, Houses are listed as historic places on arcGIS tool provided on
ncdcr.gov. The closest historic resources are historic houses which the closest is 600ft+/- from the project site. Site will not impact any historical sites.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This project will have no effect on the 100-year floodplain. The drainage area of the bridge will remain the same.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Risk Map (https://msc.fema.gov/)
Drew Bessette
( `
01/03/2024
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form Supplement
CLNA 2022 Bridge Repairs
Bridge 9.80
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Section He
Describe the overall protect in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The bridge superstructure consists of rolled steel beams. One of the beams is heavily corroded over the
end support and requires repair. In lieu of replacing the entire beam, steel patch plates will be bolted on
either side of the beam web to restore the capacity. Steel plates will be fabricated in a shop and
delivered to the site. The contractor will drill holes in the existing beam web using the new material as a
template and install the patch plates using high strength bolts. All work will be performed from
scaffolding hung from the bridge deck.
A hi -rail boom truck will be used to install/deliver material from the deck of the bridge. Site access will
be from the railroad R.O.W. No direct or indirect impacts are anticipated. No earth disturbance activities
will take place.

PATMENT OF THE INT
`i US GS
U.S. DEU SRGEOLOGICAL SURV YERIOR
science for a changing world
-76.7500'
35.6250° 342000m E 43 44
The National Map
USTopo
45 46 47 48 49 50 51
PANTEGO QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA - BEAUFORT COUNTY
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
-76.6250"
52 35.6250'
3943000mN
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
3930000mN
35.5000 ° -76.7500°42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 352000mE
-76.6250° 35.5000°
Produced by the United States Geological Survey MN * SCALE 1 :24 000 ROAD CLASSIFICATION
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) O
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2 NORTH Expressway Local Connector 00
o�
1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 185 G ROLINA Secondary Hwy Local Road �
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be 10°25' 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000 Ramp 4WD
185 MILS
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government 0159" 1 0.5 0 1 rnth
� Y
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before 17 MILS MILES . Interstate Route US Route O State Route f1
entering private lands. 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 QUADRANGLE LOCATION N
oX
Imagery .....................................................NAIR, June 2016 - November 2016 FEET U)
Roads ......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH o (D
Names............................................................................GNIS, 1980 - 2019 1 Hoke
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET co U)
Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 1899 - 2018 1 2 3 2 Pike Road �
Contours ................... CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET 3 Pungo Lake
Boundaries ..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 2018
.........................National Elevation Dataset, 2015 U.S. National Grid �
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
100,000-m Square ID 4 5 4 Pinetown co O
5 Belhaven Z
Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1982 2010 This map was produced to conform with the 6 Bath LL
UE National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011. W
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.18 6 7 8 7 Ransomville pANTEGO NC Z Q
8 Pamlico Beach , V) O
Grid Zone Designation ADJOINING QUADRANGLES Z Z
1RS 2019
o '
Swindell
y
h 1$5 o 10 /
� o
r s
�10 of
� o
y o
f ^O
BR. 9.80 Bishops C ss
1 riS011,
Gaylord
STATE.RD 1621
Pj��EY i RID,DICK-RD
TERRA CEIA-RD
�L �1
�fo
,A A ,�
1 oti �F o 99
u► o _ � ��o 1 ' 10, ., .�, Q. �-4
s��„ 1 - low 10 dD
_A _ , „-�o
41"
�� 4M.
sr o
`1p 1° -
10 c10 - � 4.1.
IL U - 1J EEOHRi c
Pariteg
Asa _ �_ . .e- �0'
Rifo
de 10
a ul �I
10���OQ� by _ILL _ILL
Q� Q
C,
.0 � �
_ILL
-� �o _ILL NEC -KB .0 cow_ILL
10 _ILL
h 26 _ILL �-
_ILL _ILL
_ _ „_ Ingoes r _ - _ j
� ' _ 10 �Lzj S, .n (�5� 0��
ds_(r
n� �l �1 _`S� s �57 4.4. 4M.
��qq �5"�u "� S�Cs L_ 1 �
- - 'J G s � - � �c —
v_5 ,_ 5- O - - - - -
�5 m � �
4M.
\ y
-
/y/
_ILL \
6 _ILL _ILL _ILL _ILL
o
- - �
v _
_ /J/
� � 5
4M.
i \ /
aL em9
s, "`s„ h
i - y o
I >;, � ems„ ,5
s
ma _4z_
- u L - 64 5, Oddfellow
_ _ -
_44_� - �� - Stotesber C
- = - „ 1Point
BYP
41,
L`15- � � _ �1 <D Co RD nsl 5
s
�75 � y'- - e
� o `>S � � o � 5' „—` � 0'
� C dar Point IV
.,, -
c'0­10 s� _ $roa Five Pin s - aYe
y y, Belh�a�v�e
�0 Fluhardt Island
n �o
�
o,u Io3
4 Point
_114 o
� P iti
FREE UNION CHURCH RD 10� "-` . , \ 0,10 y - ._4L ntego C'ee% sT
61
Q,4yao Cedar Island Gum Point
4.1.
O �
4:1. -
E "-` _ .moo �• �a2O „-`., .,_ 4.14. 99-
�L ��
81 lve _
_� hj., b y` �� d •�Q� - ,u . �=Point
ems,_, �_ E
L
Yeatesville p �� - s
_ - - - -
Hell-S amp`
NW. 00
ems, 5' _1
-4-- - 4M 4M
-
9 _44
cps p .�, h y` IL
- .4 "\ . �'- —_y - - -
y= a✓ _ 1 - Tr�eee Point
_�LL 01 � 5 ch ,5
-
a0S cl
. 4, 5� F
_44_ - V -\_1 4.M. W _ 99 y �5)
- _ � 4 s G
h�s Windmill
./ 5=y, �Ly
�
L, '�` Point
L
-41
1p 5 _ „` $� " SNARE RD 90 ` A Norflick
,�PUNGO CREEK'RD\TN �11fi < Shore
a A
10/ -
_W S1nith ,r 5 -- S�55,
BISNOP RD , "-� 5
S71"72i/jl
s
PP m
�p
Spady Point ToP G RD-
x
riD �10 v 5 -----• _ yJ�h �� - = l� The Nar ows�
" HOSE-
_ Graveyard -Point Arc bell / Ro ,5
1,RRUNDDR FOREMAN EN 5 % �� Pad t - ... 5 E 1 �5

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Beaufort County,
North Carolina
December 1, 2023

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface.............................................................
How Soil Surveys Are Made ...........................
SoilMap...........................................................
SoilMap ........................................................
Legend..........................................................
Map Unit Legend ...........................................
Map Unit Descriptions ...................................
Beaufort County, North Carolina ................
Ap—Arapahoe fine sandy loam .............
Ds—Dragston fine sandy loam ..............
Me—Muckalee loam, frequently flooded
Pt —Portsmouth loam .............................
Ro—Roanoke fine sandy loam ..............
Sb—Seabrook loamy sand ....................
To—Tomotley fine sandy loam ...............
References.......................................................
.2
..5
.8
..9
10
11
11
13
13
14
16
17
19
20
22
25

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
a
�o
345800 345900 34600D 346100 346200 346300 346400 346MO
35° 36'39"N
8
N
N
K
tb
35° 36' 14" N
345800 345900 346D00 346100 346200 346300
Map Scale: 1:5,390 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
` Meters
N 0 50 100 200 ?00
Feet
0 250 500 1000 1500
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
9
346600 346700 346800
346400 346500 346600 346700 346800
a
�o
346900
g 35° 36' 39" N
N
N
8
tb
35° 36' 14" N
346900
N
a

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Iwo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
�i
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
A.
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
�-
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Water Features
scale.
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
E F
Rails
measurements.
. 0
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Beaufort County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 26, Sep 13, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 20, 2020—Nov
29, 2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Ap
Arapahoe fine sandy loam
24.4
16.1 %
Ds
Dragston fine sandy loam
1.7
1.1 %
Me
Muckalee loam, frequently
flooded
18.4
12.1 %
Pt
Portsmouth loam
0.7
0.5%
Ro
Roanoke fine sandy loam
13.4
8.8%
Sb
Seabrook loamy sand
8.8
5.8%
To
Tomotley fine sandy loam
84.7
55.7%
Totals for Area of Interest
162.0
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Ap—Arapahoe fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r22
Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Arapahoe, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Arapahoe, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Arapahoe, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats, depressions
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam
Bg - 17 to 30 inches: fine sandy loam
BCg - 30 to 42 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Arapahoe, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats, depressions
Down -slope shape: Linear
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam
Bg - 17 to 30 inches: fine sandy loam
BCg - 30 to 42 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ds—Dragston fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3r31
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Dragston, drained, and similar soils: 45 percent
Dragston, undrained, and similar soils: 40 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dragston, Drained
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loamy fine sand
E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 10 to 42 inches: sandy loam
2Cg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY04ONC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY04ONC -
Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Dragston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loamy fine sand
E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 10 to 42 inches: sandy loam
2Cg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ecological site: F153BY04ONC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY04ONC -
Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Portsmouth, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F153AY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Nimmo, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F153AY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Me—Muckalee loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r3j
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Muckalee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Muckalee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 24 inches: loam
Cg - 24 to 80 inches: sandy loam
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153AY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Pt —Portsmouth loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3r3v
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Portsmouth, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Portsmouth, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Portsmouth, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy fluviomarine deposits over sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches: loam
Ag - 12 to 18 inches: loam
Btg - 18 to 34 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 34 to 38 inches: sandy loam
2Cg - 38 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153AY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Portsmouth, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy fluviomarine deposits over sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 12 inches: loam
Ag - 12 to 18 inches: loam
Btg - 18 to 34 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 34 to 38 inches: sandy loam
2Cg - 38 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153AY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ro—Roanoke fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3r3z
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits and/or fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam
BEg - 8 to 13 inches: clay loam
Btg - 13 to 58 inches: clay
Cg - 58 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Ecological site: F153BY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY065NC - Wet Clay Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits and/or fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam
BEg - 8 to 13 inches: clay loam
Btg - 13 to 58 inches: clay
Cg - 58 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Ecological site: F153BY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY065NC - Wet Clay Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Sb—Seabrook loamy sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r45
Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Seabrook and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Seabrook
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
C - 8 to 81 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY02ONC - Moist Sands, F153AY02ONC - Moist Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Nimmo, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F153AY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Leon
Percent of map unit. 1 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Ecological site: F153BY07ONC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY07ONC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
To—Tomotley fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3r4d
Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Tomotley, drained, and similar soils: 75 percent
Tomotley, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tomotley, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on stream terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg1 - 7 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg2 - 12 to 42 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 42 to 50 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 50 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153AY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Tomotley, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg1 - 7 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg2 - 12 to 42 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 42 to 50 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 50 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153AY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Nimmo, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: F153AY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Arapahoe, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flats, depressions
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Ecological site: F153AY09ONC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY06ONC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
24

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
W

m
A
03 A pAO' 7m.1 I p m _ O
� N � .TJ
O U 0 O
t
OJ
O O
I
"
D
m© i,
o g(
t O
S i �
I Z r
\I g ® O
8 n
W � z
OJ
6
� N C7
� � D
o000 00000w➢��m��m C/)
zzzzzzzz
cn m m - �•� D
° o
7-1
A
m zo
D
O
r D Z �T
� V
D D
o
° O
m �
� D
z
z �
�T
V
SD

zz
om
OZ
O z
„<, cam
cn
O
� m
O Z O
z D
B O A
z�
O C J
= C
��
➢ f' l U O D
D
on
Z� n
o c'
o
O O
D D
z O
O
➢ O O
D
D D
�
o
O
o D
D?
O D z
m
m e
r
Oz m
z v D
D t n
m C
D
O D
< A
O
I
m D C
D m
A
C
O
O
A z A
OmA
mm
�
C�
o
Im•, D
� {
O
D
O
m
o 0
D O
O
�
➢ O z D
Z � z m 0
O
A
D D
CJ
m
m
O
\
{ C7
O
C
O
D
m
A
O w n
A v
o
-
a
ti
m
mo
InD
=O
zO y➢< A rm mz
A
�
FO
=m
D4J0
D D�
z0
D Dr
D „„„
n�-
m-
D
r-i m
zmmN oo
Dcno
D D
mo
oo�
AZD
'no
-mD
O
<➢
A
O
G� D
A
T I z z m
Oz� z
m z
r�i
D
m z
OC>OZO m
A O z v
�
- O
N O
O
m 0
'D
A D V l
rz Zm
m z
mO
=
0 0
➢ n
DZ
Z O
C n
z m
_�
Nm
z n D
mzmNO
O�D
Dr
oA�Z OD�ODO
ZO �
O�j C
CJ�
t7mD
OO
A
Am
O
n
� �AZO
ZAm
AO
~_Dtiz�00m OA
O � Z
-m �
A
mO
Z�@
A�
Z{r
�NO
ln<
ACO
N
<
mD
O
D A
C �
� D D
➢<z
[nm
tiT O DC
A
m
A
mA
�
Um
-
A <m
=
N m
-Z➢ln
-
Dz
m�DD
N
DDO
�Zz
zD
N
OZ
D O m
o~OO
mDm��
zmD
OOD
mZ
��'
ODtn�ZOz
mD
O 0
��
�D O
o~O
��
OO
O
mO
O
O<C
=
_
D
Z r�i O �
CJOD
m 00
zJ�O
�
Z
C>A
O�CJ� D O
�_ �,O nz
�m
m � O
AZ
�
zm
G>
DOO
A
In z0
mZlm
OO A
m➢
Sl
� vmi
O
�
D
r
m
m D Z o
0 o
m
z A 0 A n D N
Z
O
A
Z
D
O
D O
O
O
D
O
m
➢
�
- - m
-
O ~ = m n O m
� D
�
D
D = �
�
�
Z
m0
AO�A
O �
n�
➢
O
0�0 �vtii 00
mzJA -m0
m
m O
m N
D
m0
AO�
Az
O
DOD
D
Z
O
D
r-
w ti
m
o
z
➢ o 0 0 0
A
N r ti
0
➢ A D
OCJ r
-
A
fTl
0 0 0 0
D ti
VJ �
Z
o m z
�
v' z o o s
� ➢D A A
n A A m m A c»
CJOrO<
z
o A m o z D
z" z
— O
z z
ti D< D
NN
O
ANDm
ANCJ yDDr
;;o
mm o0 m�
Gi
A o NA
mOn
n
Aoz
fTl
N
m
�m ��
z
oD
Z
o
c
c�
z➢ �� �o� D
Dm ��
�m�z m D
z AAA
zo ➢
o�D
zr`iOANAmD
omz
Am D
A� m r
�N nA
�
c z vmi
�in�Am�
A➢c>
z
D o➢ �D
fTl
�A�
m� zv�Au�Do
�A�o�oiA
o�nAA
mmri oc>Am
�D"zAo
c➢c O
.Z7
m c- z A c A
<�0
c�D mzz AD
➢A
o o�
z �➢z m� o
zoi
o� m �D
- 0
o
oA m0
ch
=gym
OD oo D
zoozmm
<oz`"�z
m�ZD
AD�m�
m r;��0
oDmco
DOAn�
m
o~ o
o C7
�D oo "'
m➢
mo=_
N
moo
oo �o
oz
zz
Z
C7
_�
z`^
m
N zAo� o
O
�mz���„
�Oz=��
OzoADo
�"z�
Woos �_A
v�i�0
oo�m o
O
Dm= Cn
�'n,-,
➢
Fl
` _ z ` c>
��
m
o z c��
mD
O
<m D < <
��zm
Dz=o�
oc�o �ozD
Ao�A
77
c�
AD m��=D
mom,
➢cn
o
�zDADD
o
� �n� n
mc>m
nn oz C7
�
y
o<
z A
➢�� ��
o
Ac»
„o �m
�0
cziv
ozo
m zm
��
A
A"zAA
D�oAczmm
m`"caAA
ADnn ovmi l=-,
„o Aoo
noA Z
O
oDA
D�o
���D
AAocm
mo
Cn
m O
� m
� m
�
D O
O G_-J A D
C� m D A 0
m
A D A D
r
A O m m
D D O A ti
O➢ A
� m N
D
�➢
� (n
�
A � O
z D
O P
00
A
m0
m�
O - Z
z m{ m D
m m�
o O� A Z _D
ZA➢DmmA
O
Nm-
< r
mODr
DmC
N c>
A D D m�
D� OAC�
c�OmDA D
� T y O
ODAO 0
DZti
A
A r 0
c��z
➢ { o
N z
O
r=i0
z
cn z
m_<
A A O z0 A
m�
mD
NZAO
mOmo
00 -
=zA z�O
D�
�zr z
rO�l? �
A O z
�
O O o
D
A o
Om
0 0
O Z
A
A
o
� A
z v O D n
O➢m
O o O r
00 ��
y o m
~ADDVZi �
D v 0 o O
m N
cn'�
m o o
o
m
z D
D
z
A
D
ti
c
A A
z D m=
O
O
O J A
D
o
O
O - r- m r m
S O
_ m <
= r m 0 � om
r A
o m m m
O
O[ n
� A „\\IIIIIIIIIIIII/ll,
in m ^7 M N'_
m
N
_
m
D—D=� ➢ —
�owDDom
O➢ mm
i��� D�
m0
<D
A D m0
<0
C �D OD
00 ocA� oDm
tnC
O T
AA m
m A
➢—
A A ^r Gi
Aoo m-
z
�2�000�
nD ➢- z
z� �o
zu�
c A
z- z
��� mDzE
o�
m
o
-
vmi
oA
��
m
<
D
m A m
o z oD
�ooz v�D= A� A
oT,z�'�{umi
omi
o➢ ors,
m➢Flo
m�z�o m
D D
m
W
� cu
Im-, c�oAm nN
�Dm�➢ �0
0
0� �m
oDoo ouzo nDo
A
�m�
ADS
mc�
c�A
D
m z c
o z D o
m
m o
A �nm A
m zz D
umi�
z mz
mol;�z
mD=Ammo z
o z
mvni
-
z
o - O
vni ino � mD r;
NA = AA
m�
�
m�lw
m
- z �
n n
U] D N m
A
mc
=
m
o
A
O
m o Z
D m
<
00
D
--IAJ 0 Do ti�
p� m
O� —�
O ti m O C m
C SSA �on y m00
c ID
AA
— m < D
m I Z —
m m t n➢
O m � Z J O D A
D
C J
O�
m- 0
� D O
� o
oA0 Z yD I
0 m0
z
D � C� Z
ti
Z
�
Om ��
�C o
AO�O=➢ � �A
cDnA
� O
m
�
zo
m
mo
z
m �
D
m
D
m� m m
O
m T'zz
ri—\ri➢
o
D�
O
c7
ADO Z� m
I � tiVJA OF:
m
Z� �
ON➢Z�Zz V] m
�
A
A�
m0
O
z Z D
m
� m O
cn y� A A D �� A
O cn O A cn N
`= mn
m
GJ O A
�� z~mi � D C D D z D
o
➢�
D D z
D
D z A
Dom o
D
ZO r D
D
A
m
J z y D m
A m�=ozm
D
AD
oz
76
O
�D m
m
Or NDCDl1mO Z I
N D Z A� -
�� =
A�� OZO �➢D
O
D
Gr
=
O
A O <
N CJ z In D
Z� ZJ D �O O
o
� A �
➢
m 0
➢
� � A
A
_�
O
CDAO Z
ND G> mD =
C
O
Z D
DDODz� o zw
D O
O
m
A
D
m m
�n r z z =
� Om
A O D
z
= m
�
z A D A I N
- D <�D
=
`�
D
<A
=0
D o _
�
m m
D
<ti mUJ -
�
➢
D mm�
_
=
A
A N D Z� D
O O
Z
Z ➢
O m O m I rrt m
�
cn N
m
Oz � J
m
A� o� 2O o< ACD
o0
oA�
z�oz
zm� z� �mz�
coN
o0 0
➢ �o�
oz
�zz
�� cow AD n
m �',n� ��m tom
oD�
r ➢_�°
O m o 0
now
��z
mzA �A ��r�
ADv�
z��
`n
�� _
� n�_�
�,n
" _
io n" �� �
z DA Dm D zo m zm a
rom
oDc
cam muzi
my �?mm �
m�z
Ac�
r
�z➢
0� or'zc� o➢
Z
DA
OoDm
DAn
`cr"n'A�moomzno
mo c>
oA
mz=oz
o
o
�A
zE
Az r in N m
o o � m
�
=n
o � �� o�� "<' �� 0 o
zE
< o om
Dz�
m�A
m�z
r ��
oD�➢
oA A �zD z
c'
mn
m-m
A��
o v➢i
r
=
n�
�A
om
�<,
r wo r-i
o�Dc
D - � A
m oz `'
Om
oD mom
N
mr
� o
zoD
or
o
m
DmDr;
o= mA� � Oc�
�o,zo
�z, U'<➢
c0 c'mD n
v'
A
D
m
�
n � o o in
z Ao � �� o m o A z
A D r-,
mA
D➢zm
➢m
mz
m
D
~o �
O
o m
m
r n�o o
_, D S O o
o m
oz �'="_'
_o=oA
F1 2
o c� Ao �m Do
oNz
ADc<i
z o"S' Am-
°'�
A
N ➢
o
o
�
=A
-o cn� `°
c m Am Nw o m
-�D
v�o
oA
m�o
i�
r
D
Az
D
o mono
z
o A� �
on
��
mc>�
�i?
�o
O
�
n A
�`�
➢
� n
m
m
z �z
o oo m
oz
Ao
<
zm
z o D
A�
-
-
o
0 o c> �c� c>
�➢
mzn�
m
Dm � z
mm
��
'"' mo
� � m
�
_
„
Dz
m m
D
Ll m
z D
m
<<
- n
z o o
o�
�
-
< o
0
<�
o D o
�
➢ o D�
� �
CAROLINA COASTAL RAILWAY
NO.
DATE
REVISION
BY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
FDCE, P.C.
lip,
I / 99 OCEAN D, M SUITE 5
POM LICENSE
NO C-47 3
FIRM LICENSE NO. C-4]23
GENERAL NOTES

W
z
�
m
-
W
O
\
\
�
\
-
O
\
o
m
m
m
-
o
r
-
m
W
m
O
D
N
0
0
n
A „\\IIIIIIIIIIIII/ll,
m
a
a
O O O O
OO O O
d O O O
m
V7
m
W
m
r
E�
O
n o A
oczn�
r, o
-0
�A
O
n O U
mmA
zJ�
D
<
O
mZ
zxD
z
o On
Duo
A
m
Dzo n
o"'�,_ mom,
ND n N
r In
v cn
o
r n
�
� °J �
�
o
m z
zo c� z
EE
m
z<
n
CAROLINA COASTAL RAILWAY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
2023 BRIDGE REPAIRS
BELHAVEN SUB. BRIDGE #9.80
SCOPE OF WORK
NO. I DATE
REVISION
BY
L
TRACK
BENT 1
BENT 2
BENT 3
BENT 4
BENT 5
n
BENT 6
BENT 7
BENT 8
BENT 9
FDCE, P.C.
III wil
/ 99 OCEAN D, M SUITE 5
POM LICENSE
NO C-47 3
FIRM LICENSE NO. C-4]23

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMette *FEMA
76o42'11"W 359643"N
I.V,VVV
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
SPECIAL FLOOD Wit
hBFE orDepthZoneAE,AD,AH,Ve,Aa
HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile Zonex
Future Conditions 1% Annual
4 '- Chance Flood Hazard Zonex
"Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes. Zonex
" Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NOSCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES IIIIIII Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
e zo.z Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
a - - - Coastal Transect
—sfa— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER
_ Profile Baseline
FEATURES
Hydrographic Feature
Digital Data Available AN
El No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS
El Unmapped
QThe
pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 12/1/2023 at 2:49 PM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data overtime.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Basemap Imagery Source: USGS National Map 2023

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction
in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Beaufort County, North Carolina

Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
[phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
r\
21bA(3
I 01?41b.

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. C�
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
ku 16

1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are
regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Red Wolf Canis rufus E a er
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/37
Red Wolf Canis rufus EXPN
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/37
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
fi
Birds
NAME STATUS

Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Rufa Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Endangered
Threatened
STATUS
SAT
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
\ N\
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas 4001, Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Endangered

Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Insects
IU111 II
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Sensitive Joint -vetch Aeschynomene virginica
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/855
1hkkA
,O
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATU
Endangered
Threatened

Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on all above listed species.
Bald &Golden Eagles
okm
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act' and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or golden eagles, or their
habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as
described below.
Additional information can be found using the following links: t
• Eagle Mana ment —https://www.fws.gQv/pro -many ement
— ram/ea le
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-
incidental -take -migratory -birds - 4�
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.ptf or 9 %ftw
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-
migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
21kh- \ 0 %

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
Probability of Presence Summary PWW-,V6A4\
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area.
This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make
sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report. P
Probability of Presence (■) w % \ V
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have
higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is

the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys.
To see a bar's surveyeffort range, simply hover our mouse cursor over the bar.
g - pY Y
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
f
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse. Ib
■+ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB APR y
Non -BCC CI Vulnerable 1111 MAR II 1111
JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
IIII - - -- ---- IIII Mill 111L 1111
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKIN data is based on a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the
10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in

that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid
Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that
may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator
(RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office if you have questions.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats3 should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:

• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing=
incidental -take -migratory -birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-
migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation
Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds
on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a
guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the
general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models
detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information
about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly
interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. -%
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
\0*%k�
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.

Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area.
This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make
sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have
higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is
the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
bw- X�J

3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. 00
Survey Timeframe 04
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse. "%W
SPECIES JAN
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
Chimney Swift ___
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed _
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide D(CON
ok probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
FEB p APR MAY JUN
II�YdI
IEr-ri�Nll IIII 1111
��-' i 1111 IIII 1111
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
IC_
---- ---- ---- ----
'--- ---- ---- -111 1111 1111 1111 II -- ---- ---I ----

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding
in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see
when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your
project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that
may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator
(RAIL) Tool. %J %P_
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
or
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your
location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in
your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area,

there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed
in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy
development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects * N \
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project
area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps
through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. or -
What if I have eagles on my list? _AOF L �khj
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur. FV
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of
birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at
the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low
survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is
simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they
might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in
knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be
confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or
minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.

Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1 /4Ad
RIVERINE
RSUBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
%
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional
information on the NWI data is provided below.;
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in
polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.

Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any
Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
0<\
r\
21bAC)
I 01?40A-

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS:
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
Carolina Coastal Railway, Inc.
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Drew Bessette, P.E.
, of
(Contractor / Agent)
FDCE, P.C.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
1700 Black Creek Road, Wilson, North Carolina 27893
(252) 237 - 8259
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: 0 7 0 8 00 QQ- Date: