20140820 Ver 6_Mitigation As-Built Plans_20240109

Summary of Comments on CarrawayBluffAsBuilt_DWR
Review.pdf
Page: 3
*Number: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:37:00 AM
What is the status of the DMS project? This should always be provided in an asbuilt report where the bank is set up adjacent to a DMS project.

Page: 5
QNumber: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:38:18 AM
as a general comment, this should be worded "riparian restoration" for buffer mitigation and or nutrient offset. the term "buffer" should only be
used to describe restoration within the "Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Neuse buffer which is only the first 50'.

Page: 6
QNumber: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:39:42 AM
What was the purpose for needing supplementing planting, additional easement signage, livestaking, etc which are described in this paragraph?
QNumber: 2 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:41:57 AM
the AsBuilt report always needs to reference the DWR site visit for the Task 2 credit release where DWR provides an onsite inspection to confirm
site is compliance with the approved Plan. the Report needs to also indicate what was done as a result of that DWR site inspection.
What was the result of the asbuilt inspection performed by DWR and include any and all correspondence related to that site visit in your response.

NOT TO
I. ELI$AaETH ANDTURNER AS A DULY REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE pF
`
NORTH CAROLIN . CERTIFY THAT THIS BUFFER MAP
WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF
YHAT THE
WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE ;LOW
EASEMENT BOUNDARY IS BASED ON PLAT 80OK SEE
PG NOTES RECORDED IN WAYNE COUNTY REGISTER
• x.—x x x
OF DEEDS OFFICE, AND THAT THE BUFFER AREAS
SHOWN ARE CALCULATED FROM AS�LIILT
CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE HATED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 31sI DAY OF
MY 2023
I
-i-1-I-I-I
171
ELISABETH G TURNER. PL.6-*L.4MO
_ SEAL
=[n A L-4440 a x5
=r
Si1RN•'Ji
IICI
5EE SHEET 2 FOP,
GEN ERAI NOTES
Riparian Buffer Credit:
M FT.
Acres
Streams & Ditches
27,573
0.633
Riparian Restoration
T1
6,185
0.142
=
0'-100' (Subject)
Riparian Restoration
184,330
4.232
101'-200' (Subject)
Riparian Restoration
155,811
3.577
0'-100' (Non -Subject)
Riparian Restoration
110,231
2.53
(Nan -Subject)
31'-200'
Nutrient Offset 4
90,688
2.082
0'-100' (Subject) _
N utrient Offset
308,932
7.092
101'-200' (Subject)
N utrient Offset
100,811
2.314
0'-100' (Non -Subject)
N utrient Offset
74,138
1.702
101'-200' (Non -Subject)
N utrient Offset
172,140
3.952
0'-100' (Non -Subject, Ditch)
N utrient Offset
196,707
4.516
101'-200' (Non -Subject, Ditch)
Riparian Preservation
25,273
0.58
0'-100' (Nan -Subject)
Riparian Preservation
10,532
0.242
101'-200' (Non -Subject)
No Credit
17,959
0,4123
Total CE Area
1,481,311
34.006
yx • x •x ^ x•ex • r�
xY x�yx x x�•x �x•R ."w"iW ►�'�
Ixxxxxx
I x x x
x x -p
x x
Ix • . W " . y . " .
x x f W
LINE LEGEND: _ 8x ;:
—GE—CONSERVATION EASEMENT BANK - ITi x �i "
—PROPERTY LINE -' I =T' ` x x r " " CARRAWAY
'�� I I�i'i' x
-----------TOP OF BANK (BY OTHERS) y r . a I I , ! I x x xx w CREEK
T
CONSERVATION L
EASEMENT pM5 . I I xxX.x .1.'
�� 1 x x
-I-I
fr I—TTT±Tr- x x
i
7'1­115 MAP 15 1"30T FOR
RECORDATION, 5AL.E5, OR
CONVEYANCt75 AND DOES NOT •'__�-----
COMPLY WITH G.5. 47-30 f -`
MAPPING REQUIREMENT5.
i-�-I-
-l-3
r
x x a
x 1
-'-' MATCHLNE TDB tvv'r+rW
—xxx • �\
250' 0' 250'
I r' SCALE: 1 inch - 250 Feet (11 x17)
i
o
r
w
AS -BUILT SURVEY OF BUFFER AREAS FOR
CARRAWAY BLUFF PH II MITIGATION SITE
P.O. BOX 145
5WANNANOA, NC 26778
I 1W4iW [phone]
N
�
$Inp
OWR Prgect No. 2014.0820 V6 NEUSE RIVER BASIN
w .rc5.u5
S
N
�''
BRpGOEN TOWNSHIP WAYNE COUNTY NORTH CA1iOL1NA
F-142b
a11
0

Page: 10
QNumber: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:48:26 AM
while "Subject vs Non -Subject" is correct and luckily works for this specific project, it should say "Stream -Subject" and "Stream-NonSubject" since
you do have ditches too. keep this in mind for future surveys
QNumber: 2 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:43:13 AM
i will accept this survey this time. but make sure future surveys have a little more information - see comments
QNumber: 3 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:46:27 AM
since there isn't a bolded title here for "Nutrient Offset Credit" like there is above for "Riparian Buffer Credit", the survey should have split these up
to "Nutrient Offset Credit". moving Riparian Preservation up to Riparian Buffer Credit.
QNumber: 4 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:52:44 AM
whilejust saying "Nutrient Offset" luckily works for this specific project and i understand what is being referred to, this would not suffice for other
projects or if reviewed by others in DWR. It should say "Riparian Restoration" instead of "Nutrient Offset", or "Riparian Enhancement", etc. When
dividing the table up by RBC at the top (like it is currently shown) and then by dividing the rest into "Nutrient Offset Credit" (which is not shown
but is a comment i have made on this survey above", we would know that all these "Riparian Restoration" areas are devoted to Nutrient Offset
Credit. Just saying "Nutrient Offset" can lead to missing important and relevant information needed to compare with the corresponding Project
Credit Table and Credit Map. For future, make sure that the mitigation activity "Restoration, Enhancement, Cattle Excl, or Preservation" is how the
survey depicts yoru credit areas.
QNumber: 5 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:44:49 AM
this needs to be explained in the Text of your AsBuilt report .... some of this is for non -diffused flow but the rest? Explain where the 17,959 and why
it's "no credit" area.

Page: 12
QNumber: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:58:21 AM
Mitigation activity is missing from the map. Revise the figure to tell me what the mitigation activity is for each color (Riparian restoration? Riparian
Enhancement?, etc). Make sure to keep the "Riparian" in the naming of the activity. The project credit table has a column titled "Mitigation
Activity". This needs to match with this Figure in all AsBuilt Reports.
It should say on the legend:
Riparian Restoration for RBC or
Riparian Restoration for NOC or
Riparian Preservation for RBC, etc....
You can also get creative on how you display this in the legend. it could just say
Riparian Buffer Credit and then all the colors representing RBC or then listed as
"Riparian Restoration..." or "Riparian Preservation" and then you wouldn't need to say ...."for RBC" or "for NOC". but as the legend is currently
depicting your credit areas, my first comment is based on the current layout you have.

Page: 13
QNumber: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:59:30 AM
credit table is accurate. just keep in mind the comments made on Figure 3 and on the signed Survey to make sure your future asbuilt reports are
done correctly

U
U

Page: 19
QNumber: 1 Author: kymerritt Subject: Sticky Note Date: 1/9/2024 9:36:18 AM
Which culvert is this? Isn't it along one of the streams? if so, this culvert appears to be perched in elevation, thus hindering the flow of the stream
and impacting aquatic life passage. this culvert needs to be inspected for compliance and confirmation provided to DWR. It is suggested that the
provider contact the Washington Regional Office to have an inspection of the culvert installation for compliance. If deemed to be not in
compliance, this culvert will have to be fixed.