20191403 Ver 1_Bohemian_100108_MY4_2023_20240111

Year 4 Monitoring Report

Bohemian Mitigation Project
FINAL
DMS Project #: 100108 | Contract #: 7863 | DWR # 2019-1403 | RFP: 16-007703

Randolph & Guilford Counties, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
Randleman Lake Watershed
HUC 03030003
Prepared By:
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
For Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC

Prepared For:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services

January 2024

3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612

Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400

res.us

January 4, 2024

Jeremiah Dow
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

RE: Bohemian Mitigation Project: Year 4 Monitoring Report (NCDMS ID 100108)

Listed below are comments provided by DMS on November 21, 2023 regarding the Bohemian
Mitigation Project Draft Year 4 Monitoring Report and RES’ responses.

1. Figure 2 – Please show the area of 2023 easement encroachments as polygons on the 
map. Additional encroachments along MA5 were observed during the site visit. 
Encroachment polygons have now been added based on the site walk conducted on 
11/16/2023. 
2. Several corners did not have witness posts. Please verify corner monuments/survey caps 
and ensure a witness post is located at each corner throughout the easement. All 
witness posts should have a Conservation Easement sign attached unless located in a 
fenced area. Signage can be located on the corner fence post in lieu of the witness post 
when fenced, but a metal witness post must still be located inside the fence line and 
approximately 6” to 1’ inside of the corner monument (rebar). 
RES will work to remedy any easement corners that did not have adequate signage in 2024. 
Based on prior communication regarding witness posts around fence corners, “Anytime a 
treated wooden round post is located within 3 ft of the corner we appreciate the clean marking 
by using that same post.  No need to add the extra marking.  The requirement is to have a 
physical marking devise that can be used to help locate the in the ground monumentation.  If the 
fence were located 10 ft away then we would absolutely require the corner to receive the extra 
above ground witness.” The fence posts at Bohemian should currently be sufficient. 
3. Based on observations during the site visit, some of the replanted encroachment areas from 
last year were either missed during replanting, or had high mortality. DMS recommends 
adding more containerized trees to these areas. 
RES has now replanted these areas with supplemental container plantings to offset 
encroachments and provide species diversity and vigor. 
4. Table 6 – some columns have superscripts. Should there be footnotes below the table? 
No this is a mistake on our end left over from data processing. Column superscripts have been 
removed. 
5. Please add details of completed supplemental planting to Appendix B, i.e, species, 
size (1 gallon, 3 gallon, etc.) and number planted. 
A supplemental planting table has been added in appendix B that details the 
supplemental planting work done in MY3 and most recently of December 2023.  
i
Table of Contents

1 Project Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description ....................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria ....................................................................... 2
1.3 Project Components ................................................................................................................................ 3
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach ............................................................................................................. 4
1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions .............................................................................................. 4
1.6 Year 4 Monitoring Performance.......................................................................................................... 4
2 Reference .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Appendix A: Background Tables and Site Maps Table 1: Buffer Project Areas and Assets Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3: Project Contacts Table Table 4: Project Background Information Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 5: Plant Species Summary Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Easement Repairs and Supplemental Planting Photo Log Planted and Volunteer Stem Field Data Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bohemian Mitigation Project 1 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Project #100108 January 2024
1 Project Summary

1.1 Project Location and Description

The Bohemian Project is within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin within
the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030003, 14-digit HUC 03030003010050 and DWR Sub
Basin Number 03-06-08.

The Project is located in both Guilford and Randolph County, approximately 5 miles east of
Archdale, North Carolina (Figure 1). To access the western portion of the Project, head east from
I-74 on NC Highway 62 W, turn right onto Groonetown Rd, after approximately 1.5 miles the site
will be on the left. To access the eastern portion of the Project, head east from I-74 on NC Highway
62 W, turn right onto Frazier Farm Rd, after approximately a half mile, the site will be on the left.
The coordinates for the western portion of the project are 35.914 °N and -79.884 °W. The
coordinates for the eastern portion of the project are 35.912 °N and -79.873 °W.

Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental
Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Monitoring Report for the Bohemian Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Project (Project) as a full-delivery buffer mitigation project for the Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) (DMS #100108). This Project provides riparian buffer mitigation credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape
Fear River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC –
03030003) (Figure 1). The Project is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rule 15A NCAC
02B .0250.

The conservation easement of the Bohemian Project totals approximately 22.78 acres and is
divided into two distinct sections (east and west) and includes seven unnamed tributaries that
ultimately drain into Randleman Lake approximately 3,000 feet downstream of the Project. Land
use within the western portion of the Project was primarily cropland and disturbed riparian forest
with the presence of invasive species. Land use within the eastern portion of the Project was
primarily actively grazed non-forested pasture and disturbed riparian forest with the presence of
invasive species. Furthermore, livestock have historically had access to all stream reaches within
the eastern portion of the Project. The lack of riparian trees and the long-term presence of
livestock in those areas contributed to bank instability and erosional rills within some riparian
zones.

The goal of the Project is to restore, enhance and preserve ecological function to the existing
stream and riparian buffer by establishing appropriate plant communities while minimizing
temporal and land disturbing impacts. Restoration of a native hardwood forest to the riparian
buffer and surrounding areas and the removal of livestock aid in filtering runoff from agricultural
fields, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to Project channels and the overall
watershed. Restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Randleman Lake riparian buffer (as
defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0250) results in a reduction of the water quality stressors that affected
Bohemian Mitigation Project 2 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Project #100108 January 2024
the Project: livestock access and a lack of a vegetated and/or protected riparian buffer. Immediate
water quality benefits and pollutant removal within the vicinity of the Project include the exclusion
of livestock access to streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land-uses. This
Project is consistent with the management strategy for maintaining and protecting riparian areas
in the Randleman Lake watershed. Project attributes are summarized in Table 1.

1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria

Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Riparian vegetation
monitoring is based on the “Carolina Vegetation Survey-Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Protocol for Recording Vegetation: Level 2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2”. Monitoring plots were
installed a minimum of 100 meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted
mitigation area. These plots were randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer
mitigation area (11.81 acres) and are representative of the riparian restoration and enhancement
areas where applicable (i.e., when enhancement credit is being generated from supplemental
planting under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)). The following data is recorded for all trees in the plots:
species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are flagged with
flagging tape. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of
each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners.
Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. There are 10 fixed
vegetation monitoring plots (Figure 2).

Photos are to be taken at all vegetation plot origins each monitoring year and be provided in the
annual reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are
being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Project are the
survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50
percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 stems per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer
species may be included to meet the performance standards as determined by NC Division of
Water Resources (DWR).
A visual assessment of the conservation easement is also performed each year to confirm:
 Fencing is in good condition throughout the site (if applicable).
 No livestock access within the conservation easement area.
 No encroachment has occurred.
 No invasive species in areas were invasive species were treated,
 Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
 There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that
would negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.

Bohemian Mitigation Project 3 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Project #100108 January 2024
Component/
Feature
Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Vegetation Annual
vegetation
monitoring
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive
plant species shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any
vegetation requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with
NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation
maintenance activities will be documented and reported in annual monitoring
reports. Vegetation maintenance will continue through the monitoring period.
Invasive and
Nuisance Vegetation
Visual
Assessment
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. Locations of
invasive and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Project Boundary Visual
Assessment
Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure a clear distinction
between the mitigation project and adjacent properties. Boundaries are marked
with signs identifying the property as a mitigation project and will include the
name of the long-term steward and a contact number. Boundaries may be
identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed
by Project conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers
disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as-
needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance will
continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Road Crossing Visual
Assessment
Road crossings within the Project may be maintained only as allowed by
conservation easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or
corridor agreements. Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility of the
landowner to maintain.
Livestock Fencing (if
applicable)
Visual
Assessment
Livestock fencing is to be placed outside the easement limits. Maintenance of
fencing is the responsibility of the landowner.

1.3 Project Components

This Project generates 484,526.585 riparian buffer restoration credits on existing non-forested
pasture, 72,168.500 buffer enhancement credits through livestock exclusion, and 21,958.800
buffer preservation credits. The restoration and preservation adjacent to the ephemeral Reaches
Sa and Ma4 comprises 39,071 ft2 (0.9 acres) of the Project, which is in compliance with 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o)(7) in that it is only 4.3 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation, which is less
than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation (22.10 total acres). In accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4) and (5), “the area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall
comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation”, only 5.04 acres out of the
6.97 total acres available for preservation credit are allowable to be used to generate mitigation
credits. The total mitigation credits that the Bohemian Mitigation Project generate are
summarized below and a more detailed table is in Appendix A.

Mitigation Totals Used Area Square Feet Credits
Restoration 514,428 484,526.585
Enhancement 144,337 72,168.500
Preservation 219,588 21,958.800
Total Riparian Buffer 878,353 578,653.885
Bohemian Mitigation Project 4 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Project #100108 January 2024

1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach

Restoration activities included planting a composition of native bareroot tree species based on
reference reach data and excluding livestock from the stream and surrounding riparian area. The
restoration of plant communities within the Project not only provides stabilization and improves
water quality within the easement limits but also provides ecological benefits to the entire
watershed.

Enhancement occurred in forested areas within the Project, found in small patches along SQ1,
SQ2, and a small portion of Sa, where grazing occurs adjacent to the stream in accordance with
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). All livestock was removed
from the easement and the fence was installed to exclude access to riparian areas and their
associated streams.

Preservation was used along Reach MA1, MA3, MA4, and MA5 in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5). Mature hardwood forest is
present on the right bank of MA1, on the left and right bank of MA3, on the left and right bank
of the most downstream portion of MA4, and on the left and right bank of the most downstream
portion of MA5.

1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions

Revegetation of the Site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bareroot
trees. Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Piedmont
Alluvial Forest is the target community type for the riparian restoration areas. The community is
defined by Schafale (2012). The planting of bareroot trees occurred in May 2020. Deviations from
the initial planting plan were due to bareroot availability. A list of the planted species can be found
in Table 5. Additionally, a temporary and permanent seed mixture was applied in areas where row
crops were present. Among a variety of seed, the mixture also included black-eyed susan
(Rudbeckia hirta) which is a perennial, pollinator species.

1.6 Year 4 Monitoring Performance

Monitoring of the 10 fixed vegetation plots was completed on September 21st, 2023. Vegetation
tables are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. Year 4 monitoring data
indicates that all plots are exceeding the success criteria of 260 planted stems per acre. Planted
stem densities ranged from 364 to 1012 planted stems per acre with a mean of 668 planted stems
per acre across all plots. A total of 17 native species were documented within the plots. Volunteer
species were found in eight plots, averaging 356 volunteer stems per acre. The average tree height
observed was 4.5 feet. Field data collected in MY4 including tree height, vigor, and DBH can be
found in Appendix B.
Bohemian Mitigation Project 5 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Project #100108 January 2024

Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous
vegetation is well established throughout the project. Invasive species including Chinese privet,
and multiflora rose were noted along the wood lines of the downstream crossing of MA1. This
area was treated in December 2022, however, will need to be treated again to reduce resprouts.
Fencing is in good condition and maintains cattle exclusion. All MY3 areas of encroachment have
been addressed through a combination of using additional posts, horse tape, witness posts and
easement signage. There has been two new encroachments (~450ft2) near MA5 where mowing
has encroached into the easement. The easement line will be filled with additional posts and
placards at this during the winter of 2023/2024. Horse tape will be strung between posts in the
mowed area of encroachment and RES will be in contact with the landowner to reduce further
impacts on the easement. Supplemental planting for MY3 encroachment areas occurred on March
8th, 2023, at areas of previous encroachment, these areas have not been encroached into further.
Additional supplemental planting occurred on December 14th, 2023 to address these new
encroachment areas and to provide additional species vigor and diversity. Easement
Encroachment and supplemental planting locations can be found in Figure 2 while photographs
of work completed and a summary of supplemental planting table can be found in Appendix B.

2 Reference

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation
Program Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.

NC Environmental Management Commission. 2010. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0250 – Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers.

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (2020). Bohemian Mitigation Project – Final Mitigation
Plan.

Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Appendix A
Project Background Tables and Site Maps
Table 1. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Credit
Type Location Subject? Feature Type
Mitigation
Activity
Min-Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Total Area
(sf)
Creditable
Area (sf)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer
Credits
Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0-100 433,768 433,768 1 100% 1 433,768.000
Buffer Rural Yes I / P
Enhancement via
Livestock
Exclusion
0-100 144,337 144,337 2 100% 2 72,168.500
Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101-200 43,951 43,951 1 33% 3.0303 14,503.845
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 36,031 36,031 1 100% 1 36,031.000
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 678 678 1 33% 3.0303 223.740
Credit
Type Location Subject? Feature Type
Mitigation
Activity
Min-Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Total Area
(sf)
Creditable
Area (sf)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer
Credits
Rural Yes I / P 0-100 291,884 219,588 10 100% 10 21,958.800
Rural Yes I / P 101-200 9,494 0 10 33% 30.30303 —
Buffer No Ephemeral 0-100 2,363 0 100% —
219,588
25.00%
4.20%
Feature Name
MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5,
SQ1, SQ2
SQ1, SQ2, Sb
MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5,
SQ1, SQ2, Sb
Sa, MA4
Sa, MA4
Totals 658,765 658,765 556,695.085
Eligible for Preservation (sf) 219,588
Preservation Area Subtotal (sf)
Preservation as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation
Ephemeral Reaches as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation
Feature Name
Buffer Preservation
MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5
MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5,
MA4
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 3 yr, 6 mo
Number of reporting Years1:4
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or Deliverable Complete Delivery
Restoration Plan NA Jan-20
Final Design – Construction Plans NA NA
Stream Construction NA NA
Site Planting NA May-20
As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline) May-20 Jun-20
Year 1 Monitoring Nov-20 Dec-20
Year 2 Monitoring Nov-21 Nov-21
Invasive Vegetation Treatment NA Dec-22
Easement Repairs NA Nov-22
Year 3 Monitoring Oct-22 Nov-22
Easement Repairs NA Feb-23
Supplemental Planting NA Mar-23
Year 4 Monitoring Sep-23 Oct-23
Supplemental Planting NA Dec-23
Year 5 Monitoring
1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Bohemian Site
Planting Contractor H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC Matt Hitch
Nursery Stock Suppliers Arborgen
Monitoring Performers RES / 3300 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Monitoring POC Daniel Dixon [phone]
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Bohemian Site
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030003
Physiographic Province Southern Outer Piedmont
Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name Bohemian
County Randolph & Guildford
Project Area (acres) 22.78
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)Latitude: 35.914 N Longitude: -79.884 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)11.81
Project Watershed Summary Information
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030003010050
DWR Sub-basin 03-06-08
0 2,0001,000
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Bohemian Mitigation Project
Guilford and Randolph Counties,North Carolina
Legend
Conservation Easement
Randleman Lake Service Area
©Date: 5/19/2020
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: JRM
Document Path: R:\resgis\dropboxgis\projects\NC\Bohemian\MXD\7_Monitoring\MY0\Figure 1 - Site Location - Bohem
ian.mxd
1 inch = 2,000 feet
35.914, -79.884
M A 1
Sb
M
A4
S a
M
A5
MA3
S
Q
2
SQ1
MA1
1
2
3
4
6
5
7
10
9
8
©
0 400200
Feet
Date: 1/8/2024 Drawn by: DGD
Checked by: RTM
Document Path: R:\Resgis\Projects\NC\101737_Bohemian\MXD\7_Monitoring\MY4\Figure 2 - CCPV MY4 - Bohemian.mxd
Figure 2
Current Conditions Plan View
MY4 2023
BohemianMitigation Project
Guilford and RandolphCounties, North Carolina
1 in = 400 feet
Legend
ConservationEasement EncroachmentsEasement FixedSupplemental Planting Zones2023Stream Top ofVegetation
>260Buffer Mitigation
Restoration, 0-
Restoration, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
Restoration, 101-
Restoration, 101-200'(Ephemeral)
Enhancement, 0-
Preservation, 0-
Preservation, 0-100'(Ephemeral)
Preservation, 101-
Vegetation Condition Assessment
AbsentPresentMarginal
Absent
Present
Target Community
Invasive Species
No Fill
Easement Encroachment to be Repaired
Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 5. Bohemian Planted Species Summary

Table 6. Bohemian Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

Plot # 
Stream/ 
Wetland 
Stems Volunteers Total 
Success 
Criteria 
Met? 
Average 
Stem 
Height (ft) 
1 445 0 445 Yes 1.71 
2 526 324 850 Yes 2.40 
3 728 1416 2145 Yes 5.86 
4 526 40 567 Yes 12.48 
5 567 202 769 Yes 4.22 
6 850 0 850 Yes 4.00 
7 364 324 688 Yes 3.33 
8 890 769 1659 Yes 3.51 
9 1012 121 1133 Yes 4.33 
10 769 364 1133 Yes 2.78 
Project 
Avg 668 356 1024 Yes 4.46 

Common Name Scientific Name Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 2,200
Chestnut Oak Quercus montana 1,900
Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor 1,500
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 1,500
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 1,000
Southern Red Oak Quercus falcata 1,000
Black Walnut Juglans nigra 600
Red Mulberry Morus rubra 500
Black Cherry Prunus serotina 450
White Oak Quercus alba 400
Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis 350
11,400Total
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data

Supplemental 
Planting Table  
Species Species Size Quantity
Planted MY3
Quantity
Planted MY4
White oak 
Quercus alba
3 gallon 65 94 
  1 gallon   
Red mulberry 
Morus rubra
3 gallon 35 36 
  1 gallon 30   
Swamp chestnut 
oak Quercus
michauxii
3 gallon 18 3 
  1 gallon 47   
Southern red oak Quercus falcata 3 gallon 65 94 
  1 gallon   
Sycamore Quercus falcata 3 gallon 7 
  1 gallon   
River Birch Betula nigra 3 gallon 6 
  1 gallon   
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 3 gallon 102 
  1 gallon   
  Total 260 342 

  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 7. Bohemian Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Acer rubrum red mapleTree 1058 23
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 111 222 333333 999666888999232323
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 9 9 9 11 11 11 7 7 7 27 27 27 26 26 26 29 29 29 31 31 31 31 31 31
Diospyros virginiana common persimmonTree 222222 111 555556444333
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 111337 448333444555666
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 7 5 13 6 31 2
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 111 111112111
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 555 111333222 111 121212131313131313999292929
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111 111 222222444444313131
Platanus occidentalis American sycamoreTree 1121999 114 211113611113088598822
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 7 7 7 3 3 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11
Quercus oak Tree 111111
Quercus alba white oak Tree 111333222 111111 111222222131313111111111111131313181818
Quercus bicolor swamp white oakTree 111111111 111 111 555444444555101010
Quercus falcata southern red oakTree 222444333 222111 121212101010131313141414313131
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 222 222 444444444444
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oakTree 222 222 444555111141414141414161616171717101010
Quercus montana Tree 111 111222111444666101010
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 111111111222 888444222191919161616222222272727545454
Quercus rubra northern red oakTree 555222 333 222333151515999181818191919
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 215
11 11 11 13 13 21 18 18 53 13 13 14 14 14 19 21 21 21 9 9 17 22 22 41 25 25 28 19 19 28 165 165 253 146 146 167 174 174 227 185 185 199 264 264 264
66666899113345566666677799997710171720171717181819171717121212
445 445 445 526 526 850 728 728 2145 526 526 567 567 567 769 850 850 850 364 364 688 890 890 1659 1012 1012 1133 769 769 1133 668 668 1024 656 656 751 704 704 919 749 749 805 1068 1068 1068
10
0.25
10
0.25
Annual Means
10
0.25
9
0.22
10
0.25
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
MY0 (2020)
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
100108‐01‐0007 100108‐01‐0008 100108‐01‐0009 100108‐01‐0010 MY4 (2023) MY3 (2022) MY2 (2021) MY1 (2020)
Current Plot Data (MY4 2023)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
100108‐01‐0001 100108‐01‐0002 100108‐01‐0003 100108‐01‐0004 100108‐01‐0005 100108‐01‐0006
Bohemian Easement Repair and Supplement Planting Photos
Easement Repair (02/09/2023) Easement Repair (02/09/2023)
Easement Repair (02/09/2023) Easement Repair (02/09/2023)

Easement Repair (02/09/2023) Supplemental Planting (03/09/2023)
Supplemental Planting (03/09/2023) Supplemental Planting (03/09/2023)

Supplemental Planting (03/09/2023) Supplemental Planting (03/09/2023)

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bohemian Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (09/21/2023) Vegetation Plot 2 (09/21/2023)
Vegetation Plot 3 (09/21/2023) Vegetation Plot 4 (09/21/2023)

Vegetation Plot 5 (09/21/2023) Vegetation Plot 6 (09/21/2023)
Vegetation Plot 7 (09/21/2023) Vegetation Plot 8 (09/21/2023)

Vegetation Plot 9 (09/21/2023) Vegetation Plot 10 (09/21/2023)