20071857 Ver 1_401 Application_20071007

ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SIJRVEY~R5
111 MacKenan Drive
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA, 27511
[phone]
FAX [phone]
~O7- 1 85 7
TO: ~ ~~~
2321 Lr~`LZ~S~ t31v~.
~ 1-P ~ uh ./~ ~ ~1 lr~c~y
WE ARE SENDING YOU
^ Shop Drawings
^ Copy of Letter
Attached via
Prints
^ Change order
~~~~c~a ors ~~a~~~o~~a~
DATE w ~ JOB NO. Z©~ I U ~-
ATTENTION S , ~'
PHONE #
RE: ~ r ~bv C CY r `

3 0 3 d. -~E-
,~.

~~ Y I ~ ~ ~ the following items:
^ Plans ^ Samples ^ Specifications
^ Diskette ^
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
2 --~- OL v ~O~~~ ' ,
~~~ r ~, ~ ~

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ^ Approved as submitted
[~ For your use ^ Approved as noted
^ As requested ^ Returned for corrections
^ For review and comment ^
^ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:
COPY TO: ~~ SIGNED:
^ Resubmit ir+r~~.~t~~~~f~t!~+~CH
^ Submit copies for distribution
^ Return corrected prints
/f enclosures are not as noted, kind/y notify us at once.

~ t ~' "~ ~x

WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
October 3i, 2007 . Q 7- 1 8 5 7
US Army Corps of Engineers NC-Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr.~amie Shern Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite izo 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: The Tribute/Carolina Corporate Center ~~~~~~~
Request for 404 and 4oi Courtesy Notification/Buffer Compliance ~~~
W&R Project Number - o2o6io85
Dear Mr. Shern and Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of the DCO Glenwood Urban LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE
to use NWP i8 for impacts to anon-buffered stream channel and wetland 1•ill. The proposed
impacts are associated with the construction of an apartment complex. Because the
proposed impacts are less than i5o linear feet and no buffered stream channels will be
impacted, written concurrence from DWQ is not required, nor is there any fee for submittal.
As stated in the General Certification 3631, we are providing DWQ with: 2 copies of the PCN
as well as the Stormwater plans, in order to demonstrate the diffuse flow provisions on-site.
The subject property is approximately 24.4 acres in size and is located on the east side of NC
Hwy 70, approximately 200o ft northwest of the intersection of Edwards Mill Road (SR 3009)
and NC Hwy 7o at Latitude: 35.6653988°N and Longitude: 78.5831386°W in Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina. The site contains unnamed tributaries to Hare Snipe Creek as well
as Hare Snipe Creek which is located in the Neuse River Basin. The Water Quality
Classification for these features is: C; NSW, the Cataloging Unit forthis site is: 03020201,
and the Stream Index number is: 27-33-12-(2).
Project History
Wetlands were delineated by Withers & Ravenel during March 2007. A jD request package
and sign-off maps were submitted to the USACE on April 12, 2007. We have included the
delineation map and data forms with the attachments. The stream channels depicted on the
soil survey are present in the field and subject to the riparian buffer rules; therefore, site
meetings with the NC-DWQ were not required.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed permanent impacts consist of 148 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel
(84 L.F. of intermittent/unimportant channel + 64 L.F. of Perennial/important channel) and
0.005 acres of temporary wetland impact for the construction of a retaining wall. The
impacts are summarized on the overall impact map as well as the PCN form.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan development, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation
be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and `waters' could be minimized. Wetland
impacts were also minimized through the use of a retaining wall preventing the fill slope
from entering the entire wetland. In addition, it is important to note that we proposed a site
plan to the City of Raleigh that did not provide a loop road on the east elevation of the
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, NC z75ii i tel: [phone] i fax: [phone] i www.withersravenel.com
7040 Wrightsville Avenue i Suite 101 i Wilmington, NC z84o3 i tel: 9io.z56.9z77 i fax: g1o.z56.z58y
1oz7 Sabbath Home Rd, SW i Supply, NC z846z i tel: 91o.84z•939z i fax: 91o.84z.8o19

building -near the proposed wetland and stream impacts. The City's Fire Department flatly
rejected our proposal, pointing to sections of the National Fire Code that mandate vehicle
access for this type of building construction and occupancy. At the client's direction we
have shifted the building on the site and substantially revised the grading plan to minimize
impacts. In addition to the continuous driveway, the existing and fixed driveway access
point must be honored -Glenwood Avenue is a designated arterial on the City of Raleigh
Comprehensive Plan, under the jurisdiction of the NCDOT, and cannot be moved. The
combination of the required emergency vehicle loop road and fixed driveway point makes
the impact very difficult to eliminate.
In addition to the two major items listed above, the City of Raleigh zoning code, specifically
the Group Housing Standards (code section 1o-Zio3), places numerous other restraints on
the property that had to be accommodated.
Stormwater Management Plan
The proposed impervious for this project is expected to be greater than 30%, however,
because written concurrence is not required for this project, we do not believe that apre-
approved stormwater management is necessary. The applicant will use a wet pond followed
by a level spreader, to insure that diffuse flow is achieved through the buffers. A copy of the
stormwater plans (preliminarily approved by the City) is included with the attachments for
your review. Please note that the outlet in the southern portion of the property is only
allowing the existing stormwater to pass through the site (i.e. no new stormwater will be
collected at this location), therefore, no level spreader is proposed at this location. When
the final stormwater plans are approved by the City, we will forward the approval plans and
letter to you office.
Mitigation
Because impacts to perennial channels are less than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are
less than o.i acres, we do not believe that mitigation will be required.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
Todd Preuninger
Attachments -
i) PCN Form
2) Site plans
3) Agent Authorization
4) USGS Quadrangle Map
5) Wake County Soil Survey Map
6) Data Forms (2)
7) JD Forms (z)
8) Stormwater Plans and Calculations

~~
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 T - ~ $ 5 7
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~''~~~~~~
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check e ~ !
II. Applicant Information
ACT ~ r ~~~(l7
1. Owner/Applicant Information ia~N~ . ~pY~~ ~~µ~a~~-Y
Name: DCO Glenwood Urban, LLC, Attn: Rodney BurchfiA~[ut,~!DST~t?~"ia°r~~~<<E!
Mailing Address: Three Lincoln Centre
5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1250
Dallas, TX 75240
Telephone Number: 972-763-3501 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: Rodneyburchfield(a,UDR.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preunin~er
Company Affiliation: Withers & Ravenel Inc.
Mailing Address: 114 MacKenan Drive
Card NC. 27511
Telephone Number: 919-469-3340 Fax Number: 919-535-4545
E-mail Address: tpreuninger(u~withersravenel.com
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: The Tribute/Carolina Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0796143345, 0796148498, 0796138997
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): The Tribute
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): site is located on the east
side of NC Hwy 70, approximately 2000 ft northwest of the intersection of Edwards Mill
Road (SR 3009) and NC Hwy 70.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.6653988°N ; 78.5831386°W
6. Property size (acres): 24.4
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Hare Snipe Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is wooded with a residential subdivision to the north
and east,as well as a business center to the northwest.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project
consists of the construction of an apartment complex. Typical heav~quipment, such as
excavators and graders, will be used to prepare the site for construction and roadway
installatinn
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is intended to meet the rowing
demand for housing in the area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Wetlands were delineated by Withers & Ravenel during March 2007. A
JD request package and sign-off maps were submitted to the USACE on April 12, 2007. We
have included the delineation map and data forms with the attachments. The stream channels
depicted on the soil survey are present in the field and subject to the riparian buffer rules;
therefore, site meetings with the NC-DWO were not required.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional impacts are proposed at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed permanent impacts
consist of 148 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (84 L.F. of intermittent/unimportant
Page 3 of 8

channel + 64 L.F. of Perennial/important channel) and 0.005 acres of temporary wetland
impact for the construction of a retaining
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
Impact 1 Temporary Forested 'P9 +~cs 300 ft 0.005
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.005
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: ~0.5 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must he included. To calculate acrea~e_ multiply leneth X width_ then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
Impact 2 UT to Hare Snipe Culvert Perennial 2-3 64 0.004
Impact 3 UT to Hare Snipe Culvert Intermittent 1-2 84 0.006
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 148 0.010
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill_ excavation. dredein~. flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
NA NA NA NA NA
Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.010
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.005
en Water Impact (acres): NA
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.015
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 148
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Page 4 of 8

Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Prior to site plan development,
the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to
wetlands and `waters' could be minimized. Wetland impacts were also minimized through the
use of a retainingpreventing the fill slope from entering the entire wetland. In addition, it
is important to note that we proposed a site plan to the City of Raleigh that did not provide a Ioop
road on the east elevation of the building -near the proposed wetland and stream impacts. The
City's Fire Department flatlyrejected our proposal, pointing to sections of the National Fire Code
that mandate vehicle access for this type of building construction and occupancy. At the client's
direction we have shifted the building on the site and substantially revised the rg ading_plan to
minimize impacts. In addition to the continuous driveway, the existing and fixed driveway
access point must be honored -Glenwood Avenue is a designated arterial on the City of Raleigh
Comprehensive Plan, under the jurisdiction of the NCDOT, and cannot be moved. The
combination of the required emergency vehicle loop road and fixed driveway point makes the
impact very difficult to eliminate.
In addition to the two maior items listed above, the City of Ralei zonin cg ode, specificallYthe
Group Housing Standards (code section 10-2103~pIaces numerous other restraints on the
property that had to be accommodated.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 8

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because impacts to perennial channels are less than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are less
than 0.1 acres, we do not believe that mitigation will be required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 6 of 8

IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. No buffers will be impacted by the proposed
project.
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stotmwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The proposed impervious for this project is expected to be greater than 30% however
because written concurrence is not required for this project we do not believe that apre-ap rp Dyed
stormwater management is necessary. The applicant will use a wet pond followed by a level spreader to
insure that diffuse flow is achieved through the buffers. A copy of the stormwater plans (preliminarily
approved by the City) is included with the attachments for your review. Please note that the outlet in the
southern portion of the property is only allowing the existing Stormwater to pass through the site (i a no
new Stormwater will be collected at this location) therefore no level spreader is proposed at this location
When the final stormwater plans are approved by the City we will forward a co~y of the approval letter
and plans to your office.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary Sewer
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most
recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
ht~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Because this
proiect consists of residential development and the ad'at cent parcels have already been developed we do
not believe that that this project will result in additional impacts to downstream water quality During
construction the applicant will employ the appropriate BMP's in order to reduce the amount of sediment
leaving the site.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow
processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or
sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered
and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
CS / 3-~
Page 8 of 8

Date: October 25, 2007
COMPLIANCE WITH WETLAND & BUFFER REGULATIONS
In accordance with Title 15 A NCAC 2H. 0500, the following DEED NOTIFICATION shall be recorded in
the Wake County Registry prior to the conveyance of lots. Said Deed Notification shall apply to name of
subdivision, lot numbers in Wake County, North Carolina as shown on plans titled Carolina Corporate
Center (insert subdivision name) prepared by (insert name of designer) dated date:
"A portion of this lot has been determined to meet the requirements for designation as a wetland, stream or
protected stream buffer. Any subsequent fill or alteration of this area shall conform to the proposed
alteration. The intent of this provision is to prevent additional wetland, stream or buffer filling or draining,
so the property owner should not assume that a future application for filling or draining would be approved.
The property owner shall report the name of the subdivision in any application pertaining to said rules.
This covenant is intended to ensure continued compliance with all rules adopted by the State of North
Carolina and therefore the Sate of North Carolina may enforce benefits. This covenant is to run with the
land and shall be binding to all Parties and all persons claiming under them".
Signature:
Owner's Name: DCO Glenwood Urban, L.P.
Address: Three Lincoln Centre, 5430 LBJ Fwy., Ste 1250
City, State, Zip Code: Dallas, TX 75240
Phone Number: [phone]

ST°~TE OF Tf~C~-S
VCll9.QfAA COUNTY
~_, a Notary Public of the State of'Nerth-~Earofine, ~~
1,1~Y1(~1ya l~ i ~.~CaS
County, hereby certify that owner personally appeared before me this day and executed
by above certification.
Witness my hand and notorial seal, this _1~-y - day of ~d~ y~l , ~~
,;,,, --_
k. ~= MARIALOPQ
Notary Public Zl~~. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
y~,t~` NOV9p1b@f 27, 2UQ9
My commission expires: 1/'(~~--~~

WITHERS ~~~' RAVENEL
ENGfNEER5 1 PLANNERS t SURVEYORS
Site Access/Agent Authorization Farm
l T"'_" J ~ r~ Y/ 4 / ~"
Project Name:
Property Qwner/Contract Purchaser: ~~~ ~ ~/cn t~'~°~ ~r ~~ L,-~ ~-

Fax:
Em-ail: "~
,.-~ c,~'_~~

hereby grant Withers and 12avenel, INC permission to conduct environmental
studies on the property described above. In addition., I authorize Withers and'
12avenel to act on my behalf as my agent when conducting site meetings and./or
correspondence (i.e. permit applications etc.) with the USAGE and the NC -Division
of Water Quality, if necessary.
Property pwne ° ~-r^ ~~rc ~t'~; ~~ Qate: , ~/ ~t f O 7
Jprint ame)

Al
' ! /
f_ \ lei ,, ��� Y_ �' • • � � ��, ,• =�/ 4,��' y M�� ti1 . ..� J Vii'-.
�' ;" � Cel � = .�. _ `:,� • � -� � f" f !( ' - •t' •
! `_+� •,�
�✓ ;� 'q - \ � ' f. rf i tel• , •' : �,� ����'� j •' ��ijC!
�4 f r• t+�a ,1�t'•�Q'� f �, •• '� iIts
1��, �1• •%
r/'`� . i ' ' � -i' � SITE � `; �' , •z
�_t l� �• ` _ _ � � _..may .,.. � � ��! "• q ,� t�� •�.
11 `"}• -.�„: �.�� 1 � �--. /+..`. 4 ,;% f � i �, i► Jit 'li:/ , ►1 �'' r�. - �, a<
7
wSvdA
r Ono
Op
�� • � f / '��),ry1j.j�.`� �I''' � •� ', / ��tJJJII�. p{ j 1 ' •. �i �. ; � 1 � 7 �•.'rr' � � :..1
qtr/ � / j!/,./•�'-,`:� 7[�'I.f�{F•j� 1 II \ ,/ `� � -^ t ��' _• � - `i :r•c
WITHERS RAVENEL
•••..t.,.•♦ g111a M�•1 1 ?irq V. r�r, ;• � , • . '. 7
117 MacK•nan Orrve Cry, North Carolina — ��,. }` ,�" • T �i r
telephone[phone] ww.a wrihewaven,0 com
0 1,000 2.000 4,000
Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet ++ 1
K 066-1080106108SC to Center rtmwts%USGS.mxtl '� 1. •+ + i ' / ! j j

WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 38

:\FILE.OWG_00/00/00
t / . .
;~, _ / ~.
i I .. ~>J1~~1 //. ~ \ \ ~\ ~ , `4'\~t\~ III i~. ~ i % /,.\ \
k`\~~
~%Ji+a'
/
~` f'
"~
i
~\~
y
<
~
~
~
~ ~
/
I
~
~1 ~
\'
~r~J~
~
/
~
4
~
,
~
i
~ ) 1
~ r r
<
1
<
r {
I
~4
\~
\
,,'
rl I I
1
3 I ~
•~
-
/ ..~' /
s
I 'a..~ _z!K''~~_r\..~n~~j\r*~.r'~ . ~,~~s¢f~1' 'Z ~. .` ~ 'q `I [~~ ~ . ~I ~1 14 ~,?~`' \\~ it \~I , ~ ~\~\ .. ~j"
~ , /"/.
~ 1~ _ I~ ;:~ - ~';" 1 ~ ~'" 1 I 1'1'4',( I r~'~'`'`
.,
~
~ ~ i ~ i r
~.. rk~1:
\~\ ~
~ ~~~, ~~
~~~~II ~
Ili ll~l`'
VII
1
/~
/ ~' i ~ L \4
'
\ /
,,
f
I
'
r
,
~y
~ (' ''c'.
:.,,r.T=~;-ii : r?:p ,Y~ e 1 ~1~ f i ' 1Y - ~ 7 t~ ~ 1 ' 1. \
'+ ;i' '. ,
,~ *" ',\ i ~~_ ~Y~i, t _ ,,,.,,. ~'`, \ / , /i' /~~t~'~ ~il~~~I~I~III~'1~~'It,'111~~~'!'~r'~~/ ~ 1 ~ ~~
_ y / ~1 1
_.
R~. I^ ~ ~~~ /~// ~ _ -J y~ - .`~ ~ ~~~ ' ~ i~ll'I ~lj~ I'Ii II g411~~1'j ~, I~ ~ 4 ±7. 1 4~'. ~°.'W.
~ ~ A /
.....
`r-.•,ti /'\. \ ~t... ..a... ~ / .~:_. -~T-~ sa(-` 'aP nt\\ jl i I~ AII'~1~`c; i I i' 1
~i _ j
~/
'
~)j
~ll~
l
II
;
'
1 1
r ~
1
'
`
=
'
t
~
/-~
~', 1 7
.1 a

~'
' ,..
,
~
:
~
,~ !
,
'
, ~ /
~
--
.-
!-
_,~
A I L;%1. j %r ~ ~~, d~
~ I~ \? `4 ~~// /
/ ~/ ' ~ ~ 'jam i
.., ~
1 '~ ~ /
...-
~~ ! ~ .;
/
~
//
r
tsh~
l
/
~
r
I
!
~
4
1
~
J
~
I--~ j \
i ; t
a~.Y
l.
% ~,,', '.'~i %/
ma
: { i
`
% /
~i~~/ii % / f Fl ~~
't ~I
I ~
~'
~1
\ ~~ ~ ~ ~ , '~~;~ I ,;, , / /,';fee- ,:. `',~
.~ ' ''~ % %, ,, ~~~ I i t I, ~4 ~4a .
, ,-.~~
. e, , ., -
,
:
~
(~
Fri _ ! / (
'
~'~.._~i a/ /, ~ "' Y~.f'~'7"` .. ~, ~ ~. /r% ,, j~~/(~'~ ~' ij,,,.. ~ ' •. `\ ,
~
~

. i
i/
,
1

-~
1
/ / ~1
~~ ;; /
k 1
r i ,~
.
a
}
~
'
/!
"
/
~
~ ,
~!
~ !
t ,
`
=
~~
~

I~I~~~
rl
f-
i
~:k;.
., {
ff
i % ' 1
,- r ;%
/ / i
i ... ,~ ~ / ~_
:;. .s' jT
/
~
k I f
I ~" ~
y z ~ 14
`
4 t
Ii IC. ~ a i~ \ 1
A.~
\ t~ ~ / ~~; j i% / y// /, ~~ i ~ ' ~ ! ~ , I 1 ` ~ ~'ax~ ,4 1 lltl `k! ,~~ t .~.
~ ~~:_~~, -~_. 1,~~ ~ % ,., -,pry _ ,/ ,, l,, .~ ,.,': 1,~ ~,~'1,, ,4,,;,~1~,~ 4 ; '.

0 '~, ~~ ~ / C.-......... I w ./ '/ / ,~,,~ ~ ' rl ' 3 41 /A ,~ I 111 'ply 1
_ ~ i II /' l f / ~ ~ _ ...-~ ~ i /` ~~ ` ` ~' ~ {4t ~~ t.__/ 1 ,tile'
4
114 ~„
a ; ~ `~ ~) ~ '
/ ,~v'1
'--~'" ,.
,~ /'.
"' n
e~~~j~
/' ~ ' 1~ ~
~ 1~~~
~ w~ ._
~
/
1
_
~
/
~
~
~
.
/
jll4
'
y
i
•
~Q. ~ t1~t
~ I 1-~}~~I,t • J~ ~ % ,d / I ~ .. ~~ ~•~/ , tiX /. ; ~~` 1Id~il Yn A,fj~ 1 1
,~ ~\ . ~jl' ~~'~/ ~/l //~~ ~f,~Lf..r ~( f , -',. it f' ~~ //, ~~y • ~,, ') ii>r ;14~,t '~ ~1 ~ `t
~~l~lr 1 ^ . ~ i ~ tr ~ !I 1 i;i' I //• / "~" '~~~ Y' ?," //i% //f ,fX r+l ~f~~ ~ `,/ \
' :-
~
~
'
~
`-
~~ ~
``
'
~
~
~'
~'~
~
.~~
,
,~
~
.
I ~~...,\
: ._~_.....
.'T
, , ~
; ~-.:r
,
;,~
~ .
; ;ail t
~ ii%
t ~~ r ~ ~~,~ ~ . r~; ~ - - /~, ~ 1,
_ ,. ,
_ .. _..
.
,
~._._ ,,

• .r ~ ~^ ~
...__ ~ _,.~~ , .. ' , i .::. ~ ,,~.~ j \ ,! 111
..._ r . i
"• ,
// // '' ~~ I ii' ' ~`~'
". ~
1 ` Ja
_~..~
- f =~
:
~::M
~ ~
• __. ~ _..
_ N / ^ ASS( - !/"-'
//~/// /r (`]1~f --' J. ~~ ~~ \.
~._._...._...._ , ..,.. ~ Ifs/J~// / ~~ ~.+r ab
`
'.:~~ ~`"_~#~= ~ ~%~~~ 'f~~ ~ '~ ill i' " ` '~~'~<~
_ _ i iii%~i % ~/
,.~~.. / / ~ ~ ,9~ 2 tidE'
/ (`
i
e
~"
^y
/
f
,

,
,i
,.
~l ~~ 1;
f
j
, f
~
~ ~
~ - `. I

~; ,
A- ~~,~ , ,
/ xL it t ~ I .t~

` ~'t- j I ~ ii 1
~
`
~
I
,
. I
• ~..__~
! ! ! I VI ~II~ ~ 4' 1
` p ~ II. 1 •---..._... 0
~ ,1
' ~ X11
~ ~ Iii
,
I !
~
~
,
",l
~
1 I I ~ !, ~ 4, ~~
~ I iq' i ~ i 4 `! t
! ~ 1 4 , ~
~ is I ,~ yl 1 ` U7
"
'\
-,1
,~. - ~ ,

~
Q~n
Kimley'Hcrnand.Assxiaies,mc.
CAROLINA CORPORATE CENTRE
THE TRIBUTE
MASS GRADING
PHASE 2 EXHIBIT FIGURE

~
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE
OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION ANO ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

:~
. ~ V'n'
t, r
~, ~',.-
~~
^„f ~ ~,„~......
~ -'>

:\FILE.DWG_00/00/00

/ ,~ .~
/ '.'.` / /
...
i ~ /
lil
` ;
~~ / i I /
I J._.._._ ~ ! (il~jl

.
/ i /
~;.

~

... , .,
~ / , ,~ ~~ ~~~~ j, / j' -c~~o
, ~~ ,
~ ~ -'
f /
y: •; D

~ ,E17 J=

.~
,. ~,.. .. ., ~ r-
__p- J` •
•
/
- ,.
~
~ p
H-H
' 1 cn ~
~ - ,~ j i / (n ~ D I i p ~C,~ n /~...,. -_. i
r~~ Y% :Oi ' \\~• ~ t~~
y..
r
f
~/ /
~
`
~
i ~,
\
--- ; ,
~\
.`p / ~ ref D ~'
~ ; ~
\/y~ /
,, ,
/i
f .. ,/
m...~~
C
/ /
i ~
,, ,
~ \.
%' ,~ r
(,
i/' \ ~
`
~

rn ~
\\ \ ~ ~\ •~ ~ \ ~1 _'~ " % ...!-'
~ / it ,l r ~" r'1 I

_ .....
:-
-
~ ~
i
'
l
,~,.
V \~ ~
.; it ~. \ \
~ ,

; -
~ ~ ~ -.._......_..._a.
\ , y ~~, _.._._... 1..i _......_.__...._...
_ „ `~

._._

~, ,,
x ~~ ~` .... _ _ _ _.__....
_.
_/•'
..,.mod''
_ . 1 , ~ _._.,~. _
~ ...- ' ..
// ;~
~.~'
`
~E
~,(
.-^
..r
~~_
-'~
•
'hi' X~
\ ~`~•~a~
*
'
'

,~.
n
.
~..~. "~
_ _ ..
'^~
, .%.,'
C
~~
.. ;
yr° r.....: ~JY'
y
,.?c
.
' `
'
~ rr
,.-
.
.-i..

~,~' ' .c

.....
. .
~r
r ' f..
.~. ~-
nn .'
'ti.t"~ -. -~...,.~ ••~._ ....._ ,.,_. ~ _-r ~ .~..h~ ~._r. .mss..-_ ,t'%•.~ ~~,~~ _ _~l,,.s•r
......
,l
,,
... _ Y` ......
.- ~,~,. ,
c:--r`
,. ...
~.~, ~
.-" i
.-.
~~rr J'r
r
~/~F~
-... _
_
,1.
~ ~ ..... ~ ._. iX~. ._^-_ -_ _

~. ; , _
.~
^- ,

.~.
/J\\ .._....._r._..._
•J .., ~.._ ..
\....,ti ...__~ --
._<.,-

T

'
~~~~
_ -
~..., •.~...._...._YiC
r
v r
i `~~•'
-~~..
. "~ ~ ' ',Cr,..
' ~'r
... ........_.. . ~.. ........... ...r i ,~
.~.._.~..m..... .,...-
_.._,~
.r
.
'
''
,
..
,
f

~ .
•, ....._.,~. ....... ...._.. .. ~ ,.. ........~. 1. i
.~-
C ~. .~ ..
__:..-
.:.
._
`
~
_.. ...
<~5,.
~.
~~ <~
.. - `
.
..

~ .....
:~
'~..
,~,.
><
_~.:,
~,
r- ~-~
~. ;
.~
~"
~~
. '~
_.._ ~•,
__
f
...mow r
f ~ / I w.. --- ----_~._.
r
.-- :.
f'
/

....
~ .. ,
\ .............................................................................Y...........~..-
_
.. .~__
~_:::~M
-__W. ,
J

.. _ ..
__ _._...
.._ _. _
...........
% .-
.. .
I it ~ O ~ ~ l I ~/'~ ~I '~J ~ ) i ~ .l `" ''^,~..,`', it •` ~ \ ~ /
Z TJ ~ i I~ ~
c;i~ `;
I ice( ~-7 .
\~
~
~ , `•
~i" ~
; '
'
/
y
x
~
~
,
(n ;
,
~
\
•, ;
/
~ ,
•, ,
~~\ fTl ~~
~ I
Z
a
_ ~
i
1
t D
~/
~;
~ , ~ ;;
I
;
,~f
J/
1
ll

iJ i
/ / j ~- I
~/~
1
i
i'
~~` ' ~, `~l`~~`~~ \\
~
t , l" ~ J ~/,~ r',
i i `~ ,fir'/~''''
/~ ' !
~
i
~
'/i
rx;~i
% ~
,-
, ~~ ,.t -

FIGURE
~~~ CAROLINA CORPORATE CENTRE STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
Kimlay-Horn and Asseciafes; Inc. THE TRIBUTE 2
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE
OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ' ~ 7 '" 1 8 5 7
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: W&R Project # - 2061085.00 / Glenwood Avenue Date: 10-4-06
Applicant I Owner: United Dominion Realty Trust County: Wake
State: __ NC _
____.
Investigator: Elizabeth Cartier :Withers & Ravenel
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ~ No II
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes II No ~ Community ID: Upland
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes II No
Transect ID: --
(explain on reverse if needed) PIotID: Mixed Pine/
Hardwood
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ilex Baca Tree FAC- 9. Juniperus vir~iniana ~ FACU-
2. Pines taeda Tree FAC 10.
3. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 11. Vitis rotundifolia Herb FAC
4. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 12. Toxicodendron radicans Herb FAC
5. Ma np olia r~ andiflora Tree FAC+ 13. _____
6. Carpinus caroliniana Tree FAC 14.
7. ,~ _ 15.
8. Quercus nigra Sap FAC 16. _____
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 80
Remarks:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Q Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
L1 Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Q Other II Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Q Water Marks
II Drift Lines
Field Observations: II Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Q Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
[~ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) II Local Soil Survey Data
Q FAC-Neutral Test
[~ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology Indicators Absent.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wake Soils ; 10-25% sloes Drainage Class: Somewhat esccssively drained.
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Lithic Udipsamments _Confirm Mapped Type? Yesa No^
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
0-6 B ) OYR4/4 Sandy Loam
G-14 C tOYR Sf6 _ Sandy Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
II Histosol ^ Concretions
II Histic Epipedon [1 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
II Sulfidic Odor [Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
II Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Q Reducing Conditions [] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors II Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric Soils Absent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No II
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes II No ~
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yesn Nom
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: W&R Project # - 2061085.00 / Glenwood Avenue Date: 10-4-06
Applicant I Owner: United Dominion Realty Trust County: Wake
State: NC
____
Investigator: Elizabeth Cartier :Withers & Ravenel
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes f ~ No II Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ^ No ~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes [~ No ~ plotlD: Bottomland
(explain on reverse if needed)
hardwood forest
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 9. Woodwardia areolata Herb OBL
2. Ilex opaca Tree FAC- 10. Saururus cernuus Herb OBL
3. L~uidambar styraci ua Tree FAC+ 11. Osmunda cinnamomea Herb FACW+
4. 12. Arisaema tryphyllum Herb FACW-
5. Acer rubrum ~ FAC 13.
6. _ 14. _
T
7. Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 15. _
8. Boehmeria cylindrica Herb FACW+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 90
Remarks:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
Q Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
II Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
II Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
II Other II Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available II Water Marks
II Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) ~ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
II Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 03 (in.) II Local Soil Survey Data
[1 FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology Indicators Present

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wake Soils ; 10-25% slopes Drainage Class: Somewhat excessively drained.
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Lithic Udipsamments Confirm Mapped Type? Yesn Non
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
{inches) Horizon {Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-6 _ B l OYR 4/6 ~ Sandv Loam
6-12 C1 10YR4/2 Sand~Laam
12-14 C2 10YR4/1 1 OYR 4/fi Sandy Loarn
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol II Concretions
a Histic Epipedon II High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Q Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
II Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
II Reducing Conditions [] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric Sails Present

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No II
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~ No n
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yeses No^
Remarks:

oT'1857
~~ ,p>F~TCR, t,\ t ' \
,...
- ~ __`
`. ~
,' t ~ ,• .,__ ~~
~`
~, l i /`
P
C
_ F
.1 . `,. ~~ . r~
`\
_. I •''F 1~.. _ - __ ~e~oM1 +R `` _ ~ f ~ ,~„~--~'.~ Sol1 SU'c`IW :~, J~/, - _ - . '~
~_~.,.~. . tom. a r. - - tti 7 a - .____ __ _._ _ ~' .._
10'~ ~ '~
- -- -~. / ~`, . ~ , --,- "~ _ ~ '' Jnrisdictional VI'atcrs of the US fpcrenniai) y • .,. • -.. ....
~~ -I ~~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ to the S4-iaot 4eux River Riparian Ruffbr Rocs.
r t ~ .. r i I
'~~ _ rf i ~ rt~ ~_-_-~ ''7N'!' i~.y~ ~ __ JurisdictionalWatcrsorthcUS limerm{ttcnq
r ~` _ ~ ~~"` - ~R`t - _ TT~~,'~r - ~''~ 1 Subicca to the 50•(na Ncuu Rwcr Riparan 13utTar Rulcs•
i• ~ ~~~ i -` -~- °_s_ ~ ^Y .. ~~ 4 ~'f.~. I Jurisdictional WalersalthcGS "' ••• "' ••• ^' •••'" •• "'
"',~ ~ { f ~ `t ` i~ I~ ~ Ncx ~ubtcct to thr SO-toot Ncuxr River Ripanan ESuf[er Roles. {
t05 ~:~ ~ %• ~ r^ ---- - STOP -.~ ~ ® 1
rt _- 7I+` 1~ I `w - 6N ~' ~ ~-. Wetlands
- ______ rs'~l~,~L~~ `~ ! '/ f~ i,~l. ..__.._.,1 `~ >_-_ `___- .r' AreaEvaluatrd ~-Q
.. `~ ~' ~~ PER-perenmai
%~~~ i `, ~ li `~ `--- ~ _ -, - r`~ t,V'M1 imerrnutcm
~ ~-. uc ° 'r Stream Qrigrn Poems most F>r confirmed My the tJSAC'L ardi NC[]\VQ
. ~ ~ ~,
~ ' 7 Note to Sarvcynr - AI{ stream chmne(s on•site nccd tr, fx
} ,. ~ ~ ~~-- ~~ ~ r \ •'~~-,,~'' located below the start poem as mdicatM on the map.
i
WITMCRi -.':- RAVCNCL + ~ ~, ~ All meanders in thestrcamnccdtot+esttrveycdand r~
• ~~ ,, • . • _ _ __ _ , ~~ ~ the channrl width noted st och survey pot_n~ ._____. ~. r __ _~~_ .
,,~...~~ "".;: "M.-.... ""__ - _ - r °° " _ Wetland locations ar npp /~ ,_.._ ~ _ _ _
e roximate ~ ~ ~
,; .,,, a:~c "- ' ~ r/~ - j and subject to change based on ~ ; ,
Feet ~ r' +. additional fieldwork or site meetings ' ; '•
„rat av~aM +u Wet M.y / with l3SACOE or 1~lC-DWQ. ~~ ~', ~
'~ . _ .__!

P/N: 0798.09-15-5211
1
S d-T~
W -•
~,~•
N q I
~~
~.
2
i
y ' ~.
~•
?y fj
D
N 89'49 23' E
~~•~ I
SLOB ~J
P/N,• 0796 09-15-91 14
2
P/N: 0798.13-14-0891
V
PIN.• 0796.1 J-14-9940

PlN: 0796.1 J-?4-1810
F
/ PIN: 0796.1 J-?4-2742
\~ /
NC/N/1Y AMP
~7r PIN: 0786. fJ ?4-J67S
!?
PIN: 07 6. i4-?4-6404
.\
~ ~i Pl :0798.14-?4-8)44
•~ s
.\
'~ ~ ~
~, , ~ ~ P/N.• 0796.14-?4-6203
D. J.TJI G. 900
C0~ J
B~M. f~983, IAF ?iJ?
PIN N . i96 hJ-14-6494
~' `~~ LOT 2 j
5.229 A~GRES I
~1R N9e3, PG ?iJ?
~ ~ PIN NA 7941)-14-JJ43 I I 1
? '
'~ ~~ ° j ~ L T 4 ~' ~,
I
\ \ \ I I GI1P01J ~ C PORATf ~ E
`. ~ I I OT 4
\ B M. 19 PC. ?1J?
~ I I P/N N0. 7 8.1J-1J~8~7
I
I
\ r'i
\~•\ ` \ ~~r. I
\~
.\
\~, ~~ ~~ ~
\`. ~ :.
Tf3TAL IhrETlAND ARF4 \''\ ~. r
~l. l 31 ACRES '' ,~ ~
QF 24.477 AL;RES Ei/ALUA-TED AREA `",o~f ~~, ~°'
~fr°'`'~'~ y`~~
'~ '~~~~ \
\ ;~-~~~\
~-sr sir ~r ~~ \,, ~ ,
,~v~ ~ cx~miaw~ \
.,
\~`\ \ \
i / ~
/~'1g \ \ ~
PIN: 07 .14-?4-3181
PIN: 0796.
i
\ \
i
i ~ ~ ~ P/N: 0798.1 J-?J
\~ \
% ~~
~ PlN: 0798.1 J-2J-2661
% ~ry
1 ~ ~
1 ~ ~~
I
1
~ ~ PIN: 0796.1)-?J-?648
PIN: 0796 1 J-2J-2344
P/N: 0798.1 J-2J-?48J
s ~ ~ piny g 3 23 pig
~~~y,_ dr; 796,1 J-2J-1,7J~
-.
NORTH CAROLINA \
`
,' •
~ ~ -r t•
'°" /
W14lt
E COUNTY
\
S~I3lE{N.~~ CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
~
~ \
~ ~ PIN: 0.798.1)-2J-4248
o+.
~
/
x
M
SUP AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERV/5/ON \
[7EEE~ ~IJ RECORDED IN B(JOK PAGE TFI~T ~
`\ ~
\
\ ~~ PIN: 079614-?
TI,~ ~ NPT StrtRVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS ORA,WN fROM
' ~~ ~ '~'?~fi.
~
INFOR
r4TI0IJ FOUND IN BOOK PAGE THAT THE RATlO \ ~
~ /
OF PRECISION AS CALCUIi4TED /S 1 ~+ • THAT THIS PLAT WA`S PREPARED
IN ACCORY3~4hK~' WITH ~~ 47-30 ,A~~~. {,y/1y~ES,S MY OR/C,YyNAL SIGNATURE, ~• oi~-';
\
`
R£
7k~N NUd4BER AND SEAL F}f/S Cb4Y ° F FEBRUAR)' A.D., '\ ~ ~
`
y
.. .\ \ ~^
'`\ \ ~ rj 0796.1
f'lS'TRA170N o. L-444(7 ~~~ C 1q ~fY/
~H R p~ ~,
~
~ . °
, `,\ 11 \\ '\
., ~.
~
\
/
~
o FESSi® °~'~
~
~o \,
~
~
.
~°~~
_ ,`
°r L-4440 ~r° _ ~
.. . y ._
~o ~°~
~~ ~ o
///
~
~
`
~
~~~~~rH G
~~~~~
\
.
"fii cert/1s L~1ot tie cagy of this plo'~I~Ppp~~ as voters of the U.S. or wetlands .
o~ r of watePS a~ the U.S., including wet/a1~ds requla:ted pursuant to Section 404
of ~ Wei Aat as de~~ined by the uMdersi9n~cl on this date. CU1 7
UnrM~e tJr~-e is a chal~gte in limy or our publlahed requr~ltions, tt1,fS ~ttmvinotion of
~ A
Sectfo+a J~nimncoe- ne>~y be niied upon for a ps+rioal not to exceed five (5) years ~
--
fi+oart this eti~ 1hle determination waa made utiliainy the t9$7 Co-rps of Engineers
Wat/cnde lc~tlon Manua%'
.~E
Regulatory fNfkial Dote
Title USk4CE Action IO WETLANDS DEL/MEA.TEO BY.•
RED~7~r~'~° ` WITHERS & R.4VENEL
MAp BY Wj79dfR5 ~RyR~AyVENp~IfEpN,/NN£,~TNCG S SURl~7NC
NOS, L015 2, J, ~TA4$ AND TED 11-f0-fJi~ATE CENT~OE f1tE CCU
MISGLOSURE N4!FS diSFRf@UTEP BY THE COA~fPASS AIEIh100. FrITION FOR ~,~"~„ '~S' ~ jj~,
TldE {71STANC~$ ON FNE kt~' A7@E A~tISTED t~7R/IONBAL ~~~~ ~QS~ 5~~6
s NQfEO wish Au AIPFA ~t~RPCRATE CENT Rff
CALCUtATE'D 8Y COOAlA6AwwTE COMPrAd~T10N. H~ Y~0'NIIV au-s - Cvtr NC dssrt
o1s Z i t s r (e(e;~r-sda rer~ (i~!s~df-sea
200• soo• ~ ~ao• 400 ,IPAC~cN
WAKE as-av-os St/RVEYED B~': Ks/R£
S'1ATE' ~ NOR7N CAROLINA ;~'~(~ f' • Z~' QRAIYN BY: EGT
SOLE /N FEET ; oer~- ~/coati-J/cM P.1./~ As sHOwN Iwc SHEET 1 OF 5
-,`
~~`•,~
~~~_~
I
I

PGV: 0796.09-15-3111
0.~ ~~c3 ~
G~19AfN~~ \ \ , l
J
U / U~ \
~`~!• O N N~ ~ J \ V
~ ~ U
PMi: 0796.09-15-9114
07-1857
r0
. e` ~ ' •~, ,o o v 'This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies os waters of the U.S or wetlands
'J '`,o ~ 'o \c~~ ~ ~ aN areas of waters of the tl.~, includng wetlands, regulated pursuant to Section 404
~, ~ ~ ~1 of fhe Mean Woter Act as determined by the undersigned on this dote.
4i, * ~h • ~'.. ~ u ~ ~y lMbss ttiera is a change in !aw or our published requattions, #his deterrninatiar of
.. ~ +'d~~i .`' ,~ i c3 Section 404 juri~ction nay be relied upon fa o period not fo exceeC five (5) yeas
~ ~b ~ n ~ hum tha date. This detenniration was made ut~izing the 14d7 Ca11+s of En~eers
oCo --. ,~ / '~ ~ I Watbnds AefirKation Manual.'
Ray,datory Offiaol Date
~. ~~'' / `\ ELF ~~
50' NE'USE ' ~ ~''a~
L1SM;1= Action ID
(Q • ~ RJVER ~ ' ~ -,,i PML• 0796.13-14-9940 ~
~,. (FRau roP or _ y~ ,a~ A
;P~ / &VJK 00TH SfOESJ 4 %/~
A~
y ~(,q~ /~~ 4i to9 86 4 EUS~1 E7H G. TfARNER CfRTJFY TF1AT 7NlS PLAT wAS DRAWN t1N0iER MY
- 'Ob 9~SF. ~ SIIPfRNSfON fi7'OA/ M! ACIfML SU~IkI' tL10E uNOQt ~IfY SUPFRV151A+(
0.014 ACRfS I i80e2 Ott T10N ti€OORDED AY 8C)A~( PAGE 1FNT
57 IfL° BOIXIAIRIfS MOT SU?VEYED ARE CIEIRLY NYDICrITED AS DRAWN fRAlf
PIN: 07D6.13-14-0891 18, NIfORbNTKNr FOUND !N BOOK PAGE THAT INf RATIO
;' AF PtdEC1S10N AS GALClM/ED 1S f ?0.379+; TFNT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED
1 N ~ WITH G.S. 47-30 AS >` ED. W1TN1~ AfY OkK~AYAL S1f~11Uttty
\ ? ~ ~~7 lIAN NL~BER AND SEAL R1I5 LtiIY ~.~18~ A.D.,
i \ 1e, \ /
\ '~ 923 `
\ . 1B1 ~ te2 96 ~ REraN -4440`~+~~~ CI~RdI/~~~~
\ \ ~e, ~ PIN: o79s.13-14-re1D _ '~: ~Q ~9•
L \ ~' Z _ •~ S~A~ ~•
:r L-444 0;
re, / y~y ... `~
S~IEEt 5 fq4 S1R€W ! NE~lAiY~ ~ ~/TW G• \~
MC dR~ COOi~DiNilT~x ~ ~{~Ill'~11111~\
WEliANOS DEUNFATED 9Y /
WITHERS & R,4~ENEl cwcrcrrl, AORPt3RATE C.f7V1RE • \ T`4 13'ci~1r
' 0.8• ~• ~ ~ ~ PIN• 0796.13-24-2742
LOT J /
B.Y 1985, P0. 1i32 ~ ,06
AtISCLOStlRE WAS DISTitI8u1E0 BY T}i£ txMIPPASS METHOD. PeY.• 0796.13-f#-8498 \ ra, Z ;~
THE CISTANCE$ ON THE 141P ARE ADJUSTED HORIZONTAL 50' NEE \ \ /
DISTANCES UNLESS NOTED OTH£RWlst» Au ALFA R((A~R ~11Ff~74
CALCUUTED BY CDORDUlrITE COMPUTATN,14 &1NK~BO~Sk~TES) \ t, Z
- ?
__ __ _ \ ` TB9 PIN: 0796J3-24-3875
Fttl~ CG7~M4 SOLE IN FEET • \
. ?
' ~
w~tAnro +~ ~ ILXX1'T~ CLQS ~URC \ \ "~
L' ` C~~E rrl ra;rewr rwn - ae>rr, >rc tram
_. t ~ r +) reaut>~ {ar}ral-sra r~ (irl~rr~eer \ '~
1nN1Y~-N°: A1t~ C+pl,Nlly: w~ t~-op-p~lr SUpyFylrD By; 1~E MATCHLINE SHEET 3 ~ \ PrN: o79s.14-24-6404
rta~r r • ra 8r: ~r -- - -- ~ ---- - ~~ - --

~ ~ ~ ^
MATCHL/NE SHEET 2 ~
CAROLINA CORPOR4TE CENTRE
O.B. 3338, PG. 900
LOT 3
B.M. 1985, PG. 2132
P/N: 0796.13-14-8498
\ 126
2
B,
~ ~
~ -
1z7
\ 1

ro6~
150
50' NEUSE TB,
SEE SHEET 5 ft7R STRFJW et WETLMID
lV~ GR/D COOiRDdNATE~
CAROLINA CORPOR4JE CENTRE
D. B. 3338, PG. 900
LOT 4
B.M. 1985, PC. 2132
P/N: 0796. 13-13-8997
~~
W
3
S
X5
A
R

225-117 224-118
226-116 222-119Ti120
223-115
W L IJy ~~ ~

0.650 ACRES ,n I 218-11
_ `~ a
L ~ N
P
E
~.
CH
NNEL 2123 2 ~
~J J •S

U ~
v
G
'n
in ;,~ ~ 120 ~i ~'
N ~
N U U ~ a / h
~Jy
. /
U ~
I I
2
~ ~ r~ 2 237-121CL4'
/~
N STPERCH
2~8- 282-131
2 TPERCH
V J
U
~ J J
UaN
N M
~ aD U J W~~y I U U 10 U
~~'" N I U
I ~N I N I M17
N rn N ~ cD N ~
N
ao
n
N o
N I k N
N
1~
N N P

INTERMITTENT N °°
CH
N
CHANNEL ~,q
WET~24 CS
FRS
.
0.003 ACRES
WETLANDS DEL/NEATED BY.•
WITHERS & RAVENEL
0 I
~ I
I
r I
C31 I
7-1205TPERCH
-CL3'
/`..
Rl1/ER BUFFER I '~ Tez
(FROM TOP OF
BANK BOTH SIDES)
I
154
/ T81 158
B2
P/N: 0796. 14-24-6404
~ . ~
Paz
13s -~ -
z
4 P 0796.14-24-6344
C
q8 ~ 139
\ 136
81
as
/ TB2
137 148
81 TB
141
TB1 ,~
~/
/ 2
82
/ P/N: 0796. ] 4-24-51 B i
/ ~ P1N: 0796.13-24-3077
PERENNIAL ~
CHANNEL
1so \
T81
/ ~ 62 \
82
PIN: 0796. 13-23-3944
/ 168
TB1
X00 65
/ 2
/ ~ ~p0
PERENNIAL TB9 \
CHANCEL TB2 NORTH CAROLINA \
WAKE COUNTY
CL3'/ ~ ~ ELISABETH G. TURNER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DROWN UNDER MY
SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERNSION,
DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED !N BOOK PAGE THAT
THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARf CLEARLY 1N0/GATED AS DRAWN fROM
s~ CL3' INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK PAGE THAT THE RA7)0
OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED /S 1 20.379+; THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED
00-CL3' "~ IN ACCORQ4NCf WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER ANO SEAL 7H/S D Y OF FEBRUARY A.D.,
199-CL3' 2007 .
98-CL3'
B1
B1
MATCHL/NE SHEET 4
-.~,~~-
NOTE.•
M/SCLOSURE WAS O/5TR/BUTED BY THE COMPASS METHOD. I
THE DISTANCES ON 7HE MAP ARE ADJUSTED HORIZONTAL
GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERW/SE. ALL AREA
CALCULA7FD BY COORDINATE' COMPUTAT70N. I
t30' 30' 0' 60' 120'
SCALE IN FEET
r~
as
B1
S' ~ R STR4770N No. -4440
TB1 PIN: 0796.13-23-2661 `\\~~4~H CgRO~ ~///
...
F ~ _ :4 SEAL ter;
\ R •~ L-444"OgrA :,
PIN.• 0796.13-23-2648 // ~\
"This certifies that this copy of this plot identifies os wa~~l5~b~~~he U. S. or wet/ands
all areas of waters of the U.S., including wet/ands, regulated pursuant to Section 404
of the C/eon Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this dote.
Unless there is o change in law or our published regua/tions, this determination of
~ Section 404 juridiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years
from this dote. This determination was mode utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers
16a Wet/ands Delineation Manual."
B2
Regulatory Official Date
~ Title USAGE Action lD
. ~ ~ .
FILE.• CCC_ WL ~

~~T.
CARdI[JNA CORPCN?A>Ej CENTRE
D.~ 3JJd PG..9fD0
LOT 4
F~,N. 19E5. PG ~1,iZ
RIM: 0%~6 13-1.~:' X97
I
~Q' ~~
M Ti? of R
NK BDTH SIDES)

- - MATCHLINE SHEET 3
i PIN: 0796.13-23-2544
"Thi: csrtlfiee that this copy of tAis plot ldenlrA'7ia ce wotsra of the U.S. or welMsnda
aN onsaa of wotaa of the U.S lncludin9 s~etlo+ade, rnyuloted purauarrt to Section 404
of the C/eon Water Act oa determined by the ur-deral~ned on thin dole.
~ t92 Unbsi then le c ohonya In low or our publlehed reyuoltiona, thin determinatlon of
92 Section 404 juridlctlan rncyy be nr11e<i upon for o period not to exceed flw (3) years
from thi: dole. Thia dtlerrnlimalion woo made utliriny the 1987 Corpe of Enyinesra
n Wstlonda Dellnea4ion Manuok`
~ _ ~ Regu/story Official pole
Flue USAGE Action ID
~I
NORTH CAROLINA
'A I MhIKE COUNTY
~ 19,2 1. {~_,~~~, CERTIFY TF4IT THJS PUT WAS DRAWM UNDER MY
83 SUPERNSlOM F OAI ANA L SUR1kY MADE UNDER MY SUPf/n9SlON
\~ t ? DEED DESCR/PT10N RECORDED !N BOCVC PACE ~,., Tf1+~7
THE BOUNLI+IR/ES NOT SIJRM1REYFD ARE LY lND1CATED AS DRAWN FROM
P1N: 0796.13-23-?463 /NfORANT1pN fOUNO !N BOOK PACf THAT THE Rif !O
Of RREC/S10N AS CALCULATED lS 1~~TFNT THIS PUT WAS PREPARED
\ !N ACCORLl~AICE Wl1H C.S. 47-JO WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NlMIBER AND SEAL TM L7AY OF FEBRUARY A, p„
~ ? 2D07.
PERENNIAL
CH.4N/~IEL REClsrra~.noN o. L-444La 1111!
l
;„ 296 \\~ N CAR
at ? ~~ ,;~p~•~t~~0 ~ ~~
96 ~ ~~ ~ Z. ~0 ~.! Z
i. = .4 SEAL ; _
__ •~ L-4440~i• ~=
TB1 ~ ~~ • ~
300? ' • 9y~ ~_ • ' ~
PIN: 0796.13-?3-2J@0 ~%~/~ • • ; S V R~ • ` ~~~
~2 ~ P1N: 0796.1J-23-13Ji ~///~~I~G 11\\\~\~1
;'\,~ 30
308` T82 /
~O /
\ ` 309
1
i' P®2
~, ~ \ ~ ; P/N: 0796.13-23-4246 /
;O~ \
`\ \ 313 `~
TBt \~
,~ \ s
~, \~_
~ ~~ s
G' ~,~ ~ 6
~,
o q„
\ \ ~~2 ~ Q .
\ ` ~D~xO 7l-
o~ ~r~ ~ ~
WETUIN©$ O'EUMEATED BY.• ~ ~ ~
INJTHERS & RAVENEL
NorE:• \.
MISCLDSURF M%IS DISTRIBUTED BY THE COi4IPASS METHOD. ~ \
THE ANCFS ON ~ liAP ARE ADJUSTED HORIZONTAL
D/STANCt~ 4WLE5S NfA7E0 OFHFRW/SE ALL AREA ~
cALCULATFO aY CGOROiNATE coMPtETAnoN.
tom" 30' p'' 60' 120' `.
~`E !N FEET
eC~.,WL `.
~, +;E+noly t 1~4~L ~ ,
O

00
U7
0796.14-23-5108
PlN: 0796-14-23-6009
T83 15
2
;r 326
\ TBt
s ~
32~ o79s.1~1~1,2-s994
ret
za ~
NDT81 ~ \
22_~~
.\
`~\
~~

lC GRID COORDIIWA T~~
PTA N E DESC PTA N E ©ESC
2 116~1881.84'S 2091480:279 24'RCP 174 783'435.294 20920x3.974 791
3 7'4vfYli7rt,P10 70914.472 GL9'CH fl6 76tJ413;4~'0 2092043:-069 182
4 74+8244,434 2097#70.40? CL4'CH f7T 74'3416.524 2092053.96+ CL3'CH
5 71944294.887 209144X064 CL7~H !79 763809.143 20920#'5.721 18.1
6 7'4~,976.;5d~F 2091514.206 CL9'Ctl 181 763708.426 2D92035r960 181
7 78919.924 2091516.104 24`RCP 184 T63TOt;.JBB ?092064.562 792
8 7+4930.153 2091529.464 24"RCP 145 763583.263 2092'033:958 THE
9 7E`#930:999' 2099534.607 CL4'CH 188 763636.359 Zl7D?032~,D+~~f 182
10 764939:.037 ?091546..605 CL4'CH 189 763577941 2092029.543 TB1
11 76494X563 ?09'1'56#,652 CL3'CH 192 763499.344 20'9;2056.516 781
11^ 7754476.829 2091487156 20fCL2' 193 753464.338 2'092074.019 181
13 7649"1't.130 2091450.833 f000L4' 195 753392.170 2092069..950 182
14 76491 d«g2tf ?0914'64.168 lO 1 CL4' 197 763842.388 2092040.07# CLJ'CH
f3 7'84925.7+87 2091469.657 f02Ct5' 198 763453.647 709203J.4d4 CL3'CW
i4 7S#935.4#9 2091479.521 103CL5' 199 763J#63.204 2092037.1104 CL3CH
17 X941.371 2097486.174 104CL4' 200 7638614.247 209203?.929 CL3'CH
14 764947.580 2094489.716 f05CL4' 202 763460.56? 209,7021.372 CL3'CH
19 784948.973 2091#93.223 24"RCP 203 763463.461 ?092013 5.21 CL3'CH
20 76495J.6J9 209157 X 005 24'RCP 204 763440.979 2092018.023 CL3'CH
2f 784956.41? 2091320:-812 106CL4' 206 763906.364 209'2010,092 CL4'CH
22 7843 2+tK'9 2091533.728 CL5'CH 207 763962.50# 2091994.7,73 CL.T'CH
23 7~953;d23 2091568:466 CL3'CH 211 763943:440 2091"9915240 1 f21TCH
24 784'941.239 2091564.401 CL4'CH 216 763944.030 2091974.464 113
25 784956.7^35 2091371. T5? CUNT 2 f 7 763982.443 2091997.159 1 ~TTCH
18 7'454931.149 ?0913`90:821 CL4'CH 218 763958.244 ?091981.017 114
27 784960.918 2097809.929 CL4'CH 22? TS~009.735 209f~-94. 119
74 764939.739 2094621.999 CL3 CH 223 763979.497 2091963.434 115
?9 7f9i931.5',4s1 2091657.373 CL3'CN 224 764029.2'24 209 995.1105 114
30 7!5+4914.573 2091633:290 CL3'CH 225 764030:Od1 2091'9'4#.3#~4 117
37 76~t914:834 2091'655;346 CL4'CH 226 764009:4 f$ 209••1965:018 116
32 76y4909.372 3097'67#.942 CL3'CH 129 763444.732 209'1995 979 CL3'CH
34 7'6'4444.503 71797702.212 107 230 763493.036 2097991:34? CL4'CH
35 7841906.12? 2091700.338 CL4'CH ?32 763894,015 2091994:829 CL2'CH
34 768459:067 2091720.?32 11177107 233 763910:322 209198.1.575 CL2'CH
37 7d~0?.dS2 ?091723.773 CL2'CH 235 763913.543 2091954.4?7 CL2'CW
34 7,34.074 2091717.167 110 236 7639'17.323 2097941.109 CL3'GH
39 >'65444X,c"62 209'174 1.470 C~4 CH 237 763915.345 209:39, 635 121 S1CH
40 77'A~fi7.?6'6 2091741.867 CUNT 134 763975.3445 2CJ9=f~h39.636 CL4'CH
41 1'8+F630.144 ?091702,393 9D9 241 753922.615 207'15'130,180 122
42 1'841.053 20976931432 708 242 763907.346 2091827.749 1301712?
43 7'43'052784 209 f 741.125 BECTBI 243 763933:940 2091934: l d5 123
44 1"4"5`013.432 209'174;"5.118 1'81 24:5' 763946.221 2094'92'31181 124
47 7~f973.97'# 7091744.163 1~1 249 763933:813 20919'10:344 125
50 78493.934 2091747.699 18'1 230 7634731500 209 294,090 128
51 744493.318 70977#2.262 1'81 234 76390X920 2091444.309 126
53 7RS4d44.935 209 f 734.936 18'1 25'6 783474.622 209"1'472:561 127
575 78+A4#2744 209173d.(15fl 1'81 ?57 783906.100 209'1';51848 CL2'CH
57 76M~403.d09 709174?.09'6 1'8'1 258 74384'1.?11 ?09~72r319 135GL2"
61E1 764740.594 .2091772.11.5 784 259 783847.211 2091472.54:9 STbPCH
41 74759.14'9 2091 400.377 18•'1 282 715.3871! 69'9 ?094~5d:580 CL?'CH
B4 764735.132 2091433.340 T8f 283 743497.741 209fi$74004 CL2'CH
83 74+4:724.091 2091449.442 781 264 7'4'3474.251 2094474:447 CL3'CH
6d 765057.737 2091767.317 BECT82 26'5 783901.407 2091462.343 CL3'CH
69 744711.115 2091454.145 791 284 783443.104 ?091460:674 CL3'CFI
77 74+1140.039 2091479.543 T8'f 287 783901.334 2091453.244 CLJ'CH
74 711"3'016.439 2097771.477 782 269 763441.758 2097457.939 CL3'C1/
73 78M691.876 2091912.699 7`81 270 74.3441.758 ?091437.954 CL/NT
7'4 784973.277 2097771.510 782 272 763470.453 109'1:445.149 CL3'CH
40 T6#930.445 ?097771.699 TB2 273 763920.984 Zd9f413:924 136STC'H
Q2 7'154843.495 2091770.514 182 274 763921.072 209'1823;979 CL3'CH
d4 7194441.936 7091771.319 782 2TT 763472.464 209163'3:419 CL5'CH
46 764421.484 2091776.554 Z92 278 763879.028 209'14 X6.374 CL3'CH
475 7'4+1413.079 ?09178X714 182 280 763884.735 209'1797.246 13*CL25TlNTCN
90 7`84743.752 209-142#.551 T8? 741 763465.798 2091:90X.032 13377130
92 764759.:847 2091851:694 782 282 763474.272 20919!9.819 f31STCH
94 7847'~td 774 2091470.131 18•••2 244 763473.768 2091933.037 1327TCM
94 7847#t3~47 209f4E511«593 782 2'85 763474:315 209 936.270 CL3'CH
94 7847.l5~498 ?091497.126 182 246 763883.626 ?09f94X271 CL3'CH
ff10115~714.336 2091928.446 787 288 1'63877.182 2091'964:068 CL3'CH
102 784887.071 2091987.651 187 290 763864.693 2092010.866 CL3'CH
103 7'4444 147 2091974.6175 1192 291 763868;707 ?092070:484 CUNT
106 74548055 2092023.672 TBf 293 763382.423 2D97016.3d8 781
109 784844 479 ?092035.928 782 296 763307.063 209?043.522 781
1 f0 7184591.1 f5 209?047.244 787 298 763288:031 2092093.364 TB2
112 7114473.744 2092037..070 CUNT 300 763265.991 ?092072.474 781
113 7'75#835.732 209205,7.0#-7 CL"3'CH JD? 763247.123 2092097.061 TB1
113 744!514.149 209?048:1+5'4 782 3'03 753215.9 f 0 1092218.157 782
117 744:823:437 2092170.172 TB1 306 743210.033 2092152.919 184
119 7b~532.998 ?09?!46:844 TB2 307 763171.987 2092266.437 T8?
120 7'84+444.703 2092255.442 TS'1 309 763174.299 2092206.130 T8=1
126 7'84304.441 2092274.133 182 3f 1 763102.071 2092361.344 181
tZ7 7184437.995 209224 1.408 781 .313 75309#.143 2092292.747 187
124 784378.4#? 2092333.454 181 315 782998.420 2092481.038 781
131 7'6441'8.382 2092300.542 783 316 763047.127 2092387.1200 181
135 7 714 209?310.391 1$2 322 762903.697 ?09,7459.4#5 ENTB2
138 7'754344,077 7092357. f74 781 325 763002.426 2092#3X044 79.1
137 74347 2092360.411 181 326 762973.755 2092444.37? 79'1
139 7433 2092374.19# TS? 327 762937:651 2092419.440 791
141 784248,549 2092311.470 18'1 329 78292'1.922 2092425:371 END78l
144 784334:499 2092345.49# 182
144 1'44253.94? 2092270:475 l91
144 784,311.533 2092379.919 782
150 7447'14..452 2092149.5 187
152 74'4138.6'50 2092330.204 782
154 764145«437 2092241.362 784
154 744204.431 2092265.961 781
154 744139.8{3 209?2,913 182
140 784044.944 309,27'02.197 18'1
162 7447.129 2092714'.244 782
165 743948187 20921424414 781
168 743945.545 2092149.772 TBi
16,9 743924.:671 20921 1d.~2 78`1
172 743914.202 2092144.408 78:2
NORTH GAROUh41
Nh&CE COUNTY
' 'This certi>iea that this copy of this plot identiRss as waters of the U.S. or wst/onds
1, ELS+IBE7
H C TURNER CERTIFY TtWT THIS PUT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
3UPt9RVIS10N FROM AN AG]'LUt
SURWEY Ak40E UNDER MY SUPERY1SION 0 0ll orcas of waters of the U.S, inciudi»g wetlands, rogu/oted purauont to Section 404
.
LiEEC1 DESCR/PT10N l9'ECORDEi7 fN 80OK PAGE T7tr~T
^~I of the C/san water Act be detsrmi»sd Hy the u»dsral9»ed on this data

THE BDUNOf4RlE5 NOT SURVEYED A•RE C
INDICATED~
IYN FROM U»leas there is o chnn In lbw or our ut-lfahsd
9e P regualtiona, this determination of
NVFZ7Rkl4T10N FOUND /N BOOK PAGE Tk~1T THE RAT70 1 Section 404 juridicton mby be plied upbn for a period not to exceed >iw (3) years
Of PRECISION A5 CA7.CtlUTLrD iS 1
~Q~ TN14T TJ~1/5 PUTT Ntil'S PREPARED
~ from this dote. !his dets~»i»oflbn was made utilizing the 1947 Carps of Engineers
MI AGL`ORd11~CE WITH C.S 47-JO A D. WIT1v7ES5 AkY p14fG/NAi SJGN,4TUR~ ~ WaMands Defineotion ManuoL"
R~ISTRATION NtJii78~P SEAL nWIS LW }' OF FE BRUARY A.O.,

` ' ~ Regulatory 0fficiol Date
T/ON
o. L-4.4'40
~~N C A R ~ 77 .. J Trtle US~ICE Action ID
\ ,,
/

4 SEAL 9~ e ~_ FlL,E• c~c_ wL
_ - wErUNO i1lEAnON f7?R SRS ~ Rll
: f L - 4 4 4 0 ~e
- CA~IL.lN~1 td~a CLOSa S~
~t~' 9'l'p c``~o'~~ CORPORATE CENTRE 111 ~~- aans - c.~r, Nc star
~ j~~~ ~ o aS'(f ~~ e °~ ~~ (LO1S ?. 3 ~ 4) rddrNit (1y1~e61-.TaM IJTY (~/eJe3f~f101
`
y~gemes. ~ ~~
///
~
~
\\\
~
i 7N7:EAOII WWV~~': ~G ~ Q~-~OQ ~Ii IG/GY D/• K1
~~~ iG ~
/
\
S7A1E' 1w~1w 7~oltrtw > ~ sn~ct
lJMi9M4V B~': Eaf
ZCJfWE c~~-tw p:~~~w ~s sv ~ wrr Sf~' ~ OF 5

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM D ~ ~ 8 ~ 7
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.6653988° N, Long. 78.5831386° ~~'.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hare Snipe Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
^ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
^ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
^ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION IL SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Appear to be no "navigable waters of the U.S."within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required]
^ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
^ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are and are not "waters of the U.S."within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
^ TNWs, including territorial seas
^ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
^ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 65 linear feet: 1-2width (ft) and/or NA acres.
Wetlands: 0.05 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
^ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: NA.
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent": NA.
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
i. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 7.5square miles
Drainage area: 7.5 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: <2 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
^ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 10-1'~ river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 5-11) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: UT to Hare Snipe Creek to Hare Snipe Creek to Crabtree Creek to the Neuse River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 1st.
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the acid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ®Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 1-2 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 3:I".
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ®Sands ^ Concrete
® Cobbles ®Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: moderate.
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 4
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Intermittent but not seasonal floes'
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: during high flow events and occasionally outside the growing the season.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
® changes in the character of soil
^ shelving
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition ^
^ water staining ^
^ other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
^ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
^' High Tide Line indicated by: ^
^ oil or scum line along shore objects
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
^ physical markings/characteristics
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ survey to available datum;
^ physical markings;
^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: unknown.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): >100 ft.
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: small wetland pocket abutting the stream.
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.05 acres
Wetland type. Explain: forested.
Wetland quality. Explain:moderate.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: NA.
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flu~c. Explain:
Surface flow is: C)verland sheettlovr
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by berm barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity_(Relationshipl to TNW
Project wetlands arc 1 U- I ~ river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ~-10 .icri~il (straightl miles from TNW.
Flow is from: y'Vet{aud to navigable ~~ aters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 100 - X00=.'ear floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Unknown.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Unknown.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):>100 ft.
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:100%.
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately (0.05) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Yes 0.05
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLl~:
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
^ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: 65 linear feet 1-2 width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
^ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.05 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
^ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
^ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
^ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
^ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
^ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
[] which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
^ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
[] Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
sSee Footnote # 3.
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
^ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
^ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
^ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:Survey Sign-Off maps.
^ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
^ Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
^ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: raleigh east quad.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .
^ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
^ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
^ FEMA/FIRM maps:
^ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
^ Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
^ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
^ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: This form is for a intermittent stream with abutting wetlands. This form is
associated with a permit application and sign-off maps submitted in March 2007.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.6653988° N, Long. 78.5831386° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hare Snipe Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
® Check ifmap/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
^ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
^ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION IL• SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Appear to be no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required]
^ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
^ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ire and are not "waters of the U.S."within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [ReguiredJ
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
^ TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
^ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 60 linear feet: 1-2width (ft) and/or NA acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
~ Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION Ill: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IILA1 and Section HLA1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections HLA.1 and 2
and Section III.D.L; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
I. TNW
Identify TNW: NA.
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent": NA.
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section IILD.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions wilt include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody' is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. Tf the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: square nilles
Drainage area: square mites
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
^ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through Pick List. tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into T'NW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that applyl:
Tributary is: ^ Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
^ Silts ^ Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ^ Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable.
Presence of run riffle/pool complexes. Explain: moderate.
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime: during high flow events and occasionally outside the growing the season.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
^ Bed and banks
^ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
^ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
^ changes in the character of soil ^
^ shelving ^
^ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ^
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ^
^ sediment deposition ^
^ water staining ^
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: ^ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ oil or scum line along shore objects ^ survey to available datum;
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ^ physical markings;
^ physical markings/characteristics ^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): >100 ft.
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: small wetland pocket abutting the stream.
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow RelationshiQ with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Overland sheetilow
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: LJnkuo"~n. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by berm barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity~Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pict: List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):>100 ft.
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:100%.
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, Chen go to Section IILD:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLl~:
I. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
^ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
^ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
C] Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWsB that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^' Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
^ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
^ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.05 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
^ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
^ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
^ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
^ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
^ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
^ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
^ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
^ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
eSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
^ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
[] If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
^ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
^' Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:Survey Sign-Off maps.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
^'; Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
^ Corps navigable waters' study:
^ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
^ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: raleigh east quad.
®' USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .
^ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
^ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
^ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
^ Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
^ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
^ Applicable/supporting case law:
^ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: This form is for a perennial channel and is associated with a permit application and
sign-off maps submitted in March 2007.

G~/~
LEVEL SPREADER #1
DESIGN SUMMARY
Project Information
Project Name: Carolina Corporate Centre -The Tribute
KHA Project #: 011216003
Designed by: MCP Date: 10/22/2007
Checked by: Date:
Design Source: DWQ- Level Spreader Design Guidelines, Final Version, Effective Date 7/2007
Level Spreader Design
Flow Rate determined by drawdown rate of wet detention basin upstream
therefore, Q= 0.615 cfs
Level Spreader Sizing
Downstream ground cover:
Sizing criteria:
L°ai° _
Lmin =
Lmax
Is Loaic greater than Lmin?
Is L~;° less than Lmax?
Forest Vegetation (100ft-150ft wide)
50 feet per cfs
31.00 ft '(Q~_;Nn, x 13ff/cfs)
13 ft
130 ft
Yes
Yes
Elevation of Level Spreader Lip 239.50 ft
Forbay sizing
Required =no forebay required, outfall from wet detention basin
Slope Downstream of Level Spreader
Maximum slope:
Wooded/Fon'ested area : 6%
Thick ground cover/grass: S%
Downstream Ground cover = Forest Vegetation
Downstream slope = 1.12%
Pipe sizina IPice to Level Spreader
Sized using the orifice equation: Q = CA(2gh)o.s
Pipe size = 6.00 inch
Cross-Sec. Area = 0.20 sf
Head above center line of orifice (h) = 6.00 inch
(2gh)05= 5.67
C= 0.60
Q= 0.67 cfs ~
Use 6" HDPE Pipe to level spreader
Recheck Lcalc
Q t inmr = 0.62
L~i~ = 31.00 ft.
QP;~ = 0.67
NEW Lca~c = 33 ft.

O~V ~~G
y ~
~~~ ~ ti
0 ~
NCDENR
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
LEVEL SPREADER, FILTER STRIP AND RESTORED RIPARIAN BUFFER SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
~I PROJECT INFORMATION 1
Project name Carolina Corporate Centre -The Tribute
Contact name Craig M. Duerr
Phone number (919) 653 -2973
Date October 22, 2007
Drainage area number Basin A
E. OE81GN INFORMATION-'
For Level Spreaders Receiving Flow From a BMP
Type of BMP Net Detention Basin
Drawdown flow from the BMP 0.615 cfs
For Level Spreaders Receiving Flow from the Drainage Area
Drainage area
Impervious surface area
Percent impervious
Rational C coefficient
Peak flow from the 1 inlhr storm
Time of concentration
Rainfall intensity, 10-yr storm
Peak flow from the 10-yr storm
Where Does the Level Spreader Discharge?
To a bioretention cell?
To a wetland?
To a filter strip or riparian buffer?
Other (specify)
Filter Strip or Riparian Buffer Characterization (if applicable)
Width of grass
Width of dense ground cover
Width of wooded vegetation
Total width
Slope (from level lip to to top of bank)
Are any draws present?
Level Spreader Design
Forebay surface area
Feet of level lip needed per cfs
Answer "Y" to one of the following:
Length based on the 1 inlhr storm?
Length based on the 10-yr, 24-hr storm?
Length based on the BMP discharge rate?
Design flow
Is a bypass device provided?
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
ftz Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
ftz Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
cfs Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
min
inlhr Do not complete this section of the worksheet
cfs Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
N (Y or N)
N (Y or N)
Y (Y or N) Please complete filter strip characterization below.
ft
ft
135 ft
135 ft
1.12
N (Y or N) OK

sq ft
65 ftlcfs
N
N
Y
0.615
Y
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
(Y or N)
cfs
(Y or N)
OK
Form SW401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer-Rev.2 Parts I. and 11. Design Summary, page 1 of 2

Length of the level lip 33 ft #VALUEI
Are level spreaders in series? N (Y or N)
Bypass Channel Design (if applicable)
Does the bypass discharge through a wetland? N (Y or N)
Does the channel enter the stream at an angle? Y
Dimensions of the channel (see diagram below):
M 3 ft
B 3 ft
W 10.5 ft
y 2.5 ft
Peak velocity in the channel during the 10-yr, 24-hr storm 73.98 cfs
Channel lining material NA Green SC250
• •
t w r.
, ~
,
t •----------
M
I
M
i B i
Form SW401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer-Rev.2 Parts I. and II. Design Summary, page 2 of 2

G~I~ ~..~
Wet Detention Basin
INCREMENTAL DRAWDOWN METHOD
Project Information
Project Name: Carolina Corporate Centre -The Tribute
KHA Project #: 011216003
Designed by: MCP Date: 5/1/2007
Checked by: CMD Oate: 9!4/2007
Water Quality Orifice
' Incremental Determination of Water Ouality Volume Drawdown Time
Zone 3 03 = 0.0437 Co' DZ (Z-D/24-Ei)^I'is>
Zone 2 la OZ = 0.372 Co' D'(Z-Ei)^t~z~
Zone 1
1 O~ = 0
Orifice Diameter (D) = 1.5 in
Cd = 0.6
Ei = 248 Orifice Inv.
Zone 1 Range = 242.00 to 248
Zone 2 Range = 248 to 248.125
Zone 3 Range = 248.125 to 249.6
Incremental Drawdown Method

Countour Contour
Brea Incremental
Volume
Stage, Z
Zone
O Drawdown
Time
s ft cu ft ft cfs min
248.00 9,447 0 0.00 2 0.000
248.10 9,674 956 0.10 2 0.011 1,395
248.20 9,901 979 0.20 3 0.030 545
248.30 10,129 1,001 0.30 3 0.055 303
248.40 11,265 1,070 0.40 3 0.085 210
248.50 11,719 1,149 0.50 3 0.118 162
248.60 11,861 1,179 0.60 3 0.156 126
248.70 12,004 1,193 0.70 3 0.196 101
248.80 12,146 1,207 0.80 3 0.240 84
248.90 12,289 1,222 0.90 3 0.286 71
249.00 12,431 1,236 1.00 3 0.335 62
249.10 12,578 1,250 1.10 3 0.386 54
249.20 12,724 1,265 1.20 3 0.440 48
249.30 12,871 1,280 1.30 3 0.496 43
249.40 13,018 1,294 1.40 3 0.555 39
249.50 13,164 1,309 1.50 3 0.615 35
249.60 13,311 1,324 1.60 3 0.073 302
Total 18,91 S 3,581
Drawdown Time =Incremental Volume I O ! 60seGmin
Summary
Total Volume = 18,915 cf
Total Time = 3,581 min
Total Time = 2.49 days
Max Q= 0.815 cfs

C~I1 ~~
~ and Assodaies Mtc
Wet Detention Basin Design Summary
Project Information
Project Name: Carolina Corporate Centre -The Tribute
KHA Project #: 011216003
Designed by: MCP Date: 5/1/2007
Revised by MCP Date: 10/23/2007
Checked by: Date:
Design Resource: NCDENR - Stormirater Best Management Practices Manual (July 2007)
Site Information
Sub Area Location: Basin A
Drainage Area (DA) = 9.044 Acres
Impervious Area (IA) = 5.202 Acres
Percent Impervious (I) = 57.5
Required Storage Volume (Water duality):
Design Storm = 1 inch
Determine Rv Value = 0.05 + ,OOg (I) = 0.57 in/in
Storage Voume Required = 18,636 d (above Permanent Pool)

Required Surface Area
Average Depth= 3.2 ft
SA/DA = 2.3 (85 % TSS Removal via Pond)
Min Req'd Surface Area = 9,061 sf (at Permanent Pool)
Required Length to Width Ratio 1.5 to 1
Pretreament Device Forebay
Required Forbay Sizing
Required Volume = 20.00 % of Permanent Pool
Permanent Pool Volume = 30,143 d
Required Forbay Volume = 6,029 d
Summary Of PrOpOBed POnd (DESIGN OF PROPOSED POND A T06E FINIAL/ZED AND INCLUDED WITH FUTURE SUBMITTAL)
Bottom of Pond Elevation = 241.00 ft
Sediment Storage Depth = 1.00 ft.
Permanent Pool Elevation = 248.00 ft
Temporary Pool Elevation = 249.60 ft
Top of Pond Elevation = 251.00 ft
Permanent Pool Surface Area = 9,447 sf 9447 sf >9061 sf
Temporary Pool (water quality storage) = 19,052 d 19052 cf >18636 cf
Area @ Top of Temporary Pool = 13,311 sf
Side Slopes of Pond = 3 : 1
Volume of Forebay 1 = 2,338 cf
Volume of Forebay 2 = 4,023 d
Total Forebay Volume= 6,360 6360 cf >6029 ufi
Length to Width Ratio = 4 to 1

orince siring
ozoa,.s= 0.106 ~
Os~.b= 0.043 cfs
Orifice Size = 2.00 in
D o~~a = 0.101 cts
Drawdown Time = 2.49 days
less than 5 days (yes/no) ? Yes
greater than 2 days (yes/no) 7 Yes
Antl-Flotation Device
(Flow rate required fora 2 day drawdown)
(Flow rate required fora 5 day drawdown)
(Diameter)
Riser W idth = 5 ft
Riser Length = 5 ft
Top Riser Elev. = 249.60
Bottom Riser Elev. = 241.00 it
Height of Riser = 8.60 h
Area of Riser = 25.0 sf (Water Displaced)
Vdume of Riser = 215.0 cf (Water Displaced)
Factor of Safety = 1.2
Weight = 13416.0 ibs
Weight Req'd from Anti-Flotation Device = 16099.2 ros
'Weight of Riser = 3955.1 Ibs (VOWme Riser WaN"Buoyant Wt.)
Additional Vdume of Concrete Req'd = 138.6 cf (Buoyant Wt Concrete = (150-62.4) pd)
Exterxl Riser = 3.75 ft
Vdume of Riser Extension = 93.8 d
Vdume otAnb-flotation 7'xT Concrete Slab = 49.0
Vdume Provided = 142.8
Is the Anti-flotation Device Suffident (yes/no)? Yes 142.8 > 138.6
'Assume 6" riser waN thickness with buoyant wegM of concrete = (150.62.4) pct

Profile
Scenario: Base
Profile: CB 449 TO CB 426A
Scenario: Base
Label: CB 448
Rim: 230.51 ft
'i Sump: 226.15 ft
Label: CB 446
Rim: 225.74 ft i
Sump: 219.00 ft ':
Label: CB 426A,
Rim: 223.02 ft '
Sump: 218.40 ft
Label: CB 447
Rim: 225.74 fi
Sump: 220.50 ft
Label: (CB 448 )
~ Up. Invert: 226.15 ft
Label: (CB 447) Dn. Invert: 221.40 ft
Up. Invert: 220.50 ft L: 141.42 ft
Dn. Invert: 220.25 ft Size: 15 inch
L: 22.50 ft S: 3.36
Size: 15 inch
S: 1.11
`Label: (CB 446)
0+00
1+00
Up. Invert: 219.00 fi 2+00 3+00
Dn. Invert: 218.50 ft
L: 52.49 fi
Size: 18 inch
S: 0.95 % Station (ft)
Label: (CB 449 )
Up. Invert: 228.06 ft
Dn. Invert: 226.25 ft
L: 160.33 ft
Size: 15 inch
S: 1.13
Label: C
Rim: 23
Sump: 228.06 ft
230.00
225.00 Elevation (ft)
220.00
215.00
4+00
Title: Wendell Falls SF-4 Project Engineer: Ken Jesneck
k:\...\calcs\storm drainage\sf-4 10-year storm.stm Withers 8 Ravenel StormCAD v5.6 [05.06.005.OOj
10/24/07 10:30:56 AM ©Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 1

WET DETENTION BASIN
Pond
Incremental Accumulated
Countour Contour Area Volume Volume, S Sta e, Z
sgft cult cult ft
241.00 1,563 0 0 0.00
242.00 2,434 1,999 1,999 1.00
243.00 2,434 2,434 4,433 2.00
244.00 3,403 2,919 7,351 3.00
245.00 4,454 3,929 11,280 4.00
246.00 5,563 5,009 16,288 5.00
247.00 6,728 6,146 22,434 6.00
247.50 7,332 3,515 25,949 6.50
248.00 9,447 4,195 30,143 7.00
248.50 11,719 5,292 35,435 7.50
249.00 12,431 6,038 41,472 8.00
249.80 13,311 7,723 49,195 8.60
250.00 13,898 13,165 54,637 9.00
251.00 15,421 14,660 56,132 10.00
251.50 18,086 8,377 64,509 10.50
Foreba 1 North
Incremental Accumulated
Countour Contour Area Volume Volume, S Sta e, Z
sq ft cu ft cu ft ft
241.00 0 0 0 0.00
242.00 5 3 3 1.00
243.00 73 39 42 2.00
244.00 253 163 205 3.00
245.00 527 390 595 4.00
246.00 857 692 1,287 5.00
247.00 1,245 1,051 2,338 6.00
Foreba 2 South
Incremental Accumulated
Countour Contour Area Volume Volume, S Sta e, Z
sgft cult cult ft
241.00 22 0 0 0.00
242.00 97 60 60 1.00
243.00 299 198 258 2.00
244.00 566 433 690 3.00
245.00 898 732 1,422 4.00
246.00 1,286 1,092 2,514 5.00
247.00 1,731 1,509 4,023 6.00
Permanent Pool
Temporary Pool