20240075 Ver 1_Mitigation Bank Information_20240104

PROSPECTUS WILDLANDS NEUSE 01 UMBRELLA
MITIGATION BANK
Draft Site Name: King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation
Site
Johnston County, NC
December 26, 2023 Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
USACE Action ID No. (To Be Determined)
DWR# (To Be Determined)

PREPARED BY:
DRAFT PROSPECTUS
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Site Name: King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
USACE Action ID No. (To Be Determined)
DWR# (To Be Determined)
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
December 26, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................................. 1
1.0
Mitigation Bank Introduction and Objectives.....................................................................
1
1.1
Introduction...............................................................................................................................
1
1.2
Bank Location............................................................................................................................
1
1.3
Goals and Objectives................................................................................................................. 1
1.4
Qualifications of Bank Sponsor................................................................................................. 2
2.0
Establishment and Operation of Mitigation Bank..............................................................
3
2.1
Ownership Agreements............................................................................................................. 3
2.2
Landowner Information............................................................................................................ 3
2.3
Proposed Service Area............................................................................................................... 3
2.4
Need and Feasibility of Mitigation Bank...................................................................................
3
3.0
Ecological Suitability of Site...............................................................................................
4
3.1
Bank Site Characterization........................................................................................................ 4
3.2
Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas ...................................................... 9
3.3
Threatened and Endangered Species........................................................................................
9
3.4
Floodplain Compliance............................................................................................................
10
3.5
Site Constraints and Access.....................................................................................................
10
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan......................................................................................................
10
4.1
Streams....................................................................................................................................10
4.2
Wetlands.................................................................................................................................11
4.3
Vegetation Plan.......................................................................................................................
12
5.0
Determination of Mitigation Credits................................................................................
12
5.2
Initial Allocation of Released Credits.......................................................................................
18
5.3
Subsequent Credit Releases....................................................................................................
18
6.0
Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan..................................................................
19
6.1
Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability......................................................
19
6.2
Hydrology................................................................................................................................
19
6.3
Vegetation...............................................................................................................................
20
6.4
Other Parameters....................................................................................................................
20
7.0
Maintenance and Long -Term Sustainability.....................................................................
21
7.1
Maintenance...........................................................................................................................
21
7.2
Adaptive Management............................................................................................................
22
7.3
Long Term Management Provisions........................................................................................
22
8.0
References......................................................................................................................
23
TABLES
Table 1.
Mitigation Goals and Objectives....................................................................................... 2
Table 2.
Landowner Information....................................................................................................3
Table 3.
Drainage Area and Regional Curve Predictions.................................................................. 5
Table 4.
Drainage Area and Intermittent/Perennial Status............................................................. 7
Table S.
Project Soil Types and Descriptions................................................................................... 9
Table 6:
Proposed Easement Crossings.........................................................................................
10
Table 7a.
Proposed Mitigation Credits - Concept A........................................................................
14
Table 7b.
Proposed Mitigation Credits - Concept B........................................................................
15
Table 7c.
Proposed Mitigation Credits - Concept C........................................................................
16
Table 8.
Stream Credit Release Schedule......................................................................................
17
W Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page i

Table 9. Riparian Wetland Credit Release Schedule...................................................................... 18
Table10. Maintenance Plan........................................................................................................... 22
FIGURE"
Figure 1
Service Area Map
Figure 2
Vicinity Map
Figure 3
NCDOT Draft STIP FY 2020-2029
Figure 4
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5
LiDAR Map
Figure 6
Site Map
Figure 7
Watershed Map
Figure 8
Soils Map
Figure 9a
Concept Map A
Figure 9b
Concept Map B
Figure 9c
Concept Map C
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Historic Aerials
Appendix B
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms
Appendix C
Existing Geomorphic Data
Appendix D
EDR Radius Report Summary
Appendix E
NCWAM Forms
Appendix F
Landowner Authorizations
kv Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page ii

Executive Summary
Wildlands Holdings XI, LLC (Sponsor) proposes to develop the Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation
Bank (Bank). Wildlands Holdings XI, LLC is managed by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) and was
developed for the sole purpose of holding mitigation banks. The bank is called King Mill Lowgrounds
(Site) and will be planned and designed in a single phase. The Site is located in Johnston County. The
purpose of the Bank is to provide stream and wetland mitigation credits to compensate for impacts to
Waters of the United States and/or State Waters within the service area, Hydrologic Unit 03020201, as
depicted in Figure 1.
1.0 Mitigation Bank Introduction and Objectives
1.1 Introduction
The King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site being established under the existing Bank is located on a
combination of agricultural and forest land. The Site contains one side of Black Creek and four unnamed
tributaries to Black Creek that, for the purpose of this project, are referred to as Langdon Tributary, King
Mill Creek, Pond Tributary, Barn Tributary, and East Tributary. The Site is located in the DWR Subbasin
03-04-04. All project streams flow to the Neuse River which is classified as water supply V and nutrient
sensitive water.
A review of historic aerials from 1950 to present shows that most of the site has remained unchanged
during that period. However, between 1961 and 1964 the landowner constructed the berm that now
runs along the entire length of King Mill Creek within the project area. The berm separates King Mill
Creek from Black Creek from the point where King Mill Creek enters the Black Creek floodplain to the
downstream extent of the project. It appears likely that King Mill Creek was ditched and straightened
on the property at this time. In 2021 approximately 46 acres of the Black Creek floodplain was logged
on the east side of the site. The area was not stumped and no grading took place.
Within the project area, the streams slated for restoration are incised and erosion is prevalent due to
historic channelization. West Branch and Black Creek are not incised or eroded. Wetlands have been
degraded due to channel incision and drainage as well as berm construction. The Sponsor proposes to
include 5,139 LF of stream preservation and up to 9,887 LF of stream restoration. The project will also
include approximately71.0 acres of wetland preservation, 106 acres of wetland enhancement, 10 acres
of wetland creation, and up to 23 acres of wetland re-establishment. This stream and wetland mitigation
will include a conservation easement area that is estimated to total up to approximately 334 acres.
1.2 Bank Location
The proposed Bank (35.477677° N, 78.480853' W) is in southeastern Johnston County approximately
eight miles southwest of Smithfield (Figure 1, Figure 2). The site is located within the Hydrologic Unit
Code (HUC) 030202011203. The project site drains to Black Creek, Holts Lake, and eventually the Neuse
River.
To get to the Site from Raleigh, NC take 1-40 East for 18 miles to Exit 319 for Highway 210. Take a left of
Highway 210 and then a right on Raleigh Road in 0.2 miles. Take Raleigh Road for three miles then turn
left on King Mill Road. The entrance to the site is on the right in two miles.
1.3 Goals and Objectives
The proposed Bank described above will provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River
Basin. Project benefits include site specific improvements and watershed scale benefits.
The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 1. Project goals are desired project
outcomes and objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The project will be
W Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 1

monitored after construction to demonstrate success. A detailed monitoring program will be described
in the forthcoming mitigation plan.
Table 1. Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Expected Outcomes
Construct stream channels with
Allow more frequent flood flows to
Reconnect channels with
appropriate bankfull dimensions
disperse on the floodplain. Support
floodplains.
and depth relative to the existing
geomorphology and higher -level
floodplain.
functions. Improve wetland hydrology.
Construct stream channels that will
Improve stream channel
maintain stable cross -sections,
Reduce shear stress on channel boundary.
stability.
patterns, and profiles over time.
Reduce sediment inputs from bank
Repair eroding stream banks with
erosion.
bioengineering.
Install habitat features such as
Increase and diversify available habitats
constructed riffles, cover logs, and
for macroinvertebrates, fish, and
Improve instream habitat.
brush toes in restored/enhanced
amphibians, leading to colonization and
streams. Add woody materials to
an increase in biodiversity over time. Add
channel beds. Construct pools of
complexity including large woody debris
varying depth.
(LWD) to the streams.
Restore riparian wetlands and
Restore wetland hydrology,
associated soil structure by raising
Raise local groundwater elevations.
soils, and plant communities.
stream beds, plugging existing
Periodically inundate floodplain wetlands
ditches, and planting native
and vernal pools.
wetland species.
Plant native canopy and understory
Reduce sediment inputs from bank
species in riparian zone and plant
erosion and runoff. Increase nutrient
Enhance native floodplain
native shrub and herbaceous
cycling and storage in floodplain. Provide
and streambank vegetation.
species on streambanks. Treat
riparian habitat. Add a source of LWD and
invasive species within the project
organic material to streams. Support all
area.
stream functions.
Protect Bank from encroachment on the
Permanently protect the
Establish a conservation easement
riparian corridor and direct impact to
project from harmful uses.
on the Bank.
streams and wetlands. Support all stream
functions.
1.4 Qualifications of Bank Sponsor
The Sponsor, which is managed by Wildlands, was developed for the sole purpose of holding mitigation
banks. Wildlands is a multidisciplinary professional engineering firm that brings together the expertise
necessary to create outstanding ecological restoration projects in a timely and cost-effective manner. To
execute stream and wetland mitigation projects, Wildlands assembles a team of project specific
subcontractors to perform surveying, construction services, and planting. Each of these subcontractors
has substantial experience in stream, wetland, and buffer restoration in North Carolina and a substantial
full-time professional staff presence in North Carolina. For this project, Wildlands will serve as the
Authorized Agent.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
WWidllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 2

Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
Email: [e-mail]
2.0 Establishment and Operation of Mitigation Bank
2.1 Ownership Agreements
The Site is located on five parcels owned by two individuals, and option agreements to record a
conservation easement for the Site have been signed by all landowners. Upon completion of the review
process for the bank prospectus, the Sponsor will submit a detailed mitigation plan and an umbrella
mitigation banking instrument (UMBI) for the site. The UMBI will provide detailed information regarding
bank operation and the long-term management of the Bank. Once the final mitigation plan is approved
and the accompanying instrument executed by members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the
Sponsor will record a conservation easement on the Bank.
2.2 Landowner Information
Table 2 lists the landowner names, parcel identification number(s), deed book numbers, page numbers,
and address associated with each parcel on the site.
Table 2. Landowner Information
Deed Book and Page
Address
Landowner
Parcel ID Number
Number
755 King Mill Road
Carl B. Langdon
165200 68 4050
DB: 6498, PG: 833 836
Four Oaks, NC 27524
165200-28-2946;
755 King Mill Road
Carl B. Langdon
165200-46-4523;
DB: 6498, PG: 774-777
Four Oaks, NC 27524
165200-57-7602
450 King Mill Road
Nancy Melissa Langdon
165200-78-4049
DB: 6504, PG: 600-603
Four Oaks, NC 27524
2.3 Proposed Service Area
The Bank will be established to mitigate impacts to Waters of the United States and/or State Waters
within the service area depicted in Figure 1. This service area includes the Neuse 01 (Hydrologic Unit
03030002) and the City of Raleigh, Falls Lake, Wake Forest, Hillsboro, Creedmoor, Rolesville, Garner,
Knightdale, Cary, Clayton, Smithfield, and portions of the City of Durham, Morrisville, Holly Springs, and
Fuquay-Varina.
2.4 Need and Feasibility of Mitigation Bank
2.4.1 Need
Basinwide
The Neuse 01 riverbasin, as described in the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) 2009
Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (RBWQP), is undergoing rapid population growth. Wake
County is the most populous county in the state as of 2020, growing by 25.4% between 2010 and 2020
(ncdemography.org). Johnston County grew by 27.9%, and Durham by 21.4% in that same time period.
Wake, Johnston, and Durham Counties are expected to grow by 18.4%, 25%, and 13.9% respectively by
2030 (NC Office of State Budget and Management, 2020). This increase in population increases
developmental pressures, change in land use, and the need for expanded infrastructure (roads, utilities,
etc.) all of which create the necessity for impacts to Waters of the United States to be mitigated
appropriately and allow the economic growth of this region to continue while the environment and
water quality remain a priority.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 3

The Sponsor expects Bank customers will include private enterprises and public entities with North
Carolina Division of Transportation (NCDOT) as the primary client. Figure 3 depicts the potential projects
set forth by NCDOT for fiscal years 2015-2025 within the Neuse 01 watershed. This includes
transportation projects along several state, regional, and transition highways.
Sources:
Carolina Demography. "NC Population Growth 2010-2020". https://www.ncdemography.org/2021/08/12/first-look-at-2020-
census-for-north-carolina/ Accessed: 10/26/21
Office of State Budget and Management "Projected Population Change in North Carolina Counties: 2020-2030".
https://files.nc.gov/ncosbm/demog/countygrowth 2030.html Accessed: 10/26/21
I nral Suhhncin
The proposed Site is located in HUC 030202011203 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-04. There are no current
state or watershed plans associated with this subbasin. This 14-digit HUC was listed as a targeted local
watershed in the 2015 Neuse 01 RRiver Basin Restoration Priorities document published by NCDMS. The
watershed is dominated by forested land (52%) and agricultural land (41%). Major stressors include
disturbed riparian buffers, agricultural land use, and animal operations.
2.4.2 Feasibility
A Radius Map Report was ordered for the Site through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) on
November 13, 2023. The assessment identified one record of fecal coliform groundwater contamination
within a one -mile radius of the Site that was reported by the North Caroline Department of
Environmental Quality in 1995. The assessment revealed no evidence of any recognized environmental
condition in connection to the proposed mitigation site. A summary of the EDR report is located in the
appendix.
The Site is located in a watershed that is dominated by forested land (52%) and agricultural land (41%).
There is potential for further development within the watershed stemming from the continued
development push into Johnston County.
Based on the preliminary existing conditions assessments performed at the site in 2023, Wildlands is
confident the Site has substantial potential for the development of a viable mitigation bank. Although
there are no official RBWQP goals to address, the restoration plan does address issues associated with
long term agricultural land use and its effects on the aquatic resources on site. The project will provide
substantial uplift to the Black Creek watershed.
3.0 Ecological Suitability of Site
3.1 Bank Site Characterization
The Site is on five parcels and surrounded by agricultural land. Most of the Site is forest land
characterized by a mid -successional canopy. The existing conditions of Bank streams are described in
Section 3.1.1, existing wetlands are described in Section 3.1.2, and existing vegetation is described in
Section 3.1.3. The appendix contains stream determination forms and stream geomorphic data. Figures
4 and 5 are topographic and LiDAR maps of the site, Figure 6 illustrates the existing Site conditions, and
Figure 7 is a map of the project stream watersheds.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 4

3.1.1 Existing Conditions - Streams
Langdon Tributary
Langdon Tributary originates from a backwater swamp upstream
of the project area and flows southeast on the Site until it
reaches its confluence with Black Creek. Langdon Tributary is a
low slope blackwater system with gum and cypress lining the
stream banks. Significant fish life was observed. The upper end
of Langdon Tributary appears to have natural levee features
along both sides of the channel. Bed material is comprised of
sand and silt.
King Mill Creek
King Mill Creek is a perennial stream that flows southeast
through the Site. King Mill Creek flows through a pond upstream
of the Site, and then flows on Site through a culvert below King Mill Road. Between 1961 and 1964 the
landowner constructed the berm that now runs along the entire length of King Mill Creek within the
project area. The berm also separates King Mill Creek from Black Creek from the point where King Mill
Creek enters the Black Creek floodplain to the downstream extent of the project. It appears likely that
King Mill Creek was ditched and straightened through the woods at this time.
From King Mill Road to the point where King Mill Creek enters the Black Creek floodplain, the stream
banks are actively eroding and the stream is highly incised with a measured bank height ratio of 3.1 in
cross section 6. The channel splits around what appears to be a relic dam structure and then
recombines. The berm mentioned previously runs along the left side for the entire length of King Mill
Creek Reach 1 separating it from the agricultural fields. Bed form diversity is poor with pool formation
almost non-existent. Bed material is comprised of sand, gravel, and silt. Large woody debris is minimal.
At the point where King Mill Creek enters the Black Creek floodplain a remnant channel with low banks
and clear fluvial features such as a natural meandering pattern and point bar formation in the pools was
located. Historical mapping (including a 1906 and 1908 USGS map) of the area was located but did not
provide clear evidence whether this channel was created by Black Creek or King Mill Creek. In an effort
to identify which creek would have occupied this channel, four cross sections (cross sections 1-4) were
surveyed with the intent of comparing to regional curve data. The drainage areas and cross -sectional
areas predicted by the two published regional curves for the NC Coastal Plain are shown below in Table
3.
Table 3. Drainage Area and Regional Curve Predictions
Reach
Drainage Area
Z
(mi)
Bankfull Area (NC State)
Bankfull Area (Ecoscience)
King Mill
1.8
21
15
Black Creek
78.2
258
237
The channel area measured at top of bank in two riffle cross sections was 16.5 ft2 and 20.6 ft2. This area
was compared to the area predicted by the two regional curves. The results of this assessment indicate
that the remnant channel was likely formed by flow from King Mill Creek rather than Black Creek.
King Mill Creek was almost certainly channelized from the point where it enters the Black Creek
floodplain to the downstream end of the project in the early 1960s in combination with the berm
construction. Further evidence of this channelization is apparent when comparing the area at top of
bank of the King Mill Creek channel (78 ft2) with the area of the adjacent berm (82 ft2) in cross section 5.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 5

These almost identical dimensions provide solid evidence that the current King Mill channel was
excavated and the material was used to construct the berm. It is possible that this was the point in time
when King Mill Creek was disconnected from the remnant
channel. King Mill Creek is incised through this reach with a
measured bank height ratio of 3.0 in cross section 5A. Bank
erosion is less prevalent due to the minimal flow through this
reach. Woody debris and bedform diversity are mostly absent.
Pond Tributary
Pond Tributary Reach 1 starts at a pipe outlet from a pond
adjacent to King Mill Road. The channel is shallow within a pine
tree stand for the first 100 feet but quickly becomes incised
within the agricultural fields. The measured bank height ratio in
cross section 7 is 4.1 meaning this reach is severely incised. Bank erosion is frequent with several
locations of mass wasting. This reach lacks pattern and woody debris and has limited bedform diversity.
Bed material is comprised of sand, gravel, and silt.
Reach 2 begins where Pond Tributary enters the recent timbered woods. The channel returns to a
shallow stable channel within the floodplain of Black Creek. Large woody debris is plentiful in Reach 2.
The riparian area is in an early successional state as is described in Section 3.1.3. Bed material is
comprised of sand and silt.
East Tributary
East Tributary Reach 1 enters the property from a culvert
under Tap Lane. The channel is shallow for the first 100 feet
but quickly becomes incised with a measured bank height
ratio in cross section 9 of 2.2. Bank erosion is frequent with
several locations of mass wasting. The channel exhibits
natural pattern, moderate bedform diversity, and has plentiful
woody debris. It appears that the channel was in good
condition in the recent past but has incised recently. Bed
material is comprised of sand, gravel, and silt. Forested buffer
widths vary in Reach 1 from 50 to 150 feet on the left side of
the stream, and 5 to 100 feet on the right side of the stream.
Agricultural fields make up the rest of the buffer.
Reach 2 begins where East Tributary enters the recent timbered woods. The channel returns to a
shallow stable channel within the floodplain of Black Creek. Large woody debris is plentiful in Reach 2.
The riparian area is in an early successional state as is described in Section 3.1.3. Bed material is
comprised of sand and silt.
Barn Tributary
Barn Tributary begins at a springhead. The stream quickly becomes incised with a measured bank height
ratio of 2.4 in cross section 8 and remains deeply incised to its confluence with Pond Tributary. Bank
erosion is frequent with several locations of mass wasting. This reach lacks pattern and woody debris
and has limited bedform diversity. Bed material is comprised of sand and silt. Table 4 provides drainage
area size and intermittent/perennial status by stream reach.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 6

Table 4. Drainage Area and Intermittent/Perennial Status
NC DWR Stream
Intermittent/
Watershed Area
Watershed Area (sq.
Reach Name
Identification Form
Perennial Status
(acres)
mi.)
Scores
King Mill Creek
40
Perennial
1,152
1.8
Langdon Tributary
30.25
Perennial
199
0.31
Barn Tributary
22
Intermittent
2
0.003
Pond Tributary
29.75
Intermittent
344
0.54
East Tributary
39
Perennial
77
0.12
3.1.2 Existing Wetlands
Existing wetland conditions vary across the site and were evaluated using the North Carolina Wetland
Assessment Method (NCWAM) and best professional judgement.
West of King Mill Creek, wetlands are generally high quality with
functioning hydrology and a native bottomland forest. Much of
this area is seasonally saturated and only inundated when Black
Creek floods. Depressions and sloughs within this area may be
seasonally to semi -permanently inundated which adds to the
habitat diversity. When assessed using NCWAM, this wetland
area (Areas A and B) scored high for the hydrology, water
quality, and habitat subfunctions, resulting in an overall score of
high. The forested wetland area to the east of King Mill Creek
but west of the cutover (Area C) has a moderate level of
function. Vegetation is in excellent condition and groundwater
hydrology is intact enough for the area to qualify as
jurisdictional. The primary stressor to this area is the berm
running along King Mill Creek and Black Creek. The berm prevents overbank flooding from accessing this
area which removes any value associated with storage and treatment of floodwater and likely reduces
hydroperiod. Using NCWAM Area C scored high for habitat, but medium in the water quality and
hydrology subfunctions, resulting in an overall score of medium. The cutover area (Area D) also has
reduced overbank flooding as a result of the berm. This area provides habitat for organisms that thrive
in thick, low vegetation, but lacks the structural elements of a mature forest. Area D scored medium in
the hydrology and water quality subfunctions, but scored low in habitat due to the recent clearcutting. It
received an overall score of medium. Existing wetland areas are depicted on Figure 6 and NCWAM
scoresheets are included in Appendix E.
The agricultural fields to the east of King Mill Creek and north of the wood line contain hydric soils but
do not have a contemporary wetland hydrology regime. This suggests historic presence of wetlands that
have been drained by ditching.
3.1.3 Existing Vegetation
Riparian buffer conditions along project streams are varied across the Site. Vegetation zones can be
classified into three categories: forested with a canopy (forested), recently harvested forest with
naturally regenerated growth less than one year old (cutover), and agriculture fields. Beginning at the
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 7

western extent of the project area, the left and right floodplains of Langdon Tributary consist of mature
bottomland hardwood forest extending over 300 feet on both sides, except where the stream
approaches an electrical transmission easement. Starting at the upper extent of its reach, the right
floodplain of King Mill Creek consists of mixed hardwood forest extending over 300 feet that transitions
to bottomland hardwood forest as the stream approaches the floodplain of Black Creek. The left
floodplain of King Mill Creek consists of an active agriculture field with a narrow row of trees and
transitions to bottomland hardwood forest as the stream flows to the floodplain of Black Creek. The
right and left floodplains of Pond Tributary consist of active agriculture fields and open areas dominated
by pasture grasses. The right and left floodplains of East Tributary consist of mature mixed hardwood
forest extending between 30 to 50 feet from both banks with agricultural fields and maintained
herbaceous areas beyond. As Pond Tributary and East Tributary flow towards Black Creek, they enter a
recently clearcut area and the community type on both sides becomes the cutover type with a narrow
row of mature trees along both banks. The cutover buffer extends several hundred feet from the right
bank of Pond Tributary and from 50 to several hundred feet from the left bank of East Tributary. With
the exception of the cutover area and transmission line easement, the entire floodplain of Black Creek
consists of bottomland hardwood forest within the valley bottom.
Areas with a forested canopy primarily include swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), red maple (Acer rubrum),
water oak (Quercus nigra), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), willow oak (Quercus phellos),
overcup oak (Querucs lyrata), and the occasional river birch (eetula nigra) in the overstory. The midstory
was typically characterized by American holly (Ilex opaca), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), red
maple, sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), sweetleaf (Symplocos tinctoria), and greenbrier (Smilax
rotundifolia). While Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) was observed in the midstory, individuals were
scattered and not dominating the strata. The cutover area was characterized by herbaceous vegetation
characteristic of areas that experience long-term inundation or saturation like cattails (Typha spp.), giant
cane (Arundinaria gigantea), switchcane (Arundinaria tecta), Carex spp., Persicaria spp., and Juncus spp.
Young early successional sapling species such as sweetgum and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) were readily
observed, but other desirable, slower growing species such as willow oak, water oak, and sweetbay
magnolia have successfully regenerated and were observed in the cutover area as well.
3.1.4 Soils
The proposed project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Johnston County. The primary project area
soils are described below in Table 5. Figure 8 provides a soil map of the Site. Wehadkee soils are
mapped within a majority of the project area in the broad floodplain of Black Creek and lower
floodplains of its tributaries. Tomotley and Augusta sandy loams and Altavista fine sandy loam soils are
mapped on flat stream terraces higher in the floodplain of Black Creek. Gilead sandy loam and Uchee
loamy coarse sand soils are generally mapped on hillslopes and ridges.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 8

Table 5. Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name
Description
Wehadkee soils are somewhat poorly drained and found on slopes ranging from
0 to 2% and commonly have inclusions of Chewacla soils. They are frequently
Wehadkee Loam
flooded and typically located on floodplains. Permeability is moderately high to
high. Their composition is from loamy alluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock.
Tomotley soils are poorly drained and found on slopes ranging from 0 to 2%.
Tomotley Sandy Loam
They are rarely flooded and typically located on stream terraces. Permeability is
moderately high to high. Their composition is from old loamy alluvium derived
from igneous and metamorphic rock.
Altavista soils are well drained and found on slopes ranging from 0 to 2% within
Altavista Fine Sandy Loam
the Site. They are located on stream terraces and are occasionally flooded.
Permeability is moderately high to high. They form from old loamy alluvium
derived from igneous and metamorphic rock.
Augusta soils are somewhat poorly drained and found on slopes ranging from 0
Augusta Sandy Loam
to 2%. They are located on stream terraces and are occasionally flooded.
Permeability is moderately high to high. They form from old loamy alluvium
derived from igneous and metamorphic rock.
Gilead soils are moderately well drained and found on slopes ranging from 2 to
Gilead Sandy Loam
15% within the Site. They are typically located on ridges. Permeability is very low
to moderately high. They form from clayey marine deposits.
Uchee soils within the Site are well drained and found on slopes from 2 to 12%
Uchee Loamy Coarse Sand
within the Site. They are located on ridges and broad interstream divides.
Permeability is moderately high. They form from loamy and sandy marine
deposits.
Source: Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
3.2 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
The site is not located near any sites listed on the National Register with the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO). The archaeological site files at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) have
not been reviewed at this time. All appropriate cultural resource agencies will be contacted for their
review and comment prior to any land disturbing activity.
3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands searched the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NHP) databases to identify federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal
species that have the potential to occur within the project area. According to these sources, the project
area is within the expected range of the tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus), red -cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis), Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Carolina madtom (Noturus furiosus), Atlantic
pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), and monarch butterly (Danaus plexippus). The tricolored bat is currently
proposed for listing as an endangered species and the monarch butterly (Danaus plexippus) is currently
a candidate for listing. The red -cockaded woodpecker and Carolina madtom are currently listed as
endangered, and the Neuse River waterdog and Atlantic pigtoe are listed as threatened.
A cursory pedestrian survey conducted on November 16, 2023 indicated that the project area provides
suitable habitat for the tri-colored bat in the form of forested riparian buffers for foraging, and large
tracts of forest for roosting. The project area contains suitable habitat for the monarch butterfly and
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 9

Neuse River waterdog, as well. Suitable habitat was not found for the Carolina madtom or red -cockaded
woodpecker. Wildlands will conduct a full review for protected species in the mitigation planning phase
and will coordinate with USFWS and NCWRC as necessary based on that review.
3.4 Floodplain Compliance
Black Creek and Site tributaries are mapped in a Zone
AE Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) on Johnston
County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 1642. A
limited detailed study has been performed on Black
Creek with base flood elevations defined and delineated
floodplain and floodway. The remaining tributaries do
not have detailed hydraulic studies performed, but the
downstream portions of these reaches fall within the
Black Creek SFHA. Effective hydraulic modeling for Black
Creek will be obtained from the NC Floodplain Mapping
Program. A no -rise condition will be pursued if
compatible with stream restoration and floodplain
It } 'r
o �
enhancement grading. If a no -rise condition is not
attainable, then a CLOMR will be prepared. Wildlands'
engineers have successfully navigated the CLOMR
process for several similar full -delivery project sites. The
project will be designed to avoid adverse floodplain
impacts or hydrologic trespass on adjacent properties or local roads.
3.5 Site Constraints and Access
Jy',-
One external crossing is proposed at the Site to allow for an existing transmission line crossing of a
preservation wetland. The crossing is summarized and numbered below in Table 6 and on Figures 9a
through 9c.
Table 6: Proposed Easement Crossings
Internal orExternal
No.
Width (ft)
Location
Crossing Type
Purpose
Wetland
1
250
External
Utility
Transmission Line Crossing
Preservation
The easement boundaries around streams proposed for mitigation credit provide the required 50-foot
minimum riparian buffer for Coastal Plain streams. The entire easement area can be accessed for
construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from King Mill Road. There are no airports within
five miles of the Site.
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
4.1 Streams
The proposed bank will include 5,139 LF of stream preservation and up to 9,887 LF of stream
restoration. The project will also include approximately 71.0 acres of wetland preservation, 106 acres of
wetland enhancement, 10 acres of wetland creation, and up to 23 acres of wetland re-establishment.
These approaches were chosen to provide the highest degree of ecological uplift to the system. Figures
9a through 9c provide an overview of the proposed mitigation activities on the site.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 10

Project streams proposed for restoration include King Mill
Creek, Barn Tributary, Pond Tributary Reach 1, and East
Tributary Reach 1. The restoration reaches are all incised
and eroded. The restoration reaches will be designed and
built with appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile to
allow for frequent overbank flooding, provide stable bank
slopes, enable biological lift, and reconnect streams with
wetlands and existing floodplains. Reference streams will be
identified and will serve as one of the primary sources of
information on which restoration designs are based.
Wildlands has developed a general approach to be used as
the basis for stream restoration design. The design approach, which is tailored to each site, continues to
develop as additional projects are implemented. Three different options for the stream restoration are
described below.
Concept A provides an alignment alternative that utilizes a low-lying path through an agriculture field.
This alignment was considered a possible historic flow path by reviewing the alignment of the valley
upstream of the project site and extending it down to Black Creek. A preliminary survey of this
alignment indicates that an area approximately 500 feet immediately downstream of King Mill Road will
require floodplain excavation but the remainder of the alignment will be Priority 1 restoration. Concept
B provides an alternative to Concept A that takes the shortest path to the confluence with Black Creek.
Concept C provides an alignment alternative that utilizes the remnant channel described in Section
3.1.1. that was possibly the original alignment of King Mill Creek. The restoration approach in Concept C
utilizes the remnant channel as part of the restoration design. Returning flow to this historic channel is a
rare opportunity to achieve the highest level of restoration by recreating an historic condition. In
addition, the remnant channel will be used as a reference reach providing an exact blueprint for channel
design. While the evidence around the remnant channel appears convincing, this approach does create
a short reach where King Mill Creek runs parallel to Black Creek within the Black Creek floodplain.
All three of these concepts will involve removal of the berm that separates Black Creek from its historic
floodplain. The berm will be used to fill the adjacent excavated King Mill Creek channel. Removal of this
berm will restore a natural flooding regime to approximately 120 acres of Black Creek floodplain.
Outside of a few short transition zones at upstream or downstream ends of reaches and the section of
King Mill Creek in Concept B described above, all reaches proposed for restoration will be designed with
a Priority 1 approach, raising channel beds to reconnect them with existing floodplains. Priority 1
elevation will allow the restored streams to be connected to adjacent wetland restoration areas. Bank
revetments such as brush toes will be used to stabilize the outside banks around bends. In -stream
structures will be installed to promote water quality, increase bed and bank stabilization, provide
bedform diversity, and increase aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Wildlands plans to evaluate stream
substrate and determine appropriate gradations/bed features for the Site streams.
Langdon Tributary, Pond Tributary Reach 2, and East Tributary Reach 2 are proposed as stream
preservation. These reaches are stable with low bank height ratios. Supplemental planting is not
proposed on Pond and East Tributaries in the cutover area because the wetness of this area will inhibit
tree growth and the seed source is anticipated to quickly lead to desirable regrowth.
4.2 Wetlands
Proposed wetland mitigation includes preservation and enhancement of existing wetlands, re-
establishment of historic wetlands, and wetland creation. Wetland enhancement will primarily include
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 11

hydrologic improvement. Invasives species treatment will be conducted in wetland enhancement areas
if needed, primarily within areas disturbed during construction and along streambanks where Chinese
privet is more prevalent. The greatest uplift to enhancement areas will come from removal of the 25-
foot-tall berm separating Black Creek and King Mill Creek from their floodplains. Re-establishing
floodplain access for these streams will increase the storage and treatment of floodwaters and lead to a
wetter hydroperiod within the wetland. Wetland re-establishment will restore hydrology to areas of
hydric soil that lack a current wetland hydrology regime by filling agricultural drainage ditches. Wetland
creation will be accomplished by grading upland areas in the Black Creek floodplain. These convex,
elevated landforms are naturally occurring due to floodplain depositional processes but contain aquic
soil conditions at depth. To create wetlands, soil would be excavated to approximately match the
adjacent floodplain elevations. Soil and trees harvested from wetland creation areas would be utilized to
backfill old channels and build in -stream structures. Improvements to hydrophytic vegetation
communities in wetland re-establishment and enhancement areas will be tailored to address specific
deficiencies of the current community. Wetlands proposed for preservation will not have significant
changes to hydrologic or vegetative conditions but will be placed in a conservation easement in
perpetuity. Proposed wetland mitigation areas are depicted on Figures 9a, 9b, and 9c.
4.3 Vegetation Plan
Much of the project area is currently a diverse,
functioning, mature forest. Diverse, native plant
communities will be re-established where impacted by
construction. A native riparian buffer will be established
surrounding the realigned channel of King Mill Creek
and the upper reaches of Pond Tributary and East
Tributary that have little to no forested buffer. Live
stake shrub species will be planted along restored
streambanks to provide soil stabilization, shade, and
carbon inputs. Although the cutover area has numerous
volunteer loblolly pines and sweetgums, it also appears
to have adequate regeneration of desirable species to
succeed towards a mature native bottomland forest in
the long term. Working with vegetation already present in this area would likely have a favorable
outcome over a more intensive approach such as vegetation removal and replanting. The wetland
preservation areas to the west of King Mill Creek provide an excellent reference vegetation community.
Specifics of the planting plan will be based on observations of reference vegetation, species
compatibility with expected site conditions, and prior project experience.
Areas with an existing wooded riparian corridor will be treated for invasive species as needed, primarily
in areas disturbed during construction and on streambanks where Chinese privet is more likely to
establish. The Site will be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement and will be marked
per IRT guidelines.
5.0 Determination of Mitigation Credits
The mitigation stream and wetland credit calculations were derived using the US Army Corps of
Engineers' Stream Mitigation Guidance and was based on Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum
ecological uplift. Given the existing conditions of the stream channels, wetlands, the disturbance factors,
and the constraints, management objectives for each reach have been established.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 12

The proposal contains Concepts A, B, and C, all of which are a combination of stream restoration and
preservation, and wetland preservation, enhancement, re-establishment, and creation. Stream
restoration is proposed at a ratio of 1:1 and stream preservation is proposed at 10:1. Wetland re-
establishment is proposed at a ratio of 1:1. Wetland enhancement is proposed at 2:1 and 7.5:1. This
crediting follows recent guidance from the USACE Wilmington District, which states that wetland
enhancement is for areas that exhibit a moderate level of function but are somewhat degraded in one of
the primary functional categories. Examples include restoring appropriate hydrology to a currently
forested wetland by removing berms, minor drainage ditches, or conducting understory plantings.
Wetland creation is proposed at 3:1. Wetland preservation is proposed at 7.5:1.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 13

Table 7a. Proposed Mitigation Credits — Concept A
Stream Credits — Concept A
Reach
Management Objectives
Type of
Mitigation
Length
(feet)
Ratio
Stream
Credits
RESTORATION
King Mill Creek
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile
with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures,
allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native
riparian buffer.
Restoration
4,062
1:1
4,062
Barn Tributary
287
1:1
287
Pond Tributary
1,500
1:1
1,500
East Tributary
1,680
1:1
1,680
Restoration Subtotal:
7,529
7,529
PRESERVATION
Langdon Tributary
Permanently protect with a conservation easement.
Preservation
2,684
10:1
268
Pond Tributary
1,960
10:1
196
East Tributary
495
10:1
50
Preservation Total
5,139
514
TOTAL:
12,668
8,043
Wetland Credits — Concept A
Type of
Area
Wetland
Area
Management Objectives
Mitigation
(Acres)
Ratio
Credits
Wetland
Protect existing wetlands with a conservation
Wetland
70.692
7.5:1
9.426
Preservation
easement.
Preservation
Remove berm adjacent to Black Creek and King Mill
Wetland
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
Wetland
Enhancement
hydroperiod. Treat invasive species as needed in areas
Enhancement
48.152
2:1
24.076
of disturbance.
Allow cutover area to regenerate naturally and re -
Wetland
Wetland
establish a healthy native hydrophytic vegetative
58.013
7.5:1
7.735
Enhancement
Enhancement
community. Treat invasive species if needed.
Remove berm adjacent to Black Creek and King Mill
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
hydroperiod. Re -align King Mill Creek through the valley
Wetland Creation
Wetland Creation
11.750
3:1
3.917
so creation areas are in its floodplain. Grade down
convex upland areas to match grade of surrounding
existing wetlands.
Remove the berm adjacent to King Mill Creek and Black
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
Wetland Re-
hydroperiod in areas with relic hydric soils. Re -align
Wetland Re-
establishment
King Mill Creek through the valley and remove drainage
establishment
23.000
1:1
23.000
features within fields to re -wet areas with relic hydric
soils.
TOTAL:
212.206
68.154
W Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 14

Table 7b. Proposed Mitigation Credits — Concept B
Stream Credits — Concept B
Reach
Management Objectives
Type of
Mitigation
Length
(feet)
Ratio
Stream
Credits
RESTORATION
King Mill Creek
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile
with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures,
allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native
riparian buffer.
Restoration
2,625
1:1
2,625
Barn Tributary
287
1:1
287
Pond Tributary
1,500
1:1
1,500
East Tributary
1,680
1:1
1,680
Restoration Subtotal:
6,092
6,092
PRESERVATION
Langdon Tributary
Permanently protect with a conservation easement.
Preservation
2,684
10:1
268
Pond Tributary
1,960
10:1
196
East Tributary
495
10:1
50
Preservation Total
5,139
514
TOTAL:
11,231
6,606
Wetland Credits — Concept B
Type of
Area
Wetland
Area
Management Objectives
Mitigation
(Acres)
Ratio
Credits
Wetland
Protect existing wetlands with a conservation
Wetland
70.692
7.5:1
9.426
Preservation
easement.
Preservation
Remove berm adjacent to Black Creek and King Mill
Wetland
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
Wetland
Enhancement
hydroperiod. Treat invasive species as needed in areas
Enhancement
48.152
2:1
24.076
of disturbance.
Allow cutover area to regenerate naturally and re -
Wetland
Wetland
establish a healthy native hydrophytic vegetative
58.013
7.5:1
7.735
Enhancement
Enhancement
community. Treat invasive species if needed.
Remove berm adjacent to Black Creek and King Mill
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
hydroperiod. Re -align King Mill Creek through the valley
Wetland Creation
Wetland Creation
11.750
3:1
3.917
so creation areas are in its floodplain. Grade down
convex upland areas to match grade of surrounding
existing wetlands.
Remove the berm adjacent to King Mill Creek and Black
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
Wetland Re-
hydroperiod in areas with relic hydric soils. Re -align
Wetland Re-
establishment
King Mill Creek through the valley and remove drainage
establishment
7.160
1:1
7.160
features within fields to re -wet areas with relic hydric
soils.
TOTAL:
195.767
52.314
W Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 15

Table 7c. Proposed Mitigation Credits — Concept C
Stream Credits —Concept C
Reach
Management Objectives
Type of
Mitigation
Length
(feet)
Ratio
Stream
Credits
RESTORATION
King Mill Creek
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile
with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat structures,
allow bankfull floodplain access. Establish native
riparian buffer.
Restoration
6,420
1:1
6,420
Barn Tributary
287
1:1
287
Pond Tributary R1
1,500
1:1
1,500
East Tributary R1
1,680
1:1
1,680
Restoration Subtotal:
9,887
9,887
PRESERVATION
Langdon Tributary
Permanently protect with a conservation easement.
Preservation
2,684
10:1
268
Pond Tributary R2
1,960
10:1
196
East Tributary R2
495
10:1
50
Preservation Total
5,139
514
TOTAL:
15,026
10,401
Wetland Credits — Concept C
Type of
Area
Wetland
Area
Management Objectives
Mitigation
(Acres)
Ratio
Credits
Wetland
Protect existing wetlands with a conservation
Wetland
70.692
7.5:1
9.426
Preservation
easement.
Preservation
Remove berm adjacent to Black Creek and King Mill
Wetland
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
Wetland
Enhancement
hydroperiod. Treat invasive species as needed in areas
Enhancement
48.152
2:1
24.076
of disturbance.
Allow cutover area to regenerate naturally and re -
Wetland
Wetland
establish a healthy native hydrophytic vegetative
58.013
7.5:1
7.735
Enhancement
Enhancement
community. Treat invasive species if needed.
Remove berm adjacent to Black Creek and King Mill
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
hydroperiod. Re -align King Mill Creek through the valley
Wetland Creation
Wetland Creation
10.244
3:1
3.415
so creation areas are in its floodplain. Grade down
convex upland areas to match grade of surrounding
existing wetlands.
Remove the berm adjacent to King Mill Creek and Black
Wetland Re-
Creek to re-establish floodplain access and increase
Wetland Re-
3.415
1:1
3.415
establishment
establishment
hydroperiod in areas with relic hydric soils.
TOTAL:
190.516
48.067
W Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 16

5.1.1 Credit Release Schedule
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built surveys of the
Bank. Under no circumstances shall the Bank be debited until the necessary Department of Army (DA)
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided
written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of
the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if performance standards
have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where
some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the
specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to
which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of project credits will follow
the Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Compensatory Mitigation in North
Carolina, dated February 9, 2013. The proposed credit release schedule is shown in Tables 8 and 9.
Table 8. Stream Credit Release Schedule
Credit Release
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Milestone
Release
Released
1
Bank Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
15%
30%
First year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
3
interim performance standards have been met
10%
40%
Second year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
4
interim performance standards have been met
10%
50%
Third year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
5
interim performance standards have been met
10%
60%
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
65%
6
interim performance standards have been met
5%
(75%')
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
75%
7
being met
10%
(85%')
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
80°%
8
being met
5%
(90%.)
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable,
90%
9
performance standards have been met.
0
10%
(100%')
*A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 17

Table 9. Riparian Wetland Credit Release Schedule
Credit Release
Interim
Total
Milestone
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
1
Bank Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
15%
30%
First year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
3
standards are being met
10%
40%
Second year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
4
standards are being met
10%
50%
Third year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
5
standards are being met
15%
65%
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
6
standards are being met
5%
70%
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
being met; Provided that all performance standards are met, the IRT
7
may allow the Bank Sponsor to discontinue hydrologic monitoring after
15%
85%
the fifth year, but vegetation monitoring must continue for an
additional two years after the fifth year for a total of seven years
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
8
being met
5%
90%
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards
9
are being met, and project has received close-out approval
10%
100%
5.2 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits is defined as Bank Establishment in the 2013 Wilmington District
credit release schedule guidance document. The initial allocation can be released without prior written
approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE.
b. Approval of the final mitigation plan.
c. Recordation of the conservation easement and delivery of a title opinion acceptable to the
USACE.
d. Delivery of the financial assurances described in the mitigation plan.
e. 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
f. Documentation of the establishment of the long term/endowment/escrow account.
5.3 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects, a reserve
of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after four bankfull events have occurred in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event
that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As the bank approaches milestones associated with the credit
release, Wildlands will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 18

6.0 Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan
The performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria presented in the October
2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be
conducted to assess the condition of the completed project. Specific performance standard components
are proposed for stream morphology, hydrology, vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Performance
criteria will be evaluated throughout the seven years of post -construction monitoring. An outline of the
performance criteria components follows.
6.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross sections should fall within the
parameters defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes
will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the
channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -
to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. These sorts of bed changes do not
constitute a problem or indicate a need for remedial actions. If channel changes indicate a movement
toward stability, remedial action will not be taken.
In order to assess channel dimension performance,
permanent cross sections will be installed on restoration and
reaches per the IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines
(October 2016). Each cross section will be permanently
marked with pins to establish its location. Cross section
surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,
including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
Cross section and bank pin surveys (if applicable) will be
conducted in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and
seven.
Profile and Pattern
Longitudinal profile surveys will be conducted during the as -built survey but will not be conducted
during the seven-year monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a
trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will
follow standards as described in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field
Technique (Harrelson et. al., 1994) for the necessary reaches.
6.2 Hydrology
Stream
Four bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration reaches
within the seven-year monitoring period. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the
form of four bankfull events in separate years have been documented. Bankfull events will be
documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer, as appropriate for Site
conditions. The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream within a surveyed riffle
cross section, or surveyed in where necessary. Photographs will also be used to document the
occurrence of debris lines and sediment deposition.
Where restoration activities are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gages will be installed to
track the frequency and duration of stream flow events. Continuous surface water flow within the
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 19

tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days during the seven-
year monitoring period. This 30-day period of flow can occur at any point during the year. Additional
monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be documented due to abnormally dry
conditions.
Wetland
Groundwater monitoring will be conducted for seven years after construction to evaluate the hydrologic
condition of the restored wetland areas. Wetland groundwater gages will be installed in accordance
with the techniques and standards described in the USACE document entitled "Technical Standard for
Water -Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites" (ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2, June 2005). Groundwater
monitoring gages will be established throughout the wetland area to adequately characterize the
different soils, vegetation communities, and surface topographic variations that are found across the
Site. Performance criteria for the wetland hydrology of the Wehadkee soil series is 12-16% as provided
by the 2016 Wilmington District Mitigation update. An appropriate value within this range will be
selected as the wetland hydrologic performance criteria based on further Site investigation and
discussions with the NCIRT. The growing season dates for wetland hydrology monitoring will be
determined by a combination of soil temperature data, biological indicators of the growing season start
and end, and consulting NRCS WETS tables for Johnston County. Per USACE guidance, soil temperature
probes will be located at a depth of 12 inches. The growing season may not begin before March 1 of
each year.
6.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian
corridors at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven). The interim measure of vegetative
success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 native species stems per acre at the end of the
third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Also,
trees must average seven feet in height at the end of the fifth monitoring year, and ten feet in height at
the end of the seventh monitoring year. If this performance standard is met by year five and stem
density is trending towards success (i.e., vigor), and invasive species are not threatening ecological
success, monitoring of vegetation on the Site may be terminated with written approval by the USACE in
consultation with the IRT. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees. The number of monitoring quadrants required, and frequency of monitoring will be based on the
October 2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Vegetation monitoring will occur in the summer and
will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008).
6.4 Other Parameters
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent mid -channel bars within the channel or vertical
incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane
arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for seven years following
construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment, so that the same
locations and view directions on the Site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor
restoration and enhancement areas, as well as vegetation plots.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 20

Longitudinal reference photos will be established at regular intervals along the channel by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream. Cross sectional photos will be taken of each permanent cross
section looking upstream and downstream. Reference photos will also be taken for each of the
vegetation plots. Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point, cross section, and
vegetation plot will be taken when the stream and vegetation assessments are conducted. The
photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same area in each photo over time.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above. Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the
seven-year monitoring period. Problem areas such as channel instability (e.g. lateral and/or vertical
instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts), vegetation health (e.g. low
stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive species, or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock
access will be noted. Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed and will be accompanied by a
written description in the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent
visual assessment. Should remedial actions be required, a plan of action will be provided in the annual
monitoring report.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
If required by DWR as part of the project's permitting process, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will
be performed on the restored site. Any required sampling will be performed using DWR Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (October 2012).
7.0 Maintenance and Long -Term Sustainability
7.1 Maintenance
The Bank shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the project shall be
conducted at a minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until
performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that
require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance will be conducted to rectify identified deficiencies
and may include the activities listed in Table 10.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 21

Table 10. Maintenance Plan
Component/Feature
Maintenance Through Project Close -Out
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in -stream
structures to prevent piping, securing loose coir matting, and supplemental
Stream
installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel. Areas
where stormwater and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require
maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -cutting. Beaver dams that inundate
the streams channels shall be removed and the beaver shall be trapped.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant
Vegetation
species affecting the viability of the mitigation shall be controlled by mechanical
and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will
be performed in accordance with the NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules
and regulations.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
bank site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
Site Boundary
bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or
conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be
repaired and/or replaced on an as -needed basis.
7.2 Adaptive Management
Upon completion of site construction, the Sponsor will implement the post -construction monitoring
protocols and minor remedial actions (routine maintenance) will be performed as needed for the
duration of the monitoring period. The Sponsor will notify the USACE immediately if monitoring results
or visual observations suggest a trend towards instability, major remedial actions are needed, or that
performance standards cannot be achieved. Should major remedial measures be required, the Sponsor
will submit a Corrective Action Plan and coordinate with the USACE until authorization is secured to
conduct the adaptive management activities. The Sponsor is responsible for funding and/or providing
the services necessary to secure any necessary permits to support the proposed major remedial
adaptive management actions, to implement the corrective action plan, and to deliver record drawings
that depict the extent and nature of the work performed. If the USACE determines that the Bank is not
meeting performance standards or the Sponsor is not complying with the terms of the instrument, the
USACE may take appropriate actions, including but not limited to: suspending credit sales, utilizing
financial assurances, and/or terminating the instrument.
7.3 Long Term Management Provisions
The Sponsor will institute a Long Term Management Plan responsible for assessing the condition of the
Bank and implementing maintenance provisions to maintain performance of the Bank. The proposed
conservation easement will help to ensure that only IRT-allowable activities take place. This easement
will be transferred to an IRT-approved non-profit organization once monitoring success criteria have
been achieved.
The long-term manager will be responsible for inspecting the Site annually to ensure that the
restrictions documented in the recorded easement are upheld. The restrictions and long-term
management responsibilities will convey with the land, should the property be transferred in the future.
Reporting will be documented and kept on file for future reference.
Widllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 22

8.0 References
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2011. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), 2005. Neuse Basinwide Water Quality Plan,
accessed at: https:Hdeq.nc.gov/media/309/download
NC Division of Mitigation Services. 2009. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities
Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS, accessed at
https://websoilsurvev.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
WWidllands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 23

t
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site 58 4
Service Area - HUC 03020201 58 �
dcconeechee
0 14 Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) State Park
is=:ti County Boundaries 49 [3
Municipalities_._......_.._.._•._..-•----_-._.._.._�•Y...... ...... _.i.............. .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. .._.j..._
r15 � 963 1.
Sappony 5dts : I Kerr Lake Stat �
Recreation Are{ i
1 5� ! 1
* F 9
� 1f�, f
158'7 t
Yanceyville
-Caswell Roxboro
1
n - Warren CO - !
CO _ P
j 1g8 - ers� fC0 - I ! l 1
Vance CO - j
1 ! I Henderson ! j
86 `1Xj8[oxford � 401
l j = Granville o f 1
I CO -
�•- Halifax
} ,.�rr..�.. .,�. 1. HaIiw:. % pu:.
j I I
)f 5
B r
i I reedmoor
1
1�eba
shornugh i
- Alamance-~•-~--
- Orange CO - � '•.,•
CO - = i
-.Durham CO - •'�`".,
gs. Durha
+ ake' �est
ji4
I ChapeiHill
87
► l
1
j C ry - Wake,!&, iqh ightda
1
- Chatham 1 ?
pex
Co'- boro B Everett
Jordan Garner •�,
Lake
11. oily Springs 1 Clayton
s7 '
.r. tit—• �' • �• 40
•" `•'a. �
iSoc h Carolina ram,
Laz'
_..1• -1r L••y 8
39 ; t•V
Louisburg j
- Franklin �.
co - I•
Red
;;• Nashville
i
- Nash CO -
6 �.
r• �r
�� 39 64
Zebu for -�•
Wendell ./� �, •�• _
�'
q 210
C.
o
aa1
r !�
- Le_e C_O r-rord f:
is ' l•
Fo a s
1 `•
421
Coats 'y
i�r. %
Lillington
,��j
1 %•
° _.
- Harnett
Benson
• i
CO -�
•�� % , 87
27
Coharie Sdtsa Erwin
��
�•�-
Dunn
- Moore' CO -, 24J
c 1
Walker[own
0
or Pill y Spring Lake
t Fort Liberty -
Fort Liberty 1 0 Lk _ Cumberland Sampson
CO Military - 'y r' Co - J
p-serration {
- Hoke CO -
► o Fayetteville js
i
WILD LAND S
ENGINEERING
0
L
13
50
•-•��.•�• 264
- Wilson CO -
L
� 111
581
A 17.
70 %
Olive
- Duplin CO -
1
1
l
1 Warsaw
Figure 1. Service Area Map
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Neuse River Basin 03020201
8 16 Miles Johnston County, NC
I t I

_j Se.avIZ- f .
•l _ �
1 0302020111007.0 ►
I'03020201120030
:Rg.1
Triangle Land Triangle Land
Conservancy Preserve. Conservancy Easement
Johnston County f;
Open Spare
l
030.0201130030 Project Location
f �
NC Division of Mitigation..
Services Easemenf�
1 s J
NC Department of f ,� , '' _ Black Creek Holts Lake/Black Creek Swamp
Transportation Mitigation Site .. Sandhili and Bluff y�1�
NC Division of Mitigation
/ Services Easement
03020201140010
0
f j ti
-
- — — — — Primitive Baptist church anna Creek Swam
P _] ........
ee
Project Location Habitat TRA Water Features
Municipalities Hydrology TRA 303d Listed Streams
Hydrologic Unit Code {14-Digit} Significant Natural Heritage Areas ® Airports
Q River Basin NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas
Water Quality TRA NC Historic Preservation Areas
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
W I L D L A N D S King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
0 0.75 1.5 Miles Neuse River Basin 03020201
I f fti Johnston County, NC

- Caswell
Cv ! Person CO - I n.WE
W 0�
` - Warren CO -
- Alai
CO-
■
_"
Chatham
ca -
Lds
-LeeC
IpGranviile
Co -
r'i
0
- Harnett
co-
Vdaikertown
_
{` -
*
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
i�
Service Area - HUC 03030002
County Boundaries
■
Statewide Highway
+
Aviation; Ex Aviation
[�
Regional Highway
_;_
Regional Ferry
^?
Division Highway
Division Ferry
Interstate Maintenancet
Transition Ferry
/
Bridge; None Bridge
�i
Statewide Rail
/
Transition Highway
n
Regional Rail
Other Highway; None Highway;
None Highway Safety
Division Rail
+
Statewide Aviation
0
Transition Rail
+
Regional Aviation
Other Rail; None Rail
Division Aviation
■
Regional Public Transit
WILDLAND S
ENGINEERING
Qn
b
- Fran— k[in
CO-
■ 0
- Nash CO -
Halifax
�
'Wilson CO -
3
u /
Clayton
/
^ JVI111
CO
f
King Mill Lowgrounds
M't' t' S't
0
i Aga ion i e
)a! Division Public Transit
Transition Highway
Q1 Other Public Transit
+.•+ Transition Rail
Division Bicycle And Pedestrian
Regional Public Transit
0
®Transition Bicycle And Pedestrian
Division Public Transit
Division Bicycle And Pedestrian;
s_ Statewide Highway
Regional Bicycle And Pedestrian
Regional Highway
Transition Bicycle And Pedestrian
Division Highway
Other Bicycle And Pedestrian; Ex
IM
Congestion Mitigation -Non;
CMACt
PT Public Transit
Other Highway; None Highway;
4mmm Statewide Rail
None Highway Safety
Figure 3. NCDOT Current STIP FY 2020-2029
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Neuse River Basin 03020201
� I i I 8 '16 Miles
I Johnston County, NC

r — • -J w proposed Conservation Easement
1.
Vol
i
ism
Oaks, NC USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrang
D 800 1,600 Feet
I I I
Figure R. 115G5 Topographic Map
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

rnti
;`
Flevat
Q Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
V A
rre
Akw-`-
Figure 5. LiDAR. Map
King MIA Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
W I L IJ L A N IJ S 0 800 1,600 Feet Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
r N G' r E I' N e Neuse River Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

Figure 6. Site Map
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
W T L D L A N D S Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
E N G I N E E R I N G 0 500 1,000 Feet Neuse River Basin 03020201
kt I i I i I t
Johnston County, NC

Figure 7. Watershed Map
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
W I L D L A N D S 0 1,200 2,400 Feet Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
ktww ENGINEERING
Neuse Riper Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

Figure 8. soils Map
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
W I L D L A N D S 0 800 1,600 Feet Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
ktvr E N G I N E E R I N G Neuse River Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

.A
- ANK
''.' '� •
.{ems `� � �.- .w ��{c,�■ '�- �'�41R�" _
XN-
• r.
1
08
u. :�� �'' � �� � `�` �.�►;�` `-:Q fir` ,� f' "'!t.' �
Project Location 4
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Wetland Re -Establishment (1:1)
Proposed Wetland Enhancement (2:1)
® Proposed Wetland Creation (3:1)
Proposed Wetland Enhancement (7.5:1)
Proposed Wetland Preservation (7.5:1)
Proposed Stream Restoration (1:1)
+�+p Proposed Stream Preservation (10:1)
a�
1
- - - - Channel to be Filled
�
- - - Berm to be Removed
Non -Project Streams
Existing Utility Line
Topographic Contours (4')
o Reach Breaks
is
twv
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING,
R �Y
1 �'� Its •`4X.
��'.• � fir' _ � .s•
40
_�� '` `;�' � 1. t '•., � .: --<
...ffinv. WE',
_ a :•
0 500 1,000 Feet
I I I i I t
Figure 9a. Concept Map A
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

44 R'' �
S'
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Wetland Re -Establishment (1:1)
Proposed Wetland Enhancement (2:1)
® Proposed Wetland Creation (3:1)
Proposed Wetland Enhancement (7.5:1)
Proposed Wetland Preservation (7.5:1)
Proposed Stream Restoration (1:1)
+�+p Proposed Stream Preservation (10:1)
a�
1
.... Channel to be Filled
�
- - - Berm to be Removed
Non -Project Streams
Existing Utility Line
Topographic Contours (4')
Q Reach Breaks
%tWILDLANDS
wV ENGINEERING
0 500 1,000 Feet
I i I I I
'� fz
1 •:r
Figure 9b. Concept Map B
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

71
•� ;, a'? f ' tar-.' .3 - �7C �i .;
` ,,j � �b. ter• .. �% .i.Yi
,.XN
N.
,-
X.
AN
� 1�� � \- ` • ti � � -+ram �
\l 1 Y
N:,
,
Q Project Location tea,•
�;. '�r;��;. Gam. ��3 �,' `,,'..?•�.
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Wetland Re -Establishment (1:1) -
Proposed Wetland Enhancement (2:1) h� �y � � � ,'�;,;••' ,�
® Proposed Wetland Creation (3:1) ss
Proposed Wetland Enhancement (7.5:1)
Proposed Wetland Preservation (7.5:1)
Proposed Stream Restoration (1:1) j'�•. ' '
Proposed Stream Preservation (10:1) �� a
Restore to Remnant Channel: �,• ti
- - - Channel to be Filled
- - - Berm to be Removed
Non -Project Streams ' `' ': , a,'
Y.
Existing Utility Line
Topographic Contours (4')
Q Reach Breaks A'. r
17
WVWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 500 1,000 Feet
III I I
Figure 9c. Concept Map C
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
Wildlands Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Johnston County, NC

Appendix A
Historic Aerials

Pik
NQUIRY k 7496156.5
YEAR: 1950 4N
(r 1000 EDR
V.A - "

r

i Iis
T
i � r.
.

1
... ... 41r
PWO-07imm- AOL,
it
Aw
All
N 'It

�n v

• I �r, y � _ �s
Ob
'� � •! �'' i �i 'Asp � �

i
�r 'v
4.7
y I �tz
3
INQUIRY k 7496156.5 /1 A
YEAR: 2020 4
= 1000' EDR

Appendix B
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1
Project/Site: �.� t It+
Latitude: 3So
Evaluator: r cw W ��
County: j bVw\M
Longitude: - 7 �, ¢Qj �� 3
Total Points:
at least intermittent /��
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other PY9 t.i Li
ifStream9is
if 2 19 orperennial if t 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
^ t-
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 1 1, )
I Absent
Wyk
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
f 1
_2,
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
2
Ql
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0�
lj
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial depositsV_
Q-
1
2
In
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
(0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0-
Yes =
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = I I . S ) __;D�
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
< 3�
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.
0•
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
_-C Yes = 3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = a) )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0)
1
2
3
22. Fish
ro\
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
11,
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 ther = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
`�-
Notes: C )j\Ck 1 \ V_Ck
oppis.1CSr
t.�a
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site:
Latitude: �;
9
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: y "
�•4
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent {t
Stream Determination (cir e)
Other f
if a 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermitten Perenni I
e.g. Quad Name.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
n2l
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
t; .".. R£
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5_�
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1,57
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 7r)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
52`
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes£� 3
C. Biologv (Subtotal = s ' )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
717
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish'"
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
_0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
14 1 4;
Project/Site: /nI 44 P/1 t
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other 'O'Q i(` gA
Stream is at least intermittent
if �� 19 or eerennial if 30
Ephemera!
Intermittente'rennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = -0 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(fv
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3, In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple- pool sequence
0
(�i)
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
(51-7)
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6, Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11, Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
. artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 46
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
c12
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf lifter
1.5
1
1 L
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
r -17)
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1 1 J_
1.5
. table?
17. Soil -based evidence of high water7
No = 0
�777,es'=
C. Biology (Subtotal = -e>
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3.
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
C:M
1.5
24, Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0 .5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75-1 OBL
= 1.5 Othf:-2
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1 1-? ­Y�
It ('a
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:-7-0
County: J ok A
Longitude: - -7
Total Points:
-7
Stream is at least intermittent 1�11
Stream Dete . (circle one)
in
Other
�_"
1
if a� 19 or 2erennial if 2� 30* >
I Ephemeral I�TN�ermittenlc Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
W
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = Ref
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple- pool sequence
0
(n)
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
n
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9, Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 5- t '5- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1!1_71
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
--777-
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5.
1
1,5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
(-Yes = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = '7-, , 7-5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
TD
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
7Y7-
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.115-
1
1,5
23, Crayfish
0
e-'10575
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
Q.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
)BL = 1.5 Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

,N# wvv
Evaluator: V County: n, Longitude:
all Points: Stream Determination (cir ope) Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2: 19 or i2erennial if a 30' Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial e g Quad Name:
A. PeomorplIql9gy u total
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
------------
3 In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool. step -pool.
ripple -pool sequence
0
—
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
3
11 . Second or greater order channel
No 0
' artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions mmanual ----�—
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 2
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0
00
1..
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
3
perennial streams m'ay also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual

Appendix C
Existing Geomorphic Data

Cross Section 1
Remnant Channel - Riffle
98
97
96
95
94
a'
) 93
w 92
91
0 10 20 30 40 50
Elevation Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
16.5
x-section area (ft.sq.)
18.3
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.7
max depth (ft)
18.9
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.9
hydraulic radius (ft)
20.3
width -depth ratio
Cross Section 2
Flood Dimensions
- W flood prone area (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
2.1 low bank height (ft)
1.2 low bank height ratio
Remnanet Channel - Pool
97
96
95
-- -----
94
0 93
is
(> 92
w 91
90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
21.3
x-section area (ft.sq.)
14.9
width (ft)
1.4
mean depth (ft)
2.3
max depth (ft)
15.8
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.3
hydraulic radius (ft)
10.5
'9width-depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
53.8 ' W flood prone area (ft)
3.6 entrenchment ratio
3.6 low bank height (ft)
1.6 low bank height ratio

Cross Section 3
Remnant Channel - Riffle
97
96
95
94
c
•0 93
ro
92
w
91
90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
20.6
x-section area (ft.sq.)
22.2
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
22.5
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.9
hydraulic radius (ft)
24.0
width -depth ratio
Cross Section 4
Flood Dimensions
--- W flood prone area (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
1.7 low bank height (ft)
1.1 low bank height ratio
Remnant Channel - Pool
99
98
97
�- 96
c
95
i�
94
_>
w
93
92
0 20 40 60 80 100
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
55.6
x-section area (ft.sq.)
35.2
width (ft)
1.6
mean depth (ft)
2.7
max depth (ft)
36.1
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.5
hydraulic radius (ft)
22.3
width -depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
--- W flood prone area (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
2.7 low bank height (ft)
1.0 low bank height ratio

Cross Section 5
106
104
102
�100
�- 98
c
0 96
> 94
w 92
90
88
King Mill Branch and Black Creek - Riffle
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
271.4
x-section area (ft.sq.)
101.4
width (ft)
2.7
mean depth (ft)
5.8
max depth (ft)
109.5
wetted perimeter (ft)
2.5
hydraulic radius (ft)
37.9
`width -depth ratio
Cross Section 5A
100
98
96
c 94
0
> 92
_m
w 90
88
Flood Dimensions
--- W flood prone area (ft)
--- `entrenchment ratio
5.1 low bank height (ft)
0.9 low bank height ratio
King Mill Branch - Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
17.9
x-section area (ft.sq.)
17.1
width (ft)
1.1
` mean depth (ft)
1.5
` max depth (ft)
17.7
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.0
` hydraulic radius (ft)
16.2
width -depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
19.7 ' W flood prone area (ft)
1.2 entrenchment ratio
4.5 low bank height (ft)
3.0 low bank height ratio

Cross Section 5113
Black Creek - Riffle
99
97
95
0
93
> 91
m
w 89
87
110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
163.8
x-section area (ft.sq.)
54.8
width (ft)
3.0
mean depth (ft)
5.8
max depth (ft)
59.0
wetted perimeter (ft)
2.8
hydraulic radius (ft)
18.3
width -depth ratio
Cross Section 6
96
94
92
90
0
> 88
a�
w 86
84
Flood Dimensions
- - W flood prone area (ft)
--- `entrenchment ratio
5.7 low bank height (ft)
1.0 low bank height ratio
King Mill Branch - Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
18.6
x-section area (ft.sq.)
14.3
width (ft)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
1.7
max depth (ft)
15.4
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.2
hydraulic radius (ft)
11.1
`width -depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
24.3 ' W flood prone area (ft)
1.7 entrenchment ratio
5.4 low bank height (ft)
3.1 ' low bank height ratio

Cross Section 7
96
95
94
93
92
0
.6 91
w 90
89
88
Pond Tributary - Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
6.0
x-section area (ft.sq.)
5.3
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
1.5
max depth (ft)
6.9
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.9
hydraulic radius (ft)
4.8
'9width-depth ratio
Cross Section 8
Flood Dimensions
10.7 ' W flood prone area (ft)
2.0 entrenchment ratio
6.1 low bank height (ft)
4.1 low bank height ratio
Barn Tributary - Riffle
100
99
98
97
96
0
M 95
w 94 93
92
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Elevation Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
4.1
x-section area (ft.sq.)
5.0
width (ft)
0.8
mean depth (ft)
1.4
max depth (ft)
5.9
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.7
hydraulic radius (ft)
6.0
'qwidth-depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
7.7 ' W flood prone area (ft)
1.6 entrenchment ratio
3.4 low bank height (ft)
2.4 low bank height ratio

Cross Section 9
East Tributary - Riffle
96
95
94
93
...................................... J ----------------------------------
0 92
i� 91
w 90
89
88
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
4.5
x-section area (ft.sq.)
8.1
width (ft)
0.6
mean depth (ft)
1.2
` max depth (ft)
9.1
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.5
hydraulic radius (ft)
14.3
'9width-depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
9.2 ' W flood prone area (ft)
1.1 entrenchment ratio
2.7 low bank height (ft)
2.2 low bank height ratio

Appendix D
EDR Radius Report Summary

King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site
King Mill Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Inquiry Number: 7496156.2s
November 13, 2023
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDR . Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary
ES1
OverviewMap-----------------------------------------------------------
2
DetailMap--------------------------------------------------------------
3
Map Findings Summary
4
MapFindings------------------------------------------------------------
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
10
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map -------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map------------------------------------------------
A-17
Physical Setting Source Map Findings
A-19
Physical Setting Source Records Searched
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist
from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE
WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES,
AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,
COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON -INFRINGEMENT,
MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates,
ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property.
Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the
environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.
Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any
report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC7496156.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527 - 21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E2247 - 16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E1528 - 22) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
KING MILL ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.4749990 - 35' 28' 29.99"
78.4814950 - 78° 28' 53.38"
Zone 17
728511.4
3928437.5
128 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
North Map:
Version Date:
Southwest Map:
Version Date:
Northwest Map:
Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from:
Source:
50021308 FOUR OAKS, NC
2022
50021392 POWHATAN, NC
2022
50021252 BENSON, NC
2022
50021293 EDMONDSON, NC
2022
20200603
USDA
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
KING MILL ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
PARKER/ LASSITER FAR 223 KINGS MILL ROAD IMD Higher 802, 0.152, ENE
7496156.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL---------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY---------. Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------ RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS------------------------ Land Use Control Information System
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS --------- Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI___________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
LCID Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST_________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST ----------------- State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP__________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY----------------------
Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF
Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9----------.
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI
Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL---------------- Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS-----------------------
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS
Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80-------------------.
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD-------------------------
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST-----------.
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION
2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS-------------------------
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD
Records Of Decision
RMP-------------------------
Risk Management Plans
RAATS
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS------------------------
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA--------------
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS-------------------
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV-------------
Indian Reservations
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FUSRAP_____________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES
Mines Master Index File
MINES MRDS
Mineral Resources Data System
ABANDONED MINES________
Abandoned Mines
FINDS
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO ------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
PFAS NPL--------------------
Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information
PFAS FEDERAL SITES______
Federal Sites PFAS Information
PFAS TRIS
List of PFAS Added to the TRI
PFAS TSCA__________________
PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST_____.
PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing
PFAS ATSDR
PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
PFAS WQP-------------------
Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS
PFAS NPDES
Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information
PFAS ECHO
Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING. Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT___
All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC
Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing
BIOSOLIDS__________________
ICIS-NPDES Biosolids Facility Data
PFAS
PFAS Contamination Site Listing
AIRS
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Asbestos Permits & Notifications Information
CCB
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
COAL ASH
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS--------------
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES
NPDES Facility Location Listing
PCSRP-----------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
UIC
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP--------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/28/2023 has revealed that there is 1 IMD
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
PARKER/ LASSITER FAR 223 KINGS MILL ROAD ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.152 mi.) 1 8
Facility Id: 16080
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC7496156.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 7496156.2S
Target Property
o a 1/2 1 ones
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
Special Flood Hazard Area (1 %) Disposal Sites
the target property
1
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Manufactured Gas Plants
.
National Wetland Inventory
L
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: King Mill Road CONTACT: Tasha King
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 7496156.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.474999 / 78.481495 DATE: November 13, 2023 5:09 pm
Copyright m 2023 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 7496156.2S
Target Property
o 1/8 Zia
lnunes
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Indian Reservations BIA
Hazardous Substance
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
Special Flood Hazard Area (1 %)
Disposal Sites
the target property
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Wetland Inventory
r
Sensitive Receptors
State Wetlands
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: King Mill Road CONTACT: Tasha King
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 7496156.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.474999 / 78.481495 DATE: November 13, 2023 5:09 pm
Copyright m 2023 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC7496156.2s Page 4

Database
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
INDIAN VCP 0.500
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
S W RCY
0.500
HIST LF
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
O D I
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
0.001
US CDL
0.001
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
0.001
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
TC7496156.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
IMD
0.500
0
1
0
NR
NR
1
SPILLS 90
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MILTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
MINES MRDS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS NPL
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS FEDERAL SITES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS TRIS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS TSCA
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS ATSDR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
PFAS WQP
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TC7496156.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database
PFAS NPDES
0.250
PFAS ECHO
0.250
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAININ®.250
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT
0.250
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC
0.250
BIOSOLIDS
0.001
PFAS
0.250
AIRS
0.001
ASBESTOS
0.001
CCB
0.500
COAL ASH
0.500
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
Financial Assurance
0.001
NPDES
0.001
PCSRP
0.500
SEPT HAULERS
0.001
UIC
0.001
AOP
0.001
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL
RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001
RGA LF 0.001
RGA LUST 0.001
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
Total
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 NR NR NR NR 0
0 NR NR NR NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 1
0
0
0 1
TC7496156.2s Page 7

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1
PARKER/ LASSITER FARMS
IMD S104913531
ENE
223 KINGS MILL ROAD
N/A
1/8-1/4
FOUR OAKS, NC
0.152 mi.
802 ft.
Relative:
IMD:
Higher
Facility ID:
16080
Actual:
Name:
PARKER/ LASSITER FARMS
199 ft.
Address:
223 KINGS MILL ROAD
City,State,Zip:
FOUR OAKS, NC
Date Occurred:
11/1/1995
Submit Date:
7/23/2003
Incident Desc:
NITRATES, COLIFORM IN WELL, TECHNICAL SERVICES INVESTI. NOT CONCLUDE
WELL CONTA. FROM LASSITER ONLY
Operator:
LASSITER, RUSSELL
UST ID:
Not reported
Incident ID:
Not reported
Initials of UST Regional Contact:
Not reported
Regional Office:
Not reported
Responsible Party/Company Name:
Not reported
Ownership:
5
Responsible Party Contact Name:
Not reported
Operation:
4
Responsible Party Mailing Address:
Not reported
Responsible Party City,State,Zip:
Not reported
Ownership:
Federal
Operation Type:
Educ/Religios
Responsible Party County:
Not reported
Source:
Pit, pond, lagoon
Type:
SEWAGE/SEPTAGE
Location:
Not reported
Petroleum Type:
Not reported
Date Incident Reported:
Not reported
Whether Tank is Commercial or Non Commercial:
Not reported
Site Priority:
130
Whether Tank is Regulated:
Not reported
Priority Update:
Not reported
Notice of Regulatory Requirement:
Not reported
Wells Affected:
No
Notice of Violation:
Not reported
Phase 1 or Phase 2:
Not reported
Num Affected:
0
Site Priority:
Not reported
Location:
Not reported
Current Risk Condition:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
Initial reported risk of incident (never changes):
Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Intermediate Condition Present:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.479166
Longitude:
-78.468055
Use of Land, Industrial:
Not reported
Corrective Action Plan Selected - up to 5:
Not reported
RBCA:
Not reported
Date Close Review Requested From RP or Owner:
Not reported
Date Case Closed:
Not reported
TC7496156.2s Page 8

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
PARKER/ LASSITER FARMS (Continued)
MAP FINDINGS
Extent of Contamination:
Number of Supply Wells Located on Property:
MTBE in Well Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Facility Phone Number:
MTBE in Groundwater Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Date Land Use Restriction Filed:
Date Cleanup Initiated:
Record Status:
RBCA GW Codes:
RBCA GW:
Pollutant Type Present:
Reference Number for Media Disk for Archived Record
RP Owner?:
RP Operator?:
RP Landowner?:
Comments:
GW Contam:
Soil Contam:
Contact Phone:
Owner Company:
Operator Address:
Operator City,State,Zip:
Operator County:
Material:
Qty Lost 1:
Qty Recovered 1:
Setting:
Risk Site:
Priority Code:
Dem Contact:
Wells Contam:
Latitude Number:
Longitude Number:
Latitude Decimal:
Longitude Decimal:
GPS:
Agency:
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S104913531
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Not reported
919-934-5800
Not reported
1431 LASSITER POND RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 919-934-5800
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
A
JIM ROUSH
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
EST
DWQ
TC7496156.2s Page 9

Count: 0 records.
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
NO SITES FOUND
TC7496156.2s Page 10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 06/23/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC7496156.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 14
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 14
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7496156.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 08/03/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 08/21/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 08/21/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/12/2023 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2023 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2023
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 03/22/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2023 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 05/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTS.
Date of Government Version: 07/28/2023 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2023 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2023 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2023 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2023 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2023
Number of Days to Update: 81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7496156.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 03/08/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 07/28/2023 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2023 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 03/10/2023 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 03/03/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2023
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7496156.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2023 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC7496156.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2022 Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2023
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC7496156.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 08/21/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 08/21/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 06/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2023
Number of Days to Update: 88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC7496156.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/28/2023 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2023 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 08/07/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/15/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2023
Number of Days to Update: 283
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 07/17/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC7496156.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7496156.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/20/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2023
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2023 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2023 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2023 Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC7496156.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 03/03/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023
Number of Days to Update: 98
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/01/2023 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/07/2023 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/13/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023
Number of Days to Update: 61
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 08/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/28/2023
Number of Days to Update: 98
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023
Number of Days to Update: 60
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 06/24/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 08/14/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/15/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS NPL: Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information
EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain data describing what is known
about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS FEDERAL SITES: Federal Sites PFAS Information
Several federal entities, such as the federal Superfund program, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy provided information for sites with
known or suspected detections at federal facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS TRIS: List of PFAS Added to the TRI
Section 7321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA) immediately added certain
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the list of chemicals covered by the Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI) under Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act (EPCRA) and provided a framework
for additional PFAS to be added to TRI on an annual basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS TSCA: PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information
EPA issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires
chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. EPA
publishes non -confidential business information (non -CBI) and includes descriptive information about each site,
corporate parent, production volume, other manufacturing information, and processing and use information.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST: PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing
To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by
mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, PERFL, AFFF,
GENX, GEN-X (plus the VT waste codes). These keywords were searched for in the following text fields: Manifest
handling instructions (MANIFEST_HANDLING_INSTR), Non -hazardous waste description (NON _HAZ_WASTE _DESCRIPTION),
DOT printed information (DOT_PRINTED_INFORMATION), Waste line handling instructions (WASTE_LINE_HANDLING_INSTR),
Waste residue comments (WASTE_RESIDUE_COMMENTS).
TC7496156.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS ATSDR: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
PFAS contamination site locations from the Department of Health & Human Services, Center for Disease Control &
Prevention. ATSDR is involved at a number of PFAS-related sites, either directly or through assisting state and
federal partners. As of now, most sites are related to drinking water contamination connected with PFAS production
facilities or fire training areas where aqueous film -forming firefighting foam (AFFF) was regularly used.
Date of Government Version: 06/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 601
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS WQP: Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS
The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a part of a modernized repository storing ambient sampling data for all environmental
media and tissue samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non -governmental
organizations and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. The information
is commonly used for research and assessments of environmental quality.
Date of Government Version: 09/23/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2023
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS NPDES: Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information
Any discharger of pollutants to waters of the United States from a point source must have a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The process for obtaining limits involves the regulated entity
(permittee) disclosing releases in a NPDES permit application and the permitting authority (typically the state
but sometimes EPA) deciding whether to require monitoring or monitoring with limits. Caveats and Limitations:
Less than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees and fewer states have
established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. New rulemakings have been initiated that may increase the number
of facilities monitoring for PFAS in the future.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 89
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS ECHO: Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
Regulators and the public have expressed interest in knowing which regulated entities may be using PFAS. EPA has
developed a dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS. Approximately 120,000
facilities subject to federal environmental programs have operated or currently operate in industry sectors with
processes that may involve handling and/or release of PFAS.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING: Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
A list of fire training sites was added to the Industry Sectors dataset using a keyword search on the permitted
facilitys name to identify sites where fire -fighting foam may have been used in training exercises. Additionally,
you may view an example spreadsheet of the subset of fire training facility data, as well as the keywords used
in selecting or deselecting a facility for the subset. as well as the keywords used in selecting or deselecting
a facility for the subset. These keywords were tested to maximize accuracy in selecting facilities that may use
fire -fighting foam in training exercises, however, due to the lack of a required reporting field in the data systems
for designating fire training sites, this methodology may not identify all fire training sites or may potentially
misidentify them.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT: All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing
Since July 1, 2006, all certified part 139 airports are required to have fire -fighting foam onsite that meet military
specifications (MIL-F-24385) (14 CFR 139.317). To date, these military specification fire -fighting foams are
fluorinated and have been historically used for training and extinguishing. The 2018 FAA Reauthorization Act has
a provision stating that no later than October 2021, FAA shall not require the use of fluorinated AFFF. This provision
does not prohibit the use of fluorinated AFFF at Part 139 civilian airports; it only prohibits FAA from mandating
its use. The Federal Aviation Administration?s document AC 150/5210-6D - Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents provides
guidance on Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents, which includes Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF).
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC: Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing
The National Response Center (NRC) serves as an emergency call center that fields initial reports for pollution
and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. The spreadsheets
posted to the NRC website contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state
response agency. Response center calls from 1990 to the most recent complete calendar year where there was indication
of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) usage are included in this dataset. NRC calls may reference AFFF usage in
the ?Material Involved? or ?Incident Description? fields.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BIOSOLIDS: ICIS-NPDES Biosolids Facility Data
The data reflects compliance information about facilities in the biosolids program.
Date of Government Version: 07/16/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7496156.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: Asbestos Permits & Notifications Information
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/13/2023
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2023
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2023
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/28/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2023 Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2023
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2023
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 09/28/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2023
Number of Days to Update: 4 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 07/06/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/2023 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2023
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 08/18/2022 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2022 Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2023
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 01/17/2023 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/18/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2023 Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2023
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 02/09/2023 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2023 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2023
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 08/07/2023 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/08/2023 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2023 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2023
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2024
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC7496156.2s Page GR-28

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2023
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2024
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2023
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2024
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2023
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2024
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2024
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2023
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-29

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7496156.2s Page GR-30

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
KING MILL LOWGROUNDS MITIGATION SITE
KING MILL ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
North Map:
Version Date:
Southwest Map:
Version Date:
Northwest Map:
Version Date:
35.474999 - 35' 28' 30.00"
78.481495 - 78' 28' 53.38"
Zone 17
728511.4
3928437.5
128 ft. above sea level
50021308 FOUR OAKS, NC
2022
50021392 POWHATAN, NC
2022
50021252 BENSON, NC
2022
50021293 EDMONDSON, NC
2022
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC7496156.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General South
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
0
0
0
w
z
C
0
V.�
NVI UI
TIP
VV4L11
- W N
fn T CD W N
VVfdbL
Target Property Elevation: 128 ft.
L-O L
TIP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC7496156.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720164200J
Additional Panels in search area:
Not Reported
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
FOUR OAKS
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOWO
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC7496156.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
:AZa :F� 1:L1111 0:L1011411 ki 1 I I
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Eugeosynclinal Deposits
System: Cambrian
Series: Cambrian
Code: Ce (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC7496156.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 7496156.2s
N
N
Target Property
SSURGO Soil
Water
3
4
S
2
3
C
0 1116 118 14 Mki
SITE NAME: King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: King Mill Road CONTACT: Tasha King
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 7496156.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.474999 / 78.481495 DATE: November 13, 2023 5:10 pm
Copyright m 2023 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Tomotley
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be
drained and are classified.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
COARSE -GRAINED
Soils.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
7 inches
42 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
COARSE -GRAINED
Soils.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
3
42 inches
50 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
COARSE -GRAINED
Soils.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC7496156.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
4
50 inches
72 inches
loamy sand
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
COARSE -GRAINED
Soils.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: Augusta
Soil Surface Texture: clay loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
9 inches
18 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
2
18 inches
59 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
TC7496156.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
3
59 inches
70 inches
coarse sandy
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6 Min:
loam
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
4
0 inches
9 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Altavista
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC7496156.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
2
7 inches
14 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
14 inches
42 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
42 inches
59 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name:
Wehadkee
Soil Surface Texture:
loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class:
Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
High
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 15 inches
TC7496156.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Gravels,
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clean gravels,
passing No.
Poorly Graded
200), Silty
Gravel.
Soils.
2
7 inches
57 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Gravels,
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clean gravels,
passing No.
Poorly Graded
200), Silty
Gravel.
Soils.
3
57 inches
83 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Gravels,
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clean gravels,
passing No.
Poorly Graded
200), Silty
Gravel.
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name:
Uchee
Soil Surface Texture:
loamy coarse sand
Hydrologic Group:
Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class:
Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Low
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 130 inches
TC7496156.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
29 inches
loamy coarse
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
sand
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
29 inches
53 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
53 inches
59 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name:
Goldsboro
Soil Surface Texture:
sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 76 inches
TC7496156.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
sandy loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
7 inches
14 inches
loamy sand
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
14 inches
44 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
4
44 inches
75 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 7
Soil Component Name:
Water
Soil Surface Texture:
sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Not Reported
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
No Layer Information available.
TC7496156.2s Page A-12

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 8
Soil Component Name: Gilead
Soil Surface Texture: sandy clay loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 61 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
37 inches
74 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
0 inches
5 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
5 inches
9 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
9 inches
29 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
5
29 inches
37 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC7496156.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 9
Soil Component Name: Gilead
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 61 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
5 inches
sandy loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.01
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
5 inches
9 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.01
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
9 inches
29 inches
clay
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.01
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
4
29 inches
37 inches
clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.01
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
TC7496156.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
5
37 inches
74 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 4
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.01
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 10
Soil Component Name: Nason
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
5 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
5 inches
35 inches
silty clay loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC7496156.2s Page A-15

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
3
35 inches
42 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
42 inches
46 inches
weathered
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
bedrock
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 NC0351805 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
TC7496156.2s Page A-16

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC7496156.2s Page A-17

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 7496156.2s
P\\ �
�Y160
0
D
0
0
0
0 0
o e
1( ti e
V e
�0p
�q0 - 200
90
ti
O
a /6
NCounty Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
G, L-4
lf� � ,
ti°°
J6
NC
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction E2 Wildlife Areas
c Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location 0 Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: King Mill Road CONTACT: Tasha King
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 7496156.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.474999 / 78.481495 DATE: November 13, 2023 5:10 pm
Copyright cg 2023 EDR, Inc. cc, 2015 TomTom Rai. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
1
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
Epa region:
04
State:
Pwsid:
NC0351805
Pwsname:
Cityserved:
Not Reported
Stateserved:
Zipserved:
Not Reported
Fipscounty:
Status:
Closed
Retpopsrvd:
Pwssvcconn:
2
Psource longname:
Pwstype:
TNCWS
Owner:
Contact:
TERRY PARKER OR MGR
Contactorgname:
Contactphone:
Not Reported
Contactaddress1:
Contactaddress2:
223 KING MILL RD
Contactcity:
Contactstate:
NC
Contactzip:
Pwsactivitycode:
I
PWS ID:
NC0351805
PWS type:
PWS name:
TERRY PARKER OR MGR
PWS address:
PWS city:
FOUR OAKS
PWS state:
PWS zip:
27524
PWS ID:
PWS type:
System Owner/Responsible Party
PWS name:
TERRY PARKER
PWS address:
PWS city:
FOUR OAKS
PWS state:
PWS zip:
27504
PWS ID:
Activity status:
Active
Date system activated:
Date system deactivated:
Not Reported
Retail population:
System name:
TERRY PARKER MLC#316-AW AND
B
System address:
Not Reported
System city:
System state:
NC
System zip:
County FIPS: 051 City served
Population served: Under 101 Persons Treatment:
Latitude: 352845 Longitude:
Database EDR ID Number
FRDS PWS NC0351805
NC
TERRY PARKER MLC#316-AW AND B
NC
37101
50
Groundwater
Private
Not Reported
Not Reported
FOUR OAKS
27524
System Owner/Responsible Party
Not Reported
NC
NC0351805
Not Reported
NC
NC0351805
8210
00000050
FOUR OAKS
27524
FOUR OAKS
Untreated
0782815
TC7496156.2s Page A-19

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
Elclass:
Eostat:
Edr id:
C
E
NC50004818
Precision1:
Gisid:
NC_NHEO NC50004818
M
541130
NC_NHEO NC50009647
Elclass:
C
Precision1:
M
Eostat:
E
Gisid:
152013
Edr id:
NC50009647
NC_SNHA NC10001873
Acres:
25.22
Sitename:
BLACK CREEK SANDHILL AND BLUFF
Quality type:
Not Reported
Sig:
D
Site id:
1873
Edr id:
NC10001873
NC_SNHA NC10001888
Acres: 18.45 Sitename: BLACK CREEK SANDHILL AND BLUFF
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: D
Site id: 1888 Edr id: NC10001888
TC7496156.2s Page A-20

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for JOHNSTON County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code:
27524
Number of sites tested: 1
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
% >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor
0.000 pCi/L
100%
0%
0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC7496156.2s Page A-21

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC7496156.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC7496156.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7496156.2s Page PSGR-3

Appendix E
NCWAM Forms

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user rvianuai version om
USACE AID #
TBD
NCDWR#
TBD
Project Name
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation
Date of Evaluation
11/16/2023
Site
Applicant/Owner Name
Wildlands Engineering (Applicant)
Wetland Site Name
Area A
Wetland Type
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
S. Law
Level III Ecoregion
Southeastern Plains
Nearest Named Water Body
Black Creek
River Basin
Neuse
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03020201
County
Johnston
NCDWR Region
Raleigh
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
35.471954,-78.472535
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
® Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
® NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
® Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon >- 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >- 20% coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >- 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >- 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >- 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<- 15-feet wide ®> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
®B
®B
®B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
OF
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I
❑I
❑1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A
®A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
OF
OF
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
®A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o ®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
>,
o ❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B
®B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C
❑C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
1= ®B
®B
Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C
❑C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
.0 ❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
_ ®B
®B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
®A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Area A Date of Assessment 11/16/2023
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization S. Law
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Veqetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user rvianuai version om
USACE AID #
TBD
NCDWR#
TBD
Project Name
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation
Date of Evaluation
11/16/2023
Site
Applicant/Owner Name
Wildlands Engineering (Applicant)
Wetland Site Name
Area B
Wetland Type
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
C. Neaves
Level III Ecoregion
Southeastern Plains
Nearest Named Water Body
Black Creek
River Basin
Neuse
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03020201
County
Johnston
NCDWR Region
Raleigh
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
35.475756,-78.485107
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
® Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
® NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
® Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon >- 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >- 20% coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >- 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >- 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >- 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<- 15-feet wide ®> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
®B
®B
®B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
OF
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I
❑I
❑1
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A
®A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
OF
OF
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
®A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o ®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
>,
o ❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B
®B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C
❑C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
1= ®B
®B
Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C
❑C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
.0 ❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
_ ®B
®B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
®A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Area B Date of Assessment
11/16/2023
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization
C. Neaves
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
HIGH
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Veqetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user rvianuai version a.0
USACE AID #
TBD
NCDWR#
TBD
Project Name
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation
Date of Evaluation
11/16/2023
Site
Applicant/Owner Name
Wildlands Engineering (Applicant)
Wetland Site Name
Area C
Wetland Type
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
S. Law
Level III Ecoregion
Southeastern Plains
Nearest Named Water Body
Black Creek
River Basin
Neuse
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03020201
County
Johnston
NCDWR Region
Raleigh
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
35.471734,-78.478800
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
® Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
® NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
® Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <- 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief - assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<- 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
®B
®B
®B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
❑F
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
El
❑I
❑I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A
®A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes [:]No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
®A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
®A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
T
o ®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
cc ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
S
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
Cn
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
1E ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
Cn El ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-a ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
®C ®C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
®A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Area C is east of King Mill Creek and extends to the forest edge adjacent to the clearcut Area D.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Area C
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Date of Assessment 11/16/2023
Assessor Name/Organization S. Law
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition HIGH
Vegetation Composition Condition HIGH
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user rvianuai version a.0
USACE AID #
TBD
NCDWR#
TBD
Project Name
King Mill Lowgrounds Mitigation
Date of Evaluation
11/16/2023
Site
Applicant/Owner Name
Wildlands Engineering (Applicant)
Wetland Site Name
Area D
Wetland Type
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
S. Law
Level III Ecoregion
Southeastern Plains
Nearest Named Water Body
Black Creek
River Basin
Neuse
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03020201
County
Johnston
NCDWR Region
Raleigh
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
35.471954,-78.472535
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
® Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
® NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
® Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <- 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
El El Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief - assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<- 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
®B
®B
®B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
❑F
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
El
❑I
❑I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A
®A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes [:]No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
®A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
T
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
cc ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
S
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
Cn
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
1E ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
Cn El ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-a ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
®A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
®A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Area D consists of a clearcut area in the southeastern portion of the project area.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Area D Date of Assessment 11/16/2023
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization S. Law
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

Appendix F
Landowner Authorizations

LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: 4758 Page: 216 County: Johnston
Parcel ID Number: 165200-68-4050 and 166200-08-5213
Street Address: 755 King Mill Road, Four Oaks, NC 27524
Property Owner (please print): Carl B. Langdon, Jr.
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above property, does hereby authorize
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to take all actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a
potential stream, wetland and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream
and/or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required
permit(s) or certification(s). I agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of
Engineers, to visit the property as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address: PO Box 848, Selma, NC 27576-0848
Property Owner Telephone Number: 919-291-8162
I hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
��e�xx
(Property wi
Authorized Signature)
(Date)

LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: 2959 Page: 878 County: Johnston
Parcel ID Numbers: 165200-28-2946, 165200-46-4523, 165200-57-7602, and 166200-17-4566
Street Address: King Mill Road, Four Oaks, NC 27524
Property Owner: Carl B. Langdon
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above property, does hereby authorize
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to take all actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a
potential stream, wetland and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream
and/or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required
permit(s) or certification(s). I agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of
Engineers, to visit the property as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address: 2581 US 31 North, Selma, NC 27576
Property Owner Telephone Number: 917-584-2981
I hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
4--at-
Signature)
{Date)

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF3C1769-CAC9-4B4E-9F05-774B236337A4
LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: 6187 Page: 833 County: Johnston
Parcel ID Number: 165200-78-4049
Street Address: 450 King Mill Road, Four Oaks, NC 27524
Property Owner (please print): Nancy Melissa Langdon
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above property, does hereby authorize
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to take all actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a
potential stream, wetland and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream
and/or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required
permit(s) or certification(s). I agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of
Engineers, to visit the property as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address: 225 Cornelia St. #2, Brooklyn, NY 11221-5204
Property Owner Telephone Number: 917-584-2981
I hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
ad by:
�t t (iSSu 14"Jhvu
6/17/2023
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) (Date)