The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20171605 Ver 1_Daniels Creek Report - MY3_20240111Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone 919-851-9986  312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225  Raleigh, NC 27609 January 10, 2024 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Attention: Todd Tugwell Subject: Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Fifth Credit Release (Monitoring Year 3 Completion) Dear Mr. Tugwell: This correspondence is in reference to the Daniels Creek Mitigation Site, part of the Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The 56.144‐acre site is in the Cape Fear 04 Cataloging Unit (03030004), north of the intersection of Seminole Road and US 421, in Harnett County, North Carolina. The purpose of this letter is to request the fifth release of credits (Year 3 Monitoring Complete) for the mitigation Site. Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) Site assessments were conducted between January 2023 and December 2023. Overall, the Site is in good condition and functioning as intended. Forty‐three out of 45 vegetation plots met the MY3 interim stem density requirement and all 45 are on track to meet the final success criteria. A 9.49 acre supplemental planting took place in February 2023. Supplemental stems have shown a high rate of survival through their first growing season and were successful in boosting stem density. Invasive vegetation has been treated and additional treatment may be necessary during future monitoring years. Visual assessment and geomorphic survey indicate that project streams are stable and well‐functioning aquatic resources. Bankfull events were observed on 3 of the 6 subject streams. Each intermittent stream has recorded greater than 30 consecutive days of flow during each monitoring year to date. Twelve out of 18 groundwater monitoring wells achieved the hydroperiod success criterion during MY3. An additional well was installed in the beginning of MY3, which also met the criterion. Abnormally dry precipitation conditions likely contributed to many of the seven groundwater gauges recording hydroperiods below 13%. Wildlands proposes exploring areas on‐site not currently generating wetland credit where wetland restoration credit might be gained to offset potential losses from groundwater wells that are not performing as anticipated. No easement encroachment occurred during MY3. All easement crossings are in good condition, stable, and provide access to adjacent agricultural areas while excluding livestock and prohibited activities. Pursuant to the Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument and the site‐specific Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan, successful completion of MY3 activities and demonstration that interim performance standards are being met for all parcels within the bank grants ten percent (10%) of the mitigation site’s total stream mitigation credit and fifteen percent (15%) of the site’s total riparian and non‐riparian wetland credits be available for sale. Therefore, we are requesting 1,202.4 stream credits (SMUs), 2.088 riparian wetland credits, and 0.059 non‐riparian wetland credits be released. Please contact me at 919‐851‐9986 x102 if you have any questions. Thank you, John Hutton Vice President Type Jurisdiction Date Permittee Project Name Credits Permits (SAW #) Credit Classification Impact HUC Impact Quantity Total Withdrawn Available Comments SMU USACE 11/19/2019 1,842.00 Warm 1,842.00 Release 1. Bank Establishment. 15% SMU NCDWR 2/22/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB #16-042120-13 1,561.00 SAW-2017-00998 Warm 03030004 1,561.00 281.00 SMU Harnett County 3/8/2021 Dan Ryan Builders-North Carolina, LLC Tuscarora Grove SD 281.00 SAW-2020-00575 Warm 03030004 190.00 281.00 - SMU USACE 8/30/2021 1,765.20 Warm 1,765.20 As-Built Credit Release 15% SMU NCDWR 9/30/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB #16-042120-13 1,765.20 SAW-2017-00998 Warm 03030004 1,765.20 - SMU USACE 4/13/2022 986.00 Warm 986.00 MY1 Credit Release (partial) SMU Cumberland County 6/13/2022 The Landing on Andrews, LLC The Landing on Andrews 349.00 SAW-2013-00420 Warm 03030004 248.00 349.00 637.00 SMU Wake County 10/17/2022 FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc Poject Galaxy 40.00 SAW-2021-01565 Warm 03030004 23.00 40.00 597.00 SMU USACE 2/1/2023 1,418.80 Warm 2,015.80 Monitoring Year 2 Release (10% + remainder from MY1) SMU Wake County 2/9/2023 Lennar Carolinas, LLC Sherri Downs Angier 432.00 SAW-2021-01320 Warm 03030004 216.00 432.00 1,583.80 SMU Harnett County 6/30/2023 DR Horton, Inc., c/o Bobby Stuart Senter Farm residential subdivision 811.00 SAW-2020-01350 Warm 03030004 447.00 811.00 772.80 SMU Wake County 12/8/2023 RXR Len Apex Owner, LLC Veridea 637.00 SAW-2010-01907 Warm 03030004 318.50 637.00 135.80 Totals:6,012.00 5,876.20 135.80 Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Cape Fear HUC 03030004 Stream Credit Ledger Date Last Updated: 12-21-2023 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Total Credits Released To Date: 6,012.00 LF Type Jurisdiction Date Permittee Project Name Credits Permits (SAW #)Credit Classification Impact HUC Impact Quantity Total Withdrawn Available Comments WMU 11/19/2019 2.08 Riparian Non-Riverine 2.08 Release 1. Bank Establishment. 15% WMU Harnett County 5/14/2020 Lynn Ridge of Angier, LLC Lynn Ridge Subdivision 0.92 SAW-2020-00488 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030006 0.51 0.92 1.16 WMU Wake County 6/16/2020 Greg Bagley Summerdale II Subdivision 0.46 SAW-2019-02106 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.23 0.46 0.70 WMU Harnett County 7/7/2020 PJ's Truck Bodies PJ's Parking Lot Crossing 0.28 SAW-2016-02372 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030006 0.14 0.28 0.42 WMU Cumberland County 10/14/2020 Fayetteville Cedar Creek 2019, LLC, Collins Hartzog Starbucks Cedar Creek Road 0.15 SAW-2020-01500 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.144 0.15 0.27 WMU Cumberland County 10/20/2020 City of Fayetteville Public Works Commission, Joe Glass Fayetteville Collection System Expansion 0.24 SAW-2018-00163 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.22 0.24 0.03 WMU NCDWR 2/22/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB #16-042120-13 0.03 SAW-2017-00998 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.03 0.00 WMU 8/30/2021 2.097 Riparian Non-Riverine 2.097 As-Built Credit Release 15% WMU NCDWR 9/30/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB #16-042120-13 2.097 SAW-2017-00998 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 2.097 - WMU 2/1/2023 2.784 Riparian Non-Riverine 2.784 Monitoring Year 2 Release (10% + remainder from MY1) WMU Harnett County 3/27/2023 Galt Land Development, LLC Magnolia Hills SD 0.730 SAW-2022-01656 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.365 0.730 2.05 WMU Wake County 5/23/2023 Town of Fuquay-Varina-Engineering Director, Matthew B. Poling East Academy Street Extension 0.838 SAW-2022-00772 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.419 0.838 1.22 WMU Harnett County 6/30/2023 DR Horton, Inc., c/o Bobby Stuart Senter Farm Residential Subdivision 1.210 SAW-2020-01350 Riparian Non-Riverine 03030004 0.917 1.21 0.01 Totals:6.961 6.955 0.006 Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Cape Fear HUC 03030004 Riparian Wetland Credit Ledger Date Last Updated: 12-21-2023 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Total Credits Released To Date: 6.961 acres Type Jurisdiction Date Permittee Project Name Credits Permits (SAW #)Credit Classification Impact HUC Impact Quantity Total Withdrawn Available Comments WMU 11/19/2019 0.059 Non-Riparian 0.059 Release 1. Bank Establishment. 15% WMU 8/30/2021 0.059 Non-Riparian 0.118 As-Built Credit Release 15% WMU 2/1/2023 0.078 Non-Riparian 0.196 Monitoring Year 2 Release (10% + remainder from MY1) Totals:0.196 - 0.196 Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Cape Fear HUC 03030004 Non-Riparian Wetland Credit Ledger Date Last Updated: 12-21-2023 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Total Credits Released To Date: 0.196 acres Project Name: Sponsor Name: USACE Action ID: NCDWR Action ID: Non‐Forested Wetland Credits Warm Water Cool Water Cold Water Riparian Riverine Riparian Non‐Riverine Non‐Riparian Coastal 12,280.0 N/A N/A 13.923 N/A 0.392 N/A 12,024.0 N/A N/A 13.923 N/A 0.392 N/A Scheduled Releases Warm Water Cool Water Cold Water Scheduled Releases Riparian Riverine Riparian Non‐Riverine Non‐Riparian Scheduled Releases Coastal 1 (Bank/Site Establishment)1, 2 15% 1,842.0 N/A N/A 15% 2.080 N/A 0.059 15% N/A 11/19/2019 2 (Year 0/As‐Built)3 15% 1,765.2 N/A N/A 15% 2.097 N/A 0.059 15% N/A 8/30/2021 3 (Year 1 Monitoring)10% 986.0 N/A N/A 10%N/A 10% N/A 4/13/2022 2/1/2023 4 (Year 2 Monitoring)10% 1,418.8 N/A N/A 10% 2.784 N/A 0.078 15% N/A 2/1/2023 5 (Year 3 Monitoring)10% 1,202.4 N/A N/A 15% 2.088 N/A 0.059 20% N/A February 2024 6 (Year 4 Monitoring)5% 601.2 N/A N/A 5% 0.696 N/A 0.020 10% N/A February 2025 7 (Year 5 Monitoring)10% 1,202.4 N/A N/A 15% 2.089 N/A 0.059 15% N/A February 2026 8 (Year 6 Monitoring)5% 601.2 N/A N/A 5% 0.696 N/A 0.020 N/A N/A February 2027 9 (Year 7 Monitoring)10% 1,202.4 N/A N/A 10% 1.393 N/A 0.038 N/A N/A February 2028 Stream Bankfull Standard4 10% 1,202.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Varies4 Total Credits Release to Date 60% 7,214.4 65% 9.049 0.255 Date Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule 4 ‐ A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met. 1 ‐ The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan. 2 ‐ The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria: 1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE; 2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan; 3) Mitigation bank site must be secured; 4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan; 5) Recordation of the long‐term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE; 6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required. 3 ‐ The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as‐built survey, and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan. Contingencies (if any): None Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release Daniels Creek Mitigation Site (Middle Cape Fear UMBI) Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC 2017‐00998 2017‐1605 Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan Forested Wetland Credits Total Potential Credits Projected Release Date Actual Release Date Potential Credits from As‐Built Survey Stream Credits Credit Classification Non‐Forested Wetland CreditsForested Wetland CreditsStream Credits Current and Future Credit Releases Credit Release Milestone Harnett 03030004 2019 1/2/2024 County: 8‐Digit HUC: Year Project Instituted: Date Prepared: MONITORING YEAR 3 ANNUAL REPORT January 2024 Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Harnett County, NC Cape Fear River Basin HUC 03030004 USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 NCDWR ID Number 2017‐1605 V1 Data Collection Dates: January 2023 ‐ December 2023 PREPARED FOR: The North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT) USACE Project Manager: Todd Tugwell 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 PREPARED BY: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27609 Jason Lorch jlorch@wildlandseng.com Phone: 919.851.9986 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report i DANIELS CREEK MITIGATION SITE Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.1 Project Quantities and Credits ................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1‐4 1.3 Project Attributes ....................................................................................................................... 1‐5 Section 2: MONITORING YEAR 3 DATA ASSESSMENT ........................................................................ 2‐1 2.1 Vegetative Assessment .............................................................................................................. 2‐1 2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern ..................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.3 Stream Assessment .................................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.4 Stream Areas of Concern ........................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.5 Hydrology Assessment ............................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.6 Wetland Assessment .................................................................................................................. 2‐3 2.7 Monitoring Year 3 Summary ...................................................................................................... 2‐4 Section 3: REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 3‐1 TABLES Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits ..................................................................................................... 1‐1 Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements ...................................................... 1‐4 Table 3: Project Attributes ......................................................................................................................... 1‐6 FIGURES Figure 1‐1.5 Current Condition Plan View APPENDICES Appendix A Visual Assessment Data Table 4 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table Stream Photographs Stream Crossing Photographs Vegetation Plot Photographs Groundwater Gauge Photographs Appendix B Vegetation Plot Data Table 6 Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table Table 7a Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts Table 7b Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts Appendix C Stream Geomorphology Data Cross‐Section Plots Table 8 Cross‐Section Morphology Monitoring Summary Appendix D Hydrology Data Table 9 Bankfull Events Table 10 Rainfall Summary Table 11 Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Summary Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Plots Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report ii Table 12 Groundwater Gauge Summary Groundwater Gauge Plots Annual Drought Conditions Plot Appendix E Project Timeline and Contact Info Table 13 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 14 Project Contact Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 1‐1 Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW The Daniels Creek Mitigation Site (Site) is in Harnett County near the town of Broadway, North Carolina. The Site is situated on the boundary of the Piedmont and Inner Coastal Plain physiographic provinces of North Carolina. Table 3 presents information related to the project attributes. 1.1 Project Quantities and Credits Mitigation work on‐site includes restoration, enhancement I, and enhancement II of perennial and intermittent streams along with restoration, rehabilitation, and enhancement of wetlands. Table 1 below shows stream credits by reach and the total amount of stream and wetland credits expected at closeout. Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES Project Segment Mitigation Plan Footage As‐Built Footage Mitigation Category Restoration Level Mitigation Ratio (X:1) Credits Comments Stream Daniels Creek R1 373 366 Warm R 1.0 373.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock Daniels Creek R2 366 369 Warm R 1.0 366.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 60 60 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 72 68 Warm R 1.0 72.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock Daniels Creek R3 818 842 Warm R 1.0 818.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 60 60 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 425 431 Warm R 1.0 425.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock Daniels Creek R4 1,041 1,074 Warm R 1.0 1,041.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock Daniels Creek R5 163 204 Warm R 1.0 163.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T1 R1 390 496 Warm R 1.0 390.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 39 38 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing T1 R2 98 99 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 40 40 Warm E2 2.5 16.000 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T1 R3 247 247 Warm E2 2.5 98.800 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock 48 48 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 83 83 Warm E2 2.5 33.200 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 1‐2 PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES Project Segment Mitigation Plan Footage As‐built Footage Mitigation Category Restoration Level Mitigation Ratio (X:1) Credits Comments Stream T1 R4 813 816 Warm R 1.0 813.000* Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 60 60 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 245 246 Warm R 1.0 245.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T1 R5 716 739 Warm R 1.0 716.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T1A 285 285 Warm E2 2.5 114.000 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T2 R1 260 257 Warm R 1.0 260.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T2 R2 198 200 Warm R 1.0 198.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T3 R1 401 401 Warm E2 2.5 160.400 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T3 R2 417 427 Warm R 1.0 417.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 35 35 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 510 518 Warm R 1.0 510.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T3A 168 168 Warm E2 2.5 67.200 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T4 R1 1,029 1,039 Warm R 1.0 1,029.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 40 40 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing T4 R2 538 530 Warm R 1.0 538.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T5 R1 240 240 Warm E2 2.5 96.000 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T5 R2 385 386 Warm R 1.0 385.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T6 R1 612 612 Warm E2 2.5 244.800 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T6 R2 18 18 Warm R 1.0 18.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock 35 35 N/A N/A N/A N/A Internal Crossing 250 249 Warm R 1.0 250.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T7 1,235 1,241 Warm E1 1.5 823.330 Raised Stream Profile Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 1‐3 PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES Project Segment Mitigation Plan Footage As‐built Footage Mitigation Category Restoration Level Mitigation Ratio (X:1) Credits Comments Stream T8 R1 308 309 Warm E1 1.5 205.330 Raised Stream Profile Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock T8 R2 450 460 Warm R 1.0 450.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing Out Livestock T9 658 658 Warm E2 2.5 219.333 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock, Invasive Removal T9A 365 365 Warm E2 2.5 121.667 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock, Invasive Removal T10 R1 500** 600 Warm E2 2.5 166.667** Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock, Invasive Removal T10 R2 401 401 Warm E2 2.5 133.667 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock, Invasive Removal T10A 142 142 Warm E2 2.5 47.333 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out Livestock, Invasive Removal Total: 12,024.727* WETLANDS Wetland Enhancement 8.611 8.611 Riparian Enhancement 5.0 1.722 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Enhancement 1.702 1.702 Riparian Enhancement 3.0 0.567 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Rehabilitation 0.165 0.165 Riparian Rehabilitation 1.5 0.110 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Restoration 11.524 11.524 Riparian Restoration 1.0 11.524 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Enhancement 0.897 0.897 Non‐Riparian Enhancement 5.0 0.179 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Enhancement 0.217 0.217 Non‐Riparian Enhancement 3.0 0.072 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Rehabilitation 0.112 0.112 Non‐Riparian Rehabilitation 1.5 0.075 Planting, Cattle Exclusion Wetland Restoration 0.066 0.066 Non‐Riparian Restoration 1.0 0.066 Planting, Site Grading, Cattle Exclusion Total: 14.315 Blue = Restoration Yellow = Enhancement I Orange = Enhancement II *Stream credits were miscalculated for T1 R4 in the Mitigation Plan but were updated for As‐Built. **Braided channel so valley length used for credit calculation. Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 1‐4 Restoration Level Stream Riparian Wetland Non‐Riparian Wetland Warm Riverine Restoration 9,477.000* 11.524 0.066 Enhancement I 1,028.660 Enhancement II 1,519.067 Rehabilitation 0.110 0.075 Enhancement 2.289 0.251 Totals 12,024.727* 13.923 0.392 Total Stream Credit 12,024.727* Total Wetland Credit 14.315 *Stream credits were miscalculated for T1 R4 in the Mitigation Plan and updated for As‐Built. 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits. Table 2 below describes expected outcomes to water quality and ecological processes and provides project goals and objectives. Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements Goal Objective/ Treatment Likely Functional Uplift Performance Criteria Measurement Cumulative Monitoring Results Improve the stability of stream channels. Construct stream channels that will maintain a stable pattern and profile considering the hydrologic and sediment inputs to the system, the landscape setting, and the watershed conditions. Significantly reduce sediment and phosphorus inputs from bank erosion. Reduce shear stress on channel boundary. Support all stream functions above hydrology. ER stays over 2.2 and BHR below 1.2 with visual assessments showing progression towards stability. Cross‐section monitoring and visual inspections. No major deviations from design. Cross‐ sections show streams are stable and functioning as designed. Exclude cattle from project streams. Implement cattle exclusion measures around conservation easements adjacent to cattle pastures. Reduce and control sediment inputs; reduce and manage nutrient inputs; reduce and manage fecal coliform inputs. Prevent cattle from entering the easement. Visually inspect the perimeter of the Site to ensure no easement encroachment is occurring. No cattle encroachments. Improve in‐stream habitat. Install habitat features such as constructed riffles, cover/lunker logs, and brush toes into restored/enhanced streams. Add woody materials to channel beds. Construct pools of varying depth. Increase and diversify available habitats for macroinvertebrates, fish, and amphibians leading to colonization and increase in biodiversity over time. Add complexity including LWD to streams. There is no required performance standard for this metric. N/A N/A Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 1‐5 Goal Objective/ Treatment Likely Functional Uplift Performance Criteria Measurement Cumulative Monitoring Results Reconnect channels with floodplains and riparian wetlands. Reconstruct stream channels with appropriate bankfull dimensions and depth relative to existing floodplain. Raise water table and hydrate riparian wetlands. Allow flood flows to disperse on the floodplain. Hydrologically connect stream and riparian wetlands. Support geomorphology and higher‐level functions. Four bankfull events in separate years within monitoring period. 30 consecutive days of flow for intermittent channels. Crest gauges and/or pressure transducers recording flow elevations. T3 R2, T4 R1, and T8 R2 obtained bankfull events in MY3. T1 R1, T2 R1, T5 R2, and T8 R1 exceeded 30 days of consecutive flow during MY3. Restore wetland hydrology, soils, and plant communities. Restore riparian wetland and associated soil structure by raising stream beds, plugging existing ditches, removing livestock impacts, and planting native wetland species. Raise local groundwater elevations. Periodically inundate floodplain wetlands and vernal pools. Free groundwater surface within 12 inches of the ground surface for 13% (35 days) of the growing season under normal precipitation conditions. 19 groundwater gauges equipped with pressure transducers are located in representative wetland areas and monitored annually. During MY3, 12 out of 19 groundwater gauges had groundwater within 12 inches of the ground surface for 13% (35 days) of the growing season consecutively. Restore and enhance native floodplain and streambank vegetation. Plant native tree and understory species in riparian zone and plant appropriate species on streambank. Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion and runoff. Increase nutrient cycling and storage in floodplain. Provide riparian habitat. Add a source of LWD and organic material to stream. Support all stream functions. Survival rate of 320 stems per acre at MY3, 260 planted stems per acre at MY5, and 210 stems per acre at MY7. Height requirement is 7 feet at MY5 and 10 feet at MY7. One hundred square meter vegetation plots are placed on 2% of the planted area of the Site and monitored annually. 43 of the 45 vegetation plots have a planted stem density greater than 320 stems per acre. Permanently protect the project Site from harmful uses. Establish conservation easements on the Site. Ensure that development and agricultural uses that would damage the Site or reduce the benefits of the project are prevented. Prevent easement encroachment. Visually inspect the perimeter of the Site to ensure no easement encroachment is occurring. No easement encroachments. 1.3 Project Attributes Prior to construction stream and wetland stressors at the Site included livestock access and ditching. Stream channels were generally incised, unstable, lacking bedform diversity, and lacking adequate riparian buffers. Agricultural land conditions on‐site had remained consistent since 1992. Beginning in the early 90’s, much of the Site was converted from timber land to pastureland. Table 3 below and Table 8 in Appendix C present additional information on pre‐restoration conditions. Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 1‐6 Table 3: Project Attributes PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name Daniels Creek Mitigation Site County Harnett County Project Area (acres) 56.144 Project Coordinates 35°26’33.99"N 79°1'39.81"W PROJECT WATERSHED SUMMARY INFORMATION Physiographic Province Northern Outer Piedmont & Rolling Coastal Plain River Basin Cape Fear USGS HUC 8‐digit 03030004 USGS HUC 14‐digit 03030004010020 DWR Sub‐basin 03‐06‐07 Land Use Classification 64% Managed Herbaceous, 24% Forested, 12% Developed Project Drainage Area (acres) 986 Percentage of Impervious Area 2.3% RESTORATION TRIBUTARY SUMMARY INFORMATION Parameters Daniels Creek T1 T2 T3 T4 Pre‐project length (feet) 3,636 2,670 586 1,205 1,367 Post‐project (feet)* 3,474 2,912 457 1,381 1,609 Drainage area (acres) 896 313 9 43 48 Perennial (P), Intermittent (I), Ephemeral (E) P P/I P/I P P DWR Water Quality Classification C Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) V VI/V IV IV IV Parameters T5 T6 T7 T8 Pre‐project length (feet) 624 962 1,249 787 Post‐project (feet)* 626 914 1,241 769 Drainage area (acres) 7 174 80 13 Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral P/I P P P/I DWR Water Quality Classification C Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) III IV IV IV REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation Water of the United States ‐ Section 404 Yes Yes USACE Nationwide Permit No. 27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification No. 4134. Water of the United States ‐ Section 401 Yes Yes Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Categorical Exclusion in Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019) Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA) N/A N/A N/A Essential Fisheries Habitat N/A N/A N/A *Post‐project (feet) for streams with both Restoration and Enhancement include both in total length listed. Crossings were also included in the total length for comparison to pre‐project lengths. Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 2‐1 Section 2: MONITORING YEAR 3 DATA ASSESSMENT Annual monitoring and site visits were conducted during MY3 to assess the condition of the project. The vegetation and stream success criteria for the Site follow the approved success criteria presented in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019). Performance criteria for vegetation, stream, and hydrologic assessment are in Section 1.2 Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements. Methodology for annual monitoring is presented in the MY0 Annual Report (Wildlands, 2021). 2.1 Vegetative Assessment The MY3 vegetative survey was completed in August 2023. Out of 45 vegetation plots, 43 met the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre. While vegetation plots 19 and 23 did not meet the interim requirement they are still on track to meet the final density criterion with a density of 283 stems per acre. Vegetation plot 23 would meet the performance standard if tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) was counted toward the success criteria. The IRT will be contacted via email to obtain approval to include tulip poplar toward the success criteria. Fixed vegetation plots exhibited stem densities ranging from 283 to 647 planted stems per acre, with an average stem density of 378 planted stems per acre. Random Vegetation plots exhibited stem densities ranging from 405 to 688 stems per acre, with an average density of 534 stems per acre. Vegetation plots show high diversity with planted species counts ranging from 4 to 10 within individual plots and a total of 19 across plots. Numerous desirable volunteers are establishing on‐site, increasing the total species count across plots to 27. Herbaceous vegetation is abundant across the Site and the riparian habitat is reducing nutrient runoff from the cattle fields outside the easement and stabilizing stream banks. Refer to Appendix A for Vegetation Plot Photographs and the Vegetation Condition Assessment Table and Appendix B for Vegetation Plot Data. 2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern During MY1 and MY2, coastal Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) was observed in various locations throughout the Site and was treated in 2022. Treated areas were then seeded with a native seed mix and supplementally planted in February 2023. Native herbaceous and woody vegetation are now re‐ established in these areas, as can be seen in photographs included within Appendix A and random plot stem counts in Table 7b of Appendix B. Coastal Bermudagrass is one of the primary vegetations in the cattle pastures surrounding the easements and therefore will be monitored and treated as necessary in future monitoring years. Areas previously dominated by coastal Bermudagrass experienced high, but localized, stem mortality during MY1 and MY2. To address this, a supplemental planting occurred within these areas in February 2023. Species planted were those approved in the mitigation plan and baseline monitoring report. In total, 9.49 acres were planted along portions of Daniels Creek, T3, T4, T5, T7, T9, and T10 (Figures 1.1‐ 1.4). The supplementally planted area was less than 20% of the original 54 planted acres. To aid in supplementally and originally planted stem’s success, ring sprays and soil amendments applied locally around the base of stems were completed in May 2023 in various locations across the Site (Figures 1.1‐ 1.5). Scattered Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rose multiflora), and callery pear (Pyrus calleryanna) occurrences were treated throughout the Site in MY3 and will be treated as necessary in future monitoring years. Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 2‐2 2.3 Stream Assessment Morphological surveys for MY3 were conducted in May 2023. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. All 25 cross‐sections on‐site show little to no change from design in the bankfull area and width‐to‐depth ratio. Bank height ratios are less than 1.2. Visual assessments indicate that in‐ stream structures have remained stable. In‐stream vegetation was treated within most restoration and enhancement I reaches from July 2023 to September 2023. No sedimentation issues were observed during MY3 and no effect on bank stability as a result of treatment was observed. Vegetation remains well established on many of the stream banks, providing adequate coverage and protection. Pebble count data is no longer required per the September 29, 2021, IRT Technical Work Group Meeting. The IRT reserves the right to request pebble count data and particle distributions if deemed necessary during the monitoring period. Refer to Appendix A for the Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table and Stream Photographs and Appendix C for Stream Geomorphology Data. 2.4 Stream Areas of Concern Murdannia grew in several stream channels during MY1 and received treatment in MY2. Follow up treatment occurred within most restoration and enhancement I reaches from July to September 2023 (Figures 1.1‐1.5). Live stakes were also planted along stream banks site‐wide, where necessary, during the winter of 2023 to shade in‐stream vegetation. Additionally, Murdannia was treated within headwater wetlands in September 2023, followed by the application of a cover‐crop mix of Virginia wildrye (Elymus virginicus) and a wetland species mixture consisting of Panicum rigidulum, Bidens aristosa, Helianthus angustifolius, Carex albolutescens, Juncus effusus, Carex lupulina, Rhexia mariana, and Carex vulpinoidea. These were added to headwater wetlands to increase beneficial plant competition with invasive species. Due to Murdannia’s ability to reproduce via fragmentation and transport downstream, it is believed that controlling populations in headwater wetlands will reduce quantities in downstream waters. While corrective action over the monitoring period has shown effective in reducing the degree of Murdannia within stream channels, Wildlands recognizes that multiple treatments are typically needed for effective invasive plant control. Murdannia treatment has not appeared to show any negative effects on stream bank stability or vegetative conditions across the Site. The Site will continue to be monitored and invasive species will be treated as necessary. Beaver activity was observed during MY3 on Daniels Creek beginning in May 2023. Beaver were trapped and dams were removed in May, and once again in November 2023 (Figure 1.3). No evidence of long‐ term damage to the stream or surrounding vegetation was observed as a result of beaver activity. Herbaceous vegetation was either not affected or has grown back in areas which were affected. While some trees were lost, stem density was high along Daniels Creek and therefore is continuing to meet success criteria based on vegetation plot data and visual assessments throughout the year. While no further evidence of beaver has been observed, Wildlands will continue to monitor the Site and take action as necessary. 2.5 Hydrology Assessment Bankfull events were recorded on T3 R2, T4 R1, and T8 R2. Bankfull events were not recorded on T1 R4, T8 R1, and Daniels Creek R4. Daniels Creek Reach 4, T7, and T1 R4, however, experienced a bankfull event during MY2. While T8 is B‐type channel and floodplain interaction is not an integral aspect of this stream type, an additional crest gauge was added further downstream, where events were more likely to occur given that T8 is a headwater stream. Two bankfull events were observed on T8 R2 during MY3. The presence of baseflow must be documented on intermittent reaches (T1 R1, T2 R1, T5 R2, and T8 R1) for a minimum of 30 consecutive days during a normal precipitation year. All flow gauges were well above the performance criteria during MY3 with flow ranging from 53 to 222 consecutive days. Flow Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 2‐3 was also observed in these channels during visual assessments that were conducted throughout the year. Refer to Appendix D for hydrologic data. It is worth noting that as of December 9th, the annual precipitation total is approximately 10 inches below the 30th percentile value obtained from the Agricultural Applied Climate Information System DUNN 4 NW, NC WETS table (ACIS, 2023). Additionally, according to the National Integrated Drought Information System, Harnett County experienced abnormally dry conditions at the end of March and beginning of April 2023 (NOAA, 2023). Abnormally dry conditions re‐occurred through much of August and November (NOAA, 2023). Approximately 80% of Harnett County also experienced moderate drought in mid‐November. Overbank events might have been affected as low precipitation reduces soil moisture in the floodplain, which promotes infiltration and reduces discharge in the channel. These processes may have led to not observing an overbank event on T7, T1, and Daniels Creek during MY3. 2.6 Wetland Assessment Nineteen groundwater gauges were installed to monitor the hydrology in wetland re‐establishment and rehabilitation areas. Groundwater gauge 19 was installed in a jurisdictional wetland, as requested by the Army Corps of Engineers, but is not tied to performance criteria. This wetland is influenced by hydrology of an adjacent, uphill, seep wetland. Wetland restoration areas within the Site are typically bottomland hardwood forest or headwater forest wetlands that do not experience the same hydrologic influence from adjacent seep wetlands. Therefore, Wildlands believes this wetland area may not be representative of the restored wetland areas on‐site. As stated in the Mitigation Plan, the growing season dates at this Site are March 1 to November 20. Soil temperature probes and observation of bud burst were not used during MY3 to corroborate the beginning and end of the growing season, as growing season dates are fixed for the Site. To meet the success criterion, gauges must show groundwater within 12 inches of the soil surface for 13% of the growing season (i.e., 35 consecutive days). Twelve of the 18 groundwater gauges held to performance standards attained the success criterion for MY3. An additional well (groundwater gauge 20) was added at the beginning of MY3, which also met the criterion. Overall, groundwater hydrology across the Site was affected by relatively low antecedent precipitation during February 2023 and overall dry conditions throughout the year. The annual precipitation total was close to 10 inches below the WETS table 30th percentile value for rainfall accumulation up to the beginning of December. Also, as stated in Section 2.5, Harnett County experienced abnormally dry conditions toward the end of March and beginning of April 2023 (NOAA, 2023). Abnormally dry conditions re‐occurred for much of August (NOAA, 2023). Additionally, 30‐day cumulative totals indicated below normal precipitation through February and portions of March. Due to these conditions, Wildlands believes additional seasons of water table observations and additional groundwater gauges are required to better understand hydrology at the Site and thoroughly evaluate the success of wetland restoration areas. Gauges 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 17 did not meet the performance standard during MY3. The groundwater table would have been within 12 inches for 35 consecutive days at groundwater gauge 11, however, the water table dropped below 12 inches for 36 hours, which brought the consecutive days meeting criteria down to 26 days. Groundwater gauges 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 17 had a groundwater table consecutively within 12 inches of soil surface for less than 5% of the growing season. An additional groundwater gauge will be installed within the same wetland restoration area as groundwater gauge 1 in the upcoming winter of 2024 to gather more information. While groundwater gauge 5 did not meet criteria in MY3, it exceeded criteria in MY2, and therefore Wildlands does not intend to install another groundwater gauge within this area. Groundwater gauge 20 was installed during MY3 to investigate more of the wetland Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 2‐4 restoration area surrounding groundwater gauges 7 and 8. This gauge met the criterion, and another groundwater gauge will be installed on the left side of T4 to further isolate the surrounding area which is not meeting the performance criterion. An additional groundwater well near gauge 17 will also be added to isolate the surrounding area which is not meeting performance standards. Wildlands proposes exploring areas on‐site not currently generating wetland credit where wetland restoration credit might be gained to offset potential losses from groundwater wells that are not performing as anticipated. Figures 1.2‐1.5 display proposed groundwater well locations for areas which might meet the wetland hydroperiod criterion that were not originally proposed for wetland restoration crediting. 2.7 Monitoring Year 3 Summary Out of the 45 vegetation plots, 43 exceeded the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre and all 45 are on track to meet the final success criterion. Overall diversity has remained high across the Site and planted stems have shown good growth in their third growing season. A supplemental planting took place in February 2023 to replace stems lost due to coastal Bermudagrass competition and ensure the rest of the Site is on track to meet the final success criterion. This planting was successful in boosting stem density. Scattered invasives treatments also took place in MY3 and will be treated as necessary in future years. Areas with coastal Bermudagrass which were treated in 2022 have recovered, with native herbaceous vegetation and trees and shrubs once again established in these areas. Murdannia has been observed in several stream channels and was treated during MY3. Additional measures including live stake planting and efforts to control Murdannia in headwater wetlands were also implemented to further reduce its presence. Visual assessments and cross‐sections show streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. Beavers were noted on‐site and have been removed along with their associated dams. No long‐term damage to the stream or surrounding vegetation was noted as a result of beaver activity. Bankfull events were documented on T3 R2, T4 R1, and T8 R2 and greater than 30 days of consecutive flow were recorded on all flow gauges. Twelve out of 18 groundwater gauges met success criterion. An additional groundwater well was installed in the beginning of MY3, which also met the criterion. The failure of the 7 groundwater gauges might be attributed to a relatively dry March and low annual precipitation conditions. Wildlands intends to install additional groundwater gauges within areas not currently generating wetland restoration credit in an effort to circumvent potential credit loss. Also, to further investigate the wetland restoration areas represented by groundwater gauges 1, 7, 8, and 17, additional groundwater gauges will be installed during MY4. Stream crossings are functioning as intended, fencing is in good condition throughout the Site, and no signs of encroachment were observed in MY3. Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report 3‐1 Section 3: REFERENCES ACIS. 2023. Agricultural Applied Climate Information System (AgACIS). WETS Station: DUNN 4 NW, NC. Accessed at: https://agacis.rcc‐acis.org/?fips=37085 Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook. Drostin, M, and Herrmann, M. 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM‐245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p. Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., and Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS‐EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.0. NOAA. 2023. National Integrated Drought Information System. Drought Conditions for Harnett County. Accessed at: https://www.drought.gov/states/north‐carolina/county/harnett Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169‐199. Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books. Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages 12‐22. North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR‐DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC. United States Geological Survey. 1998. North Carolina Geology. Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2019. Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. USACE, Raleigh, NC. Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2021. Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 (MY0) Annual Report. USACE, Raleigh, NC. [[[[ [ [[ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [[[[ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[ [[ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[ [ [ [[[[[ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [[[[[ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [[[[[[ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [[[[ [ [[ [[[[[ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [[[[[ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [[ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P T7 T4 R 1 T1 R4 T3 R 2 T1 R5 T1 R1 T4 R 2 T6 R1 T 8 R 2 T9A Daniels Creek R3 T1 A T9 R2 T1 R2 T10 R1 T 4 A T5 R2 T3 R 1 T1B T4 C Daniels Creek R4 T 8 R 1 T6 R2 T4 B T10 R2 T2 R1 T5 R1 T3A T2 R2 Daniels Creek R2 T 1 R 3 T10A Daniels Creek R1 Daniels Creek R5 T9 Reach 1 T1 R 4 Conservation Easement Internal Crossing Utility Easement JD Wetlands - Enhancement and Rehabilitation Riparian Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration Riparian Non-Riparian Stream Restoration Stream Enhancement I Stream Enhancement II Linear Wetland - Not for Credit Not for Credit [Fencing !P Reach Break Figure 1 - Current Condition Plan View Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Monitoring Year 3 - 2023 Harnett County, NC¹ 2021 Aerial Photography 0 400 800 Feet Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2 Figure 1.3 Figure 1.4 Figure 1.5 [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ GF GF GF GFGF GF GF !P !P PP 47 PP 44 PP 45 PP 41 PP 46 PP 42 PP 43 PP 47 PP 44 PP 45 PP 41 PP 46 PP 42 PP 43 T 9 R 2 T10 R1 T1 0 R 2 T 9 R 1 T1 0 A T9 A T 9 R 2 T10 R1 T1 0 R 2 T 9 R 1 T1 0 A 11 0 0 + 0 0 1102+ 0 0 11 0 4 + 0 0 1106+00 1108+00 1110+00 1000+00 1001+00 1002 + 0 0 1004 + 0 0 1006+00 1010+00 1012+00 1014 + 0 0 1106+00 1006+58 15 28 30 29 27 Conservation Easement JD Wetlands - Enhancement and Rehabilitation Riparian Non-Riparian Fixed Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Random Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Vegetative Areas of Concern - MY3 Ring Sprays & Soil Amendments Supplemental Planting Stream Enhancement II Not for Credit [Fencing As-Built Bankfull !P Reach Break GF Photo Point Figure 1.1 Current Condition Plan View Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Monitoring Year 3 - 2023 Harnett County, NC 2021 Aerial Photography 0 75 150 Feet ¹ !A !A !A [[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ !A !A !A !A !A !A GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF !P !P !P XS 2 2 XS 25 X S 1 XS 2 4 XS 2 XS 2 3 T8 R1 FG + CG PP 3 PP 39 PP 40 PP 38 PP 1 PP 2 PP 37 PP 36 PP 35PP 34 GWG 10 GWG 14 GWG 11 GWG 12 GWG 13 T7 CG T7 T 8 R 2 T 8 R 1 Dan i e l s C r e e k R e a c h 2 Daniels Creek Reach 3 Dan i e l s C r e e k R 1 100+00 10 2 + 0 0 10 4 + 0 0 106+00 108+00 1 1 0 + 0 0 11 2 + 0 0 80 2 + 0 0 80 4 + 0 0 80 6 + 0 0 808+ 0 0 81 0 + 0 0 81 2 + 0 0 900+00 902+ 0 0 904+ 0 0 906+ 0 0 908+00 14 13 12 15 19 20 14 16 18 17 13 Conservation Easement Structures JD Wetlands - Enhancement and Rehabilitation Riparian Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration Riparian Non Riparian Fixed Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Criteria Not Met Random Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Vegetative Areas of Concern - MY3 Ring Sprays & Soil Amendments Supplemental Planting Murdannia Treatment & Headwater Wetland Seeding Stream Restoration Stream Enhancement I Linear Wetland - Not for Credit Not for Credit As-Built Bankfull Cross Sections [Fencing Stream Areas of Concern - MY3 Murdannia Treatment Groundwater Gauge Condition - MY3 !A Criterion Met !A Criterion Not Met !A Proposed Groundwater Gauge !A Crest Gauge !A Flow Gauge GF Photo Point !P Reach Break Figure 1.2 Current Condition Plan View Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Monitoring Year 3 - 2023 Harnett County, NC 2021 Aerial Photography ¹0 150 300 Feet !A !A [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [[[[ [[[[ [[[[ !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GFGF GF GF GF GF!P !P !P !P XS 11 X S 6 XS 5 XS 10 X S 3 XS 12 XS 7 XS 2 1 XS 1 3 XS 4 GWG 18 1 3 0 + 0 0 PP 7PP 6 PP 15 PP 32 PP 4 PP 5 PP 33 PP 9 PP 8 PP 16 PP 18 PP 14 PP 17 GWG 9GWG 16 GWG 6 GWG 17 GWG 15 GWG 14 CG T1 R4 DC R4 CG T 6 R 1 T 1 R 5 T 1 A T1 R 4 T 6 R 2 Daniels Cree k R 3 Dani e l s C r e e k R 5 Daniels Creek R4 224+00 114+00 11 6 + 0 0 11 8 + 0 0 1 2 0 + 0 0 12 2 + 0 0 1 2 4 + 0 0 1 2 6 + 0 0 12 8 + 0 0 132+00 134+00 226+00 228+ 0 0 230+ 0 0 232+00 212+00 70 0 + 0 0 702+00 70 4 + 0 0 706+00 708+ 0 0 710+00 9 10 8 7 11 B B B B B B B 11 10 26 20 23 24 21 25 22 Conservation Easement Utility Easement Structures JD Wetlands - Enhancement and Rehabilitation Riparian Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration Riparian Fixed Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Criteria Not Met Random Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Vegetative Areas of Concern - MY3 Ring Sprays & Soil Amendments Supplemental Planting Stream Restoration Stream Enhancement II Linear Wetland - Not for Credit Not for Credit As-Built Bankfull Cross Sections [Fencing Stream Areas of Concern - MY3 Murdannia Treatment B Beaver Dam Removed Groundwater Gauge Condition - MY3 !A Criterion Met !A Criterion Not Met !A Proposed Groundwater Gauge !A Crest Gauge GF Photo Point !P Reach Break Figure 1.3 Current Condition Plan View Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Monitoring Year 3 - 2023 Harnett County, NC 2021 Aerial Photography 0 150 300 Feet ¹ !A !A !A !A [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [[[[ !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GFGF GF GF GF GF GF !P !P !P !P !P XS 16 X S 1 8 XS 15 X S 1 7 XS 11 XS 2 0 XS 19 XS 9 XS 10 T3 R 2 T1 R 4 GWG 19 for informational purposes only -no hydrology perfomance criteria. T4 R 2 PP 21 PP 25 PP 11 PP 23 PP 21 PP 22 PP 13 PP 12PP 31 PP 26 PP 28 PP 30 PP 27 PP 29 PP 24 PP 14 GWG 3 GWG 19 GWG 5 GWG 4 GWG 7 GWG 8 GWG 20 T5 R2 FG CG T1 R4 CG T3 R2 T4 R1 CG T3 R 2 T3 R 1 T3A T4 R 1 T5 R2 T5 R1 402+00 404+00 406+00 410+00 412+00 410+00 412+00 21 4 + 0 0 218+00 220+00 222+00 224+00 400+00 408+00 414+00 416+00 410+00 510+00 511+00 512+00 52 0 + 0 0 522+00 530+00 532+00 6 0 0 + 0 0 6 0 2 + 0 0 6 0 4 + 0 0 6 0 6 + 0 0 60 8 + 0 0 50 0 + 0 0 502+00 50 4 + 0 0 506+00 508+00 510+00 512+00 514+00 516+00 2 3 6 4 5 7 9 7 6 4 5 8 10 12 Conservation Easement Structures JD Wetlands - Enhancement and Rehabilitation Riparian Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration Riparian Fixed Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Random Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Vegetative Areas of Concern - MY3 Ring Sprays & Soil Amendments Supplemental Planting Murdannia Treatment & Headwater Wetland Seeding Stream Restoration Stream Enhancement II Linear Wetland - Not for Credit Not for Credit As-Built Bankfull Cross Sections [Fencing Stream Areas of Concern - MY3 Murdannia Treatment Groundwater Gauge Condition - MY3 !A Criterion Met !A Criterion Not Met !A Proposed Groundwater Gauge !A Crest Gauge !A Flow Gauge GF Photo Point !P Reach Break Figure 1.4 Current Condition Plan View Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Monitoring Year 3 - 2023 Harnett County, NC 2021 Aerial Photography 0 150 300 Feet ¹ !A !A [[[[[ [ [ [ [ [[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ !A !A !A !A GF GF GF !P !P XS 8 X S 1 4 PP 20 PP 19 PP 10 GWG 1 GWG 2 T 1 R 1 T 1 R 2 T 2 R 1 T2 R 2 200+00 202 + 0 0 204+00 206+00 208+ 0 0 210+ 0 0 22 0 + 0 0 22 2 + 0 0 310+00 300+00 302+00 304+00 306+00 308+00 21 4 + 0 0 !A 1 2 3 1 Conservation Easement Utility Easement Structures JD Wetlands - Enhancement and Rehabilitation Riparian Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration Riparian Fixed Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Random Vegetation Plot Condition - MY3 Criteria Met Vegetative Areas of Concern - MY3 Ring Sprays & Soil Amendments Murdannia Treatment & Headwater Wetland Seeding Stream Restoration Stream Enhancement II Linear Wetland - Not for Credit Not for Credit As-Built Bankfull Cross Sections [Fencing Stream Areas of Concern - MY3 Murdannia Treatment Groundwater Gauge Condition - MY3 !A Criterion Met !A Criterion Not Met !A Proposed Groundwater Gauge !A Flow Gauge !A Barotroll GF Photo Point !P Reach Break Figure 1.5 Current Condition Plan View Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998 Monitoring Year 3 - 2023 Harnett County, NC 2021 Aerial Photography 0 75 150 Feet ¹ APPENDIX A. Visual Assessment Data Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Reach 1 366 732 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 4 4 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Daniels Creek Reach 2 437 874 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 3 3 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 2 2 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Reach 3 1,273 2,546 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 7 7 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 5 5 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Daniels Creek Reach 4 1,074 2,148 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 5 5 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Reach 5 204 408 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 2 2 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T1 R1 496 992 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 9 9 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 4 4 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T1 R2 40 80 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T1 R3 330 660 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 1 1 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T1 R4 1,062 2,124 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 9 9 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T1 R5 739 1,478 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 9 9 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T1A 285 570 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T2 R1 257 514 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 N/A Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T2 R2 200 400 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 4 4 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T3 R1 401 802 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T3 R2 945 1,890 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 35 35 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 6 6 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T3A 168 336 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T4 R1 1,039 2,078 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 45 45 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T4 R2 530 1,060 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 4 4 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T5 R1 240 480 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T5 R2 386 772 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 29 29 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Totals: Bank Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T6 R1 612 1,224 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T6 R2 267 534 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T7 1,241 2,482 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 19 19 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 2 2 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T8 R1 309 618 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 27 27 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 2 2 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T8 R2 460 920 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 19 19 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 2 2 100% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T9 254 508 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T9A 658 1,316 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T10 R1 600 1,200 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. 2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T10 R2 401 802 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. T10A 142 284 Surface Scour/ Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour.0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. 0 100% Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical ‐ rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse.0 100% 0 100% Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 00 NA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 00 NA Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Structure Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: % Stable, Performing as Intended Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length Bank Totals: Structure % Stable, Performing as Intended Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As‐Built Amount of Unstable Footage Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USCAE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Planted Acreage 54.00 Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping Threshold (ac) Combined Acreage % of Planted Acreage Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.0.10 0.00 0.0% Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count criteria.0.10 0.00 0% 0.00 0.0% Areas of Poor Growth Rates Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance Standard. 0.10 0.00 0% 0.00 0.0% Visual assessment was completed December 7, 2023. Easement Acreage 56.14 Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping Threshold (ac) Combined Acreage % of Easement Acreage 0.00 0% 0.00 0% Easement Encroachment Areas Encroachment may be point, line, or polygon. Encroachment to be mapped consists of any violation of restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Common encroachments are mowing, cattle access, vehicular access. Encroachment has no threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact area. none Visual assessment was completed on December 7, 2023. Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table Total Cumulative Total 0 Encroachments Noted / 0 ac Invasive Areas of Concern Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the total easement acreage. Include species with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short‐term or community structure for existing communities. Invasive species included in summation above should be identified in report summary. 0.10 STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 1 Daniels Creek R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 1 Daniels Creek R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 2 Daniels Creek R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 2 Daniels Creek R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 3 Daniels Creek R3 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 3 Daniels Creek R3 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 4 Daniels Creek R3 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 4 Daniels Creek R3 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 5 Daniels Creek R3 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 5 Daniels Creek R3 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 6 Daniels Creek R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 6 Daniels Creek R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 7 Daniels Creek R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 7 Daniels Creek R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 8 Daniels Creek R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 8 Daniels Creek R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 9 Daniels Creek R5 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 9 Daniels Creek R5 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 10 T1 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 10 T1 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 11 T1 R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 11 T1 R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 12 T1 R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 12 T1 R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 13 T1 R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 13 T1 R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 14 T1 R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 14 T1 R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 15 T1 R4 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 15 T1 R4 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 16 T1 R5 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 16 T1 R5 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 17 T1 R5 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 17 T1 R5 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 18 T1A – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 18 T1A – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 19 T2 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 19 T2 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 20 T2 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 20 T2 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 21 T3 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 21 T3 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 22 T3 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 22 T3 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 23 T3 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 23 T3 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 24 T3 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 24 T3 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 25 T3A – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 25 T3A – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 26 T4 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 26 T4 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 27 T4 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 27 T4 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 28 T4 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 28 T4 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 29 T4 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 29 T4 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 30 T5 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 30 T5 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 31 T5 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 31 T5 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 32 T6 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 32 T6 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 33 T6 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 33 T6 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 34 T7 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 34 T7 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 35 T7 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 35 T7 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 36 T7 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 36 T7 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 37 T7 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 37 T7 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 38 T8 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 38 T8 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 39 T8 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 39 T8 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 40 T8 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 40 T8 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 41 T9 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 41 T9 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 42 T9 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 42 T9 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 43 T9A – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 43 T9A– downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 44 T10 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 44 T10 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 45 T10 R1 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 45 T10 R1 – downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Photographs PHOTO POINT 46 T10 R2 – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 46 T10 R2 – downstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 47 T10A – upstream (03/09/2023) PHOTO POINT 47 T10A – downstream (03/09/2023) STREAM CROSSING PHOTOGRAPHS Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Crossing Photographs Daniels Creek R2 – Looking Upstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek R2 – Looking Downstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek R3 – Looking Upstream (03/09/2023) Daniels Creek R3 – Looking Downstream (03/09/2023) T1 R2 – Looking Upstream (05/03/2022) T1 R2 – Looking Downstream (05/03/2022) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Stream Crossing Photographs T1 R4 – Looking Upstream (03/09/2023) T1 R4 – Looking Downstream (03/09/2023) T3 R2 – Looking Upstream (03/09/2023) T3 R2 – Looking Downstream (03/09/2023) T6 R2 – Looking Upstream (03/09/2023) T6 R2 – Looking Downstream (03/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs VEGETATION PLOT 1 (08/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 2 (08/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 3 (08/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 4 (08/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 5 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 6 (08/29/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs VEGETATION PLOT 7 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 8 (08/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 9 (08/09/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 10 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 11 (12/07/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 12 (08/09/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs VEGETATION PLOT 13 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 14 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 15 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 16 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 17 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 18 (08/29/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs VEGETATION PLOT 19 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 20 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 21 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 22 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 23 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 24 (08/29/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs VEGETATION PLOT 25 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 26 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 27 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 28 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 29 (08/29/2023) VEGETATION PLOT 30 (08/29/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 1 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 2 (08/09/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 3 (08/09/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 4 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 5 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 6 (08/29/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 7 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 8 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 9 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 10 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 11 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 12 (08/29/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Plot Photographs RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 13 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 14 (08/29/2023) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 15 (08/29/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE PHOTOGRAPHS Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Groundwater Gauge Photographs GROUNDWATER GAUGE 1 ‐ (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 2 ‐ (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 3 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 4 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 5 – (12/07/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 6 – (11/21/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Groundwater Gauge Photographs GROUNDWATER GAUGE 7 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 8 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 9 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 10 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 11 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 12 – (11/21/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Groundwater Gauge Photographs GROUNDWATER GAUGE 13 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 14 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 15 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 16 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 17 – (11/21/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 18 – (11/21/2023) Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data – Groundwater Gauge Photographs GROUNDWATER GAUGE 19 – (12/07/2023) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 20 – (11/21/2023) APPENDIX B. Vegetation Plot Data Table 6. Vegetation Performace Standards Summary Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Plot Fixed Vegetation Plot 1 Fixed Vegetation Plot 2 Fixed Vegetation Plot 3 Fixed Vegetation Plot 4 Fixed Vegetation Plot 5 Fixed Vegetation Plot 6 Fixed Vegetation Plot 7 Fixed Vegetation Plot 8 Fixed Vegetation Plot 9 Fixed Vegetation Plot 10 Fixed Vegetation Plot 11 Fixed Vegetation Plot 12 Fixed Vegetation Plot 13 Fixed Vegetation Plot 14 Fixed Vegetation Plot 15 Fixed Vegetation Plot 16 Fixed Vegetation Plot 17 Fixed Vegetation Plot 18 Fixed Vegetation Plot 19 Fixed Vegetation Plot 20 Fixed Vegetation Plot 21 Fixed Vegetation Plot 22 Fixed Vegetation Plot 23 Fixed Vegetation Plot 24 Fixed Vegetation Plot 25 Fixed Vegetation Plot 26 Fixed Vegetation Plot 27 Fixed Vegetation Plot 28 Fixed Vegetation Plot 29 Fixed Vegetation Plot 30 Random Vegetation Plot 1 Random Vegetation Plot 2 Random Vegetation Plot 3 Random Vegetation Plot 4 Random Vegetation Plot 5 Random Vegetation Plot 6 Random Vegetation Plot 7 Random Vegetation Plot 8 Random Vegetation Plot 9 Random Vegetation Plot 10 Random Vegetation Plot 11 Random Vegetation Plot 12 Random Vegetation Plot 13 Random Vegetation Plot 14 Random Vegetation Plot 15 Yes Yes Yes Yes Success Criteria Met *Tract Mean Yes Yes Yes No** Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No** Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 95% *Success Criteria Met is based on the interim success criteria for MY3 of 320 planted stems per acre. **Plot is still on track to meet MY5 criteria of 260 planted stems per acre. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 111111 Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub 111 Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree 222111111111111 Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree 111 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 111 Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 1 111 Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree 111 111 Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree 1 Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree 11 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 222 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 333333222222222 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree 111 Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 111 Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 111111 111 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 222333 222 Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree 333 111 Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree 1 Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree 111111222111 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 111 Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree 111111 10 10 10 12 12 13 9 9 10 12 12 13 9 9 9 55599106679910777 405 405 405 486 486 526 364 364 405 486 486 526 364 364 364 Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 1 0.02 Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type VP 1VP 2VP 3VP 4VP 5 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T 111 1 1 222 222222 222 111 222 111 111 111 5 111 222 222111222 222 111 1 111222 111 111111 111111444 222222 1 222 222 222 111 1212148898889910121212 8810556555778666 486 486 567 324 324 364 324 324 324 364 364 405 486 486 486 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 VP 7VP 8VP 9VP 10VP 6 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T 111 111 222111222222222 111 111 111 111 111 111 222333444333333 111 2 111 222 111 222 111111222 111 111 11 222 444111 111 333 14 14 14 8 8 21 11 11 11 13 13 13 10 10 10 101010668444777666 567 567 567 324 324 850 445 445 445 526 526 526 405 405 405 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 VP 13 VP 14 VP 15VP 11 VP 12 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T 222 111 111333333 222 111 111 1 222 111 222 222222111 111222 222 222 222222 111 333 111111 111 222333111111 111 131313131314888777999 888667555555666 526 526 526 526 526 567 324 324 324 283 283 283 364 364 364 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 VP 19 VP 20VP 16 VP 17 VP 18 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T 222 111 111222222333222 111 111 111 111 22 1 1 222 333111222333222 222 111 222 111 222 111 111 111 111 3 333111111333 111 222 9 9 12 12 12 12 7 7 8 14 14 14 11 11 11 667888556888555 364 364 486 486 486 486 283 283 324 567 567 567 445 445 445 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 VP 25VP 21 VP 22 VP 23 VP 24 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T 333 71 111222111111444 111 111 111 111 76 34 222222 222222333222222 111 222333 111222 222111333111 111 111 111 1 222222111333555 1 222222 14 14 16 14 14 24 16 16 20 9 9 10 14 14 14 8810779101011667555 567 567 647 567 567 971 647 647 809 364 364 405 567 567 567 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 VP 26 VP 27 VP 28 VP 29 VP 30 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Baccharis Silverling Shrub Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Celtis laevigata Southern Hackberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree Ilex opaca American Holly Shrub Tree Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Shrub Tree Quercus alba White Oak Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Shrub Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Taxodium distichum Bald‐cypress Tree Ulmus alata Winged Elm Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteers PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakes T: Total Stems Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted Stem Counts size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 16 16 16 9 222 222222222111 1 40 40 40 38 38 38 41 41 41 52 52 52 666888888111111 888888888222 667888555777 333333333444 1 333 25 9 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 23 23 23 54 54 54 56 56 56 58 58 58 67 67 67 8 8 8 13 13 13 18 18 18 21 21 21 113 111 1 20 20 20 19 19 19 19 19 19 23 23 23 111 25 25 25 27 27 27 33 33 33 41 41 41 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 35 35 35 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 22 22 22 16 1 35 35 35 39 39 39 39 39 39 51 51 51 1 10 10 10 12 12 12 13 13 13 20 20 20 222222222777 280 280 322 296 296 296 312 312 312 408 408 408 19 19 27 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 378 378 434 399 399 399 421 421 421 551 551 551 30 0.74 30 0.74 30 0.74 30 0.74 Annual Means MY3 (2023) MY2 (2022) MY1 (2021) MY0 (2021) USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 11 Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 11 11 Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Tree Baccharis halimifolia Groundseltree Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree 112211 331133 Carya sp.Hickory Tree Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 11 Crataegus monogyna Common Hawthorne Tree Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Tree 2211 11 Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Tree 1111 Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Exotic Lindera benzoin Spice Bush Shrub Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip‐poplar Tree 11 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet gum Tree 22 11 Morus Rubra Red Mulberry Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 22 11 Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum Tree Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree 11 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 5555222211335544 Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 1122 Prunus serotina Black Cherry Tree 11 Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 1111111111 Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 11 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 11 11 Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Tree 22 Quercus spp.Oak Species Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 1111223322 Salix sericea Silky Willow Tree Symphoricarpos Orbiculatus Coralberry Shrub Tree Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Shrub Tree 33444433 3344 Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 11 Ulmus Rubra Slippery Elm Tree 11 Ulmus Alata Winged Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub tree Cornus Amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub tree 22 12 12 12 12 10 10 17 17 13 13 11 11 17 17 12 12 665555111188887755 486 486 486 486 405 405 688 688 526 526 445 445 688 688 486 486 Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Te ‐ Number of stems including exotic species T ‐ Number of stems excluding exotic species Species count Stems per ACRE 0.02 0.02 0.02size (ACRES)0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Table 7b. Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts Daniels Creek Mitigation Site 1 VP 6VP 7 Stem count size (ares)111 VP 3VP 4VP 5 Scientific Name Common Name Species Type VP 1VP 2 111 0.02 VP 8 1 Current Plot Data (MY3 2023) USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Acer negundo Boxelder Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub Tree Baccharis halimifolia Groundseltree Tree Betula nigra River Birch Tree Carya sp.Hickory Tree Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree Crataegus monogyna Common Hawthorne Tree Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Tree Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Tree Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Exotic Lindera benzoin Spice Bush Shrub Tree Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip‐poplar Tree Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet gum Tree Morus Rubra Red Mulberry Tree Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum Tree Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina Black Cherry Tree Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Tree Quercus spp.Oak Species Tree Rhus copallinum Winged Sumac Shrub Tree Salix nigra Black Willow Tree Salix sericea Silky Willow Tree Symphoricarpos Orbiculatus Coralberry Shrub Tree Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Shrub Tree Ulmus americana American Elm Tree Ulmus Rubra Slippery Elm Tree Ulmus Alata Winged Elm Tree Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub tree Cornus Amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub tree Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Te ‐ Number of stems including exotic species T ‐ Number of stems excluding exotic species Species count Stems per ACRE size (ACRES) Table 7b. Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Stem count size (ares) Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T 1 1 2 2 2 3 13 13 2 2 2 2 17 17 11 1 1 3 3 1144 5 5 3311 22 22 19 19 22 22 23 23 34 34 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 1122 4 4 5 5 1 1 11 221111 8 8 5 5 6 6 9 9 22 11 2 2 1 11 11 2233 22 11 6 6 10 10 8 8 11 11 11 11 5 5 1 1 4 4 3 3 11 111 22551133331133 45 45 49 49 37 37 42 42 11 11 1111 7 7 3 3 8 8 19 19 11 11 3 3 1 1 113311 22 12 12 9 9 3 3 8 8 11 22333322 12 12 5 5 9 9 10 10 4411 7 7 2 2 2 2 14 14 2 2 4 4 8 8 12 12 77 33 66113311 20 20 11 11 19 19 44 22 11115544 32 32 33 33 37 37 27 27 11 3366 2 2 11 22 22 11 1 1 22 18 18 15 15 15 15 12 12 16 16 13 13 11 11 204 204 190 191 197 195 207 207 99888855887777 27 27 25 25 22 20 16 16 728 728 607 607 607 607 486 486 647 647 526 526 445 445 550 550 513 515 531 526 558 558 0.02 0.02 111 0.020.020.02 0.02 11 VP 12VP 11 0.37 VP 15 MY1 (2021) 15 MY2 (2022) 15 0.37 0.37 15 0.370.02 1511 VP 9VP 10 VP 13 VP 14 Annual Means MY3 (2023) Current Plot Data (MY3 2023)Annual Means MY0 (2021) Annual MeansAnnual Means APPENDIX C. Stream Geomorphology Data Bankfull Dimensions 9.9 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 15.3 width (ft) 0.6 mean depth (ft) 1.4 max depth (ft) 15.7 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.6 hydraulic radius (ft) 23.6 width‐depth ratio 70.0 W flood prone area (ft) 4.6 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 1 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 1 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 363 364 365 366 367 368 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 102+50 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 3.9 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 6.6 width (ft) 0.6 mean depth (ft) 1.2 max depth (ft) 7.2 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.5 hydraulic radius (ft) 11.2 width‐depth ratio 30.0 W flood prone area (ft) 4.5 entrenchment ratio < 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 2 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 356 357 358 359 360 361 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 106+47 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 22.0 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 15.3 width (ft) 1.4 mean depth (ft) 2.7 max depth (ft) 17.3 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.3 hydraulic radius (ft) 10.7 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 3 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 3 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 347 348 349 350 351 352 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 114+39 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 12.0 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 12.6 width (ft) 1.0 mean depth (ft) 1.9 max depth (ft) 13.3 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.9 hydraulic radius (ft) 13.2 width‐depth ratio 130.0 W flood prone area (ft) 10.3 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 4 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 3 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 347 348 349 350 351 352 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 114+75 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 19.4 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 14.7 width (ft) 1.3 mean depth (ft) 2.4 max depth (ft) 15.7 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.2 hydraulic radius (ft) 11.2 width‐depth ratio 140.0 W flood prone area (ft) 9.5 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 5 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 4 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 326 327 328 329 330 331 0 1020304050 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 130+32 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 21.3 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 16.9 width (ft) 1.3 mean depth (ft) 3.0 max depth (ft) 19.0 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.1 hydraulic radius (ft) 13.5 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 6 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 4 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 324 325 326 327 328 329 0 1020304050 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 130+78 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 25.3 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 16.3 width (ft) 1.5 mean depth (ft) 3.1 max depth (ft) 18.6 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.4 hydraulic radius (ft) 10.5 width‐depth ratio 140.0 W flood prone area (ft) 8.6 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 7 ‐ Daniels Creek Reach 5 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 0 1020304050 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 133+38 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 8.4 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 12.0 width (ft) 0.7 mean depth (ft) 1.2 max depth (ft) 12.4 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.7 hydraulic radius (ft) 17.0 width‐depth ratio 33.0 W flood prone area (ft) 2.8 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 8 ‐ T1 Reach 1 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 390 391 392 393 394 395 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 202+17 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 11.5 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 12.0 width (ft) 1.0 mean depth (ft) 1.7 max depth (ft) 12.6 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.9 hydraulic radius (ft) 12.5 width‐depth ratio 125.0 W flood prone area (ft) 10.4 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 9 ‐ T1 Reach 4 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 357 358 359 360 361 362 0 1020304050 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 217+31 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 18.9 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 12.8 width (ft) 1.5 mean depth (ft) 2.6 max depth (ft) 14.7 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.3 hydraulic radius (ft) 8.6 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 10 ‐ T1 Reach 4 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 344 345 346 347 348 349 10 20 30 40 50 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 222+32 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 8.6 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 11.6 width (ft) 0.7 mean depth (ft) 1.5 max depth (ft) 12.2 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.7 hydraulic radius (ft) 15.7 width‐depth ratio 55.0 W flood prone area (ft) 4.7 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 11 ‐ T1 Reach 4 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 345 346 347 348 349 350 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 222+61 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 18.5 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 21.4 width (ft) 0.9 mean depth (ft) 2.1 max depth (ft) 22.1 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.8 hydraulic radius (ft) 24.7 width‐depth ratio 115.0 W flood prone area (ft) 5.4 entrenchment ratio 1.1 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 12 ‐ T1 Reach 5 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 326 327 328 329 330 331 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 232+17 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 29.5 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 17.2 width (ft) 1.7 mean depth (ft) 3.8 max depth (ft) 19.8 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.5 hydraulic radius (ft) 10.0 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 13 ‐ T1 Reach 5 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 324 325 326 327 328 329 5 15253545 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 232+57 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 7.1 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 12.2 width (ft) 0.6 mean depth (ft) 1.1 max depth (ft) 12.4 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.6 hydraulic radius (ft) 20.8 width‐depth ratio 80.0 W flood prone area (ft) 6.6 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 14 ‐ T2 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 379 380 381 382 383 384 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 306+52 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 12.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 10.5 width (ft) 1.2 mean depth (ft) 2.0 max depth (ft) 11.4 wetted perimeter (ft) 1.1 hydraulic radius (ft) 9.0 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 15 ‐ T3 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 361 362 363 364 365 366 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 415+28 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 3.8 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 7.8 width (ft) 0.5 mean depth (ft) 1.0 max depth (ft) 8.2 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.5 hydraulic radius (ft) 16.0 width‐depth ratio 25.0 W flood prone area (ft) 3.2 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 16 ‐ T3 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 362 363 364 365 366 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 415+43 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 7.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 10.2 width (ft) 0.7 mean depth (ft) 1.1 max depth (ft) 11.0 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.7 hydraulic radius (ft) 14.4 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 17 ‐ T4 Reach 1 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 381 382 383 384 385 386 0 102030 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 505+94 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 2.8 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 6.6 width (ft) 0.4 mean depth (ft) 0.9 max depth (ft) 6.9 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.4 hydraulic radius (ft) 15.5 width‐depth ratio 22.0 W flood prone area (ft) 3.3 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 18 ‐ T4 Reach 1 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 381 382 383 384 385 386 5152535 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 506+05 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 4.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 7.7 width (ft) 0.5 mean depth (ft) 1.0 max depth (ft) 8.1 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.5 hydraulic radius (ft) 14.1 width‐depth ratio 130.0 W flood prone area (ft) 16.9 entrenchment ratio 0.8 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 19 ‐ T4 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Upstream 363 364 365 366 367 368 0102030 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 512+03 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 2.3 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 6.1 width (ft) 0.4 mean depth (ft) 0.7 max depth (ft) 6.3 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.4 hydraulic radius (ft) 16.0 width‐depth ratio 20.0 W flood prone area (ft) 3.3 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 20 ‐ T5 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 372 373 374 375 376 377 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 606+90 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 6.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 9.2 width (ft) 0.7 mean depth (ft) 1.5 max depth (ft) 10.0 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.6 hydraulic radius (ft) 13.4 width‐depth ratio 130.0 W flood prone area (ft) 14.2 entrenchment ratio 1.1 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 21 ‐ T6 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 338 339 340 341 342 0102030 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 706+91 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 4.1 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 7.6 width (ft) 0.5 mean depth (ft) 1.0 max depth (ft) 8.0 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.5 hydraulic radius (ft) 14.1 width‐depth ratio 50.0 W flood prone area (ft) 6.5 entrenchment ratio 0.9 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 22 ‐ T7 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 361 362 363 364 365 366 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 810+13 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 8.7 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 11.0 width (ft) 0.8 mean depth (ft) 1.6 max depth (ft) 11.7 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.7 hydraulic radius (ft) 13.8 width‐depth ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots Cross‐Section 23 ‐ T7 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 View Downstream 359 360 361 362 363 364 5 15253545 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 810+32 Pool MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023)Bankfull Bankfull Dimensions 3.1 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 7.8 width (ft) 0.4 mean depth (ft) 0.7 max depth (ft) 8.0 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.4 hydraulic radius (ft) 19.2 width‐depth ratio 18.0 W flood prone area (ft) 2.3 entrenchment ratio 1.2 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 24 ‐ T8 Reach 1 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 385 386 387 388 389 390 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 903+16 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Bankfull Dimensions 7.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.) 11.1 width (ft) 0.6 mean depth (ft) 1.3 max depth (ft) 11.5 wetted perimeter (ft) 0.6 hydraulic radius (ft) 17.2 width‐depth ratio 40.0 W flood prone area (ft) 3.6 entrenchment ratio 1.0 low bank height ratio Survey Date: 05/2023 Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering View Downstream Cross‐Section 25 ‐ T8 Reach 2 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Cross‐Section Plots 365 366 367 368 369 370 0 10203040 El e v a t i o n (f t ) Width (ft) 907+16 Riffle MY0 (4/2021)MY1 (11/2021)MY2 (05/2022)MY3 (05/2023) Bankfull Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)Floodprone Area Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 366.06 366.07 366.09 366.10 358.13 358.12 358.12 358.12 N/A N/A N/A N/A 350.02 350.00 350.00 349.99 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.06 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 Thalweg Elevation 364.73 364.78 364.74 364.72 357.11 356.96 356.95 357.00 347.74 348.03 347.85 347.91 348.37 348.24 348.25 348.12 LTOB2 Elevation 366.06 366.06 366.16 366.16 358.13 358.19 358.12 358.19 351.00 351.06 350.57 350.62 350.02 350.04 350.08 350.01 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.3 2.5 2.7 2.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)9.1 8.9 10.1 9.9 4.5 5.1 4.4 5.1 30.3 19.9 20.2 22.0 11.7 12.2 12.7 12.0 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 328.68 328.64 328.64 328.69 N/A N/A N/A N/A 323.86 323.92 323.83 323.84 391.73 391.83 391.85 391.85 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 Thalweg Elevation 326.57 326.56 326.44 326.38 324.98 324.63 324.81 324.85 321.28 321.07 320.97 320.86 390.43 390.67 390.64 390.66 LTOB2 Elevation 328.68 328.69 328.67 328.77 328.01 327.90 327.89 327.90 323.86 323.79 323.97 323.78 391.73 391.85 391.91 391.90 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.0 3.3 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)18.2 19.3 18.6 19.4 27.7 23.7 23.6 21.3 26.3 24.0 28.8 25.3 7.8 8.0 8.6 8.4 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 359.12 359.09 359.07 359.12 N/A N/A N/A N/A 347.35 347.44 347.55 347.39 328.76 328.77 328.75 328.78 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.11 Thalweg Elevation 357.58 357.41 357.42 357.47 344.49 345.07 345.13 345.10 346.14 346.27 345.81 345.89 326.98 326.89 326.89 326.88 LTOB2 Elevation 359.12 359.04 369.06 359.12 347.55 347.60 347.70 347.68 347.35 347.39 347.34 347.37 328.76 328.90 328.83 328.98 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 3.1 2.5 2.6 2.6 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)11.5 10.9 11.4 11.5 22.4 18.4 19.8 18.9 8.8 7.7 8.9 8.6 15.1 17.1 16.3 18.5 1Bank Height Ratio (BHR) takes the As‐built bankful area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation. 2LTOB Area and Max depth ‐ These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elevation (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth. T1 Reach 4 Cross‐Section 8 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 11 (Riffle) Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Reach 3 Cross‐Section 4 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 6 (Pool) Daniels Creek Reach 4 Daniels Creek Reach 1Daniels Creek Reach 2 Daniels Creek Reach 5T1 Reach 1 Table 8. Cross‐Section Morphology Monitoring Summary Cross‐Section 1 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 2 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 3 (Pool) Cross‐Section 7 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 12 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 5 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 9 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 10 (Pool) T1 Reach 5 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area N/A N/A N/A N/A 381.62 381.52 381.63 381.64 N/A N/A N/A N/A 363.29 363.33 363.27 363.26 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.01 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 Thalweg Elevation 324.34 324.23 324.27 324.19 380.51 380.51 380.48 380.53 361.61 361.61 361.89 361.92 362.53 363.28 363.22 362.27 LTOB2 Elevation 327.96 327.97 327.93 327.97 381.62 381.62 381.64 381.65 364.09 364.02 363.95 363.92 363.29 363.22 363.28 363.29 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)3.6 3.7 3.7 1.7 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)32.6 32.7 31.3 29.5 7.0 6.8 7.1 7.1 14.8 13.4 12.3 12.2 3.6 2.8 3.7 3.8 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area N/A N/A N/A N/A 383.51 383.58 383.53 383.60 365.69 365.62 365.74 365.76 373.29 373.30 373.36 373.36 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Thalweg Elevation 382.42 382.51 382.52 382.96 382.69 382.71 382.65 382.69 364.52 364.59 364.61 364.61 372.67 372.62 372.61 372.68 LTOB2 Elevation 383.90 383.91 383.92 384.05 383.51 383.54 383.53 383.56 365.69 365.65 365.80 365.58 373.29 373.26 373.28 373.33 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.5 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)9.1 7.8 8.4 7.2 3.1 2.9 3.0 2.8 6.2 6.0 6.2 4.2 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.3 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 340.07 340.22 340.12 340.16 362.79 362.79 362.81 362.82 N/A N/A N/A N/A 386.79 387.00 386.94 386.99 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.00 0.64 1.00 1.15 Thalweg Elevation 338.65 338.67 338.71 338.71 361.86 361.76 361.72 361.75 360.08 360.34 360.50 360.56 385.94 386.37 386.22 386.40 LTOB2 Elevation 340.07 340.09 340.25 340.24 362.79 362.75 362.83 362.75 362.12 362.19 362.15 362.13 386.79 386.93 386.94 387.08 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.7 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.5 4.4 6.7 6.2 4.8 4.4 5.0 4.1 11.1 10.7 9.3 11.0 2.5 2.0 2.5 3.1 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 367.72 367.76 367.88 367.80 Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Thalweg Elevation 366.48 366.52 366.57 366.57 LTOB2 Elevation 367.72 367.77 367.92 367.76 LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)7.6 7.7 8.1 11.1 1Bank Height Ratio (BHR) takes the As‐built bankful area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation. 2LTOB Area and Max depth ‐ These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey (The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation). Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above. The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elevation (same as in the BHR calculation) will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth. T3 Reach 2 Table 8. Cross‐Section Morphology Monitoring Summary Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 T1 Reach 5T2 Reach 2T3 Reach 2 T8 Reach 2 Cross‐Section 25 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 13 (Pool)Cross‐Section 14 (Riffle)Cross‐Section 15 (Pool)Cross‐Section 16 (Riffle) T4 Reach 1 Cross‐Section 17 (Pool)Cross‐Section 18 (Riffle)Cross‐Section 19 (Riffle) T8 Reach 1T7 T5 Reach 2T4 Reach 2 Cross‐Section 21 (Riffle)Cross‐Section 22 (Riffle)Cross‐Section 23 (Pool)Cross‐Section 24 (Riffle) Cross‐Section 20 (Riffle) T6 Reach 2 APPENDIX D. Hydrology Data Reach MY1 (2021) MY2 (2022) MY3 (2023) MY4 (2024) MY5 (2025) MY6 (2026) MY7 (2027) T1 R4 8/20/2021 10/4/2021 9/30/2022 No Events T3 R2 No events 3/12/2022 6/30/2023 9/9/2023 T4 R1 7/8/2021 No Events 11/21/2023*** T7 7/8/2021 8/15/2021 8/20/2021 11/11/2022 No Events T8 R1*No Events No Events No Events T8 R2**‐‐ 3/21/2023 7/5/2023 7/9/2023 Daniels Creek R4 No Events 9/30/2022 No Events MY1 (2021) MY2 (2022) MY3 (2023) MY4 (2024) MY5 (2025) MY6 (2026) MY7 (2027) Annual Precip Total 46.55 49.09 35.82* WETS 30th Percentile 31.80 45.11 45.50 WETS 70th Percentile 59.92 54.60 54.75 Normal YYN Table 9. Bankfull Events Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Table 10. Rainfall Summary Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 *Includes Rainfall until 12/9/2023 *T8 is designed as a headwater B type Channel. **T8 R2 crest gauge installed during MY3. *** Debris lines observed on 11/21/2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site MY1 (2021) MY2 (2022) MY3 (2023)** MY4 (2024) MY5 (2025) MY6 (2026) MY7 (2027) T1 R1 163 Days/ 212 Days 89 Days/ 219 Days 127 Days/ 197 Days T2 R1 175 Days/ 324 Days 101 Days/ 270 Days 53 Days/ 201 Days T5 R2 255 Days/ 324 Days 107 Days 317 Days 75 Days/ 307 Days T8 R1 238 Days/ 326 Days 299 Days/ 360 Days 222 Days/ 323 Days **Data colleted through November 21, 2023. Data will be updated in MY4. *Success criteria is 30 consecutive days of flow. Table 11. Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Summary Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Reach Max Consecutive Days/Total Days Meeting Success Criteria* USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 127 days of consecutive stream flow Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 390.0 390.5 391.0 391.5 392.0 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Water Level Thalweg Bankfull 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek: T1 R1 Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 53 days of consecutive stream flow Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 380.5 381.0 381.5 382.0 382.5 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Water Level Thalweg Bankfull 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek: T2 R1 Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 75 days of consecutive stream flow Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 382.0 382.5 383.0 383.5 384.0 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Water Level Thalweg Bankfull 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek: T5 R2 Recorded In‐Stream Flow Events Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 222 days of consecutive stream flow Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 385.0 385.5 386.0 386.5 387.0 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Water Level Thalweg Bankfull 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek: T8 R1 Table 12. Groundwater Gauge Summary Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 MY1 (2021) MY2 (2022) MY3 (2023) MY4 (2024) MY5 (2025) MY6 (2026) MY7 (2027) 1 18 days (6.8%) 15 days (5.7%) 1 days (0.4%) 2 239 days (90.2%) 118 days (44.5%) 265 days (100%) 3 23 days (8.7%) 35 days (13.2%) 35 days (13.2%) 4 72 days (27.2%) 99 days (37.4%) 36 days (13.6%) 5 18 days (6.8%) 40 days (15.1%) 12 days (4.5%) 6 3 days (1.1%) 47 days (17.7%) 72 days (27.3%) 7 3 days (1.1%) 5 days (1.9%) 7 days (2.7%) 8 3 days (1.1%) 4 days (1.5%) 4 days (1.5%) 9 63 days (23.8%) 62 days (23.4%) 76 days (28.8%) 10 7 days (2.6%) 3 days (1.1%) 7 days (2.7%) 11 4 days (1.5%) 27 days (10.2%) 26 days*** (9.8%) 12 71 days (26.8%) 59 days (22.3%) 86 days (32.6%) 13 6 days (2.3%) 78 days (29.4%) 69 days (26.1%) 14 19 Days (7.2%) 44 days (16.6%) 77 days (29.2%) 15 95 days (35.8%) 81 days (30.6%) 109 days (41.3%) 16 0 days (0%) 43 days (16.2%) 35 days (13.3%) 17 1 days (0%) 17 days (6.4%) 13 days (4.9%) 18 15 days (5.7%) 78 days (29.4%) 95 days (35.9%) 19*239 days (90.2%) 265 days (100%) 259 days (97.7%) 20**‐‐35 days (13.2%) Gauge Max. Consecutive Hydroperiod (Percentage) USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 WETS Station (Daily Rainfall): Lillington 2.0 W (~ 10 miles east) WETS Station (30th & 70th Percentile): DUNN 4 NW (~ 24 miles east) Growing Season: 3/1/2023 to 11/20/2023 (264 Days) Success Criteria is 13% of the growing season (35 consecutive days) *Groundwater gauge 19 is for informational purposes and will not be held to hydrology performance standards. ** Groundwater gauge 20 installed in MY3 *** Groundwater within 12 inches from 3/1‐3/8 and 3/10‐4/5 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 1 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #1 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #1 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 265 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #2 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #2 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 35 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #3 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #3 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 36 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #4 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #4 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 12 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #5 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #5 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 72 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #6 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #6 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 7 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #7 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #7 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 4 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #8 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #8 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 76 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #9 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #9 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 7 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #10 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #10 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 26 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #11 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #11 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 86 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #12 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #12 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 69 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #13 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #13 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 77 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #14 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #14 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 109 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #15 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #15 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 35 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #16 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #16 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 13 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #17 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #17 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 95 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #18 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #18 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 259 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #19 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #19 Gauge Malfunction 1/31 ‐3/7 Groundwater Gauge Plot Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 St a r t of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 3/ 1 / 2 0 2 3 En d of Gr o w i n g Se a s o n 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 35 max consecutive days Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ‐50 ‐40 ‐30 ‐20 ‐10 0 10 Pr e c i p i t a t i o n (i n ) Wa t e r Le v e l (i n ) Monitoring Year 3 ‐2023 Daily Precipitation Gauge #20 Criteria Level Soil Surface 30‐Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge #20 Well installed on 1/31/2023 USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 1 Annual Drought Condition data from NIDIS US Drought Monitor Harnett Co. 2022‐2023 Annual Drought Conditions Plot Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 20 40 60 80 100 1/4/2022 3/4/2022 5/4/2022 7/4/2022 9/4/2022 11/4/2022 1/4/2023 3/4/2023 5/4/2023 7/4/2023 9/4/2023 11/4/2023 Dr o u g h t Ca t e g o r y Pe r c e n t a g e (% ) Months Annual Drought Conditions (Harnett Co. NC) Abnormally Dry (D0)Moderate Drought (D1)Severe Drought (D2) APPENDIX E. Project Timeline and Contact Info USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐00998 Table 13. Project Activity and Reporting History Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Task Completion or Deliverable Submission Mitigation Plan Approved November 2019 November 2019 As‐Built Survey Completed April 2021 April 2021 Construction (Grading) Completed NA April 2021 Planting Completed NA April 2021 Year 1 Monitoring Stream Survey November 2021 February 2022Vegetation Survey November 2021 Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)Stream Survey April 2021 July 2021Vegetation Survey April 2021 August 2023 Supplemental Planting February 2023 Beaver Damn Removal Stream Survey May 2022 Vegetation Survey August 2022 Coastal bermudagrass Treatment May 2022 Herbaceous seeding June 2022 Monitoring, POC Jason Lorch 919.851.9986 Monitoring Performers Wildlands Engineering, Inc. December 2026 Year 7 Monitoring Stream Survey 2027 December 2027Vegetation Survey 2027 Stream Repairs October 2021 Construction Contractor Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. 126 Circle G Lane Willow Spring, NC 27592 Table 14. Project Contact Table Daniels Creek Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 3 ‐ 2023 Designer Angela Allen, PE Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27609 919.851.9986 Year 6 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring December 2024 Year 5 Monitoring Stream Survey 2025 December 2025Vegetation Survey 2025 Murdannia Treatment August 2022 Year 2 Monitoring December 2022 Wetland Murdannia Treatment July 2023 December 2023Year 3 Monitoring Wetland Murdannia Treatment September 2023 In‐Stream Murdannia Treatment July‐August 2023 Streambank Livestake Planting January‐March 2023 Headwater Wetland Seeding October 2023 May & November 2023 Soil Amendments & Ring Sprays May 2023 Headwater Wetland Seeding November 2022 Stream Survey May 2023 Vegetation Survey