20240064 Ver 1_21602 PCN Support Package_20240104

GTA ASSOCIATES, INC.
�1dNk 1 . s.�
•
GEOTECHNICAL AND g
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
A Practicing Geoprofessional Business Association Member Firm
January 4, 2024
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
Re: Nationwide Permit 29 Pre -Construction Notification
Station Pointe
Harnett County, North Carolina
Division of Water Resources:
On behalf of DRB Group (Applicant), GTA Associates, Inc. (GTA) is submitting the
following information for a Pre -Construction Notification Wetland Permit Application:
1. Agent Authorization Letter;
2. Site Location Map (Figure 1);
3. USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2);
4. NRCS Soils map (Figure 3);
5. Pre -Filing Meeting Request Documentation;
6. Wetland/Waterbody Impact Plates (Figures 1-5);
7. Avoidance and Minimization Analysis;
8. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat documentation and;
9. Marshburn Wetland Map, prepared by Morris & Ritchie Associates of NC, P.C., dated
August 20, 2021.
10. Wetland data forms
11. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services Acceptance Letter
The Station Pointe project ("project") is identified as the parcel assemblage on Tippet Rd,
Angier, Harnett County, NC, with an area of 91 ± acres (Parcel ID 0406730011). The project is
located south of Tippet Road in the Town of Angier, within Harnett County, North Carolina. A
Site Location Map depicting the location of the project area is included as Figure 1. The project
includes the construction of a residential subdivision and associated stormwater management
facilities, utilities, and roadways.
The project area is generally comprised of open, agricultural land, ponds, and wooded
areas. Morris & Ritchie Associates of NC, P.C. performed a wetland delineation of the project area
530 Hinton Pond Dr. Knightdale, North Carolina 27545 [phone]
Abingdon, MD 4 Baltimore, MD + Laurel, MD + Frederick, MD 4 Waldorf, MD 4 New Castle, DE + Georgetown, DE
Somerset, NJ ♦ NYC Metro 4 Pittsburgh Metro + Quakertown, PA + Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, PA * York, PA
♦ Northeastern, OH ♦ Sterling, VA * Nashville, TN ♦ Charlotte, NC ♦ Raleigh, NC * Orlando, FL
Visit us on the web at www.gtaeng.com

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality — Division of Water Resources
Re: Station Pointe — Nationwide Permit 29 Pre -Construction Notification
January 4, 2024
Page 2
in 2022. A copy of the Dupree Farms Wetland Map, prepared by Morris & Ritchie Associates of
NC, P.C., dated February 28, 2022 accompanies this application. There are no areas of 100-year
floodplain within the project area according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) number 3720066200J, effective October 3rd 2006. To
develop the project, unavoidable impacts to an open water pond, forested nontidal wetlands, and
perennial streams are anticipated. As proposed, the project will result in approximately 17,687
square feet (SF; 0.4 acres) of permanent palustrine forested (PFO) wetland loss, 7,173 SF (0.124
acres) of permanent PFO to PEM conversion, 1,679 SF (0.03 acres) of temporary PFO wetland
impacts, 857 SF (0.019 acres) of open water pond impacts, and 20 linear feet (0.003 acres) of
temporary perennial stream impacts.
The Applicant requests Nationwide Permit 29 authorization for unavoidable impacts to
nontidal wetlands, stream buffers, and perennial streams. Should you have any questions, or
require additional information, please contact this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
GEO-TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Josh Riding
Environmental Scientist
T. Andy Stansfield, Jr.
Vice President
JSR/MAJ/TAS
21602
LAShared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\VVET�Reports - Permitting\Permitting\21602 Cover Letter.docx

Pre -Filing Meeting Request
Documentation

Joshua Riding
From: Joshua Riding
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 8:47 AM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: 401/Buffer Pre -filing Meeting Request
Please fill out the following information:
Project Name: Station Pointe Subdivision
County: Harnett
Applicant Name: Mr. J. Adam Ashbaugh, P.E.
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
**Please note that multiple projects may be submitted within the same email by supplying all the above information for
each project.
***In the event your email is not allowing auto -responses, please save a copy of your sent email for your records and if
necessary use that copy in application/form submittal.

Figure 1
Site Location Map

fi
yFn Grew,
Noe[ nurrfr �r ...
lax '
E�� e.M ❑
A
y4
y
d a
�
w.>• af.a Svre[
31
"' � Seems
,.•uYCirr.n level
k•eei
�
;_ ,r Cam•[. sn�r I -
tiw,rti.i.enF.eldL�en•-.
�fr
. h, N _
Frr: Lniii:[rii
5[•en
r
,xslji
_
,sn
wes� �iliir.f[•n Sr.+e[ w
_ -_
NC 210 —
.
wes,�Mn:+Strpxi
Fes[ r.m.y;an Seen
�fr; Cli�ren Sh.ei
t5
_eai Ah:rr•5[rre[
S NC SS
m
a
r �'t
ri dr
mrv-
-- —fir
• ,e� ! _
-ILA � ► 7' 1 �
i jj1+ f
F ,+ih �,•
I�
t
e ll-tErhefn [ -I
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA
0 2,000
0
LEGEND APPROXIMATE SCALE
NORTH 1 INCH = 2,000 FEET
'--- SUBJECT SITE
GE-0-TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS SITE LOCATION MAP
3445-A BOX HILL CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE STATION POINTE
ABINGDON, MARYLAND 21009
PHONE: 59SUBDIVISION
FAX: [phone]�895
WWW..GTAENG.COM
© G EO-TE CH N OL OGY ASSOCIATES, INC. HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NO. 21602 SCALE: 1"=2,000' DATE: APRIL 13, 2023 DRAWN BY: JSR REVIEW BY: MAXTAS FIGURE: 1
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 -Station Pointe\WET\CAD\GIS\21602 SLM.mxd

Figure 2
USGS Topographic Map

�0 �\� �• cH ATF
i y
R
�• W DORA S z E�\�0� •¢
sRp
C giercs
SST
_
EPOT EWILLIAMS,ST
,W DST_
E DEP'OT--300� �� S,T S
"'"NOTON ST 210
W CHURCH ST
a,
55 �
MCI ti
���
\ mac,
G7
��N— N
BFN
����' �-
a- �,
)� Angie300
� r
�TIPPE7 RD
Jr
CLEARFIELp p "o GAMBRIDGE OR
J O a -4
Angier
55
�G4 % �a
p � i \
z
50 m
2� s�
\
l /
2
4
C!
0
300���
Cheste fi
Lake
C`• • �• �({q�
300
NATHAN MATTHEWS-RD
SOURCE: UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (USGS), ANGIER, COATS, FUQUAY-VARINA, AND
LILLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLES, 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SERIES, DATED 2022.
0
0 2,000
1
LEGEND
SUBJECT SITE
APPROXIMATE SCALE
NORTH 1 INCH = 2,000 FEET
GEO-TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP
3445-A BOX HILL CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE
ABINGDON, MARYLAND 21009
STATION PO I N TE
PHONE: 59
FAX: [phone]�895
SUBDIVISION
WWW.GTAENG.COM
©GEO-TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC.
HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NO. 21602
SCALE: 1"=2,000'
DATE: APRIL 13, 2023
DRAWN BY: JSR
REVIEW BY: MAXTAS
FIGURE: 2
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 -Station Pointe\WET\CAD\G I S\21602 USGS.mxd

Figure 3
NRCS Soils Map

L:\Shared\Project File s\2023\21602 -Station Pointe\WET\CAD\G I S\21 602 SOILS.mxd

Wetland/Waterbody Impact Plates

NOIItlI1011OS C' "OII0nbJISNO0 bJOd 03SV3137i ION
S7133NION30NI1lnSN07
A03NN3DILNOXINLSStl9
(L9Ztr0)tl1090N �IO1 L60151390N�s—onN NOI1 IAIItl30
896P199(6lfi)Xtl3 bL9L25f1fi991tl0ZZOOISB(fiLb)3NOHd3l31
N''�NNo osi .i aiv
vNno6voiu N '—no —N.- '6 —1.—
6oatlOa�I3ddII31
Z
"�
©©�
L99G2 ON'H0131Vn b9Z 311n5'OVO4 111H 13dVH0 blf9
Sa33NIJN3 JNf1 Il�SN00
dVW 10Vd WI IIVL13A0
Noisiniaans
9-1
LU
'ONI `1.O3NN3N'8 NOXIN `SSVS
31NI0d N011`d1S
33H
133HSLU
O
® a
x
w
z
E
—
s
a
LL
O
8 Z
3
y
o
ru g r
or ri ?
J! s �
�l ko
iz' Al
`�S Y J�
! �` it iiiij �. a / `L��
��)
oz
Oi�Y� wa eEitidlp I �__-- _ _ � r�r�:�J—,C, �� \ „r✓�/.'/.�.y'.�,' i �
d�oi ^FH_ aV�•�Ill/ �5 \..i{ \f� \� ` i ���I`C, JJI.1C
.i W r-h� hip -nip n� ' w o%J0 cc
ccf
Mpgg Iri -- rri 3
''SS�� 1 � I •°�;1 �
_ I I I I
I--------
0
del
o
- Fw'Z.
w 5 o?oa
o �300
a zom z 5
kz1°o
ou ow

Q9Z0.0) V1080N `MOL O) SIMON tl38WNN'1tl30 ### :AS NHO 31VOS NIIOUVO HIHON `A1NN00113NUVH `H31ONV AO NMO
6966•LS8(6L6):XVd 6L81•bS£(008) HO ZZbb•lS8(6 l6)�131
- L09LZON�H`J13lVH`0SZ31NS`OVOtlIlIHl3dtlH00lE9 NVId avobi13dd11 W
SH99NIJN3 JNuinSN00 13Vdwi aNVI13M NOISIAIaens N 0 m'ONI J`l.O3NN3N'8 NOXIN `SSVI3 ASN-a —3ivaY ONaor 31NIOd N0I1V1S
U
U ¢
N
p 0
G O
LL LL
J
r
°D
Uw
Jw
m
Uw
v
rnw
a
Qz
o
�z
o
Z W
Q w
o
z ¢
ON
>N
5 0
=
z
Q
a
Z
N
N
LU
W
N
N
N
nj
J
0
0
--z
—
i
1
i
1
1 �
\1
41-1
1
1
-- a
I C
i
LU
l +
/
? /
n
a)
00
00
1-
CV
N
N
N
i0VdWI ONVli3M
30
ON3
£Z'98Z
Z'98Z
9b'S8Z
J cai �
n:
9b'S8Z
in rtDi 0
I
99'b8Z
L'b8Z
IL6'48Z
6'F8Z
bZ'£8Z
Z'£8Z
w
I
m
OL'Z8Z
0L ZH
LZ'Z8Z
£'Z8Z
I
86' L 8z
O'Z8Z
I
09' L 8Z
8'L8Z
SC L 8Z
SCLH
Z8 L8Z
8' 18Z
I
W y
Z Z
LO'Z9Z
J 0
0 z8Z
ONVI lOVdWI INViS
ZS'SL+O
cc-
LLI
Z
V W
�Z' g8Z
£b'Z8Z
ViS
�b'Z8Z
ai
co
co
N
CV
N
z.
y- ;-----�

(L9Z0-0) VIOSON `MOL O) SIMON Stl38WNN'1tl30 ### :AS NHO 31VOS NIIOHVO HIHON `A1NN00113NUVH `H31EM JO NMO
- 8968•LS8(6l6) XVtl 6L81•bS£(008)HO ZZbb•lS8(6l6) 131 �A3:i) Ndld ay0a 13dd11 W N
L09LZ ON �H O131VH `0SZ 311NS `OVOtl IIIH l3dtlH0 OLE9
SH99NIJN3 JNiiinSNOD 13Vdwi aNVI13M NOISIAIaens N ?r
•ONI `l.O3NN3N'8 NOXIN `SSVI3 ASNMVHa Cc�vaY'ON aor 31NIOd NOIlb�1S
1.
0
ci Q
Q o
o
o
OV
W
J
W LL
a LL
Q H
U w
O - .
F �2
Co
J LL
O c� F
H �
Zw
az Q
Z O
N
N Q
U
u!
2 > W
=
0
cc 2 cc
a U N
Z
1 1
W
J
0 0
N N
o N V2
J w
QW
U W
y LL
O J Z O
UW
J
w U
> co
N uI
N N
0 0
Vl
6N N /IN
HN
Wl OV3M
b88Lb9b9L''S'98Ss99999sZZZ
J0 0N3
0'96+L V1S 66'99Z
0 99Z
£L'69Z
oOL'S9Z
o00'S9Z
O S9Z
�L Q S9Z
HQ£S'L9Z
i3VdW1 Z W 9'L971
ZzZ
W J
SL' L L+0 V1S v W b9'89Z
b8'89Z
N N N N
O
O
O
Lo
N
O
O
O
O
N
sI+I `wv ZY.6Z:9 BZOZ/4/Z4 Z loed-I`r)-p•loed-1-13eM•Ud•690ZZ•406\)Uuu!-!IGAd g0\31A13\u0lslnlpgnS mAed eeAdna - 69OZ7,\ZZOZ\:H
O
O
O
Lo
N
O
O
O
O
N
sI+I `wv ZY.6Z:9 BZOZ/4/Z4 Z loed-I`r)-p•loed-1-13eM•Ud•690ZZ•406\)Uuu!-!IGAd g0\31A13\u0lslnlpgnS mAed eeAdna - 69OZ7,\ZZOZ\:H

(L9Z0-0) VIOSON `MOL O) SIMON Stl38WNN '1tl30 ### :AS NHO 31VOS NIIOUVO HIHON `A-LNN00113NUVH `H31ONV AO NMO
J I
6966•LS8(6L6):XVtl 6L81•bS£(008) HO ZZbb•lS8(6 l6)�131
- L09LZON �HO13lVH`0SZ311NS`OVOtl IlIH l3dtlH00lE9 N` Id avobI13dd11 WLU
M
SH99NIJN3 JNuinSN00 13Vdwi 4N`dI13M NOISIAIaens N ?r
'ONI `l.O3NN3N'8 NOXIN `SSVI3 ASNMVHa —3ivaY'ON aor 31NIOd NOIlb�1S
1.
0
a
O
J
W
a H
aLL
O N
Uw
CO W
f.
JLL
OLL
a
Z W
Z
J
N
2 O
a
W f/1
coaw
o
2
_
CC Z
0
a U
Z
/W
v
W
J
` I
N /00
m �
\ C Q ONVI
---- 1 J
I ` �
00
N
0 0
N N
O N V2
J w
aW
U W
y LL
O J Z O
UW
_ J
W U
i co
N N
N N
0 0
O
O
O
Lo
T
O
O
O
O
T
O
O
O
O
J LU
L
1
1 1 i
1/
• � 1
i
s1+1 `wv b5.6Z:6 BZOZ/6/44 `B loedwl.6iHp•loedw1•13eM•Ud•690ZZ•406\)UeulwllGAd g0\IIA13\u01s1n1pgnS mAed eeAdna - 69OZ7,\ZZOZ\:H
OVd
O
I-
(CO
N
N
N
WI GNVI13M
OS'OLZ
ZZ'60+L V1S
OS OLZ
iovdWi
J
09ro[Z
8 OLZ
W H
OZ'L9+O
VIS
/
Z Z
l8'lLZ
j O
8 ILZ
W a
l9'lLZ
H
9ILZ
Z W
W J
V W
b8'lLZ
O
b8' LLZ
I-
(CO
N
N
N

(L9Z0-0) VIOSON `MOL O) SIMON Stl38WNN'1tl30 ### :AS NHO 31VOS NIIOUVO HIHON `A1NN00113NUVH `H31ONV AO NMO
6966•LS8(6L6):XVtl 6L81•bS£(008) HO ZZbb•lS8(6 l6)�131
- L09LZON �H`J13lVH`0SZ31NS`OVOtl IlIH l3dtlH00lE9 NVId avobI 13dd11 WLU
L
SH99NIJN3 JNuinSN00 13Vdwi aNVI13M NOISIAIaens N ?r
'ONI `l.O3NN3N'8 NOXIN `SSVI3 ASNMVHa —3ivaY'ON aor 31NIOd NOIlb�1S
1.
i
n
1
JJ
,ChB
Jam',
LU
J
lot
1
of \
\
-I >\
CV
ONVI
V A \
1
%%N V
Q
6S'LL+0
N
N
N
N
9 L'69Z
9 L'99Z
jWl ONVl13M
d0
ON3
LCZ9Z
3l'6L+1
V1S
LZ9Z
\
90'Z9Z
L'Z9Z
I
LZZ9Z
f'Z9Z
6'L9Z
L6'l9Z
09'L9Z
9'L9Z
1
W y
/
Z Z
69'L9Z
J O
L' 19Z
W ~
lb'Z9Z
� ;
b'Z9Z
loVdWl
Z LLI
W J
0 W
Ob'"Z
V1S
O
Ob'b9Z
(�O
(00
lLo
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
Lo
N
O
O
O
O
N
sl+l `wv 9&:99:04 BZOZ/6/44 It loedwl.6Mp•loedw1•13eM•Ud•690ZZ•406\)UuulwllGAd g0\IIAI3\u01s1n1pgnS mAed eeAdna - 69OZ7,\ZZOZ\:H

Avoidance and Minimization Analysis

AVOIDANCE AND NHNINHZATION ANALYSIS
STATION POINTE SUBDIVISION
HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Site Description
�r ! OF g
?e*60
The Station Pointe Subdivision project site is located south of Tippet Road and east of
Matthews Mill Pond Road in the Angier area of Harnett County, North Carolina. The subject
property is identified as PINS O40673 0011, 040673 011 01, 040673 0014. A Site Location Map
of the project site is enclosed as Figure 1. The subject site primarily consists of agricultural
fields, wooded areas, and open water ponds.
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map for the subject site (Figure 2)
indicates that the subject site primarily drains south towards West Buies Creek.
Proiect Purpose
The greater Raleigh area, including Harnett County and the Town of Angier have
experienced a continued rapid rise in population, which creates a need for high quality housing
opportunities. In order to meet these needs, the establishment of new developments is essential to
provide quality living options for new and existing residents attracted by Harnett County's
anticipated growth.
To develop this site, unavoidable impacts to nontidal wetlands, perennial streams, and
open water ponds are anticipated. Proposed impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable.
Avoidance, Minimization, and Design Considerations
The proposed subject site is constrained by wetlands in the northern and central portions
of the subject site, as well as existing open water ponds and streams connecting these features.
The applicant avoided and minimized the impacts through project design by having the northern
and southern portions of the neighborhood accessed through separate entrances to avoid large
road crossings through the wetlands and stream in the center of the site. The route for the road
that accesses the northern and western portions of the neighborhood was selected in order to
minimize the impacts to the maximum practicable extent, while still maintaining project
feasibility, and limits the impact through this area to one wetland and waterbody impact.
The applicant selected this subject site, in part, due to the existing infrastructure in the
area. In order to tie-in to the existing sewer infrastructure, there are two crossings. These
crossings were located with minimizing impacts in mind, and cross the wetlands at narrow areas
with the shortest possible route to the existing sewer infrastructure.

Avoidance and Minimization Analysis Station Pointe Subdivision
GTA Proiect No. 21602
The applicant avoided and minimized impacts through construction techniques by
electing to make Wetland Impact 94 an elevated boardwalk rather than a gravel path. In the
original design of the neighborhood this path was intended to be a gravel path through the
wetland with a culverted stream crossing. The applicant elected to change this to an elevated
boardwalk to avoid permanent wetland impacts and avoid stream impacts all together, as the
stream will be spanned by this boardwalk.
Within the property there are approximately 10.8 acres of nontidal wetlands, 5.5 acres of
open water ponds, and approximately 333 linear feet of perennial streams. The applicant is
proposing 17,687 square feet (SF; 0.4 acres) of permanent palustrine forested (PFO) wetland
loss, 7,173 SF (0.124 acres) of permanent PFO to PEM conversion, 1,679 SF (0.03 acres) of
temporary PFO wetland impacts, 857 SF (0.019 acres) of open water pond impacts, and 20 linear
feet (0.003 acres) of temporary perennial stream impacts. The applicant has avoided impacts to
the maximum extent practicable, designing the layout of the subdivision to avoids impacts
wherever feasible. Throughout the design process the feasibility of multiple site configurations
was considered to avoid and minimize impacts. Earlier designs included additional stream and
open water impacts, as well as increased permanent wetland impacts. The final site configuration
avoids impacts to the maximum extent practicable, while still maintaining economic feasibility
for the project.
However, this configuration carries unavoidable impacts to nontidal wetlands, open -
water ponds, and streams. The unavoidable impacts have been minimized through both planning
considerations and construction techniques.
The wetland impacts associated with this configuration will require compensatory
wetland mitigation. The Applicant proposes to satisfy this requirement by paying in to an In Lieu
Fee program, as there are no mitigation banks with wetland mitigation credits currently available
in the 03030004 Watershed. The proposed development is estimated to result in 0.56 acres of
forested nontidal wetland impact, requiring approximately 1.12 acres of wetland mitigation.
The unavoidable impacts have been minimized through both planning considerations and
construction techniques.
LAShared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Permitting\Permitting\21602 Avoidance and Minimization analysis.doc
`%

Agent Authorization Letter

CONSULTANT/AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: PID: 040673 0011
STREET ADDRESS: Tippet Road, Harnett County, NC
Please print:
Developer/Applicant: Trevor Dalton
Developer/Applicant:
The undersigned hereby authorizes
Josh Riding of
(Contractor / Agent)
GTA Associates, Inc.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Developer/Applicant's Address (if different than property above):
3000 RDU Center Drive, Suite 202, Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone:
919-796-5956
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date:

Endangered Species and Designated
Critical Habitat documentation

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
r ■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
June 5, 2023
Josh Riding
Geo-Technology Associates
3445 Box Hill Corporate Center Drive
Abingdon, MD 21009
RE: Info Request ID: 274
Dear Josh Riding:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

CO
N
-40
W,
Q
CO
CO
z
7
U
U
0
C
E
N
H
N
co
N
I
co
7
co
z
CO CO
C r
o
n C (�
O CC3 M
0 LL �7
Ncn
+ +� U 0)
CO CO LF CO
C
O N
CO CC3 0)a
> +c3
Q Q O
n o
u 1 O N
Al
N
O E
cn E
D_ z
co E
� E
N
C
0
C
� N
� E
N O
C
N
E
7
O
O
C)
U)
O
C
N
L
we,
'0(D
E
W
N
Q
Q
o
U
CO
O
co
O C
O co
c
E O
O N
V) 0�
n
M
M
C �
O cn
o E
CO
N
Q
O
N
O
a
N
O
cn
CO
E
C
0
CO
C
N
C
N
E
7
O
O
0
cn
CO
N
Q
co
co
z
O
z
U
O J
u
C
0
CO
C
N O
C Co
N
E
D
o E n
ocn z0
ro ro N
Q Q Q
O
fo fo C
C C 3
CO CO 0
Q
Q
a
a
z
u
z
T
U
O
y
!M
N
a

N
rl-
cn
07
Q�
0
66
N
C)
N
N
W
19
no
v PAP,
PQ
N
9 �
p 0 G
o (V
N C
Z m
by
¢a-
c
_ is ewl!M s Oc
a
� w -
st w
S BroadS, o
s "W9h Si
a
rn a
Pb �aaJ sain8 PillO
Q 3 a
� ac
tea`
O!
�J4,
a�
Y
o
� c a
�S�aaoN sawef Ole
W
z
wo�6-
°nzsm°p
T
ro
a _0
w C
Q O
� m �
6 N -0
� O �
Q 7
O
v O Co
CD V
M M (U N
CV p G O
N m d
as
M
O
M
CU
a

Dupree Farms Wetland/Stream Map,
prepared by Morris & Ritchie
Associates of NC, P.C., dated February
28, 2022.

(0

Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Station Pointe City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 27-Dec-23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DCP-1
Investigator(s): J. Riding Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site are typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation -,Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic?
Yes X
NWI classification: PFO
No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Wetland 1
Remarks:
This DCP was established within Wetland 1, in the northern portion of the subject site.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
UShared\Project Files\2023\21602 -Station PointeMETReports- PernnittingT—itting\21602 DCPsxls

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DCP-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
) % Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species That Are
1- Magnolia virginiana
15
Y
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7 (A)
2- Fraxinus pennsylvannica
15
Y
FACW
Total Number of Dominant Species
3- Platanus occidentalis
5
N
FACW
Across All Strata:
7 (B)
4- Ilex opaca
5
N
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species That Are
5-
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100% (A/B)
6-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7-
8-
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
9-
OBL species x 1 =
10-
FACW species x 2 =
40
= Total Cover
FAC species x 3 =
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
FACU species x 4 =
Sapling / Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
UPL species x 5 =
1- Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
Y
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2- Magnolia virginiana
5
Y
FACW
3-
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4-
5-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6-
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8-
3 - Prevalence Index is <3-01
9-
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide
10-
supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
10
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
be present, unless disturbed orproblematic-
1 Microstegium vimineum
15
Y
FAC
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
2- Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
3- Solidago rugosa
10
Y
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4- Magnolia virginiana
5
N
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in-
5- Myosoton aguatfcum
5
N
FACW
(7-6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)-
6-
7-
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
8-
a less than 3in- DBH and greater than or equal to 3-28 ft (1 m) tall-
9-
10-
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11-
of size, and woody plants less than 3-28 ft- tall
12-
45
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, greater than 3-28 ft- in height-
50% of total cover: 22-5 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1- Stratum not present
2-
3-
4-
5-
0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) -
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2-0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Permitting\Permifting\21602 DCPs.xls

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-5 10YR 4/3 100
5-20 10YR 7/2 100
'Type: C=concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Texture
SaL
cal
Sampling Point: DCP-1
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,
153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Perm itting\Permitting\21602 DCPs.xls

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Station Pointe City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 27-Dec-23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DCP-2
Investigator(s): J. Riding Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site are typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation -,Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic?
Yes X
NWI classification: PFO
No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
If yes, optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks:
This DCP was established in Wetland 2, south of Wetland 1.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
UShared\Project Files\2023\21602 -Station PointeMETReports- PernnittingT—itting\21602 DCPsxls

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DCP-2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
) % Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species That Are
1. Fraxinus pennsylvannica
25
Y
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2. Platanus occidentalis
20
Y
FACW
Total Number of Dominant Species
3. Pinus taeda
10
N
FAC
Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species That Are
5.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
9.
OBL species x 1 =
10.
FACW species x 2 =
55
= Total Cover
FAC species x 3 =
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover:
11
FACU species x 4 =
Sapling / Shrub Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
)
UPL species x 5 =
1. Magnolia virginiana
15
Y
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2. Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
3.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5.
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.01
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide
10
supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
25
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 12.5
20% of total cover:
5
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
)
be present, unless disturbed or problematic-
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
1 - Persicaria sagittata 25 Y OBL
2. Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
3. Phytolacca americana
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4. Microstegium vimineum
5
N
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
5.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
6.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
8.
a less than 3in. DBH and greater than or equal to 328 ft (1 m) tall-
9-
10
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft. tall
12.
45
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, greater than 328 ft. in height.
50% of total cover: 22.5
20% of total cover:
9
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Permitting\Permifting\21602 DCPs.xls

SOIL
Sampling Point: DCP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 2/2 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M CL
C=concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,
153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Perm itting\Permitting\21602 DCPs.xls

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Station Pointe City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 27-Dec-23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DCP-3
Investigator(s): J. Riding Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site are typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation -,Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic?
Yes X
NWI classification: PFO
No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Wetland 3
Remarks:
This DCP was established within Wetland 3, south of Wetland 2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
UShared\Project Files\2023\21602 -Station PointeMETReports- PernnittingT—itting\21602 DCPsxls

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DCP-3
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
) % Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species That Are
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25
Y
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6 (A)
2. Platanus occidentalis
20
Y
FACW
Total Number of Dominant Species
3-
Across All Strata:
6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species That Are
5.
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
9.
OBL species x 1 =
10.
FACW species x 2 =
45
= Total Cover
FAC species x 3 =
50% of total cover: 22.5
20% of total cover:
9
FACU species x 4 =
Sapling / Shrub Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius )
UPL species x 5 =
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Y
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2. Sambucus nigra
10
Y
FACW
3.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.01
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide
10
supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
25
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 12.5
20% of total cover:
5
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius )
be present, unless disturbed orproblematic-
1 . Persicaria sagittata
10
Y
OBL
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
2. Rubus hispidus
10
Y
FACW
3. Smilax rotundifolia
5
N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4. Arundinaria gigantea
5
N
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
5.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
6.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
8.
a less than 3in. DBH and greater than or equal to 328 ft (1 m) tall-
9-
10
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft. tall
12.
30
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, greater than 328 ft. in height.
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Stratum not present
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Permitting\Permifting\21602 DCPs.xls

SOIL
Sampling Point: DCP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 6/6 20 CL
C=concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,
153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Perm itting\Permitting\21602 DCPs.xls

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Station Pointe City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 27-Dec-23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DCP-4
Investigator(s): J. Riding Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Field Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site are typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation -,Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic?
Yes X
NWI classification: N/A
No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Wetland 3
Remarks:
This DCP was established to document upland conditions within the subject site.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
UShared\Project Files\2023\21602 -Station PointeMETReports- PernnittingT—itting\21602 DCPsxls

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DCP-4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
) % Cover Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species That Are
1. Stratum not present
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant Species
3-
Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species That Are
5
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
9.
OBL species x 1 =
10.
FACW species x 2 =
0 = Total Cover
FAC species x 3 =
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
0
FACU species x 4 =
Sapling / Shrub Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
)
UPL species x 5 =
1. Stratum not present
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2.
3.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5.
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.01
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide
10
supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 = Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
0
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
)
be present, unless disturbed orproblematic-
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
1 . Digitaria ciliaris 30 Y FACU
2. Festuca arundinaceae
30 Y
UPL
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in-
5-
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
6.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
8.
a less than 3in. DBH and greater than or equal to 328 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft. tall
12.
60 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, greater than 328 ft. in height.
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover:
12
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot size: 30' Radius
)
1. Stratum not present
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover:_____2_ Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Permitting\Permifting\21602 DCPs.xls

SOIL
Sampling Point: DCP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 6/4 100 SaL
C=concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0
L:\Shared\Project Files\2023\21602 - Station Pointe\WET\Reports - Perm itting\Permitting\21602 DCPs.xls

North Carolina
Division of
Mitigation
Services Letter

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
J. Adam Ashbaugh, PE
DRB Group
3000 RDU Center Dr, Suite 202
Morrisville, NC 27560
Project: Station Pointe
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 6, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: June 6, 2024
County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the applicable 404 Permit/401 Certification/Buffer Approval within this time frame,
this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once
DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit
and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid
by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.57
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Kelly B. Williams
In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
cc: Josh Riding, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
h(h�TH :.AROI iRA IV
o �nmmmenni w�a 919,707,8976