670025_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230608

U Division of Water Resources
Facility Number h Z - 2 O Division of Soil and' Water Conservation
s ° O OtherAgency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: t (��L3� Arrival Time: I S1 { 0 Departure Time: ® County:
Farm Name: 'Y OJA( j/ G am— S Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title:
Onsite Representative: :I r., ,A —At, C_� f'' ; ((z�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine:'I Capacity, .-Pop:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current'
Wet Poultry ,Capacity Pope
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dav Poultry Capacity Pori: ".
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
r—TOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Region:
°Design Current
Cattle° .Capacity 'Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
E2 A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
G A
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E3NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E24o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: f{ 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
13Z
No 0 NA 0 NE
❑ No VNA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ AYb NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �K(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ©No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
EZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ' ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E2rN0
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
FlAo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
/[�
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
WD
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N�17.
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
5No�
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
O
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, Ninuelrispections
opriate ox below. �(Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard aste sis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: U17 VF5 jDate of Inspection: (D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑140 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:]No YNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes To 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑Ao
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
No
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[]
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[:3/NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EDI�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
� 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� �—` Date: b
Page 3 of 3 511212020