310253_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230711

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 �� 3 O Division of Soil audWater�Conservation
«�;,- .
0 Other Agency
type of Visit: (D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
teason for Visit: G Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:—�,�^Z3 Arrival Time: �Z Departure Time: t County: Region:
Farm Name: l �- i n , Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: q� t C,, L-C% `^ . C✓ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
-,Design., Current
Design
Current
Design:.,Current
Swine _.Capacity _ Pop. _,.
Wet -Poultry,
Capacity
Pop:
Cattle rapacity .Pop
Wean to Finish I
ILayer
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkey Poults Other
Turkeys
Dairy Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No N ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ TA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) El Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes rNo/
X ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
Page I of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - 2. Date of Inspection: it 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6­15AONE
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier: -bt I
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes gN
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑Yes ,❑
'❑ NA
❑ NE ,
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes l <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes 0'NVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail .to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes E;Xo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes OAo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other•
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Applicati ' 2/Nyt/ekylyi Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall tockingCrop eld ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall
Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes Wo
❑ NA .
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: j - 2S3 I jDate of Inspection: 7 12-3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZN ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ N ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours -and/or document
❑ Yes ❑/NO
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes L_1 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA 04E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW?
El Yes No
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes E j
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question `#): Eaepiain: any„YES' aa'severs and/or aAy'additioraat recommendations ar any other comments
Use drawings'of facility,, td better ewiaiu`situations-(use additional pages as necessary).
_ _
j -1'Z_kS
C'� C
11 y
"4� V-\ �— a -A� <- s Q-,----9
o
0�-�,�1��Q�1�
s �s
i vy <&iq
>
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: / 1
S/I2/2 20