Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240032 Ver 1_04_RTP_GreenwayTrail_StreamDataForms_20240104North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11 Date: 12/12/2023 Project/Site: RTP Greenway Trails - Northern Area: Stream S1 Latitude: 35.897094 Evaluator: E. Radford, WPIT, CA (Kimley- Count Durham Count y• y Longitude:-78.852908 Horn), C. Brown (Kimley-Horn) Total Points: 25 •on Stream Determi (circle one) Other Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral termitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Southeast Durham if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30 A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- poolsequence 0 1 2 3 2 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0 B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.5 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1 1.5 0.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3 C. Biology Subtotal = 5 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Stream S1 is a small, narrow intermittent reach originating at a wetland offsite and flowing into a culvert under Laboratory Drive. Stream S1 has continuous, shallow banks, with strong baseflow and one small headcut observed. No biology was observed at the time of data collection. North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11 Date: 12/12/2023 Project/Site: RTP creenway Trails - Northern Area: Stream S2 Latitude: 35.901071 Evaluator: E. Radford, WPIT, CA (Kimley- Count Durham Count Y Y Longitude:-78.857143 Horn), C. Brown (Kimley-Horn) Total Points: 33.5 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent erenni e.g. Quad Name: Southeast Durham if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30 A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 18.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- poolsequence 0 1 2 3 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3 5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3 B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1 1.5 0.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3 C. Biology Subtotal = 6 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Stream S2 (Burdens Creek) is a weak perennial stream originating offsite and flowing north to south through the project study area. Stream S2 has strong baseflow, sinuosity, and in channel structure throughout. No biology was observed at the time of data collection. North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11 Date: 12/12/2023 Project/Site: RTP creenway Trails - Northern Area: Stream S3 Latitude: 35.901050 Evaluator: E. Radford, WPIT, CA (Kimley- Count Durham Count y• y Longitude:-78.857016 Horn), C. Brown (Kimley-Horn) Total Points: 19 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral <termitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Southeast Durham if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30 A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 8.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 1 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- poolsequence 0 1 2 3 1 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1 5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 2 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0 B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1 1.5 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3 C. Biology Subtotal = 4 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Stream S3 is a weak intermittent channel originating at a headcut below a roadside stormwater ditch and eventually flows into Stream S2 within the project study area. Discontinuous, ponded channel baseflow was observed throughout stream S3 along with strong debris lines. No biology was observed at the time of data collection.