Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310077_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230803Dtvon ofVC�ater Resources' a Facility Number 31 —1'7 Q Division of Soil anil Water Conservation «. - :. :. Other Agency..3r Type of Visit: (D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: z_ a'l Arrival Time: Departure Time: �( County: a Farm Name: C1Y GI Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Longitude: Region: Design Current P Design Curreut Curreiat , nW Desi u SwCapai~ity - 1Pop. .. " V1'etoiiltry Capaety ; Popaitie E CapacXop - y . .. , :� �y. _ , -:: ,. Wean to Finish Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No FTNA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ �❑ NE 2. Is there di Bence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 5/I2/2020 Continued Page 1 of 3 5/I2/2020 Continued Facility Number: 3 - '7 7 jDate of Inspection: 3 23 Waste Collection & Treatment 4t Is -storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No EKA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: �\ - '' L.2 L3 'D lb-1 D i G- 2 Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): `LLk Observed Freeboard (in): 16 d . 5. Aje there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I�VU ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there *structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes `-;' ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ 'NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes D'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E 3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes P40 ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes [a/y ElYes L_I No ❑ Yes To ❑ Yes [No ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes yo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: I- Date of Inspection: Y13 IZ3 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. -- ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ][�No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [3 N ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNj o 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No Reviewer/Inspector Name: ')� Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 as necessary)"' ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE Phone: )—tO S" Date: b 2 511212020