310088_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230815

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency _
Type of Visit: d9) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IS- Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: Q- County: Region:
Farm Name: ate 1 0 -es Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: )C4 .J c, �r=,v. Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone: � to Zc1 D ®`'tti
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current °;;
Design , Current
Swine_
Capacity €Popp
Wet Poultry ;Capacity;.
Pop
Cattle` ` Capacity _Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Designs ebCurtent
D POu1tI
Capacity; Pop
F'Other, ;
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
l; � p
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
FKNA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ o
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[] o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: $ I z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:]No U 1 " ' ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [R o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [21<3 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 5/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EZ/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ffNo
0 NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ YesZ�4c
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP [:]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yestzl
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 3 l - g Date of Inspection: 8' 11 r
Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes Q,�
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
VJ
V-f ��
n
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: C—,
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes . No
❑ZN
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑No
[
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes E] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA MZNE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
rNo
fN o
o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: C
Page 3 of 3 511212020