310610_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230824

U Division of Water Resources
Faclli Number w 1 - (ol p 0 Division of Soil and`;., ater C6uservatio�
�'.�jr' -
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I '�C 23 1 Arrival Time: L` Departure Time: ._� d County:
Farm Name: �,(2e v►�ca ti invrIp �a.a r. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Yti` S YV_\ u r
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Region:
Phone: � l q CSFf `1 O R' �
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Curren a
a ;e
Design
Current
,• Design Current _
, Swine ,.. 'Capacity, Pop `
,.
W" t Poultry
Capacity
Pop s.�
Cattle Capacity,. Pop
Wean to Finish
Layer
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Other
Turkeys Turkey Pouets
Dairy Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [],IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E24A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 3 t - G t p Date of Inspection:
2y
23
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Z<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[-]Yes
❑ No
E],PQA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier; -J:f- l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�NoD
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E �No❑
NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑�Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[Wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [-]Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application /
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ❑-1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E�,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0-110 ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
D<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑Yes
<No,❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
F2to ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
EKNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 3 i jDateof Inspection: Z
5
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Do ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑j ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑,No❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? �-
❑ Yes
Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
24 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
/
❑,�O ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA TE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
to ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
l-XO ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? I
❑ Yes
to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question=#): Explain any YES` answers and/or�anya',additional recommendati®ns,or any other, comments.:'
Use drawings of facility to"better exutain=situations.(4 'hdditional Dates as necessarvl.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: f �S J /0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3
511212020