310283_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231017

/// 0) Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 1 Z$ 3 0 Divislon of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation U 'rechnicai Assistance
Reason for Visit: ©Routine Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: i ('] Arrival Time: Departure Time: U= County:
Farm Name: NG� f-1:1 Owner Email:
Owner Name
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: �%�`� v� �r ' �^" t Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
u Swine Capacity` Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder t3 D °
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Latitude:
Integrator:
Region:
Phone: 910 'L Rlq b IA4 LA
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current
°Wet�Poultry , Capacity POP.'
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry C
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design Current,
Cattle Capacity Pop.,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[-]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes
❑ No
�TA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
�iA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[]Yes
[:]No
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[—]Yes
2 1V�
❑ NA
❑ NE
adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
3. Were there any observable adv p
[:]Yes
CEO
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
511212020 Continued
Page I of 3

Facility Number: - 'L TA Date of inspection: to
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
E2 0 ❑ NA
❑ No E3 1` A
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: V
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
f
Observed Freeboard (in):--r)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) /
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑>Fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ON- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [/]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ET'go
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑7
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E�Ao
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[ -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ZNO
❑,P� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: I i - `L$- jDate of Inspection: 10 1 V7 1 Z3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ �No A ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check El Yes ElNoA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No WNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
❑Yes . ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: F�
Page 3 of 3 511212020