NC0024872_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20150902

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 2, 2015
Mr. Johnny Lambert, Director of Public Utilities
298 E. Depot Street, Suite 300 RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
Mocksville,NC 27028
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection SEP 0 4 .2015
Davie County WWTP vVater Quality
NPDES #NC0024872 Permitting Section
Davie County
Dear Mr. Lambert:
On September 1, 2015 George Smith, of this office, performed a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI).
Mr. John Grey, Mr. Johnny Lambert, and Mr. Tim Smith, ORC were present for the inspection. The purpose of
this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the pretreatment program, which includes: reviewing the
files, POTW plant performance, monitoring data, industrial user inspection, and adherence to the enforcement
response plan(ERP).
Background
Cooleemee WWTP has a 1.5 MGD permitted flow.
There is one industry Ingersoll Rand (#0004), which is located with the Town of Mocksville jurisdictional
limits.
POTW Interview
There were no NPDES violations related to pretreatment.
Program Elements
The Headworks Analysis (HWA) was approved on August 14, 2012. The next HWA is due September 30,
2016.
The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was approved on May 15, 2015. The next IWS is due April 30, 2020.
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on December 30, 2013.
The Enforcement Response Plan(ERP) was approved July 2, 2010.
Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) was approved on December 15, 2014. •
(Over)
450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
Phone:[phone]\Internet:www.ncdenr.gov

•`i
Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review
A review of the pretreatment file for Ingersoll Rand (#0004) shows the records are in excellent order, and that
the monitoring data was correctly judged for compliance. The records show the County is implementing the
pretreatment program through control of a permit.
•
Action Items
A Pretreatment Annual Report is due March 1, 2016.
Once you have collected your four (4) quarterly STMP samples in 2015 you will have completed your sampling
requirement foi:,the HWA due on September 30, 2016. Use the 2015 STMP data to complete your headworks
analysis.
The pretreatment compliance inspection is considered satisfactory. Mr. John Grey is implementing the
pretreatment program in an excellent manner. If you have any questions, please contact George Smith or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,NCDENR
ATTACHMENT
cc: Mr. John Grey,P.O.Box 9,Mocksville,NC 27028
PERCS-Unit—Monti.Hassan
WSRO Files

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority(POTW)Name: Cl,V t i vl i Y 11 /
2. Control Authority Representative(s): E,j chi (-�r.7 JOii n
Ioy' L—G%aryt
3. Title(s): I L'trleJ �in�Dv r/4 ' Dir_lc
4. Last Inspection Date: 7//1/11/ Inspection Type(Check One): [-PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ❑' ES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES P 'O
. Order Type,Number, Parameters: /!/.;! Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type
N I 1 NICIO 10 -I Li 1 F 171 ._-1 1ogle,/ I sT 1 P l ! S 1 1 1 I
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users(Sills)? / SIDS
•
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs)? 0 CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0
10.Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? ()
11.Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10 NOIN
12.Number of SIUs With No IUP,or With an Expired IUP C NOCM
13.Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-Annual Periods(Total Number of SIUs in SNC) PSNC
14.Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods p MSNC
15.Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods SNPS
16.Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? ❑ YESO
If Yes,What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial ❑ YES 7jicO
Discharge(Interference,Pass-Through,Blockage,Citizens' Complaints,Increased
Sludge Production,Etc.)?
If Yes,How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits:
either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods?Not Been Published for SNC for Reporting: f\,f/*,
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published:
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders?For all Sills on an �/ %yl
Order,Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication?If Yes, Which ❑ YES LINO
Ones?
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? OYES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? 1'ES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? v YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? cES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify
yourself!
26. If NO to 23 -26, list violations Ni/4'
i
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES [�'NO
If yes, which ones?Eliminated: +1,'lPi• Added: A,'/0
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files. verify POTW has copy of Program
Element in their files. complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter,and dates consistent with Program Info: •
Program Element Last Submittal Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file? Date In file If Applicable
Headworks Analysis(HWA) ❑ Yes ❑ No fay /H,10! Yes ❑ No .5,/27, .20/�
Industrial Waste Survey(IWS) ❑ Yes ❑ No ri r y ' ',3-o iS Li'Yes ❑ No '&;" .:Z;7
Sewer Use Ordinance(SUO) ❑ Yes ❑ No 90) ;lc;r_3 ❑"Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan(ERP) ❑ Yes ❑ No ,fie/ ,J.0/0 ['Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan(LTMP) ❑ Yes ❑ No I),c. i r ;Lot," 0-Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT(IUP)FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name 1. C''. 2. 3.
30. IUP Number Oto r�
31. Does File Contain Current Permit? J Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date r',•n /„ ,24717
33. Categorical Standard Applied(I.E.40 CFR,Etc.)Or N/A V/H
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior 0-Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? ©'Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
36. a.Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan? a. ples ❑No a. ❑Yes ❑No a. [Wes ❑No
b.If No, is One Needed?(See Inspection Form from POTW) b:-QYeLDNo b. [Wes ❑No b. ['Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification,Does File Contain a Toxic ❑Yes❑No(�i,NiA ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan(TOMP)? -
38. a.Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a. ©-Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes ❑No
b.All Issues Resolved? b❑Yes❑N°pN7A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Complete Likes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-Custody Forms? [ Yes ❑ "No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the SIU Complete its Ces❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP,including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports 111'f'es❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N!A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula(CWF), does ❑Yes❑No©3Q/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include ❑Yes❑NoOKA ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Identify ❑ Yr Q)No ❑Yes ❑ No El Yes ❑ No
All Limits Non-Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
'ti'Ij
43b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify es']No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
All Reporting Non-Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU(Within 24 Hours)of All Self- a.❑Yes❑NoG31�I/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days? b❑Yes❑Nof111�I/A b❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware c❑Yes❑No /A
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? c❑Yes❑No❑N/A c❑Yes❑No❑N/A
46. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC? ❑Yes lallo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
47. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Was Enforcement Taken ❑Yes❑Nol /A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP(NOVs,Penalties, timing, etc.)?
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? ❑Yes❑Nol:/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? ❑Yes❑NoilN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. a.Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? a.❑Yes❑NotA' a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.Is SIU in Compliance with Order? b❑Yes❑Noli4- b❑Yes❑No❑N/A b❑Yes❑No❑N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This ❑Yes 0/No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

. •
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
�i\�)� .62;:f Yr�t� S ti ,/4 ��vt,�li�' '`° `(
;T
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans:Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Ty
NI \ I I I I I I I I I l 1 I I l 1 I l 1 2
(DTIA) (TYPI) (NSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
3. Type of Industry/Product: \� /
4. Industry Contact: Title:
Phone:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model InspectionForm or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following:Parts of the Industrial Inspecaionjoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑-YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour' ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES EI NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments: \
N
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
Requirements:
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES IIKO
NOV: ❑ YES In' O„,
QNCR: ❑ YES i 'NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory l,,/ ,Marginal UnSatisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: e-'1.7_4, DATE: q// /1.5
•
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3