SW3210702_Response To Comments_20240103

Neat Sl ith, vL/ineerivL9, Ivi c. t ;;4:[
161T4 139 Pinehurst Ave. —Suite C
ffir
Southern Pines,NC 28387
Phone: [phone] j
Fax: [phone]
www.nsen ein eerinL.corn
NC License#C-1425 4
January 2,2024
NCDEQ
Post Construction Stormwater Permitting Group
512 N. Salisbury Street, Office 640M
Raleigh,NC 27604
Re: SW3210702
Parcel-08051005E
Provision Church
Union County,NC
NSE Job No. 2200682
The following is in response to comments received. The comments have been copied and italicized
and our responses are as follows:
Fire Marshal—Kevin Rigoli:
1. While not required,you may wish to change the note on the cover page(or elaborate on it
in your response) indicating that the project is reapplying as high-density (this does not
appear to be the case per the other submittal items).
The cover sheet has been revised.
2. - Application, Section IV,8—Please update the percent BUA calculation to reflect
the proposed addition of BUA (it should correspond to information in Section IV, 10).
The application has been corrected.
3. - There appears to be some inconsistencies between the swale design information
included in the Supplement-EZ Form, plans and calculations. Please revise either or as
needed:
a. General:
The plans (plan sheet CD-2) indicate a different bottom width for the swales than
is shown in the calculations.
The permanent grass swale detail is on sheet CD-1.
b. Swale 2:
The slope is shown in the calculations as 2.0%and is shown in the supplement as 5.0%.
The discrepancy has been corrected in the supplement.
c. Swale 3:
The rational coefficient is shown in the calculations as 0.98 and is shown in the
supplement as 0.06.

Provision Church 2
Union County,NC
NSE#2101403
The slope is shown in the calculations as 4.5%and is shown in the supplement as 5.0%.
The Vactual is shown in the calculations as 2.17 fps and is shown in the supplement as
3.17 fps.
The discrepancies have been corrected in the supplement.
d. Swale 4:
The rational coefficient is shown in the calculations as 0.71 and is shown in the
supplement as 0.50.
The slope is shown in the calculations as 4.5%and is shown in the supplement as 5.0%.
The discrepancies have been corrected in the supplement.
Sincerely,
NEAL SMITH ENGINEERING,INC.
. c
Bryan C Welborn
Neal Smith Engineering,Inc.—Southern Pines,North Carolina