310810_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231130

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ' I—� - �� O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Com iance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral p Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: lid Region:
Farm Name: L""y IU U��(,c,, { `� Owner Email:
Owner Name: CG/w •t4-� t 11 ' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: qq ^��'Fh��r� { " ._ Integrator:
Certified Operator: I/�'e I Q, �)C1�'1 t �l f/\`� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
W an to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder "z (/ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NI
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NVN
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: _3( - Date of Inspection-
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes {moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: nv
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): L
/T
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes p'Nc> ❑ NA ❑ N E
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
i
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 Yes o ❑ NA ❑ N E
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environs ntal threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): S(,t1
13.Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes L]-blaa- ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes LQK—b ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [D No- ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �o -❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ N E
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ©-N-o ❑ NA ❑ NF
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑,N2�❑ NA ❑ NF,
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L]-<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q>o ❑ NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes &< ❑ NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: I-i - U Date of Inspection: j �p
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes n-No ❑ NA ❑ Nli
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes UNo- ❑ NA 0 NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ETN-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [:] No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes (D.Aftr' ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E:k ❑ NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ®'No ❑NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P-Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ YesL'�� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
G ;�,,,-1 - — i'✓a*Cu�C.�/� c,( k Gil,�l UV-� U� c� /Yr�i. r,, a ��2 et C c c�ok
J
Reviewer/Inspector Name: '�'� U�;/���'� Phone: Gf
1 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I I 1. L.
Page 3 of 3 511212020