SW4231202_Wetland Determination/Report_20231229

iv II,1 4 .. i.‘......,
PiLul
P I LOT E N V I R O N M E N T A L , I N C
February 24, 2023
Mr. Lee Bryant
Evans Engineering, Inc.
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro, North Carolina 27407
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Approximate 52-Acre Tract
US Highway 158
Advance, Davie County, North Carolina
Pilot Project 7849.1
Dear Mr. Bryant:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland delineation for the
approximate 52-acre tract located southeast of US Highway 158 in Advance, Davie County, North
Carolina.
Background
Wetlands are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials
into waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters
of the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the
Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to
approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-DWR). Permits are required prior
to impacting any jurisdictional feature. The type of permit required is specific to the type,
location and amount of impacts. Stormwater management plans and/or mitigation for proposed
impacts could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 7849.1
February 24,2023
The findings and conclusions in this report are our opinions based on field conditions
encountered at the time of the site visit. Changes including, but not limited to, regulations,
weather, timber/vegetation removal and usage/development of the site or nearby properties
can alter the findings and opinions presented in this report. We recommend that this report only
be used for preliminary planning purposes. Agency verifications, followed by a survey of
jurisdictional features, are required to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional
features and are valid for a period of up to five years following issuance of a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) and/or NCDEQ-DWR Site Determination Letter.
Global Positioning System (GPS) location of jurisdictional features has been conducted by Pilot
personnel in the field utilizing a Trimble handheld GPS unit capable of sub-meter accuracy. Field
GPS data has been post-processed by Pilot personnel and digitally provided to the client for
assistance with preliminary planning. Pilot expresses no warranties or liabilities to accuracy of
GPS locations and/or provided GPS data.
Scope of Services
Pilot was contracted to perform a wetland delineation for the approximate 52-acre tract located
southeast of US Highway 158 in Advance, Davie County, North Carolina. The site is identified on the
Davie County Geographic Information System (GIS) as parcel identification numbers (PINs)
5872313806, 5872302996 and 5872218873. The scope of services included a delineation of
jurisdictional features (streams, wetlands and other surface waters) on the site. The site
boundary was not marked at the time of our field delineation.
Literature Review
We reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Davie County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetland Inventory(NWI) Map and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
• The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) depicts Smith Creek along the southwestern site
boundary. An unnamed tributary to Smith Creek and pond are depicted on the southern and
central portions of the site. Drainage swales that could contain additional surface waters or
wetlands are located on the site.
2

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 7849.1
February 24,2023
• The USDA Web Soil Survey of Davie County(Drawing 2) identifies the following mapping units
on the site:
Map unit symbol Map unit name Hydric Soils List
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently
CoA flooded Yes
Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
FcB2 moderately eroded No
Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
FcC2 moderately eroded No
JkB Jackland loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes No
Tomlin clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
ToB2 moderately eroded No
Tomlin clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
ToC2 moderately eroded No
W Water No
Pilot also reviewed the last published USDA Soil Survey of Davie County (Drawing 2A). The
published soil survey depicts streams and a pond on the site, generally consistent with the
USGS Topographic Map. Additionally, streams are depicted upgradient of the pond and on
the northern portion of the site, adjacent to US Highway 158.
• The USFWS NWI Map (Drawing 3)depicts streams and a pond on the site,generally consistent
with the USGS Topographic Map. Wetlands are not depicted on the site.
• The FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4) identifies the southwestern portion of the site within the 100-
year and 500-year flood plains, a portion of which is located in a regulated floodway. The
remainder of the site is depicted within Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard located
outside of the 100-year and 500-year flood plains.
Field Delineation
Pilot conducted the site visit on February 20, 2023. The site contains wooded land. A pond is
located on the central portion of the site. Based on our observations, the pond is hydrologically
connected to upgradient and downgradient waters, and is therefore a jurisdictional water subject
to USACE/DWR regulation. The pond was geolocated using a handheld Trimble GPS unit and
digital elevation modeling data.
Several streams are located on the site. The streams contain defined beds and banks, meanders
and indicators of an ordinary high-water mark. The streams identified as SB2, SC (Smith Creek),
SD and SE on Drawing 5 contain strong geomorphology indicators and hydrology indicators and
appear perennial. Streams SA, SB1 and SBA contain weak geomorphology and hydrology
indicators and appear to be intermittent. The stream origins, confluences, and intersections with
3

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 7849.1
February 24,2023
culverts and the site boundary were marked in the field with blue and white striped surveyor
tape. The streams were geolocated using a Trimble handheld GPS unit and digital elevation
modeling data.
Wetlands are located adjacent to the ponds and streams on the site. The wetlands are separated
from surrounding uplands by topographic, vegetation and/or soil breaks. USACE Wetland
Determination Data Forms, supporting our opinions, are included as attachments. The wetland
boundaries were marked in the field with red and white striped surveyor tape and geo-located
with a Trimble handheld GPS unit.
Drawing 5 shows the approximate locations of the pond, Smith Creek, the streams (including our
designations), wetlands, data points and flag numbers. A survey is recommended to determine
the exact extent and location of jurisdictional features.
Watershed Classification
The site is located within the Yadkin River Basin. Smith Creek and its unnamed tributaries are
located on the site. The NCDEQ-DWR has classified Smith Creek as Class C waters. Consultation
with the local planning authority is recommended to determine local buffer/stormwater setback
requirements for the proposed development.
Agency Verification
The delineation has not been verified by the USACE. We understand that our flags will be
surveyed to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional features and applicable
surface water buffers. The delineation, including locations and designations of features, is
subject to change during agency verification(s).
4

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 7849.1
February 24,2023
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
4527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
AI) 7 Luc,
/2-/-1 •
Michael T. Brame, PWS David S. Brame, PWS
Principal Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2—Web Soil Map
Drawing 2A— Published Soil Map
Drawing 3— NWI Map
Drawing 4— FEMA FIRM
Drawing 5—Wetland Map
Wetland Determination Data Forms
5

lo
X .
IWO
Ir
At
LEGEND
70�i Site Boundary
4,
71
WSGS Topographic Map
Drawing 1
USGSTopognaphic Map
ApprOApproximate 52-AcreTract
�
- U3 Highway l5O
Advance N[ {}uadnan�|e
' Advance, Davie County, NC
Scale: 1" = 2000' �

I I y ;i •f - l�#rZ'!
u
�' F,C ♦ Ti Yf r
if----- - FcR2 . x dr • ' 1.
' . .,. • ,
`',1 -1.*Fitt i f:i 4. ti,4t ` 4 ', I.
0.
e•
1 A..t rA
/% C1
���� 41 • to ." Illirilifil'\
'
) -t, , Wilb -
YoC2 . 7 r J
. ''..1 . ,,, , . ,... • -,i, ' / . .
.. r
ilo
itt
F
.„ ., A
,r•
`,-, w .� •
il
���- ,
a
cG2 -�--- lr. - Tvez
0,_/, `� _,,a \. / ,
t.,....
• .... .... ..: _ ... .. ...,
f1 r
...
..._
f/' .......
„,2 ' t
....,
_ _
.,.. . III .
.(41, _ - . 11.1111.1.1111.11. 01111,g;1115
rah t r- ••�
., .\
l tilt,lke e •
rt t fY
1 7Z 1A ce itgh
ftik .-A4low
ye .4 v 1, :
*44
44 ' c ••..
r ' 'y f ,t d
-, _4462.,,rk .,p.411.trvii)it:. e . _ 11p,LEGEN5[ e
w
Boundary
4
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
USDA Web Soil Survey - '. - Approximate 52-Acre Tract
Of Davidson County NC P11-1:110 .w US Highway 158
Scale: 1" = 500' P,L o T ENVIRONMENTALINCC Advance, Davie County, NC
Pilot Project 7849.1

°
PCC2 IMI
hA
Fdi 2
Ob
Afr
16 C2
41,
CIJ
dot -WO
rI3
GnC2
log
En LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2A Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey Approximate 53'AcreTract
of Davie County, NC US Highway 158
Published 1995, Sheet l PILOT Advance' Davie County, N[
@i ° ����� " ' ~~~- `�—^ �

tit ` ,1 ,` , •
er$
�• 1 f-----.... 1 . '• . .., 1* o • . t
r' ' ..s•.
rA %#, . t; tit t '1 `'`�: - .
1111..
1, \NI) '. rs.-,,, 0702,4)7 , .3 4. / 1 -
tiiii.- . 't:4„
r 1,t •
e.• 1 c; : .,
.0' :fir ll° . .
.�., 1
ir: .. - ....•
t • • at s"c‘ . .•• • ,
. 1 4 s•No. .' \ 4
•
lr ` ,.. •1
01.1141.
Ar ' r • ,
I
` ;11 f
Al Y r' liPttet -, .40 or., ��
ti moil,' ':'•? ‘/IS Wig
• e ...e. . Is
v.
la
' , , ,11
.^ - LEGEND
• •• ,' # a;t,'04, ♦ tit a ,.`,# ; �i► ' •v r� •a� Site Boundary
r , ,, -; = w..•, N, .t A ' 1 Freshwater Emergent
ir .., ,.. I _� �r ,II- % V Freshwater Forested/Shrub
� ' ••- 0� Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
ti ` i� , k., r�" r rf� s Estuarine and Marine
�• • i ,Q • t• �•_ Freshwater Pond
f , r I4t `r 1 1 Lake
r �,�`� Riverine
t J •"•�� f 14 Other
Drawing 3 NWI Map
USFWS NWI Approximate 52-Acre Tract
Wetlands Mapper US Highway 158
Scale: 1" = 400' p11"131 Advance, Davie County, NC
P I LOT E N V I R O N M E N T A L.I N C
Pilot Project 7849.1

7 :I , ` ' ..i f li4trr t
r- 1
C I tif .1-
_.4 ,` 0 r , `� . .- r
•
1c Ito?, . . A.
---Ati - a - ,,, • '4 '
•
+F \ - \
tip' _ 1
�. ''
tl . 1.I i_ it*. 1.'1'
11\) , 7, _
.... ,
. .J.
.,
PANEL 1
, ,
, . •
. ..., ,
,,,,. . ,, - , ,, , .
4. '\\
3r7105;720IK
U r � C lYJC1l�'7!Aitl r
l
^^i_1 \ \\I:\ , iti .11.0
11� -mil •..M ._ .
Iflis
\, ,,,� , ; ,I_
2
\ \7 1 .
.. „....,........
.,. . ..,....,... ..
. , ..
!. r .,-.
_ _ s .,,,,
• .
s i
I \ —„„ -
, •. .
1645 . '
.� I r i ' _1
G LEGEND
. I. ‘, 1 Site Boundary
�a •1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
• 41
• P ',T �,/, ,4 r _ ! 'J ,,. Regulatory Floodway
,,
�'�, �' P NEL �' ay
•• ■Apeaafea lUndeterminedFloodHazard
' 71 !5�8 f00K
' • ''':* : A''.:w,� I �. , %. 0' 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
�•ig I ��' !1!' 1/2/20Q9 i Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard l
N
` 6" ` ®Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
1 14. / - , it . .1 _. `��d ll !'� 5, AMIVallifir
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
National Flood Hazard Layer , � . Approximate 52-Acre Tract
►� , �'i
US Highway 158
From FEMA Web Map Service . L
Scale: 1 PLOT�^-• Advance, Davie County, NC
/, = 400, P I LOT ENVIRONMENTAISSINC -
Pilot Project 7849.1

LEGEND
4k
4411410
Site Boundary
41/1411fil A
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream SA
\< 305 LF
:.•::•.-..:: Pond WB 1-6
■ WA 1-30 0.032 Ac.
Wetland 0.138 Ac. \
■ Culvert
/pond- -. 4. SB1
SA 1-5 Data Pointrit
` 540 LF
DP-1■ Flag Number/Feature ID - \
T.y ri
111
••Nt` % • R . '
�r i41� SB2
Y'"' a ,•�r r ` Ae, 250 LF
WC 1-3
4.
. I ;:.A .1 0.016Ac. \
• ',F• ` SBA
t , ' o s„4• 1 10 LF
. , Apr
\
t PA 1'
ill; 1.563 Ac.
•
'' DP-1 0
r, 1
lir°
\ i
Wd 1-49
3.870 Ac.
11 1
SC(Smith Creek) f - _
955 LF
DP-3 •
SE �:
SD
70 LF 160LF 411.--
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY.THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED
BY THE USACE. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATION
CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL ON FEBRUARY 20,2023. - -
il
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
2019 Satellite Imagery from ESRI Approximate 52-Acre Tract
and Pilot GPS Data t US Highway 158
Scale: 1" = 250' PII.®1w Advance, Davie County, NC
Date: 02.23.2023 • PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC Pilot Project7849.1

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 7849.1/Highway 158 City/County: Advance/Davie Sampling Date: 2.20.23
Applicant/Owner: Evans Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Flood Plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Gentle Slope Slope(%): 0-1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.996909° Long:-80.444370° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam(CoA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
i 1. Betula nigra 20 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Platanus occidentalis 20 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 No FACW Total Number of Dominant
4. Acer rubrum _ _ 10 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. - Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
7. _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 65 x 2= 130
1. Platanus occidentalis 5 Yes FACW FAC species 25 x 3= 75
2. Ligustrum sinense 15 Yes FACU FACU species 15 x 4= 60
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 105 (A) 265 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.52
6. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _ _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _ _ X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
25 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eulalia viminea 10 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Woodwardia areolata 10 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. - Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. _ Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 - Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-18 10YR 4/2 80 7.5YR 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. - 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 7849.1/Highway 158 City/County: Advance/Davie Sampling Date: 2.20.23
Applicant/Owner: Evans Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Side Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope Slope(%): 1-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.997404° Long:-80.444310° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview sandy clay loam(FcC2) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
i 1. Quercus alba 20 Yes _FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Catya tomentosa 30 Yes UPL - Total Number of Dominant
4. Liriodendron tulipifera _ 10 No FACU Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 38 20%of total cover: 15 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Ulmus rubra 10 Yes _ FAC FAC species 110 x 3= 330
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC FACU species 40 x 4= 160
3. Juniperus virginiana 5 No FACU UPL species 30 x 5= 150
4. Pinus taeda 5 No _ FAC Column Totals: 180 (A) 640 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.56
6. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _ _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _ _ _ _3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
30 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eulalia viminea 60 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 No FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. _ Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. _ Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
65 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 33 20%of total cover: _ 13 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 10 _ Yes FAC
2.
3. _
4. _
5 Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. - 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 7849.1/Highway 158 City/County: Advance/Davie Sampling Date: 2.20.23
Applicant/Owner: Evans Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Swale Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0-1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.995620° Long:-80.441394° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Tomlin clay loam(ToC2) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
i 1. Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
4. _ _ Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. - Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7. _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Yes FAC FAC species 70 x 3= 210
2. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes _ FACU FACU species 35 x 4= 140
3. _ UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 105 (A) 350 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.33
6. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _ _3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
10 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eulalia viminea 20 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 No FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Lonicera japonica 5 No FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. - Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. - (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Vitis rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0