20150936 Ver 1_401 Application_20150915

1103 Stone Drive
Brevard, NC 28712
August 29, 15
i mbaldri ae (akmail. com
NC DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -161
Dear Madam or Sir:
Re: attached PCN Form and check - Deerlake Forebay Maintenance Dredging Project
4 cvPiO5s
I am seeking both a 3 and 16 permit. I have edited page 1 on the attached application to correct my
misunderstanding. You will find included our check for $240 to NC Division of Water Resources.
We have been working locally with David Brown, Army Corps of Engineers, Tim Fox, NC Dept.
E/NR, and Andrea Leslie, Coordinator - Mountain Habitat Conservation, all of whom together have
made a site visit and appraisal of the work for which we seek a permit.
S' ce ly
_�
J Bal rige
828 - 884 -5454

1
. i
Op W A T�
w.ill
q Office Use Only:
O G y Corps action ID no. , 0 9 A y rrr,,,��� ' DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) D=orm � D -� o l � Y
A. Applicant Information
_SEP 15I
1. Processing I
1 a. Type(s) of a royal sought from the UtNR -WATER RESo 'S
pp g LN Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 401 & BUFFER RERMITTIN�a
Corps: i
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 and 76 or General Permit (GP) number: n/a l
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No I
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): I
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1- 11194$0 /n k4T �f d-x IT"i
a
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
Aer M Fix �� - �g f� °q(�;S/6 • w�a LET Yes . ❑ Yes ® No
-I h-7114- I
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program propo for igation ❑ Yes ® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In ❑ Yes ® No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Deer Lake Maintenance Dredging
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
2d. - Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
Transylvania
Brevard
Deerlake Village
Deeriake Village Community Association POA
Book 002681 Page 0199
kex) KbtS 19r %Id014 J) VCjA
3e. City, state, zip: Brevard, NC
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: -im ba.6 d r o c. T aompor -i um. n -
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

14. Applicant Information (if different ffrom owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
41. Telephone n ®.
4g- Fax no.:
4h- Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: �
5b. Bus�ness name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
C ! -
.�g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parce'r ID): 8586-67-6261-000
i 1b. Site coordinates (in dem-nal degm s 0
•!'f j��R' i Lafl�'de. 35.250960 Longiflide: -82.729960 ii
'$t ;"'UA- a vans good vicinity reap (DE)DMEW) (-DD,DDDDDD1
Prn.'-rtyi size:
a CO -i-S
rla Nate
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream. river, et---) to I
proposed r-roiect: i - a M
receivin-
2h. liva-ter 'Qualfty
eec. Fiver basin: man is avaiiabie at"
ails e.ne.usiadminimapsf
V Z-o.enr.stai
3.
3P. Ejesc ^,be -ne exisiUq conditionts on -d e sAe and the generai iand use In 4M5 VICH-13 r. T ie r!ect at t e f n,
Ch. s
application:
c- '0 C
W! H
"th 1 i.f fr'� 1
M t
Lk-t t -m ll n r - d r za nt r, n
-ta E-SKY. C3
6-u. P -S LT
3e- Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of pp�uiprnent to be used:
LO I LO,5 P,"O PV -O
5P-0 SLAAAA&A-&Y PAbb TOP-- A---T I
-rY()1C,5,L QqUtFMeV1:t
C.
14. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional Wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property I
project (including all prior phases) in the past? 0 Yes N.0 Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the Jurisdietional determination, -what type
1 0 Preliminary in a,
of determil-at.on -waS mmade'3:
A If tiulo I llh� ;uric ict` na� areas? enny: onrsuRamCamnan -
—e
Go;-Fs iuris-dicti- in�azg
Page -3 a f 12

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been reqUested or obtained for I Z Yes 0 No Ei- Unknown
Uhis project (including all purse phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, exp' in M de: H according to'help fiiie" ins�:uc::—s.
_
ACuore A %At On-30771, -! sued! 1P for maintenan-Ce dredging of Dea.-I
6, Future Plan-s
6a- Is this a chased project? Yes &1,10
6b. If y,---,exrj1ain —�Le��e
I -
I N4
0 �$,L:Puic go-1
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Corps
�9. To'Mil wat'land impac'M-
1. impacts Summary
Li
2h- Comments:
Ia. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply➢ :
El Wetlands [] Streams -tributaries
F-1 Buffers
Open Waters F1 Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
uofQ
2. Wetland Impacts
I El corps
F-1 INT
.0 on a s: fh----n cornplele I- is quast on
ft EISGI>� REV we"land im-nacts pr posed ite
each wetland area iMnacted.
4a. j 2b. 2c.
I 2d.
2e.
VVe-fland impact
i u co 's
Type oflurisdiction
,-lumber - I Type of impact ype of we
Fe
A nA 4 C. ea co!
Permanent (P) or Of knowill
DVVQ - non-404, other), (acres:
Temporary (T)
T ype of impact
Stream name I '
VJI 0 P
LJ Yes
No
-
1 Co, ps
r-1 DWO
Impact
EJ Yes
Dcoms
VV2 El P 10 -1
No
D DVVQ-
stream
El Yes
Corps
W3 El P ij 1 T
I-JI No
or-I DIAIQ
W4 F-1 P F1 T
F-11 Yes
[I corps
T emporary
El iN'lo
El DWQ
mr-, P. P E I r
Ej
I Corps
fe et)
Ivs�s
El DWQ
W6 Ei- P u
Yes
-
0 corps
El No
r"
El MVIQ
Si OPEIT
S2 OPLIT
S3 El P F0 T
13 P El
S5 El P F-1
Sr r-1 P F-1 T
PER
Corps
�9. To'Mil wat'land impac'M-
I
Li
2h- Comments:
It DINFC,
0 P E- Rx
corps
3. Stream Impacts
uofQ
0 PER
I El corps
F-1 INT
---are
f=� t .2 �Mn L s n n i a 1 n r i ni
Aidir. pn - on e s! e, Uien complete
H.0 tc npaact:D) oposed U t
this
�eussVorl f0f all stre nn sites ai
P!=
i u co 's
;INT
3a.
3b. 1
3c. 3d .
3e.
Stream impact
T ype of impact
Stream name I '
Perennial
-type of jurisdiction
1 Average
Impact
number -
k! P E R) o r
(Corps - 404, 101
stream
iength
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
I DIAIQ - non-404,
J
;;near
T emporary
(IN T)?
offier)i
fe et)
Si OPEIT
S2 OPLIT
S3 El P F0 T
13 P El
S5 El P F-1
Sr r-1 P F-1 T
PER
Corps
DINT
l Dynes
Li
It DINFC,
0 P E- Rx
corps
iNT
uofQ
0 PER
I El corps
F-1 INT
DWQ
F-1 PER
cm-'s
F1
P!=
i u co 's
;INT
F 1
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
x -n

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, squnds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b. 4c.
4d. 4e.
Open water
impact number -
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
oi OPEIT
Door Lake (former
Ompoundment of
Maintenance Dredging
Larnbo Cre& i
Carolina Lake'a
,,2 0 P [JI T
03 El PP. T
04 ❑P❑T
I
I
4f. Total open water impacts
0 7- A-
v;il rp-Move EIRF0,3113 4 cubic yds,of accumulated sediment. S di twill
, V. - 44kV-t1,AAUA
be disposed at
p';-
( 4k.�-
1, V U
5. Pond or Lake Cc-struction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then comPlete
the chart below.
a. 5b.
p 5c:
5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond 1D Proposed use or purpose
'
(acres)
number
of pond Flooded
Flooded F-He' Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated I
Pi
P2
5f. Total
5g- Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
5;. Expeeted pond surface area 'acres":
k I
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Sk. Method of construction:
0 "fes; ❑ No If yes, peanit lD no:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section ® of this form.
Meuse D Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
[l Catawba CI Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d.
6e. 6f. 6g.
Suffer impact
number- Reason
Suffer Zone I impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for
Str earn name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) impact
131 El P 1-1 s
i_6 Yes
El No
B2 F1 P Q T
El des
El No
B3 iI P ® -f
F1 Yes
No
j
Sh. Total buffer impacts
j6i. Comments:
—
D -7 -s ?
- -Zr)- 4 -:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
I a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Ot�eA e. 90, 4 C-L
I
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
5P_& "&-Cw e t Ck. 41'2,
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for yes No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? IJ
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): El DWQ ❑ Corps
Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to in-lieu Foe Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream rnitigation, stream temperature.
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DV11Q only):
4e. Rii;.aian weiiand r-iti ation requested:
QaE -i requestedd:
net rn - ior
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h. cornment
I'Type I Quantity
El Yes
linear feet
warm 0 cool ]cold
square feet
acres
acres
acres
Page a Of '12
i VZ; �­wi; : Q

D.l.a
Redesign oftheTorebay and -the forebay wall were done with input -from a professional
engineer. The new forebay will operate more effectively in stopping silt from entering
the main body of the lake and moving downstream. The enlarged capacity of-the
redesigned forebay will result in less frequent dredging of the forebay.
To facilitate the placement of equipment for the dredging, the project design calls for the
placement of shale rock and geogrid along the bank of the lake at the forebay location to
stabilize the Shoreline and prevent soil from entering the lake. Shale rock will be placed
at strategic locations leading from the street down to the lake to facilitate the movement
of equipment and eliminate additiopal sources of erosion. Prior to the dredging the
lowering of the lake will be done at a slow rate to minimize silt from moving out of the
lake during the process.
Deerlake Village's covenants detail the requirements concerning sediment control and
require compliance with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973,
as amended. These will be applied to this project. Mulch filled filter socks are to be
used as the primary method of control around the silt entrapment area and must be in
place before work begins. Selection of the contractor to do the work will be based in
large measure on their experience and expertise in dredging, building forebays and
implementing effective sediment control.
D.l .b.
Oversight of all work and activities identified above - with the exception of the sediment
control - will be conducted by Deerlake Village's Lake Management Committee (LMC),
the group responsible for managing -and maintaining -the lake. Compliance with the
erosion and sediment control will be monitored by members of the community's
Landscaping Review Committee.
The task of lowering the lake will be done 'by the LMC, who have experience in
managing the level of the lake and will ensnare that the water is let out at the proper rate
and to a level that will ensure that the contractor can work with minimum impact on the
lake.
P

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact viiihin a protected riparian bui-er that requires
91 1 F-1 Yes El No
�uffer r-ni'Ligalfion? If ves. you will have to fill out this entire form - Please
contac; the State for more inform2tiorl.
6b. If Yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian Calcul ate the
amount of mitioation required-
6e.
Reason for im pact Re"Llired mitigabor.
Z On a � - 'I - I
(square feet) (square feet)
''_one E 3 (2 for Catavrba)
Zone 2 1.5
6'L Total bu�- ni ifigation
6a. !f buffer mitigation is required, discuss what Itype of mitigation is proposed ip-atfrnert fn private mitinafinn hink x Den-niftee responsible riparian buffer resioration- payment into an approver in-fif5u feefund;.
6h-
D= CYI- V i

E. Storfnwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
I a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified n Yes El No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? I
I b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Yes No
Comments:
12. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? El Yes El No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
0 Certified Local Government
2e. *Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWQ Stormwater Program
D*VVQ A01 Unii
3. Certified Local Gov(arnment Stormwater Review
13a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
El Phase 11
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El NSW
apply (check all that apply): El usmP
r_1 Water Supply Watershed
El Other:
3c. Has the approved Stor-inwater Management Plan with proof of approval been El Yes No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
El Coastal counties
0 HQW
4a. Which o; the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply F1 ORW
(check all hat apply): F_
J Session Law 2006-246
0 Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? El Yes F1 No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Storm-water Review
5a. D'oesthe Storri-tv;rafter Management Plan nneet the appropriate requirements? 1-1 Yes Di No
17b_ Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met
L?
;Yes 1 1 No
Page 10 of 12
N ForMl I - Version 1 -3 De,
I _ - Decernber ;v, cuvfl

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statenocal) funds or the Yes No
use of public (federalistate) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project requkre preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes 0 No
(Notth Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) F1 Yes No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? El Yes No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 91 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or (® Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historip or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ONO
status (e.g., National Historic Tru §t designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 900 -year fioodplain? I ❑ Yes [X] No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Latest on -line FIR1llIdFEMA North Carolina
Information
A U-M
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
fAppli nVAgent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only, if an authorization letter from the applicant
is Drovided.)
Page 12 of 12
Date

Appendices documentation for PCN August 2015
Lambo Creek Forebay 1(Desilting 0 Reconstruction for Maintainability
Activities and Procedure
1. Lower Carolina lake water level slowly to avoid /minimize turbidity in lake and downstream,
and as needed (about 3 to 6 feet) to enable dredging and forebay repair /reconstruction.
2. Build a permanent access roadbed and clean -way area ... per picture (page 2).
a. Locate the permanent access roadway from Deer Lake Road onto lot 2 as picture page 2.
Construction will be gravel base with ensuing grass cover.
b. Locate lake shore forebay clean -out access area adjacent the forebay shoreline for backhoe/
truck loading access. Construction will be natural shore stone with ensuing grass cover per
details given on page 8a of the PCN, all parties have full documentation.
3. Build a rectangular silt entrapment area adjacent to and using the step slope on lot 2 as one side
( page 3 and specifications) . The remaining three sides of the silt drying area on lot 2 will be
formed in the lower area using silt fencing. Think four to five truck -loads of silt.
4. Dredge /desilt about 50 cubic yards of silt from existing forebay and Lambo creek inlet for new
forebay. See Google Map picture (page 4) for the GISGS location of the Lambo Creek inlet,
and Google Map picture (page 2) for the schematic locations for the forebay and graveled
access way.
5. Transport the wet silt by truck to the silt entrapment area for drying.
6. Repair existing forebay with new forebay construction for maintainability adding new wall and
stone as required to make about 30 linear yards of forebay dam wall per sketch (page5).
7. Raise/Return Lake to normal level.
8. Remove silt retention fence after drying and prior to grading.
9. Finish grade with a natural grade to retain current water flow; maximum edge slope lfoot fall
in 2 feet of run.
10. Reseed silted area with grass, use ground cover to promote germination, prevent erosion, and
enable sodded land recovery.
Page 1

�r
i
.�i
•. Y
lama,
MAZ '
�w

Reference:
DEERILAKE VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
RULES & REGULATIONS - Part 9
PROCEDURES FOR -NEW CONSTRUCTION
httn : / /www. deerlakevi l l aae. orp-/resources /P ART +9 +New +Construction +revised +June +2014. pd f'
Appendix E
Sedimentation, Erosion Control, and Surface Water Protection
This appendix is based on sections 6.4 and 6.5 of the Brevard Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO) of January 2007 as amended.
III. Sedimentation and Erosion Prevention
In order to prevent soil erosion and sedimentation pollution of streams, springs, flat water
bodies; drainage networks, or other surface waters, the property owner shall at all times
comply with all requirements of the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control
Act of 1973, as amended.
A. The following conditions are considered hazardous, a nuisance, and a threat to property
and the environment; creating such conditions and /or allowing them to continue shall
constitute a violation of this Ordinance.
1. The discharge or deposition of sedimentation pollution from one parcel of land
onto another parcel of land of the same or different ownership.
2. The discharge or deposition of sedimentation pollution onto a street or public
right -of -way, including drainage ditches and swales within a public right -of-
way.
3. The discharge or deposition of sedimentation pollution into any surface water,
including drainage ditches and swales.
4. The discharge or deposition of sedimentation pollution into wetlands, surface
water protection areas, or other protected areas.
5. The uncontrolled or uncontained movement of sedimentation pollution within
any parcel of land.
B. Requirements of the Property Owner and Developer.
The property owner is responsible for ensuring that development complies with the
following requirements of this Ordinance:
3. The discharge of sedimentation pollution from grading, excavations, open cuts,
side slopes, and other land surface disturbances shall be prevented, and all
grading, excavations, open cuts, side slopes, and other land surface disturbances
shall be mulched, - seeded, sodded, or otherwise protected with appropriate
sedimentation and erosion control treatments.
5. Erosion and sedimentation from all land disturbance activities shall be controlled
and contairi d with any method approved by the ARC to prevent the deposition of
sedimentatiii'm pollution upon adjoining parcels, lots, streets, and any surface
water. Failure to properly install and / or properly maintain approved
sedimentation / erosion control measures shall constitute a violation of this
Ordinance.
Revised standards by Bob Cole
& Phil Davis 6116114
3 -1
Architectural Review Committee
Landscape Review Committee

IV
6. furthermore, it is recognized that development projects are dynamic and that
proposed and approved sedimentation / erosion control measures may, from time
to time, prove inadequate. Therefore, it shall also be a violation of this Ordinance
to fail to install additional sedimentation / erosion control measures upon
observing, or being notified, that approved and installed sedimentation / erosion
control measures are insufficient.
7. At a minimum, erosion and sedimentation control measures, structures, and
devices shall be planned, designed, and constructed to provide protection from the
calculated maximum peak rate of runoff from a ten -year storm. (finch in 10
minutes /6.53 inches in 24 hours)
Surface Water Protection Requirements (see Section 6.7 of the City of Brevard U.D.O.)
A. Surface Water Protection Area Delineation.
Surface water protection area requirements apply to streams and other surface water
bodies, as well as lands within thirty (30) feet from the top of each bank of a stream or
other surface water body.
1. - For streams and other surface waters with defined channels, protection area widths
are measured horizontally on a line perpendicular to the surface water, landward
from the top of the bank on each side of the channel.
2. "Top of bank" shall be determined by the Administrator` by considering factors
such as the break in slope for a watercourse and the presence of streamside
vegetation. (This administrator is the Code Administrator in the Brevard Planning
Department.)
3. For wetlands, as defined in this Ordinance, protection area widths are measured
horizontally, landward from the outermost point at which wetland conditions can
be identified.
4. For ponds, lakes, and other impounded surface waters, protection areas widths are
measured horizontally, landward from the ordinary high water line.
5. For other surface waters, the protection area shall be determined by the
Administrator in consideration of the purposes of this section.
6. When a combination of floodway / non - encroachment area and / or surface water
types exist, the most restrictive measurement of surface water protection area shall
apply.
B. Surface Water Protection Area Requirements.
1. Protection areas shall be left in a naturally vegetated state, unless reforestation of
disturbed protection areas is required as part of any site plan approval. When
reforestation of a disturbed protection area is required, it shall be done in
accordance with a planting plan approved by the Administrator.
2. Concentrated runoff from ditches or other manmade conveyances shall be diverted
to diffuse flow before the runoff enters the protection area.
3. Periodic corrective action to restore diffuse flow shall be taken by the property
owner as necessary to avoid the formation of erosion gullies.
4. Diffuse flow of runoff shall be maintained in the protection area by dispersing
concentrated flow and reestablishing vegetation.
5. Surface water protection areas shall be delineated upon any development plan ands^
shall be noted as protection areas within which no disturbance or development
shall be permitted.
Revised standards by Bob Cole
& Phil Davis 6116114
Architectural Review Committee
5-2 Landscape Review Committee

Location • Lambo Legend Inlet
Lam•• Creek Inlet
Write a description for your map.
1 7
ism
171
Aw
14
ambo Creek Inlet
Q.
W.", Oft.-
G"Oosle r"�rth
.X1
El
VIL�
El
N
".390 ft