20221617 Ver 2_Eastfield DWR Response Package_December 2023_20231219

.A6. GATEWAY"
� ENGINEERS
A FULL -SERVICE CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM
December 19, 2023
C-46118-0000
Eastfield Associates LLC
101 S. Raiford St, Suite 200
Selma, NC 27576
Attn: Stephanie Goss, Supervisor 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Sue Homewood, 401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Eastfield Development (DWR 20221617 Ver 2)
Dear Ms. Goss:
THE GATEWAY ENGINEERS, INC.
100 MCMORRIS ROAD.
PITTSBURGH, PA 15205
412-921-4030 PHONE
412-921-9960 FAX
www.gatewayengineers.com
On behalf of Eastfield Associates LLC, The Gateway Engineers, Inc., is submitting this letter in response
to your Request for Additional Information Letter dated December 4, 2023. For ease of review, we have
provided the following responses (shown in bold) to the review comments (shown in normal text).
1. The updated development for Block E includes multiple impacts to stream beds for stormwater
outlets (Al, A2, El, E2, E3, E4). It appears that further avoidance and minimization can occur by
controlling for outlet velocity before discharge into the stream bed. Please explain why the
project cannot be constructed in the typical manner and avoid the impacts to the stream bed from
stormwater outlets.
Response: Due to elevation constraints, the SCM outlets must discharge at the elevation of the
stream bed. These elevation constraints also require the oudetpipes to have minimal slope, less
than I %. The discharge velocity from the outlets will be minimal and will not cause erosion.
The proposed rip rap aprons will provide additional protection.
The SCM outlets have been revised to avoid impacting the stream channel. The outlets have
also been rotated to discharge in the direction of the channel flow. These outlets are believed
to be Deemed Allowable under the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules (Rule).
2. Please provide a mitigation acceptance letter or Statement of Availability for the required Neuse
River Buffer mitigation.
Response: Terracon is currently seeking the required Buffer Mitigation of 36,425 SF of buffer
credits from either private mitigation providers and/or the State's in -lieu fee program. SOAs
from two private mitigation banks and NCDMS are included.

A6. GATEWAY December 19, 2023
ENGINEERS C-46118-0 f3
Page 2 of 3
A FULL -SERVICE CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM
3. Please provide a detailed buffer restoration plan for review. Please ensure that the plan complies
with all the applicable buffer restoration criteria established in 15ANCACV02B.0295(n).
Response: Please refer to the Buffer Restoration Plan Drawing included with this response.
Also included is a narrative documenting the buffer restoration, monitoring, and success
criteria. The restoration and subsequent monitoring and success criteria are based on
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (NCDENR 2004).
4. In order to document that the road crossing at Stream Impact F does not require buffer mitigation,
please provide buffer impact amounts for each impact area separately. Please note that buffer
impacts from primary SCMs are "deemed allowable" uses in accordance with
15ANCACO2B.0714(9)(a)(1).
Response: The Block E Impact exhibit has been revised to show the separate impact areas.
Stream Impact F buffer impacts total 6,257 SF (0.144 ac) and does not exceed the one-third of
an acre mitigation threshold and is believed to be Allowable upon Authorization.
Stream Impact G consists of proposed perpendicular impacts and existing parallel impacts that
resulted from the construction of a portion of West Providence Boulevard The proposed
Stream Impact G perpendicular impacts from the road crossing total 6,819 SF (0.156 ac) and
does not exceed the one-third of an acre mitigation threshold and is believed to be Allowable
upon Authorization.
The Stream Impact G parallel impacts consist of 7,700 SF of Zone I impact and 8,883 SF of
Zone 2 impact. These parallel impacts are believed to be Allowable with Mitigation upon
Authorization. The applicant is proposing to provide compensatory mitigation as follows for
these impacts:
Zone I Impact. 7,700 SF at a 3:1 ratio — 23,100 SF of buffer mitigation required
Zone 2 Impact. 8,883 SF at a 1.5:1 ratio—13,325 SF of buffer mitigation required
Total Buffer Mitigation Required: 36,425 SF of buffer credits
The proposed plan does not adequately account for all buffer impacts at Stream Impact G. Due to
the installation of a culvert, the buffer is impacted along both sides of the stream channel. Please
revise the plans to show the loss of buffer along both sides of the stream channel adjacent to the
culvert and adjust the impact and mitigation tables accordingly.
Response: The site layout and parking stalls have been revised to limit the impacts at Stream
Impact G. The areas to the west of the stream will be restored in accordance with the Buffer
Restoration Plan. Our response to Item 4 provides details on these impacts associated with
Stream Impact G.
6. The Indirect and Cumulative Analysis provided states that "Johnston County's Stormwater
Management Ordinance is applicable to Eastfield and future projects", based on the Division's

A6. GATEWAY December 19, 2023
18-0000
ENGINEERS C-461e3of3
Page 3 of 3
A FULL -SERVICE CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM
discussion with Johnston County stormwater staff, the ordinance is not applicable to property
within the Town of Selma. Please revise the ICI accordingly.
Response: Please refer to the revised Qualitative Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis.
7. Please provide the following information related to the revised stormwater management plan:
a. Please review the revised ponds A2 and E4 design calculations sheet to ensure that the
orifice sizing provides the drawdown time within the required 2-5 days. Also, please
make sure to update the pond's profile drawings and Supplemental EZ form accordingly.
Response: Orifice sizes have been revised to accommodate the required 2-5 day
drawdown time. The Pond details on sheets C710 and C711 and the Supplemental EZ
form have been revised to reflect these changes.
b. Supplemental EZ form, cover page, needs to be sealed, signed, and dated by the designer
(PE).
Response: The Supplemental EZ Form has been signed, sealed, and dated.
c. Please submit an updated O&M agreement (also, signed and notarized). The new O&M
should include all 8 ponds in Block A, C, and E.
Response: The O&MAgreement has been updated to include all 8 ponds and has been
signed and notarized
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 412-409-2395 or Jeff Harbour
(Terracon) at 919-805-4208. As always, thank you for your assistance and guidance during this process.
Sincerely,
THE GATEWAY ENGINEERS, INC.
Joshua M. Scanlon, P.E.
Project Engineer

Stream and Buffer Impact Plan

is9LSLZON'VAI3S _
ooz Aims aa0' s L' `a
0l� `1N3Wd0�3/�DO 3i:jnINDACly x
Sb]]1NIJN]� aoda3avd3ad YF v ="
ON VW�3S of ,;'i=E9 X
JUdBA31V J l ` a: 3w b 9L AV,b,M _ aaoo3a Noisin3aY�
1N3WdM3n34 4P3131Sd3
U
W a
a — —
�pr
U -
II
W
a (�
o
co v v
p z�
_ � p
W w -
�y \ [
/iAr j z �o.o c�i
Lu
o ao d w o
K L 7 p
—
O iwwww w vE
W w ZLLZLL �jA v
d p mOmOm �tA
s
o
z
z
rc N e
r
�q
_ a
o �
a-
n
t /
i
W
g
J
m
w
Q
¢
d
w
¢
C7
O
U
G
p
z
Q
w
W
w
�
w
F
pW pw
O C7
W
�m�m �z
���
O
O
¢ ¢a ¢m
O a0 a
—¢m ¢
a
O
U
Q w WN We
Ww W
d
o
�°���
m N mN m-
m-
U
¢
J
J
J
LaL m
w
a
OF
�a
w
W �
O�
a W
OD
w
w w
w
ww
w'w'ww'w'
�
msmW
�ww
m�msmg
"'www`"w
msmsmg
mgmgmg
m�
&
U
ZJ
JZm
ww�www"'www`"w
Zm JZ
ZJ
ww
ZJ
`w
oaoaoaoioaoaoioaoaoioaoa
p
N
00000000o0
n
N�
�¢N¢�¢N¢M¢
N 2� N�
o0
N�
opo0-opop-o0op
N� N�
N�
N� N
¢M¢Na
¢
¢
¢ ¢

9L9ZZ ON'SAl3S
ooz 3ilns is aaodlva `m
-
Old `1N3WdO-lDAD4 En:jnlN3Aad
-
Sbil"NIJNI
I
aoaa3avd3ad
�N VW�3S
m is
_
'W
bOL AtlMHJIHMAyVE)
1N3Wd013A34 413131Sb'3
0a003alloISIA3a
III
<
K
_
J
fry /
Q
U
O
O
}
I� Q
I W O
J In
LLB~ LL II O
EL Lij
O Q W
U U W J U
CO z�
V O U
QEIL D
o li=>
m
� � m
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
o
�
a
O
N
0
o
0
+
m
m
W O
I
I �
w o
J �
J �
I
LL II O
II
[L
J
Lu
J
Lu
J W Q
U
J
LL QU J
J
Q
U
co
d
J
11 F CO
Q
C 7 z J
v0ZU
li
¢OU
�
o a O w
eel
aof
o>
o 2 >
oee
+ _
o
0

Riparian Buffer Restoration Plan

Wrerracon
2401 Brentwood Rd, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
P [phone]
Terracon.com
Eastfield Riparian Buffer Restoration Plan
DWR# 20221617 V2
1.0 PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION
The applicant for the Eastfield Development is proposing the following riparian buffer restoration
activity as required by NCDWR pursuant to the current permit review process for the project. The
area to be restored was previously disturbed by land clearing activities and will be restored to
comply with current State regulations. This plan is based on guidance from Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration (NCDENR 2004) and 15a NCAC 02b.0295, which defines the buffer restoration
process for permittees. Please refer to the Block E Buffer Restoration Exhibit included with this
submittal.
Site Preparation - Areas where mechanized equipment operation has created significant berms
of topsoil and organic debris, ruts in the ground surface, or where removal of vegetation root
systems has created voids in ground surface, will be backfilled and/or blend graded to the
surrounding contour. We do not believe that any grading will be required in the restoration area
as no fill material was placed in the area when the vegetation was removed. If any instances of a
higher -than -normal grade are discovered, these areas will be shaped to match the normal grade
to allow for diffuse flow through Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the riparian buffer. Any naturally occurring
(pre-existing) depressional areas and drainage feature/patterns within the buffer will remain intact.
Planting - A native riparian buffer seed mix will also be applied in the disturbed buffer areas to
promote groundcover. Plant species in the native riparian buffer seed mix may include but are not
limited to: Virginia wild rye (Elymus virginicus), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), creeping
bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera), black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta), deer tongue (Panicum
clandestinum), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), awned barnyard grass (Echinochloa
muricata), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutans), and
gamma grass (Tripsacum dactyloides).
Disturbed areas within the buffer will be over -planted with a combination of woody tree and shrub
species to meet the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre. Our planting plan calls for
the installation of native hardwood trees and shrubs to be planted at density of approximately 300
stems per acre to account for natural mortality and the possible effects of wildlife browse.
Currently we are proposing that approximately 80% of the plantings consist of bare root seedlings
with the remaining 20% consisting of either 1-gallon or 3-gallon containerized woody stems.
• The Zone 1 restoration area is 0.85 acres. Approximately 255 woody stems will be planted
to provide sufficient woody species to meet the final performance standard.
• The Zone 2 restoration area is 0.54 acres. Approximately 165 woody stems will be planted
to provide sufficient woody species to meet the final performance standard.

Eastfield Riparian Buffer Restoration Plan �erracon
DWR# 20221617 V2
This totals approximately 420 stems to be planted in the 1.39-acre buffer restoration area to
account for natural mortality such that the area may have 260 stems per acre at maturity and/or
when the area is deemed successful. No one species can comprise more than 50% of the total
stems. Native tree and shrub volunteer species may be counted towards the final performance
standard.
The plan requires the use of a minimum of four native tree species and a minimum of two native
shrub species. Trees and shrub plantings will be randomly intermixed. Buffer plantings will be
marked with color -coded flagging (by species) prior to installation. We are currently proposing a
mix of the following species depending on commercial availability at the time of the planting.
Please note that the Neuse Buffer Rules allow for a one-time fertilizer application to establish
newly planted vegetation.
Traps Shrlrhs
1. Green Ash
sweet pepperbush
2. River birch
Southern wax myrtle
I Sourwoad
Winged sumac
4. Sycamore
common el49rderry
5- Swarnp chestnut oak
Gallberry
6- Winged elm
American beauty berry
7. Flmv&ring Dogwood
8- Amarloan Holly
9- 3�155KM5
2.0 PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Based on discussions with NCDWR, the applicant agrees to implement the restoration plan as
soon as possible after permits are issued authorizing the project. It is understood that the
restoration is a vital part of the overall development approval and work to prepare the buffer area
for the restoration activities will be initiated as soon as practicable based on weather, seasonality,
and plant availability. The restoration area will be clearly marked in the field so that no disturbance
can occur from other, adjacent work that may occur. Strict enforcement of the no disturbance
zone will be implemented and monitored during the restoration activities and during the work that
may occur on the adjacent parcels. The applicant will provide specific details regarding initiation
of the restoration to NCDWR once this date and timeline is developed after the issuance of the
permit.
3.0 SITE MONITORING & REPORTING
Within one year after NCDWR approval of the restoration plan the applicant will provide
documentation that the riparian buffer has been restored per this plan. The applicant is proposing
that monitoring occur twice per year (spring and fall) for the first two years to identify and correct
any potential problems within these first two years. The monitoring will adhere to the requirements
in 15a NCAC 02b.0295 and the results will be submitted to NCDWR via a brief report for review
and approval. Starting year three, monitoring will be performed once per year (late summer/early
fall) for three years or until the applicant and NCDWR agree that the site can be deemed
Explore with us 2

Eastfield Riparian Buffer Restoration Plan �erracon
DWR# 20221617 V2
successful. Therefore, it is possible that the monitoring could cease after year three with
NCDWR's approval. The applicant must demonstrate that a minimum of 361 living and viable
stems (including native woody volunteer species) are present the end of three years. If significant
mortality occurs during the monitoring period, the applicant will replace those dead stems and
report that action to NCDWR. Other qualitative factors will also be considered such as overall
species health and diversity, evidence of wildlife utilization, and observations regarding diffuse
flow through the buffer areas. Any evidence of invasive or noxious weed recruitment into the
restoration area will be noted and reported and remedial actions to address the invasive species
will be reported to NCDWR in the report. Photo points in the form of flagged and numbered
wooden construction stakes will be installed following the restoration activities. Baseline photos
at each photo point will be taken and a photo point map showing the approximate location of each
photo point will be prepared. A copy of the photo point map and comparative monitoring photos
also be provided with each monitoring report.
4.0 PROTECTION
• The applicant will notify future landowners of buffer restrictions and any maintenance
requirements.
• The restored riparian buffer is to be protected and maintained in perpetuity.
• Noxious and/or invasive vegetation, as outlined in the Guidelines, will be managed as
follows: In the initial stages of riparian buffer establishment, competition for nutrients by
adjacent grasses and forbs will inhibit seedling growth. Release from herbaceous
competition has been demonstrated as the most cost-effective method to accelerate the
growth of seedlings. The plan for buffer establishment must incorporate control of the
herbaceous layer. Options for weed control include four to six inches of well -aged
hardwood mulch, weed control fabrics, or pre -emergent herbicide. Typically, mowing to
control weeds will be impractical based on the random distribution of plantings. Weed
control should be continued for three years from the time of planting (NCDENR 2004).
Common invasives include:
Ailanthus altissima (Tree -of -Heaven)
Albizia julibrissin (Mimosa)
Elaeagnus umbellate (Autumn Olive)
Hedera helix (English Ivy)
Lespedeza cuneata (Korean or Sericea Lespedeza)
Ligustrum sinense (Chinese Privet)
Lonisera japonica (Japanese Honeysuckle)
Microstegium vimineum (Japanese Grass)
Paulownia tomentosa (Princess Tree)
Pueraria lobata (Kudzu)
Rosa multiflora (M ultiflora Rose)
Wisteria sinensis (Chinese Wisteria)
Explore with us 3

'
L9ZZ ON'SAI3S
ooz 3iins i9aNaodiva s 'md
a
-
n
Oll `1N3WdOl3/�34 32if113/�a
mo
Sbil"NIJNI
aoa a3avd3ad
w<
_ Eemw x
�N
MAUVE)
I IV-
aaoaaa Noisinaa
a
ao Ad,�H� H
MHUH
1N3WdOl3n34 M3131SV3
o
m
_ � -
V
w
I11
p
6
-
i
i v �
i
rii �
r
LLJ
co
w
fn
/ ___—i—__`—
a
� k
R z0
Z
z
W
W
W
=
OI
Q
tW
-
-
-
w
a
—
s
a
z z

Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis

G AT E �WAY
C-46118-0000
On Call. On Time. On Target.
November 2023
Revised December 2023
Eastfield Development
US Highway 70-A
Selma, North Carolina
PREPARED FOR
Eastfield Associates, LLC.
101 S Raiiford Street, Suite 200
Selma, NC 27576
SUBMITTED BY
Ryan M. Enoch, P.E.
The Gateway Engineers, Inc.
100 McMorris Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15205
412.409.2313 PHONE
412.921.9960 FAX
www.gatewavengineers.com
renoch(cgatewayengineers.com
REVIEWED BY
Daniel S. Deiseroth, P.E.
v
D
n
D
z
v

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY
QUALITATIVE CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS
CONCLUSION
APPENDIX
SITE LOCATION MAPS
Eastfield Development
Cumulative Impact Analysis
1-3

PROJECT SUMMARY
Adventure Development is proposing to construct infrastructure for the Eastfield mixed -use
development located southeast of the interchange of Interstate 95 and US Highway 70 in Selma,
Johnston County, North Carolina. The project consists of road construction consistent with the Town of
Selma's transportation plan, utility installation, and site grading for future commercial, residential, and
industrial uses. The proposed development goals have been oriented based on input received from the
Johnston County Economic Development Commission.
The total Eastfield site is approximately 307 acres, of which 212 acres is developable. The project area
consists of a mixed hardwood community, agricultural fields, existing utility easements, and existing
rural residential and commercial buildings. The project area is owned by the applicant. The project
parcels are currently zoned as Industrial, Interstate Business, High Density Residential, or Low Density
Residential by the Town of Selma.
The purpose of this project is to construct necessary infrastructure for a mixed -use development within
a strategic location in Selma, North Carolina to meet the market needs of the community for commercial
and industrial facilities. The applicant's goal was to assemble enough land to address the voids in the
community, increase the tax base of Selma while minimizing environmental impacts. The proposed work
to improve and modernize the US 70 / 70A intersection is based on NCDOT studies indicating that the
existing intersection does not meet current traffic needs and safety standards.
The project is located within the Neuse River Basin and drains to Bawdy Swamp and unnamed
tributaries to Mocassin Creek, a source of Bawdy Creek. A Best Usage Classification (BUC) of QNSW has
been assigned to both water bodies. Multiple wetlands associated with Bawdy Swamp and Mocassin
Creek were identified onsite that have been determined to be subject to Section 404 jurisdiction. To
accomplish the goals of the project approximately 3.03 acres of wetland impacts and 299 linear feet of
stream impacts (267 If of loss and 32 If of embedded rip -rap) are proposed to construct the required
road improvements and associated infrastructure for the development. Because of these impacts the
applicant is submitting an Individual Permit Request for impacts to wetlands and waters of the US
(DWR# 20221617 v2 / USACE# SAW-2017-00326)
QUALITATIVE CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS
Per Section III of the NCDEQ 2004 Cumulative Impact Policy, private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts unless they are 1) relatively large, 2) involve commercial development, and 3) occur
in otherwise relatively undeveloped landscapes with an impact on regional growth patterns. Based on
these characteristics the DWR has determined that a qualitative Cumulative Impact Analysis is required
for the Eastfield Development. The following analysis provides considerations of the Qualitative Indirect
and Cumulative Impacts to downstream water quality resources from the Eastfield Development.

NC DWQ Cumulative Impact Policy, Version 2.1, dated April 10,2004, Question 1a.
Is growth likely to be induced by the project?
The purpose of this project is to meet the existing market needs of the Selma community, not induce
growth. The Eastfield Development is relatively large and includes commercial development. While the
existing site parcels are relatively undeveloped, the area is zoned Interstate Business and is located
within the 1-95 corridor just two miles from downtown Selma and 30 miles from Raleigh. It is reasonable
to expect continual development in this area over time, regardless of Eastfield. Therefore, it is unlikely
that the Eastfield Development will impact the current regional growth patterns.
NC DWQ Cumulative Impact Policy, Version 2.1, dated April 10,2004, Question 1b.
Are existing uses of the water likely to be impacted?
The project site drains to Bawdy Swamp and unnamed tributaries to Mocassin Creek, a source of Bawdy
Creek. The receiving waters have been classified as Class C Nutrient Sensitive Waters (C;NSW). The
project is not located within a watershed classified as Water Supply (WSW), High Quality (HQW), or
Outstanding Resource (ORW).
The Town of Selma Unified Development Ordinance is applicable to Eastfield, and future projects, and
establishes minimum criteria to control and minimize quantitative and qualitative impacts of
stormwater runoff from development. The code requires that properties shall retain stormwater
discharged from the site so the post development peak discharge rate shall not exceed the rate for the
site predevelopment for the 1-inch, 24-hour storm.
The anticipated direct impacts to water quality will be mitigated by the construction of Wet Ponds
throughout the site to provide stormwater management and protect water quality downstream. The
Wet Ponds have been designed in accordance with NCDEQ's Stormwater Design Manual incorporating
features such as forebays, vegetative shelves, multi -stage outlet structures, and rip rap outlet
protection. Additional water quality protection will be provided through Erosion and Sediment Control
measures provided during construction.
Water quality impacts will also be minimized by the protection and preservation of the existing riparian
buffers to maintain the natural nutrient removal functions. The Neuse River Basin buffer protection
rules require a 50-foot buffer measured from top of bank on each side of the stream.
NC DWQ Cumulative Impact Policy, Version 2.1, dated April 10,2004, Question 1c.
Are additional regulatory measures needed?
The site is located within the Neuse River Basin in Johnston County. The Eastfield Development site is
located within the Town of Selma and not subject to the Johnston County stormwater requirements.
However, the surrounding areas outside of the jurisdictional limits of Selma are held to these standards
described below.
In December of 1997, the Environmental Management Commission adopted rules to reduce the amount
of nitrogen delivered to the Neuse River Basin from point and nonpoint sources by a minimum of 30
percent of the 1995-loading rate. Wastewater treatment plants and industrial plants are considered
2

point source discharges. Point source discharges are regulated under the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) administered through the NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources Division of Water Quality. Non -point source discharges originate from rainfall or snow melt
flowing across lawns, streets, parking lots, agricultural fields, forests, industrial sites, construction sites,
etc. In May 1998, the Johnston County Board of Commissioners adopted the Johnston County
Stormwater Management Ordinance. The intent of the ordinance was to protect streams from the
secondary impacts of development. Later in 1998, the Environmental Management Commission
adopted the Neuse River Basin — Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Basin -wide
Stormwater Requirements (Neuse Rules). In those rules, Johnston County was identified as one of the 15
local governments required to adopt a Stormwater program specifically addressing nitrogen reduction.
The EMC approved the revised Johnston County program in December 2000 with an effective date of
March 9, 2001.
Even though the site is located outside of the Johnston County jurisdictional limits, the Eastfield
Development stormwater management plan has been designed in accordance with the Johnston County
Stormwater Design Manual, dated January 2008. This manual details the requirements on impervious
area limits, hydrology and hydraulic calculations, nitrogen reduction, stormwater BMPs, stream buffers,
certifications, inspections, and maintenance. No additional regulatory measures are needed.
CONCLUSION
The Eastfield Development will support the existing needs of the surrounding community and improve
the economic condition of Johnston County. Although cumulative and indirect impacts could result from
the project, these impacts would be minimal assuming adherence to the existing state and county
stormwater and erosion and sediment control regulations, therefore , cumulative and indirect impacts
are not expected to cause a violation of downstream water quality standards in association with the
Eastfield Development. All phases of the project's development, from initial planning, to operation and
maintenance of completed facilities, will all adhere to the local, State, and federal water quality
management standards and goals. The Eastfield project is not anticipated to result in any detrimental
impacts to onsite or downstream water quality because of the stringent application of and adherence to
all required water quality treatment protocols.

APPENDIX A

It
i C f V 0
:5 w0 _ ' QI } } }
O V F- LU QM QM QM QM
~ U) >- YF
o - w 0 QI= QI QI QI
g Z H Z Z Z

Co
0
0
0
9
v
0
u
a+ T
C �
a �
a�
� �
,� a
� 2
TC N
— C
� O
y
C
N
V
a �
y
$, v
�
L a
— � y 2
�
3 m
� o �
,�
� J �n Z �
N M
y m 2�
E
� � �
a
in 4
�n
��
�. `�� � `
+ �� i

Revised Ponds A2 and E4 Design Calculations and Profiles
and Supplemental EZ Forms

��-��I_,-��_�, ,. II„
Ins lS aaoilna s,�o�
Cll'1N3WdOl�n34 �2jnlN�]A v
c
o
S2i��NIJN� �
an�a3a�d3
a a �
A�1BA3 MI W
3 4Nb b)IJOIB
1N3WdOl3/��4 4131J1Sb�
aao03aNOISL9a
w
U
�
�
5
f U
o
w
�
0
a
m U
a
w
U
O
�
f U
a
w
O
w
5
U U
o w
w a
c
o
y
`o
r
J
L 'x
�
-
w ^ r
w �
5
$
No
WIT
THU
Is+mt
^L
ed
rc�
¢u
ed
wgI-
w�
w�r�
r
-
-
eweiniao xsreu,s.a3nwmw ew oc �� ��� o- ....,.a.�aq. ppnu� cuuo w000rv2. n%��=w�+.e{p

Ins lS aaoilna ,o� c -
011'1N3WdOlEln34 zi inlN�IA6f
S2i��NIJN� an�a3a�d3 a
A�1/fA31�1J1 aao03aNOISIAM 3 (INb' V N00I9 1N3WdOIAA10 4IAIJiSVl
lo
d
O U
O Oz
5 � U
U
U
wQ
oW
o�
:� �III�III m U v U
� t r
l
o b0000
o i$a U
,ILL=

SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
FORMS LOADED
PROJECT INFORMATION
1 Project Name
Eastfield Crossing, Block C
2 Project Area ac
117.7
3 Coastal Wetland Area ac
0
4 Surface Water Area ac
0
5
Is this project High or Low Density?
High
6
1 Does this project use an off -site SCM?
No
COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003(4)
7
Width of vegetated setbacks provided feet
50
8
Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated?
Yes
9
If BUA is proposed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003 4 c-d ?
N/A
10
Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project?
No
NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs:
11
Infiltration System
12
Bioretention Cell
13
Wet Pond
8
14
Stormwater Wetland
15
Permeable Pavement
16
Sand Filter
17
Rainwater Harvesting RWH
18
Green Roof
19
Level Spreader -Filter Strip LS-FS
20
Disconnected Impervious Surface DIS
21
Treatment Swale
22
Dry Pond
23
StormFilter
24
Silva Cell
Bayfilter
Filterra
25
26
FORMS LOADED
DESIGNER CERTIFICATION
27 Name and Title:
28 Organization:
29
Street address:
30
City, State, Zip:
31
Phone numbers :
32
Email:
Certification Statement:
certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the
information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans,
specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here.
\\�II1111111���//
SEAL =
057382 =
,A GINS .• G�.
�qN M . ENO
Signature of Designer
12-12-2023
Date

DRAINAGE AREAS
1
Is this a high density project?
Yes
2
If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs
8
3
Does this project have low density areas?
No
4
If so, number of low density drainage areas
0
5
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
versions?
No
FORMS LOADED
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION
Entire Site
1
2
3
4
4
Type of SCM
Wet Pond Al
Wet Pond A2
Wet Pond C1
Wet Pond C2
5
Total drainage area (sq ft
4229863
1063051
272250
1698840
836352
6
Onsite drainage area (sq ft
3933607
1063051
272250
1406355
832581
7
Offsite drainage area (sq ft
296256
292485
3771
8
Total BUA in project (sq ft
3465264.025
823865 sf
210994 sf
978264 sf
1173630 sf
9
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to permitting)
(sq ft
399010
399010 sf
10permitting)
New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to
s
3066254.025
823865 sf
210994 sf
978264 sf
774620 sf
11
Offsite BUA (sq ft
12
Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots:
- Parking (sq ft
1646086 sf
637831 sf
163350 sf
341876 sf
287407 sf
-Sidewalk (sft
169467.1
106305 sf
27225 sf
-Roof (s ft
459459.55
53153 sf
13613 sf
374726 sf
- Roadway s ft
- Future (sq ft
- Other, please specify in the comment box
below (sq ft
317653.775
26576 sf
6806 sf
261662 sf
13625 sf
473588 sf
13
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
Isubdivided lots (sq ft
14
New infiltrating permeable pavement not on
subdivided lots (sq ft
15permitting)
Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to
s ft
16
Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft
17
Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft
18
Percent BUA
82%
78%
78%
58%
140%
19
Design storm inches
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
20
Design volume of SCM cu ft
304243 cf
61910 cf
21443 cf
132873 cf
63865 cf
21
Calculation method for design volume
Simple Method
Simple Method
Simple Method
Simple Method
Simple Method
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
22
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
drainage area(s):

DRAINAGE AREAS
1
Is this a high density project?
Yes
2
If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs
8
3
Does this project have low density areas?
No
4
If so, number of low density drainage areas
0
5
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
versions?
No
FORMS LOADED
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION
Entire Site
5
6
7
8
4
Type of SCM
Wet Pond E1
Wet Pond E2
Wet Pond E3
Wet Pond E4
5
Total drainage area (sq ft
4229863
100188
39204
98010
121968
6
Onsite drainage area (sq ft
3933607
100188
39204
98010
121968
7
Offsite drainage area (sq ft
296256
8
Total BUA in project (sq ft
3465264.025
77646 sf
30383 sf
75958 sf
94525 sf
9
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to permitting)
(sq ft
399010
10permitting)
New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to
s
3066254.025
77646 sf
30383 sf
75958 sf
94525 sf
11
Offsite BUA (sq ft
12
Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots:
- Parking (sq ft
1646086 sf
60113 sf
23522 sf
58806 sf
73181 sf
-Sidewalk (sft
169467.1
10019 sf
3920 sf
9801 sf
12197 sf
-Roof (s ft
459459.55
5009 sf
1960 sf
4901 sf
6098 sf
- Roadway s ft
- Future (sq ft
- Other, please specify in the comment box
below (sq ft
317653.775
2505 sf
980 sf
2450 sf
3049 sf
13
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
Isubdivided lots (sq ft
14
New infiltrating permeable pavement not on
subdivided lots (sq ft
15permitting)
Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to
s ft
16
Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft
17
Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft
18
Percent BUA
82%
78%
78%
78%
78%
19
Design storm inches
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
20
Design volume of SCM cu ft
304243 cf
5753 cf
2372 cf
7897 cf
8130 cf
21
Calculation method for design volume
Simple Method
Simple Method
Simple Method
Simple Method
Simple Method
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
22
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
drainage area(s):

WET POND
1 Draina a area number Al A2 C1 C2 E1
21
Minimum required treatment volume cu ft
61910 cf
21443 cf
121750 cf
59939 cf
5753 cf
GENERAL MDC FROM 02H .1050
3
Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build -out?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
4
Is the SCM located away from contaminated soils?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
5
What are the side slopes of the SCM H:V ?
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
6
Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered
side slopes?
No
No
No
No
No
7
Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion
10- ear storm)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
8
Is there an overflow or bypass for inflow volume in excess of the
desi n volume?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
9
What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance?
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
10
If applicable, will the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
11
Does the maintenance access comply with General MDC (8)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
12
Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
13
If the SCM is on a single family lot, does (will?) the plat comply with
General MDC 10 ?
Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
15
Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
161
Does the SCM follow the device specific MDC?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
17
Was the SCM desi ned b an NC licensed rofessional?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WFT POND
MDC FROM 02H .1053
18
Sizing method used
HRT
HRT
HRT
HRT
HRT
19
Has a stage/storage table been provided in the calculations?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20
Elevation of the excavated main pool depth (bottom of sediment
removal) (fmsl
163.50
164.50
161.00
162.00
1635.00
21
Elevation of the main pool bottom (top of sediment removal) (fmsl)
164.00
165.00
161.50
162.50
164.00
221
Elevation of the bottom of the vegetated shelf (fmsl)
167.00
169.50
165.00
165.50
167.00
23
Elevation of the permanent pool (fmsl)
167.50
169.65
164.50
1166.75
167.25
24
Elevation of the top of the vegetated shelf (fmsl)
168.00
170.50
166.00
166.50
168.00
25
Elevation of the temporary pool (fmsl)
168.05
171.00
165.50
168.00
168.00
26
Surface area of the main permanent pool (square feet)
89694
13905
129349
48195
6391
27
Volume of the main permanent pool (cubic feet)
289052 cf
42377 cf
363619 cf
148003 cf
13884 cf
28
Average depth of the main pool (feet)
3.00 ft
4.00 ft
2.81 ft
3.07 ft
2.17 ft
29
Average depth equation used
Equation 2
Equation 2
Equation 2
Equation 2
Equation 2
30
If using equation 3, main pool perimeter (feet)
31
If using equation 3, width of submerged veg. shelf (feet)
32
Volume of the forebay (cubic feet)
43358 cf
6357 cf
82981 cf
162314 cf
2083 cf
33
Is this 15-20% of the volume in the main pool?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
34
Clean -out depth for forebay (inches)
6 in
6 in
6 in
6 in
6 in
35
Design volume of SCM (cu ft)
61910 cf
21443 cf
132873 cf
63865 cf
5753 cf
361
Is the outlet an orifice or a weir?
Orifice
Orifice
Orifice
Orifice
Orifice
37
If orifice, orifice diameter (inches)
4 in
2 in
4 in
3 in
1 in
38
If weir, weir height (inches)
39
If weir, weir length (inches)
Drawdown time for the temporary pool (days)
Are the inlet(s) and outlet located in a manner that avoids short-
circuiting?
40
2.2
2.05
3.35
2.74
2.87
41
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
42
Are berms or baffles provided to improve the flow path?
No
No
No
No
No
43
Depth of forebay at entrance (inches)
42 in
48 in
48 in
42 in
42 in
44
Depth of forebay at exit (inches)
42 in
48 in
48 in
42 in
42 in
45
Does water flow out of the forebay in a non -erosive manner?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
46
Width of the vegetated shelf (feet)
6 ft
6 ft
6 ft
6 ft
6 ft
47
Slope of vegetated shelf (H:V)
6:1
6:1
6:1
6:1
6:1
48
Does the orifice drawdown from below the top surface of the
permanentpool?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
49
Does the pond minimize impacts to the receiving channel from the 1-
r, 24-hr storm?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
50
Are fountains proposed? (If Y, please provide documentation that
MDC 9 is met.
No
No
No
No
No
51
Is a trash rack or other device provided to protect the outlet system?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
52
Are the dam and embankment planted in non -clumping turf grass?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
53
Species of turf that will be used on the dam and embankment
Clean Crop Seed
Clean Crop Seed
Clean Crop Seed
Clean Crop Seed
Clean Crop Seed
54
Hasa planting plan been provided for the vegetated shelf?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Wet Pond 4 2:37 PM 12/11/2023

WET POND
1 Draina a area number E2 E3 E4
21
Minimum required treatment volume cu ft
2372 cf
7897 cf
8130 cf
GENERAL MDC FROM 02H .1050
3
Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build -out?
Yes
Yes
Yes
4
Is the SCM located away from contaminated soils?
Yes
Yes
Yes
5
What are the side slopes of the SCM H:V ?
3:1
3:1
3:1
6
Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered
side slopes?
No
No
No
7
Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion
10- ear storm)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
8
Is there an overflow or bypass for inflow volume in excess of the
desi n volume?
Yes
Yes
Yes
9
What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance?
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
10
If applicable, will the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
Yes
Yes
Yes
11
Does the maintenance access comply with General MDC (8)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
12
Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
13
If the SCM is on a single family lot, does (will?) the plat comply with
General MDC 10 ?
Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
N/A
N/A
N/A
14
Yes
Yes
Yes
15
Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
161
Does the SCM follow the device specific MDC?
Yes
Yes
Yes
17
Was the SCM desi ned b an NC licensed rofessional?
Yes
Yes
Yes
WFT POND
MDC FROM 02H .1053
18
Sizing method used
HRT
HRT
HRT
19
Has a stage/storage table been provided in the calculations?
Yes
Yes
Yes
20
Elevation of the excavated main pool depth (bottom of sediment
removal) (fmsl
162.50
163.50
163.50
21
Elevation of the main pool bottom (top of sediment removal) (fmsl)
163.00
164.00
164.00
221
Elevation of the bottom of the vegetated shelf (fmsl)
167.00
167.00
167.00
23
Elevation of the permanent pool (fmsl)
167.50
167.50
167.25
24
Elevation of the top of the vegetated shelf (fmsl)
168.00
168.00
168.00
25
Elevation of the temporary pool (fmsl)
168.10
169.00
168.00
26
Surface area of the main permanent pool (square feet)
3253
7313
10093
27
Volume of the main permanent pool (cubic feet)
5813 cf
14928 cf
19915 cf
28
Average depth of the main pool (feet)
1.79 ft
2.04 ft
1.97 ft
29
Average depth equation used
Equation 2
Equation 2
Equation 2
30
If using equation 3, main pool perimeter (feet)
31
If using equation 3, width of submerged veg. shelf (feet)
32
Volume of the forebay (cubic feet)
872 cf
2239 cf
2987 cf
33
Is this 15-20% of the volume in the main pool?
Yes
Yes
Yes
34
Clean -out depth for forebay (inches)
6 in
6 in
6 in
35
Design volume of SCM (cu ft)
2372 cf
7897 cf
8130 cf
361
Is the outlet an orifice or a weir?
Orifice
Orifice
Orifice
37
If orifice, orifice diameter (inches)
0.75 in
1 in
1.25 in
38
If weir, weir height (inches)
39
If weir, weir length (inches)
Drawdown time for the temporary pool (days)
Are the inlet(s) and outlet located in a manner that avoids short-
circuiting?
40
2.31
2.2
2.32
41
Yes
Yes
Yes
42
Are berms or baffles provided to improve the flow path?
No
No
No
43
Depth of forebay at entrance (inches)
54 in
42 in
42 in
44
Depth of forebay at exit (inches)
54 in
42 in
42 in
45
Does water flow out of the forebay in a non -erosive manner?
Yes
Yes
Yes
46
Width of the vegetated shelf (feet)
6 ft
6 ft
6 ft
47
Slope of vegetated shelf (H:V)
6:1
6:1
6:1
48
Does the orifice drawdown from below the top surface of the
permanentpool?
Yes
Yes
Yes
49
Does the pond minimize impacts to the receiving channel from the 1-
r, 24-hr storm?
Yes
Yes
Yes
50
Are fountains proposed? (If Y, please provide documentation that
MDC 9 is met.
No
No
No
51
Is a trash rack or other device provided to protect the outlet system?
Yes
Yes
Yes
52
Are the dam and embankment planted in non -clumping turf grass?
Yes
Yes
Yes
53
Species of turf that will be used on the dam and embankment
Clean Crop Seed
Clean Crop Seed
Clean Crop Seed
54
Hasa planting plan been provided for the vegetated shelf?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Wet Pond 5 2:37 PM 12/11/2023

Wet Pond Design Worksheets

m
d 7-2
b N 5 m w
e $ y m
V 6
m n
11 n II
an
O
�S
ch ❑�4
y
m V Y'"
�
p
a C n E p�
3 m c m
o�
QE N N'
3
Sm°mr w9 m,-mm3
U
Q
o
it 1 3 lt,e
E
N �
4
Ul
U1 `�
—
C
C
O Z.
rn �
p 0
�
O
O
v
+ '
u
O
Y U1
w
O U
O Q
v > w
CC p
j
m
m O
>
a .O
m ti
r'
N
E v
0 0
II
w
l
m E
� � O
i m C
E. E
� m V
Cm=�V
--LEE
x
r
* ununn
n
03 F-
c e>SFCc)
II
3
m
� a a
v 0 0
> N
a` C! Cr
v
9
LL
to
1 C
t0 n N to
N
i
O N o
1
o m o
6 o
i
�
'o r
1
m
a` o
v
o
,o
IIw
LL
o
cr
i+ O
O 'O _
o � ❑
O N
$� o
v v
u
- II -
O Cr 0
oo
N
rn
E
O
H

{
�
�
|}
!
]
<
§
(
§
„
...
)
,
r
=TJ®
§\
(\\
±zz
a1a
\�}
\
2 //
00
00
\
[!
'}g
_
)&&)
6
0
\\\
\\\
■
/
(
4

§
\�}
{
�
�
]
|}
< !
§
(
§
„
...
)
,
r
=T&®
§\
(\\
±zz
\
2 //
\
[!
'}g
_
)&&)
6
00
\\\
/\/
■
/
(
4

§
a1a
\�}
{
�
�
|}
!
]
<
§
(
§
„
...
)
,
r
�=G2
§\
(\\
±zz
\
2 //
00
\
[!
'}g
_
)&&)
6
00
\\\
/\/
/
(
4

%
§
a1a
\�}
{
�
�
|}
!
]
<
§
(
§
„
...
)
,
r
Tƒ(2
§\
(\\
±zz
\
\
[!
'}g
_
)&&)
6
00
\\\
/\/
■
/
(
4

§
a1a
\�}
{
�
�
]
|}
< !
§
(
§
„
...
)
,
r
=T3®
§\
(\\
±zz
\
2 //
\
[!
'}g
_
)&&)
6
00
\\\
/\/
■
/
(
4

Block A-E Executed O&M Agreement

Operation & Maintenance Agreement
Project Name: Eastfield Crossing, Blocks A-E
Project Location: Selma, NC
Cover Page
Maintenance records shall be kept on the following SCM(s). This maintenance record shall be kept in a log in a known set location.
Any deficient SCM elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired, or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can
affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the pollutant removal efficiency of the SCM(s).
The SCM(s) on this project include (check all that apply & corresponding O&M sheets will i
Infiltration Basin Quantity:
Infiltration Trench Quantity:
Bioretention Cell Quantity:
Wet Pond Quantity:
Stormwater Wetland Quantity:
Permeable Pavement Quantity:
Sand Filter Quantity:
Rainwater Harvesting Quantity:
Green Roof Quantity:
Level Spreader - Filter Strip Quantity:
Proprietary System Quantity:
Treatment Swale Quantity:
Dry Pond Quantity:
Disconnected Impervious Surface Present:
User Defined SCM Present:
Low Density Present:
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s)!
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Type:
8
No
No
I No
ie aaaea
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed for
each SCM above, and attached O&M tables. I agree to notify NCDEQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the
system or responsible party.
Responsible Party:
Title & Organization:
Street address:
City, state, zip:
Phone number(s):
. Email:
MAZOOMM��MA
l
MUM
V17JEWM
sam _
7.
Date:
Notary Public for the State of
County of F do hereby certify that _
personally appeared before me this day of
acknowledge the due execution of the pera ' ns an ain nance Agreement.
Witness '1984 official seal,
G ip-TAR Y
PUB00 2
O 3
ON Gpvaaa -7
Seal My commission expires 1
STORM-EZ 12/12/2023
Version 1.5 O&M Agreement Page 1 of 5

Wet Pond Maintenance Requirements
Important operation and maintenance procedures:
Immediately after the wet detention basin is established, the plants on the vegetated shelf and
- perimeter of the basin should be watered twice weekly if needed, until the plants become
established (commonly six weeks).
_ No portion of the wet pond should be fertilized after the initial fertilization that is required to establish
the plants on the vegetated shelf.
_ Stable groundcover will be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the sediment load to the wet
pond.
if the pond must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment
through the emergency drain will be minimized as much as possible.
At least once annually, a dam safety expert will inspect the embankment. Any problems that are
found will be repaired immediately.
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an
accurate depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
After the wet pond is established, it will be inspected quarterly and within 24 hours after every storm event greater
than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance shall be kept in a
known set location and shall be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately.
SCM element:
Potential problem:
How to remediate the problem:
The entire wet pond
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the wet
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to remove the gully, plant ground
erosive gullies have
cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one -
pond
formed.
time fertilizer application.
The inlet pipe is clogged
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the sediment off -site.
(if applicable).
The inlet pipe is cracked
or otherwise damaged (if
Repair or replace the pipe.
The inlet device
applicable).
Erosion is occurring in the
Regrade the swale if necessary and provide erosion control
devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future
swale (if applicable).
problems with erosion.
Sediment has
accumulated to a depth
Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem
greater than the original
if possible. Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a
design depth for sediment
location where it will not cause impacts to streams or the SCM.
storage.
The forebay
Provide additional erasion protection such as reinforced turf
Erosion has occurred.
matting or riprap if needed to prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticide is used,
wipe it on the plants rather than spraying.

Wet Pond Maintenance Reauirements (Continued)
SCM element:
Potential problem:
How to remediate the problem:
Sediment has
accumulated to a depth
Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem
greater than the original
if possible. Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a
design sediment storage
location where it will not cause impacts to streams or the SCM.
depth.
Algal growth covers over
Consult a professional to remove and control the algal growth.
The main treatment area
50% of the area.
Cattails, phragmites or
Remove the plants by wiping them with pesticide (do not
other invasive plants cover
spray).
50% of the basin surface.
Best professional
practices show that
pruning is needed to
Prune according to best professional practices.
maintain optimal plant
health.
Determine the source of the problem: soils, hydrology,
The vegetated shelf
Plants are dead, diseased
disease, etc. Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide
or dying.
a one-time fertilizer application to establish the ground cover if
a soil test indicates it is necessary.
Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticide is used,
Weeds are present.
wipe it on the plants rather than spraying.
Shrubs have started to
Remove shrubs immediately.
grow on the embankment.
Evidence of muskrat or
Consult a professional to remove muskrats or beavers and
beaver activity is present.
repair any holes or erosion.
A tree has started to grow
Consult a dam safety specialist to remove the tree.
The embankment
on the embankment.
An annual inspection by
an appropriate
professional shows that
Make all needed repairs immediately.
the embankment needs
repair.
Clean out the outlet device and dispose of any sediment in a
Clogging has occurred.
99 g
location where it will not cause impacts to streams or the SCM.
The outlet device
The outlet device is
Repair or replace the outlet device.
damaged.
Weeds or volunteer trees
Remove the weeds or trees.
are growing on the mat.
a
Floating wetland island
The anchor cable is
(if applicable)
damaged, disconnected or
Restore the anchor cable to its design state.
missing.

Wet Detention Pond Design Summary
Wet Pond Diggram
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
C1
Permanent Pool El.
164.5
Permanent Pool El.
164.5
Temporary Pool El:
165.5
Temporary Pool El:
165.5
Pretreatment other No
Clean Out Depth:
3
Clean Out Depth:
3
than forebay?
Sediment Removal E
161.5
Sediment Removal E
161.5
Has Veg. Filter? No
Bottom Elevation:
161
Bottom Elevation:
161
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
C2
Permanent Pool El.
166.75
Permanent Pool El.
166.75
Temporary Pool EL
168
Temporary Pool El:
168
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
4.25
Clean Out Depth:
4.25
than forebay? NO
Sediment Removal E 162.5
Sediment Removal E
162.5
Has Veg. Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
162
Bottom Elevation:
162
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
Al
Permanent Pool El.
167.5
Permanent Pool El.
167.5
Temporary Pool El:
169
Temporary Pool El:
169
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
3.5
Clean Out Depth:
3.5
than forebay? N0
Sediment Removal E 164 Sediment Removal E
164
Has Veg. Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
A2
Permanent Pool El.
169.65
Permanent Pool El.
169.65
Temporary Pool El:
171
Temporary Pool El:
171
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
4.65
Clean Out Depth:
4.65
than forebay? N0
Sediment Removal E 165 Sediment Removal E 165
Has Veg. Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
164.5
Bottom Elevation:
164.5
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
E1
Permanent Pool El.
167.25
Permanent Pool El.
167.25
Temporary Pool El:
168
Temporary Pool El:
168
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
3.25 Clean Out Depth:
3.25
than forebay? ND
Sediment Removal E
164
Sediment Removal E
164
Has Veg. Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
E2
Permanent Pool El.
167.5
Permanent Pool El.
167.5
Temporary Pool El:
168.1
Temporary Pool El:
168.1
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
4.5
Clean Out Depth:
4.5
No
than forebay?
Sediment Removal E 163 Sediment Removal E 163
Has Veg. Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
162.5
Bottom Elevation:
162.5
WET POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
E3
Permanent Pool El.
167.5 Permanent Pool El.
167.5
Temporary Pool El:
169
Temporary Pool El:
169
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
3.5
Clean Out Depth:
3.5
No
than forebay?
Sediment Removal
E 164
Sediment Removal E
164
Has Veg, Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
WEr POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
E4
Permanent Pool El.
167.2 Permanent Pool El.
167.2
Temporary Pool El:
168
Temporary Pool El:
168
Pretreatment other
Clean Out Depth:
3.2
Clean Out Depth:
3.2
No
than forebay?
Sediment Removal E 164
Sediment Removal E 164
Has Veg. Filter?
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
Bottom Elevation:
163.5
ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHLLT5 IF NLUL55AKY

Mitigation SOA Letters

fires
Statement of Availability - Neuse 03020201 (Outside Falls)
EBX-Neuse I, LLC and Environmental Banc and Exchange (EBX)
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Banks
December 19, 2023
Eastfield Associates, LLC
101 S. Raiford Street
Selma, NC
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the Eastfield Development Project
Bank MBI/LIMBI Name: EBX-Neuse I, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES Neuse Buffer and
Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES Poplar Creek Buffer & Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank,
EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES 2021 Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank, and RES
2022 Phase II Umbrella Mitigation Bank.
Bank Site: See Table Below
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC and Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Bank Site DWR Project #: See Table Below
Riparian Buffer Credits Needed: 36,4253.00 SF
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 2,981.30 SF
Bank's Credit Service Area: Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Outside Falls)
To Whom It May Concern:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC and Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC has the above -mentioned Riparian Buffer Credits from one
or more of the mitigation bank parcels listed below to satisfy the anticipated buffer mitigation requirements related to
the above -mentioned project. The project is located within the service area HUC 03020201 where these Banks are
allowed to provide riparian buffer credits for buffer mitigation requirements.
BANK PARCEL
BANK SPONSOR
DWR PROJECT #
Bucher
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2016-0977v2
Selma Mil
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2014-0705v2
Hannah Bride
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2017-0537v2
Meadow Spring
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2016-0980v2
Polecat
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2016-0978v2
Stone Creek
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2016-0241v2
Poplar Creek
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2016-0979v2
Uzzle
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
2016-0981v2
Shady Grove
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
2020-1091v2
Wolf King
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
2020-1149v2
Thunder Swamp II
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
2021-0306v2
Caraway Bluff II
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
2014-0820v6
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. We have the inventory as shown above;
however, this letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first served basis. An invoice for

It ZOS
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Neuse 01(Falls and Non -Falls Lake Watershed) Riparian Buffer Credits Statement of Availability
December 18, 2023
Eastfield Associates, LLC
Attn: Kevin Dougherty
101 S. Raiford Street
Selma, NC 27576
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the "Eastfield Development" project
Permittee: Eastfield Associates, LLC
Riparian Buffer Credits Needed: 36,425 sq. ft.
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 7,709.50 sq. ft.
Neuse River Basin (03020201) — Non -Falls and Falls Lake Watershed
BANK NAME
BANK SPONSOR
DWR PROJECT NUMBER
Anderson Farm Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2021-0023v3
Black Dirt Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2021-0206v2
Cox Pond Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2020-1942v2
Falling Creek Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2015-0572v2
Grantham Branch Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2017-0687v2
Little River Weaver Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2020-1941v2
Long Pond Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2019-1639v2
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2019-0239v2
O'Berry Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2021-0019v2
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2020-1940v2
Sassarixa Swamp II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2019-0661
Thoroughfare Swamp Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
2019-0044v2
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC
2018-0196v2
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC
2019-0157v3
Wolfe Mitigation Bank
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC
2018-0580
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings IX, LLC
2020-1938v2
Dear Mr. Dougherty,
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC, Wildlands Holdings V, LLC, and Wildlands Holdings IX, LLC, owned and operated by
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., currently have sufficient riparian buffer credits from the above -mentioned banks to
partially satisfy the riparian buffer mitigation requirements related to your project. The project is located within
the service area (HUC 03020201), of the Banks.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. It is neither a guarantee of
future credit availability, nor a guarantee of credit pricing. Credits are sold on a first come, first serve basis at
the Bank's price at the time an invoice is requested. Invoices reserve both the credits and the price for a period
Wildlands Holdings III, V, and IX, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

W10.*
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
of 30 days.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification and
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources
approving the Riparian Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to
Wildlands Holdings III, V, or IX LLC (depending on availability at the time of permit issuance). We will then issue
a credit transfer certificate verifying your credit purchase to the North Carolina Division of Water Resources and
to you for your records.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at (704) 332-
7754 x114 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Camden M. Brunick
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Mitigation Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 114
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator I NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Sue Homewood, Regulatory Agent I NC Division of Water Resources
Wildlands Holdings III, V, and IX, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Kevin Dougherty
Eastfield Associates, LLC
101 S. Raiford St
Selma, NC 27576
Project: Eastfield
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 19, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/19/2024
County: Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the applicable 404 Permit/401 Certification/Buffer Approval within this time frame,
this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once
DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit
and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid
by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies, bank credit availability
and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Neuse
03020201
Riparian Wetland
3.56
Neuse
03020201
Warm Stream
267
Neuse
03020201
Riparian Buffer
Up to 7,700 @ 3:1
Neuse
03020201
Riparian Buffer
Up to 8,883 @ 1.5:1
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Kelly B. Williams
In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
cc: Jeff Harbour, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
h(h�TH :.AROI iRA IV
o �nmmmenni w�a 919,707,8976

fires
this transaction will be sent upon your request, and we will formally reserve both the credits and per -credit pricing for a
period of 30 days from the date of invoice. Credits and pricing may be reserved for an extended period by signing a
reservation agreement and paying a 10% deposit.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Buffer
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources approving the
Riparian Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment. We will then issue a mitigation
credit transfer certificate verifying your buffer credit purchase to the North Carolina Division of Water Resources and to
you for your records.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your buffer mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
919-209-1055, [e-mail] or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely
A7
Amy Staley
Credit Sales Manager
CC:
Katie Merritt, Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator, NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
Sue Homewood, NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
Jeff Harbour, Terracon
2