WQ0008764_GW Assessment_20051101

ELEVENTH SUPPLEMENT
6
DEC 0 8 2005
D&R = FAYEf f EVILLE REGI OVAL Of RCE
PHASE 2
GROUND WATER QUALITYASSESSMENT
prepared for
WestPoint Stevens
Wagram, North Carolina
prepared by
Nutter & Associates, Inc.
Athens, Georgia
NOVEMBER 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................. ii
LIST OF TABLES ... .................................................. iii
LIST OF FIGURES..............:.....................................iv
1. INTRODUCTION..................................................... 1
2. GROUND WATER QUALITY .. _............................•........... 3
2.1 Nitrate -nitrogen Concentrations ................................. 3
2.2 pH and Specific Conductance .................................. 5
3. WATER TABLE GEOMETRY AND GROUND WATER FLOW ANALYSIS ...:... 6
4. CONCLUSIONS.................................................... 7
5. ACTION PLAN ..................................................... 8
6. REFERENCES ......... .................... ........:.............. 9
�V
APPENDIX A Phase 2 Work Plan and DEHNR Modified Work Plan
9� APPENDIX B Ground Water Analytical Results
APPENDIX C Historic Distribution of Nitrate -Nitrogen Concentrations in Ground
Water
- Nutter & Associates, Inc. ii .

U
li
Lj
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Ground water quality data for wells sampled in March 2005 in the vicinity of
fields 26 - 70, WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, NC.
Nutter 6 Associates, Inc. iii

L
U
L
L
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. General locations of the LAM wells, temporary monitoring wells, and
biosolids application fields.
Figure 2. Trend in,ground water nitrate -nitrogen in LAM monitoring wells near fields
26-70 through March 2005, WestPoint Stevens Land Application System.
Figure 3. Trend in groundwater nitrate -nitrogen in temporary monitoring wells A-G2
near fields 26-70 through March 2005.
Figure 4. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in water table aquifer around
fields 26-70, March 2005.
Figure 5. Water table elevation contour. map around fields 26-70, March 2005.
3
Nutter & Associates, Inc. iv

L
r�
1, INTRODUCTION
The WestPoint Stevens (Stevens) textile plant in Scotland County near the town of
Wagram, North Carolina operates a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for effluent
discharge to the Lumber River. Biosolids from the WWTP have been land treated since
1985 on 75 acres of loblolly pine trees (fields 1 - 25; Figure 1) and 55 acres of coastal
Bermudagrass (fields 26 - 70). An additional 94 acres of Bermudagrass fields (fields 71
(I - 90) were added to the system in 1991. The system operates under authority of North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) Division
of Water Quality Permit No. WQ0008764, dated October 14, 2005; these fields formerly
operated under Permit No. WQ0002377, dated March 7, 1997.
On October 18, 1996, the North Carolina DEHNR issued a Notice of Violation to
Stevens -concerning elevated ground water nitrate -nitrogen at the Compliance Boundary
at well LAM-2 (down gradient of fields 26 - 70) and at the Review Boundary at LAM-7
(down gradient of fields 1 - 25). The notice required that Stevens take the following
actions.
Assess the cause, significance and extent of violation of standards at well LAM-2
and submit results of the investigation and a plan and proposed schedule for
corrective action.
2. Demonstrate that standards exceeded at the Review Boundary at LAM-7 will not
cause a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary.
On November 19, 1996, Stevens presented a work plan to DEHNR to address these
requirements (Phase,2 work plan). The Phase 2 Work plan was approved (with
modifications) by DEHNR on December 19, 1996. The Phase 2 work plan and DEHNR
modified work plan. are presented in Appendix A. The Phase 2 work plan required
IL sampling of ground water at locations along the Stevens property line in January 1997,
with additional monitoring in November 1997 to re -check nitrate -nitrogen concentrations.
!- Summaries of work completed in fulfillment of the Phase 2 work plan as well as
subsequent actions to develop additional ground water quality information in the vicinity
of fields 26 - 70 through November 1999 have been presented in previous reports
�; prepared by Nutter & Associates, Ina ¢formerly Nutter, Overcash & Associates, Inc.)
and submitted to Stevens in -November 1998, July 1999, February 2000, January 2001,
September 2001, August 2002, July 2003 and September 2004.
L The September 2004 report also contained the following action plan:
11 1. Fields 26 - 70 will not be used for biosolids application until nitrate -nitrogen
concentrations around the fields are below the MCL of 10 mg/L.
' Nutter & Associates, Inc. 1

i,
�J
2. Fields 26 - 70 will continue to be managed intensively in a coastal
L Bermudagrass/ryegrass crop throughout the period of no biosolids application
to remove the accumulated nitrogen from the soil and reduce the quantity of
nitrate -nitrogen moving to the ground water.
3.. In.accordance with the requirements of the NCDENR-DWQ, conduct annual
ground water monitoring in March 2005 at temporary wells A through G2 for
nitrate -nitrogen, pH and specific conductance in conjunction with routine LAM
monitoring at wells LAM1-COMP, LAM-2, and LAM-3.
4. A supplemental report containing new data from wells LAM 1-COMP, LAM-2,
and LAM-3 and the temporary monitoring wells will be prepared following the
March 2005 monitoring event. Recommendations regarding future ground
water monitoring will be included in that report.
5. In accordance with the conditions specified in NCDENR-DWQ's August 22,
2003 letter to WestPoint Stevens, request a determination from NCDENR-
DWQ as to whether temporary wells B through G2 may be abandoned and
plugged.
The objective of the tasks listed above is to further monitor the ground water quality at
and around fields 26 - 70 and to facilitate a decrease, in ground water nitrate -nitrogen
concentrations.
Carolina Environmental Laboratories, Inc. collected ground water samples for WestPoint
Stevens from temporary wells A through G2 near fields 26' - 70 on March 29, 2005. This
sampling was conducted to supplement routine monitoring of the LAM monitoring well
system completed by Carolina Environmental Laboratories, Inc. for Stevens on March
21, 2005. This report presents the results of the March 2005 ground water monitoring
near fields 26 - 70.
Nutter & Associates, Inc. 2

2, GROUNDWATER QUALITY
2.1 Nitrate -nitrogen Concentrations
Beginning in 1994, concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen increased sharply in two monitoring
wells (LAM-2 and LAM-3) in the vicinity of fields 26 - 70 and peaked in 1997. In October
1996, Stevens suspended biosolids applications to fields 26 - 70 to remove the source
of additional nitrogen to the area.
Analytical results for March 2005 ground water samples collected in the vicinity of fields
26 - 70 are presented in Table 1. Temporary wells A through G2 were sampled by
Carolina Environmental Laboratories, Inc. on March 29, 2bO5; wells LAM 1-COMP,
LAM-2, and LAM3 were sampled by Carolina Environmental Laboratories on March 21,
2005. Analytical reports from Carolina Environmental Laboratories are presented in
Appendix B. Trends in ground water nitrate -nitrogen concentrations near fields 26'- 70
are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
Concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen at wells LAM 1-COMP and LAM-2 were above the
Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 10 mg/L, but have generally decreased
overtime compared to past high levels (Figure 2; Table 1). Concentrations of nitrate -
nitrogen in LAM 1-COMP have fluctuated in a slow decreasing trend since November
1996. The March 2005 concentration (Table 1) is approximately 48 percent lower than
the past high concentration of 35.6 mg/L. Concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen in well
LAM-2 peaked in July 1996 (Figure 2) and have since decreased by approximately 77
percent. Nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in LAM-3 peaked in April 1997 and have
decreased substantially since that time. The March 2005 concentration of 9.2 mg/L
i .nitrate -nitrogen in well LAM-3 is approximately 89 percent lower than the April 1997 high
and is below the 10 mg/L MCL.
Trends in nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in temporary wells.A through G2 are shown in
Figure 3. Through March 2005, ground water nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in most of
the temporary wells had either declined since early 1997 (wells A, C, D and G2) or
remained below the MCL of 10 mg/L with little change (wells B, E, and F). The data in
Table 1 and Figure 3 indicate that the overall, long-term trend toward decreasing nitrate -
nitrogen concentrations near fields 26 through 70 has continued through March 2005.
i
L At well A, the nitrate -nitrogen concentration has decreased markedly from a high of 175
mg/L in July 2000 to 11.9 mg/L in March 2005; this concentration is the lowest detected
at temporary well A since monitoring began in April 1997. This concentration is lower
than concentrations detected at the perimeter of fields 26 - 70 at wells LAM1-COMP and
LAM-2 (18.6 and 15.3 mg/L, respectively) and temporary wells C and G2 (18.2 and 15.5
mg/L, respectively).
Nutter & Associates, Inc.
3

The March 2005 nitrate -nitrogen data presented in Table 1 were used to develop a
contour'map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations for the water table aquifer (Figure 4).
Figure 4 is plotted using a contour interval of 10 mg/L nitrate -nitrogen.
In Figure 4, the distribution of contours which illustrate nitrate -nitrogen concentrations
across fields 26 - 70 vary from the distribution of contours in maps prepared following
prior monitoring events (refer to historic nitrate -nitrogen contour maps presented in
Appendix C). Figure 4 shows that concentrations are highest west of fields 26 - 70, at
LAM1-COMP, and south of fields 26-70, near temporary well C. The geometry of the
i elevated nitrate -nitrogen area is similar to that in March 2003, though the March 2005
L_ data indicate lower ground water nitrate -nitrogen across the application fields. The
change in the distribution pattern of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations is attributed to a
substantial decrease in ground water nitrate -nitrogen through natural attenuation
processes. Comparison of nitrate-nitrogen.at individual wells shown in Figure 4 to the
historic nitrate -nitrogen distribution maps in Appendix C reveals that concentrations of
nitrate -nitrogen along the Compliance Boundary south of fields 26 - 70 have decreased
since January 1997. Similarly, concentrations along the eastern and western
boundaries of fields 26 - 70 have also decreased substantially.
More than eight years of ground water monitoring data from January 1907 through
March 2005 suggests that the area of elevated (greater than 10 mg/L) ground water
nitrate -nitrogen in the vicinity of fields 26 - 70 is remaining stationary and its lateral
extent is decreasing. Nitrate -nitrogen concentrations at specific monitoring wells are
decreasing over time. Although short-lived and local fluctuations in nitrate -nitrogen
concentrations may occur in response to specific, the overall decreasing trend is
expected to continue, and the lateral extent of ground water exceeding 10 mg/L nitrate -
nitrogen is expected to decrease. No additional biosolids or other sources of nitrogen
are being applied to fields 26 - 70, therefore the risk of additional excess nitrogen
leaching to ground water is considered low. A potential ground water receptor survey
completed in April 1997_ identified no potential receptors down gradient of fields 26 - 70
(Earth Systems Associates, Ltd., May 1997).
Ground water nitrate -nitrogen at temporary well A has decreased substantially relative to
past high levels, and the March 2005 concentration of 11.9 mg/L is just above the 10
mg/L MCL. Concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen at well LAM1-COMP generally parallel
concentrations at nearby temporary well G2; similarly, concentrations at LAM-2
generally parallel temporary well C. Concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen at the remaining
temporary wells (B, D, E, and F) remain below 10 mg/L. As such, routine monitoring of
the LAM wells (LAM1-COMP, LAM-2, and LAM-3), as required by NCDENR, will be
adequate to monitor future. trends in nitrate -nitrogen in the vicinity of fields 26 - 70.
Nutter & Associates recommends that monitoring at the temporary wells (A, B, C, D, E,
F, and G2) should be suspended. These wells should remain in place for a minimum of
one year in the event that additional data need to be developed from the wells. After it
has been determined that no additional data are needed, from the temporary wells, the
wells should be plugged and abandoned by a qualified, North Carolina certified well
contractor. WestPoint Stevens should consult with DEHNR and obtain concurrence
before implementing any changes in the current monitoring program.
LNutter & Associates, Inc. 4

.j -1
U
Z2 pH and Specific Conductance
Specific conductance and pH measurements for the March 2005 ground water samples
in the vicinity of fields 26 - 70 are presented in Table 1. Specific conductance and field
pH analyses for the temporary wells were performed Carolina Environmental
Laboratories (Table 1). March 2005 specific conductance values in the temporary wells
ranged from 19 pS/cm at well F to 642 PS/cm at well A (Table 1). The lower specific
conductance value at well A in March 2005 parallels the reduced nitrate -nitrogen
concentration detected at this location.
Ground water pH values ranged from 4.33 (well A) to 5.38 (well B). All wells are below
the pH compliance range of 6.5 to 8.5 S.U:, however, this was also true of background
water quality in both up- and down -gradient wells sampled in 1989 and 1990 (Earth
Systems Associates, Ltd. 1991) There is no apparent, relationship between pH and
nitrate -nitrogen concentrations.
Nutter & Associates, Inc. 5

3. WATER TABLE GEOMETRYAND GROUND WATER
FLOW'ANALYSIS
L Using the water table elevation data presented in Table 1, a water table elevation
contour map was developed for March 2005 using one foot contour intervals (Figure 5).
The water table surface is similar to the land surface, with ground water gradients and
flow directions generally following the topographic geometry. Ground water flow
directions are designated with arrows in Figure 5. The water table in the vicinity of fields
26 - 70 slopes radially away from the center of the fields near temporary well A,toward
Shoe Heel Creek to the west, the property boundary to the south and LAM-3 to the east.
The primary ground water flow directions are to the south and west in the direction of the
steepest ground water table gradients. Hydraulic gradients in the vicinity of sprayfields
26 - 70 are relatively low, approximately 0.5 to 1 percent slope (0.5 'to 1 foot elevation
change per.100 feet in horizontal distance).
- Ground water flow in the vicinity of well E is toward the north -and west in the direction of
well LAM-3 and well D, indicating a ground water flow divide in the southeastern portion
of the fields. This ground water divide may act as a barrier to migration of nitrate -
nitrogen from the fields toward the southeast.
0
0
I
Nutter &Associates, Inc. 6

4. CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are made regarding the change in ground water quality in the
vicinity of fields 26.70 since March 2004 and since the Phase 2 ground water quality
assessment began.
1. The March 2005 nitrate -nitrogen map for the area in the vicinity of fields 26 -70
(Figure 4) indicates that the area with ground water nitrate -nitrogen
concentrations above the 10 mg/L MCL is smaller than in previous years. The
concentration of nitrate -nitrogen in the center of fields 26'-70 at well A has
decreased sharply, but remains slightly above 10 mg/L.
2. The. data indicate ground water nitrate -nitrogen is below the 10 mg/L MCL at
the property boundary near wells B, .LAM-3, D, E and F..Concentrations at
wells G2 and LAM1-COMP west of the application fields and wells C and LAM-
2 south of the application fields remain above 10 mg/L, but have decreased
substantially relative to past high -concentrations. Since biosolids application to
fields 26 - 70 has been discontinued and ground water flow away from the
fields is slow due to low gradients, the overall decreasing trend in ground water
nitrate -nitrogen concentrations at the property boundary is expected to continue
over the long term.
3. A shallow ground water divide between temporary well E and fields 26 - 70
appears to limit migration of ground water toward the southeast, resulting in
lower concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen southeast of the divide.
4. Concentrations of nitrate -nitrogen in wells LAM1-COMP, LAM-2 and LAM-3
have decreased substantially compared to concentrations in late 1996 and
early 1997. `Overall, nitrate -nitrogen concentrations have decreased .
substantially along the east -west axis of of fields 26-70 since intensive
�; monitoring began in January 1997 and over the long term a continued decrease
in ground water nitrate -nitrogen is expected.
i,
i
L
f
lU
Nutter & Associates, Inc. 7

5. ACTION PLAN
The following tasks are proposed to further monitor decreasing ground water nitrate -
nitrogen concentrations in the vicinity of fields 26 - 70 and ensure continued
improvement in ground water quality:
1. Fields 26 - 70 will not be used for biosolids application until nitrate -nitrogen
concentrations around the fields meet ground water quality standards and .until
application of biosolids is approved by NCDENR.
2. Fields 26 - 70 will continue to be managed intensively in a coastal
Bermudagrass/ryegrass crop throughout the period of no biosolids application
to remove the accumulated nitrogen from the soil and reduce the quantity of
nitrate -nitrogen moving to the ground water.
3. Routine groundwater monitoring at wells LAM 1-COMP, LAM-2, and LAM-3 will
continue as required by the project permit. Nutter & Associates recommends
suspending monitoring at temporary wells A through G2. Stevens should
consult with.NCDENR to gain approval for proposed changes in ground water
monitoring.
4. If no additional monitoring data is required by NCDENR from wells A through
G2 after one year, Nutter & Associates recommends abandoning and plugging
these temporary monitoring wells. Stevens should consult with NCDENR to
gain approval before abandoning the wells. The wells should be plugged and
(' abandoned by a qualified, North Carolina certified well contractor.
Nutter & Associates, inc. 8

6. REFERENCES
Earth Systems Associates, Ltd., 1991. Ground Water Monitoring Data Review for the
LAM Network at the Sludge Land Treatment System. J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc.,
Wagram, North Carolina.
Earth Systems Associates, Ltd., March 1997. Phase 2 Ground Water Quality
Assessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, North Carolina.
Earth Systems Associates, Ltd., May 1907. Supplemental Report: Phase 2 Ground
Water Quality Assessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wag ram,, North
Carolina. .
Nutter & Associates, Inc., January 2b01.' Sixth Supplement: Phase 2 Ground Water
Quality Assessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, North Carolina.
Nutter & Associates, Inc., September 2001. Seventh Supplement: Phase 2 Ground
Water Quality Assessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, North
Carolina.
Nutter& Associates, Inc:; August 2002. Eighth Supplement:. Phase 2 Ground Water
Quality Assessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, North Carolina.,
Nutter, Overcash &.Associates, Inc., January 1998. Second Supplement: Phase 2
Ground Water Quality Assessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram,
North Carolina.
Nutter, Overcash & Associates, Inc.; November 1998. Third Supplement: Phase 2.
Ground Water,QualityAssessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram,
North Carolina.
Nutter, Overcash & Associates, Inc., July 1999.- Fourth Supplement: Phase 2 Ground
E Water Quality Assessment: Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, North
-- Carolina.
Nutter, Overcash & Associates;,lnc.,`February 2000. Fifth Supplement: Phase 2 Ground
12 Water QualityAssessment. Prepared for WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, North
Carolina. .
L'
Nutter & Associates, Inc. 9

Table 1. Ground water quality data for wells sampledin March 2005 in the vicinity of
fields 26 - 70, WestPoint Stevens, Wagram, NC.
Monitoring
Well
Water
Table
Elevation
Nitrate-
nitrogen
pH
Specific
Conductance
ff
mg/L
S.U.
US/cm
A
2071
11.9
4.33
391
B
204.8
1.9
5.38 •
27
C
200.9
18.2
4.73
355
D
203.1
5.9
5.33
98
E
203.9
1:0
5.29
24
F
199.6
0.5
5.21
19
1321'
196.5
15.5
4.51
350
LAM 1-COMP2
196.3
18.6
4.75
LAM-2 s
200.3
15.3
4.69
-
LAM-3 z
202.1
9.2
1 4.71'
'Water table elevation measured relative to elevation of well G.
2pH measured by Carolina Environmental Laboratories for WestPoint
Stevens.
f
I ,
I,I
L Nutter & Associates, /nc ,

I , I
LEGEND...
e .''LAM Monitoring Well,
Temporary Monitoring Wells
208.61,,
.� 4 1 MMN
1 51
Sprayfields 1-25
02 .9
nL r V� R
00. SEVENS ft
=RMES
I
Sprayfields 26-70
Figure 1. General location of the LAM wells, temporary monitoring wells, and biosoilds Nutter, Overcash & Associates, Inc.
application fields. I .Environmental Consultants
2

E--1 C-
1
MW
Date
LAM I -COMP LAM2 �• LAIVI3,
I Figure 2. Trend in groundwater nitrate -nitrogen in LAM monitoring wells near fields 26- I Nutter & Associates, Inc. I
70 through March 2005, WestPoint Stevens Land Application System. Environmental Consultants

J _
180
-
160.
140
J
I
CD
E 4 20:
c
w
.
rn
2100
-
.:80.
z
60'
40
_
r
FF
1/97 4/97 11]97 7/98; 3199 41'/99. 7L00 $./01' ,3/02• 3L03 3/04: 3/05'
Date
Figure 3.
Trend in ground water nitrate -nitrogen in monitoring wells A-G2 near fields
Nutter & Associates, Inc.
26-70 through March 2005. WestPoint Stevens Land Application System.
Environmental Consultants

L _
Grassed Sprayfleld
Boundary —,_
10 _
tt.
•
LAM MW 'A'
#t—COMP (/
18.6 • � 1
MW 'O' \
•
15.5
10
LAM 2 aamn m0�
MW 'c' 15.3 •
MW 'Fr,• er�erot
10
o 100 200 200 aw e00
I
SCALE e1 Fur
Wcsl% s E 3
MW V
BRYANT
LEGEND
• Monitoring Well
18.6 Nitrate —Nitrogen, mg/L
10 Nitrate —Nitrogen C ntour
Interval = 10 mg%L
Revised 5/28/05; Nutter & Associates, Inc.
Base Map Source. J. F. Wampier Engineering, Inc.
Figure 4. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in water table aquifer Nutter & Assocle teS, Inc
around•fields 26 - 70, March 2005. Environmental Consultants

l �_
LAM
#1—COMP I
Fig197 19i
•
I
MW "G"
196.5 •
198
MW "F"
199.6 •
199
Grassed Sprayfield
Boundary,
MW „A„
2E 207
203 205 2L7
'r MW "C"
200
200.9
WESTPOINT STEVENS
PLANT SITE
206
203
BRYANr
0 200 400 600
scALE IN FEET
205
MW "B"
2E
1
MW " E"
203.9
• Monitoring Well
207 Water Table Elevation, ft.
Contour Interval = 1 ft.
Direction of Ground Water
Flow
nevisea o/Ar/uQ; nurrer ac nssoclules, inc.
Baas Map Scum: J. F. Wamplar EnBUuadng, Inc.
Figure 5. Water table elevation contour map around fields 26 - 70, March 2005. NUfter & Associates.. Inc
Environmental Consultants

I
APPENDIX A
Phase 2 Work Plan
and
DEHNR Modified Work Plan
Nutter & Associates, Inc.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional office
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary .
DIVISION OF WATER QUAL1Ty
GROUNDWATER SECTION
December 19, 1996
Mr. Roger Baucom
Westpoiwt Stevens
P.O. Box 388
Wagram, NO 28396
SUBIEC T:. Workpian Approval for
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. WQ0002377
Westpoint Stevens
wastewater Spray Irrigation
Scotland County, Ne
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Tile Eayettevtlle Regional Office Groundwater Section has reviewed your workplan dated
November 19, 1996, written to address the subject NOV. Please proceed with your pion as you
outlined it for us, and as it bas been slightly modified to mat our•needs.
Plan for .Corrective Actions for Violation 1.
1. To investigate the extent of contaatinatlon along the southern border of the grassy
spiayfield containing LAM 2 and 1AM-39 advance five (jeoprobe borlags at the
property line, immc&tely.southof thefield, and.saMle theemundwatar forpN,
specifte conductance, and nitrate sutrogea,
2. Further define the groundwater flow by constructing two plewmeters in addition
to the aforementioned borings.
3. To ensure that nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in this field are not fiutba
aggravated, do not spray biosolids on Field 1 until sampling is completed and the
results are satisfactory.
4. Conduct this sampling by January 16, 1997, and submit the report by February
28, 1997. -Ra-check the nitrate-nttrogen conoentraHons ai these aforementioned
locations is November 1997 during your normal sampling time period and submit
the results along with your other mutts by the last day of 1)ecerllber 1997, If
there ate any problems with this schedule, please call me to arrange a different
time.
WOCr1 KA0 BLACM. SUite 714, FayettwMe
_ North CamGna 28301.504J
Volce 910-406-1641
FAX [phone]
M EgUd OAMhu-ity Arrumoave Action Employer

W. Baucom
December 19, 1996
Page 2
Plan for Corrective Action for Violation 2.
1. Resample LAM-7 to verify the nium level
2. Advanoo tw6 Qeoptobe borings at the comph=Cr boundary near I AM 7 and
sample the groundwater for pH, specific condocdanm, and nitrate -nitrogen.
3. Qmduet 9 t sampling by 7nnaary. 16, 1997 and submit the report by February
28, 1997. R"heck the alUate-nitrogen concentrations at these aforementioned
locations in November 1927 dudngYew nonnalsamplingtilmPedodand submit
rrsnt the ts along:witf}ypur ti8�c•rnsults by the last day of becemile[ 192Y.;. if
there atn any*fbieml wither =2dalo,- pleaso came to nUugba 41ficumt
t1me.
If you have -any questions paining to this Nodce, please contact Beth Mt&s or Art
:Bamhardt, I..0. at (910) 48&1541.
8incexely,
Beth Madis
(groundwater Thamician
u

November 19,1996
NOrth Carolina. Department of Heahb,
i Environment andNatural Resourors
Wachonia Building, Suite 714
' Fayellnville, NC 29301-5o43
a:
w-
Attn-. Mr. Kett T. Stevens
Rr giOnal Supervisor
Re: Notice ofVioladon-PennftNo. WQOOM77
WeatPolnt Slevans - Wastewater Spray Irrigation
Scotland County, Not9tCmd=
Dmr'Mr 3teveas: .
We have nv�ewzd the above-refozeneed Notice of Violation..and offer thn following axpleastton-
end wodcplaniarespoQse"to eaohitemiaed violation;
Violation I : IMAM 2. in August, our conwhant, Bluth Systems Assoolatea, Ltd,, favcsdgeted
the potential eansea of elevated nitttdo-nitrogen concentrations In LAM-2 and LAM 3. The
following ranncMona were drawn:
• The mast probable cause ofthe elowdod nlhate-altrogenwas detreainod to be spoor iey
i � heave loadhzgs of nitrate lathe bL�solids dazing ihaporiod Novicetbet I493 4trough
November t994 wbeathon,ew digester wa: bemgbmugkonUm.
• The dataind we thatthe gonmd waterffitcata at conxittt ionspeaked In
November 1994 and are iaaslow, downwardtrendwith soma seaswal vadatlons. Nils
essessmmdisW"cmddenty tit mostpoobablooa6aoas==mt.Oncapruomses'
In the digea mwero stsbMz4 thesourceofthe n4fmio to the site wasrti;movod and the
gmimdwalw orntcentradow should decrease over onto with dUutioa fiom rainfall
I grovadwatcrmtgrattan.
The issue ofthe extent ofthe elevated nitrate nitrogeaconoentrationsalong ttte western
boundary of tho grassed sprayfieids was addtraaed by the installation ofLAM I COMP
1, I at the compllanco boundaty. The new welt was sampled in August 1996 and the nttrate-
U nitrogen Concentration was 3A nV& no location of I.AM-1 COMP h ahm n on Figure
I which you should already have via fax. A hard copy will follow tomorrow'a mail.
All of the above conclusions are oatiinod in greater detail in the attached copy of a letter from
But Systems dated August 12,1996.
i
To investigate the extent of the elevated nitrate -nitrogen levels along the southern'bouhdary of
the grassed apmyfield containing LAM-2 and LAM-3, Barth Systems will advance five
L,

rah (Geoprobe)"temporary borings between the sprayfield and the property boundary.
water will be samplod in each boring for pH, specifio conductance, end nitrate -nitrogen.
Mate locations of the borings rue also shown on Figure 1. Specific locations will be
d in the field. Because the direction of ground water flow along this boundary is
a, there is a chance that the high nivawnitrogen level In LAM-2 could come firm the
PmPWY• To deterrnitto the actual direction of groundwater flow, piemmeters will also
led at cacti sample location
easuro that tho elevated nitrato-nitrogen levels are not aggravated, no Rather inigadon w14
s place in the area of LAM-2 until the proposed sampling is completed.
(afion 2 - LAM-7- At the tune that the August 12 letter was written, tritrate-nitrogen
ccnttadous in LAM-7 had been under the MGL of Io man for a fall years However, the
ate -nitrogen conoeat dos 1n the sample collected at the end o0aly was 30 mg& 1.
it was determined That tine mostproballo cattso ofpast elevated attitdo-nitrogen tevels in
was nitri6eatioq of wcemrrlated otgrntio-nitrogea in the sell firm historical blosolids
Ia response to this determination, bl=Hds loadim were decmased signMeantly to
adjaoant to LAM 7. This rasaltadin adtop in aitnrtus at6rogoalevels to bolow the MCI,.
no btoarellde have ban applied to the field htrevetttl moatbtS it is beNevcd that the luny
ation could result from a lab am. This well vAll be iesempled immediately to ventfy
Hwovar, to ensure that there ate not elevated levels of `mftawnitrogen ht this area; two
Gobs borings will be adveaced at the Complianco Boundary adjacent to LAkt 7 The
aappproorcratate locations of these borings are ehavva in Figure 1. 'Spoetfie locations will be
ldcatlfiod in the field. Ground water Will be'sintrpled at each boring end analyzed fap% -
s itic conductanoN and nftwea
Sc ulo
UI =approval of this work Plea by DEHMN rho Gcoprobc bosinga and ground water sampling i
WIR be schoduted. This daft will be eomblued withtho data received from the normal November
nitoft event to develop a map of theM*at of ekvatt d levels. A report will
HIndations.
ared within 60 days of the sampling avant The mpott wM present due date, a map
the extent of elevated nittato-nitrogea levels end the dtrectlen of groundwater flow, and
for Rather actions. The report will be submitted byM=ch 1,1997.
i
If you haw any questions about the plant Outlined above or the schedule, please give me a call at
705,-645.45IS or call Roger Baticota st 910-369.4192.
vly,
i
�I
Laniu
;er of Environmental Engineering l
'ring & Environmental Department
�I

APPENDIX B
Ground Water Analytical Results
Nutter & Associates,

I j
CAROLINA
LAB4RATORiE$, ,LLC
FINAL REPOIT OF ANALYSES
WestPoint Steven; Inc. PROJECT NAME: Wells A - G
Attn: Herman Benton REPORT DATE: 04/06/05
PO Box 388
'
Wagram, NC-28396-0388
SAMPLE NUMBER- 56354
SAMPLE 3:D- We
1 A
SAMPL$ MATRIX- Gw
DATE SAMPLED-,03/29/05
TIME SAMPLED- 1525
-- DATE RECELVED- 03/29/OS
SAMPLER- Mark
Malloy
RECEIVED BY- beg
TIME RECRIVED- 1645
DELIVERED BY-
Mark Malloy
Page 1 Of 1
ANALYSIS
'
- ANALYSIS
_
METHOD
DATE
BY
RESULT
UNITS LRL
L_ Field pH
.. 450OPH
B• 03/29/05
SMM
,.4.33
Std Units
Temperature
'25SOB
`03/29/05
SMM
16..5
'Celsius
Depth to Water
'.03/29/05
SMM
19.56
Ft
Conductivity
2510E
03/30/05ERP
391
umbo/cm 14.9.
l .Nitrate Nitrogen
450ON0
-E 64/04/05
ERP
--11.9
mg/L 0.5,
' LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
•'
"-LABORAIRY DIRECTOR
1229 North Hornei Boulevard, Sanford, NOA Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC W WMW 306 NC DW 37741
i

CAR LINA EivviRLABORATORIES,- • LLC
I
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
tE
West Point Stevens, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Wells A - G
Atts: H Benton REPORT DATE: 04/06/05
PO Sox 3E��,S
I Wagram. C•28396-0388 '
SAMPLE I NUMBER- 56355 SAMPLE ID- Well B - - SAMPLE MATRIX- GW
DATE SAMPLED- 03/29/05 1TIME'SAMPLED- 1345
DATE RECEIVED- 03/29/05 SAMPLER- Mark Ma11oy RECEIVED BY- hcg -
TB RE IVRD- 1645 DELIVERED BY- Mark Malloy ,
Pane 1 of 1
h to Water
cacti' ity
ate itrogen
Lo er Reporting Limit
12291
ANALYSIS
METROD
DATE
BY
RESULT
UNITS LRL
4500pH-B
.03/29/05
SMM
5.-3.8.9td
Units
2550E
03/29/05
SMM
1Q.6
Celsius
03/29/D5
SMM
17.98
ft
2520E
03/30/OSERP
'
27
_
umho/cm 14.9
450ONO3-E,,,
04/04/05
ERP
,, 1.9
mg/L 0.5
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
Hornet Eoulev.J,5.64 NorA Caroline 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC W W/GW 306 NC DW 37741

1�
CA.ROLINA ENyiRoNmENTAL LABop.Awms, LLC
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
WestPoint Stevens, Inc.
PROJECT NAME:.
Walls A - G ,
Attn: Herman Benton
- REPORT
DATE:
04/06/05
PO Box 388
Wagram, NC•2B396-0388
SAMELE NUMBER- . 56356
SAMPLE ID- Well C
SAMPLEi',MATRIX- OW
DATE SAMPLED- 03/29/05 -
.
TIME $AMPLED- 1450
- DATE RECEIVED- 03/29/05
SAMPLER- Mark Malloy
RECEIVED BY- heg
TIME RECSr=- 1945
DELIVERED BY- Mark Malloy
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
�. ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE
BY
RESULT UNITS LPL
FieldpH4500pH-B
03/29/05
SMM
4.73 Std Units
Temperature
2550E .. 01/29/05
S[+M
17.4 Celsius
Depth to Water.
03/29/05
SMM
22.50 it ,
14.9
Conductivity-
2510E 03/30/05
ESP
355. umho/cm
Nitrate Nitrogen
450ONO3-E 04/04/05
ERP
18.2 mg/L. 0.5
—' LPL = bower Reporting Limit
-
I�
`
LABORATORY DIRECTOR�'��
1229 NoA Homer Boulevard, Sanford, NoA Caroline 27330 9191776-1880 . Pax 919/776-6724
NC W WIGW 306 NC DW 37741-

LINA .ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORms, LLC
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
West Point StevenS,.Inc. PROJECT NAME: Wells A - G
Attn: Herman Benton REPORT DATE: 04/06/05
PO Box 36
Wagram, N 26396-0366
SAMPLE NUMBER- 56357 SAMPLE ID- Well D SAMPLE MATRIX- GW
420
DATE SAMP b- 03/29/05 TIME SAMPLED- DATE RECEIVED- 03/29/05 SAMPLER- Mark Malloy RECEIVED BY- hog
o
TIME RECEIVED- 1645 DELIVERED BY Mark Malloy
Page i of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
BY
RESULT
UNITS
Field pH
4500pH-B
03/29/05
SMM
5.33
Std Units
2550B
03/29/05
SMM
17.2
Celsius
Temperatire
03/29/05
SMM
19.73
ft
Depth to
conductivity
Water
2510B
D3/30/05
ERP
9a
umho/cm
Nitrate Nitrogen
45DONO3-B
04/0410S
ERP
5.9
mg/L
LRL = Lower
Reporting Limit
LRL
14.9
0.5
LABORATORY DIRECTOR Q Pj, N^'�7
1229 Nort Homer Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 9191776-1880 Fax [phone]
NC W W1C T 306 NC DW 37741

i'
y C'AROLINA EWiRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, LLC
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES-
WestPoint Stevens, Inc.
PROJECT NAME: Wells A - G ,
Attn: Herman Benton
REPORT
DATE:
04/06/05
PO BOX 388
-- Wagram, NC•28396-0388
SAMPLE NUMBER- . 56358
SAMPLE ID- Well E
SAMPLE MATRIX- GW
DATE SAMPLED- 03/29/05
TIME SAMPLED- 1400
DATE RECEIVED- 03/29/05
SAMPLER- Mark Malloy
RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1645
DELIVERED BY- Mark Malloy
-
page 1 of 1
-
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
BY
RESULT UNITS LRL
Field pR
45o0pH-B
03/29/05
SMM
5.29 Std Unite
Temperature
2550E
03/29/05
SMM
17.5 Celsius
Depth to Water
03/29/05
SMM
19.54 ft
Conductivity
2510B-
03/30/06
ERP
'24 vmho/cm 14.9
_
' Nitrate Nitrogen
450ONO3-E
04/04/05
ERP
1.0 mg/L 0.5
LRL m Lower Reporting Limit
—
LABORATORY
DIRECTOR
1229 North Hamer Boulevard, Sanford, NoA Caroline 27330 • 919/776-1880 Pax 919/776-6724
NC W W/GW 306 NC DW 37741

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, LLC
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
WestPoin Stevens, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Wells A - G
Attn: Herman Benton REPORT DATE: 04/06/05
PO Box 38�8
Wagram, NC,28396-03BB
NU
MBER- UMBER- 56359 SAMPLE ID- Well F SAMPLE MATRIX- GW
DATE SAMPLED- 03/29/05 TIME SAMPLED- 1440
DATE RECEIVED- 03/29/05 SAMPLER- Mark Malloy RECPIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1645 DELIVERED BY- Mark Malloy
Page 1
f 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
METHOD
DATE
BY
RESULT
UNITS LRL
Field pR
4500pH-B
03/29/05
SMM
5.21
Std Units
Temperature
2550E
03/29/05
SMM
17.0
Celsius
Depth to
Water
03/29/05
SMM
21.96
ft
Conducti�i.ty
2530E
03/30/05
ERP
19
umho/cm 14.9
Nitrate
450014O3-H
04/04/05
ERP
0.5
mg/L 0.5
(Nitrogen
LRL - Lower
Reporting Limit
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
ji N-T'
1229 North Homei Bouleva=d,1Sanford,Te/ GW 3 6NC DW 37741
azol�na 27$-1880 Fax [phone]

CAROLINA ENWRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, LL C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
WestPoint Stevens, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Walla A - G
Attn: Herman Benton REPORT DATE: 04/06/05
PO Box 388 '
Wagram, NC•28396-0388
SAMPLE NUMBER- 56360 SAMPLE ID- Well G SAMPLE MATRIX- GW
DATE SAMPLED- 03/29/05 _ TIME SAMPLED-1510
DATE RECEIVED- 03/29/05 SAMPLER- Mark Malloy RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1645 DELIVERED BY- Mark Malloy
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
METHOD BY
.
' RESULT UNITS LRL
ANALYSIS
.DATE
Field pH
450OPH-B 03/29/05 SMM
4.51 Std Units. "
25508 03/29/05 SMM
16.1 Celsius
Temperature
03/29/05 SMM
8.90 f0
Depth to water
2510B 03/30/05 RAF
350 undo/Cm 14.9
Conductivity
4500NO3-E' 04/04/05 ERP
25.5 mg/ L 0.5
Nitrate Nitrogen
LRL Loner Reporting Limit
`
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
I
i
1229 North Hornei Boulevard, San{ora, North Carolina 27330
919/775-1880 Paz 919/776-5724
NC WW/GW 306 NC DW 37741

C4Rol,INA ENVIRONMIs" = I,ABokmP m. W
1229 N. HoRNEn Blow. • SANFORD, NC 27330
[phone] 9 FAx [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Page / of L
CLIENT: WestPD4nt Stevens, Inc. Contact.. Herman Benton
ANALYSES
REQUIRED
BILLTO:—
o
Address:_QO BOX' 388
Phone N: ) Fax t
Purchase Order
City: Wagram State: NC Zip: 213396
7
°•
PROJECT NO:
•
PROJECT NAME;
TumaroundTime.
❑- Normal (2 weeks) ❑ Rush (7 week)'
❑' flush (48 hours)• ❑ Rush (24 hours)`
PRIM E
CO C EO BY: S to
act
PRESERVATIVES
PRESERVED INFIELD
W
U
Fa
CZ
Y
n
,.,
rr
�
PRESERVED IN LAD
Is the sample chbrinatetl? Yea °
Oil the results be used for regulat°ry montloring purposesv YosG . . No _
p
O
N
4
Z
z
T
=
RECEIVED ON ICE
SAMPLE 0
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
SAMPLE I.O.
MlWLE
MXHIX
�tt
OaIOOF
REMARKS
x
Well A
GW
2
x
x.
x
pH= T= °
x.
Well B
:GW.
2 ...'x'
X.
x
pH_ , T= 4C
x
Well C
GW
2
x
x
x
v
PH j.,T= I• °C
$C 357.
..,:
"Wt
GW
x':'
x'
x
_
PH_ T— °C
5635�
x
Well E
GW
2
x
x
x
pH T= °C
�bS
:..
x•
` •Well F
oW
2 .
.X;;.
:.x
";
.
pH=5-f= �.�°C
(,6
�• ©
x
Well G
GW
2
x
x
x
pH_ T= - °C
•
RECEIVED -BY
__ DATE!_
IME
ADDITTONALINSTRUCTIONS
• RUSH WORK MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO SAMPLE SUBMISSION. ADDITIONAL CHARGES MAY APPLY.

SUBMIT FDRM ON yEL= PAPER ONLY
7F—RotaryDotributor
RPAIn I MrOF ENYM MMel f• MMURALR2e0URM
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: ■ATm071M �0N,6110UN01NATM 1EC70°'COMPLIANCE REPORT FORMFACILITY IMEMNAMON Palm Pr7ntCIA" or TYPO
Facility Nerve- WestPolyd Stanns, Inc. EXPIRATION DATE:
UICParmh Name (Rdlffereue):_ Facility Address: ERMfrTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
W�rem(.'OtR1tySwtYndContact Peron: Telephone•: 00"---R°cp14t"�m°d°"EateryWell Location/ Site Name: °�°" No. of WNis t0 tee Sarnplad: /7 y Few _Runadafat
A01 land AppksllondSbdXp
Well Depth: 30
ft. Well Diameter.?
in.
Dw 13 InfluM 498)
-
-
Screened b*rvel:
fL to h.ICM*
Efflueet (99)
Ii M Y•lua ehoufd "•!loci dlmtv*d end
Dap to Water LgM: 00
R. below measuring point.
col wet concontra Ions.
Measuring Point (M.P.) is:— ft. above fend eudace.
Gallons of water pumpedrbailed before earrlplig: 10.5
Relative M.P. Elevation In R-
Date sample collected: tl "2005
Date "to enelped 00=005
Field anelyale: pN 4.75
, Spodk Conductarm
uMhos
LaWratay Naine:
306
CovIrm Em ftnmerCM labs, LLC
Tarp. 14A
-C.Odor
Appearance
Coffi a3tior No.
PARAMETERS (Sarri9ies for f•ls were collected unnhe ed_t10
and Raid aeidlfisd
—YES _ NO)
COD
mgA.
N"e (NO2) as N
rTV
Ni - Nickel
mgA
ColifomT: MF Fecal 41 con 11 DDml
Nitrate (NO3) as N 1B a
mgA
Pb -Lead
mgA
ColifomT: MF Total
11DDml
Phosphorus: Total as P
rftV
Zn - Zinc
mgA
(NODS.U011112" ed forivowM•omp4s)
Orthophosphate
mgA
AmrtoniaNbogen 40.1
mgh
Dissolved Sdids: To%I
175 mgA,
AI - Aluminum
m9A
01her (Specify Canpotnds ar d Caxartmtiort Unha)
pH (when anatya
4.75 units
Ba - Barium
m9A
TOC
=1.0 mgA
Ca - CakAum
rtgA
Chloride
29 mgh
Cd - Cadmium
mgA
Arsenic
mgA
Chromium: Total
mgn
Grease and Ofs
mgA
Cu - Copper
mgA
Phenol
mo
Fe - Iron
mgA
ORGANICS: (GC,GC/MS,HPLC)
Sulfate
mgA
Hg - Mercury
mgA
(specify te•tpnd riefthod s. AtIvA lab r pol I
SpecificConduotarice
uMhos
K- Potasslum
mgA
RepotttAtteched? Yes—(1) No_(0)
Toted Ammonia
mgA
Mg - Magnesium
mgn
VOC : method e -
TIW as N
mgA
Mn - Manganese
mgA
: mathod d .
Tr
vera�
Phoned
Prance
Farb ID6 3SSti` / 7�
M 910 Q/Q
Fax 3(
�-7
_�c I ;Z . I
9
GW.59 7 (aw>

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLOW PAPER ONLY
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
Fadety Nerve: vveerrwm
Pemdt Name (0 dramern):
Fadilty Address: PLl Bcx 380
Nc. - -- zones aunty Scow,d
Corte t Person: Telephone N-
Well Loodav all Novel: —No. of WWIA to to Sarood: u
Well WonuflMom Ni ober (from Permit)- L^"'-Z rw ow r kowTre=r msy/mr
Well DopfR39 . tt Well DwrAta:1 in. ChrstOn MH=d (98)
Smoodlydarvol: fLlo Ill. ❑ Effluerd (99)
Oepib to Water Levol: 21.40 tL IwW nmwxkng point.
Mesa "Point (M.P.) le:_ IL abvis land w1we. Relsda M.P. EWM§m In ft.:
Gagmsolwaterpurpadtagodbetomwnong: 9.0 DeMaarnpbcdlected 03121200E
FlWdenetyale: pH'l•6 swftC*ndUdv" AS"
Tame, ts.e "C,odor I App Whir
OEMinellIT OF BIM IMN ff A NanML rAMA A
TYPE OF PERMITTED OpERATIDN BEING MONITORED
I.egoon _Rwned oomc hdlRnibn 13e0ery
SMaY Field _ Rrmedblo c
noLry Mgr bubr �a Land Appin0on d SUVO
- colk9dal noncanrelloria. -
Dab eamplemniynd; 04Na400S -
Laboratory Name: Ca ;ha Erwk mwnral Labe. LLC -
009kalfomNo. 3D0
PARAMETERN (Swripbs for MWJS roars aoIbCbd unfatsled_YES _ _NO
and fla60 rreidNMd
_AYES _ It0).
COD
rfigA,
Nitrite (NO2)-as N
mgA
Ni - AlickrL
rngA
Colllorm: MF Fecal <'t col
HODmI
Nitrate (NO) as N rs.3
mgA
Pt) •, Lead
111$A
Coliform: MF Total
- /1DDml
Ptasphor=s: Total as P
mgA.
Zn - Zino
by
(Naaeuwewl.saallmrblewwAedSwo")
Orthophosphate
mM
AamoniaM#ogen <o.l
To
DlssoW Solids: ToW 140
nV
Al - Aluminum
nw
Other (*a* c ffvm a and Conoetdr "n urtlfa)
beltenelyzr
�mggAA
mg
TOC 41.
Ca - Calcium
Chwde 3e
mgA
Cd - Cadmium
mgA,
Arsenic
mgll
Chromium: Total
aw
Grease and Oils
Cu �r
01101
r
m9A
Sulfate
mgA
Hg- Mercury
Specific Conductance
v hos
K - Potassium
�
Total Ammonia
mgA
Mg - Magnesium
mgA
TKN as N
mgA
Mn - Manganese
mgA
GW59
Rev. 0312000
OR18ANICS: (GC,GCIMS,HPLC)
(Spedlybell and method if. Att0h Wb )Sport.)
ReportAaedled4 Yea___(I) No—(D)
VOC- metlrod
Wr Admind Ap" )
- —� - —� - -- - —J

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLQIpf PAPER ONLY
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
FacilityNwrr: WeMPard Stevens, Inc.
Permit Nam (if diftrent):
Fa0N0y aes Addr: POD
Weel+am No _ 78e9a county 9000mnd
cam Poreon: Telephone a:
Wei Lo=WV Site Name: nje " No. cI Weio lobe Samptad:
Well Identification Number(from Pumll); LAM-s
ForilranOrlrrTrabrmtsidrms
Wei Depth: 44
It Well DlWOW:2
In.
ow*olsO Influmd (98)
Screened MMrvnl:
1L tD S•
Q Effluent (99)
Depth 10 Water Lsvel: 20.02
rL bOm meawrirg point.
Maasudrig Point IM.P.) Is:—
tL abow land sufts.
Refatin M.P. Elavatbn In R:
Galion of weter pumpedheied before sampling: 12.0
Date 9anole eobcbd: 031UM
Field snatyaie: pl+4YI
, Specific Conduclanoe
uMhos
Tamp.1B.6
°C.Odor
Appearance
NATYRU
PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE:_
Non-Dischetp® uIC
NPDES
IyPE Of PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
_- Lopoon __Rwneft6w INilraaon eatery
Spray FWd __Fwask5m:
Rotary owribuw as Lard Applhlaar oh Studsb
tams• Value* shoiddr~dbsoMedavid
aolloid;al oonaon"llons.
Data sartlple "yzed: 041OW005
LeWyalory Na": Csmll^a ErmkomromW LVm. LLC
COMICatbn No. 306
PARAMETERS (Sa mp+as rot matab wars C4110CW unl ft,000__YP.B _NO
and field ocidWed
—YES _ NO)
COD
mo-
Nitrite (NO2) as N
mgA
Ni - Nickel
Coliform: MF Fecel < t ml
/100mil
Nitrate (NO3) as N 92
rrW
Pb - Lead
m91
Cc&wm: MF Total
/100m1
Phosphorus: Total as P
mgA
Zn-- Zmc
INma:UNWIlmundfarmOdyMaOtdaama-*)
Orthophosphate
mgA
Amff=laNib'ogen <o.t
Wo
Dissolved Sotkis: Total Ire
RW
AI - A(uminurn
rt+9A
Other (Spo* Compw a end Conoenki Pion Lns)
pH (WhW anolyted) 4•7+
units
Ba -Barium
m94
TOC 41.0
mgA
Ca - Calaum
nt9A
Chloride to
rngll
Cd-Cadmium
mgA
Arsenic
mg/I
Chromium: Total
mgA
Grease and pus
mgA
Cu - Copps
mgA
Phenol
mgA
Fe -Iron
mgA
ORGANICS: (Gc,GGMs,HPLO)
Sulfate
mgA
Hg - Mercury
mgA
(Sportily teat and nwd d e. Attach
lob rgo&)
Specific Conductance
uMhos
K - Potassium
mgA
Report Attached? Yes_-0)
No _..._(0)
Total Ammonia
m9A
Mg - Magnesium
mgA
VOC : tneviod N .
TKN as N
mgA
Mn - Manganese
mgA
: W41hod R =
-
: n*Vvod a a
tor^ffaWAPMNuunb pNaarW @
GW 59 Parma. to AvawuaD r Cara ,
Rev. 03MM

APPENDIX C
Historic Distribution of Nitrate -Nitrogen
Concentrations in Ground Water
Nutter & Associates, Inc.

IAM
#I —ramp
20.0 0
:•G•
24
Grassed Sprayfield
Boundary
"ESTwrt ssl E"S
23 19
/ /22 /21
18
20 / 17 LAil
I LL'_
MI w •F• r
•C.
MW A•
e In = NO an eae
� �
WYANT
A
MIN •E•
• Monitoring Well
15.9 Nitrafe—Nitrogen, mg/L
16-24 Nitrate—Nitroggen "coPtour
Interval = 1.0 mg/L
Revised 9/20/04; Nutter & Associates, Inc.
saes Map Source; J. F. Wampler Engineering. Inc.
Figure 4. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in water table aquifer Nutter & Associates, Inc.
around fields 26 - 70, March 2004. Environmental Consultants
i

Grassed Sprayfleld
Boundary
VVESW P°tkmmir � s
\ 10\
6"
i •
LAM i / MW .A.
#1-COMP 0
1-5 •
MW 'G'
•
1a4
J i S0 3 MW V
10 , 1 21:77 t0 3.2
MW 'C' 30 2Q 1
MW'F' • „m•,aea4.
1
G.e u xz2
e�r�r
0 100 ac0 M 400 ee0
SOME IN R[r
— ` MW 'E'
2.4
LEGEND
•
Monitoring Well
1
Nitrate —Nitrogen, mg/L
10
Nitrate —Nitrogen C niour
Interval = 10 mg%L
Revised 7/16/03; Nutter k Associates, Inc.
ease Map Source: J. F. Wampler Engineering. Inc.
Figure 4. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in water table aquifer Nutter & Associates, Inc.
around fields 26 - 70, March 2003. Environmental Consultants
6

F--
uw
p1-comp
xs. •
mw .a.�
7.8 �•
,
s0�
30 —
to
•mW 'r
<a.s
Grossed Sproyfleld
Boundary -�,
1s
70 s0
So
e 1m xoa >m sao eoo
- a
iY RXT 0E L7 1 I
10
30 20 i
J1 1 I
i
i
1g;
12
MAW
LEGEND
• Monitoring Well
31.5 Nitrate -Nitrogen: mg/L
10 Nitrate -Nitro on Contour
Interval,= 10 mg/L
Revised 8/05/02; Nutter & Associates, Inc.
_ Bass ,Yap Source; J. F. Wampler En➢inesdn➢, Inc.
Figure 5. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in water Nuffer & Associates, Inc.
table aquifer around.fields 26 - 70, March 2002. Environmental Consultants
7U

Grassed Sprayfleld
Boundary \r ;
wE5 p0M n
[ < 50 20 MWso
4 g 711
\
is
.,,. 90
LAM ff1—CAMP 40 60
27.9'
uW .a.50`
e 120110
176
15D 140 \
/�//"
0 Ita
1�
eme Map 5aame J. F. Wamplar Enolnedng, Ina.
- s
Figure 5. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations in water table aquifer around fields 26.70, July2000.
IN
T, .
LEGEND
�. • Man0001np Wag'
314 Nlfrate—Nitrogen, mg/L
to i Nlfroto—Nitrogen Contour
Interval = 10 mg/L.
Redded 1/24/0,{ NuNer a Ardaalo,ea, Ine.
Nutter & Associates, Inc.
Envfronmentol Consultants
10

b
Grassed Sprayfield ,
Boundary
�Nr sl�x i
WES1reFlnN1' SIZE 8 0.9 � i
FlnN1 MW 'B"91
f0 1 ,
1 ,
2
I �
40_ 30\ ! r !
ss so 1$i
8 Zi
BMW A" i 1
60
4D 5D gi
COMP {
0
I3.6 f
10
1`
10 1.0 MW 'E- i
3<.3 CONTR CORNER MW "D'
• LAM 2 Yp 0
ypeeT
2.f ��"F" 10 MW '• ueefe'w
LEGEND
zl.z i
0 Monitoring Well
Nitrate —Nitrogen, mg/L
.. .. .. .- .. .- 10 '.. Nitrate —Nitrogen Contour
Interval = 10 mg/L
Base Map Source: J. F. Wampler Engineering, Ina.
evo/eo
Figure 4. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations In water table aquifer around gelds 26-70, November 1999. Nutter, Overcash & Associates, Inc.
Environmental Consultants

Grassed Sproyfleld
Boundary 1
sxe 5
so 50P g0 90 so
BMW
,% I //aI f
�
� Im Sneer
60
w., 'C' 50
A1W
DP—G2 40
30 - >a e.e MW .E
20
20 ne NER 10 WIN 'D'
to •UJA 02
MW 'C _x erlew'r i
OWW x LEGEND
a IN sao we aw ew earwr • Monitoring Well
Direct—Push Ground
Water Sample
.. ,- .. .. ..173111 Nitrate —Nitrogen, mg/L ..
Nllrate—Nitrogen Contour
Intarval = 10 ma/L
Baas Map Source: J. F. Warepler Engineedng. Inc.
oe/Ie/ar
Rgure 4. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations In water table aquifer around fields 26-70, March 1999. Nutter, Overcash $ Associates, Inc.
Envkonmentel ConsuMents

Grassed Sproyfield
Boundary
�tPUM VTEE
1
l O
MW .a •1 'I
� �10
� I
`♦ \ 30
i 1
40
\
50
�60
�70
i♦
i§
♦ \ \9 OMW�
4.41i 1
—80
27.1 40 50
70
030
a1-C P
60
1, ,
\
\
50
30 .G
SO
11
21,1 OP—G
Ia 10
0.8
MW T
i
10
p®, CO ORNFR b g MW 'D'
1
1
2 e der /
1
bxaflea°t
MW •.
t.o �"W F
_
1
LEGEND
IF074 �
a 11 we eas 'se M vvW
9. Monitoring Well
® Direct —Push Ground
Water Sample
.. .-
•• '•
31 s Nitrate—Nltrog6h. mg/L
/ Nitrate —Nitrogen Contour
,10 Interval = 10 mg/L
Base Map Source: J. F. Wompler Engineering, Inc.
9/le/Be
Nutter, Over &Associates, Inc.
Figure 4. Contour ma of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations In water table a uifer around fields 26.70, Jul lgga.
p9 Y
amenash
Environmental Consultants

Dry . \\
:4.Mw
Grassed Sprayfleld
Boundary -�,
1te A
\ \ \\ .BMW A'
-loo'
o cos ias •aoo aoo aoo
i�
W 01W UCVENS 1 a \ "EV
to N
\ \ \ao
BRYMl1
MW 'E'
LEGEND
.. _ ... .. .. - '� Monitoring Well
sts Nitrate —Nitrogen, mg/L
m Nitrate —Nitrogen Contour
'Interval = 10 mg/L
'Base Map Source: J. F. Wampler Enginearing. Inc.
1/xa/aG
Figure 3. Contour map of nitrate nitrogen concentratIons in water table aquifer around gelds 20.70, November 1997. Nutter, OvereashA Associates,
Inc.
to

r
Grassed Sprayfield
Nllrale-nitrogen Contour
inler al = 10 mg/L
Bme aep Seume. J..r. Wamglu Englnuring. Inc.
4W.1
Figure 3. Contour map of nitrate -nitrogen concentrations In water table aqulfer around fields 20-70, January 1091. EARTH SYSTEMS m*men Co=IwATES, LTD.
boil,WrlrraodWute6Lwueemen[fnowluua
in