20200694 Ver 1_Email_20231205

Baker, Caroline D
From: Erin Binkley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 11:26 AM
To: Elks, Katharine B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Cc: Turlington, Chad; Elias Ruhl
Subject: [External] RE: SAW-2020-00952 Big Rockfish Creek SS outfall- Additional Information
Needed
Attachments: 2023.11.30_BRCO C2 Impact Maps Vicinity-Enlarged.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message
button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Hi Katherine,
Please find the attached enlarged Contract 2 area to address question 5. Can you please provide confirmation that you
received all the materials?
Thanks,
Erin
Erin Binkley, CE, WPIT
Environmental Scientist
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON
310 Hubert Street Raleigh, NC 27603
T 919.828.3441 1 D 919.719.1086
[e-mail] I www.FandR.com
The content of this email is the confidential property of Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F&R) and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any
purpose except with F&R's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify the sender immediately.
From: Erin Binkley
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 4:27 PM
To: Elks, Katharine B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
1

Cc: [e-mail]; Elias Ruhl <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2020-00952 Big Rockfish Creek SS outfall- Additional Information Needed
Hi Katherine,
Please find the below additional responses from the client:
1. Please find the attached impact maps for Phase/Contract 1, which is finalized.
5. The client is working on providing this.
6. Responses -See A through D below.
a. Wetland B-See snapshot below that clarified why tip of WL#B is impacted. Alignment was based on
minimizing deeper sewer installation that would have otherwise increased the cut depth by 4 to 6
feet
^r �11�-•51 • � � • t � e
1 e
TEMP- NONE 041TLET { t TEMP- COMRNATION SILT/
{ (TYP- WHERE SHOWN) TREE PROTECTION FENCE s -
SEE EC-10 ON SHEET (TYP. WHERE SHCM) t .• ` . �TEMP.
DE D—S FOR TAILS SEE EC-8 ON SHEET 0-8 • •r; (T`
�+ t FOR DETAILS ` SHEET
�� 4 • t f 4
IE�P. STOwE OUTLET
{(TYP. YMERE SHOYrtI) "
9 �{ EC--10 ON SHEET'.
j r _ D .e FOR PETALS 16� {
)N FENCE
t e
IEET D—B 9g4k 43
DETAIL r
TEMP. WETLMD CROSSING I W5-4T_�
(TYP,) SEE EC-15 ON
SHEET D—D FOR DETAILS
PROPOSED MH97 — E.B. TEMP. HICK HAZARO SILT FEh
STATION 2+1+19.Tz —(TYP WHERE SHOWN)
4' DIA- NON —TRAFFIC MANHOLE 5 � SEE EC-9 ON SHEET D—I}
NI/ CAMLDCK RING AND COVER FOR DETAILS
b. Wetland 18-See snapshot below that clarifies why tip of WL#18 is impacted. Alignment was based
on maintaining sufficient separation from existing outbuilding and lakeshore to avoid riparian
impact.
Fil

., . ..• ..... •^ FW ►K'URARLAW ►•LOr fLNA rLMr. a I VRIM W ILL
NECESSARY DURING, CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL (A7E —� favu J?tU9�gJRG� cr (T1P. WHERE SHOWN)
OF LIKE KIND WITHIN PUE. WIDTH OF GATES JANVVPrTtl17P �.f SEE EC-10 ON SHEET'
SHALL CONFORM TO DETAIL M.17 ON SHEET D-4 0-8 FOR DETAILS
N MAINTAINING R
SEPARATION���
FROM LAKESHORE
.e.,. —inn• �— — �_
N.8
341.91 LF
--- _SCE waITE e
�TEM1aS. TREE PROTECi10N �ENCE. PROPOSED M1466 — E-19 —
(T1?. WHERE SHOW) STATION 181+66.91
SEE EC-7 ON SHEET D— 5� DIA. NON TRAFFIC MANHOLE Y
FOR DETAILS -W/ CAMLOCx RING AND COVERcir SEC -
z� rWrE 'Irras s+cffi WE 7�ANDS W78
+ I
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/
Ck.EARrNC uWrTS .
SEE NOFE 9 MAINTAINING 4; I (TYP. WHERE SHOWN).
JrUTM SEPARATION I
sm. FROM EX. + {
r OUTBUILDING p I I
r Epp I CASEAOM ,
a"■s1E�xrr
7a% L
c. Wetland 26-See snapshot below that clarifies why WL#26 is impacted. Alignment was based on
maintaining sufficient separation from existing slab, driveway/parking area, existing well and
apparent septic drain field, which overlays driveway//Wetland 29- See snapshot below that clarifies
why WL#26 is impacted. Alignment was based on minimizing impact to properties by running
parallel to existing property line, resulting in a more negotiable and less costly easements.
3

� N �
SM1TR, MARCIA k I
7675 LAUPuOr+TER DRgvE
/ 9453-19-9290-
PARCID- ! 28kL
/}
f 11 } f C#tGE
ASEWMF
1`` I
t STREAM CROSSING (TY
UMITS OF DISTURBANCE/
CLEARING UMITS
{TYP. WHERE SHOWN)
T ROAD
RACE do
I (TYP.)
I 9493-$9-7180- W/ CAMLOCIL RING AND COV
PARCk 0 A -a I l
5TREAM M t�
04WLESS, CuRRIE
(INTERMY TTEN T) K & SONIA P
j SJ 1 36:1 MILL
STREAM BANK 0 itCoaox_,A-pia_
{ STABILIZATION (TYP•)
I SEE EC-22 ON SHEET
( D-TO FOR DETAILS
+E T WETLANDS W29
%TAI S
LANDS
Nf1
SuiTFr. WARar
7670 LA61PUGHXT
9493-19-7T8
PARCEL / 9
. _.1 1
WETLANDS
,,-w26_00
WETLANDS
F7___ /
Z" ,9
'-TEMP. COMBINATION SILT,
f TREE PROTECTION FENCE
f SHEETWHERE SHOWN) SEE
r SEE EC-8 ON SHEET D-I
FOR DETAILS
.PROPOSED MH69 - E.&
(STATION 191+07.95
5' CIA. NON -TRAFFIC MANHOL$
W/ CAMLOCK RING AND COVER r
—0
-
wx9-aoe eao '�
TEMP. WETLAND CROSSING
(TYIP.) SEE EC-15 ON
�p1 SHEET 0-9 FOR DETAILS , J
Jf+ I iF TEMP. TW PRoTECTIoN FENCE
7 hpEr + - (TYP. USHER SHOWN) „
SEE EC-7 SNE. C-8
d. Wetland C-See snapshot below that clarifies why WL#C is impacted. Alignment was based on best
location for transitioning out of the existing neighbor, crossing Camden Road and landing an ideal
location for making this trenchless crossing. The enlarged temporary impact is necessitated for
construction of the jacking pit for the trenchless crossing.
4

� 4 �
\\� 4O'x2Vx16! DEEP
LAUNCHINC PIT
71D3 u} \ \
w+awG DRI)k aRi,E - ari
c PARCEL J 35 }
5
TEMP, GRA►rFl
CCHSTRUCTI
ENTRANCE
tir
6VE TLAND Wa
100YR FZ000ftAW PCR FfMA nRU
PANEL 37149#114&W JAAWARY ,+W, -13 rrIm
2a07 (100 YR BASE Flog
ELEVAnCW - APPROX. 129.0')
PROPOSED MH92 — E.B. �
STA710N 228+68-93
5' DIA. TRAFFIC MANHOLE
W/ CAMLOCK RING AND COVER
66
' STM CASNO PIPE
TEMP. CHAIN LhHK FE)htC
From: Elias Ruhl <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:31 AM
To: Elks, Katharine B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Erin Binkley <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2020-00952 Big Rockfish Creek SS outfall- Additional Information Needed
Katherine,
See responses highlighted in yellow below. Note that there are a few items that we are waiting for from the design
engineer and we will provide that information/documents once they are received. Please let us know if you have
questions or need additional info regarding the info provided. Thanks!
Eli
Elias N. Ruhl
Branch Manager
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON
310 Hubert Street Raleigh, NC 27603
T 919.828.3441 1 D 919.719.1973
[e-mail] I www.FandR.com
5

From: Elks, Katharine B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 9:52 AM
To: Elias Ruhl <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: SAW-2020-00952 Big Rockfish Creek SS outfall- Additional Information Needed
Good morning,
After my initial review of the permit request I have a few comments and requests for more information.
1. 1 see the expired permit for all the impacts that were separated into 4 contracts. Please show on a separate
figure any parts of the project that were completed and the impacts associated. Awaiting additional figures
from the design engineer. Will send ASAP.
2. The narrative indicates there was some or all mitigation paid previously. Please send the executed Mitigation
Transfer Form showing what was purchased. If there were partial mitigation purchases please indicate which
impacts these were for. See the signed MTF and DMS receipt of payment attached.
3. Stream impacts in the ePCN do not match the impacts stated in the letter request dated November 3,
2023. Also, stream impacts should also be shown in acres as well as LF please. Impact numbers on the Cover
Letter have been updated to reflect the ePCN and the Impact Maps. See attached.
4. It is not clear if further mitigation is needed. The letter mentions splitting credits as needed based on availability
and I do not have an executed MTF. If more mitigation is required please obtain an updated acceptance letter
from the appropriate Bank or DMS. See the signed MTF and DMS receipt of payment attached.
5. Please submit a zoomed in project figure that shows only the area of Contract 2 with the impacts. Awaiting
additional figure from the design engineer. Will send ASAP.
6. There are several places the alignment could be straightened or slightly shifted to avoid impacts. Please provide
information as to why the alignment can't be tweaked for further minimization. I understand that a minimum
grade is needed, but please take a look at these and let me know if potential adjustments can be made.
Awaiting additional info from the design engineer. Will send ASAP.
a. Sheet 12 — Wetland WB: appears that straightening the alignment or angling differently could avoid the
tips of the wetland
b. Sheet 9—Wetland W18
c. Sheet 10—Wetlands W26-29
Sheet 11- Wetland WC: Shifting the alignment at the western manhole could avoid the wetland, also
there are temporary impacts wider than 10' in a small area. Why is that needed?
Thank you,
Katharine Elks
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-251-4567 (office)
910-473-7034 (cell)
E-PCN-Submittal
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/Forms/Pre-Construction Notification Form
PJDs, Wetland Delineation Concurrence &JD's.
http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/J D/FI NALSAW-J D-REQUEST-FORM-20170508. pdf
Submittal You may submit requests via e-mail in PDF format to
[e-mail]
Automated Data sheets for Atlantic & Gulf Coastal Plain Data Form Version 2.0
https://usace.contentd m.ocic.org/uti Is/getfi le/col lection/pl602lco119/id/2566

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at:
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.