WQ0008764_Modification Application_20010406

LEC �wR. o�,�bo��ILD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
July 11, 2001
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Colson
cc: FXr-FBamh—drdf,)
LFay_etteville_GWS-FRO
Through: Debra Watts t01'.
From: Salam Murtada, P.E. grit
Subject: West Point Stevens
Scotland County
WQ0008764 / GWO1079
RECEIVED
MCI 9 2001
FHYME'VILLc
AEG. OFFICE
The Groundwater Section reviewed the subject permit modification application for the addition of
276.39 acres. After all modifications, the permit will allow for the disposal of approximately 2500
dry tons of industrial class-B biosolids over a total of 219.35 acres (see figures 1 thru 10). The
residuals are treated aerobically by the West Point Stevens WWTP, which processes wastewater
from textile manufacturing.
During the review process, the Groundwater Section noted the following discrepancies:
According to the PAN calculations conducted by the applicant on Page 13 of 18 of Section H of
the report, the total "required acreage was 3055 acres, which is approximately 876 acres more
than what was made available. However,. the applicant determined the total acreage based on the
assumption that cotton crops is grown on all sites — multiple crops were not taken into account.
According to the calculations conducted by the Groundwater Section, which took the multiple
crops into account, the new sites will assimilate a total of approximately 42,514.9 maximum
total pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year leaving a total of 169,407.7 to be
assimilated by the existing sites. Unfortunately, the Groundwater Section did not have sufficient
data on the crops grown in the existing fields, to make a final recommendation. Nevertheless,
the subject review involves the addition of sites without any increase in residuals, which is
considered a step in the right direction. However, more sites may need to be added.
2. The sodium absorption ratio (SAR) is 19.21 based on the submitted sample, which is too high. It
is recommended that the SAR should not exceed 10. Therefore, the Groundwater Section
recommends that provisions be included in the permit to prevent dispersion of the soils from the
High SAR application. Furthermore, the annual report submitted by the permittee did not
include analysis of the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) to insure that sodium would not
saturate the exchange sites, which constitutes a violation of Condition II.22 of the existing
permit, issued on August 19, 1999.
Page 1 of 5 C:\Review\GW01079.doc

3. The Groundwater Section does not recommend the inclusion of site NC-RO-07-03 (14.27 acres),
owned by Jerry Thigpen in Robeson County due to the presence of shallow water beyond the
one (1) foot buffer. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the existing ditches to lower the water
table was deemed unsuitable to receive residuals.
Only after the resolution of items 1 and 2 addressed above, will the Groundwater Section
recommend the issuance of the permit, with the following conditions:
1. Application areas covered by this permit:
a. The review for this permit involves the following application areas. Residuals may be applied
throughout the year, unless otherwise noted.
Status of sites for the renewal of Permit No. WQ0008764
Site / Field
Status
Owner/Operator
Net Area in
Restriction Code
County
Acres
NC-RO-07-01
New
Jerry Thigpen
19.09
GW-A
Robeson
NC-RO-07-02
New
Jerry Thigpen
2.53
OW -A
Robeson
NC-RO-07-04
New
Jerry Thigpen
68.97
GW-A
Robeson
NC-RO-07-05
New
Jerry Thigpen
32.04
GW-B
Robeson
NC-RO-08-01
New
Jerry Thigpen
10.10
GW-A
Robeson
NC-RO-08-02
New,
Jerry Thigpen
19.57
GW-A
Robeson
NC-RO-08-03
New
Jerry Thigpen
20.99
GW-A
Robeson
NC-RO-08-04
New
Jerry Thigpen
18.78
GW-A
Robeson
NC-RO-09-01
New,
Carol Foods / Martin
15.96
GW-A
Robeson
McLaughhlin
NC-RO-09-02
New,
Carol Foods / Martin
15.19
GW-A
Robeson
McLaughhlin
NC-RO-09-03
New,
Carol Foods / Martin,
12 86
GW-B
Robeson
McLaughhlin
NC-RO-09-04
New
Carol Foods / Martin
3 88
GW-A
Robeson
McLaughhlin
NC-RO-10-08
New
Kenneth Collins /Alan Locklear
13.95
GW-B
Robeson
NC-SC-12-03
New
Laurence H. Reicbner / Martin
8 21
GW-A
Scotland
McLaughlin
WP 1-2 / Robeson
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
12.80
GW-A
WP 1-3 / Robeson
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
46.00
GW-A
WP 1-5 / Robeson
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
32.80
GW-A
WP 1-6 / Robeson
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
20.30
GW-A
Page 2 of 5 C:\Review\GW01079.doo

WP 1-7 / Robeson
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
29.60
GW-A
WP 4-1 /Robeson
Existing
J.D. Carmichael, Inc / John D.
Carmichael
182.90
GW-A , WQ-1
WP 4-4 /Robeson
Existing
J.D. Carmichael, Inc/John D.
Carmichael
39.30
GW-A, WQ-1
WP 4-5 /Robeson
Existing
J.D. Carmichael, Inc / John D.
Carmichael
146.50
GW-A, WQ-1
WP 4-7 /Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael / William P.
134.0
GW-A, WQ-1
Carmichael
WP 4-8 Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael / William P.
98.0
GW-A , W -1
Q
Carmichael
WP 4-9 Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael/ William P.
90.0
GW-A, W -1
Q
Carmichael
WP 4-10 /Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael / William P.
25.0
GW-A , WQ-1
Carmichael
WP 4-1 I /Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael / William P.
20.0
GW-A, WQ-1
Carmichael
WP4-12/Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael / William P.
Carmichael
30.0
GW-A,WQ-1
WP 4-13 /Robeson
Existing
John D. Carmichael / William P.
Carmichael
18.0
GW-A , WQ I
WP 10-1 NC-RO-
Existing
Buddy Dunn / Alan Locklear
2.20
GW-A , WQ-2
10-01/ Robeson
WP 10-2 NC-RO-
Existing
Buddy Dunn / Alan Locklear
3.00
GW-A
10-02/ Robeson
WP 10-3 NC-RO-
Existing
Buddy Dunn / Alan Locklear
38.60
GW-A
10-03 / Robeson
WP 10-4 NC-RO-
Existing
Kenneth Collins / Alan Locklear
8.70
GW-A
10-04 / Robeson
WP 10-5 NC-RO-
Existing
George Bland / Alan Locklear
12.70
GW-A
10-05 / Robeson
WP 10-6 NC-RO-
Existing
George Bland / Alan Locklear
5.30
GW-A
10-06 / Robeson
WP I0-7 NC-RO-
Existing
George Bland / Alan Locklear
27.60
GW-A
10-07/ Robeson
WP 11-1 / Robeson
Existing
Earl Deese / William Deese
41.00
GW-A
WP I t-2 / Robeson
Existing
Earl Deese / William Deese
28.10
GW-A
WP 1 I-3 / Robeson
Existing
Earl Deese / William Deese
2.09
GW-A
WPII-4/Robeson
Existing
Earl Deese/William Deese
11.84
GW-A
WP 13-2 / Robeson
Existing
John S. Balfour Jr.
52.82
GW-A
WP 13-3 / Robeson
Existing
John S. Balfour Jr.
18.90
GW-A
WP 13-4 / Robeson
Existing
John S. Balfour Jr.
14.30
GW-A
WP 2-1 / Hoke
Existing
William W. Cameron
9.30
GW-A
WP 2-2 / Hoke
Existing
William. W. Cameron
21.00
GW-A
Page 3 of 5 C:\Review\GW01079.doc

WP 2-3 / Hoke
Existing
William W. Cameron
14.00
GW-A
- WP 2-7 /Hoke
Existing
Lucille Watkins / William W.
Cameron
11.0
GW-A
WP 2-8 / Hoke
Existing
Eddie Diggs / William Cameron
27.50
GW-A
WP 7-1 / Hoke
Existing
James McPaul / Robert Wright
25.00
GW-A
WP 7-2 / Hoke
Existing
James McPaul / Robert Wright
28.00
GW-A
WP 7-4 / Hoke
Existing
Robert Wright
26.00
GW-A
WP 1-I / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
28.0
GW-A
WP 1-4 / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
49.10
GW-A
WP 1-8 / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
98.0
GW-A
WP 1-9 / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
40.70
GW-A
WP I-10 / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
36.00NGW-A
WP 1-I I / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
23.50
WP 1-12 / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
33.20
WP 1-13 / Scotland
Existing
E. Hervey Evans Jr.
10.0
GW-A
WP 4-2 / Scotland
Existing
J.D. Carmichael, Inc. / John D.
Carmichael
52.70
GW-A , WQ-1
WP 4-3 / Scotland
Existing
J.D. Carmichael, Inc. / John D.
Camuchael
39.60
GW-A, WQ-1
WP 4-6 Scotland
Existing
J.D. Carmichael, Inc. / John D.
Carmichael
91.0
GW-A, WQ-1
WP 12-1 NC -SC-
12-01 / Scotland
Existing
Ronald Maynaed / Martin
McLaughlin
17.50
GW-A
WP 12-2 NC -SC-
12-02 / Scotland
Existing
Charles L. Thomas / Martin
McLaughlin
43.51
GW-A
Total Proposed Area = 262.12 acres
Total Existing Area=1,916.96 acres
Total Buffered Area = 2,179.08 Acres
Page 4 of 5 C:\Review\GW01079.doc

GW-A: These sites are dominated by soils with mean seasonal high water tables greater than
three feet. Application of residuals may occur throughout the year. No residuals shall be applied
to any site when the vertical separation between the depth of application and the water table is
less then three (3) feet.
GW-B: These sites are dominated by soils having mean seasonal high water tables between one
and three feet below the land surface. The application of residuals on these sites shall be
prohibited from December through March inclusive. No residuals shall be applied to any site
when the vertical separation between the depth of application and the water table, is less than
three (3) feet. The actual water table depth for seasonally restricted soils must be verified by soil
borings, within 24 hours, prior to any application event (applications are limited to April through
November inclusive). The number of borings advanced shall be sufficient to adequately
characterize water table conditions across the entire proposed application site. Any open boring
must be properly filled with native soil, prior to application to decrease the chance of any
residuals contaminating the ground water.
WO-1: These fields may include artificial subsurface drainage systems at greater than 4 feet of
depth. A surface water monitoring plan/study has been agreed to between the Division and the
Permittee, as a result of a September 27, 1994 meeting. The plan shall be followed and the
surface waters shall be monitored to ensure the land application of the subject residuals does not
violate State laws, rules and regulations. Any drainage system that is less than 3 feet from the
ground surface shall have the proper buffer established.
WO-2: The entire field shall not be utilized until the buffer waiver forms have been completed,
properly signed by the respective owners, and submitted to the Division.
2. Applicable Boundaries:
a. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system individually permitted after December 31, 1983 is established at either 250
feet from the waste disposal area, or 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is
closest to the waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or
beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action according to
15A NCAC 2L .0106(2).
b. The REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the disposal systems midway between the
Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste disposal area. Any exceedance of
standards at the Review Boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L
:0106(d)(1).
3. Additional Requirements:
Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall be provided.
If you have any questions, please call Salam Murtada at [phone].
Page 5 of 5 C:\Review\GW01079.doc

OUTPUT REPORT: Class-B Residuals
IMPI IT r1ATA
WQ Permit Number
W00008764
GW Review Number
GWO1079
Facility
W estpoint Stevens
Available Area
2179.04
Gallons of Residuals
14,446,274
Solids %
4.15
TKN (mg/Kg)
86,300
Ammonia-N (mg/Kg)
7,700
NO3-NO2-N (mg/Kg)
0
Dry Tons of Residuals
2500
Form of Application
Surface
Type of Residual Treatment
Aerobically Digested
Most Limiting Crop
Cotton
Type of Sludge
Industrial
)ut uaza
PAN (lbs/DT
PAN (lbs/Yr)
211,922.6
Required Acres 3027.466
the applicant meet the area requirement? No
one] Acres Needed 848.4260023
ration Rate (Tons/Acre/Yr) 0.826
Pollutant
Life
Pollutant.
19.21
Copper
35.20
Five Year PAN Cycle'Per One Application Event
70.00
62.56
60.00
86
Subsurface
Application
50.00
y 40.00
Surface Application
_
�p
30.00
J
20.00 -
'
1fi59-
10A0
,.
..
2AS
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Year

VICINITY MAP
0 I 1
SYNAGT
A Raid a(r IICan,gtmtnt CanPany
:.� = , s' >.,� � ''� �_:• ..• yr• �' �` . ��:! _- � <.I =_-. 'I =-_-� l� � ::
.I ,n i li 6—r _ ^IS a _ _ _ a •.. _r �. e _ .A iCO�. ra----JmoC�_
1. ,Fa" .°` \ r°� ~ 1�.1,• - I_ ---t .a rF Yn 1
7: iar � S) •. } -_ - , '• •4- "�' ` .- E ; • r1. .pia
' �.�%tl_ Y \W� � r13., �• � •.�4 --tr /, ,y,. lr r'.o i —1- J• •� i I r
CO. •J 4�.)}'--"" gyp': r'a/`, •, '+
�'.
.':6. '.4 •j %4' n%�:.IbsaS°i i' •1_. /, - _ rC\` ; +l IJ Vl ul
?•. •( :• 0 1 _ 1:.:�. . r - ° :' `. 1 : '''SIT \ _'
^'�y Figure 1
WestPoint Stevens
Land Application of Sludge
C Robeson County
1 WQ0008764 / GWO1079
NC-RO-07 (1 thru 5)•
Site Vicinity Map
y COUNTY ,�nl,2tc. OWNER Jerr

S 'AGP YN \0
TOPOGRAPHIC INIAP A RefiJuabAlanigemea. Com.pa,y
Af a to it.
. k
>77i
A�,
V
V
A$
7nV
It,
Z�
C
.Q
;B6
Figure 2
S
westpoint Stevens
Land Application of Sludge
Robeson County
WQ0008764 / GWO1079C-RO-07
N (I thru 5)
Map
Site Detail
OWNER SCALE: 1 2 FIELDS 4 2 7
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR /'7,I CONTOUR INTERVAL

M SYN IN I A-GRO
VICINITY MAP A Ra;dwhbfam,,?n: Comp,Ry
70
21.
-W:
A"_
t
jx
Q r
A
SITE
LOCATION
Figure 3
WestPoint Stevens
Land Application of Sludge
Robeson County
WQ0008764 / GWO1079 7
-2)
7 NC-RO-08 (I thru 4)
Site Vicinity Map L
COUNTY O\VN`ER- 1-/ViW-s T/;4 4 e 1

X%\11/1
WSYNAGNO O —
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP A Rj;,6,a1j At ... S,m-m,
y—
E 50 ".. 2.,.
coppight'D2
Cq
A!
mI
V
k
T - owcft
Wr7- iL
IF I
x
a 6
Figure 4
westpoint Stevens
Land Application of Sludge
Robeson County
WQ0008764 / GWO1079
NC-RO-08 (I thru 4)
Site Detail Map
OWNER Villia SCALE: P = 246Do FIELDS 2
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR, CONTOUR INTERVAI...—�

SYNACILRD
VICINITY MAP
A Rui,G.:4 M1fun.ayn�•r.: Coc:��-y
'` \j:{,,`((•((� v.lt u... •:' '1` �'.L /•• �. •� y — JIf MO(13UR:W_.� - Ca� •j,�c\_J
-• •'' \S, .% _ sol 1 _:'- .I•�`� __-.�P. `oY_I'.i'. ,�•`�iSy - / t L-C�
i; jS,(c nm., rr' -1. �� � • 4.... 4•e `g ` v ',•^ 1 an '', "a ' �a � •. _ �./ �,� �• _ 1
—77
d Mal `• .! ;\ L � � \\\ .. ` - ✓ _ _ , _ _ .f•• �,.
�w
V `( of .�-.�� •! •' .• L0. Y `�i. ::� _ - �,„•; ..��-.
'•�, #'1. •.`ci .F�' � �- _• " /-'.t_ __ I _'_ � "y car _l. `
�' � "'� ,•° � is-, Lw i/� 4 I -,f -- - %' ( ..,
- �7.. � , /ram, _ - ... : _.. _ 11-- ' `.f. �•� -� _ 1, 1<, I �;-r • �;
•`• - l9 Yam,: .� wry:. L, - •, i- - ����• L`�' '\j' � � �
1"
`SITE:\.
LO
{_
/'
` Qa:
191 c^^. Arl mc'� .-. � .:`• \ 1;� ,AI, yl •/ 4�;
` Figure 5
Y WestPoint Stevens/`/��> ; ,t: 1 • !'� '-ly ` a.., L�
Land Application of Sludge
Robeson County
i WQ0008764 / GWO1079
NC-RO-09 (1 thru 4)
Site Vicinity Map
COUNTY �� /Pt�. OWNER (f.,' ,ve�.�/n•/n`l...1/_.-=

\% IY,QW j
SyNt-.-IGP)o
TOPOGRAPHIC IMAP
ropyrighk� 2000 Maps a la carha, Im N t
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiaure 6
WestPoint Stevens
, *4-
plication of SludgeLand Ap
Robeson County
WQ0008764 / GWO1079
NC-RO-09 (I tbm 4) 41U..
Site Detail Map
77.
OWNER SCALE: I FIELDS
PHOTOQUADNEAR 7 COX-FOUP, [NTEI�VA1.1.

`g- .SYN&GF,,,0
VICINITY NAP
h rciduR!1 Af..r:a�eos^: �Orr�rp
j��u V ..\ }..'• r� yU/ `•. i "..\- .1°uC Iq....w.;.:. s. _ - - ; r,�'.tV _ `i?r l � _ I -` N y: /' - C/
11 Yf•.� t 2Sa�•'.Vy.,
' \ft_ t`tL }1 c � 1�P' �I.d' Q / /,' ^,! \ II �L .n r � s •,
l., i /.• W •, i • ,4 .: L Yr 'ice `— 1 _ °• "r ^ti-
ix
-} ✓
�'`� • `\` ic;6•) { �s` /, '( y�„ ram. 1, ^t' 1c �. `� •.+ •• -�
fir.: _ j .- d •/ � 1 '�' {- /' ,�� \ :(;
A r� SITE.•
✓ I } n 4 - ION
p 710
Figure 7
WestPOint Stevens 7
Land Application of Sludge
Robeson County
WQ0008764 / GWO1079
A
NC-RO-10-8
! Site Vicinity 1v1ap
COUNTY OWNER r

�..
t�yyt, Y ;_ r - ;
4• ._1

r
VICINITY M.zP
\% j
A Rar;d alr C,,-*,,.y
` `Jf; • I �.nu-�_ f roan. 47
-,tit: •i l • ".,` -•� v.r -} ., `e - - r_ r1 •.: � : '• ': _ -_•
�T'�ti . , • �- . rj 4. � { mot'. .i, , _ - � - ur.:. "s
'�^,fin^ �' . `\`' 4 'Ir. •/�[�`^ � Mi=�\ _��t' -
...� ; :,,_>'• a - _ .. -._� s , �,%' = is _ _ - - - . t ' ., � �
,� / s _'ter �~"i` d _ _ - �•�;-s � - -�
,,:�,�N:- -�•�� %,',�..^� f.a., - ^tea � ::�J �-_ _ � �`"�_`�:�,y .--
u•��•':y� - \ \!i:• % `� J .''' ;, it a•`�r' ���'- ,, j '�•' �': ^• .`.
a� A •, �a� all•\ �, \,jsY4.•r`,,. •" G •- ".n •`Y ' j I, •`. •' a b•,•
Figure 9 -t r , ' —rt•' — i
WestPoint Stevens a '�: '+ , yo- 4 ` , (• "..,i , T"� I �a •� ' ` `•''r
Land Application of SludgeScotland County County ' II/1 ,� , ' t'`•' }
WQ0008764 / GW01079 °'' .. y /• a�
- Site Vicinity Map --
COUNTY S anL J 0WNER 4 < -,e LJ ��(,

Oily
Vi:. i
SYI�_�
TOPOGRAPHIC NIAP
r{ RetiJ:m(r dl.:mJ,;r. :ec: Comp..q�
OWNER LG.,,vrr...r� i<i; �� SCALE: P = 2 y o oo FIELDS 3
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR S;/.-« M. // / 9 r/ CONTOUR MTERVAL_ __

-4 I
\o�OF WAT'Z Q
� r
O - 'c
MEMORANDUM
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
GROUNDWATER SECTION
May 24, 2001
TO: Salam Murtada
DWQ-GW Section, RCO
Parker -Lincoln Bldg.
Through: Art Barnhardt, FRO
DWQ-GW Sections
From: Billy Meyer,.Hydrogeological
Technician II, DWQ-GW Section, FRO
SUBJECT: Comments on permit amendment for:
Westpoint Stevens
WQ0008764/GW01079
Scotland County
KerrT. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
As requested, the Fayetteville Regional Office has completed the review of the subject
facility and developed recommendations to monitor and minimize impacts to
groundwater.
According to the amendment package, submitted by Westpoint Stevens and prepared by
Synagro, and the field/soil investigation conducted by the FRO, only two of the proposed
fields are unsuitable for seasonal or year round -application of biosolids.
Attachments:
• Field Maps
-J. Thigpen (NC-RO-08-03, 4, &5): Water Table Verification and Field Deletion
-Caroll Foods/McLaughlin (NC-RO-09-03): Water Table Verification
-Kenneth CollinslAllen Locklear (NC-RO-10-08): Buffer Revision
• Fields Table
-Field characterization; application recommendations (FRO)
AZAT
NMEN;R
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Waste Characterization:
Westpoint Steven's is a textile mill that produces towels for Wal-Mart. The residuals are
the fibrous by-products from the manufacturing process. All residuals are aerobically digested
and waste constituents are primarily in organic form and released upon mineralization by soil
bacteria.
Assimilative Capaclty:
According to the submitted calculations, based on the most restrictive crop, Westpoint
needs additional land to assimilate their waste in a year where maximum sludge is produced.
However, Westpoints' wastewater manager indicated the dramatic decrease in production and
possible closure of the plant.- These calculations are also based on the most limiting crop,
Cotton. Many of Westpoint's fields contain Bermudagrass, which can remove much more
Nitrogen, and thus the calculated assimilative capacity in the amendment application is
misleading.
The 2000 Annual Report (Synagro) revealed that only 45% of the permitted acreage
received residuals. The additional acreage in this permit will further reduce the sludge load on
currently permitted land.
Westpoint's sludge also has a very high SAR and provisions should be included in the
permit to prevent dispersing the soil and preventing hydraulic assimilation. However, salt
concentrations in the sludge should not reduce the yields of proposed crops. The permit might
require Westpoint substitute something in their waste production process.to omit the high salt
concentration of sludge. The permit currently requires monitoring of ESP (exchangeable sodium
percentage) using soil analysis. This was not done in the annual report.
Site Observations/investigation:
Due to the information contained in the attached chart "Westpoint Stevens Acreage Addition:
FRO Observations, Comments, & Recommendations', only certain fields are covered in this
section.
*Jerry Thigpen (NC-RO-07-03): This field is basically an old bay with all of the water
draining to a central location. Ditches dissect the depression but a drainage network
does not remove the water. Thus the effectiveness of these ditches in lowering the water
table is suspect and was deemed unsuitable to receive residuals.
•Kenneth Collins/Locklear (NC-RO-10-08 & 09): A dwelling was observed in the SW
corner of this Feld that did not appear on Synagro's buffer maps. The Southern Finger of
this field contained marginal drainage ditches and a predominance of poorly drained soil;
therefore, this area was buffered from the application area. The new acreage for this
field according to ArcView calculations is 17.08 Acres - greater than the 13.95 (unaltered
buffer) Acres in the amendment package submitted by Synagro. ArcView's estimations
are probably more accurate than what Synagro's. Also notice the recommended location
for WTV on the attached map.
NC-RO-10-09 was completely comprised of poorly drained soils (Rains/Lumbee).
The drainage ditches were not observed up close but the adjacent field had shallow
drainage ditches. This field is also far away from the other fields, only 10 acres, and.
application would be seasonal at best. Therefore it was decided that this field should be
deleted.
Recommendations:
1) The Groundwater Section of the FRO recommends permitting application of Westpoint
Stevens' residuals to all fields according to restrictions outlined in the attached table.
2) Include provisions to prevent dispersion of the soil from application of the HIGH SAR
residuals. No section of their Annual Report includes analysis of the ESP of the soli to
insure that Sodium does not saturate exchange sites.
3) At a minimum and/or as a guide for the permttee, Water Table Verification should occur
in the general area indicated on attached maps.

GROUNDWATER SECTION
GW#: 01031
WQ#: 001240
Review by: Billy MTever
Date: May 24.2001
Field Investigation? (Y/N): Y
County:Scotland
Facility Name: Wesmoint Stevens
Location:Main Street
Disposal System: land application of municipal
l sludge at agronomic rates
Design Cap. (GPD): 7,500,000
Description of Facility:Textile Mill Wastewater
Residuals which are aerobically di ct d
Size of Impoundment (Ft. Sq.)_&/or Size
of Application Area: 292.24 Proposed Acres
Waste Source:
Muu. Sludge ; Mon. W.Water ;
Primary Secondary Tertiary
Ind. Sludge ; Ind. W. Water(.99)
; Others: Domestic (.01)
Distance from Waste Source to nearest:
Stream:10 Ft.
Well:-MFt
For Well: Type ofuse: -private Depth:_ Pump Rate (Est):_
What natural site conditions will reduce/increase chance ofgw contamination?: (Reduce) Many of the sites are
located near areas of groundwater discharge Most of the soils are well drained and are productive agricultural
lands,
Depth to: Bedrock225Q Ft., Seasonal High W.T.>217t, Annual W.T. Flux--j-I t.
Surficial Aquifer: Bedrock/Artesian Aquifer: - -
Gen. Lithology: Sand/S.Clay Gen. Lithology:
Hyd. Cond.:_0_ 10Ft./Day Hyd. Cond.: Ft./Day
OMeasured X Estimated OMeasured OEstimated
Thickness:_3Q Ft.
Legrand: Site Numerical Description= 17 - 4 7 2 4- A a w y
T 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 6B
Hydrogeologic Site Grade: E Situation Grade: +lE
No. of Monitoring Wells: Proposed: Up_ Down— Existing: Up_ Down_
Proposed Sampling Schedule & Parameter(s):Nonc
Have there been any exceedences of the groundwater standards? Yes_2LNo_
Has any enforcement action been taken? YesX_ No= Date of Action: 10/1R/96
Summary of enforcement action taken: NOV, Sludge application ceased and extensive monitoring network was
begun to characterize the NO3N contamination. Annual reports are submitted to the FRO updating the natural
attenuation of the Bite,
Remarks/Recommendations ( Continue on Reverse, if necessary): See Field Chart and attached comments.
1 •1,�
r-
Hyd. Regional Supervisor.- ""—

Westpoint Stevens Acreage Addition: FRO Observations, Comments, & Recommendations (5101 Amendment)
see acmnvmns and soli Noes at the bottom of the table
2 5��
'Sche�61ie!
-hr-
removal
� '(16 IaM)
NRemoved
C r0'P', (Ris
_r rleik.
--SHWr-,
i ynagro
A"
'11, GW Cbnmhnts',.',�p,
%
Recommendationsil
Jerry Thigpen(i)
NC-RO-07-01
19.09
CBG
275
5249.75
we
36+
OK
YR
NC-RO-07-02
2.53
CBG
I
275
695.75
Pop -end No
36+
OK
YR
NC-R
6b):Wk(,2-)TV'
"
%'Old Bay mith McCoolnTs
0 UNSUITABLE asrimof ,laroposedIdbay (CobldApp�.amund
NC-RO-07-04
68.97
Colton
70
4827.9
WkfVVa;Ra(CD)
36-
Ra(A of lid; SE curer w[DD's,
YR; WTV (So. map)
NC-RO-07-05
32.04
Colton
70
2242.8
No(.4);Go(2);Ra(.3)
24
Ha(-.25 in Se cmer DD's on one side;
Questionable Field)
seasonal, WFV(Seo map)
Willie Thigpen
NC-RO-08-01
10.1
CBG
275
2777.5
Wk
36+
OK
YR
NC-RO-08-02
19.57
CBG
350
6849.5
Wk
36-
OK
YR
NC-RO-O8-03
20.99
CBG
350
7346.5
Wk
36-
OK
YR
NC-RO-08-04
18.78
CBG
275
5164.5
Wk:Po(.05)
36--
OK
YR
Carnal Foods/M. McLaughlin
NC-RO-09-01
15.96
CBG
350
5586
Wa(.6J6;Po (.33
36+
OK
YR
NC,RO-09-02
15.19
CBG
350
5316.5
Po(.75),Wa(.25)
36+
OK
YR
NC-RO-09-03
12.86
CBG
350
4501
Go(.3);No (2);Po (.2)
36+
VanetyoISojIs(Ranging Tm-m-oto
NWPo going from W to E)
Seasonal;WTV(See Map)
NC-RO-09-D4
3.88
CBG
350
1358
We
36+
OK
YR
Kenneth Collins/A. LockJear
NC-RO-10-08h1
17.08
CBG
350
5978.
Po(.6),'Jo(,2);LU1Pm(,
36+
Areas of PO scit- Increased Mure—ma—
map)
Seasonal: VVTV(See map)
r�x' : ,
Alan
W��;
�'�P iiv�li
'.4(, �350-
siaes;,verylar-
Pe
n'P, ......
� ��
-�'UNSUITABLE"
LH. Reichner[M McLaughlin
NC-RO-12-03
8.21
CBG
350
2873.5
No
36+
OK
YR
1
265 25
1
286.875 1
60,76720 1
Jerry Thigpen owns poultry operation and associated fields should never receive litter after Issuance oflaermit
pl Acreage changed due to house observed In the field (see attached map).
JACRONYMS
L..
PD
LY
LMldop
Sr'
Wo
W,

r
r
SYNAGOO
A Residuals Management Company
APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION
BIOSOLIDS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
WESTPOINT STEVENS
Wagram, NC
PERMIT #W00008764
re
ppR2' 70\
�
J�J`vk
c��Fr�°`
A better tomorrow for our Client Triangle: The GENERATOR, The LANDOWNER, and The ENVIRONMENT
Prepared by:
SYNAGRO SOUTHEAST
P. O. Box 1770
6490 Stadium Drive
Clemmons, NC 27012
Toll Free: 1.877.267.2687

Section #
Section I
Section II
Section III
Section IV
Section V
Section VI
Section VII
Section VIII
Table of Contents
Title
Summary of Sites
LAORS
Residual Analysis
TCLP Analysis
Total Nutrient Analysis
Pathogen and Vector_ Attraction
Reduction Monitoring
WWTP Information
Schematic
Residuals Transport and Application
Spill Control Plan
RsC,E�� EDiION
Agronomist Report
Soil Scientist Report
Proposed Site
Site Description
Site Summary
Vicinity Map
Topographic Map
Aerial Reference Map
Application Area Map
Soils Map
Soil Test Analysis
Soil Description
Agreement Forms
Ncn pischzt9e view n�

West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram, NC
Summary of Sites
New Sites
Site No. Owner/Lessee Application Area
(area excludin g buffers)
Robeson County
NC-RO-07-01 Jerry Thigpen 19.09
NC-RO-07-02 2.53
NC-RO-07-03 20.04
NC-RO-07-04 68.97
NC-RO-07-05 32.04
Total for site NC-RO-07 142.67 acres
NC-RO-08-01 Willie Thigpen
10.10
NC-RO-08-02
19.57
NC-RO-08-03
20.99
NC-RO-08-04
18.78
Total for site NC-RO-08
69.44 acres
NC-RO-09-01 Carol Foods/Martin McLaughlin
15.96
NC-RO-09-02
15.19
NC-RO-09-03
12.86
NC-RO-09-04
3.88
Total for site NC-RO-09
47.89 acres
NC-RO-10-08 Kenneth Collins/Alan Locklear 13.95 -_
NC-RO-10-09 Alan Locklear 10.08
Total for site NC-RO-10 24.03 acres
Scotland County
NC-SC-12-03 Laurence H. Reichner/Martin McLaughlin 8.21
Total for site NC-SC-12 8.21 acres
New Site total for West Point Stevens 292.24 acres
�l
l

West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram, NC
Summary of Sites
'Old Sites
Old Site No. New Site No. Owner/Lessee Application Area
(area excluding buffers,
Robeson County
WP 1-2 E. Hervey Evans Jr. 12.80
WP 1-3 46.00
WP 1-5 32.80
WP 1-6 20.30
WP 1-7 29.60
Total for site WP 1 141.50 acre
cWPz4 1,,,/ vtrL" -C7
J. D. Carmichael, inc./John D. Carmichael 182.90
WP 4-4'
39.30
'WP 4-5
146.50
WP 4-7
John D. Carmichael/William P. Carmichael 134.00
(WP-4=8,/4-
98.00
WP 4-10
25.00
WP 4-11
20.00
WP 4-12
30.00
WP 4-13
18.00
Total for site WP 4 783.70 acres
WP 10-1.
NC-RO-10-01
Buddy Dunn/Alan Locklear
2.20
W, ..P=10-2✓
NC-RO-10-02 CV;
3.00
WP:10-31/
NC-RO-10-03CZ
38.60
WP=10-4✓
NC-R0-10-04&,0
Kenneth Collins/Alan Locklear
8.70
IMP40-5 ✓
NC-RO-10=05 c3
George Bland/Alan Locklear
12.70
cW-Mr0-6✓
NC-RO-10-06,ei
5.30
WP=17 7 ✓
NC-RO-10-07 Q5
27.60
Total for site NC-RO-10
98.10 acres
WPfiI-1 ✓ �'" S� Earl Deese/William Deese 41.00
WM:1=2 ✓ Fos" 28.10
WP=1Ts3 v 2.09
WP-171-4-/ " 1184
Total for site WP 11 83.03 acres
WP=13=2 ✓ t&L'
cWP=13`3✓ Lhi
�.1
John S. Balfour Jr. 52.82
" 18.90

West Point Stevens WWTP
Wasram, NC
Summary of Sites
Old Sites
Old Site No. New Site No. Owner/Lessee Application Area
(area excluding buffers]
Robeson Count
WP=13=4 " .471" 14.3
Total for site WP 13 86.02 acres
Hoke County
WP-2=l' ✓r,s William W. Cameron 9.30
=2' ✓ try 21.00
WP_2-3 US 14.00
WPQ2 7 ✓ G*S Lucille Watkins/William W. Cameron 11.00
WP-2=8 ✓ L I Eddie Diggs/William Cameron 27.50
Total for site WP 2 82.80 acres
WP 7-1 James Mcphaul/Robert Wright 25.00
WP 7-2 28.00
NVP 7-4 Robert Wright 26.00
Total for site WP 7 79.00 acres
Scotland Countv
WP 1-1
E. Hervey Evans Jr. - 28.00 •.
WP 1-4
11 49.10 -
WP 1-8
98.00
WP 1-9
40.70
WP 1-10
36.00
WP 1-11
23.50
WP 1-12
33.20
WP 1-13
10.00.
Total for site WP 1
318.50 acres
WP 4-2 J. D. Carmichael, inc./John D. Carmichael 52.70
WP 4-3 39.60
WP-456 91.00
7�8tal for site WP 4 183.30 acres
WP=1-2=1-✓L3 NC-SC-12-01 Ronald Maynaed/Martin McLaughlin 17.50
W-P-12-2✓uri NC-SC-12-02 Charles L. Thomas/Martin McLaughlin 43.51
Total for site WP 12 61.01 acres
l* Old Site Total for West Point Stevens 1,916.96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources RECEIVED
Division of Environmental Management WATFRnI'Al ITYSFCTION
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form APR 1 y l��I
f (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
LAND APPLICATION OF OTHER RESIDUAL SOLIDS Non -Discharge Permitting
This application is intended for facilities which are EXEMPT from 40 CFR Part 503
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
I. Applicant's name (please -specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.):
WestPoint Stevens
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its
compliance):
Re mid E. nc__ n__e__.rt__ n___v_ `1ANC-YID-0E1,,t-er ntr Div ..Dix E46W&eR4ub
3. Mailing address:P.O. Box 388 '
City: Wagram State: NC Zip:28396
Telephone Number: [phone]
4. Application Date:
5. Fee Submitted: $. 325.00 [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205 0(5).]
6. Specify whether these residuals will be land applied to: X agriculturAl lands, - forest, public contact
sites, reclamation sites; (Please be advised, if these residuals will be distributed for lawn or home garden use, the
application for the "DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS" should be completed -rather than this application.)
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, please complete
the application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals
in a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
8. For Class B Residuals (or Class A Residuals to be land applied on a dedicated site), please specify the number of acres on
which residual solids are to be land applied under the authority of this permit:
prdposed in this application 292.24 acres; total (current and proposed): 2209.2 acres
9. County (ies) where residuals will be land applied: Scotland. Hoke. Robeson
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
I Application No. (will be completed by DEM):
2. Specify whether project is: new; _renewal*; X _modification
For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. in addition, please submit updated cumulative loadings for
the ten (10.) pollutants and updated owner's agreement for tLCh site.
3. If this application is being subn-dtted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list theexisting permit
number W00008764 and it's issue date_ Aueust 19, 1999.
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 1 of 18

III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated or prepared: WestPoint Stevens
?. Facility permit number:W00008764
Specify whether facility in Section I 11. 1 is owned by: = federal; X - private; - state; local government.
4. Specify facility design flow: 7.5 MGD; facility average daily Flow: 4.0 MGD;
Type of residual storage: concrete basin
Volume of residual storage: l.2 million gallons
Length of residuals storage at facility: 36.5 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in
units that are separate from treatment system, i.e, not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 63 5 days.
Estimated volume of residuals: 2500(dry tons/yr.);
5. Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above, currently on site: Yes, ---X_No
If Yes, please identify:
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Hermon Benton
7. Facility contact's telephone number: (910) 369-4I86
8. Location of treatment facility: Wagram State; NC - County Scotland
9. Mailine address: P.O. Box 388 Waeram. NC 28396
10. Latitude: 34050' 05" Longitude: 79021'20"
11. Specify the source of tine residuals: = treatment of water (alum sludges);- - - treatment of industrial wastewater
(100% industrial residuals); X treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater (please specify)
appropriate percentages of -99% industrial wastewater, 1 % domestic wastewater); other (explain):_
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
12. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? - Yes; X_ No. This includes
facilities which are classified as a "Class 1" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40 CFR 403.8, to
have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class I" by the
appropriate federal or State'authority)
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that includeindustrial sources.
a.. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? _ Yes; X No. If Yes,
list the
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 2 of 18

b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? -_ Yes; - X No. Attach
laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and Corrosivily for
each residual. SEE SECTION Ill
ote: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the xange listed below, the residual is by definition a
Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels. .
PPM
PPM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.0
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.0
2,4-D
10.0
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
I,l-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene..
0.13
Endrin
. 0.02
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Pyridine
5.0
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphene
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2.4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1 Vol.Avt.):
>2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE, AS NOTED IN
EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR THAT RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD
NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
2. ' For each residua please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other known and suspected contan-iinants that are tributary to the system. SEE SECTION HI
Cadmium
Aluminum
Copper
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Lead
Calcium
Nickel
Magnesium
Zinc
Nitrate -Nitrite
% Total Solids
pH
Phosphorus
Potassium
Sodium
NitrogenTKN
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
3. Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals (attach lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceilling Concentration
(mg/kg) Dry Weight Basis
Pollutnat Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Cadmium
85
0.00
Copper
4300
397.00
Lead
840
14.00
Nickel
420
12.00
Zinc
7500
92.00
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 3 of I8

V. PATHOGEN REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach add. pages for additional sources of residuals):
_I00% Industrial Residuals with no domestic contribution (Skip this section, proceed to Section VI)
_Residuals from the treatment of water (Alum Sludges) with no domestic contribution (Skip this section, proceed to
` Section VI)
_Residuals from animal processing plants (if the residuals are being injected into the soil, please explain the process
and the equipment used, skip this section and proceed to Section VI
X Industrial residuals with domestic contribution In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen -reduction can be
achieved using either 40 CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part 503. Since the pathogen reduction requirements found in 40 CFR
Part 257 (note, " Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" or PSRP) are incorporated into 40 CFR Part 503, only Part
503 is listed below. Please check which of the following applies to the subject reSidual:
In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503,'a residual can not be land applied if it does not meet one of the followingaltematives .
for Class B pathogen reduction.
.a Please,specify a, bl, b2, b3, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a. at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total dry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
of total dry solids.
b, the residuals must be treated by one of the following " Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP).
1. Aerobic Di"estion - residuals are auitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a specific mean cell
residence time and temperature between 40 days at200 C and 60 days at 150 C.
2. Air Drying - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or unpaved basins for a minimum of three months. During
two of the three months, the ambient average daily temperature is above 00 C.
} 3. Anaerobic Digestion - residuals are treated in the absence of air for a specific mean cell residence time and
temperature between 15 days at 350 C to 550 C and 60 days at 200 C.
4. Composting- using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature of
the residuals are raised to 400 C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days, the temperature in the
compost pile exceeds 550 C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise.the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours_ of
contact.
c. the residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
VI. RESIDUALS TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION: SEE SECTION V
I. How will the residuals be delivered to the application sites (leak proof trucks, etc.)?
2. What type of equipment will be utilized for land application?
3. How will the application of the residual be controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site? -
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 4 of IS

4. Will the 'land application operation utilize acontractor who specializes in Residuals Management'or will the permittee
management the program? X - Contractor; Permittee. If a contractor is utilized, provide the name of the
..firm, a contact, address, and telephone number: SYNAGRO SOUTHEAST C/O TERE A AYERS
P.O. BOX 1770
CLEMMONS NC 22012 PHONE [phone]
VII. SITE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED LOADING RATES:
[.The following sites are to be us6d for land application under this permit application [please attach map(s),see La.]:
Application Area [acres] Maximum slope
Site No. County Owner/Lessee (excluding buffers) (in percent)
SEE SECTION VIII
Note: If more than ten (10) sites aretobe covered by this application, please attach a forth listing all of the sites along with the information
listed below: -
a.. A vicinity map must be attached. This map must show the location -of each site in -relation to at least two geographical
references and major intersection (numbered roads, named streams/rivers, etc.). SEE SECTION VIII
b. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached delineating both total and buffered acres. This
—4� map must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet or 25% of total site relief
F (whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines; all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways
0
and all dwellings within 500 feet of the land application areas; and all buffers. SEE SECTION VIII
Note: The'following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the sites, larger buffers may be required:
I . 400 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for surface residual application,
200 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership.or which is to be sold
for subsurface residual injection.
2. • 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply source, all streams classified as WS or B,
waters classified as SA or SIB and any Class I or Class H impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking watent
3. 100 feet between any surface residual application area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way, 50 feet
between any subsurface residual injection area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.f
4. 50 feet between.the residual application area and property -lines for both surface and subsurface application (if the
original permit was issued with the buffer distance to property line as 100 feet, updated maps must be submitted and
new acreage delineated for the buffer to be reduced).
5. -10 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (upslope).
6. 25 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains. or surface water diversions (downslope).
ffr
7. 25 feet between the disposal area and any groundwater lowering and surface drainage ditches. '
SPECIFY THE NAME OF AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE SURFACE WATERS (as
established by the Environmental Management Commission) TO THE LAND APPLICATION SITE(S). USE THE
ATTACHED INFORMATION SHEET (PAGE 9 OF 18) TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION. SEE PAGE 9 OF 18
FORM: LAORS 02195 'Page 5 of 18

Note: The maximum slope for land application of residuals is 10% for surface application and 18% for subsurface application
2. For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soils scientist (the evaluation must be signed by the soil
scientist) which addresses soil color; the depth, thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the presence or absence of a
seasonal high watertable or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residual application; pH and cation
exchange capacity. If the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is less than three feet, please also Attach a demonstration,
using predictive calculations or modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in the contravention of classified groundwater standards as contained
in NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the separation be less than one foot. This report must be signed by the soil scientist
and submitted with application. SEE SECTION VII & VIII
3. For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of liquids, solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any
other contaminant know to be in the residual. A part of the agronomists -recommendations must be a crop management
plan. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the site(s), when they should be grown and how they should be
harvested and marketed. This report must be signed by the agronomist and submitted with application. SEE
SECTION VI
4. Attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the following parameters, along with any
other significant parameter that has been shown to be contained in the residual: SEE SECTION VIII
Standard Soil Fertility Test (which includes): pH Phosphorus Potassium
Acidity Calcium Manganese
Magnesium Zinc Copper
% Humic Matter Sodium Cation Exchange Capacity
Base Saturation (by calculation)
And the following Pollutants: Cadmium Lead Nickel
5. In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the calculations contained in the
attachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet' (beginning on Page I I of 18). ff more than one residual is to be covered by
this permit, additional worksheets must be attached.
VI. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Five (5) complete copies of the permit application and five (5) copies of all required supporting information, including
cover letters trust be submitted or the application package will be returned as incomplete.
2. Please explain how access to the land application sites, by both people and animals, will be controlled following the
application of residuals: SEE SECTION V
a. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sites within 30 days after the application of residuals.
b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during the active site use and
for.12 months following the last application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at the site.
3. Please explain the procedures that will be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the application process (i.e. will
the sites be Flagged): Buffer areas will be clearly marked with pin flags
4: Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private Lands" for each land application
site that is not owned by the applicant. A copy of the DEM approved form is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, prior approval must be received from DEM. SEE SECTION Vlll
5. Each application site must be assigned a site identification number. SEE SECTION I
S. Attachments may be utilized to provide the information that is requested in this application form; however, if attachments
are utilized, their location should be so indicated on the application form. All attachments must be numbered to correspond
to the individual parts of the application that require the attachment. If the attachments are part of a larger document, a
table must be provided that lists the locations of the required information. SEE APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 6 of 13

Ap)Aicant's Certification:
TANLY D. �IEI;1oN
attest that this application for modification of W00008764
( has been reviewedby me
is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if al— required parts of this application are no:
completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be
returned as incomplet
ty Sivnatnre l/l date/�
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 7 of 18

Instructions:
Processing of this, application will not be initiated until five (5) copies of all .of the following items have been submitted in
r ` addition to five(5) copies of.the completed application form. If any -of the below items haJerbeen excluded from the
Package, please explain.
Is a general location map included?
YES_X or NO
2. Is a site map (drawn to scale) included which delineates total and buffered acres and shows all property lines, buffers,
existing wells within 500 feet, topography, drainage features, and any surface waters?
YES X or NO
3. Is a vicinity map enclosed which clearly indicates the projects location with respect to State roads and named Surface
waters? -
YES X ' or NO
4. Is a signed soil scientist report included which defines the following:
a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
b), depth and thickness of soil horizons,
c) pres6nce of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
d) depth to seasonal high water table,
e) the hydraulic conductivity,
f) ' 'recommended loading rate for the site,
YES X' or NO
Is a signed agronomist's report included which identifies the crop and loading
recommendations for N-P-K?
YES X orNO
G. Is the Crop Management Plan included in the application package?
YES X orNO
7. "Has the Land Owner's agreement been completed and signed?
YES X orNO
8. Appropriate fee in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .02050(5)-(eff. January 1, 1999):
New Applications, Modifications or Late Renewals $325.00
Timely Renewals without Modifications $250.00
YES X or NO
9. Five (5) copies of all reports, evaluations, agreements, supporting calculations, etc, must be included as a part of the
application package.
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 8 of 18

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with thesubmission of the
application Package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
.8. In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be located, you are required
to submit this form, with items I through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of Environmental Management Regional Water
Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5 " by I I " copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute
USES Topographic Map which shows the subject surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest
downslope surface waters (waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application
may not be submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
I. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality corporation individual or other )
West Point Stevens `
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: West Point Stevens
P.O. Box 388
3. City:_ Wagram State: N.C. Zip: 28396
4. Telephone Number: [phone]
5: Project Name: West Point Stevens
6. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 2500 dry tons per year
7. Name of closest surface waters: Buffalo Creek
8. County(s) where land application sites are located: Scotland. Hoke. Robeson
Map name
10. Applicant
TO: REGIONAL WATER -QUALITY -SUPERVISOR
Please provide the with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur, as identified on the
attached map segment:
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification. if a
Signature of regional office
RECEIVE-
FEB 2 7 2091
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 9 of I8

WEST POINT STEVENS
LAND APPLICATION FARM SITES
WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION
NEW FARM CITES
FARM SITE
SITE
N0.
COUNMI
SURFACE _ -_
WATERS
QUAD MAP
CIASSIFI-
CATION
Jcrry Thigpen
RO-07.01
Robeson
lowers Branch
Maxton
CS
Jerry Thigpen
RO-07-02
Robeson
lowers Branch
Maxton
Jerry Thigpen
RO-07-03
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
Maxton
Jerry Thigpen
I RO-07-04
Robeson
I Shoe Heel Creek
Maxton
Jerry Thigpen
RO-07-05
Robeson
Shoe .Heel Creek
Maxton
Willie Thigpen
RO-08-01
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
Maxton
C
Willie Thigpen
RO-08-02
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
WillicThigpen
RO-08-03
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
—Maxton�^A-�
Maxton
Willie Thigpen
RO-08-04
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
Maxton
cico-*j GS
Carol Foods
RO.09-0I
Robeson
Frazier Branch
Johns
Carol Foods
RO-09-02
Robeson
Frazier Branch
Johns
e S�
Carol Foods
RO-09-03
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
Johns
C
Carol Foods
RO-09-04
Robeson
Frazier Branch
Johns.
Alan Locklear
RO-10-OSI
.Robeson
Turkey Creek
Pembroke
(�i✓� ��-
Alan Locklear
RO-10-09I
Robeson
Shoe Heel Creek
Rowland
.q (f
aurence H. Reichne
SC-12-03
Scotland
Shoe Heel Creek
Silver Hill
I

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
t/M
K SYNAGEQ
A Ruidua(t Managmieae Co npany
,,,OWNER L6..vrr. c,c 4,d c SCALE: I" = 2 `i o oo FIELDS 3
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR S;/ « /,•// / 9 f/ CONTOUR INTERVAL E

TOPOGRAPHIC, MAP
'1�m SYNAGl�O.
A'RwdnaG Mnnegm,,t Company
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR / e b io I c Y 793 CONTOUR INTERVAL S

W/• SYNAGRO
T®j� ('�n ,� 7�Nj" 'r
L o l T i�ty [ ^� j MAP A 2uldiia(r Alanagmtmf Cautpany
OWNER SCALE: I" = 2 2',Ooo FIELDS
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR �ow�„ J s CONTOUR INTERVALS'

SYVAGR0
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RaiduaG ALnegm:<nt Canparty
®tO��ZONE-Comm
Copyright 0200011 ps a la carte, Inc
t +
� .1..-s. j 'o T�l-1 �Ac t+st. �j o✓s.c'><yca 6M. �'� 'y�.y `� `./ :t� yi���:
ilk%
' �.. �+yl� ♦ \.cam Z- �_. 14+..f ,.. I?rc ,+ry+> �_.aS��t+'��� r �^\yri\ .G s`
,y r
F 1 ,or to .- yl"�t �3 a t �� �'� _ �n�t'Y4Y. �~t s �, t ♦�_} :FK�+�t; +_.
�t?ry, t y t tl,,. "!s' •t \ �..�.f s �+ ..� t„ y _ a
! r/
zf
j
NN
Id
e
"eve
93rz
i 1 Y
a f
OWNERC�,�,!/Fobs.:. SCALE:I"=_ay000 FIELDS
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR To I n s l y 7/ CONTOUR INTERVAL S i

SYNAGRO
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP A Raidudli.M.n.8mm"I company
OWNER 011ie. 7-4!�.ae, SCALE: 1" = 2141 boo FIELDS 4 2 � 31 q
PHOTQQUADfxftAR Pgel CONTOUR INTERVAL

'sy
NAGRO
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP P A Raidmall M.nagement Company
OWNER cTeee'�z Tl;!) OR SCALE: V q
000' FIELDS Z-2.3, 's
CONTOUR INTERVAL

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES (12/94)
Asheville Regional WQ Super -visor Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
j
Raleigh Regional WQ Superviser
59.Woodfin Place
Post Office Box 1507
Post Office Box 27687
Asheville, NC 28801
Washington, NC 27889
Raliegh NC 27611
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax (919)'975-3716
Fax [phone]
Avery Macon
Beaufort Jones
Chatham Nash
Buncombe Madison
Bertie Lenoir
Durham Northampton
Burke McDowell
Camden Martin
Edgecombe Orange
Caldwell Mitchell
Chowan Pan-dico
Franklin Person
Cherokee Polk
Craven Pasquotank
Granville Vance
Clay Rutherford
Currituck Perqui s
Halifax Wake
Graham Swain
Dare Pitt
Johnston Warren '
Haywood Transylvania
Gates TyreH
Lee Wilson
Henderson Yancy
Greene Washington
Jackson
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
.919 North Main Street
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Fayetteville, NC 28301.
Mooresville, NC28115
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
Alexander Mecklenburg
Brunswick New Hanover "
Bladen Robeson
Cabarrus Rowan
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Richmond Catawba
Stanly Columbus Pender
Harnett Sampson'
Gaston Union
Duplin.
Hoke Scotland
Iredell Cleveland
Montgomery
Lincoln
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alimance Rockingham
AUeghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry-
Davidson
Watauea
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 10 of 18

CALCULATIONS WORI{ SHRUT
i This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Envirorunental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as possible. Its
preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of residuals or different
residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. List the specific residual- that is covered by these calculations (place or princess of origin)
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons =_Gallons of Residuals' % Solids' 8.34 lbs./gallon
produced annually 100
2000lbs./ton
Total Dry Tons = • • 8.34 lbs./gallon
" 100
2,000 lbs./tan
2500 Dry Tons per year
if the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be.a larger initial application, please attach a detailed explanation and provide
calculations for each variation.
B. Complete the following calculations to establish the portion of the residual that is made up of the various parameters:
%Total Solids= 4.15%
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONSI
Parameter
mg/L
/ % Solids (Decimal)
mg/Kg Dry
weight
�x .002
= lbs./ dry ton
Cadmium
0.00
x .002
= 0.000
Copper
397.00
I x .002
= 0.794
Lead
14.00
x .002
= 0.028
Nickel
12.00
x.002
= 0.024
Zinc
92.00
x .002
= 0.184
Ammonia-N
7700.00
x .002
= 15.400
Calcium
4100.00
x .002
= 8.200
Magnesium
4600.00
x .002
= 9.200
NO3-NO2-N
0.00
x .002
= 0.00
Phosphorus
11600.00
x .002
= 23.200
Potassium
9700.00
x .002
= 19.400
Sodium
37200.00
x .002
= 74.400
TKN
86300.00
x .002
= 172.600
Other
X 002
=
x .002
—
x .002
=
x .002
=
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 11 of 18

C. Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
`,. Mineralization Rate (MR) 30
= rhese values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed (Please note, the Mineralization Rate [MR] should
be utilized in the following calculations as a decimal):
PAN for Surface Application
PAN='[(MR) x (TKN - NH3)] +,5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN = [ .30 x ( 86300 7700 11 +.5 x ( - 7706 ) + 0.00
PAN = - 27430 PPM Dry Weight
PAN for Subsurface Application
PAN = [(MR) x (TKN - NH3) I + (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
'AN=1 .30 x1 86300 7700 )1'+( 7700 )+ 0.00
PAN = 31280 PPM Dry Weight
3. Total PAN to be land applied per year
Total dry tons of residual to be land applied per year:
Total PAN in pounds =(PAN in make Drv: Weight) x 2000 Pounds / Ton
per dry ton 1,000,000
= (PAN in PPM Dry Weight) x 0.002
= 54.86 Pounds/DryTon/Year **SURFACE**
Total PAN in pounds =(PAN in Pounds / Dry Ton) x Total tons of residual to be land applied
54.86 x 2500
137150 Pounds/Year
Due to the fact that organic nitrogen is mineralized slowly over time, the amount of nitrogen that comes available in years following the initial
application must be taken into consideration when calculating application rates for the subsequent years. This being the case, please attach an
evaluation of this factor and its impact on loading rates. Show the adjusted pan for at least five years. SEE FOLLOWING PAC_ E
(54.86 + 10.67) * 2500
The maximum adjusted annual PAN is 213,825 Pounds/Year
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 12 of 18

Synagro Southeast, Inc.
Winston Salem, North Carolina
RESIDUAL PAN CALCULATION
West Point Stevens WWTP
TKN= 86,300 mg/kg
NH3= 7,700 mg/kg
NO3-NO2-N= 0.00 mg/kg
Min Rate= 0.30
PAN= Jmin.rate (TKN - NH3) + 0.5 (NH3) + NO3-NO21 * 0.002
0.30 78,600 - 3,850 0.00
PAN= 54.86 LBS/DT
Calculate residual nitrogen for years 2,3,4 and 5-following the initial application to determine
the amount of PAN/DT remaining.
2ND YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= Jmin.rate (Ist year org. - N 2nd year min. - NJ * 0.002
0.15 78,600 23,580
PAN= 16.51 LBS/DT remaining from Ist year application
�. 3RD YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= Jmin.rate (2nd year org. - N 3rd year min. - NJ * 0.002
0.08 55,020 8,253
PAN= 7.48 LBS/DT remaining from I st year application
4TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= Jmin.rate (3rd year org. - N 4th year min. - NJ * 0.002
0.05 46,767 3,741 _
PAN= 4.30 LBS/DT remaining from lst year application
5TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= Jmin.rate (4th year org. - N 5th year min. - NJ * 0.002
0.03 43,026 2,151
PAN= 2.38 LBS/DT remaining from I st year application
Residual PAN from years 2 thru 5 after the initial application = 30.67 Lbs/Pan/DT

Westpoint Stevens Acreage Addition: RO Observations, Comments, &Recommendations (5/01 Amendment)
see acronymns and soil types at the bottom of the table
Farm
Field
Application,
Acres
Crop
Scheduled_
-N'removal
(lb/acre)
N Removed
Crop (lbs),
_Primary Soil Series
Jerry Thigpen
NC-RO-07-01
19.09
CBG
275
5249.75
Wa
NC-RO-07-02
2.53
CBG
P.p� Ska w
'300e6
759
Po W-end ,Nc
NC-RO-07-03
13:22
SB's
INVjJflaw,e�i.."D
100
1322
Mc .8 DD ;Wk .2
NC-RO-07-04
68.97
Cotton
70
4827.9
Wk/Wa;Ra DD
NC-RO-07-05
32.04
Cotton
70
2242.8
NO(.4);GO(.2);Ra(.3)
Willie Thigpen
NC-RO-08-01
10.1
CBG
200V/
2020
Wk
NC-RO-08-02
19.57
CBG
2002/
3914
Wk
NC-RO-08-03
20.99
CBG
200✓
4198
Wk
NC-RO-08-04
18.78
CBG
200 /
3756
Wk;Po(.05)
Carrol Foods/M. McLaughlin
NC-RO-09-01
15.96
CBG
250 N>
3990
Wa(.66);Po .33
NC-RO-09-02
15.19
CBG
250 'Qa\
3797.5
Po .75 ;Wa(.25)
NC-RO-09-03
12.86
CBG
300
3858
Go .3 ;No(.2);Po(.2)
NC-RO-09-04
3.88
CBG
275
1067
Wa
Kenneth Collins/A. Locklear
NC-RO-10-08t2J
17.21
CBG
250 ✓
4302.5
Po(.6);Jo(.2),Lu1Pm(.2
Alan, ocklear
NC-RO-10-09
.10 _. _.
CBG
1, 0
0 _
Ra/Ly
L.H. Reichner/M. McLaughlin
NC-RO-12-03
8.21
CBG
325
2668.25
No
278.6
3265
47,972.70
(') Jerry Thigpen owns poultry operation and associated fields should never receive litter after issuance of permit.
Izl Acreage changed due to house observed in the field (see attached map).
ACRONYMS
DD= Drainage Ditches
YR=Year Round Appllwtlon
WT= Water Table
W Vw Water Table Verification
_ Map Symbol_
_ Soil Sades _
Dralnago Class
Go
G dsbom
MWD
Na
Helena
WD
J.
JUMs
SWP
La
Lakeland
ED
L.
Lumbee
PD
Ly
Lynchburg
SWP
Mc
McColl
PD
No
Norfolk
WD
Pm
Plummer
PD
Po
PowAa
SWED
Ra
ReNs
PD
We
Wagrxm
WD
Wk
mans.
WD

ox,�&5)1 I
0 o- S-
2
® 9 A s ?-1-� Yl
i1l�G.w L���.. � FI�LO.�,. ✓ I V
86F�5oc� ,
/T Q . ktia.Sq

Expected N-Removal By Crops Proposed In Westpoint Fields
+psi
Soil!SeriesDrainage
Class,
'SB (bulacre)
N-removal
(lb/acre)
CBG
(DT/acre)
N-removal
(Iblacre),
Goldsboro
MWD
45
1�69.2
6.5
325
Kalmla
WD
42
157.92
6.5
325
Johns
SWP
45
169.2
5
250
Lakeland
ED
22
82.72
4
200
Lumbee
PD
45
169.2
4.5
225
Lynchburg
SWP
46
172.96
5.5
275
McColl
PD
38
142.88
4
200
Norfolk
WD
42
157.92
6.5
325
Plummer
PD
25
94
3.5
175
Pocalla
SWED
30
112.8
5
250
Rains
PD
44 _
1.65.44
4.5
225
Wagram
WD
28
105.28
5.5
275
Wakulla
WD
22
82.72
4
200

4. Crop information on nitrogen uptake
per year
Crop(s)
(Division Recommendations)
(Provide for the Crops Snecified)
PAN (Ibs./acre/year)
PAN (Ibs./acre/year)
Alfalfa
200
200
Y! Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
220
Common 220, Coastal 350
Blue Grass
120
120
Corn (Grain)
160
160
Com (Silage)
200
200
Cotton
70
70
Fescue
25
250
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
75
75
Milo
100
100
Small Grain (Wheat, barley, oats)
100
100
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
180
180
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
220
220
Soybeans
200
200
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
200
200
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendations: Coastal Bermuda 350
Ibs/ac/yr per NCDA and NCSU Extension Service It is the applicant's request to allow double cropping nutrient utilization within
a calendar year, This is a standard agricultural practice and with professional site management this practice is environmentally
5. Total acres needed to land apply the pounds of available nitrogen calculated above
Total acres needed: = Maximum total pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN)
Pounds of nitrogen needed for crop*
213825 /'70= 3055 '
Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN = 3055 acres
* This value must be the value for the crop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per acre.
[['there are various crops that will only be utilized for certain sites, please attach the calculationsfor each site and determine the total needed
acres using the format outlined above.
D . Calculate the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
(* *This section must be completed in mg/I, to convert: mg/kg x % solids [as a decimal] = mg/I* *)
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent /. [0.5 (Ca Milli Equivalent+ Mg Milli Equivalent)] 0.5
CONCENTRATION Equivalent Weight Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 1543.8 (mg/1) / 23 = 67.12
CALCIUM (Ca) 170.15 (mg/1) / 20 = 8.51
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 190.9 (mg/I) / 12 = 15.91
SAR= 19.21 .
If calculation sheets are being completed for more than one residual or site, please attach a summary sheet
that bring the results of all the calculation sheets to one point.
r '
t
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 13 of 18

E. Determine the Site Life for this land application site:
The lifetime pollutant loadings shall not be exceeded. The site life is determined by calculating the number of years that
the site can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculations will be based
on the most restrictive crop plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement specified and the maximum dry tons of residuals
to be land applied annually. Therefore, in the table below the Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre(Year will be calculated
as:
I. Most restrictive crop based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: Coastal Bermuda
Associated plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: 360 (Ibs / Acre / year)
2. Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN (as found in C.5 above): 3055 acres
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year. 2500.00 dry tons per year
4. Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = DMTons/ Year of Residuals to be land applied
Minimum number of acres required for land application'
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year
If any of the application sites are to be loaded at greater than the rate specified above, please specify the loading rate and explain:
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year (different from above) _.
For the purpose of site life determination, the lifetime pollutant loadings shall not exceed the following for the corresponding Cation Exchange
Capacities (CEC). Site life for the site covered by this application shall be determined by using the lowest CEC. The appropriate column
should be chosen and applied in the"Allowable Lifetime Pollutant Loadings based on CEC" in the table below.
CEC<5 CEC5-15 CEC>15
Pollutant
(Ibs / acre)
(Lbs / acre)
(Lbs /acre)
Lead
500
1,000
2,000
Zinc
250
500
1.000
Copper
125
250
500
Nickel
125
250
500
Cadmium
4.5
9
Is
in the table below, the highest annual loading (Tons of Residuals to be Apphed/Acre/Year) specified above, will be multiplied by
the Ibs./dry ton of each pollutant as found in B above. The Site Life can then be determined by:
Site Life (Years) =_Allowable Lifetime Loadings (Ibs./acre)
Projected Pounds to be Applied/Acre/Year
Pollutant
Tons ' of
Ibs. /dry ton of
Projected
Allowable lifetime
Site Life
residuals to
each pollutant
Pounds to
pollutant loadings
be Applied
(as found in
be Applied /
based on CEC.
per Acre
part B above)
Acre / Year
From chart
per Year
above (Ibs/acre)
Lead
0.82
0.028
0.023
500
21739
Zinc
0.82
0.184
1 0.151
250
1656
Copper
0.82
0.794
1 0.651
125
192
Nickel
0.82
0.024
1 0.020
1125
5208
,Cadmium
0.82
1 0.00
1 0.000
14.5
N/A
Compare the five (5) pollutants above and determine which pollutant that will result in the shortest life for this site.
The Limiting Pollutant is Copper
The Site Life is 192 years.
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 14 of 18

Residual Analysis
TCLP
Nutrient & Metal Analysis
Pathogen & Vector Attraction Reduction Monitoring

TCLP

7- w--,
v�
ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP.
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Mr. Ron Lilley
Synagro, Inc.
PO Box 1770 6490 Stadium Dr
Clemons, NC 27012
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
(615) 758-SBS6
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0815269
Est. 1970
June 06.2000
ESC Sample 9 :
L16852-01
Date Received May 17, 2000
_
ESC Key-:
AMSCO-ROANOKE
Description SLUDGE - TCLP
Site ID
WASHINGTON
Sample ID WEST POINTS STEPHENS
Project':
WEST
Collected By Kevin J. Campbell
Collection Date 05/16/00 14:10
Parameter
Result
Det. Limit
Units
Limit
Method
Date
Corrosivity Non -Corrosive
9040A
05/17/00
Ignitability No
Ign O 170
Deg. F
D4982
05/20/00
Reactive CN (SW846 7.3.4.1)
BDL
0.046
mg/kg
9012
05/23/00
Reactive Sulf.(SW846 7.3.4.2)
BDL
25.
mg/kg
9030
05/23/00
TCLP Extraction
-
1311
05/17/00
Mercury
BDL
0.00020
mg/l
0.2
7470
05/23/00
Arsenic
BDL
0.0050
'mg/l
5.
6010
05/22/00
Barium
2.9
0.0020
mg/1
100
6010
05/22/00
Cadmium
0.0036
0.0020
mg/l
1.
6010
05/22/00
Chromium
0.080
0.0020
mg/1
5.
6010
05/22/00
Lead
BDL
0.0050
mg/1
5.
6010
05/22/00
Selenium
0.036
0.6050
mg/l
1.
6010
05/22/00
Silver
BDL
0.0020
mg/1
S.
6010
05/22/00
TCLP ZHE Extraction
-
1311
05/17/00
TCLP Volatiles
Benzene
BDL
0.050
mg/l
0.5
8260
05/18/00
Carbon tetrachloride
BDL
0.050
mg/l
0.5
8260
05/18/00
Chlorobenzene
BDL
- A.O50
mg/l
100
8260
05/18/00
Chloroform
BDL
0.050
mg/l
6.
8260
05/18/00
1,2-Dichloroethane
BDL
0.050
mg/1
0.5
8260
05/18/00
1,1-Dichloroethene
BDL
0.050
mg/1
0.7
8260
05/18/00
2-Butanone (MEK)
BDL
0.25
mg/l
200
8260
05/18/00
Tetrachloroethene
BDL
0.050
mg/l
0.7
8260
05/18/00
Trichloroethene
BDL
0.050.
mg/l
0.5
.8260
05/18/00
Vinyl chloride
BDL
•0.050
mg/l
0.2
8260
05/18/00
Surrogate Recovery
Dibromofluoromethane
79.
8 Rec.
8260
05/18/00
Toluene-d8
100
& Rec.
8260
05/18/00
4-Bromofluorobenzene
110
4 Rec.
8260
05/18/00
TCLP Pesticides
Laboratory Certification Numbers:
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - I-2327,.CT- PH-0197, FL - E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-Thl-01
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R-140, SC - 84004, TN - 2006, VA - 00109, WV - 233
Page 1 of 2

`t
ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP.
Mr. Ron Lilley
Synagro, Inc.
PO Box 1770 6490 Stadium Dr
Clemmons, NC 27012
Date Received May 17, 2000
Description SLUDGE - TCLP
Sample ID WEST POINTE STEPHENS
Collected By Kevin J. Campbell
Collection Date 05/16/00 14:10
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 75B-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
ESE. 1970
June 06,2000
ESC Sample k L16852-01
ESC Key : AMSCO-ROANOKE
Site ID : WASHINGTON
Project : WEST
Parameter Result Det. Limit Units Limit Method _ Date
Chlordane BDL 0.030 mg/1 0.03 8081 05/20/00
Endrin BDL 0.0050 mg/1 0.02* 8081 05/20/00
Heptachlor BDL 0.0050 mg/l 0.008 8081 05/20/00
Lindane BDL 0.0050 mg/1 0.4 8081 05/20/00
Methoxychlor BDL 0.0050 mg/1 10 8081 05/20/00
Toxaphene BDL 0.10 mg/1 0.5 8081 05/20/00
Surrogate Recovery
Decachlorobiphenyl 68. % Rec. 8081 05/20/00
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 53. % Rec. 8081 OS/20/00
TCLP Herbicides
2,4,5-TP,(Silvex) BDL 0.0020 mg/l 1. 8151. 05/23/00
2,4-D BDL 0.0020 mg/1 10 8151 05/23/00
Surrogate Recovery .•
2,4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 100 % Rec. 8151 05/23/00
TCLP Semi-Volatiles
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL 0.2.0 mg/1 7.5 8270 05/19/00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL 0.10 mg/l 0.13 8270 05/19/00
Hexachlorobenzene BDL. 0.10 mg/1 0.13 8270 05/19/00
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene HDL 0.10 mg/l 0.5 8270 05/19/00
Hexachloroethane BDL 0.10 mg/l 3. 8270 05/19/00
Nitrobenzene BDL 0.10 mg/l. 2. 8270 05/19/00
Pyridine BDL 0.10 mg/l 5. 8270 05/19/00
m&p-Cresol BDL 0.10 mg/l 400 8270 05/19/00
o-Cresol BDL 0.10 mg/l 200 8270 05/19/00
Pentachlorophenol BDL 0.10 mg/l 100 8270 05/19/00
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BDL 0.10 mg/l 400 8270 05/19/00
2, 4, 6-Trichlorophenol BDL 0.10 mg/1 2. 8270 05/19/00
Surrogate Recovery
Nitrobenzene-d5 23. % Rec. 8270. 05/19/00
2-Fluorobiphenyl 22. % Rec. 8270 05/19/00
p-Terphenyl-dl4 65. % Rec. 8270 05/19/00
Phenol-d5 37. % Rec. 8270 OS/19/00
2-Fluorophenol 41. % Rec. 6270 05/19/00
2,4, 6-Tribromoohenol 61. % Rec. �8270 05/19/00
BDL - Below Detection Limit en Hayes, ESC Representative
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL)
Laboratory Certification Numbers:
A2LA - 1461-01, AIRA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - I-2327, CT- PH-0197, FL - E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R-140, SC - 84004, IN - 2006, VA - 00109, h'V - 233
Note:
The reported analytical results relate -only to the sample submitted.
` This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC.
l_
Page 2 of 2

Nutrient And Metal Analysis

ep(
2000 nber: A$L EASTERN AGRICV ' )RAL LABORATORIES, INC.
2000 '-221
Lab Number:
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone]�
Fax No. [phone]
45330 Pagel
Account Number:
45230 Samples Submitted By:
Send To: SYNAGRO SOUTHEAST WEST POINT STEVENS ED HARDEE
POB 1770
CLEMMONS NC 27012 Date Sampled: 12/12/2000
Date Received: 12114/2000
Sample1D: WEST POINT STEVENS ,mmn,.,,,,,,,
'
Result
Result
YClCIiIIV II
Limit
Analysis
Analysts
Parameter
( eo)
(mg/kg)
(mglkg)
Analyst
Date
Time
Method Reference
SOLIDS(AS IS)
4.80
48000
100
JCM
12/14/2000
15:00
SM 254OG
NITROGEN(TKN)
8.83
88300
•100
JCM
12/16/2000
16:00
EPA 351.3
PHOSPHORUS
1.29
12900
100
JCM
12/15/2000 .
16:00 -
SW 846-6010B
POTASSIUM
SULFUR
0.90
9000
100
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B
CALCIUM
0.99
9900
100
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B
MAGNESIUM
0.41.
4100
100
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00.
SW 846-60108
SODIUM
0.50
5000
'32500
100
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00-.
SW 84616010B
IRON
3.25.
100
JCM'
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B'
ALUMINUM
3690
1
JCM
12/16/2000
16:00
1SW 846-6010B
MANGANESE
2510
10
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B
COPPER
134
1
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B
ZINC
348
1
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 848-6010B
AMMONIA -NITROGEN 0.58'
93 .
5600'
1
-100
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B
NO3-NO2 NITROGEN
ND
10
JCM
12/15/2000
15:00
EPA 350.2
CADMIUM
JCM
12/15/2000
15:00
SM 4500-NO3 F
CHROMIUM
ND
1
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B
NICKEL
12
5
JCM
12/16/2000
16:00
SW 848-80108
13
5
JCM
12/16/2000
16:00
SW 846-6010B .
�PAUL.
ALL VALUES ARE ON
A DRY WEIGHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED.
H. CHU C. NORMA JONES
Our reports and letters am for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole orin pert, normayanymierance be made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or
other public
announcements
without obtaining
our prorwrtten authorization.

Rep. nber: A&L EASTERN AGRICU' )JRAL LABORATORIES, INC.
200( /-221
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone]
Lab Number: Fax No. [phone]
45330 Page 2
Account Number:
45230 Samples Submitted By:'
ED HARDEE
Send To: SYNAGRO SOUTHEAST WEST POINT STEVENS
j
e-¢.a
*•;.�a.z�c�R�F'� tic=E°'�
POB 1770
CLEMMONS NO 27012
Date Sampled: 12/12/2000
Date Received: 12114/2000
Sample ID: WEST -POINT STEVENS
Date Reported: 12119/2000
Result
Result
Detection
Limit
Analysis,
Analysis
Parameter
M
(mg/kg)
(mglkg)
Analyst
Date
Time
Method Reference
LEAD
ARSENIC
ND
5
JCM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-60108
MERCURY
1.79
0.2
KM
12/15/2000
15:00
SW 848-7061A
SELENIUM
ND
0.2
KM
12/15/2000
16:00
SW 846-7471A
PH (STD.UNITS;AS IS)
7.50
0.66
0.1
0A
KM
12/15/2000
15:00
SW .846-7741A
ORGANIC NITROGEN.
8.27
82700
100
RD
DCH
12/15/2000
12M5/2000
14:00
EPA 150:1
MOLYBDENUM
ND
5
JCM
12/15/2000 -
16:00
CALCULATION
-SW. 846,6010E
ALL VALUES ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED. PAUL C. H. CHU C. NORMA JONES
• Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use or our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole orin pert, normay any rererenco be made
to the work, the iesulls, or the company in any advertising, nows relrnse, or other public announcements without obtaining our prlorwrif(en authorization.

Pathogen And Vector Attraction Reduction
Monitoring

i
CAROLINA .ENVIRONMENTAL .LABORATORIES,_ .L.LC
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro Southeast, Inc. PROJECT 'NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770
Clemmons, NC 27012-
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24196 SAMPLE ID- #1 WestPoint Stevens SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED- 1030
DATE RECE�VED- 12/12/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1205 DELIVERED BY- Ed Hardee _
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
Total Solids 254013. 12/13/00 ERP 45600 mg/L 1.0
r� ) Fecal Coliform 9222D 12/12/00 PAY < 4400 col/9 4400
1
f'
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g /'�
'LABORATORY DIRECTOR - "-"�
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 9191776-1880 .Fax [phone]
NC WW/GW 306 NC DW 37741 SC 99035

CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL .LABORATORIES, L.L C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro Southeast, Inc. PROJECT NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers_ REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770
Clemmons, NC 27012-
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24197 SAMPLE ID- #2 WestPoint Stevens, SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED- 1030
DATE RECEIVED- 12/12/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee - _ RECEIVED BY= hog
TIME RECEIVED= 1205 DELIVERED BY- Ed Hardee
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
— Total Solids
Fecal Coliform
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
2540B 12/13/00 ERP • 45500 mg/L 1.0
9222D 12/12/00 PAX < 4400 Col/g 4400
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g
LABORATORY DIRECTOR ^� —
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC WW/GW 306 NC DW 37741 SC 99035

CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, LL C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro Southeast, Inc: PROJECT NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770
Clemmons, NC 27012-
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24198 SAMPLE ID- #3 WestPoint Stevens SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED- 1030
DATE RECEIVED- 12/12/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1205 DELIVERED BY- Ed Hardee
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
Total Solids 254013 12/13/00 ERP • 49100 mg/L 1.0
',Fecal Coliform 9222D 12/12/00 PAK < 4100 col/g 4100
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC WW/GW 306 NC DW 37761 SC 99035

CAROUNA .ENVIRONMENTAL .LABORATORws, L.L C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro Southeast, Inc. PROJECT NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770
Clemmons, NC 27012-
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24199 SAMPLE ID- ##4 WestPoint Stevens SAMPLE MATRIX- So
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED- 1030
DATE RECEIVED- 12/1,2/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee _ RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1205 ➢ELIVERED,BY- Ed Hardee
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
-, Total Solids 2540E 12/13/00 ERP • 47400 mg/L 1.0
IjFecal Coliform 9222D 12/12/00 PAK < 4200 col/g 4200
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC WW/GW 306 NC DW 37741 SC 99035

CAROUNA ENVIRONMENTAL .LABORATORIES, . L L C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro Southeast, Inc. PROJECT NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770
Clemmons, NC 27012- "
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24200 SAMPLE ID- #5 WestPoint Stevens SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED-1030
DATE RECEIVED- 12/12/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee _ RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1205 DELIVERED BY- Ed Hardee
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
Total Solids 2540B 12/13/00 ERP 45700 mg/L 1.0
Fecal Coliform 9222D 12/12/00 PAK < 4400 col/9 4400
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit '
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax 919/776=5724
NC WW/GW 306 NC DW 37741 SC 99035

CAROLINA .ENVIRONMENTAL .LABORATORIES, LL C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro•Southeast, Inc. PROJECT NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770 -
Clemmons, NC 27012- "
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24201 SAMPLE ID- #6 WestPoint Stevens SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED- 1030
DATE RECEIVED-•12/12/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee _ RECEIVED BY-. hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1205 DELIVERED BY- Ed Hardee
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS- METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
Total Solids 2540B. 12/13/00 ERP 46300 mg/L 1.0
,Fecal Coliform 9222D 12/12/00 PAK < 4300 col/g 4300
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC WW/GW 306 . NC DW 37741 SC 99035

CAROUNA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORA TORIES,. L L C
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
Synagro Southeast, Inc. PROJECT NAME: WestPoint Stev.
Attn: Teresa Ayers REPORT DATE: 12/28/00
PO Box 1770
Clemmons, NC 27012-
SAMPLE NUMBER- 24202 ..SAMPLE ID- #7 WestPoint Stevens SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/12/00 TIME SAMPLED- 1030
DATE RECEIVED- 12/12/00 SAMPLER- Ed Hardee _ RECEIVED BY- hcg
TIME RECEIVED- 1205 DELIVERED BY- Ed Hardee
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LRL
._ Total Solids 2540D 12/1:3/00 ERP 46200 mg/L 1.0
Fecal Coliform 9222D 12/12/00 PAK < 4300 col/9 4300
LRL = Lower Reporting Limit
Results are reported on a "dry weight" basis
NOTE: Geometric Mean = <4,300 col/g
LABORATORY DIRECTOR L-..-�•�C
1229 North Horner Boulevard, Sanford, North Carolina 27330 919/775-1880 Fax [phone]
NC WRV/GW 306 NC DW 37741 SC 99035

CAROLINA .L`NVIRONMN'NTAL .LABORATORIES, .LLC
1229 N. HORNER BLVD. • SANFORD, NC 27330
[phone] • FAX [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Page of
CLIENT: Synagro Southeast Contact: 7c A 61* Aj& K T
ANALYSES
REQUIRED
BILL TO:
Phone tl: ( ) Fax PI: ( )
Address: PO Box 1770
m
Clemmons
City: State: NC Zip: 27012
~
to
Purchase Order a:
0
N
CL
PROJECT NO:
PROJECT NAME:
Turnaround Time:
Vtf iL go: — 7 rZcGr v $'
N
❑ Normal (2 weeks) ❑ Rush (1 week)'
❑ Rush (48 hours)' ❑ Rush (24 hours)`,
COLLECTED BY: (Signature) PRINTED NAME
m
.�
_ PRESERVATIVES
PRESERVED IN FIELD ❑
PRESERVED IN LAB ❑
Is the sample chlorinated? Yes _ No _
U
m
Will the results be used for �No
u
_
regulatory monitoring purposes? Yes _
p
Z
O
U
rn
m
Z
0
Z
�
=
z •;
=
=
RECEIVED ON ICE ❑
SAMPLE N
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAS
SAMPLE I.D.
SAMPLE
10F
REMARKS
MATRI%
CONTAINERS
¢
Z41
xv} ^
lo:ao
X
#1
Sl
1
Zf
1>✓�.'
( L+..S
, .i ?riik
! 7 'L
#p? Y
a�,/hXi
.`!"C"^i.'
K._
*' !\
1 �.- � � \ L..•
' .4.G i Yi v..F '`Y
�.,,_
J�i _
i
" 11
IX
X
it
f
.r}'�
.�Pgg
gqiti:?+M1�
X
! :•�
'
)!'
P 1:
S
oC+ {n.,
IENM ,t.R '%-�i Y37.�WOW
:k''J
2 `j
x
#3
Sl
1
x
x
'tom(\ rT
2- b s
.1 IlzM�.
%Sr
7qf
,���'.
2
y�.
r,
�.:
'rvA'
_
2-42UO
x
iA5
Sl
1
2ral r Yr
r \IxI
i f.t
h
?:?iYn
12Yj+s 1'
µ�
�,c�)VK✓!P£5�C 'y!� (d=pd�.iM� rN '=i 4.�r=
I
Li4yl r�YtJ'
.[! k
x
'^. i
I �,vY.
g
Ir4
4
z+'i'1
x
£�*Ck
�n�
.e.l 1
s
�.°'"'
r
r
rl } - �.: 1
!
. I'V
�
.
..
�T.1
1" J,J� Y1 4 S�
. �.V.t+L� �✓d_.rY �
. . }�._.
i I�
, _
.S
..= is
�\{j�f
S
`
�
,��ll
Tiy YY
Z�207�
x
#7
Sl
1
x
x
7
ihr M1
.,.h \1
". t
-...'Se
�Y.
.
KK .
``''
r0.
n..
'.•r:-.d "� xn+ {".i
-,,(� '�.t
f .
1 i'1
(�'.
07
"t•
+1T
ti>L
y
e. M.. .....Rsm
�!;' I
?ru'ii.
r,.'
.T4T&
��k'1 :_n ?� J16,
_ 1.
itr.,+J4
.b'81..-.....
l({ 1f
..(:... .,:
Jr
5.4. .1. a,i
�'
5
is ra.
Al+
try1
P�.
CIS
,.. M,.
5}'tv,.
cir..
'f1�7.,+,.
�:,fY
a""a.i �,.,�'4
L1..
`i'rfrt 1� prl a, ryr lktyt lI �a lx ��'� f n1�iR.. n VK�'r.., !r Iq (' iPK;.. >,R151Y
f' Jjj /�[+ J gryyy�,�� jyry� y �i f.J' (.AW y�'.�} y t G,S,m'i
: /:.4rf!f! 'il�' hL^iyi(r j4 5l�l'fJ x/ t
1 N"i} �'.r. �.t
A. �YrLPi2".iC,.tr Z,r`i44V+.j1 ..V K.r.I ..%.N£ Ilib�uo k 2/
- i.. su..2:vi N... la 7 AS ., -fit„
:Yi[I Y
RELINQUISHED BYI DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY - DATE/TIME ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS
a—/s--� I i
�
I>✓�
t�5
IEPORT COPY ' RUSH WORK MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO SAA 'IBMISSION. ADDITIONAL CHARGES MAY APPLY.

SECTION IV
WWTP INFORMATION
The West Point Stevens WWTP is located in Scotland County, South East of Wagram on
Highway 401. Turn South on to Air Base Rd. and the Plant is Approximately 2.5 miles
on the left bordering Shoe Heel Creek. West Point Stevens currently permitted for 2500
dry tons per year. The wastewater treatment plant facility is designed to handle
7,500,000 gallons per day. They average approximately 4,000,000 gallons per day. The
town uses aerobic digesters to treat the initial waste product. Within Section III is
biosolids analysis of nutrient and metal analysis, toxicity characteristics leaching
procedure and pathogen and vector attraction reduction monitoring. These analysis show
that the product contains no elements harmful to the environment if land applied in
association with the applicable regulations. Within this section is a schematic of the plant
design for West Point Stevens.

EQUALIZATION
BASIN
(4) x 40 HP MIXERS
10 MG
THICKENER
WESTPOINT STEVENS W W T P
Wagram, NC
AERATION
BASIN
(6) x 75 HP AERATORS
(6) x 50 HP AERATORS
(2) x 40 HP MIXERS
6 MG
AEROBIC
DIGESTER
1.2 MG
MIXER
FLOCCULATOR
I
.,WASTE
SLUDGE
DISPOSAL
CLARIFIERS
(3) x 30' DIAM
IEFFLUENT
.Lumber
River

Residuals Transport and Application
The residuals Transport and Application plan describes the process in which residuals
from West Point Stevens will be land applied to agricultural lands for beneficial reuse.
The residuals will be applied to row crops on proposed fields in Robeson and Scotland
Counties. The residuals will be used as a replacement for conventional nitrogen and
phosphorus fertilizers to meet agronomic rates.
Treatment
West Point Stevens has a land application program for the biosolids produced. The
biosolids have been previously treated by aerobic digestion, to .reduce concentrations for
compliance with pathogen and vector attraction reduction. The biosolids have been
previously analyzed by an independent laboratory for nutrient and metal concentrations.
After the treatment and analysis of the biosolids they can be injected, incorporated, or
surface applied as a class B biosolid.
Transportation
The biosolids will be loaded at the plant in a designated staging area assigned by the
plant. The biosolids will then be transported to the land application site in leak proof
tank trailers driven by experienced drivers. Trucks will travel major traffic routes to the
fields, highway regulations such as weight limits and other ordinances are known and
will be observed. The trucks will deliver the biosolids directly to the site of application,
and will directly off load it in to the field applicator (terragator, spreader truck, pull tank,
umbilical system, etc.). Biosolids will be cleaned off of the transportation equipment
before leaving the field
Application ,
Prior to any application soil samples will be taken of the sites to be used. These sites will
be analyzed for liming requirements and nutrient and metal concentrations. From this
analysis of the site, and knowing the crop nutrient requirement for the proposed sites, an
application rate can be determined that does not exceed the agronomic rate of the crop. A
residual PAN carryover will also be determined and factored into the application rates.
This residual PAN is calculated up to five years. Once liming and application rates have
been determined, the fields will be limed to bring the pH to an acceptable level. The
fields are then to be flagged showing clearly the denoted buffer areas ( buffer explanation
on.following page). All application of biosolids will stop during times of *inclement
weather to limit the amount of compaction caused by the equipment. The" application
equipment will be calibrated by measuring the amount handled on a known square
footage. Once the rate of discharge has been determined, changing the speed of the
applicator can change the application rate. Experienced operators will operate the
equipment applying the biosolids evenly across the field.
• All proposed fields are located in secluded areas that are very sparsely populated.
The land is privately owned and posted as such.
*'inclement weather — more than .5" of rain in a 24 hour period, snow covered or frozen
ground

Buffer Explanation
Application Method
Area description Injection- Surface Spreading
Property boundary
50'
50'
Public Road
50'
50'
Inhabited Dwelling
200'
400'
Potable Wells (public & private)
100'
100'
Channel Ways
25'
25'
Drainage Ditch
50'
50'
Surface Water
100'
100'

AGRONOMIST REPORT
Synagro Southeast (Synagro) is operating a land application program for the
recycling/beneficial reuse of wastewater biosolids produced at West Point Stevens
WWTP. The agronomist report is submitted as a crucial step in the review of potential
receiver sites for the program. Several factors should be taken into consideration in
determining a site's suitability to receive biosolids. These factors are:
• Site Investigation
• Topography
• Soils
• Biosolids Characteristics and Loading Rates
• Crop Management
Site Investigation
The site investigation consisted of a physical observation of each proposed site in which
the following parameters were evaluated:
• Soil Characteristics
• Slope
• Cropping Systems
• Location of Property Lines
• Location of Residences
• Location of Wells and Surface Water Features
Site specific information is enclosed (See Section VIII) for each site evaluated.
Application area maps delineating the proposed application areas within each field are
also enclosed.
Topography
The slope of each site was evaluated during the site investigation. The slope for the
individual sites range from 0 to 10 percent for surface application and 0 to 18 percent for
sub -surface injection. Areas of excessive slope have been eliminated from the
application areas.
Soils
Soil fertility samples were collected from each site and were analyzed for standard soil
fertility parameters and regulated metals content. The results of these analyses are
reported in Section VIII. Soil testing of the sites included in this application indicates
that the soil pH is moderately acidic on most sites and should be adjusted by the addition
,P.
of lime prior to or during land application activities being performed in order to achieve

optimal crop production. The lime recommendations are generally made based on raising
the pH to a standard of 6.0.
Biosolids Characteristics and Loading Rates
Biosolids samples were collected and analyzed by, an independent laboratory (See
Section III). The biosolids analysis report and calculations` indicate that the residuals are
non -hazardous and non -toxic. Both the soils and the crops should be able to assimilate
the proposed loadings of liquids, solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and salts
known to be in the residuals. This assessment is based on the biosolids analysis
,provided. the planned application rate, proper crop management guidelines and adherence
to permit requirements. Nitrogen is considered to be the most limiting characteristic of
these biosolids, however, soil tests should be reviewed annually to identify any changes
in the nutrient status of the soil.
Crop Management
Based on the site and soil evaluations, crop nutrient requirements and the nutrient content
of the biosolids, all sites should readily assimilate the residuals, however crop rotations
and management practices should be evaluated prior to each application to account for
changes in the proposed crop rotation and land use objectives. Site specific cropping
patterns are discussed further in the Site Descriptions contained in Section VIII. Crop
management guidelines that will be of importance for these sites will be:
^s timing of application events with plant nutritional needs and periods of plant
dormancy,
• split applications to prevent hydraulic overloading or nutrient leaching,
• performance of proper stabilization methods to fit crop and soil needs,
• establishment of suitable vegetative cover current agricultural sites,
• incorporation or injection of residual solids on fields that have a high
incidence of flooding,
• maintenance of proper vegetative cover on more sloping areas with runoff
potential, and
• proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting.
Land application should provide an environmentally acceptable means of beneficial reuse
of the biosolids provided all the parameters of the agronomist report and the requirements
of the permit are followed.
K in eCarripbell
Agronomist

SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION

SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that soil and site evaluations were conducted on the proposed
application sites by Synagro Southeast. The soil and site evaluations consisted of hand
auger borings of the soils on the application sites, soil profile descriptions, collection of
soil fertility samples by standard soil sampling methods, location of property lines,
location of residences, locations of wells and surface water features, identification of all
required buffer areas, and generation of application area maps.
This is to certify that soil and site evaluations were conducted on behalf of WestPoint
Stevens proposed application sites by Synagro Southeast.
Robert P. Willcox, L.S.S.
No. 1098
� SOI;,
sk
A
1098
�FNORTH

West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram, NC
Proposed Sites
Site No. Owner/Lessee Application Area
(area excluding buffersl
Robeson County
1.
NC-RO-07=01 Jerry Thigpen 19.09
NC-RO-07-02 2.53
NC-RO-07-03 20.04
NC-RO-07-04 68.97
NC-RO-07-05 32.04
Total for site NC-RO-07 142.67 acres
2.
NC-RO-08-01 Willie Thigpen 10.10
NC-RO-08-02 19.57
NC-RO-08-03 20.99
NC-RO-08-04 18.78
Total for site NC-RO-08 69.44 acres
3.
NC-RO-09-01 Carol Foods/Martin McLaughlin 15.96
NC-RO-09-02 15.19
NC-RO-09-03 12.86
NC-RO-09-04 3.88
Total for site NC-RO-09 47.89 acres
4.
NC-RO-10-08 Kenneth Collins/Alan Locklear 13.95
NC-RO-10-09 Alan Locklear 10.08
Total for site NC-RO-10 24.03 acres
Scotland County
5.
NC-SC-12-03 Laurence H. Reichner/Martin McLaughlin 8.21
` Total for site NC-SC-12 8.21 acres
Total for West'PointStevens 292.24 acres

Jerry Thigpen Farm
For West Point Stevens
The Jerry Thigpen. Farm, is located approximately 2.5 miles south of Maxton following
Hwy 301. All of the fields can be accessed from Hwy 301. The surrounding areas are
predominantly rural and sparsely populated.
The five fields total 190.46 gross acres, 142.67 acres of the site is applicable, after buffers.
The five fields consist of coastal bermuda used for hay and pasture, along with the
cropland used for cotton soybeans and com.
The slope of the site was nearly level, to gently sloping (0-6%). The Robeson County
Soil Survey issued January 1978 reports that this site contains 9 different soil series,
Norfolk,.Lynchburg, Wakulla, Goldsboro, Wagram, Lumbee, McColl, Pocalla and Rains.
Pocalla was found with a boring in field 2. Lynchburg was found in field 5. Wakulla
was found in the remaining fields._ The soil test analysis showed no nutrients to be
deficient though pH is low and will have to be corrected through the proper application of
time. With proper application and monitoring the proposed sites should benefit from the
application of biosolids.

SITE SUMMARY
West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram, NC
Owners Name
Jerry Thigpen
Operator:
Same
Address:
Thigpen Farms
1211 S. Austin Street Extention
Maxton, NC 28364 '
Phone:
[phone]
Site # NC-RO-07
Estimated
Total Applicable
Field # Acres Acres Crop(s)
Perdominent Latitude &
Slope Soil Series Longitude
Field 01
43.40
19.09
Coastal Bermuda
0-4%
Wakulla
340 42' 49"
790 21' 18'`
Field 02
8.84
2.53
Coastal Bermuda
0-2%
Pocalla
'
340 42' 39"
790 20' 48"
Field 03
21.62
20.04
'
Soybeans
2-6% ,
Wakulla
340 42' 07"
790 20' 46"
Field 04
79.70
68.97
•
Cotton
0-2%
Wakulla
340 41' 67"
79° 20' 44"
Field 05
36.90
32.04
Cotton _
0-2%
Lynchburg
340 4�1' 50"
79° 20' 50"
TOTALS 190.46 142.67
Notes:

VICINITY MAP
M�m
�"A
SYNAG�J
A Rrtidua4 Afanagmant Company
Ti'Opti.•
'L
COUNTY�o�PsoK

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
®YtSF:�EU1l�•�lLi�}®
!11 r. !.''�
:1:301
�
Cepynghl6 �OOII p5 lac tie like
ie' .
3016 SYNAGRQ
A Ruidnah Management Company
Y
/( I
�.i ♦ \ v /
,v
\ as '-�^ r �.-.n 5` • t , 1 f69 . _ t Glg
1 './ 1 = .�3. _ of >. ,rt,h;, �` 'y • I10okQp4
.. r 70�CJ
✓ yr 1.. ..
16
�NKi ' . 7 v .x:.r�L�LM +' i � � -• . - � t ; t x r�������'C�i� , 1.11
a`-caJ. > _L . f t .,.
.49
IN
)��'�^ °\.•:•�1s1 tJC �._�/\'�.y V � I ,i'1�•t. '��.. 6^„rY,��;�i \' ��.1.�+�`
OWNER �1 e/�Y 7 SCALE: 1" = Z %ood FIELDS /_ 2 , y, 5
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR ///axta 19 rf/ CONTOUR INTERVAL S r

i �
( / "
r
Y .t
1 ^5i :.
. •iv t.. J. F7,
r �
t � r.. r ^c ry., . s
a � ,�
e da r .4'�.
� �
1 j T Jr
d �
� � -
r a
�p
:.'i
� r
A
ryb-
`
*-
(�.
��� ¢'
i . -� f a
r ,..
�:
1
SrP. _ � _ �'' Y_'� J
� f
)'• 1 y .�.�'�
�`i F" �
Y / � 1
_ ./e. } _
4�,.
_ _ S
V\'

'; LIGATION AREA MAP SYIVAGR0
A Raidrra/r dimragezerl CamP,,,y
All
z
r ` I off
Owner
r"
Scale: P =' 9
92 Field #'
Total
Acres `i3. -/
Net Acres /% 0 9
STREAM
@ m
APPLICATION AREA
-- — PRIVATE ROAD
"—j
DRAIN
R
HOUSE
FORESTED AREA
O
POND
0
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
—
FENCE
WELL
S
OSTORAGE
AREA
'o
0
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
•
INCORPORATION,
8-120/. SLOPE

III, SYNAGRQ
,r
XPLICA.TION AREA NEAP A au;d,,,h n,,,.,...­
Owner _Ter,-„ TA;,
on,
Scale: l" = 994 a'.
Field # Z
Total
Acres 8, 8 y Net Acres Z . 53
•' -�
STREAM
Z '. ®
APPLICATION AREA --
- - PRIVATE ROAD
-�
DRAIN
IS
HOUSE
_ FORESTED AREA
O
POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
-
FENCE
WELL
\\ _
OSTORAGE
AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
.
INCORPORATION,
842% SLOPE

'N)
�SYNAG1Z0
APPLICATION AREA MAP ; nu d„e,, M_.._ __._:. , _.
Owner
Scale: 1" _ 79 5 2-. Field # 3
Total
Acres Z 1. � Z
Net Acres_ Z o, o--1
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
— - — PRIVATE ROAD
• —�
DRAIN
l I
HOUSE
FORESTED AREA
O
POND
.0
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
—
FENCE
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12°/a SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
11PA')SYNAGRO
A RvidrraG M .....aa.,. �.:.:._....
w
' Owner ,
Tk
Scaler I" = 79 y Zrr Field #.
5 igr„
Total
Acres 7 9: '7
Net Acres__KL 9,7
—�
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
-- - — PRIVATE ROAD
—,j
DRAIN
M
HOUSE
[ FORESTED AREA
O
POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
-3E—
FENCE
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
'
8-12% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
SYNAGRO
A Raidualr I{iauun n..,,. (•....,._._.
Owner _Ter r �z Tk.
Scale: V = r;1 2 '" Field #
Total
Acres 3 6. cl
'Net Acres 32. O `/
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
— - — PRIVATE ROAD
'
DRAIN
®
HOUSE
FORESTED AREA
O
POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
)f--
FENCE'.-
f�jf
WELL
O
STORAGE AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION,
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

:i

01,411, SYNAGRO
SOIL DESCPJPTION SHEET ARofdva%M--t;ww C—P-7
Project: GvPS Landowner:
Site: — Field: _� Sample #: _ -- Slope: U 1yo/d
Acres (gross): y3. y •Acres (net): ?o Crop: eel,--LJ
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
PROFILE A
Horizon Depth'
Texture
Color '
Structure Mottles
/)-7
—�_ —
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Horizon Depth
Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT-
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes:
Described By:
Date: Z2Z12( o
i
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Type
S Sand
WK Weak
G
Granular
BK Blocky
- Loam
MD Moderate
PL
Platy
ABK Angular Blocky
31 Silt
ST Strong
PR
Prismatic
SBK Subangular Blocky
C Clay
CPR
Columnar
MA Massive

SY MOD
SOIL DESCPJPTION SHEET ARuiGuh Mnnajerau,Cmp�
Project:«s Landowner:
Site: Field: 2 Sample #: I Slope: p- 2
Acres (gross): .Acres (net): 2 - S 3 Crop:
.s
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE A /q k „ Z s
11t, a6t SG /o % C�
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Horizon Depth
Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes: Led
' r7 r ,.I �
Described By:
Date: Z ' z0
i
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Tvoe
S Sand
WK Weak .
G
Granular
BK
Blocky
Loam
MD Moderate
PL
Platy
ABK
Angular Blocky
31 Silt
ST Strong
PR
Prismatic
SBK
Subangular Blocky
C Clay
CPR
Columnar
MA
Massive

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: % � s/- 0 ' t- rev-,-'.
>' SYNAG0
A Raid mh MartnV-n , CamA--7
Landowner: Jr..,, 7�/- _
Site' Field: 3 Sample #: — Slope; 2 -G y
Acres (gross): 2 2. .Acres (net): 2o•o5/ Crop:
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon
Depth
Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE A 4
0— 7
s
/o .
7 — z �f
5
/u Y
L,
W—g01-
GS
7.S
C,
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT: >YD"
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series: //4
Horizon Depth
Depth to SHWT:
Texture Color
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes: �'„ e r) �, v« h / O V h ) %� �✓/ of T'
Described By:
1
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
S Sand
WK Weak
L Loam
MD Moderate
SI Silt
ST Strong
C Clay
Structure Mottles
Date:
Structure Tvoe
G
Granular
BK
PL
Platy
ABK
PR
Prismatic
SBK
CPR
Columnar
MA
Blocky
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Massive

SOIL, DESCPJPTIOET SHEET
Project:
SYNAGRO
A Rah&d1j Af—rc f Compaq.
Landowner:
Site: Field: �_ Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): %% 7 ,Acres (net): 6e. ?'7 Crop: C fjfo r
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture
6 �• . �
PROFILE A � '
Color
1!q y
Structure Mottles
�'
G�
�a
Depth to SHWT: > y2 "
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT.
Depth 8 type of restrictive layer:
Soil
/Series:
Notes:
Described By:
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
S Sand
WK Weak
Loam
MD Moderate
�I Silt
ST Strong
C Clay
Date: /2 2/ D a
Structure Tvoe
G
Granular
BK
PL
Platy
ABK
PR
Prismatic
SBK
CPR
Columnar
MA
Blocky
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Massive

SOIL DESCRIPTION SKEET
Project: W sf /%•, r '. , s
r
N�Mjp
,ASYG
A Ruidr h Me joj Con;�errir
Landowner: J Y„L/ 7l � J77.
Site: Field: S Sample #: — Slope: U
Acres (gross): 36, 9 Acres (net): Crop:
SOIL. PROFILE. DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE A - fib 0-'7" S
/o %
9 _
L 5
zy-3G' 5
% ,Kf�
W✓K iS/?Af
Depth. to SHWf: 2 c("
Depth '& type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
r Horizon Depth - Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT.
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes:
Legend
Texture
S Sand
L Loam
SI Silt
C Clay
Described By: Date: r2l2�/oa
r '
Structure Grade
WK Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Structure Type
G
Granblar
BK
Blocky
PL
Platy
ABK
.Angular Blocky
PR
Prismatic
SBK
Subangular Blocky
CPR
Columnar
MA
Massive

NCDA A r c Division
4300 Reedy
Creek Road Raleigh,
NC 27607-64.2,' \119) 733-2655:,:..:.•:.. ....
Report '869
..1Crowerr. Tlligpen,Jerry
Copies to:
Synagro'...... _ast
1211 Austin St Ext.
PON
Maxion, NC 28364
oil
Test
fi
Re ort
o
Southeast
�-/ Pann:
PO Bo
PO Box
1770
Clemmons, NC 27012
1/ 3/01 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Robeson County
Agronomist Comments:
'rile heavy metal concentration
is within -[lie limits
of acceptable levels and
should Pose no threat to crops grown on this land. Follow soil test recommendations for lime and fertilizer
application.
T. Kent Yarborough, Aaronomisl
Field Information
jApplied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
o Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Linte N R05 RO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mu See Hole
1.501 Berm Hay/I'as,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1 4,1' 180-220 0 200-220
$ 0
6
0 13
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W111 CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-t Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zit -AI
Crt-I
S-1
SS-1 1110-N NIIs-N Na
MIN o.66 1.37
3.5 54.0
1.6 5.7 76
13 44.0 9.0 177 116 47
47
67
25
0.0
Field Information
Applied.Limel
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime N R05 JV0
Mg Crt
Zn
B
Mn See (Vote
1502 Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm HayRas,M LIT 180-220 0 20-40
0 0
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% 1V/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I
K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cn-I
S-1
SS -I NO3-N NHs-N Na
MIN 0.36 1.31
6.1 77.0
1.4 6.2 237
93 57.0 12.0 318 _ 200 703
703
_ 426
35
0.1
Field Information
Applied Litnej
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime N R05 RO
Mg Crt
Zn
B
Mn See Note
1503 Soybeans
1st Crop: Soybeans
0 0 0 60-80
0 0
0
0 3
2nd Crop:,
Test Results
Soil Class JIM% IVIV CEC BS56
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca% kfg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Crt-1
S-1
SS-1 A101-N NIA -Al Na
MIN 0.32 1.46
3.2 75.0
0.8 6.3 80
36 55.0 15.0 132 85 148
148
65
22
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lintel
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crap
No Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime N R05 RO
Mg Crt
Zn
B
Mn See A'ote
1504 Cotton
Ist Crop: Cotton
0 50-70 0 70-90
0 0
0
1.0
0 3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class 11M% IM, CEC BS%
Ac pit P-I
K-I Ca% Alg% D111-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
&-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1 A14;-N NHt-At Ala
MIN o.46 IAI
3.4 85.0
0.5 6.4 112
32 68.0 14.0 194 114 124
124
27
24
0.1

NCDA AgrorAfte
Division
4300_Reed Creek Road Raleigh, NC
27607-646�019)
733-2655 :: Grower: Thigpen
Jerry
Report NOk '869 P 2
'Field Inform
Recommendations `. .
Sample No.
1505
Last Crop
:n1im6
Cotton
TlA
Crop or Year
1st Crop: Cotton
2nd Crop:
Lime
0
N B05 h0
50-70 0 30.50
Mg C$
0 0
Zn
0
B
1.0
Mu See Note
0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM15 W/V CV; BS'�
MIN 1.8 1.27 3.1 100.0
Ac . pH P-I K-I
0.0 5.8 236 54
Ca% Mg%
77.0 14.0
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
261 170 72
Zn-AI
72
Cu-I
36
S-I
47
SS-1 NQ-N NH-N Na
0.1

NCDA '---onomic Division 4300 Reedy Creels Road
111eigh, NC 27607=6465 , , _ ,
[phone] ..
1
Heavy Metal Soil Test Report
Thigpen, Jerry
Report #: 18869
1211 Austin St Ext.
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION
Maxton,NC 28364
Robeson County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd Ni Pb
Se Cr
Al
As
Sample Cadmium Nickel Lead
Selenium Chromium Aluminum
Arsenic
ID
mg/dm3 (ppm)
1501 0.00 0.00
1.10
0:00
0.10
4.70
1502 0.00 0.10
2.60
6.Oo
0.10
5.60
1503 0.00 0.00
0.90
0.00
0.10
4.00
1504 0.00 0.00
1.10
0.00
0.10
3.10
1505 0.00 0.10
0.00
0.00.
0.20
8.40

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee:
West Point. Stevens
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:_ Municipal. &Industrial
Site ID Number Field Number: NC-RO-07
Field Number: 1.2.3.4.5
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Robeson Couritv
Owner of Property used for residual application:_Igu y Thigpen
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
r.- Land use or cropping patterns:_ Coastal Bermuda
i
Intended use or disposition of crops: Pasture & Hay
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits West Point Stevens_
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to, apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in .accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his
representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This
agreement shall remain in effect 'for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his
representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as
written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM LARS: 06l94 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Petmittee, County and State Officials or their representatives
to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application and to establish monitoring facilities on
or near the application site as required by the residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives to take
necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application permit as issued by
the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of residual application. The
NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the
laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the program for
land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee
for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals may be applied to
sites with a pH of less than 6.6 provided a suff—cient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and
cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and
schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his
representative and the Permittee will determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement for a period of
eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access to the land
- application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following residual application. Such controls
may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
I I. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or Land Owner
(Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third party, the landowner
shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this
Agreement.
FORM LARS: 06/94 1Page 15 of 18

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the
subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a t'nirty (30) day period following the residual
application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during
these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modif—cation must be requested and obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and agreements. In addition, a notice shall be
given by the current landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at
each site.
17. Any duly. authorized. officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental Management may, upon
presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any
records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another municipality,
contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement The land application of any additional
wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this permit, is prohibited.
iLtittfttittftiLitttNtttttttt!lFttttttFFRtittttttfttif FftttttttttttltNFttttttRRtttttttttiF
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM LARS: 06194 Page 15 of 18

'* * * * * * * * * * t * k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * t * * * * t k * * * * * * * * *
W
L have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permiuee to apply sludgelresidual to my lands as specified herein.
wn /
D���
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY,
L the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that z L
personally appeared before me this day and
WITNESS my hand and official seal -this day of
My. commission Expires
SEAL:,.._...:.!; -
execution of the f6reoing instrument
t t k k t* t t t t t* k*# t t t t k* t#* t k* t t***# k* t*** k* t t R## t k# t k*** t k
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
Lessee
Date
L 187J W have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permi
�f/ro/2anf
Date
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 18 of 18

Willie Thigpen Farm
For West Point Stevens
The Willie Thigpen Farm, is locatedapproximately 2.5 miles south of Maxton following
Hwy 301. All of the fields can be accessed from Hwy 301. The surrounding areas are
predominantly rural and sparsely, populated.
The four fields total 96.20 gross acres, 69.44 acres of the site is applicable after buffers.
The four fields consist of coastal bermuda used for hay and pasture.
The, slope of the site was nearly level, to gently sloping (2-6%). The Robeson County
Soil Survey issued January 1978 reports that this site contains 3 different .soil series,
Wakulla, Lumbee and Pocalla. Pocalla was found with a boring in field 3. Wakulla was
found in the remaining fields. The soil test analysis. showed no nutrients to be deficient
though pH is low and will have to be corrected -through. the proper application of lime.
With proper application and monitoring the proposed sites should benefit from the
application of biosolids.

SITE SUMMARY
West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram,. NC
Owners Name
Willie Thigpen
Operator:
Same
Address:
Thigpen Farms
1211 S. Austin Street Extention-
Maxton, NC 28364
Phone:
[phone]
Site #
NC-RO-08
Estimated
Total
Applicable Perdominent Latitude &
Field # Acres
Acres Crop(s) Slope Soil Series Longitude
Field 01
18.78
- 10.10
Coastal Bermuda
2-4°/q
Wakulla
340 42' 48"
790 21' 27"
Field 02
25.48
19.57
Coastal Bermuda
2-4%
Wakulla
340 42' 32"
790 21' 24"
Field 03
21'.73
20.99
Coastal Bermuda
2-6%
Pocalla
340 42' 39"
790 21' 12"
Field 04
30.21
18.78
Coastal Bermuda
2-4%
Wakulla
340 42' 30"
79° 21' 13"
TOTALS 96.20 69.44 -
Notes:

Y �, xanno - �iNno�
4 � \ � I' p•pK• ri e �e• li � �s �w - .o_ a� ��
_ as P`� �n.••t^,` i �q'�` � `/n�.•.�j ��� '�J`1. �,�!•-�-)_� o-;e :,
!3115.
_ u. in .\..- ai'. �l• CW' +�I', sa "ojO -D I 1_wv>w .` � /E -i
�4 : J. _(\1 -�`'>
�' � -:.: N•.``'L_ _,fgj i.` u � S
'r%r• 1 i .�i�� _'
i ' ' i \i\b
I _ '•.� Cry .� Y'.
,.d -,•r
Vs
,
•yZ
Ja •%,: ';
.Cuvdu(o' LunuaBvunyy f�anrLny }'
Odf)VNAS
II��,
0

�\,, NJ
'SYNAGIRD
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP A Raiduals Afanagmient Company
Cc 20001A ap aja ca Q1:1 �10
7 kN
Sw
`1(� Y fix° .�„ "�Y�uY T-.�+� � `p, ' ; ?. l'�r'+✓4'i� � ( ,{``�. tip" '
4 is
.95
4L-
p"
X
4
OWNER V;11i, ZY'�oe, 4
SCALE: I"= 2 V, 6c, o FIELDS / 2 3 q
PHOTOQUADIYEAR /`/9/ CONTOUR INTERVAL

,m
� �_ � •'sue ^}• �e
� _
r\
Y

a
APPLICATION AAA MAP
NPI'' SYNAGRO
A Rai�Lm/1 Alarrcgnuu
Owner `
i'i/;// r%
` 4 �•, Scale: 1" _ 7 9: L ' Field 9,�'
. /
STREAM
—j
DRdIN
O
POND
—�.`—
FENCE
OSTORAGE
AREA
Total Acres /f. if/ Net Acres /O. /O
APPLICATION AREA — PRIVATE ROAD
$ HOUSE ! FORESTED AREA
O OUTBUILDING
' WELL
0 SOIL DESCRIPTION
\\ UNSUITABLE
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
°�0'151 SMAGTO
Owner W//TI- Scale: l"= 7902Field# Z
J,
STREAM
-�
DRAIN
O
POND
-�`-
FENCE
OSTORAGE
AREA
Total Acres 2 3. VP Net Acres >9. 57
APPLICATION AREA - - - PRIVATE ROAD
11 HOUSE [FORESTED AREA
O OUTBUILDING
WELL
SOIL DESCRIPTION
\\
UNSUITABLE
SUITABLE FOR
_
INCORPORATION,
842% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA lAIAP
SYNAG�O
Owner Y✓//.'� T%;<: Scale: 1" = 7y%2 Field # ' 3
"'-,f STREAM
-�
DRAIN
O
POND
-
FENCE
OSTORAGE
AREA
Total Acres_ Z 1. -3 ' Net Acres_ 20. 5 5
APPLICATION AREA - PRIVATE ROAD
At HOUSE 0FORESTED AREA
O OUTBUILDING .
WELL
O SOIL DESCRIPTION
\\ UNSUITABLE
SUITABLE FOR
.INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

APPLICATION A' RRA MAP
ftN)
1000 SYMAGRO
Owner..Y✓//,c 7`�;Scale:I"= 75sz Field# V
-j STREAM
"-�
DRAIN
O
POND
-`
FENCE
•O
STORAGE AREA
Total Acres 30_'2 1 Net Acres I i. '7 9,
APPLICATION AREA PRIVATE ROAD
81 HOUSE FORESTED AREA
O OUTBUILDING
, WELL
O SOIL DESCRIPTION
\\ UNSUITABLE
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

SYT UD
SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET itR M—t--Mmt--fCampmy
Project: WP5 Landowner: Llhr. `}'{.a'
Site: Field; Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): Acres (net): D_ /O Crop: [��, f.•._._%
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE A n-g
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer: r-
SoilSeries
Horizon Depth
` PROFILE B
Notes:
Legend
Texture
S Sand,
L Loam
SI Silt
C Clay
Texture Color
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:l
Structure Mottles
Described By: * ,,, � Date:
i
Structure Grade
WK Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Structure Type
G
Granular
BK
Blocky
PL
Platy
ABK
Angular Blocky
PR
Prismatic
SBK
Subangular Blocky
CPR
Columnar
MA
Massive

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: Gli/9S'
SYNAGRO
A Ra;Awli ManeCv t Company
Landowner:
/< Or
Site: `— Field: Z Sample #: Slope: _ Z _ y%
Acres (gross): 2 S. yy Acres (net): I F. S % Crop: _0 151
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE A A _ e,
gt� 3Cr GS
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer: 4
Soil Series: (/V1 v/Z,
t
` PROFILE B
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes: o
`` n
g�/Ca r Jv v n J 77
{c
� tifm
z
Described By:
Date: /Z zr G o
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Type
S Sand
L Loam
WK Weak G
MD Moderate PL
Granular
Platy
BK Blocky
ABK Angular Blocky
SI Silt
ST Strong PR
Prismatic
SBK Subangular Blocky
C Clay
CPR
Columnar
MA Massive '

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: Wy - i%;_ �- ! t , , s
Site: — Field: 3
A Raiduah Mane fc t Come.
Landowner: V6-//'r TkY
Sample #: — Slope:
Acres (gross): 21. 73 ,Acres (net): 20. 9 `! Crop:
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth
Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE A A o- 6"
S
io_ Y?•wk
�„ati. �� _
P-ZY"
i e 2y-NZ«'
SL
vY %v
�vb st9rc —
Depth to SHWT:
y2 f
PROFILE B
Depth & type of restrictive layer: 1To
Soil Series: YvcK
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
Depth to SHWT:
Depth 8 type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes:
r-c
Legend
Texture
S Sand
L Loam
SI Silt
C Clay
Described By:l ��� �� Date: I A I/GO
Structure Grade
WK Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Structure Tvoe
G
Granular
BK
PL
Platy
ABK
PR
Prismatic
SBK
CPR
Columnar
MA
Blocky
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Massive

SGRO
SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET ne.,,tr,cm
,w
Project: GZ//� Landowner: /✓ /
Site: _ Field: Sample #: Slope:
.Acres (gross): 30,2/ _Acres (net): /� Crop:, ee,5 1 1
.SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE A
__,_ k `< _�
o s
r —
Depth to SHWT: 3� `
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
�t
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
'PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Seriesf
Notes:
Described By:.. %
i
Date: /L 2 /Z Oc
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Type
S Sand
WK Weak G
Granular
BK Blocky
Loam
MD Moderate PL
Platy
ABK Angular Blocky
;I Silt
ST Strong PR
Prismatic
SBK Subangular Blocky
C Clay
CPR
Columnar
MA Massive

NCDA A ro ac Division
4300 Reed iGreelt Road-; Ralei I NC 27607-646'
`�19) 733 2G55`,i +r ` ,:
Report P�'867
. , .:,.sa ,
Grower: Thigpen, Willie
Copies 1,
Synagro So ast
'
1211 South Austin St.
Maxton, NC 28364'
-
oil
Test Report
Synagro
Southeast
-P
Farm:
PO Box
1770
Clemmons, NC 27012
1/ 5/0I SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Robes6n County
Agronomist Comments:
The heavy metal concentration
is within the limits
of normal background levels, unless otherwise
noted, and should pose no threat to crops grown on this
land. The "heavy metal" results are
shown on a separate report. No lime is recommended above PH 6.5. Otherwise follow soil lest
recommendations for lime and fertilizer application rates.
M. Ray Tucker Agronomist
Field Information
Applied Limel
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr TIA
Crop or Year Linte
N R05 Ko Mg Crt
Zn
B
Ain See Note
1401 Berm liay/Pas,M
Is( Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1.8'r
180-220 0 150-170 0 0
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% iV/V CEC BS o
Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) ZU-I Zn-AI
C11-1
S-I
SS-1 A'Q-N NlG-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.36
5.5 64.0
2.0 5.5 310 30 50.0 12.0
113 77 394 394
280
41
0.1 '
Field Information
lied-Llin'e
iRecommendattons
Sample No. Last Crop
No Yr TIA
Crop or Year Linte
N R05 100 Mg Crt
Zn
B
Mtt See Note
1402 Berm Hay/Pas,M
IslCrop: Berm Hay/Pas,M PIT
180-220 0 100-120 0 0
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% IVIV CEC BS•0
Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zu-AI
Cu-I
S-I.
SS-1 A'4-N A'lL-A' Ara
MIN 0.71 1.38
5.2 6.0
1.6 5.7 198 51 .54.0 11.0
156 103 223 223
154
31
0.1
Field Informatio A
lied Llme
sltecommendatlons.
" " °'R.
a a. :. Y f s2,.',".einf9 rt".
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr TIA
Crop or Year Lime
N R05 I00 Mg Cis
Zn
B
Mn See Arote
1403 Berm I-lay/Pas,M
lsl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 3T
180-220 0 0.20 $ 0
0
0 12
2nd Cro• :
Test Results
Soil Class HM% IV/V CEC BS9b
Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% A1g%
Mn-I Mn-Al (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 AY$-N NHt-N Ara
MIN 2.68 1.10
5.1 37.0
3.2 4.8 94 119 20.0 6.0
890 543 54 54
79
97
0.1
Field Information
lied:Lime':Recommendatiohs
"~
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr TIA
Crop or Year, Litne
N R05 l00 Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn See Note
1404 Berm Ihay/Pas,M
Isl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1.8T
180-220 0 100-120 0 0
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class "I % IV/V CEC =6
Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (I)Mu-Al (2) Zn-] Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 A'Q-N ArH-A' Ara
MIN 0.92 136
4.6 57.0
2.0 5.3 250 49 40.0 10.0
404 252 238 238
388
53
0.1

NCDonomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road 'Heigh; NC,276Q7-6465 ._, (919),733-2655 1
Heavy Metal Soil Test Report
Thigpen, Willie
Report #: 18867
1211 South Austin St.
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION
Maxton,NC 28364
Robeson County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd Ni Pb
Se Cr
Al As
Sample Cadmium Nickel Lead
Selenium Chromium
Aluminum Arsenic
ID
mg/dm3 (ppm)
1401 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.20
5.10
1402 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.10
4.00
1403 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.10
7.30
1404 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.20
6.50

West Point Stevens
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Perri
Contact Pei
Address of
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:_Municipal. &Industrial
Site ID Number Field Number: NC-RO-08
Field Number: 1.2.3.4
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
_Robeson Countv
Owner of Property used for residual application:_Willie Thigpen
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping pattems:_Coastal Bermuda
Intended use or disposition of crops: Pasture & Hay
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits_West Point Stevens_
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his
representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This
agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his
representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as
written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM LARS: 06/94 ' Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives
to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application and to establish monitoring facilities on
or near the application site as required by the residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives to take
necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application permit as issued by
the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) for the land 'described above prior to commencement of residual application. The
NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specifymaximum application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the
laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data conceming the program for
.land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee
for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals may be applied to
sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a suff-cient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
residual and soil mixture of at least 6:0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and
cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and
schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his
�1 representative and the Permittee will determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement for a period'of
eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access to the land
application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following residual application. Such controls
may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or Land Owner
(Lessee) prior to and -during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third party, the landowner
shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this.Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this
Agreement.
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

Id. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the
subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a Nnitty (30) day period following the residual .
application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during
these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modif-cation must be requested and obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and agreements. In addition, a notice shall be
given by the current landowner to 'the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at
each site.
17. Any duly authorizedofficer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental Management may, upon
presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any
records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may gbtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another municipality,,
contractor, or other permitted entity for the.land specified by this Agreement. The land application of any additional
wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this permit, is prohibited.
#rtrtrttrtti4FRR#}tittt#ttittt4i4if#4t44if#4#Fi#tf#iiittftttt#tiki4RfiRft4fi#tt4iit##R##f FttF#44
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM LARS: 06194 Page 15 of 18

t t#{ k t t## t 4 tk t t* t k{ t#{ k*## k t t 4# t{{ t k#* t### t* t t t# t# t# t* k{
1, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herei
` � it i'C� per't Fri ro-s
Land Owner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY,
L the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the rgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of - .Q X( )
My commission Expires) 3
SEAL:' .
L have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
L 4tj of 7' N enN have read this land owner's agreement and o hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Pe
mu
f/&/Zau�
Date —
FORM: LARS 06/94. Page 18 of 18

J
Carroll Foods Farm
For West Point Stevens
The Carroll Foods Farm, is located approximately 2.0 miles south of Maxton following
State Rd.1107 (Fairiey Rd.). All of the fields can be accessed from State Rd. 1107. The
surrounding areas are predominantly rural and sparsely populated.
The four fields total 50.67 gross acres, 47.89 acres of the site is applicable after buffers.
The four fields consist of coastal bermuda used for hay and pasture.
The slope of the site was nearly level, to gently sloping (04%). The Robeson County
Soil Survey issued January 1978 reports that this site contains 6 differentsoil series,
Norfolk, Wakulla, Goldsboro, Wagram, Lakeland, Pocalla and Rains. Pocalla was found
with a boring in field 2. Wagram was found in the remaining fields. The soil test
analysis showed no nutrients to be deficient though pH is low and will have to be
corrected through the proper application of lime. With proper application and monitoring
the proposed sites should benefit from the application of biosolids.

SITE SUMMARY
West Point Stevens,WWTP
Wagram, NC
Owners Name
Carrel Foods
Operator:
Martin McLaughlin
Address:
Carroll Foods Inc.
325 McKay St. -
Maxton, NC 28364
Phone:
(9101 276-0648
[phone]
Site #
NC-RO-09
Estimated
- Total
Applicable
Field # Acres
Acres Crop(s)
Perdominent Latitude &
Slope Soil Series .Longitude
Field 01
16.53
15.96
Coastal Bermuda
0-4%,
Wagram
'
340 41' 10"
790 22' 53"
Field 02
15.72
15.19
Coastal Bermuda
0-4%
P,ocalla -
340.41' 17"
790 22' 53"
Field 03
13.31
'
12.86
Coastal Bermuda'
0-4%
Wagram
340 41' 47"
790 22' 45"
Field 04
5.11
- 3.88
Coastal Bermuda
0-3%
Wagram
'
340 41' 16"
•790 23' 08"
TOTALS 50.67 • 47.89
Notesr

I ts'0 SYNAGRO
VICINITY MAP
A Rurdrmli Manage/rat Company
rT• ) ¢�: 1%1N11 S•�.,f it - -'O.-
sot t . �'�:
�.P IO: fib- =.i' r4.� _•• `� v_ �e - .)�,� -=.f '_yW.

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
I Copynghtc�2000llapsala car5e + / � � `` ,
1-0 SYVAGEO
A Raiduak.AlanagementCompany
13
,,�� t
Mil
—
1
sF`�?„
7s Y
-e I r `a��.{I �• 1 �`'-.. .E-'Zr + � yP` r � �.t � �tY rs� y - a ..
4 Y T -
;, C it 0' �.s rf ,f )"�"vrt. / ram-7'.�a. �i'�.�f✓
1 '� ,fit Y .:a .£ ��)_ ,,yam`,,,\\\....���''',,,jjj F .`T" �y�f+i-�y.-,rye , {
7.
-i •_ r � E�^+v � f t 5# i 7°` �"r"ora '�r'"�9V''�u . f'� ` {j�+".
� �.,.�, !J} �! F c t+; ( "�Si 'F..x , R� ✓ ~�1�.- x \� °� 5 �14r s,
y _J
S,S ..^"t _..r~,.sL: ?_i�'-Mti�..-� 3-i,'•,• ,
OWNER C'u ,�,!/ Fo �s SCALE: I" = 2- y/0c, FIELDS
/YA/hVI,
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR ' To A n s / 9 7 / CONTOUR INTERVAL .S

APPLICATION AREA NEAP
�111/..sYNAGI�O
• A RuidrrnG Maneguuenr Camparq• .
E
• r
^Ir
N.
Owner C'_ u,;/ /,00
/:
Scale: 1" = 7Field # 1
Total
Acres
-NetAcres / S. 96
—,f
STREAM
APPLICATION AREA
-- — PRIVATE ROAD
•
DRAIN
®
HOUSE
[ FORESTED AREA
O
POND
O
OUTBUILDING'
UNSUITABLE
'3F —
FENCE
WELL
\\
STORAGE AREA
0
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
O
INCORPORATION,
8-120% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
SYNAGRO
A Raidualf Mavagmnrrf Caarpmq•
' n
\ w Oy
i
I 0
� i 1
\ n /
0 I q4'l
y
Owner ( a,al F-,aJs
- —) . SCREAM
—� •
DRAIN
POND
—X—
FENCE.
OSTORAGE
AREA
Scale: I" = 7 y 2 0'
Field # Z
Total
Acres Vet
Acres /S. / 5
APPLICATION AREA —
— — PRIVATE ROAD
'
HOUSE
FORESTED AREA
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
WELL
\\
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

4PPLICAT'ION AREA MAP
�1111.' SYNAGRO
A Ruhlu AAfmw ........ Cam.,,,,...
Owner Id / 00 9
`� .,//
Scale: 1" _
FieId # 3
Total
Acres/3 ._3
Net Acres 12. e 6
- •' -�
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
- - - PRIVATE ROAD
• -�
DRAIN
HOUSE
FORESTED. AREA
O.POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
-3�
FENCE
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
- O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
'
8-12% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
S,YNAG�O
A Rgidu ij Af,,,S n en/ Ca...
Owner �� p / F ,,
d < �//�n, �:
/7: �1� ,1. /
Scale: l" = 7 5 a �;7 Field #
_
Total
Acres S . I I
Net Acres "3. ff
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
— — — PRIVATE ROAD
• —j -
DRAIN
HOUSE
C? FORESTED AREA
O
POND
0
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
�.`
FENCE
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: wps
, SYMG�O.
A R&;Awh Mc t1 r cmp n;
Landowner:
Site: _ Field: Sample #: ^— Slope: D - yq
Acres (gross): 6. 3 .Acres (net): /S. 9G Crop:
PROFILE.A
PROFILE B
Notes:
Legend
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth
Texture
—� r At
S
bq ;t
L
Depth to SHWT:
3 �"
Depth & type of restrictive layer: _
Soil Series: W-114�U11'
Horizon Depth Texture
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
I
Described By:
i
Texture
Structure Grade.
S Sand
WK Weak
L Loam
MD Moderate
SI Silt
ST Strong
C Clay
Color Structure
s
Color
e
Mottles
Structure Mottles
Date: Z r
Structure Type
G Granular BK Blocky
PL Platy ABK Angular Blocky .
PR Prismatic SBK Subangular Blocky
CPR Columnar MA Massive

� SYNAGPtO
soxL DEsc RJPTION SHEET ARuiA hAf..gs ,Ca p,7
Project: )KI-1 S Landowner:
Site: Field: 2 Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): ZAL-0-5 ,Acres (net): %S./6 Crop:o/
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE _� _f20
3 C _S. G sy I�fE 94/c
Depth to SHWT: 2 34' "
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series: C�(/�
r1
PROFILE B
Notes: -
Legend
Texture
S Sand
_ Loam
�I Silt
C Clay
Horizon Depth
Texture Color
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive. layer:
Soil Series:I
l% n
Described By:
Structure Grade
WK Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Structure Mottles
Structure Type
G
Granular
BK
Blocky
PL
Platy ,
ABK
Angular Blocky
PR
Prismatic
SBK
Subangular Blocky
CPR
Columnar
MA
Massive

SYNAGPO
SOIL, DESCIUPTION SHEET ARuldmli Aro,fa tCamPny
Project: � �� s / �� .ra � Landowner.
Site: Field: Sample #: — Slope: Yl
Acres (gross):: 8.3 - Acres (net): 12. f 6 Crop: _ S,l„ Idle,
PROFILE A
PROFILE B
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture
�iE i '3C� SL
Color Structure Mottles
Depth to SHWT: &/
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series: I44
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
Depth to SHWT:
Depth A type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
/� I
Notes: /moo J tI2. J.
Described By:
Legend
Texture Structure Grade
S Sand WK Weak
Loam MD Moderate
51 Silt ST Strong
C Clay
Date:
Structure Tvoe
G
Granular
BK
PL
Platy
ABK
PR
Prismatic
SBK'
CPR
Columnar
MA
Blocky
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Massive

' SYNAGE
SOIL DESCPJPTION SHEET ARaldudh Mur Zt tC—P--r
Project: 1/, { /, ' Landowner:
Site: ` Field: Sample #: — Slope:'_
Acres (gross): S. ! / Acres (net): Crop:
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE A & If S - aYX ,
T /_ V V —� L
Depth to SHWT-
Depth & type of restr'ctive layer: 20—
Soil Series: c, 4 Ilk
Horizon Depth
PROFILE B
Notes:
Legend
Depth to SHWT:
Texture Color
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
n I
rm
Described By:
Texture
Structure Grade
S Sand
WK Weak
Loam
MD Moderate
si Silt
ST Strong
C Clay
Structure Mottles
Date:
Structure Tvoe
G
Granular
BK
PL
Platy
ABK
PR
Prismatic
SBK
CPR
Columnar
MA
Blocky
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Massive

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: West Point Stevens
Contact, Person: (j/ truN
Address of Permittee: P.O. Box 388
Wagram, NC 28396
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:_ Municipal. & Industrial
Site ID Number Field Number: NC-RO-09
Field Number: 1.23.4
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
_Robeson Coun
Owner of Property used for residual application: _Carrol Foods
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): —Martin McLauglilin
Land use or cropping patterns:_ Coastal Bermuda
Intended use or disposition of crops: Pasture & Hay
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits_ West Point Stevens_
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his
representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives,'in consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This
agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his
representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as
written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS -
I. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives
to inspect each parcel of property prior to,.during, and after residual application and to establish monitoring facilities on
or near time application site as required by the residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives to take
necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application permit as issued by
the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental
Management ' (DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of residual application. The
NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the
laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or. his representative with information and data concerning the program for
land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee
for residual application.
5. The Permittee will famish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals may be applied to
sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a Buff--cient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and
cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable time Permittee to amend this Agreement and
schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his
i
representative and the Permittee will determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8.. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the permit.
9.. Time landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement for a period of
eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access to the land
application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following residual application. Such controls
may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or Land Owner
(Lessee) prior to and during application:
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third party, the landowner
shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this
Agreement.
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the
subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a t'nirty (30) day period following the residual
application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during
these periods after each application. '
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modif-cation must be requested and obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and agreements. In addition, a notice shall be
given by the current landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at
each site.
17, Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental Management may, upon
presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
.facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any
records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another municipality,
contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement. The land application of any additional
wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this permit, is prohibited.
tt#it##rtttttit#titttttiii#it#ti#tttttit#ittYiiittt#ktitYtittK#K#YtYttttt#KKK#ttYYttitt#titti
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

k# k k i��9 �✓ " T�(rrt k t* t t *k t t k k k k k** k k**** t* k*# t k## k* t *#
have read this land owners agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Pernuttee to apply sludgctresidual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
/- -1� 9 • �a I
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, 2 o 13-esa,, COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do Hereby certify that f
f
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument .
WITNESS' my hand' and official seal this day of 9 , 19 n /
t' PUBLIC
cl�ssie� a jiues fPy Cbmmis lion Expires 09-072004
t * # } * } * * } } t # # t
1 R�1l / 1 G �` i� t 11 r� have read this land owner's �en[ and ereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. �j
- i- a
* # * t t # t t # * t t * } t t * t t # * t't * * # # k ** * * k t # # k # # t # # t } * # * *•* * # * * * *
7 cat ' D. A eL46 ►J have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Pemr
Date
FORM: LARS 06194 Page 18 of 18

+' Alan Locklear Farm
For West Point Stevens
The Alan Locklear Farm, has two fields to add. Field 8 is located approximately 8.2
miles east of Maxton following Hwy 74. The field can be accessed from Hwy 74. Field
9 is located approximately 3.6 miles south of Raerrion and can be accessed oft of State -
Rd. 1130 (Townsendville Rd.). The surrounding areas are predominantly rural and
sparsely populated. '
The two fields total 50.50 gross acres; 24.03 acres of the site is applicable after buffers.
The five fields consist of coastal bermuda used for hay.
The slope of the site was nearly level,`to gently sloping (24%). The Robeson County
Soil Survey issued January 1978 reports that this site contains 7 different soil series,
Lynchburg, Lumbee, Pocalla, Joesville, Kalmia, Lakeland and Rains. Pocalla and
Lynchburg was found with a boring in field 8. Lynchburg was found in field 9. The soil
test analysis showed no nutrients to be deficient though pH is low and will have to be
corrected through the proper application of lime: With proper application and monitoring
the proposed sites should benefit from the application of biosolids.

SITE SUMMARY
West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram, NC
Owners Name Kenneth Collins
Operator: Allan Locklear
Address: Kenneth Collins
Hwy 74
Pembroke, NC
Phone:
Site # NC-RO-10
Estimated
Total Applicable
Field'# Acres Acres
Perdominent Latitude &
Crop(s) Slope - Soil Series, Longitude
Field 08
40.00
13.95
Coastal Bermuda
2-4%°
Pocalla
1340 39' 39"
TOTALS
Notes:
40.00 13.95
0

SITE SUMMARY
West Point Stevens WWTP
Wagram, NC
Owners Name Allan Locklear
Operator: Same
Address: 1154 Old Baker Rd.
Maxton, NC 28364
Phone: [phone]
Site # NC-RO-10
Estimated
Total Applicable
Field # Acres Acres Crop(s)
Perdominent Latitude &
Slope Soil Series, Longitude
Field 08
10.50
10.08
Coastal Bermuda
. 0-4%
Lynchburg
340 355" '
79. 21'5' 39"
TOTALS 10.50 10.08
Notes:

VICINITY MAP
iAYY
SYNAGRQ
A Raldua(r Managmunt Company
:OUNTY �/ 41 oN 0WNER 141 ���s

r SYNAGBO
VICINITY MAP
A 2aid]rali Managenun] Company
�v$ _ 1, �� �,-;�``e. x.:..�ra�ut,�:+•a.:.'; ar c _.- _<. ..: �.a \�wa_ - \
am
" t�- � a �' � `fib r' `' b �.• - _ <� -
' ,6, •• C N J �'b � t `� . 1,.esW6 � °i°��- '1_� / I- � � s��t 1 rT' ``i � , � `]� � 1!•�t'�'-
~�, \p °9 e'�''C'_^.b 14°�r i(r4- tom° 1 /•, •• , -_yg I ,•� � ' v \ �- _
FQ
l6t _ 6J O,h Q00-f: 1%-� \ :� C•. �� i V^ ys4� _
Def,
63
LK
�*ItLo tSIXEZ,� V.
IY' ___� c;'• _P moo; .\
COUNTY 0(oti,sor OWNER IYIIH,

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
oyt
SYNAGEQ
A Ra;d"lj Managwien, Conp,,y
'R
.4
\4 "
14� gg
ggg
COP'
OzW, 5�
-gg
-
z07
eel"
-v
N1.
cam.
An
1197
OVINEB
Z/c /�2 'SCALE: I"= ?K,,-)oc> FIELDS
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR /9,,r 1793 CONTOUR INTERVAL

SYNAGRO
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
A RaiJnalt ASanagemtnl Company
OWNER A_ SCALE:1"= Zy000 FIELDS °�
PHOTOQUAD/.YEAR CONTOUR INTERVAL S l

YV
V- 4
01:0

10.

APPLICATION AREA MAP
4/
SYN AGRO
A RuMmah Mang ...... I C...
vil
r
Owner
4
Scale: l"=, 752e;"
Field #
Total
Acres Net Acres
STREAM
APPLICATION AREA.
PRIVATE ROAD
DRAIN
-HOUSEFORESTED
AREA
O
POND
0 -
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
FENCE
WELL
O
STORAGE AREA
0
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-120% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
SYNAGRO
d RaidrrnG Almmx ...en! CnnrGmre
Owner
Scale:J" = % 5 2c "
Field #
Total
Acres Net
Acres /0 . o k
• • �.
STREAM
APPLICATION AREA --
— PRIVATE ROAD
DRAIN
®I
HOUSE
(0 FORESTED AREA
O.POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
—3.`--
FENCE
I&
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
0
SOIL DESCRIPTION
'SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

i
SOIL, DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: V/p
A Raid vh bf + rw=, Compaq
Landowner:
Site: Field: _� . Sample #: Slope: D - Y%
Acres (gross): '/D. oo Acres (net): 13.9S Crop:
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure
PROFILE A �4 r
. 2,) S o G
Depth to SHWT: r'
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Mottles
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure Mottles
PROFILE B SG
a
SG
/o`
C,
/1f 23 G4
Z.D %
K'Z S(y,-
A 61 7Sc4.
o s�
Sd c /6 v
Depth to SHWT: C/Z'�
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:) Z
'F�r f0.b/G
Legend
Texture
S Sand
L Loam
SI Silt
C Clay
Described By:
Structure Grade
WK Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Date: 2 A G r
Structure TVDe
G
Granular
BK
PL
Platy
ABK
PR
Prismatic
SBK
CPR
Columnar
MA
Blocky
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Massive

SMGAO
SOIL DESCPJPTION SHEEN' ARaddmhAf nqj .j C,p,�
Project: _)�,sf ,fo;` f 5�-v�tis Landowner:
Site: Field: 9 Sample #: — Slope: O -- "3 5d
Acres (gross): _OO Acres (net): 10.09' Crop: l ocx s71. / O
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth
Texture
Color
Structure
Mottles
PROFILE A "
SC 4/
/OYl4 1
6.
�0-8
t, /i 21("
Scl-
/3fL 2Y-3�
SCIE
3
10 Z/
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series: Z,i„ cG
(arc
Horizon Depth
Texture
Color
Structure
Mottles
PROFILE B
Notes:
Legend
Texture
S Sand
L Loam
SI Silt
C Clay
Depth to SHWT:
Depth A type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
A 11I'
fix"/ fG4 7-/ 0 4
Described By:
Structure Grade
WK Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Structure Type
G
Granular
BK
Blocky
PL
Platy
ABK
Angular Blocky
PR
Prismatic
SBK
Subangular Blocky
CPR
Columnar
MA
Massive

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Perm ittee:
West Point Stevens
List of wastewater residuals to be applied -to these lands:_ Municipal. & Industrial
Site ID Number Field Number: NC-RO-10
Field Number:
Location of Land to be.used for residual application (include map for each
Owner of Property used for residual application:Kenneth Collins
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): —Allan Locklear
/ Land use or cropping patterns: Coastal Bermuda
Intended use or disposition of crops:_Pasture & Hay.
The undersigned land owner or his representa tive hereby permits West Point Stevens_
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his
representative receives, inconsideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This
agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his
representative and the'Pennittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as
written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering. Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page,15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives
to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application and to establish monitoring facilities on
or near the application site as required by the residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives to take
necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application permit as issued by
the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) for the land -described above prior to commencement of residual application. The
NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the
laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the program for
land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee
for residual application.
.5. The Perrnittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals may be applied to
sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a suff—cient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Perrnittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and
cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and
schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his
representative and the Permittee will determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patients and time
results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of time permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement for a period of
eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access to the land
application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following residual application. Such controls
may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site. .
]I. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or Land Owner
(Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Slmduld the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third party, the landowner
shall be responsible to insure the third parry agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this
Agreement.
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the
subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a Pnirty (30) day period following the residual
application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during
these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modif—cation must be requested and obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and agreements. In addition, a notice shall be
given by the current landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at
each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental Management may, upon
presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any
records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another municipality,,
contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement. The land application of any additional
wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this permit, is prohibited.
t RiiRtififtititttttlittdiiti#ittttFtFFRRF#!!#tt#ttttttitititi##itRtltttttitititi#tti#Ftittf
RESTRICTIONS:.
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

I, M e n n P i �, (101 I *- n 5 have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to apply sludgelresidual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
Dare
NORTH CAROLINA, "Pa6e-s.' COUNTY,. I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that A I oyi LD Jed
caa-
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day 46. 1 Je L', i :s� ?moo
lVl3§50inmissi R.-Eltvires
;i `afl.¢.::': �'<.n r •off
i.
I / t I a l L o cu tYa t- have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
Elie stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
/6--20— po
Dare
L IAI" tv' 0?�T3 a have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permi
Daze
FORM: LARS 06194 Page 18 of IS

Lawrence H. Reichner Farm
For West Point Stevens
The Lawrence H. Reichner Farm, is located approximately 1.3 miles west of Wagram
following State Rd.,1405 (Wire Rd.). The field can be accessed from State Rd. 1405.
The surrounding areas are predominantly rural and sparsely populated.
The field totals 53.03 gross acres, 8.21 acres of the site is applicable after buffers. The
five fields consist of coastal bermuda used for hay and pasture.
The slope of the site was nearly level, to gently sloping (0-6%). The Scotland County
Soil Survey issued November 1967 reports that this site contains 2 different soil series,
Norfolk and Wagram. Norfolk was found with a boring performed by Synagro personnel
The soil test analysis showed no nutrients to be deficient though pH is low and will have
to be corrected through the proper application of time. With proper application and
monitoring the proposed sites should benefit from the application of biosolids.

I
Owners Name
SITE SUMMARY
West Point Stevens
Wagram, NC
Lawrence H. Reichner
Operator: Martin McLaughlin
Address: Lawrence H. Reichner
20761 Old Wire Rd.
Laurinburg, NC 28352
Phone: [phone]
Site # NC-SC-12
Estimated
Total Applicable
Field # Acres Acres ' Crop(s)
Perdominent Latitude &
Slope Soil Series Longitude
Field 03
53.03
8.21
Coastal Bermuda
0-2%
Norfolk
340 52' 42"
79° 23' 46"
TOTALS
Notes:
53.03 8.21

VICINITY MAP
,&1A
%SYNAGRO
A RairlaaG Managenmat Company
Utz
r_ '• it � •A t' .^/ A �' -.t. :y ': .l °m �.0
Y'i _ �_ .x' " �. ,. � - - I � �'•_:° 2' of �6� , \' .s g. , `.`
ed� _ ,7--s?{t':• Is - t ! C re_ ' 1' FF _"\SI\- y' \ � b'
b � � _J Iv. _ �_ •"�\ _ •iy_� � :� 1 .,T ,•- ! ` _ _ _ _ i a � .' Imo`. 1 (° _ tir�'0` 4
_ g- /• / : � • °q.t-. - � + � �I _ �.. , ice• rya
_ �' `` � l.: / ,y .te _-'��\� ///yyyC!_" _' --_ � .r'i •}�v�j: C ,• `t
_.T_�Y'`. i`` _ 1 ,i` d � J'• !•.-.' •. J. 1 - - '-�je Ed(Hr � d
' i� �i'e • � '\ : ' �r p�t,i�_ °� - � � 6 �ifj.; a .>' �:L _. �� � - _�� - c -_
l •I i tet •Op � `'.:. 0 '. :��pt / i^ � YT'� a -� _ •Fe a
l .P�rp � .' +fin � ,�rl 64,b cif ',/�.41 �^ �- ] ¢w 1_1 � •.b
%: g " `„w �'� � . 1 1, :' S1T€'' '_ = _ �• , _ •.
i F
+1' �i.:.. - IS i ♦1 _ _ _ / �' ___ \' ! _ �..RO E��. _ _ c_p � b �.nv.mc_
,.u�:dtmt�.\, • 1 : Sot __ �� �•• �__ _ 6 '' f i _' O _. - r . -.. rr _ + "^ _ % __�.
, i.:. ` ,,t' m C\•�(,. r v! r ry'y t\ ` _ �.,,\. � - -.! .1` --k.• T• _`1
4r�`\� I ^''' - � _.I ab. Y / �i t�Fl r. �— �_ `:4r ilr _I•r" A
/�-v ' _; .�. +� /•fir o _ �w,aai°
n id lS:.dP°: \ 1-�� yr \ ,^ •tP - '•-t � •`"c\ F � '\mr, t ;1'•-±`�' �"•:
ir_ 44r
,s�.�t\�-•.:� >< \i� �r'-' �A�. � _ ``-��- a LTi,V_a `•
71,
(�..y T•i '. '�Y'Ia' - `R -�, Meaim 6 p a1.
j,•bd'Ir11Ll,.I.'T O_ . ; ' l% _(' w R�.`\.� • _`(.` ��
V-. ".
COUNTY L, J OWNER

SYNAGR©
.e
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
A Ruidmalt Managm"t cor-p-gy
ONVNER_Z,--,rvr..r. 4-do, SCALE: 1" = 2 y o oo FIELDS 3
PHOTOQUAD/YEAR CONTOUR INTERVAL

cc till
..........

APPLICATION AREA MAP
q SYNAAGRO
Owner L i ,/ r r, e c
Scale: 1" = 7y1 2
" Field # 3 .
Total
Acres .S 3. n 3
Net Acres R. 2 1
• ••-�f
STREAM
FloAPPLICATION.AREA
--- PRIVATE ROAD
—�
DRAIN
a[
HOUSE
FORESTED AREA
O
POND
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
FENCE
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-120/6 SLOPE

c,7 t

SOIL
y� ('���i �+g �,7 SHEET
SY GRG
SOIL DESCiS..LP $ IO �7H E Y ARaiduall.Mm Z u;lComp.ry
1 - Project: ✓V„s }r`; , f' :Sr Landowner:
r
Site: Field: " / Sample #: Slope: _�2_z p-a
.Acres (gross): .Acres (net): Crop: L
. 3
SOIL. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS,
Horizon Depth Texture
Color
Structure" Mottles
PROFILE A A 0-1 = LS
ey Si
C, _
�— G-iz s
/vtL 12
P; _
ri-3y 5
—
IiLiE•
' z io iX sC
7sYKjY
S/i/c
Depth to SHWT- y 3 t'
Depth & type of restrictive layer:•.
11 n tiv
Soil Series:
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive:layer:
Soil Series:I
Notes:
Described By: ��7�� f At4 Date: IZ 1A140
Legend
Texture .
S Sand
L Loam
SI Silt
C Clay
Structure Grade
WK _ Weak
MD Moderate
ST Strong
Structure Type"
G
Granular
. BK
Blocky
PL
Platy
ABK
"Angular Blocky
PR
Prismatic
SBK
S'ubangular Blocky
CPR
Columnar
MA
Massive -

NCDA A rc c Division. ,. 4300 Reedy Creek,Road:: Raleigh, NC.27607=64( ")19) 733` 260 ;3 ' ^; Report, '868
. ,
;'
grower: Reichner, Lawrence
Copies to: Synagro SomucaSl
°
20761 Old Wire Rd
Laurinburg, NC 28352
oilTest
Report
Synagro Soutlte:u
Farm;
PO Box1770
1
Clemmons, NC 27012
1/ 3/01 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Robeson County
Agronomist Comments:
'rile heavy metal concentration is well within the
limits of normal background levels and should pose no threat to crops grown on this land. Follow soil test recommendations for lime and
fur ili%el' applicatioll.
T. Kent Yarborough, A> ronomisl
Field Information
Applied Lintel
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho Yr T/A
Crop or Year Linne N R05 KO Mg Cis
Zn B AIn See rvote
1601 Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm 11ay/Pas,M .5T 180-220 0 160-i80 0 0
0 0 12
2nd'Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS°°
Ac pH P-I X I Ca% A1g% Nb:-1 Mn-AI (I)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-1 S-I SS -I Na-N AH-N A'a
MIN 0.32 1.36• 3.5 80.0
0.7 6.2 127 27 58.0 18.0 125 84 97 97
140. 24 0.1

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: West Point Stevens
Contact Person: —
Address of Permittee: P.O.
Wagram, NC 28396
List of wastewater. residuals to be applied to these lands:_ Municipal. & Industrial
Site ID Number Field Number: NC-SC-12
Field Number: 3
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application: —Lawrence Reichner
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns:_ Coastal Bermuda
Intended use or.disposition of crops:_Pasture & Hav
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits West Point Stevens_
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his
representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This
agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his
representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as
written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM LARS: 06/94 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes [he Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives
to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application and to establish monitoring facilities on
or near the application site as required by the residual land application permit.
?. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their representatives to take
necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the tern of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application permit as issued by
the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of residual application. The
NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the
laws and -regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the program for
land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee
for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals may be applied to
sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a suff-cient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the time,
residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and
cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and
schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his
representative and the Permittee will determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement for a period of
eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access to the land
application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following residual application. Such controls
may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.'
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or Land Owner
'(Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third party, the, landowner
shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this
Agreement.
FORM LARS:06/94 Page l5 of IS

N. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the
subject matter of this Agreement. '
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a t'nirty (30) day period following the residual
application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent -access during
these periods after'each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modif-cation must be requested and obtained from the Division
of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and agreements. In addition, a notice shall be
given by the current landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at
each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental Management may, upon
presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any
records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another municipality,
contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement. The land application of any additional
wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this permit, is prohibited.
kRRkekki4tktlRRiik}►KltktkKkktikktttktltkt}IttktititllikktktiiktiRktttittk}tikkkktiRkttttRt}
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM LARS: 06/94 1Page 15 of 18

s,
t t * * k * * # # * # # t * t * k* t t k t * * t * # k # k t * { * # * * t * t k k # # # t t * # k * * # * # t
l n u, r k H t � /t ?\ e c 4 st r; • � have read this land o er's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein
2L�- � Q-'r.L—
r-and Owner
9-/y-aa
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, �pCOUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that C7i U)YYo�p
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument
aooa
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
NOTARY PUBLIC ' // /
My commission Expires //v
SEAL::.......
�i
have read this land owner's air
the itipuhttions and restrictions as specified herein. J,:
hereby agree to abide by
l+ t+ t t t# t# t# r{ t t r{{{ t{## t t# t# t# t t t t t t+ t t t t t t t t t t+ t t t t t t t t
I T� �i��d� have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permi
Date
FORM: LARS 06/94 Page 18 of 18

Westpolat Stevens Acreage Addition: FRO Observations, Comments, S, Recommondatlons (Vol Amendment)
Farm
Field
Acres
Scheduled
pb/acre)
Crop(lbs).
Primary Sall Series
SHWySynagro(in)
- Synalim Comments
GWCommentc
Recommendations
Jon,,ThIgpen
NGRO-074)1
19.09
CBG
U�f6681.5
Wa
36.
OK
YR ✓
Svc)
NGRO4742
2.53
CBG
885.5
Po end,No
36.
OK
YR
Ito
NORO-074)3
20.04
SB'¢
4w
4008
IMd OD k
36.
Old Bay Wit MCCoIk DOs In whole fiction
SeasonaNR
NC-R"7414
68.97
Colton
70✓
4827.9
WkIWa;Ra DD
36.
Ra.1ot M;SCggw/DO's
YR
NGRO-074)5
32.04
Cotton
70v,
2242.8
No.4;Gd'.2;Ra.3
24
Questionable Field)
seasonalclieckminsin SWcomer
Willie Th'
N6R04"l
10.1
CBG
�
3535
Wk
36.
OK
YR e,
00
NGRO-08-02
19.9
CBG
6849.5
Wk
36.
OK
YR
NGRO-06A3
CBG
am
7346.5
Wk
36.
OK
YR ✓
4`
NO11048414
18.78
CBGe0
6573
Wk:Po .OS
36.
OK
YR
Centel Foeds(M. McLaughlin
NC-ROBS-01
15.%
CBG v
0 /
5566
We.60;Po.33
36.
OK
YR
'VIO
�
NC-RO-09O2
15.19
CBG
750
5316.5
Po.75;Wa.25
36.
OK
YR
(fyl�
Wifely of of S(Rangin9 mm omNol o
NGRO-09-03
12.86
CBG
7S0
4501
Go :3 :No .2 ;Po .2
36.
g.i.q fram W to E
SeasonaWR check Go and Ra
5
1,1P1104 41
3.88
CBG
3
1358
W.
36•
OK
YR
.n
so a ee.
Meporaono um ar potions; s
��
KennetM1 LOIIIOSIA. LocHear
NGROAOUII
13.95
LBG
0�
4682.5
G'.33@@;Po :17
SHWiglr
have SP bugea
Seasonal et¢tl
��5 oo;4i
Alan Loektear
NC-RO-1009
10.08
CBG
350
3528
cIR®1C�3
24-
Mas6 Re; DD's on Mies sides, deph?
Questionable
�yy
LH. RelrJnterlM. Mdpu Nin
NGRP1243
8.21
LBG
350
28A.5
No
36.
OK
YR
293.24
7099530
l'I Cedaln buffers were revised In order to Increase Me efficiency a/applicat/on acreage. See maps and centimeters.
ACRONYMS
w.sq:ae.
5�fz \q, 21
f �C,°l
CL lc'� �j
LW-N)

ywe�
\�1
m
919
tip Symbol
Sall Series
I Taxonomy
- General: topo, parent material, depth, geographic association, landform etc:
'
Jo
. JoM;
y,orwri yi, a el ceMs.
. wer�sy, -'--
s?miacbve IhanNc AqukJiapfudulls
neatly level, somewhat poorly to moderatelywell tlmined sails on stream terraces and upland of the Coastal Plain.
-
Fine -loamy, saceous, si active, means Aquic
The Goldsboro series consstsoverydeep, modemtelypermea e, emtelywel mined salsteatformed In Coastal
Go
Goldsboro
Palwdults
Plain sediments. These sells am on uplands and have slopes ranging from 0 to 10 percent
m oamy over sandy or sandy-sailetal,i iceous,
well drained,nee y level and gently sloping soils on fluvial means of the Coastal Plain. They have orme n oamy
Ka
KelMe
semiactive, thermic Typic Hapludults
marine and fluvial sediments '
The Lakeland series consists of very deep, excessIvely dmined, rapidly permeable soils that fanned In thick beds of "lie
Le
. Lakeland
Thermic, coaled Typic Guarbipsa aments
or marine sands. Slopes are dominantly 0 to 12 percent but range to 85 percent in dissected areas.
neaoarny over sandy or sari y-ska eml, siliceous,
very deep, poorly trained sa s on stream renews an uplands pa e sta am. Than soils forme n a or
'Lu
Ii.umb-
subactive, thennio Typic Endoaquuits
marine deposits that are generally stratified.
Fine -loamy, siliceous, se active, eml c Aenc
The Lynchburg series consists o very deep, somewhat pop y drafned sails mat col in oamy marine sediments.
LWhI urg jl
Paleaquulls
Slopes are less than 2 percent
-
--�
The McColl series consists of poorly drained, slowly permeable soils that am shallow or moderately deep to a trappan
uv •z `
and very deep to bedrock. They formed in loamy sediments in oval depressions on the Coastal Plain. The sells am nearly
.McCall
Fine, kaolinitic, them is Typic Fragiaquults
level or concave. Runoff Is ponded. Slopes am less than 2 percent.
The Norfolk series consists of vary deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils Mat famed In loamy ma ne sediment
No
Norfolk
Fneaoarry, koolinitic, thermic Typic Kandludults
of the Coastal Plains. These upland soils have slopes ranging from 0 to 10 percent.
very deep, poorly drained and very poorly drained moderately permeable soils Nat formed in sandy and loamy sediments
—
Loamy, siliceous, subactive, memlic Gmssarenic
on marine lemons. These soils am on level or depressional landscapes and along poorly defined drains of the Coastal
Pm
to it
Paleaquults
Plain. They are saturated in winter, spring, and sometimes Into summer.
very deep, somewhat excessively drained, moderately permeable sells Matown in sandy and loamy sediments on
Pe
Powga
Loamy, siliceous, thermic Arenic Plinthic Paleudults
marine terraces. The soils are on nearly level or gently sloping low ridges on Coastal Plain.
The Rains series consists of very deep, pooh drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in thick loamy sediments
.,
t.
Fmeaoamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic
on marine terraces. The soils are an nearly level fires or depressions on the Coastal Plains. Slopes am less than 2
t Ra-g
-Rains_
Palwquults
percent
--no
Yvagramseries consistsve eep, e soils Mat famed
we
Wagram
Loamy, owlinitiC, Monte Arenic Krndludults
sediments on Coastal Plain uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent
very eep, somew a excess ve y chemical, rapidly permeable Wits that famedn sandy Coastala n se men on
Wk
Wakuila
Siliceous, themdc Psammentic Hapludults
Uplands and stream terraces.

,0
,�4043,0-I.
1
Nola G+t t-'/ .yq-�gaoabt+�
'+�-44'0-Ia9S21�
SW3h&LS INIOA l/fZM

took A
Willie Thigpen 14
CF/McLaughlin 14 L
r
IT,
lot I JIv
. ..... . -41
. c
Sr_AL_�
A
ALT
P-7 L isu
wl�
Z 4
Nv'
A
'A
-9 L
ITO
L
5W
Iw Z
Al

F
�r� •.�8���� {\�V�� (,a, i� /.l:a �. r/ 'Y rua s+ C ,� ,�� ,� �"' ��.�y'T
� L"\\ � ` ~ � �v .ri �. {11 yti(s�1"�. a �-�j/T�1�_ •\�' � 9t � g -/� • Ei3 •�: 0 0 �. - � ',
Jerry Thigpen 1-5 ,y.
Willie Thigpen 1-4 Ao = �m
`j CF/McLaughlin 1-4 �� 6"� (J;o \l, : l"
\ ).. -_ ..—�_/ ,¢� l �i� i� Po td� :_\ L� / ` 1 dry` � . '-- - ; � ''� � -•\}
(
J
J �1�
f 0
G1-7
(90
-\ l� 1 ��� /J '\\. \ '� !r — - I \f _ mod' ,, ' ` - •••
% '
10
t.�.-�/( °`ram ���5��� � ,'���i,`I su��: +.✓- "�`��. ate" _ _ ��.

\,1 -J _ I �'L/�. ••.. •rV E ham/: /�•: i
, J s
I
`p L
�� .• � � Y. I C --I' n asar cPr. •'•
�.'1 .4 S, . :S • „�!'' -lam.' � t 1"- - 66 �'• v-.
LHR3 _ - A;
1 � \` ;L Hm e �J r � $'Yj f� A E _ :Nm ../•' 4k � � /:. C1.EF� 1 V''�• 5\ l� P yf''r� ', u„w
'•,� f ,5 .. �}. �. �' •o•, `..� J ''f1ii:: (_lam t .,t --�'
%�� `• swe". c t
4
N

APPLICATION AREA'MAP
'rUl S,NAGPO
A R,r:d.. /, u_.. _
Owner Tom,. ; , T� Scale: I" _ '7 9 i z Field # 3
—� STREAM
• —�
DRAIN
O
POND
FENCE
OSTORAGE
AREA
Total Acres Z /. � z Net Acres Z o , o-V
® APPLICATION AREA - -- PRIVATE ROAD
gI - HOUSE (0 FORESTED AREA
O OUTBUILDING
WELL
O SOIL DESCRIPTION
\\
UNSUITABLE
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

M
24 WA
-�?^T.: ,may, {
t��
v4 yv. { .)�}y�. 5 (" +f bt'�.# y

SYNAGRQ
APPLICATION AREA MAP s Co,
Owner
1-9/1 - 2,,
/4,
Scale: 1" = %
5 2 6; " Field # 0—
Total
Acres
Net Acres /0 . o. k
-j
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
-- - - PRIVATE ROAD
-�
DRAIN
91
HOUSE
I?FORESTED AREA
POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
FENCE
R
WELL
- \\
O
STORAGE AREA
O
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
5-120% SLOPE

�•'4..'.. $$.e �
F ..,c. � 4 �*y� i y"f ,5 %. (4 r k ♦ ^Yt .�" ,
y yki 4*k � x J if''�}4
�� �T 1 �� ;\
L\4 liY•�M" �}Y 4{
� i T(
•
•iH. •"�. ♦c. ...�%. � is F .,.
4 k � 4. . 4l +s" • +f �yd� � ��i
•l
N•-.
}
b �. * t � ti V � f6 1
•'y✓
.fib.
�5
� t� �', 0.jt's Y�y.. • ,..�.:
y''
,�. x
�
A �
t �p�{•,y�w L+Xp � k• tt �y
"'gym
`"5Y-�
•�`x..�
a. " „yt'i•"a� 1h�' � ^
: i
-r. �+' r:
`'
s.i'k l,��ns a x• !,«+�i:
y a.'¢1 :.�y
.Y T+'� �d« Y .!;
� -
.e '�Ca_ s v.. F' 4 • i, a- k d5 �'i+'♦ y y- '4e�ya� r n
tto � � �� C r��,i to '� 1 �t. "Y G�,S � �`'•V, >, ,y '
u4j,•T,
I -x--4. a�•.rt.�:tdS S' ' X
IF�`4„ 6a7-.�",,�C "�iyyr'1*c• 'r yf"t; •'.'1 y,,'/ p �`t M''bb �µYN
^ilJ w5' vuf i i+ .�} 11 i ♦ 4 t Tr „•Y
y �ry„r r - C�k „s � .,� ... •., w 9 tvLied ,. ^f
,,
a �• t;a ae� � , � ^'. � ,�� . �fri� F 'i' A �. Tf- .,- t 1 .� ,� x#i
xr {
J >F ._..x,.� �'yw v •-y;..-� 4>: r z. a < s �•,�'S tti-.t'
t-nw,�7777
%r �+. ie - r. ... ,.�W' ""}:x� s } w`$jk S 4�m "e,'S�"ax. �°'•�t
+ s � � ��� �' : • � A'. ' �" �t ,n «$ •lT r p »p .. � ,t . _ 1 $'j �k � p #� � �.,. a v� V i ` i r x 4 &°,.,C f ,��{'. �'�
iesrt.'t"rg/ k iSY It c.ei srk i kt'1t
I_e f •.i "c , y 'd'+_te$e�4': y v : •.
Ffi }YS t lop�• `!a
�` •, d f! p @� p �s a r �'S� �� R Y. .,r .*.i � yrid �`r",r��� ,�.
i4
i .. _ ♦ Y)�..T�t yr,
•' •`y {.+x §"�pn ��. .Yv % a '^* .h i "} of
� :e Ve p,.�r+a �}d s � •ayy �� r �� �f1 S N i"aY � k i i�- �x i�ydy� u a
�k • a" �:cy, v � N h# s � fi J'�{• } [� 1� "' zASs` i �� 'e �A£` 5� f�. � v' �,.',':�¢j}a «r '4,Y:
v ,r •!, + i.
yv fy.y£, • a",'„may d� .1 4L iw `e, F A
�}(' , a1+ { k. fb, s -i w �a• q �i :' ay u Y 4 "' -. Al r pit �i
lF.y r y q .gyp yr*,
'e yY L}�-k:ja8k +a k J }' v . x c> p• `rtp4 ,rt •"1 } ' 4 y�' !d '. .S ,
.rd)F ! S yY !yam "Y" k x
it 41t1 '�J
t,•,L'M..
tj,
{tip •f i4 t a ar :tK ,tM:
�! n }::}x} ro 4 ...v - Six •$+x{. Aw`: , g xo YY -.' '•
• � z` �� V4 x� n. �, tt.. s'}.� °� ", „"•u .��� t.ix.' t - r YtS k� Si.
.n r .
�, �ry xL, �y6. °^x. i Y i'_'-'sP, t

APPLICATION ARE' A MAP.
XMI711v
0� SYNAGP\Q
Em
0-
SO
I
Owner /7
4
Scale: V=
Field #
Total
Acres VO.00 Net Acres
STREAM
APPLICATION AREA
PRIVATE ROAD
DRAIN
11
HOUSE
[FORESTED AREA
O POND'
0
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
FENCE
9
WELL
O STORAGE AREA
0
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
8-12% SLOPE

APPLICATION AREA MAP
�11111 SMAGRO
A Raid&1, Afungcemer. Ca,,,,,,
4�
�i ♦
Owner_ --,,,/ �17;1,,
i77`` //
ScaIe:I"= %`iZo'
Field# 3
Total
Acres , /3.3 /
Net Acres / 2• 6
STREAM
®
APPLICATION AREA
-- — — PRIVATE ROAD
DRAIN
®
HOUSE
FORESTED. AREA
O
,POND
O
OUTBUILDING
UNSUITABLE
—
FENCE
WELL
\\
O
STORAGE AREA
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUITABLE FOR
INCORPORATION,
S-12% SLOPE

is e
r
s
,may u y
�k

LHR3
PPni
C1405)
v 4
f Wfr�