2023169 Ver 1_Roxboro PCN (7.31.23) Final_Reduced DEQ_20231211

LaBeRa
Powered by partnership.
December 11, 2023
NCDEQ
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Joint Application for Permit —Water Quality Certification and Pre -construction Notification
City of Roxboro
Western Sewer System, Force Main, Gravity Sewer and Pump Station
Roxboro, NC
LaBella Project No. 2201369
On behalf of the City of Roxboro, we are submitting a Joint Permit Application for your review and
approval.
The City of Roxboro seeks a Water Quality Certification under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 58 for 0.37 acres
of permanent impacts to federally jurisdictional wetlands. This permit specifically pertains to the proposed
construction of a sewer system, force main, gravity sewer and pump station to accommodate the current
and future water treatment needs of the City of Roxboro. In accompaniment to the NWP, City of Roxboro is
submitting a Pre -construction Notification.
We have submitted the following materials in support of this PCN (attached):
• EXHIBIT 1— PROJECT NARRATIVE
• EXHIBIT 2 — PROJECT PLANS
• EXHIBIT 3 — MAPS AND FIGURES
• EXHIBIT 4 —PROTECTED SPECIES
• EXHIBIT 5 — WETLAND REPORT
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Eric Prunchak, PWS
LABELLA ASSOCIATES, D.P.C.
Environmental Manager
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300 1 Charlotte, NC 28285 I p 704-376-6423
www.LabeLLapc.com

LaBella
Powered by partnership.
NATIONWIDE 58 PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
Western Sewer System, Force Main, Gravity Sewer and Pump Station
Roxboro NC, 27573
LaBella Project No. 2201369
Prepared For: City of Roxboro
105 South Lamar Street
Roxboro, NC 27573
Prepared By: LaBella Associates, D.P.C.
400 S Tryon St Suite 1300
Charlotte, North Carolina 28285
Date: July 2023
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300 , Charlotte, NC 28285 p 704-376-6423
www.labellapc.com

LaB�lla
F, --. ,,. . ., i c, 1: � [ '. ..- i �-� r t r' . .- i �. - [�
EXHIBIT I
PROJECT NARATIVE

LaBeLLa
Powered by partnership.
EXHIBIT I
Project Narrative
Project Purpose
The City of Roxboro has identified capacity and reliability concerns with the existing Marlowe's Creek Sewer Outfall. The Sewer
Outfall provides sanitary sewer service to the eastern side of Roxboro while also transporting wastewater from the southern
portion of Roxboro and Person County to the wastewater treatment plant which is on the northern boundary of the city. A
previous study by AWCK, Inc. evaluated the existing conditions of the Sewer Outfall as well as future conditions that will
impact the Sewer Outfall.
The study reported that the Sewer Outfall is undersized for the existing conditions. The Sewer Outfall is sufficient to handle
daily dry weather flows, but it becomes surcharged during wet weather conditions. This surcharging leads to sanitary sewer
overflows and shows that the existing line needs to be addressed either by increasing the capacity or by reducing flows.
Growth in Roxboro is anticipated along the City's southern boundary. This area is currently served by the Southside and
Duncan Pump Stations that pump back to the Sewer Outfall. As daily flows go up at these pump stations (or their
replacements), the situation with the Sewer Outfall will be compounded. The recommended plan of action for addressing the
existing the situation with the Sewer Outfall also needs to provide for future growth.
Proiect Descriotion
The project consists of construction of approximately 23,115 linear feet of 16-inch force main, approximately 20,242 linear
feet of 18-inch thru 24-inch gravity sanitary sewer, including seven jack and bored road crossings, and the construction of a
1,400 gpm (2.016 MGD) duplex wastewater pump station with associated site work and utilities.
The 16-Inch force main will begin at the Southside Pump Station on the south side of the City of Roxboro and continue north
northwest generally following alongside the Marlowe's Creek Tributary 1A. This section of the project will consist of the 23,000
linear feet of 16-Inch force main. At the termination of the 16-Inch force main, a manhole will be used to transition to a 24-
Inch gravity sewer. The 24-Inch gravity will continue North northeast for 20,000 linear feet to the City of Roxboro Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
There are associated permanent impacts associated with this project. These impacts are summarized in table 1 below.
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300 1 Charlotte, NC 28285 I p 704-376-6423
vwwv.labellapc.com

e
Table 1. Proposed Permanent Wetland Disturbance.
Wetland ID
Cowardin
Classification
Permanent Wetland
Impacts (sqft)
Wetland WAH
PFO
139
Wetland WAI
PFO
1059
Wetland WD
PFO
897
Wetland WE
PFO
1595
Wetland WF
PFO
107
Wetland WG
PFO
454
Wetland WI
PFO
55
Wetland WJ
PFO
385
Wetland WK
PFO
45
Wetland WL
PFO
100
Wetland WM
PFO
1800
Wetland WN
PFO
379
Wetland WO
PFO
182
Wetland WP
PFO
88
Wetland WQ
PFO
2134
Wetland WR
PFO
974
Wetland WT
PFO
244
Wetland WU
PFO
250
Wetland WV
PFO
985
Wetland WW
PFO
484
Wetland WX
PFO
462
Wetland WY
PFO
1940
Wetland WZ
PFO
1230
15988(sgft)
0.37(ac)
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed project is in an urban/suburban area, with large sections of the alignment consisting of existing facilities or
currently mowed and maintained utility right of way. Other areas, particularly in the northern half of the alignment, are
undeveloped sections of forest, some of which was recently logged. The pipe will be buried and returned to existing conditions
above ground. In forested wetland areas, stumps will be left in place to avoid disturbing the root systems and wetland soils.
The utilization of a gravity sewer allows for the avoidance of constructing a pump station for this segment of the alignment.
July 31, 2023 P a g e 12

e
WETLADS
According to National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping, there are three mapped NWI codes onsite. One wetland code, PF01A
(Palustrine Forested Broadleaf Deciduous Temporarily Flooded) was recorded. Two stream codes were also documented
RSUBH (Riverine Unknown Perennial Unconsolidated Bottom Permanently Flooded) and R4SBC (Riverine Intermittent
Streambed Seasonally Flooded). Please refer to Exhibit 3. A wetland delineation was conducted and included in Exhibit 5. A
multitude of perennial and intermittent streams, as well as Paulustrine Forested (PFO) and Paulustrine Emergern (PEM)
wetlands were identified.
FEMA Flood Zones
In order to maintain a feasibly level sewer and force main, as well as designing and implementing a gravity sewer, the
alignment must follow the same low topographical reliefs that streams and water -ways will likely run through. Much of the
alignment in the north and south cross through 100-yearfloodplains and regulatoryfloodways. Impacts in these areas consist
of underground pipe with minimal temporary above ground disturbance. No new permanent above ground structures will be
constructed within the 100-year floodplain or the regulatory floodway other than manhole tops, which extend at least 2 feet
above grade, and vent pipes where the floodplain is deeper than 2 feet above ground surface. It is not anticipated that this
project will have any adverse impacts to floodplains. (Refer to Exhibit 3)
Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program and US Fish and Wildlife Service resources were used to review available databases
for the presence of endangered species and threatened species potentially occurring in the study area. The table below
provides the common and scientific names of the listed species, as well as their federal status and occurrence.
Federal Species
Species
Status
Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflovus)
Proposed
Endangered
Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi)
Threatened
Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus)
Endangered
Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni)
Threatened
Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus)
Candidate
July 31, 2023 P a g e 13

e
State Species
Species
Status
Four -Toed Salamander (Hemidactylium scutatum)
Species of Special
Concern
The Review found the occurrence of one salamander, Hemidactylium scutatum, known by the common name Four -Toed
Salamander. This species is state listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC). USFWS listed five species who have the
potential to occur within the project area, Tricolored bat Perimyotis subflavus (Federally Proposed Endangered), Neuse River
Waterdog Necturus lewisi (Federal-IyThreatened), Carolina Madtom Noturusfuriosus (Federally Endangered), Atlantic Pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni (Federally Threatened) and the Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus (Federal Candidate Species). There
was no critical habitat for these species identified by USFWS within the study area. Due to the urban/suburban nature of the
project area, it is not likely that suitable habitat for these species exists on site. State and federal species lists resulting from
the review can be found in Appendix A.
A majority of the project area consists of either existing facilities, mowed and maintained utility right of way or recently logged
forested area. Of the habitat that has not already been disturbed, impacts will be temporary and returned to existing
conditions. Consultation with USFWS will ensure that all necessary precautions will betaken during the construction process.
This project is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on state or federally listed species. Refer to IPaC official species list
in the Threatened and Endangered Species Report in Exhibit 4.
July 31, 2023 P a g e 14

LaBeLLa
powelect &Y
allIBIT 2
PROJECT PLANS

O
OC
0
cc
x
O
LLM
O
W
3:
Z
W
C/3
W
w
U w
ry- CD
ocoz
LL.= o
W O Q
wU:)
CIO
c. z Ccl.
Q G
� z ZD
QQ
C�
m
co
os
T
o
CO
e
O
N
k
z
T
a' o
Q
�■
x
U
w
O

CL
LU
�I8
t! J OC �LLyZ Q O]
N�a o _ _
coZ��=o x Q r
Lu
~ O
CSJ20 k m m,� "� CD W>- W-F K a W
,V = K fff H y W H y - z J O
Jo o �w},a�
W F = ' R
W Z v
Coro y�a� w Q
62 a
�� a z _ so � = cn
R r R
t A d..R
Y A
x A I.A
h
0
1
I I
as` s
s
T P
k' �.F,
i
s

a
W r mc
Q W +
zF�xo
yNWyN a 0 W o
�GO
L 1 o d 2 ' CC � n
Ela z- d 2
m O C7 .. d

CL
�r�
ooZ
> w +
��F
O
- CO Z W
X
z
J
C3 O
t V
■ /��•
(P
W N W= a
oy� II
-
O
J8a
m� RWyz
yb
w �
LV
OTC
o
c
cm
_
d
0 x
/1
I /
A -
-
Y:.,:; g=
�" r
Hl
...... -I 'y
0

a }
0 7 2 GWj F O
�y O
O
cc ..5 ' J
_ o z p V
LLI QJ rye x °ca'M c _ ~
/R v �CS720 m kd OC N y W N y k aLU WCL
o
O W w
np_ d a cn
Lz _ �° doe ti CD a
M ATCHl1NE SiA- 29+00 1
SHEET Ul04
v
�, A
o�
(A--,�j
b� �r
jdf

a
0
7 2
GWj
O
F O
O
Q L1J +
z�ocFo
/R
�Ci720
OC
m kd� f~/J y-W f0/J y
k
a
Lu W o
w
N d
+
i
J>;
��d°2
1
y a
0
0- n N
np-
F-
z_
d
\ 1 0
e ,o so
n
--
� l
J'A
`OVA � . `�''., A �,�� `'/ '�• '� � ! ��'�, `� �.
1 Ill
I g1-
1 I y
�I
I _
I y-
IIa
I+ i. i 1 ---_-_--'
I
I ii �J
1 1
/ 8 1
EOIf1133HS �
00+fiZ'V1S 3NIlH3iVK
o

6
0
N M
7 2
i Q
aor�
GWj
W
�LLyz
o
O
O
a w +
M �•
cP b
_ o� coz p� F
a
_
o
OC J p
�
LU
LO
y In
CIOV�
¢
a
J
cmw�},aCL
W
U +
r
n
CODa CL
�J, q 9
p
C�
CD
r
z
p
d
I
i
oo ,;
s,P=6
a��H NEE � I � i'�•��� N n a -'n
1 �4
\ Cr
i�
lip =
r
1l ° -`'

CL
W }}
��0 7j2� 2W F o
CD��yZ = ¢ w N
CD 0
■/R• v d�2O k� OC f}A N k A co
0 O O
W CC h N 1 w j O i
W
LJp- �d°a �' Nay � _
U r z s cm _ [C
v
r
----
o
y.
T' y
------------
-�. - ___- - ___ -_ - i r,-��:.
I

a }
0 7 2 (Wj F O
O
CD
cc
X _ CDLu ~ O
/K d v �(S 20 m kap Y OC N y W VJ y k a O W o �N c o �J OaM1H l.L W V) 1 U) + i
�2rFZ_� O W
rI p F W G d _ = d O
z _ ��6OZ U ti
LV
do ca a
4 .
I'�
�1
-I a
I I
f l v I I
I 1
III iWi o
al 1 I
I ,' � Ea.�.�,,-
-a.��/3..3,o/Nlod/ I � /N3w3�3 1,
--�_ 3JINl11N31JOi/]f ai I.tlnaOdW I ���,'�/I' '� A, '��� �-'�,�Ey13Nirtl3MOd MItldWOJ /HEII �� '�� / 3
'4-4o+—�w/-/—�Y,.'-r6+�e�-ram ;e.=:o
!
-_ "'.q_�
I
r I
I i ;rI
m ATC SHEET
sriE
ri I
1
E l U06
1

6
cw.i
� o
A l q m
Z� �U
O w
OC LL y Z
_
Q w C
�cP�, d
_ p� a)Z F .2
X 2yw
c�
Z p
is
/�yy��
W
/}( N m
,v v
'
db 20
a
ryye
and OC Fy�Oy
¢
o
a
F
0 L o
w
0
J
OU
7j 60
p� LL W OC yya
° o O w 'a
LU
0w M
r
O
ri
�do2
= a a
U y
7 z_
U)i
=
soon
00+b8'H15
VAi �
------------
I
MATCHLINE
SHEET
i33Hs
3NITH�IVW
a�A
I i
l
I" T
"'S
i+
r
- , V�
„� In �
STA. 73+00
U107
�
"'
h

6
LD o
U i Q W O
F O _ c� Z p V
■ .. o s w� ac CD W y W a o c7 �
iF- ¢ a o
WccVJ rn a w L>U o T
W ca JS ziyo a 3�z� O w �
no_uw<aa d
a z �do2 U h CD _ _
LV
m C7 s" Y s d
Vzi
r
}}
Al
„ r
I,
� MPtC SEE
I

CIL
mc
}
� 0
7)ZO
W
f>
W
Q
rr OLLyZ
_
O
F O
+
Q W o
J
m Z�o
X y W a
z
C.'3 O
o
of
V
cP
�b�2oy}3o�
C� W
p Lu ~
LJ
T
8�o
J8
d
e� c �¢y
+
T
3�o
r 3z�
O w L
ci y��
c) rn
r
nn
inn z_
110
o
co
-
aco
_ 1I
C
Me
r'
1' A
I
_ -�f T.!
- / T-
11
r �
,, LL ., `"'N
-_ I' :r"
„\a
� �r
F _
s3 °
nF I
I> i
n /
/11
i I
IIT rkr
1 f
MATCH INESTN.95+00
SHEET U109
—
p
aW
IL
-

a }
O
z _ Q L U
m zF�Fo - o [C z o T
LLI
o n - ■y� x Vl W cs
R� v �CL�20 ka a cc y y W y y G a � w 0o T
J�N Ro o�� / CD�°�}xym V) } T
N 3o r a a Lu o
n o a
e��z_ ydo2 � - dp d
z LLn lEEHs
OO+L L L V15 3NIlHn1tlW
it
rpp I
I
1,
b
III � e A "M'�\
\�
1 b¢"
I
3
J uu
I tVA
hF
\: •: •: it/ ` I,Y ,rj� y-
71
Y
I •, III ; I _ X_ , �, p'� � ,,
,j
II I
MNiC SH E STA. 106+00
SHEET U110
-
_

a }
d m J Q W }
O
Q L1J
o CC z o �1
CD C C3 L V
ac F— " Mi 7W COD G a w oo T
rZM � + r
a W
~ W�aa a U
do c� a U
E L Lf1133HS
OD+gZII L b1S 3NIlH�1tlW
�All, ;
io o
el ^ V
.•: :,_•.fir*:�.��• '� Mt1 guy, \
ffi S
I' M11 3HS
00+L L L -tl15 3Ni,HN1tlVJ
--

C
}
/��
cPJ
7
-
O ' p O
ccLL N Z
CD
> O>
a w
ry\
MW
��•
o
z o
V J
/� d w
d�20
yy ¢
m kdpg OC y y W y N
G
a
r
0o
❑ wLU
T
w ¢d
�p
N
o
s P 1a
Y
NE�SJ i I � rai�
✓fir hH' � -L �
)
� it
,j
I
li
r � I
o Y
6 I� i�
1
Vi
/ d
Z L LN 133H5
oa_1Z 1-NI/-11,
�� o
�oz od
oz
e
tj

a }
d m J Q W }
cc �LLyZ - Q LU W
�.. ¢co 2
CD H
cc 1C, C4i k a ❑ w oo T
tt Q d J �G l.L w OC fN 1 W } T
G W
�y�z� a Lu
u) M
rl
p ¢
��z 62 x _
do c� a F
_ H
Y
„�
I
m I'
V` v, /
e A N, 'y
i�
/
--� .-�V�L,
SG� 5 EE
-
-
o
-

Q }}
8 7 2 F o
C pC W +
QL U
.W. o cn eft X a� W a LO
C3
CD
Ifu 2 N °d2o ac F— ,,W COD i G a 0 w o T
a W
LU 1 - d Lu
CC
MAI GHLINE Sl A. 151+00
SHEET U116
_ r I
>' �� 1'r'1 r�✓' I. l
I
} rJ \'l+
i o
I
�I
It
�,�
�s ,• � ,,'i'+ , I ' - gym,'; ! ,�) -
71,
d153N1]NNl y�
/
I 'Ell
I
-_
Ak
_-
-

0
N m
7 2
2�Y
C.3
W
� � p O_
o
}
>
J
CD
y W y y
Hw
¢
a
O W 0o
i
O
C� LL W OC fA d
ID3: - :.-
>
(n > }
T
7��p2
d
ti
O W ID
d Cn
c- 4,3 7r
-
cc d
z
_
cF-
,�ATCHLINE
SHEE, U111
. e�
bif
I� I
III,
I
z \,
w1
_- '.tl• ,I, � ova,,
�o
I ; .•Tf' • I
oo./ N�33Hs
s/ His3NITH��eW
o
o

6
� 0 7 2 U
N m W }
�� ti ZO Vo Q Wdl
M
Mom yN�d e� m
■■.�.• a
��� d72o - k�� aC yrnWyrn G a 0 cr
CD
w o T
o o� LL W OC Vs a w T
J d do m, O W a3 v) }
CL d fn r
^ p ct
r, y . �
MNTCHUNE ST,4. 183+00
SHEET U118
a
2,
w
- ---- -- _
--
fi r 1 s EE
EE
i i9 3
'��� 1 MP�HlIN E1 U116
t ��i SHE
o
mjs

fu a
q a
7 2
Z��U
U
O
OC �LLyZ
2
+
Q w Obi
W/x
m Z. � FO
_
o
z p
0y�
W
v
��20
kd OC y y W y y
G
A
w w oo
i
W d
� /6o O � W }
i
�d0
Zffi
Lu
d
rl
W~d
U a
�
602
= a
s
MNTGHLINE S— 194+00
SHEET TH 9
� �l=i/�3 }•rSc i
A It,
�,' ;•
I
i I w
I 1
Y Ll LH 133HS
00+£9l 'tl153111HHGlyl01
c

6
G W }
Al q m Z��U OC LLyZ _ Q w
F c� o z p V
a 0 o T
�0 00 0�� LL uyaacwya w w T
J� �� 7jd0 �o O �w oaf 0Ow
ri = a =
7 z_ �b o2 U y�
C7 _ d
IMEMOS
�NON
ME

CL
W
O OCw p
rr lL VJZ _ 0 z +
co zF�x� w
Wn O�cP ■� x wVIW~Q o Cl) O O
N� ui kipp °C y �n w y fn k a d w o
3N tto d- aiS w2Noy1 O U + N
C W [[
w CL d LL
p F
O � _
1
11 -
I1 e
1
I 1
I I
I
I
I I
I
_ J
bMp,hj — oo,�oO—, sa}--SV ouaHoj

CL
W
C �w o
z O
m3� and' eg m ZF�Fc w ¢ N N
O ■y� X OC Vl W C " o Co O
CD
2 N y W y H k A d w F /��
p jyj}a�� U O V V
a7 W j a d LL
�� OeP°°pG 9q6 i,C= / 4.o Ppr��2}PG qSO ./ iNN�vy
2
a�a III a
P,
E
I I I pNCG w �
t ego sop6 P°5o� v
ii I P
l G
IP
. tl I
I�I, II
I� I I 1 r 5' f sfi to 0(
RpiG �'a
ES
,II PEPSE aS PG �a vEG
��� yyo,l III E�EgG9 QG
/ I
• �fW�'_ o
00+6Lb153N11 �1yW �
o
I
I
_
I
I
-
-
II
—
I
�lo
��
alb
I 1
f
I
161
C—
—
bMp,hj — oo, �oO—a Lzoz/c/� SG}I -SV GIIaa°j

CL
/�� •" BOO Ccc
/W� �a SJ7 O �LLyZ 0 z
W n O �cP ■� X OC Vl W~ Q o � G �
dv d�2o m�y�CCry3oy G a Ow o
�o d� it
�% o W�yya o + N
JO W CC
a - 0 v �y��a _ d LL.
J�d2
O C _
xoo
Stp o
d
"4\ v—s+ass e Is!
�NRV o NEWELL JD & osr+EF��/� Y• s )} T
PG 422
I PB PG 95 �0 • � � RI' I •' H NRV D NEWELL JR &OTHERS /
J 21.�G
�Fa
eG�"
CI
t7B 146
n coiw 86 PG
C @WI
���� �
IFWD
�e
e ¢6 a tici
Ix
1 RENRv o NEeR ow.R.
4,
De 1 PG 2 k •� I' _
I "
PB PG 95 '117
r DRY
EP Alb, ,b E,
71
HENkv D NEWELL JR &PINES
'I OB 146 PG 422
95
PB 6 PGLR
L W�
117
X WG4o5 NV 5 3 9
HENRY 0 NEWELLNEWELL J5 EX e
p0 146 PG 422
PB 6 PG 95 �_-
- la1
w
EMS
�
C1p ANNE434
DB E76 E6 PG 404 "•
PS6 PO 95
c
RANIAII WILNER"N�
p0 p96 PG s64 I' p9
L PB 6 PG
I am
iod a sl a MAGNOLIF
,ALL PRGPEPIIES INC WV 1 e EX As'N E
D9 259 PG 21e
PC 6 PG 96
PC S PD 9 _5
n
T OUNCAN JR z� —
1I\I a —
e -
} C711_12-1
+
o V b12.62
_.—
_-'-.��-
e
0
II
-
-
--
-
I
-
__-
e
e
—
�N
I I
z
se
--
--
—
—
—
I
I
m
�u
HAJ
5Mp,hj — oocGo—, Lzoz/c/� SG}IDGGssd DIIGaDj

a
A� J CC rt LL Z Z
W = -CDy
M cc
_ G
m� W} W F k a O C O O
7 J k w y w CIOH d w O N W OC H a-
Q U
cW Q 1 LLrm
S�A� 41+s0
M ATC 9NFEi U205
I'
1 _
�
0 1III 1 111 111III o
i
<� .G
i ___, as �/ ✓ o
oox eo _�
<s ay
3NnH J
!N
o
I
I
1/1
Al
11
I
I
_
-
II
I
I
bMp,hj — oo,�oO—a lzoz/c/� sa}l -SV ouaaoj

CL
d m i Q W O
cP J OC r2 lL y N
o -_
M> �Py = eg m Z�oCx� w GQLO
W� plcP °Pyo' x �fA W ~Q o G O
N w d�y�2p ka cc w y W CO y G a d w O
W e b) a a N
� LL
p � = = rz
_ W a
n c�
� � z ��6 02 U ti
6
U° o
S—HLINE STN. 52+00
SHEET N206
�I
It
I I
� I
IN
I'
a� d
a
,.
�r
I
I
5
IT
I
III
II
II
5Mp,hj — ooc�TOSS., sa}--SV ollaaoj

W8 n� CD
m Z F 2 2 W Q `L/
x Ix
IN cc OL o W 0
N N - d
W�yNa o �+ N
CDz� � o �
^ p r u+ a s - a LL =
LJI �bo2 c� Nam
so fm
MATCHLINESTA. 63+00
SHEET U207
I I
\ II\\IIJ
fi
II
lll�l N e •1 �$.
� II
,� lea •:`.':"-•.�:-:•-••:•..•;••r
VV� •...1 j � ,
:a Atiry
, 111 :a
1�\
".. -
I
a
.I 1,
` 1 61= --- _- _---_ -n-- - --
�` lr j F7_iAR'ZEEER SEEASEMENiV------ - — --
E 122
\
I
l _
SOH. N*�
00+ZS "b1,EN,NIlHC1bW
m m o o m
Brr.�i�� oo.�Ossr nGl..'N.:to eio q,l u9Cwct nNea
5Mp,hj - ooc�OEE., sa}--SV ouaaoj

a
C
A� J OC rr LL Z - Z M
co
X oc N W~ Q o N
d v d�2o °0 CD
ry3CD G a O w
C o
7 J kW // N W N d o
WloaCL O U /�1
} tV
dLL
0 Mo
U CO
a � � z_ 02 � ��
y do �, -
n�
LL
aaen 133Hs
og-z "Vls 3NIlH31VNl
e�
41
�o
��, ;I
l I o
. I I
I �I
,I
,t
a3
Y � \
a �\
l \ o
�
�
_
—
-
0
4-4
wwa
\
0
0
0
sMP'wj — oo, �oO s v Lzoz/c/� sa}lo SV ouaaoj

�w
zF�Fc
¢ o00
N
WHW-g
N y W y H
F
H
d W
O
w o
W 2 C* d
W
� �3
Q V +
N
O
�z�
o �
aLL
r
�O
CD
co
,ATGNL- STA. 04+00
SHEET U209 �
cr
I � I
II 2a d w�� I Q I III
-_
m {I I
I I
l9 I
1 �ifl I
11 I
0
I? w I
s �I
ke
I+
a �
a
Zoo _ y 1
1 I � ---_ —
I i
II All
I I I
?I I
Ij I
I
I� I
I I
I I w
I
r
7 I
I I
IS I
I
�I I
i I
E[ b1S �NITHUl bW
an�p lw oo.-oneN�[ux�uxTa ugh-���os wa�nv ew N�Ssclort'x'wd
5Mp,hj — oo, �oO—a sa}l -SV ollaaoj
an�p lw oo.-oneN�[ux�uxTa ugh-���os wa�nv ew N�Ssclort'x'wd
5Mp,hj — oo, �oO—a sa}l -SV ollaaoj

d
W
//����No JO f�
CD �2v arc i 1 1 z Z n
M� ��J�d o� m zF�F� co Q
■ //���• o s rg x oc y W a F co
►V �yy �67 OJ k� �� h y W y ti a W o
1 U N
O W
J8� �� �6 � mo o �_� �o
cz
Ilk-
0
,00
95
Sp.
ES 10 —
�pSG�SEESJz
y.,...
`a
I •
••i
i
I \
3mu \
o y
er=e
YIG1-57 _-\,_•-Htt R AAILLS; R D.
_ DL€—!TFF
BOZf1133HS _ _ _
00+bB'b153Nf1H�1VIN
o
—
bMp,hj — oo,�oO—v Lzoz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

CL
a d o 7)Zo U W O
� c Z CDx c +
CD z 00
zF�x2 w Q 0
v 6�20 - kipg�� yy W yy _ k a a w o T
N tt o O- J mY l.L W C h 1 Q U O N
� o + �
z �d o2 U ti ¢ _
bo c� n
d
b�
w.w
a
-------------
------------
I
------ -- ------- ��,
_— -
......... -
I; F ' ------------
b tJryA
_
bMp,hj - oo,�oO—, Lzoz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

CIL
�:E0
C �W +
cc
w Q T T
oa o
CD
y k a O w o T
W=W o c) + N
�3>zm o o
LL
�aas = a
dp CS
�^! 1531111HH1bVy
�2
Ic
-I
Batt
1�N
•-!\� i=ate _______�-_ — —
iLa I_ —
+
------------------
;
r
mo
0
0 L3
00+g0 L "VIS b1S 3N]INIlHD1bVl
I
I -
5Mp,hj - oo,�oO—a aoz/c/� sa}l -SV ouaaoj

fl
N
CD
N
ao CD
O-w2fn�d O U +
� ILW LL
r 1
^+
i
II^e I
as
r
C
. w
----------------
------------
-------
I�
�1ZN 133H5
OO+L i i -b15 3NIIHOIVW
o
o
bMp,hj — oo, �oO—a ooa/o/o sa}--Sd ouaooj

CIL
CD
zF�Fo - w GQG o
■.. O tP Cy� X W y W Q o Cl) G F
y y ? w w i
ai ti vo d mS W W 2N 1 U N
}�} � o N
a F W Q d_JE w -
°ox
/yam b r�
o 'T
J o9 \3
e
/ =a
-- —
I�
e
7
a.�e i.0 so.��ss�+wn. .I.?� ew Mc ssc_ozz n vna
5Mp,hj — oo,�oO—, aoz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

f�CIL
C
//yDY�
2�
C W
y
M'
■ o
p�
C F
rp� X OCyE
y CD y
a
w oo
gyI
W y
W d
a
d
0 U
N
M
7,
L.L
-
d2
cz
Ellz_
�o
cn
'
cs �
P
Sao+oo
MpTGHS�H E\�25
F
_1
\
1 � I
1 I i
Ir
x
I
_I o,
I
IIn i
\
Wp0a5
1 � I
_�I � I
( I 1
i 111fI
I
V/ I 1 Ey
I
"III
I I
I y I
I
1
I
I LL e I
T �
I 1
.' I I44 I iT
s zn'
oo+ssl vis Aamllneoivmi
m
--------------
—
Po
a��om oo.�as+n. ,i. n. wm�ti;,.�,os ww�oxo�ovmewmosac-o��awa
5Mp'hj — oo,�oO—v 'Oz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

�L
CD
§)&- - 0E:
LO
C, C, w
@§&oa§ 2LL .
:
��
� / \
=v..
I
Al
i~`
IA
are -oo,� � , »� « --- x nan

a
C
Z�
O W
//1
ors
my�/X mwW ~Q
o
w GQ
Cl)G
`L�
/W/(a
���ZO
f
og i LL tiyWyy
G
a
d w o
T
N
o
W o� H
ri
d
LL
u ,�y b1S 3NS
r N V (V
r
i
i
i
_ 1
I�
i
_ A
4
J,l
0 1 JL
I of
7/
I
-I
� � 1
1 �
\,l %
Y
� a\
MP��HSHFI U2,
m_
kt
bMp,hj — oo,�oO—a (zoz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

2
ca
■�•a O�� ■� X VJ W ~¢ o
�dv ddZo 0 aoc �y3cy G a O w O T
7J k 1 V! wCO d U
O /1
+ �CV
J �,o 7w�Gd d 0
�� �d o2 U CID x� -
U do
ao+ s'=�i33Hs
£@l b153NI1H�1blN
3 Mtl3d,oiul �'G /
�GTON
cr)�`�� �mm
U
- _coT me
Ll
e I�
�I
a l
I8 gI I /
_
�6
iICI r
I
I III
F
= rc
__
i hi sy l '✓,
= I
91Zf1133H5
££'dLl Vl£3Nf1H�1VW
�
o
m
-�
-
-P I
_
�
m
�
�
bMp,hj — oo, �oO—a oon/o/o 3a}--Sd ouaooj

a
0 7 Z O
+
CD O rJ7 O 5 LL y Z = C z
maN t `1. e- m 1FZFo w Q o
O cJl ■� X EC y y,� Q o H
k�� ac yyWyy G a p w oo T
7p g
W} N
Jam 77O C �FZ� a O
ri
c W G d LL
z _ 6 oZ � y � �
U R dp51
'..
00+p661��133HS
V1S 3NIlH�lbL11
I
I � 1
�No, Ho ebaHe6 C—
�,� N�� �daoH j
a
II / 31>I IVN£9 �d 840t BQ
'� Ij to _/ N!I% 3a M l tlIy0lJl�l
Ip n e � f
" SIR Y
e. e°ga `' es nuct�I r �•, � ssl �d dla ea
�P tiS e° —+°=1 - a3laavwNn 1
pecy I I Ia 'j� J; NO1;,YlJ 3N3��3 AHy I
Ir I I
rs569P� �T
wl,
o w I I 1
mI
Al
BID
o I2 IYI I
a I I =
I�ei yII.II 1
ag
r
o
C-
-
--
1 1
v 1
\
-
—nip—
JJIE
5Mp'hj - oo, �oO—v aoz/c/� -a !. SV ollaaoj

a
cc
W Q N CY)
co
�dv d�Zo s�y� �y3cy - G a O W o T
7 J kW 1 N W N 0-
o /� 1
CDW}°a� O U } tV
rl
d°
a oo.sac�cn ij3Ns
g
G e=e
o e0 o Q a
- _ S NI-L =p
y_
� e
ps .e=°ama
„$
s�y1 = x -
pl
`�°e
= i
°'83PLL
=
5Mp,hj — oo,�oO—, aoz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

cc 6
O W
r" Or ' 00 cD
n' LL CD
w Q o
■.. os ■� x aCyW c uJ g
a v 'A o N
"qqN o0 og '� uy+aycv�`"a p v N
ab W
np_ _ W jaa LL a
z 7�d o2 y a -
do
�fi� S3NHy�1eW l y /T
1
�e C+ PQ fi p"p/ P9
o-� C 1
OX
yb y9
I �
N fA �l
p = RCtie�o`¢a % 4 le
x"
�\ is
�=
a \
� 0
V , ` t_ O p 6 o ePGP ryryGry ^
Q 0
0*
0
S�2 y 3�3H 00 4 OQC. Oho QQc"e 50 Q
0
i
-
-
I
/
I
II
II
-
II
I
I
II
I
I
Hid
bMp,hj — oo, �oO—v Lzoz/c/� sa}l -SV ollaaoj

CL
C� 2� p Al.
r OY pp
NN SJ S y = m Z N
a ��7d _ p W Q N r
a - o N 2i 0 N
N °d 20 m kd OC y y W y y G a a W
0 UN
p
mE LL W y a +
CD �
1 a LL N
z y � � � -
o do ca U
o'
c+�e��G55
MPSCN5 F5SV222 �'v�� oc� eGG�6 l y \_
G Q
- S
QG cd�
� L E
/= _ mac?; -au �- ,•, �+
r. � .lNl�sry1 c �' ��`� �'�_ �• P�OV�G a0.rt
4p5'IOp0a 3 6. l j \F4. VJO QG ti
\o�eP� �-� - u +�� '!, •!r goo?%\ +e
+e 6`5` Zoo lg+•;q ,."�+i
bpi i
G+
x9222 r q `.r• /� _ry'O ^699 bay +��5
'IO�nrySe �'
. _
_
bMp,hj — oo,�oO—a Lzoz/c/� sa}--SV ouaaoj

CL
_ .L o W W
7O2� p
ED ¢o N
ocP c� X WtiW�Q o U) G F /1
i m dd 2J k� H y W y N A d w O V 1V
W�to a c N
yLca O � _�
7 Y r W a 1 LL N
OPdo v~
W
Fc
gl
-
DB 630 PG ;66 y
� tPR NCE R' SRUMWRIGNND /f / . c 1 .
x URAVEt � CA pgEt081 3�5 � /� eF� EN WOOPS — —
�A
�N45 oa �� "wYa,oz,N3N / v� pe �td1�� 23 9 PNOREWS K R� ND
d �<E
� � 3 PB PG MPEOft�E 0 S D _
6 VPRNPD W� _ _
y StORv
rc °
Rp
a
�W a b _ n — _ - •;
w
3 0
�zzn i33Hs
oo+tzz wis aNnemmru �-
Hv°m°d.°madew..z...:m�
sWP'wj — oo,°oO—, Lzoz/c/� Ra}--SV ouaaoj

CL
I0 72
J OC rr LL Z
O
m z oc F r a cn T
■■ .... o P K� X W
a
N °d�2o m k��`� COD cm k a CDz0 }
X U)
c� a
E� a z_ L 'ISL J (M w

CL
0 72 Z
c" 2° p z u+ d Q
�
MW 8 osr°� o �LLyo _ d
mCD z�ocFr a (n Z
■ .�. C%7'O m kd cc UD
2 COD W H H G A z O O T
CD
���p V ui
N�Qd X (~
E� ac>rz_ L 'ISL J OC f W Q

C
a z
IN o 7j Zo W O O
Y 'm" 20 r ' p 0 }
W H
H - a J J T
rr cP K� X OC CD
y W
a o W O
(� °620 m m$f ryW 3oy y k a Lu ~
k y
� yaaoa
� O >~
e C/)

CL
I0 72 Z
t Q J d w
w y p _
0- m Z���� o � N
�d Uo m m3y� ¢ r}3oI K a a T
N H —^
7 J VJ W N `',
O- �� w w OC N 1 � }
w a d J W
rl
deo�LLo � \ i
Al I
I
s\
z
w opF
= w�
awrp ��moz
_
\\
/
M „99,9050�

LaB�lla
F, --. ,,. . ., i C, 1: � [ '. ..- i �-� r t r' . .- i �. - [�
EXHIBIT 3
MAPS AND FIGURES

O
CO
uo
N '6
O
rI
-0
N U O
Z
G
N
M�
W
O
rL. jp
>
N N Z
NLL
�j
J
V
Z L
a
x
o
O
a
4
a
C7
cn
.
al ua Naa wvm '.1- n

a
Q
O
co
N
£
cc
TA
w,
MW
�
O
O
Z
_-_
O
kJ 15
J
V p
O
ZaZ
(n 0
9
Li
�n
U
0
T -
J
a,�a�Naa Nv„l , a:,

s
�.+
O
i
w r
c
z
■jam■
N U O
'C w
z
N cn
> a
c -o
- o
Q 0
Q� i
v
w15
O �% p',z��
w ii a
£
CU
O
z
��
J
°yZ
Z L Z
ono
N d' o
�-y
V
a
o v�
A
J�Z I I I0I
N�a��
3
s 9
y
Y.
�a
4
i
a'
i
al -lem d WVN-lol.ao

s
._j
O
-
O
r
00
LO
}? E �
a
■jam■
N U O
'C w
z
N Ul
> a
c
Q 0
w
v
15
a'
a ;r-
O �% p ',z � �
w ii a
£
CU
O
z
°y
oa n
4N
c�
d�_
LZ
O
2 J
(n O LL LL> LL K
a
a£ a
z
LLZa
c
J�Z I I I0I
N a
a
2E
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

s
._.+
O
i
oo
�°a
}?EU
a
��a
m
d v O
rn O Z
N Ul
;
c -o
Q
Q i
w
v
o
C Cw
O �',z��
w
O O
y Z
0
� No
J
�}
U
z L
a
O �%
'O A N N LL LL> > N N J>
(n 0 LL LL'
a
a£ a
Z
�J1
�0ZI11EI
N65
�
a
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

-
§ \0
(DE `
�«)
°`\
*
_£-
@�
_{! :
_-
\
�
a-
k@j
��L
�\
_
�.
)0)
\\\
t
0V)
�f2 ,E
\�§���\�
_
\\\\\

cn
J
O
o
0
COo -
C
a; � c�
o
£
_
a
M
M�
d O
in D z
s
N
w v
w
3��
v� oz�
J
c
C
4
m o u
aa>
i
LL
a
V
Z
Z L
IL
��� o
D W o
a s
C
w
JN.+amomw
LL
al :Imainaa vy":jweao

cn
J
O
O�°c
i
i
o
£
O
O
M
m/Oy
O
N
rn (; Z
O
s
_
N
LJJ
v
°
.L.
W
WW>m
=
NN
Jjv
OQ
OUO
x
oNO
a
LLO
a
>
�,ZLO
♦U,
z
IL
��
W
W W
a£ d
cLL
W
JN.+amomw
LL
al-Imainaa WVN-icneolD

cn
J
i
o
ao r
L°c
i
N
£
a
M
.0
K
Gf U 0
C w
N 4? Z
Q: Ul
o
LL
N
W
caw
o
-
J
Q
A O LL
�-y
U
Z�Z
a
��� o
p to
o �_ w o0
w �n LL
4
ate=
W
LL
�Jt
JNtia"omw
LL
al -1-1.8 WVN 1-0

QCO
i
p
)
.0
K
N V C
w+
to D Z
15
W
caw
o o
pW
w ��
o
J
0
o m X
o
z
IL
w o
4�
LL
w LL
a£
W
LL
JN.+amomw
al-Imainaa WtlN-loleolD

c
E
Y
N
3
M
m
o
•�
�-y�
W
O
Q
Q
Z
O O
o °�
Q Q N m
N£
=
>
w
z+ _
w
O
---
C N .6 O .Z m
a s -
c
Q
U
yamFinaoin
-tea-
u
d-,e -d Ol--13 pxwm I.AO sI-dwl-9am$ij\uapeVmvq pue spedwl puep@M\SI`J\(j—S uj@sNJ wogxo8\LWtld\-9-gled

o
m
O
V
T
W
O
�
Q
(D O o
z
yD
y 0
c C
IJ
0
m m .•
m w O
0 0 cca s
m m �:j .. 3 R -o E E
m E o `0-m
Q Q N o o o W12
E E w F:5 w m U (n ur
ooco A�������3 Y�Q
C"� o 0 0 0 0 o A E o E N Y Q
y a m F m a` a` a` 0- 0- 0- w w a w
00 I I I o I I I I 1
cu
LO
N£
w
-
r_ cu
c6
LL
a
d3 --8 al PxwZsluedwl wea11S Pue Puepm\uoua illW Pue slaedwl Puep@M\SI9\(j—S wa]sa wogxua GWtld -0 -gled

o
m
�
z
y �
IJ
O
2�
E
w o wLO
cu
o c a a
= N
w
o
15 E
.. E w F w m U w m
---
o
cu
0.
3 ��AY�A
�E
��Q�000000D y�=�Eo2-
N
E-o O O O O O O N y E N y Q
caa��
y d (O F (O d a a a a d W ii w d w
a
JI !OIII oNIII� 1
N£�a
,w
d3 _�a Naa Ol-�olea�� pxw TsI-dwl —IS pue puellaM\uage$iLby pue sl-dwl PuepaM\SI`J\(j—S walsa M) wogxo8\LWtld\-8 -41ed

r
°
V
N
N W
WLO
^ t
O^
V%
x
Q
Q
Q
Z
..
.. a� L a� _ A E
s LL E m
a
+U.i
w
ro
R
0
U(D
w
�Q
IQ
��O
�52�3
do
ac
o
��� E Q�
�QQQQQQv
�
�
LL
C o o o 0 0 0 1y N
♦�
o
a` a` d C A LL W LL W =1a�
JI !OIII oV1IIII 1
N£�a
dl Iam H Ol 1-1-10 PxwZsluedwl wea11S Pua Puepm\uoua illW Pua slaedwl Puep@M\SI9\(j—S wa]sa
M) wogxua GWtld -0 -41ed

r
°
V
N
N W
WLO
^ t
O^
V%
x
Q
Q
Q
Z
..
.. a� L a� _ A E
s LL E m
a
+U.i
w
ro
R
0
U(D
w
�Q
�
IQ
��O
��52�3 �
do
ac
c
�� �E Q�
��QQQQQQv
�
�
LL
C o o o 0 0 0 1y N
♦�
o
a` a` d C A LL W LL W =1a�
JI !OIII oV1IIII 1
N£�a
dlOl-1-1-0 Pxw Zslaedwl weallS Pue Puepm\uoueiiiW Pue slaedwl Puep@M\SI`J\11amaS waysa
M wogxua GWtld -0 -41ed

0
\LO
�z
©
�$
2
$
{ f !f�{! \ ee
\km;;
2t
LU
2
« ER
�m\
K�(�\{{j�\k
_
%
2
7
A/
aeye:/ „ /o! ff\§}o
:—
ƒ
{�
v;E'P
—
u—
,§{[{)\))\)|
KKKKKK;;)w w=1
\
°�q011}~kk����
-«
/
)/\/
_ar:rPxul v_,r___.__,_M\Slm__w_od\LVqVd\a_

r
°
V
N
N W
WLO
^ t
Q
Z
O^
V%
x
Q
Q
..
.. a� L a� _ A E
s LL E m
a
+U.i
w
ro
R
0
U(D
w IQ
�Q
�
c
��O
��52�3 �
�� �
do
ac
�E Q�
�QQQQQQv
�
�
LL
C o o o 0 0 0 1y o N
♦�
a` a` d C A LL W LL W =1a�
JI !OIII oV1IIII 1
N£�a
d3 --8 al '.1-0 PxwZsluedwl wea11S Pua Puepm\uoua illW Pua slaedwl Puep@M\SI9\(j—S wa]sa
M) wogxua GWtld -0 -41ed

r
°
V
N
N W
WLO
^ t
O^
V%
x
Q
Q
Q
Z
..
.. a� L a� _ A E
s LL E m
a
+U.i
w
ro
R
0
U(D
w
�Q
�
IQ
��O
��52�3 �
do
ac
c
�� �E Q�
��QQQQQQv
�
�
LL
C o o o 0 0 0 1y N
♦�
o
a` a` d C A LL W LL W =1a�
JI !OIII oV1IIII 1
N£�a
dl Ol 1-10 pxul Tslueduil ueallS Pua puellaM\uoReBillW Pua slaedwl Puep@M\SI9\(j—S wa]sa/y) wogxoa\GWtld\-8-gpad

r
°
V
�;
N
w O wLO
o
^ t
= Nc
V%
x
Q
Q
Z
..
.. a� L a� _ R E
s LL
a
+U.i
w
ro
R
E�o
m
d
Y�
E��Q�Q�0QQQQ.�Q
�Qv o. 2' .
a�1z
cu
m
LL
o
C N5 E-� o 0 0 0 0 0 1p y E N Y Q
aa-
♦�
U
N
o
y LL N F N LL a` a` a` a` d C A LL w LL w�
a�
+,
JI !OIII 1
oV1IIII
N£�a
U
V1
i
• ` "•
P.
E
1r .
PxwZsluedwl weetlS W e Puel]aM\uape$i1IW Pue slueduil Puep@M\SI9\(j—S wa]sa/y) —qg %\GWtld\-a -glad

c
V
Y
N
m w O w
cu
nJ
= N c
LO
W
x
O
Q
C
L a y E m m
Q N o o
O
O°
w
-
w
_
z f
A A
E E w n m UCo Y u
r -
O
4-4
L d
o oo o o o o v °3 of
w o
n n n n n n o m
C -� -� o 0 0 0 0 o N y N Y Q
U
N
y a m F N a` a` a` a` a` a` C N i w a w
! o I I I pN 117■E I
x 4
1
\'
�1
• l�a�'. �,i t
d3 -1a Naa al-loleald pxw-Ts .dud —IS pue putIp@m\uage$i11W pue sluedwl PuepaM\SI`J\11amaS walsa/o wagxaa\LWtld\-8 - ptad

c
V
Y
N
m w O w
O
nJ
VJ
Q.
Vi Z `\'
$ o c a a
= N c
Lo
K
O
Q
Q
N
..
.. m A .a -o E
m m E S L d N y E A m
"
a
=
� U
O (6
w
o
o
z f
4
E E A A °
E E w F� n m U 3 in Y u
r
c6
J
O
x
m m m ... a� a� a� � � m o m m
---
aoN�
�
�
o d
o oo o o o o v 3 01
o
d—
n n n o m
0 0 oC N Y Qm
C N ii w d w
a a
ar
JI 0 0III oV1IIII
rw
IF—
d3-�a Naa Ol-�olea��
PxwZsluedwl wea11S Pue Puepm\uoue illW Pue slaedwl Puep@M\SI9\(j—S wa}sa/o wogxoa\GWtld\-8-gpad

c
E
V
D
N
m w O wLO
O
nJ
= N c
K
Q
N
.. m A .a -o E
m m E S L d N y E A m
a
=
� U
w o
,V
_
z
4
W A
E E F w � n m U 3 Co Y u
r
c6
J
O
x
m m a� a� a� a� a� a� ° o m m
a o N
L d
o oo o o o o v °3 01 E
w o
n n n n n o m
C o 0 0 0 0 o N y N Y Q
a` a` a` C N ii w d w
a s
ar
J I 0 0 I I I oN
dl -yam Na21 Ol -1-13 pxw Zs]aedwl weapS pue puep@m\uageVmvq pue slaedwl PuepaM\SI`J\(j—S waysa wogxua GWtld -0 -gled

%
D
2
f
@
0
2
»g
f /wLo*
°
_
�$
2�f�f!
k�;
ee
(�/�\{\j�\k
2�
w2
\ _
aeye:& „ :o! )f)2\�
��
%
2
f§ -
:;,;;;;;;;! :I#!�:
2
�E
U
/_
,[\[\(((((();\}\\\\
\0}1}~kk����
-2
)
a__r_, Pxw T_wj_S__W_.__w__s_ua_o8\�VqVd\a_

c
E
V
D
N
m w O wLO
O
nJ
= N c
K
O
Q
Q
N
.. m A .a -o E
m m E S L d N y E A m
a
=
� U
O (6
w
o
-
,V
_
z
f
4
E W A
E E w F� n m U n Y u
r -
c6
J
O
x
m m a� a� a� a� a� a� ° o m m
a o N
L
d
o oo o o o o v °3 01 E
w o
n n n n n o m
C o 0 0 0 0 o N y N Y Q
a` a` a` C N ii w d w
a s
ar
JI 0 0III oV1IIII
dl -yam Na21 Ol-1alea10 pxw Tslaedwl weatlS pue puep@m\uageVmvq pue slaedwl PuepaM\SI`J\(j—S walsa wogxua GWtld -0 -gled

c
E
V
D
N
m w O wLO
O
nJ
= N c
K
O
Q
Q
N
.. m A .a -o E
m m E S L d N y E A m
a
=
� U
O (6
w
o
v
,V
_
z
f
4
E W A
E E w F� n m U n Y u
r -
c6
J
O
x
m m a� a� a� a� a� a� ° o m m
a o N
L
o d
o oo o o o o v °3 01 E
w o
n n n n n o m
C o 0 0 0 0 o N y N Y Q
a` a` a` C N ii w d w
a s
ar
JI 0 0III oV1IIII
d3 a 8 Olpxw Zslaedwl weatlS pue puellw\uageVmvq pue slaedwl PuepaM\SI`J\(j—S walsa wogxua GWtld -0 -gled

c
w
V
Y
N
m w O w
O
nJ
= N c
K
O
mE L
fi
O_ (6z
w
oo -
_
A mU E =E
F� 3i
c6Ew
J,V
O
m � :j
�m
d
o o o o o o v 3 01
m
d—
n n n m m
0 0 oC N Y Qm
dN
C N ii w d w
a s
ar
JI 0 0III oV1IIII
�- II
CM
FT
AL
1
d3 -1a 8 Ol-lu1ew0 pxw TSIDedwl weetlS pue puep@m\uapeVmvq pue sluetlwl pueRaM\SI`J\(jw@S walsa wogxoa Lwv 0-vled

c
E
V
D
N
m w O w
O
nJ
= N c
LO
K
O
Q
Q
N
..
.. m A .a -o E
m m E S L d N y E A m
a
=
� U
O (6
w
o
co
,V
_
z
f
4
E A A
E E w F� n m U n Y u
r -
c6
J
O
x
m m a� a� a� a� a� a� ° o m m
a o N
L
o d
o oo o o o o v °3 01 E
w o
n n n n n o m
C o 0 0 0 0 o N y N Y Q
a` a` a` C N ii w d w
a a
ar
JI 0 0III oV1IIII
-T-^'lTr l" —r ?�— -
-vft 41&
� r
by
r � �
I
d3 -1a 8 Ol-'.1-0 pxui -Tsje duil a IS Pue puellaM\uoReBRIW Pue sluedwl puep@M\SI``J\(j—S uj@ s o wogxoa\GWtld\-8-gpad

c
E
V
D
N
m w O wLO
O
nJ
= N c
K
O
Q
Q
N
.. m A .a -o E
m m E S L d N y E A m
a
=
� U
O (6
w
o
-
,V
_
z
f
4
E W A
E E w F� n m U n Y u
r -
c6
J
O
x
m m a� a� a� a� a� a� ° o m m
a o N
L
o d
o oo o o o o v °3 21 E
w o
n n n n n o m
C o 0 0 0 0 o N y N Y Q
a` a` a` C N li w d w
a s
ar
JI 0 0III oV1IIII
d3 -1a Naa OlPxw Zslaedwl wea11S Pue Puepm\uoue iiiW Pue sluedwl PuepaM\SI`J\(jw@S waysa wogxua GWtld -0 -gled

O
5
J uu u
d3 0l pxui V6GOC606 sjp—d luaf.d\SI9\(—S uj@ s ) ojogxo8\GWtld\-0 -glad

O
i
O
o
_
�
.O-. o
'O o
min+'
J uu u
- r4loW
i
s
00
W
M
t
d3 --8 p— V6L0E606 sI—ed luafo�d\519\1�ama5 walsa o�ogxoa GWtld -8 -41ed

1„!,J
o
o
N
_ N £
O
d
o
_
EMU
N £ a
M
M
M
W
� / T
M �
� M
M
d3 -iav H Ol-1e1-10
pxui V6LOE606 sjp—d l,afo d\SI`J\(—S w a ) ojogxo8\LWtld\-8 -q ed

n,cu
LJ,J
o
o
N
d
o
o
J u u u
d3 --8 Ol pxui V6GOC606 sI—ed luaf.d\SI`J\(—S uj@ s ) ojogxo8\GWtld\-0 -glad

n,
O
i
,�
LJ,J
o
o
N
O
d
o
o
J u u u
d3 --8 Ol p—VZ ZO£LOL slasled is [%\SI9\IlannaS walsa Mojogxoa GWtld -8 -41ed

n,cu
o
_
�
aN+ o
'O o
min+'
J u u u
d3 —inGa 01 1-11GIO 11-1 V7ZOE707 11—ld

n,cu
LJ,J
o
o
N
d
o
o
J u u u
d3 Ql 1— 0 P— VZLO£ZOZ SIG"Id walsGM) ologxoa\LWVd\ 0 41ed

O
LJ,J
o
o
N
- N £
O
d
o
EMU
i
N
4
...............................................
f .-
d3 uan —8 Ol '.I-,0 pxui V6LOC606 sjp—d j,@r.d\SI9\(—S —a ) ologxo8\GWtld\-0 -glad

n,
O
i
,�
LJ,J
o
o
N
O
d
o
o
J uu u
l
cq
*,
t -
.�:;
co cq
\ N Y
O
M N
N 1
coD
Lo
k,
N
co
N
a)
N
N
wr �I
i
M
� O
N N
�-r
T y.
N
} N
N
1 ,
J
a
K N
O
M —
T7 K� N
d3 -1--8 Olpxw 46L0£606 slaaled —a M) alaQxaa\LWtld\-0 -41ed

�
n)
Li
O
Z
i
O
�' o
a a
- N
a
5
�
o
X
J uu u
d3-IMOROd Ol-1WOWO pxw VZLO£ZOZ SIOWed lWWj\SI9\(—S UJD a1)O]OgxOd\LWtld\-0 -410d

(6
o
J uu u
dl-1amaNaa Ol -1-13 pxw V6L0E606 slaal0d 1a 1Wd\SI`M—S UJD aW) 010gx0d\LWtld\-0 -g10d

n�
O
a
- N
a
15
EMU
O
N
02
s � �
pxurbZLOEZOZ slao�ad l�afoid\519\UamaS wa]sa/y� o�ogxoa\LWtld\-8 -41ed

�
n)
Li
O
Z
i
O
�' o
a a
- N
a
5
X
J uu u
dl Ol 1-10 p.. p6L0£606 sI—ed ]aafaid\519\llamas w ,l M) ologx%\LWtld\-0 -glad

�
n)
Li
O
Z
i
O
�' o
a a
- N
a
5
X
J uu u
d3 --8 Ol pxw4ZL0£Z0Z slaaled ]aafaid\519\llamas walsa/) alagxaa\LWtld\-0 -glad

�
n)
Li
O
Z
i
O
�' o
a
- N
a
5
X
J uu u
ti
I r rr r
W � _
N �
� O
co
9
d3 Ol 1-10 pxw pZioezoz slowed u,@y M) mogxoa\Zwvd\-a -a1ed

o
m o
a15
X
m
o
�
a��
�
d
+'
aN.• o
N
'O o m �
ya`aa
EMU
N £ a
co
j e
I 1 r ; t �.
l ' f
O
W
�
O
N
O
O
I
O�
A�
�1
j 1 .i
m
N P,N
O O O OHO
m N a
O �� N
G O G N
= � O
Pxw VZLOEZOZ sl—d lWWd\Sl`J\(—S UJD a 1) 010gx0d\LWtld\-0 -41ed

�
n)
Li
O
Z
i
O
�' o
a a
- N
a
5
X
�
+'
aN+ o
'O
cin
J uu u
d3 -1an —8 al-]eleald pxw VZLO£ZOZ SI—d lWWj\SI9\(—S UJD a 1) 010gx0d\LWtld\-0 -41ed

Adjacent Property Owners Table
Parcel Number
102 12A
Site Address
PATTERSON DR
Owner
DLH DEVELOPMENT LLC
Mailing/Owner Address
3605 NC HIGHWAY 96, OXFORD, NC 27565-7212
10213
PATTERSON DR
W ILEY NAT ESTATE
502 PACER DR, HYATTSVILLE, MD 20785-4638
102 13A
PATTERSON DR
CITY OF ROXBORO
PO BOX 128, ROXBORO, NC 27573
102 148
357 PATTERSON DR
CITY OF ROXBORO
PO BOX 128, ROXBORO, NC 27573
102 149
585 PATTERSON DR
LEM PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 58278, RALEIGH, NC 27658-8278
102 155
132 MAE CT
DLH DEVELOPMENT LLC
3605 NC HIGHWAY 96, OXFORD, NC 27565-7212
102 176
133 MAE CT
VELASQUEZ PEDRO AMBROCIO & CRUZ RICCY MABEL VILLALOBOS
133 MAE CT, ROXBORO, NC 27573-7700
102 189
232 KEITH PL
DLH DEVELOPMENT LLC
3605 NC HIGHWAY 96, OXFORD, NC 27565-7212
10219
3250 DURHAM RD
PERSON MEMORIAL CEMETERY
PO BOX 1135, ROXBORO, NC 27573-1135
102 190
244 KEITH PL
NATIONAL HOME CORPORATION
1080 HOLCOMB BRIDGE RD BLDG 100 #330, ROSWELL, GA 30076-4346
102 191
237 KEITH PL
NATIONAL HOME CORPORATION
1080 HOLCOMB BRIDGE RD BLDG 100 #330, ROSWELL, GA 30076-4346
10222
SOMERSET DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR & OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
10277
355 PATTERSON DR
FEARMAN ALEXANDER E LIFE ESTATE
355 PATTERSON DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6019
1061
HURDLE MILLS RD
SCHMITT HEATHER MARIE & WAITE MATTHEW DAVID
3716 SANDY RIDGE LN, DURHAM, NC 27705-5352
10619
PATTERSON DR
BROOKS WILLIE E & BROOKS WILMA S
481 TOM OAKLEY RD, TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
10622
HURDLE MILLS RD
WINSTEADH WJR
PO BOX 18419, ASHEVILLE, NC 28814-0419
106A 8
PATTERSON DR
BROOKS WILLIE E & BROOKS WILMA S
481 TOM OAKLEY RD, TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
107101
WISTERIA DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR&OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
107102
WISTERIA DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR&OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
10711
44 WISTERIA DR
LAWSON ANNETTA
44 WISTERIA DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6059
107111
WISTERIA DR
DUNCAN RICHARD TJR & DUNCAN BONNIE
334 PATTERSON DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-602C
107112
WISTERIA DR
DUNCAN RICHARD TJR & DUNCAN BONNIE
334 PATTERSON DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-602C
107 11 3
54 WISTERIA DR
TALL PROPERTIES INC
PO BOX 1035, ROXBORO, NC 27573
107114
32 WISTERIA DR
WILKERSON RANDALL
32 WISTERIA DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573
107115
WISTERIA DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR&OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
107116
WISTERIA DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR&OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
107117
WISTERIA DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR&OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
10712
31 WISTERIA DR
SCOGGINS HENRY MICHAEL
31 WISTERIA DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6059
10712A
202 MAGNOLIA DR
DAVIS LARRY & DAVIS MARY AN R
54 DAVID LN, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6089
107 12B
201 AZALEA DR
ELLIS LANCE THOMAS
201 AZALEA AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6045
10713A
184 MAGNOLIA DR
FAUCETTE BRENDA R
184 MAGNOLIA DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573
107 26B
185 AZALEA DR
STONE AGNES V
185 AZALEA AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573
10727
MAGNOLIA DR
HOLT JUDITH W & LACROIX BRIDGETT YARBROUGH
PO BOX 400, HUBERT, NC 28539-040C
107277
195 MAGNOLIA DR
POWELL TIMOTHY WAYNE ESTATE
36E FOXWOOD DR, TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583-8778
107 27 8
75 WISTERIA DR
CATES NATHANIEL III & CATES PALMER N ESTATE
75 WISTERIA DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6059
107501
334 PATTERSON DR
DUNCAN RICHARD TJR & DUNCAN BONNIE
334 PATTERSON DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-602C
107 50 2
314 PATTERSON DR
MOONEY REBECAH A LIFE ESTATE
314 PATTERSON DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573
10761
343 PATTERSON DR
REYES UBALDO FRANCO & PEREZ MARIA CONSUELO BELLO
72 HONEYSUCKLE LN, ROXBORO, NC 27573-3809
10775
182 AZALEA DR
MOORE KIMBERLY & MOORE JIHAD
182 AZALEA AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6058
10776
196 AZALEA DR
PRICE SHAVOO KIERRA & PRICE STUART LAMONT
196 AZALEA AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6058
10779
WISTERIA DR
NEWELL HENRY 0 JR&OTHERS
PO BOX 949, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1089
2564 DURHAM RD
EATON CORPORATION TAX DEPT 2N
PO BOX 80615 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46280-0615
108910UT
INDUSTRIAL DR
WEST DONALD&WEST MYRAJUNE
426 FIELDSTONE DR, BURLINGTON, NC27215-4641
10892
315 INDUSTRIAL DR
DIALIGHT CORPORATION
1501 ROUTE 34, WALL TOWNSHIP, NJ 07727-3932
11010
INDUSTRIAL DR
DALLAS DAMES E & DALLAS NANCY L
PO BOX 1123, ROXBORO, NC 27573
11010A
1995 HURDLE MILLS RD
BRADSHER SYLVIA JONES
1995 HURDLE MILLS RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574-6505
11012
805 INDUSTRIAL DR
DALLAS JAMES E & DALLAS NANCY L
PO BOX 1123, ROXBORO, NC 27573-1123
11016
INDUSTRIAL DR
HPI PROPERTIES LLC
103 SUMMERWINDS DR, CARY, NC 27518-9638
1109
840 INDUSTRIAL DR
HPI PROPERTIES LLC
103 SUMMERWINDS DR, CARY, NC 27518-9638
110 9A
776 INDUSTRIAL DR
LONG DANNY D LIFE ESTATE & LONG BARBARA G LIFE ESTATE
776 INDUSTRIAL DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-6506
11235
402 BROOK CAR DR
CARVER THOMAS BERKELEY
316 BROOKS CAR DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-3739
11290
HURDLE MILLS RD
TROY ENTERPRISES INC
238 CEDAR CLUB CIR, CHAPEL HILL, NC 27517
116101
480 BURLINGTON RD
MOOSE LODGE 2005
116 10A
520 BURLINGTON RD
PATRICK RICKY 1
520 BURLINGTON RD ROXBORO NC 27573-5477
11611
111 HAMLIN DR
CLAYTON TIMOTHY EUGENE
111 HAMLIN DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-8871
11612
LEASBURG RD
WAGSTAFF ASSOCIATES PARTNERSHIP & WAGSTAFF LINDSAYTIR
31 REAMS AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573
116121
122 HAMLIN DR
LONG HORACE V & LONG SANDRA KAY B
122 HAMLIN DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574
116122
140 HAMLIN DR
MURPHYJAMES
140 HAMLIN DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-6647
11635
1221 LEASBURG RD
TAVA INC & TREV LLC
1990 LONGS STORE RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574
11636
95 HAMLIN DR
WADE VICTORIA L
95 HAMLIN DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-9607
11639
55 HAMLIN DR
LONG HORACE V & LONG SANDRA KAY B
122 HAMLIN DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-6647
11646
1267 LEASBURG RD
LONG HORACE V & LONG SANDRA KAY B
122 HAMLIN DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574
1181
CRITCHER WILKERSON RD
L PROPERTIES LLC
3068 CHUB LAKE RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574
11810
WESLEYAN RD
PERSON COUNTY NC
304 S MORGAN ST RM 219, ROXBORO, NC 27573
11812
CARRINGTON LN
PERSON COUNTY NC
304 S MORGAN ST RM 219, ROXBORO, NC 27573
11816
WESLEYAN RD
WAGSTAFF ASSOCIATES PARTNERSHIP & WAGSTAFF LINDSAYTIR
31 REAMS AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573-5225
11818
215 WESLEYAN RD
PERSON COUNTY NC
304 S MORGAN ST RM 219, ROXBORO, NC 27573
11819
145 WESLEYAN RD
BROWN JIMMY LEE
8639 CRUTCHFIELD RD, SNOW CAMP, NC 27349
11820
WESLEYAN RD
CARVER THOMAS BERKELEY
316 BROOKS CAR DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573
11821
WESLEYAN RD
MORALES JOSE LUIS DE LA CRUZ
320 PERSONALITY LN LOT 39, ROXBORO, NC 27573-456C
1187
WESLEYAN HEIGHTS RD
HALL NORMAN C
50 MANCHESTER DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1188
245 CRITCHER WILKERSON RD
PERSON COUNTY NC
304 S MORGAN ST RM 219, ROXBORO, NC 27573
12111
495 BURLINGTON RD
ALETHEIA HOLDINGS LLC
495 BURLINGTON RD, ROXBORO, NC27573-5476
12112
447 BURLINGTON RD
ALETHEIA HOLDINGS LLC
495 BURLINGTON RD, ROXBORO, NC27573-5476
1212
BURLINGTON RD
ALETHEIA HOLDINGS LLC
495 BURLINGTON RD, ROXBORO, NC27573-5476
1213
20 CRITCHER WILKERSON RD
FISH JENNIFER W
1372 ROBERTSON RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574
1214
55 CRITCHER WILKERSON RD
WILKERSON JASON B
1877 MILL HILL RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574-8674
12215
441 BURLINGTON RD
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS
441 BURLINGTON RD, ROXBORO, NC27573
12232
BURLINGTON RD
HOLEMAN JAMES BROWN 1R
PO BOX 1066, ROXBORO, NC 27573-1066
12250
981 LEASBURG RD
BURNETTE PROPERTY RENTALS LLC
833 DURHAM RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573-5609
12251
993 LEASBURG RD
HICKS BRIAN CRAIG & HICKS JENNY
252 WINDING TRAIL DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-8882
12252
1003 LEASBURG RD
HICKS BRIAN CRAIG & HICKS JENNY
252 WINDING TRAIL DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574
12253
1011 LEASBURG RD
BLALOCK BERTHA H
1011 LEASBURG RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573-5469
122 55
1023 LEASBURG RD
HARPER DONOVAN 0 TRUSTEE
PO BOX 1172, ROXBORO, NC 27573-1172
11225
1071 LEASBURG RD
SOLOMON GORDON A & SOLOMON FAYE P
603 W GORDON ST, ROXBORO, NC 27573
112276
734 LEASBURG RD
SOLOMON GORDON A & SOLOMON FAYE P
603 W GORDON ST, ROXBORO, NC 27573

12278
1135 LEASBURG RD
TOWN & COUNTRY BUILDERS INC
1990 LONGS STORE RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574
12310
455 SEMORA RD
WAGSTAFF ASSOCIATES PARTNERSHIP & WAGSTAFF LINDSAY TIR
31 REAMS AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573
72321
737 LEASBURG RD
HICKS BRIAN CRAIG & HICKS JENNY
252 WINDING TRAIL DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574
1235
1248 LEASBURG RD
CLAYTON WILLIAM GAIL & CLAYTON PHYLLIS
1248 LEASBURG RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574-8485
123 5A
LEASBURG RD
CLAYTON WILLIAM GAIL & CLAYTON PHYLLIS
1248 LEASBURG RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574-8485
1236
1200 LEASBURG RD
YEATTS MICHAEL & YEATTS KAREN R
1200 LEASBURG RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574-8485
1237
THOMAS RD
WAGSTAFF ASSOCIATES PARTNERSHIP & WAGSTAFF LINDSAY TIR
31 REAMS AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1239
745 LEASBURG RD
HICKS BRIAN
252 WINDING TRAIL DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574
12565
YOUNGER RD
ALLEN CHERIE MONIQUE
70 YOUNGER RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573
12614
641 RACHEL UN
ADMIRAL PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 71815, DURHAM, NC 27722
12615
READE DR
SEVEN UP DISTRIBUTING CO
PO BOX 1359, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1263
124 SEMORA RD
STEWART TARRENCER& DRUMWRIGHT CAPRICE N
124 SEMORA RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6200
1264
100 SEMORA RD
SHERNISKY TYLER WILLIAM
100 SEMORA RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573-6200
127117
HARDY PL
FITZGERALD JEFF & FITZGERALD PAIGE
634 LONG AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573
127118
HARDY PL
FITZGERALD JEFF & FITZGERALD PAIGE
634 LONG AVE, ROXBORO, NC 27573
12814
318 WHITE OAK DR
MASON FARM ESTATES LLC
9409 S MERE CT, RALEIGH, NC 27615-2319
128A 18
HICKORY CT
BITTNER JAMESG& BITTNER BRENDA J
206 OLD HICKORY DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-2823
128A 20
140 OLD HICKORY DR
ROGERS JASON W & ROGERS JENNIFER
140 OLD HICKORY DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-2821
128A 54
HICKORY CT
BITTNER LAMES& BITTNER BRENDA J
206 OLD HICKORY DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-2823
12937
W ESTOVER DR
GREENE CAROLYN
1024 LAKE MICHAEL WAY, MEBANE, NC 27302-9838
1333
1715 COLLEGE DR
PIEDMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE
PO BOX 1197, ROXBORO, NC 27573
13333
27 WOODLAKE CT
CARVER WILLIAM G III & CARVER KIMBERLY
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
13335
WOODLAKE CT
CARVER W GORDON 1R & OTHERS
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
13336
WOODLAKE CT
CARVER W GORDON 1R & OTHERS
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
13337
WOODLAKE CT
CARVER W GORDON 1R & OTHERS
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1334
1935 CARVER DR
COUNTY OF PERSON
304 S MORGAN ST SUITE 219, ROXBORO, NC 27573-5245
73345
265 FAIR OAKS DR
YOUNG IRA JAMES JR & YOUNG MICHELLE
265 FAIR OAKS DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-6346
13346
FAIR OAKS DR
CARVER W GORDON 1R & OTHERS
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
13347
FAIR OAKS DR
CARVER W GORDON 1R & OTHERS
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1335
DENADA PATH
CARVER W GORDON 1R & OTHERS
PO BOX 560, ROXBORO, NC 27573
13355
CARVER DR
GARRETT STEPHEN D & GARRETT CARLA G
917 CARVER DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574-633C
1341
CARVER DR
DANSFIELD LLC
PO BOX 349, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1342
CHUB LAKE RD
DANSFIELD LLC
PO BOX 349, ROXBORO, NC 27573
1347
526 WHITE OAK DR
LEWIS HENRY III & SMITH EN BARBARA V
PO BOX 449, ROXBORO, NC 27573-0449
13479
1003 CHUB LAKE RD
ADMIRAL PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 71815, DURHAM, NC 27722
134 7A
CHUB LAKE RD
OAKLEY JOHN W ESTATE
217 CRESTWOOD DR, ROXBORO, NC 27573-4918
1398
CHUB LAKE RD
CLAYTON WALLACE 0
2741 CHUB LAKE RD, ROXBORO, NC 27574
1411
CAVEL CHUB LAKE RD
LOFTON CHIP FELIX & LOFTON SHARON W
PO BOX 3010, ROXBORO, NC 27573-301C
14214
127 ROSEMARY CREEK DR
G2BA LLC
1901 HILLANDALE RD STE 100, DURHAM, NC 27705-3291
256
50 BURLINGTON RD
HICKS BRIAN CRAIG & HICKS JENNY
252 WINDING TRAIL DR, ROXBORO, NC 27574
257
711 LEASBURG RD
CHG MHP ROXBORO LLC
4605 OLEANDER DR STE 202, MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577-5735
2572
970 LEASBURG RD
W ESTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH OF ROXBORO
721 LEASBURG RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573
7573
707 LEASBURG RD
PLATINUM INVESTMENTS OF ROXBORO LLC
PO BOX 848, ROXBORO, NC 27573-0848
1259
605 S MORGAN ST
MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 1359, ROXBORO, NC 27573
26 11
141 SEMORA RD
TKTK ASSOCIATES
141 SEMORA RD, ROXBORO, NC 27573
2612
87 SEMORA RD
COUNTY OF PERSON
304 S MORGAN ST RM 219, ROXBORO, NC 27573
2613
S MORGAN ST
MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 1359, ROXBORO, NC 27573

LaB�lla
F, --. ,,. . ., i c, 1: � [ '. ..- i �-� r t r' . .- i �. - [�
EXHIBIT 4
PROTECTED SPECIES

LaBeLLa
Powered by partnership.
7/28/2023
Pete Benjaman
Unite States Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
Re: Online Project Review Request, City of Roxboro, Western Sewer System, Person
County, North Carolina, IPaC Consultation Code: 2023-0077259
We have reviewed the referenced project using the Raleigh Field Office's online project review
process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review on May 311, 2023 and are submitting our project review package in
accordance with the instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: an approximately 8 mile sewer system, force main, gravity
sewer and pump station. The location of the project and the action area are identified on the
enclosed map.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species, critical habitat,
and bald eagles considered in our review, and the species conclusions table included in the
package identifies our determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Eric Prunchak at (703) 975-9 718 or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
I -A
Eric Prunchak, Environmental Manager
Enclosures:
1) ENTIRE PROJECT REVIEW PACKAGE
400 S. Tyron St, Suite 1300 . Charlotte, NC 28285 1 p 704-376-6423
www.labellapc.com

a�
J
O
N ()
-
O
rI
M�
O
inYZ
G
LUN
W
a
d
V
O� d' 0
�
mn
Ol ua Naa wvm '.1- n

O
N E()
-
O
rI
M�
.0
O
to Y Z
G
LUN
W
J a
ooz�fN
d
V
O� d' 0
�
Emn
J
•n .+ac._a
a,�a�Naa Nv„l , a:,

8 E
0) cn
C*4
(D cn
cc
Lu 0
0 0
w
ch
0
m 0
E
��
(5 c L H L ,
2
a
Z
16
—j0z
a] I-d VYVM lol.ao

m
�
s_
m
x
(, �,
s
=
Q.m
a
Lu
= a
O<% C z�
wcc
N
a�
JO
Q
O
T
O
m ° N
o�
�>�>��
y (5 O LL LL> LL J K
a
a£ a
Z
16
J0Z I I I0I
N a
a
2E
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

m
�
i
o
8c�
m cn
N
m�
x
m�
s
_
=
Q.m
a Q
Lu
= a
O <% C z�
N 4
w
O
J
O
O X
d=
o�
D-�T, T,>�>�J�
y (n 0 LL LL> LL K
a
a£ a
Z
Oj 1 101
N a
fi
E
µsy�
�y
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

m
�
i
o
}?Ec�
���
mcn
N
m�
x
m�
s
_
=
£
Q.m
a Q
CU
Lu
= a
O <% C z�
N 4
w ii a
O
O
J
O
O X
d=
o�
D-�T, T,>�>�J�
y (n O LL LL> LL K
a
a£ a
Z
Oj III0I
N a
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

cn
JI,
o
8 E
£
M
MW
inYZ
w v
15
w
Ja
Q:
N O LL
aa>
�L Q
a
a
X �� oLU
w LL
a£
W
OLL
Jj
N.+amomw
al-Imainaa WtlN-loleolD

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0077259
Project Name: Western Sewer System
May 03, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

05/03/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

05/03/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

05/03/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

05/03/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0077259
Project Name: Western Sewer System
Project Type: Government / Municipal (Non -Military) Construction
Project Description: Sewer system and pump station improvements.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/Q36.35108735,-78.98996617062303,14z
Counties: Person County, North Carolina

05/03/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
AMPHIBIANS
NAME
STATUS
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
FISHES
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
CLAMS
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164

05/03/2023
4
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

05/03/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferns Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.

05/03/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.

05/03/2023
3
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC + 1 it I I I+„'[i� 1 I I j I++ +J}+ ++++ " "++ +' +'+, +++'
Vulnerable --- .-- — — — — — — — — — — — — --+� i --- ---- ---- ----
Chimney Swift 11 I 1 I I I I 11 +� 0111 IN''1' pill'" "" ",+ 1 1 1 1 }++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Eastern Whip-poor-���
Will ++++ ++++ ++++ Mill ++++ ++-4-4-++ + ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide IEEE MENE Emil
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler + I I ++ +1 � �1
+++ ++ t t+ +++ + ++ T++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide ` (CON) �� ��

05/03/2023
4
e Warbler mr
BCC 1Rangewide +++ ++++ I� i= I' ++++ +++$ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON) — MMMM i,
Prothonotary ++" +'� '
Warbler +�---
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed ++++ '+++ +'+,
+,�, ++I� I� +� I I + + + +
Woodpecker * +++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird ++'+ +++T +,+++,+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ +++$ $„" Jill
+'"'+++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librq�r/
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding.
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as

05/03/2023
5
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.

05/03/2023
H.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

05/03/2023
7
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Charlotte city
Name:
Eric Prunchak
Address:
400 S Tryon St
Address Line 2:
#1300
City:
Charlotte
State:
NC
Zip:
28285
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
7043766423
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Department of Agriculture

iICIt Crnur.-, caurrra"u
f
�*L
NC DEPARTMENT OF
■
NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESC}i!#2tiF5
May 3, 2023
Eric Prunchak
La Bella Associates PC
400 S Tryon St
Charlotte, NC 28285
RE: Western Sewer System; 2201369
Dear Eric Prunchak:
A P& A%Xh,, %wc"tary
Meta �$U;J$ i,a-
Depu1T Urac 14r, Nalur al pklAwe ►end an
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMIEW OF kAT14%% AND CMTUAAA► ftSOOKES
t2h% Kt*F4 STWIFT Q4 EKPm_ ,1,< r,*6 1 K{sl +Vl �#RVI:ECE�4TER. RALE � 1C Z*04)
"..707.4120 - FAX019.M79121

■
\
O
\
E
/
CO
/
ƒ
\
CO /
s 2
/
\
o e
? ®
©
s
f
j
o
:
z
5
3 d
a
.g
2
ƒ
2 %
o')
e /
\
7
® /
}
}
)}
\
\j
\
a cn
>
§
%2
t:+}
\ o
/[
»_
©aU
±
2
t t t t»
e e e e\©
3
G:
s=
« _
E E E E»
2}\
u
s
s
CO 2
e 5 5 5 5}
s
\ \
\
3
/
> s
> > > > >
e o 0 0 0
&
%
u&
&
0
3 3 3 3
y}{\
\ \ \ u
u
\ /
/ \ \ \ \
\ o
2 j
\/a
660
E
=g
ƒ%
z
\
co
2 \
\
\
\
\y
s\\/
^ƒ\
0
co
}\!2
\
r \
e a
6
°
3
*�
±
/>
=
^ $
® o
e
© \
o
\
% s
2
:
% \
0
s
\ \
2>\.\
.k
|
\
:
\
E—
0
\\z�
CO.\
0
n E / /
§ ƒ
\ \
/
COj
/
% z
/
coo
/ 0 0
FT- e e e/
J
7}
e
\
a)
/ /
2 o 0 0
-0
\
°
/ u, u,\
§
2
/ O \
\
-0
\
/ƒ\-
c
y=
g y
0\
CO°/
»
Ln
\ \
\
«
0
\
:
\ _
e
\
\
\\
\\.\
/
\
0
0
3O
u
u
�
°~
\
COy
c
\
/
/
I
)
\
/ 3
\
$
/
\
s
e
� (
e /.±
t
s
»
2
u a)e e
3\
v:
2 z
c
s
/
3
CO / / /
/ ?
« /
/
>
e
E
\
0 }
\ \
e
co
g
E/
a
co
E
\
/
\
©
©
\ \ D-
\ 2
\ 2
©
o
E
o O O O
y/
x:
�»
»
}
/ \ E ® ?
2 T
\ \
_
®
\
u
4
4 x / \ /
a \
75
m
E
4
t
s
s 0 0 0 0/\\§
2 e e e
§ :
z
\
\
E
\
E
\
\ \ / o o
j \
\ }
2
E
2
2
e s
=_>
z z z
r=:
j /
E
e
o
e
» .e
e
e » % % %
9 ®
% }
e 3
4
Z
e
z
7 2
x
x Gee e,J
9
e=
§
/

\
�
ea
/ /
s 2
\
a a
e
e
\
0
/
/
CO
4
E
/
_
a a)2
/
°
CO CO
® 6
/
c
s \
/
Ln
\
g<
\\
CO
s CO
»ƒ
2
/s
i/
»
t t t t t t t
G:
e e e e e e e
\§
\
E
\
/ / / / / / /
^ 2
=
u
g
y
e
g
2
Y
\
° ^ Y
2
e
g g
e e
\ / / / / / / /
` s
CO)
&
x
\ &°
\ \
/ / / / / / /
/\
277
77}
M M M M M M M
®\
/
e
v v
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
\
9
e e
c a a a a a a a
©
\(®
6\
\
E E/
0
3
© 4
\\®
\
\\/
m\% \
0E
CO %
ƒ
\
_
»
m m
/% a\ 1
0
a
a a
®f�«\
0
3 3
)�
saz>2
e®3(D
±/2%©
y
© ©
\\
v
CO D t` Z
4 a e
o&
a
3 3
\
/.% * 9
/
/ /
\
3
\
s
\%
~
~ ~
CO
e\
-
\
/
®\
4'ED
«
a
u
o 0 0 0
�
\_CO
\
\
\ \ \ \ / / /
\
%
E
E
//««
o o
e
x x x x
J
0J
=
z z
o0 0 0 0 0 0%co
2 2 2 2 e e e
2\
\$//
/
\ \ \ \
/ 3
}
CO
\
3
±
»
/ /
/ / /
/
2 0
E
0
�/
2 2
§
y y y y
` 6
e
L
O O O O///
\\
\
\ \
\
\
\
\>
0
Ln
\
Cl�
Cl)
\
-\
/
\
\
\
0
H
./
ee
± t
oo
a »
um s
=
o
g
\%
\
\(
u\
-00s
0
0
CO��
CO
? g
3% 3 CO
COy
\ E
©
\ .g
u ECO
\ 2
y+ 2 y/
§
o
e
\/
\
C
/ t
f E \
\ \
E.±
E %
> ±
a / / \ ±
s s
\
\ /
\
/
/ /
\ /
/ \ 2 %
\
/ / / / e e e
\
\
\
»
\ \ \ \ / / /
CO
/
/
m e
\
s a s s
/\
g
/
v
o
y
\ y
=
e / / / /
^ §
/
u
v
%
=
0 z
/
_ _ _
E z z z z e e e
\\
//
2
\
\ \
/
» D
% E
o
e O O O O z z z
J 0 0 0
`
(
o
» »
\
o 0 0 0
y > >
\ \
u
%
$ 0 0 0 0 t t
©
/
/ /
±
a)c
-0-0a a=
\ /
/ .9
/
/
e
E
/ /
G
\\
o o o o 0 0 0
2 2 2 2 e e e
z:
t\\
e= z
e
-/
2 E
_/_/
2 E 2 E
2/%/
//\\\
0 0 0 0
/
E o
2 E
2 E 2 E
2
2-0
=_
» »
x
e e=
E
c o
c o c o
e»
e
e.±
e
e»»»»
3 5 3
4
Z e
Z e Z e
Z
s
e e
x
x e e e e

01
I
Ol I

LaBella
P :- r e d 1', . o � i r t r, --, r E �- i [,
EXHIBIT 5
Wetland Report

LaBella
Powered by partnership.
WETLAND AND STREAM DELINEATION REPORT
Roxboro Western Sewer System
Roxboro, Person County
LaBella Project No. 2201369
Prepared For: City of Roxboro
779A Mountain Road, Roxboro NC 27573
Brooks Lockhart
336-599-3116 ext. 8
[e-mail]
Prepared By: LaBella Associates, D.P.C.
400 S Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28285
Date: July 2023
400 S. Tyron St, Suite 1300 1 Charlotte, NC 28285 1 p 704-376-6423
www.labellapc.com

I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
NTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1
1.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................1
1.2
PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................................1
1)
METHODOL,)GY................................................................................................................................1
2.1
RESOURCES..................................................................................................................................1
2.2
WOUS JURISDICTIONAL AREA DELINEATION..............................................................................2
'HYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RESOURCES.........................................................................
3.1
PHYSIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................................2
3.2
SOILS.............................................................................................................................................3
3.3
HYDROLOGY..................................................................................................................................4
AGENCYRESOURCES...........................................
........................................................................4
4.1
USFWS NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY (NWI)
........................................................................4
4.3
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONES..................................................................................................4
5.0
RESULTS............................................................................................................................................5
5.1
UPLANDS.......................................................................................................................................8
5.2
WETLANDS....................................................................................................................................8
5.3
STREAMS.......................................................................................................................................8
PERENNIAL STREAMS..........................................................................................................................8
INTERMITTENT STREAMS.....................................................................................................................8
STREAM NOTABLE OBSERVATIONS.....................................................................................................9
6.0
GUNGLU51UN5..................................................................................................................................9
7.0
SIGNATURE OF WETLAND PROFESSIONALS................................................................................10
8.0
REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................11

0=1
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE i.SOIL MAP UNITS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................ 3
lABLE2. USFWS-NW|MAPPED WETLANDS AND/OR STREAMS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ................... 4
lABLE3. DELINEATED WETLANDS .............................................................................................................. 5
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDCKA-F|GURES
FIGURE 1-USGSSITE LOCATION
FIGURE 2-NVV|'yWAPPEDRESOURCES
FIGURE 3-NCMAPPED RESOURCES
FIGURE 4-FEMAFLOOD ZONES
FIGURE 5-WETLAND AND STREAM DELINEATION SURVEY
APPENDIX B-DATA FORMS
APPENDIX C-PH0T0L0G
APPENDIX D-HYDR|CSOIL MAP

e
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Roxboro (Client) retained La Bella Associates, D.P.C. (La Bella) to perform a wetland and
stream delineation for the Roxboro Western Sewer System (the Project). For the purposes of the
wetland and stream delineation, the Project Study Area is defined as approximately 8 miles of current
and proposed utility Right of Way in Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina stretching from just south
of Rosemary Creek Dr and ending south of Patterson Dr. Please refer to Appendix A, Figure 1 for the
Study Area location and boundary. The geographic coordinates of the approximate Study Area center
are:36.388101,-79.006679(NAD83). Wetland and stream delineation field work was performed on
April 13,14,19,20,20, and June 27, 2023.
1.2 PURPOSE
This report was prepared for the purpose of obtaining concurrence from the United States Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE)-Charlotte District and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) Raleigh Region on jurisdictional wetland and stream boundaries within the Study Area, in
support of the Project. Specific tasks performed for this report include a field delineation of potentially
jurisdictional Waters of the United States (WOUS) encompassing wetlands and streams, and a detailed
description of the delineated waters based on hydrology, vegetation, and soils information collected
in the field.
This report describes the results of the delineation and data collection efforts performed by La Bella,
and a description of the wetlands and streams that were delineated. This document is intended to
provide the information required to support a Jurisdictional Determination (JD) with the USACE-
Charlotte District and DEQ to support permitting needs (e.g. Joint Permit Application), if regulatory
permit authorizations are required.
2.1 RESOURCES
Materials and literature supporting this investigation are derived from a number of sources, including:
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangles; United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Person County,
North Carolina (USDA-NRCS, 2023); USDA-NRCS Soil Map Unit shapefiles; USDA-NRCS Field Indicators
of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA-NRCS, 2018); Munsell Soil Color Charts (Kollmorgen
Corporation, 1988); Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) digital Flood Hazard data; United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) shapefiles; Person county
GIS websites for locality resources such as Resource Protection Areas (RPAs). Vascular plant names
follow nomenclature found in the USDA PLANTS database (USDA, 2019). Wetland indicator status for
vegetative species was determined by reference to the National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al.,
2018). Jurisdictional features are characterized according to the NWI mapped wetlands and
deepwater habitat classification system (Cowardin, 1979).
-1-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
2.2 WOUS JURISDICTIONAL AREA DELINEATION
La Bella field staff performed the wetland and stream delineation within the Study Area on April
13,14,19,20,20, and June 27, 2023, in accordance with the methods presented in the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), as supplemented bythe
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: {Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Supplement, Version 2.0 (USACE, 2012)
Wetland and stream boundaries were defined in the field with sequentially -numbered pink surveyor's
flaggin. Each flag was digitally recorded using a USACE-approved sub -foot Global Positioning System
unit. Data and observations were collected throughout the Study Area, from both the wetland and its
associated upland area, referred to as data points. Data points help determine and locate the wetland
boundaries with field data verification of the upland areas. These data points were recorded on the
USACE (Eastern Mountains and Piedmont OR Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain) Wetland Determination
Data Forms (Appendix B).
During the field reconnaissance, the Study Area was also observed for streams that would potentially
be considered jurisdictional by state and/or federal regulatory agencies. Field indicators such as the
presence of an ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) as well as observed characteristics such as flow,
substrate composition, presence/absence of defined bed and banks, origin of hydrologic source,
presence/absence of vegetation in the stream channel, and composition and relative abundance of
resident benthic macroinvertebrates to classify onsite streams into three stream types: ephemeral,
intermittent, and perennial. Identified streams were also assessed for stream order using a Perennial
Stream flow determination worksheet in accordance with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
"Perennial Stream Reconnaissance Protocols" version 4.11 guidance (NCDWQ, 2010).
Representative photographs were taken of the data point locations, delineated wetlands, and streams
within the Study Area (Appendix C).
The USACE and DEQ have jurisdiction of WOUS under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and
Section 401 under the State Water Control Board, respectively. The USACE-Charlotte District does not
have jurisdiction over isolated wetlands or ephemeral stream channels; however, DEQ has jurisdiction
over these features.
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RESOURCES
3.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY
The Study Area is located in the Land Resource Region (LRR P), and Major Land Resource Area (MLRA
136). The Study Area topography consists of forested areas often next to a perennial stream, clearings
-2-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
on the edge of Roxboro and urban areas of Roxboro. Land cover within the Study Area consists of
Forests, fields, and pavement. Elevations within the Study Area range from approximately 450 feet
above mean sea level (AMSL) to approximately 750 feet AMSL.
3.2 SOILS
The Soil Survey of Person County, NRCS Web Soil Survey indicates there are sixteen soil map units
within the Project Study Area, as outlined in Table 1.
Table 1. Soil Map units within the Study Area
Map Unit
Hydric
Hydric
NRCS Soil Map Unit
Symbol
Drainage Class
Soil?
Rating
(91.)
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
ApB
Well drained
No
0
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
ApC
Well drained
No
0
Appling-Urban land complex, 2 to 10
AuB
Well drained
No
0
percent slopes
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2
Somewhat poorly
percent slopes, frequently flooded
ChA
drained
Yes
40
Georgeville loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
GeB
Well drained
No
0
Georgeville loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
GeC
Well drained
No
0
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
HeB
Moderately well
Yes
1
drained
Herndon loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
HrB
Well drained
No
0
Herndon loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
HrC
Well drained
No
0
Lignum loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
LgB
Moderately well
Yes
1
drained
Rion sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
RoF
Well drained
No
0
Tarrus loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes
TaE
Well drained
No
0
Udorthents, loamy, gently sloping
UdB
Well drained
No
0
Urban land
Ur
Wedowee sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent
WeD
Well drained
Yes
0
slopes
Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent
WeE
Well drained
No
0
slopes
Source: USDA, NRCS, 2022; Soil Survey Staff, 2022
The Hydric Soil ratings outlined in Table 1 and the Web Soil Survey map provided in Appendix D,
indicate there are two soil map units containing hydric components. Helena sandy loam has a hydric
-3-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
rating of 1 and is moderately drained. Helana-Urban land complex has a hydric rating percent of 7 and
is also moderately well drained.
3.3 HYDROLOGY
The Study Area is located in the Flat River watershed (USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03010104.
The source of surface hydrology for the Study Area is the perennial streams and associated floodplains
that run parallel to the alignment. The City of Roxboro receives an average of 45 inches of precipitation
annually (SERCC, 2020). Three sections of NWI mapped streams intersect the property.
4.1 IJSFWS NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY (NWI)
USFWS NWI mapping indicates there is one NWI-mapped wetlands and two NWI-mapped streams
within the Study Area (refer to Appendix A, Figure 2), as outlined in Table 2.
Table 2. USFWS-NWI Mapped Wetlands and/or Streams within the Study Area
NWI Wetland Code
Classification Code description
Delineated
Wetlands)
Palustrine (P) Forested Broadleaf(FO) Deciduous (1)
Wetland WB and
PF01A
Temporarily flooded(A)
WF, Stream SC and
Stream SY
R5UBH
Riverine (R) Unknown Perennial (5) Unconsolidated
Stream SZ
Bottom UB Permanent) Flooded H
R4SBC
Riverine (R), Intermittent (4), Streambed (SIB),
Wetland WR
Seasonal) Flooded C
4.3 FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONES
The FEMA 100-year Flood Zones associated with Marlow Creek runs across the northern portions of
the Study Area. The FEMA 100-Year Flood Zones associated with North Flat River run across southern
portions of the Study Area.
-4-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
La Bella field staff delineated eight Palustrine Emergent Wetlands, twenty-six Palustrine, eleven
perennial streams, and ten intermittent streams within the Study Area (See AppendixA, Figure X). The
remainder of the Study Area is considered to be urban land with forested portions intermixed. These
habitats lack wetland hydrology and hydric soils.
Table 3. Delineated Wetlands
Wetland ID
Cowardin
Classification
Acreage On -site
Latitude, Longitude
(NAD83)
Jurisdiction
Wetland WA
PEM
0.021
36.439557,-78.977469
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WB
PFO
0.002
36.43951,-78.977672
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WC
PEM
0.025
36.438961,-78.979025
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WD
PFO
0.087
36.438009,-78.980111
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WE
PFO
0.137
36.435947,-78.983763
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WF
PFO
0.017
36.43395,-78.985033
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WG
PFO
0.041
36.43252,-78.986391
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WH
PFO
0.001
36.429901,-78.983281
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WI
PFO
0.004
36.426481,-78.984589
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WJ
PFO
0.026
36.422985,-78.985055
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WK
PFO
0.003
36.422605,-78.985254
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WL
PFO
0.007
36.421292,-78.986933
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WM
PFO
0.141
36.40508,-78.995072
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WN
PFO
0.037
36.404413,-78.995452
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WO
PFO
0.006
36.403909,-78.995744
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WP
PFO
0.004
36.403799,-78.995805
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WQ
PFO
0.170
36.402312,-78.996366
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WR
PFO
0.071
36.40032,-78.997411
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WS
PFO
0.001
36.398143,-78.998456
USACE/NCDEQ
-5-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
Wetland WT
PFO
0.021
36.397218,-78.998827
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WU
PFO
0.015
36.39226,-79.000712
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WV
PFO
0.093
36.371326,-79.00031
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WW
PFO
0.028
36.369868,-78.999913
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WX
PFO
0.027
36.369036,-78.999262
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WY
PFO
0.112
36.368115,-78.997996
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WZ
PFO
0.075
36.367849,-78.995732
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAA
PEM
0.001
36.360472,-78.99008
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAB
PEM
0.006
36.360702,-78.98999
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAC
PEM
0.088
36.362182,-78.989383
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAD
PEM
0.013
36.362848,-78.989405
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAE
PEM
0.007
36.363271,-78.989271
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAF
PEM
0.006
36.363556,-78.989181
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAG
PEM
0.039
36.351434,-78.989637
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAH
PFO
0.011
36.418047,-78.986856
USACE/NCDEQ
Wetland WAI
PFO
0.090
36.413947,-78.988923
USACE/NCDEQ
Table 4. Delineated Streams
Stream
Approximat
Stream
Length/Wdt
Stream Bed
a Area
Latitude,
ID
Flow Regime
h in Study
Substrate
Within
Longitude
Jurisdiction
Area (If)
Study Area
(NAD83)
Acres
Stream
Sand and
0.019
36.439766,
USACE
SA
Perennial
30
stone
-78.977301
NCDEQ
Stream
Organic
0.001
36.438905,
USACE
SB
Intermittent
21
material
-78.979021
NCDEQ
Stream
Sand, stone,
0.089
36.424123,
USACE
SC
Perennial
245
and organic
-78.986035
NCDEQ
material
Stream
Sand and
0.004
36.406603,
USACE
SE
Intermittent
44
organic
-78.99403
NCDEQ
material
-6-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
Stream
0.009
36.403539,
USACE
SF
Perennial
33
Sand
-78.995916
NCDEQ
Sand, rock and
0.008
Stream
Intermittent
52
organic
36.402763,
USACE
SG
material
-78.996209
NCDEQ
Stream
0.001
36.40184,
USACE
SH
Intermittent
37
Sand and rock
-78.996509
NCDEQ
Stream
Organic
0.002
36.40175,
USACE
SI
Intermittent
12
material
-78.996475
NCDEQ
Stream
0.010
36.398836,
USACE
Si
Perennial
42
Sand
-78998187
NCDEQ
Stream
Sand and
0.005
36.396779,
USACE
SK
Perennial
51
organic
-78998978
NCDEQ
material
Stream
0.003
36.385654,
USACE
SL
Perennial
22
Sand
-79.006124
NCDEQ
Stream
Perennial
21
Sand
0.006
36.367834,
USACE
SO
-78.995513
NCDEQ
Sand, stone
0.032
Stream
Perennial
88
and organic
36.361996,
USACE
SP
-78.990012
NCDEQ
material
Stream
Sand and
0.009
36.361749,
USACE
SQ
Perennial
30
stone
-78.989313
NCDEQ
Stream
Sand and
0.027
36.349183,
USACE
ST
Perennial
102
small stone
-78.992049
NCDEQ
Stream
Organic
0.002
36.420023,
USACE
SU
Intermittent
32
material
-78.986988
NCDEQ
Stream
Sand and
0.003
36.418026,
USACE
SV
Intermittent
32
organic
-78.986876
NCDEQ
material
Stream
Sand and
0.01
36.41639,
USACE
SW
Intermittent
32
organic
-78.987601
NCDEQ
material
0.013
Stream
Intermittent
34
Organic
36.413219,
USACE
SX
material
-78.989415
NCDEQ
0.003
Stream
Perennial
31
Sand and rock
36.409976,
USACE
SY
-78.991496
NCDEQ
0.003
Stream
Intermittent
32
Sand
36.407628,
USACE
SZ
-78.992763
NCDEQ
-7-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
5.1 Uplands
Uplands encountered in the study area were typically dominated by Quercus alba (white oak) and
Liriodendron tulipifera ( Tulip poplar) trees and saplings. There was often little to no herbaceous layer but,
Parthenocissus quinquefolia (Virginia Creeper), Lonicera japonica (Japanese honey suckle) and Osmunda
cinnamomea (Cinnamon fern) were also observed.
5.2 Wetlands,
Palustrine Emergent Wetlands
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetlands delineated during this project cut across the Study Area cut on the
edges of more forested portions of the study area. These wetlands were typically associated with a
delineated stream or an erosional feature. Herbaceous plants often found in these wetlands consisted of
Rubus argutus (Sawtooth blackberry), Juncus effusus (Common bog rush), Microstegium vimineum
(Japanese stilt grass), and Carex (Broom sedge), commonly found saplings in these delineated saplings
included Salix nigra (Black willow), Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip Poplar), Lindera benzoin (northern spice
bush), and Carpinus caroliniana (American hornbeam).
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetlands
Palustrine Forested Wetlands delineated during this project were most commonly found under trees such
as Ulmus americana (American Elm), Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip poplar), Liquidambar styraciflua
(Sweetgum), and Acer rubrum (red maple) which are known for being facultative or facultative wetland
tree species. Saplings of these trees were also found alongside shubs such as Lindera benzoin (Northern
spicebush). In the herbasous layer, Microstegium vimineum (Japanese Stilt Grass), Carex gynandra
(Nodding sedge), and Arisaema triphyllum (Jack-in-the-pulpit) were commonly found.
5.3 Streams
Perennial streams
Perennial streams delineated on the study area had sandy or sand and rock substrate with little to no
notable organic material. Small fish and macroinvertebrates were observed frequently in these systems.
The perennial streams delineated appear to be fed into by a combination of surface runoff and
groundwater. Notably, perennial streams SC and SP were frequently impacted by beaver dams.
Intermittent streams
Intermittent Streams delineated on the study area typically had muddy substrate primarily consisting of
organic material. Small macroinvertebrates but no fish were observed in these systems. The intermittent
streams delineated appeared to be fed primarily if not exclusively by surface runoff.
-8-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
Stream notable observations
It should be noted that portions of Stream SC as well as streams SU through SZ were delineated in a
portion of the study area that has recently undergone heavy logging activity. Portions of the river banks
have been altered as well as multiple sections of partial stream redirection due to recently felled trees
were observed in this area.
6.1 Summary
La Bella delineated eight Palustrine Emergent Wetlands, twenty-six Palustrine Forested Wetlands,
eleven perennial streams, and ten intermittent streams within the Study Area. Wetlands total
approximately 1.43 acres of the Study area. Of the wetlands delineated within the study area, 0.206
acres was delineated as PEM wetlands while 1.23acres was delineated as PFO wetlands.
A total length of 1023 linear feet (.259 acres) of streams were delineated within the study area. 328
linear feet of the delineated streams was identified as intermittent while the remaining 695 linear feet
was identified as Perennial Stream.
The WOUS found in this wetland and stream delineation are considered jurisdictional based on their
classification as perennial or intermittent streams within the study are or by their hydric soils, high
water table, and the presence of wetland plant species present in the delineated PEM and PFO
wetlands.
All jurisdictional boundaries are subject to verification by the USACE-Wilmington District and/or the
NCDEQ - Raleigh Regional office, under their respective jurisdictions
6.2 Regulatory and Permitting Conclusions
All identified and delineated wetlands and streams are considered to be jurisdictional to USACE-
Raleigh District and DEQ fNorth Carolina), under their respective jurisdictions, under the Clean Water
Act. Any Project -related filling or disturbances within the delineated boundaries of all aforementioned
WOTUS will require federal CWA Section 404 authorization through the USACE and a CWA Section 401
Water Quality Certification from the DEQ.
Agency field verification of these boundaries is needed by the USACE and DEQ in order to obtain a
preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD). La Bella Associates can contactthe USACE to schedule
a field meetingto conduct a WOUS boundary confirmation. This process takes an average of (three to
four) months depending on the availability of USACE personnel and USACE field office. If any potential
impacts are proposed, a PJD is required in orderto begin the permitting process through the applicable
regulatory agencies.
-9-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

Do
7.0 'NATURE OF WEri-AND PROFESSIONALS
We appreciate the opportunity to serve your professional environmental needs. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact Eric Prunchak at 703-975-9718.
Report Prepared By:
Report Prepared By:
PRO-. �0��J �&- � ��-X �J?a
Eric Prunchak, PWS Kieran Merritt
Wetlands Ecologist Environmental Scientist
-10-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

e
CFR. 2010. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40: Protection of the Environment, Part 230: Section
404 (b) (1) Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material. United
States Army Corps of Engineers.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Goblet and E.T. LaRoae. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, OBS-79/31,
Washington, D.C.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Waterways Experiment Station; Vicksburg, MS.
Kollmorgen Corporation. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen
Corporation, Baltimore, MD.
Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2018. The National Wetland Plant List:
2022 Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. Available at: http://wetland-
plants.usace.army.mil/nwpl—static/index.html
If applicable, NC Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
NRCC. 2020. Northeast Regional Climate Center, National Oceanic Applied Climate Information
System Annual Climate Data. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY. Available at: http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/ Accessed September, 2019.
Soil Survey Staff. 2019. Web Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource
Conservation Service. Available at:
https.//websoiIsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
City/County, YEAR. RPA Regulations/ordinances
USACE. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
OR Atlantic (Version 2.0). Technical Report TR-12-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
USDA. 2021. The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC. Available at:
http://plants.usda.gov/.
USDA-NRCS. 2022. Soil Survey of Person County, North Carolina. United States Department of
Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Cornell University Agricultural
Experiment Station, Washington, D.C.
USDA-NRCS. 2018. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 8.2. L. M. Vasilas, G.
W. Hurt, and J. F. Berkowitz (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the National Technical
Committee for Hydric Soils.
-11-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

Oz,
-12-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
Roxboro Western Sewer System
La Bella Project No. 2201369

oz,
eJ LaBeLLa
APPENDIX A
FIGURES

x
tom
N
O
W N
Ey
O
'a
NZ
i
'a
G
c=
x(L)
w
L J
�
`a t
_
i
fiJ •
LA
"
'.-� n� �• � sty J
O
' A �
f
' E
1.
a n, i,Ga NvN

fu
2
O
Cu
N Q
U
?
Y N
N Z
4 _
Q
w
N o
W
O
O C>
O
a4
J
°
Ja
c
•CID O
c
T
++
f6
x m o
w
LL
J
iyy t'
rAlf
Ol a N 8 WVN .oleaq

m
s
�
O
i
O
C
00
LO
C
a; � v
Z
� �
£
=
a�i vn
N
IN1X
N U O
'O 'r-
N Y Z
N Ul
> a
c -o
= a
Q O
Q i
v
w o
rr
O<%Cz��
�wii
z
J a
o
aT+
a
N L Z
ono
N d' o
2i m
n
V
Za
ova
Y
A� �>�>� J
a
Z
J�Z I I I0I
N a
- 3
z �
v
Y.
v�lS`I
.s
i
a'
i
al -lem d WVN-lol.ao

O
-
O
r w
LO
c
}? E �
z s
IN1
-0
N U O
'C .
rn �; Z
N Ul
> a�
c
Q 0
w
v
o
C��
0
�wii a
£
Cc
2O
z
J
+
�
N L Z
noa
o
4N
LZ
LL
d�_
na
VaT
Za
O
2 J
a
Z
cm
J�16
Z I I I0I
N a
a
2E
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

i
Lo
c o
a
N
Wo
m
dip
v, c
N Ul
21
c -o
0)
aa�
CL i
w
� oM
o
C Cw
I^'
O 0'z�N
w ii a
£
Cc
2 0
J a
ioZ
x N
a
a
Z
IL
p to
LL2 LLT1m
a a s
cm �1LL01>
z
N a
a
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

O
i
O
c
LO
c
}? E
(;
z s
0
IN1
N U O
'C .
rn Z
N Ul
> a
c -o
= a
Q O
Q i
w
v
5
CCw
O
2w ii a
£
Cc
O
z
J a
>,
O O
io L Z
0
J
n
V
Z a
o
2J
a
Z
J0Z I I I0I
N a
al --Raa WVN-lolealD

a
Lcn
a N y m i
n
ih YZ o
K tt0 N W r_
O 'a
ov
O a m£ o
ME = O t% p z 3
O r O o
y a -o w
`a -a f6 N ' o LL s� i LL ♦ eS
a C N X
J T �_ ( o aai L a a
y a�
LL
�o v�LL LU a£ w
JO�®1 LL
N.+amomw
al-Imainaa vy"-loleao

a
Lcn
O N y m i
n
ih YZ o
K tt0 N WN rn 2
v
o
W
O 'o
—
-a f6 N o W i LL ♦ eS
a C N
J T om_ (D o a a> Lea a
moLL
v�LU
W a£ w
JO�®1 LL
N.+amomw
al-Imainaa WVN-loleolD

a
Lcn
O N y i
n
ih YZ o
K tt0 N W v
N rn
o
O C> O a m£ o
3:E r O ch o
J`a -a f6 N o w s� i IL♦ eS
a C N O X - LL `m = V d
T _ (DLL
� o aa> Lea a
mo voLU
w a£ w
Jm�®1 LL
N.+amomw
al -1-1.8 WtlN 1-0

a
i O co N a O N i
V) d• to Y Z o R v
X m rn w m W o
O CO > a m£ o
�E = v ,
o
`a -a f6 N o IL
eS
a C N O X - LL `m = V d
J T _ �� o aa> Lea a
moLL
voLU
w a£ w
LL
JN.+amomw
al-Imainaa WtlN-loleolD

M a
E Y
0
K
y
in NZ
N
�o£
LU
a c
N
?� > o
o
a
-
o
E
�O
0"
�Y__-
mcu
♦�eS -
a_
11
1
1
N M lP — (D v �� � �: i�
00 / 4
M
a
o
a
-
-!
U
Q
as
mE
as�m�o
G 3
a`8
E
oS�
oS�
N
n5
G 3
0 jp
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0 0
o N
U m
U
O
¢
U❑
02
Y
2 Z
O
O
>>
X>
3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 i
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
O
z
U U
� o K
asp a€
oa; g 6 m
u
o `o
G oo
N
E co ry S M o u-
E _ n
o n
N 5 m Y L m
E-
N m N w 1 N N N' N J N a N~ N N N N N O N o N L
mE E E E E E E E E m o L 2 3
1 Z � t3ii N Q—
Naa MN -'.1- n

M/
\
\
0
) \
{ E g ,
/ & (
: /\
2 \
m !
�¥
§
°
§f
°
�/a\\
:
\\�
\ \Q/
fco
8
w,§:
Gz r\
_
»:; «®k),\);
-
}
�°
�&s
�}
§�
���®{\%iz\@}
/f-;®®
/}�
u
Ua-
o
=■o
® fe
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:
_
:c0
\/
Q
3
2\
§A °
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
Q)d±£

M/
\
cu
2
) k
{ E g ,
/ ® »
: /t
; \
n !
�¥
§
°
§f
°
�/a
:
\gE \�`2 \�\\
w z §:
�mGz r\
_
»:; «®k),\0.
�&s
_@\@}
/f-;®®
/}�
/ )/:c
U
Uz«
o
3
=■o
®fe
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:
_
\/
:
Q
3
W
§A °
®2cl Lua-f/§{
.
Q)d±£
L
\ Q ° " �����/)'[\~
\ ms-
R

\
2
_
°
E
\ J £
.Ec
/
2 >
e ?
0
22
2§u
z
\)\ \�`�\\�
�..
` ^
;\
-
m !
wz§:
«t;) )�:
\ \/S
f
co
Cl)
2
§A
)#
)< O
\/)dcu
�fco2Qw0
00
a] Imamad M)4 101-3

/
E
§
b t
�{
2
2 E
E E g ,
) z ® `
_-`
»
- l7
@ \
m !
0
°
§f
°
�/a
\)} \�`� \�\\
.\
\\�
\/
f
w z §:
�mGz r\
»:; «®k),\);-
�o\
�&s
�}
§t
���
- -«\«)
/f-;®®
/ )/:c
2
Uz«
o
3
=■o
®fe
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:
\/
Q
3
2\
§A °
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
.
Q)d±£
�
\\//2
R

M/
\
0
) k
{ E g ,
/ ® 2
`
: /\
2 \
m !
�¥
:
\)} \�`� \�\\
\\�
\ \d/
f
w z §:
Gz r\
_
»:; «®k),\0.
�°
�&s
�}
0
'a
��X
_ _@ ®{\%iz\@}
/f-;®®
.
-
/)/:c
u
Uz«
o
3
=■o
® cE
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:Q)d±£
_
Q
3
W
§A °
®2:fJLw0-C) {/))!
�
\0 ° " �111 V

.E�
\
2
) k
{ E g ,
2 \
m !
�¥
§
°
§f
°
�/a
:
\)} \�`� \�\\
\\�
f
w z §:
��Gz r\
e�=
ttL _
»:; «®k),\0.
�!
2@
]$§
®E ®{\I;!®®*
-
2
zz«
3
)9-;®- ®©
{/l2f;[[{))§,2
\/
Q
3
2\
§A °
llf/§{/))!
Q)S±£
@
�

M a
a+
m m >
V z
£ t o
>
(6 cu
E
i
f6 O
N
�
(; Z
A ETE n m
to to
w o o
■Mj/■
EO
Q N E (p `0 N �' C O F
(6
� N
d'
r o x E
ro'
-o
` LL
J
U
�
C
,� fg > ii n m -
o
in��c�iiwa c��¢�in�c yo
r 8 a ` a =
(6
LL
J
00 a °1111V
�n�am�a_-via
Ol-�a 8 MN -'o1-n

M e E- )[ ) § b t
No-o (U E 2 m
E g , ) z® : 77 2\ !
0 0 ` Lu p
\\ �� �z\\\\ }}2 § /o
�} )t M_ M[z:
2@ ]$§ \:,:�; <�E,: \\d U2«
33 §A� ° \\\fff[{{))##§: \/ 2)q\\ �
Q 2\ ®2:fC)wo-- §{/))! . ` 222 jU
cill\Q ° " 117m■j/)'[\ \\//2 R

M a
,.
z
Oi
f6 O
N
o O
-
_ s wN
■Mj/■ Q
E
x
vI
C
� N Z
?� o �o
N O LL 6 6 n m
a° A°° E oo
£
y�
Lu O o
S.
f6
O
in
O
Ji
O
-a IC
O Q%
y,
N (n (� .6 N Q`
N 3
N a'
Q
c
4 0
d'
oar ° ��r o xc E
`-0
-o
LL
J
U
f6
N�
0-¢
C
,� ii Jg > m m > , - — m —
o
yin�o�c�iiwa c��¢in�in
`, 8 a ` - -
���.Q
(6
�'
LL
v J 0 a HIM
�n�am�a_-via
4:: .ftL
ilt
d'
�! e
Jean Sxr��
:.
ay '.1)l lPa 0

E Y
cu a
v
2
f6 Q
o O
_ " wN
0) i
-ax
Lon
LA
E
O
a
3. Q f
Q N (p N 0
C O E
O N A
o
o < FE
� _
1
o21 a r ..E r ox
m
d
J
U
f6
N�
o
ii fg a, ii Q
yin6o�c�iiwa c��¢�in�in
= a - _
�z�.Q
(6
LL
4 1�111®
J
mac
�n�am�a_-via
Naa MN -'.1- n

M a0
•�
A m a
_
c�6
g` _
=00-•
O
Co
Q
N �V
_
LLa �y
£
p
Ln'o
.0
NYZ
m o
'LL a� E nm
o+
£
Lu
C O
f6
to 'z
°
O
;
O'aO
4+
o
Q �.m
d
o x o
21
d°an
f6
C �
> iQ
Q �iofi(yo�w�¢�
O
LL.
v 0 a HIM
J
n�am�a_-via
Ol-�a 8 MN -'o1-n

\
^-
�{
2
) k
w E g ,
/ ®
-
: /\
§ \
m =!
�¥
§
°
§f
°
�
/a
��Gz r\
:
_
\)} \�`� \o\\
\ \Q/
w \ \:
»:; «®k),\);»/
�G^
�}
'a
o
\2$
_« ®{:I;!\«)
- /`
- .
dj�
2
Uz«
3
=■o
®fe))/:cam
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:
\/
Q
3
D
§A °
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
\�
~\\//2
Q)d±£
y}
zzz��-■�q)�[\
Rin

a
V z t
O 0)
Oi
f6 O
N
o O
--
_ s wN
Lo
■\Mj/■ Q
E
�%
'O C
Q: U) Z ^
N LL O N 0 n m
O
—
O
w p o
oT Y
(n
Y_
O
M
Q
coA Q d
--OC
N z
�
N
21 o x
J
U
f6
(D
C
ii Q..
o a
yin�Q3:C)Lwa c��¢�in�in
���.Q -
(6
�' 7j—D
LL
111MJ
�n�am�a_-via
Ol-yam Na21 MN-'.1-t]

M/
-
\
)k
kEu
- l\§\
mp!
�¥
0
°
§f
°
�/a
��Gz r\
_
\)} � \�\\
w % \:
»:; «®k),\);
�&s
�}
0
§�
���
_ _@ ®{\%iz\@}
/f,;®®
-
/}-0
2
o
3
=■o
�.mmU_a-
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:
`Q)d±£
_
Q
3
2\
§A °
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
\Q

CU
�§
0
§k
{ Eu ,
/�
: /\
� \
Lo
�¥
§
°
§f
°
�/a
�TGz r\
:
\)} E. E,F _
w \ \:
»:; «®k),\);cr
�&s
- -« )
/f-;®®
/ )/:c
2
Uz«
o
=■o
®fe
{/l2f;[[{))§,
\/3
Q
3
2\
§A °
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
t CU
`
S
j
L
\0 ° " HIM)'[\
222

0
)k
kEu °:
\� �_
: /
�cu \LO
§
°
§f
°
�/a
\)} � \�\\
\\�
\ \d/
f
w \ \:
_
»:; «®k),\);
�°»
�&s
�}
0
'a
���
®
- -« ;f/I;!\«)
/
� 2
o
=■o
®fe
{/l2f;[[{))§,,:
\/
Q
3
U
§A °
®2cl wD-f/§{/))coo
Q)d±£
`
jU
\Q ° " 117gjj/)'[\
.
g
2

0
)k
kEu °:
\�
: /
�cu \LO
§
°
§f
°
�/a
_
\)} \�`� \�\\
.`
\��
f
w \ \:
»
- _
«®k),\0.
.
°
�&s
�}
0
'a
���
®
- -« ;f/I;!\«)
� 2
Ua-
o
=■o
® fe
{/l2f;[[{))§,2
:c
\/
Q
3
2\
§A °
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
Q)d±£
`
�
\0 ° " 111��/)'[\
222
\\//2
R

M/
0
)k
kEu °:
\� �_
'-' `
0\
m=!
§
°
§f
°
�10
\)} \
�°
w \ \:
�2
«®k),\);
�}
20
�2=
]■§
_ _«�[:,
®
zz«
®©
{/l2f;.
Q
3
2\
§A °
I>02,,:
®2:fJ:llf/§{/))!
\0
_
d)Q)S±£
` 222
° " HIM)'[\
�
\�\/3
R �

Oz,
Qm LaBeLLa
Fcrwp:au d7ys�irrsi�a+-
APPENDIX B
Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/13/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: UPA-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.439596 Long:-78.977308 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data point between stream and wetland.
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
3. Tilia americana / American basswood
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
2. Prunus serotina / Black cherry
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Podophyllum peltatum / May -apple
2. Lonicera japonica / Japanese honeysuckle
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 35
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FAC
10
Yes
FACU
50 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 10
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACU
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
60 Yes FACU
10 No FACU
70 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
14
0
oampung r-oint: urH-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
FACU species 105 x 4 = 420
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 130 (A) 495 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.81
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPA-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/13/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: WETA-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 34.4395 Long:-78.977383
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Slope (%): 0-3
Datum:
PF01A
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Area has been logged.
HYDROLOGY
No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ytht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Salix nigra / Black willow 3 Yes OBL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Juncus effusus / Common bog rush, Soft or lamp rush
3 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
80 Yes
1
FACW
2.
Typha latifolia / Broadleaf cattail, Broad-leaved cattail
5
No
OBL
3.
Ranunculus pusillus / Low buttercup
5
No
OBL
4.
Lonicera japonica / Japanese honeysuckle
3
No
FACU
5.
Rubus argutus/ Saw -tooth blackberry
3
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
96 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover: 19
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
oampung r-oint: vvtIH-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 13 x 1 = 13
FACW species 80 x 2 = 160
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 6 x 4 = 24
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 99 (A) 197 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.99
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETA-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/1 85 7.5YR 3/3 15 C PL,M Slty Clay Loarr
6-20 10Y 5/1 60 10YR 5/8 40 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/13/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: UPD-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.437932 Long:-78.980323 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: uru-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
20 Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
5 Yes
FAC
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 40 (A) 155 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.88
2. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree 5 Yes FACU
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
10 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Eupatorium capillifolium / Dog -fennel
10 Yes
FACU
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPD-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-10 2.5Y 6/3 100 Slty Clay Loarr
10-20 7.5YR 4/6 70 10YR 6/1 30 RM M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/13/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: WETD-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.437953 Long:-78.980403 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6-12
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvti u-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Acersaccharinum / Silver maple
30
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Ulmus americana / American elm 15 Yes FACW
3. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam 10 No FAC
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
27
20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
1. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 90 (A) 225 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.5
2. Lindera benzoin / Northern spicebush 5 Yes FAC
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
15 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
20
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETD-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-6
7.5YR 5/4 100
Slty Clay Loarr
6-12
10Y 5/1 95 5YR 5/6 5 C
M Silty Clay
12-20
10Y 6/1 70 7.5YR 5/8 30 C
M Clay
'Type: C=Concentration,
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/13/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: UPE-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.435797 Long:-78.983749 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 14
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: urt-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
40
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 (A/B)
2. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree 20 Yes FACU
3. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 15 No FAC
4. Acersaccharinum / Silver maple 15 No FACW
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
45
20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
60
Yes
FACU
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
FACU species 120 x 4 = 480
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 155 (A) 570 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.68
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
60 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft raidus )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Phegopteris hexagonoptera / Broad beech fern
5
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPE-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 2.5/2 100 Loam
6-20 7.5YR 6/1 93 10YR 2/2 7 RM M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/13/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: WETE-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.435836 Long:-78.983789 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvt i t-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua / Sweetgum
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9 (A/B)
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam 20 Yes FAC
3. Ulmus americana / American elm 15 Yes FACW
4. Acerrubrum / Red maple 15 Yes FAC
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Lindera benzoin / Northern spicebush
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 10 x 5 = 50
Column Totals: 105 (A) 320 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.05
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam 5 Yes FAC
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
15 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis / Royal fern
10
Yes
N I
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass 5 Yes FAC
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia / Horsebrier
5
Yes
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 1
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETE-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4
5YR 4/1 100
Fine Sndy Lm
4-10
10YR 5/1 98 10YR 3/3 2 C
M Fine Sndy Lm
10-20
2.5Y 6/3 98 5YR 5/8 2 C
M Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration,
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.43397898 Long:
Roxboro/
Sampling Date: 04/14/2023
State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: UPF-1
Slope (%): 0-2
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
convex
-78.98499823
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: urr-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
40
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0 (A/B)
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam 10 No FAC
3. Magnolia tripetala / Umbrella magnolia 7 No FACU
4. Liquidambarstyraciflua / Sweetgum 7 No FAC
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
64 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
32
20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Lindera benzoin / Northern spicebush
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 47 x 3 = 141
FACU species 67 x 4 = 268
U PL species 5 x 5= 25
Column Totals: 119 (A) 434 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.65
2. Fagus grandifolia / American beech 20 Yes FACU
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
40 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
10
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Stellaria media / Chickweed, Common chickweed 5 Yes UPL
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPF-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 3/2 100 Sandy Loam
2-12 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam
12-20 10YR 5/4 2 7.5YR 5/8 C PL Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.4339717 Long:
Roxboro/
Sampling Date: 04/14/2023
State: North Carolirr Sampling Point: WETF-1
Slope (%): 0-2
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
): concave
-78.98495467
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ytht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 ft radius )
1. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 ft radius )
1. Lindera benzoin / Northern spicebush
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
3. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
15
Yes
FAC
10
Yes
FAC
25 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5
10 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FAC
5 Yes
FAC
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
oampung r-oint: vvt i r- i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 50 (A) 150 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETF-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 6/2 95 2.5YR 5/6 5 C M Silty Clay
6-20 2.5Y 7/3 70 10YR 6/8 30 C PL Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/18/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPL-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.42137264 Long:-78.98704382 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-2
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
2. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
3. Quercus falcata / Southern red oak
4. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
35
Yes
FAC
35
Yes
FACU
10
No
FACU
10
No
FAC
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
10 Yes FACU
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia / Muscadine 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
oampung roint: urn-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 105 (A) 370 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPL-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-20 2.5Y 6/3 100 Slty Clay Loarr
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/17/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETI-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.42642241 Long:-78.9845969 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-2
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvt i i-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum / Red maple
35 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 60 (A) 180 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.0
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
0 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
0
20% of total cover:
0
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1.
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0
20% of total cover:
0
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia / Muscadine
10 Yes
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETI-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 Loam
4-10 10YR 7/4 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M Loamy Sand
10-20 2.5Y 6/2 95 7.5YR 6/8 5 C M Sandy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/18/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETL-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Relic stream channel Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.42134054 Long:-78.98701405 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
No vegetation present during time of sampling.
HYDROLOGY
0-2
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
50% of total cover: 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
No vegetation present in relic channel.
oampung roint:
vvt i L- i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 0
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
-
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETL-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/1 100 Fine Sndy Lm
4-20 10YR 6/1 100 Fine Sndy Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/18/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPM-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.40533522 Long:-78.99505037 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
3-5
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 18
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
2. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree
3. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
4. Pinus taeda / Loblolly pine
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Lonicera japonica / Japanese honeysuckle
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia / Horsebrier
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
40
Yes
FAC
25
Yes
FACU
10
No
FAC
5
No
FAC
80 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
3 Yes FACU
3 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
10 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
oampung r-oint: urivri
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
FACU species 28 x 4 = 112
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 93 (A) 307 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPM-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 2/2 100
Loam
1-8 10YR 6/4 100
Loamy Sand
8-18 10YR 6/4 60
7.5YR 5/8 40 C M
Sandy Clay
18-20 2.5Y 6/2 100
Loamy Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/18/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETM-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.40532502 Long:-78.99499029 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
3-5
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roin[: vvt i ivi-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
1. Acerrubrum / Red maple
35 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
5 Yes
FAC
FAC species 85 x 3 = 255
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 90 (A) 275 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.06
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
5 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
30 Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Lonicera japonica / Japanese honeysuckle 5 No FACU
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
17
20% of total cover:
7
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETM-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 2.5/2 100 Fine Sndy Lm
4-6 10YR 6/6 60 2.5YR 4/6 40 C M Loamy Sand
6-20 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
X Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/18/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETN-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.4042991 Long:-78.99555911 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvt1 rv-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua / Sweetgum
50 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 3 x 1 = 3
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam
5 Yes
FAC
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 73 (A) 198 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.71
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
5 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Carex intumescens / Greater bladder sedge
15 Yes
FACW
-
^Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex gynandra / Nodding sedge 3 No OBL
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
9
20% of total cover:
4
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETN-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 3/4 10 PL,M Loam
4-20 10YR 5/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/20/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPQ-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 7-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.40223283 Long:-78.99642567 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: urQ-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree
40 Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0 (A/B)
2. Quercus albs / White oak 15 Yes FACU
3. Oxydendrum arboreum / Sourwood 15 Yes UPL
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1
FAC species 63 x 3 = 189
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
UPL species 15 x 5 = 75
Column Totals: 133 (A) 484 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.64
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
0 20% of total cover:
0
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
60 Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia / Horsebrier
3 Yes
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 1
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPQ-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/1 100 Fine Sndy Lm
2-20 10YR 6/4 100 Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/20/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETQ-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvti Q-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Acerrubrum / Red maple
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Fraxinus caroliniana / Carolina ash 25 Yes OBL
3. Ulmus americans / American elm 15 No FACW
4. Liquidambarstyraciflua / Sweetgum 15 No FAC
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1. Lindera benzoin l Northern spicebush
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 110 (A) 265 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.41
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
10 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
20
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETQ-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 3/2 100 Silty Clay
16-20 10YR 2/2 100 Silt Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
X Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/20/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPR-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.40008667 Long:-78.99755433 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: urm-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Acerrubrum / Red maple
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3 (A/B)
2. Oxydendrum arboreum / Sourwood 10 Yes UPL
3.
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
5
Yes
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
Column Totals: 120 (A) 380 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.17
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
5 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
60
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Parathelypteris noveboracensis / New york fern 20 Yes FAC
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia / Horsebrier
5
Yes
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 1
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPR-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 5/3 90 10YR 3/3 10 D M
12-20 2.5Y 6/2 80 2.5Y 7/6 20 C M Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/20/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETR-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.40014333 Long:-78.99754367 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ytht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 ft radius )
1. Acernegundo/ Boxelder, Box elder
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
3. Acernegundo/ Boxelder, Box elder
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 ft radius )
1. Lindera benzoin / Northern spicebush
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
2. Arisaema triphyllum / Jack-in-the-pulpit
3. Boehmeria cylindrica / Smallspike false nettle
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia / Horsebrier
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
15
Yes
FAC
15
Yes
FAC
10
Yes
FAC
40 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 8
20 Yes FAC
20 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
4
60 Yes
FAC
20 Yes
FACW
10 No
FACW
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
oampung r-oint: vvt i K_ i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 155 (A) 435 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.81
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETR-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 100 Sndy Clay Lm
5-20 10YR 4/1 98 10YR 7/4 2 C M Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/20/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETT-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.397212 Long:-78.998805 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
3-5
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ytht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
2. Arisaema triphyllum / Jack-in-the-pulpit
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 27
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia / Horsebrier
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FAC
10
Yes
FAC
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
20 Yes FAC
20 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 4
50 Yes FAC
5 No FACW
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 11
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
oampung r-oint: vvt i i- i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 110 (A) 325 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.95
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETT-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/2 100 Slty Clay Loarr
2-4 10YR 5/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Sndy Clay Lm
4-20 10YR 5/1 95 10YR 6/6 5 C M Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPU-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.3921945 Long:-79.00072917 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (HeB) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 47
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia / Virginia creeper
2. Toxicodendron radicans / Eastern poison ivy
3. Campsis radicans / Trumpet creeper
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Toxicodendron radicans / Eastern poison ivy
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 15
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
70
Yes
FAC
25
Yes
FAC
95 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 19
3 Yes FAC
3 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1
10 Yes
FACU
10 Yes
FAC
1 No
FAC
21 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 4
30 Yes FAC
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
oampung r-oint: uru-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 139 x 3 = 417
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 149 (A) 457 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.07
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPU-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 100 Sandy Loam
6-10 2.5Y 4/2 100 Loamy Sand
10-20 2.5YR 4/1 100 Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETU-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.39226767 Long:-79.0006925 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (HeB) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

ytht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
2. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
3. Ulmus americana / American elm
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Ulmus americana / American elm
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Juncus effusus / Common bog rush, Soft or lamp rush
2. Toxicodendron radicans / Eastern poison ivy
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Toxicodendron radicans / Eastern poison ivy
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 15
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
30
Yes
FAC
30
Yes
FAC
20
Yes
FACW
80 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
10 Yes FACW
5 Yes FAC
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
5 Yes FACW
5 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
30 Yes FAC
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
oampung r-oint: vvt i u- i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 135 (A) 370 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.74
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETU-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-16 2.5Y 5/2 98 7.5YR 7/8 2 C M Loamy Sand
16-20 2.5Y 5/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPLV-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.37135783 Long:-79.00024683 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (HeB) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
3-5
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 14
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roin[: urLv-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree
20
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3 (A/B)
2. Acer rubrum / Red maple 15 Yes FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 10 No FAC
4. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam 10 No FAC
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
27
20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
5
Yes
FAC
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 145 (A) 455 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.14
2. Carpinus caroliniana / American hornbeam 5 Yes FAC
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
10 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
75
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
37
20% of total cover:
15
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia / Muscadine
5
Yes
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 1
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPLV-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/2 100 Sandy Loam
2-10 10YR 6/4 60 10YR 2/2 40 RM M Sandy Loam
10-20 10YR 6/4 70 10YR 2/2 30 RM Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETV-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.371543 Long:-79.00036233 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (HeB) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No _
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roin[: vvt i v-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Acerrubrum / Red maple
35
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 25 Yes FAC
3. Nyssa sylvatica / Blackgum 20 Yes FAC
4. Magnolia virginiana / Sweet -bay 10 No FACW
5. Quercus albs / White oak 10 No FACU
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Vaccinium corymbosum / Highbush blueberry
10
Yes
FACW
FAC species 165 x 3 = 495
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 195 (A) 575 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.95
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 10 Yes FAC
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
20 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
75
Yes
FAC
-
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
37
20% of total cover:
15
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETV-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/2 85 2.5YR 3/3 15 C M Sndy Clay Lm
2-6 10YR 4/2 96 2.5YR 3/3 4 C M Sndy Clay Lm
6-20 10YR 4/2 100 Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETW-01
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.36987933 Long:-78.999955 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (ApB) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
2-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvti vv-ui
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua / Sweetgum
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Acer rubrum / Red maple 25 Yes FAC
3. Quercus alba / White oak 10 No FACU
4.
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1. Nyssa sylvatica / Blackgum
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 85 (A) 245 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.88
2. Vaccinium corymbosum / Highbush blueberry 10 Yes FACW
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
20 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Osmunda spectabilis / Royal fern
5
Yes
OBL
-Problematic
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETW-01
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/1 100 Slty Clay Loarr
2-20 2.5Y 6/1 60 10YR 6/8 40 C M Silt Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: WETZ-1
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.36787743 Long:-78.99560771 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
0-2
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jirata) - use SCIenuTIC names Ot plants.
oampung roini: vvt IL-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Quercus phellos / Willow oak
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
2. Acer rubrum / Red maple 20 Yes FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC
4. Ulmus americana / American elm 10 No FACW
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
32
20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica / Green ash
15
Yes
FACW
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 100 (A) 245 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.45
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
-
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-
15 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index :53.01
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
-
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
-
Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
1. Carex gynandra / Nodding sedge
10
Yes
OBL
-Problematic
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Juncus effusus / Common bog rush, Soft or lamp rush 10 Yes FACW
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
6.
7.
8.
g
10.
11.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 .
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WETZ-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 7/1 85 2.5YR 5/6 15 C M Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.43049785 Long:
Roxboro/
Sampling Date: 04/17/2023
State: NC Sampling Point: UPV-1
Slope (%): 0-3
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No —
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
none
-78.98379307
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
2. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
3. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Asimina triloba / Common pawpaw
2. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
60
Yes
FACU
15
No
FAC
15
No
FACU
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACU
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Osmunda cinnamomea/ Cinnamon fern 5 Yes NI
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
oampung r-oint: urv-i
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
FACU species 80 x 4 = 320
U PL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 105 (A) 405 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.86
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPV-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/2 100 Fine Sndy Lm
2-8 10YR 5/3 100 Loamy Sand
8-20 10YR 6/4 98 10YR 6/8 2 C M Loamy Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/17/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPV-2
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Hill slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 7-15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.42751049 Long:-78.98370531 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WeE) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No _
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree
2. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
3. Quercus falcata / Southern red oak
4. Quercus rubra / Northern red oak
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 42
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Fagus grandifolia / American beech
2. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
25
Yes
FACU
25
Yes
FAC
25
Yes
FACU
10
No
FACU
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
10 Yes FACU
5 Yes FAC
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
oampung r-oint: urv-Z
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 100 (A) 370 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPV-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy Loam
3-7 10YR 6/4 100 Sandy Clay
7-20 10YR 7/4 100 Sandy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Roxboro Western Sewers City/County: Roxboro/Person Sampling Date: 04/21/2023
Applicant/Owner: Western Sewers State: NC Sampling Point: UPV-3
Investigator(s): BM, KM, KW Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 - Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.395441 Long:-78.99946283 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes (WeD) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIVli5-Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
3-5
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Vtht I A I IVIV (tour Jiraia) - use SCIenuTIC names Ol
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera / Tuliptree
2. Acerrubrum/ Red maple
3. Platanus occidentalis / American sycamore
4. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
5. Celtis occidentalis / Common hackberry
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 42
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua / Sweetgum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia / Virginia creeper
2. Microstegium vimineum / Japanese stilt grass
3. Toxicodendron radicans / Eastern poison ivy
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 22
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Toxicodendron radicans / Eastern poison ivy
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FAC
20
Yes
FACW
15
No
FAC
10
No
FACU
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
15 Yes FAC
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
3
20 Yes
FACU
15 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FAC
45 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
oampung r-oint: urv-s
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
FACU species 50 x 4 = 200
U PL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 150 (A) 480 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m)
tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPV-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 2.5YR 3/2 100 Fine Sndy Lm
2-10 10YR 6/8 100 Fine Sndy Lm
8-20 10YR 6/6 100 Sndy Clay Lm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
(LRR N, MLRA 147,148)
(LRR N, MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Roxboro Western Sewers
LaBelLa
Powered by partnership.
Project
Roxboro Western Sewers
ID
335108
Survey Date
04/25/2023
User
Eric Prunchak
Evaluator:
Ep KM
Project/Site:
Roxboro
County:
Person County
Latitude/Longitude:
Latitude
36.35361183
Longitude
-78.98905283
Other e.g. Quad Name:
Int stream 2
Total Points:
20.25
Stream Determination (circle
Intermittent
one)
A. Geomorphology
1. Continuity of channel bed
2 - Moderate
and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along
1 -Weak
thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex.
1 -Weak
riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
4. Particle size of stream
1 -Weak
substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 - Absent
6. Depositional bars or
1 -Weak
benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1 -Weak
8. Headcuts
0 - Absent
9. Grade control
0 - Absent
10. Natural valley
0.5 - Weak
11. Second or greater order
No = 0
channel
Su btota 1 =
7.5
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 2 - Moderate
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 -Weak
14. Leaf litter 1 -Weak
15. Sediment on plants or 0.5 - Weak
debris
e� LaBella
made with Wildnote Page 1 of

16. Organic debris lines or
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of
high water table?
Subtotal =
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in
streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in
streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note
diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in
streambed
Su btota I =
Notes:
Sketch:
0 - Absent
No=O
4.5
1 - Moderate
1 - Moderate
1 -Weak
1 -Weak
1 - Moderate
0.5 - Weak
1 - Moderate
1 - Moderate
FACW = 0.75
8.25
None
e., LaB!Ra
made with Wildnote Page 2 of 2

Roxboro Western Sewers
LaBelLa
Powered by partnership.
Project
Roxboro Western Sewers
ID
334916
Survey Date
04/25/2023
User
Eric Prunchak
Evaluator:
EP KM
Project/Site:
Roxboro
County:
Person
Latitude/Longitude:
Latitude
36.36167167
Longitude
-78.9894435
Other e.g. Quad Name:
SQ
Total Points:
35.75
Stream Determination (circle
Perennial
one)
A. Geomorphology
1. Continuity of channel bed
2 - Moderate
and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along
1 -Weak
thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex.
2 - Moderate
riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
4. Particle size of stream
2 - Moderate
substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
2 - Moderate
6. Depositional bars or
1 -Weak
benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1 -Weak
8. Headcuts
1 -Weak
9. Grade control
0.5 - Weak
10. Natural valley
0.5 - Weak
11. Second or greater order
No = 0
channel
Su btota 1 =
13
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 2 - Moderate
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2 - Moderate
14. Leaf litter 1 -Weak
15. Sediment on plants or 0.5 - Weak
debris
e� LaBella
made with Wildnote Page 1 of

16. Organic debris lines or
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of
high water table?
Subtotal =
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in
streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in
streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note
diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in
streambed
Su btota I =
Notes
Sketch:
0.5 - Weak
Yes = 3
9
3 - Absent
3 - Absent
2 - Moderate
1 -Weak
1 - Moderate
1 - Moderate
1 - Moderate
1 - Moderate
FACW = 0.75
13.75
Backflooded by beaver dam
►=9"
e� LaBeLla
made with Wildnote Page 2 of 2

Roxboro Western Sewers
LaBelLa
Powered by partnership.
Project
Roxboro Western Sewers
ID
335127
Survey Date
04/25/2023
User
Eric Prunchak
Evaluator:
EP KM
Project/Site:
Roxboro
County:
Person County
Latitude/Longitude:
Latitude
36.3511115
Longitude
-78.99009217
Other e.g. Quad Name:
SS
Total Points:
8
Stream Determination (circle
Ephemeral
one)
A. Geomorphology
1. Continuity of channel bed
1 -Weak
and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along
1 -Weak
thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex.
0 -Absent
riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
4. Particle size of stream
1 -Weak
substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 - Absent
6. Depositional bars or
0 - Absent
benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 - Absent
8. Headcuts
0 - Absent
9. Grade control
0 - Absent
10. Natural valley
0 - Absent
11. Second or greater order
No = 0
channel
Su btota 1 =
3
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 - Absent
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 -Weak
14. Leaf litter 0.5 - Moderate
15. Sediment on plants or 0 - Absent
debris
e� LaBella
made with Wildnote Page 1 of

16. Organic debris lines or 0 - Absent
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of No = 0
high water table?
Subtotal = 1.5
18. Fibrous roots in
1 - Moderate
streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in
1 - Moderate
streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note
0 - Absent
diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 - Absent
22. Fish
0 - Absent
23. Crayfish
0.5 - Weak
24. Amphibians
0.5 - Weak
25. Algae
0.5 - Weak
26. Wetland plants in
Other = 0
streambed
Su btota I =
3.5
Notes:
Sketch: None
e., LaB!Ra
made with Wildnote Page 2 of 2

Roxboro Western Sewers
LaBelLa
Powered by partnership.
Project
Roxboro Western Sewers
ID
335138
Survey Date
04/25/2023
User
Eric Prunchak
Evaluator:
EP KM
Project/Site:
Roxboro
County:
Person County
Latitude/Longitude:
Latitude
36.34954833
Longitude
-78.991956
Other e.g. Quad Name:
ST
Total Points:
48.25
Stream Determination (circle
Perennial
one)
A. Geomorphology
1. Continuity of channel bed
3 -
Strong
and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along
2 -
Moderate
thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex.
2 -
Moderate
riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
4. Particle size of stream
3 -
Strong
substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
2 -
Moderate
6. Depositional bars or
2 -
Moderate
benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
2 -
Moderate
8. Headcuts
2 -
Moderate
9. Grade control
1 -
Moderate
10. Natural valley
1 -
Moderate
11. Second or greater order
Yes = 3
channel
Su btota 1 =
23
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 2 - Moderate
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2 - Moderate
14. Leaf litter 1.5 - Absent
15. Sediment on plants or 1 - Moderate
debris
e� LaBella
made with Wildnote Page 1 of

16. Organic debris lines or 1 - Moderate
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of Yes = 3
high water table?
Subtotal = 10.5
18. Fibrous roots in
3 -Absent
streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in
3 -Absent
streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note
3 - Strong
diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 -Weak
22. Fish
0.5 - Weak
23. Crayfish
1.5 - Strong
24. Amphibians
1 - Moderate
25. Algae
1 - Moderate
26. Wetland plants in
FACW = 0.75
streambed
Subtotal =
14.75
Notes:
Sketch: None
e., LaB!Ra
made with Wildnote Page 2 of 2

Om
eJ LaBeLLa
APPENDIX C
Photo Log

In
O cm
+_+ (14
f13 O
N N
Q
® Q
E
ca .�
a)o
i
a ' cc
U) U
Cc o
_0 Z
O
O o
N x
cal
4--1
U)
m
LU
m
(B
4-1
O
7-5
0-
4-1
W
(B
4-1
O
D
O
Cn
(B
4-1
O
W
0-

Awl
I
U)
O
O
O cm
+_+ N
03 co
N N
0) Q
® Q
1:
03
N
i
Cn
73
CU
CU
+-+
N
E-
06
0
cc
U
tt
0
Z
O
O
X
O
4-1
c�
4-1
O
D
O
Cn
UD
U
(B
LL
(B
4-1
U
O
LL
n
4-1
D
O
Cn
two
c
U
m
LL
LLI
(B
4-1
O
O
LL
n
4-1
D
O
Cn
UD
c
U
m
LL
J
(B
+-+
U
O
LL
n
W
m
LLI
two
U
(B
LL
(B
4-1
O
O
LL
0-

nip
1 ".04:
j r4.. N"',
oA
'i 1� al
,ll

0
0
x
0
rr
U)
0
0
(Y)
C13
o
(D
C)
<
E
cc
ca
W
U)
C)
-0
Co
C)
_0
co
z
x
0,J
4-1
LU
�Afl A
LL
co
4-1
ItV.
LL
1.

O cm
N o
® Q
E
ca .
N o
+-j cc
U) U
Cc O
_ Z
� O
O 0
N x
tf
tf
z
U
(B
LL
m
E
(B
4-1
O
Cn
(B
i
O
E
U
Q
LLI
rj
4-J
)
U'
VW
tf
0
z
b;A
U
m
LL
Q
E
rk' �
' co
O
4-1
c�
m
LL
O
W
O
LLI
(B
O
4-1
U_
W
7
c
O
z

4-1
U)
m
LEI
�o
U
(B
LL
LL
E
m
O
4-1
Cn
(B
O
i
(D
n
(D
(B
m
LL
(B
O
U)
O
L
LU
m
c
O
a-=+
U_
U)
7
c
O
z
L�
O
z
�o
U
(B
LL
2
E
m
O
i
Cn
a--+
c
+-+
E
O
a--+
c
4-1
D
O
Cn
b�A
U
!LL
V
E
m
U
4-1
Cn
4-1
c
Q)
+-+
E
4-1
c

O cm
+_+ (14
f13 O
N N
Q
® Q
E
ca .�
a)O
a--' cc
U) U
Cc o
_0 Z
O
O O
N x
EJF]
O
z
b�A
U
LL
E
m
U
ate-+
Cn
a--+
c
Q)
I:;
E
O
4-1
U)
O
4-1
O
Cn
b�A
U
(B
LL
E
m
O
ate-+
Cn
(B
O
O
n

rd

I
(U O
_0 z
O
O 0
4-1
U)
(D
O
U
(B
LL
F-
(B
U
4-1
Cn
4-1
U
tj
F-
(D
c
U)
O
z
tv0
U
cc
U—
cc
O
U)
06
2
>Q
cc
>O
O
LL
0—
tf
0
z
U
(B
LL
N
E
(B
4-1
U
Cn
4-1
E
U
4--1
W
U
bIA
U
m
LL
X
(B
U
+�-1
Cn
(B
U
U

f Fj

Om
eJ LaBeLLa
APPENDIX D
Hytlric Soil Map

36o 26' 57" N
36o 20' 22" N
Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Person County, North Carolina 3:
(Western Sewer System)
676000 677000 678000 679000 680000 681000 682000 683000 684000
676000 677000 678000 679000 680000 681000
in
N Map Scale: 1:59,300 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters N
0 500 1000 2000 ?000
Feet
0 2500 5000 10000 15000
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
usoA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
682000 683000 684"
36o 26' 57" N
r
36o 20' 22" N
5/1 /2023
Page 1 of 5

7 N
0
U N
0
o U
a) �
a a)
(n
E
D a)
o_ y
m
rn
U
O O
m
7
(6
O_
U
U O
O
N
p .�
-O
(0
E
a)
.N E
N 'p U) 6
��—
(n
N
O
C E
— O)
Q
U
—�
o_
N
tem E
Z
E
NmN
Q
ma)
N � OO
y
O
m
N
N
a)6
O Q N
Z
U o
tl)
'6N0>
Ey
Q
UQ
N
0
U)
a
Q
!E2i 0
E
U
mw O
OU) `
D
O
Qa)
L
CL
D Q
O
s
U
m
U)
a) O
i
O
a) p
O O
'a)
U
U
m
O
+
O_ uj m
O
Z
N
O
N O
a)
a) ,O N O
m
E a)
O
01,
U O
y
m
O
O E N
m
a)
a)>
7 y U O
u�.oK
��
N�
In
-a2CL �o
a
o
0
O
y
N
U)
a)
Q
U
3 J>
m�
) U) 0_ O
(n
Q C
N
a) i
d
) O
t C
N
C
G
(6
�
a)
Z E
Q� U
o
a) o_ - (au)
��
a) a)
�
m
a)
a)
�
0 O�
�. -0
y
>+
L N N j0
O) N
miu
m
O _O T 7
N
C
(6
�
O��
>
m m
U .o
N O
E
_ U
O
E m p
a)
5
OQ
W
O
O_ O
a)
m
o_ m _
t -O
. O
U)O
vOOD
U
C
O >
_
(a)
m O
U0
N
N OO
)
E a)U)
V
N
(6 m
a) a)
O
09 O
O_ .O m a)
m O y� U
y
—
0 7
— O
O N
m NO
O)
a)Ep t
L w
y
N
T
L
L
CL
�
°'
y
y
0
y o
R r
O
w
�° a
C R
a)
(n
R
U
R
C
W
R F
R
0
F
m
W
a
R
R
R
0)
(o
d)
N
o
d)
N
o
R
.-.
d)
(0 N
Cl)
OU
O
0)
(0
OO
o
O
mO
(O0
MO
o
0o
O`p
UaC
O
rn
(
a
a
y
(0M
a
a`
a
y
O
(O
ro
Cl)
a
y
Q
0 .�
a
a
a a
=
m
w
c
.�
a
a
a
a
=
m
0
a
a
a
a
H
a >
>
> >
o
o
>
>
>
>
o
o
a
>
>
>
>
o
o
y
Q
y
pf 2
c
2
2 2
Z
Z
pf
c
2
2
2
2
Z
Z
p)
c
2
2
2
2
Z
Z
(n
�
°
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑
�
i
i
�
■
■
o
o
■
o
R
"
LL }}
y
d
0
y
y
y
R
Q
U)
m
Z

Hydric Rating by Map Unit -Person County, North Carolina
Western Sewer System
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to
0
7.1
16.5%
6 percent slopes
ApC
Appling sandy loam, 6 to
0
3.3
7.8%
10 percent slopes
AuB
Appling-Urban land
0
1.3
3.0%
complex, 2 to 10
percent slopes
ChA
Chewacla and
40
8.7
20.1 %
Wehadkee soils, 0 to
2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
GeB
Georgeville loam, 2 to 6
0
1.6
3.6%
percent slopes
GeC
Georgeville loam, 6 to
0
0.2
0.4%
10 percent slopes
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to
1
1.7
4.0%
6 percent slopes
HrB
Herndon loam, 2 to 6
0
2.8
6.5%
percent slopes
HrC
Herndon loam, 6 to 10
0
0.8
1.9%
percent slopes
LgB
Lignum loam, 2 to 6
1
4.1
9.6%
percent slopes
RoF
Rion sandy loam, 25 to
0
0.1
0.1 %
45 percent slopes
TaE
Tarrus loam, 15 to 35
0
0.5
1.1 %
percent slopes
UdB
Udorthents, loamy,
0
0.2
0.4%
gently sloping
Ur
Urban land
0
0.3
0.8%
WeD
Wedowee sandy loam,
0
1.6
3.7%
10 to 15 percent
slopes
WeE
Wedowee sandy loam,
0
8.8
20.5%
15 to 25 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
43.0
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Person County, North Carolina
Western Sewer System
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5