110006_Inspection_20231206 (2)

Division of Water Resourer"
Facility Number ELI O Division of Soil and Water C„nservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: L L Arrival Time: (t3 UO1Qn Departure Time: 23aG County: A�L—zm"h,-Region:
I
Farm Name: f-L ,b ladQ y Owner Email '92-�R-- 674-e/'96.}-
Nj It7
Owner Name: e� ffen;r, L � Llyj3 l Phone: Mailing Address: �O, `e--SZi�. —1 d'ep `'}�/pjf[avo�w�� /Jl 2- p Lt i 32--
Physical Address: '�� h[)w ��_ R"of
r-
-
FacilityContact: ( p�-,- Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1,.�pvQ �,j l): Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 'f` tJB DLi -:J-�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Y�In !v-�KT�2- '""" „Latitude:-5.�'7-,'yam Longitude:^a'�-.dS
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at ❑ Stmomre ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Rgy
go
Dai Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
BeefBrood Cow
❑ Yes " No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
54 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Cg No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 511212020 Continued

Racili Number: O �� Date of Inspection: !Z (�'7,0'
ry
'Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural phis storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
5!�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier aLk
Spillway?: Ub
Designed Freeboard (in).
Observed Freeboard (in):" OTt-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e, large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
9
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste AooGcation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes FIND
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pounding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E;�,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yea E4,No
❑ NA
❑ HE
acres determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yea
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
U1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[�J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
5�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Eacilit Number: 14 [I)ate of Inspection:
�l
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appfopriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
[9—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
RLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
.LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[)eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
F52fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�r2qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
b�,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same ageney7
❑ Yes
Fk'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
�sbl l
10OX
w20Q r.4
Ct/Lq
Pap IA_, �a6PVYV.
C�feb�afi'a e✓u� a�aa �ti Pr*-
�,`�s dales lo>r a-oa-r— au� r� t3��-y
�r b,, A&4
�t d e--oa t"La c- D�
�jr '� hLc.i`J e_46a4�'5l,_ yl..o,.c &M--de-d 4 l /!
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ��Ea4
Pho¢e: PL�p�/^ ,F7 IpVdP
Reviewer/Inspector Signanue: N
Date:
1
i
Page 3 of
5/72/2020