110006_Inspection_20231206

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 110006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC110006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:Routine County: Buncombe Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/06/2023 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident#:
Farm Name: T&C Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: George A Nesbitt Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 936 Fletcher NC 287320936
Physical Address: 440 Lower Brush Creek Rd Fletcher NC 28732
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'28'35" Longitude: 82'26'05"
436 Lower Brush Creek Rd, Fletcher.4 miles SW of Fairview, 6 miles east of Fletcher, turn at Oak Baptist Church on to Lower
Brush Creek Rd. Go to dirt Rd 4th drive on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, &Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: George A Nesbitt Operator Certification Number: 21355
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Tony Nesbitt 828-628-1956
Primary Inspector: Timothy R Fox Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Tim Fox with ARO inspected the site. Tony Nesbit was present during the inspection.
Calibration due again in 2025.
Soils done in 2021 due in 2024.
Spot checked Meadowa#11 Field size 13.
Plan to eliminate dairy cows by next year and evaluate new livestock(beef cattle)option.
6 continuing education hours needed by 1/1/2025.
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWC11000E Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number:110006
Inspection Date:12/06/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle- Milk Cow 300 I 80
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond SLURRY POND 01/01/1996 I D1/01/1989 22.80
Page 2 of 5

Permit:AWC11000E Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number:110006
Inspection Date:12/06/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ MEIEI
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Page 3 of 5

Permit:AWC11000E Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number:110006
Inspection Date:12/06/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit:AWC11000E Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number:110006
Inspection Date:12/06/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5