310852_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231127

O'Division of Water Resources
Facility Number / $S2 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ('Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: erRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I r'I/l7 231 Arrival Time: Departure Time: /O: 1i 404 County: ,�,T Region:
Farm Name: //CV1fi5 Dre✓ N,)✓5ta Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILa er IDairy Cow
can to Feeder -2 00 21 I 1 INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pallets _ _ Beef Brood Co—
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No 0 NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑/ No ❑ NA 0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 3 j - ks z Date of Inspection: /Z7 12 3
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): a�
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑i No NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑'No [DNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes 0 No NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA m NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [Z]NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [Z] NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA V] NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 3r - -f 52 [Date—of Inspection: 111Z, 23
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �] NG
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �] NF
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA FZ] NF
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NF
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA N l:
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N A 0 N l;
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ N F:
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'N E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Nl-'
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ N E
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NI?
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
JX-{''`� (!��V h�C1 /tCt✓C �/1< iC(U, ci_S fu: !.-�SDfCT, ��iS CJi/'C
V(kt,gS CLL,C of fliza•� C,' GJCtS lot,�a� �f
><kf ivtsprtf'Oki, iln.5 S' {c cJ ( Ptrect P/a,
V S i f p kcV.ew rrCo.'CIs-.
I'IClctj- 1vOr~ C�-cc,+
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /1.1&Gc"d Al&'Z'-� Phone: 116. 7Y 2- Sl6 SS
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1y1z7123
Page 3 of 3 511212020