202321640 Ver 1_OJC Real Estate III LLC NW Permits_20231128

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
OJC Real Estate III, LLC November 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of OJC Real Estate III, LLC, Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC is submitting
Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests for the site re -development of a residential property,
including the construction of a single-family residence, driveway and parking, septic system,
and stormwater retention areas. The proposed project involves the re -development of a 0.69-
acre property that previously housed a demolished residence, garage, and septic system.
The property has been re -developed with a three -bedroom single-family residence, stormwater
retention areas, and an engineered septic system considered a repair of an existing system by
Albemarle Regional Health Services (see Appendix A).
OJC Real Estate III, LLC acquired a septic system repair permit from Albemarle Regional Health
Services on February 2, 2023(see Appendix F), and a building permit from Currituck County
Permits & Inspections department on March 3, 2023 (see Appendix G). At the time of the
Jurisdictional Determination request in June 2023, the construction of the residence had
reached 90% completion. Subsequently, Currituck County has requested a Jurisdictional
Determination to be completed before allowing any further construction activities. The
outcome of the Jurisdictional Determination request revealed the presence of Jurisdictional
Wetlands on the property, introducing a new permit process that needed to be addressed in
accordance with regulatory requirements.
The project's purpose is to continue the re -development of the property and complete the
existing home in its current location, allowing the owner to receive a Certificate of Occupancy
from Currituck County.
The 0.69-acre property comprises 0.26 acres of uplands and 0.43 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands. The re -development has impacted 0.125 acres (5,450 square feet) of jurisdictional
wetlands for the house and septic system. In compliance with Albemarle Regional Health
Services requirements, the septic system's drain field has 24 inches of fill, and a retaining wall
has been constructed around the perimeter to minimize additional wetland impacts.
Compensatory mitigation for the unavoidable wetland impacts will be achieved through the
purchase of off -site mitigation credits from the Hidden Lake Wetland Mitigation Bank (refer to
Appendix C), approved for use in the Pasquotank Watershed. Wetland credits will be purchased
at a 2:1 ratio for the impacted 0.125 acres of non -riparian wetlands (0.25 credits).
1IPage

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
OJC REAL ESTATE III, LLC
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUEST
EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 1
1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET............................................................................................ 3
2.0
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 4
3.0
SITE DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................... 4
3.1
Site Location............................................................................................................................... 4
3.2
Site Conditions........................................................................................................................... 4
4.0
PURPOSED AND NEED........................................................................................................... 5
5.0
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS.................................................................................................... 5
6.0
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS....................................................................................................... 5
6.1
Introduction............................................................................................................................... 5
6.2
No -Action Alternative............................................................................................................. 6
6.3
Offsite Alternatives.................................................................................................................... 6
6.4
Onsite Alternatives.................................................................................................................... 7
6.5
Preferred Alternative................................................................................................................ 7
6.6
Conclusion................................................................................................................................... 8
7.0
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION....................................................................................... 8
8.0
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION............................................................................................. 9
9.0
SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION...................................................................................... 9
9.1
Threatened and Endangered Species..................................................................................... 9
9.2
Cultural Resources.................................................................................................................... 9
FIGURES
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Site Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix B: Wetland Mitigation Credit Availability Letter
Appendix C: USFW Threatened and Endangered Species List
Appendix D: NC- State Historic Preservation Office Review
Appendix E: Albemarle Regional Health Services Permit
Appendix F: Currituck County Permits
2 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
1.0 Project Information Sheet
Permit Organizations
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Nationwide Permits 18 & 58
• NC Division of Water Resources: 401 Certification
Project name:
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
State:
North Carolina
County:
Currituck
Latitude:
36.454251
Longitude:
-76.048563
Subject Property Size:
0.69 acres
HUC Code:
03010205 (Pasquotank Watershed)
Wetlands:
Palustrine Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PF01Cd)
Project Information
Owner Name:
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
P.O. Box 62
Maple, NC 27956
Contact:
Scott Feehley [phone]
[e-mail]
Consultant Name: Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
P.O. Box 3266
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Contact:
Doug Dorman [phone]
[e-mail]
3 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
On behalf of OJC Real Estate III, LLC, Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC is submitting Nationwide
18 & 58 Permit Requests for the site re -development of a residential property located at 2490 Caratoke
Highway in Maple, Currituck County, North Carolina. The proposed project encompasses the
construction of a single-family residence, driveway and parking, septic system, and stormwater
retention areas.
The 0.69-acre parcel has already undergone significant re -development, featuring a three -
bedroom single-family residence, stormwater retention areas, and an engineered septic
system. The property owner has made a substantial investment, and the re -development is
currently at 90% completion. Throughout the planning process, the applicant has collaborated
with Currituck County, Albemarle Regional Health Services, and the design engineer to
formulate a project that strategically minimizes environmental impacts on -site.
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Location
The 0.69-acre site is situated at 2490 Caratoke Highway in Maple, Currituck County, North
Carolina (see Figure 1). The property is adjacent to residential properties and forested areas to
the east, west, and south, while the northern boundary faces Caratoke Highway. The project is
within the Pasquotank Watershed, specifically falling under the Hydrological Unit Code
03010205.
3.2 Site Conditions
The site predominantly features mixed hardwood forest and a cleared area from the previous
homesite and ongoing development activities. Surface waters on the site naturally drain
southward, flowing into adjacent wetlands. Identified by Parcel Identification Number
004100000770000, the property is zoned as Single Family Residential (SFM) and Agricultural
(AG).
A wetland delineation, conducted in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987
Delineation Manual, aimed to pinpoint the presence and location of jurisdictional wetlands
within the property boundary. The delineation was verified on August 10, 2023 by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, and details can be found in Appendix A: Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Information. The site boasts generally flat topography, with the highest
elevations reaching approximately 4 feet above mean sea level on the north side, closer to
Caratoke Highway. The elevation gradually decreases to 2-3 feet above mean sea level on the
south side of the property.
4 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
The purpose of the project is to re -develop the property with a three -bedroom single family
residence and provide much needed housing for the area. The re -development of the property
consisted of demolishing the existing house and garage as well as removing the septic system
associated with the original home.
As the area continues to grow it is necessary to accommodate the growth and respond to the
changes while maintaining aspects of the community that the residents value and meets the
Counties development standards. Development of new properties as well as the re-
development of existing properties will ensure that the economical health and growth of
Currituck County is adequate enough to serve the existing population and future residents.
5.0 JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS
The re -development of the property has led to unavoidable impacts on 0.125 acres (5,450
square feet) of Palustrine Freshwater Forested wetlands. These permanent wetland impacts are
specifically associated with the construction of the house and the existing drain field area,
which are essential components of the re -development project. For a visual representation of
the location of these jurisdictional impacts, please refer to Figure 2: Site Plan. This map
provides a clear overview of the areas affected by the wetland impacts as a result of the
property's re -development.
6.0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
6.1 Introduction
The re -development of the subject property closely mirrors the characteristics of the previous
existing home that was demolished due to its uninhabitable condition. The reconstruction of
the new home necessitated an updated septic system, as mandated by Albemarle Regional
Health Services (refer to Appendix E) and Currituck County. Given these requirements and
current septic system standards, the size of the new septic system experienced a significant
increase compared to its predecessor.
Considering the location and site design, a thorough evaluation of multiple alternatives was
conducted, including: (a) The no -action alternative, (b) Off -site alternatives, (c) On -site
alternatives.
5 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
OJC Real Estate III, LLC November 2023
The primary goal was to determine the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative.
After careful consideration of these alternatives, the preferred option was selected for its
capacity to provide the most economical solution to address the existing development that has
taken place on the property. The criteria guiding the identification of the preferred alternative
included:
• Availability of off -site locations to move the existing home
• Relocation of existing home and septic system on site
• Economic feasibility of relocating of existing house and septic system
• Redesign of the septic system to alternate location onsite
These criteria were essential in selecting the preferred alternative, which not only addresses
the project's needs but also environmental impacts.
6.2 No -Action Alternative
The No -Action Alternative would leave the existing house in its current location and will impact
0.125 acres of Jurisdictional Wetlands. Due to the needs of the project in conjunction with the
jurisdictional wetlands on site, impacts to Waters of U.S. are unavoidable and therefore,
development could not occur without the Nationwide Permits. The project has been examined
to continue with development of the property in a manner that avoids and minimizes impacts
to the aquatic resource to the maximum extent possible, while meeting the requirements
necessary to continue with the existing project.
Onsite alternative layouts were analyzed to determine the least environmentally damaging
practicable alternatives while meeting the needs of the existing developed property. All onsite
alternatives were deemed not practicable as they would incur significant financial hardship on
the owner.
6.3 Offsite Alternatives
Additional parcels were assessed as potential locations for relocating the existing house as part
of the ongoing residential development. However, the number of viable alternative sites is
constrained within this area. The evaluation of these sites took into account factors such as
proximity to the existing home, property cost, expenses associated with relocating the
structure to an offsite location, wastewater suitability, and the cost of installing a new septic
system.
Due to the limited availability of parcels for sale within a reasonable distance of the subject
property, along with the increased costs associated with moving the existing house to an
alternate site and designing/installing another new septic system, the overall project has
6 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
OJC Real Estate III, LLC November 2023
become economically unfeasible. The assessment of offsite alternatives has revealed significant
challenges and elevated costs when compared to the preferred alternative.
In summary, the economic considerations, combined with the scarcity of suitable parcels and
the associated expenses, have led to the determination that pursuing an offsite alternative is
not economically viable, making the preferred alternative more practical and feasible for the
continued residential development.
6.4 Onsite Alternatives
Due to the project's requirements and the presence of jurisdictional wetlands throughout the
site, it has been determined that impacts to waters of the U.S. are inevitable. Consequently,
development cannot proceed without obtaining Nationwide Permits, irrespective of any
attempts to redesign the project to avoid and/or minimize wetland impacts.
Various onsite alternative design layouts were thoroughly examined to identify the least
environmentally damaging practicable alternative, while still adhering to the requirements of
Currituck County and Albemarle Regional Health Services. The alternative design options
considered were:
(a) Relocating the existing septic system to the north side of the property and moving the house
south into the wetlands.
(b) Retaining the house in its current location and redesigning the septic system using an
engineered EZ Treat wastewater system (Type II treatment) on the north side of the existing
house. This option also involved creating a stormwater retention area in the wetlands on the
south side of the existing house.
Following a comprehensive evaluation of these design options, all onsite alternatives were
deemed impracticable. Option (a) would align with the purpose and need of the project but
would result in comparable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, and the associated costs of
relocating the house and septic system were deemed economically unfeasible for the owner.
Option (b) would also lead to comparable jurisdictional wetland impacts, and the placement of
the EZ Treat wastewater system on the north side of the property would require further
southward relocation of the existing house, presenting additional challenges.
In summary, despite efforts to explore onsite alternatives, none were found to be practicable,
and the impacts on jurisdictional wetlands remained a significant challenge, necessitating the
need of permits for the proposed development.
6.5 Preferred Alternative
The preferred No -Action alternative for the project involves maintaining the current
configuration of the existing house, septic system, driveway, and stormwater retention areas,
7 1 1 a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
OJC Real Estate III, LLC November 2023
as originally permitted by Currituck County and Albemarle Regional Health Services. The house
and septic system have already been constructed, and measures have been implemented to
minimize wetland impacts.
While alternative options, as mentioned earlier, provide different approaches, they invariably
lead to impacts on Jurisdictional Wetlands, or the associated costs are economically unfeasible
for the property owner. The current configuration, permitted and approved, is considered the
preferred No -Action alternative due to its existing compliance with regulations, minimized
impact on wetlands compared to other options, and the practical considerations of the
property owner.
6.6 Conclusion
The property owner obtained a building permit from Currituck County Permits and Inspections
Department (Appendix F), and a wastewater permit was issued by Albemarle Regional Health
Services (Appendix E) at the initiation of the construction and permitting process. Six months
into the construction of the house, Currituck County requested a Jurisdictional Determination
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers which resulted in the determination of wetlands on the
property.
Following thorough consideration, it has been determined that maintaining the existing house
and infrastructure in their current location is the most practicable solution. This approach not
only addresses the needs of the owner's existing situation but also provides a plan that
minimizes impacts to a valuable environmental resource. This determination is supported by
the previously granted building and wastewater permits, and it aligns with the goal of finding a
balanced solution that respects regulatory requirements while addressing the practical
considerations of the property owner.
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Impacts to the Jurisdictional Wetlands have been effectively avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable through the modification of the drain field design. This involved
the installation of a retaining wall around the perimeter of the existing fill area and a limitation
on additional fill through a 3:1 slope, demonstrating a commitment to minimizing
environmental disturbance. The applicant has successfully navigated the project's purpose and
need, resulting in the proposed design that incurs the fewest impacts to Waters of the U.S.,
while still fulfilling the requirements of the existing property development.
Furthermore, the proposed project has taken measures to mitigate the potential for secondary
impacts by obtaining a project -specific land disturbance permit. This permit was prepared in
accordance with Currituck County regulations and covers all land -disturbing activities
associated with the project, including those in the drain field area, house area, and access
8 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
OJC Real Estate III, LLC November 2023
driveway. This approach ensures that the project is conducted in compliance with regulatory
standards and emphasizes the commitment to responsible land use.
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation for the unavoidable impacts on wetlands, resulting from the re-
development of the property, will be accomplished through the acquisition of off -site
mitigation credits from the Hidden Lake Mitigation Bank. This mitigation bank is approved for
use in the Pasquotank Watershed, identified by the Hydrological Unit Code 03010205. Wetland
mitigation credits will be procured at a ratio of 2:1, equivalent to 0.25 credits for non -riparian
wetland impacts.
To confirm the availability of compensatory mitigation, a letter of credit availability is provided
and can be found in Appendix B. This letter confirms the financial commitment required for
obtaining the mitigation credits, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.
9.0 SUPPORTING INFORMATION
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC Resource List (refer to Appendix C) was consulted to
assess the likelihood of the presence of threatened and endangered species on the project site
and within a 2-mile radius of the project area. According to the results from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service IPaC, there is a potential for the federally and state -threatened Northern Long -
Eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) to occur on the site.
However, given that the project is 90% complete, and site work has been finalized, it is
anticipated that there will not be any species present on the site at this stage of the project.
The completion of site work minimizes the likelihood of impacting or encountering species of
concern during the remaining stages of the project.
9.2 Cultural Resources
The North Carolina State Historic and Preservation Office has completed an Environmental
Review (Appendix D) of the property and they found there to be no historical resources which
would be affected by the project.
9 1 P a g e

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
101Page

OJC Real Estate III, LLC
r
'P
Bau Back c
� ,ems _
• ..
�� y'r + 1✓
- - -. Back Rio
1 ..: _. _ - ^•,
CITY OF VIRGI NIA BEACH
1
15
r�r
�
1 '
i
ruin Bau
1
0
9 Curntunk
.. ...
..
SaDn
Site
-
', •�
rli+f5... ;x r#1WY CURB I'l1L '.
ti
• - _
CU RRI_TDCK CC70 NTY
I 59
.
ClIMN C ity
Sy ORY. CUT.gp: L'a L•;iark &?�
15E
....� �..
.._. _ .. _ :.. .�
1
. ... .... ... ... ... ... ... .... ._ ... j
._ ... .. ._ ... ... .._ ... ... ... ... ...
�
.3a.
a:.
�.
........
..... �., gip:
_ ...... ._ _
.M:
4,
y
E� 345
Po a
�.
._ 4 .. /.
1111012023, 10:12:53 AM
1:144,448
0 1.26 2.6 5 mi
0 2 4 8km
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset,
3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information
SZm, National Hydrogmphy DAaset, National Land
Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National
Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems U.S.
NC Department of Envimnmental Quality
2017
Figure 1. Vicinity Map

CARATOAE HIGHWAY
I
1
�ej Z404 "111M LM
SEPTIC TANK & PUKP T"M
-EXISTING DRAINF=
W= 24" OF FILL
AND RETAINING MALL
fW 3b
N N
< * LEGEND:
a
i N - WETLAND IMPACTS 0.125 ACRES
- - - - - - - 404 WETLAND LINE
404 WETLANDS
SITE PLAN
OJC REAL ESATE III,
2490 CARATOKE HIGHWAY
MAPLE — CURRITUCK COUNTY — NORTH
30' 0' 60' 120' 180'
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=60'
LLC
CAROLINA
ATLANTIC ENV/RONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC
P.O. BOX 3266, K/TTY HsJff'K, N.C. 27949
[phone], a moil dougdoec®gmoil com
FILE: OJC 2023 DATE: 11/10/23 REVISED:

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
APPENDIX A
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
111 Page

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2490 Caratoke H
City, State: Moyock, NC 27959
County: Currituck County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0041000000770000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Doug Dorman -Atlantic Environmental
Mailing Address: PO BOX 3266
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Telephone Number: 252-599-2603
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: OJC Real Estate III, LLC- Scott Feehle
Mailing Address: PO BOX 62
Maple, NC 27956
Telephone Number: 252-207-6956
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Doug Dorman
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
06/26/2023
Date
Signat re
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
' For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 0.69 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
36.454251
Longitude:-76.048563
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
F4 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

WETLAND DELINEATION SURVEY JOHN 3:16
FOR
OJC REAL ESTATE III, LLC
CRAWFORD TOWNSHIP
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BEING THE EASTERN HALF OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 1653, PAGE 370
OCTOBER 24, 2D23
GRAPHIC SCALE
00 o so 100 200 RpYNERS
N
NC 168
( 1N FEET) SITE
1 inch = 100 1L M N.
EAST CURRITRUCK
GARATOKE HIGHWAY - NC 168 (REFERENCE PROJECT 6C0DOT 49005T PLANS)
2 RIDGE D
RD
it
N68' 14' 00"E TlE LINO VICINITY MAP
t50.0101'43 18J NGS "BAILEY"
901 97 N:997,485.19'L E:2,868.923.41'
NAD83(2011)
f I�
I
NOW OR FORMERLY
SUSIE MAE HILL
D.B. 1028, PG. 555
WESTERN HALF OF
D.B. 83, PG. 605
NOW OR FORMERLY
BRUMSEY & WHITEHURSTI
D.B. 317, PG. 297
D.B. 274, PG. 771
D.B. 274, PG. 774 (MAP)I
(TIE LINE)
IS88' 14' 00"W
f 50.010'
0.69
ACRES
(TOTAL)
UPLANDS
(0.26 AC)
[OTENTIAL
WETLAND a
u
LINE � z
O 0 J
a
a
zz
w
.Ill. 3
z<
OTENTIAL
PETLANDS U)
r-
0.43 AC) zz
NOW OR FORMERLY
LUCULLUS BRUMSEY HEIRS
D.B. 72. PC, 512
LEGEND
hi.
POTENTIAL WETLANDS
NGS MONUMENT "BAILEY"
c�
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
EXISTING DISTURBED AXLE
O
EXISTING IRON REBAR
�i
SET IRON REBAR
PROPERTY LINE
—
PROPERTY EXTENSION
- -
RIGHT OF WAY
— — — — —
— PROPERTY TIE LINE
- - - - - - - - - -
- - OVERHEAD UTILITIES
-•-•-•-•- -- , ,
- POTENTIAL WETLAND LINE
(TIE LINE)
N88' 14' 00"E
aI1. (NTS) 626.10'� � 1
(TEE LINE)
S15' 56' 33"E
588' 14' 00"W 4.71' (NTS)
NOTES: 50.00,
1.) ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
NOW OR FORMERLY
2.) AREA BY COORDINATE METHOD_
BRUMSEY & WHITEHURST
3J THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE (AE 4) AS SHOWN ON MAP PANEL y3720896800K,
D.B. 317. PG. 297
DATED DECEMBER 21, 2018.
D.B. 274, PG. 771
4,) THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IN DEED BOOK 1653, PAGE 870 IS IN ERROR. THE GRANTOR OF THIS DEED
PG. 774
ONLY HAD TITLE TO CONVEY THE EASTERN HALF OF THIS PROPERTY. REFERENCE DEED BOOK 1065,
D.B. 274, (MAP)
PAGE 29, DEED BOOK 1065, PAGE 32, & DEED BOOK 1065, PAGE 35. THE WESTERN HALF OF THE
PROPERTY IS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY SUSIE MAE HILL DEED BOOK 1028, PAGE 555,
5.) FIELD WORK DONE NOVEMBER 30, 2022.
WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM THE DEED
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN D.B. 1653, PG. 870: THAT
THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS
DRAWN; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS
CALCULATED IS 1:10.000+. THAT THIS PLAT WAS
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30(M) AS
AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 3GTH
DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022.
I, NICHOLAS M. RACKLEY PLS-5062, CERTIFY,
C. THAT THE SURVEY IS OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR
PARCELS OF LAND OR ONE OR MORE EXISTING
EASEMENTS AND DOES NOT CREATE A NEW STREET OR
CHANGE AN EXISTING STREET.
,`1lliuunN�
CARo<;2,, !RLACKLEY
�� = EYING LAND SURV
�.
905 Halstead Blvd Unit 16Eiizabeth City, NC
27909 C-4476 (By appointment only)
M.I
252-679-7670
tilt
[e-mail]

�
J
J
(D
4-0
C/)
W
(D
ry
C)
�
�
0
�
�
0
�
44
�
�
�
0
ca
z
0
`
m$
}\E
\\
)/
\\\G
SO
<)
-
e
]®co
_]!2a
CL CO
)/\\(
�wc�w \
co
2/22 7
« E 1.0
rU)
0 El El
7
g
2 \
g =
\ �
9
\ k
/ \ \
L E 0-
co \ \
/ / /
E E E
El El El
k
\ k
� \
E E
% %
■ co co
f E E
\
( 3 3
cli \
( 7 F -1 El
�

Z
a
�o
OOx'£Ob
M „LS.T o9L
8
n
8
M „64,£ o9L
00�£Ob
z
a
�o
00Z9£Ob 00MOb 009b£Ob OOCKOb OOOKOb
00Z9£Ob 00MOb 009vwO 00£b£Ob
8
n
T
N
U
'o
U
� o
�
= m
'o �
(n Q
cr
W
N O
U
z
m
00
o
m
Z
d
A
L
W
'
W
X
Q
O
O
W
�
�
V
N
Q
.i°
V) >
N
c�
a
N O
N +�
>
p
p
L
L
7 N
ziiijc
C
ZU
8
M„64,£
o9L
�
OOOb£Ob
z
a
ry
�o
Ali `I

Z
O
CQ
G
O
LL
Z
Ca
G
0
Z
/W
V
W
J
a
O N
N
T
m
�
(6
Q
U
O U O
O
N
ON
y 0 .�
a)E
-O
N
m
E
.N E
N y w
�—
N
— 0)
p_ CL
> m
c
O_
m
00
— U N
O
O
N
N a
(n
O
(6 (`m
Q y
u
U
m
O
.j C
N
N
N O
O Q N
Z
t N
tll
E N -6
3
Q
U)N
-p m
Q
O
3
'O
!EO >
O
E
O N
ctll
Z
0O
(U
LQ
2iC
mtll_
m>N
Q
LU
tlNl
C Nm
D
QN
0—a)y
Q
T
(U
a)
O
0
p _
m�
N7
UU
O
_ +
E
a)
U
-
NOcn
a)
1'm
w
o
E
'
N
O O (
'O
N
NmMn
E 0 O N
N '6
Li
m
(n
Q
tll
t C
N
(6
ZEE
Q O
acL
aO))
o
o
-0°O
"07-
N N
6
m
m
O
_
mjU
i
tl-O
Q
O'O mT
U
m m
o
U .Q
mO
s c E
—O 00
N
°?
O
C
m(6
p
0 0 N N m
O>
Q
CL 0
m N
Q m
O
Ul
7
tll tll
O
0 U -0
tll U N D
Q N
U) a)E
m
O
y 0
�,
0 .Q N C
N
N N
p N p
m 0 n �_
= L
0 7
= O
O N
N
m
m E m 55
H
a E
U U
p
Q Q m
L w
H o
U U
U
ch
s O E
H U .— 0
y
� y
4 O R Q
L
Q Li O L
>. 0
d Q O J R a) O O O L
Q U) O Q R R 0 m d
O U) O N N N y O R
O N L y a U
U) in > O cn in g J v Q
� R C
R � �
a/
LL }{ O O
* R 4 R5 R
F m
y
C O
O y Q
o .� U)
cL
N
o w w w y R Q a
Q Q 3 R O > 0 0 Q
> > > o w 3 y o > w o o W _ o
O Q Q Q R a Q a T O o O m m >. a) Q
o R R R y 3 a = `o E O a) o o U)
a R — 3 O T w > > a R w o coi Y o a
y o 0 0 O o R O > R y o o m R o a o
Q cn cn cn p m m U U (7 (7 J J a U) U) U) in U) U)
w a
R
cun
Q y
m
Z

Soil Map—Currituck County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes
5.5
0.9%
At
Augusta fine sandy loam
25.0
4.0%
Ca
Cape Fear loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, rarely flooded
64.7
10.3%
Cb
Conaby muck
8.5
1.4%
Po
Ponzer muck, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, rarely flooded
25.7
4.1 %
Ro
Roanoke fine sandy loam
468.7
74.9%
To
Tomotley fine sandy loam
27.4
4.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
626.6
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/26/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 2490 Caratoke Hwy City/County: Moyock/Currituck County Sampling Date: 06/20/23
Applicant/Owner: OJC Real Estate III, LLC - Scott Feehley State: NC Sampling Point: Uplands
Investigator(s): Doug Dorman, Atantic Environmental Consultants Section, Township, Range: Moyock
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flood Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153B Lat: 36.454251 Long:-76.048563 Datum: USGS
Soil Map Unit Name: Roanoke fine sandy loam NWI classification: PFO1Cd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Wetland criteria not met as per the 1987 US Army Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Gulf Coast Plain Regional Supplement.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network, the site conditions were
drier than normal at the time of the field work.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 20
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 16
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Google Earth & Currituck County GIS Site.
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Uplands
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4. Quercus falcata
10
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
90
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
OBL species x 1 =
1. Pinus taeda
20
Yes
FACW species x 2 =
2. Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
3. Persea borbonia
10
Yes
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
4.
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
40
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Morella cerifera
30
Yes
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
2.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Arundinaria gigantea
30
Yes
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Osmunda spectabilis
20
Yes
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
)
1. Smilax bona-nox
10
Yes
2. Toxicodendron radicans
10
Yes
FAC
3. Berchemia scandens
10
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
30
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
No vegetation on property. Existing house removed
and site prepared
for new development.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Uplands
mDsoiuie uominam inaicaior
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
FACU species x 4 =
2.
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
=Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: )
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Uplands
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/3 100 Loamy/Clayey Soils disturbed from development
8-16 10YR 6/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 RM PL Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric soils present. Soils Mapping information from USDA-NRCS Soils Website.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 2490 Caratoke Hwy City/County: Moyock/Currituck County Sampling Date: 06/20/23
Applicant/Owner: OJC Real Estate III, LLC - Scott Feehley State: NC Sampling Point: Wetlands
Investigator(s): Doug Dorman, Atantic Environmental Consultants Section, Township, Range: Moyock
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flood Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153B Lat: 36.452950 Long:-76.048704 Datum: USGS
Soil Map Unit Name: Roanoke fine sandy loam NWI classification: PFO1Cd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland criteria met as per the 1987 US Army Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Gulf Coast Plain Regional Supplement.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network, the site conditions were
drier than normal at the time of the field work.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (B1)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 14
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Google Earth & Currituck County GIS Site.
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetlands
MDsoiute
uominam
inuicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 81.8% (A/B)
80
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
OBL species x 1 =
1. Persea borbonia
20
Yes
FACW species x 2 =
2. Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
3. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
4.
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
45
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Morella cerifera
30
Yes
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
2.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Arundinaria gigantea
40
Yes
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Osmunda spectabilis
20
Yes
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Woodwardia areolata
10
No
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
70
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
)
1. Smilax bona-nox
10
Yes
2. Berchemia scandens
10
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
No vegetation on property. Existing house removed
and site prepared
for new development.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetlands
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
FACU species x 4 =
2.
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: )
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wetlands
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 RM PL Loamy/Clayey
8-14 10YR 6/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric soils present. Soils Mapping information from USDA-NRCS Soils Website.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
APPENDIX 6
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
12 1 Page

SATISKY & SILVERSTEIN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 201
415 HILLSBOROUGH STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
DAVID C. GADD
[e-mail]
November 10, 2023
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
PO Box 62
Maple, NC 27956
C/O Doug Dorman
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Re: Offer of 0.25 mitigation credits from the Hidden Lake Wetland Mitigation Bank;
Project — 2490 Caratoke Hwy, Moyock NC 27958
Dear Mr. Dorman:
I am the attorney for Hidden Lake, LLC. Hidden Lake LLC manages the Hidden Lake
Wetland Mitigation Bank in Tyrrell County, North Carolina (the "Bank"), which is designed and
constructed to mitigate for non -riparian wetland impacts occurring in the Hydraulic Unit Code
03010205 Service Area in northeastern North Carolina. The US Army Corps of Engineers has
issued approval for release of non -riparian wetland credits from the Bank which can be used to
satisfy permit requirements of mitigation in the Hydraulic Unit Code 03010205 Service Area.
Hidden Lake LLC hereby offers to sell mitigation credits from the Bank for a fixed price
of thirty-six thousand five hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($36,500.00) per credit. Upon
acceptance of this offer, I will coordinate with the US Army Corps of Engineers to present a
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form, which provides further instruction on
the transfer of credits pursuant to the permit.
This offer is valid and binding for sixty days from the date stated above. Please let me
know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 984-269-4879 or at the address on the
letterhead above.
Yours truly,
David C. Gadd

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
APPENDIX C
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
131Page

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0015109
Project Name: OJC Real Estate III, LLC
November 10, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

11/10/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws. gov/sites/defaultlfiles/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.

11/10/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
• Marine Mammals
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

11/10/2023
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0015109
Project Name: OJC Real Estate III, LLC
Project Type: New Constr - Above Ground
Project Description: 0.69 acre residential property
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.v-oop-le.com/maDs/036.44779645.-76.05549883809485.14z
Counties: Currituck County, North Carolina

11/10/2023 5
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 13 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Aci, and may have additional
consultation requirements.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
STATUS
Endangered
Proposed
Endangered
Threatened

11/10/2023
H.
BIRDS
NAME
STATUS
Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis
Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus
Threatened
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Rufa Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa
Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
REPTILES
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
Threatened
Population: North Atlantic DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta
Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743

11/10/2023
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acti and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

11/10/2023 8
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (0)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle lbs d■■ Jill 11ji
■11I Jill
Jill - - - - J1 Jill
III Jill
Non-BCC ++ ++++ +
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mi rator.
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/suDDlemental-information-mis7ratorv-birds-and-bald-and-p-olden-eas7les-mav-occur-
project-action

11/10/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acti and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9427
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406
King Rail Rallus elegans Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Sep 5
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8936

11/10/2023 10
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9513
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9439
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9478
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9431
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
0 probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data

11/10/2023
11
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel +—.— ---+ ++—+ --- -- . . . . - . . — - — — — -- I- - - - - ----
BCC - BCR
Non-BCCBald Eagle
Vulnerable
Jill Jill Jill 111 1 -4-111 Jill Jill ---- Jill Jill Jill Jill
NCCatBCRed +-++++++ Jill Jill Jill Jill III- --- ---- --I-
BCC angew de +—++ ++++ III Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill ---- (CON)
King King Rail BCC Rangewide +-++ +++ + +--- ---'
(CON)
Prairie warbler ++
BCC Rangewide — — — -
- - - -
- - - -
+- + +--- ---+
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler +—++ ++++ +--- --'+ +'—+ + Jill- - - - - - - - - - - -
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird +-++,+++ +--- ---+ ++-+ +--- - - - - - - - - - - - - ----
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush III
i" lik
""' - - - -
- - - -
BCC Rangewide +—++
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mi rator.
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/suDDlemental-information-mip-ratorv-birds-and-bald-and-p-olden-eap-les-mav-occur-
project-action
MARINE MAMMALS
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also
protected under the Endangered Species Act! and the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.

11/10/2023
12
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are
shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears,
manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries3 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins,
and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on
this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the
NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take of marine mammals and further
coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Field Office shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973.
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not
threaten their survival in the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
NAME
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469

11/10/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Private Entity
Name: Doug Dorman
Address: PO Box 3266
City:
Kitty Hawk
State:
NC
Zip:
27949
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
2525992603

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
APPENDIX D
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
141Page

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
November 2, 2023
Doug Dorman
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
PO Box 3266
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
dou dg aeckgmail.com
Re: Construct single family home, 2490 Caratoke Highway, Moyock, Currituck County, ER 23-2221
Dear Mr. Dorman:
Thank you for your letter of October 2, 2023, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewgdncr.nc.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
APPENDIX E
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
151Page

Permit: 385146
PIN: 004100000770000
Owner:
Orville James -Contracting/ Scott Feehley
PO Box 62
Maple, NC 27956
Loci
2490 Caratoke Hwy NC 168
At a[ MAR" Rrclpvnt litnrrrl StaviccS
M Public Heaftli
Applicant:
Orvill—Ja es Contracting/ Scott Feehley
PO Box 62
Maple,"NC 27956
23 0 1>L
Z�L)
Sheets Z,�, 7;
�tC
k;"Vjc-n -t be+ n�
S1D'
i'1wv'
4Uthorized Agent: 14�
Carver, Kevin
www,arhs-nc.org
Currituck
REPAIR
LTAR: 0.300
Water: PUBLIC
TYPE III G.
SINGLE FAMILY
GPd: 360

THE AUTHORIZATION FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION (CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION) SHALL
BE VALID FOR A PERIOD OF 60 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUANCE.
The issuance of the Improvement Permit or Construction Authorization in no way guarantees the issuance of other local, state or federal
permits.
Wastewater systems and water supplies shall meet state and/or local regulations.
NO CHANGES IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE ALLOWED UNLESS PRIOR APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE HEALTH
DEPARTMENT. IF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THE APPLICATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT PERMIT OR
CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION IS FOUND TO BE INCORRECT, CHANGED, OR IF THE SITE IS ALTERED, THE
IMPROVEMENT PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION SHALL BECOME INVALID AND MAY BE SUSPENDED OR
REVOKED.
When contacting the Environmental Health office concerning this document, be sure to know the application number. The number must be
used in all inquiries and inspection requests.
The Environmental Health Staff can be located at the following telephone numbers between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. The office telephone numbers are:
Camden ........................[phone]
Chowan ........................[phone]
Currituck .......................[phone]
'Pasquotank ....................[phone]
Perquimans ....................[phone]
Bertie...........................[phone]
Gates...........................[phone]
Wastewater system installers are responsible for notifying the Environmental Health offices for final inspections. Wastewater systems must
be inspected and approved by a representative of the' Environmental Health staff before any portion of the installation is covered and/or used.
ISSUANCE OF AN OPERATIONS PERMIT SHALL INDICATE THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO
THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE REGULATIONS, BUT SHALL IN NO WAY BE TAKEN AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE
SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION SATISFACTORILY FOR ANY GIVEN PERIOD OF TIME.
Wastewater systems shall be operated and maintained in such a manner as to not create a public health hazard. Septic tanks should be
pumped out every 3 to 5 years by a permitted pumper. Please conserve water!
Minimum Distances*
Ground Absorption Wastewater Systems to:
Private Wells to:
1.
Private water supply sources
100,
1. Wastewater systems 100,
2.
Public water supply sources
fool
2. Building foundations 25'
3.
Coastal waters (mean high water mark)
50'
3. Surface waters 50,
4.
Streams, canals, marshes, or
4. Property lines to,
other surface waters
so,
5.
Lakes and ponds
50,
*Variances can be given on some distances;
6.
Groundwater lowering ditches and
please call the Environmental Health office
devices
25'
if you feel a variance is necessary.
7.
Embankments or cuts
15,
S.
Swimming pools
15'
9.
Property Lines
to,
10.
Water lines
10,
11.
Building foundations
5'
Septic tanks, nitrification fields, and repair areas shall not be located under paved areas or areas subject to vehicular traffic.

cmvWw s.ee w+.. yd �ps'^� W.
_— _�.LYdd3tl YIILSIS JIld35 � ' ,
are u.�-ncnu ' cn •.e ed .0 Feu zaK i
7N'+�1�vw.L> lckgi—1PmN6v] `�
gd I=asgsaeunj M 'tea eve OW
34
3
51
fit 1
af:.b4��?. "i',h'�{�!;(•±�� � b�� �� ���� �84p6'�S �y6k B g � � � � y�ES+l
Elt
r. L:eM Ao i ep QpF� g � $FPg�
;. gggg f
p
LU
z F
❑ [ P
1
z
e`a tt
hill
]its9[�aB 3t "hill
a
i
..-wms�
1 3
a�--- _.—_--=—
I-----------
u

Rwwm — ,� sayy,
.■u fY..tY 1Yr � �/ tiIV�11 H315u�4d35
m■sL y _
'°"'°�a x„■�nx �� �r�'vsaQsg saulvj •M .� �N'A&��ul�o;7'dMwn�o nn ,aus � s
�1 Pb1+a20 (� Y0 � V 066�
m
n
a r-
TI
LAN
Vj
wx qx
I 12,
SN
•
8 �
F-
a
CO c
'rErzi�� --- -__-_---------
XOQ-
-- a Q JAd 0Y4�S .t. 'Jqd 0Y4�S.ear
'01
sg�P� r---_--- --------____
Mm.ueQA.� t� e
ja
V
pW 8 g
{R��pss ifs rlip�
u"
o i v $�
� a
a a g

Nationwide 18 & 58 Permit Requests
OJC Real Estate III, LLC
APPENDIX F
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
November 2023
16 1 Page

►-
a
N
M
z
O
Q
U
J
U
O
V
�
M
(V
N
W
N
w
U
i
U
Q
Q
J
Q
z
ww
o:f
V)
u
}
2
w
se O
se
U o
rn
N
J
w
N
O
O
CD
O
CD
CD
CD
00
v
CD
O
O:f
m
N
N
=
o
�
i
C
O
=
c
`w
O
E
G7
a
V
Q
IA
in
V
a
+,
V
o
a`
C
O
c
�
Z
3
O
C
L.
a
u
a
Q
LU
>
'y
Q Q
N
I I
ate+
�
�
�
�
�
•�
Gl
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O O
7
O
O
O
O
O O
0
O
O
O
O
O O
�
to
to
to
to
to to
v
C
[O
N O O O O O O
N O O D O O O
LL V O to O Ln O
N Ql b4 I� b4
u 0 b4 to A
b4
H
N
Q
E
7
z
00
Q
V N
In
N O
rn
M
M
LL
in
N
M
N
in o2
N �
lD
z_
D
w
7)
i
D D
Ln
Ln
w
Ln Ln
Ln
L
LL
n
K
L In
I
pLn
LL
> W
> Q
C
C
L
O
w
o
LL z
0
LL
in
2
oC
lJ
W LL
a
a
a
a
a a
O
O
ci
u
I u
I u
M
N
O
N
O

a
N
M
M
N
O
N
O
a)
N
7
N
7
N
7
a1
a1
N
7
7
a
_
a
_
a
7
v
7
a
a
y
r_
a
Ln
V)
Ln
r
c"
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
N
'�
'�
•�
•�
'�
�
7
O
O
b4
O
O
b4
O
O
b4
O
O
14
O
O
b4
O
O
b4
O
O
b4
O
O
b4
O
O
b4
0
0
Q
Q
Q
a-+
V
U
N
C
ru
O
O
O
O
O
In
m
O
b4
O
b4
O
b4
O
b4
O
b4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LLI
O
tH
O
tH
O
tH
O
V}
O
b4
O
b4
O
b4
O
b4
O
b4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V1
sv
V1
e,a
V1
sv
�
O
w
O
D
ck�
0-
a)
�
w
Q
a
m
a)
N
O
_
a)
L
U
in
N
\
m
\
m
N
o
m
m
o
N
rn
I�
2
2
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
O J
O J
O J
O J
O J
O J
O J
O J
O J
V J
V J
V J
V J
V J
V J
V J
V J
V J
J V
J V
J V
J V
J V
J V
J V
J V
J V
W V
W V
W V
W V
W V
W V
W V
W V
W V
YO
Y
C
W Z
W Z
W Z
W Z
W Z
W Z
W Z
W Z
W Z
�
V1
�
V1
L
V1
W
LL
N
N
O
L
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
J O
Q U
N
cW
V C
cW
V C
cW
V C
cW
V c
cW
V c
cW
V c
cW
V C
cW
V C
cW
V c
0
0?
o?
oa
oa
oa
o?
o?
oa
oa
z
z
�
o
0
LL
Q
V
z
zw
w
Z
w
w
�
w
=
H
Z
Z
O z
LL w
V
Z
oC
H z
in
z
m
Q Z
c
W
N
W
C
O
z
Z
O
W O
J O
w
o
Q
O
W
0
(D
J w
z O
J
N
J W
z
a
W W
z
v
CI
iwn
z
O=
z
iwn
z
a
iwn
z
VI
LL
LL
U:
LL V
LL
LL
V
S
C
•'
t6
t6
to
to
to
c6
�6
w
�6
LL
�6
w
�6
LL
�6
w
�6
w
�6
w
�6
w
OIw
O
O
O
O
O

0
0
0
y%
0
0
0
w
a)
E
Y
O
E
u
Y
N lA
u U
2
C
N �
E �
T �
a �
W
Y �
J
� �
�
QJ
QJ
Y E
U
V J
T
(3) �
Ol
w V
O C
c 6
QJ
•c
Q v
�
W
v
a
� °'
o a
x
v, E
c �
w
E o
�
a c
O
u
a
O
a� LA
�
w
OLn
0) a�
� E
z
a
L
�
U
O
� Q