20231614 Ver 1_10344_170 Carters Ridge Rd_PCN_11.22.23_20231122

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: 170 Carters Ridge Road
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Attached
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Nakeeta Sharpe
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Brad Luckey, Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B lb]:
170 Carters Ridge Road, Advance, Davie County, NC 35.85666,-80.43621
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 5776494740
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Davie
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Advance
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Humpy Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
❑✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
C
Revised 20150602

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
170 Carters Ridge Rd
2b.
County:
Davie
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Advance
2d.
Subdivision name:
NA
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Nakeeta Sharpe
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
00007/0065
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
NA
3d.
Street address:
609 Carolina Avenue Northt
3e.
City, state, zip:
Statesville, NC 28677
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-775-2510
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
5776494740
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.85666 Longitude: - 80.43621
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
2.41 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Humpy Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains a gravel driveway, stream crossing, recently cleaered land and wooded land. Structures are not located
on the site. The site is located in a rural and residential area of Advance, Davie County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.00 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=212 LF.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to one single family residence and detached garage.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of one single family residence with detached garage. In order to facilitate the
proposed development and access the site, it is necessary to have a stream crossing. Inadvertently, a culvert was
installed in a stream and a second stream was filled for construction of the access road. Graders, haulers, excavators
and other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the single family residence
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: NCDWR NOV-2023-CV-0015
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey 11.13.23
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Road Fill/Keyed In
Unnamed
® PER
® Corps
4
34/30
Rip -Rap
❑INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ®P ❑ T
Road and
Sideslope Fill
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
2.5
126
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
160/30
3i. Comments: Stream Impact 1 will permanently impact 34 linear feet (136 square feet) of stream channel with access road fill
(culvert, sideslopes) and permanently impact 30 linear feet (120 square feet) of rip -rap inlet/outlet protection.
Stream Impact 2 will permanently impact 126 linear feet (315 square feet) of stream channel with access road fill.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Temporary impacts are not proposed. Mitigation is not proposed.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are not proposed.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has selected the crossing location in a relative straight portions of the streams. There are no other options to
access the property without stream crossings. The applicant selected the crossing location in an area that does not contain
wetlands. The remaining 221 linear feet of stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control devices, including silt fence and silt fence outlets will be used to prevent down -gradient
sedimentation. If water is present during rip -rap installation, then a temporary coffer dam will be installed upgradient of the
culvert crossing. During rip -rap installation, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Upon completion of the
culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dam will be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: The applicant does not propose mitigation for impacts to streams.
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
low density %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project is low density. This estimate
accounts for anticipated impervious from lot development. Vegetative swales have been constructed adjacent to the
existing driveway crossing and area of woody vegtation have been allowed to establish along remaining portions of
stream on the site.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Davie County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
® Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The applicant is a
private individual who purchased the property with the intention to construct a primary residence sometime prior to Feburary
2023. The applicants were not aware of environmental protection regulations for streams or wetlands until informed by
NCDEMLR compliance concerns and NCDWR NOV 2023-CV-0015. Prior to NCDWR NOV, the applicants contractor
installed approximately 30 linear feet of 36" corrugated plastic pipe culvert into an estimated 34 linear feet of stream channel
for a driveway crossing. Additionally, the contractor filled an estimated 126 linear feet of stream channel for construction of
the access drive. Upon discovery of potential compliance concerns, the applicant immediately engaged another contractor to
stablize uplands areas and install silt fencing and other BMPs to prevent down -gradient sediment lost to waters and engaged
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) to complete a forensic delineation of the site and to assist returning the site to compliance.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Impacts from wastewater generation are not proposed.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The IPaC report for the site identifies the following federally protected species: Tri-colored bat (PT), Schweinitz's
sunflower (E) and Michaux's Sumac (E) as protected species that could be proximate to the project area.
The project area has previously been impacted and cleared, however, adjacent areas contains a mature hardwood forest
estimated to older than 30 years in age. Mid and understory vegetation is densely vegetated. Suitable habitat for
Schweinitz's sunflower or Micaux's sumac would not be expected to have been located within the project area.
Therefore, we have made a determination of no effect for these species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify cultural resources of the site. The map does not
identify listed or eligible for listing properties on or proximate to the project area. A copy of the map is included as an
attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NHFL (Drawing 4, attached)
Digitally signed Bradley Luckey
DIN:Lu: cn=Bradley Luckey, o=Pilot
Bradley
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
Env iromental, Inc., ou,
Luckey email=[e-mail],
c=US
11.22.23
Date:2023.11.22 11:04:11-05'00'
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

.r.. .__ ' i.Y r '• .. J+r-M1-..�.I �_ t _ 1}{ gipy' •_ ',- 1. ram". 'k .,4}rk►._yl�
� J� �{ _-'VLF•
IL
i1r. FJ
9 I .
■
kt
7 �
r � _
ro
0
Drawing 1�r �
USGS Topographic Map �t
Advance and Churchland,
NC Quadrangles PILOT
Scale: 1" - 2,000' P I L 0 7 E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L. I N C
im
w
0
I
P
,�)
��1��`
LEGEND
Site Boundary z,
USGS Topographic Map
Carters Ridge Road
Approximate 2.41-Acre Tract
Advance, Davie County, NC
Pilot Project 10344

Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
of Davie County, NC
Published 1995
Scale: 1" = 300'
r�
a
*04a FcG2
aa� 1
Pc82
1
l i LEGEND
Site Boundary
.., � Y
. ."~ JrAM
. O�y
�..
P I L 0 7 E N V I R 0 N M E N 7 A L. INC
Published Soil Map
Carters Ridge Road
Approximate 2.41-Acre Tract
Advance, Davie County, NC
Pilot Project 10344

-.Iw 4k A Win
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 200'
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
s Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
� Riverine
� Other
NWI Map
Carters Ridge Road
Approximate 2.41-Acre Tract
' "" Advance, Davie County, NC
P I L O T E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L. I N C Pilot Project 10344

11
I PAN
+ ~ 371057i
4 ef'f.
41
N
';I' LEGEND
- Site Boundary
1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodvay
No Sped al Floodvay
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
lArea with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
Drawing 4 i,Y �" <� FEMA FIRM
' Carters Ridge Road
National Flood Hazard Layer
From FEMA Web Map Service - Approximate 2.41-Acre Tract
p11.07 Advance, Davie County, NC
Scale: 1" = 600' PILOT ENYIR0NMEN7AL.INL Pilot Project10344

Legend
Culvert
—••—•• Proposed Rip Rap Dissipator
Existing Stream
Existing Relocated Stream
----- Area of Permanent Impact from Culvert
--• Area of Permanent Impact From Fill
Site Boundary
�.,V
T
Drawing 5 Wetland Map Overview
Satellite Imagery from ESRI - ` Carters Ridge Road
and Pilot GPS Data -_ Approximate 2.41-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 100' PILOT Advance, Davie County, NC
Date:11.22.23 P107 ENV1R0NMENTAL.INC Pilot Project10344
U�

15 LF 60 SF
34 LF/136 SF
061
4�
<15
LF/60 SF
!$+ft#'ar
Drawing 5
DEM from NCOne Map
and Pilot GPS Data
Scale: 1" = 25'
Date: 11.22.23
_.tea
PILOT
P I L 0 T E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L. I N C
Wetland Map
Carters Ridge Road
Approximate 2.41-Acre Tract
Advance, Davie County, NC
Pilot Project 10344

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 170 Carters Ridge Rd City/County: Advance/Davie Sampling Date: 11.13.23
Applicant/Owner: Nakeeta Sharpe State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Luckey, Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): NA Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.85666 Long:-80.43621 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: PaD-Pacolet sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Quercus phellos
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Ulmus alata
10
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Celtis occidentalis
10
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FACW species 2 x 2 = 4
1.
Ligustrum sinense
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
2.
Juniperus virginiana
5
Yes
FACU
FACU species 39 x 4 = 156
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 91 (A) 310 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.41
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
10
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Juncus effusus
2
No
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Polystichum acrostichoides 2 No FACU
4.
Rosa multiflora
2
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
26
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
https://www.fws.p,ov/office/asheville-ecolop,ical-services
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0018974
Project Name: 170 Carters Ridge Rd
November 22, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. Effects of the action are all consequences to listed species or

11/22/2023
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether

11/22/2023
3
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

11/22/2023
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0018974
Project Name: 170 Carters Ridge Rd
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: SFR
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.8566705,-80.43633783995428,14z
Fr„—
x
nE
L
Counties: Davie County, North Carolina

11/22/2023 5
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

11/22/2023 6
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acti and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental

11/22/2023
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle 16-1 dill 1111 IN 1111164 161 - - - - dill 111111111111
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mi rator.
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-mi ratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-ea les-may-occur-
project-action
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acti and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

11/22/2023 8
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY
OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 25
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9513
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9439
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Sep 10
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9398
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9431
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental

11/22/2023
E
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle 16-1 dill hill lilt Al 11111111 — — — — dill IN 1111
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide ---� ----
—III IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII ----
(CON)
Prairie
BCC Rangewide —
--
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler —
— — — — — — — 141 IIII IIII IIII — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Woodpecker — — — — —
— — — — — — — —+ —III IIII IIII IIII
BCC Rangewide�—
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide----
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management

11/22/2023
10
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-mi ratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-ea les-may-occur-
project-action
WETLANDS
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
WETLAND INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS GENERATED.
PLEASE VISIT HTTPS://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML OR CONTACT THE FIELD
OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

11/22/2023
11
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Private Entity
Name: Bradley Luckey
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
City:
Kernersville
State:
NC
Zip:
27285
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
3367084997
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers

n
u
tn
S
ii
co
P
ui
0 00000

From:
nakeetasharoe (�bbellsouth.net
To:
Brad Luckev
Subject:
Fw: [External] 170 Carters Ridge Road
Date:
Tuesday, November 14, 2023 9:33:12 AM
Attachments:
imaoe001.ono
Nakeeta Sharpe, BSQP, CADC
456 Virginia Avenue
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
704-775-2510 (Cell)
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
To: Homer, Seren M <seren.home [e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 05:49:12 PM EDT
Subject: Re: [External] 170 Carters Ridge Road
It was a pleasure to meet you. I hate we had to meet under these circumstances but thank you for all your
help
I will work on securing a consultant
Thanks again
Nakeeta
Nakeeta Sharpe, BSQP, CADC
456 Virginia Avenue
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
704-775-2510 (Cell)
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 05:03:45 PM EDT, Homer, Seren M <[e-mail]>
wrote:
Hi Nakeeta,
Thank you for meeting us at your property today. As discussed, we will consider your actions taken thus
far to stabilize the site and your email notification below indicating your plan of action as your initial
response to the NOV.
As discussed, please see the attached list of a few environmental consultants that work in this area. As I
mentioned, we cannot recommend anyone in particular, and this is not a comprehensive list, but should at
least give you somewhere to start. You can also conduct a Google search to find some others if you'd
like. If you do, I'd recommend trying a few keywords in addition to "environmental consultant" and "North
Carolina", such as "wetland delineation" and "Section 404/401 permitting". There are some environmental
consultants that only deal with other environmental areas like soil/groundwater contamination, petroleum,
etc., so those keywords should help narrow your search a bit.

Thanks again, and please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or need anything else.
Best regards,
Seren Homer (she/her)
Environmental Specialist, Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone] 1 Cell: [phone]
seren. homerrcDdeq. nc. gov
**Please note new email address**
U
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 11:22 AM
To: Homer, Seren M <seren.home [e-mail]>
Subject: [External] 170 Carters Ridge Road
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious
emails with the Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.

Hello Ms. Seren
Please consider this as my initial response.
We plan to hire an Engineer Consultant to help with the application
We plan to apply for an After The Fact Permit.
I have already made contact with one possible Consultant
Nice to meet you today and thank you
Nakeeta
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties by an authorized state official.