790001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231204

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:II' rWA I Departure Time: 1 County:P ' ,) 11(i 11 Region: �"Isw
Farm Name: G 6 e �O\, On \Ckyw� Owner Email:
Owner Name: �'� `\,(���(j��( Phone: TV5-02)a- C�-j 1
Mailing Address: V1'�� �1YG1�P �41��, (�. ��IilC\1�i`'v1 ��� 1U• �
Physical Address: \k�qsL
Facility Contact: ,'aA klyx •�to Title: Y\k],\(`ln(W Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: 1v Certification Number:
T
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: \ Latitude: 3U,0,-6' a�` Longitude:1tAn yq i o3 it
5
H}\j U �etd����1t N�v�\5Y) `v �c i �(L� +�ray —? ZZU N> cif H�vy'►o�+G—7�L�l r xlrr �c�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder HN"on-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharp,es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JE�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - C)' Date of Ins ection: Z 2
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Ayes ❑ No [:] NA ❑ N E
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes )E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [21�NLo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): - ,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes J;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes JEZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [:] Yes 5R�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?Ifs bQy hPIGIA Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Wa to is y ❑Soil AI"Ina ysis ❑Wyss Weath�e''r'nCode
ARainfall ❑Steeking ❑&e�iekl 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Slud e S> lr1�
22. Did the facility fail to install endMaintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No )4NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check 0Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
KFailure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No Tj�NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes [] No DNA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? In S pr(J Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
"x "TOOL Ct� nfw',OUA- h t1 vlejaj tu �,�►�d ;+ n
t� .
f)UI- brvt ,r �nLe av�
? n0V dui Crn a\ ex\eAN� ; W_cv*m avl b
1 -ITM hceo�'�D 1W (A M emwAl - )W1XWd vvx-j bum by"
b'UMU'v, (",UAW ftv Un ���vj ��C' ��
��
am Wt vy , tic k t u.�1.\k\ v l 0,.�U'-\- od•5 r\ v\� .
t)\A0 A1(t of CLWW -_1A�1. CV1k LX* N acc l
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020