20201937 Ver 2_November2023DeadTree_PhaseB_MY2_20231128

Annual Monitoring Report MY2 (2023)
DEAD TREE PHASE B NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
DWR Project # 2020-1937 V3
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
In Agreement with:
The Dead Tree Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits Pursuant to the
Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management Strategy
November 2023
Prepared By:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Table of Contents Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Bank Parcel
DWR Project # 2020-1937 V3
Annual Monitoring Report MY2 (2023)
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Parcel Location ................................................................................................................................. 1
2.1 Parcel Background ..................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Parcel Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Restoration Activities ....................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities ......................................................................................... 3
3.2 Parcel Protection ....................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Mitigation Potential ......................................................................................................................... 5
5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria ........................................................................................... 5
5.1 Monitoring Protocol .................................................................................................................. 5
5.2 Parcel Maintenance .................................................................................................................. 5
5.3 Long Term Management Plan ................................................................................................... 6
6.0 Financial Assurance .......................................................................................................................... 6
7.0 References ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figures 2, 2A-C – Current Conditions Plan View
Table 1 - Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B: Vegetation Data
Table 5 – MY1 CVS Output Data
Vegetation Plot Photos 1 - 105
Page 1 Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
1.0 Introduction
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report (MY2 2023) for the Dead Tree Phase B Bank Parcel (Parcel) as
agreed upon in the Dead Tree Nutrient Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument (UBI) and Dead Tree Phase B
Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP), made and entered into on October 19, 2021 by Restoration
Systems, LLC, acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). This document details the riparian area restoration
activities, monitoring efforts, and the final mitigation potential of the Parcel.
Measuring 150.94 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due
to development within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. NCDWR representatives conducted an onsite
determination for parcel applicability and suitability of Site Features on December 30, 2020 and January
5, 2021. A Site Viability letter for Buffer & Nutrient Offset was provided by the Division on April 6, 2021
and May 14, 2021.
Restoration Systems (RS) was granted Conservation Easements by Eureka Etheridge Farms, LLC and Nancy
Harris Craven et al. The conservation easements were recorded at the Edgecombe County Register of
Deeds on Deed Book 1754 and Deed Pages 992-1008 and Deed Book 1754 and Deed Page 1024-1049 on
April 5, 2022. Easements were assigned to the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May 31,
2023- see Book 1780 pages 649-668, 669-699, and 720-741.
RS began preparation for restoration of the riparian buffer and planted the Parcel in February of 2022.
Riparian buffer restoration activities included ripping/bedding of the parcel with a narrow set plow, bare-
root planting, and broadcast application of a permanent seed mix. During August 2023, Axiom
Environmental surveyed one hundred and five (105) Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) monitoring plots
and collected Year 1 Monitoring data (Appendix B).
2.0 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located between Whitakers and Leggett, approximately 5.5 miles east of the town of
Whitakers in Edgecombe County, NC. The Parcel is within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin 14-digit USGS
Cataloging Units 03020102040010 and 03020102060010 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North
Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-03-04) (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Parcel Location: (36.092169°, - 77.616978°)
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
-Get on I-440 E from Capital Blvd (2.4 mi)
-Take exit 14 and continue on US-64 E (43.9 mi)
-Take exit 464 and merge onto I-95 N toward Richmond (6.4 mi)
-Take exit 145 for NC-4/NC-48 toward US-301 and turn left onto NC-4 N/NC-48 N
(1.0 mi)
-Turn right onto Watson Seed Farm Rd (3.4 mi)
-Turn right onto NC-33 E (3.0 mi)
-Turn left onto S White St/White Oak Swamp Rd (0.1 mi)
-Turn right onto W Pippen St and continue onto NC-33 E (5.4 mi)
-Turn left onto Red Hill Church Rd and destination is on the left (0.3 mi)
-Latitude, Longitude: 36.092169°, - 77.616978°
Page 2 Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel MY2
Monitoring Report – November 2023
2.1 Parcel Background
The Parcel encompasses 150.94 acres of land over one tract of forested and open historical agricultural
fields. Prior to Parcel development, land use is described as agricultural row crop production, including
cotton, corn, and peanuts. Forested areas are located along the downstream portions of Parcel features
and within the greater floodplain of Fishing Creek, outside of the Parcel’s proposed limits. The farmer
regularly applied fertilizers and herbicides to the fields. Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside
of forested areas due to historic and agricultural practices.
The Parcel encompasses portions of two contiguous tracts of land held by Eureka Etheridge Farms, LLC,
and one tract of land held by the Harris family, which is immediately adjacent to land tracts containing
the Dead Tree Phase A Bank Parcel. Site features originate on-site. Features north of Red Hill Church Road
drain immediately to Fishing Creek, while the single feature south of Red Hill Church Road drains to Maple
Swamp. There were no existing structures in the project area.
2.2 Parcel Objectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel focused on
providing ecological and water quality enhancements to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin by restoring the
riparian area to create a functional riparian corridor. Goals were accomplished as outlined in the following
table.
Goal Objective
Decrease nutrient levels
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the
agricultural fields through restored native buffer zones. The off-
site nutrient input will also be absorbed on-site by filtering
flood flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood
flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input
Sediment from off-site sources will be captured by deposition
on restored floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow
overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature and
increase dissolved oxygen
concentrations
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature
reducing thermal pollution.
Create appropriate terrestrial
habitat
Riparian areas adjacent to ditches and streams will be restored
by planting native vegetation.
Permanently protect the project
Parcel from harmful uses A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
3.0 Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration involved planting appropriate native tree species along the 200-foot-wide
riparian corridor of streams and hydrologically connected ditches at a density of 680 stems per acre on
8ft x 8ft spacing. Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few
years of tree establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable
species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the riparian
areas of the Parcel included those listed in Table C. Stems were mixed prior to planting to ensure diversity
of bare roots across the planted area. A seed mix including the species listed in Table D were applied to
provide temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss
during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting took place on March 13, 2022.
Page 3 Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Table A – Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity Phase Specific Actions
Riparian
Restoration
Within the Site' s proposed conservation easements:
-Treatment of Bermuda and fescue grass species within active pasture areas (see
Herbaceous Treatment note above).
-Site-wide discing of agricultural and pasture areas ahead of planting — discing
occurred parallel to the Site Features, promoting floodwater attenuation by
increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel floodplains.
-Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site-specific seed mix (see
Planting List – Table D)
-Establishment of a native hardwood forest via the planting of bare-root saplings
from the top of bank out a maximum of 2QB' along Parcel Features —Planting List
–Table C
Table B – Summary Protection Activities
Parcel
protection
(150.94 acres)
1.) Restoration Systems (RS) was granted Conservation Easements by Eureka
Etheridge Farms, LLC and Nancy Harris Craven, et al. The conservation easements
were recorded at the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds on Deed Book 1754
and Deed Pages 992-1008 and Deed Book 1754 and Deed Page 1024-1049 on the
30th and 29th of March respectively. Easements were assigned to the North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May 31, 2023- see Book 1780 pages 649-
668, 669-699, and 720-741.
2.) RS marked the easement at every corner with an iron, CE cap, and corner t-post.
Additionally, easement posts were placed every 200-feet along the Parcel
boundaries.
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas were restored according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (2014). The planting plan for the riparian restoration area included planting 86,500
native bare-root hardwood saplings across 123.849 acres at a Parcel density of +/- 600 stems per acre and
live stakes for stream bank stabilization where necessary. The planted species composition is intentionally
diverse and while based on these communities, also accounted for local observations and nursery
availability.
All species were selected based on their ability for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, the ability to
withstand hydraulic forces associated with flood events, suitability to specific soil types, and Parcel
conditions. Tree species were mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random plant
across the Site. Planting density is set to ensure sufficient diversity and density of planted stems outlined
in Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (2014) of 260 trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will
be greater than 50% of the established stems.
The bare root planting list is provided in Table C followed by the permanent seed mix in Table D. Year 2
(2023) vegetation data is provided in Appendix B. Year 2 data was collected in September by Axiom
Environmental and derived an average planted stem density of 421 stems per acre.
Page 4 Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Table C – Planting List
Common Name Scientific Name Tree/Shrub* Number of
Stems
Species % of
Total
River birch Betula nigra Tree 7,500 8.9%
Common hackberry Celtis occidentalis Tree 4,400 5.0%
Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis Shrub 4,400 5.0%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana Tree 7,400 8.6%
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree 4,400 5.0%
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tulipifera Tree 7,400 8.6%
Southern crabapple Malus angustifolia Tree 1,000 1.2%
Mulberry Morus rubra Tree 7,400 8.6%
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica Tree 4,400 5.0%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Tree 4,550 5.2%
Oak (White) Quercus alba Tree 7,400 8.6%
Oak (Swamp chestnut) Quercus michauxii Tree 7,400 8.6%
Oak (Water) Quercus nigra Tree 7,400 8.6%
Oak (Red) Quercus rubra Tree 2,200 2.5%
American elm Ulmus americana Tree 7,400 8.6%
Southern arrowwood Viburnum dentatum Shrub 1,850 2.1%
Total 12 Species 86,500 100%
Table D – Permanent Seed
Common Name Amount (in
pounds) Common Name Amount (in
pounds)
Common Yarrow 3.75 Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower) 6.25
Winter Bentgrass 6.25 Narrowleaf Sunflower 5.00
Blue False Indigo 1.25 Oxeye Sunflower 6.25
Plains Coreopsis 6.25 Wild Bergamot 1.25
Lanceleaf Coreopsis 6.25 Deertongue, Tioga 6.25
Cosmos 6.25 Clasping Coneflower 1.25
Rocket Larkspur 3.75 Blackeyed Susan 6.25
Showy Ticktrefoil 6.25 Purpletop 31.25
Purple Coneflower 6.25 Blue Vervain 2.50
Virginia Wildrye, 'Madison' 12.5
Total (pounds) 125.00
3.2 Parcel Protection
Restoration Systems (RS) was granted Conservation Easements by Eureka Etheridge Farms, LLC and
Nancy Harris Craven et al. The conservation easements were recorded at the Edgecombe County
Register of Deeds on Deed Book 1754 and Deed Pages 992-1008 and Deed Book 1754 and Deed Page
1024-1049 on the 30th and 29th of March respectively. Easements were assigned to the North Carolina
Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May 31, 2023- see Book 1780 pages 649-668, 669-699, and 720-741. RS
marked the easement at every corner with an iron, CE cap, corner t-post. Additionally, easement signs
were placed every 200-feet along the Parcel boundaries.
Page 5 Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
4.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the approximately 150.94 acres protected under the conservation easement, 124.12 acres are
anticipated to provide Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrient Offset Credits equivalent to 281,063.289 lbs. of
nitrogen offset credit and 18,102.649 lbs. of phosphorous offset credit as detailed in the Credit Table
found in Appendix A, Table 1. Riparian area restoration, measured from the top of bank on Parcel streams
and ditches, will include at least 50' from the tops of banks and will extend outward a maximum of 200'
from tops of banks and will generate Nutrient Offset Credits that are not transferable to Riparian Buffer
Credit per the approved UBI. Nitrogen and Phosphorous offset credits will be generated from the project
and shown on separate ledgers.
5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation at each Phase will monitor plant survival and species
diversity. Quantitative sampling will include one hundred and five (105) permanent 10 x 10-meter
vegetation plots as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al.
2008) and will occur no earlier than Fall of each year (Figures 2A-B, Appendix A). Vegetation plot
placement will adequately represent riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas. A reference
photo will be taken from the origin point of each plot (Appendix B). All planted stems in the plots will be
marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data collected will include species, height, planting type (planted
stem and/or volunteer). Total and planted stem density by plot and species will be reported during
monitoring years 0-5 (Table 5, Appendix B). Individual and average stem height data will be reported
during monitoring years 3-5. Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until
success criteria are fulfilled. Restoration Systems shall submit to NCDWR annual monitoring reports no
later than December 31st of each year. Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any
maintenance, supplemental planting, or encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria within
the buffer will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five
years of monitoring.
Year 2 (2023) monitoring occurred September 18-27, 2023, resulting in an average of 421 planted
stems/acre across the Site. Additionally, 96 out of the 105 individual plots met success criteria (Appendix
B).
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/ or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the
establishment of invasive species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
Page 6 Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing within Tar-Pamlico Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.
5.3 Long Term Management Plan
A permanent conservation easement to preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent
with its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any activity that would
materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/ Parcel was recorded at the Edgecombe County Register
of Deeds on 4/05/2022 in Book 1754, Page 992-1008, 1009-1023, and 1024-1049. RS assigned the
conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute
("GS") 121- 34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code on 5/31/2023. The assignment is recorded
in Deed Book 1780 pages 649-668, 669-699, and 720-741. The holder is the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat
Foundation, which is certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and has been approved by
DWR.
6.0 Financial Assurance
RS secured all financial assurances according to the approved UBI. No bond shall be less than $150,000 to
cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000 initially, to cover monitoring expenses. Performance
bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring period, with
confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR
reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof
of bond renewals when applicable.
7.0 References
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2019. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https:// websoilsurvey. sc. egov. usda. gov/ App/ HomePage. htm [ Accessed July 19, 2020].
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2020. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species, Wake
County, North Carolina (online). Available:
https:// www. fws. gov/ raleigh/ species/ cntylist/ wake. html (Accessed July 19, 2020).
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figures 2, 2A-C – Current Conditions Plan View
Table 1 - Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes
!(
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
1³
Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank Parcel
USGS 14-Digit Hydrologic Unit03020102-040010 and 03020102-060010
36.093625°, -77.609707°
0 30 6015Miles
Legend
NC County Boundaries
Tar Pamlico River Basin
NC River Subbasins: USGS 8-Digit HUCs
Bank Parcel Service Area - Nutrient Offset: Tar-Pamlico River, Sub-Basin USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020102
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO,USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, KadasterNL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
RJH
1:1,000,000
PARCEL LOCATIONAND SERVICEAREA
DEAD TREE PHASE B NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
Edgecombe County
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer
Permitting
Branch
August 2022
2020-1937 V3
Be
t
h
a
n
y

C
h
u
r
c
h

R
d

(
H
w
y

3
3
)
Red Hill Church Rd.
Feature 7B - Ditch
Feature 7 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 11 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 9A - Ditch
Feature 10A - Ditch
Feature 9B - Ditch
Feature 9 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 8B - Ditch
Feature 10 - Intermittent/PerennialUtility Line 30-Foot
Right-Of-Way (ROW)
Propsoed Easement is
5-Feet Byond ROW
Feature 8A - Ditch
Feature 8 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 5D - Ditch
Feature 6D - Ditch
Feature 4D - Ditch
Feature 3A - Ditch
Feature 3 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 6 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 5 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 4 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 3B - Ditch
(Not Viable)Feature 3C Ditch
(Not Viable)
Credit Figure 2A (Insert)
Credit Figure 2B (Insert)
Credit Figure 2C (Insert)
Legend
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Conservation Easement: 150.94 Acres
Dead Tree Phase A (TP 01) - Conservation Easement: 65.15 Acres
Dead Tree - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Installed CVS Plots (105 Total)
Dead Tree - Surveyed Top of Bank
TOB Offsets - Surveyed Top of Bank Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
TOB to 100 Feet
TOB to 200 Feet
Dead Tree - Phase B (TP 02) - NOC Areas
No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019, Diffuse Flow)
No Credit - Less Than 50-Feet
Restoration (TOB - 200-ft) - NOC
Preservation (TOB - 200-ft) - No Credit
800 0 800 1,600 2,400400
Feet
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
2³
Edgecombe County
KRJ
1:10,000
CCPVAND CREDIT MAP
DEAD TREE PHASE BNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Imagery: 2021 NC OneMap
November 2023
2020-1937 V3
Feature 11 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 9A - Ditch
Feature 10A - Ditch
Feature 9B - Ditch
Feature 9 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 10 - Intermittent/PerennialUtility Line 30-Foot
Right-Of-Way (ROW)
Propsoed Easement is
5-Feet Byond ROW
Feature 6D - Ditch
Easement Area #12
10.59 Ac.
Easement Area #11
4.80 Ac.
Easement Area #10
4.15 Ac.
Easement Area #9
12.98 Ac.
Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area & No Credit Given
No Credit - Less than 50-feet
No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area Planted Through Swales Above
DWR Origin Point.
9
6
7
5
4
8
2
3
1
11
21
17
2324
2025 14
48
10
22
13
19
16
18
12
26
29
15
360 0 360 720 1,080180
Feet NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
Legend
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Conservation Easement: 150.94 Acres
Dead Tree Phase A (TP 01) - Conservation Easement: 65.15 Acres
Dead Tree - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Installed CVS Plots (105 Total)
Dead Tree - Surveyed Top of Bank
TOB Offsets - Surveyed Top of Bank Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
TOB to 100 Feet
TOB to 200 Feet
Dead Tree - Phase B (TP 02) - NOC Areas
No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019, Diffuse Flow)
No Credit - Less Than 50-Feet
Restoration (TOB - 200-ft) - NOC
Preservation (TOB - 200-ft) - No Credit
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
2A³
Edgecombe County
KRJ
1:4,500
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Imagery: 2021 NC OneMap
2020-1937 V3
CCPVAND CREDIT MAP
DEAD TREE PHASE BNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
November 2023
Feature 9A - Ditch
Feature 9B - Ditch
Feature 8A - Ditch
Feature 4 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 7B - Ditch
Feature 7 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 9
Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 8B - Ditch
Feature 8
Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 5D - Ditch
Feature 6D - Ditch
Feature 4D - Ditch
Feature 6 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 5 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 4 - Intermittent/Perennial
Easement Area #10
4.15 Ac.
Easement Area #9
12.98 Ac.
Easement Area #4, 34.77 Ac.
Easement Area #6
19.11 Ac.
Easement Area #7
24.38 Ac.
Easement Area #5
10.80 Ac.
Maintenance Area,
0.17 Ac.
Easement Area #4, 34.77 Ac.
Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area to-be Planted & No Credit Given
Diffuse Flow Credit
Deduction Required;
Area to-be Planted &
No Credit Given
Diffuse Flow Credit
Deduction Required;
Area to-be Planted &
No Credit Given
Easement Area #3
18.76 Ac. 41
84
76
59
86
32
42 52
44
27
91
99
62
33
95
82
21
17
81
92
34
66 77
2324
30
70
53
60
46
73
61
20
71
80
90
25
78
56
40
49
87
63
28
79
37
50
14
31
38
68
48
55
69
29
22
72
43
13
19
36
39 51
54
74
75
94
67
83
47
16
18
88
58
35
64
89
26
57
65
15
85
45
400 0 400 800 1,200200
Feet
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
Legend
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Conservation Easement: 150.94 Acres
Dead Tree Phase A (TP 01) - Conservation Easement: 65.15 Acres
Dead Tree - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Installed CVS Plots (105 Total)
Dead Tree - Surveyed Top of Bank
TOB Offsets - Surveyed Top of Bank Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
TOB to 100 Feet
TOB to 200 Feet
Dead Tree - Phase B (TP 02) - NOC Areas
No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019, Diffuse Flow)
No Credit - Less Than 50-Feet
Restoration (TOB - 200-ft) - NOC
Preservation (TOB - 200-ft) - No Credit
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
2B³
Edgecombe County
KRJ
1:4,500
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Imagery: 2021 NC OneMap
2020-1937 V3
CCPVAND CREDIT MAP
DEAD TREE PHASE BNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
November 2023
Feature 3A - Ditch
Feature 3 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 4 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 3B - Ditch
(Not Viable)
(Feature's TOB Area Removed
From Pres. Area)
Feature 3C Ditch
(Not Viable)
(Feature's TOB Area Removed
From Pres. Area)
Feature 5D - Ditch
Feature 4D - Ditch
Feature 6 - Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 5 - Intermittent/Perennial
Easement Area #4
34.77 Ac.
Easement Area #7
24.38 Ac.
Easement Area #5
10.80 Ac.
Diffuse Flow Credit
Deduction Required;
Area to-be Planted &
No Credit Given
Feature 7B - Ditch
Feature 6 - Intermittent/Perennial
Easement Area #6
19.11 Ac.
Easement Area #8
10.60 Ac.
84
76
59
86
96
52
91
99
62
95
82
81
92
98
53
60
73
61
97
80
90
78
56
87
63 79
55
77
72
51
54
74
75
94
93
83
88
58
64
89
57
65
85
101
104
105
100
102
103
66
360 0 360 720 1,080180
Feet
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
Legend
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Conservation Easement: 150.94 Acres
Dead Tree Phase A (TP 01) - Conservation Easement: 65.15 Acres
Dead Tree - Subject Fee-Simple Parcels
Dead Tree Phase B (TP 02) - Installed CVS Plots (105 Total)
Dead Tree - Surveyed Top of Bank
TOB Offsets - Surveyed Top of Bank Offsets
TOB to 50 Feet
TOB to 100 Feet
TOB to 200 Feet
Dead Tree - Phase B (TP 02) - NOC Areas
No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019, Diffuse Flow)
No Credit - Less Than 50-Feet
Restoration (TOB - 200-ft) - NOC
Preservation (TOB - 200-ft) - No Credit
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
2C³
Edgecombe County
KRJ
1:4,500
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
Imagery: 2021 NC OneMap
2020-1937 V3
CCPVAND CREDIT MAP
DEAD TREE PHASE BNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
November 2023
Table 1. Dead Tree Bank Parcel ‐ Phase B ‐ Tar‐Pam 02, 2020‐1937v3, Project Credits
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
Credit Type Location
Subject? (enter 
NO if 
ephemeral or 
ditch 1)
Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer 
Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (ft2)
Total (Creditable) 
Area of Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit 
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit  Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1) 
 Convertible to 
Riparian 
Buffer? 
 Riparian Buffer 
Credits 
 Convertible to 
Nutrient Offset? 
 Delivered 
Nutrient 
Offset: N (lbs) 
 Delivered 
Nutrient 
Offset: P (lbs) 
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0‐100 3A,4D, 5D, 6D, 7B, 8A, 
8B, 9A, 9B, 10A 1,318,416 1 100%No —Yes 68,796.709 4,431.040
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101‐200 3A,4D, 5D, 6D, 7B, 8A, 
8B, 9A, 9B, 10A 1,328,571 1 33%No —Yes 69,326.610 4,465.170
———
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0‐100 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 1,142,791 1 100%No —Yes 59,632.362 3,840.785
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101‐200 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 1,596,502 1 33%No —Yes 83,307.608 5,365.654
———
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration
Diffused Flow 
Deduction
Features 7B, 8B, 9A
13,050 1 No —No ——
———
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes Ditch Restoration
Non‐Credit Area;
Less Than 50‐Ft
Features 3A and 9B
627 1 No —No ——
———
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration
Non‐Credit Area;
Less Than 50‐Ft
Features 7, 8, & 10
6,956 1 No — No — —
———
———
———
———
———
———
———
———
Totals (ft2):5,406,913 0 0.000 281,063.289 18,102.649
Total Buffer (ft2):00
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):5,406,913 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:00
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):0 0.0%Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):0 0.0%Preservation as % TABM
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer 
Width (ft)Feature Name  Total Area (sf) 
Total (Creditable) 
Area for Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit 
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit  Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1) 
 Riparian 
Buffer Credits 
Buffer —
Buffer —
Buffer —
—
—
—
—
Buffer —
Buffer —
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft2):00
Square Feet Credits
0 0.000
0 0.000
0 0.000
0 0.000
Square Feet Credits
Nitrogen:281,063.289
Phosphorus:18,102.649
Tar‐Pamlico 03020102
19.16394
297.54099
Restoration:
Enhancement:
Mitigation Totals
5,406,913
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Nutrient Offset:
Preservation:
Total Riparian Buffer:
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA November 10, 2022
Parcel Protection NA Recorded April 5, 2022
Planting February, 2022 March 13, 2022
As-built Data Collection March, 2022 May 5 – May 10
Construction Completion Walkthrough NA June 21, 2022
As-built Report Submittal NA September, 2022
MY1 Report Submittal NA December, 2022
MY2 Report Submittal NA December, 2023
Year 3-5 Monitoring December 2024 - 2026 On schedule
Table 3: Project Contact
Firm POC & Address
Full Delivery Provider Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer/Permitting: Restoration Systems, LLC
Raymond Holz: 919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Planting Contractor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Josh Merritt: 919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Seeding Contractor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Matthew Harrell: 919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC
27603
Vegetation Monitoring: Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC
27603
Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Project Information
Project Name Dead Tree Phase B
County Edgecombe
Project Area (acres) 150.94
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36.092169ºN, -77.616978ºW (NAD83/WGS84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Inner Coastal Plain
River Basin Tar-Pamlico
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020101 USGS Hydrologic Unit14-digit 03020102040010 and
03020102060010
DWR Sub-basin 03-03-04
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (acres) 402
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area <5%
Appendix B: Vegetation Data Dead Tree Phase B Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Appendix B: Vegetation Data
Table 5 – MY1 CVS Output Data
Vegetation Plot Photos 1-105
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 111111111111 111 555222
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 111
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 444
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 222111333222222333 111
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 111222888111555
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1222 333 222
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 333222333 111 111111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 111111 111 666
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 444111
Quercus oak Tree 111 333111333222
Quercus alba white oak Tree 111 222
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 1 1111555
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 333
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 2 2 2 111 222
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 222
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 1 1 1 111
3331515159998810111111161616888111111111111888141414121212
333444666557666444666444444333666666
121 121 121 607 607 607 364 364 364 324 324 405 445 445 445 647 647 647 324 324 324 445 445 445 445 445 445 324 324 324 567 567 567 486 486 486
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
11
0.02 0.02
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0007 2201002‐01‐0008 2201002‐01‐0009 2201002‐01‐0010 2201002‐01‐0011 2201002‐01‐0012
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
2201002‐01‐0001 2201002‐01‐0002 2201002‐01‐0003 2201002‐01‐0004 2201002‐01‐0005 2201002‐01‐0006
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 222222 111 222 333
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 2 2 2 111111 111111333111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 3 3 3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 222222444 222666
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 555444111 111111666 333111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 222333 111 111
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 111111 222111 222
Quercus alba white oak Tree 333 111
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 111333777 333 111 222
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 111
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 222333222666
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
151515131313999111111999888111111888101010131313101010141414
666555444555444444555333666666666444
607 607 607 526 526 526 364 364 364 445 445 445 364 364 364 324 324 324 445 445 445 324 324 324 405 405 405 526 526 526 405 405 405 567 567 567
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
2201002‐01‐0021 2201002‐01‐0022 2201002‐01‐0023 2201002‐01‐0024
1111
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0019 2201002‐01‐00202201002‐01‐0013 2201002‐01‐0014 2201002‐01‐0015 2201002‐01‐0016 2201002‐01‐0017 2201002‐01‐0018
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 333666 111 666
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 111222
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 111111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 333111 444111111444111 111444
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 222 333
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 333 222
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 333111444111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 1
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 333
Quercus alba white oak Tree 223333 222 111444111 222
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 111
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 111111 777 111 555
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 222 111222 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 222111 333 111444 666
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 3 3 3
10 10 11 12 12 12 5 5 5 13 13 13 14 14 14 10 10 13 8 8 8 13 13 13 8 8 8 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 13
555888444333555667555666333666444445
405 405 445 486 486 486 202 202 202 526 526 526 567 567 567 405 405 526 324 324 324 526 526 526 324 324 324 526 526 526 486 486 486 486 486 526
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
2201002‐01‐0031 2201002‐01‐0032 2201002‐01‐0033 2201002‐01‐0034 2201002‐01‐0035 2201002‐01‐0036
111111
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0025 2201002‐01‐0026 2201002‐01‐0027 2201002‐01‐0028 2201002‐01‐0029 2201002‐01‐0030
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 111111 333444 333333
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 444111111222 222 111
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 222111 111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 333111111 555 333222111555222
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 111111222
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 222 111111
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111111 222
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 118 111
Quercus oak Tree 111 111
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 111111333 222 222
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 222
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 2 999222 555222 222
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
1111117779994441111111111118815888999777141414111111
555555666333222444444222777666555666
445 445 445 283 283 283 364 364 364 162 162 162 445 445 445 445 445 445 324 324 607 324 324 324 364 364 364 283 283 283 567 567 567 445 445 445
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
11111111
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0037 2201002‐01‐0038 2201002‐01‐0039 2201002‐01‐0040 2201002‐01‐0041 2201002‐01‐0042 2201002‐01‐0043 2201002‐01‐0044 2201002‐01‐0045 2201002‐01‐0046 2201002‐01‐0047 2201002‐01‐0048
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 111666888444 333 222
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 111111 444
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 111 111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 3 3 3 111111333
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 111222111 111 111
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 111111111 111
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 111
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111111111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 4 4 4 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 111 111 111
Quercus oak Tree 111
Quercus alba white oak Tree 111111444333
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 111 111222 555111
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 333222 111 222
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 333334222 222
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
777444111111101010888141414131313101011777101010555101010
555444444666777666444555555777111555
283 283 283 162 162 162 445 445 445 405 405 405 324 324 324 567 567 567 526 526 526 405 405 445 283 283 283 405 405 405 202 202 202 405 405 405
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
2201002‐01‐0057 2201002‐01‐0058 2201002‐01‐0059 2201002‐01‐0060
1111
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0049 2201002‐01‐0050 2201002‐01‐0051 2201002‐01‐0052 2201002‐01‐0053 2201002‐01‐0054 2201002‐01‐0055 2201002‐01‐0056
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 222222999333222 111111 888
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 333111 111
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 3 3 3 111222 111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 5 5 5 333111 333666
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 222
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 111555222 111 444
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 2 2 2 1 1 3 111111333 222
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 222
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1111222
Quercus oak Tree 222 111
Quercus alba white oak Tree 222 222 2 222
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 5 5 5 222
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 111111 111 222444 222222
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 2 2 2 333 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 111 111
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 1 1 1
141414888101012151515131313999888999557101011151515141414
666333555333777555555444334445666666
567 567 567 324 324 324 405 405 486 607 607 607 526 526 526 364 364 364 324 324 324 364 364 364 202 202 283 405 405 445 607 607 607 567 567 567
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0071 2201002‐01‐0072
11
0.02 0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0068 2201002‐01‐0069 2201002‐01‐00702201002‐01‐0061 2201002‐01‐0062 2201002‐01‐0063 2201002‐01‐0064 2201002‐01‐0065 2201002‐01‐0066 2201002‐01‐0067
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 222111 111111111333 555
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 222111 444222
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 111 111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 444333444 222222 444222
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 111111 2 111
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 444222333666 111
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111333444333 333
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111111111111 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 111 111
Quercus oak Tree
Quercus alba white oak Tree 111113333 111
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 3 3 3 444111 888555111222
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 111222 222
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 111336 555 333 333
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 111
7 7 7 12 12 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 9 9 9 12 12 16 10 10 10 15 15 15 10 10 10 12 12 12 13 13 13 17 17 17
444666555888666445555444333444555999
283 283 283 486 486 607 647 647 647 688 688 688 364 364 364 486 486 647 405 405 405 607 607 607 405 405 405 486 486 486 526 526 526 688 688 688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
2201002‐01‐0084
1111
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0073 2201002‐01‐0074 2201002‐01‐0075 2201002‐01‐0076 2201002‐01‐0077 2201002‐01‐0078 2201002‐01‐0081 2201002‐01‐0082 2201002‐01‐00832201002‐01‐0079 2201002‐01‐0080
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 222 222333444 111
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 222
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 333
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 6 6 6 2 2 2 1222 222
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 111 111 111
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 3 3 3 111222111 111
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 111111
Quercus oak Tree 222 222
Quercus alba white oak Tree 111444 666666333222
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 333222444 111777111111111111222333
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 222222 111112
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 222222
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 2
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 111 222
6661313131111111111119991313131414141111114456669910777
222555666777555444666333223444555444
243 243 243 526 526 526 445 445 445 445 445 445 364 364 364 526 526 526 567 567 567 445 445 445 162 162 202 243 243 243 364 364 405 283 283 283
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
2201002‐01‐0091 2201002‐01‐0092 2201002‐01‐0093 2201002‐01‐0094 2201002‐01‐0095 2201002‐01‐0096
111111
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name
1
0.02
11
0.02 0.02
Common Name Species Type
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
2201002‐01‐0085 2201002‐01‐0086 2201002‐01‐0087 2201002‐01‐0088 2201002‐01‐0089 2201002‐01‐0090
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 148 148 148 150 150 150 163 163 163
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 40 40 40 53 53 53 59 59 59
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 3 3 3 43 43 43 63 63 63 106 106 106
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 4 4 4 128 128 129 114 114 114 126 126 126
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 62 62 64 62 62 62 65 65 65
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 63 63 64 74 74 75 123 123 123
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1 333555666
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111 111828284969696107107107
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 26 26 26 35 35 35 47 47 47
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 1 1 4 35 35 50 34 34 35 46 46 46
Quercus oak Tree 33 33 33 51 51 51 86 86 86
Quercus alba white oak Tree 111223111 333111222111797985767676838383
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 111 111
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 3 3 3 777333 666888222143143144149149149157157157
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 3 3 3 222222 111585859575757636363
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 111
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 333333 37 37 37 38 38 38 44 44 44
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 111111 9999103999999106106106
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 10 10 10 8 8 8 21 21 21
1212121212131010108889991010109991111141212121093 1093 1126 1165 1165 1167 1408 1408 1408
666555555222555777444333888191919181818171717
486 486 486 486 486 526 405 405 405 324 324 324 364 364 364 405 405 405 364 364 364 445 445 567 486 486 486 421 421 434 449 449 450 543 543 543
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
105
2.59
105
2.59
1
0.02
1
0.02
105
2.59
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Project Code 22010_02.  Project Name: Dead Tree TP02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
2201002‐01‐0103 2201002‐01‐0104
Annual Means
MY2 (2023) MY1 (2022) MY0 (2022)2201002‐01‐0097 2201002‐01‐0098 2201002‐01‐0099 2201002‐01‐0100 2201002‐01‐0101 2201002‐01‐0102 2201002‐01‐0105
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 8Plot 7
Plot 1 Plot 2
Plot 3 Plot 4
Plot 5 Plot 6
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 15
Plot 9 Plot 10
Plot 11 Plot 12
Plot 13 Plot 14
Plot 16
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 23
Plot 17 Plot 18
Plot 19 Plot 20
Plot 21 Plot 22
Plot 24
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 32Plot 31
Plot 25 Plot 26
Plot 27 Plot 28
Plot 29 Plot 30
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 40Plot 39
Plot 33 Plot 34
Plot 35 Plot 36
Plot 37 Plot 38
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 48Plot 47
Plot 41 Plot 42
Plot 43 Plot 44
Plot 45 Plot 46
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 56Plot 55
Plot 49 Plot 50
Plot 51 Plot 52
Plot 53 Plot 54
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 64Plot 63
Plot 57 Plot 58
Plot 59 Plot 60
Plot 61 Plot 62
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 72Plot 71
Plot 65 Plot 66
Plot 67 Plot 68
Plot 69 Plot 70
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 80Plot 79
Plot 73 Plot 74
Plot 75 Plot 76
Plot 77 Plot 78
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 88Plot 87
Plot 81 Plot 82
Plot 83 Plot 84
Plot 85 Plot 86
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 96Plot 95
Plot 89 Plot 90
Plot 91 Plot 92
Plot 93 Plot 94
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 104Plot 103
Plot 97 Plot 98
Plot 99 Plot 100
Plot 101 Plot 102
Dead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix B: Visual Assessment DataDead Tree Phase B Site
MY2 Monitoring Report – November 2023
Plot 105