NC0038377_Revised J15060909F_20150902

+ DUKE Analytical Laboratory
ENERGY
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Order Summary Report
Order Number: J15060909
Project Name: MAYO STEAM - AB GW ASSESSMENT SPECIATION
Customer Name(s): Tim Hunsucker, Jerry Wylie, Kathy Webb, John Toepfer
Customer Address:
Lab Contact: Peggy Kendall a kendal Phone:
ho e:
P ggy
Report Authorized By: uke-energy.com Date:
(Signature) 4.` c(J
201�.08.17
Peggy Kendall
09:37:17-04'00'
Program Comments:
Please contact the Program Manager (Peggy Kendall) with any questions regarding this report.
Data Flags & Calculations:
8/17/2015
Page 1 of 35
Any analytical tests or individual analytes within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality
system or quality control requirement. The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results)
under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data
included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor results can be found in the
subcontracted lab final report. Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have
been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted.
Data Package:
This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described in this narrative. An estimation of
the uncertainty of measurement for the results in the report is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced, except
in full, without the written consent of the Analytical Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratory with any questions. The
order of individual sections within this report is as follows:
Job Summary Report, Sample Identification, Technical Validation of Data Package, Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis,
Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Sub -contracted Laboratory Results, Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports &
Documentation, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narratives, Chain of Custody (COC)
Certification:
The Analytical Laboratory holds the following State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina
(DHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005. Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of
specific methods.

Sample ID's & Descriptions:
Collection
Sample ID Plant/Station Date and Time
Collected By
Sample Description
2015021303
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 2:20 PM
Synterra
MW-13BR
2015021304
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 9:24 AM
Synterra
MW-3
2015021305
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 12:30 PM
Synterra
MW-16D
2015021306
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 12:30 PM
Synterra
MW-16 DUP
2015021307
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 2:15 PM
Synterra
MW-16S
2015021308
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 9:57 AM
Synterra
MW-16BR
2015021309
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 9:20 AM
Synterra
ABMW-4BR
2015021310
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 2:10 PM
Synterra
ABMW-3
2015021311
MAYO STEAM
23-Jun-15 12:00 PM
Synterra
ABMW-2
9 Total Samples
Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35
Technical Validation Review
Checklist:
COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals Yes No
and analyses (compliance programs and procedures).
All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. ❑ Yes❑ No
All laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.❑ Yes ❑ No
Report Sections Included:
U Job Summary Report
❑ Sample Identification
n Technical Validation of Data Package
❑ Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis
❑ Analytical Laboratory QC Report
Sub -contracted Laboratory Results
❑ Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports, & Documentation
❑ Customer Database Entries
66 Chain of Custody
[I/0] Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Sent Separately
Reviewed By: Peggy Kendall Date: 8/5/2015

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 4 of 35
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: MW-13BR
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 2:20 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021303
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 5 of 35
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: MW-3
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 9:24 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021304
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: MW-16D
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 12:30 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021305
Matrix: GW WW
Page 6 of 35
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: MW-16 DUP
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 12:30 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021306
Matrix: GW WW
Page 7 of 35
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 8 of 35
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: MW-16S
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 2:15 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021307
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 9 of 35
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: MW-16BR
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 9:57 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021308
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 10 of 35
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: ABMW-4BR
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 9:20 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021309
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 11 of 35
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: ABMW-3
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 2:10 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015021310
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060909
Site: ABMW-2
Collection Date: 23-Jun-15 12:00 PM
Sample #: 2015021311
Matrix: GW WW
Page 12 of 35
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete Vendor Method V_BRAND
-- Additional Information --
Per Synterra, the sample ID documented on the chain of custody as MW3BR should be identified as MW3. This is
a revised report and supersedes the initial report dated 8/5/15. The report has been revised to correct date analyzed
values and significant figures that were reported incorrectly in the initial report. The Fe(III) result for sample MW-16D
was a detectable result, not a non -detect as reported in the original report. Correcting the significant figures used
resulted in slightly altered values for Mn(IV) results associated with the client samples ABMW-4BR and ABMW-2.

Page 13 of 35
BRO�©KS
RAND
LABS
MEANINGFUL METALS DATA
August 13, 2015
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
980-875-5848
Project: Duke Energy Progress Mayo (LIMS# J15060909)
Ms. Kendall,
Attached is the revised report associated with nine (9) aqueous samples submitted for hexavalent
chromium, iron speciation, and manganese speciation analyses on June 23, 2015. The samples
were received in two sealed coolers at 0.3°C and 0.0°C on June 24, 2015. This report has been
revised to correct date analyzed values and significant figures that were reported incorrectly in
the initial report. The Fe(III) result for the client sample MW-16D was a detectable result, not a
non -detect as reported in the original report. Correcting the significant figures used rendered
slightly altered values for Mn(IV) results associated with the client samples ABMW-4BR and
ABMW-2. The EDD format has also been corrected to conform to the EDD design requested.
No other changes have been made to this report.
Hexavalent chromium analysis was performed by ion chromatography inductively coupled
plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS). All samples requesting iron
speciation analysis were analyzed by spectrophotometry. Mn(II) analysis was performed via ion
chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-
CRC-MS). Mn(IV) analyses were performed via digestion and subsequent analysis by
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS). Any issues
associated with the analyses are addressed in the following report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
k:`1
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
3958 6th Ave NW • Seattle, WA 98107 • T: 206-632-6206 • F: 206-632-6017 • www.brooksrand.com • [e-mail]

Page 14 of 35
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Report prepared for:
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Project: Duke Energy Progress Mayo (LIMS# J15060909)
August 13, 2015
1. Sample Reception
Nine (9) aqueous samples were submitted for hexavalent chromium, iron speciation, and
manganese speciation analyses on June 23, 2015. The sample was received in acceptable
condition on June 24, 2015 in two sealed containers at temperatures of 0YC and 0.0°C.
The client requested that the sample name for the client sample MW3BR (LIMS ID:
2015021304) should be changed to MW3 (LIMS ID: 2015021304). The chain of custody
form reflects the sample ID as MW3BR (LIMS ID: 2015021304); however, no results were
reported using this sample ID. In accordance with the client's instructions, the sample ID
MW3 (LIMS ID: 2015021304) was used to report results for this sample.
All samples were received in a laminar flow clean hood, void of trace metals contamination
and ultra -violet radiation, and were designated discrete sample identifiers. An aliquot of
each sample submitted for hexavalent chromium analysis was decanted into a clean
polypropylene tube. All hexavalent chromium sample fractions were stored in a secure
refrigerator maintained at a temperature of 4°C, until the analyses could be performed.
The sample fractions requesting iron speciation analysis were stored in a secure, monitored
refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each filtered sample submitted for manganese speciation analysis was decanted
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube for Mn(II) analysis. These fractions were stored in a
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could
be performed. Subsequently, the original bottles (filtered and unfiltered fractions) intended
for Mn speciation were preserved to pH < 2 with concentrated HNO3 and then stored in a
secure polyethylene container, known to be free from trace metals contamination, until the
digestion could be performed.

Page 15 of 35
2. Sample Preparation
All sample preparation is performed in laminar flow clean hoods known to be free from trace
metals contamination. All applied water for dilutions and sample preservatives are
monitored for contamination to account for any biases associated with the sample results.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC-ICP-DRC-MS Prior to analysis, an aliquot of each
sample was filtered with a syringe filter (0.45µm) and injected directly into a sealed
autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of
a sample may shift the equilibrium of the system, resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Iron Speciation Analvsis by SpectrophotometrX No sample preparation was required as a de -
gassed HCL solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Manganese Mn(II Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
(0.45µm) directly into an autosampler vial for Mn(II) analysis. No additional sample
preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of the samples may shift the
equilibrium of the system resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Manganese Mn(IV Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS Each filtered and unfiltered sample submitted
for Mn speciation analysis was preserved with 1 % HNO3 (v/v) upon sample receipt. Each
sample fraction was then further digested on a hotblock apparatus with aliquots of 50%
HNO3 (v/v) and 50% HCl (v/v), in accordance with the digestion procedure specified in EPA
Method 200.8. All resulting sample digests were analyzed for total manganese via
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).
3. Sample Analysis
All sample analysis is preceded by a minimum of a five -point calibration curve spanning the
entire concentration range of interest. Calibration curves are performed at the beginning of
each analytical day. All calibration curves, associated with each species of interest, are
standardized by linear regression resulting in a response factor. All sample results are
instrument blank corrected to account for any operational biases associated with the
analytical platform.
Prior to sample analysis, all calibration curves are verified using second source standards
which are identified as initial calibration verification standards (ICV).
Ongoing instrument performance is identified by the analysis of continuing calibration
verification standards (CCV) and continuing calibration blanks (CCB) at a minimum interval
of every ten analytical runs.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC-ICP-DRC-MS Each sample for hexavalent chromium
analysis was analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS) on June 24, 2015. An aliquot of each sample is

Page 16 of 35
injected onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by a basic (pH > 7) gradient. The
eluting chromium species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where
energy -transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are
extracted from the plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel
through a pressurized chamber (DRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts
with interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector
detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Iron Speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry All samples submitted for Fe speciation
quantification were analyzed on June 24, 2015, and in accordance with the scientifically
accepted method outlined by:
Stookey, L.L., (1970). "Ferrozine - A new spectrophotometric reagent for iron",
Anal.Chem., 42:779-81.
Manganese Mn(II Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS All samples for Mn(II) analysis were
analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on July 6, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected onto
an anion exchange column and mobilized by an acidic (pH < 7) gradient. An ion pairing
agent provides a dynamic ion exchange mechanism for the cationic manganese species on the
chromatographic column. The differences in the affinity of manganese species towards the
ion pair agent and the column results in separation. The eluting selenium species are then
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber (CRC)
containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts with interfering ions of the same target
mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass
analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Manganese Mn(I ' Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS All samples submitted for Mn speciation
quantitation were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass
spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS) on July 28, 2015. Aliquots of each sample digest are
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through an initial quadrupole (Q1), which
filters the target masses prior to their entrance into a second chamber. The second chamber
contains specific reactive gasses or collision gasses that preferentially react either with
interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z) or with the target analyte,
producing an entirely different mass to charge ratio (m/z) which can then be differentiated

Page 17 of 35
from the initial interferences. The ions then exit the collision/reaction cell into and additional
quadrupole (Q2). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer,
on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z), and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
4. Analytical Issues
No significant analytical issues were encountered. All quality control parameters associated
with the samples were within acceptance limits.
The total recoverable Fe concentrations of samples MW-13BR, MW-16S, ABMW-3,
ABMW-2 were slightly less than the associated Fe(II) concentrations. The relative percent
differences between the results were 1.8%, 0.5%, 23%, and 1.8%, meeting the criteria for
duplicate precision. All iron present should be considered to be in the Fe(II). The Fe(III)
calculations were reported as non -detectable at the level of the eMDL.
Mn(IV) is quantified by analyzing the water samples for total Mn and dissolved Mn. Mn(IV)
is operationally defined as the difference between the filtered and unfiltered total Mn
concentrations, since it is thermodynamically favored to be in the form of a precipitate.
The estimated method detection limit (eMDL) for hexavalent chromium is generated from
replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for Fe(II) and total recoverable Fe were set at 5 based on the sensitivity of
the instrument.
The eMDL for Mn(II) has been generated from replicate analyses of the lowest standard in
the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for Mn(IV) been calculated using the standard deviation of the method
blanks prepared and analyzed concurrently with the submitted samples.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC

Page 18 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (1)
Sample ID Cr(VI)
MW-13BR 0.005
MW3
0.155
MW-16D
0.051
MW-16Ddup
0.061
MW-16S
0.011
MW-16BR
0.017
ABMW-4BR
0.005
ABMW-3
ND (<0.005)
ABMW-2
0.017
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution

Page 19 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (2
Sample ID
Fe(II)
Fe(III)*
Mn (II)
Mn(IV)**
MW-13BR
1200
ND (<250)
483
4.67
MW3
ND (<5.0)
ND (<5.0)
1370
ND(<0.44)
MW-16D
ND (<5.0)
9.4
291
9.17
MW-16Ddup
ND (<5.0)
ND (<5.0)
278
15.4
MW-16S
190
ND (<5.0)
282
30.6
MW-16BR
9.6
ND (<5.0)
26.9
5.54
ABMW-4BR
1100
280
445
40.4
ABMW-3
10100
ND (<1000)
676
60.9
ABMW-2
250
ND (<5.0)
1310
20.0
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
*Fe(III) defined as the difference between total recoverable Fe and Fe(II)
**Mn(IV) operationally defined as the difference between total and dissolved Mn

Page 20 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (1)
Analyte (Ng/L) PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL* eMDL 5x RL 5x
Cr(VI) -0.001 -0.003 -0.001 -0.001 -0.002 0.001 0.001 0.005 0.050
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 21 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (2)
Analyte (Ng/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL**
eMDL 1x
RL 1x
eMDL 2x
RL 2x
Fe(II)
Total Fe
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
20
20
10
10
40
40
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
**Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
eMDL**
eMDL 50x
RL 50x
eMDL 200x
RL 200x
Fe(II)
5.0
250
1000
1000
4000
Total Fe
5.0
250
1000
1000
4000
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
**Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (2)
Analyte (Ng/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL* eMDL 10x RL 10x eMDL 25x RL 25x
Mn (II)
-0.98
-0.98
-0.98
-0.98
-0.98
0.00
0.082 0.82 5.0 - -
Total Mn
0.04
0.17
0.16
0.01
0.12
0.08
0.010 - - 0.25 1.0
Diss Mn
0.35
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.14
0.15
0.018 - - 0.44 1.0
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 22 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (1
Analyte (Ng/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Cr(VI)
LCS
2.002
1.967
98.2
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (2)
Analyte (Ng/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Fe(II)
Total Fe
ICV
TMDA-70.2
500.0
376.0
552.2
427.0
110.4
113.6
Mn (II)
Total Mn
Diss Mn
LCS
TMDA-70.2
TMDA-70.2
10.00
312
312
10.67
308.9
309.2
106.7
99.0
99.1

Page 23 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (1)
Analvte (ua/L) Sample ID Rea 1 Rea 2 Mean RPD

Page 24 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (2
Analyte (fag/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Fe(II)
MW-13BR
1200
1200
1200
0.0
Fe(II)
ABMW-3
10080
11520
10800
13.3
Total Fe
MW-13BR
1179
1179
1179
0.0
Total Fe
ABMW-3
8020
8492
8256
5.7
Mn (II)
MW-16D
291.3
283.0
287.2
2.9
Total Mn
Batch QC
805.4
806.7
806.0
0.2
Diss Mn
Batch QC
1.89
1.85
1.87
2.0

Page 25 of 35
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Mayo
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060909
Date: August 13, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate 0
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Cr(VI)
Batch QC
5.000
4.778
95.2
5.000
4.893
97.5
2.4
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix
Spike Duplicate
(2)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Fe(I1)
MW-13BR
25000
26050
99.4
25000
26410
100.8
1.4
Fe(I1)
ABMW-3
100000
109000
98.2
100000
111400
100.6
2.2
Total Fe
MW-13BR
25000
25120
95.8
25000
25000
95.3
0.5
Total Fe
ABMW-3
100000
106600
98.3
100000
106600
98.3
0.0
Mn (II)
MW-16D
50.00
335.7
97.1
50.00
336.6
98.8
0.8
Total Mn
Batch QC
1000
1815
100.9
1000
1996
119.0
9.5
Diss Mn
Batch QC
1000
884.8
88.3
1000
1011
101.0
13.4

tt),
.r^
zoo
Q
vl
w0
Page
26 of
N
)
O
O U
a
-a
-a
-0
_0
b ca "
o
O
Z
a) a)
a)a)
a)
p
d
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
-0
C
G)
a)
i
Q
10 ?
U
U
v -o
_0
w
_
O>
(D
�
-og
_
_
_
=
o
F
00c)
O
aE
O
a
u
y O 3
U F
U a)
a)
CJ
Q)
4)
al
a)
a)
U N
a) o o
G
p
m
YT
_
a)
!?
U)
to
to
_
>
G)
U)
CO
CO
u
;;
a
ce
j
a)
c
c
�n
_
U
a)
u
c
CZU
S/7
�
F
> O m
O
O
O
OA .O - C
cC
-�
C
CL
O
F.
J
j
C
C
oo
'
, �
cl
�t
C'
J
'
CD
a)
m
>
v
v
lac
z
o
o
Z_
�
o
=o
a
`n
z
z
S
z
z
E E
�+
O
@
O
a
�
ati
EFL£
fE�£f
10
*-�
3333
3333
%b
lb
J
u
AD
�
N
`
4
s
C',
`�
NO
d
^!
CI
r
g
°°
'
��
i
L
O
•�
�
M
ul
V
cm
a) ate)
z
Q z z
C43)
5
n

m
I
,
r"
a U
=o
`w. U
'D
-0
'O
-d
o 0o
0 00
o
(U
—0
�D ry�1
cue
U
U
U
W V y
o o
>
aCL
�
cA
cA
u co
ca
�n
U
a>
c
c
v T N ca
..
V
QJ
L'.
LL
67
b
I
a n ❑ N
v
n
(U
V)
o~
O C O y
O
O
v
j
UO
O
u y
O ✓ saj
"''
O
'�''
"D
v
U
U
1 „
L C
v
`I�
C
J
ib
;T
c!
�6
1�1
w
�
aNi
v
O
z
� N
o
(1)
0
=O
to Z
Z
Z
0
Ei
E
�s
33333
Qj
s
v)
s
0
°°kj—
cq
/�
`O
n
.L
r
_3
M
f�
r�
Z
ul
3
�o
.n
%D
7E
aaa
a _0
ll�)-
�> ((n U(L( 2
-j I - I j
age 27 of 5
J
� J =
QT., .O Oc
L a)
E a E JEL
E E E U F
I
0
E
O
N
v
0
o
v
0
a.
E
�
�
Q
C
'O
H
N
N N
0
a
0
U
t� u
H
c
3
�
Y
v
3
o=
a o
N
uu
Cd
N C
cC ij
.n 3
v
N
v
C
a
Q
C7
.0

o
C-
y
� 00
N w
u
00
00 G
p 0
O C U
u
a
0
r
Z
C LL
O
i
M
J
C:
7 00
O
O 00
�
o y ,r,
®-
U
ce
n W p N
O
u
.�
U00
u G\
'O O Q
(u
cr
cc
'u
u
0
Ln
M
�''•
�
'� �+
N
O
U
W
u
7
cr C.
0
0
H
I
`.l
L C
t1) Cn (A'
0 S
L Z 0 O O O
^ z z
co
) I I
Y
ml
.9
13
3
�
3
�
N
G
!'
• L
F
•a
N
V
t
UA
u
° 7'
'oo�
U
GI�I1§I�
).nl -Iv,l'
Q
a
�.
14
33�
Page 28 of 35
hl
�O
c 14
W
E
O
w
A.
0
0
,
y
v
y �
Q •
O
0
a
O
U , r
L=
u
v 1
>
v
`=
c
n a 7
N
`..
G
�
p �
N
C
N
U
C
�
O
�
u
O
N
.v
.
N

C
00
Mr
�00
0 c
�w
� N
C � I
a Lz.
a
O
0
U p
p ay. y
Ov
0
,: .-- o
4. b.0 o
R a M o
'G T d'
N
u p
y
F y� o p .0n a
I
Wu � '0o o00 00 0 cc
�
L�
�
O
L
tl
J
v
r
R
i
(�
DZ(/S
�z
o
N
W
Q�
2 cl
U N
U
U
En
Y4
F.
U
U)
z 0 0
SO m Z Z
Z
cl
v
scl
cl
Q
0
r
O
I
1
�ul
T
ii
~ v
~
J
C
m=sm W
I,)
U UCn U)Q UL2
Page 29 �f 35
Q� (1-1

1 rll a.
�J
G�
Ib
N1
M W
co
00
Ln
Ln
0 x
:- rL
ocq
T
age 30 of
J�
U E U
C O O
L)
v
(I
-a
a
-0
-a
-o
�oj
o
(D
a)
a)
O O
N O O
`�
a
CAA M
ca
y
Y
20
6i
'J
O
,
C
>
o n
v
fIca
I
E a
E E
E n
E
0 3 •�
�
�
ci �
aEi
c) r-
�
-b
CIS
j
a)
a�i
a�i
a�i
_
aa))
Q))
aa))
d)
N
v
�y 0 O
CCL
0
U)
_
—
CA
CA
rA
fn
-z
_
Ci)
^
V'
'^
VJ
U -J ca
ai
C?.
N
to
U•,)
a)
C
C
[D
U
a)
C
C
O
F'
y
y
I
'L3 -p
a) o
v
>
n
c)
"mod
a)
N
M c
-�0
7�"tu��
m
�
C
�,
p �' •L
c
O
. U
J
f�
C�
(D
��Ai
�
=
o
a)
a)
c
a)
c
Q
_
z
a)
c
=O
N
Z
Z
Q
O
M
Z
Z
E
E
ca
v
)
m
a
z
a)
z
a)
C)0
0
+��
3333
3333,
Q
nCd
j
J
N
cal
N
s
M
o
_
CL
o
MM
?
W
it)V)
v
c
�
�v,a
CIS
10
° o
x
^0
I
_
7

p Name:
Person:
'hone Number
�ax _
.mail Address:
'roject Name:
'roject Numbe
'O Number:
;amplc ID
age 31 of 35_
00
18804 Northcreek Parkway Phone (4.' q 183-33
Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
BRL Ptr; 'L _ erCmr Ma�)re
By submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
in the quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
with the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your
BRL representative as soon as possible 425 483-3300.
14 V' if
Requested Turn Around Time:
ram. Geh . Ls M
Method of Sample Delivery:
Courier Tracking Number:
Confu-mation of Sample Reception: 'Yes NO
1217608
Bottle ID
Date and Time
Matrix
Volume
Preservative
Initials
Requested Anal es and Methods
Comments
Ty
W
�w
1 pnt
+ tlr►
NH4OH/NH4SO4
De assed HCI
None
None
qR
„
, `
Cr I
Fp_2pec
Mn Spec
Mn Spec
field filtered _
field filtered
field filtered
unfiltered
y�.
NH40H/NH4SO4
assed HCI
None
None
field filtered
field filtered
field filtered
unfi{.ored
'i r_
:3 i
�� �, .
„
>y✓
W
M 1
en
Ilh
J)_ L
t I?
rLt
Cr VI
Fe 5 c
Mn S c
Mn Spec
Relinquished by: (sign) (print) Z �• {L t DatelTime:
� not iGdo�,uYt-✓ Dateffime: 1 `^ ��
Received by: (sign) (p ) �a1s
Comments:
.�''.,�w � ' C 7 C-
Tem : C U
Relinquished by: (sign) (print) Datelrime:
Received by: (sign) (print) DateMme:
Please account for each sample bci tde as a seperate line item for verification purposes.
Matrix: Air, Freshwater (FVV), seawater (SV/), groundwater (GVI), wastewater (%rw), soil (SL), sediment (SD), tissue (TS), product (P), other (0)
Nev ,.I (April W)5)

YK
Z/ by
1880tt`forthcreekParkeray Phone(4_ 483-3'-,
—Ag'J
Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
— —
YNww�ed -W—LA
fs ;
:om an Name.
Qr �r
BRL P 't etCmr M211te
:ontact Person:
a
By submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
address: it
t
�-_ �� w �� („ �9 Q j
in the quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
with the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your
'hone Number:
BRL reresentative as soon as possible 425 483-3300.
rax. Nurt��tz:
__---------- . ---
Requested Tum Around Time:
'mail Address:
weAD
blsrn (`m Coop. CAM
Method of Sample Delivery.
'eo'ect Name;
v
h
Courier Tracking Number:
'ro'ect Number•
(CXL
Confirmation of Sample Reception: � Yes NO
'O Number: — 1217608
,ample ID ani< n) i Q n<
Bottle ID I
Date and Time
Matrix
Volume
Preservative
Initials I
Requested Analytes and Methods
Comments
15 I
lW MI I
NH40HINH45O4
77 i ,
> , r�
W
116r M
Degassed HCl
,' L_
Fe
< )�
2 .- ,;
6rW
&W
in
IWV%l
None
None
- 1_
r4i11_
Mn
Mn
u -, . ; c _
i3 3� f
zs. ; i r
GV✓
I)COA1
NH40H/NH4SO4
- _
Cr VI
M J
Degassed HCl
+i1-
Fe Spec
v1 _
2
5. 1 < .. L
W
M
None
`� t
Mn Spec
6rW
MI
None
2
Mn Spec
Relinquished by: (sign) (print)t Date/Time:TJL! 1,'r
Received by: (sign) (print) DateMme:
Relinquished by: (sign) (print) Date/Time:
Received b (sign) (print) Date/1 ime: -
Please account for each sample bottle as a seperate line item for verification purposes.
Matrix: Air, Freshwater (ice, seawater (SW% groundwater (Gn wastewater (WV/), soil (SL), sediment (SD), tissue (IS), product (P), other (0)
field filtered
field filtered
field filtered
field filtered
unfiltered
field filtered
field filtered
unfiltered
t 1 1'ev �A (Ap,il2005)

.A
)mpany Name:
intact Person:
lone Number:
ix Number:
mail Address:
roject Name: L
roject Number:
C) Namhrr-
ID
18864r i`?orthcree:k Parkway Phone (&Wet83o7W
Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
T
bmitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
e quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your
re resentative as soon as ossible 425 483-3300.
urctrrl Turn Around Time:
Method of Sa le Delive
Gs to
Courier TrackingNumber:
a
ConL—,nation of Sample Reception: Yes
0 NO
1217608
Initials Re uested Analytes and Methods
Comments
Matrix
Volume
Preservative
Bottle ID Date and Time
NH40HWIN
I
Fe Spec
field filtered
field filtered
rS 33 �l- 5 iv�s
W
IaS' n+�
De assedHCl
�
Mn Spec
field filtered
S� .J �� _j
rtrt
None(r
None
Mn S c
unfiltered
W
I ,pnl
er
`
"' '
Cr VI
field filtered
,�1 �, ► : -., i; �i, _ J
s,z ' '�`'
G'b✓ 1
M
NH40H1NH4SO4
C
Fe C ec
field filtered
Gyp/ '
G assed HCI
TL
Mn S ec
field filtered
K b 2 yti l
1 ' '' ` '
'
None
None
;i:,
Mn S ec
4
unfiltered
'2'
'i ' � = r
N/
Ml
Fed
t t_
Date/Time:Z_,� �'�
Comments::
Relinquished by: (sign)
rint
(p )
Received by: (sign) (p rint)
cJ� ��,A���/
Date/Time: —��,� G
Temp: �'- •c.
Relinquished by: (sign) (print)
DateMme:__________
Received by: (sign) (print) Dateffime:
Please account for each sample bode as a seperate line item for verification purposes.
Matrix: Air, Freshwater seawater (SW), groundwater (GW( wastewater RIM, soil (SL), sediment (SD), tissue (TS), product (P), other (0)
t ;rim AS +{-:,�_ ¢r r,�- • fa;�,e�;0•-3
v.,A.IF
I,ev .1 (April 2005)

ntact Person:
.dress:
one_Murnber:
x Number:
nail Address:
oject Name: I
•oject Nurnbe.
D Number:
ample ID
Relinquished by:
Received by: (sit
188(` i`?orthcreek Parkway Fax (42� 483-9818
Bothell, WA 98011
Ej,,
=te=
Pro, tt' �!e` f samples the client agrees to all tams and conditions set forth
�9 provided'oy the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
nd conditions associated with your project, pltase contact your
ativc as soon as possible 425 483-3300.
equestedIr..— Around Time:
Le M
�. 1217608
Bottle ID
DateandTitnel Matrix
Volume
Preservative
I� M�
NH40HMH4SO4
De assed HCI
fn
None
w
None
5 7-
13 j
2,� r1.,
.._-----None ----
t.-ounu Ir,....,.. -.__ _
Con& —,ration of Sample Reception: Yes 13 No
Comments
Initials Re uested Analytes and Methods
04L C I field filtered
L Fe Sp±C field filtered
Mn S ec field filtered
Mn S unfiltered
As S ec
field filtered
N►�
EDTA -1
Cr I
field filtered
NH40H/NH4SO4
Fe V ec
field filtered
/h
De assed HCl
Mn S ec
field filterec
None
Mn S ec
unfiltered
li;is Ml
__ None
MPH fitters(
Date/Time:�S /`— :
Dateffime:'155 o
Date/Time:
Relinquished by: (sign) (print)
DatelTime:
Received by (sign) (print)
Please account for each sample bode as a seperate line item for venucanon purposes-
(TS), product (P), other (0)
Matrix: Air, Freshwater ('FW), seawater
(SW), groundwater (GW), wastewater (NW), soil (Sq, sedimcnt (SD), tissue
ltev ,.i (Ap�it NY)5)

0?L
1881w Northcreck Park way PhoneT43Q)aW-330i,
Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
.om an Name: er P
-ontact Person: j:
By submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
lddress: j t
}-, vi �tt � flftrl v� �/ L
in the quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
_
with the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your
BRL representative as soon as possible 5 483-3300.
42Rcguested
'hone Number: �t�i — i►i '
pax Number,_
_._---___----
Turn Time: ----------
mail Address: K t+vG
Q nl rra. Cod . Le► t+n
Mcthod of Sam le Dehve :
'ro'ect Name: v
h
Courier TrackingNumber.
'roject Number: 10M
---
Confumation of Sample Reception: Yes 0 No
'O Number: 1217608
ism le ID fit%
p
Bottle ID
Date and Time
Matrixt
Volume
Preservative
Initials
Requested Anal es and Methods
Comments
--71
AsS - -
filtered -- - ..
L� • ,
tj ' > 3 1 7
= ' '
L�/
J)C ftl
NH40HiNH4SO4
1
Cr(VI)
field filtered i
77 3 '
;" K 1.
W
1 S P%1
Degassed HCl
z
Fe Spec
field filtered
. r
-
,. /c.;`
(rye/
�+n
None
L
Mn Spec
Meld filtered
vt
r 3 Z
• >.; I - ,�
W
1 ,iN►�
None
Mn Spec
unfiltered
- -- -- -
--
..
-- None -- -
--__
field fiiiered-.------
j'
1 M
NH40HJNH4SO4
Cr VI
field filtered
7/(-
t ; i z
7: r ;�;
CtW v
W
M
M
De assed HCl
None
t /1,�-
A-•L
Fe Spec
Mn Spec
field filtered
field filtered
None
/1 t
Mn Spec
unfii:ored
Relinquished by: (sign) '- (print) 91 (,,A � r e � z-- Date/Time4�3S L`' [Teml):
omments:
Received by: (sign) (print) tiF3,• Date/Time:_ rt
�t C
Relinquished by: (sign) (print) Date/Time:
Received by: (sign) (print) Date/Time:
Please account for each sample bode as a seperate line item for verification purposes.
«Matrix: Air, Freshwater (FW), se
awater (SW), groundwater (GW), wastewater (WVV), soil (SL), sediment (SD), tissue (TS), product (P), other (0)
_'-'i.) ;51"'.C'� vl�� �:ti+ ,..� �� -a....w..S•f.,t.•i4 '_ � � ��� ra -.y � .. i:�� t . `. v.`,` t �,'4.�� -r. �-?LJtp �Z.'��:,5
I,ev i.I (Apni 2M)