HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0038377_Table 1-1 Summary of Revised Well Locations MAYO_20150902TABLE 1-1
SUMMARY OF REVISED WELL LOCATIONS
MAYO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, ROXBORO NC
Raleigh Regional Office - Mayo Steam Electric Plant
Well/
General Location on
Relocation,
Approximate Distance
Justification for Relocation,
NCDENR Concurrence/
Boring ID
Groundwater Assessment
Addition,
and
Addition, or Deletion
Comment
Plan
or Deletion?
Direction of Relocation
Saturated conditions and slope of land surface
S13-4
East side of power plant area
Relocation
200' south-southeast
created unsafe conditions (unstable ground for
drilling equipment; proximity to fence)
S13-6
Southwest side of 1981 landfill
Relocation
100' southwest
Ease of access and concern about drilling into
landfill debris
MW-7S
East of ash basin and north of
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
railroad line
discretely monitor was not observed
MW-7D
East of ash basin and north of
Relocation
750' northeast
Moved at request of NCDENR to be outside of
Written concurrence in
railroad line
compliance boundary
conditional approval letter
MW-76R
East of ash basin and north of
Relocation
750' northeast
Moved at request of NCDENR to be outside of
Written concurrence in
railroad line
compliance boundary
conditional approval letter
East of ash basin and west of
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
MW-9S
railroad line between ash basin and
Deletion
discretely monitor was not observed
Mao Lake
East of ash basin and west of
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
MW-9D
railroad line between ash basin and
Deletion
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
Mao Lake
MW-10S
East side of power plant area
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
discretely monitor was not observed
MW-10D
East side of power plant area
Deletion
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
Saturated conditions and slope of land surface
MW-10BR
East side of power plant area
Relocation
200' south-southeast
created unsafe conditions (unstable ground for
drilling equipment; proximity to fence)
MW-11S
West side of Highway 501
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
discretely monitor was not observed
MW-11D
West side of Highway 501
Deletion
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
Overhead utilities, underground utilities, proximity
Verbal concurrence with
MW-11BR
West side of Highway 501
Relocation
500' north
to US Highway ROW, and nearby slope instability
relocation
created unsafe conditions
Verbal concurrence during site
South side of property along Plant
No water bearing zone was identified within the
visit; possiblity of employing
MW-12BR
entrance road
Deletion
bedrock core after the 50 foot exploratory depth
former production wells (DEP)
into bedrock had been exceeded
as bedrock background wells
discussed
MW-13S
West side of Highway 501
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
discretely monitor was not observed
MW-13D
West side of Highway 501
Deletion
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
MW-13BR
West side of Highway 501
Relocation
300' northwest
Moved to accommodate forthcoming US Highway
Verbal concurrence with
501 expansion
relocation
MW-14S
Northwest portion of property, near
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
Mayo Lake Road
discretely monitor was not observed
MW-14D
Northwest portion of property, near
Deletion
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
Mayo Lake Road
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
MW-14BR
Northwest portion of property, near
Relocation
100' northwest
Ease of access for large drill rig
Mayo Lake Road
MW-15S
Peed property near NC/VA line
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
discretely monitor was not observed
MW-15D
Peed property near NC/VA line
Deletion
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
MW-15BR
Peed property near NC/VA line
Relocation
100' southwest
Limit tree cutting and land clearing on private
property
Safety considerations required that walking on ash
Verbal concurrence with
ABMW-1
West side of ash basin
Relocation
150' southwest
basin be limited in this area
relocation during site visit
discussion
ABMW-01 was completed using a hand auger.
Safety considerations prevented heavy equipment
ABMW-1S
West side of ash basin
Deletion
from working on the ash basin at this location;
therefore, drilling/well installation into saprolite
was not possible with hand auger
Safety considerations precluded using heavy
Verbal concurrence with
ABMW-2
Central portion of ash basin
Relocation
400' south
equipment on this part of the ash basin. Drill rigs
relocation during site visit
were permitted on the ash harvest area
discussion
ABMW-2S
Central portion of ash basin
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
discretely monitor was not observed
ABMW-2D
Central portion of ash basin
Deletion
A transition zone/PWR of sufficient thickness and
saturation to discretely monitor was not observed
Safety considerations precluded using heavy
Verbal concurrence with
ABMW-3
South side of ash basin
Relocation
400' southwest
equipment on this part of the ash basin. Drill rigs
relocation during site visit
were permitted on the ash harvest area
discussion
Safety considerations precluded using heavy
Verbal concurrence with
ABMW-3S
South side of ash basin
Relocation
400' southwest
equipment on this part of the ash basin. Drill rigs
relocation during site visit
were permitted on the ash harvest area
discussion
ABMW-4S
South side of ash basin
Deletion
Saprolite of sufficient thickness and saturation to
discretely monitor was not observed
Prepared by: JAW Checked by: EMB
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\105. Mayo Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\1.11 CSA Reporting\Tables\ReportTables\Table 1-1 Summary of Revised Well Locations MAYO.xlsx Page 1 of 1