RE_ I-5883 SR13. J.S. relocate Site 4.

From:Sprinkle, Hannah H
To:McGinness, Christopher H
Subject:RE: I-5883 SR13. J.S. relocate Site 4.
Date:Monday, November 27, 2023 7:24:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
Good morning,

Hope you had a nice Thanksgiving break.
If the relocated ditch was originally a JS then it will remain as a JS and should be protected as such.
Please remind the contractors that the check dams are temporary in nature, and they will need to
establish vegetation on the banks and remove the devices.

Thank you,

Hannah

Hannah Sprinkle
Environmental Specialist II
401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch
Department of Environmental Quality

[phone] (mobile)
910) 796-7379 (office)
[e-mail] ***please note my email address has changed ***

From: McGinness, Christopher H <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 4:37 PM
To: Sprinkle, Hannah H <[e-mail]>; Underwood, Chris
<[e-mail]>
Subject: I-5883 SR13. J.S. relocate Site 4.

Afternoon Hannah,
I just left the site we talked about this morning and yesterday. The silt fence crew is about to install
silt fences along the upper edge of the ditch shown in the picture attached.

The permit plans don't show the relocated ditch as a JS. Our question is do we treat it as a JS since
we've relocated it?

The check dams were installed in the bottom of the ditch today. 11/21.

The two culverts in the foreground are newly installed. They lead to a culvert that is bored under the
highway that discharges into a wetland.

Please let me know if there is any other form to fill out for the temporary BMPs in the channel, and
please let me know how to interpret the plan set with a relocated JS.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.