Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820270_Routine Inspection_20231116I fYLS l6 aJla�� 3 (; 0 tet"4�4y t � 7�' 0 I Ii �,_- Ei 4 , �i_ iti) 3, � � Type of Visit: JOTompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: -C Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: /(/(p Arrival Time: I JO fJ/l1 Departure Time: 0 f3 County: c'� Region: F� 0 Farm Name: // ��.(�/�,y�Gyq-r✓1 Owner Email: Owner Name: f l�l�t/' Phone: i Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: AIAZoi Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: ✓+! Certified Operator: Certification Number: tOO q3(�3 Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Imnacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? Certification Number: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: ❑ Yes ef!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes J:],No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - %(j Date of Inspection: ,/(& 7 9 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes J21No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):_ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? C Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes .0' No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes _2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑/Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): cU6r4� G ( 4�5 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops fiffer from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes J"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? T 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [2,No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes LENo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E:I*o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ..E�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes :.E]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: Tp , 02 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F,;Mo 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes J:]-No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes 3 "O ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes eE51N ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 4EJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes _E2 No []Yes allo ❑ Yes P4Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Phone: <7lU S_S -9 ;YS_ Date: 1l //(' /,3 Page 3 of 3 511212020 FACILITY#: O) -276 FARM NAME: LAGOON LEVEL PERMI .9) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS EXPERIATION DATE _ CURRENT NUMBER OF OIC CARD YES OR NO NUMBER OF ANIMALS WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#2o) SOILTYPES CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (# i) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE ; �29 193 NITROGEN LEVEL DATE C/ ,16 �et NITROGEN LEVEL DATE ! /// l a NITROGEN LEVEL F11,5-/a z 1 • l S EVERY 3 YEARS: P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) - PH (Nateif4o,W.) Cu2N (NO MORE THEN 3000) (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) SOIL REPORT (#21) DATE 3 // 9 ! w, ad Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES IRR2 (# i) NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (nza) EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION FLOW RATES r7d 5-- RAIN FALL Ira ) -INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. SLUDGE (#zt s25) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE ✓a- aa/aa P: C/ % RATIO OF SLUDGE O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY_ *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 �- Ends September 30t Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31� Corn: Opens February 15e - Ends June 301h Cotton: Opens March 151" - Ends August 1� Rye: Opens September 1n- Ends March 31A Oats: Opens September 1rt- Ends April 151^ Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30* Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15w Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 � Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t -Ends August31st