NC0003433_J15060721F_20150902

+ DUKE Analytical Laboratory
ENERGY
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Order Summary Report
Order Number: J15060721
Project Name: CAPE FEAR - AB GW ASSESSMENT SPECIATION
Customer Name(s): Tim Hunsucker, Chris Suttell, Kathy Webb, John Toepfer
Customer Address:
Lab Contact: Peggy Kendall Phone:
peggy.kendall@d
Report Authorized By: Uke-energy.com Date:
(Signature) c.
raggy Kendall �� 5.07. 15
09:50:26-04'00'
Program Comments:
Please contact the Program Manager (Peggy Kendall) with any questions regarding this report.
Data Flags & Calculations:
7/15/2015
Page 1 of 21
Any analytical tests or individual analytes within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality
system or quality control requirement. The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results)
under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data
included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor results can be found in the
subcontracted lab final report. Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have
been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted.
Data Package:
This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described in this narrative. An estimation of
the uncertainty of measurement for the results in the report is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced, except
in full, without the written consent of the Analytical Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratory with any questions. The
order of individual sections within this report is as follows:
Job Summary Report, Sample Identification, Technical Validation of Data Package, Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis,
Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Sub -contracted Laboratory Results, Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports &
Documentation, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narratives, Chain of Custody (COC)
Certification:
The Analytical Laboratory holds the following State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina
(DHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005. Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of
specific methods.

Sample ID's & Descriptions:
Sample ID Plant/Station
2015020542 Cape Fear
1 Total Samples
Collection
Date and Time Collected By
18-Jun-15 10:00 AM Synterra
Page 2 of 21
Sample Description
CMW-6

Page 3 of 21
Technical Validation Review
Checklist:
COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals Yes No
and analyses (compliance programs and procedures).
All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. ❑ Yes❑ No
All laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.❑ Yes ❑ No
Report Sections Included:
U Job Summary Report
❑ Sample Identification
n Technical Validation of Data Package
❑ Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis
❑ Analytical Laboratory QC Report
Sub -contracted Laboratory Results
❑ Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports, & Documentation
❑ Customer Database Entries
66 Chain of Custody
[I/0] Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Sent Separately
Reviewed By: Peggy Kendall Date: 7/15/2015

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060721
Site: CMW-6
Collection Date: 18-Jun-15 10:00 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015020542
Matrix: GW WW
Page 4 of 21
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Page 5 of 21
BRO�©KS
RAND
LABS
MEANINGFUL METALS DATA
July 14, 2015
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear (LIMS# J15060721)
Ms. Kendall,
Attached is the report associated with one (1) aqueous sample submitted for hexavalent
chromium, selenium speciation, arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation
analyses on June 18, 2015. The samples were received in a sealed cooler at -0.2°C on June 19,
2015. Hexavalent chromium analysis was performed by ion chromatography inductively
coupled plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS). Arsenic speciation
analyses were performed via ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS). All samples requesting iron speciation analysis were
analyzed by spectrophotometry. Mn (II) and arsenic speciation analyses were performed via IC-
ICP-CRC-MS. Mn(IV) analysis were performed via digestion and subsequent analysis by
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS). Any issues
associated with the analyses are addressed in the following report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
3958 6th Ave NW • Seattle, WA 98107 • T: 206-632-6206 • F: 206-632-6017 • www.brooksrand.com • [e-mail]

Page 6 of 21
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Report prepared for:
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Project: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear (LIMS# J15060721)
July 14, 2015
1. Sample Reception
One (1) aqueous sample was submitted for hexavalent chromium, selenium speciation,
arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation analyses on June 18, 2015. All
samples were received in acceptable condition on June 19, 2015 in a sealed container at
-0.2°C.
The client instructed Brooks Rand Labs to cancel selenium speciation analyses for this client
sample. The chain of custody form reflects selenium speciation as a target analyte; however,
no selenium speciation results were reported in accordance with the client's instructions.
All samples were received in a laminar flow clean hood, void of trace metals contamination
and ultra -violet radiation, and were designated discrete sample identifiers. Sample fractions
requesting hexavalent chromium, selenium speciation, arsenic speciation, and iron speciation
analyses were field filtered by the client. Two containers were submitted for each client
sample requesting manganese speciation, one field filtered fraction and one unfiltered
fraction. An aliquot of each sample submitted for hexavalent chromium analysis was filtered
into a clean polypropylene tube. All hexavalent chromium sample fractions were stored in a
secure refrigerator maintained at a temperature of 4°C, until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each sample submitted for arsenic speciation analysis was filtered (0.45µm)
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube; all filtrates and original bottles were then stored in a
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could
be performed.
The sample fractions requesting iron speciation analysis were stored in a secure, monitored
refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each filtered sample submitted for manganese speciation analysis was decanted
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube for Mn(II) analysis. These fractions were stored in a
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could

Page 7 of 21
be performed. Subsequently, the original bottles (filtered and unfiltered fractions) intended
for Mn speciation were preserved to pH < 2 with concentrated HNO3 and then stored in a
secure polyethylene container, known to be free from trace metals contamination, until the
digestion could be performed.
2. Sample Preparation
All sample preparation is performed in laminar flow clean hoods known to be free from trace
metals contamination. All applied water for dilutions and sample preservatives are
monitored for contamination to account for any biases associated with the sample results.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC-ICP-DRC-MS Prior to analysis, an aliquot of each
sample was filtered with a syringe filter (0.45µm) and injected directly into a sealed
autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of
a sample may shift the equilibrium of the system, resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Arsenic speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
directly into a sealed autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as a
buffered EDTA solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Iron speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry No sample preparation was required as a de -
gassed HCL solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Manganese Mn(ff Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
(0.45µm) directly into an autosampler vial for Mn(II) analysis. No additional sample
preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of the samples may shift the
equilibrium of the system resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Manganese Mn(IV) Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS Each filtered and unfiltered sample submitted
for Mn speciation analysis was preserved with 1% HNO3 (v/v) upon sample receipt. Each
sample fraction was then further digested on a hotblock apparatus with aliquots of 50%
HNO3 (v/v) and 50% HCl (v/v), in accordance with the digestion procedure specified in EPA
Method 200.8. All resulting sample digests were analyzed for total manganese via
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).
I Sample Analysis
All sample analysis is preceded by a minimum of a five -point calibration curve spanning the
entire concentration range of interest. Calibration curves are performed at the beginning of
each analytical day. All calibration curves, associated with each species of interest, are
standardized by linear regression resulting in a response factor. All sample results are
instrument blank corrected to account for any operational biases associated with the
analytical platform.

Page 8 of 21
Prior to sample analysis, all calibration curves are verified using second source standards
which are identified as initial calibration verification standards (ICV).
Ongoing instrument performance is identified by the analysis of continuing calibration
verification standards (CCV) and continuing calibration blanks (CCB) at a minimum interval
of every ten analytical runs.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC-ICP-DRC-MS Each sample for hexavalent chromium
analysis was analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS) on June 25, 2015. An aliquot of each sample is
injected onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by a basic (pH > 7) gradient. The
eluting chromium species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where
energy -transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are
extracted from the plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel
through a pressurized chamber (DRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts
with interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector
detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS Each sample was analyzed for arsenic
speciation via ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on July 2, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected onto
an anion exchange column and eluted isocratically. The eluting arsenic species are then
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber (CRC)
containing a specific collision gas. Polyatomic interferences, due to their inherently larger
size, collide more frequently with the collision gas and therefore may be separated from the
analyte of interest via kinetic energy discrimination (KED). A solid-state detector detects
ions transmitted through the mass analyzer on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z),
and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Iron Speciation Anal sy is by Spectrophotometry All samples submitted for Fe speciation
quantification were analyzed on June 19, 2015, and in accordance with the scientifically
accepted method outlined by:
Stookey, L.L., (1970). "Ferrozine - A new spectrophotometric reagent for iron",
Anal.Chem., 42:779-81.

Page 9 of 21
Manganese Mn(II) Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS All samples for Mn(II) analysis were
analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on June 30, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected
onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by an acidic (pH < 7) gradient. An ion
pairing agent provides a dynamic ion exchange mechanism for the cationic manganese
species on the chromatographic column. The differences in the affinity of manganese species
towards the ion pair agent and the column results in separation. The eluting selenium species
are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes
cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma
through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber
(CRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts with interfering ions of the same
target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the
mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Manganese Mn(IV) Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS All samples submitted for Mn speciation
quantitation were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass
spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS) on July 2, 2015. Aliquots of each sample digest are introduced
into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause desolvation,
atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a differentially -
pumped vacuum interface and travel through an initial quadrupole (Q 1), which filters the
target masses prior to their entrance into a second chamber. The second chamber contains
specific reactive gasses or collision gasses that preferentially react either with interfering ions
of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z) or with the target analyte, producing an
entirely different mass to charge ratio (m/z) which can then be differentiated from the initial
interferences. The ions then exit the collision/reaction cell into and additional quadrupole
(Q2). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer, on the basis
of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z), and the resulting current is processed by a data handling
system.
4. Analytical Issues
No significant analytical issues were encountered. With the exceptions noted below, all
quality control parameters associated with the samples were within acceptance limits.
For Mn(II) analysis a client sample from another reception date (batch QC) was analyzed as
the quality control sample. Mn(II) results were greater than the value of the associated high
calibration standard. A linear range verification standard was analyzed at 2000 Jig/L. The
Mn(II) recovery for the linear range verification standard was acceptable, at 105.1%,
demonstrating that the linear range of the analytical platform extended to 2000 µg/L for
Mn(II). All reported Mn(II) results were less than 2000 µg/L with the dilutions at the
instrument factored in, and thus were within the linear range demonstrated by the linear
range verification standard. No corrective actions were necessary.

Page 10 of 21
The matrix spike duplicate sample (MSD) spike recovery for Mn(II) was below the lower
control limit of 75%, at 62.1%. The native Mn(II) concentration in the quality control
sample was significantly greater than the spiking level. Acceptable spike recoveries are often
not realized when the ambient level analyte concentration is greater than the spiking level.
No qualification of data was necessary.
Mn(IV) is quantified by analyzing the water samples for total Mn and dissolved Mn. Mn(IV)
is operationally defined as the difference between the filtered and unfiltered total Mn
concentrations, since it is thermodynamically favored to be in the form of a precipitate.
The estimated method detection limit (eMDL) for hexavalent chromium is generated from
replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid are generated using the
standard deviation of replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve. The
eMDL for monomethylarsonic acid is calculated from the average eMDL of the three arsenic
species contained in the calibration (i.e., arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid); the
calibration and CCVs do not contain monomethylarsonic acid due to impurities in this
standard which would bias the results for other arsenic species.
The eMDL value for Fe(II) and total recoverable Fe was set at 5 based on the sensitivity of
the instrument.
The eMDL for Mn(II) has been generated from replicate analyses of the lowest standard in
the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for Mn(IV) been calculated using the standard deviation of the method
blanks prepared and analyzed concurrently with the submitted samples.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC

Page 11 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (1)
Sample ID Cr(VI)
CMW-6 0.007
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution

Page 12 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (2)
Unknown
Sample ID As(III) As(V) MMAs DMAs As Species
CMW-6 0.147 ND (<0.030) ND (<0.039) 0.111 ND (<0.039)
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in Ng/L
MMAs = monomethylarsonic acid
DMAs = dimethylarsinic acid
Unknown As Species = Total concentration of all unknown As species observed by IC-ICP-MS

Page 13 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (3)
Sample ID Fe(II) Fe(III)* Mn (II) Mn(IV)**
CMW-6 237 19.6 187 8.27
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NR = Analysis not requested
*Fe(III) operationally defined as the difference between total recoverable Fe and Fe(II)
*Mn(IV) operationally defined as the difference between total and dissolved Mn

Page 14 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary 0
Analyte (fag/L) PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 5x
RL 5x
Cr(VI) 0.001
0.000
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.050
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL
= Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding
eMDL calculations
Qualitv Control Summary -
Preparation Blank Summary
(2)
Analyte (Ng/L) PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 10x
RL 10x
As(III) 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.031
0.20
As(V) 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.030
0.20
MMAs 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004
0.039
0.20
DMAs 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.058
0.21
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 15 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3
Analyte (lag/L) PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL** eMDL 1x RL 1x
Fe(II) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 20
Total Fe -2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.6 1.2 5.0 5.0 20
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
**Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (lag/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL* eMDL 10x RL 10x eMDL 25x RL 25x
Mn (II)
-0.29
-0.25
-0.28
-0.30
-0.27
0.02
0.026 0.26 5.0 - -
Total Mn
0.110
0.068
0.074
0.070
0.084
0.020
0.002 - - 0.060 1.0
Diss Mn
0.020
0.076
0.040
0.056
0.045
0.024
0.003 - - 0.072 1.0
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 16 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (1
Analyte (lag/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Cr(VI)
LCS
2.002
1.967
98.2
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (2)
Analyte (lag/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
As(III)
LCS
5.00
4.91
98.2
As(V)
LCS
5.00
4.66
93.3
MMAs
LCS
5.07
5.77
113.8
DMAs
LCS
3.63
3.52
97.1
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (3)
Analyte (lag/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Fe(II)
ICV
500.0
516.4
103.3
Total Fe
TMDA-70
369.0
413.3
112.0
Mn (II)
LCS
10.00
10.26
102.6
Total Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
294.8
94.5
Diss Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
301.3
96.6

Page 17 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (1)
Analvte (ua/L) Sample ID Rep 1 Rep 2 Mean RPD
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
As(III)
Batch QC
0.117
0.141
0.129
18.8
As(V)
Batch QC
ND (<0.030)
ND (<0.030)
NC
NC
MMAs
Batch QC
ND (<0.039)
ND (<0.039)
NC
NC
DMAs
Batch QC
ND (<0.058)
ND (<0.058)
NC
NC
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL

Page 18 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (3
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Fe(II)
Batch QC
25.6
27.9
26.7
8.7
Total Fe
Batch QC
44.4
44.4
44.4
0.0
Mn (II)
Batch QC
12040
12200
12120
1.3
Total Mn
CMW-6
178.2
171.6
174.9
3.8
Diss Mn
CMW-6
170.0
189.3
179.6
10.8

Page 19 of 21
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060721
Date: July 14, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate 0
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Cr(VI)
Batch QC
5.000
4.568
91.4
5.000
4.650
93.0
1.8
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix
Spike Duplicate
(2)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
As(III)
As(V)
DMAs
Batch QC
Batch QC
Batch QC
20.00
20.00
20.98
17.98
17.68
18.64
89.3
88.4
88.9
20.00
20.00
20.98
18.23
17.69
18.71
90.5
88.4
89.2
1.4
0.0
0.4
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix
Spike Duplicate
(3)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Fe(II)
Total Fe
Batch QC
Batch QC
500
500
535.0
546.5
101.7
100.4
500.0
500
535.0
534.8
101.7
98.1
0.0
2.2
Mn (II)
Total Mn
Diss Mn
Batch QC
CMW-6
CMW-6
500.0
1000
1000
12630
1188
1195
102.0*
101.3
101.6
500.0
1000
1000
12430
1131
1116
62.1*
95.7
93.6
0.8
4.9
6.9
*Ambient analyte concentration greater than spiking level. See case narrative

a
�^7
0
00
U
U
u
00
t,' O O
m
00
y
c
m
m
m
M
U ..+ t
r
2
ti
a W 0 O
u
y C ca
y
Q
00
c
i u
z
> cNa
O+0
U ;
Z n
7
00 o
o ❑ @
o
P
°�°
m
m
m
m
m
c
m
QI V U- �I �I U) I <I UI LLI
° Lam+ Y�.I O
y 1, '
S
Csa .5 a WCQ7
V U
c c c
p = Z Z Z
OT
w
Z
Q%
U
S
.J
f
0
00
� 1
L
-
�Q
—
a
'i a
CL
Fz�s�bzz
is
Zm
V
Q
cc R w
G Z u
v Z
1
r� A e!
0. M.
:I.
O
U_
Q
N
O
O O
p
M
Z
Z Z
w O
Z
�
d
E
C
Y
0
Page 10 of 21

ampany Name' S f r1 t E rr a
.Co tl� �✓ �- b h —
ontact �-I
Y
lddress2..z:�
�7-3>� -C;�S
phone Number: d
Fax Number:
I3mail Address:
Pro ect Name:
t
c
Pro ect Nuen er. 121760$
PCB Number: Matrix volume
Sam le ID �015 DJ1 Q5 � Bottle ID Date and'i'ime '
w r
,ad by. (sign) r i ; l v �- (print)
by: (sign} (print) ✓—"' -
by:
(print)
(sign)
J .50&0 -7-a
18804 Northcrcck ParkwaPhonOW) #92V�y Fax[phone]
Botha W A 98011
auteMerenn
oect Mn1. Pra
submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set Eorth
the quotation provided by the BRI, protect manager. If you arc not familiar
th the term and conditions associated with your protect, please contact your
3I to resent -.- as soon as satble 425 483-3300.
uested'I'um Around `I'irtte:
[ethod of Sample DeIivcr
Courier Trackin Number.
Sample Reception: 'Y�
No
Confirmation of
Initials Re uested An tes and Methods
Comments
preservative
As S
field filtered
EDTA - i
i ' ' Cr Vi
field filtered
H40HMH4SO4
Fe S c
field filtered
ere assed HO
Mn S c
field filtered______�
--- None
Mn S
unfiltered
None
Se S c
field filtered
None
field filtered
EDTA -1
As S
Cr
field filtered____
NH40R(NH4SO4 Fe S
field filtered
Degassed HCI
Mn S221c
field filtered _
None
Mn S ec
unfiltered
None
Se S
field filtered
None
Dateffime:
Datwllfft:_44fI ' :>;c
Received b : (si n)
le bottle as a seperate tine item for verification p t) sedunent (SD), tissue (I'S), product (P), other (0)
Please account for each samp groundwater (C i ), wastewater (W�,
Matrix: Air, freshwater (F%D, seawater (S�,
Rcv t.t (April2W5)