20231170 Ver 1_More Info Received_20231121

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2021-01636
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: McConnell Road
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ✓❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Brad Luckey, Pilot Environmental
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
McConnell Road 36.03875,-79.66024
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a] : 8803437590
9. Project Location— County [PCN Form A2b]: Guilford
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: McLeansville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Little Alamance Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Cape Fear/3030002
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
0 Nationwide Permit #
!Jurisdictional Regional General Permit #
Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
C
Revised 20150602

wA
r
o
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
McConnell Rd
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
McCleansville
2d.
Subdivision name:
McConnell Ridge
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
AF-McConnell, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
008577/00915
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Jeff White
3d.
Street address:
1330 Sunday Drive, Suite 105
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-422-5741
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8803439694
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.03851 Longitude: --79.65967
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
166 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Alamance Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land and fields. The site is located within a rural residential area of
McCleansville, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=1.52 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=9,550 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop the site with McConnell Ridge, a townhouse and single family
residential neighborhood.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of McConnell Ridge, a townhouse and single family residential
neighborhood. The overall project includes the construction of townhomes, single family residences, amenity and
clubhouse area, landscaped areas and stormwater control devices. In order to facilitate the proposed development and
access lots, it is necessary to have one stream crossing for road access, one wetland impact for road improvements to
McConnell Road, five stream and wetland crossings for proposed sewer lines and two stream crossings for proposed
water lines. To facilitate the development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers,
excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2021-01636
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey/David Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW-2021-01319 dated 3.14.23 and NCDWR Site Determination Letter dated 11.8.22
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Road Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.02
Hardwoods
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ®T
Sewer Line
Bottomland
Hardwoods
® Yes
El No
[:1 Corps
[:1 DWQ
0.002
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.02/.0.002
2h. Comments: Wetland Impact 1 (Wetlands "F" Impact Inset, SEI Sheet 1 of 2): The widening of McConnell Road will
permanently impact 0.02 acres (779 SF) of wetlands with road sideslope fill.
Wetland Impact 2 (Evans Sheet 7 of 8 and SEI Sheet 2 of 2) will temporarily impact 0.002 acres of for sewer line installation.
Areas of temporary impacts will be restored to similar pre -construction grade and stabilized with native herbaceous seed mix.
Mitigation is not proposed for the net loss impact to wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: See Attached Stream Impact Table
Stream Impact 1 (SEI Sheet 2 of 2) will permanently impact 112 linear feet (854 SF) of perennial stream with road crossing fill
(road, side slopes and keyed -in rip -rap energy dissipaters) and temporarily impact 30 linear feet (220SF) of stream channel
with associated de -watering.
Stream Impact 2 Evans Sheet 3 of 9 will temporarily impact 7 linear feet 154 SF of stream channel with sewer line open
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

cut/back-fill installation and associated de -watering.
Stream Impact 3 (Evants Sheet 4 of 9) will temporarily impact 8 linear feet (184 SF) of stream channel with sewer line open
cut/backfill installation and assoicated de -watering.
Stream Impact 4 (Evans Sheet 5 of 9) will temporarily impact 7 linear feet (165 SF) of stream channel with sewer line open
cut/back-fill installation and associated de -watering.
Stream Impact 5 (Evans Sheet 6 of 9) will temporarily impact 8 linear feet (191 SF) of stream channel with sewer line open
cut/back-fill installation and associated de -watering.
Stream Impact 6 (Evans Sheet 7 of 9 and SEI Sheet 2 of 2) will temporarily impact 5 linear feet (105 SF) of stream channel
with sewer line open cut/back-fill installation and associated de -watering.
Stream Impact 7 (Gannett Fleming Sheet 2 of 3) will temporarily impact 108 linear feet (5,843 SF) of Little Almaance Creek
with water line open-cut/backfill installation and assoicated de -watering.
Stream Impact 8 (Gannett Fleming Sheet 3 of 3) wll temporarily impact 56 lineer feet (2,979 SF) of Beaver Creek with water
line open cut-bckfill installation and associated dewatering.
Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction grades, stabilized with matting and native herbaceous
seed mix. Mitigation is not proposed for proposed for net loss stream impacts.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
131 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: A buffer authorization certificate from local municiality will be approved prior to buffer impacts occuring.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed residential sub -division to avoid other impact to streams, wetlands. The applicant
has selected the stream crossing locations in an area the stream is narrow and straight with few meanders. The applicant
designed the road crossing the utilize approximate 10-foot head/end walls thus reducing the permanent impact to the stream.
The remaining 1.517 acres of wetlands and 9,373 linear feet of stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence or other BMPs will be used. Temporary coffer dams will be installed. During
construction, water will be bypassed around the construction footprints. Appropriate stream bank protection will be provided in
the channel during construction and all excess excavated material will be immediately removed from the crossing area and
stockpiled in upland locations. Upon completion of the culvert/sewer line installations, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will
be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert or over the restored stream beds. Following installation of the culvert
and sewer/water lines, areas of temporary stream impact will be restored to similar pre -construction grades. The stream
banks will be matted with biodegradable materials and seeded/live staked with native species.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: The applicant does not propose mitigation for loss of streams and wetlands.
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: Guilford Co.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Stormwater management plan approval
from local delgated municipality will be obtained prior to impacts occuring.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Guilford County
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water
quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Impacts from wastewater generation, outside of those in this application, are not proposed.
Page 1 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The IPaC report for the site identifies the following federally protected endangered or threatened species: Schweinitz's
sunflower (E) and small whorled pogonia (T) as protected species that could be proximate to the project area.
The project area contains an immature hardwood forest estimated to be less than 30 years in age. Mid and understory
vegetation is densely vegetated. Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower or small whorled pogonia are not located
within the proposed project area. Therefore, we have made a determination of no effect for these species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify cultural resources of the site. The map does not
identify listed or eligible for listing properties on or nearby the project area. The map identifies a survey only property on
the southwestern portion of the larger delineation area. A copy of the map is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NHFL (Drawing 4, attached)
Digitally signed by Bradley Luckey
DN: cn=Bradley Luckey, o=Pilot
Bradley
Enviromental, Inc., ou,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
ema5=[e-mail],
Luckey
11.21.23
Date: 2023.11.21 16:21:15-05'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

t
an
�
O00
a1
N
\
+-+
N
I,
w
I,
w
Ln
O
Ln
U
cI
N
fp
Q
c I
�
E
L
ai
to
u1
N
N
M
:1-
-1
M
N E
N
N
N
N
N
Ln
Ln
Q ai
L
+
N
(6
b
O
c
O Z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
Q
O �
— ai
c6
c6
(o
c6
c6
c6
c6
E
C
ai
ai
v
ai
ai
ai
ai
N
ai
ai
a1
ai
a1
a1
a1
a1
Q
E
E
E v
a1
E
a1
E
v
E
a1
E
a1
E
u Y
aif
L Y
aj
v
L
co E
ai
L co
co
co
co
co
co
v>
E av
L
v
co a
L
z
J nz U
ai
U
ci
N
c
c
c
c
c
m
u
co
Q
aj
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
E
(
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
o v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
Q-
\
v
v
v
v
v
—
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
L.L
co
L
O
O
CL
co
fLo
fLo
fLo
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
+1
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
E E
C:
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
ai
�
E
L
E a'
c,
v n E
-1
N
m
u,
'o
r-
o0
L z3
Z

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address:
4453 McConnell Road
Greensboro, NC 27301
Owner Information:
Name:
AF-McConnell LLC
Address:
1330 Sunday Drive Ste 105
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number:
919-422-5741
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
[e-mail]
-L Signatu*re.)j Date:�� �� Z-2'"—
hite

_140j° , SHEET 1 OF 9
�o
f 0, IA-85
_- - MILLSTRE M R
_..
\ -
-EXIT
�a
131 Ro
�� � � `; '� %---- ----- ------ - - - -- - -- /,�`':� ���� MCCONNELL RD n
w00
ijLLJ
-- --
MCC DGE
z
VICINITY MAP 1 =4000' w
/ \ \
LU
'�',�, •�••�\ ;' •�� �' r :.: �' , + CT ��:�� = =\ e Ate""-
�.;\.\ %: ♦��'- y \\ �`�,r j 11/15/20�23I. BRI
•....•�' a" F
IN
® -
-- ♦ __ _ �. ,o'� OVERALL
\-,'=------- -- - - \ ;�'`'aa��,`��\' McCONNELL RIDGE
-
McCONNEL STREAM IMPACTS
WETLANDS (TYP)- -
FUTURE DEVEL P �' � � -_ �'`�,=.■-' ' -\, \ `\ o ` obA�"�`��"\�'.
b#0%4?' % JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP-GUILFORD COUNTY
CITY OF GREENSBORO-NORTH CAROLINA
110' RIPARIAN BUFFER / •\ \\ \\\ O \\ � `\\$6 \ ` NOVEMBER 15, 2023
ZONE 2 ZONE 1 WIDTH OF STREAM ZONE 1 / ZONE 2 \H \\b.•h ` 200 0 100 200 400
20' RIPARIAN 30' UNDISTURBED FROM TOB TO TOB 30' UNDISTURBED 2 RIPARIAN
BUFFER BUFFER BUFFER FFER \ \ Lat$ \\•''"'s \
1 inch=200ft.
'�• ® +� 4609 Dundas Drive
�an'S Greensboro,
North Carolina 27407
n ineeringg Inc. Fax [phone]
—Since 1974— Phone [phone]
STREAM BUFFER DETAIL `�- �GONN I Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
N.T.S.
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWIC\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

— — — BETSY PHIPPS AND
REBECCA ASKEW PHIPPS
PARCEL #116797
-` /
SS> S 'KOUNG's MI�t _ EX. 40' SEWER E
l� s> OU TF — , SM T /
A �
' s>
(v ZONE 2 ` — _ E)(. 42" DlP ` ss>
o
ZONE 1 rn, ` — CONS7-RUc �oN�
�/ V�
� EStii'T.
_ 10' C NO/l
ST HROUGH 0 H
REAM BUFFER
LITTLE
NCE CREEK
ZONE
�PROPERTY LINE
ONE 2
� � \ , POGO pUB GeV\ \�R // � / I ♦
SUSS �°
♦� � SwF � �/ a
♦ � R / I ♦'0
A
�\ \\ O♦�
♦ \ \sFo � l •
e ore sE ■ \ o \Go ` ♦
\v pS� ■ \ sF \ J+
A% ENFt 00`
McCONNELL RIDGE
PHASE-1 ■ \ \ ` 1
\ \ I\
■ \ Ill �T �
/ I/ I
/
/ I I
/ 1
I
NOTE: SEWER TO BE BORED ' r
UNDER STREAM CHANNEL ,•'
a�
11*0
It
it
� _ 1
_ ' ••_■■
I ly
1
I it
1
McCONNELL RIDGE
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
' ! 1
` I •
♦ ` I
AREA TABULATION
TOTAL ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE = 1903 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 617 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1286 SF
(TOTAL ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE = 1253 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 417 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 836 SF
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 0
NO IMPACT TO STREAM (SEWER WILL BE BORED
UNDER STREAM)
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF BUFFER TO EDGE OF
BUFFER NOT INCLUDING STREAM CHANNEL = 103 LF
(STREAM CHANNEL WILL NOT BE DISTURBED —SEWER
WILL BE BORED UNDER STREAM)
CA
� "Essio'
53416
11/15/2023
°6NGINE��'\
IMPACT-1 11001111M
McCONNELL RIDGE
STREAM IMPACTS
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP-GUILFORD COUNTY
CITY OF GREENSBORO-NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch =40ft.
+� Van5 4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro,
10 or,1 Carolina 27407
+� ngineeringy Inc. Fax [phone]
—Since1974— Phone [phone]
I Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWK\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

°p�seo ism I +
p ?O• p J0 / I - • 1
\\\�oposfopo�o8ev��f\MT ///Qo� // I • •
TRUSS \ �/ I ' � I � •
\ I
CN PN E FE
\ \ I I I ■ I
McCONNELL RIDGE ;
PHASE-1 I \
• I .I
■
1 � •� � �I
� I McCONNELL RIDGE
�y� /
/ ° ; FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
30,�
00000,
30,
5 \
, 20 ' vv v
r
O
'
\ \•OG
F
AREA TABULATION
TOTALPERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 606 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1264 SF
•
DISTURBANCEPERMANENT
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 867 SF
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 154 SF
TOTAL LF OF STREAM DISTURBANCE = 7 LF
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF BUFFER TO EDGE OF
BUFFER INCLUDING STREAM CHANNEL = 112 LF
VAAAAA11111I1 01111111111
CA h'O ���''%,
O
_ Q�oFEssio,///<,y�
1115/2023
/�NGINE���'�
4$F� B
IMPACT-2
McCONNELL RIDGE
STREAM IMPACTS
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP—GUILFORD COUNTY
CITY OF GREENSBORO—NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch =40ft.
+E moans
+E ngineemin9 Inc.
—Since 1974—
I Engineers Surveyors Planners
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro,
North Carolina 27407
Fax 336,854,8876
Phone[phone]
Firm License No.: C-0168
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWK\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

SHEET 4 OF 9
��♦♦ `��\
McCONNELL RIDGE
��\
AREA TABULATION
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
•
♦
TOTAL ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE = 1914 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 643 SF
0 ` �
�
I
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1271 SF
\ \
•
�FF� 2�
♦ �� �\ ,�
I I
I
TOTAL ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE = 2333 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 419 SF
0
`♦ �\ N, / `
! I
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1914 SF
\P\�\
N, N,
ZON
/
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 184 SF
TOTAL LF OF STREAM DISTURBANCE = 8 LF
�O`��F
♦ `
,,,,,,,,,,,,;
0 ♦ r��
� ♦ N,
"�.
;>
CONSTRUCTION ESM'T.
E `
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF BUFFER TO EDGE OF
_
•• � _
+
BUFFER INCLUDING STREAM CHANNEL = 113 LF
"^ ~
•�
`
``. 10' MAINTENANCE
CORRIDOR
THROUGH THE STREAM
`
C
BUFFER
4 1.zo
/
CAR '%
moo,
oFEss,o,
♦♦�
\ \
11/15/2023
\
\\
IMPACT-3
l \\
McCONNELL RIDGE
• s�
STREAM IMPACTS
♦ �► ` \ \
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP-GUILFORD COUNTY
McCONNELL -` �.
� \\\
\\\
CITY OF G CAROLINA
PHASE-1RIDGE ` `
McCONNELL RIDGE
NOVEM ER SO DZH
\
\
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
ao 0 20 ao so
\ \
I 1 inch =40ft.
Vn5 4609 Dandles Drive
Greensboro,
1 `
\ \
\\ \\
+ —o North Carolina 27407
+� ������'��i9 ���� Fax [phone]
I
\ ao \
—Since 1974— Phone [phone]
Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWI<\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

SHEET 5 OF 9
\
` �```A���� \\
AREA TABULATION
McCONNELL RIDGE ♦ '
PHAS —1
9
1 S� VIP"
♦ ��2
\\
TOTAL ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE = 2097 SF
/ ��1,
` �s
`
\ McCONNELL RIDGE
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 687 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1410 SF
BPS ��
` \�
\ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
/
TOTAL ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE = 1327 SF
\ \
\ \
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 451 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 876 SF
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 165 SF
TOTAL LF OF STREAM DISTURBANCE = 7 LF
SF \
1
\\ \\
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF BUFFER TO EDGE OF
\
30' TEMP.
CONSTRUCTION ESM'T.
`
\
I
\
BUFFER INCLUDING STREAM CHANNEL = 118 LF
1000
C
\
10' MAINTENANCE
CORRIDOR
• � `\ \
000, /
THROUGBUFFERSTREAM
• MO �� \ \ \
\
• v
CARO
�v
�`�°���
%
0 .,'FESS/0�%
\
�P
�` \
A
\ \
A
j 1 1 / 15/2023
° LNG I
'
♦
.000
IMPACT-4 �iii1111ml ImMO
\\
McCONNELL RIDGE
STREAM IMPACTS
PRIVA7
�,
\
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP—GUILFORD COUNTY
8, e��,P�
��ss SE`"ER McCONNELL RIDGE
` `
` \\
CITY OF GREENSBORO—NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE-2
•
`
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
40 p 20 40 80
•
♦
I 1 inch =40ft.
I
1
I
I I
V��5 4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro,
{ North Carolina 27407
+E ngineering, Ingo Fax [phone]
♦ I
`
I
—Since 1974— Phone [phone]
I Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWK\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

SHEET 6 OF 9
I I �♦ I � �\\ \\ / / /
\
=I
\ \\ F+ST
AREA TABULATION
\ oG McCONNELL RIDGE
\ A
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE = 2060 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 692 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1368 SF
\
♦ \\ \
TOTAL ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE = 1385 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 434 SF
` `
/ \ \
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 951 SF
�\
��
\\ \
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 191 SF
♦ \ ao
.".`...... TOTAL LF OF STREAM DISTURBANCE = 8 LF
� _• \ p�evc \ \Fib,
,� \ e• SUS \ \SST
�\
"" 1 ie�,
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF BUFFER TO EDGE OF
/ \
BUFFER INCLUDING STREAM CHANNEL = 119 LF
McCONNELL RIDGE \
\
30' TEMP. \
PHASE-2 CONSTRUCTION ESM'T.
�o
CAR
�10' MAINTENANCE
CORRIDOR
THROUGH THE STREAM
'
BUFFER53416
11/15/2023
NGINE��°�
F�.13 ?'?
IMPACT-5 ����IM1111ii�����
�v
♦�� qM��
McCONNELL RIDGE
STREAM IMPACTS
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP-GUILFORD COUNTY
`
CITY OF GREENSBORO-NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
McCONNELL RIDGE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch =40ft.
I
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT �-. �
+� Vans 4609 Dandles Drive
Greensboro,
— — + —
+� ngineerlin 9 axh Carolina 27407
Inc.� Fax [phone]
/ `
— Since 1974— Phone [phone]
Planners Firm
`
I Engineers Surveyors License No.: C-0168
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWI<\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

` \
\
McCONNELL RIDGE
\��v FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
\
DSA
1 ' PERENNIAL
STREAM `
_
R
�.000
^o
/
I._
/10' MAINTENANCE
CORRIDOR
THROUGH THE STREAM
/ BUFFER
Tn
/
/
I
•
.■..� on
MEN
30' TEMP.'
CONSTRUCTION ESM'T.
WILLIAM FOUST A/W
FANNIE FOUST
PARCEL #116689
PROPER �\N�
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
LOYD D. SMITH A/W
CAROLYN J. SMITH
PARCEL #116672
\
\
\
\
O
rD
AREA TABULATION
......... .
�.❖.•.O•.O❖.•q ky, I -. IX-. -
(TOTAL ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE = 1785 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 698 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 1087 SF
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 105 SF
TOTAL LF OF STREAM DISTURBANCE = 5 LF
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF BUFFER TO EDGE OF
BUFFER INCLUDING STREAM CHANNEL = 147 LF
���AAAU�11I I I I I I I I I1 /lll/1111,
\° N CA R�
�'1 <
0
534
11/15/2023
�NGINE��
/%s�c /. BRA P,���°�
IMPACT-6 �11iiinnn i I I I MOO
McCONNELL RIDGE
STREAM IMPACTS
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP—GUILFORD COUNTY
CITY OF GREENSBORO—NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
40 0 20 40 80
1 1 inch =40ft.
co
vans 4609 Dundlas Drive
Greensboro,
a North Carolina 27407
ngineerling, Inc. Fax [phone]
—Since1974— Phone [phone]
1 Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C,0168
[CIVIL 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWI<\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]I

PLUNGE POOL- -'���
I�rr
•• `•ram
Is
•
0
0v0
ZoN
McCONNELL IR DGr
\)UTURE DEVELOPMENT
�•
411
i
IINV
�I ' V<'
AV 4F
TR E CL ARING IM ACT ONLY
1
FOR I15' A.U.E. AROUND POND -�
I•
01
�� ♦ / lot ^
I ,� ~
• p:- W
q � O
D.
AREA TABULATION
TOTAL ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE = 0 SF
TOTAL ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE = 1043 SF
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE = 1043 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE = 0 SF
TOTAL STREAM CHANNEL DISTURBANCE = 0 SF
(NO DISTURBANCE TO STREAM CHANNEL)
CA R� %%
11/15/2023;
�NGINE��°�
BRA
IMPACT-7
McCONNELL RIDGE
STREAM IMPACTS
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP-GUILFORD COUNTY
CITY OF GREENSBORO-NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
40 0 20 40 80
1 1 inch =40ft.
+E moans 4609 Dundlas Drive
_ Greensboro,
— I---- a North Carolina 27407
+E ngineering) Inc- Fax 336-854,8876
—Since1974— Phone [phone]
1 Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168

T90F 9
A-------i
10' WIDE
TOP OF BANK
O O O O O
O
OO OH
—
STREAM
O O O OHO —
C� _
O D O C
TOP OF BANK
w
o_
a
KEYED -IN CLASS-1 RIP -RAP, 18" THICK WITH
COIR FIBER FILTER MATTING UNDER RIP -RAP
A—�
PLAN VIEW
TOP OF BANK
\ O O
KEYED -IN CLASS-1 �\ /
RIP -RAP, 18" THICK
STREAM INVERT o //`��'
\\ O O O /// y� COIR FIBER MATTING
\ UNDER RIP -RAP
PIPE
SECTION A —A
NOTES:
1. PERMANENT CROSSING FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT.
2. CLASS I RIP -RAP TO BE LAID MIN. 18 INCHES THICK OVER ENTIRE AREA OF DISTURBANCE
(AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER).
3. CLASS II RIP -RAP USED IN LARGER STREAMS (AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER).
4. AS PROJECT IS STABILIZED PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING AND SPREAD ALL EXISTING
EROSION STONE INTO MATTING AS SHOWN. ADD STONE AS NEEDED.
5. ANY REQUIRED ARMORING ABOVE NORMAL HIGH WATER MARK SHALL CONSIST OF MATTING
OR APPROVED VEGETATIVE COVER.
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
N TS
MATTING ANCHOR TRENCH
IN TRENCH ON 1' CENTERS
n uruno nvoo� no
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
f� 6 UVERLAY(MLN)
PLAN VIEW
COIR FIBER
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
EXTEND MATTIN
TO NWSEL
'HORS ON
CENTERS
ANCHORS
181, F (TYP) FLOODPLAIN/
EXISTING
BACKFILL—� y GROUND
/ L—ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
IN TRENCH
-_ "—""—"MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED IN TRENCH
AND BACKFILLED
STREAM BED
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
6" MIN
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
2" x 2" (nominal)
WOODEN STAKE
1"
2"
2"
24"
#4 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT BAR
4"
IAMETER BEND
4"
24"
1" (nominal)
STAPLE
12"
ANCHOR OPTIONS
NOTES:
1. IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL SEEDING, SOIL
AMENDMENTS, AND SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE
COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING.
2. RE AR OR STAPLES MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF
WOODEN STAKES AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
�N CA Rp
=Q ESS/0
53416
11/15/2023
INE��O��
DETAIL SHEET �. ' .
McCONNELL RIDGE %�/,F 130
STREAM IMPACTS
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP-GUILFORD COUNTY
CITY OF GREENSBORO-NORTH CAROLINA
I NOVEMBER 15, 2023
�an5 460 +� 9 Dundas Drive
Greensboro,
North Carolina 27407
+E ngineeringy Inc. Fax 336-854,8876
—Since 1974— Phone [phone]
1 Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
[CML 3D 2019 PROJECTS\GREENHAWK\McCONNELL ROAD\DRAWINGS\McCONNELL ROAD STREAM IMPACTS.DWG]

ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT = 14,713 SF
� II
/ I
yp �A, III
I
/ I
\ — \ A EREN NLY / / I <
PERMANENT DISTURBANCE
ROADWAY CROSSING =
11,100 SF
SEWER CROSSING =
1,229 SF
TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE
SEWER CROSSING=
2,384 SF
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT =
35,056 SF
® PERMANENT DISTURBANCE:
ROADWAY CROSSING =
5,283 SF
CLEARING/GRADING =
20,868 SF
POND EASEMENT=
6,429 SF
SEWER CROSSING =
2,027 SF
® TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE
SEWER CROSSING =
449 SF
WETLAND IMPACTS =
873 SF
FUTURE PHASE
McCONNELL RIDGE
SUBDIVISION
VICINITY MAP
1" = 4,000'
\,r rcnrvirlrvuvi
A\\
A / IMPACT FOR ROAD /
CROSSINg
340 ; 52 97
339
......... �,
V I I V I A\ \ FUTURE PHASE
% h O MCCONNELL RIDGE
\ 1 A 1 \\\\
\ \ 1 A A\ \ ❑ M�vvo — \�/ /� 33 34 \
- . � SUBDIVISION
I A v 36 37 47 46
�
v V V A 1 1 \ I / I I I III 23 \ \ \ \ 307 \
V 1 \ \ \ McCONNELL._ A / - �' \ 338 1 IIII. �� \ 22 \ \ v V
V I ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 21 20 v 38
1 \ \ DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
\ \ 1\
308 v
16
309
\ \ \ \ 330 - 1 PERMANENT ZONE 2 \ ��i A A \ 12 \ n / \ I z
I \\
J I ( 94 SF WETLAND _=, � \ z
v v\ \
PACT / 9
w
KIM FXMILY> LIMITED PART NE SHI \ \ \ l l I 4 — 7 I f i — i _
/ I 1I PA CEL 1166�78 I/I I II
/ I DB 695 P ,C� 1465
PERMANENT ZONE 2 10 PERMANENT _
I I I 4453CCONNE L RID. 1 \ I SEWER 1,799 SF ZONE 1 IMPACT
\ I \ / I 1,229 SF
I 5 2 ACRES
1 I I TEMPORARY ZONE 2 — — PE I
RMANENT ZONE 2
TEMPORARY ZONE 1 I I / IMPACT FOR SEWER IMPACT FOR CLEARING
I � � \ I WILLI�KM FOUSTA/W I I � � A � v
I IMPACT FOR SEWER I / a
I I ` FANNIE FO� � i � I / / / CONTRUCTION 449 SF �� o� AND GRADING 13,103 SF �5a � �
\ I I DB`4418 PG. 12 \ I \ lCONTRUCTION 1,229 SF 1 /Il/ 3..../P.B. 120 PG.29 \ \
WETLANDS„G„1:._... \ �\ \ I \ \ \ 1 PFOUSTAW�j
/ PERMANENTZONE2 I / /I / / / l I // / �/ /i�i MCCONNELL \ \ \
�PARC 116697
DWG 1 �: \ 4461 M CONNELL RD. \ \/ / / / IMPACT FOR SANITARY \ \ \ _� I / / — _ / \/ — / // / / / _ _ ROAD IMPROVEMENTS \ \ \ \
I \ 1 \ \ I/ / / / G �� " — DESIGNED BY OTHERS. \ \ \
ILLIA/ / / SEWER 228 SF ( � / / � 9 / / J / / i /
FA NIEiFOUST
1 1 I ::::.................. O VA\ I I I b6 418 rG. 1128 / / LLOYg D. S ITH A/W
V I I I P.BI 120 PG. 29 / I / MCA OLYN J./Sly(ITH
R �{CEL 11 D ]b G. 17 LLOYD Q S TH A/W GEORGE A. PRIE�MEYER \
I4507 MCCONNELLRD. / / P 8 1 Pc�s / CARD YN . SMITH /
P CEL/11�6672 / / � � I � � — — — — t' � '� / / m / i� � /�� � 3�� ��( �QQ DB 3364 PG. 402 \ V \ V
� DB 84 PG. 2 / / / F / ( \ .I P.B. 64 PG. 143
/ P�. 5 PG. I HAROLD W. HOWARDA/W / / / / �P `��\\L �QP PARCEL 116692 \ \ \ \
\ V A \ \ \ 1 1 \ / / / s cCgNryEL RD/ / I/ — — — / / �V / / �"��� �� �/ / I ' /"�' L� �ve Pam\ V v \ \ \ I PARCEL 1166�5 VALERIE H. HOWARD
\ - \ \ / / a / / / O < / F Q\\ 4708 MCCONNELL RD. \
— — — AN \ \ \ \ 1 \ / / / / / / /45 pMCCONNELL R� DB 8253 PG. 294 THOMAS M. LARSOM A/W m °' / �II/I/P.B. 51 PG.80I /\/OT�\d'PEGGY L. CARBON / �' y w �, A / ✓F / C,FF I
PARCEL 116686 T
O / / / I I I I 4515 MCCONNELL RD. DB 2990 PG.805 m v w ° v / Q \ �F �0 ll G��g p
M'v rn �A. r� O 00�
1 ` / — \ ❑ I I I I I PARCELI 6688 nr�rn n D' Co S F6S /� ✓� /( \ \
/ N G1 �z c�,j�'�\ cp G� 2
4519 MCCONNELLRD. / I Am,ib 00 ��c /7C,pF
�i` • A I I 1 I I \ / I I I I \ \ / 1O O O Z N Gl
vt T�
O� W
S/ F O
`q J RRY REESON
r �� / DB 8098 PG. 494 \ v
v v V v V I v
PARCEL
P.RC1607
— _— ----- — — —
/
`u_\-47-03 MCCONNELL R .0uT -UT--_ _ U- _ _
---
\ \
\ \
I \
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
400
I
/ — PROP. FILL LINE v v A \ PROP. FILL LINE —
\ _____ UT____ UT--0 UT_____ -
ilpiTm
_ — —
mow
�� ---
— — — — �U T
UT_____ ROAD
_ -BUT-_ _ UT ---- UT - -• - , — — _ —
_=U1--_ U1- - / , • . . ' , , _, _ _ \ _ —_ \ _ -1�I CCU
— —• = '
3072
-
-0' WIDE PUB I R __ OF WAY
DISTURBED APPROX. LOCATION % �22' WIDE ASPHALT PAVEDROAD— —
LIMITS PROP. SILT FENCE DISTURBED' DISTURBED APPROX. LOCATION
FENCE SILT LIMITS LIMITS \
779 SF WETLAND '
• J /
IMPACT / KIM FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP /
— " 1 I C DB 6695 PG. 1465 �/
I 1 \ / i PARCEL 116678
WETLANDS � /
4453 MCCONNELL D.
1-14
5.25ACRES —--
0
Cr
z
w
®\NN MUST
�TIU7'Y pR® FCp��!
C; 0 T,b �0
N
r' E
00 0
m U 00
U tjp 4. N
Lu i CD " N
a ON 4-U
0 CD N Z
bA p
0 11p L7 >
NLn
N m m a�
00
i
� 0
O �
0 �
Q �
z
O
a
s
0
z
W J � n
Q
5
OJ=
J �o
J 0
Lu W N
LL.IZpZ�
O Z = O
wu V)0�
j � O J N
W
'
oa ��rn
Q
C
G
li
.J
J
�
W
LL
Z
Z)
Z
m
O
o
Q
Lu
w
J
Q J
Z
z
O
= LL
Q
U F -
oo�a
,vwzz
OQp�:
s�00
aofUH
z z
w w
0 0
U U
z z
w w
Lu
0 0 0
� �
z � �
z z z
0 w w
L i­- i­-
> 0 0
w
� a a
M M
w
Q
0
O r-I
0
DRAWN BY: SDT
CHECKED BY: AIRS
DATE: 07/10/2023
PROJECT NO.: 706.01
REF. NO.:
SCALE: 1"=100
Mill-
R cTM
Cl
BEFORE YOU DIG! I 1 OF
CALL 811 N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER 1\
IT'S THE LAW!
( IN FEET)
1 inch=100ft.
WETLAND "F" IMPACT
SCALE: 1"=40'

PROPOSED
PIPE EARTH BERM
GENERAL NOTES:
(TYP.)
O O TEMPORARY
tL ON STRUCON
CINIII T111I
RPUBLICTER
1. PROPERTYGREENSBORO WATER
O BEERY CITY OFEENSBORO
SERVED
TIII
VED BIII
[ V
CLASS "I"
FESTREAM CROSSING
RIP RAP
AND SEWER.
`
FLOW
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE TO CITY OF GREENSBORO STANDARDS
0
M U
U �
-------
5
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
j
C O
MIN
LU O� [
3. 5'SIDEWALK TO BE LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF PUBLIC STREETS.
0 N U
0 CD
A
4. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
>
1-0
0J�QQJJzOU5L0w
5. AREA DETERMINED BY D.M.D. METHOD.
NNMM
sOi4V
_QZJQ=zQ1�
//
\
�
��—
///
I
FLOW _
6. THIS MAP DOES NOT MEETG.S. 47-30AND IS NOT FORTHE
RECORDATION OR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.
MLn
i
5'
�
/-,:-/
I
\�
LLOYD D. SMITH
MN
7. THIS MAP IS SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, AGREEMENTS, OR
RIGHTS OF WAY RECORDED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THIS MAP
[B
Q
�_II
CAROLLYN J. SMITH
SAND BAGS
WHICH WERE NOT VISIBLE AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION.
112 L.F.
/_
/—\—/—
��
��/II�
&k
DB 2810� 176
PROPOSED DISTURBANCE LIMITS
8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OFATITLE
854 S.F. PERMANENT
PARCEL EL 1
EARTH BERM PAN
REPORT AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL
STREAM IMPACT
/ INCLUDES D
CULVERT
/�I/�
4511 MCCONNELL RD.
(TYP.)
POLYETHYLENE FABRIC PROPOSED
ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY.
/--�
��
�II
EARTH BERM
\
.
\-
CJ_ OQJ
30
._\�\�
Q-II
ON FACE (8 ML. THIC(TYP.) FROM
9. DIP SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO CLASS 50.
PROP. 20'SANITARY SEWER ESMT
�
Q�
.
TOP OF PUMP
MIII
PROP. 8"SVTARY SEWER
////
n
CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
—_/ �r
molimmmITOPUMP
�
-/—�
R
O' AlTARV
/
/
/—_
a
REAM—
FLOW
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL FROM NCDEQAND ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS FROM OTHER REVIEWING
��LN
\�
\—
—
AGENCIES
C
Lu
PRECAST CONCRETE ENDWALL
NCDOT STD. 838.33
—�II
SSM
\_�/Q
\�
�
'/ �
/
' �
—WILLIAM FOUSTA/W
FANNIE FOUST
DB 4418 PG. 1128
P.B. 120 PG. 29
EX. INV/ TEMPORAR Y
CREEK STONE DAM
REMOVE SANDBAGS & FABRIC TO ALLOW FLOWTHROUGH POLYETHYLENE FABRIC
2. FLAG ALL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PRIOR TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
3. SETUP PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING ON -SITE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION WITH
APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL.
N .:+a)
w
N
,
j�
\
�/III/
PARCEL 116689
4507 MCCONNELL RD.
WHEN NOT PUMPING AROUND. ON FACE (8 ML. THICK)
SECTION A -A
�v�WER
O
�—��.
//S
T--UURR
/,/�-
94 SF WETLAND
. \.
�
—
g�_UI�►F�FT FR\\
/
IMPACT
�
/III
1PUMP AR1FOR CULVERT
TEMPORARY CROSSING
4. CLEAR TREES AROUND PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREA ENOUGH TO INSTALL SILT FENCE,
DIVERSION BERMS AND SILT FENCE ROCK OUTLETS ALONG THE TOP OF BANK AND PROJECT
Lf) U
J_
\—�
I
\�
/�III
—
--
PRECAST CONCRETE ENDWA
lII�/
y_\
INSTALLATION
PERIMETER. DIRECT WATER INTO EXCAVATED STORAGE LOCATED ON EITHER SIDE OF STREAM AT
PROPOSED CULVERT OUTLET DO NOT GRUB STUMPS OR DISTURB STREAM CHANNEL AND SID E
1
_
NCDOT STD. 838.33
�
—�•
�
_\\III
NOTES
_ TEMP. STONE D
—///�
—/��--
_�—�fRQO
SLOPES OF STREAM.
STREAM IMPACT 44 SF
'
'gg
1) EROSION STONE TO BE "CLASS I" RIP -RAP UNLESS DESIGNATED DIFFERENTLY ON CONSTRUCTION PLAN.
2) PUMP AND LINE SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR USING THE BASE FLOW SHOWN ON THE
5. INSTALL PUMP -AROUND & ROCK CHECK DAM DOWNSTREAM OF CULVERT. DEWATER WORK
AREA INTO EXCAVATED STORAGE AND BEGIN CULVERT INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR
/II
CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
3) MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
INSTALL CULVERT DURING NON -RAIN EVENTS WITH THE STREAM AT BASE FLOW
.
—NU'
/
�/�//,
//II
�/
SANDBAGS SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS WHICH ARE RESISTANTTO ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION,
CONDITIONS.SANDBAGS:
�
RIP -RAP OUTLET
��,__
—'_!`�/
/
/
TEARING AND PUNCTURE, AND WOVEN TIGHTLY ENOUGH TO PREVENT LEAKAGE OF FILL MATERIAL. (i.e.
SAND, FINE GRAVEL, ETC.)
6. INSTALL CULVERT AND INLET/OUTLET HEADWALLS AND DIRECT STREAM INTO COMPLETED
0
PROTECTION TO
TEMP. SANDBAG COFFERDAM
CULVERT. WRAP SILT FENCE OVER AND AROUND CULVERT END WALLS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
Q
KEYED IN
/II
UIV, TEMP STREAM IMPACT176SF
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR CULVERT CROSSING —PUMP AROUND
ASSLOPESREBROUGHTTOGRDE. SEED AND MULCH PROJECT SLOPES IMMEDIATELY AFTER
O
////
_�
_
SLOPES
<BE
LL
RIP -RAP TO BE PLACED
THAT THE STREAM
O
/_
1) INSTALL PUMPAND LINETO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING TO
AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUING PUMPING WHILE
7. INSTALL REMAINING SANITARY SEWER &GRADING. SEED AND MULCH REMAINING AREAS.SUCH
sU w
WILL FLOW ON TOP OF
WORKING WITHIN THE STREAM.
w n
�>
THE RIP RAP EVEN IN
LOW FLOW CONDITIONS 1
)NSTALL DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY STONE DAM AND FILTER FABRIC TO PREVENT BACKFLOW INTO
O ID
w w
CONSTRUCTION AREA.
r4
(pO
CULVERT TO BEHRIP-RAP
OUTLET
3) INSTALL PROPOSED EARTH BERMS ALONG TOP OF BANK ON EACH SIDE OFTHE CONSTRUCTION AREA.
> Z Q U 0)
ZZ
CcrO
BY
4) INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN ORSILT BAG ATTOP OF BANK. DEWATERCONSTRCTION AREA BETWEEN
zINSTALLED o
PUMP -AROUND
PROTECTION TO
BE KEYED IN
TEMPORARY DAM USING TEMP. SEDIMENTTRAP.
5) UPON CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION, REMOVETEMPORARY DAMS, FILTERFABRIC. DEPRESS TEMPORARY
UD
w U n C7 r1
wC4
METHOD (SEE
DAM BOTTOMS INTO STREAM BED UNTILTOP OF RIP RAP IS LEVELWITH STREAM BOTTOM.
�=�
LLmDETAILTHIS
W
SHEET)
6) UPON STABILIZATION OF CLEARED AREAS, REMOVE TEMPORARY EARTH BERM, SEDIMENTTRAP, AND
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 Q rn
BASIN.
tDEWATERING
0w
40 0 20 40 80 160
(
IN FEET)
j Q
1 inch =40 ft.
J
IIIIIIIIIII11II
II/
II
II
111
III
III
III
III
III
III
III III
III
III
III
III
III
111 III
III
III
111
III
Lu
OVQZV
660
660
wJJN
ZWOUOJ
U
1�'11
\'
u
F0N
.
(,
_ /
.
1
`
s00
111111111IIIIIIIIII
/
iJ�oG/\
1
i
a- N U F-
IIIIIII1IIII1
11 1'i
1
V1IIIiII1I1II/
650
650
1
JJs�i"i�f"i111I1lu1
// /
III1I'IIIIIIII'
JzQ¢6�l
L_j
EX.
CL STREAM
`ii
LL
`
IZ
RP,
B"
vll
//
S/EWv■■TIII
EViR
`
O
O1?A"
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIY
`
/
IV
J
J
EPA
ATI
N
I
/
\ /
/
1
1n
F_
F_
-
/�Y/J��
/
LL
LL
1111I
T /
III
Luoo0>
p
ijLLOlwN=C~w�LLU°CtepNOp°
F
mn
.
'%IIIIIIIIIIIII
yn
CL
'IIIIIIIIIIIII
0
Z
Z"
OI
640
1"
SD-74
I
4
0
0
IIIuI1IIIIIIIIIII
1-11
A7Z// �U
111iI'111L
W
�`� -
../tii1/
•
r
�
-I
v\
�
-�,. -`
wR
°
iI111I1l'
iII�
,.
O
ri
00
(JIF—INV.
>/1/
_
6'
8.6zI
l
JL
�N`(`(Nu
�a/
/
VIIIII
11111111111
15IIIIIIIII
�
�\"�
y1
'
1 IN v.
63+F•O5I
1111111111I
`
°
I FI,D,S
J2Y
ifh
1
111111111111111111
111111111111111111
11111111111111111
1
I
CrCm
1
1
1
DRAWN BY: SDT
DAD
PAID
11IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
1IIIIIIIIIIIII
--.l�.D�
/1
V�7,IIIIIIIIIIIII
1111111111111111
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
I I
ILIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IV1
I
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1
1111111111111111111
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1 I
1111111111111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1
1111111111111111111
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
CHECKED BY: ARS
�L�-
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIII
I
11
11
�_-�11111_I
IIv,TQ
'
-
1',
11
11
I0
It
11
11
11
DATE: 07/10/2023
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
�
IQFIIIIIIIIIIIII
IlIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
mT1
:.1C1III1I'IIIIII .
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.
1f
x
x
11
11
dr
= —I
11
11
I2 =
11
11
11
PROJECT NO.: 706.0152.5
REF. NO.:
1//
1
-
.
4-
1-
RIP
RAP
PAD
IZ
1
1
VHz630
630
SCALE: 1-40'
IIIIIII
IIIIIII
IIIIIII
IIIIIII
IIIIIII
IIIIIII
IIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIII
11111111111
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
11111111111
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
11111111111
/
01,IICA
I//oIa//
o/•O,//•/
I11I1LLL^I1/nI/1/I'�
•_CN�_uCCQ�J-1�
1�I 1�
1IaX1n/�IFFF
I1n1/
U1
''
-��;'0ao,
�S S/
/a
,
,•
,%����O,�,,•
-
r
-I1'"
_-
�111
CULVERT
CROSSING
SSMH-I
TO
SSMH-K
:
41
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
1 I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
1 I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C2
620
620
2012

MCCONNELL ROAD WATER MAIN
LITTLE ALAMANCE
CREEK CROSSING
SEE SHEET 2
STREAM IMPACTS
PERMIT DRAWINGS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOVEMBER 2023
E� Cj
If
;;�I BEAVER CREEK
_ " _ _ SEE SHEET 3 _
'
If
N.
------------
\ r .If If
If
4.
-------------
r c:7 /
1 N.
i r
\. /
If If
N.
-�- _ \ I I I 1 I I ` I \\ \ \--�� I \ I •=\ Afcl.o/^�I�'
- - J
L� \
,`��—� �3
~ /
R M03 - \ IN
\\ \
�.
\\ I \ o
IN
vok
\ `\ `\ \ `\`\ `\`\ `\
\
\
\ `.
` _ \<•�
00
IN
I/� � +. `��. ♦♦ \.. � / / � OI \\. \\ \ \ , / // / / ��__\ �`♦ __
I '11 rSR 0
Dk CO N, - - - — - - —
NN
1 � r
N.
I
� I I I . r � _--' _ - . -�_ . - _. \. � \_ \ _ , j .•:� �_ //.r:�----_ ./ice, - !. � \ 1 i . L \ \ , \ � ♦
LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK CROSSING
STREAM IMPACTS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
DISTURBANCE = 5,843 SF
LENGTH = 108 LF
PERMANENT IMPACTS
N/A
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: I" = 200'
BEAVER CREEK CROSSING
STREAM IMPACTS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
DISTURBANCE = 2.979 SF
LENGTH = 56 LF
PERMANENT IMPACTS
N/A
N.C. GRID - NAD 83
z Now
fioannettFieming

G�[i]
580
0.2% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
1% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE m
\ (100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN)
w
\ U-
DAVID E, PURVIS
OB 350B PG. 58 m
PARCEL 116824 W %\
5200 MILLSTREAM RD.
d gyp,
\ d It
PROP. 12" DIP
\ \ WATER MAIN (TYP.)
DAVID E, PURVIS \
DB 3666 PG. 2215
PARCEL 116823
5214 MILLSTREAM
RD. \ Al
yo \ \
MILLSTREAM ROAD\\
SR#3134 \ \
- \
\ l
OLIVIA WRAY EX. ROW (TYP.) 1
DB 5035 PG. 1256
PARCEL 116622 \
4239 MCCONNELL RD. \ \
I
I 20
�I\xh
GNPN 9
5.843 SF TEMP.
CHANNEL IMPACTS
I/ I
cr) DAVID E, PURVIS r 1% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
I DB 3508 PG. 58 / MO -YEAR FLOODPLAIN)
PARCEL 116824
EX. 5200 MILLSTREAM RD. r
N.C. GRID - NAD 83
Z
EASEMENT I 0.2% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
PROP. TCE (TYP.) (TYP.)
20' (TYP.) � / I LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK CROSSING
(!] I w/ o c •• � n K i 1 / T r A A I-1 r1 rl A I-1 \/ n T I-1 r A A A T A A I-1 A n T n
PROP. PERMANENT cn`^'
\ EASEMENT (TYP.)
SEWER (TYP . )
10' TYP. / /
BEVERLY H.
BRESLYN
/ \ AND WILLIAM E.
\ ss r BRESLYN
DB 6986PARCEL 1155990
\ 4416 MCCONNELL RD.
_ \ss
— OH OH/P OFi�/ _ \ ss 1
'A T — _ s M
6 EX. CONC. BRIDGE I 9
PROP. 12" DIP < W
WATER MAIN (TYP.) \. I I =
LLj
ROAD +
I
�
0 \ \Z 1(\ 1;
LLj
In
%
\ b I mG \ Lu
EX. 36 " SAN . �--�
O \ 7m 9 PAUL T. LARKIN A/W SEWER INSIDE ��� _J
ANGELA M. LARKIN 60" STEEL cnI
v- 1 D.B. 8012 PG. 1106 =
PARCEL 116912 �
\ \\ \ 4308 MCCONNELL RD. EX. ~
EASEMENT Q
(TYP.) "57
PLAN
SCALE: 1"-40'
1% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
MO -YEAR FLOODPLAIN)
LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK
STREAM CHANNEL
EX. GRADE
PROP. 12" DIP
J
WATER MAIN (TYP.)
I
_
/
\
PROP. 12" DIP
WATER MAIN (TYP.)
I I
I I
I I
EX. 36" SAN.
4' MIN. COVER (TYP.)
SEWER INSIDE
60" STEEL
3
0
5 6
7
PROFILE
SCALE: 1"-40' HORIZ.
1"-10' VERT.
10
11
1 C1VIrUrlHrl T 0 1 rlC HICI 1I II-'HU 1 0
TEMPORARY
DISTURBANCE
PIPELINE LENGTH
WITHIN CHANNEL
� inTrr�
5,643 SF
108 LF
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF GREENSBORO,
GUILFORD COUNTY, NCDOT, AND NCDEQ STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS.
NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL ALL REQUIRED PERMITS
HAVE BEEN OBTAINED.
3. ALL GRADES SHALL BE RESTORED TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS.
4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" TOPSOIL AND SEEDING UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. CUT AND FILL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL NOT BE STABILIZED WITH TURF
GRASS BUT MUST BE STABILIZED WITH VEGETATION THAT REQUIRES MINIMAL
MAINTENANCE, E.G. "NO -MOW MIX".
5. SOIL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE
EROSION. AREAS OF THE PROJECT SITE THAT ARE NOT TO BE GRADED SHALL BE
PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OR OTHER DISTURBANCE UNTIL FINAL
SEEDING IS PERFORMED.
6. ALL TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE
TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT TO BE REMOVED
FROM TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, AND ALL DISTURBED AREAS
SET TO FINAL GRADE AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE
MATERIALS OFF SITE. THIS RESPONSIBILITY SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED
APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS DICTATED BY THE JURISDICTIONAL EROSION CONTROL
AUTHORITIES.
STREAM REFORESTATION DETAILS
PLANTING DETAILS
LIVE, STAKES PLANTING DETAIL
LIVE STAKE
ems, 2
640
BARER00'I' PLANTING DETAIL
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR
~'II
r �I
PLANTING NOTES;
MATTING ANCHOR TRENCH
610 IN TRENCH ON 1' CENTERS
ANCHOR OVERLAP
� — — — — . ON .CENTERS 1'. —.
580
1
►O�OOOOOOOOOO��i�O��o�i�00000000000000��0,��
.►��i?�t�A?�A?Q�?�?QQ�t�t�?i w D���QQ������i���i�i���i�i�����i�i
6" OVERLAY (MIN)
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS PLAN VIEW
18"
(TYP)
COIN FIBER
MATTING
BACKFILL—\
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
EXTEND M
TO NWSEL
1' CENTERS
IN TRENCH
- - MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED IN TRENCH
AND BACKFI L L E 0
ANCHORS ON
STREAM BED 1' CENTERS
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
TSP, 1 STRF_A.MHA.NK REFORESTATION SMALL BE PLANTED 3 FF. TO 5 IT.
ON CENTER RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 4 Fr. ON CENTER,
APPRO.YRIATF.LY 2724 PLANTS PER .ACRE_
TYPE 2 STREAMBA.NK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED 6 FT. TO 10 FT.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8 FT. ON CENTER
APPROXIMATELY 680 PLANTS PER ACRE,
NOTE:TAPE IAND TYPE 2 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE
PAID FOR AS 'STR&t1. REFORESTATION"
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION TYPICAL
nPI I
STREIMBANK REFORESTATION
MLCfURE,nYE, SILE..AND FURNISH SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING.
TYPE 1
50% SALIX NIGRA BLACK R'ILLOIY 2 R- 3 R LIVE STAKES
60% CORNUS AVOML]I SILKY DOGWOOD 2 R- 3 RLIVE STAKES
TYPE 2
EXISTING
GROUND
6" MIN
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
2" x 2" (noninal)
WOODEN STAKE
q10 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT BAR
4"
IAMETER BEN
4
24"
1" (nominal)
STAPLE
1"
12"
ANCHOR OPTIONS
EiannettFieminq
0 20' 40' 60'
1" = 40' HORIZ.
0 5' 10' 20'
1" = 10' VERT.

1% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
MO -YEAR FLOODPLAIN)
0.2% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
650
640
630
620
610
600
590
580
�GT \"N'
F9
\�9
Off
W
UJ
w
cn
0
O
Cll
cn
z
I --I
U
a
\ \ \ \ g \ 6 I STEVEN C. LOWDERMILK
\ (�'cFFR O'cFF9 I DB 3452 PG. 1441
\ II D.B. 5957 PG. 954=R/W
\ \ \ I 1% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE PARCEL 116821
BEVERLY H. BRESLYN AND \ 90� 6 II (100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN) 4411 MCCONNELL RD. I
WILLIAM E. BRESLYN \ FF ti l✓�FF I I I
DB 6986 PG. 200 9 1 \
\ F9 PARCEL 115599
4\ \ 0.2% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
mG 416 MCCONNELL RD. \ o \
2
PROP. TCE (TYP.)90FFFR �TyAF 6���
F9
5' (TYP.) 9G\ Z0 \\ \ \\ I
PROP. PERMANENT \�
EASEMENT (TYP.) G,�� \ \ \ F19 \\ I
5' (TYP.)
\ 6 BEAVER CREEK \ F9 \ I
STREAM CHANNEL \ \ \ I
PER FEMA (TYP . )EX \
MON.(OTYP.)\
EX. ROW (TYP.) 0, ��T \\�
O c \ FF9 1,9tjpp4,
PROP. TCE (TYP.) PROP. 12" DIP
2E 979 SF TEMP. \ < 20' (TYP.) WATER MAIN (TYP.)
�TYp CHANNEL IMPACTS
T \\ eOFFFq (T_PROP. PET
pF 2 6 \ m EASEMENTRMANE(TYPN)
T
Fq 10' (TYP.)
/�J OH/P
\ \ \ \ e� --- OH
\ \ < CCO� \ ` T \ \ 56' /P
TCE 196
T- T
/O T
\ \ / �_ T T\ T T / —
�,9 \ \ -T T—fT �j --T— T/
—— - — — — — — — — — — — — — 4, --
\� BG —TAT TAT �T
BEVERLY H. BRESLYN \ / \\\ \\ / BEVERLY H. BRESLYN AND \ EX. ROW (TYP.)
\ \ WILLIAM E. BRESLYN
AND WILLIAM E. BRESLYN /\ —
\ DB 6986 PG. 200
FAMILY TRUST \ \ '9
\ PARCEL 115599
D.B. 6986 PG. 200 4416 MCCONNELL RD. j
CEL 115599
3916 RMCCONNELL RD.
PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=40 '
1% ANNUAL FLOOD CHANCE
(100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN)
BEAVER CREEK
I
I
I
STREAM CHANNEL
I I
I I
I I
PROP.
ARV
EX. GRADE
I
I I I
PROP. 12" DIP
WATER MAIN (TYP.)
4' MIN. COVER (TYP.) PROP.
!2" DIP
WATER
MAIN (TYP.)
2
13
14
15
16
17
PROFILE
SCALE:1"=40' HORIZ.
1"=10' VERT.
19
20
21
w.�1.I
640
630
N.C. GRID - NAD 83
z low
BEAVER CREEK CROSSING
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
TEMPORARY
DISTURBANCE = 2,979 SF
PIPELINE LENGTH
WITHIN CHANNEL = 56 LF
NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF GREENSBORO,
GUILFORD COUNTY, NCDOT, AND NCDEQ STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS.
NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL ALL REQUIRED PERMITS
HAVE BEEN OBTAINED.
3. ALL GRADES SHALL BE RESTORED TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS.
4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" TOPSOIL AND SEEDING UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. CUT AND FILL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL NOT BE STABILIZED WITH TURF
GRASS BUT MUST BE STABILIZED WITH VEGETATION THAT REQUIRES MINIMAL
MAINTENANCE, E.G. "NO -MOW MIX".
5. SOIL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE
EROSION. AREAS OF THE PROJECT SITE THAT ARE NOT TO BE GRADED SHALL BE
PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OR OTHER DISTURBANCE UNTIL FINAL
SEEDING IS PERFORMED.
6. ALL TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE
TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT TO BE REMOVED
FROM TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, AND ALL DISTURBED AREAS
SET TO FINAL GRADE AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE
MATERIALS OFF SITE. THIS RESPONSIBILITY SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED
APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS DICTATED BY THE JURISDICTIONAL EROSION CONTROL
AUTHORITIES.
STREAM REFORESTATION DETAILS
PLANTING DETAILS
LIVE STAKES PLANTING DETAIL
LIVE STAKE
u YIi.Olfl�IDJILIIIO
BARF,ROOT PLANTING DETAIL
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR
PLANTING NOTES: }J
Iti
��,
620
L
•iiiiiiiiiiiiiii"i i'i' �' O!i�i�i�i�i�i --I
�
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
►000000000000000�^O ��000000000000000�'�
iii"iiii�i�0i�i�v�i�i�i���i��ti i�.�i�i�i•OOi�ii�i'iii�i�i'i•O
�000000000000000���� ���0����00�•�•�•���•�•�O��O�<�
o !�200000�2�02�2�!�!�000�_�000!�2i2iS!�2.2.2i!�!�0002�
.is,
U.-I:T11
580
2
->•i Fes— 6" OVERLAY(MIN)
ANCHORS ON_/
1' CENTERS PLAN VIEW
T)TE I STRF_AMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLA.NTIJ) 3 Ff. TO 5 Vf.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGLNG J F'I'. ON CENTER,
APPROXDLATELY 2725 PLANTS PER ACRE..
TYPE 2 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PL4\'1'ED 6 Pl'.'l'O 10 Fr.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING S FT. ON CENTER.
APPROXIMATELY 680 PLANTS PER ACRE
❑ NOTE: TSTE IAN'D 'l1PE 2 STREAMBAN'K REFORES'1AXIl1N SHALL BE
PAID FOR AS "STRFAWBANK REFORESTATION"
STREAMBANK RL:FORL:STATION TYPICAL
'IYYh: II
TYPE. II
II
ISTREAWBe1NK REFORESTATION I
MIXILRF.,'ItYF. SF/,F:, M'O NfIRNISH SFWLL COFFOARI TO TllE FOLLOMNGi
TYPE 1
50% SALIX NIGRA BLACK WILLOW 2 R— 3 ft I" STAKES
50% CORNUS AMOMEM SILKY DOGWOOD 2 ft— 3 ft LIVE STAKES
TYPE 2
2" x 2" (nominal)
WOODEN STAKE
1"
12-24"
A10 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT BAR
COIR FIBER
18
(TYP)
FLOODPLAIN/
EXISTING
24
MATTING
BACKFILL
GROUND
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
\, r�
1" (nominal)
EXTEND MATTIN
STAPLE
1
TO NWSEL
6" MIN
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
IN TRENCH
12"
- - Z - -
MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED IN TRENCH
AND BACKFILLED
ANCHORS ON
STREAM BED
1' CENTERS
ANCHOR OPTIONS
TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
gannettFieminq
0 20' 40' 60'
1" = 40' HORIZ.
0 510' 20'
1" = 10' VERT.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01636 County: Guilford U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-McLeansville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Pilot Environmental, Inc.
Attn: Michael Brame
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
Kernersville, NC 27284
E-mail: shomerAyilotenviro.com
Size (acres) —166 Nearest Town McLeansville
Nearest Waterway UT to Little Alamance Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.038513,-79.659675
Location description: The proiect area is primarily located on the east and north sides of McConnell Rd, and on the south side
of Little Alamance Creek, in McLeansville, Guilford County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above -described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33
USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be
sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map
dated 9/2/2021. Therefore, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above -described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including
wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above -described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above -described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated _ We strongly suggest you
have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this

SAW-2021-01636
survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may
be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above -described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Bailey at [phone] or
david.e.bailey2 C&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 03/14/2023.
D. Remarks: N/A
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A. SHANNINgUSACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do no object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: 00,
Date of JD: 03/14/2023 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at hl!ps://reaulatoiy.ops.usace.gmy.mil/customer-service-survey/.

DWC 1-14
WVA 1-5
(0.01 AC)
DP-3 O
Ltk3tNU
DWG 1-14 .
(0.478ac)
Site Boundary
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Intermittent Stream
#
Perennial Stream
jog
Wetland
-
DP-10 Data Point a
wA1-2 Flag Number/Feature ID
Verification Results
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACAE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ-
DWR ON SEPTEMBER 1,
2021. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISIDICTIONAL FEATURES.
`�#
Drawin 5
g
,ma
� 11/8/zozi
�` Wetland Map
2018 Satellite Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot GPS Data
'` I `_ y
4453 McConnell Road
Approximate 166-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 450'
� ,� --
McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Date: 9.2.21
v. PILOT EN VI RO NM E NTAi.I NC
Pilot Project 6869

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
A licant: Pilot Environmental Inc., Attn: Michael Brame File Number: SAW-2021-01636 Date: 03/14/2023
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑X
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.g.M.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ug latoiyProgramandPermits.asox
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the fixture. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: David Bailey
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Raleigh Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNINC&USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 03/14/2023
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Pilot Environmental, Inc., Attn: Michael
Brame, 743 Park Lawn Court, Kernersville, NC 27284
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, 4453 McConnell Road /
McLeansville / Guilford County, SAW-2021-01636
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is primarily located
on the east and north sides of McConnell Rd, and on the south side of Little Alamance Creek, in
McLeansville, Guilford County, North Carolina.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Guilford City: McLeansville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.038513 Longitude:-79.659675
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Little Alamance
Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
0 Field Determination. Date(s): 9/1/2021

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resources in
review area
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
Little Alamance Creek
36.04255
-79.66404
2990 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSA
36.03525
-79.66028
3100 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSB 1
36.03758
-79.65757
1690 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSB 2
36.03734
-79.65725
150 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSC
36.03839
-79.65697
190 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSE 1
36.03526
-79.6595
240 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSE 2
36.035
-79.65805
450 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream DSF
36.03518
-79.66271
320 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream SA
36.04187
-79.66418
100 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream SB Beaver
Creek
36.04207
-79.66426
220 FEET
non -wetland
404
Stream SC
36.03877
-79.66193
250 FEET
non -wetland
404
Wetland DWA 1-8
36.04069
-79.66219
.152 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland DWB 1-3
36.03894
-79.65884
.01 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland DWC 1-14
36.0384
-79.65791
.222 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland DWD 1-4
36.03844
-79.65704
.014 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland DWE 1-15
36.03759
-79.65704
.116 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland DWF 1-14
36.0361
-79.66313
.368 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland DWG 1-14
36.03475
-79.66273
.478 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland WA 1-5
36.03683
-79.66071
.026 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland WD 1-11
36.03494
-79.65781
.119 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland WE 1-2
36.03526
-79.66005
.002 ACRES
wetland
404
Wetland WVA 1-5
36.0381
-79.6579
.01 ACRES
wetland
404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
❑X Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (PEI)
❑X Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
N Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
❑X U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1=24000 (1 "=2,000') Mcleanville, NC
❑X Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: USDAWebSoilSurvey Guilford County, NC
NNational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Wetlands Mappe
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
N FEMA/FIRM maps: National Flood Hazard Laver From FEMA Web May Service
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
N Photographs: N Aerial (Name & Date): 2018 Satellite Imagery from ESRI (Wetland Mau dated 6.29.21)
or N Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
NOther information (please specify): OL2 LiDAR (NC SDD website)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
03/14/2023
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Mr. Brad Luckey
Pilot Environmental Inc.
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 8, 2021
Delivered via email to: [e-mail]
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the 401 Certification Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC
02B .0506(c))
Subject Property: 4453 McConnell Rd, McLeansville NC, Guilford County
Dear Mr. Luckey:
On September 1, 2021, 1 conducted an on -site determination with you to review features located on the
subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state regulations. David Bailey
with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was also present during the site visit.
The Division acknowledges any and all areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the
USACE. The attached initialed and dated sketch accurately depicts all Division stream determinations
conducted during the site visit.
At the time of this letter, all perennial stream channels and jurisdictional wetlands found on the
property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. In addition, the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules may
apply to some streams at this location, please be sure to contact the local government for further
information regarding the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Please note that these regulations may be subject
to change in the future.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. The owner (or future
owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future
correspondences concerning this property. Landowners or affected parties that dispute this
determination made by the Division may request a determination by the Director of Water Resources.
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
NCRTH CARCLINA
Dew emm im�momnia�.i` /"� 336.776.9800

Page 2 of 2
This determination is final and binding, unless an appeal request is made within sixty (60) calendar days
of the date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and/or within the proposed project area
and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information, please call me at 336-776-9693 or
[e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 & 4 of G.S.
150B.
Sincerely,
Docu Signed by:
456ED631098F411_
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Pilot Environmental Wetland Map - initialed and dated
Electronic Cc: Jeffrey White, GHD Development LLC
David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 3001 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
hFORiH CAROLINq i
Dore qm m E,�,im�ma,�i u�an� /"� 336.776.9800

5
LEGEND
Site Boundary
LI
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
4453 McConnell Road
A
USGS Topographic Map
Approximate 166mAcre Tract
McLeansville, NC Quadrangle McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 2,000' PH
P , IOS FHV R 0 N M F T A L INC Pilot Project 6869

DWF 1-14
(0.368 ac)
(1W LF) DWD 1-4
t DWB 1-3 (0.014)
* t (0.010 ac)
DWC 1-14
.�(0.222 ac)
DSA WVA 1-5
DA
(3,100 LF) (0.01 AC) ®P-2
WA 1-5
(0.026 ac) DSB 2 DWE 1-15
(150 LF) (0.116 ac)
DP-3 O
DSE 1
240 LF
(450 LF) WD 1-11
—�� (0.119 ac)
i'
(0.002 ac)
mw�LEGEND
rww-�,—, 7
(0.4z8ac) Site Boundary
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Intermittent Stream
4 Perennial Stream
P9 Wetland
DP-10 Data Point k
wA1-z Flag Number/Feature ID
Verification Results
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACAE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ-
DWR ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2021. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISIDICTIONAL FEATURES.
s
Drawing 5 11/8/2021 Wetland Map
2018 Satellite Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot GPS Data
Scale: 1" = 450'
Date: 9.2.21
4453 McConnell Road
Approximate 166-Acre Tract
MCLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 6869

(f
� *_.- United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
0'R Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0118733
Project Name: McConnell Rd
FISH &WILJCDUF '
>�4' Ir 6
August 18, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

08/18/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https: //www.fws. gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.

08/18/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/18/2023
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0118733
Project Name: McConnell Rd
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Residential
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/036.03858125,-79.6598528364772,14z
. I F' . ...
Counties: Guilford County, North Carolina

08/18/2023
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides
Population:
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890
[.yIV:14ILIJ61
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Threatened

08/18/2023 6
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treated of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.

08/18/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee

08/18/2023
H.
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES
JAN FEB
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
k4-4- ++++
1-01-111-011-01 ++++
Jil I+i1 &� +--JVulnerable�J=M
■�`� ����IL
0 M MEE
BCC Rang wl de +—++ ++++ +••� +i11 1111 1111 1111 WN 1111 1'++ —�++ Chimney Swft +��+
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler ++++ BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler +-+++++++++++11+111111111111++++++++++++­+++--+

08/18/2023
R1
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary ■ ■■■
Warbler +—++ ++++ ++++pill + ++�-Jill 4-4-4-4-++++ ++++ —�++ +--+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed + ' '+, +,+' „+' + ;� Jill Jill "++ + ' +
Woodpecker —++ ++ + + + + + —�++ --+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird +—++ ++++ ++++'+++ ++++ ++++ ++-- ++++ ++++ ++++ — 4-4- --+
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush Jill Jill
"
BCC Rangewide +—++ ++++ ++++ + +++ +++ --++ +--+
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library—/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizinp--incidental-take-migratorv-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

08/18/2023 10
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL)Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

08/18/2023 11
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modelinu and Predictive MaDDinp- of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

08/18/2023
12
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Private Entity
Name: Bradley Luckey
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
City:
Kernersville
State:
NC
Zip:
27285
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
3367084997
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers

U
iu
HPOWEB 2.0 General Audience
-79.670092 36.031304 Degrees
LAN
r-
in

N
P
■
r
Y fry %f V4 I
�5� 7
..
-r_ r
f { ff
LEGEND
Site Boundary
USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 1
4453 McConnell Road
USGS Topographic Map �' +
Approximate 166-Acre Tract
McLeansville, NC Quadrangle
Scale: 1" = 2,000' McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
.. PILOT ENVIR0NMENTAL.INC Pilot Project6869

Drawing 2
USDA Web Soil Survey
of Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 500'
�f.JL
1
;IIIIIIAT
.. P I L O T E N V I R 0 N M E N 7 A L. I N C
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Web Soil Map
4453 McConnell Road
Approximate 166-Acre Tract
McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 6869

' N
Cc
44.11
'allt ar
rn C
} : • t EnB WKC
EnB �` E
nC
Etsl3 :: kC nC #
EnB �'F I
EnC
kE En B Co �
i rr(_
C h
frl En
•Err(:;
ApB �
En C •+ F. r;
t► l R ,
Y ��T. n{
End' HhB
%:frC; E rlEi rrct
r LEGEND
r
� En a •1 x � I-
�'� Ix � - ~+ • � � if r. r '1: _� Site Boundary
Drawing 2A h Published Soil Map
USDA Published Soil SurveyiE. 4453 McConnell Road
of Guilford County, NC' ' Approximate 166-Acre Tract
Published 1977, Sheets 29 & 35 � McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1„=1,000' PILOT ENVIR0NMENTAL.INC Pilot Project6869

S
� ��
04 ^v-s
Drawing 3
U5FVVSNVV|
Wetlands Mapper ^
Scale: 1"=5OO' PILOT �
_
rm
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
FreshvvaterForested/3hrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepvvater
' Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
0 Riverine
*----Othe,
NW|Map
4453McConnell Road
Approximate l6G-AcreTract
K4cLeansvi||e,Guilford County, N[
Pilot Project G8G9

Drawing 4
National Flood Hazard Layer
From FEMA Web Map Service
Scale: 1" = 500'
8F. _
1
- � V
" . . . . . .
. ., - y -
LEGEND
Site Boundary
1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway
Special Floodw2y
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
• Future Conditior. 1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
.. P I L O T E N V I R 0 N M E N 7 A L. I N C
FEMA FIRM
4453 McConnell Road
Approximate 166-Acre Tract
McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 6869

SB
(220 LF)
Little Alamance
Creek
(2,990 LF)
SC
(250 LF)
r
4
DSA
(3,100 LF)
%DWG 1-14
DSB 1
1690 LF
Q� (190 LF)
DWB 1-3
(0.010 ac)
DWC 1-14
(0.222 ac)
WA 1-S
(0.026 ac)
WVA 1-5
(0.01 AC)
v
DSE 1
240 LF
DSE 2
(450 LF)
E((
WE 1-2
(0.002 ac)
# j - LEGENL
D W D 1-4
(0.014)
Z
®P-2�
�I
DWE 1-15
(0.116 ac) "I
DP-3 0 7
(0.478ac) Site Boundary
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Intermittent Stream
�Y Perennial Stream
f
Wetland
�
DP-1 O Data Point
wA1-z Flag Number/Feature ID
Verification Results
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACAE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ-
DWR ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2021. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISIDICTIONAL FEATURES. j
Drawing 5 '� Wetland Map
2018 Satellite Imagery from ESRI - 4453 McConnell Road
and Pilot GPS Data �` -„�`-' Approximate 166-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 450'DDo�1, McLeansville, Guilford County, NC
Date: 9.2.21 Pilot Project 6869
P I L 0 7 E N V I R 0 N M E N 7 A L. I N C
v

N
d
K live
cc
jr
In w
f1 I. • — err �- s�
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map i McConnel Road
Approximate 1.4-Acre Tract
McLeansville, NC Quadrangle �` �1 --
Scale: 1" = 2 Quadrangle
PILL Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
P I LOT E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L I N C Pilot Project 6869.3

�; � v,� \ �§ . �-
� r �� � �/ .�
VY
r
I
0

i
Or
16
/ W-
JV
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2A �'',�� ` Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey ' �` .' � ``� ' K4cConne| Road
of Guilford County, N[ , Approximate 1.4'Acre Tract
Pub|ishedlB77 ' Greensboro, Guilford County, NC

i A
i ,
. 4 -
5 i
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 600'
f LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
a Freshwater Pond
Lake
Rivenne
Other
NWI Map
McConnel Road
-ti
Approximate 1.4-Acre Tract
P11.11 Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
PILOT ENVIR0NMENTAL.INC Pilot Project6869.3

I
710880301}�
LEGEND
Site Boundary
.01 `¢Annual Chance Flood Hazard
MR egulatoiy Floodvay
Sped al Floodw@y
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
ICE Future Conditions 1 V.Annual Chance Flood Hazard
%AreawithReduced Risk Due to Levee
FEMA FIRM
Drawing 4 McConnel Road
National Flood Hazard Layer
From FEMA Web Map Service - ,�'� Approximate 1.4-Acre Tract
�O1 Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1= 600 I L 0 T E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L, I N O
Pilot Project 6869.3

1;, T.
Little Alamance
(104 Lf)
aver Creek
(118 Lf)
LEGEND
.- Site Boundary
• • • • • • Intermittent Stream
SA Perennial Stream
(48 Lf) Wetland
SA 1-5 Flag Number
DP-1 Data Point
WA
(0.02Ac) Culvert
E LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR TF
DEQ-DWR. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES.
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI _ McConnel Road
and Pilot GPS Data - Approximate 1.4-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 300' p11.13 Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Date: 10.06.23 P I LOT IiN V I R D N M E N T A L. I N C Pilot Project 6869.3

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: McConnell Road Water Line City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 9.19.23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental, Inc Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.81549 Long:-80.24143 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: WkE: Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott Complex NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (62) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (64) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-1
HUSUIU LC
UUI I I Idl 11
Il1U lU LLUI
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Betula nigra
20
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Platanus occidentalis
10
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Celtis occidentalis
10
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25
20%
of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
1.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
3.
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 360 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10
20%
of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
25
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Andropogon virginicus
5
No
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Polygonum sp. 5 No FACW
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
35
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
18
20%
of total cover:
7
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Vitex rotundifolia
5
Yes
UPL
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20%
of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-11 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey Auger refusal @ 11"
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: McConnell Road Water Line City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 9.19.23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental Inc Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.04071 Long:-79.66582 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: WkE-Wilkes-Poindexter-Whynott NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (62) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-2
/iU5UIU LC
UUI I I Idl 11
II IU 1(; LLUI
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Acer negundo
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Celtis occidentalis
5
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
45
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
23
20%
of total cover:
9
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Prunus serotina
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
2.
Fagus grandifolia
5
Yes
FACU
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 85 (A) 290 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.41
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
15
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8
20%
of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Yes FACU
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20%
of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20%
of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type _LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Brad Luckey
From: Heather LaGamba
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 11:20 AM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -File Notice - McConnell Rd (6869.2)
We would like to submit a Pre -filing Notice for the following project:
Project Name: McConnell Rd (6869.2)
Project Owner: GreenHawk Corporation
Project Owner's Address: 1330 Sunday Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Project County: Guilford
Type of project/Approval Sought: 401 WQC, Pre -Application Request Meeting Declined
Thank you and have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Heather LaGamba
336.345.9536 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]