20201665 Ver 2_CORRECTED_White Farm_MY2_SubmittedNov21_2023_20231121

ID#* 20201665 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/21/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/21/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Matthew Harrell [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20201665 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer
Mitigation Bank Parcel
County: Halifax
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: CORRECTED White
21.32MB
Farm_MY2_Su bm itted Nov21 _2023. pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Harrell
Signature: *

Year 2 Monitoring Report
WHITE FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
DWR Project # 2020-1665 V2
Tar -Pamlico River Basin
In Agreement with:
The Roseneath Umbrella Nutrient Offset Banking Instrument for
Nutrient Offset Credits Pursuant to the
Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Management Strategy
November 2023
Prepared By:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project # 2020-1665 V2
Year 2 Monitoring Report
Table of Contents
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1
2.0
Parcel Location.................................................................................................................................1
2.1 Parcel Background.....................................................................................................................2
2.2 Parcel Objectives.......................................................................................................................2
3.0
Restoration Activities.......................................................................................................................2
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities......................................................................................... 3
3.2 Parcel Protection.......................................................................................................................4
4.0
Mitigation Potential.........................................................................................................................5
5.0
Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria...........................................................................................5
5.1 Monitoring Protocol..................................................................................................................5
5.2 Parcel Maintenance........................................................................................................................... 5
5.3 Long Term Management Plan...........................................................................................................6
6.0
Financial Assurance..........................................................................................................................6
7.0
References....................................................................................................................................... 6
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figure 2 - Current Conditions Plan View
Table 1- Project Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Tables
Table 5 — MY2 (2023) Vegetation Data
Table 6 —Temporary Plot Data
Vegetation Plot Photos 1 - 75
Appendix C: Adaptive Management Plan
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel pg. i
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

1.0 Introduction
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Year 2 Monitoring Report for the White Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel). As agreed upon in the
Roseneath Nutrient Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument (UBI) and White Farm Bank Parcel Development
Packaged (BPDP), made and entered into on November 29, 2021 by Restoration Systems, LLC, acting as
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division
of Water Resources (DWR). This document details the riparian area restoration activities, monitoring
efforts, and the final mitigation potential of the Parcel.
Measuring 95.63 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due
to development within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. NCDWR representatives conducted an onsite
determination for parcel applicability and suitability of Site Features on December 2, 2020. A Site Viability
letter for Buffer & Nutrient Offset was provided by the Division on January 22, 2021 and February 9, 2021.
Restoration Systems (RS) was granted a Conservation Easement by the White family on February 28, 2022.
The final conservation easement was recorded at the Halifax County Register of Deeds on April 26, 2022;
Book No. 2697, Page 191— 210. It was assigned to the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May
31, 2023- see Book No. 2734, Page 97-124.
RS began preparation for restoration of the riparian buffer and planted the Parcel in February/March of
2022. Riparian buffer restoration activities included ripping/bedding of the parcel with a narrow set plow,
bare -root planting, and broadcast application of a permanent seed mix. During March 29 —April 5, 2022,
Axiom Environmental installed seventy-five (75) Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) monitoring plots and
collected as -built data. During October of 2023, Axiom Environmental collected monitoring year 2 data
(Appendix B).
2.0 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the town of Hobgood in Halifax County, NC.
The Parcel is within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin 14- digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020102070030 of the
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub -basin Number 03-
03-04) (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Parcel Location: (36.059133%-77.421170°)
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Get on 1-440 E from Capital Blvd (2.4 mi)
- Take exit 14 and continue on US-64 E (66.0 mi)
- Take exit 486 for US-258 N/NC-111 N (4.0 mi)
- Turn left onto NC-122 N (9.2 mi)
- Turn left onto NC-125 N and destination is on the right (2.5 mi)
- Latitude, Longitude: 36.059133°,-77.421170'
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

2.1 Parcel Background
The Parcel encompasses 95.63 acres of land over one tract of historical agricultural fields. Prior to Parcel
development, land use is described as agricultural row crop production including cotton, corn, and
peanuts. The landowners regularly applied fertilizers and herbicides to the fields. Streams and ditches on
the parcel had no existing riparian buffer. Site Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside of
forested areas due to historic and agricultural practices.
The Parcel is comprised of one tract with hydrological features that drain to Deep Creek, a tributary of the
Tar River. There were no existing structures in the project area. The larger parcel contains the ZO: HX436:
James A White House, but this structure is not located within the conservation easement footprint. The
farmhouse was not impacted nor disturbed during the project and a buffer around the structure was
implemented in the field during the planting process.
2.2 ParcelObiectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel focused on
providing ecological and water quality enhancements to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin by restoring the
riparian area to create a functional riparian corridor. Goals were accomplished as outlined in the following
table.
Goal
Objective
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the
agricultural fields through restored native buffer zones. The off -
Decrease nutrient levels
site nutrient input will also be absorbed on -site by filtering
flood flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood
flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Sediment from off -site sources will be captured by deposition
Decrease sediment input
on restored floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow
overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature and
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature
increase dissolved oxygen
reducing thermal pollution.
concentrations
Create appropriate terrestrial
Riparian areas adjacent to ditches and streams will be restored
habitat
by planting native vegetation.
Permanently protect the project
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
Parcel from harmful uses
3.0 Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration involved planting appropriate native tree species along the 200-foot-wide
riparian corridor of streams and hydrologically connected ditches at a density of approximately 680 stems
per acre on 8ft x 8ft spacing. Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the
first few years of tree establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of
undesirable species that may out -compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the
riparian areas of the Parcel included those listed in Table C. Stems were mixed prior to planting to ensure
diversity of bare roots across the planted area. A seed mix including the species listed in Table D was
applied to provide temporary and permanent ground coverfor soil stabilization and reduction of sediment
loss during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting took place on March 1, 2022.
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Table A — Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity
Phase Specific Actions
Within the Site' s proposed conservation easements:
- Treatment of Bermuda and fescue grass species within active pasture areas (see
Herbaceous Treatment note above).
- Site -wide discing of agricultural and pasture areas ahead of planting — discing
Riparian
occurred parallel to the Site Features, promoting floodwater attenuation by
Restoration
increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel floodplains.
- Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site -specific seed mix (see
Planting List —Table D)
- Establishment of a native hardwood forest via the planting of bare -root saplings
from the top of bank out a maximum of 200' along Parcel Features —Planting List
—Table C
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas were restored according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295. The planting plan for the riparian restoration area included planting 63,000 native
bare -root hardwood saplings across 96.30 acres at a Parcel density of +/- 600 stems per acre and live
stakes for stream bank stabilization where necessary. The planted species composition is intentionally
diverse and while based on these communities, also accounted for local observations and nursery
availability.
All species were selected based on their ability for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, the ability to
withstand hydraulic forces associated with flood events, suitability to specific soil types, and Parcel
conditions. Tree species were mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random plant
across the Site. Planting density is set to ensure sufficient diversity and density of planted stems outlined
in Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 of 260 trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will be
greater than 50% of the established stems.
The bare root planting list is provided in Table C followed by the permanent seed mix in Table D. Baseline
data was collected in March and April 2022 by Axiom Environmental and derived an average planted stem
density of 455 stems per acre. Axiom Environmental collected monitoring year 2 data in October 2023
and found an average planted stem density of 421 stems per acre (Appendix B).
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Table C — Planting List
Common Name
Scientific Name
Tree/Shrub*
Number of
Stems
Species % of
Total
River birch
Betula nigra
Tree
6,300
10%
Eastern Redbud
Cercis canadensis
Shrub
3,150
5%
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
Tree
6,300
10%
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Tree
3,150
5%
Yellow poplar
Uriodendron tulipifera
Tree
6,300
10%
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Tree
6,300
10%
Black gum
Nyssa sylvatica
Tree
3,150
5%
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Tree
3,150
5%
Oak (White)
Quercus alba
Tree
6,300
10%
Oak (Swamp chestnut)
Quercus michouxii
Tree
6,300
10%
Oak (Water)
Quercus nigra
Tree
6,300
10%
American elm
Ulmus americona
Tree
6,300
10%
Total
12 Species
63,000
100%
Table D — Permanent Seed
Common Name
Amount(n
Common Name
Amount(in
Common Yarrow
3.00
Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower)
5.00
Winter Bentgrass,
5.00
Narrowleaf Sunflower
4.00
Blue False Indigo
1.00
Oxeye Sunflower
5.00
Plains Coreopsis
5.00
Wild Bergamot
1.00
Lanceleaf Coreopsis
5.00
Deertongue, Tioga
5.00
Cosmos
5.00
Clasping Coneflower
1.00
Rocket Larkspur
3.00
Blackeyed Susan
5.00
Showy Ticktrefoil
5.00
Purpletop
25.00
Purple Coneflower
5.00
Blue Vervain
2.00
Virginia Wildrye,'Madison'
10.00
Total (pounds) 100.00
3.2 Parcel Protection
Restoration Systems (RS) was granted a Conservation Easement by the White family on February 28, 2022.
The final conservation easement was recorded at the Halifax County Register of Deeds on April 26, 2022;
Book No. 2697, Page 191— 210. It was assigned to the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May
31, 2023- see Book No. 2734, Page 97-124. RS marked the easement at every corner with an iron, CE cap,
and corner t-post. Additionally, conservation easement signs were placed on each corner.
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

4.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the Parcel's 95.63 acres protected under the conservation easement, 3,974,709 square feet
are anticipated provide Nutrient Offset Credits equivalent to 205,885.272 pounds of nitrogen offset
credit and 13,260.603 pounds of phosphorous offset credit as detailed in Appendix A, Table 1— Project
Credits. Riparian area restoration, measured from the top of bank on Parcel streams and ditches, will
include at least 50' from the tops of banks and will extend outward a maximum of 200' from tops of
banks and will generate Nutrient Offset Credits that are not transferable to Riparian Buffer Credit per
the approved UBI. Nitrogen and Phosphorous offset credits will be generated from the project and
shown on separate ledgers.
5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Quantitative sampling will include seventy-five (75) permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as outlined
in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur no
earlier than Fall of each year (Figure 2, Appendix A). Vegetation plot placement will adequately represent
riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas. A reference photo will be taken from the origin
point of each plot. All planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data
collected will include species, height, planting type (planted stem and/or volunteer). Total and planted
stem density by plot and species will be reported during monitoring years 0-5 (Table 5, Appendix B).
Individual and average stem height data will be reported during monitoring years 3-5. Monitoring of the
restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled. Restoration
Systems shall submit to NCDWR annual monitoring reports no later than December 31st of each year.
Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental planting, or
encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria within the buffer will be based on the survival
of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring.
Year 2 (2023) monitoring occurred October 12-17, 2023. The monitoring efforts found an average of 421
planted stems/acre across the Site. Sixty-nine out of the 75 individual plots met success criteria (Appendix
B). Additionally, nine temporary transects were conducted at random locations throughout the Site.
Average stem density for the temporary transects was 459 planted stems/acre (Table 6, Appendix B).
Trees throughout the site were generally vigorous. Vegetation data is in Appendix B, and locations of plots
and transects are depicted on Figure 2 (Appendix A).
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
Adaptive Management Plan (AMP) — During the as -built walkthrough, DWR noted an area of low vigor
and sparse vegetation measuring approximately 5.6 acres as well as an area of little to no planted stems
12'-25' from the top of bank through most of the site. In response, RS implemented a replant of these
areas in January 2023. Bare -root stems were planted on 12' x 12' centers, adding an average density of
300 additional stems per acre within the identified areas of concern. The supplemental planting list is
provided in Table E, and documentation of the AMP is in Appendix C.
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Table E — Supplemental Planting completed January, 2023
Common Name
Scientific Name
Tree/Shrub*
Number of
Stems
Species % of
Total
River birch
Betula nigra
Tree
500
17%
Yellow poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tree
500
17%
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Tree
500
17%
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Tree
1,000
33%
Oak (Swamp chestnut)
Quercus michauxii
Tree
500
17%
Total
5 Species
3,000
100%
In addition to the adaptive management plan outlined above, if the Parcel or a specific component of the
Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section 5.1, adaptive measures will be developed
and/ or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site maintenance will be performed to correct
any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood of affecting the project success. Such
items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, or insects that cause excess tree mortality.
Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success criteria and will include a work schedule
and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance performed will be included in the monitoring
report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of
tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the establishment of invasive species that may out -
compete the planted native vegetation. The only herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved
herbicides that will be applied in accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and
regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing within Tar -Pamlico Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.
5.3 Lone Term Management Plan
A permanent conservation easement to preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property
inconsistent with its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any
activity that would materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/ Parcel was recorded at the Halifax
County Register of Deeds on 4/26/2022 in Book 2697 Page 191. RS assigned the conservation easement
and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121- 34 et seq. and
170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code on 5/31/2023. The assignment is recorded in Deed Book 2734 Page
97. The holder is the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation, which is certified under 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code and has been approved by DWR.
6.0 Financial Assurance
RS will secure all financial assurances according to the approved UBI. No bond shall be less than $150,000
to cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000 initially, to cover monitoring expenses.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

7.0 References
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2021. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoiIsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [Accessed June 25, 2021].
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2021. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species, Wake
County, North Carolina (online). Available:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html (Accessed June 25, 2021)
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 7
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figure 2 - Current Conditions Plan View
Table 1- Project Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

I
I
�
+
\
� Ro n(*e-RJPids
Roa no ke
''tia
Kerr Laka Stets
t �
- Lake
pids ',
Iacreation Aisa
1
ti`'g- ----- --
Southge
1
I
Nr,
�
_
_--.USr1,9n'"aY"T�----•-
`.Y_a-_
n
Litt
�lieldon
6-
t ns
- -
- - -
FtoanoFe12lverRESTORATION
Nalbnal y -
-
>aS'i ld klfa
Middleb
Narrenton
an �d'4
F fuga
I r _ n
,i
c1-
�r%
Prepared for:
1
fl
L,tue f+sh
� �
sswah
NC DEQ
Division of
k
q
Water Resources
401 8r Isolated
Henderson
Q
Wetlands/Waters
Program 8r 401
rc�F �hh}
!
Safi
r40A AX
\ t1r ana a
Stormwater
r
S71°
coo Cr,r
$o� 5
Project:
'
No 019
rxV, s,. lr
Il
/
- VIA R R f ,
bkbdoountin
a
WHITE FARM
—
_
He}�
Hollister
State
te
° f
NUTRIENT OFFSET
v Sapon, Sdtsb
(
0
i
BANK PARCEL
A�
cr
�`
ASBUILT
'9
/d.
3+/y
~�
cr"�
T
nt
' ✓� �,� � ti
i �
ij
°'��
Errtiela
�
� .
Halifax County, NC
✓
1
Title:
`J
J
11
/
y ✓ hASli w » t
' }ti tt.•.
DerA otland Neck.
PARCEL LOCATION
✓
^�
AND SERVICE
,'
AREA
/ hital
Loilisburg
' y
Castalia �[Grrak i
V
Etit1F 1.. i `
—__ Drawn by:
Red Oak RJH
/ EDGECOM H; I,r l
Date:
�Dortches August 2022
k
Scale:
/ 1:275,000
�—Nish1ill ;;, Bank Parcel Location I-: 1 Project No.:
24c rt Bunn Nlumeyer 36.059348°,-77.420946° 2020-1665 v2
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, Spring Hope
USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster s FIGURE
NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, ©-
1
�! CokeY Swamp I i u, �• iib
Legend
Miles
O Tar -Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020102, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits r
9 rY SI>arpeburg 0 5
N
10

Fegendy NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
rm - Subject Fee Simple Parcel ,
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is conti uous from TOB, is a minimum ofrm -Conservation Easement: 96.30 Ac. 9 50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.rm - Installed CVS Plots (75 Total)it023) Temporary Vegetation Transacts Y 1 " i ` / - ' 1 -
El RESTORATION
O White Farm - Surveyed Top of Bank ti -F - _ _ - -
a
a .z' ,. eat r 2 _
White Farm - NOC Credit Areas �'��`• ��' :�•:l¢ _ s` � ,� r ,� '� .' .:' � - u e-1-�=— -
3` Prepared for:
No Credit - Less Than 50-Feet -
NC DEQ
- No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019, Diffuse Flow) :. es ❑ • y
' Division of
Restoration (TOB - 200-ft) - NOC r . -'.� :'-: %' S Water Resources
White Farm - Surveyed Top of Bank Offsets Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area to -be Planted & No Credit Given 401 & Isolated
- - TOB - 5o Feet ys = r Z, , , , Diffuse Flow Credit
Epp Deduction Required; Wetlands/Waters
y i .
- - TOB - 100 Feet _ ` 5 �' , ' ' ❑ Area to -be Planted & Program & 401
_ _ ❑10 No Credit Given
TOB - 200 Feet . %' _$� - - _ Stormwater
Surveyed Highway125 _ __--_ ___�_F - ' - _ �' ❑-' - _ _09-
m Project:
��• ---- eat a .11� - v
- - - Edge of Road ? , , - 31 ❑- - - = 0- - -OEl
ur c2.� ���_ ` 14'
;.
--- ROW s!i ya aii' El' 2s
_ -
294 ` - ' --- ► ¢': ­ WHITE FARM
9� ` '`1sa�15p_ - y NUTRIENT OFFSET
2 - _ _ _ - BANK PARCEL
20
_. ❑
Diffuse Flow Credit
32 Deduction Required; • 25 `. -' - ❑21 _ - e
' ❑ Area to -be Planted & ' d ` - - ' �' 22 �+
No Credit Given ' ` Feature-2c =' , ❑ Halifax County, NC
D24 - • - - - Title:
❑ _ �a ❑
G. v 153 . . k 23.
33
' ❑. CCPV
AND
52'
d CREDIT MAP
34 i
Diffuse Flow Credit '
Deduction Required;
i' Area to -be Planted &
No Credit Given 151i Imagery: 2021 NC OneMap
l
�, �'i ' , •� 0 Drawn by:
w� 57
�` '�'� 1 Q ❑', \Q . APS
50' l ` 35 - - - a ❑ ❑ - . ` Date:
'� %� ❑ 59 58 `i . ti, �' ` - 37 ❑38- . December 2023
- •39" - ❑
61 73 , ❑ 6 ` O g� �- - - - - - - - � - - - 40' - Scale:
ate. - - - _
-F 63 62 ❑ 72 ❑ ~ y ty i ti . ' _ - - Feature_3_ - - - - - - - - 4 - 1:5,000
36- r= ❑
65 eature 60� ❑ t ❑ ` ^_~ 5.. _ . - -❑r
❑.� 70 �. 4 1 ti ❑ ❑�~� 47 45 44 ~ Project No.:
i
❑ ❑ ❑ ��._�� 55' • 48 4 _ .. ❑ 4 0 - ► _ 2020 1665 v2
67 ❑ 74 c 6
71 edt4�ey d 42❑
❑�5
FIGURE
Diffuse Flow Credit
Deduction Required; Area to -be Planted &
No Credit Given
Feet
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600

Table 1. WHITE FARM, 2020-1665 v2, Project Credits
Tar -Pamlico 03020102
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
19.16394
297.54099
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
(enter NO if
ephemeral or
ditch '
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
i
Total Area (ft)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
i
Mitigation (ft)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:l)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: N (Ibs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
la, 2b, 2c, 2e, 4a,
46 4c
715,104
1
100%
No
—
Yes
37,315.082
2,403.380
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
la, 2b, 2c, 2e, 4a,
46 4c
613,132
1
33%
No
—
Yes
31,994.047
2,060.664
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
1, 2, 2a, 3, 4
1,393,335
1
100%
No
—
Yes
72,706.082
4,682.834
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
1, 2, 2a, 3,4
1,224,002
1
33%
No
—
Yes
63,870.060
4,113.726
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-50
Non -Credit Areas
Less Than 50-Feet
Feature 4a
2,668
1
100%
No
—
No
—
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
I / P
Restoration
0-50
Non -Credit Areas
Less Than 50-Feet
Features 1 3 and 4
4,716
1
100%
No
—
No
—
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
Credit Deduction or
Non -Diffused Flow
Features la, 2e, 2b, 4b,
21,752
1
No
—
No
—
—
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
3,974,709
0
0.000 205,885.272 13,260.603
0
0
3,974,709
N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft) for Credit
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft)
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (ft)
Min -Max Buffer
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Width (ft) Feature Name
Preservation Area Subtotals
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
0
0.000
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
0
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
0
0.000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
I Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient Offset:
Nitrogen:1
3,974,709
205,885.272
Phosphorus:
13,260.603
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
0
0
0
#DIW01
0
0.0%
Total Area (sf)
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft)
0
0
Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Preservation as %TABM
Initial Credit %Full Credit Final Credit I Riparian
Ratio (x:l) I Ratio (x:l) I Buffer Credits
last updated 08/03/2020

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone
BPDP Proposed Date
Actual Date
BPDP Approved
NA
November 29, 2022
Parcel Protection
NA
April 26, 2022
Planting
February, 2022
February 2022
As -built Data Collection
March, 2022
March 29—April 5, 2022
Construction Completion Walkthrough
NA
June 29, 2022
As -built Report Submittal
NA
September 2022
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2022
December 2022
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2023
December 2023
Year 3-5 Monitoring
December 2024 — 2026
On schedule
Table 3: Project Contact
Firm
POC & Address
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Raymond Holz: 919.755.9490
Designer/Permitting:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Josh Merritt: 919.755.9490
Planting Contractor:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Matthew Harrell: 919.755.9490
Seeding Contractor:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Nursery Stock Suppliers:
ArborGen
1.888.888.7158
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC
27603
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
Vegetation Monitoring:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC
27603
Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Project Information
Project Name
White Farm
County
Halifax
Project Area (acres)
96.30
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36.0591339N,-77.4211709W (NAD83/WGS84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Inner Coastal Plain
River Basin
Tar -Pamlico
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020102
USGS Hydrologic Unit14-digit
03020102070030
DWR Sub -basin
03-03-04
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (acres)
396
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
<5%
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Tables
Table 5—Year 2 Vegetation Data
Table 6 —Temporary Transect Data
Vegetation Plot Photos 1-75
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 22012. Project Name: White Farm
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22012-01-0001
22012-01-0002
22012-01-0003
22012-01-0004
22012-01-0005
22012-01-0006
22012-01-0007
22012-01-0008
22012-01-0009
22012-01-0010
22012-01-0011
22012-01-0012
22012-01-0013
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
4
41
4
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
11
4
4
41
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
21
2
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
5
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
3
3
3
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
8
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
5
5
51
11
1
1
1 1
1
11
2
21
21
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
31
3
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
ITree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
Stem count
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
101
101
10
101
101
10
111
111
11
81
81
8
8781
8
141
14
14
131
131
19
121
121
12
12
121
12
101
10
10
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
3 31
3
41
5 51
5
51
51
5
41
41
4
6
61
6
31 3
3
6 61
6
9
91
9
41 41
4
7
71
7
61 61
6
51
5
5
Stems per ACRE
28 283.3
283.3
283.3
283.3
242.8
242.8
404.7
404.7
404.7
404.7
404.7
404.7
44
445.2
445.2
323. 323.7
323.7
3 323.7
323.7
566.6
566.6
566.6
52 526.1
768.9
485.6
485.61
485.6
485.61
485.6
404.71
40471
404.7
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requiremAby more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P-all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Vigor Note: As noted in Section 5, individual and average stem height data will be reported during
monitoring years 3-5.

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 22012. Project Name: White Farm
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22012-01-0014
22012-01-0015
22012-01-0016
22012-01-0017
22012-01-0018
22012-01-0019
22012-01-0020
22012-01-0021
22012-01-0022
22012-01-0023
22012-01-0024
22012-01-0025
22012-01-0026
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
21
2
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
11
11
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
61
6
6
1
1
1
6
6
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
2
21
2
61
61
6
11
11
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
Stem count
13
131
13
81
8
8
7
7
7
91
91
10
131
131
14
101
101
10
11
11
11
7
7
10
12
12
13
11
11
11
12
12
13
8
8
9
12
12
12
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
species count
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
6
7
7
7
4
4
4
5
5
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
Stems per ACRE
526.1
526.1
526.1
323.7
323.7
323.7
283.3
283.3
283.3
364.2
364.2
404.7
526.1
526.1
566.6
404.7
404.7
404.7
445.2
445.2
445.2
283.3
283.3
404.7
485.6
485.6
526.1
445.2
445.2
445.2
485.6
485.6
526.1
323.7
323.7
364.21
485.61
485.61
485.6
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T= All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 22012. Project Name: White Farm
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22012-01-0027
22012-01-0028
22012-01-0029
22012-01-0030
22012-01-0031
22012-01-0032
22012-01-0033
22012-01-0034
22012-01-0035
22012-01-0036
22012-01-0037
22012-01-0038
22012-01-0039
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
5
1
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
1 21
2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
11
1
11
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
'1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
ITree
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Viburnum dentatum
Isouthern arrowwood
IShrub
Stem count
15
151
15
91
91
11
14
141
15
Ill
111
13
121
121
17
101
101
10
71
71
7
141
141
14
61
61
6
61
61
6
10
10
10
14
14
14
6
6
6
size fares)F607
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count6
6
6
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
7
7
7
2
2
2
Stems per ACRE
607
607
364.2
364.2
445.21566.61
566.61
6071445.21
445.21
526.1
485.61
485.61
6881404.71
404.71
404.71283.31
283.31
283.3
566.61
566.61
566.6
242.81
242.81
242.8
42.81
404.71
404.71
404.7
61
566.61
242.81
242.81
242.8
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 22012. Project Name: White Farm
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22012-01-0040
22012-01-0041
22012-01-0042
22012-01-0043
22012-01-0044
22012-01-0045
22012-01-0046
22012-01-0047
22012-01-0048
22012-01-0049
22012-01-0050
22012-01-0051
22012-01-0052
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
6
6
6
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
11
11
1
1
1
11
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
11
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
S
S
5
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
61
61
6
Viburnum dentatum
Isouthern arrowwood
Shrub
Stem count
121
12
12
71
71
7
131
131
13
11
111
11
91
91
9
ill
ill
11
81
81
8
81
81
8
101
101
10
77
107101
10
131
131
13
15
15
15
ill
ill
11
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)i
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species countl
51
51
5
3
3
3
S
S
S
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
S
5
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
Stems per ACRE
485.6
485.6
485.6
283.3
283.3
283.3
526.1
526.1
526.11445.21
445.21
445.21364.21
364.21
364.2
445.21
445.21
445.2
323.71
323.71
323.7
323.7
323.7
323.7
404.71
404.71
404.7
404.71
404.71
404.7
526.11
526.11
526.1
6071
6071
607
445.21
445.21
445.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T= All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 22012. Project Name: White Farm
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22012-01-0053
22012-01-0054
22012-01-0055
22012-01-0056
22012-01-0057
22012-01-0058
22012-01-0059
22012-01-0060
22012-01-0061
22012-01-0062
22012-01-0063
22012-01-0064
22012-01-0065
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
I
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
21
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
11
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1 41
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
21
1
1
11
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
Tree
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
Tree
6
6
6
3
31
3
1
1
21
21
2
10
10
10
1
1
1
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
1
1
1
Stem count
11
11
11
7
7
7
10
10
10
8
8
8
9
9
9
6
6
6
13
13
13
8
8
8
15
15
15
11
11
11
13
13
13
12
12
12
9
9
9
size fares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count[445..2
S
5
5
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
3
7
7
7
3
3
3
8
8
8
5
5
5
4
4
4
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
Stems per ACRE
445.2
445.2
283.3
283.3
283.3
404.7
404.7
404.7
323.7
323.7
323.7
364.2
364.2
364.2
242.8
242.8
242.8
526.1
526.1
526.1
323.7
323.7
3 23.7
607
607
607
445.21
445.21
445.2
526.11
526.11
526.1
485.61
485.61
485.6
364.21
36421
364.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Code 22012. Project Name: White Farm
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
Annual Means
22012-01-0066
22012-01-0067
22012-01-0068
22012-01-0069
22012-01-0070
22012-01-0071
22012-01-0072
22012-01-0073
22012-01-0074
22012-01-0075
MY2(2023)
MY1(2022)
MYO(2022)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
IT
PnoLS
I P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
76
76
76
75
75
75
94
94
94
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
1
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
9
9
9
20
20
20
33
33
33
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
74
74
78
52
52
52
39
39
39
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
22
22
221
23
23
23
31
31
31
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
51
51
58
48
48
48
76
76
76
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
5
5
5
114
114
114
114
114
114
125
125
125
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
31
31
31
43
43
43
62
62
62
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
53
53
67
42
42
42
20
20
20
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
48
48
48
102
102
102
171
171
171
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
5
51
51
1
1 1
1
1
571
571
58
421
421
42
251
25
25
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
8
8
8
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
105
105
105
65
65
65
29
29
29
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
65
65
65
47
47
47
58
58
58
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
12
121
12
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
Tree
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
65
65
65
66
66
66
69
69
69
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
1
1
1
Stem count
20
20
22
8
8
8
12
12
12
12
12
12
9
9
9
10
10
10
41
41
5
121
121
12
141
141
14
141
14
14
7801
7801
807
7441
744
744
844
8441
844
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
75
75
75
size (ACRES)i
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1.85
1.85
1.85
Species counti
61
61
6
41
41
4
71
71
7
51
5
5
41
4
4
51
51
5
31
31
4
71
71
7
71
71
7
61
61
6
171
171
18
171
17
17
141
14
14
Stems per ACREJ
809.41
809.41
890.3
323.71
323.71
323.71485.61
485.61
485.61485.61
485.61
485.61
364.21
364.21
364.21404.71
404.71
404.7
161.91
161.91
202.3
485.6
485.6
485.6
566.61
566.61
566.6
566.61
566.61
566.6
420.91
420.91
435.4
401.41
401.41
401.4
455.41
455.41
455.4
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P-all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 6. White Farm Temporary Veg Plots (MY-02)
50m x 2m Temporary Plot
Species
T-1
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
T-6
T-7
T-8
T-9
Betula nigra
3
1
3
3
6
2
7
Cercis canadensis
1
Diospyros virginiana
1
1 2
1
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
2
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
2
3
Morus rubra
5
Platanus occidentalis
2
2
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
1
2
Quercus michauxii
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
4
Quercus nigra
3
1
5
2
1
Quercus rubra
1
2
1
1
Quercus alba
3
1
2
1 1
1
Ulmus americana
4
2
Total Stems
7
11
12
9
12
13
15
15
Total Stems/Acre
283
445
486
364LL486
526
607
607

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Plot 14
Ik";1I
I'
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Plot 28
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
IrPlot 38
NEEIr@
Plot 40
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
pftk bt
Plot 44
White Farm Site
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023
Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Plot 57
Plot 59
Plot 61
Plot 63
Plot 58
6
�.,
Plot 62
White Farm Site
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023
Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Plot 67
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

White Farm Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Plot 73
White Farm Site Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
MY2 Monitoring Report — December 2023

Appendix C: Adaptive Management Plan
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix C: Adaptive Management Plan
Year 2 Monitoring Report— December 2023

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
February 28, 2023 Fx: [phone]
TO: Ms. Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FROM: Barrett Jenkins
RE: DWR #2020-1665v2 / White Farm Nutrient Offset Site / Completion of Adaptive Management
Plan
Ms. Merritt,
This letter is to notify DEQ of the completion of the Adaptive Management Plan (AMP) for the White Farm
Nutrient Offset Site (Site) (DWR #2020-1665v2) submitted in December 2022. During the as -built site visit
on June 29, 2022, multiple items requiring corrective action were identified, including low vigor and sparse
areas seen in some areas measuring a total of 5.6 acres, little to no planted stems were observed
throughout much of the site along the top of bank to a width of 12'-25' in most areas, additional T-post
need to be in areas where easement boundary was difficult to follow, stem flagging within veg plots, and
no conservation easement placards on easement boundaries.
On September 1, 2022, INC Wildlife Habitat Foundation (NCWHF) conservation easement placards were
installed on all surveyed corners. Additionally, new T-posts were added to the areas Katie Merritt
highlighted. A map is attached highlighting action items, and photos of the work described are provided
below.
On January 9, 2023, IRS implemented a replant of three thousand (3,000) bare roots within the top of bank
and low stem density areas noted during the as -built site visit (Figure 1). Two rows were planted on 12' x
12' centers within the top of bank area of concern. Additionally, the 5.6-acre low densities areas were
planted on 12' x 12' centers adding roughly three hundred (+/- 300) stems per acre. Bareroots were
planted within the fixed vegetation monitoring plots, which will be recorded in the Yr. 2, 2023, Monitoring
Report.
Planted species were hand mixed into bundles by a professional to ensure proper diversity of planted
material throughout the replanted areas. One IRS Project Manager was onsite to guarantee that the overall
quality of the planting would exceed success criteria requirements.
Table 2 details the species and the number of planted stems. Photo documentation is provided on pages
4-5 of the replanting effort.
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

Restoration Systems, LLC
DWR #2020-1665v2 / White Farm Nutrient Offset Site / Completion of Adaptive Management Plan
Page 2
Table 1: Remedial planting species and number of stems
Common Name
Species
Number of Stems
River birch
Betula nigra
500
Yellow Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
500
Mulberry
Morus rubra
500
Sycamore
Platanus Occidentalis
1,000
Oak (Swamp chestnut)
Quercus michauxii
500
Total
Five species
8,150
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 512.230.0424.
Sincerely,
J�
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems
Attachments
1.) Photo Log
2.) Figure 1— AMP Action Items Overview

Restoration Systems, LLC
DWR #2020-1665v2 / White Farm Nutrient Offset Site / Completion of Adaptive Management Plan
Page 3
Photo 1: All survey corners with a post marked as below. September 1, 2022
Photo 2: All surveyed corners with T-posts marked as below. September 1, 2022
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

S '

Restoration Systems, LLC
DWR #2020-1665v2 / White Farm Nutrient Offset Site / Completion of Adaptive Management Plan
Page 5
Photo 5: Planting crew hand planting bare roots within areas showing low densities. January 9, 2023

Legend
OWhite Farm - Conservation Easement: 96.30 Ac.
OWhite Farm - Surveyed Top of Bank
O Added T-post
® Low Density Planting
O AMP TOB Planting (Up to 16 feet from TOB)
O White Farm - Installed CVS Plots (75 Total)
White Farm - Surveyed Top of Bank Offsets
- — — TOB - 50 Feet
— — TOB - 100 Feet
— TOB - 200 Feet
OWhite Farm - Subject Fee Simple Parcel
�- Added T-Post
1J"L2
RESTORATION
El
?- 4 ' •3_ _ -� . _ - , _ _ Prepared for:
El
Q '� t s 7 NC DEQ
Ab
i �',_ ' Division of
•�` Top of Bank Planting _ Water Resources
(12' x 12' centers)
Y. �..
401 & Buffer
o Permitting
❑10 ;'. Branch
012
-- _ ❑- -', - %.\� Project:
30— _ Feafu�e;2 _ 41_ .13
p•'k - - _ _ _ `\ ���'p `� _ • t `.1, WHITE FARM
29 2 ``\d ``'19 \� `\ - _ _+_ , 15E - ..' NUTRIENT OFFSET
`.18'❑, BANK PARCEL
`❑ �� ` 20 - _ ' Z217 _ AMP
27k ` 16 -
•❑ �- ❑ 7
°5 26 - . -
32 Top of Bank Planting si25 ` - . - .. -�21
` 22
Q (12' x 12' centers) Q . Fe ei ❑
atur_ _ �
` 53 23
33
52�.
Top of Bank Planting
(12' x 12' centers) ` 1 34� IL k
i
i 51 i
Halifax County, NC
Title:
CCPV MYO (2022)
AND
AMP
Action Items
Imagery: 2021 NC OneMap
i
Drawn by
.-57 O `�` `` b RJH
50' 35 - Low Density Planting Zone
6 Q , , - �i - _ • ` ` (12' x 12' centers) :fr,;. Date:
37
59 . • 58 . ` ❑38 _ _ February 2023
'ET
Q _ b 64 \\ \ ' I I - 73 _ - -t 0*1 ` 49 _ _ - ' - - -❑ 40` Scale:
_ - - ture 1:5,000
�65 Feat ` - _ 63_ 62_ - wQ /72 Q t t I ` \` 36'"�Fea _ _3 - - - -
_ 70� \0` - . _ 47 ❑ Project No.:
4.
66 - L-P 48 6
i
`67 1 � �1 - - - �1 . 74
681 i 69 .75
Feet
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 ,
2020-1665 v2
FIGURE
1