NC0003433_J15060591F_20150902

+ DUKE Analytical Laboratory
ENERGY
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Order Summary Report
Order Number: J15060591
Project Name: CAPE FEAR - AB GW ASSESSMENT SPECIATION
Customer Name(s): Tim Hunsucker, Chris Suttell, Kathy Webb, John Toepfer
Customer Address:
Lab Contact: Peggy Kendall Phone:
peggy.kendall@d
Report Authorized By: Uke-energy.com Date:
(Signature)[� -.!f-
"'°ggy Kendall 2015.07.08
10:38:43-04'00'
Program Comments:
Please contact the Program Manager (Peggy Kendall) with any questions regarding this report.
Data Flags & Calculations:
7/8/2015
Page 1 of 25
Any analytical tests or individual analytes within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality
system or quality control requirement. The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results)
under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data
included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor results can be found in the
subcontracted lab final report. Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have
been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted.
Data Package:
This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described in this narrative. An estimation of
the uncertainty of measurement for the results in the report is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced, except
in full, without the written consent of the Analytical Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratory with any questions. The
order of individual sections within this report is as follows:
Job Summary Report, Sample Identification, Technical Validation of Data Package, Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis,
Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Sub -contracted Laboratory Results, Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports &
Documentation, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narratives, Chain of Custody (COC)
Certification:
The Analytical Laboratory holds the following State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina
(DHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005. Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of
specific methods.

Sample ID's & Descriptions:
Collection
Sample ID Plant/Station Date and Time
Collected By
Sample Description
2015019818
Cape Fear
15-Jun-15 1:28 PM
Synterra
ABMW-1
2015019820
Cape Fear
15-Jun-15 1:25 PM
Synterra
ABMW-1S
2015019821
Cape Fear
15-Jun-15 2:27 PM
Synterra
ABMW-1BR
3 Total Samples
Page 2 of 25

Page 3 of 25
Technical Validation Review
Checklist:
COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals Yes No
and analyses (compliance programs and procedures).
All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. ❑ Yes❑ No
All laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.❑ Yes ❑ No
Report Sections Included:
U Job Summary Report
❑ Sample Identification
n Technical Validation of Data Package
❑ Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis
❑ Analytical Laboratory QC Report
Sub -contracted Laboratory Results
❑ Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports, & Documentation
❑ Customer Database Entries
66 Chain of Custody
[I/0] Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Sent Separately
Reviewed By: Peggy Kendall Date: 7/8/2015

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 4 of 25
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060591
Site: ABMW-1
Collection Date: 15-Jun-15 1:28 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019818
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 5 of 25
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060591
Site: ABMW-1 S
Collection Date: 15-Jun-15 1:25 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019820
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 6 of 25
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060591
Site: ABMW-1 BR
Collection Date: 15-Jun-15 2:27 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019821
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Page 7 of 25
BRO�©KS
RAND
LABS
MEANINGFUL METALS DATA
July 7, 2015
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Duke Cape Fear Plant (LIMS# J15060591)
Ms. Kendall,
Attached is the report associated with three (3) aqueous samples submitted for chromium
speciation, arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation analyses on June 15,
2015. The samples were received in a sealed cooler at 1.0°C on June 16, 2015. Hexavalent
chromium analysis was performed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma dynamic
reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS). All samples requesting iron speciation
analysis were analyzed by spectrophotometry. Mn (II) and arsenic speciation analyses were
performed via IC-ICP-CRC-MS. Mn(IV) analysis were performed via digestion and subsequent
analysis by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).
Any issues associated with the analyses are addressed in the following report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Russell Gerads
Business Development Director
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
3958 6th Ave NW • Seattle, WA 98107 • T: 206-632-6206 • F: 206-632-6017 • www.brooksrand.com • [e-mail]

Page 8 of 25
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Report prepared for:
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Project: Duke Cape Fear Plant (LIMS# J15060591)
July 7, 2015
1. Sample Reception
Three (3) aqueous samples were submitted for arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and
manganese speciation analyses on June 15, 2015. All samples were received in acceptable
condition on June 16, 2015 in a sealed container at 0.1 °C.
All samples were received in a laminar flow clean hood, void of trace metals contamination
and ultra -violet radiation, and were designated discrete sample identifiers. An aliquot of
each sample submitted for hexavalent chromium analysis was decanted into a clean
polypropylene tube. All hexavalent chromium sample fractions were stored in a secure
refrigerator maintained at a temperature of 4°C, until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each sample submitted for arsenic speciation analysis was filtered (0.45µm)
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube; all filtrates and original bottles were then stored in a
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could
be performed.
The sample fractions requesting iron speciation analysis were stored in a secure, monitored
refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each filtered sample submitted for manganese speciation analysis was decanted
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube for Mn(II) analysis. These fractions were stored in a
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could
be performed. Subsequently, the original bottles (filtered and unfiltered fractions) intended
for Mn speciation were preserved to pH < 2 with concentrated HNO3 and then stored in a
secure polyethylene container, known to be free from trace metals contamination, until the
digestion could be performed.

Page 9 of 25
2. Sample Preparation
All sample preparation is performed in laminar flow clean hoods known to be free from trace
metals contamination. All applied water for dilutions and sample preservatives are
monitored for contamination to account for any biases associated with the sample results.
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
directly into a sealed autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as a
buffered EDTA solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Iron Speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry No sample preparation was required as a de -
gassed HCL solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Manganese Mn(II) Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
(0.45µm) directly into an autosampler vial for Mn(II) analysis. No additional sample
preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of the samples may shift the
equilibrium of the system resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Manganese Mn(IV Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS Each filtered and unfiltered sample submitted
for Mn speciation analysis was preserved with 1 % HNO3 (v/v) upon sample receipt. Each
sample fraction was then further digested on a hotblock apparatus with aliquots of 50%
HNO3 (v/v) and 50% HCl (v/v), in accordance with the digestion procedure specified in EPA
Method 200.8. All resulting sample digests were analyzed for total manganese via
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).
3. Sample Analysis
All sample analysis is preceded by a minimum of a five -point calibration curve spanning the
entire concentration range of interest. Calibration curves are performed at the beginning of
each analytical day. All calibration curves, associated with each species of interest, are
standardized by linear regression resulting in a response factor. All sample results are
instrument blank corrected to account for any operational biases associated with the
analytical platform.
Prior to sample analysis, all calibration curves are verified using second source standards
which are identified as initial calibration verification standards (ICV).
Ongoing instrument performance is identified by the analysis of continuing calibration
verification standards (CCV) and continuing calibration blanks (CCB) at a minimum interval
of every ten analytical runs.
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS Each sample was analyzed for arsenic
speciation via ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on June 22, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected
onto an anion exchange column and eluted isocratically. The eluting arsenic species are then

Page 10 of 25
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber (CRC)
containing a specific collision gas. Polyatomic interferences, due to their inherently larger
size, collide more frequently with the collision gas and therefore may be separated from the
analyte of interest via kinetic energy discrimination (KED). A solid-state detector detects
ions transmitted through the mass analyzer on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z),
and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Iron Speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry All samples submitted for Fe speciation
quantification were analyzed on June 16, 2015, and in accordance with the scientifically
accepted method outlined by:
Stookey, L.L., (1970). "Ferrozine - A new spectrophotometric reagent for iron",
Anal.Chem., 42:779-81.
Manganese Mn(II Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS All samples for Mn(II) analysis were
analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on June 22, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected
onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by an acidic (pH < 7) gradient. An ion
pairing agent provides a dynamic ion exchange mechanism for the cationic manganese
species on the chromatographic column. The differences in the affinity of manganese species
towards the ion pair agent and the column results in separation. The eluting selenium species
are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes
cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma
through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber
(CRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts with interfering ions of the same
target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the
mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Manganese Mn(I ' Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS All samples submitted for Mn speciation
quantitation were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass
spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS) on June 30, 2015. Aliquots of each sample digest are
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through an initial quadrupole (Q1), which
filters the target masses prior to their entrance into a second chamber. The second chamber
contains specific reactive gasses or collision gasses that preferentially react either with
interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z) or with the target analyte,
producing an entirely different mass to charge ratio (m/z) which can then be differentiated

Page 11 of 25
from the initial interferences. The ions then exit the collision/reaction cell into and additional
quadrupole (Q2). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer,
on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z), and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
4. Analytical Issues
No significant analytical issues were encountered. All quality control parameters associated
with the samples were within acceptance limits.
Unknown arsenic species were present in various samples associated with the arsenic
speciation analysis resulting in late elution into following sample injections. The late eluting
peaks did not affect the target arsenic species; however, differentiation between late eluting
peaks and other unknown arsenic species for a given sample could not be accomplished.
Mn(IV) is quantified by analyzing the water samples for total Mn and dissolved Mn. Mn(IV)
is operationally defined as the difference between the filtered and unfiltered total Mn
concentrations, since it is thermodynamically favored to be in the form of a precipitate.
The estimated method detection limit (eMDL) for hexavalent chromium is generated from
replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid are generated using the
standard deviation of replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve. The
eMDL for monomethylarsonic acid is calculated from the average eMDL of the three arsenic
species contained in the calibration (i.e., arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid); the
calibration and CCVs do not contain monomethylarsonic acid due to impurities in this
standard which would bias the results for other arsenic species.
The eMDL value for Fe(II) has been generated from replicate analyses of the lowest standard
in the calibration curve. The eMDL value for total recoverable Fe was set at 1/3 the value of
the associated reporting limit since the standard deviation associated with the replicate
analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve was zero.
The eMDL for Mn(II) has been generated from replicate analyses of the lowest standard in
the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for Mn(IV) been calculated using the standard deviation of the method
blanks prepared and analyzed concurrently with the submitted samples.

Page 12 of 25
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Russell Gerads
Business Development Director
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC

Page 13 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (1)
Sample ID Cr(VI)
ABMW-1 ND (<0.005)
ABMW-1 S 0.016
ABMW-1 BR 10.5
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L

Page 14 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (2)
Unknown As
Sample ID
As(III)
As(V)
MMAs
DMAs
Species
ABMW-1
27.6
0.253
ND (<0.035)
ND (<0.015)
NA
ABMW-1S
17.2
11.0
ND (<0.035)
ND (<0.015)
NA
ABMW-1 BR
ND (<0.062)
0.464
ND (<0.035)
ND (<0.015)
NA
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
MMAs = monomethylarsonic acid
DMAs = dimethylarsinic acid
Unknown As Species = Total concentration of all unknown As species observed by IC-ICP-MS
NA = Not available. Please see narrative.

Page 15 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (3
Sample ID
Fe(II)
Fe(III)*
Mn (II)
Mn(IV)**
ABMW-1
38.7
ND (<6.7)
186
2.36
ABMW-1S
7.3
ND (<6.7)
28.8
ND (<0.38)
ABMW-1 BR
4.8
ND (<6.7)
4.01
36.6
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NR = Analysis not requested
*Fe(III) operationally defined as the difference between total recoverable Fe and Fe(II)
*Mn(IV) operationally defined as the difference between total and dissolved Mn

Page 16 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (1)
Analvte (ua/L) PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL* eMDL 5x RL 5x
Cr(VI) 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.0024 0.0015 0.001 0.005 0.050
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (2)
Analyte (Ng/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 10x
RL 10x
As(III)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.062
0.20
As(V)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.028
0.20
MMAs
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004
0.035
0.20
DMAs
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.015
0.21
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 17 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3
Analyte (lag/L) PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL** eMDL 1x RL 1x
Fe(II) -2.4 -2.4 -2.4 0.0 -1.8 1.2 3.6 3.6 20
Total Fe -4.7 -4.7 -4.7 -4.7 -4.7 0.0 6.7 6.7 20
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
**Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (lag/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL* eMDL 10x RL 10x eMDL 25x RL 25x
Mn (II)
1.03
1.08
0.79
0.81
0.97
0.15
0.035 0.35 5.0 - -
Total Mn
0.055
0.037
0.047
0.086
0.046
0.021
0.003 - - 0.06 1.0
Diss Mn
0.214
0.005
-0.067
-0.031
0.051
0.126
0.015 - - 0.38 1.0
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 18 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (1
Analyte (lag/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Cr(VI)
LCS
2.002
1.967
98.2
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (2)
Analyte (lag/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
As(III)
LCS
5.00
4.559
91.2
As(V)
LCS
5.00
4.659
93.2
MMAs
LCS
5.07
5.655
111.5
DMAs
LCS
3.63
3.554
98.0
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (3)
Analyte (lag/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Fe(II)
ICV
500.0
410.9
82.2
Total Fe
LCS
500.0
498.4
99.7
Mn (II)
LCS
10.00
10.19
101.9
Total Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
315
101.1
Diss Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
310
99.5

Page 19 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (1)
Analvte (ua/L) Sample ID Rea 1 Rea 2 Mean RPD
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
As(III)
Batch QC
0.381
0.400
0.391
4.8
As(V)
Batch QC
0.135
0.140
0.138
3.6
MMAs
Batch QC
ND (<0.035)
ND (<0.035)
NC
NC
DMAs
Batch QC
ND (<0.015)
ND (<0.015)
NC
NC
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL

Page 20 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (3
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Fe(II)
Batch QC
12.1
12.1
12.1
0.0
Total Fe
Batch QC
14.1
14.1
14.1
0.0
Mn (II)
Batch QC
1499
1413
1456
5.9
Total Mn
Batch QC
1069
1106
1088
3.4
Diss Mn
Batch QC
1073
1079
1076
0.5

Page 21 of 25
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Jay Perkins
LIMS# J15060591
Date: July 7, 2015
Report Generated by: Russell Gerads
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate 0
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Cr(VI)
Batch QC
5.000
4.758
94.7
5.000
4.912
97.8
3.2
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix
Spike Duplicate
(2)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
As(III)
As(V)
DMAs
Batch QC
Batch QC
Batch QC
20.00
20.00
20.98
19.67
18.70
19.72
98.4
93.5
94.0
20.00
20.00
20.98
19.51
19.19
20.09
97.6
95.9
95.8
0.8
2.6
1.9
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Spike/Matrix
Spike Duplicate
(3)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Fe(II)
Total Fe
Batch QC
Batch QC
500.0
500
539.0
503
105.4
97.8
500.0
500
541.4
498
105.9
96.9
0.4
0.9
Mn (II)
Total Mn
Diss Mn
Batch QC
Batch QC
Batch QC
500.0
1000
1000
1928
2046
2051
94.4
95.8
97.5
500.0
1000
1000
1957
2069
2072
100.3
98.1
99.6
0.8
1.1
1.0

o a 0
T
GO
U
Vi
00 c
C O
C O
�
c A
O
b h
G
-o
LI
a�
N 'O
�
p
v N
u O `
v v
C
O
Ca .
T3
U ;
tv
X
�
05
N
UI
E
C
U
CL
U) V/
x
u N
ai
°
C
U
U
LJ
v oo
oo
y
Q
u C`
'O O
O
e
cc
cd
o-'U"u,
U
3
U
u
O
=
~ w
_
Q
"U
❑
�
Z
N U
c c
0
Z Z
i
;a --)I r- .l 2-1 �I ,�
Q� �! Li:E
C
nC
OUN O
❑ Z
I J
I
am Its
e 22
I

cd0 1
o � T
`. 4 lu i
00
N
M
00
o: O[
d dclrO O N CJ d O O N
u O
C aUi G N O O a) �
J ccl �. OO ( I
�• v .O �Nd' "C7
t
0 d
c
G)cn
W a o cn (n (n cn N O c c d
cd
T c u Q Q
0
a;
v > o o Ll I
n ej
a v > Q° 2 w a6i
C o a c ro A o
0 n 0
U
• Q O C Q
o J
o
O O
Z Z Z W D@ Z Z
Z Z
D
i
�zm
NI
N
'O
o,CIS J �
J C T
00
; o Q 1,
tr- Q
L C0 CA PA
Page 23 cf 25
a a�
p
(n
Q 3
3
3
3
3
V
3
� T
a�
z(z2�
:a
ca
s
F
N
n

i86(w �'-iorthcreek,"arkway Phone �4. � 183 3'��
IKS"Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
LABS tr_t.ms R4a�ttr
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone Number
Fax Number:
Email Address:
YProiect Name:
B'RL ru c.t _.
By submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
; 60% I<b 6 in the quotation provide by the BRL project manager. If you are not famiUar
.. v ��� lease contact your
� with the term and conditions associated with your project, p
BRI, re resentativc as soon as ossible 425 483-33M
4 - 31 D -OTs`i Requested Turn Around Time:
a ot. e—
io
rr'�• Gd r�
1217608
Bottle ID
Date and Time
Matrix
Volume
Preservative
y_ l�6a
6 Sf/S 13W
t^�
/
EDTA-1
i33.7"? I
/5 13 a
Csl^/
r 7.,5 " 1
NH40H/NH4SO4
f3 3 7 71
/rs //s" t 3
C� w
s'1
De assed HCI
(3a.l03b
�✓is`�,�s- �3a
t-l�✓
(�5 t^^i
None
f33�5s�
- Jis/3� r 3a.sr
�-W
1 ►
None
7-6-
6 ;S%i.s` 13 �'e
Cz
i � rr^ (
None
of
Initials
K.Q.
t2 ✓� n
(Z1c C
2�n
(ZL�
�� ct
{3gr.1-73
e1 ts- i3J.5 Caw
ray-1 EDTA-t
NH40H/NH4SO4
RV-0
(� "- n
A B r1 w- r 5
t3 3 7�s r �.
�l/slip r 3.s
assed HCI
V
Ag Mw - l�
t333a�6
Ells/�s" i3�
/yls 13,
None
Ric D
,48 Ntw "t`'
133c6c3.
133 ob 70
None
of Sample Reception: Q Yes
oe,, —trrl Analvtes and Methods
------ f�
DatefTime: ui `-
led by: (sign) ------ • (print)n Date/Time: ? CCU 0
by: (si
(Print) j 12
(print)
bY: (sign) Dateffime:
Fe
Mn
Mn
Fe
Mn
r7-5-
DateTme:________
KeGeswvu u . w v
Please account for each sample bode as a seperate line item far verification purpose . roduct (P), other (0)
Matrix: Au, Freshwater (l"W), seawater (SW), groundwater (GW), wastewater (WW), soil (St), sediment (SD), tissue (M), p
® No
Comments
Feld filtered
field films
field filtered
filtered
filtered
' .O.G
Ile, +.I (Ap,ii NOS)

Pe
188t+•r Northcreek Parkojay Phone (. '1
S r ��r �(;� Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
r c �Tautr
�AgS .r,�.... �,,,a.• __ BRL Pz 't:ct �`: crcm • ,
o an Name: j n re C a' 4 By submittingof samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
ontact Person: w � lj in the notation provided'oy the B�-project manager. If you are not familiar
ddress: d {v `t with the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your
nvt ,a+,�itentativc as soon as possible (425} 483-3300. --
hone Number: 5'k 7 - 3 7 -v5r`c Re uested Tum Around Time:
ax Number. Method of Sam le Deliv
:mail Address: K a nC V a %, ' `� c—' d' G`m ^ `�'' Courier Trackixt Ntuxtbcr
tion of Sample Reception: Yes E3 NO
'roject Name: C),)V - r pile '
ConfL na
'roject Number: t o Comments
'O Number: 1217608
Matrix Volume Preservative Init►als Re nested Anal es and Methods
iam le ID ,Bottle ID Date and Time � field altered
�,r w I3.6 M I EpTA-1 field filtered `
A6^w- ! (3tz_ 3CtS� ( 37* is .S :N�-7 -
_ ---- NH401+NH4SO4 field filtered
AC3Mw - i 13fZ 1 '3 WO'/i tY1r` V-n Fe Spec
i `ta7 De assed NCI Mn S ec field filtered
A-('3Atw- t d2 6i�q sri None (LV--0
Sob 63- 147 i2 VC p Mn S ec unfiltered
A#3 >h w -- t i3 ►Z None field filtered
A,O/1 ,/- 1 S(t i 396ss /r5 iS Nab None i2 ✓. Se S ec
A 6"Aw ! 132 ► `( 7
As S ec field filtered
EDTA -1 Cr VI field filtered
NH46HINH4SO4 Fe E ec field filtered
De assed HCl Mn S ec field filtered _
None Mn Spec unfiltered
(print) K�f t- wf..., o ^ G,
Relinquished by: (sign) / { - I Dateffime: i7c�S`
iG^ (print) 1C( �i. l i'1 Temp:
Received by: (p
(si 1 Comments:
DateMme:---_-___--.—
Relinquished by: (sign) (print) DatelTime: Temp:
Received by: (sign (print
Please account for each sample bode as a seperate line item for verification l oipurl (Sq sediment (SD), tissue (TS), product (P), other (0)
oumdwater G wastewater (WVin,
Matrix: Air, Freshwater (OW), seawater (SW), W ( '
(Apw'