NC0003433_J15060477F_20150902

+ DUKE Analytical Laboratory Page 1of33
ENERGY
Order Number:
Project Name:
Customer Name(s):
Customer Address:
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Order Summary Report
J15060477
CAPE FEAR - AB GW ASSESSMENT SPECIATION
Tim Hunsucker, Chris Suttell, Kathy Webb, John Toepfer
Lab Contact: Peggy Kendall Phone:
peggy.kendall@du
Report Authorized By: ke-energy.com Date:
(Signature) -- -- - -- 201-5.07.1-0
Peggy Kendall 08:17:00-04'00'
Program Comments:
Please contact the Program Manager (Peggy Kendall) with any questions regarding this report.
Data Flags & Calculations:
7/10/2015
Any analytical tests or individual analytes within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality
system or quality control requirement. The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results)
under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data
included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor results can be found in the
subcontracted lab final report. Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have
been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted.
Data Package:
This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described in this narrative. An estimation of
the uncertainty of measurement for the results in the report is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced, except
in full, without the written consent of the Analytical Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratory with any questions. The
order of individual sections within this report is as follows:
Job Summary Report, Sample Identification, Technical Validation of Data Package, Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis,
Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Sub -contracted Laboratory Results, Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports &
Documentation, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narratives, Chain of Custody (COC)
Certification:
The Analytical Laboratory holds the following State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina
(DHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005. Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of
specific methods.

Sample ID's & Descriptions:
Collection
Sample ID Plant/Station Date and Time
Collected By
Sample Description
2015019310
Cape Fear
10-Jun-15 12:20 PM
Synterra
MW-17SU
2015019311
Cape Fear
10-Jun-15 12:50 PM
Synterra
MW-17BR
2015019312
Cape Fear
10-Jun-15 12:55 PM
Synterra
MW-17SL
2015019313
Cape Fear
10-Jun-15 2:50 PM
Synterra
MW-21SL
2015019314
Cape Fear
10-Jun-15 2:50 PM
Synterra
MW-21BR
2015019315
Cape Fear
10-Jun-15 2:37 PM
Synterra
MW-21SU
6 Total Samples
Page 2 of 33

Page 3 of 33
Technical Validation Review
Checklist:
COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals Yes No
and analyses (compliance programs and procedures).
All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. ❑ Yes❑ No
All laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.❑ Yes ❑ No
Report Sections Included:
U Job Summary Report
❑ Sample Identification
n Technical Validation of Data Package
❑ Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis
❑ Analytical Laboratory QC Report
Sub -contracted Laboratory Results
❑ Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports, & Documentation
❑ Customer Database Entries
66 Chain of Custody
[I/0] Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Sent Separately
Reviewed By: Peggy Kendall Date: 7/10/2015

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060477
Site: MW-17SU
Collection Date: 10-Jun-15 12:20 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019310
Matrix: GW WW
Page 4 of 33
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060477
Site: MW-17BR
Collection Date: 10-Jun-15 12:50 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019311
Matrix: GW WW
Page 5 of 33
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060477
Site: MW-17SL
Collection Date: 10-Jun-15 12:55 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019312
Matrix: GW WW
Page 6 of 33
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 7 of 33
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060477
Site: MW-21 SL
Collection Date: 10-Jun-15 2:50 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019313
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 8 of 33
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060477
Site: MW-21 BR
Collection Date: 10-Jun-15 2:50 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019314
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 9 of 33
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060477
Site: MW-21 SU
Collection Date: 10-Jun-15 2:37 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015019315
Matrix: GW WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Page 10 of 33
BRO�©KS
RAND
LABS
MEANINGFUL METALS DATA
July 8, 2015
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
980-875-5848
Project: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant (LIMS# J15060477)
Ms. Kendall,
Attached is the revised report associated with six (6) aqueous samples submitted for hexavalent
chromium, selenium speciation, arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation
analyses on June 10, 2015. The samples were received in a sealed cooler at temperature of 0.0°C
on June 11, 2015. This report was revised to correct an Fe(II) column header that was
inadvertently titled Fe(III) in the initial report. No other changes have been made to the original
report. Hexavalent chromium analysis was performed by ion chromatography inductively
coupled plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS). Selenium
speciation and arsenic speciation analyses were performed via ion chromatography inductively
coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS). All samples
requesting iron speciation analysis were analyzed by spectrophotometry. Mn(II) analysis was
performed via IC-ICP-CRC-MS. Mn(IV) analysis were performed via digestion and subsequent
analysis by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).
Any issues associated with the analyses are addressed in the following report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
it L7�--
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
3958 6th Ave NW • Seattle, WA 98107 • T: 206-632-6206 • F: 206-632-6017 • www.brooksrand.com • [e-mail]

Page 11 of 33
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Report prepared for:
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Project: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant (LIMS# J15060477)
July 8, 2015
1. Sample Reception
Six (6) aqueous samples were submitted for hexavalent chromium, selenium speciation,
arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation analyses on June 10, 2015. All
samples were received in acceptable condition on June 11, 2015 in a sealed container at
0.0°C.
All samples were received in a laminar flow clean hood, void of trace metals contamination
and ultra -violet radiation, and were designated discrete sample identifiers. Sample fractions
requesting hexavalent chromium, selenium speciation, arsenic speciation, and iron speciation
analyses were field filtered by the client. Two containers were submitted for each client
sample requesting manganese speciation, one field filtered fraction and one unfiltered
fraction. An aliquot of each sample submitted for hexavalent chromium analysis was filtered
into a clean polypropylene tube. All hexavalent chromium sample fractions were stored in a
secure refrigerator maintained at a temperature of 4°C, until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each sample requiring selenium speciation evaluation was decanted into a
polypropylene centrifuge tube and each filtrate was stored in a secure, monitored cryofreezer
(maintained at a temperature of -80°C) until selenium speciation analysis could be
performed. The original bottles were then stored in a secure, monitored refrigerator
(maintained at a temperature of <6°C).
An aliquot of each sample submitted for arsenic speciation analysis was decanted into a
polypropylene centrifuge tube; all fractions were then stored in a secure, monitored
refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be performed.
The sample fractions requesting iron speciation analysis were stored in a secure, monitored
refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be performed.
An aliquot of each filtered sample submitted for manganese speciation analysis was decanted
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube for Mn(II) analysis. These fractions were stored in a

Page 12 of 33
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could
be performed. Subsequently, the original bottles (filtered and unfiltered fractions) intended
for Mn speciation were preserved to pH < 2 with concentrated HNO3 and then stored in a
secure polyethylene container, known to be free from trace metals contamination, until the
digestion could be performed.
2. Sample Preparation
All sample preparation is performed in laminar flow clean hoods known to be free from trace
metals contamination. All applied water for dilutions and sample preservatives are
monitored for contamination to account for any biases associated with the sample results.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC-ICP-DRC-MS Prior to analysis, an aliquot of each
sample was filtered with a syringe filter (0.45µm) and injected directly into a sealed
autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of
a sample may shift the equilibrium of the system, resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Selenium Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS Prior to analysis, an aliquot of each
sample was filtered with a syringe filter (0.45µm) and injected directly into a sealed
autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of
a sample may shift the equilibrium of the system, resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
directly into a sealed autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as a
buffered EDTA solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Iron Speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry No sample preparation was required as a de -
gassed HCL solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Manganese Mn(ff) Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
(0.45µm) directly into an autosampler vial for Mn(II) analysis. No additional sample
preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of the samples may shift the
equilibrium of the system resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Manganese Mn(IV) Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS Each filtered and unfiltered sample submitted
for Mn speciation analysis was preserved with 1 % HNO3 (v/v) upon sample receipt. Each
sample fraction was then further digested on a hotblock apparatus with aliquots of 50%
HNO3 (v/v) and 50% HCl (v/v), in accordance with the digestion procedure specified in EPA
Method 200.8. All resulting sample digests were analyzed for total manganese via
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).

Page 13 of 33
3. Sample Analysis
All sample analysis is preceded by a minimum of a five -point calibration curve spanning the
entire concentration range of interest. Calibration curves are performed at the beginning of
each analytical day. All calibration curves, associated with each species of interest, are
standardized by linear regression resulting in a response factor. All sample results are
instrument blank corrected to account for any operational biases associated with the
analytical platform.
Prior to sample analysis, all calibration curves are verified using second source standards
which are identified as initial calibration verification standards (ICV).
Ongoing instrument performance is identified by the analysis of continuing calibration
verification standards (CCV) and continuing calibration blanks (CCB) at a minimum interval
of every ten analytical runs.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC-ICP-DRC-MS Each sample for hexavalent chromium
analysis was analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-DRC-MS) on June 13, 2015. An aliquot of each sample is
injected onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by a basic (pH > 7) gradient. The
eluting chromium species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where
energy -transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are
extracted from the plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel
through a pressurized chamber (DRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts
with interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector
detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Selenium Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS Each sample for selenium speciation
analysis was analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on June 30, 2015. An aliquot of each sample is
injected onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by a basic (pH > 7) gradient. The
eluting selenium species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where
energy -transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are
extracted from the plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel
through a pressurized chamber (CRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts
with interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector
detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.

Page 14 of 33
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS All samples submitted for As speciation
quantitation were analyzed by via ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision
reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on June 23, 2015. Aliquots of each
sample are injected onto an anion exchange column and eluted isocratically. The eluting
arsenic species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer
processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the
plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized
chamber (CRC) containing a specific collision gas. Polyatomic interferences, due to their
inherently larger size, collide more frequently with the collision gas and therefore may be
separated from the analyte of interest via kinetic energy discrimination (KED). A solid-state
detector detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer on the basis of their mass -to -
charge ratio (m/z), and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Iron Speciation Analysis by SpectrophotometrX All sample fractions submitted for iron
speciation were analyzed on June 11, 2015. The samples were analyzed for iron speciation
in accordance with the scientifically accepted method outlined by:
Stookey, L.L., (1970). "Ferrozine - A new spectrophotometric reagent for iron",
Anal.Chem., 42:779-81.
Manganese Mn(I) Analysis by IC-ICP-CRC-MS All samples for Mn(II) analysis were
analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC-ICP-CRC-MS) on June 18, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected
onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by an acidic (pH < 7) gradient. An ion
pairing agent provides a dynamic ion exchange mechanism for the cationic manganese
species on the chromatographic column. The differences in the affinity of manganese species
towards the ion pair agent and the column results in separation. The eluting selenium species
are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes
cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma
through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber
(CRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts with interfering ions of the same
target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the
mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Manganese Mn(IV) Analysis by ICP- QQ-MS All samples submitted for Mn speciation
quantitation were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass
spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS) on July 6-7, 2015. Aliquots of each sample digest are
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause

Page 15 of 33
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through an initial quadrupole (Q1), which
filters the target masses prior to their entrance into a second chamber. The second chamber
contains specific reactive gasses or collision gasses that preferentially react either with
interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z) or with the target analyte,
producing an entirely different mass to charge ratio (m/z) which can then be differentiated
from the initial interferences. The ions then exit the collision/reaction cell into and additional
quadrupole (Q2). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer,
on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z), and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
4. Analytical Issues
No significant analytical issues were encountered. All quality control parameters associated
with the samples were within acceptance limits.
Mn(IV) is quantified by analyzing the water samples for total Mn and dissolved Mn. Mn(IV)
is operationally defined as the difference between the filtered and unfiltered total Mn
concentrations, since it is thermodynamically favored to be in the form of a precipitate.
For the Mn(IV) analysis, several total and dissolved Mn results were greater than the value of
the associated high calibration standard. A linear range verification standard was analyzed at
2000 µg/L. The Mn recovery for the linear range verification standard was acceptable, at
92.4%, demonstrating that the linear range of the analytical platform extended to 2000 µg/L
for Mn. All reported total and dissolved Mn results were less than 2000 µg/L with the
dilutions at the instrument factored in. These results were within the linear range
demonstrated by the linear range verification standard. No corrective actions were necessary.
The estimated method detection limit (eMDL) for hexavalent chromium is generated from
replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for selenite, selenate, and selenocyanate are generated from replicate
analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve. Not all selenium species are present
in preparation blanks; therefore, eMDL calculations based on preparation blanks are
artificially biased low.
The eMDL values for methylseleninic acid and selenomethionine are calculated from the
average eMDL of selenite, selenate, and selenocyanate. The calibration does not contain
methylseleninic acid or selenomethionine due to impurities in these standards which would
bias the results for other selenium species.
The eMDL values for arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid are generated using the
standard deviation of replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve. The
eMDL for monomethylarsonic acid is calculated from the average eMDL of the three arsenic
species contained in the calibration (i.e., arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid); the

Page 16 of 33
calibration and CCVs do not contain monomethylarsonic acid due to impurities in this
standard which would bias the results for other arsenic species.
The eMDL values for iron speciation have been generated from replicate analyses of the
lowest standard in the calibration curve.
The eMDL for Mn(II) has been generated from replicate analyses of the lowest standard in
the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for Mn(IV) been calculated using the standard deviation of the method
blanks prepared and analyzed concurrently with the submitted samples.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC

Page 17 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (1
Sample ID
Cr(VI)
Se(IV)
Se(VI)
SeCN
McSe(IV)
SeMe
Unknown Se
Species (n)
MW-17SU
0.058
ND (< 0.069)
ND (< 0.085)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
0 (0)
MW-17BR
0.393
ND (< 0.069)
ND (< 0.085)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
0 (0)
MW-17SL
0.100
ND (< 0.069)
ND (< 0.085)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
0 (0)
MW-21SL
0.052
ND (< 0.069)
ND (< 0.085)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
0 (0)
MW-21 BR
0.110
0.414
ND (< 0.085)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
0 (0)
MW-21SU
0.190
ND (< 0.069)
0.183
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
0 (0)
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in lag/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
SeCN = Selenocyanate
McSe(IV) = Methylseleninic acid
SeMe = Selenomethionine
Unknown Se Species = Total concentration of all unknown Se species observed by IC-ICP-MS
n = number of unknown Se species observed

Page 18 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (2)
Unknown As
Sample ID
As(III)
As(V)
MMAs
DMAs
Species
MW-17SU
ND (< 0.062)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.015)
ND (< 0.035)
MW-17BR
ND (< 0.062)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.015)
ND (< 0.035)
MW-17SL
0.138
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.015)
0.608
MW-21SL
0.625
0.218
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.015)
ND (< 0.035)
MW-21 BR
0.093
2.34
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.015)
ND (< 0.035)
MW-21SU
ND (< 0.062)
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.015)
ND (< 0.035)
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in tag/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
MMAs = monomethylarsonic acid
DMAs = dimethylarsinic acid
Unknown As Species = Total concentration of all unknown As species observed by IC-ICP-MS

Page 19 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (3
Sample ID
Fe(II)
Fe(III)*
Mn (II)
Mn(IV)**
MW-17SU
24900
2300
39400
ND (< 2.3)
MW-17BR
15.9
ND (< 3.9)
30.2
4.60
MW-17SL
79100
3100
6640
290
MW-21SL
775
170
1910
ND (<0.12)
MW-21 BR
ND (< 3.4)
4.5
ND (< 0.91)
4.07
MW-21 SU
45.5
28.5
11900
530
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
*Fe(III) defined as the difference between total recoverable Fe and Fe(II)
**Mn(IV) operationally defined as the difference between total and dissolved Mn

Page 20 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (1)
Analvte Woo PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL* eMDL 5x RL 5x eMDL 50x RL 50x
Cr(VI)
0.033
0.017
0.013
0.013
0.019
0.010
0.001 0.006
0.050 -
-
Se(IV)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001 -
- 0.069
0.50
Se(VI)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002 -
- 0.085
0.50
SeCN
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001 -
- 0.028
0.46
McSe(lV)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001 -
- 0.061
0.49
SeMe
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001 -
- 0.061
0.49
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 10x
RL 10x
As(III)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.062
0.20
As(V)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.028
0.20
MMAs
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004
0.035
0.20
DMAs
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.015
0.21
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 21 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (pg/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 1x
RL 1x
eMDL 50x
RL 50x
Fe(II)
0.0
-2.3
-2.3
-2.3
-1.7
1.1
3.4
3.4
20
170
1000
Total Fe
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
0.0
3.9
3.9
20
190
1000
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (pg/L)
eMDL*
eMDL 100x
RL 100x
Fe(II)
3.4
340
2000
Total Fe
3.9
390
2000
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 22 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (fag/L) PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL* eMDL 10x RL 10x eMDL 1000x RL 1000x
Mn (II) -0.21 0.08 -0.13 -0.15 -0.09 0.12 0.091 0.91 5.0 91 500
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (fag/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 25x
RL 25x
eMDL 500x
RL 500x
Total Mn
0.070
0.041
0.044
0.079
0.052
0.019
0.002
0.057
1.0
1.1
20
Diss Mn
0.16
0.10
0.10
0.06
0.12
0.04
0.005
0.12
1.0
2.3
20
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 23 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (1)
Analyte (Ng/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Cr(VI)
LCS
2.002
1.856
92.7
Se(IV)
LCS
10.00
10.18
101.8
Se(VI)
LCS
10.00
10.47
104.7
SeCN
LCS
8.92
8.859
99.3
McSe(IV) LCS 6.47 6.561 101.4
SeMe LCS 9.32 8.223 88.2
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
As(III)
LCS
5.000
4.559
91.2
As(V)
LCS
5.000
4.659
93.2
MMAs
LCS
5.073
5.655
111.5
DMAs LCS 3.625 3.554 98.0

Page 24 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (3)
Analyte (Ng/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Fe(II)
ICV
500.0
509.1
101.8
Total Fe
TMDA-70
369
344.9
93.5
Mn (II)
LCS
10.00
10.85
108.5
Total Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
294.7
94.4
Diss Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
300.5
96.3

Page 25 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (1)
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Cr(VI)
MW-21SU
0.190
0.212
0.201
11.1
Se(IV)
MW-17SL
ND (< 0.069)
ND (< 0.069)
NC
NC
Se(VI)
MW-17SL
ND (< 0.085)
ND (< 0.085)
NC
NC
SeCN
MW-17SL
ND (< 0.028)
ND (< 0.028)
NC
NC
McSe(IV)
MW-17SL
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
NC
NC
SeMe
MW-17SL
ND (< 0.061)
ND (< 0.061)
NC
NC
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
As(III)
Batch QC
0.381
0.400
0.391
4.8
As(V)
Batch QC
0.135
0.140
0.138
3.6
MMAs
Batch QC
ND (< 0.035)
ND (< 0.035)
NC
NC
DMAs
Batch QC
ND (< 0.015)
ND (< 0.015)
NC
NC
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL

Page 26 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (3
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Fe(II)
MW-17SU
24890
24550
24720
1.4
Total Fe
MW-17SU
27210
26430
26820
2.9
Mn (II)
Batch QC
25.50
25.19
25.35
1.2
Total Mn
Batch QC
32.73
30.97
31.85
5.5
Diss Mn
Batch QC
16.34
15.37
15.85
6.1
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL

Page 27 of 33
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Energy Progress Cape Fear Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060477
Date: July 8, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate 0
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Cr(VI)
MW-21SU
5.000
5.231
100.6
5.000
5.110
98.2
2.3
Se(IV)
MW-17SL
251.0
243.7
97.1
251.0
244.9
97.6
0.5
Se(VI)
MW-17SL
250.0
248.2
99.3
250.0
248.0
99.2
0.1
SeCN
MW-17SL
228.8
220.8
96.5
228.8
221.0
96.6
0.1
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(2)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
As(III)
Batch QC
20.00
19.67
96.4
20.00
19.51
95.6
0.8
As(V)
Batch QC
20.00
18.70
92.8
20.00
19.19
95.2
2.6
DMAs
Batch QC
20.98
19.72
94.0
20.98
20.09
95.8
1.9
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike
Duplicate
(3)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Fe(II)
MW-17SU
25000
50230
102.0
25000
49210
98.0
2.1
Total Fe
MW-17SU
25000
48830
88.0
25000
48940
88.5
0.2
Mn (II)
Batch QC
50.00
80.07
109.5
50.00
80.26
109.8
0.2
Total Mn
Batch QC
1000
1057
102.5
1000
1030
99.8
2.6
Diss Mn
Batch QC
1000
982.9
96.7
1000
1007
99.2
2.5

o � o
o
en OD h W R
cn N H- C u
00 c O C u p a
�00 y O 0 m m m m
?� N OU 0 II+ ®
v -o ..
0 ekd 4p�p . o w w m 3 w
cd N o b-- ;•-
eq
c0 �y
G yUj N
y 0 d E3
N m m m
a C M p O 0
v, CU m c c m
C Q LL
c 1' ° o r"
o
z o v o Q Z
0
00 O C �
4.
O O C+
C O aCi 00
cn O 6n0
/'�
6yU7 •�.+ C p; y p i; y G n
>o
_
Q= i
p = U) Z Z Z
CU
w O
Z
0
r6 � `rib f
V'1 �
V v
00
cq
ell (�o C}
«
«
«
w
c
m
EM MME
al �I LLI �I gl
C
Q
4 o c
C`s
�
O
C)
cn
_
=
� m m
m
~O
=
O
m Z Z
Z
W
v
m
0
z
z
�I��IAIJI�,I
t
��
n
c6
Nz
O
Page 2£1of 33
m
0
A

o
H
N O C
O G 00
T7
d
•� � N
O �
�
m
m
m
m�
tr-
C v
®
p
O=
C
N
`° 41 •�? C7
�
�
w
w
7
w-
0
ICS
o G
o
C+
•.I A
c
a�
".I1I -�,V
L.I�I�INI 1¢I"ILL-
) ��� ��ooaC
a a 5 o
D �
_ -0 (D d
v 0 2 Z Z Z
W
Z
rr,-�
A III
u
tlo '
N
6 r6
kD
a+
O o p O o
p
00
yj
AO
z
z
o�, w
c
3I�I�I��3 3
o o
q
0 <o
Jo •Jo �' �.
c�MMcr'
0
J
U
O
Page 2F of 33

X , �
77
-7
•0
P
ige30of3
O
y W u
i
I
M oo
" c
r
ti C
O a o
ca
C
!
G
C
z
v
a,v
v
v
v
v
v
v
l
U p a
C
O1. r
a,
o
cCa cOi
®
w
v
"d
v
:�
•a
v
v
v
v
N 'p o
N,
O
N
N
61
O
N
N
vN y- Ln
E
E
v u Q
E
E
C
a
v
o L
o m
m
U
a>
U
(D
U U
a�
U
m
v y o
[n
U)
(n
cn cn
U)
u)
O CO
¢ Q
U
LL
in
Q
LL
cn
.-000ip
"r
o
A
v° o v
a v c H
v a x a
c
N
z
a
v o o oo
N
v a
v
C 0 cw 'O > Z
.� z '✓.' O" Cl W
I
'\
o�o•D E u 7
� C
�
0� N
0e
-5 'v
5 3
U
C
f C
Ci
C/
y
Ly
C�
`L'
.
UO
0
0
f
r
=
Z
N
c
c
c
0
Z
0
Z
0
Z
Fa-
Z
0
0
0
Z
ElL
E
>~
Z
w
N
14-
0
0
>
I
re
A
to
r6
/6
r3
r
6
r6
v'6cj
r.
r
ul
4
m
m
•�
M
0
d
c
!�
!�,
�n
l�
!�
!
�,
!�
✓
C:
a a
c�
C
A
In
O
1 �
M40--
-�
`�
Qo
JC
m
�.
,�
/6
T
�
a✓
�
`3`
a
a a;
a, I ro
jj"
zz
33
3�
3�
Cz
v'-
��
u
V
�
^
GL
W
a
:
Cl)
U
tY tY
rr �

, j rsO&bv7 -
18804 Northr-mck Parkway Phot gr 4834300
Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]
BRI. Pro'ect lanager, Maute
w.r..� .....�
Name:By submitting of samples the client agxces to all terms and conditions set Eorth
Ka. �h (n/e. in the quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
act Pecaon: ro ect, ease contact your
etas: 1 `/� t-- � v ST. the term and conditions associated with your p j please
��,, v t L, 7� `101 > 0 1 BRL re msentstive as soon as sibte 42 483 3300.
me Number tis a 7 - 3 nested Turn Around 'rime:
Number: Method of SUMIC
Courier
tH Address: . one vc n `' '�
t T Number:
�� l e t:onfirmatiott of satr,pk Reception: Yea E3 No
ect Name: (7y KG. r I e-`"
act Number It% �• t o 3
Numbex. 1217608 Initials uesbed and Methods
Conuumts
Bottle ID Dam ate Tum Matrix Vohuxu Preservative field filtered
kID t �,S ,1 EDTA-1 (ZK�? AsS
w -) 7 `� i3 37�b I b(/c IlS t c t; r� field filleted
3 J�o/�� ra w 1as I NHgQWNH49 field filtered
7 u 3t ,� ► HCl Y r� Fe
M w — I % `� L1 } i �.3.0 V�'' K ,� Mn field filtered
1 �46 -w , a s •�, I None Mn urtAllerod
Mvr - ►`�v g306%S I ias ,r� Nacre
M w- t 7 a d Se field filtered
! t None
held fitared
_ w j �;� � EDTA -1
t7 D c i I3,45g I � �% � COO i` fieldititered
`d 37G c ).71 x` '. v� t 3,3 NH40HlNH4SO4 Fe ✓' field filtered
t[-7�- � HCi 2K �
1-1 6tZ 33 7 7 �t °' 15 � �' � `�'' ' '� � � o Mn S field fiFrered
a 7 6 iR Pi 3 C'. L (� - , S �,Sv C: t,U t M Notts K t? Mn i unfiltered
_ i t3 ►Z 13 3 ; a s I None r� Se .� field filtered
(h w t -716 �' GU
Dekeffkm b /bit 1-7 /U ;
teNrtquiahed by: (astrj -1r j - Daterrittte: .,l
Zeceived by: ( ) (p""nt)
ReWquMed by: ( i (ram)
178tterTitne:
Received :�
Please account for each sample bottle as a separate tine item for verification p a (SLs t (5l)}, tiout Ca , product (t'), othu (U)
Matrix: Air, Fmhwaw OM), seawater (SD(�, &rouadwater (GV. wastewater (QV\M), (S ).
Rev 1.1 (Apdt 2D05)

18804 Northcrcek Parkway Phordk`�W300
Fax [phone]
Bothell, WA 98011
BRL Pro'ect M
Maute
of samples
lea the client agrees to all tetma and conditions set forth
By submitting amp . lE you are not familiar
the quotation provided by the BRL protect manager
tact Person: Ke 1- k, tnJ E with your roject, please contact your
(Tess: ' ' t. t D th the term and conditions associated yo P
BRL reacntative as soon as Bible 425 483-3300•
e er J: (e S 960 1 U:
>ae Number s`I7 -?> 70 4�S'i tcd Turn Around1
Method of le Deliv
Number. 1 • Number:
=a nf-E r Ott G o r ' O, Courier
ail Address: ; , d o n o v , `y 'CO o r- P 1, . I
Confirmation of Sample Reception: � Ya
13 No
i t Number: /0 121i608 and Methods Comments
Nu
> b preservative Initials Re uested
Date and'I"ttne Matrix Volume ASfield filtered
Bottle ID
k ID 14,5' r, ► EDTA -1 ►{ Y field fj{tered
Q 41 5- (n 0115- 1a5-s- HISO4 tZk kJ C
M - �� S 37� i / 6he /t 6- r �s8' I NNAONM > Fe Bald filtered
S M sed NCI i � K o field filtered
17SL- (�3771 611o1�s ,•3ss- Cs�/ Ia- en r Nate 1:►tO Mn
i3 3a 6 Y s � �ol�4s- � r w � a.s 1 r� K � Mn � uinAltand
(�365'� c 6 0% as's C-st•✓ l �� f^ None 0 V � so field filtered
34 �.4s �io�is ; ).s's` '�'�`•'' t �'� `"•1 None
i 7 51 As r field filtered
S a� EOTA -1 field filtered
v1 uJ _ l i , M ! t+lN40WNN4504 Fe field fired
/11 _ �1 � � ; Vi ll ',arc%� ;y� o Cr w � ��! HCI �2��a field filtered
M l; L 3 Win
C� 14y IWI5 i y �, w t iS` c 1 None K 0 Mn / unflltMrd
L,/ ! None field filtered
Vv-
Mw - dl sz -�q �.CsU a;/o ,s ,rya o G-~►,� � a MI _None
jelinquished tbwy: (Print) ZX DateMMO:41L
2eceived by (sign)
Re inquiahed by (sigt►) ( ) :
pttte%Time:
M
Rec:e&ed to line Turn for verification purposes.
Please account for each sample bottle as a sepera wastewater ffM, soil (SL), scdknew (SD), f-s-x (C5j, product ([�, other (�)
Matrix: Air, Freshwater (!?9V).
seawater C ", groundwater (GW)
ttcv 1.1 (Ape+ 70M

.1t80.1 Northca.cs 'Parkway P'.one W6) -:,0 1
Bothell, w:\ twi I :'.-x (423' 483 9818
,n any Nanw: [ a � p
BRI, Project Manager: Jeremy Nlaute
Contact Person: Kai i )Vb
By submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
in the quotation provided%y the BRL project manager. If you are not fatnihar
with the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your
BRI, re resenotive as soon rs possible 425 483-3300.
Address: % !' oe� S �•'i "�� C>
Phone ."dumber: S' c( 7 - 3 70 -O$ (
Fax plumber:
Re nested Turn Around Time:
Email Address: A—dont rn 2,-,5 co r , c Q^^
Method of Sample Delivery:
Project Name: r u leer =.,e .
le,
[Q a l— 1
Courier Trackin Number:
Project Number: /0 2�6 . io j
C.onfirn-ation of Sample Reception: Yip
P 13 No
I'{) Number: 1217608
Sample ID
Bottle Ill
Date and Time
Matrix
Volume
Preservative
Initials
Requested Anal tes and Methods
Comments
Mw- t R R
Q. R
! 37'3a
36 3,V6
&Ilo/S'
61fiefs` /ySa
(� w
I�Ls (-I
1 d S r+ 1
EDTA- 1
NH40HMH4SO4
— assail HCl
(Z --(>_
({rc D
_ V-
R
As S ec
Cr(Vl) ✓ —
Fe Spec %` _ --
Mn Spec -
field filtered
field filtered
-- ..
field filtered
1336yIY
None
RkfJ
field filtered
d
R
I ?�� �a
6/,c%- y�5-o
/
G W
1 ,�,� t
None
R K.-O
Mn Spec f
unfiltered
OR
13 39 is.S
�/io/i.s /ySp
(j tnr
�.�� r* t
None
R K n
Se Spec
field #filtered
't w- d• I
t3 Y / .� 413
4110115- / y 3 7
-w
1 a S✓`• t
EDTA - 1
12 K.o
As S -
field filtered
Mw - t S r✓`
637*1�o
/roo�s /v37
�,
I 5 �.t
NH40H/NH4SO4
91cC>
Cr(v1 -f
field filtered
w- I S V
(3 3 a41
b/ra/is - ��r.37
tv L✓
I aS••, i
assail HCI
0 K p
Fe S
field filtered
/"Iw - �t 5 i✓
43
t a.S r+%
None
R ►,
Mn Spec
field filtered
w- a ► ' C,
a33
1-07
371
A,w
i dSrh�
None
None
i20t a
ti
Mn Spec✓
Se Spec v
unfiltered
field filtered
Relinquished by: (sign) `+i `i-_-- (print)c�
Received by: (sign) - (print)
DateRime: • x%S "7j�
Date/Time: <
Relinquished by: (sign) (print) Date/Time:
Received by: (sign) (print) Date/Time:
Please account for each sample bottle as a seperate line item for verification purposes.
Matrix: Air, Freshwater O-W), seawater (SW), groundwater ((;W), wast^water (Viol), soil (SL), sediment (SD), tissue (CS), product (p), ether (0)
hcc I (Apr- 21K6)