20231565 Ver 1_PCN Attachments_Woodlake II_20231115

PCN Attachments
1. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
2. NCDWR PRE -FILING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. USGS TOPO VICINITY MAP
4. NRCS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY VICINITY MAP
5. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD/AJD/CONCURRENCE
EMAIL)
6. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION - NCDMS ACCEPTANCE LETTER
7. S&EC THREATENED & ENDANGERD SPECIES REPORT & EMAIL
8. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAPS
9. IMPACT EXHIBIT & PROFILE
10. DRAINAGE AREA MAP

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Wood Lake Phase II S&EC Project # 14464
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Gary Beecher Field Office: Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 494550401277, 494550401278, 494550401280, 494550401276,
494550401279, 494550401016, 494550401020, 494550401021, 494550401048 & 494550401149
Site Address: 3035 Rockfish Road
City, County, State: Raeford, Hoke County, NC
Name: Y-atA-py-d
Mailing Address: I
Telephone Number:
Email: (\ajAuA E
(please
Signature
Date
1I-U-aoa3
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Deborah Shirley
From: Camden Brunick
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 11:05 AM
To: Turlington, Chad
Subject: Pre -Filing Meeting Request - Wood lake II Phase II
Attachments: WLIIPH II PROJECT AREA.pdf
Good afternoon Chad,
This email is for a pre -filing meeting request for the Wood Lake II Phase II project located at 3055 Rockfish Road in
Raeford, Hoke County, NC. The project is a proposed residential development and is approximately 35.90 acres. This
project proposes the construction of a single-family residential development including but not limited to; roadway
infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, and SCMs. Specifically, there is one (1) road crossing that impacts
streams/buffers. Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of cut land with an existing dirt path that runs through the
property. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested and cut land with residential neighborhoods.
Rockfish Road bounds the property to the south and Townsend Road bounds the property to the Northwest. Please see
the attached site plan above. Please note this may change as we work with the engineers on minimizing impacts.
Project Name: Wood Lake II Phase II
County: Cumberland
Applicant Name: Raeford Development Company (Attn: Dan Farrell)
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Thank you,
CAMDEN BRUNICK
Environmental Consultant
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone](cell)

Z G
v+ �a
o �a
AV o
_.LL
��'�•�-� l�l \:�\\\��\RD.CKFISH RD
I g6'
CH-RD- J /
Project Number: U$G$ Map Map Title: N
14464.W4 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: I I I I I I
MM Wood Lake II, Phase 2 Feet
Scale: 1 1000'
Hoke County, NC
" =
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Source: 2019 NC Raeford &
84
0 6/ 16/2 0 22 12 Fnlle ofNausa RonA. Suila IN. Rnlai3h. VC27615 • Ph.—[phone] • Fas [phone]
Nicholson Creek Quads

JT CaoA
WaB NSA
►L 17 $aD y, r�
el G OA
r� �[
p pp
CaS -
CaB l,i�•r4
l :1f1 I_ ;�B
W a R JT R
Web
W a B
•. Oaf) � Bad
WaB
Baa
WaS
CaB
KaA J i
C} a B T
cr, 1
JT
13 eLlt.9Of C�I3
NC Center for Geographic Information &Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
14464.W4 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: SOII Survey/ Map I I I I I I I I I
M M Wood Lake II, Phase 2 Feet
Scale: 1 1000'
Hoke County, NC A*
" =
Date: Source: Cumerland & Hoke County Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
06/16/2022 Soil Survey Sheets 09 & 15 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615•Phone [phone]•Fax: [phone]
—&e.eem

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2023-02209 County: Hoke County
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Mason Montgomery
S&EC
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Raleigh, NC, 27615
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mmontuomeryAsandec.com
Size (acres) 24 Nearest Town Raeford, NC
Nearest Waterway Beaver Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates Latitude: 34.99358 Longitude:-79.14343
Location description: This 24-acre proiect is located on Rockfish Road in Raeford, Hoke County, NC (Parcel ID:
494550001062)
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There appear to be waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC & 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC 4 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary iurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation
process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory
mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD
will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD,
which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There appear to be waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
There appear to be waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the
permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective
presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is not sufficiently
accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2023-02209
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on
your property which, unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from the date of this notification.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Gary Beecher at [phone] or
Gary.H.BeecherA usace. army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.
D. Remarks: A desk top review was conducted on this JD application using information obtained from the consultant
(S&EC) and from Corps produced Lidar Maps.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries and/or the
jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this request. This
delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should
discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

SAW-2023-02209
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A. SHANNIN&USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: November 14, 2023 Expiration Date: PJD does not expire
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://re ug lator .00ps.usace.anny.mil/customer-service-survey.
Copy Furnished via email to:
Owner:
Raeford Development Company, LLC
i amal(&i andkbuilders.com

SAW-2023-02209
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: S&EC
File Number: SAW-2023-02209
Date: Nov 14, 2023
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
C
PERMIT DENIAL WITH PREJUDICE
D
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
X
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
F
SECTION I
The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at https://www.usace.army.miI/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory-Program-
and-Permits/a eals/ or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district
engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and
your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you
accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and
conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and
return the form to the district engineer. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address
some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued
as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered
permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district
engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and
your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you
accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and
conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This
form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C. PERMIT DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Not appealable
You received a permit denial without prejudice because a required Federal, state, and/or local authorization
and/or certification has been denied for activities which also require a Department of the Army permit before
final action has been taken on the Army permit application. The permit denial without prejudice is not
appealable. There is no prejudice to the right of the applicant to reinstate processing of the Army permit
application if subsequent approval is received from the appropriate Federal, state, and/or local agency on a
previously denied authorization and/or certification.
D: PERMIT DENIAL WITH PREJUDICE: You may appeal the permit denial
You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2023-02209
E: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide
new information for reconsideration
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps
within 60 days of the date of this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all
rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of
Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the
division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this
notice.
• RECONSIDERATION: You may request that the district engineer reconsider the approved JD by
submitting new information or data to the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. The
district will determine whether the information submitted qualifies as new information or data that justifies
reconsideration of the approved JD. A reconsideration request does not initiate the appeal process. You
may submit a request for appeal to the division engineer to preserve your appeal rights while the district is
determining whether the submitted information qualifies for a reconsideration.
F: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: Not appealable
You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable.
If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for
further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate
the JD.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision you
If you have questions regarding the appeal process, or
may contact:
to submit your request for appeal, you may contact:
District Engineer,
Philip Shannin
Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Regulatory Appeals Review Officer
Attn: Gary Beecher
South Atlantic Division
69 Darlington Avenue
60 Forsyth St SW, Floor M9
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Philip.A.Shannin2(a)usace.army.mil
404-562-5136
SECTION II — REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT

SAW-2023-02209
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. Use additional pages as necessary. You
may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the
administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information
to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process.
You will be provided a 15-day notice of any site investigation and will have the opportunity to participate in all
site investigations.
Date:
Signature of appellant or agent.
Email address of appellant and/or agent:
Telephone number:

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 01/22/2021 (November 14, 2023 Corps)
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mason Montgomery - 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Raleigh NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington Field Office, Woodlake 2 Phase 2, SAW-2023-02209
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Hoke City: Raeford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.993024 Long.:-79.143475
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaver Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑■ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: November 14, 2023
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
34.992072
-79.143007
1960 If
Perennial Stream
Section 404
B
34.992185
-79.144158
562 If
Perennial Stream
Section 404
W1
34.992127
-79.142672
1.18 ac
Wetland
Section 404
W2
34.992473
-79.143896
0.85 ac
Wetland
Section 404
W3
34.991986
-79.144893
0.09 ac
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑■ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
(1"=1000') Cumerland & Hoke County Soil Survey Sheets 09 & 15
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Cumerland & Hoke County Soil Survey Sheets 09 & 15
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑■ Other information (please specify): Corps produced Lidar Maps
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

;1\
MoKe uounty• •
it
/ I
I. .
I j l l l I 11 ly
1 I I I
vmg
. \ I
i F I . \\ \ \\ 1 . \�-----
I I
�„\ ,� .�\..� \ r 1 1 l ♦_____� \ 1 1 1 I I I � 111.1 1 1
`�� �t �: \ I 1♦ ." \ � \ I I I I I I I IIII 11
�� .\ \ \ 1 ♦. \__ \ \ I I I 1 II 1 IIII .I
:♦♦ 1, v\ •.\\ \\ \\ .� I I I I I I I 1 1 1 11 111 1 1
♦; �`'.•{` ♦♦♦ ♦♦ \, \\ \`♦ ♦__----���/ / I I I I 1 1 I I IIII \ 1
♦ ♦ \::\ I I 1 1 .\\\\ \ \
�/7
NCC�GIA
I

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC itECKTENWALD
Director
Contact
J&K General Contractors
1184 Fayetteville Road
Raeford, NC 28376
Project: Wood Lake II
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 14, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 5/14/2024
County: Hoke
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.24
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Aa�dJA_,��
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Debbie E. Shirley, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
fk; C0.R[71 IRAAEQ 217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
do.t.—M EP7... a f `� 919.707.8976

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone; [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service July 8, 2022
Raleigh Field Office S&EC Project No: 14464.W4
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Re: Online Project Review Request, Woodlake II Phase 2, Raeford - Hoke County, North
Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review July 8, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the instructions
for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: A planned residential development that is proposing impacts to wetlands
and streams.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Woodlake II Phase 2 (34.994670,-79.144728). The site is located at 3013 Rockfish Road, Raeford
Hoke County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package 6. FWS Official Species List
2. S&EC T&E Species Report 7. NHP Report
3. Vicinity Maps 8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
4. S&EC Photo Report 9. FWS Self -Certification Letter
5. Overall Site Plan

Environmental Consultants,
8412 balls of Netiw Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC', 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax
sandcc.com
July 8, 2022
S&EC Project No.: 14464.W4
To: J&K Contraction Inc.
Attn: Daniel Farrell
1184 Fayetteville Road
Raeford, NC 28376
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Woodlake II Phase 2 (+/- 68 acres)
3103 Rockfish Road, Raeford, Hoke County, NC
Dear Mr. Farrell:
On June 23, 2022, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Woodlake II Phase 2
property shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at 3103
Rockfish Road in Hoke County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Black Branch in the Cape Fear
River Basin, which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to
Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as C.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Woodlake II Phase 2 - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 5

July 8, 2022
S&EC Project #14464.W4
RESULTS!
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
• American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Threatened
• Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate
• American Chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), Endangered
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), Endangered
• Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report did not identify any natural or managed land areas within the project area or within one mile of
the project area.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and
individual Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual
RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. We found no ideal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine
forests) within the project area. Most of the site is dominated by dense new growth of Loblolly pine,
Sweetgum, and Oak saplings. There were mature Loblolly pines near a home site. These trees were
observed in detail, and no cavities or evidence of cavities were observed. Given the lack of species
present, and no presence of suitable habitat we concluded that the project would have "No effect" on
RCWs.
AMERICAN ALLIGATOR (Alligator mississippiensis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat for the American Alligator. The
NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrences within the project area or within one mile of
the project area. Suitable habitat for the American Alligator consists of lakes, rivers, creeks, marshes,
swamps, and ponds. During the evaluation, no evidence of American Alligator was observed. Due to
Woodlake II Phase 2 - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 5

July 8, 2022
S&EC Project #14464.W4
the presences of ponds, streams, and wetlands on -site, S&EC believes that the project would "May
affect, not likely to adversely affect" the American Alligator.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY (Danaus plexippus):
The Monarch Butterfly is currently listed as a candidate species, and not yet listed or proposed for
listing as threatened or endangered. Due to the current status of Monarch Butterfly, consultation with
USFWS under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required. FWS recommends conserving
pollinator habitat where practicable.
AMERICAN CHAFFSEED (Schwalbea americana):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the site for potential suitable habitat for the
American Chaffseed. We found no individual species during our evaluation. The NHP report did not
list an elemental occurrence on or within one mile of the site. American Chaffseed is a hemi parasitic
stem that grows in openly disturbed areas that are routinely burned 1-6 years. There was no evidence
of controlled burns on -site. The areas S&EC believes could be suitable habitat include the sewer
easements, due to mowing. These areas were surveyed in detail and no species were found. Due to
these observations, S&EC believes this project would have "No effect" on the American Chaffseed.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC (Rhus michauxia):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We visited
a known population of Michaux's Sumac within Wake County prior to conducting our preliminary
surveys. We found no individual Michaux's Sumac species within the project area. The NHP report
did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within
the project areas to include primarily disturbed open areas along easements, roads, and ponds. Other
sumac species identified on -site included Winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). Given the lack of species
present within the areas believed to be suitable habitat, we concluded that the project would have "No
effect" on Michaux's Sumac.
ROUGH -LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE (Lysimachia asperulaefolia):
S&EC personnel conducted a preliminary survey of the site for potential suitable habitat for the
Rough -Leaved Loosestrife. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
Woodlake II Phase 2 - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 5

July 8, 2022
S&EC Project #14464.W4
project area or within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species is edges between
longleaf pine stands, and pond pocosins. This species can also be found alongside roads and
maintained easements. During our assessment we found no species of Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat exists on -site. There are disturbed
areas along the roads, easements, and wetland edges. These areas were surveyed in detail. Since no
species were observed within the areas believed to be suitable habitat, we have concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on the Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles. " We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Myotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter." Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Woodlake II Phase 2 - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 5

July 8, 2022
S&EC Project #14464.W4
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. June 23, 2022.
7. NHP Report: June 23, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. July 8, 2022.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. July 8, 2022.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 30pp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
Woodlake II Phase 2 - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 5

Z G
� 77
o
- 'kill_LA�MA�
(' I
� 2�`Eaa<o ^
�o'
1=
OCKFISH RD
o goo
0 0 J 1L
CH-RD-IJ
Project Number: U$G$ Map Map Title: N
14464.W4 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: I I I I I I I I I
MM Wood Lake II, Phase 2 Feet 1 " = 1000'
Scale: Hoke County, NC
Soil Sc Environmental Consultants, PA
mSource: 2019 NC Raeford &
ate: &5l3 Falkd least Rwd SuKc IOi. HakigR tiC 7'+615 • Phauw: E9i918465906• Fac[9l9]8149467
06/30/2022 Nicholson Creek Quads

JT CaoA
WaB NSA
►L 17 �i a D r�
el G OA
l :1f1 CaS L ;AB
W a R JT R
Web
W a B
•. Oaf) � Bad
WaB
Baa
WaS
CaB
aA �` J.f
C} a B T
a D cr, 13
JT
13 eLlt.9Of C�I3
NC Center for Geographic Information & Anal sis
Project Number: Map Title: N
14464.W4 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: SOII Survey/ Map I I I I I I I I I
M M Wood Lake II, Phase 2 Feet
Scale: 1 1000' Hoke County, NC
" = •
Source: Cumerland & Hoke County Soil & Etivironmental. Consultants, PA
Date: & l3 Falk aP leux• R ad Suer 16i. Raleigh \C 39613 - Phnw (9i)1846-39W - F—(919)8149A67
06/30/2022 Soil Survey Sheets 09 & 15 -d—

+ I 1 I I
I
/ 1
I / 1
Ir 1\\
.
/ I I r I"fi 1 f < t
I IIII 1 \ \ \\ I
lilt
\\\\� \\\\\ �\ III - \ '/ / ; / � / �I II11.11./ � /'I �♦
IIII III / I I
if i1� it
\ i
\\ 1' •/ / 1 / I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1
11
/ Iw �\. \\\ �\\`. \\\\4.\\ x ►\\ \\'\\ M_ 1r � _ I � III 1 1 I � 1 � ���.
I �
1''
\l\ \ ..\ \ \ I \ \ . I \ \ 1\ \ \ \ \ ♦\ \\ \ ' \ \ 1 1 A \ I \ \ 1I
\ \\ 1 \\
.r\\
� l •# j j I � 1 1 I 1111 11
\"i51 I
it
At
\\\11 I 1 \ l I I 1 /l! 1. 14. 1I 1.'•I \ \\r'-\\.`\ `��— __---"-4F•, \ \.\ \ \ \ \\ ` \\\\ \\\\\\\
: yr\\I I 1 I III IIII I 1
��\1\ \`—_\ \\\ IIII IIII IIII I 1
I I I I I\ IIII 1\\ 1 I I I
/ IIII I I I'1
Ifit
lil
lj%l ll% j l
IIII It
jlllj IIII I I
1111 I I I I I I I
I IIII I I I I I
\ IIII 11 1 1 I j
/IIII I I I I I I I
Jill j1I I I I
Ill I I I I I J
j Ill j j 1 1 I I I
lil i i i 1 1 I
I11 I� I l l I I
IIII I I I J I I
till II I I I
Ila 1 1 1 1 I I
I III 1 1 1 I
I I IIII I.l I J \
I I111 1111 \
I I I I J \
I % i

Job #: 14464.W4
July 8, 2022
Photo 3: Pond

Job #: 14464.W4
July 8, 2022
Photo 5: Perennial stream
Photo 6: Perennial stream

Job #: 14464.W4
July 8, 2022
Photo 7: Perennial stream
Photo 8: Black Branch

1.
• 'a . P - -.,- .•r{�k4��xh r%ii h +�'�: fir• .
tw
ell
71
\a �� rya. '' ~ .!*.•�,+,+�.• >• _' '
• ...� � � ' ' <�s`'�•„4 �; � .'.4 � ,.'.r. ; - .� � .z mac. - ; �
r, _ �?'�..•�rr;." '�' h'�,�;;s • " ter,,

z U CgNF
SITE
Q
2
Z
(P
Z
0
ROCKFISH
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
ECM® ECM -EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
EiP Oo EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EiR Oo EIR-EXISTING IRON ROD
EPKO EPK-EXISTING PK NAIL
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
SRBO SRB-SET REBAR
o COMPUTED POINT
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
PROPERTY LINE
- OPT - - - OLD PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
-SETBACK LINE
ss SANITARY SEWER LINE
SD STORM DRAINAGE
w WATER LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITY
- CREEK
WETLANDS
PERMANENT EASEMENT
X FENCE LINE
WOODEN FENCE
- HOC- HOC- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
- sF - sF - SILT FENCE LINE
TREE LINE
PPS UTILITY POLE
C• GUY WIRE
Wv
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
T SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
GRAVEL
0 ASPHALT
0 WATER
0 WETLANDS
O INLET PROTECTION HACKNEY LANE
CHECK DAM _ _ ' PUBLIC R/W
(\ 27
N/F
IS E. BRYSON
785, PG 287
IDE 2-51, MAP 001
100,M rw
�W W 0'tl DOl
100YR FLD � \ - � I '
100YR
� I•v
W W Y CQIC FlIYE
♦ •� •� \lI1 �� 50
♦ W W W W � ` `� ov
48 \
8�
/ 1
a3
2W a 1, 1
\w44 MOM
41 , 1 A:,
n / 0- N
J^ `\ 03
O
O / r_
c / ♦ry 0 y
v
\ \,E uluHOD54
�ro E RflAOND
�ro EE REIgUFD , IMIN"�' / I -I
o.
/ G MT
1 \
5
i N eE Revam
�' F
\ro \
J GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
DB 1336,PG 761F-- C57
E \
IS86°46'05"E / � JF� N/F
99.28' TIE 43 \ j I J I I GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC. I PP
^ ( DB 1336, PG 761
- _/ i / � // r I =1 ,fir' 3
JK GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.1 I
35 36 37
34 38 39 40 / I I I I =B �6, PG 761
32 33 O � 2
O L- J L J O�
L IL
L- I / 59 1 PP
I- 41 28 A / N /F \ PP
f J&K GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INA
- - Z - _ _ _ _ - - - ♦ /� DB 1336, PG 761 1
/ t
� D-GROVE WALK ROAD � �� / I Ifl � 1� \
50' R/W (PRIVATE) - / 60 ♦ I
r - - M \ � I=1 N/F Y
O� - - - �,a U-MN � °""" � J&K GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC i PP
R]6
/ ^
PHASE II Ra D - - - - E/Sfl1EE"=EIQ T W 80EWNK NT as w = '
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY v I (/ \ ' I I . ' DB 1336� 761 1
1,563,892SF (35.90 AC)
N/F
DARREN PITTMAN & WIFE, /
o TRACEY PITTMAN
TRACT A OF
IN-11-10z
DB 976, PG 674(28 � PC 3, SLIDE 3-47, MAP 007
to
N/F (y
TEREN J. BRUNNER & WIFE,
LEIA DAWNE BRUNNER
DB 300, PG 905
Lr-
PC 2, SLIDE 2-51, MAP 001 0 Q�P�
o N
Na Spv�NSd �\ k�E 78
m aw�i"x ' ri"aE
50' BRIDAL PATH EASEMENT / �T 1 \
PC 2, SLIDE 2-51, MAP 001 1p
/
/
r i
16 CA 3 // z.• .ro Rau ' 1 / ' � 1\ 1\1_1\�1\�
� CD /
EASEIEHT
. � \ � Q�P•( � 14
-9 /
zo
1w
\1 COUNTY OF HOKE
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
DB 885, PG 710
PC 3, SLIDE 3-99, MAP 001
s2 /
J
1��1l fl
\ COUNTY OF HOKE
1! 30' UTILITY EASEMENT
DB 885, PG 710
PC 3, SLIDE 3-99, MAP 003
111�1►I, .�l'
RM �1(/ / ,
�) 28 27 26 25 24 �'pE �TT 61 / / • W 1 \
30 29 O O I / \ / �^ W J
31 I O 0 I I I/ / I ( ��✓ N/F I
L- I WOODROW WILSON 1 \
I- / J / ICI DB 1310, PG 972 1 I� El9ElQIT� \ R3 62 aA6
COD23
F
18 19 20 21 I 22 s��dq_ '";�."�. /♦ // / /
17 I I , / / m awR cE \ ` O Q v/Q/Q / / �/ / C /� ma m W IMNeNK N/F
I
JL- L-�T '��Q //% // ALLEN BAREFOOT JR. i I
-_ DB 769, PB 532
R35 - - - / //�\ V , / /
RN / \
N / \ , / �/' �/ 63 \ i
41
NC RN,P \/ \`
20' 80' 20' (TP) / aoz cuwrc a u•au
WN z IWV z WL
IN---------- -
/\ �\ /
• \
- - �,tlE/„9F1FulIT l ♦ � ♦ � y R� � 64 \� N/F
72 / /IJ
77 CA4 73 O STUART VALEVIS & WIFE
O 76 75 74 CA i / /� / "" \ \ \� RHONDA VELEVIS
- U �� - A11� A , / ,i 1 R49 V DB 333, PG 1
_j
j \ - _ - // J�
u•
rm Rau \
w w eurTm ��v/ / / / 'ca° ("r) \
ma, Al
�/ �30' cwmE eunm
' _ /�i �����/ - ♦ 68 �� I I N/F
66 \ I 1 ICI CLAUDDE B THOMAS 20 NIPE
- - ' • _'_� - ' PG
\giro W e! II� ,
\ 1 ♦♦ COUNTY OF HOKE�
W W �.'�. 30' UTILITY EASEMENT \R\ I -
DB 885, PG 710 , `-PHASE II -
v PC 3, SLIDE 3-99, MAP 001 PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
1 1,563,892SF (35.90 AC) \
,_j
I �
I �
JAMES WOOD & WIFE, I LUMBEE QUALITY BUILDERS INCORPORATED -
MARGARET B. WOOD DB 1228, PG 714
\ D B 112 , P G 114 I \
N/F PHASE 11
1 JAMES G. WOOD, JR. \ I \
DB 200, PG 25 � LD PAVEMENT: 133,853ft2
SIDEWALK: 23,120ft I 2 �
I
\ LOTS: 67 (211,335)
PHASE I REVISED
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY S F C WATER (STREAM) : 12,960
845,721SF (19.42 AC) �
I SFC WATER (POND): 16,263
I TOTAL SITE (UPLAND): 1,534,618SF
TOTAL SITE: 1,563,892SF (35.90AC)
/ J
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
/
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
400
site
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite.U2, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1 910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
www.4Dsitesotutions.com
CAROZ//
SEA
02
•• G I NE ••: ja���
o 4 U 5=22
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
WOOD LAKE II
PHASE II
SUBDIVISION
PROJECT AREA
MAP
CLIENT
RAEFORD
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC
645 Laurinburg Highway
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
BRETT
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1632
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100'
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 5, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
C-3mOl

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
i�c 03�/ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: June 16, 2022
Project Code: 2022-0054837
Project Name: Woodlake II Phase JI
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/16/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.govibirds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

06/16/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/16/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/16/2022
2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0054837
Event Code: None
Project Name: Woodlake II Phase II
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: this project is located in Hoke County, NC and is approximately 38 acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/034.99490155,-79.1438860574506,14z
s
Counties: Hoke County, North Carolina

06/16/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: httpss://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Candidate

06/16/2022
4
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

06/16/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(SCRs) in the continental USA
htWs://ecos.fws.gov/ecl?/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Sep 30
and Alaska.
htWs://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177

06/16/2022
2
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferns
Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 31
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.

06/16/2022
3
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel ++++ ++++ ++++ ii�� 11111111 JillLL+++++ ++++ ++++ .
BCC-BCR
Bachman's Sparrow ++++ ++++ +++' ++++'+I!III
III! +#�' ++++ ++++ ++--
BCC Rangewide ■
(CON) ` J
Non-BCCe lrm+-+ ++++ ++++ +11 Jill 1W PIT+++, Jill 1+77 11 Jill
Vulnerable
Will Eastern Whip -poor- ++++ ++++ ++++ ++„111,
+++, ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++--
BCC Rangewide
(CON)

06/16/2022 4
Prairie Warbler ++++ ++++ +++
BCC Rangewide Jill '' �_'1'++1 +1++ 111..........
(CON)
Prothonotary ++++ ++++ ++++ Al
Warbler """"'i` ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++--
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed i III I Woodpecker I++,++' ++I+ Jill Jill Jillill Jul � � � � 11 11
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush '� Till
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ ++" ",+ +'++ ++++ ++++ ++--
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidinu-and-minimizinv--incidental-take-migratorv-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding.,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act

06/16/2022 5
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects

06/16/2022
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modelinu and Predictive MaDDinp- of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/16/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Name: Mason Montgomery
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2: Suite 104
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27615
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
7047732837

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■ ■■IF NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ !
■■k�■A NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
June 16, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Woodlake II Phase II; 14464.W4
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18308
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butler(o)ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1:1 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGI 4_ NC 27fiO3 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALCIGH. NC 27699
OFC 915707.9120 • FA 919.707.4121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Woodlake II Phase II
Project No. 14464.W4
June 16, 2022
NCNHDE-18308
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name WW' Last
Group Observation
Date
Freshwater Fish16694 Cyprinella sp. cf. Thinlip Chub 2009-09-15
zanema
Freshwater Fish10683 Semotilus lumbee Sandhills Chub 2009-09-15
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Element
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Rank
�k-
I
E
3-Medium ---
Special
G2Q
S2
Concern
E
3-Medium ---
Special
G3G4
S2
Concern
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/helip. Data query generated on June 16, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-18308: Woodlake II Phase II
S01'•
d
a
v
j
n
n
's s
ro _
o —
P nG
T K a
o c
� N
N
� O Saddlehred 1n
v
233 ft
a FtOckfrs R,
a
O
t1
V
RG�kEish R
6 9
a
LF P
N �
o Phillip Church Rd
N �k
S L lJ
Z +°
wE o
VV o 0.3 fl.6 1.2 Miles
S
June 16, 2022
Buffered Project Boundary
Project Boundary
Sources: Esn, Airbus OS, USG5, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodetaslyrelsen, Rilksw terstaal, GSA. Gealand, FEMA,
Imermap and the GIs user Community
Sauces- Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, VSGS, ® OpmStreNMap
canlrioutors, and the GIS VSer Cammunny
Page 3 of 3

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Woodlake II Phase 2
Date: July 8, 2022
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Picoides borealis)
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022.
American Alligator
Suitable habitat present,
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Alligator mississippiensis)
species not present
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022.
American Chaffseed
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Schwalbea americans)
species not present
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022.
Michaux's Sumac
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Rhus michauxii)
species not present
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
species not present
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022.
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald Eagles
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Suitable habitat present,
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
Myotis septentrionalis
species not present
S&EC staff on June 23, 2022. Relying upon
the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic
Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities
Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill
our project -specific section 7
responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA JuIV 8, 2022
Signature /Title Date

F_OJ7OFTy�2a 7&1& H • E
N United States Department of the Interior
7 0
_= a9 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES,`
gactt a,,a „fF.•
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date:
November 14, 2023
Self -Certification Letter
Project NameWoodlake II Phase II
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
❑✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑✓ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleighkfws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Deborah Shirley
From: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 12:28 PM
To: Mason Montgomery; Mann, Leigh
Subject: Fw: DUE DATE: AUGUST 18, 2022 Fw: [EXTERNAL] Woodlake II Ph II T&E Submittal
Attachments: S&EC Woodlake II Ph II T&E Report Signed.pdf
Mason,
The Service concurs with the determinations for Woodlake I I
From: Mann, Leigh <[e-mail]> on behalf of Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2022 4:34 PM
To: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Subject: DUE DATE: AUGUST 18, 2022 Fw: [EXTERNAL] Woodlake II Ph II T&E Submittal
From: Mason Montgomery <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2022 7:33 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Woodlake II Ph II T&E Submittal
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.
Hello,
Attached is the threatened and endangered species report for the Woodlake II ph II property located in Hoke County,
NC. S&EC is submitting for concurrence. Please let me know if any additional information is needed when making the
determinations.
Thank you,
Mason L. Montgomery
Soil And Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.

APlease consider the environment before printing this email.

Ozy
00,
SITE Y �`4Ne �=••••••���•�• llllllilllllllll(lull\�\�111111111111111ililllll
I, CHRISTOPHER J PUSEY, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS
DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL aie t
PHASE II SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND
BOUNDARY AND SEAL THIS 2 DAY OF NoV E12- A.D., 2023.
oNs �
S
ROCKF'SM RO
o,oise
_ _____ ____ _ __________________
NOFlr PROFESSIONAL D RVEYOR — L-4291
VICINITY �����N CAIgOz���i��
NOT TO SCALE �` �. ESS
- _
HACKNEYLANE
60� Raw_
I
I
F1
SEAL - rS86.46'05"E
�'— 99.28' TIE
HI R ``
�-
ix
c
► I
ite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
4.9 Chicago Drhe S." la FWettevft, NC 28306
office1910-426-6M f 1810.426-S777 G�e-.m IC-2354
w ADekeeduti—
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
WOOD LAKE II
PHASE II
SUBDIVISION
P
WETLANDS
I IMPACT MAP
EXISITING
CONDITIONS
EXHIBIT
I`
CLIENT
RAEFORD
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC
k
645 Laurinburg Highway
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
URVEYED BY:
CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
BRETT
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1632
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=200'
DATE RELEASED
NOVEMBER 2, 2023
SHEET NUMBER
W-1
OF
S
3

1 '
c SAD , I ❑
W /
SITE O(feRep(ANf
100YR FLD
001
PHASE II
BOUNDARY 100 1op4
ROCKFISH RO [— • �
100YR FLD
1110F1 rm •' •'.'.' • — O
Z)
` o I o.
au a.koo1
au 0
I, CHRISTOPHER J PUSEY, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS
DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL s? $N
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND
AND SEAL THIS 2 DAY OF N 6E2 A.D., 2023. I I c o
❑ o
A
PROFE SIONA A SURVEYOR — L-4291
-0 oFess/0 e:
o
SEAL _ ® c
❑ E O 1
® ® © o ��
o o ►
❑ a
© O ® ❑D . a! / 17/
WETLAND IMPACT AREA I I
I
O
,r GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 200
IN FEET )
1 inch = 200 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I Land surveying
409 Chicago DNve, SuM 11Z FryeOeviHe, NC 28306
office1910-4264m fax1=42f3777 Grxrsen.mJC-2354
—mvADekeeduti0m.mn
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
WOOD LAKE II
PHASE II
SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS
IMPACT MAP
OVERALL SITE
PLAN
CLIENT
RAEFORD
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC
645 Laurinburg Highway
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
SURVEYED BY:
CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
BRETT
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:E
1632
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=200'
DATE RELEASED
NOVEMBER 2, 2023
SHEET NUMBER
W-2
OF 3

SITE
BOU
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
CREEK
WETLANDS
LOC LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
0 WETLANDS
0 PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
® TEMPORARY S R AM IMPACT
.§y\ CAR i*
Y.
:4 SEAL -
rill Zt.4
PPHER `` ``�0�
/I -oz-z3
I, CHRISTOPHER J PUSEY, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS
DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND
AND SEAL THIS 2 DAY OF
oe
-------- NOV EZ A.D., 2023.--
O---------
PROFE—RV—YR -L-4291
----
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (FILL): 5,165 SF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 940 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 732 SF (122 LF)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 108 SF (21 LF)
DESCRIPTION:
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY THE
ROADWAY CROSSING AND THE INSTALLATION OF A
BOX CULVERT.
/ 26.00 LF CAD 0.777. 15"
CLASS IV RCP
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
WETLAND 2-Z", o-
TOP BANK
�C O
♦` 11110
I
190
185
175
170
III
1n
�JU 1
�.30
=NT IMPACTS
°-D
`O /
00
. L _..�.
64.19 LF ® 9.087. 15" RCP_
I
0
'� I I I I I I
!
TOP BANK
-9-0
Rv
O
CENTERLINE
0 �Z�
1 11
F
{
On STREAM A
�w (2) 86.42 LF
® 0.81% 78" ALUM PIPE
(DOUBLE 178" (PIPE
04M
WITH
Cf)atPRE-FABRICATED
HEADWALLS
UPPINV
INER
OUT175?500) g
190
GRADE
FINISHED
Ln
2�
/
\
4}
DOUBLE 78" PIPE WITH
PRE -FABRICATED
HEADWALLS
UPPER PIPE(2+48):
INV IN 176.20
INV OUT 175.50
LOWER PIPE(2+58):
INV IN 175.20
INV OUT 174.50
� O
u7
0)
u7
rn
6 F
00 rn
2+00
3+00
185
180
175
170
4Dsite
solutions
\ civil engineering I Land surveying
4.9 Chicago DNve, SuM 11Z FryeOeviGe, NC 28306
office 1910-426-61T/ faal.-426-SM G­IC-2364
v ADekee0W0om• n
REVISIONS
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 40
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
PROJECT NAME
WOOD LAKE II
PHASE II
SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS
IMPACT MAP
LISMORE NOOK
CROSSING
CLIENT
RAEFORD
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC
645 Laurinburg Highway
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
SURVEYED BY:
CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
BRETT
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1632
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
VERTICAL: 1 "=4'
DATE RELEASED
NOVEMBER 2, 2023
SHEET NUMBER
W-3
OF
3

SITE Y
Q
2
Z
lP
Z
0
PHASE II `°NS
J
BOUNDARY O ( 6 606 fig OVN 4R19 ON
y
ROCKFISH RD �
s
O�
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
ECM® ECM -EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
EiP Oo EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EiR Oo EIR-EXISTING IRON ROD
EPK0 EPK-EXISTING PK NAIL
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
SRBO SRB-SET REBAR
o COMPUTED POINT
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
PROPERTY LINE
- OPT - - - OLD PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
- - RIGHT-OF-WAY
-SETBACK LINE
ss SANITARY SEWER LINE
SD STORM DRAINAGE
w WATER LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITY
- CREEK
WETLANDS
PERMANENT EASEMENT
X FENCE LINE
WOODEN FENCE
- LOC- LOC- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
- sF - sF - SILT FENCE LINE
TREE LINE
PPS UTILITY POLE
C• GUY WIRE
Wv
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
GRAVEL
ASPHALT
0 WATER
0 WETLANDS
O INLET PROTECTION HACKNEY LANE \
CHECK DAM 60 PUBLIC R/,y \
27 I
N/F
IS E. BRYSON I
785, PG 287
IDE 2-51, MAP 001
I
I
I
I
PHASE II
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
1,563,892SF (35.90 AC)
N/F o
DARREN PITTMAN & WIFE, /
o TRACEY PITTMAN
z o TRACT A OF
DB 976, PG 674 /
28 \� PC 3, SLIDE 3-47, MAP 007
N/F to
Q ,
TEREN J. BRUNNER &WIFE,
LEIA DAWNE BRUNNER zo
DB 300, PG 905 O� � 1(.�
PC 2, SLIDE 2-51, MAP 001 oN / -- PN�QR P�E�
15 pv19
�NSo
O
I- In
-m'- LIV I I
PC 2, SLIDE 2-51, MAP 001 -- --
r -
\ CA 3 , 1
' I / 16 -
15
/ 80
A.
Q�P� 14
`-9 /
�L , / - It
� I
J 000,
-/ PHASE 1
COUNTY OF HOKE
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
DB 885, PG 710
PC 3, SLIDE 3-99, MAP 001
-� -7
i
/A /-�
eal'f � i ,,,��- its
MEOW- \ �\\\1\1111)) )) )
COUNTY OF HOKE
30' UTILITY EASEMENT
DB 885, PG 710
PC 3, SLIDE 3-99, MAP 003
S86°46'05"E
99.28' TIE
m
O
O
O
O
1
O
III III
O
�O
M
1
N /F \
JAMES G. WOOD, JR.
DB 200, PG 25
PHASE I REVISED \
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
845,721SF (19.42 AC) \
i
i
i
i
TT W W W
DO,
/� gll 1 1 1
100YR FLO \ -
1
50 N
49 \II I I
W W W W W W II \
W W W W W 1
W CA z-
48 1
J / 1 TBM
111 11111111 4JI0 4D DISK #4
�
' f\ I N51, 04.035 \ 47 IE1 / -�
ELEV 173.27
NC GRID N) 83
201
NAVD 188
52
47BO / A -n 1
f Q7 o = 1
53
ti
_
54
46
( I 55
45 5 �` \
/ / N/F
\ 56 J&(IGENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
44 / �/I DB 1336,PG 761
1 1
57
I N/F
J GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC. PP
pl,43 ' �N / I ICI DB 1336,
36, PG 761
58
N/F I +
40 42 i 1% I W W I JK GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
39 1336,\
37 38 D W I I DB 6, PG 761
37 O
PP
41 / , N/F
_ _ f J&K GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.A
DB 1336, PG 761Rn �1 1
I I N/F
J&K GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.' PP �\
I- DB 1336, PG 761 `
25 I�-j
N/F
WOODROW WILSON 1
' 62 / / • ICI DB 1310, PG 972 1 I
\ V / // � 1
21 22 ��s / / /�. /// �./ PP
/ N/F I
ALLEN BAREFOOT JR. 1
DB 769, PB 532 1
O vra-v, Nis / '` \ ♦\` / / I
NV IN I
IT3.90mm
NV NR
ILYEIt flRx2+5lL \
NY QR Ii11Aa1'A , O \ /
73 72 �� STUART VA EVIS & WIFE
O74 / /� , \ \ \ \�\ R D ONDA VEG 1L1S
- CA J�
69
41
_
0
W W COUNTY OF HOKE
J 30' UTILITY EASEMENT
DB 885, PG 710
W PC 3, SLIDE 3-99, MAP 001 PHASE II
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
I, J 1,563,892SF (35.90 AC)
I
N/F I N/F
JAMES WOOD & WIFE, LUMBEE QUALITY BUILDERS INCORPORATED
MARGARET B. WOOD I DB 1228, PG 714
DB 112, PG 114
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
i
i
PHASE 11
LID PAVEMENT: 133,853ft2
SIDEWALK: 23,120ft2
LOTS: 67 (211,335)
SFC WATER (STREAM): 12,960
SFC WATER (POND): 16,263
TOTAL SITE (UPLAND): 1,534,618SF
TOTAL SITE: 1,563,892SF (35.90AC)
N/F
CLAUDE THOMAS CANIPE
DB 224, PG 20
100 0
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
400
site
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, INC 28306
office 1 910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
www.4Dsitesotutions.com
�Z:pF SSO•��i
SEA
• 02 =
.• G NE ••: ja���
�O I I110\'
U � -.2223
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
WOOD LAKE II
PHASE II
SUBDIVISION
PROJECT AREA
& DRAINAGE
AREA MAP
CLIENT
RAEFORD
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC
645 Laurinburg Highway
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
BRETT
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1632
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 31, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
C-3mOl