The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150901 Ver 1_Application_20150902d� m�4� � � �= _ � ��'� `.�'�� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR"I'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVERNOR September l, 2015 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Ms. Loretta Beckwith NCDOT Coordinator NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13 and 23 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 363 over Robinson Creek on SR 3197 (Lower Christ School Rd.) in Buncombe County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-3197(1), Division 13, TIP No. B-5244, Debit $240 from WBS 42846.1.1. Dear Ms. Beckwith: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 363 over Robinson Creek on SR 3197 (a 34-foot bridge) with a 45-foot cored slab bridge on the existing alignment that will span Robinson Creek. The project will utilize an off-site detour. There will be a total of 119 linear feet (1 fl of permanent stream impacts: Site 1. 90 lf of bank stabilization along Robinson Creek: • 47 lf associated with the new bridge • 13 lf associated with the tying in of a new ditch to Robinson Creek (southwest quadrant) • 30 If associated with tlie tying in of a new ditch to Robinson Creek (no►-theast quadrant) Site 2. 29 lf of impact from the fillii� of the UT to Robinson Creek. A new ditch will be constructed outside/beyond the fill slope of tlie UT to Robinson Creek that is to be filled, replacing the lost fi�nction of the stream. With this submittal, the NCDOT is also requesting a Pl•eliininaiy Jurisdictional Determination (PJD). MAILING ADDRESS: TE�EPHONE: 919-707-6000 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-250-4224 CENTURY CENTER, BUILDINGA PROJECT DEVEIOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WEBSITE.' 1000 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER HTTPS://CONNECT.NCDOT.GOV/RESOURCES/ENVIRON RALEIGH NC 27610 Rn�Ei�H NC 27699-1548 MENTAUPAGES/DEFAULT.ASPX Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), USFWS Concurrence Letter, PJD Packet, stol•mwater management plan, permit drawings and design plans for the above- referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in June 2014 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. This project calls for a letting date of February 16, 2016 and a review date of December 29, 2015; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.govh•esources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Bill Barrett at (919) 707-6103. Sincerely, ------- -------_— � ------�� - Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �oF,��,rFRQ Office Use Only: � � o c Corps action ID no. � y i ,, , � � � DWQ project no. ° �` Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 23 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 363 over Robinson Creek on SR 3197 2b. County: Buncombe 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Arden, NC 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5244 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6103 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: wabarrett@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.459989 Longitude: - 82.480958 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.20 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Robinson Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Tr 2c. River basin: French Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: predominately residential 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 150 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient (and/ or) functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 36-foot bridge with a 45-foot, single-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: PJD request being submitted with this permit application. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Temporar T Site 1❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts X Permanent X Temporary 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) bank � PER � Corps Site 1� P❑ T stabilization Robinson Creek � INT � p�/�/Q 15 47 (bridge) bank stabilization � PER � Corps Site 1� P � T (ditch Robinson Creekk � INT � p�/�/Q 15 13 confluence) bank stabilization � PER � Corps Site 1� P❑ T (ditch Robinson Creek � INT � p�/�/(� 15 30 confluence) Site 2� P❑ T fill UT to Robinson Creek � PER � Corps 3 29 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 119 Perm 0 Temp 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem orar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent X Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 9 feet longer than the existing bridge; the proposed bridge will span Robinson Creek; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade as the existing structure; an off site detour will be used, 3:1 fill slopes where practicable. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State � Yes � No If no, explain: Pursuant to contact with Lori Beckwith of the USACE (see attached e.mail dated 6/24/2015, mitigation will not be required for the filling of the UT to Robinson Creek (29 If), as the proposed ditch will provide the lost function. 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the 90 If of bank impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? stabilization impact at Site 1, as it does not require fill in the stream bed and therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, does not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S. and is not subject to compensatory mitigation. Furthermore, the proposed bank stabilization is necessary to prevent erosion and sedimentation by preventing bank destabilization and thereb minimizin im acts to the environment. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 29 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm � cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: If required from 1 a, see attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS and NHP websites, and on-site surveys. Of the species listed for Buncombe County, only three have habitat present: Bunched arrowhead, Virginia spiraea, and the recent inclusion of the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB). Bunched arrowhead was surveyed for on May 23, 2011, and no individuals of this species were found and there is no NHP listing of this species within 1 mile of the project. The portion of the study area that provided habitat for bunched arrowhead, is not within the boundary of the project, as currently designed. Virginia spiraea was most recently surveyed on June 27, 2013. No individuals of this species were identified, and there is no NHP listing of this species within 1 mile of the project. With the recent listing of the NLEB, this project was assessed for habitat. As noted in the July 24, 2015 Memoradum, this proposed project has a biological conclusion of May Affect - Not Likely to Adversely Affect. A letter requesting concurrence with this biological conclusion, dated August 10, 2015, has been submitted to the USFWS. Construction activities will not take place until ESA compliance is satisfed for the NLEB. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps �(JRichard W. Hancock, P.E. ' -: . .___. . ----- --. .,_��` �� / � �v�S Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. m United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Field Office l60 Zillicoa Street Asheville, North Carolina 2880] August 20, 2015 Mr. Richard Hancock, P.E. North Carolina Department of Transportation 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27669 Dear Mr. Hancock: Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for proposed replacement of Bridge Number 363 (B- 5244) on SR 3197 over Robinson Creek in Buncombe County, North Carolina. On August 10, 2015 we received your letter (via email) requesting section 7 concurrence on effects the subject bridge replacement projects may have on the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis, NLEB). The following comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). We have reviewed the information provided in your concurrence request letter. The action area for these proposed projects is within the known range of the NLEB. We agree with your assessment that tree clearing associated with these projects is minimal and is within close proximity to existing maintained right of way, and that your agreement to cut trees outside of the bat maternity roosting season April 15-August 15, will reduce the probability of take for NLEB to a discountable level; and accordingly, we concur with your biological conclusion that the proposed construction may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the NLEB or IB. Therefore, we believe the requirements under section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered i£ (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. If we can be of assistance or if you have any questions about these comments, please contact Mr. Jason Mays of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 226. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Numbers 4-2-11-082. Sincerely, Janet Mizzi Field Supervisor Barrett, William A From: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW <Loretta.A.Beckwith@usace.army.mil> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 1128 AM To: Barrett, William A Subject: RE: B-5244 (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE � Thanks for the information. I'm comfortable with the relocation counting as mitigation for the impact to this particular stream, as long as no length is lost. It wouldn't hurt to put that we discussed this in the PCN or the cover letter for this project. And as discussed below, for future projects, please submit the NC SAM forms. Thanks and have a great 4th! Lori -----Original Message----- From: Barrett, William A [mailto:wabarrett@ncdot.�ov] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:39 AM To: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: B-5244 (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi Lori, THANKS for your response and the additional information you provided. This is a project that I have taken over, and I had tried to find stream forms for this particular feature, but could not; which is why I provided the site photos (and agree with you pics are inefficient for determining stream quality, but went with what I had available). I was out at the site during some of the field reconnaissance; and can verify that it is a fair quality stream. There were other features within the original study area (that are now outside the construction area) that required much more attention and evaluation while out at the site. I do understand the need to provide the stream forms so that USACE has proper documentation, and will make sure that we have these in the future. I have requested mitigation from EEP for the 29 If of impact to the UT, while awaiting your response so as not to delay the application submittal. I have received EEP's confirmation of mitigation. I know that you concurred with the submitted rational for not requiring mitigation for the impacts to the UT, and just want to make sure that you are comfortable with that call in absence of stream quality forms. I have mitigation confirmation in hand, if that is the preferable route to go. Let me know. THANKS � p.s. by the way, the application submittal is being delayed a little bit, as the NLEB discussions continue. -----Original Message----- From: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW [mailto:Loretta.A.Beckwith@usace.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 4:03 PM To: Barrett, William A Subject: RE: 6-5244 (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE � What you have in mind for this project sounds fine. It's always good to have an NCSAM sheet (or a SQAW for older projects) as mitigation may be an issue with stream relocation projects. Mitigation isn't an issue for this project based on the length and apparent fair quality, but it's a good idea to collect this information during field visits and include it in the PCN/application. If we don't have a form showing that the stream in question is fair quality (vs. good) we may default to a 2:1 mitigation ratio, in which case we may require more mitigation than the stream relocation yields. The form helps, too, because you often can't determine stream quality from photos. Thanks, Lori -----Original Message----- From: Barrett, William A [mailto:wabarrett@ncdot.�ov] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 2:21 PM To: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW Subject: [EXTERNAL] B-5244 Hi Lori, I am working on the permit application for B-5244, the replacement of Bridge No. 363 on SR 3197 (Lower Christ School Rd.) over Robinson Creek, in Buncombe County. This project has a similar scenario as B-5403, where the function of a stream (that is located parallel to the road and is to be filled due to the new bridge) will be replaced by the creation of a ditch located outside the fill slope. Unlike B-5403, this stream (a UT to Robinson Creek that originates in a roadside ditch and has eroded down to become jurisdictional for the last 29 feet) runs straight, rather than meandering). Using the thought process that was done for B-5403, the loss of function of the stream should be replaced by the new ditch. I have attached one of the permit pages to represent what I have attempted to describe. The 29 linear foot JD stream section is highlighted in yellow and labeled in a red box. I have also attached three pictures, with their approximate location and orientation, shown on the attached the plan sheet. Please let me know your thoughts, and feel free to call if you would like to discuss. THANKS! � William A. Barrett PDEA-Natural Environment Section Environmental Coordination and Permitting 919-707-6103 wa ba rrett@ n cdot.�ov Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Bill Barrett, NCDOT, 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG- D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: TIP: B-5244 Description: replacement of Bridge No. 363 on SR 3197 (Lower Christ School Rd.) over Robinson Creek. (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Buncombe City: Arden Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.45999971°N, Long. -82.480985° W Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 150 linear feet: 15 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands: 0 acres. Cowardin Class: Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: N/A Non-Tidal: N/A E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date: ❑ Field Determination Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: 2 SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant ❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps � U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24000; ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: � Aerial (Name & Date): or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) G -Z y-�f' Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Estimated Longitud Cowardin amount of Site Name Latitude e Class aquatic Class of aquatic resource resource in review area 1 35.459°N -82.480°W R3UB 131 linear feet non-section 10 — non-wetlan 2 35.499°N -82.480°W R2UB 29 linear feet non-section 10 — non-wetlan °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal �}�� ..-� „ .- �_� ��.�; �i i ', � , r' �'r '. y � � _ _ J� � !; �- C�1�4 1 ��--i- . � x ¢ � ' i>. 'r':I'r ryy� ��,� dp� � ;� e+ � =, 'i`- �' y +_ � 33Q5 �'" ~�� iiiF''� � � � � I yF° `3303 ��-'` �� "'ta� �'. i.`r'i „ ;�.� � x I'3�� 2❑ 3Z45 �� Q,� �`,��3�� -�,h�'��'�" 36�I�r. ��5� � ,�9 r'.U---- �S i� 3ll�i� � �� i ui '.,°`'' ��; ,i5 �� , .-o�.as,a�, � \ ' ' 3333 .�Jy � 0 �,� �'.1 � .�'' ` � 3319 ��E� - \ �� ----�� t rr��3197 �,n`'�, �� {,� � . 3 3 4 i� • ��i �, 7' > ti, ,� f,�' g t g� ��`*. n;'�33:3� ,�•,}_ r-`�'D � �., \3i8� , F'" 33�6 ��---,' �I"IC.�� C1. ��3�}ir�+-�-I� 4/ \„sf '. ,, �3 T '`..� �� -_19 7 � C'' �'t;' ! ,,� :� a1 �' ��; � ''�, �f`/'s - -- - - �a�° 3 3 61 � I1� � I � 3 � 49 � � ti. ti �' �ir " � 3351 � ,13 m�l ^��, ,/'�I. in''� � — , - - �.` I � 1�'i '� 318� i � \ .'�`1''� � , A� � �`� � ; "� r � 3 � 1 � '� , %j �^ ' � i ` ��— — Q i , .25 � `-� '� \ �' �l. i `. .3 i - -,� � �,��..„ 4� f �� I� �i �'�,:r� ��,. - --- 3 �89 `�9_1 33(l� - �'� f . i7 J � } � � �.� � ='i ��-'�--. ` �� i '� \� -7----� i� r'I 1 i:ii�— � •.�"r�, � � o � +, r� f:`�,, � !.' � ' ` �� I 3342 �'� r �,� �` 'e �r� ��, _y �_. ` - � � `� ---- � � � � w .24 i �--j� ��C- 'r3i k 3-rt- � � a.�. `', d;.3 �! ir31l� �ry ry � � 1 _ -- � i ca � �V7 �� d� y� � c; l -'v� .. '.; � � , +r+ � i -- 1" i�r� �t rF "�� _�,,: ,i z�4% I I 4 � tr��, r �;,;. r�' �, i� �� ' . � ., ti � � ��' t, •s� ; � I� � I =�y f� �,� ,'�wF ;� . � �3136 �•'` '� �'-- '� ,:r �' I - _ � 3T � �I _ �*,�` �° � ' � 47 � / ,� � I ' �r_ � �+ '-�------' � � r � n ; �� , f:' ,.� ` i` ,r ��', 7� ---�_-� 3143'.`; � . � 3 :,- .�' ��,C�. } �7i' _ _ - � '.� = � i ,Q �` ��i-- f'� 311€ c] `�1 �'' � G� �, _r _ � ��„ I, �� — — � - �- -- L�� t— -- - — � I -- �� - — I — i'�554_- . % }-i��dF��%��{�, -I� I � 1545 . � ''� r I �/ r J � � � � i -- � % � L�S1 1 s °�''� �'�� — ---- �-- i �' -- 'r �4e �"� I� I''� ---- _ y�' � � '{I�� '�''`� �,,. I� � ��! ��` ';;n+T --�, � � 13 f� � � I, { �- ` f r ��frryq - I 7 l� .� _ r� I"_ �, � �� i�� `��f I� ::a;," � 1 4� y1545 ___ _ - r�" r�i' 1�61 -3 ---- 154 •I �4 r` �'ze�,.f.�'— 1�`?:; _ s�:�o;, �-- '-� � - �;am�arv ' $:�„xnE. " � � � 1 f 'F, � '`� r,,� ((�x � t i�.� � ��o�AT q o� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMF,NT OF 9 �P �� TRANSPORTATION �� DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS i q o� PROJEC7' DEVEI.OPMENT 8L T �i �9�, oQj ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH eNTOF TR%�j� BUNCOMBE COUNTY REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 363 oN SR 3197 OVER ROBINSON CREEK B-5244 Figure 1 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles _ ��9 "S��r��..d .'.T. �- +r+�.___�� _ R J� . • t . ; ;;' ��I',�•": � ` f ; �aq;,$ ` <` Q `-Y � "r- . " �y,� . ky" - "' ,�:� i ` 1 ''i� � � F� I-�-1 . �y �� , . - _ .�- �. � ' Z � v1,� _ .t4�4i�"v - 11� � _ .,4 ��' �, ^'i�� `' ¢ E--i 1� � _� F �.�� '�, � � .,�,'� -� '� � . � �I � � . ,% '41� , ;i • [� W Z 5-• ,- • - �._ �, ; . p' ..,�. $. � � � � ^ i :' ,.' - ` . Y '` 7 l ' 1 � O �\ r� S� f°' .4 � •Y" #� ..�: � � O � � �/ '� f, �;a�� -��' =� � x O � � O �' O� � '� �, � _ -+�,,,-w �� ;. � �� ,; . �� - Z � ,� � _ • t ;, � ,�f �* �+� � W E"'� M � r' '--� � T� '�! ;.1� &. �`�'- �` _ - -� ��-+ x � Z d" o � ¢, `o cn � " r 'i�� '� '�f�'W W N� °'�o�o � . ' ' -�:�. �;�¢ ��' �, ` `�` O Q `;� °' U d" U ' � r T ` � �j ��j � � � � '�`� •� �` - �,� y +�� { ; -e � � r�-� E--� F-+ � � � -i--+ � � �;�_ . �4� . ' �� 0 � � . ,--� �" '"' �+ � ` ' ,,� 'r/kr --�' ' r^ � M5..{ �p '�-' � �� -+ � � � � , L. '� �'I ,,,�1 � . �.�1 � '� fy.l � .�. � - , H`'� � � � �J W �y �/ �i j .i � v - "� • ._ �,y� • �' �1 7�� ,�, H f� 4-� � � � H � �1ti _ ' � I �. M ' S . .I �j, � � � l � � �j � O O � ~ � U � v�J ^ f 1 ,.,/ W � r-r '1� i� �i'.- '` . .� .�� " � f,� H H A-, W ~ ''�'� W cY, � � � " ��' � ,�: ,� � -.� y � �' � �, �' � � .--� � � � � � � -•, -�'��r t , ��'� �_�;� '� - '�}• . `- � C�, c� _, _ ,- � : �1` �; •, s,:^ N V7 r� �-+ ., +ar �2: , • V N �M-. .��;; � i �� ""� , , r ',� � � f� , , -- _. � . �+� -� t. , , •.. �` �_ �� :; � - � � � � � � � ' � � � � �;. � 4 � r ► } � � ,.� t � �'e a _ . � , . _ , �4 ,t ' '71 Y .�J'� � . � .� __ _ . �. .. i �'5 +'a' � _ +� _a i� 1' � . �_ .y��"`�` " _ � n4_ �I � , ,. . - . =w � Y V/ �r 1 °6� ~qt�� x4�'Y* � .�y .tr�.�. ��* ��• . _. J'. .. ...� F ..��`� . .. 1/�1`) - .. ii� 'h �l � . I A� l��t `•'w +... � � , } , �f t,� J�.:.+!k ry /�y . . .. ' ... W �. . . i, . \ ,4i1\,� � - V l . / y.r� ~'�` � .. _• "'-�" �S'. .. . ' ��f!_ '�I �' �A �" �V'. - LR S- '�* �.�'�. • ' y�� . f . . ' • � . . }/ � 9. ' ' : , . . . � . - � �'17 _ 1 . � , 1.�1 � � � - �t . . . ' _. . • ' �1 3F°r' . . . .. . , .. . . Y� � . . I _ . . ., i.i I � F.�� ."� �� .�1 S�'�.; '� . � ' � . � ��• ��,� �. - _'s ' " _ _ . ��. ::I.� _' k.�A� '.a�. � f� �` ' __ ...f' - , ' _ , . �•'. 1c r . ' `' �.• � .f �� Y Y . .. _ r ` _ - , -. � '. � jir�Ay , .,� . �� , � i+ - � . . • � �pr+�� ,. O". � - L' � _ , .M� �: � S !I�'�s'c'� �, 'I �� 1�� . � l�� 1 , � � ' �� U ', � - V �y '1_ � �� ..iLi.�� . . _. (n 'L�t� 3° . ' p�� o �' �� ^°_ . �''t L � �� j: '� ' . �: , .� _ � , r_ � _ - _ _ � r.�1.J + . . _ . � � - F = - ,� :��'-��'�'�: ,� Z ,,. �. ., . _ , �a . , � . - �. . . _ � _ . . . _ I -,'�j� ` � L '� � y�1�P 4. ' � iu � .. . , . � ' � . M • �y�; A�, � ' �, � � t � � . rj � � � " _ , - � � '1- I� � `�� ' . '. �. R �. y�� "'� 6,,+ . • ' � f-`w di` ;� � _ �, : -, •�JJ (n ' � �� - - � , � - � � � � �u �� w • � (� ,��`°-". , K+ , ' ,�. �� ``° Y� W p�` ' r �. . Y-�" '�'= :�' ��- N � � �� . �_`LJ ' �-� - - , - y' '�i, f#�`.M 4,, �� A� - .. . � a.:. - - �,.. � . . � , ' � i' - . . . � ca �� '�� -- r, _ ��. _ _ _ o � , - �� ; ,;,J, - : � , � .�� - ° O �� '� , �, . � �; ��, a'�, U�`��,',� �' � � ' 9 r', ''"�y � i� � _ - � - - " , � �� ,J '.+ � � . � - ' 'i� � }� y � . y �'. , � .. � � ■ .. �� - �- '� - � _�� ` (m �^ . � � ��. . � ' ;t;' � �Y,�.� ti� �" � -. � � -:�: a r,;... � ° � i �e � _ � �� AI� i� � 4' �. :M, f,.. �:� �! � � �, . ,F� r � � _ �� . �� -_i � �. �t' �: . ' ' .M � � �t , . y.. - _ �`. �� . �j,�- . •� '.� , . 1.-ij . , r ' Y - ' � �-. - . � Q `� x � � • _ ' ' �.,.') �'fi`�,'�'� � , ''� . � . � � g � �� 4 yli. ��"_. :n .. � 1�- .�'��i7.,^ . . - " � . ��{ � � � s r - . . , - _ . � � .; =. ,�' _`y 4 , - . _ _ , � ° , . � - -," r ,, • °x �.,� �"�� i'a;; t :r .}��'"'� �,-. � 1 : �-� ..-€f �, 'T � F� 1''1 C- � . . o ��.�� -1 � . � .. �.. .. � .��. �,�. �r � ..� `e%�� .. � 'I 'h��`_ �,-� ;.r . L 4�� ,�pq�, N .R -�Fl,�1�, i' � t - - � � f _ :M{F . iY.s�-:;.�•;, � ♦ , � � � : � • �Y ' .�r _ � � - 'i.., . • , � ..e�e�=� � � _6. � ,_:� , .�, _ � y.- y . " _ T P . - , ' : : I S � - �� .� ��.. � j f � �� Y � . _ _ -" f ..` d J+�_ H ; . S, -� �;, , . . �¢ '�� ' !!`- 1 'Yx � r. �.w-'-, z..n � . . . � ��._ �� . � . . . ' Hi�h�,ti��V North Carolina Department of Transportation � � Stormwater _M ,,,�,,.,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program � �=�� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN _. (Version 12; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Project/TIP No.: B-5244 County(ies): Buncombe Page 1 of 2 General Project Information Project No.: B-5244 Pro�ect T e: Brid e Re lacement Date: 6/10/2015 NCDOT Contact: William (Bill Zerman Jr., PE Contractor / Designer: HDR En ineerin Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Road Address: 3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27612 Phone:(919 707-6755 Phone:(919 232-6600 Email: bzerman@ncdot. ov Email: w att. elverton@hdrinc.com City/Town: Arden, NC Count (ies): Buncombe River Basin(s): French Broad CAMA Count ? No Primary Receiving Water: Robinson Creek NCDWQ Stream Index No.: 6-57-17 NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water Primar : Class C Supplemental: Trout Waters Tr) Other Stream Classification: None 303(d) Impairments: None Buffer Rules in Effect N/A Project Description Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): 300 Ft. Surrounding Land Use: Agricultural-Low Residential (Rural) Proposed Project Existing Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area (ac.) 0.20 ac. 0.13 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Roadway -(2) 11' travel lanes with 4' shoulders. Bridge -(2) 11' travel lanes, 33' out to Roadway -(2) 10' lanes with 2' shoulders. Bridge -(2) 10' lanes, 20.17' out to out. out (cored slab) Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 4000 (2035 Existin : 2200 2011 General Project Narrative: Replace bridge #363 on SR 3197 (Lower Christ School Rd.) over Robinson Creek with a 45' cored slab bridge. References Hi hWa North Carolina Department of Transportation �Stormwater '''� , «,..�_�„ Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN __ (Version 1.2; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Project/TIP No.: B-5244 Count (ies): Buncombe Page 2 of 2 Project Environmental Summary Surface Waterlm acts Sheet Station Feature Water / Wetland / Receiving Surface NRTR Map NCDWQ Stream NCDWQ Surface 303(d) Type of Existing Proposed No. (From / To) Im acted Buffer T e Water Name ID Index Water Classification Im airments Im act SCM SCM 4 13+79.5 Stream Perennial Robinson Creek 6-57-17 C;Tr None Stabilization N/A N/A 14+24.5 4 14+23 Stream Perennial Unnamed Tributary to N/A C;Tr None Stabilization N/A N/A 14+52 Robinson Creek ` List all stream and surface water impact locations regardless of jurisdiction or size. Equalizer Pipes to be noted as a minimization of impacts. All proposed SCMs listed must also be listed under Swales, Preformed Sour Holes and other Energy Dissipators, or Other Stormwater Control Measures. Description of Minimization of Impacts or Mitigation References � � � � � � � � � � z � ��Q ��Z r�a� ��,, �� . �. � � � � V W O � � � � o� �o �o 0 V s� � V � � 0 � See Sl�et 9-A Fo� Index of Sl�ets �� 1 C �� I� �]F ]H[��IH[�VA�� Br�xcoMBE cou�� LOCATl011i: BRIDGE N0.363 OVER ROBINSON CREEK ON SR 3197 TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, A11iD STRUCTURE CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT. GRAPHIC SCALES 3o a3 q 5o ioo PLANS 50 1�5 Q 50 1Q0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) DESIGN DATA ADT �011 = 2200 ADT 2035 = 4000 K = 9 % D = 70 96 T = 3 96 ' V = 40 MPH " TTST =1% DUAL 2% FUNC CLASS = LOCAL SU�REGIONAL TIER PROJECT LEIITGTH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 8-5244 = 0.048 MILE LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5244 = 0.009 MILE TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT �5Z44 = 0.057 MILE P�qav�ed Tn tAe Offke of: DIVISl011i OF HIGHWAYS ]0a0 B{reA Rids� Dr„ Ra1�i�A NC, 37610 7011 STATQ]ARD JP6GlFIC,1TIONS RIGXT OF WAY DATB: I KEVIN E, MOORE, PE FEBRUARY 20, 2015 PR�� LETT7NG DATFs: I NATHAN N. ADIMA, PE FEBRUARY 16, 2016 PRq(BCT DR.41(iN ENQ�I�ER �� RATh PROlSGY P6l6tFMQ N0. 1.�. B-5244 ,�.,� �� ..ti�Ha PRELIMIN�sRY PLANS DO NOT USB FOA CON9'CRUCC[ON HYDRAULICS SNGIXSSR RQAD[i�AY DBSIGN SNGINSBR � � N Z 0 � � � 0 � , 0 � S � � � � DETAIL A SPECIAL CUT DITCH ( Nof to $cale) ` - Fronf ar Ditch Natural � p'� �e< Slope Ground ?y D Q\O — Min. D=1 Ft. FROM STA. 14+10 RT TO STA. 14+75 RT DETAIL B LATERAL BASE DITCH ( Nor to Smle) b z � ti�` ,,,�t. � d � F�u Slope Geotextile B Min. D=1 FT. Max. d=1 Ft. b=0 Ft. Type of Liner- Class B Rip-Rap B-2 Ff' FROM STA. 13 + 50 RT TO STA. 13 + 60 RT i � DETAIL C SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH ( Not to Scale) Nafural � �� Fronf Ground ?•) D ��D�ieC Slope d Ditch Geoiextile B Min. D=1 Ft. Max. d =1 Ft. B = 2 Ft. Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap FROM STA.12+75 LT TO STA. 13+50 LT N DETAIL D RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT ( Not fo Scale) 10'min.-�. �� Ditch �,0'min. Grade � � �'_ GEOTEXTILE Type of Liner= 3 TONS,CL I Rip� GeoTexfile = STA. 13 + 70 RT STA. 14 + 00 RT STA. 14 + 35 LT / � � � � / � � z�Zy / � / � \ � � / p� � ,��2 �-� � � ,°� � � � M SURFACE WATER IMPACTS -- — � BASEI DI CHT PO� '^C\ � � \ � � �— � ' SEE DETAIL 'C' � � % _ � S �� r � �� _ � ��-' � � � � � � � � _ � I \ �� \ �6� \ � . I�� w . _ . V - 1� � � � � � s� , _ _ � � _ °° . , __ c � � � � _ _ _ --- � �— _2C�LV�/� � � � � � � DETAIL E LATERAL BASE DITCH ( Nof to Scale) b ?�� ,y�l 1'iFi. d ° F,�� Slope Geotextile B Min. D=1 Ft. Max, d=1 Ft. 6=5 Ft. Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap B-2 Ff• FROM STA. 14+40 LT TO STA 15+25 Ll 5�� S I � �,- / / l �-"�, �' �, % I �� ;j' � � � ( ;� �� / �� v-' � � � � �/ S� _ S� " i � i �� J� � � U- 4 �, �� . � ��`-� � � � EMBANKMENT RIP RAP SEE DETAIL 'D' \ i , , �rr�sr"'—�� E FFLAT GRATE t_ � / _ �%- — - f �_ I� �,� SBG BEG +49 �; P�E i s" / � , / / � �— �9� -' RCP-III / � �' �, �� M� � � 2' BASE DITCH ; `�`� � ` ��' � SEE DETAIL 'B' � � �� y—� � � �� / / � � ��__� � m z �. : -, � � �� , , �s s _ �_ -� � � � , ; � � � ,. ,, _ , • -� � � � , �� \ � �� I � � � _ �' ti � � � � � � _ �� `� ✓ / .�,, � � � ��, � \� /` , � a i , / � � , 'V�� e , � �-_ � � � z�z i � / � � � � � --ziaa-� � � � o� �� a��A� � � -__ / �:, j� )�l—�� i �� `� �� "o �" ' ', - � � `5�,1 ti� � � l � m�� titi,�\ �. I �w`g � �- �"',, , � � � ��, � � �� ' _ Sf —�- �S� ' � �\ \�,\��\ ° - " - ��s' ;' sr�, �s� / � ��v �v�, . � � �__ ti,, 1 � � i�"� - �"� ` �; � , ' � )S� r�, z /�`�� < /� % , � �S �� / �/ ' � �� \ � �� , , � i � � , , � , �; �; , _` � j % 2 BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL 'E' ` PpE 3 _—_--.}*\ � \ , F � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-5244 4 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ��- AT&T UNDER GR��i il IG � � TE�E�HUNE v�� i�- ��„ J , i � � �°" � � / � � � % —_ ,-� - � � �_� Sz�z— - — = � �; �1,� —� _ � � � �� ; _ � �� _`____ � . . . . � , T�--.v— F � _ n_ . � ��, - . ��— � F _ `---- v-r - Y � E— _ �� r� � � c�'� ; -.� _ A �.. � � SPECIAL CU'T DITCH��'�`-��a _ _�c��, �� SEE DETAIL 'A' °�� ti`�� / � EMBANKMENT RIP RAP � Q�T � ' �� T� � � � SEE DETAIL 'D' � �i � �, j �' � � Ex�sT�NC � � � � � j � � �� R�W � �- � eFACE WATER IMPACTS -�� I � �� 0� � j`< / i �� \ � ,. � ; .-� � `�J / ``� �ii � � � , ; � � '� /�� / �� I � � �'s� /� ti � / � / � o ��' � l� � � �� G� � � i � 4 � � � �� \ - c��_ (�� /�� ` �' �°�� '/ l �� /_ � � � � � ' �" , � �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER PERMIT DRAWING SHEET _ OF _ Z 0 � � 0 � , 0 � S � � � � DETAIL A SPECIAL CUT DITCH ( Nof to $cale) ` - Fronf ar Ditch Natural � p'� �e< Slope Ground ?y D Q\O — Min. D=1 Ft. FROM STA. 14+10 RT TO STA. 14+75 RT DETAIL B LATERAL BASE DITCH ( Nor to Smle) b z,7 'L.� �„iFt. � d � F�u Slope Geotextile B Min. D=1 FT. Max. d=1 Ft. b=0 Ft. Type of Liner- Class B Rip-Rap B-2 Ff' FROM STA. 13 + 50 RT TO STA. 13 + 60 RT DETAIL C SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH ( Not to Scale) Nafural � �� Fronf Ground ?•) D ��D�ieC Slope d Ditch Geoiextile B Min. D=1 Ft. Max. d =1 Ft. B = 2 Ft. Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap � @, \ �x � �� ' � I /�_ // _ . , - � ,— � _ � i� - ��M� FROM STA.12+75 LT TO STA. 13+50 LT N DETAIL D RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT ( Not fo Scale) 10'min.-�. �� Ditch �,0'min. Grade � � � GEOTEXTILE Type of Liner= 3 TONS,CL I Rip� GeoTexfile = STA. 13 + 70 RT STA. 14 + 00 RT STA. 14 + 35 LT M SURFACE WATER IMPACTS � SPECIAL CUT C �OE C BASE DITCH � � EE DETAIL 'C� C / � S � �F - �� _ �� .-�. , -� r \ �— � �� _ _ E F FLAT GRATE SBG BEG +49 , i s" � RCP-III - P� E` ,� �� 2' BASE DITCH � �' � � �� -� SEE DETAIL B' � m m / / � � ti , , . - -� � � % - �� i � � ,- � � � � J � �� \ % � y - J� � , �i� �, � � _ = i � i �%� � � �, I �� _ � - a, � � � , �'� � , � �� ;� I � � �� " � � � � � �� w�-g �-� �r � �, :-� -� � �` �� `U- / _� ' _ ._ Y ` � ,`" � S� � I � � � �5�� __ �S� _, . / �� i �S �" / � �S � � =, / ' . � � - , ; / i �` -� DETAIL E LATERAL BASE DITCH ( Nof to Scale) b ?�� ,y�l 1'iFi. d ° F,�� Slope Geotextile B Min. D=1 Ft. Max, d=1 Ft. 6=5 Ft. Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap B-2 Ff• FROM STA. 14+40 LT TO STA 15+25 Ll 5� � � _�, - '� �� .' �� , �� J / /" �^ ��/ � - ,/� � � - �:. �r r � � � � ;'� �� _ ; ; �l' � _ � EMBANKMENT RIP RAP SEE DETAIL 'D' � � , � / 2' BASE DITCH �' � . j / /,' �:� �. S�� `�_�� S�- �'� Z- SEE DETAIL 'E' ` PpE 3 ---=_� � � F_ , PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-5244 4 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER � � � ,, T��H��iv� v�A� � �� ,� � � � �_ � � ��,-� �-i ° ° _° ,�_ti�- -� �,��-�, ,�- :'' Ex, :T,N� _� _ ', . . . . a e T�—s�p— C / � � � — —� �-�-� F _ � v- ,� r C E E -� ' � '� � � SPECIAL CUT DITCH T ��` �=� M' SEE DETAIL 'A' "�� EMBANKMENT RIP RAP , ,;r SEE DETAIL 'D' � V " SURFACE WATER IMPACTS '' � 3 —�� i- �� `� � ��s � s `. � `��'`' �� , � % x �r / � � %`,� . `� � 3 � ° �/ � �� DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER /' . _� i ; Ex�� T� �' � R w �� o�� , � Z \ \ 'r� � i � o , , � � > , �' i / � � �� C�G. �� ., ; �; ,��,, � �,o, �o i �� 'c�P ,// � , _ PERMIT DRAWING SHEET _ OF _ ! : i : : : .. i .� . � �. �. � . .. ...�, � ...� ... ..�' ... ... .' ... '. .. _ _ I�il�' ...� ... . .. ... ...� .... ... ... .. ... I III.. _ .. . . .. . . . . .....:. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .....:. .......... ....._ . .... . .... .. ... .... . ..... ..... ....... ....... :::... ::::::: ::::::: ::::::: ::::::: ::::::: ::.. .:::::: ...�....I�.�....- _ - . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- , . .. . i ... ... ... .. . ... ... ... .. .... ...... ...... . ..... . ...... . .... . . .... ...,_ ....,. � .... . .... .. ... .... . ..... ..... ..... .....�, .......... ..._ :::. ....:::. . ...:::. . .::.:. . . :::.... . .::: . : . .. . . .. : .. . .. : .. . �: �- : �: : � : : .. .. .. ...:::.......:::. .....::�.....:� �. ...�.� ....:.�. ....... ...... :. .. ..... iiiiii � ��ii " ii' iiiiii � i ii '..,,'i _ :::: ::: . :: : � � :::�. . . ��. �. � .. �. . . .. �� . .... . ... : : : : . .. ._ '. '� ir: . . . . . . .. . . . ._ '�:� : : : : . . . :. : : : . . :... : : : ..: : � .. .. I ,.,.� � . . . . . . . . . .: .. .: . .. . ... 12+00 13+00 �'� �I 14+00 �'I� 15+00 ! � _ ��_. _ : _ � �$ I I, � .i ��_�_iJ_._ �� :_j_� ._.. �I i... .. �_. _iJ_i__... � � ......_ � . . . . . � . �.... 16+00 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5244 ROADWAY OESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ::::i..:.::::.i:. �.��.��,i .��.��,�..�. ; --- - - F - 1 -- --_----- ,_ 2130 = - _ ,--. ---------- -� --- - ---- - - - � - - - --- - - --- __ , � I _ , � � � � � � � � � � � � � �, __ _ - ��' - � � � � � � � � � ___�_ _-_ . _- _----- , - ,�I - -- �� _ _ _ _ __ - _ r _ _ � - _ _ __ _ C BRIDGE �, � � � � � � � �__ -� ' � END �RADE � � � � , � _= BEGIN GRADE : _ - _ —L— STA. 15+25.00 _ - ' -- L— STA. 12f75.00 : - � - � �- _. - -L- STA: 14+02 __ � � EL. 2/25.89 � _ _ _ �' � - � , �'� � � � � �� — — EL.2/25.02 - � GP ELEV. = 2125.5' , � __ � - - __ I_ , - REMOVE 1@ 45' 18" CORED SLAB �� EXISTING GRADE '� � � , BEGIN TlP PROJECT ExIST�NG - SKEW = 120 , ,�, END TlP PROJECT . � PROFI�E '�' _- . �_ . . � � _L— STA. 15+50.00 j � —L— STA. 12+50.00 BRIDGE � VERTICAL ABUTMENTS � �-- � PROPOSED / . _ GRADE _ - - - 0% !+)0.3480% . -i - _ - — - -- — — — — — - _ (+)0.348 e � — — —,_-- � _ : . __ _ -------------- — ----- -- _ __:�—+— __ __ _ _ __ __ _ -- - _ - 2120 =_� 2110 0 + 00 � _ _ __ _ __-___ ----- ------ ---- -- -� , �00 14+00 1_5+00 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 13+79.5 -L- / 14+24.5 -L- Bank Stabilization (bridge) < 0.01 47 3+60 -L- / 14+10 -L- (RT Bank Stabilization (ditch) < 0.01 13 14+23 -L- / 14+52 -L- (LT Stabilization (reconstruct ditch) < 0.01 29 14+31 -L- / 14+44 -L- (LT Bank Stabilization (ditch) < 0.01 30 TOTALS*: 0.01 119 0 0 "Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 2013 10 24 c �o� � � T � � a � �� m �, � o� � �� ee,�w _�� , TQ a o� N�w � o �' Qa� �� .�� OLy�p � � � � ., � V W O QC � � � o� � � 0 V •� `\ V � � O V See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets �� 5��1� �� V��S B U1�COMB.E COUI�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110.363 OVER ROBI11IS0111 CREEK 011t SR 3197 TYPE OF WORK GRADING, PAVING, DRAI11lAGE, A111D STRUCTURE CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT. P1aELIMINAIdY FL.�NS DO NOT CrSE FOR CONSTAUCTION P�epo�e0 in ihe Offlce of: H3'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2011 = 2200 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 � 50 10� I000 Birch Rid e Dr., Ra[ei h NC, 276I0 ��F ADT 2035 = 4000 g g �� °� � c,� K = 9 % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5244 = 0.048 MILE zorz szaNnann srEC,Ficar,oNS �� PLANS . � v.s. g D= 70 �o LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5244 = 0.009 MILE sfcxarune: � ' 50 25 0 50 l00 T= 3 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: KEVIN E. MOORE. PE s � V= 40 MPH TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5244 = 0.057 MILE FEBRUARY 20, 2015 PRO�ecr sNCrNESx ROADWAY DESIGN ° PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1% DUAL 2% ENGINEER ��°�.�� Q l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: NATHAN N. ADIMA, PE �� W�� LOCAL FEBRUARY 16, 2016 PRO�scr ossicN sNCixsEn PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER rE SlGNATURE: \ � V' � Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Parcel/Sequence Number Existing Fence Line Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary Known Soil Contamination: Area or Site Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site 0 EiP � O ECM i23 —x x x— � e �, � — — — —WLB— — — — .�a EnB EPB � ,. �� BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O Sign � Well °w Small Mine 5Z' Poundation � Area Outline � Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream Buffer Zone 1 Buffer Zone 2 Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----J —�s — BZ 1 BZ 2 E - �... — o,_...�, � � � � ,�. m 5°]��°I�� II� ��7IE��I�T �C�I[��IL�1�� lL �Y �LdJ'IL�A� �ll llIL�L`lJ1lLll VV � 11 � CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF WfIY.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � CSX TRANSPORTA7ION 0 MlLEPoST 35 �� 0 �:a W ia W i� /.a �✓ �� _•� —E TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement ----- Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T T T T Existing Cable Guiderail n n Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n Equality $ymbol Pavement Removal T�EGET�ITION.• Single Tree Single Shrub Hedge ^^' � ��i �# Woods Line 1"`-`""`"-`'�`"�'� Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole $torm $ewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded U/G Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � � � � � Water Hydrant � Vineyartl Recorded U/G Water Line � Designated U/G Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - - Above Ground Water Line ^�c Wote� CONC - J CONC WW I � CONC HW �--------� �CB OO s • O /1 r �� Existing Telephone Pole + Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole O Telephone Booth � Telephone Pedestal ❑T Telephone Cell Tower � U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable * Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) — - - - -*- - - - Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit �_ Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -�_- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable � F° Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� ----� Fa- -- N: TV Satellite Dish C� N Pedestal � N Tower � U/G N Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G TV Cable '� Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -�°- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable T� °� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*r - - - -�� °^- - - GAS: Gas Valve � Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line � Designated WG Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -�- - - - Above Ground Gas Line p�c cas SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout �+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line �s Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�� so��.a�y sewe� Recorded SS Forced Main Line �s� Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -�ss- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records — End of Information • 0 O 0 n.� 0 usr 0 � � AATU R E.O.I. � Z 0 � � � 0 v � N m � � �. POINT DES�, NORTH —————————— — — —————————————— ——————— ———————— 2 BL-2 64�3�IDe3422 1 BL-1 64�487e4932 GPS2 B5244-2 64�77IDe666� BM1 ELEVATION = 2123.63 N 64�432 E 963641 L STATION 13�52,�9 39,80' RIGHT RR SPIKE SET IN BASE OF A 18" i�NCRRY TRCE ACROSS FROM BL 2 f NOTES: S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET 8-5244 EAST ELEVATION L STFITION OFFSET 963469e698� 2124e6ID 11�41e42 15e54 Cf 963622e1611 2125e�7 13�8�e45 11e45 LT 963975e476� 2129e7ID OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS NCDOT BASELINE MONUMENT °BLrl" LOCALIZED PROJEC7' COORDINATES —U STA.12+50.00 N=640487.4932 BEG STATE PRO ECT 42846.1.1 E=sssszz.isn .J ELF.'V. = 2125.07' LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES N = 640379.8873 E = 963546.6128 \ �/ NCDOT BASELINE MONUMENT "BL-2" \ LOCALZZED PROJECT COOHDINATES N = 640300.3422 B� _ z E=9634698980 � �� ELEV. _ ffi24.60' � � �,,- %/ i�R KRIS3197CH�OL // /, LpWE SR � � / � � �pl� SG� G�4��;1 O��¢ 5� Oy � BM#1 —� STA 73+52.09 39.80' RIGHT � ELEV. =2723.63' /� 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTPJ/WWW.DOH.DOT. STATE.NC. US/PRECONSTR UCT/HIGHWAY/GOCATION/PROJECT/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: 85422_LS_CONTROL. TXT SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVLDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATZON AND SURVEYS UNIT. • INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. NETWORK ESTABLISHED FROM NGS ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE (OPUS) �ti�5w �0 V� S�// � j5( � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. 42846.7.1 ti �9a C9 6�;0 —L— STA. 15+50.00 END STATE PROJECT 42846.1.1 LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES N = 640595.5859 / E = 963754.1115 BL—I --- LO — L-� �'ER =SRt, B,�MI� 4� S 47 �� R_ l Y'/ 39'3Z2" W � 580.2p' NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE � /�ti" / S4/// ,/ �/�S�/ �S / �'ti�� ' /� g4 3tititi .� NCDOT GPS MONUMENT (B—G244-2) LOC.4LIZED PROJECT COORDINATES N = 640770.6660 E=96'3975.4960 ELEV. =212990' SHEET NO. 1C DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCGS FOR MONUMENT "8-5244-2 = GPS-2" WITH NAp 83 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 640770.6660(ft) EASTING: 963975.4760cftl ELEVATION: 2129.701ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRIDI IS: 0.99963296 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "B-5244-2 = GPS-2" TO -l- STATION 12+50.00 IS S 47°39'37.2" W 580.20' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAI. DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 101 PAVEMENT SCHEDULE C.1 PROP. APPROX. 1.5'� ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.SA, - AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER S�. YD. PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.SA, C'Z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER S�. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCflETE SURFACE COURSE, TVPE SF9.SA, C.3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER S�. VD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN LAVEflS NOT TO EXCEED 1.5" IN DEPTH. pi PROP. APPROX. 2.5'� ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, - TYPE I19.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 285 �BS. PER Sa. YD. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, p Q TYPE I19.06, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER Sa. YD. PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAVERS N0T LESS THAN 2.5 " IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH. E1 PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TVPE 825.08, - AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER S�. YD. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, E'z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PEfl S4. V�. PER 1" OEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 4" IN OEPTH OR GREATER THAN SLp" IN �EPTH. R1 SHOULDER BERM GUTTER T_ EARTH MATERIAL �J EXISTING PAVEMENT W WEDGING C2 p� R1 Vq TpR?:) 6'� ORIGINAL GR UND � 9.5„ E1 7 GRADE TO THI LINE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER DETAIL: -L- STA. 13+48.17 TO STA. 13+61.69 (Begin Approach Slab) RT VAR 3'-1" 1'-3„ TO� 3'-6" � � � -L- 1P _I_ 71' VAR 5'-6" —�-� - 1'-3" �TO I 5'-9" -; C3 GRADE C3 ° POINT I .04 .04 � � � �0 � 0 00 �0 �� 0� �� 00 00 m �� 33' OUT TO OUT (71 CORED SLAB UNITS) °� TYPICAL SECTION OF CORED SLAB BRIDGE �� , ��.�. �ro �s' -L- STA. 13+79.50 (BEGIN BRIDGE) --L- STA. 14+24.50 (END BRIDGE) ORIGINAL GROUND �. /��\\ \2� � $,_�„ � -L- I 22,_0„ . * ADD 3'-0" W/GUARDRAIL I 4'-0"* EXIST TO 11'-0" � EXIST TO 11'-0" 4'-0"* VAR. VAR. D S ^^ 0' TO 1.96' Cl CROWN� ,C�4 ^^ FDPS � PniN-r PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-5244 2A-/ WN/ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTIO?�' 4:1 — —Y— — T— El p� 9.5� I U 9.5" p�� El T SFF'� SF: �\ 6 � CT I ORIGINAL GROUND i°Ns GRADE TO THIS LINE \— GRADE TO THIS LINE \-- TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 �-L- STA. 12 + 50.00 TO -L- STA. 12 + 75.00 —�— -L- STA. 15 + 25.00 TO -L- STA. 15 + 50.00 I ORIGINAL GROUND I 2,�0„ FDPS 4:� T GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 � -L- I 22�-�� rcnue C2 I POINT C: 0.02 0.02 D1 E� i 9.5" E� D1 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 iROUND USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 -L- STA. 14 + 74.50 TO -L- STA. 15 + 2 5.00 *ADD 3'-0" W/GUARDRAIL 4'-0" z,_�„ FDPS � ��F � 6, ORIGIN�L GROUND GRADE TO THIS LINE USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 -L- STA. 12+75.00 TO STA. 13+79.50 (BEGIN BRIDGE) -L- STA. 14+24.50 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 14+74.50 0 2 � a° c � 0 8 0 � 0 � N O � O N � > a � U ti � U � O � yp O o O� � o $ o ��° � i � J J � �1 * + � � � O � ~ ON t�o * Mp i � � J I �� I I � O � i � o �� Q � � � � � � Q � � N �� 9' � M o. -� �c. BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END BRIDGE -L- 13+68.50 VAR. 3'1" -L- 14+24.50 TYPE-III �r T� TYPE-III GRAU 350 TL-2 GRAU 350 TL-2 ' ' ' _ _ __.... 1 3'-6" ______ . . . . . . GRAU 350 TL-2 TYPE-III�VAR.S'-6" TyPE-III GRAU 350 TL-2 T� END APPROACH ' BEGIN BRIDGE 5'-9" -L- 14+35.50 -L- 13+79.50 DETAIL SHOWING PAVEMENT TO BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP 1 O � PROP. APPROACH SLAB � / / � ,('' i / / {. -/ /�/ �;3 � ,. \� � O.B.N5,PG.�55�9,F��S�TRKi ronrqp ar va r, vo. 2j � � � O � �� \� � BEGIN TIP PRO ECJ T B-5 "� —L— STA. l2 + SO V`�� V�� q ��'q +oo.00 -�- � � �� as.00 �r 9Tf' \.\� EX.RW _ C _� / + � /P�� 2. � �'u'�v�T r t� `N C�S � N 7�°30'07" E `'�/ ,(? �- �j \6-\ � _. Y \ � \ � �y"� � - � 9.33' 'o' ds � \ \ £,� � �s�� — � � a��/ ��+� � � ��3 � ^ � / � —L— PC 510.12+36.33 `�`� � � � � ` • a�� P �\ V /�/ \�\l�� /` � � I /// \\\ > �o^� �GS � �y'I' �j \� �/ "" � �Sf �' �/ I I O \ \ / / � \ \ B• � � � (�� D�.B. 7t7�. P6. �� Sf � � I \ /� � qw k� _ _ _ _ �_ { yC � — — � � PdiTqN OF P.& 2l PG. i! /� + � � �3 \� // / y�, 7� , � s,� � \ �3 � � �i� �>3 0 � �� \ r \ 3 g9 1� � �'7 � . �� \ � �� g5 �(i � N � \ �0�� F2/_� 1 + 5b �� 5g 29'S5. \ / \��" O� / � , �sos.00. E � � � �v I I �o �-� p�Rg.C.SOpU�t�E6 a4 � ,�� F � � � 4�, �j % � F' � �j I I ��es X � NE:.O� 8�8. P4 67 �. , � � � � � a �3 � `�+ %/o eti" / � � I ` � � � o� � �� y� � � � i� � +�� ;; � a. � � � � � � �� • — a � �� +�� +�� i �� '� %��% + � /. �, � � �i �� 7 � � �� 3 ' ` �� A � , , ` � � r,., � � + �� , � � � � � Y � � � -- _ `_ — � � Rh m� a� i � • /� • i _ — — — � — ysr.,s'" -L- V °� + / ` �ti`�tl i � � 1 � / � �3 � � Pl S�a 10+86.46 Pl Sfa 14+6p,p8 �°o � �� \ / � �= 25'00'O�A'tRTI F+ o + e9�c � �� c�j � � �3 � � � �' D = l4 4P 28.4' � _ 20' � ODA' IRTJ � ° � � �3 / � L = 170J7' L = 44296' \ SHOULDER BERM GUTfER / � \�� T = 86.�' T= 223J6� \ �; see sr+eer zn-i Foa oerna � � � ``� /� �� `�� SE =39SOE�PLAN SE _� SE �LAN � � �-L- STA.13+48]7 TO 13+61.69 (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB) RT �� \ � �� '�V�� L7 � � I � `/ / o I� / ��° � � / / , � % ;� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5244 4 RhV SHEET NO. '.OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION � �O OQ �S o� /y °'o � �� / � \, � � � � \€1� \\\\1� aaEM �`��wYa�s 5s��vye�ns a REF�pd 668. PG.7i� SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEET S? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS