400144_Inspection_20231108

. ��v3sion ai��f�r nrttc�s
S
'�`a,Cty ��r; .. � Q Y ` %�� � Dl�Piafun: q� �auil au�l:;Wat�ar �[►;a�e7rv��Ee�. .
0 Other boy
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up' O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: o County: Region: U'�A_la
Farm Name:
Owner Name: ��y p�.� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Email:
Integrator:
Phone: 9.5� —13-Jr9 -3y_1 �
Certified Operator: L_,2 ,, w 40 Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
M44.Current
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish dZI
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Certification Number:
Latitude:
De&ip
CurrO .
wetPObltq'
Chpa0ty
POD?.
Layer
Non -La er
JD g40
brvPouttry
Canacity
Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
iP (*rent.
Cattle Opadw.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: p
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): aog—�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmer.11
1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): ef,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Ins ection: — — o9-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
B?f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Rf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 5�_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[::]Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
;RxplAwanyYRS anawex' and/or auk ltlona ac a�nmeu a ai0l�ao $ * tr# r tsRRi ufa� s;
k o a la ter Iatn situations (use a`d"bual ea a necesoMo
YY
��-- iy - �� � 1. •�r� �
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /9 S (? //\,/ e_ k'_
•
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: %/— ;E— '5�3
511212020