20150885 Ver 1_401 Application_20150815

DUKE
n% ENERGY®
AUG 2 5 2015
Serial: BSEP 15 -0074
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Subject: Nationwide Permit 39 / DWR GC 3890
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant — Parking Lot Project
Brunswick County, North Carolina
DKE -15010
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Brunswick Nuclear Plant
P.O. Box 10429
Southport, NC 28461
Duke Energy Progress, LLC, is applying for a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Nationwide Permit 39 and an NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Water Quality
Certification 3890 for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with a proposed
supplemental parking lot at the Brunswick Steam Electric Power Plant site. The subject property
and project area is located at Duke Energy's Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, on the east side of
Cogentrix Drive, approximately 1/2 mile north of its intersection with East Leonard Street in
Brunswick County, North Carolina. The project area drains to Gum Log Branch which is a
designated SC;Sw;HQW within the in the Cape Fear River Basin. The following attachments are
included as part of this permit application:
• PCN Form
• Application Fee - $240 Check
• Fig.1 - USGS Quad —Southport
• Fig.2 - Brunswick County Soil Survey (Sheets: 18)
• Fig.3 - Existing Conditions
• Fig.3.1 - Existing Conditions w. Aerial
• Fig.4 - Overall Impact Map (Insets 1)
• JD Request Package
• Jurisdictional Wetlands Plat
• Stormwater Management Plan
• Copy of NCDENR Stormwater Permit (SW8- 150805)
PROJECT LOCATION /HABITAT: The subject property and project area is located at Duke
Energy's Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, on the east side of Cogentrix Drive, approximately' /2
mile north of its intersection with East Leonard Street in Brunswick County, North Carolina. The
project area is approximately 12.8 acres of primarily forested area, approximately 2,000 feet
south of the generation facility and supporting infrastructure. Cogentrix Drive runs south to north
along the west side with a gravel access drive running along the northern border of the project
area. Land use within the vicinity of the project area is primarily heavy industrial - energy
generation, with some wooded areas between the various uses.

Ms. Karen Higgins
Page 2
Approximately 80 percent of the project area can be characterized as upland areas with a
forested mix of of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweet gum red
maple (Acer rubrum), and oak species (Quercus sp.), with an understory of blueberry
(Vaccinium sp.), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and
greenbrier (Smilax sp.). The remaining 20% of the project area can be characterized as
hardwood flat wetland complex, with similar vegetative species on the edges with some black
gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red bay (Persea borbonia), and pond pine (Pinus serotina) on the interior
of the wetland complex.
There are no known historic structures and /or properties within the proposed project. There are
no known Federally Endangered Species and /or known habitat within the project area.
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES: There is a network of drainage ditches within and adjacent to
the subject property which drain to Gum Log Branch to the north and the Cape Fear River to the
east. Gum Log Branch is designated SC; Sw; HQW and is a tributary to the Cape Fear River
basin (HUC 03030005). There are several jurisdictional wetlands within the project area
(Wetlands A, B, and C) which total approximately 1.49 aces and key out to a hardwood flat
system type as referenced in the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Methodology (NCWAM).
There is a non - jurisdictional ditch that connects wetland "C" and wetland "A," and another non -
jurisdictional ditch which connects wetland "B" to an off -site drainage network. The limits of
wetland area "A" were not investigated, and it is assumed to continue outside of the project and
draining toward Gum Log Branch and /or the Cape Fear River. There are no jurisdictional
streams, open water bodies, and /or isolated wetlands within the project area. Our findings were
confirmed by Mr. Kyle Dahl of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Wilmington Field
Office on August 7, 2015, with an on -site concurrence meeting.
PROPOSED IMPACTS: The Duke Energy Brunswick Steam electric Plant is proposing to
construct approximately 209,118 square foot (sf) paved parking lot, comprised of approximately
578 spaces, adjacent to the Brunswick nuclear reactor in order to provide needed parking for
additional staff and sub - contractors during maintenance periods and emergency situations. As
part of its annual maintenance the nuclear plant is required to drain and refuel the nuclear reactor,
which is known as an "outage." This a very labor intensive process requiring an additional 2,000
people on -site during the maintenance period. Due to parking constraints, these extra personnel
are currently shuttled in from off -site parking areas several miles away to the generation facility.
This is an additional logistical constraint that encumbers an already technically orchestrated
process. In order to make this maintenance process more safe and efficient for the additional
personnel, Duke Energy wishes to construct this parking lot on the east side of Cogentrix Drive,
adjacent to the nuclear reactor (Fig. 4). The proposed project will also include associated lighting,
stormwater controls, and driveway improvements.
The entire site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while most effectively
utilizing the upland areas within the project area. Although efforts have been made to avoid
impacts to jurisdictional waters, there is one proposed impact to wetland area "B" which will result
in 0.04 -acre of impact. The proposed parking design does avoid wetland areas "C" and the higher
quality wetland area "A" to the east.
The design is for a contiguous parking surface within the project area, but all sedimentation and
erosion control measures will be implemented before construction to minimize runoff. The
stormwater will flow across the parking lot to the east or rear of the parking lot, where it will then
be allowed to sheet flow into wetland area "A" to the east. Typical construction equipment, such
as a long -arm track -hoe, dump trucks, front end loader, and bush hog will be used for the initial
clearing.

Ms. Karen Higgins
Page 3
TOTAL PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS:
Impact Location I Impact Type 11 Proposed (acres)
Inset 1 (perm.) Fill for Parking Lot 0.04
(road)
TOTAL
0.04 acres
AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: Impacts to jurisdictional waters have been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The entire site was designed to minimize impacts
to aquatic resources while most effectively utilizing the upland areas within the project area.
Although efforts have been made to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters, there is one
proposed impact to wetland area "B" which will result in 0.04 -acre of impact. The proposed
parking design does avoid wetland areas "C" and the higher quality wetland area "A" to the east.
The design is for a contiguous parking surface within the project area, but all sedimentation and
erosion control measures will be implemented before construction to minimize runoff.
MITIGATION: There is less than 1/10 of an acre of wetland impact associated with the
proposed project. Duke Energy proposes mitigation in the form of avoidance and minimization
to waters of the U.S.; however, if wetland mitigation is required, Duke Energy will reserve
mitigation credits from an approved mitigation bank.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: The proposed development onsite includes the addition of
approximately 5 acres of supplemental parking for the current facilities. All runoff from the
parking lot is collected in grass swales which carry the water to the rear of the parking lot, where
it is converted to non - erosive velocities before being discharged into adjacent wetlands. The
parking lot was situated in the best available location in order to minimize impacts to the
surrounding environment in combination with Duke Energy security protocols. The 34.76 acre
permit boundary for this site includes adjacent forested areas, bringing the proposed percentage
of impervious to 14.99 %. This percentage is below both the state maximum of 24% and
Brunswick County 15% threshold for Low Density projects.
In this report are detailed calculations proving that the use of the proposed centipede sod outlet
converts the peak flows generated from the parking lot into non - erosive velocities. Installation
and maintenance of the sod as proposed, is by guidance from the NC Erosion Control Manual.
The project is located within the Cape Fear River Basin, with stormwater runoff from the
proposed development draining to Gum Log Branch. According to the N.C. Division of Water
Resources BasinWide Information Management System (BIMS), this waterway is classified as
SC; Sw, HQW at this location. The development must meet the new coastal rules defined under
Session Law 2008 -211. As proposed, for both the 10 -year and 25 year storms, non - erosive
velocities have been obtained using the grassed swales and sod outlet. In order to keep the sod
healthy, strict installation and maintenance guidelines have been included on the construction
drawings. A copy of the final stormwater management plan and approval letter from NCDENR is
enclosed.
Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. Please contact Mr. Marty McGowan,
Environmental Coordinator of the Brunswick facility at 910.457.2538 to schedule the site visit. In

Ms. Karen Higgins
Page 4
the interim, please feel free to contact Mr. McGowan if you have any questions or wish to
discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
John A. Krakuszeski
Plant Manager
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
cc: Mr. Marty McGowan, Brunswick Nuclear Plant Environmental Coordinator
Mr. Don Safrit, P.E., Senior Environmental Specialist, Permitting & Compliance,
Carolinas
Mr. Kevin Yates, Project Manager, The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

W A
T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
® Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: NWP: 39 / GP: 3890
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ® Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DW Q (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
For the record only for Corps Permit:
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
because written approval is not required? Certification:
project no:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
❑ Yes
❑ No
Deed Book and Page No.
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
John A. Krakuszeski
fee program.
applicable):
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
® Yes
❑ No
City, state, zip:
below.
3f.
Telephone no.:
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant — Supplemental Parking Lot
2b.
County: Brunswick
2c.
Nearest municipality / town: Southport
2d. Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 3411 PG: 478, PG: 63, PG: 27
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
John A. Krakuszeski
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 10429
3e.
City, state, zip:
Southport, NC 28461
3f.
Telephone no.:
910 - 457 -3691
3g.
Fax no.:
910 - 457 -3369
3h.
Email address:
Page Iof14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kevin Yates
5b. Business name
McAdams Company
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 14005
5d. City, state, zip:
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
5e. Telephone no.:
919- 361 -5000
5f. Fax no.:
919- 361 -2269
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
2097 -12 -96 -1776
Latitude: 33.949810 N Longitude: - 78.009897 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
Project Area: - 12.8 acres
Gum Log Branch
SC; Sw; HQW
Cape Fear; HUC 03030005070010
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
The subject property and project area is located at Duke Energy's Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, on the east
side of Cogentrix Drive, approximately ' /z mile north of its intersection with East Leonard Street in
Brunswick County, North Carolina. The project area is approximately 12.8 acres of primarily forested area,
approximately 2,000 feet south of the generation facility and supporting infrastructure. Cogentrix Drive runs
south to north along the west side with a gravel access drive running along the northern border of the project
area. Land use within the vicinity of the project area is primarily heavy industrial - energy generation, with
some wooded areas between the various uses.
Approximately 80 percent of the project area can be characterized as upland areas with a forested mix of of
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tuhpifera), sweet gum red maple (Acer rubrum), and oak
species (Quercus sp.), with an understory of blueberry (Vaccinium sp.), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Chinese
privet (Ligustrum sinense), and greenbrier (Smilax sp.). The remaining 20% of the project area can be
characterized as hardwood flat wetland complex, with similar vegetative species on the edges with some black
gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red bay (Persea borbonia), and pond pine (Pinus serotina) on the interior of the wetland
complex.
There is a network of drainage ditches within and adjacent to the subject property which drain to Gum Log
Branch to the north and the Cape Fear River to the east. Gum Log Branch is designated SC; Sw; HQW and is
a tributary to the Cape Fear River basin (HUC 03030005). There are several jurisdictional wetlands within
the project area (Wetlands A, B, & C) which total approximately 1.49 aces and key out to a hardwood flat
system type as referenced in the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Methodology (NCWAM). There is a
non - jurisdictional ditch that connects wetland "C" and wetland "A ", and another non - jurisdictional ditch
which connects wetland `B" to an off -site drainage network. The limits of wetland area "A" were not
investigated, and it is assumed to continue outside of the project and draining toward Gum Log Branch and/or
the Cape Fear River. There are no jurisdictional streams, open water bodies, and/or isolated wetlands within
the project area. Our findings were confirmed by Mr. Kyle Dahl of the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Wilmington Field Office on August 7, 2015, with an on -site concurrence meeting. See Figures 1 -4.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Riparian: 1.49 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
None. Ditches within the project area are non - jurisdictional features
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide parking adjacent to the generation facility for subcontractors during
maintenance periods and emergency situations.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Duke Energy Brunswick Steam Electric Plant is proposing to construct an approximately 209,118 square
foot (sf) paved parking lot, comprised of approximately 578 spaces, adjacent to the Brunswick Steam Electric
Plant in order to provide needed parking for additional staff and sub - contractors during maintenance periods
and emergency situations. As part of its annual maintenance the nuclear plant is required to drain and refuel
the nuclear reactor, which is known as an "outage." This a very labor intensive process requiring an
additional 2,000 people on -site during the maintenance period. This is an additional logistical constraint that
encumbers an already technically orchestrated process. In order to make this maintenance process more safe
and efficient for the additional personnel, Duke Energy wishes to construct this parking lot on the east side of
Cogentrix Drive, adjacent to the generation facility (Fig. 4). The proposed project will also include associated
lighting, stormwater controls, and driveway improvements.
The entire site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while most effectively utilizing the
upland areas within the project area. Although efforts have been made to avoid impacts to jurisdictional
waters, there is one proposed impact to wetland area "B" which will result in 0.04 -acre of impact. The
proposed parking design does avoid wetland areas "C" and the higher quality wetland area "A" to the east.
The design is for a contiguous parking surface within the project area, but all sedimentation and erosion
control measures will be implemented before construction to minimize runoff. The stormwater will flow
across the parking lot to the east or rear of the parking lot, where it will then be allowed to sheet flow into
wetland area "A" to the east. Typical construction equipment, such as a long -arm track -hoe, dump trucks,
front end loader, and bush hog will be used for the initial clearing.
Development within the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant is under the jurisdiction of Brunswick County and
will be subject to the rules and regulations set forth in the Brunswick County Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO). In addition, development within the plant will be required to achieve the following
approvals, as appropriate:
• North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Energy, Mineral, and
Land Resources (NCDENR DEMLR) - Sediment and Erosion Control Permitting.
• NCDENR DEMLR — State Stormwater Management Permit.
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) / NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) — 404 / 401
Permit for wetland impacts.
Page 4of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: McAdams Company
Name (if known): Kevin Yates / George Buchholz
Other: J
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
• On -site wetland concurrence meeting conducted on August 7, 2015 by Kyle Dahl (USAGE representative); USACE
Action ID. Unknown at this time.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
i
6. Future Project Plans I
6a. Is this a phased project? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b.
2c. 2d.
2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact
Type of wetland Forested
(Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Inset 1 Fill (for parking)
(Wetland B)
Hardwood Flat ® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.04
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.04
2h. Comments: (See Figure 4, Inset 1)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts
(including temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d.
3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404, width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other) (feet)
feet)
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: (See Figure 4, Inset 1)
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
N/A
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond 1D Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond Flooded I Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total I N/A
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO) (N /A)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
(T)
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional waters have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The entire
site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while most effectively utilizing the upland areas
within the project area. Although efforts have been made to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters, there is one
proposed impact to wetland area `B" which will result in 0.04 -acre of impact. The proposed parking design does
avoid wetland areas "C" and the higher quality wetland area "A" to the east. The design is for a contiguous
parking surface within the project area, but all sedimentation and erosion control measures will be implemented
before construction to minimize runoff.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The design is for a contiguous parking surface within the project area, but all sedimentation and erosion control
measures will be implemented before construction to minimize runoff. The stormwater will flow across the
parking lot to the east or rear of the parking lot, where it will then be allowed to sheet flow into wetland area
"A" to the east. Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

construction and installation, as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheets to be reviewed and approved by
the NC Division of Land Quality and/or Brunswick County Erosion Control. All work will take place during
dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non - jurisdictional, stable ground adjacent to the shoreline.
The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, and
other measures as shown on the erosion control plans, clearing only as necessary to install these devices. All
erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff
producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately
to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the
owner's representative.
All slopes shall be graded no steeper than the angle that can be retained by vegetative cover or other
adequate erosion control devices or structures. No material for construction will be placed in jurisdictional
waters, at any time. Excavation will be limited to the area necessary for site preparation; all excavated
material will be placed and retained on high ground above the flood pool elevation. All excavated material
will be placed landward of the normal pool elevation contour on high ground and confined by adequate dikes
or other retaining structures to prevent erosion and sedimentation into adjacent waters, wetlands, or streams.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
® Yes ❑ No
There is less than 1/10 of an acre of wetland impact
associated with the proposed project. The applicant
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts proposes mitigation in the form of avoidance and
to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? minimization to waters of the U.S.; however, if
wetland mitigation is required, the applicant will
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
reserve mitigation credits from an approved
mitigation bank.
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type
❑ Yes
Quantity
❑ warm ❑ cool
square feet
acres
acres
acres
❑cold
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 1
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 1
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) l
Zone 2 I 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee
responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ® No
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? I New Proposed Impervious: 14.99%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ` ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed development onsite includes the addition of approximately 5 acres of supplemental parking for
the current facilities. All runoff from the parking lot is collected in grass swales which carry the water to the
rear of the parking lot, where it is converted to non - erosive velocities before being discharged into adjacent
wetlands. The parking lot was situated in the best available location in order to minimize impacts to the
surrounding environment in combination with Duke Energy security protocols. The 34.76 acre permit
boundary for this site includes adjacent forested areas, bringing the proposed percentage of impervious to
14.99 %. This percentage is below both the state maximum of 24% and Brunswick County 15% threshold for
Low Density projects.
In this report is detailed calculations proving that the use of the proposed centipede sod outlet converts the
peak flows generated from the parking lot into non - erosive velocities. Installation and maintenance of the sod
as proposed, is by guidance from the NC Erosion Control Manual.
The project is located within the Cape Fear River Basin, with stormwater runoff from the proposed
development draining to Gum Log Bracnh. According to the N.C. Division of Water Resources BasmWide
Information Management System (BIMS), this waterway is classified as SC; Sw, HQW at this location. The
development must meet the new coastal rules defined under Session Law 2008 -211. As proposed, for both the
10 -year and 25 year storms, non - erosive velocities have been obtained using the grassed swales and sod
outlet. In order to keep the sod healthy, strict installation and maintenance guidelines have been included on
the construction drawings.
A copy of the final stormwater management plan and approval letter from NCDENR is enclosed.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWO Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Certified Local Government
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
City of Southport
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
®
Coastal counties
®
HOW
❑
ORW
❑
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
® Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review (N /A)
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered `yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes No
letter.) ❑
Comments:
2. Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in I El Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project and appropriate land use contol measures are in
place which mitigate future impacts to downstream water quality. In addition, there is an expansive
wetland complex to the eastern side of the project area, which will also encumber future expansion of this
project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There will be no wastewater generated with the proposed project.
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or I Yes El No
habitat? ®
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act I El Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E] Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS web page (httn: / /www.fws.2ov /endangered/) and the Natural Heritage virtual workroom
( htto : / /www.ncnhn.org/web /nht) /nhn- man - viewer) were accessed on April 29, 2015, to determine if the
project would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat. Based on field inspections
conducted on April 30, 2015, it is believed that no adverse impacts to threatened and endangered species
and their known habitat will occur due to the construction of the proposed project. McAdams requested
concurrence of these findings from the USFWS on May 4, 2015. On June 4, 2015, the USFWS
responded and concluded "that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed
endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed
for listing under Act at these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have
been satisfied for your project." Please see attached letter.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
An interactive map called the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper
(httn: / /www. habitat. noaa .2ov /Drotection/efIVefhmanner /) was accessed on June 26, 2015 to determine if the
project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) interactive map, which shows
the locations of properties and districts in Brunswick County, North Carolina entered in the National
Register of Historic Places (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) was conducted on April 29, 2015. Based on
field inspections conducted on April 30, 2015, it is believed that there are no historically sites located at
the proposed project. McAdams requested concurrence of these findings from the SHPO on May 4, 2015.
On May 22, 2015, SHPO responded and concluded that they "are aware of no historic resources which
would be affected by the project." Please see attached letter.
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The project site is not located in a special flood
hazard zone. It is located in Zone "X" as defined by F.E.M.A. F.I.R.M Community Panel #3720300700
J; dated June 02, 2006.
John A. Krakuszeski 9.,-Q A, Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Sign ure
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Brunswick County NC GIS
June 16, 2015
PIN: 209712961776 PARCELID: 20600001 OWNER: DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC
1 = 2000 Feet ADDRESS1: ADDRESS2: 410 S WILMINGTON STREET CITY: RALEIGH STATE: NC ZIPCODE: 27601 -1748
N 2849.36 ACRES PL 63/27 & 53/23 HWY 211 DEEDDATE: 4/27/2013 DEEDBOOK: 3411 DEEDPAGE: 0478 PLATBOOK: 0063
w`6�%y e PLATPAGE: 0027 PLATDATE: 11/9/2009 ACREAGE: 2849.36 TOWNSHIP: SMITHVILLE DEFERREDVAL: 0
G LANDVAL: 45469930 OTHERVAL: 217750 HOMEVAL: 0 TOTALVAL: 45687680 FIRECODEID: 14 FIRECODENAME: Southport
Disclaimer Map and parcel data are believed 0 be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a the search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification

� r
NA
he
SI5
• � I • � � °�� , Via. � � �� > -
} PROJECT AREA
11 C" 1
Y f.
' m Pvll c: 1.
Towns Per z - s I
i
cta.
«•' i BM $Z g is ubstr$ 'jf fL` tt L
Tbwe
l
tja4 GIs V
r
Nay • e --
X § 2
� I � � •� 'may, � 11 �: 5
v. DEEP
. -WA TEFL -
\USG -�i7 1I TE gUAD� "SOUTHPORT ", NORTH CAROLINA:, 2013 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
J
LAT: 33.949810 N, LNG: 78.00097W
N BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT
WETLAND DELINEATION
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP
J
o 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet PROJECT #: DKE -15010
\ I inch =2,000 feet SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA WADAMS/

s
A
BrB
Ht
B t
f PROJECT AREA
1V W
4 ioA
tj A
Fo
B aB- - ,F cy
GoA�
Oil
D87 Fo To LY
)y R a T
M. • ■
f3 a B
4r
i
B a B
ere
t�
_ - 0
To J
,a
Lo m
�Aa --
BnB
KrB c
0
KrB -�
�'-- Lo
d PaA DO .,� Dp V�VaB
{
USGS• SOIL SURVEY SHEET 181 BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
3
LAT: .949810 N, LONG: -78.00497 W
N BRUNKSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT
AWETLAND DELINEATION
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 500 1,000 2,000 PROJECT #: DKE -15010
Feet Mc ADAMS
DAMS
inch= 1,000 feet SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA ri f

17-
p
ource. Esri, Di.gi4alG� I � be, �eoE e, i- bed, DA, U � , AE ,
Getma5ainq, ATM& grid, I@M' IGP, swissfiopo, and the GI' User Co

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: �,Yl.Ali�,l )t <- A)(Af I, c Acts`;- City /County:C�)�.�`i`1y o+ A r 0,1aC .; Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner .�.�1 sue_ r <,rr -t,. ?�rti State: k)c Sampling Point: (�
Investigator(s) : V-,Yi V _e t Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): I °%r)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA); Let: �,z . 50,!O j. Long: Datum: kAb8�a
Soil
Mao Unit Name: (-,o\ k,-,,V1 NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes v-- No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Indicators (minimum is that
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required),
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Primary of one reauired.
check all amly)
❑
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
0
High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
EJ
Water Marks (81)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑_
Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑_
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑_
Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water - Stained Leaves (89)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Fie d Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes -4- No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _4__, No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec ions), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
..
4
2.
3.�r
4.
'rakw.
5.
r %
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: LL-
SaDlina/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: _�
)
1.
�G�,C!' i ll t t �:'� �C7f" l.e (Yl � !�C ! �i✓�,
1,J
FA(0
2.
i -C -X rvol" : I
-q�
� �1 LC-
4.
r. ko r 1,o fA,
t_
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
[
c--� 20% of total cover:
Herb
Stratum (Plot size:
2.
j
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
T) Y- 1 150 10
Sampling Point: lJ�=
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: MultiDIv bv:
OBL species r- -) x 1 = in
FACW species Q x 2 =
FAC species "! x 3 = ,
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: I `" (A) o L (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�2 - Dominance Test is >50%
�3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
= Total Cover
50% of - ^total cover: 20% of total cover: ;
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: _/1 l )
.t
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
c
50% oft otal cover: .� 20% of total cover: Present?
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: s'�J
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) j /Color (mast) 1 % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
pto -.1(( I loo p - �;�"l�:s'. \4� jler .C.�;. +��
O 6 C3
to b (- ' � Y I i, O� � ` Y�n�,�f t =A ,ap 4 C ab s
'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains,
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
a_ Sandy Redox (35) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: /
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION
1
Project/Site: 11-( -I > k, \, CJ—, AAA C � r1�� � ll 6 �
Applicant/Owner: A) _ V,
Investigator(s): Gi
Landform (hilisiope, terrace, etc.):
%. 0'1 b
DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
City /County:,So, 4 ,, r)( } Fx In t�S o _ Sampling Date: �4` 0 State: � Sampling Point: i ac�
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %) 104
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 1�AL—? ° Lat: Long: _TZ.019 + I Datum: M \IX
Soil Map Unit Name: `- (aAAS- w bn °)� `3 "YA MI 100 -v'e't NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V/ / No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �/ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes ✓ No
Yes No ✓
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apoly)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑_
High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Q
Sediment Deposits (62)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑_
Iron Deposits (65)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
0
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Yes No
Secondary indicators (minimum of two reouired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Ej Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (135)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No '✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

'Df � _a I , tj)C)
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: _D ? j - 0
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total % Cover of:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
�� 20% of total cover:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: c . )
d
1
% Cover
Lfs
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2. i C e �,rk (-L EVr 'an * ; .t
}
�
` l I -'_1 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
� 4C
2. I ! P.V. 0 f ­ rig
3. ,� C a r rVt, C �i� / a C tLa a
ML
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4. t An'rtA kICA 44
�
� � t�
5.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
11
00
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
I (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total % Cover of:
50% of total cover: J 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
i� =Total Cover
50% oft otal cover: 20% of total cover: 5
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. } r
I
3 `
3.
4.
5.
[ =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
OBL species
ZS=Total
Cover
50% oft otal cover:
�� 20% of total cover:
x3=
Saolin Shrub Stratum (Plot size: (
)
V
D
1. fA\'6Y-t ,, wl
► 35
` l I -'_1 (B)
� 4C
2. I ! P.V. 0 f ­ rig
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
c�
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: J 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
i� =Total Cover
50% oft otal cover: 20% of total cover: 5
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. } r
I
3 `
3.
4.
5.
[ =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
OBL species
c:>
FACW species
C-)
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
D
Column Totals:
► 35
Multiply bv:
x 1 =
C'>
x2=
C
x3=
x4=
7%
x5=
CD
(A)
` l I -'_1 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 13. 4-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: P a - (AV
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type, Loc`
ure Remarks
o ^ t
11jdg4e)p
�Text
{/ q
i
6�f. -A �_.j C ic�✓ E
1I
(�y'��'� era!
pq
C)-° 6 d lb\I • �.d I C S.„J
/�
`.W' 9,'`X, cA!f._. °,f 1 P:..A../�4+,1��f�.
))i
t t
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
C 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q Black Histic (A3)
J Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LR R P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 1538)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
aW Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

-D - !mot 0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: VJ1 A`__- S c- L UA( kC,f`- TA 6, City /County: S& 1LY��)C_+ I IIAAS!M'A- Sampling Date: 9 I
Applicant/Owner: )�`?c.�z �re�.., �a =;� State: �..P Sampling Point: lf� - �d
Investigator(s): GY), py Section, Township, Range:
1
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Mt_ -A Lat: . 951 Long: 3-2,01 n
Soil Map Unit Name: C-1 0 r � 6ev () 'R" a_.', 6tV\lJ 1 rA NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ZNo (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V-" No
Slope ( %):
Datum: AA11) Z
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Yes ✓ No within a Wetland?
Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that ao)ly)
El
Surface Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
.High Water Table (A2)
°Saturation
t—iMarl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
I--I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
(A3)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
1Q
I--I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Yes as No
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No r Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
65
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): c) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:"
'2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: c_b ) % Cover S ecies . Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
1. ti u� '`zi c Lw
2. � ry 16 � Total Number of Dominant
3. r �, S _, ,'1 -9 e A� e E l w Y ML Species Across All Strata: t. 0 (B)
4. Iv�ca_ 1
Percent of Dominant Species !
5_ That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l D (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
8.
Total Cover OBL species 0(D x 1= I p
/ { FACW species 2Q x 2 =
50% of total cover: 'I 20% of total cover: t '-
FAC species t 9
Saolino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 3 =
{ FACU species 0 x4=
1. to 2. t 1 J - UPL species x 5
(A)
�
(B)
3. -r Column Totals:
' 1 k Prevalence Index B/A 4. b M
=
5. t
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Str atum (Plot size:
1. TkoA
2. 1
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
115 20% of total cover:
I. n = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: c�
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
2. SPAl`CIX r0-4,✓,fi � "��44AL
3.
4.
5.
Q S = Total Cover
50% of total cover: U 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_V 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
`b IE;()IC)
Sampling Point:b'Kd `'-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(in)c,,h„es) Color (moist) t % Color (moist) % Type, Loe Texture [ Remarks oo
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
T
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
TI
] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Tj Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
419
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�❑-i
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P. T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
�L-1I
LJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes " No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

- IGOI
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
�f' d} e ` "Dcl
Project/Site: ;f )YlAn<,V 1 J__ kJAcRj_ r(r f" �O /L City /County: 3D� 'f� a >`s dIC ampiing Date: ✓ I�
Applicant/Owner: L ( �r ���� State: N� Sampling Point: .(it tl
Investigator(s): k' Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
11 m. . of os i -cl Datum: /vB J .i
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): /�C Lat: ` ��?. �0 Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: ��a r� b °�t �CYYil NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes S No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
within a Wetland .
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
El
Surface Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (613)
�
LJ
High Water Table (A2)
II Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Water Marks (61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Sediment Deposits (62)
1L�-If
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
�LIf
L-I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
a Water- Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Yes No
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No °� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No =/ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No 4/ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

E c
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: b ?4 -- q
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
- =r
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: - )
%Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species n
1.
P� Y\ v,�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
L i no &a,,,Ar_0y +,A'1 ;

�_C- � +C) t ()
SOIL Sampling Point: 4 . t},
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
C > -CD IC, y �5 P ifs
(_6 - U (0Y12.5 6 !(Y)
1' ~_ 1,9k (00
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type, Loe Texture Remarks
� Cka(k
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
F]
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 Muck S)
F]
F]
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
F]
F]
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
u cm (A10) (LRR
El Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
F]
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
F]
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
F]
Depleted Matrix (F3)
T�
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
HStratified
0
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
-0
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
U Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
F]
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
E1
iron-manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
0n
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
M
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Brunswick Nuclear Plant - Parking Lot Project is an
approximately 12.8 -acre parcel of land located just outside of the Owner's Protected Area for the plant on the west side of Cogentrix Drive in
Southport, North Carolina. The property is located at parcel of land (PIN Number 209712961776) within Brunswick County.
State-.NC County /parish/borough: Brunswick City: Southport
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 33.949810° N, Long. 78.0098970
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Gum Log Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Cape Fear River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030005070010
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
®Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
®Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are and are not "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Ll Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 600 linear feet: 3width (ft) and/or 0.04 acres.
Wetlands: 2.1 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):'
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: The 2 non -RPWs were determined to be ephemeral ditches, and therefore not jurisdictional.
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
? For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HI.A.1 and Section I LDA. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, sldp to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IH.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section HI.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HI.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 9.5 acres
Drainage area: 2.9 acres
Average annual rainfall: 60.99 inches
Average annual snowfall: 0.0 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through I tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 2 -5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 -2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW: Project waters flow south and east through ditches and canals, then into Gum Log Branch,
into Nancy Creek, into Welden Creek, for approximately 4 miles and then enter the Cape Fear River.
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known: 1 st.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that anal*
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
® Artificial (man- made). Explain: The 2 non -RPWs are artificial ditches.
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 0 feet
Average side slopes:
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
® Other. Explain: tributary (ditch) substrate is not significantly different from surrounding substrate.
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: bed and bank are not well defined, stable
banks, little erosion or movement of sediment.
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain: ditches do not have well developed run/riffle /pool complexes.
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Ephemeral flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: as
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Overland sheetflow. Characteristics: Bed and banks of ditches are not well defined.
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
• sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
• water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.1 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: No water was present in ditches at time of evaluation; no evidence of pollutants were observed.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): forested; 50 feet and greater.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Ditches provide habitat for terrestrial species.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 2.1 acres
Wetland type. Explain: mixed hardwood forest.
Wetland quality. Explain: Fair; the wetland areas have experienced past disturbance, the project area has likely been
logged within the past 50 years.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain: Flows occur only during and/or after large rain events.
Surface flow is: Not present
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW:
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Water flows from Wetland B to Ditch 2 via overland
sheetflow.
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximitv (Relationshio) to TNW
Project wetlands are 2 -5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 -2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 2 -year or less floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: No water was present in ditches at time of evaluation; no evidence of pollutants were
observed.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): forested; 50 feet and greater.
® Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain: mixed hardwood forest; 90% cover.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:Wetlands provide habitat for terrestrial species.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an )
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately ( 2.1 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directiv abuts? (Y/1) Size (in acres)
Wetland A - Y 1.95 Wetland B - N 0.13
Wetland C - Y 0.06
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Wetlands provide habitat for terrestrial
species, remove pollutants from storm flows, and attenuate flooding downstream during and after large rain events.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section HIM: The non -RPWs and their adjacent wetlands have the capacity to reduce the amount of
pollutants and flood waters reaching TNWs.
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS /WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (fl).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 600 linear feet 3 width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section 111.13.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 2.1 acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):to
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

® Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
® Other: (explain, if not covered above): non - jurisdictional waters are ephemeral ditches.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 "= 2,000' Southport.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Brunswick County.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date)-NC OneMap 2012.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR , CONSTRUCTION

DEMLR USE ONLY
Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number
Applicable Rules: ❑ Coastal SW - 1995 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non - Coastal SW- HQW/ ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ Mgmt Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Brunswick Nuclear Plant Parking Lot
2. Location of Project (street address):
Brunswick Nuclear Plant, Cogentrix Drive
City:Southp ort
County:Brunswick Zip:28461
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From River Road SE (NC 87) turn onto Rob Gandy Blvd, go to end, turn left onto E Leonard St then travel
0.2 miles and turn left onto Cogentrix Drive. Continue approximately 0.5 miles and site will be on risht.
4. Latitude:33° 56' 57.95" N _ Longitude:78° 00' 39.83" W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New ❑Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenewals with modifications also requires SWU -102 - Renewal Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit numberN/ A , its issue date (ifknown)N/ A , and the status of
construction: [-]Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ❑ Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
®Low Density ❑High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System [-]Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from
DEMLR requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number,
if assigned, N/ A and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed, N/ A
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1- 877 - 623 - 6748):
❑CAMA Major ®Sedimentation/ Erosion Control: 6.2 ac of Disturbed Area
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater 0404/ 401 Permit: Proposed Impacts 0.04 ac
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/ Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:N/ A
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ❑No ®Yes
If yes, see S.L. 2012 -200, Part VI: http : / /portal.ncdenr.orgjweb /Ir /rules- and - regulations
Form SWU -101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 1 of 6

iii. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the nroiect):
Applicant/ Organization: Duke Enerp-v ProLzress, Inc
Signing Official & Title:John A. Krakuszeski, Plant Manager
b.Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:Hi2hwav 87, North
City:Southn ort State:N C Zip :28461
Mailing Address (ifapplicable):P.O. Box 10429
City:Southn ort State:N C Zip :28461
Phone: [phone] Fax: (910 ) 457 -3369
Email:iohn.kraku szeskiCa�luke- enerizv.com
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/ Organization: N /A
Signing Official & Title:N/ A
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:N/ A
City:N/ A
Mailing Address (if applicable):N/ A
City:N/ A
Phone: (N/ A )
Email:N/ A
State:N/ A Zip:N/ A
State:N/ A Zip:N/ A
Fax: (N/ A )
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/ Organization: Marty McGowan. BNP Environmental Coordinator
Signing Official & Title:John A. Krakuszeski. Plant Manager
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:P.O. Box 10429
City:Southn ort
Phone: (910 ) 457 -2538
Em ail:m artv.m e2ow an (a- Luke -en er ev.com
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: N/ A
Point of Contact:N/ A
State:N C Zip :28461
Fax: (9 10 ) 457 -2273
Phone #: (N/ A )
Form SWU -101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 2 of 6

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Onsite stormwater will flow across the nronosed parkins to the rear, where it will be converted/ maintained
as sheet flow before entering existins wetlands located adjacent to the nronosed lot.
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date: N/ A
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date: N/ A
❑ Other: Date: N/ A
b.If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW — 1995 ❑ Ph 11 — Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Cane Fear River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 34.76 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 0 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) — Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) — Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project Area':
34.76 acres
+ Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following: the normal pool of impounded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (NHW) line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHW) line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overallpercent built upon area (BUA). Non - coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHW) line maybe
included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 14.99 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have? 1 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use ]for the wholeproperty area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
Receiving Stream Name
Stream Class *
Stream Index Number
Total Drainage Area (sf)
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
Off -site Drainage Area (sf)
Drainage Area 1
Gum Log Branch
SC, Sw, HQW
18- 88 -1 -3 -1
220,865
220,865
0
Drainage Area 2
Gum Log Branch
SC, Sw, HQW
18- 88 -1 -3 -1
1,293,168
1,293,168
0
Proposed Impervious Area ** (sf)
206,942
19,936
% Impervious Area ** (total)
93.70
1.54
Impervious ** Surface Area
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area 2
On -site Buildings/ Lots (sf)
0
0
On -site Streets (sf)
0
2,176
On -site Parking (sf)
206,942
0
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
0
0
Other on -site (sf)
0
0
Future (sf)
0
5,500
Off -site (sf)
0
0
Existing BUA*** (sf)
0
12,260
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
Drainage Area 3
Gum Log Branch
SC, Sw, HQW
18- 88 -1 -3 -1
1,514,033
1,514,033
0
226,878
14.99
Drainage Area 3
0
2,176
206,942
0
0
5,500
0
12,260
Total (sf): 206,942 19,936 226,878
* Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: http.//portal.ncdenr.orQ /web /walps/csu /classifications
** Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
** *Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BUA that is
to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. N/ A
Form SWU -101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 3 of 6

Proiects in Union Countv: Contact DEMLR Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that maybe subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per 15A NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O &M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O &M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from httn:/ / nortal.ncdenr.ore/ web/ wa/ ws/ su/ bmn- manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources ( DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application
instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from
httn:/ / nortal.ncdennora/ web/ wa/ ws/ su/ statesw/ forms does. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DEMLR Office. (The appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map at httn:/ / nortal.ncdenr.or2/ web/ wa/ ws/ su/ mans.)
Please indicate that the following reauired information have been Provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from httn:/ / nortal.ncdenr.ore/ web/ wa/ ws/ su/ statesw/ forms does.
Initials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants
Form. (f required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed. sie_ned and dated) and O &M
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable toNCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
http:/ / www.envhelp.org_/ pates/ onestopexpress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/ management for
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within '/z mile of the site boundary, include the 'h
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/ Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/ project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off - site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
Form SWU -101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 4 of 6

9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5 "x11" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DEMLR to verify the SHWT prior
tosubmittal, (910) 796- 7378)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: 3411 Page No: 0478 _
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/ or 3a per 15A NCAC 211.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
http:/ / www.secretarv.state.nc.us/ Corporations/ CSearch.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from httrr / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /lr /state - stormwater-
forms docs. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DEMLR, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/ or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/ or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Brandon Finch, PE
Consulting Firm: McAdams
Mailing Address:2905 Meridian Parkwav
City:Durham
State :N C Zip :27713
Phone: (919 ) 361 -5000 Fax: (919 ) 361 -2269
Em ail:fin ch (a4n cad am sco.com
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or type name ofperson listed in Contact Information, item 2a) N/A certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name ofperson
listed in Contact Information, item la) N/A with (print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item la) N/A to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
Form SWU -101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 5 of 6

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/ or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater permit reverts back
to me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR immediately and
submit a completed Name/ Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater
treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143 -215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement
action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143 - 215.6.
Signature: Date:
I, , a Notary Public for the State of , County of
, do hereby certify that
personally appeared
before me this _ day of , and acknowledge the due execution of the application for a
stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission expires
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name ofperson listed in Contact Information, item la) John A. Krakuszeski
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormwater rules under 15A NCAC 2H .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signature: Date:
I, , a Notary Public for the State of , County of
, do hereby certify that personally appeared
before me this day of , and acknowledge the due execution of the application for a
stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission expires
Form SWU -101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 6 of 6

08-14-'15 11:13 FROM-
T-271 P0001/0005 F-336
,%ate of North Carolina
Department of Envirouinent and Natural Resourees
Wilngngton ]Regional Office
Pat AfeC,-ojy, GoverAor FAX COVER SIMET Donald A van der VaaF4 SccreUrY
Date, No. Pages ( M-1- cover),
TO: Froul, Jocas'mer
Co: Phone: (910.) 796-7336
Fax: Fax: [phone]
Re:
127 DIdM.Drive. B-xtmsjo� 'Wilmington, NC 28405.0,[phone] o An Equal Opporftiolty Affinuativc Action F=IPI0Y0r

08-14-'15 11 :13 FROM- T -271 P0002 /0005 F -335
At *A.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
August 13, 2015
John A. Krakuszeski, Plant Manager
Brunswick Nuclear Plant
Duke Energy Progress, Inc,
PO Box 10429
Southport, NC 23461
Subject: State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8 150805
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Parking Lot (DKB- 15010)
Low Density Project
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Krakuszeski:
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete Stormwater Management Permit Application for
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Parking Lot (Dke- 15010)on August 11, 2015. Staff review of the plans
and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater
Regulations set forth in Session Law 2008 -211 and Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding
Permit No. SW8 150805, dated August 13, 2015, for the construction of the built -upon area associated
with the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other agency permit that
may be required. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit regarding the
Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions, certification of the project,
procedures for changing ownership, and transferring the permit. Failure to establish an adequate
system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system, to record deed
restrictions, to certify the project or to transfer the permit in a timely manner, will result in future
compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, Per
NCGS 143- 215(e) the petition must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of this permit_
You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee Is required) and /or
the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714, or via telephone
at 919 -431 -3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com.. Unless such demands are made this
permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Linda
Lewis at (9 10) 796 -7215.
Sine rely,
a� Tracy Dav' , P.E., D 3L�
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
GDS /arl: O :1WQ1Shared\StorrnwaterlPermits & Projects120151150805 LD12015 08 permit 150805
cc; Brandon Finch, P.E., John R. McAdams Company, Inc_
Brunswick County Inspections
Brunswick County Engineering
. Wilmington Regional.Office Stormwater File
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land .Quality Section, -Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North' Carolina 2$405
(910) 796 -7295 /Fax: [phone] • Internet; htto: / /oortal.nodenr;orq /web /Ir/

08-14-'15 11:13 FROM- T -271 P0003/0005 F -335
State. stormwater Management z3ystems
Permit No. SW8 150805
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
LOW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina
as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Duke Energy progress, Inc.
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Parking Lot (DKE- 95090)
8250 River Road SE, Southport, Brunswick County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of a 24% low density project in compliance with the
provisions of Session Law 2008 -211 and Title I 6 NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter collectively and
separately referred to as the "stormwater rules') and the approved stormwater management plans
and specifications, and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the
Division and considered a part of this permit.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specific conditions and limitations:
1, DESIGN STANDARDS
I- The overall tract built -upon area percentage for the project must be maintained at 24% per
the requirements of the stormwater rules: This permit covers the construction of a total of
226,878 square feet of proposed built -upon area (BUA) for a supplemental parking lot.
2. The only runoff conveyance systems allowed will be vegetated conveyances such as swales
with minimum side slopes of 3:1 (H:V) as defined in the stormwater rules and approved by
the Division. The lower edge of the parking lot is designed to act as a level spreader to
facilitate sheet flow from the parking lot into the adjacent wetlands.
3. No piping shall be allowed except those minimum amounts necessary to direct runoff
beneath an impervious surface such as a road or under driveways to provide access.
4. The project shall provide and maintain a minimum 50 -foot wide vegetative buffer adjacent all
surface waters, measured horizontally from and perpendicular to the normal pool of
impounded structures, the top of bank of each side of streams and rivers and the mean high
water line of tidal waters. All runoff directed into and through the vegetative buffer must flow
through the buffer in a diffuse manner.
5. Stormwater runoff that is directed to flow through any wetlands shall flow into and through
these wetlands at a non - erosive velocity.
Ill. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. No person shall alter the approved stormwater management system or fill in, alter, or pipe
any drainage feature (such as swales) shown on the approved plans as part of the
stormwater management system, except for minimum driveway crossings, unless and until
the permittee submits a modification to the permit and receives approval from the Division.
Page 2 of 4

08-14-'15 11 :13 FROM- T -271 P0004/0005 F -335
z5tate stormwater management -systems
Permit No. SW8 150805
2. The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area for the entire
project does not exceed the maximum allowed by this permit.
3. Swales, vegetated areas and other vegetated conveyances shall be constructed in their
entirety, vegetated, and operational for their intended use prior to the construction of any
built -upon surface, per the approved plans.
4. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of the swales
or other vegetated conveyances will be repaired immediately.
5. The permittee shall at all times provide and perform the operation and maintenance
necessary as listed in the signed Operation and Maintenance Agreement, such that the
permitted stormwater management system functions at its optimum efficiency.
6. Built upon area includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick,
stone, slate, coquina, driveways, and parking areas, but does not include raised, open wood
decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
7. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for revised
plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any modification to the
approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed below:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area.
C. Further subdivision, acquisition or sale of the project area in whole or in part, The
project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee, for which Sedimentation
and Erosion Control Plan approval or a CAMA Major permit was sought.
d. Filling in, piping, or altering any vegetative conveyance shown on the approved plan,
except the minimum driveway crossings.
e. The development of any future area or additional phase(s) noted on the approved
plans.
8. All stormwater conveyances will be located in either a dedicated right -of -way (public or
private), recorded common areas or recorded drainage easements, The final plats for the
project will be recorded showing all such required rights -of -way, common areas and
easements, in accordance with the approved plans.
9. The permittee must certify in writing that the project's stormwater controls, and impervious
surfaces have been constructed within substantial intent of the approved plans and
specifications. Any deviation from the approved plans must be noted on the Certification.
The permittee shall submit the Certification to the Division within 30 days of completion of
the project.
10. The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his representative
within the time frame specified in the written Information request.
11. , The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more of
the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the
permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for modifying the site to meet
minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide copies of revised plans and certification
in writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
Ill. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions of a stormwater
management permit or the requirements of the stormwater rules is subject to enforcement
procedures as set forth in N.C.G.S. 143, Article 21.
2. The Permittee grants permission to DENR Staff to enter the property during normal business
hours for the purposes of inspecting the stormwater control system and its components.
Page 3 of.4 .

08-14-'15 11:13 FROM- T -271 P0005/0005 F -335
State 5tormwater Management Systems
Permit No: SW8 150805
3. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except, after notice to and approval by
the Director. A request to transfer the permit will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved. The ermittee shall complete, sign and submit a Name /Ownership Change
Form (available online The Name /Ownership Change Form must be accompanied by the
supporting documentation as listed on the form and must be submitted to the appropriate
Regional Office of the Division at least 60 days prior to any one or more of the following
events:
a. The sale or conveyance of the project area in whole or in part;
b. The dissolution of the corporate entity, LLC, or General Partnership;
c. Bankruptcy and /or foreclosure proceedings;
d. A name change of the permittee;
e. 'A name change of the project;
f. A mailing address change of the permittee.
4. The Permittee is responsible for compliance with all the terms and conditions of this permit
until such time as the Division approves the permit transfer in writing. Neither the sale of the
project area, in whole or in part, nor the conveyance of common area to a third party
constitutes an approved transfer of the stormwater permit.
5. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.!
6. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The filing of a
request for a permit modification, revocation and re - issuance, or termination does not stay
any permit condition.
7. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the
permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit for cause as allowed by
the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, Subchapter 2H.1000; and North Carolina General Statute 143 -215.1 et. al.
8. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with and
obtaining any and all other permits or approvals that are required in order for this
development to take place, as required by any statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances,
which may be imposed by any other Local, State or Federal government agency having
jurisdiction. Any activities undertaken at this site that cause a water quality violation or-
undertaken prior to receipt of the necessary permits or approvals to do so are considered
violations of NCGS 143- 215.1, and subject to enforcement procedures pursuant to NCGS
143- 215.6,
9. Approved plans, application, supplements, operation & maintenance agreements and
specifications for projects covered by this permit are incorporated by reference and are
enforceable parts of the permit. A copy of this permit, application, supplements, the
operation and maintenance agreements, and the approved plans and specifications shall be
maintained on file by the Permittee at all times.
10. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the swales must follow the
guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and
Design Manual.
Permit issued this the 130 day of August 2015.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
d�Tracy D s, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 4 of 4

rA
This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary
of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act in the areas
impacted by the present proposed activity, as determined by the
undersigned on this date . Other areas of jurisdiction may be present
on the site but have not been delineated . Unless there is a change in
the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404
jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from this date . This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual .
(Name)
(Title)—
(Date)-
(AID #)
(UNNAMED)
GRAVEL DRIVE
TOTAL WETLAND AREA : 1.49 ACRES — (BASED ON ASSUMED
PROJECT BOUNDARY)
,��� ■uuuq�•
i SEAL 9�
0n:< L -5019
•. �C'•. SUR .••J �.
I, ERIC M. MANTURUK, a North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor,
do hereby certify that this map was prepared under my supervision
and shows the locations of Section 404 Jurisdictional Areas as
delineated by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., Durham, NC.
ERIC M. MANTURUK, PLS L -5019
DATE
AREA "A" N�T EVALUATED)
(LIMITS OF WETLAND - _ -
GENERAL NOTES
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC.
PIN# 2097 -12 -96 -1776
DB 3411, PG 478
PB 63, PG 27
(ABANDONED)
SINGLE STORY
GUARD SHACK
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
1.
2.
3.
4414, '40
Q flz�!
ri
2
\
THIS IS A WETLANDS DELINEATION EXHIBIT.
THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C. GRID
— N.A.D. 1983.
WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY THE
McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
FOR WETLAND FLAG DATA TABLE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4.
REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27
OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776
THE WETLAND EXTENT AND /OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND
AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WAS NOT
DETERMINED. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN
THE PROJECT AREA IS SHOWN HEREON.
JKURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS WERE CONFIRMED BY MR.
KYLE DAHL OF USACE ON AUGUST 7, 2015.
FOUNDATION
r
•�
WU�A
a
Z RO
as
O 00
E; is 1
1 X O
W O all ttj
O
C) — O
LLJ N
(S8 QVN) alma 'DW w Y
w
SHEET 1 OF 4 JJIMeADAMS IF
BRUNSWICK
NUCLEAR
CAPE FEAR RI%
PLANT
S� a
SITE
LOCATION
o
EAST
COGENTRIX
LEONARD ST
DRIVE
VIC %W MAP
NOT TO SCALE
AREA "A" N�T EVALUATED)
(LIMITS OF WETLAND - _ -
GENERAL NOTES
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC.
PIN# 2097 -12 -96 -1776
DB 3411, PG 478
PB 63, PG 27
(ABANDONED)
SINGLE STORY
GUARD SHACK
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
1.
2.
3.
4414, '40
Q flz�!
ri
2
\
THIS IS A WETLANDS DELINEATION EXHIBIT.
THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C. GRID
— N.A.D. 1983.
WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY THE
McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
FOR WETLAND FLAG DATA TABLE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4.
REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27
OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776
THE WETLAND EXTENT AND /OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND
AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WAS NOT
DETERMINED. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN
THE PROJECT AREA IS SHOWN HEREON.
JKURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS WERE CONFIRMED BY MR.
KYLE DAHL OF USACE ON AUGUST 7, 2015.
FOUNDATION
r
•�
WU�A
a
Z RO
as
O 00
E; is 1
1 X O
W O all ttj
O
C) — O
LLJ N
(S8 QVN) alma 'DW w Y
w
SHEET 1 OF 4 JJIMeADAMS IF

r.
This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary
of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act in the areas
impacted by the present proposed activity, as determined by the
undersigned on this date . Other areas of jurisdiction may be present
on the site but have not been delineated . Unless there is a change in
the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404
jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from this date . This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual .
(Name)
(Title)—
(Date)-
(AID #)
V O.0- aJ /
G
11
11
l
i
i
E i SEAL �<
�n:< L -5019 .Y
•. �C'•. SUR .••J •.
I, ERIC M. MANTURUK, a North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor,
do hereby certify that this map was prepared under my supervision
and shows the locations of Section 404 Jurisdictional Areas as
delineated by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., Durham, NC.
ERIC M. MANTURUK, PLS L -5019
DATE
C"- DR3 DI VFA f'[1Y0 a-
1. THIS IS A WETLANDS DELINEATION EXHIBIT.
2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
3. COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C. GRID
— N.A.D. 1983.
4. WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY THE
McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
5. FOR WETLAND FLAG DATA TABLE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4.
6. REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27
LEGEND OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776
7. THE WETLAND EXTENT AND /OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND
• WETLAND FLAG AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WAS NOT
wv
WATER VALVE DETERMINED. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN
THE PROJECT AREA IS SHOWN HEREON.
GUY GUY WIRE 8. JKURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS WERE CONFIRMED BY MR.
0 WELL KYLE DAHL OF USACE ON AUGUST 7, 2015.
0 BOLLARD
Cob POWER POLE B-2
B -1
OU OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE B -3
B -4
B -5
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC.
C-5 c -4 WETLAND AREA "C" PIN# 2097 -12 -96 -1776
998 SQ. FT. DB 3411, PG 478
0.02 AC. PB 63, PG 27
3
— UE1
3�'ELECTRIC TURBINE
I INSIDE CHAIN
LINK FENCE
3
3
�T T T T -, T
COGENTRi DR, �pRNATE)
ASPHALT DRIVE T— T-- T— �T— _— T— T-�T�T—
T T T
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
y B-7
.v
WETLAND AREA "B "__/ B -8
—g
1,941 SQ. FT. a B
0.04 AC. y a
a
y
B -10 'v B -11
a y
B -12
\ / 3e\ ri
2
7"
�m
r
•�
ZROWU�A
a
as
T T T T T T T T T O _ 00
O 00
La O to
O
to O
W N
(SS QPN) QIXD '0N w Y
� � w
SHEET 2 OF 4 / ®MCADAMS IF

I
This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act in the areas impacted by
the present proposed activity, as determined by the undersigned on this date .
Other areas of jurisdiction may be present on the site but have not been
delineated . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from this date . This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual .
(Name)
lose %��, I, ERIC M. MANTURUK, a North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor,
Ro •i•, do hereby certify that this map was prepared under my supervision
,�����.•FESS/ 00 /�•••� and shows the locations of Section 404 Jurisdictional Areas as
;9 . delineated by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., Durham, NC.
E SEAL 9�
L-5019
3 y Off; Y : ERIC M. MANTURUK PLS L -5019
•. �C'•. SUR .••J �.
P
DATE
\ / \
3e
-------------------------------------
- - - - -- .,,#
GENERAL NOTES
..,,\:..••st
( Title)----- --------------------------------
- - - - --
1.
THIS IS A WETLANDS DELINEATION EXHIBIT.
( Date) ____
2.
THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
3.
COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C. GRID
(AID # )------------------------
- - - - --
— N.A.D. 1983.
4.
WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY THE
McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
5.
FOR WETLAND FLAG DATA TABLE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4.
6.
REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27
OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776
7.
THE WETLAND EXTENT AND /OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND
#
AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WAS NOT
#
DETERMINED. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN
THE PROJECT AREA IS SHOWN HEREON.
#
8.
JKURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS WERE CONFIRMED BY MR.
#
KYLE DAHL OF USACE ON AUGUST 7, 2015.
#
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC.
PIN# 2097 -12 -96 -1776
DB 3411, PG 478
�� �! y ° y y y y y
PB 63, PG 27
AREA
I
"=
LIMITS OF WETLAND
EVALUATED)
�.
y v y
'U
NOT
y
y y y
a y y y
#
PROJECT BOUNDARY
-
y y
y y
y y y
y yy " y y A -38
y "
y y
y
y
y y y A -35 A -36
W
a a y y y y y
y y y
y y
y y y v A -37
�!'
y
y y y y v y y y y
y y v Y
v
y
v y y y A -34
flDITCH TT/
�y
y y y
y y y y y
y y, y y y y
.v
y y
y
y y y
y y
A -1
y yy
y y
y y y y yy y
y y y y y
y y y y y v v y y y y y y
yy
y y yy yy
v
y
y
y y y
y y yy
y y y
y
v
y
y
y
A -7
y y y y
y y v v y
y y y y y y y y y y y y
y
y y
y y „
y y
y
A -26
y y
y y y A -33
y
J y
y
y
y
y y y y .v y
y y y y y y y
y y
.v y A -25
y ,v y
A -27 y y
A -28 y y
.v .v
mA -6
'v
y y y
y .v y y y y �' y y y
y �' 'v
y y
y .v .v
v
y
A -9a
„ y y .v
y ,v .v y " y y y y y y y y
y " A -24
A -29 y V v
y
y
A -8 A -9b y y y y y y
y v y y y v v
°' y y y
A -23
y A -31 y
y
J
5
y
A -10 y y y y y y y y y y y y y '"
y y y
A -32
A -1 v y
y y y
A -11 y y y y y y y y ° y y y y y y y
y y y
A -30
3-A
y
y y y y y y y y y y
y A -22
y
,v
A -12 v -v " y 'v y y y y° y y y y y
y y
y A -21
A -4
y y y y y y y y .v
y y y
I� A -2
A -3
y y y y y y
y y y
II
y y
y y y y y y �' y y y y y y y
y
A -20
A -13 v y y y y y " y y y y y y
I�
y y y y y y y A -19
A -14 y i y y
'I
y A -18
A -15
A -16 A -17
LEGEND
• WETLAND FLAG
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 215 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND AREA "A"
62,400 SQ. FT.
1.43 AC.
(S8 QPN) amo 'ON
r
Le ' -
ZROWU�A
a
as
O 00
O 00
O t1
O
o
to o
W N
w � w
SHEET 3 OF 4 / ®MCADAMS IF

I
This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act in the areas impacted by
the present proposed activity, as determined by the undersigned on this date .
Other areas of jurisdiction may be present on the site but have not been
delineated . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from this date . This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual .
(Name)
(Title)-
(Date)-
(AID #)
°.��N • C A•Ro��''•.
i SEAL 9� i
0n:< L -5019 .Y
•. �C'•. SUR .••J •.
I, ERIC M. MANTURUK, a North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor,
do hereby certify that this map was prepared under my supervision
and shows the locations of Section 404 Jurisdictional Areas as
delineated by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., Durham, NC.
ERIC M. MANTURUK, PLS L -5019
DATE
C"- MA DI VFA 1f'[1Y0 a
1. THIS IS A WETLANDS DELINEATION EXHIBIT.
2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
3. COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C. GRID
- N.A.D. 1983.
4. WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY THE
McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
5. FOR WETLAND FLAG DATA TABLE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4.
6. REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27
OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776
7. THE WETLAND EXTENT AND /OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND
AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WAS NOT
DETERMINED. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN
THE PROJECT AREA IS SHOWN HEREON.
8. JKURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS WERE CONFIRMED BY MR.
KYLE DAHL OF USACE ON AUGUST 7, 2015.
r
•
r
•
•
I/
1
0
E;
to
j 0
w o
Y to
W
Y
R
ri
2
OR
U�
P�
a
as
00
0 ob
to
O
N
SHEET 4 OF 4 / JJIMeADAMS IF
WETLAND FLAGS
WETLAND FLAGS
Northing
Easting
Descrietion
Northing
Easting
Description
74653.9
2300471.3
DITCH 77 Al
74319.7
2300192.6
B1
74633.2
2300443.4
Al
74310.2
2300195.8
62
74622.8
2300409.7
A2
74311.4
2300182.7
134
74601.6
2300409.3
A3
74305.1
2300186.0
133
74590.1
2300413.4
A4
74284.8
2300163.6
65
74598.3
2300447.9
A5
74294.4
2300158.3
136
74595.0
2300484.7
A6
74260.3
2300141.5
137
74566.6
2300489.3
A7
74269.7
2300133.6
138
74557.4
2300460.2
A8
74233.6
2300119.3
139
74522.4
2300479.3
Aga
74244.4
2300103.1
B10
74511.7
2300494.1
A9b
74211.4
2300090.6
1311 TT B12
74511.7
2300469.2
A10
74221.5
2300076.7
B12
74524.9
2300443.1
All
74768.7
2300166.5
Cl
74521.2
2300422.5
Al2
74767.9
2300149.7
C2
74505.6
2300391.3
A13
74778.6
2300128.5
C3
74477.7
2300380.3
A14
74805.9
2300119.5
C4
74442.1
2300370.1
A15
74825.4
2300118.3
C5
74412.4
2300368.7
A16
74836.0
2300126.1
C6
74372.1
2300365.3
A17
74822.4
2300130.3
C7
74337.2
2300375.4
A18
74804.5
2300138.6
C8
74302.3
2300387.9
A19
74787.3
2300137.0
C9
74279.2
2300398.4
A20
74779.8
2300150.6
C10
74267.8
2300420.5
A21
74249.2
2300437.5
A22
74244.4
2300458.0
A23
74227.7
2300471.4
A24
74188.5
2300493.0
A26
74211.4
2300485.2
A25
74150.7
2300486.2
A27
74132.6
2300483.8
A28
74132.0
2300466.1
A29
74129.6
2300447.7
A30
74102.9
2300463.8
A31
74074.0
2300454.4
A32
74063.2
2300488.0
A33
74048.5
2300517.1
A34
74030.2
2300526.6
A35
73965.9
2300531.5
A36
73982.2
2300554.0
A37
73955.5
2300538.5
A38
DATE
C"- MA DI VFA 1f'[1Y0 a
1. THIS IS A WETLANDS DELINEATION EXHIBIT.
2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
3. COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C. GRID
- N.A.D. 1983.
4. WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY THE
McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
5. FOR WETLAND FLAG DATA TABLE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4.
6. REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27
OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776
7. THE WETLAND EXTENT AND /OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND
AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WAS NOT
DETERMINED. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN
THE PROJECT AREA IS SHOWN HEREON.
8. JKURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS WERE CONFIRMED BY MR.
KYLE DAHL OF USACE ON AUGUST 7, 2015.
r
•
r
•
•
I/
1
0
E;
to
j 0
w o
Y to
W
Y
R
ri
2
OR
U�
P�
a
as
00
0 ob
to
O
N
SHEET 4 OF 4 / JJIMeADAMS IF

Permit No.
(to be provided by DEMLR)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
LOW DENSITY SUPPLEMENT
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
A low density project is one that meets the appropriate criteria for built upon area and transports stormwater
runoff primarily through vegetated conveyances. Low density projects should not have a discrete stormwater
collection system as defined by 15A NCAC 2H .1002(18). Low density requirements and density factors can be
found in Session Law 2008 -211, 15A NCAC 2H.1000, Session Law 2006 -246 and the State of North Carolina
Stormwater Best Management Practice Manual. Curb and gutter systems are allowed provided they meet the
requirements in 15A NCAC 2H .1008(g).
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name : Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Supplemental Parkine
Contact Person: John A. Krakuszeski Phone Number: ( 910 )457 -3691
Number of Lots:N /A Allowable Built Upon Area (BUA) Per Lot *:N /A
Number of Dwelling Units Per Acre * *:N /A
Low Density Development (check one): ® without curb & gutter ❑ with curb & gutter, outlets to (check one):
❑ Swales ❑ Vegetated Area
*If lot sizes are not uniform, attach a table indicating the number of lots, lot sizes and allowable built upon area for each lot.
The attachment must include the project name, phase, page numbers and provide area subtotals and totals. BUA shall be
shown in units of square feet.
* *(Phase II Post - Construction [non -SA] only)
II. BUILT UPON AREA
Refer to DEMLR's forms and applications website for specific language that must be recorded in the deed
restrictions for all subdivided projects. (htti):Ht)oilal.ncdenr.orp/web /Ir /state- stormwater- forins docs)
Complete the following calculation in the space provided below where:
• SA Site Area - the total project area above Mean High Water.
• DF Density Factor - the appropriate percent built upon area divided by 100.
• RA Road Area - the total impervious surface occupied by roadways.
• OA Other Area - the total area of impervious surfaces such as clubhouses, tennis courts, sidewalks, etc.
• No. of Lots - the total number of lots in the subdivision.
• BUA per Lot - the computed allowable built upon area for each lot including driveways and impervious
surfaces located between the front lot line and the edge of pavement.
• Total allowable lot BUA - the computed allowable built upon area for all lots combined.
• Total BUA from lot listing - the sum of built upon area allocated for each lot on the list of non - uniform lots.
Form SW401 -Low Density-Rev.3-2/10/09 Page I of 4

For uniform lot sizes:
(SA: N/A ftZ x DF: N/A) — (RA: N/A ftz) — (OA: N/A ftz) = BUA per Lot = N/A ftZ
(No of Lots: N/A)
For non - uniform lot sizes:
a. (SA: N/A ft' x DF: N/A) — (RA: N/A ftZ) — (OA: N/A ftz) = Total allowable lot BUA = N/A ftZ
b. Total BUA from lot listing: N /Asf. b must be <_ a
III. DESIGN INFORMATION
Complete the following table. If additional space is needed the information should be provided in the same
format as Table I and attached to this form. Rainfall intensity data can be found in Appendix 8.03 of the State
of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual or at
http : //hdsc.nws.noaa.gov /hdsc /pfds/
Table 1.
Swal° design information based on the
0 -year sto -m.
Swale No.
Drainage Impervious Grassed C
Q Slope
N/A
Area (ac) Area (ac) Area (ac)
(cfs) ( %)
1
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
IV. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Form SW401 -Low Density- Rev.3- 2/10/09 Page 2 of 4
Vallow
Vactual
Flow
(fps)
(fps)
Depth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A

The following checklist outlines design requirements per the North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 2H.1000, NCDENR BMP Manual (2007), Session Law 2006 -246, and Session Law 2008 -211.
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An
incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information. This will delay final
review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to indicate that the following requirements
have been met and supporting documentation is provided as necessary. If the applicant has designated an agent
on the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form, the agent may initial below. If anv item is not met,
then iustification must be attached. Only complete items n through p for projects with curb outlets.
Page /Plan
Initials Sheet No.
_ N/A a. tFor projects in the 20 coastal counties: Per NCAC 21-1.1005, a 50 foot wide vegetative buffer is
provided adjacent to surface waters. For Redevelopment projects, a 30' wide vegetative
buffer adjacent surface waters is provided.
} N/A b. tFor HQW or ORW projects outside the 20 coastal counties: A 30 foot wide vegetative buffer is
provided adjacent to surface waters.
�i N/A c. tFor Phase 11 Post - Construction projects: All built upon area is located at least 30 feet landward of
all perennial and intermittent surface waters.
N/A d. Deed restriction language as required on form SWU -101 shall be recorded as a restrictive
covenant. A copy of the recorded document shall be provided to DWQ within 30 days of
platting and prior to the sale of any lots.
Permit e. Built upon area calculations are provided for the overall project and all lots.
J#_ N/A f. Project conforms to low density requirements within the ORW AEC. (if applicable per
cows##* 15A NCAC 21- 1.1007)
N/A g. Side slopes of swales are no steeper than 3:I; or no steeper than 5:1 for curb outlet swales.
N/A h. Longitudinal slope of swales is no greater than 5%; for non -curb outlet projects, calculations for
shear stress and velocity are provided if slope is greater than 5 %.
*y i. At a minimum, are designed to carry the 10 year storm velocity at anon- erosive rate.
(x_ j. �vrtit<s discharg n to wet ands are designed to flow into and through the wetlands at a non -
�rossMivee velocity (for this flow requirement into wetlands, non - erosive is velocity 5 2 ft/s).
N/A k. Swale detail and permanent vegetation is specified on the plans.
_ EC -4 1. Swale detail provided on plans; includes grass type(s) for permanent vegetative cover.
N/A m. Swales are located in recorded drainage easements.
N/A n.tt Length of swale or vegetated area is at least 100 feet for each curb outlet.
N/A o.tt The system takes into account the tun -off at ultimate built -out potential from all surfaces
draining to the system (delineate drainage area for each swale).
Ullk— N/A p.tt Curb outlets direct flow to a swale or vegetated area.
t Projects in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, Catawba River basins, and Randleman Lake may require additional buffers.
tt Only complete these items for projects with curb outlets.
Form SW401 -Low Density- Rev.3- 2/10/09 Page 3 of 4

V. SWALE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
Mowing will be accomplished as needed according to the season. Grass height will not exceed six inches at
any time; and grass will not be mowed too close to the ground or "scalped ".
2. Swales will be inspected monthly or after every runoff producing rainfall event for sediment build -up,
erosion, and trash accumulation.
3. Accumulated sediment and trash will be removed as necessary. Swales will be reseeded or sodded
following sediment removal.
4. Eroded areas of the swales will be repaired and reseeded. Swales will be revegetated as needed and in a
timely manner based on the monthly inspections. Side slopes must be maintained at the permitted slope.
5. Catch basins, curb cuts, velocity reduction devices, and piping will be inspected monthly or after every
significant runoff producing rainfall event. Trash and debris will be cleared away from grates, curb cuts,
velocity reduction devices and piping.
6. Swales will not be altered, piped, or filled in without approval from NCDENR Division of Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the six
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DEMLR of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print Name and Title:John A. Krakuszeski. Plant Manaeer
Address:Hiehwav 87, North
Phone:[phone] Date: S- t l- t e
Signature: 9.✓4 Q.
Note: The legally responsible parry should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a
resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
1, ZM W , 1 E A\ VV\01_n n , a Notary Public for the State of _/ (per }1j OaAoUna , County of
rrr,.,... s .)C 1, \c , do hereby certify that Z-n .n .. PC. K \(`O k It S za s kt personally appeared before me this
day of Av a „, -V it ,a o, 5 , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing swale maintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official seal,
�6L 1 ROW�
Notary signature
SEAL My commission expires k1h Zjsf 1- d 'a.D 1ql
Form SW401 -Low Density- Rev.3- 2/10/09 Page 4 of 4

i
►1
USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, "SOUTHPORT ", NORTH CAROLINA; 2013 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
LAT: 33.949810 N, LONG: - 78.009897 W
N BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT
PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 PROJECT #: DKE -15010
1 inch = 2,000 feet Feet SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA
�
r
WADAMS0,,

s
A
EBrB
Ht
B t
PROJECT AREA
1V W
4 i o A
tj A
Fo
B aB- - ,F cy
GoA�
Oil
D87 Fo To LY
)y R a To
M. • ■
f3 a B
4r
� y
B a B
BrEl
t�
_ - 0
To '
,a
Lo m
�Aa --
BnB
KrB c
0
KrB -�
�'-- Lo
d P a A D O p aB
111i
c
USGS- SOIL SURVEY SHEET 18 BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LAT: 33.949810 N, LONG: - 78.00897 W
N BRUNKSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT
PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION "
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 500 1,000 2,000 PROJECT #: DKE -15010 MCADAMS
Feet
> �nen =l,000 feet SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA J

I
I
Cpl
-o I
c-------- - - - -- ---------
----------------- -- - -� - --
�rvv
y x�
ry
i
,
LEGEND
�� r / (£8 OBN) 9I90 ON
l� ®®EM
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
IMPACTS 1941 SQ. FT.
(0,04 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
40
0 20 40
I inch = 40 ft.
X:APro iectz \DKE \DKE- 15010 \Storm \Wetlands
\Permlttlnq \PCN USACE \DKE15010— EC_N_G.dwq, 8/20/2015 2:0507 PM, Buchholz, George
PROJECT N0. DKE -15010
L
BRUNSWICK
=JOHN R Ma9DAMS
'�
\
FILENAME: DKE15010ECNG.DWG
NUCLEAR PLANT
COMPANY. INC.
Meridian Parkway
a SCALE: ,., - 40,
S hCem 713
v, DATE:
INSET 1
License No.: C -0293
MCADAMS (800) 7335646• MeAdamsCoxinn
08 -13 -15
SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA

.'111�
a�
rn
`o
0
0
0
U
m
Q
0
0
N
N
0
O
N
04
N
LO
3
U
0
0
W
Y
W
U
Q
N
D
VICINITY MAP
NTS
LEGEND
r
O
�.
TEMPORARY BENCH
MARK
r-4
BORE HOLE
O
•
WETLAND FLAG
Cq
F-�
N
WATER VALVE
GUY
GUY WIRE
0
WELL
O
7
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
O
BOLLARD
O
0
ELECTRIC BOX
O
X�
LIGHT POLE
CaD
POWER POLE
-6-
SIGN
FO
FIBER OPTIC LINE
UNIt
UNKNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES
W
WATER LINE
W
UE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
T
TELEPHONE LINE
QU
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
UE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
SD
STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
—X
X—
FENCE LINE
M�1
W
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
FILENAME:
DKE
- 15010
-C1
CHECKED BY:
OJ
J
/ O
OJ
UE
J
0
T T
GAP
�Y
0/
GATE POLES
I
3
E UE. -- UE
ELECTRIC TURBINE
7 CHAIN LINK
FENCE
1
GENERAL NOTES SITE DATA:
1: THIS IS A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL(S) OF LAND. THIS IS A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, 1. PROJECT AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 13.57 ACRES.
2. BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON NO GRID (NAD 83). 2, ON -SITE WETLAND CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. KYLE DAHL ON
3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES. 08/07/15, FINAL USACE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DETERMINATION HAS NOT BEEN
4. ZONING: CO -1G RECEIVED AS OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
5. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY. 3, TOTAL WETLAND AREA CONCURRED DURING ON -SITE FIELD MEETING WITH USACE IS 1.49
6. FLOOD NOTE; THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. IT IS ACRES.
LOCATED IN ZONE "X" AS DEFINED BY F.E.M.A F.I.R.M COMMUNITY PANEL #3720300700 J 4, PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN; HUC 03030005070010
DATED JUNE 02, 2006. 5, NAME OF NEAREST BODY OF WATER IS GUM LOG BRANCH, WHICH HAS A NCDWR WATER
7. REFERENCES: DB 3411, PG 478; PB 63, PG 27 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION OF SC, Sw, & HOW.
OF THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTRY, 6. THERE ARE NO KNOWN HISTORIC STRUCTURES OR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA
PIN: 2097 -12 -96 -1776 (SHPO LETTER 05- 22 -15).
8. UTILITY STATEMENT 7. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT LIKELY TO AFFECT ANY FEDERALLY ENDANGERED SPECIES
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY OF THEIR HABITAT ACCORDING TO USFW (USFWS LETTER 06- 04 -15).
INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN
SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE
DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM
INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
9. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED AND MAP PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT.
THIS SURVEY SUBJECT TO ANY FACTS AND EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A
��� FULL AND ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH.
�Q POND 10. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000' OF SITE.
11. ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON NAVD 88 DATUM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
1 I (TBM): "IRON PIPE W /CAP # 500 ELEVATION: 27.60' NAVD 88.
12. TREES SHOWN HEREON ARE FIELD LOCATED BY McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015
V BASED ON "HERITAGE TREE SURVEY AREA" PERFORMED BY KEITH KINLAW AND AMERICAN
�I
FOREST MANAGEMENT. �
13. WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON DELINEATED BY McADAMS COMPANY ON MAY 21, 2015.
14. THE WETLAND EXTENT AND/OR BOUNDARY OF WETLAND AREA "A" OUTSIDE THE PROJECT
V,
I / � AREA WAS NOT DETERMINED.. THE LIMITS OF WETLAND AREA "A" WITHIN THE PROJECT � � ,�
AREA IS SHOWN HEREON. V, V,
I /
-AREA NOT EVALUATED - w w w
I V_ � w V, u w
w v` � V_ V, V, � v w V_ w V
I II
u�
I
C I
I
o (�
D V
I� p
998 SQ. FT.
0.02 AC.
(SEE NOTE #13)
7.
J 27.4'
I
x-27
J/
w v V, u w
� V
u7 � � V- `� V` � � w v'
v V_ � �
V, � ` ` WETLAND AREA "A"
w w w ± 62,400 (1.43 AC) V, �
V, V_
N
C
JG �?
ICTIONAL
C�
� V
\1� \, 1� I V,
C,
WETLAND AREA "A" BOUNDARY
WETLAND AREA "B"
1,941 SO. FT,
0,04 AC.
(SEE NOTE #13)
N
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS INC.
PIN# 2097 -12 -96 -1776
DB 3411, PG 478
PB 63, PG 27
-T T T T T T n
r r T ' a
-- T T T T T yr- - - J� % A�_%_% A% A %_ T T
COGENTRIX DR. T T T T
(PRIVATE) T T r T T T T T r
ASPHALT DRIVE
UNK UNK UNK UNK- UNK UNK UNK- UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK
iwK - UNK UNK UNK- UNK- UNK K UNK
UNK UNK - UNK UNK UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK UNK UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK UNK
K - UNK - UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK U D. -_
UNK UNK - UNK - UNK UNK UNK - r
UNK L
iiniu ��V�fIIL� INK UNK- .UNK- UNK
NK - -
N
V W
V
V,
- T T Tr�� 7 ;UNK T T T - T T T T _ _ -
UNK - UNK UNK -
- UNK U UNK- UNK UNK- UNK UNK- UNK UNK UNK -
UNK - UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK.- UNK - UNK - UNK - UNK- UNK - UNK UNK - - -
Is CONTROL BOX
- SINGLE STORY
GUARD STATION
(ABANDONED)
±50 SQ. FT.
(£8 QBN) QIdo DN
WNW
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
I I I I I
1 inch = 40 ft.
M E \
� O
U
• O
U C
z moro
av o
M 0 °
Viz oz
�Q � W�
N t`
A o
00 ^
V J
A
0
W
■
v-�
o-�
r
O
r-4
DID
O
�
Cq
F-�
a
C)
r-a
�
O
;4
-t�
O
DATE: 08 -10 -15
SHEET N0.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING — NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION / iJ MCADAMS
r
O
F-�
a
C)
W
�
max
O
E
z
W
a
W
ED
r ;
O
0
V)
a
ND
Vs
M�1
W
PROJECT No. DKE -15010
FILENAME:
DKE
- 15010
-C1
CHECKED BY:
EM M
DRAWN BY:
E M M
SCALE:
1"=40
DATE: 08 -10 -15
SHEET N0.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING — NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION / iJ MCADAMS

0
co
N
O
L
m
Q
M
O
d'
N
0
0
N
N
\
0
0
Ln
Li
Y
0
Li
U
Q
(n
D
X
Iw
n_ .�
MI
�p
e
0
SITE DATA:
1. PROJECT AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 13.57 ACRES.
2. ON —SITE WETLAND CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. KYLE DAHL ON
08/07/15. FINAL USAGE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DETERMINATION HAS NOT BEEN
RECEIVED AS OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
3. TOTAL WETLAND AREA CONCURRED DURING ON —SITE FIELD MEETING WITH USACE IS 1.49
ACRES.
4. PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN; HUC 03030005070010
5. NAME OF NEAREST BODY OF WATER IS GUM LOG BRANCH, WHICH HAS A NCDWR WATER
QUALITY CLASSIFICATION OF SC, Sw, & HOW.
6. THERE ARE NO KNOWN HISTORIC STRUCTURES OR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA
(SHPO LETTER 05- 22 -15).
7. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT LIKELY TO AFFECT ANY FEDERALLY ENDANGERED SPECIES
OF THEIR HABITAT ACCORDING TO USFW (USFWS LETTER 06- 04 -15).
(ABA.DmEU)
X 50. BT.
(E8 am) U19D DN
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch:- 1 00 ft.
co 01
� � U
• O
U cd 0)
�O
00 z yLo
""D U >n U
W a m
N
l� Z O
A O
00
0
w
a
a
Q
U
■
E
c�
N
a�
O�
�
�
z
wow
a
wow
W
O
�
o Q
U
a
a
Q
U
■
DATE: 08 -10 -15
SHEET NO.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION ImMcADAMS
N
O�
�
�
z
a
W
O
�
max
U
O
�
z
N
W
a
o
�
�
Vj
M�1
PROJECT No.
D K E -15010
FILENAME:
DKE-
15010
-C1
CHECKED BY:
EMM
DRAWN BY:
EMM
SCALE:
1
" =100'
DATE: 08 -10 -15
SHEET NO.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION ImMcADAMS

0
CD
N
O
L
U
7
m
Q
m
0
0
N
04
N
OD
\
3
of
z
I
w
I
0
0
U)
w
Y
i
w
U
a
0
Jii "II'iu,�ufr�IJlil;lili;�;ll;lll �i+l
_JII�IIIIII�IIIiII •_Illlll�illlllll 111 Ill
JI �I!IIIII "I��I-11�I; II ;;1;'illl1 / If
I / If l'Ijj 11111 (1 (r�1i /i'JI r^� \\ - l
u l +li�lir3 /lh4/ /II I I I I
111 " +ll �l al1 /I , I I I I I I I
'REN
q¢ll�'If11j111
I +Pliiii1j10 1 i l' i l i li it � % 1 ,
I' �'Inp''p ri i i j I III'
+II+ II + '�/ \' \I \ \i ) / l if ,/ , I .\ . . / •_
IIII Ilf r+i ll+li'f���i iIi I i i I f 1 / , .� I 1
- - - - --
r \
I , '/ 1 —
, -
_ -_ - -' WETLAND AREA „A"
I '4Uip1 iI'lif I l ' ' ± 70453 SQ. FT. (1.62 AC)
TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
1111111 It 1 I / 1 nd III I
I I I I ' \` I t'T9
//�II1111111'
r
+ll' +41
/ I +IIII �ll,ll
�IIIIII IIII +II 111 I W I `\ ,> /- Q,�.ti•S�— �^��,��` '� �.SFhA
'III+IIII Ij 11 II I I ( Ol SF/TP -- SF/TP— SF/TP %( __ SF SF/iP -- SF/iP `---� SF �J'1 QI 41 Ql DSF/TP -'t- aFc --1 "' `/_C -�,),J✓. -r"`�� 0, / \1 \I ,j1 \ \ ,/ /1
II I I ' 1 AAII(( Ql SF P SF/TP -- 'qc¢ *���f� / SF�p 4, 0'1 --i-' \ rip' `\ ,IoI SF
1 11111+ 1 11111 II 1 1 I SF%TP� SF/TP ` /'IP SF/Tp \ SF SF/Tp � SF/TP SF/TF''l' I Imo\_ --�. U, SF/TP �� l ` /�'�
uI 11 I I 11 II \ / Y SF/TP� iTp -- \ �--- SFAP
--- -- -- -- J -- --- --------------------- -� ' - -- - --
7rl I 111 I 1 / 11 , � - ------- -------------- � r- ... � --
I'' III'rl' It'II II 11 iI // // c� `�\ '1.�- ... _ __.
Ilia ill Ilii I r- I ii 1` ( n 11 \\ \SLITl FEN Cf< 0 TL TO
{It l / 1 €_IN$TA D LO \ 1
'1111111'171 +11 I I `,� / , 1 IIJ \ I -------- \ /
I I I + I / \ - -- Pb NTH' \'Et l \ \ /
+�'I'ni I �\ 111 / ' ^� \ —y ' \ \ 1 / 1 i
1 I I Il
IIII I \ I1 —' •\ ,'� _ ~� � �4- I I ( \ \� ��,: � \� � ♦- i � ` - � /
o
Ld--- - - - - --
� l ` \ 11 Ill I \ - -- --- -- - -- -- -- - - -- -- - -/- -- -- -\ - -- -- -- - -- ---,
aI'�r'III�+illii
�IIllllr�i,
:I
_
/ I , 1 \ \ 1 N \ S
\ \r,T+ /� , 1 I I 1 9 , \ .:: �: 9��
riJl'�I !MI \\ /� / 1 / 1` \\\ \\ \� \\ \ \ \ \ EA \ -- - I %'�/ �o
It I
r / /
`\
/;% //
/�`�
EXISTING
\ s : - =� J �%' =� JJ l I I /I ,� � \\ � \` / i ' - - - -- "B�. IM} ACQ °•\ .l -�\ \ \ /'�� rte' '��/ / /
GRAVEL PATH
SQ.' FT. (0 04 AC)
p
�� i %i''/ ' / _// I � I I / �- �'� \ i I / _''___ �__ __�_ _ _- __.�.� _- ___ -_-� \ \, `�• 1 �'� \ \ \ / / /�/ i / / \�/9u /r/ / iii
,' 1 ' / / ' / //i I I /• � ' / / /ice r /rii/ , riii 1
/ ♦i I !jam/! —dL ds — ds \ ,, /. / / \ /, //
SE-
--PARKING
�
LOT
/
�i rte � 3i -__-
/
M J OF \ j j0 t
s \ i 6 /plSTll BANCE
%%% /!!`\ , / ^ \ \ \ r,�. I f� / \ ♦� � I iii /i �r /i / %ii
W_qLAND AREA C � I - / - - - - � - - -t- -� �-- Z - -\- -- � - -" _ 1-------- t----- -- - I
/ ---------- - - - - -- ------------------
/ I + 98� SQ. FT. 0.02 AC I
CID
®' 7 TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED !/
III \ I I ♦ 1 1 `\ � \ ♦\ /' /i l
` p
/ 1
I=
1 \ -
/ -- - -tom - - -- - -- ----------------- - - - - -- - - - - --
' •\ • -- - - - - -- _ - - -\ �( __- -- �C------------------ - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- -- - _ -w- -- -- -=-- r-�^�;"50 _ � - ` _-
- - - - --
--- - -- - -- — - -- - _ '(
-
I
1
I.
L
._ y' \
1
--- ------- _ _ - - -__ -- _ -_ -__ _ _
>Y
------ \ '__.__-_.__. ----------- __. M,�_._xr:_ -: — a=ee__wei_�'��`"/— _ -__ _- - - � W r v.a ,�[. -. -.. s, � —.s— •- c�-- •�` -�-� �— - �J."�`Oi "_v__r`- -�a1r- -vas r« r '
-.� �
—.. —�
(PRIVATE -"RJW) _ ----------------------
---- - - - - --
SITE NOTES
1. THERE ARE EXISTING, JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS ON -SITE. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,
THESE AREAS SHALL BE STAKED AND PROTECTED WITH TREE PROTECTION / SILT FENCE.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THERE BE ANY DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE APPROVED
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR THE
WETLAND AREAS TO ENSURE SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS ON -SITE
DOES NOT DISCHARGE INTO THESE AREAS.
2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, AND NOTES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER'S ATTENTION
IMMEDIATELY.
3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ALL DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE
FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER AND
DESIGN ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH
CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION
SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR ANY WORK DONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR
GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN
GI VEN.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE SITE SPECIFIC
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMPLETED BY S &ME, DATED JUNE 23, 2015, AND TITLED
" GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT - BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT SUPPLEMENTAL
PARKING LOT."
5. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT DE- WATERING MAY BE NECESSARY IN THE EXCAVATION AREAS
(E.G. SUBGRADE AREAS). THEREFORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL,
OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN ANY PUMPING EQUIPMENT, ETC. NEEDED FOR REMOVAL OF
WATER FROM VARIOUS PARTS OF THE PROJECT SITE. DURING PLACEMENT OF FILL WITHIN
THESE AREAS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE WATER LEVEL BELOW THE BOTTOM OF
THE EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION AREAS. THE MANNER IN WHICH THE WATER IS
REMOVED SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE EXCAVATION BOTTOM AND SIDE SLOPES ARE STABLE,
WITH NO SEDIMENT DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE (I.E. PUMPED WATER MAY NEED TO BE
DIRECTED TO AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL DEVICE PRIOR TO DISCHARGE).
6. A PARKING LOT LIGHTING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BY OTHERS UNDER A SEPARATE
COVER.
7. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST DUKE ENERGY SPECIFICATIONS AND
NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
LEGEND
TOTAL JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND 65,339 SQ. FT. - --
(1.49 AC)
TOTAL JURISDICTIONAL ,r
WETLAND IMPACTS
1941 SQ. FT. (0.04 AC)
GRADING LEGEND
---------`--------- STORM DRAINAGE
LD LD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
250 5' CONTOUR
252 1' CONTOUR
------ _250 EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
________252_______ EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
SITE DATA
1. PROJECT AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 13.57 ACRES.
2. ON -SITE WETLAND CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. KYLE DAHL ON
08/07/15. FINAL USACE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DETERMINATION HAS NOT BEEN
RECEIVED AS OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
3. TOTAL WETLAND AREA CONCURRED DURING ON -SITE FIELD MEETING WITH USACE IS 1.49
ACRES.
4. PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN; HUC 03030005070010
5. NAME OF NEAREST BODY OF WATER IS GUM LOG BRANCH, WHICH HAS A NCDWR WATER
QUALITY CLASSIFICATION OF SC, Sw, & HQW.
6. THERE ARE NO KNOWN HISTORIC STRUCTURES OR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA
(SHPO LETTER 05- 22 -15).
7. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT LIKELY TO AFFECT ANY FEDERALLY ENDANGERED SPECIES
OF THEIR HABITAT ACCORDING TO USFW (USFWS LETTER 06- 04 -15).
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED = 578
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
II I I�
, (88 QVN) dIN9 II � ��
1 inch = 50 ft.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
� 1
0
� � U
• O
U Cd
0 N
�0
Opz CIO
Lo '7 U U ,
Co
N.C." l�
EC's' A O
00
A
O
Y--I
w
a
,,,,Slit 111188 "',
0 •
USE
2747
'VOr.11Ri1���
wz�
W
W
w � �
W o
W V'
z �
O Q
•
•
�zo
w
zap
GQ
O
�r
a�
PROJECT NO- DKE -15010
FILENAME: DKE15010 —EC1
CHECKED BY: BRF
DRAWN BY: C G H
SCALE: 1 " = 50'
DATE: 08 -10 -15
SHEET NO.
�J MCADAMS
J
■

�.�. STATE
m. iryy (A91
V
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
May 22, 2015
George Buchholz
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Construct Parking Lot, Brunswick Nuclear Plant, Southport, DKE- 15010, Brunswick County,
ER 15 -1016
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
Thank you for your letter of May 4, 2015, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental .reviewna,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� aL�L-��.
�fvRamona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
June 4, 2015
Kelly Roth
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Re: Brunswick Nuclear Plant Parking Lot- Brunswick County, NC
Dear Ms. Roth:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally- protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally - listed. endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally - protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
' The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
If z A; k
Pitef Benjamin
Field Supervisor
3

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson