Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout260016_Routine_20231027Facility No. Farm Name Owner Sack -up 00C Time In I L i q9,7 Circle: General or FREEBOARD: Design 11 JU JU `- Observed = J� Crop Yield Rain Gauge Soil Test Weekly Freeboard Spray/Freeboard Drop _ Weather Codes ; Waste Analysis: Date Wettable Acres _ Daily Rainfall 120 min Inspections Nitrogen (N) Time Out Dare Integrate Site Re^ No.tob5z(09 °C�t' wit Rye No. AvA, CAB, Wj Tit.. NPDES Sludge Survey. Calibration/GPM Waste Transfers Rain Breaker PLAT 1-in Inspections Date Nitrogen (N) v v1Y lJIV II VI oul O Other Agency Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: (�I nmp, Arrival Time: Departure Time: � County: 1, VI IARegion: "I Tel.' Farm Name: P-10 ft` R 1��— Owner Email: r Owner Name: e I t f o "� � 1 "/ j Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: J Q rn -c S l a m b Title: Onsite Representative: _ 0 rn-e Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to I Wean to I Feederto Farrow to Farrow to Farrow to Other FT Latitude: Phone: /� p Integrator: Pro�a9P Certification Number: OI (OI1 j Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layei Non - Non -La er Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes (h No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes k No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued ..mare a,ouecpon & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: P— B Spillway?: NO No Designed Freeboard (in): (q Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? r� (Le., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ❑Yes I \ I No ❑ NA ❑ NE 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No NA NE waste management or closure plan? ❑ ❑ If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes -N No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) ❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ) maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, 2 ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 tbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): Cp ('UH 1Z L 13. Soil Type(s): 1�081111!oKAVAW 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑AUP ❑Checklists n Desi" M KAr -. MY ---- . ___ ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ &A ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA D NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Trans rs ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ElCrop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 S/12/2020 Continued 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE "� Other Issu Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? RA TlL_ C [:]Yes [�LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �4No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE - - --- ..._ .........1.. 1-- u .,,.,....-UN "." Uy ujc same agency! U Yes LjNo 0 NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). bv-abee4� bU l Piahf-eq Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: Date: 5112/2020 1.