NC0088579_Permit Issuance_20080613

off& WAT�,4?Q
th
•7
�O Y
June 13, 2008
Mr. David Ramsey
Shulls Mills Properties, Inc.
61 Glens Boulevard
Banner Elk, North Carolina 28604
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
NCO088579
Stone Bridge WWTP
Watauga County
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15,
2007 (or as subsequently amended).
This final permit contains the following changes from the draft you were sent on April 23, 2008:
o The Division has set a new TRC compliance level of 50 pg/L due to several analytical difficulties.
This is not a change in the permit limit, analytical method, or reporting requirement. You must
still report whatever value is reported by the certified laboratory, however any value below 50
pg/L will be considered compliant by the Division.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such
demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the
legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or
permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Toya Fields at telephone
number [phone], extension 551.
Coleen H. Sullins
cc: cc: Central Files
Asheville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]. hCaro ina
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 On the Internet at http:Krm//h2o.enr.state.ncus/gtj{rgl/(J
An Equal Opportunity/Aative Action Employer

Permit NCO088579 •
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Water Quality
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Shulls Mill Properties, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Stone Bridge Subdivision WWTP
950 Shulls Mill Road
Shulls Mills
Watauga County
to receiving waters designated as Lance Creek in the Watauga River Basin in accordance with
the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II,
III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective July 1, 2008.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on September 30, 2012.
Signed this day June 13, 2008.
Coleen H. StAlins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Ar
Stone Bridge WWTP - NCO088579
USGS Quad Name: Boone
Receiving Stream: Lance Creek Lat.: 36009'58"
Stream Class: C;Tr I Long.: 81°44'6"
Subbasin: Watauga — 04 02 01

Permit NC0088579
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the
exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements,
terms, and provisions included herein.
The Stone Bridge Subdivision WWTP is hereby authorized to:
1. Operate a domestic wastewater treatment facility located on Shulls Mill Road, Shulls
.Mills, Watauga County.
2. Upon receipt of an Authorization to Construct from the Construction Grants and
Loans Section, construct wastewater treatment facilities not to exceed 0.05 MGD.
3. After submitting an Engineer's Certification, discharge wastewater from said
treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Lance Creek,
which is classified C; Tr waters in the Watauga River Basin.

Permit NCO088579
AW. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning upon receipt of an Engineers Certification for a 0.05 MGD facility and
lasting until permit expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated domestic wastewater
from outfall serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFL
CHARACTERISTICS,
_
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
�
Monthly
-
Avera a
Daily
_.. _
Maximum ,
JMeasurement
Fre uen : `
°Sample
_ T . e'
Sample ..
.
' Locations ..
Flow
0.05 MGD
Continuous
Recording
E
BOD, 5 day, 200C
30 mg/L
45 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
E
Total Suspended Solids
30 mg/L
45 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
E
NH3 as N (summer)
2.0 mg/L
10.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
E
NH3 as N (winter)
4.0 mg/L
20.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Weekly
Grab
E
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 s.u.
Weekly
Grab
E
Temperature
Weekly
Grab
E
Temperature
Weekly
Grab
U,D
Dissolved Oxygen
Weekly
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen
Weekly
Grab
U,D
Total Residual Chlorine2
28.0 pg/L
2/Week
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen
Semi-annually
Grab
E
Total Phosphorus T
Semi-annually T
Grab
E
Notes:
1. Sample Locations: E= Effluent, U= 50 feet upstream of the outfall, D=100 feet downstream of the
outfall.
2. TRC limit and monitoring requirements shall apply only if chlorine is used for disinfection. The
facility shall report all effluent TRC values reported by a NC certified laboratory (including field
certified laboratories). However effluent values below 50 Vg/L will be treated as zero for
compliance purposes.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.

LEVEL B Model
FACT SHEET FOR PERMIT LIMIT DEVELOPMENT
Stone Bridge Subdivision WWTP
NPDES No. NCO088579
Facility Information
Applicant Name:
Shulls Mill Properties, Inc.
Permitted Flow
0.05 MGD
Type of Waste:
100% Domestic
County:
Watauga
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Lance Creek
Regional Office:
Asheville
Stream Classification:
Stream Index Number:
C;Tr
8-8-(2)
Quad
C12NW
303(d) Listed?:
Not listed
Level B modeler:
To a Fields
Subbasin:
04-02-01
Date:
4/9/08
Drainage Area (mi2):
1.35
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0.27
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.35
Average Stream Flow (cfs):
2.7
IWC %) at Proposed Flow:
22
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION:
Shulls Mills Properties, LLC has applied for new NPDES permit NCO088579 for the discharge of 50,000
gpd of treated domestic wastewater. The development project is proposed to consist of 138 3-bedroom
single-family homes on 44.77 acres of land.
The facility will discharge to Lance Creek, a C-Tr waterbody in the Watauga River Basin. Lance Creek is
not a 303(d) listed waterbody. The 2007 Watauga Basin Plan states that several restoration projects are
underway throughout the watershed. One project is the Camp Yonahlossee Restoration project, which
includes restoring 700 feet of stream channel, enhancing 0.5 acre of a mountain bog and planting a
riparian corridor along the streambanks. Project partners include the Division of Water Resources, the
NC Cooperative Extension Service Center, Watauga County, Watauga County SWCD, and the
Yonaholosee Property Owners Association (POA) with the POA funding nearly one-third of the project
total of $253,000. The Watauga County SWCD will oversee the project and provide technical support. The
project will be a demonstration project for the surrounding mountain communities. It is estimated that
over 400 tons of soil will be saved, reducing sediment loads in Lance Creek [AU# 8-8-(1) and 8-8-(2)], a
tributary to the Watauga River.
Approximately 1.3 miles downstream of the proposed discharge, Lance Creek combines with the
Watauga River, which is classified B;Tr;HWQ. In order to ensure compliance with rules for dischargers to
HQW waters (15A NCAC 2B .0224 (v)), the volume of all wastewater discharges draining into the HQW
segment of the Watauga River was summed and compared to the 7Q10 flow at the most downstream
discharger to assure the total flows did not exceed 50% of the total instream flow. Flows from 14
dischargers were summed for the 8.3 mile stretch from the headwaters of the Watauga River to its
confluence with Laurel Fork. The total wastewater volume (including the Stone Bridge W WTP)
constitutes approximately 40% of the Watauga streamflow under 7Q10 conditions. The following table
summarizes this analysis.
Stonebridge W WTP - NCO088579
Level B Model
Page 1

Summation of Discharges into the Watauga River and its Tributaries
Permit
Facility
Flow
(MGD)
Receivin Stream
s7Q10 0
discharge (cfs)
NCO049174
Smoketree Lode
0.01
River
0
NCO062961
T necastle WWTP
_Watauga
0.04
Watauga River
0.1
NCO035149
Seven Devils Resort
0.12
UT Watauga River
0.12
NCO042358
Adams Apple Condominiums
0.02
River
0.4
NCO058891
Valley Creek WWTP
_Watauga
0.9
Valley Creek
NCO033448
County House Village
0.005
Valley Creek
NCO070408
Art Plaza WWTP
0.035
River
1.3
NCO050610
The Ponds WWTP
_Watauga
0.076
Watauga River
2.1
NCO030473
Mill Ridge Development WWTP
0.052
Watauga River
2.2
NCO065617
Hidden Valley Incorporated
0.02
Watauga River
2.9
NCO032191
Hebron Colony and Grace Home WWTP
0.009285
Watauga River
6.75
NCO032213
Yonahlossee
0.15
Lance Creek
NCO088579
Stonebridge
0.05
Lance Creek
NCO032123
Hound Ears WWTP
0.14
Watauga River
6.4
TOTAL FLOW (MGD)
1.63
TOTAL FLOW (cfs)
2.52
% Flow of Watauga River at
Hound Ears WWTP
39.41%
Note: The Hound Ears WWTP is the most downstream discharger in this analysis.
Due to the high number of dischargers in close proximity to this proposed WWTP, Division staff made an
attempt to link existing models and estimate whether additional discharges might have a collective
impact on the receiving stream. A model developed in 1992 for the Hidden Valley WWTP (NC0065617)
expanded upon the model for the Mill Ridge WWTP (NC0030473), which had in turn expanded upon
models for upstream dischargers. Therefore the endpoints of the Hidden Valley model were used at the
upstream boundary of the Watauga River. On Lance Creek, the model results for the Yonahlosse WWTP
were not available, so this discharge was remodeled for the Lance Creek characterization.
At no time during the model simulation does the instream dissolved oxygen drop below the 6 mg/L trout
standard. The minimum predicted DO is 6.62 mg/L at the Yonahlossee WWTP on Lance Creek. The
proposed Stonebridge discharge lowered instream dissolved oxygen by an estimate 0.29 mg/L (to 7.92
mg/L D.O.)
Over the course of the simulation there were several instances where the instream ammonia was higher
than the 1 mg/L recommended level for protection against instream toxicity, however those excursions
were due to existing dischargers. The proposed Stonebridge discharge raised instream ammonia levels
by an estimated 0.65 mg/L, and the effect quickly dropped to background levels.
Based on the results of the model, recommended effluent limits for 0.05 MGD are as follows:
Effluent Characteristic
Effluent Limitations
Monthly Average
Daily Maximum
BODs
30 m /L
45 m /L
NH3 as N (summer)
2 m /L
10 m /L
NH3 as N (winter)
4 m /L
20 m /L
Total Suspended Solids
30 m /L
45 m /L
Total Residual Chlorine
28 u /L
Fecal Colif orm
200 / 100 mL
400 / 100 mL
Stonebridge WWTP — NCO088579
Level B Model
Page 2

The facility should also receive semi-annual TN and TP monitoring in accordance with the 2B .0500
regulations for domestic wastewater.
STATE CONTACT:
Western NPDES Program - Level B Modeling Contact: Toya Fields, (919) 733 -- 5083, ext 551
Stonebridge WWTP - NC0088579
Level B Model
Page 3

c
NCO088579
Facility:Stonebridge Subdivision
Discharge to: C;Tr
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
0.27
7Q10 (CFS)
0.27
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.05
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.05
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0775
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0775
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
22.30
IWC (%)
22.30
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
76.23
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
3.72
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
0.35
Fecal Limit
200/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.05
Ratio of 3.5 :1
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0775
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
18.13
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
8.94
For Minor domestic -type facilities:
T
Minimum of 2 mg/l (summer) NH3-N; 4 mg/I (winter) NH3-N
Chlorine:
Residual chlorine must be capped at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity effects

Acct. Name:
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
NORTH CAROLINA-WATAUGA COUNTY
l3 NH713- Z:�115 DES—.�___.._..._._._._._______�_.�. __ _ ._.__.. -_ _
.. _.___..... __ _-- _..-----.__. _ __.__.______8e�f�l.t�sn . er�.�n�.a�faTQ a .Pu�Q �aai ounce ::�-....:. _.
and State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by the
Acct. # 112162 law to administer oaths, personally appeared:
C�COST OF PUBLICATION
Total $113.81 Who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he (she) is
REPRESENTATIVE
of a newspaper known as THE WATAUGA DEMOCRAT, publishe
issued and entered as second class mail in City of Boone,
in said County and State; that he (she) is authorized to make
this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice of other legal
advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was
published in THE WATAUGA DEMOCRAT the following dates:
SHULLS MILL NPDES PERMIT
04/28/2008
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper,
document or legal advertisement was published was, at the time
of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of
the requirements and qualifications of Section-1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified
newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina.
This 28th day of April, 2008
VIC
R�3worrrxo and sub ribed before me, this
�•� 28fkj day of Apr' 20C
90 7
c�!o 0\���•` Notary Public
My Commission Expires:. ��°

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
NORTH CAROLINA-WATAUGA COUNTY
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County
and State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by the
law to administer oaths, personally appeared:
Who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he (she) is
REPRESENTATIVE
of a newspaper known as THE WATAUGA DEMOCRAT, publishe
issued and entered as second class mail in City of Boone,
in said County and State; that he (she) is authorized to make
this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice of other legal
advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was
published in THE WATAUGA DEMOCRAT the following dates
SHULLS MILL NPDES PERMIT
04/28/2008
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper,
document or legal advertisement was published was, at the time
of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of
the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified
newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina.
Acct. Name:
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES
Acct. # 112162
COST OF PUBLICATION
Total $113.81
PUBLIC NOTICE Copies of the draft permit and
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA other supporting information on
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT file used to determine conditions
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT Present in the draft permit. are
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER available upon request and pay
-
RALEIGH, INC 27699-1617 menl of the costs of reproduc-
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO Lion. Mail comments and/or
ISSUE A requests for information to the
NPDES WASTEWATER NC Division of Water Quality at
PERMIT the above address or call Dina
Sprinkle [phone], exten-
On the basis of thorough staff sion 363 at the Point Source
review and application of NC Branch. Please include the
General Statute 1 anon and NPDES permit number (below) in
15A NCAC 02H.0109 and other any communication. Interested
Persons may also visit the
lawful standards and regulations,
the North Carolina Environmen- Nis of Water Quality at 51
tal Management Commission N. SalDivisiisbury Street, Raleigh, NC
proposes to issue a National of 8:00 a. between the hours
Pollutant Discharge Elimination re iew i a.m. and n fit . To
System (NPDES) wastewater review information on file.
discharge permit to the person(s` Shulls Mill Properties, LLC., (61
listed below effective 45 days Glens Boulevard, Banner Elk,
from the publish date of this NC 28604) has applied for new
notice. NPDES permit NCO088579 for
Written comments regarding the the Stone Bridge WWTP in
g g " -iqe County. This proposed
proposed permit will be accepted
until 30 days after the publish
date of this notice. All comments
received prior to that date are
considered in the final determi-
nations regarding the proposed
permit. The Director of the NC
Division of Water Quality may
decide to hold a public meeting
for the proposed permit should
the Division receive a significant
degree of public interest.
This 28th day of April, 2008
O. H
Vr �0T`�R13wonito and su
:n
28flltj py of Apt
7%''
eNot�1/1111!!►��
My Commission
bed before me, this
Notary Public
Expires:

SUMMER
---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : STONEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION
Receiving Stream : LANCE CREEK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O. is 8.45 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 4.93 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 6.07 mg/l.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
------
Milepoint
---------
Reach #
-------
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment
1
6.62
0.00
1
Reach
1
45.00
9.00
6.00
0.15000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
45.00
9.00
('-76
0.05000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Segment
2
8.10
0.20
2
Reach
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
7.50
9.00
6.00
0.00900
Segment
3
8.23
0.10
2
Reach
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
2
45.00
108.00
0.00
0.14000
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

*** MODEL
SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
:
STONEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION
Subbasin
040201
Receiving Stream
:
LANCE CREEK
Stream
Class: C;TR
Summer 7Q10
:
0.27
Winter
7Q10
0.35
Design Temperature:
23.0
LENGTHI
SLOPEI
VELOCITY
DEPTH
Kd
Kd
Ka
Ka
KN
------------
mile
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I ft/mij
fps
I
ft
design I
@200
I design I
@200 I
design '
Segment
1
0.51
235.00
0.253
0.32
0.77
0.67
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Segment
1
0.43
372.00
0.289
0.33
0.83
0.73
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Segment
1
0.37
216.00
0.277
0.39
0.72
0.63
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Segment
1
0.95
84.00
0.216
0.49
0.53
0.47
34.86
32.65
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
Segment
2
0.22
44.60
0.301
0.86
0.45
0.40
25.80
24.17
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Segment
2
0.10
44.60
'0.414
1.07
0.48
0.42
35.45
33.21
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Segment
2
1.10
44.60
0.414
1.07
0.48
0.42
35.50
33.26
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Segment
3
0.10
48.00
0.445
1.10
0.50
0.44
41.01
38.42
0.63
Reach
-------------
1
:
3
0.27
48.00
0.454
1.10
0.51
0.44
41.84
39.20
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Segment
3
0.10
400.00
0.839
0..81
0.94
0.82
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Segment
3
0.28
142.00
0.621
0.94
0.68
0.60
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
Segment
3
0.37
87.00
0.539
1.01
0.60
0.52
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach
5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t
Flow
CBOD
NBOD
D.O.
cf s
Mg/1
mg/l
Mg/1
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
0.232
45.000
9.000
6.000
Headwaters
0.130
2.000
1.000
7.720
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.148
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.148
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste
0.077
45.000
9.000
6.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.230
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.230
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 2
Reach 1
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Headwaters 3.375
5.200
8.300
8.940
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 2
Reach 2
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
3.750
1
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 2
Reach 3
Waste
0.014
7.500
9.000
6.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 3 Reach 1
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Headwaters
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 3
Reach 2
Waste
1 0.217
1 45.000
1108.000 1
0.000

Tributary 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
• * Runoff 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
Segment 3 Reach 3
Waste 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Tributary 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
Segment 3 Reach 4
Waste 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Tributary 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
* Runoff 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
r
Segment 3 Reach 5
Waste 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Tributary 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
* Runoff 0.000 2.000 1.000 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cf s/mile

SUMMER
Seg #
Reach #
Seg Mi
D.O.
CBOD
NBOD
Flow
1
1
0.00
6.62
29.58
6.13
0.36
1
1
0.05
7.33
28.76
5.98
0.37
1
1
0.10
7.70
27.98
5.84i
0.38
1
1
0.15
7.90
27.22
5.701
0.38
1
1
0.20
8.01
26.50
5.57
0.39
1
1
0.25
8.07
25.81
5.45'
0.40
1
1
0.30
8.11
25.14
5.331
0.41
1
1
0.35
8.13
24.50
5.21
0.41
1
1
0.40
8.15
23.88
5.10'
0.42
1
1
0.45
8.16
23.29
4.99'
0.43
1
1
0.50
8.17
22.72
4.88
0.44
1
2
0.47
8.17
22.72
4.88
0.44
1
2
0.52
8.17
22.17
4.79
0.44
1
2
0.57
8.17
21.65
4.69
0.45
1
2
0.62
8.18
21.15
4.60
0.46
1
2
0.67
8.18
20.66
4.51
0.47
1
2
0.72
8.19
20.19
4.43
0.47
1
2
0.77
8.20
19.74
4.35
0.48
1
2
0.82
8.21
19.30
4.27
0.49
1
2
0.87
8.21
18.87
4.19_T_
0.50_
1
- 3
_
0.85
7. Klo
22.40 -
4.84
0.57
1
3
0.90
&80. 96/
21.83
4.73
0.58
1
3
0.95
��39,37
21.27
4.63
0.60
1
3
1.00
20.74
4.53
0.61
1
3
1.05
__EL78Y-°j
g--2-i-P3
20.23
4.43
0.62
1
3
1.10
AM
19.74
4.34
0.63
1
3
1.15
-PI
)
19.27
4.25
0.64
1
3
1.20
8.20q
18.82
4.16
0.65
1
4
1.20
8.2,9y
18.82
4.16
0.65
1
4
1.25
8.23
18.39
4.07
0.67
1
4
1.30
8.2Xa
17.97
3.98
0.68
1
4
1.35
8.2,3a
17.57
3.90
0.69
1
4
1.40
8.23
17.19
3.82
0.70
1
4
1.45
8.23
16.81
3.74
0.71
1
4
1.50
8.24
16.45
3.66
0.72
1
4
1.55
8.201f
16.10
3.59
0.73
1
4
1.60
8.25
15.77
3.52
0.75
1
4
1.65
8.26
15.44
3.45
0.76
1
4
1.70
8.26
15.12
3.38
0.77
1
4
1.75
8.27
14.82
3.32
0.78
1
4
1.80
8.28
14.52
3.25
0.79
1
4
1.85
8.28
14.24
3.19
0.80
1
4
1.90
8.29
13.96
3.13
0.81
1
4
1.95
8.29
13.69
3.08
0.83
1
4
2.00
8.30
13.42
3.02
0.84
1
4
2.05
8.30
13.17
2.97
0.85
1
4
2.10
8.31
12.92
2.91
0.86
1
4
2.15
8.31
12.68
2.86
0.87
2
1
0.00
8.94
5.20
18.30
3.38
2
1
0.05
8.79
5.18
18.25
3.38
2
1
0.10
8.67
5.15
�8.19
3.38
2
1
0.15
8.59
5.13
8.14
3.38
2
1
0.20
8.52
5.11
8.09
3.38
2
2
0.20
8.10
3.47
4.36
7.13
2
2
0.25
8.18
3.46
4.34
7.13
2
2
0.30
8.24
3.45
4.32
7.13
8��kdvd��

J �7
2
3
0.30
8.24
3 .45
4.33
7.14
2
3
0.35
8.29
3.44
4.31
7.14`
2
3
0.40
8.33
3.43
4.29
7.14
2
3
0.45
8.36
3.42
4.27
7.14
2
3
0.50
8.38
3.41
4.25
7.14
2
3
0.55
8.40
3.39
4.23
7.14
2
3
0.60
8.41
3.38
4.21
7.14
2
3
0.65
8.42
3.37
4.19
7.14
2
3
0.70
8.43
3.36
4.17
7.14
2
3
0.75
8.44
3.35
4.15
7.14
2
3
0.80
8.44
3.33
4.13
7.14
2
3
0.85
8.45
3.32
4.11
7.14
2
3
0.90
8.45
3.31
4.09
7.14
2
3
0.95
8.45
3.30
4.07
7.14
2
3
1.00
8.46
3.29
4.05
7.14
2
3
1.05
8.46
3.28
4.04
7.14
2
3
1.10
8.46
3.26
4.02
7.14
2
3
1.15
8.46
3.25
4.00
7.14
2
3
1.20
8.46
3.24
3.98
7.14
2
3
1.25
8.46
3.23
3.96
7.14
2
3
1.30
8.46
3.22
3.94
7.14
2
3
1.35
8.46
3.21
3.93
7.14
2_
3
1.40
8.47
3.20
3.91
3 ~-
-- 1
---0.-0-0--
---�8.45 --
-- 4.2 3
3.7 9
8.01
l
3
1
0.01
8.45
4.23
3.79
8.01
3
1
0.02
8.45
4.22
3.79
8.01
3
1
0.03
8.45
4.22
3.78
8.01
3
1
0.04
8.45
4.22
3.78
8.01
i+
3
1
0.05
8.45
4.21
3.78
8.01
'
3
1
0.06
8.45
4.21
3.77
8.01
3
1
0.07
8.46
4.21
3.77
8.01
3
1
0.08
8.46
4.21
3.77
8.01
3
1
0.09
8.46
4.20
3.76
8.01
1
0.10-
8.46
4.20
3.76
8.01
3
2
0.10
8.23
5.28
6.51
8.23
3
2
0.11
8.24
5.27
6.50
8.23
3
2
0.12
8.25
5.27
6.50
8.23
3
2
0.13
8.26
5.27
6.49
8.23
3
2
0.14
8.27
5.26
6.49
8.23
3
2
0.15
8.28
5.26
6.48
8.23
3
2
0.16
8.29
5.25
6.48
8.23
3
2
0.17
8.29
5.25
6.47
8.23
3
2
0.18
8.30
5.25
6.47
8.23
3
2
0.19
8.31
5.24
6.46
8.23
3
2
0.20
8.31
5.24
6.45
8.23
3
2
0.21
8.32
5.24
6.45
8.23
3
2
0.22
8.33
5.23
6.44
8.23
3
2
0.23
8.33
5.23
6.44
8.23
3
2
0.24
8.34
5.23
6.43
8.23
3
2
0.25
8.34
5.22
6.43
8.23
3
2
0.26
8.34
5.22
6.42
8.23
3
2
0.27
8.35
5.22
6.42
8.23
3
2
0.28
8.35
5.21
6.41
8.23
3
2
0.29
8.36
5.21
6.41
8.23
3
2
0.30
8.36
5.20
6.40
8.23
3
2
0.31
8.36
5.20
6.39
8.23
3
2
0.32
8.37
5.20
6.39
8.23
3
2
0.33
8.37
5.19
6.38
8.23
3
2
0.34
8.37
5.19
6.38
8.23
3
2
0.35
8.37
5.19
6.37
8.23

3
2
0.36
8.38
5.18
6.37
8.23
• 3
2
0.37
8.38
5.18
6.36
8.23
3
3
0.37
8.38
5.18
6.36
8.23
3
3
0.38
8.38
5.18
6.36
8.23
3
3
0.39
8.38
5.17
6.36
8.23
3
3
0.40
8.38
5.17
6.35
8.23
3
3
0.41
8.38
5.17
6.35
8.23
3
3
0.42
8.39
5.16
6.35
8.23
3
3
0.43
8.39
5.16
6.34
8.23
3
3
0.44
8.39
5.16
6.34
8.23
3
3
0.45
8.39
5.15
6.34
8.23
3
3
0.46
8.39
5.15
6.34
8.23
3
3
0.47
8.39
5.14
6.33
8.23
3
4
0.47
8.39
5.14
6.33
8.23
3
4
0.48
8.39
5.14
6.33
8.23
3
4
0.49
8.40
5.14
6.33
8.23
3
4
0.50
8.40
5.13
6.32
8.23
3
4
0.51
8.40
5.13
6.32
8.263
3
4
0.52
8.40
5.13
6.31
8.23
3
4
0.53
8.40
5.12
6.31
8.23
3
4
0.54
8.41
5.12
6.31
8.23
3
4
0.55
8.41
5.12
6.30
8.23
3
4
0.56
8.41
5.11
6.30
8.23
3
4
0.57
8.41
5.11
6.29
8.23
3
4
0.58
8.41
5.11
6.29
8.23
3
4
0.59
8.41
5.10
6.29'
8.23
3
4
0.60
8.42
5.10
6..28
8.23
3
4
0.61
8.42
5.10
6.28
8.23
3
4
0.62
8.42
5.09
6.27
8.23
3
4
0.63
8.42
5.09
6.27
8.23
3
4
0.64
8.42
5.09
6.27
8.23
3
4
0.65
8.42
5.08
6.26
8.23
3
4
0.66
8.42
5.08
6.26
8.23
3
4
0.67
8.42
5.08
6.26
8.23
3
4
0.68
8.42
5.07
6.25
8.23
3
4
0.69
8.42
5.07
6.25
8.23
3
4
0.70
8.43
5.07
6.24
8.23
3
4
0.71
8.43
5.06
6.24
8.23
3
4
0.72
8.43
5.06
6.24
8.23
3
4
0.73
8.43
5.06
6.23
8.23
3
4
0.74
8.43
5.05
6.23
8.23
3
4
0.75
8.43
5.05
6.22
8.23
3
5
0.73
8.43
5.05
6.22
8.23
3
5
0.78
8.43
5.03
6.20
8.23
3
5
0.83
8.44
5.01
6.18
8.23
3
5
0.88
8.44
5.00
6.16
8.23
3
5
0.93
8.44
4.98
6.14
8.23
3
5
0.98
8.45
4.96
6.11
8.23
3
5
1.03
8.45
4.95
6.09
8.23
3
5
1.08
8.45
4.93
6.07
8.23
Seg #
Reach #
Seg Mi
D.O.
CBOD
NBOD
Flow

WINTER
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger
:
STONEBRIDGE
SUBDIVISION
Receiving Stream :
LANCE CREEK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End
D.O.
is 10.68
mg/l.
The End
CBOD
is 4.87
mg/l.
The End
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NBOD
is 6.38
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
Milepoint
Reach #
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment
1
------
7.56
---------
0.00
-------
1
----
Reach
1
45.00
18.00
6.00
0.15000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
45.00
18.00
6.00
0.05000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Segment
2
9.70
0.00
1
Reach
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
15.00
18.00
6.00
0.00900
Segment
3
10.46
0.10
2
Reach
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
2
45.00
108.00
0.00
0.14000
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00'
0.00
0.00000
Reach
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

WINTER
Seg #
Reach #
Seg Mi
D.O.
CBOD
! -
1
1
0.00
7.56
26.84
10.82
1
1
0.05
8.65
26.12
10.56
1
1
0.10
9.32
25.44
10.32
1
1
0.15
9.73
24.79
J10.08
1
1
0.20
9.99
24.17
9.86
1
1
0.25
10.16
23.58
9.64
1
1
0.30
10.26
23.01
9.43
1
1
0.35
10.33
22.46
9.23
1
1
0.40
10.37
21.93
9.04
1
1
0.45
10.40
21.43
8.86
1
1
0.50
10.42
20.95
8.68
1
2
0.47
10.42
20.95
8.68
1
2
0.52
10.43
20.49
8.52
1
2
0.57
10.43
20.04
8.36
1
2
0.62
10.44
19.62
L8.2
1
2
0.67
10.44
19.21
6
1
2
0.72
10.45
18.81
7.91
1
2
0.77
10.46
18.43
7.77
1
2
0.82
10.46
18.06
7.64
0.87
10.47
17.70
7.51
_1 ,_-2�_
1
3
0 .
. 9-4---
-2-0-.
1
3
0.90
10.12
20.43
56
1
3
0.95
10.25
19.93
F8.76
37
1
3
1.00
10.33
19.46
19
1
3
1.05
10.39
19.008:��
1
3
1.10
10.42
18.56
7.85
1
3
1.15
10.45
18.14
7.69
1
3
1.20
10.47
17.74
7.54
1
4
1.20
10.47
17.74
7.54
1
4
1.25
10.48
17.36
7.39
1
4
1.30
10.48
17.00
7.24
1.
4
1.35
10.49
16.64
7.10
1
4
1.40
10.50
16.30
6.97
1
4
1.45
10.50
15.98
6.83
1
4
1.50
10.51
15.66
6.71
1
4
1.55
10.51
15.36
6.59
1
4
1.60
10.52
15.07
6.47
1
4
1.65
10.52
14.78
6.36
1
4
1.70
10.53
14.51
6.25
1
4
1.75
10.53
14.24
6.14
1
4
1.80
10.54
13.99
6.04
1
4
1.85
10.54
13.74
5.94
1
4
1.90
10.54
13.50
5.84
1
4
1.95
10.55
13.27
5.75
1
4
2.00
10.55
13.04
5.66
1
4
2.05
10.56
12.82
5.57
1
4
2.10
10.56
12.61
5.48
1
4
2.15
10.5 6 -
12. 4 0
5-,A-Q
2
1
0.00
9.70
5.20
8.30
2
1
0.05
9.87
5.19
8.28
2
1
0.10
10.02
5.18
8.27
2
1
0.15
10.13
5.16
8.25
2
1
0.20
10.23
5.15
8.23
2
2
0.20
9.96
3.58
.62
2
2
0.25
10.10
3.57
4.61
2
2
0.30
10.22
3.56
4.60
_ Flow
0.40
0.41
0.42
0.43
0.44
0.45
0.46
0.47
0.48
0.49
0.50
0.50
0.51
0.52
0.53
0.54
0.54
0.55
0.56
0.57
0 (�'OALC
0.65
0.67 �rrd
0.68 Vi
0.70
0.71
0.73
0.74
0.76
0.76
0.77
0.79
0.80
0.82.
0.83
0.85 I
0.86 1:
0.88 (('�
0.89 ') L
2�-
0.91
0.92
0.94
0.95
0.97
0.98
1.00
1.01
1.03
1.04
5 00- -- -
5.00 ;�i-L)
5.00
5.00 V ti v
5.00
10.00
10.00
10.00

0
2
3
0.30
10.21
3.58
4.62
10.01
2
3
0.35
10.28
3.57
4.61
10.01
2
3
0.40
10.33
3.57
4.61
10.01
2
3
0.45
10.38
3.56
4.60
10.01
2
3
0.50
10.42
3.55
4.59
10.01
2
3
0.55
10.46
3.55
4.59
10.01
2
3
0.60
10.49
3.54
4.58
10.01
2
3
0.65
10.52
3.53
4.57
10.01
2
3
0.70
10.54
3.53
4.56
10.01
2
3
0.75
10.56
3.52
4.56
10.01
2
3
0.80
10.58
3.51
4.55
10.01
2
3
0.85
10.60
3.51
4.54
10.01
2
3
0.90
10.61
3.50
4.54
10.01
2
3
0.95
10.62
3.49
4.53
10.01
2
3
1.00
10.63
3.49
4.52
10.01
2
3
1.05
10.64
3.48
4.51
10.01
2
3
1.10
10.64
3.47
4.51
10.01
2
3
1.15
10.65
3.47
4.50
10.01
2
3
1.20
10.66
3.46
4.49
10.01
2
3
1.25
10.66
3.45
4.49
10.01
2
3
1.30
10.67
3.45
4.48
10.01
2
3
1.35
10.67
3.44
4.47
10.01
2
3
1.40
10.67
3.44
4.47 __---
10.01
1
0.00
";-6-6-_____-4.28
4.55
11.05
3
1
0.01
10.66
4.28
4.55
11.05
3
1
0.02
10.66
4.28
4.55
11.05``y��
3
1
0.03
10.66
4.28
4.55
11.05/
3
1
0.04
10.66
4.27
4.55
11.05
. j k1 `�
3
1
0.05
10.67
4.27
4.55
11.05
3
1
0.06
10.67
4.27
4.55
11.05
3
1
0.07
10.67
4.27
4.54
11.05
3
1
0.08
10.67
4.27
4.54
11.05
3
1
0.09
10.67
4.27
4.54
11.05
3
1
0.10
10.67
4.26
4.54
3
2
0.10
10.46
5.05
6.53
11.27
3
2
0.11
10.47
5.05
6.53
11.27
3
2
0.12-
10.48
5.04
6.53
11.27
3
2
0.13
10.48
5.04
6.53
11.27
3
2
0.14
10.49
5.04
6.53
11.27
3
2
0.15
10.49
5.04
6.52
11.27
3
2
0.16
10.50
5.04
6.52
11.27
3
2
0.17
10.50
5.04
6.52
11.27
3
2
0.18
10.51
5.03
6.52
11.27
3
2
0.19
10.51
5.03
6.52
11.27
3
2
0.20
10.52
5.03
6.51
11.27
3
2
0.21
10.52
5.03
6.51
11.27
3
2
0.22
10.53
5.03
6.51
11.27
3
2
0.23
10.53
5.02
6.51
11.27
nA�
3
2
0.24
10.54
5.02
6.51
11.27
3
2
0.25
10.54
5.02
6.50
11.27
Ll!^
3
2
0.26
10.54
5.02
6.50
11.27
3
2
0.27
10.55
5.02
6.50
11.27
3
2
0.28
10.55
5.02
6.50
11.27
3
2
0.29
10.56
5.01*
6.50
11.27
3
2
0.30
10.56
5.01
6.50
11.27
3
2
0.31
10.56
5.01
6.49
11.27
3
2
0.32
10.57
5.01
6.49
11.27
3
2
0.33
10.57
5.01
6.49
11.27
3
2
0.34
10.57
5.00
6.49
11.27
3
2
0.35
10.57
5.00
6.49
11.27

3
2
0.36
10.58
5.00
6.48
11.27
3
2
0.37
10.58
5.00
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.37
10.58
5.00
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.38
10.58
5.00
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.39
10.58
5.00
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.40
10.59
4.99
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.41
10.59
4.99
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.42
10.59
4.99
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.43
10.59
4.99
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.44
10.59
4.99
6.48
11.27
3
3
0.45
10.59
4.98
6.47
11.27
3
3
0.46
10.60
4.98
6.47
11.27
3
3
0.47
10.60
4.98
6.47
11.27
3
4
0.47
10.60
4.98
6.47
11.27
3
4
0.48
10.60
4.98
6.47
11.27
3
4
0.49
10.60
4.98
6.47
11.27
3
4
0.50
10.61
4.97
6.47
11.27
3
4
0.51
10.61
4.97
6.47
11.27
3
4
0.52
10.61
4.97
6:47
11.27
3
4
0.53
10.61
4.97
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.54
10.61
4.97
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.55
10.62
4.97
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.56
10.62
4.96
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.57
10.62
4.96
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.58
10.62
4.96
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.59
10.62
4.96
6.46
11.27
3
4
0.60
10.63
4.96
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.61
10.63
4.95
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.62
10.63
4.95
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.63
10.63
4.95
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.64
10.63
4.95
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.65
10.64
4.95
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.66
10.64
4.95
6.45
11.27
3
4
0.67
10.64
4.94
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.68
10.64
4.94
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.69
10.64
4.94
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.70
10.64
4.94
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.71
10.64
4.94
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.72
10.64
4.93
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.73
10.65
4.93
6.44
11.27
3
.4
0.74
10.65
4.93
6.44
11.27
3
4
0.75
10.65
4.93
6.43
11.27
3
5
0.73
10.65
4.93
6.43
11.27
3
5
0.78
10.66
4.92
6.43
11.27
3
5
0.83
10.66
4.91
6.42
11.27
3
5
0.88
10.67
4.90
6.41
11.27
3
5
0.93
10.67
4.89
6.40
11.27
3
5
0.98
10.67
4.88
6.40
11.27
3
5
1.03
10.68
4.88
6.39
11.27
3
5
1.08
10.68
4.87
6.38
11.27
Seg #
Reach #
Seg Mi
D.O.
CBOD
NBOD
Flow

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
:
STONEBRIDGE
SUBDIVISION
Subbasin
040201
Receiving
Stream
:
LANCE CREEK
Stream
Class:
C;TR
Summer 7Q10
:
0.27
Winter
7Q10
0.35
Design Temperature:
12.0
LENGTHI
SLOPE
VELOCITY
DEPTH
Kd
Kd
Ka
Ka
KN
------------
mile I
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ft/mi
fps
I ft
design I
@200
design
@2010
design
Segment
1
0.51
235.00
0.277
0.33
0.49
0.71
42.01
50.00
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Segment
1
0.43
372.00
0.321
0.33
0.54
0.77
42.01
50.00
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Segment
1
0.37
216.00
0.307
0.39
0.46
0.67
42.01
50.00
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Segment
1
0.95
84.00
0.244
0.50
0.34
0.49
31.05
36.95
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
Segment
2
0.22
44.60
0.404
0.91
0.31
0.45
27.27
32.46
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Segment
2
0.10
44.60
0.533
1.12
0.32
0.47
35.98
42.82
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Segment
2
1.10
44.60
0.534
1.12
0.32
0.47
26.01
30.96
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Segment
3
0.10
48.00
0.566
1.14
0.34
0.49
29.68
35.33
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Segment
3
0.27
48.00
0.574
1.14
0.34
0.49
30.12
35.84
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Segment
3
0.10
400.00
1.062
0.84
0.66
0.96
42.01
50.00
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
Segment
3
0.28
142.00
0.787
0.*98
0.47
0.68
42.01
50.00
0.27
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
Segment
3
0.37
87.00
0.683
1.05
0.41
0.59
42.01
50.00
0.27
Reach
5
* Runoff -0.000 2.000 _1 1.000 9.700
Segment 3 Reach 1
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Headwaters
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 3
Reach 2
Waste
1 0.217
1 45.000
1108.000 1
0.000

---
----------
---------
---------
--------------------------
-------------------
Flow
CBOD
NBOD
D.O.
cfs
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
0.232
45.000
18.000
6.000
Headwaters
0.170
2.000
1.000
9.700
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.190
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
1
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.190
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 1
Reach 3
Waste
0.077
45.000
18.000
6.000
Tributary
0.000
1
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.300
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
1
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.300
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 2 Reach 1
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Headwaters
5.000
5.200
8.300
9.700
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 2
Reach 2
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
5.000
1
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 2
Reach 3
Waste
0.014
15.000
18.000
6.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 3 Reach 1
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Headwaters
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 3 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.217 1 45.000 1108.000 1 0.000

Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
1 0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 3
Reach 3
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 3
Reach 4
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
Segment 3 Reach 5
Waste 0.000
Tributary 0.000
* Runoff 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.000
1.000
9.700
2.000
1.000
9.700
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

S ✓Y1� �T #Z
tj
S W,V SVV T -"S
05
(� N do
MiN 2�dt
°"` ,�
OSC.,S a
N
ooulua �nq il.�SCAS 5 o
uses 007
AO
c�
USES a��(O�o �
S-[ U �,ti, ale
gwdQ _ s) o,:,xb
USA» j j0a

V U
4sA,,
J,
3a
03, y ?3-7• s1-0
USES o3.4767, S5o7 � i cdcu �
` �A-/•Sy 3a� Q.l,fo oD
3cgo uN� : J
19Go 3 Do: 6 M' /L
� a9d�� d� 3�aa 3r6o �
l,C��'S79 %Q'7S (D.a� Y0•l�Sm')=.D,11c�s
anqs
p.oSmC cis
�A-/•3Ss�""
_Ld2�� - ----- ---
£(0 3s s) o.l,��s)� (�,sy ,) = D,Iq`%r/n r '7Qros �lo,sb' s) l� .�y �/ ,3aM.)='0, 4bv)o
�ar�w �'(o.?sus) (o.�s���/�3�T-)��1�3�� 23i�`1
M M;

z�'k
M®®EL INPUTS FGIR LEVEL SANALYSIS
GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility Name:
STOAT E E 1Z I
(E SO
>1 V) j
NPDES No.:
woo B
Type of Waste:
/007r, zpm
E'.~
Facility Status:
,ZOO E
Receiving Stream:
110q-tv (f
�k
Stream Classification:
C ; !
O . I ✓
f .M
Subbasin:
_ a _ p
County:
V
Regional Office:
Vf
Topo Quad:
C _
FLOW INFORMATION
USGS tf
Date of Flow Estimates:
Drainage Area (m0):
JTd
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): VZIj
t7
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
r
Average Flow (cfs):
U
30Q2 (cfs):
fWC at Point of Discharge
Cummulative IWC (90
MEMO
MODEL INPUT INFORMATION
LENGTH OF REACH (miles)
INCREfvIENTAL LENGTH (miles)
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
FLOW (MGD)
./ O
Q
CBOD (mg/l) m
m
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/I)
L
RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs/m))
A 10
,/
D.
QA (cfs/mi!)
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TRIBUTARY CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/0
D.O. (mg/1)
SLOPE (fpm)
Name of facility

SUMMER
( Seg # (
Reach # (
Seg Mi
D.O.
1
1
0.00
6.62
1
1
0.05
7.33
1
1
0.10
7.70
1
1
0.15
7.90
1
1
0.20
8.01
1
1
0.25
8.07
1
1
0.30
8.11
1
1
0.35
8.13
1
1
0.40
8.15
1
1
0.45
8.16
1
1
0.50
8.17
1
2
0.47
8.17
1
2
0.52
8.17
1
2
0.57
8.17
1
2
0.62
8.18
1
2
0.67
8.18
1
2
0.72
8.19
1
2
0.77
8.20
1
2
0.82
8.21
1
2
0.87
8.21
-3-
0.8.5
7.92
1
3
0.90
8.05
1
3
0.95
8.13
1
3
1.00
8.18
1
3
1.05
8.21
1
3
1.10
8.23
1
3
1.15
8.24
1
3
1.20
8.25
1
4
1.20
8.25
1
4
1.25
8.23
1
4
1.30
8.23
1
-4
1.35
8.23
1
4
1.40
8.23
1
4
1.45
8.23
1
4
1.50
8.24
1
4
1.55
8.25
1
4
1.60
8.25
1
4
1.65
8.26
1
4
1.70
8.26
1
4
1.75
8.27
1
4
1.80
8.28
1
4
1.85
8.28
1
4
1.90
8.29
1
4
1.95
8.29
1
4
2.00
8.30
1
4
2.05
8.30
1
4
2.10
8.31
1
4
2.15
8.31
( Seg #
Reach #
( Seg Mi
D.O.
( CBOD
29.58
28.76
27.98
27.22
26.50
25.81
25.14
24.50
23.88
23.29
22.72
22.72
22.17
21.65
21.15
20.66
20.19
19.74
19.30
18.87
2 24 -
21.83
21.27
20.74
20.23
19.74
19.27
18.82
18.82
18.39
17.97
17.57
17.19
16.81
16.45
16.10
15.77
15.44
15.12
14.82
14.52
14.24
13.96
13.69
13.42
13.17
r P-1- W-161"I
..
IIC
-•D
-===-
NBOD
6.13
5.98
5.84
5.70
5.57
5.45
5.33
5.21
5.10
4.99
4.88
4.88
4.79
4.69
4.60
4.43
4.35
4.27
4.19
L4 73
4 63
4 53
4.43
4.34
4.25
4.16
4.16
4.07
3.98
3.90
3.82
3.74
3.66
3.59
3.52
3.45
3.38
3.32
3.25
3.19
3.13
3.08
. 3.02
2.97
2.91
2.86
NBOD
Fl ow
0.36
0.37
0.38
0.38
0.39
0.40
0.41
0.41
0.42
0.43
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.45
0.46
0.47
0.47
0.48
0.49
0.50
0.57
0.58
0.60
0.61
0.62
0.63
0.64
0.65
0.65
0.67
0.68.
0.70
0.71
0.72
0.73
0.75
0.76
0.77
0.78.
0.79
0.80
0.81
0.83
0.84
0.85
0.86
0.87
Flow

jo
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
:
STONEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION
Subbasin :
040201
Receiving Stream
:
LANCE CREEK
Stream
Class:
C;TR
Summer 7Q10
:
0.13
Winter
7Q10 :
0.17
Design Temperature:
23.0
LENGTHI
SLOPE
VELOCITY
DEPTH
Kd
Kd
Ka
Ka
I KN
------------
mile I
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ft/mi
fps I
ft
design I
@200 I
design
@200
design
Segment 1
0.51
235.00
0.253
0.32
0.77
0.67
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
0.43
372.00
0.289
0.33
0.83
0.73
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
0.37
216.00
0.277
0.39
0.72
0.63
53.37
50.00
0.63
Reach 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
1 0.95
84.00
0.216
1 0.49
1 0.53 1
0.47 134.86
1
32.65
0.63
Reach 4
t
Flow
CBOD
NBOD
D.O.
cfs
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
0.232
45.000
9.000
6.000
Headwaters
0.130
2.000
1.000
7.720
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.148
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.148
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 3
Waste
0.077
45.000
9.000
6.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.230
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.230
2.000
1.000
7.720

SUMMER
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger
:
STONEBRIDGE
SUBDIVISION
Receiving Stream :
LANCE CREEK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O.
is 8.31
mg/l.
The End CBOD
is 12.68
mg/l.
The End NBOD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is 2.86
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
------
Milepoint
---------
Reach # (mg/1)
------- ----
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment 1
6.62
0.00
1
Reach 1
45.00
9.00
6.00
0.15000
Reach 2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach 3
45.00
9.00
6.00
0.05000
Reach 4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

MODEL INPUTS FOR LEVEL B ANALYSIS
GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
r
County:
M IL
Regional Office:
L
Topo Quad:
_
FLOW INFORMATION
USGS#
Date of Flow Estimates:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):'
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC at Point of Discharge (%):
CummulaHve IWC (%);
MODEL INPUT INFORMATION
LENGTH OF REACH (miles)
/77
D4CREMINTAL LENGTH (miles)
0.
01�-
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
FLOW (MGD)
00
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.Q. (mg/1)
RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs/mi2)
QA (cfs/mil)
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TRIBUTARY CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
14
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
SLOPE (tpm)
,
Name of facility

Sf (, a) (;v F �)
a�co
��rflw `O. Al qs�
QA� ' o? gsrl. �.
w7040 =/o%
Ncoo &slat
N(Do A '-flu fio,d�
n, OSd mC� JJGo So (o l o i
0,07(v m�J
uses o-� 4787aoro
`Neha,-o, Mvi
ke,003aI I /�
01 001 m,4b
Nfi3 als �ilw�
7Q = • -7 cTs
7Qr �

MODEL INPUTS FOR LEVEL B ANALYSIS
GENERAL INFORMATION
FacilityName:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Topo Quad:
FLOW INFORMATION
USGS tt
Date of Flow Estimates:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC at Point of Discharge
Cummula five IWC (%):
MODEL INPUT INFORjvIATION a
LENGTH OF REACH (miles)
INCREMENTAL LENGTH (miles)
, D
.01
O
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
FLOW (MGD)
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD(mg/p
D.O. (mg/f)
RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs/mil)
QA (cfs/mil)
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TRIBUTARY CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
SLOPE (fpm)
S?
Name of facility

Clad
1�a = 60-1 0,73mi)
a\`r
p�iLPc�-:
ev
Ll�" Vrp G ll9
o`. ADD
0
Pound
�� ooJ�jro?3
61S

c
/01AA a
QAzfit.& qs
f%oio = a �y3
w7c��� y, Sys
i
/
�� �wgis�y7;s� so

)4CO03 6:
f2100ti•
n
••
r v Cr Gr
L QF'„rma Gh _
..il
Knob
036: 13' il56: Pd 081 46, OG 3„ ;;
. - - C(L -
-
f�rxn{lnchrn.Fi w'.__•
-
i�
ENxzerrl Clltts 'i
u
I
LL
. Timothy
'�
'_ •. �'
Knob
�4 '- a ..
'%
..
'•� �r is
�L 00 5907
- Town.end GO
+
�'
K
i
r
rr:1 <':r
Xnyria
-I
Knob
_
_Ttartir
7C0065617
'I
_
ol:�
Knob
i
[Q610
`- E
r- ..

�( jtej
w�PGi
Permit
Permit
Facility
County
Region
Type
Class
Flow
Subbasin
Receiving Stream
„ /
NC 561�
NC0065617
Hidden Valley WWTP
Watauga
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1MGD
Minor
20000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
NCO030473
Mill Ridge Development WWTP
Watauga
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1MGD
Minor
52000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
NCO032123
Hound Ears WWTP
Watauga
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1 MGD
Minor
140000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
s
0 o stic
or
0032191
Hebron Colony & Grace Home WO
Watauga
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1 MGD
Minor
9/I'000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
NCO042358
Adams Apple Condominiums WW1
Avery
Asheville
100% Domestic < 1 MGD
Minor
20000
40201
IWATAUGA RIVER ,
NCO049174
Smoketree Lodge
Watauga.
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1MGD
Minor
10000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER ,
NCO050610
The Ponds WWTP
Watauga
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1MGD
Minor
76000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
l%
NCO062961
Tynecastle WWTP
Avery
Asheville
100% Domestic < 1MGD
Minor
40000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
NCO070408
Art Plaza WWTP
Watauga
Winston-Salem
100% Domestic < 1 MGD
Minor,
35000
40201
WATAUGA RIVER
✓��/ib`' �vb

The Watauga River HQW` class and existing dischargers.
NCAC 2B .0224 High Quality Waters
-rated as excellent based on biological and physical/chemical characteristics through
Division monitoring or special studies, native and special native trout waters (and their
tributaries, ...primary nursery areas, all water supply watersheds which are rated as WS-I
or WS-H.....
(v): The total volume of treated ww for all discharges combined shall not exceed 50
percent of the total instream flow under 7Q10 conditions.
The problem:
An existing discharger wants to expand and needs to know whether the combined flow of
the dischargers has exceeded 50 percent of the total instream flow in the Watauga River
HQW segment
There are 11 dischargers in the Watauga River and its unnamed tributaries for a total of
approximately 530,000 GPD of wastewater. The farthest downstream discharger has a
s7Q l0 of 6.75 cfs. The dischargers represent 12% of the total instream flow.
There are two dischargers into Valley Creek, a tributary of the Watauga River that is
classified C Trout. There is a question as to whether this stream and its dischargers
should be included in the discharger total because it is not classified as HQW. The
argument could be made that it drains into the HQW segment and should be included. If
these two dischargers are included in the total, the dischargers would represent 33% of
the total instream
* * Problem: MMcintire reviewed this in 2003 and came up with 44% of the flow with
the expansion of the Ponds WWTP. I was unable to duplicate this result.
Questions to be answered:
• Do you include non-HQW waters in the equation?
• Do you calculate the percent of the instream flow at the end of the HQW segment
or at the discharger in question?
• Can facility just have equivalent loading and not worry about the % of the
instream flow?

Calculations for equivalent loading for the Ponds
Existing limits
BOD5 = 5110
NH3 = 2/4
Summer BOD5 Loading = 5 * 8.34* 0.076 MGD = 3.17 lbs/day
Winter BOD5 Loading = 10* 8.34* 0.076 MGD = 6.34 lbs/day
Summer NH3 Loading = 2 * 8.34* 0.076 MGD = 1.27 lbs/day
Winter NH3 Loading = 4 * 8.34* 0.076 MGD = 2.54 lbs/day
Total Summer Loading = 3.17 + 1.27 = 4.44 lbs/day
Total Winter Loading = 6.34 + 2.54 = 8.88 lbs/day
Equivalent loading @ 0.276 MGD (previously proposed expansion flow)
Summer BOD5 = 3.17 lbs/day/8.34/0.276 mgd =1.38 mg/l
Summer NH3 =1.27 lbs/day/8.34/0.276 mgd = 0.55 mg/l
Winter BOD5 = 6.34 lbs/day/8.34/0.276 mgd = 2.75 mg/l
Winter NH3 = 2.54 lbs/day/8.34/0.276 mgd =1.10 mg/1
To fulfill, NCAC 02B.0224 (1)(c ) to expand with no increase in permitted pollutant
loading, The Ponds would have to meet summer limits of BOD5-1.4 mg/l and NH3 =
0.55 mg/l and winter limits of BOD5-2.8 mg/l and NH3 = 1.1 mg/l.
These limits are too low for current technology
Consultations with DWQ staff:
Matt Matthews- AQ Tox - thinks we should go to the bottom of the HQW segment and
include everything upstream. Non-HQW wastewater ends up in the segment so it should
be included. The 7Q 10 flow from the trib is included in the flow of the Watauga River.
Boyd Devane - Planning Branch.- Initial thought: Don't want wastewater to exceed' 50%
contribution anywhere in the stream. After conversation, agreed with using the largest
7Q 10 at the end of the segment to calculate the % of instream flow.
Recommendation:
To calculate the % of instream flow in the HQW segment of the Watauga River, based
on how the rule is currently written.
1) Use the 7010 flow at the discharger furthest downstream on the Watauga River,
2) Include all trib flow and trib dischargers whether those streams are classified as
HQW or not.

Stonebridge WWTP - NCO088579
Subject: Stonebridge WWTP - N00088579
From: "Mark Brooks" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:15:06 -0500
To: "'Toya Fields"' <[e-mail]>
Toya —
Below is the communication from my client to the current operators of the Hound Ears WWTP. We could not find
a phone number for the current head of the Homeowners Association as the position has changed since the legal
battle and my client could not get any return phone calls. Hopefully Mr. Lashua with Utilities Inc. can provide you
with the information you need.
Thanks and feel free t to call me with any questions.
Mark C. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Engineering Associates, P.A.
[phone]
" "�J.
From: DavidF Ramsey[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 8:12 AM
To: Martin Lashua
Cc: Mark Brooks
Subject: Re: Hound Ears Plant Stonebridge
Martin: Have you had a chance to issue the letter I need? I need it so we can continue with our discharge permit for
our new sewage treatment plant. If you are willing to modify your position and permit our project to discharge to the
Hound Ears Plant in accordance with our approval permit from DWQ we would be interested in that method instead
of a new discharge permit and new sewage treatment plant but we must have an answer so we can proceed with our
project.
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Lashua
To: DavidF Ramsey
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:09 AM
Subject: RE: Hound Ears Plant Stonebridge
Good morning
Can you please provide some more background on this project. I am foggy with the name. Is this the "Dr.
Gersing" property?
utrlitim Inc
Martin Lashua
Regional Director
phone [phone] x 216
fax [phone]
[e-mail]
1 of 2 1 /22/2008 9:40 AM

Stonebridge WWTP - NCO088579
From: DavidF Ramsey [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:03 AM
To: Martin Lashua
Cc: Mark Brooks
Subject: Hound Ears Plant Stonebridge
Martin:
Our project on Shulls Mill Road or Stonebridge still needs your cooperation. Based upon my review of the service
area it appears at least 18.89 acres of our 44 acre property is within your service area and since the NC Utilities
Commission Order indicated that if we were in your service area that we were entitled to be served.
However we have decided to constructed our own sewage treatment plant and DWQ needs a letter for our
application that Carolina Water will not serve our project as originally planned.
Will you please issue me a letter indicating that Carolina Water will not provide sewage service to the Stonebridge
project.
Thank you for your cooperation and still think it would be better for all concerned if Carolina Water would agree
to provide us the sewage service and please I do need this information as soon as practical.
David F Ramsey
Professional Engineer
Confidentiality Notice:
This E-Mail transmission (and/or the documents accompanying it)
may contain information belonging to the sender which is
confidential, privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. The information is intended only for the use
of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action
in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this E-Mail transmission
in error, please immediately notify us by return E-Mail or
telephone to arrange for return of its contents including any
documents.
2 of 2 1/22/2008 9:40 AM

RE: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NC0088579
Subject: RE: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
From: "Mark Brooks" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:23:16 -0400
To: "'Toya Fields"' <[e-mail]>
Toys —
We are not really aware what other developers in the area are doing. The nearest development other than Hound
Ears would be Yonahlassee (sp?), and they have a small treatment plant. I do not think anything else is currently
planned between that development and Stonebridge, but could not tell you for sure. If Stonebridge was not
utilizing their all capacity and a neighboring development wanted to connect, I feel the developer would be open to
this to help defray the O&M costs.
Mark C. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Engineering Associates, P.A.
[phone]
From: Toya Fields [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:32 AM
To: Mark Brooks
Cc: 'DavidF Ramsey'
Subject: Re: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NC0088579
Yes, I understand that only Hound Ears is using their system. I was wondering whether other
developers are in a similar situation as your client. If so, has there been any discussion amongst the
developers who were denied service to operate a joint WWTP amongst themselves. I'm trying to
understand whether we are going to receive permit applications for multiple projects on the same creek
in the near future.
I understand that you may only be able to speak to the current needs of your client, however it may be
something to consider.
Toya
Mark Brooks wrote:
To our knowledge, nobody but Hound Ears is on their system and they have not allowed any other developments
to share in the use of their plant. As explained in the EAA, my client tried for several years to get Hound Ears to
allow them to connect to their plant. They initially said yes and then denied them access later. This went to
court. Please refer to the description of these events in the application information and EAA.
Thanks.........
Mark C. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Engineering Associates, P.A.
[phone]
1 of 5 9/3/2008 2:34 PM

RE: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
From: Toya Fields [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:43 PM
To: Mark Brooks
Cc: 'DavidF Ramsey'
Subject: Re: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
Hi Mark,
I know this one is getting dragged out, but we are still working on the water quality modeling scenarios.
I appreciate your patience. One question that I had from the add -info letter that I sent you in the fall: are
you guys aware of any other area developers that were denied service by Hound Ears? If so, has there
been any discussion of operating a joint treatment facility?
Thanks,
Toya
Mark Brooks wrote:
Toya -
We have not seen anything on this yet. Has is gone out? Just checking......
Mark C. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Engineering Associates, P.A.
[phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Toya Fields [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:35 PM
To: Mark Brooks
Subject: Re: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
Excellent! Thanks Mark. You have good timing- if all goes well I should
be able to get a draft permit to notice next week.
Toya
Mark Brooks wrote:
Toya -
FINALLY got a response letter from the operations company running the
Hound Ears WWTP. Hope this is not too late. Please call with any
questions.
Mark C. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Engineering Associates, P.A.
[phone]
2 of 5 9/3/2008 2:34 PM

RE: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
*From:* DavidF Ramsey [mailto:[e-mail]]
*Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2008 9:26 AM
*To:*,Mark Brooks
*Subject:* Fw: Hound Ears Plant Stonebridge
*Importance:* High
**Mark: I finally got the letter. Attached is his email which is full
of some bull_.**
**Please go ahead with the permitting of the discharge permit.**
**Regarding the other line in LeToya Fields letter I have not
knowledge of other area developers being denied service. I recently
work on a preliminary project on Highway 105 which was owned by one of
the former Hound Ears Club family. The location is the old Red Roof
Restaurant which is on Highway 105 and need to cross the Watauga
River. He advise me that he had been given permission to discharge to
the Hound Ears Plant as part of the sales of the land. After I advised
him on the cost of crossing the Watauga River he declined to purchase.**
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Martin Lashua <mailto:[e-mail]>
*To:* DavidF Ramsey <mailto:[e-mail]>
*Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2008 9:08 AM
*Subject:* RE: Hound Ears Plant Stonebridge
Dear Mr. Ramsey,
I am in receipt of your email below. As you know, this matter is of
considerable age and the NC Utilities Commission ("NCUC") order
regarding their position on this matter was issued on 2/26/04 - almost
4 years ago. It took some time to get back up to speed.
I felt it important to correct some of the misunderstandings you may
have and those of which you have specifically mentioned in your email
below.
1) The NCUC stated: "The Hearing Examiner concludes that even though a
portion of the 44 acres may at one time have been part of the tract
owned by former owners of Hound Ears, this is insufficient to
establish that any part of the Stonebridge development is within
Carolina Water's certificated service area." . . . "Thus, there is no
competent evidence to support a conclusion that any part of the
Stonebridge development was contemplated by Carolina Water or the
Hound Ears developer to be within Carolina Water's service area." The
NCUC determined that Stonebridge has not been subsequently added to
Carolina Water's service area by continuous extension. (Gersing order
page 14, 17).
2) The NCUC noted that the Hound Ears facility will be fully utilized
once development within Hound Ears is completed. The NCUC determined
that Carolina Water should not be required to serve the Stonebridge
development using the "apparently fully committed wastewater treatment
facility in the Hound Ears development." (Gersing order page 23).
Regrettably, we are not in a position to serve any portion of the
proposed project in the existing Hound Ears wastewater treatment plant
as all remaining capacity is committed. Per your request, I am
attaching a letter which I hope is acceptable for your use with the
3 of 5 9/3/2008 2:34 PM

RE: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
Division of Water Quality.
0
While we are unable to assist you through the existing facility, we
would welcome the opportunity to discuss utility service for the
project through new facilities. Obviously, we have a local and strong
utility presence and feel we could offer you or your client the best
utility operation solution.
If I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at
704-525-7990 x 216. Thank you again for your attention.
Martin Lashua
Regional Director
Phone [phone] x 216
Fax [phone]
email [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* DavidF Ramsey(mailto:[e-mail])
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:03 AM
*To:* Martin Lashua
*Cc:* Mark Brooks
*Subject:* Hound Ears Plant Stonebridge
**Martin: **
**Our project on Shulls Mill Road or Stonebridge still needs your
cooperation. Based upon my review of the service area it appears at
least 18.89 acres of our 44 acre property is within your service area
and since the NC Utilities Commission Order indicated that if we were
in your service area that we were entitled to be served**[m1]
<# msocom 1> **. **
** However we have decided to constructed our own sewage treatment
plant and DWQ needs a letter for our application that Carolina Water
will not serve our project as originally planned: **
**Will you please issue me a letter indicating that Carolina Water
will not provide sewage service to the Stonebridge project.**
**Thank you for your cooperation and still think it would be better
for all concerned if Carolina Water would agree to provide us the
sewage service**[m2] <#_msocom_2> ** and please I do need this
information as soon as practical.**
**David F Ramsey***
**Professional Engineer**
** **
**Confidentiality Notice:**
** **
**This E-Mail transmission (and/or the documents accompanying it)**
**may contain information belonging to the sender which is **
**confidential, privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under **
**applicable law. The information is intended only for the use**
**of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not**
**the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any**
**disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action**
**in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly **
**prohibited. If you have received this E-Mail transmission **
**in error, please immediately notify us by return E-Mail or **
4 of 5 9/3/2008 2:34 PM

RE: Stone Bridge Subdivision - NPDES Permit # NCO088579
**telephone to arrange for return of its contents including any**
**documents.***
See item 1 above
See item 2 above
Toya Fields - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
Tel: [phone] x 551
Fax: [phone]
Toya Fields - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
Tel: [phone] x 551
Fax: [phone]
5 of 5 9/3/2008 2:34 PM

Utilities. Inc:
January 18, 2008
Mr. David P Ramsey, PE
Shull's Mill Properties, Inc
61 The Glens Boulevard
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Re: StoneBridge and/or Shulls Mill Properties and Al Gersing Watauga County, NC
Dear Mr. Ramsey,
I am in receipt of your request for sanitary sewer capacity for the proposed Stonebridge project While it appears
that part of the proposed project is adjacent to our Hound Ears utility system, the existing wastewater treatment
facility (NPDES NCO032123) is presently fully committed and we are unable to provide additional service from this
Facility.
We regret that we are unable to accommodate your project in this manner but if we may be of assistance in any other
way, please let me know. I can be reached at 704-525-7990 x 216.
Thank you for your attention.
, -
n ely
Martin Lashua
Regional Director
Ca Carl Daniel
Rex Woody
Chris Ayers— Hunton and Williams
a uam tewrnwrCamlina Water Service, Inc. of North Carolina
P.O. Box 240908 a Chanotle, NC 2a224 * P: 704-525-79M i F: 704-525b174
5701 WesW Dr., Suile 101 • Charlotte, NC 28217 i w .uiwaler.=

cc: Permits and Engineeringr
Technical Support Branch
County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention:
Date: November 2, 2007
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County -Watauga
Permit No. NCO088579
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility and Address: Stone Bridge Subdivision
950 Shulls Mills Road
Shulls Mills, NC 28607
2. Date of Investigation: November 1, 2007
3. Report Prepared by: Sue White
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
David Ramsey
828-936-5875 / 727-409-4639
5. Directions to Site: 421 N to Boone, turn left onto the 105 bypass, turn left onto Old
Shulls Mill Road. Turn left onto Shulls Mill Road. Pass Hound Ears gate on left go 1/2
miles to black iron gate on right. Address is on gate.
6. Discharge Points(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: N36° 9.97' Longitude: W81' 44.093'
U.S.G.S. Quad No.: C12NW U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Boone, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Yes

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Mountainous, this property is not
located in a flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: 100 yards. Dwelling to be removed during construction.
No other existing dwellings.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Lance Creek
a. Classification: Class C Trout
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Watauga River Basin Subbasin WATO1
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Drainage area
is approx. 1.35 sq miles. Windy channel through mostly residential areas and a
golf course.
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity)
50,000 gpd
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste Water Treatment facility?
N/a
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)?
No current facilty
d. Date(s) of construction activities allowed by previous A/C's issued in the previous
two years.
N/a
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities;
None
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities.
Purestream BESST plant with an influent equalization tank. The activated
sludge plant utilizes sludge uplift clarification to allow for operations with higher
mixed liquor concentrations in the aeration chamber and enhanced clarification.
The system has an anoxic tank that the aerated effluent is recirculated through to
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

facilitate further biological degradation and de -nitrification. The system will
utilize UV disinfection. The system will meet the state's duality requirements
with backup aeration, clarification and disinfection.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Fecal, BOD, NH3
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/a
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM Permit No.
Residuals Contractor
Telephone No.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP
Other .
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Licensed septage hauler to POTW
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet).
SIC Code(s): 4952
Primary Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code:
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved. (municipals only)?
N/a
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
N/a
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate) N/a
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 3

CA
c
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge
options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: Limited by poorly drained soils and lack of acreage.
Connection to Regional Sewer System: None available.
Subsurface: No suitable soils
Other disposal options: None Available
5. Other Special Items: N/a
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
While there are 3 existing treatment plants in the area, none are willing or have the capacity to
take the flow from this project.
Signature of report preparers
Water Quality Regional Supervis
Date: November 2, 2007
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 4