NC0088781_Application_20081114

Mr. Gil Vinzani
NPDES Eastern Program Supervisor
Point Source Branch NC DENR / DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Lower Cape Fear Water & Sewer Authority (LCFWASA)
Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant
Letter of Authorization for NPDES Permit Application Short Form C-WTP
Dear Mr. Vinzani:
Please find enclosed "Attachment A Local Government Review Form", signed and notarized by
the County of Bladen in accordance with the Lower Cape Fear Water & Sewer Authority's
application for a NPDES permit.
Please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] if you have any questions or need additional
information. Thank you for your assistance.
Cordially,
Don Betz
Executive Director
Lower Cape Fear Water & Sewer Authority
Enclosure
CC: Chairman and Board of Directors
Morelia Sanchez -King, PH.D., P.E., HUA
Lower Cape Fear Water d- SewerAnthos7ty
1107 New Pointe Blvd, Suite 17
Leland, North Carolina 26451
phn 910.383.1919 fax [phone]
www.lcfwasa.org

Attachment A. Local Govexx meat Review Form
General Statute overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local govemmente in
the issuance of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the
Environmental Management Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic
wastewater discharge facility until it hag received a written statement from each city and county government having
jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the proposed facility and its appurte tAces are to be located. The
written statement shall document whether the city or county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if
such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not
approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has determined to be inconsistent with aoolog or
subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to have statewide ai0ficance and is in
the beat interest of the State.
Instruction to the Apacamt: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the
applicant *hall request that both the nearby city and county govexnaunt complete this form The applicant must:
Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for tbie form to be completed to the clerk of
the city and the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
• If either (or both) local governtncnt(a) fail(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the
cerdfied mail card(*), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit
the application to the NPDES Unit.
■ As evidence to the Commission that the local govcn nent(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant
shall submit a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local governments)
failed to respond within the 15-dap period.
c.
Instructions nt: to the Local GoveMmeThe nearby city and/or county government which map have or has .
jurisdiction over any part of the load on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required
to complete and return this form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt: The form must be signed and nouirized.
Name of local
(City/county)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the propord facility and its appurtenances are
to be located? Yee [Vf No [ J If no, please aign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [ tl" No [
If there is a coning ox subdivisions ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance?
Yea
No [ ] %c1r+��nc.� wo�t� 6� A►h�koie� WIiK c774�S o� �'2��GSsiT�ca.�ipr., �� Q�Q .
e
Date j I — �oy signature
(Ci alter oun
State of . County of _ 9 j f, dr-.n
--
On ttu* day of_ Iu o V ern t e r—.aoopersonally appeared before me, the said
name 4 rC o t-�!''t t` , to me known and known to me to be the person
described in raft who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the
same and being dully sworn by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing domament are true.
My Commission expires115-laoog.(Signature of Notary Public) hzi
Notary Public (official Still
Z 'd 69H *ON PEO : 0l 800Z Iff 11 Do

November 10, 2008
Mr. Gil Vinzani
NPDES Eastern Program Supervisor
Point Source Branch NC DENR / DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Lower Cape Fear Water & Sewer Authority (LCFWASA)
Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant
Letter of Authorization for NPDES Permit Application Short Form C-WTP
Dear Mr. Vinzani:
This letter serves as authorization for Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates (HUA) to submit an
application for a NPDES Permit Short Form C-WTP on behalf of the Lower Cape Fear Water &
Sewer Authority (LCFWASA) for the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant
near Tarheel, Bladen County, North Carolina.
Please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] if you have any questions or need additional
information. Thank you for your assistance.
Cordially,
Don Betz
Executive Director
Lower Cape Fear Water & Sewer Authority
CC: Chairman and Board of Directors
Morella Sanchez -King, PH.D., P.E., HUA
Lower Cade Fear Water & Sewer A a bonny
1107 New Pointe Blvd, Suite 17
Leland, North Carolina 28451
phn 910.383.1919 fax [phone]
www.lcfwasa.org

LU I Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
Consuitinq Engineers
203 DOE 1 809C 01 11/15/09
RETURN TO SENDER
;HOBBS UPCHURCH & ASSOCIATES
9262 MARKET ST STE 201
WIUMINGTON NC 29411-966i
RETURN TO SENDER
Mr. Gil Vinzani, NPDES Eastern Program Supervisor I' �Jj NOV - 4 2Q18
Point Source Branch
NC DENR / DWQ — — -- -. -
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: NPDES Permit Application
Project: Discharge of the Decant and Backwash Water from the Bladen Bluffs
Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant, Tar Heel, N.C.
Dear Mr. Vinzani:
We respectfully apply for a NPDES permit for the backwash water from the
Bladen Bluffs surface water treatment plant (WTP). The WTP will be operated
by the Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority ("The Authority") between
NC Hwy 89 and the Cape Fear River. The capacity of the plant will be 4.4 up to
6.o MGD. The maximum discharge from the facility will be o.9 MGD (15% of
the maximum flow rate of 6 MGD).
An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared in accordance with the North
Carolina State Environmental Policy Act (NC SEPA) for the purpose of
evaluating the environmental consequences of completing the Bladen Bluffs
Regional Surface Water System including the WTP described above. The EA
received the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on June 11, 2oo8.
We are enclosing the following documentation:
• NPDES Application- Short Form C- WTP and application fee (check for
$86o)
-Analysis of Source Water January 2oo8, Provided by the Division of Water
Quality
• Bladen Bluffs WTP Hydraulic Profile and Process Schematic
• Location of the proposed NPDES Discharge at 34°45'53" N and 78"48'16" W
-Alternative Analysis for the disposal of o.9-MGD backwash water

Vinzani - Bladen Bluffs WTP- Backwashwater NPDES Permit Application
Disposal alternatives analyzed included: connection to an existing sewer system,
land based disposal, recycle of backwash water, surface water discharge, and
disposal combinations.
The option of land based discharge is severely limited by soils adjacent to and in
the vicinity of the WTP property. The limitations of the soil and the cost of
equipment for the land application, coupled with the required maintenance of
the system make it unfeasible.
The two remaining options considered were recycling of the waste stream and
surface water discharge. DENR Plan Review Branch requires that any recycle
be limited to 1o%, but recycle in any amount is discouraged. For this reason,
the surface water discharge is requested.
The option of surface water discharge will not present an environmental
concern to the waters of the Cape Fear River. The discharge will eliminate the
potential for increasing the organics load to the WTP.
We, therefore, respectfully apply for a NPDES permit for o.9-MGD backwash
water flow from the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant in
Tar Heel, N.C.
Please contact me for any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
Morella Sanchez -King, Ph.D., P.E.
Division Manager- Hampstead Office
14878 US Hwy 17
Suite 5
Hampstead, NC 28443
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Enclosures
CC.
Don Betz, Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
Brenan Buckley, P.E., CDM
Fred Hobbs, P.E., HUA
2
Hampstead, NC • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Southern Pines Nags Head Charlotte Beaufort

W
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
DISCHARGE OF
THE DECANT AND BACKWASH OPERATIONS
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Tar Heel, N.C.
SUBMITTED TO:
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/Eastern NPDES Program
Mr. Gil Vinzani
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 - 1617
T: 919.807.6395 F:9i9.807.6495
SUBMITTED BY:
Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
Executive Director: Don Betz
1107 New Pointe Blvd, Suite 17
Leland, North Carolina, 28451
T: 910.383.1919 F:910.383.1949
www.lcfwasa.org
Prepared By:
Morella Sanchez -King, Ph.D., P.E.
Hobbs, Upchurch &Associates, P.A.
Consulting Engineers
14878 US Hwy 17
P.O. Box 1400
Hampstead, NC 28443
T: 910-270-5520; F: 910-270-5548

wq
m
p1
F"
tmq
MR
m
m
r"
Fm
ran
r"
m
p"
w
P"
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
APPENDIX A: EXCERPTS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE
WATER SYSTEM/FONSI JUNE 11, 2008
APPENDIX B: APPLICATION RECLASSIFICATION OF A 10-MILE SEGMENT OF THE
CAPE FEAR RIVER OCTOBER 2008 STATUS
APPENDIX C: ANALYSIS OF SOURCE WATER BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY,
JANUARY 2008
APPENDIX D: BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
HYDRAULIC PROFILE AND PROCESS SCHEMATIC
APPENDIX E: BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
LOCATION OF NPDES DISCHARGE POINT
APPENDIX F: ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
rm

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
ME For discharges associated with water treatment plants
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number NC00 7
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
_ Facility Name Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water System
Mailing Address 1107 New Pointe Blvd., Suite 17
City Leland
State / Zip Code North Carolina, 28451 )
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone] Nov
e-mail Address [e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road NC Highway 87
City Tar Heel
State / Zip Code North Carolina, 28392
_ County Bladen
3. Operator Information:
�. Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
Mailing Address 1107 New Pointe Blvd., Suite 17
City Leland
m State / Zip Code North Carolina, 28451
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
_ 4. Ownership Status:
Federal ❑ State ❑ Private ❑ Public
5. 'lope of treatment plant:
Page I o(7 C-WTP 03/05

MR
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
rya
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
FM
® Conventional (Includes coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation, usually followed by
filtration and disinfection)
❑ Ion Exchange (Sodium Cycle Cationic ion exchange)
rAR ❑ Green Sand Filter (No sodium recharge)
❑ Membrane Technology (RO, nanofiltration)
ON Check here if the treatment process also uses a water softener ❑
6. Description of source water(s) (i.e. groundwater, surface water)
The source water is the Cape Fear River (surface water), south of Fayeteville, between Lock and
Dams 2 and 3. Analysis of the source water collected is included in Appendix C. Additional
information related to the source water is provided in Appendix A (Excerpts from Environmental
Assessment) and Exhibit B (Application for the Reclassification of a segment of the Cape Fear
a•r River) .
7. Describe the treatment process(es) for the raw water:
The recommended treatment process for the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface WTP is based
on conventional treatment. Appendix D includes a schematic flow through the facility.
Principal plant features include:
FM • Rapid Mix
Two rapid mix basins will be provided. Provisions will be made for feeding ferric or alum
coagulant, polymer, and caustic to the rapid mix chambers. The rapid mix chambers will
each be 5 feet x 5 feet x 8.2 feet water depth, with a detention time of 30 to 20 seconds
each at a plant flow rate of 4.4 to 6 mgd. Two chambers are provided in series to allow the
flexibility of adding coagulant chemicals at separate locations. Design power input as
defined by G- value will be about 1000/second at 68°F in the mixing zone.
• Flocculation
Two trains of four -stage flocculators will be provided. Each flocculation basin will be about
10.5 feet long and 10.5 feet wide per compratment with four equal compartments, and will
�► have an approximate 13 foot side water depth at design flow. A baffle wall will separate
each flocculation stage. Each compartment will be equipped with a vertical flocculator of
the turbine type driven by a variable frequency drive (VFD). Maximum water power input,
as defined by G-value will be approximately 80/second. The four compartments wifi allow
for tapered flocculation, which will allow for optimization of the flocculation process. It is
estimated that average energy input will be approximately equal to a G value of 20 to
40/second. The VFDs for the flocculators will be of the variable frequency type for
optimum efficiency. Flocculation detention time is about 30 to 20 minutes in the basins
at 4.4 to 6.0 mgd.
�► • Sedimentation
Two sedimentation basins, each equipped with sludge collection equipment, will be
provided. The basins will have approximately 15 foot average side water depth at design
flow. The total tank volume will provide for a detention time of 4.0 hours at 4.4 mgd to
6.0 mgd (bid alternate).
Sludge will be collected by chain and flight collectors to hoppers located at one end of the
tank. Sludge will be manually or automatically withdrawn through the use of telescopic
valves to a view box, which will allow the operators to visually monitor the sludge
consistency in order to determine the length of time for sludge removal and minimize
discharge of clean water.
Water will flow from each sedimentation basin into a filter influent flume. Provisions will be
made to feed chlorine, caustic, and polymer into the filter influent.
r•,
Page 2 of 7 C-WTP 03/05

MR
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
• Filtration
Three filters will be provided, each having a design capacity of 1.5 mgd. Each filter cell will
be 21.75 feet x 12 feet, having an area of 261 sf and a filtering rate of 4.0 gpm/sf. The
filters will be equipped with air water backwash, washwater troughs, sand, and GAC or
anthracite media.
Filter Hydraulics
Settled water enters the filter from the ifiter influent channel through an influent valve,
flows into the inlet and backwash trough ports, and from the troughs is distributed over
the filter bed.
The filters will initially be rated at 4 gpm/sf, but will be hydraulically capable of up to 6.0
,.� gpm / sf.
S. Describe the wastewater and the treatment process(es) for wastewater generated by the
facility:
Treatment Process Residuals and Waste Washwater Disposal
1. Residuals Sources
Provision of adequate residuals handling facilities and proper residuals management is
FM critical to the successful operation of a water treatment plant (WTP). The major sources of
residuals at the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface WTP include the sedimentation sludge and
spent filter backwash water. Suspended matter, color, and other impurities in the raw
water are removed mostly during the coagulation/clarification process. A small amount of
these residuals not removed in the sedimentation basins is removed in the filters and the
solids are subsequently removed in the spent filter backwash water.
ram► 2. Residuals Quantity
The quantity of residuals produced by the plant depends on the raw water quality and the
chemicals used to treat the raw water. Knowledge of water chemistry and extensive
experience at operating other treatment plants has shown that a relationship exists
between these factors that can be used to predict the amount of residual solids produced.
By far, the majority of residuals produced in the plant come from the coagulation process.
Other additives such as polymer and powdered activated carbon (PAC) can be assumed to
rya produce amounts of residuals equivalent to the dosages added to the water. Suspended
solids also produce an equivalent weight of residuals, as they are non -reactive. Iron and
manganese (including manganese from permanganate) are oxidized in the treatment plant
and are removed in the oxidized precipitate form. Therefore, the equation used to
calculate the amount of solids produced is:
S - 8.34 * Q (0.53C + SS + A +1.9Fe +1.58 Mn) (1)
Where the parameter values used for calculations include,
S = solids produced (lb/day)
Q = average plant flow (mgd), 3.3 mgd
C = average coagulant dose, 60 mg/L Fe2(SO4)3
SS = average raw water suspended solids (mg/L)
b*Tu, where b = constant, assume 1.5 and Tu =
average raw water turbidity in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU)A
42 mg/L
A = additional chemicals added (mg/L), 2 mg/L for
estimated annual average
Fe = average raw water iron concentration (mg/L), 0.90 mg/L
Mn = average raw water manganese concentration (mg/L), 0.1 mg/L
The raw water suspended solids can be estimated from the raw water turbidity:
SS (mg/L) = b* Tu as shown above
The correlation factor between turbidity and suspended solids may vary from 0.7 to 2.2 and
MR
Page 3 of 7 C-WTP 03/05

f"
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
may seasonally vary for the same raw water supply. Since no suspended solids data was
available, the value of b was assumed to be 1.5 for the purpose of estimating the residuals
quantity.
Using equation (1) and the above parameter values, S = 2,138 dry lb/day.
Based on our experience from other treatment plants, roughly 90 percent of the solids
produced will end up in the sedimentation sludge. The rest will be collected in the spent
filter backwash water. Table 1 provides a summary of estimated sedimentation residuals
quantities under current and future flow conditions. An average flow of 6.6 mgd allows for
doubling of the plant flow to 8.8 mgd daily maximum capacity.
r•� Table 1
Summary of Sedimentation Sludge Quantities (based on 90 percent of the solids being in
the sedimentation sludge at a concentration of 0.5 percent solids)
Average Daily Plant Flow, mgd 3.3 6.6
Solids (lb/day) 19924 32848
Volume (gpd) 469000 921,000
The quantity of filter backwash water produced is a function of filter to waste run time and
the amount of water used in backwashing. Based on our experience with other treatment
plants, approximately 86,000 gallons of water will be produced in each filter of the size
proposed while backwashing typically, though this number can vary. The calculated
backwash volume is based on a maximum backwash rate of 22 gpm/sf for 15 minutes
duration. In addition, approximately 31,000 gallons of filter -to -waste will be discharged
,•� per filter backwash at an average plant flow of 3.3 mgd before putting the filters back into
service, assuming 30 minutes of filter -to -waste per backwash at 4 gpm/sf filter rate. Table
2 summarizes the estimated average quantity of backwash water produced for current and
future flow conditions. It is assumed that two filters at 4.4 mgd and four filters at 6.6 mgd
will be backwashed each day.
Table 2
Summary of Estimated Average Spent Filter Backwash Water Quantity
Average Daily Plant Flow (mgd) 3.3 6.6
Total Number of Filters 3 Up to 6
No. of Filters Backwashed 2 4
Backwash Volume (gpd) 1729000 3449000
Filter -to -Waste (gpd) 629000 1249000
�► Average Daily Total (gpd) 2349000 4689000
3. Waste Characteristics
The sedimentation solids and spent filter backwash water have significantly different
characteristics. Sedimentation sludge is a small flow with high solids concentrations
typically between 0.5 percent to 2 percent, depending on the raw water quality and
coagulant conditions as well as the frequency and duration of sludge removal. We estimate
that roughly 90 percent of the solids generated are removed in the sedimentation basins.
Sedimentation basin sludge is removed each day and its removal can be timed to be
proportional to the volume of water treated by each sedimentation basin.
The approximately 10 percent of the solids not removed in the sedimentation basins will be
removed by the filters and subsequently removed from the filter media during filter
backwashing. Spent filter backwash water is discharged after each filter backwash.
so
F"
Page 4 of 7 C-WTP 03/05

V"
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
4. Residuals Handling Approach
The proposed two -residuals basins will serve to receive the sedimentation sludge,
washwater from the sedimentation basins, and filter backwash waste at the Bladen Bluffs
Regional Surface WTP. The residuals basins will be used for storage and as an
equalization/clarification basin. In normal operation, backwash water and other high flows
would be directed to one basin while the other basin functions as more of a polishing
basin. When one basin is down for cleaning, the other basin would be decanted down prior
to backwashing so as to capture the backwash and then allow it to settle before decanting.
Putting all the solids in the residuals basins appears most cost effective. Once a basin
reaches 5 percent solids concentration, bidding for contract removal is needed. Decant
from the residuals basins could be pumped using the recycle pump station to the raw
water piping upstream the impoundment or flow to a ditch towards the river for discharge
in accordance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
Residuals Basins
Each of the two residuals basins will have a capacity of approximately 2.0 MG and a depth
MR of approximately ? ft. Each of the basins has been sized to provide approximately 365
days of storage capacity for an average daily flow rate of up to 3.3 mgd, assuming that no
land application of thickened sludge were to take place on -site.
An Various sludge disposal options were considered including disposing 2 to 5 percent
thickened sludge from the residuals basins or gravity thickener by either land application
on -site, contract hauling and disposal off -site, or contract dewatering and disposal.
The least cost option is currently to put all solids in the residuals basins and to take
backwash high flows to one basin first, then to the other basin at lower decanted flow
rates for polishing. Once a basin is full of sludge, contract sludge removal will occur. In
the long-term, once the plant is expanded or if contract cleaning bids are much higher
than currently quoted, the other disposal options can be revisited.
Based on the residuals production projected above, and assuming that the solids
concentration of 2 to 5 percent, the estimated residuals basins cleaning frequencies are
presented in Table 3.
Table 3 - Estimated Residuals Basins Cleaning Frequency
Average Daily Plant Flow (mgd) 3.3
At 5 percent Solids
Residuals Volume 1.9 MG/year
Depth of Residuals per year 6 ft
�4 Estimated Dredging Frequency Once every year
At 2 percent Solids
Residuals Volume 4.8 MG/year
Depth of Residuals per year 15 ft
Estimated Dredging Frequency Once every 4 months
Note: Dredging requirements estimated based on reserving the top 2ft of lagoon depth for
proper plant operation.
9. Number of separate discharge points: one discharge of 0.9 MGD (See location in Appendix E).
Outfall Identification number(s)
10. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ® Intermittent ❑
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration:
Page 5 of 7 C-WTP 03/05

raq
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
MR
11. Plant design potable flowrate 4.4 up to 6.0 MGD
Backwash or reject flow 0.9 MGD
ran
Ro
12. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map shouring the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude):
Cape Fear River south of Fayeteville, between Lock and Dams 2 and 3. See Exhibit B for
outfall location.
The outfall will be located at 34°45'53" N and 78°48'16" W. (See Exhibit C).
13. Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals or disinfection
treatments, that have the potential to be discharged.
Ferric Sulfate or Aluminum Sulfate, Chlorine (Sodium Hypochlorite),
Caustic Soda or liquid lime, Fluoride (Hydrofluosilicic Acid), Polymer,
Corrosion Inhibitor (e.g. phosphate), Ammonia (future), and Oxidant (e.g. Permanganate),
Calcium Thiosulfate.
Note: "or" means that the plant will have the ability to use either but only one would be uses
time.
'aq 14. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
M"
15. Additional Information:
Provide a schematic of flow through the facility, include flow volumes at all points in
the treatment process, and point of addition of chemicals.
Solids Handling Plan
16. NEW Applicants
Information needed in addition to items 1-15:
New applicants must contact a permit coordinator with the NCDENR Customer
Service Center.
Was the Customer Service Center contacted? ® Yes ❑ No
Analyses of source water collected
Engineering Alternative Analysis
v Discharges from Ion Exchange and Reverse Osmosis plants shall be evaluated using a
water quality model.
am
Page 6 of 7 C-WTP 03/05

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
17. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Or
Printed name of Person Signing Title
OQEGGA SfWcdci-lCinl /0/342008
Signature of Applicant Date
.� North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b provides that: An ( �(2) p y person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
`7
0
OR
r
go
Page 7 of 7 C-WTP 03/05

w
M
�n
Im
M
L�
w
w
IN
_
ow
w
(EXCERPTS) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,
AND OPERATION OF THE
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER SYSTEM
BLADEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED BY:
Morella Sanchez -King, Ph.D., P.E.
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
Consulting Engineers
14878 US Hwy 17
P.O. Box 1400
Hampstead, NC 28443
T: 910.270.5520 F:910.270.5548
[e-mail]

MR
PIR
T"
M
16.�=
t�
PIR
TER
MR
faq
pq
MR
MR
MR
F"
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................ 3
A.I. COMPONENTS OF THE BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER SYSTEM ..................................................... 5
B. WATER RESOURCES......................................................................................................................................... 8
B.1 CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN...................................................................................................................................... 8
B.2 ESTIMATION OF THE LOW FLOW (7Q10) ATTAR HEEL....................................................................................... 10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Location of the proposed Bladen Bluffs Project at Tar Heel, N.C. including Raw water intake, Water
Treatment Plant, Future Water Treatment Plant Expansion site and Land Application Site ............................ 4
Figure 2. USGS Station 0210550: Cape Fear at W.O. Huske Lock near Tar Heel......................................................11
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Bladen County: Surface Water Classifications of Water Bodies within the Cape Fear River Basin
an

go
MW
Pq
PR
FM
"R
MR
F"
MR
Taq
P"
(EXCERPTS) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF THE
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER SYSTEM
BLADEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
A. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared in accordance with the North Carolina State
Environmental Policy Act (NC SEPA), N.C. General Statute Section 113A-1. et seq., N.C. General
Statute 143-215.1 (b)(2) and other applicable laws, for the purpose of evaluating the environmental
consequences of completing the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water System ("System", `BBRSWS'�
developed, constructed and operated by the Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
("Authority"). The EA received the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on June 11, 2008.
Local government endorsements to this proposed system have been received from the counties of
Bladen, Columbus, Cumberland', and Sampson; from the cities of Clinton and Whiteville; and from the
towns of Elizabethtown, Chadbourn, St. Pauls, White Lake, and Lake Waccamaw. In addition, there
are letters of support from the Lumber River Council of Governments and Smithfield Packing
Company. The Authority will offer water services to local governments and industrial users in the
counties of Bladen, Columbus, Robeson and Sampson counties (the "4-County Region'.
Phase I of the System will involve the construction of the following components:
(a) A 30-MGD intake structure installed adjacent to the river to avoid future river disturbances but
operated at a withdrawal capacity of 12 MGD,
(b) Screens, pipe, and pump station installed for 30 MGD, but initially operating up to 12-MGD
capacity,
(c) A water treatment plant with a capacity of up to 6 MGD,
(d) A raw water impoundment with a capacity between 12 to 20 MG, and
(e) Transmission line main, at the ROW of NC 87, will be available to existing local water distribution
systems (i.e Bladen County).
The intake, SWTP and storage reservoir will be located on land that is currently owned by Smithfield
Packing Company (SPC) in Tar Heel, N.C. (Figure 1). Arrangements will be made for long-term use of
the site by the Authority once the project is approved and prior to construction.
An application for the reclassification of a portion of the Cape Fear River (and its tributaries) from
Class "C" to Class "WS-IV" was submitted to the Classification and Standards Unit of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ) on December 4, 2006 (See Appendix B). A public
hearing was conducted on August 14", 2008. The Reclassification package is to be presented to the
Environmental Management Commission for their approval at their November 2008 meeting.
I Cumberland County agrees to abide by the watershed regulations governing the Cape Fear River Reclassification request.
go
Lower Cape I -car Water and Svwcr .\uthorM 3
Bladen Bluffs Regaonal Surface \Vater Smem I'Accrpts from the Fti ironmcntal :\sscssment-DI?NIt Project # 1388; # 13820 NJ
Prepared by Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.

M
M
LJ
Cl
`A
0
.. uwvrony
tt �
�wgyrar�rec
Raw Water
Intake Site
\`1
wl
1 1
J
Water Treatment
Plant Site
,t
Future Water Treatment
Plant Expansion Site ft T
Reserved Area (Future)
w
1��1 I4
1
f
� � t
Figure 1. Location of the proposed Bladen Bluffs Project at Tar Heel, N.C. including Raw water intake, Water Treatment
Plant, Future Water Treatment Plant Expansion site
L. nc.r �'..qx Pau \C'.,tcr.unl$accr \uthuritc 4
B6adcn Bluffs 1";6 nal Surface \\'amr ?csRvm ISxerpts from the Fnvirom- mud :\.asessment -DENlt Project # 1388; D\C'Q # 13820
PrcpotrJ b, Hobbs, Upchurch & Associ t[ , P.A. rUJ

W
as
IA
r
AL Components of the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water System
System components (a-e) will be located on land currently owned by SPC provided to the Authority by
way of lease.
a. Intake, rate water main, and raw waterAnm2 station:
The raw water intake will consist of the installation of a 30-MGD capacity intake operating at a
withdrawal capacity from 6 to 12 MGD. The intake infrastructure will include piping up to 42-inch
diameter and up to two pipes, with wedge wire screens installed in the river. The wedge wire screens
will be located on a support structure in the Cape Fear River (Class C surface water) at Bladen Bluffs,
5.5 miles down stream of Lock and Dam Number 3 (LD3) where the 7Q10 is approximately 585 cfs.
The intake will provide water to a raw water pump station that will pump the water up to a raw water
impoundment. The screens will be sized to provide capacity of up to 10 MGD per screen. The
pumping capacity will be sized at least for current needs (at least 4 MGD net capacity leaving the
treatment facility) with expansion capability up to 30 MGD by adding facilities. Normally, just one
pump would be run to satisfy initial demands. The intake will be designed in consultation with the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission to minimize entrainment and impingement of fish. A compressed air
backwash system will be installed for cleaning debris off the screens. River water will flow by gravity
pipeline to the raw water pump station. The air backwash compressor and electrical control equipment
will be in the raw water pump station to protect against the 100-year flood.
The proposed raw water pump station structure will likely be located in the FEMA-defined 100-year
floodplain as determined by the January 2007 updates prepared by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program. However, the finished floor of the structure will be located above the 100-year
flood elevation of 66 feet to protect critical equipment such as motors, controls, and electrical systems.
It is probable that the raw water pump station and intake pipe will be located within 450 feet of the
riverbank. The construction method used to install the intake pipe had not been determined but will
likely be performed by either open -cut excavation or micro -tunneling towards the river. In the event
the intake pipe is installed by open cut methods requiring disturbance of the existing vegetative buffer,
the vegetative buffer immediately adjacent to the river bank will be restored to provide visual screening
from the river.
1. - 5
HI i .capts Irom the Encirunmcnrtl Asscesmcnt -DENR Project # 1388; D\Y'Q # 13820 NJ
., I lobbs, Upchurch & Assuci:uc.' P.A.

we
we
an
am
t_■
in
r
M
r
M
b. O tream storage (Up to 20 MG Raw Water Lrboundmeno
The transmission mains from the raw water pump station to the raw water impoundment and from the
raw water impoundment to the treatment facility will be sized for 15 MGD initial capacity to give 30
MGD when paralleled in the future. The raw water impoundment will be sized within the range of 12
to 20 MG of storage. The range is due to limits on affordability, state regulations on raw water storage
volumes, and balancing the desire for more storage against the potential for increased algae growth
from storage.
C. Surface water treatment b nt
Standards under the Safe Drinking Water Act will be met by using a proven conventional treatment
technology utilizing sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection. The SWTP will be able to operate
intermittently without impacting the finished water quality and maintaining settled water turbidity.
Some or all of the capacity may be made available to the Authority as part of a clearwell project
currently being built by SPC. The initial design will accommodate flows up to 6 MGD net capacity.
d. Slud�acilities
The preliminary design evaluates options of residuals handling including land application, bidding for
others to remove the residuals, and storing in reclamation basins. In all options, there will be
a reclamation basin for backwash water equalization and residuals storage. Contract hauling
and disposal of sludge from residuals basins is estimated to be the least cost option initially based on
quotes received. To preserve the option of future on site land application, a portion of the site will
be reserved for residuals land application; therefore, that requirement is conservatively included in land
disturbance estimates at this time.
If used in the future, the land application system will be designed to comply with all NCDENR
requirements. A Surface Disposal of Residual Solids permit will be requested from NCDWQ. This
permit requires detailed soils reports and hydrogeologic evaluations and will include volume of sludge
to be produced, identification of disposal site with loading and percolation rates, site geology, discharge
flows, analysis of sludge characteristics, and utilization of nutrients. If future final design and soils
testing show land application to not be feasible, then residuals disposal will be contracted out and land
application will not be used.
The residuals flows including both sedimentation basin sludge and backwash water will have a total
flow of up to approximately 0.9 MGD with the initial construction. The 0.9-MGD flow would be
discharged into the Cape Fear River (Water Resources are described in Section B) via a NPDES permit
(NPDES application enclosed). The solids to be land applied from the up to 6-MGD net capacity water
treatment facility are estimated to consist of an annual average of up to approximately 4,000 pounds per
day of solids. If this amount of solids were applied at a range of 0.5 to 3 percent solids, then the range
in flow would be 10 to 70 gpm of flow.
I ., Capp I i \C `n.r "n I t6
151 J I I IItluu I r.JfiII \\.LISr,i if\ccrptsfrom the I?nvinvancnutlAssessment -UIiNItproject #1388;UWQ#I382n NJ
.-.d b" Hobbs Upchurch & Associates, P.A.

aft
sOM
Tran.rmurion Lines Accessible to Existing Water Mains
A network of 6, 8, 10, and 12 inch diameter water mains exists throughout the 4-County Region. This
existing distribution infrastructure is accessible to the proposed transmission lines. This guarantees that
the 4-County Region will have access to the surface water system.
Bladen County may be the first local government to be served by the system. Elizabethtown will have
access to the water by the construction of a 16 to 24-inch transmission line (diameter to be defined
during the design phase) from the Bladen Bluffs Surface Water Treatment Plant site and parallel to NC-
87. Along the way, the Towns of Tar Heel and Dublin will have access to the regional system.
Similarly, other towns (i.e. Bladenboro, Clarkton, White Lake, etc) will have access to the system.
Transmission main routes and other associated water conveyance infrastructure will be located in
rights -of -way (ROW). After construction, the only visible features of the water conveyance facilities will
be at the control valve locations (access plates for the buried control valves and/or small aboveground
control valve structures). Landscaping will be used, as necessary, to reduce potential visual impacts at
the control valve locations.
Lutccr Caps 14ar \C':ucr and Scwcr \mhnrin
Bladcn Nu11's Rcgional Surl:mc Wacr Scstcm Hsttugns tram the lin%ironmmtal :\scssmem -DI?NR Project # 1388; )WQ # 13820 NJ
Prepared by Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.

CM
0
..
r
In
IN
u
me
oft
r
�M
B. WATER RESOURCES
B.1 Cape Fear River Basin
The Cape Fear River is the largest river basin occurring entirely within North Carolina and drains
approximately 9,322 square miles. The headwaters arise north of Greensboro, in northern Guilford
and southern Rockingham Counties. The river is formed by the confluence of the Deep and Haw
Rivers approximately 14 miles northeast of Sanford and flows approximately 200 miles to its mouth
into the Atlantic Ocean at the town of Southport.
Table 17 and Table 18 list the surface water classifications (published by NC DWQ) and the
characteristics of the surface water bodies within the Cape Fear River Basin located in the towns of Tar
Heel, Elizabethtown, Roseboro and Clinton by NC DWQ.
This subsection also includes discussions related to (1) the pre -and post- Jordan Lake Reservoir 7 Q 10
at the proposed intake site, (2) the possibility of the removal of the locks and dams on the Cape Fear
River, and (3) other authorized NPDES discharges in the vicinity of the proposed SWTP.
Water Features in Bladen County
Bladen County is home to the chain of lakes known as the Bladen Lakes. The five individual lakes that
make up the chain are Bay Tree, Singletary, Jones, Salters and the most popular, Wbite Lake. Bladen
County's water resources also include the Cape Fear, South and Black Rivers. These water features
provide the opportunity to canoe, boat, fish and camp. To protect these uses, Bladen County has
adopted a watershed/water supply ordinance that covers a small portion of the county in the East
Arcadia area, and a floodplain map and ordinance that covers the entire county.
Lower Cap, R u Watoand `Q, ,-Authority 8.
Bh&n Bluffs Rcp omal SuAace \Vat,, �'pstem Excerpt., from the Environmenctl Assessment -DENR Project # 1388; DWQ # 13820 NJ
Prvpured be Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, PA.

r
�r
r
r
r
OR
on
Table 1: Bladen County: Surface Water Classifications of Water Bodies within the Cape Fear River Basin
Location
Class
Description C DWQ
1. South R at US 13 near Cooper
Waters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife,
2. Cape Few R at W.O. Huske Lock near Tar Heel
fish and aquatic fife propagation and survival, agriculture and
3. Cape Fear R below Lock and Dam 3 boat ramp
other uses suitable for Class C. Secondary recreation includes
4. Cape Fear R at power lines near Tolarsville
wading, boating, and other uses involving human body
5. Cape Fear R at SR1316 at Tarheel
contact with water where such activities take place in an
6. Cape Few R below Harrison Cr new Ruskin
infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. There are no
7. Harrison Cr at SR 1320 at Burney
restrictions on watershed development or types of
8. Cape Fear R at US 701 at Elizabethtown
discharges.
9. Turnbull Cr at SR 1509 near Johnsontown
C
10. Cape Fen R DNS mouth at Ellis CR
11. Cape Fear R above Lock and Dam 2
12. Cape Few R at Lock 2 new Elizabethtown
13. Browns Cr at NC 87 mouth
14. Turnbull Cr — NC 53 & NC 41 new Elizabethtown
15. Cape Fear R at RM 70
16. Hammond Cr at SR 1704
1. Cape Fear R at SR 1730 new Carvers
Waters used as sources of potable water where a WS-1, II or
2. Cape Fear R above Lock and Dam 1 — East Arcadia
III classification is not feasible. These waters are also
3. Cape Fear R at Lock 1 near Kelly
protected for Class C, uses. WS-IV waters are generally in
4. Cape Fear R at NC 11 near Kings Bluff
WS-IV
moderately to bigbly developed watersheds or Protected Areas, and
involve no categorical restrictions on discharges.
Cape Fear River at RM 55
Waters protected as water supplies which are generally
upstream and draining to Class WS-IV waters or waters used
by industry to supply their employees with drinking water or
as waters formerly used as water supply. These waters are
WS-V
also protected for Class _C uses. WS-V has no categorical
restrictions on watershed development or wastewater
discharges unlike other WS classifications and local
governments are not required to adopt watershed protection
ordinances.
1. South R at US 13 near Cooper
Supplemental classification intended to recognize those
2. Cape Fear R at Lock 1 new Kelly
SW
waters that generally have naturally occurring very low
3. Cape Fear R at NC 11 near Kings Bluff
velocities, low pH and low dissolved oxygen. No specific
restrictions on development are involved.
1. Six Runs Cr at SR 1960 near Taylons Bridge
Supplemental classification intended to protect unique and
2. Six Runs Cr at SR 100
special waters having excellent water quality and being of
3. Black R at NC 411 near Tomahawk
exceptional state or national ecological or recreational
significance. ORWs have one of the following outstanding
resource values:
Outstanding fish habitat or fisheries,
Unusually high level of waterbased recreation,
ORW
Some special designation such as NC or National
Wild/Scenic/Natural/Recreational River, National Wildlife
Refuge, etc.,
Important component of state or national park or forest, or
Special ecological or scientific significance (rare or
endangered species habitat, research or educational areas).
No new discharges or expansions of existing discharges shall
be permitted. There are associated development controls
enforced by DW . ORW areas are ILQSV by definition.
Lom¢ f ;,pc Pea \V'nwr anJ S�mcr Authorrtc 9
Bladen Bluffn Ar%arar Scslcin bacerpts from the Emmmmental.Assesstncm -DFNR Project # 1388; 1AVQ # 13820
Prrpared be Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.

M
r�
r
r
W
M
W
re
r
r
r
B.2 Estimation of the Low Flow (7Q10)atTar Heel
Since the proposed intake site is in close proximity to the gauging station at Huske Lock and
Dam (USGS Station 0210550) the flow characteristics at the gauging station are applicable to
the proposed intake location (34°46'17" N and 78°47'52" W).
No listed drainage area is available in USGS records. However, a drainage area of
approximately 4,860-4,870 sq miles is an acceptable estimation.
The following low -flow estimates were provided for use and consideration:
For the gauging station in the Cape Fear River at William O. Huske Lock near Tarheel, the
published 7Q10 is 797 cfs, based on 1982-97 climatic years (12-month period ending March 31)
and designated by the year in which the period begins, used for determining low -flow
characteristics at continuous -record gauging stations). It reflects the period of regulated flow
releases since Jordan Lake was opened in the early 1980's. The 797 cfs value was the most
recently published 7Q10 for the gauging station included in the Cape Fear River low flow
basinwide report, published in 2001 (hiW://nc.water.uso.gov/reports/wriOl4O94). Low -flow
characteristics published in this report are based on streamflow data available through the 1998
water year (that is, ending September 1998).
Following the recent drought periods, re -analyses of the low -flow characteristics indicate some
substantial changes in the 7Q10 discharge when considering the additional years of record. The
most recent low -flow analysis on file for this site is based on data through the 2004 climatic year
(that is, ending March 31, 2005). The 7Q10 based on streamflow during the 1982-2004 climatic
years is 585 cfsabout 25 pereent lower than the previously publisbed value. During the additional years
since report publication, the two lowest annual minimum 7-day average flows since 1982
occurred during 1999 and 2002 (Figure 2).
In addition to the flow releases from Jordan Lake, there is a target discharge of 600 cfs that is
required at the USGS stream gauge in the Cape Fear River at Lillington (station ID 02102500,
drainage area 3,464 sqm). During the recent drought periods, the target discharge has been
adjusted downward to help in the drought management of Jordan Lake. Thus, use of the low -
flow characteristics at this location needs to include an awareness of the upstream flow
conditions that have occurred during the analysis period.
To use the lowest value of 585 cfs is recommended (Curtis Weaver, USGS, personal
communication).
L""' Capa I uur \\'n[cr and $ewer \ud.nnt, 10
Nladcn Rlufls R,p,nal Surhacc AA''ter Slsrem l 'C"T'ts from tlm Iin iroiz cntnl .-Asscros cnt-DI _NR Project # 1388; DWQ # 13820 ��
PnparLd by Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.

M
m
1 30
M
rr
M
MR
USGS Sta. 02105500. Cape Fear River at W.O. Huske Lock near Tarheel
Lowest annual 7-day average flows. 1938-80. 1982-2004 climatic years
(Discharge records since October 1937)
2000
Note: C raMb year is the 1&month period hem April 1 throw Mwoh 31
and is designated bythe yen in which the period begin. The oFinaflc gear
k the standard period iced in bwflow a nalwesior gaging stations.
--�- - 7-day. 10-year lowflaw d'scharge(pos4Jordan)
ee>_ Looeat anwl7, day merage d'soharge(poslJon1m)
1500 lowest anew) merage 7-day discharge (pre -Jordan)
—e— 7-day, 10-year bwflos decharge(preJordan)
1000
500
0
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Climatic year
Figure 2. USGS Station 0210550: Cape Fear at W.O. Huske Lock near Tar Heel
Mr. Curtis Weaver (USGS) provided calculations and graphical plots for the 7-day average low flow in
the Cape Fear River at LD3. Figure 2 shows the pre- and post Jordan Lake periods. An average low
flow of 400 cfs for the period between 1945 and 1980 is apparent. For the period 1990-2004, the
average low flow ranged between 600-800 cfs. As shown, the plot graphs the lowest annual average 7-
day flow for both before and after the operation of Jordan Lake. From these low averages and with the
more influential extreme lows, the 7Q10 flows were calculated and plotted as a series of linked black
points on the pre -Jordan plot with blue points showing the post Jordan operation. At least 10 years of
data is required to derive the 7Q10 values; therefore the first 9 years in both instances show no 7Q10
value. With adequate stream gauge data, the DFLOW program from the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (US EPA) can be used to examine those values and derive the 7Q10 flow.
This information also was provided to the USACOE in spring 2006 in response to a request from their
group studying the potential impacts associated with possible removal of the lock and dam structures'.
1 In response to the NCDWR memorandum dated April 24, 2006 related to the removal of the locks and dam from the
Cape Fear River.
I .r Cap, I u AV m an 11 \,, I ],,m, 11
I iLld,11 Iilllll - 1,11 Sw [AIL AA`car Ica the I.ncin n n nl.il Accssrerm -I APINH P,o'ro !P I,ift 1 # 13820 1 u��
rd hH r obbs, Upchurch & Associates P.A.

M9
P"
MR
fm
No
P"
M
P"
MR
PW
F"
MR
APPLICATION TO REQUEST
RECLASSIFICATION OF NC SURFACE WATER
1. Date of Request: November, 2006
2. Requested by: Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
1107 New Pointe Blvd, Suite 17
Leland, North Carolina, 28451
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
3. River Basin: Cape Fear Counties: Bladen, Cumberland
4. List Waterbodv requested for reclassification:
Waterbodv Name Waterbodv Index Current Class Request Class
CAPE FEAR NC18-(26) "C" "WS-IV"
5. Attachments:
Is a USGS 7.5 minute topographic map outlining the subject waters/land area
attached? YES
Is this a request for a more protective water supply reclassification? —YES —
If so, is a resolution from all local governments with land use jurisdiction within
the boundaries of a proposed water supply watershed attached? YES
Resolution from the following entities are attached:
■ Bladen County
■ Cumberland County
6. Reason for request. (see enclosed reyort: Justification of a 30-MGD Water Intake
in the Cape Fear Rver at Tar Heel, Bladen County,, NCB
It is the intention of the Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority (LCFWASA)
of Leland, NC to initiate the construction of the Bladen Bluffs Water System
(BBWS). As a prerequisite to formal design, LCFWSA is applying for the
reclassification of 10 river miles of the Cape Fear river from Class code C to Class
code WS-IV along that length of river starting at the coordinates 34°46'17 N by
78°47'52 W at Tar Heel upstream to the mouth of an unnamed creek at the
coordinates 34°54'22 N by 78°48'55W.
LCFWASA intends to install a raw water intake in the river designed for a capacity of
30 MGD. The water intake is approximately 2.6 miles North of the town of Tar Heel.
Prepared by Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
M. Sanchez -King, Ph.D., P.E. / B. King
T: 910 270 5520
msanchezkChobbsupchurch.com

tit
tR
MW
MR
FM
MR
ran
rXR
MR
MR
P"
POR
MR
No
tan
No
an
In addition to the intake structure in the river, a 20 million gallon holding pond and a
4 MGD treatment facility are to be constructed on the Smithfield Packing property at
the bluffs above the river.
BBWS is intended to serve the entire region through supplying raw water to Bladen,
Columbus, Pender, Robeson, and Sampson counties that currently draw water from
receding aquifers or aquifers that are in danger of chloride intrusion. With the
conversion from groundwater sources to surface sources by municipalities and
industries the stressed aquifers may recharge to original levels and quality, however
groundwater will continue to be a source for small consumers in locations where
surface regional water is not feasible to distribute.
The initial flow to be withdrawn from the river is 4 MGD to Smithfield Packing, used
for all requirements of pork processing from cleaning of carcasses through finished
product and employee consumption. However the installed intake structure, pumps,
and piping will be designed and built for the 30 MGD flow that will become available
through later appropriate permitting processes as the necessary infrastructure for
distribution becomes available. From a watershed perspective, the current proposed
consumers as well as future users would return their treated water back to the Cape
Fear.
The ultimate goal of the project is multifaceted but two primary goals are most
obvious and crucial:
1) Consumers of water in this region of the state cannot withdrawal any more
groundwater than they are at this moment. Historical levels in test wells show
localized cones of depression in the main pumping centers (i.e. Smithfield
Packing site, Elizabethtown) indicating that movement of water underground
will be flowing in from all directions with the possibility of salt water
intrusion, unless the current pumping levels cease. Once withdrawal from the
aquifer slows or stops, groundwater levels very likely will rebound over time
and become a reliable source for small consumers in remote areas. To
illustrate, provided that that groundwater levels remain stable and no
additional pumping centers are activated, the static level of the Upper Cape
Fear Aquifer would rebound at a rate of 0.10 inches/year. If, however,
pumping were to cease entirely, the static level would rise much faster.
2) The availability of a reliable and cost-effective source of water will enhance
economic development in southeastern North Carolina.
Prepared by Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
M. Sanchez -King, Ph.D., P.E. / B. King
T: 910 270 5520
m sanchezkeahobbsupch urch.com

PSI
TNR
F"
P"
P"
t"
M
MR
M
0"
PR
F"
P"
MR
F"
0"
Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water System
Request for Reclassification
Waterbodies to be Reclassified
WaterBody
Stream
Current
Request
County
Description
Index #
Class
Class
Cape Fear River
18-(26)
C
WS-IV
Bladen/
From:
Cumberland
34' 54' 27" N; 78 48' 47" W
To:
34'46' 17"N;784715211W
on the main stem of the Cape
Fear River
Gray's Creek
18-35-(2)
C
WS-IV
Cumberland
Segment from
Lacy Blossom road
to the Cape Fear River
Hair's Mill Creek
18-36
C
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Source
to the Cape Fear River
Willis Creek
18-37
C
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Source
to the Cape Fear River
Swans Creeks
18-37-1
C
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Source
to Willis Creek
Long's Branch
18-37-1-1
C
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Source
to Swan's Creek
Kirk's Mill Creek
18-37-2
C
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Source
to Willis Creek
Unnamed
18-37-3-(1)
B
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Source
Tributary
to dam at McGou ans Lake
Unnamed
18-37-3-(2)
B
WS-IV
Cumberland
From Dam at McGougans
Tributary
Lake to Willis Creek
Georgia Branch
18-38
C
WS-IV
Bladen
From Source
to Cape Fear River
Mine's Creek
18-38-1-(1)
B
WS-IV
Bladen
From Source
to dam at Pages Lake
Mine Creek
18-38-1-(2)
C
WS-IV
Bladen
From dam at Pages Lake
to Geor ' Branch
MR

11
004. 45 GAT N 034'
0.00• N T — 034•
0.06' N
1� �r
I.
71
'
y
`4 �7 •� ' t''U /' E.' ; '�1i. ��'�
• '
1 f - � f ! �".` a S,.I
+ .' _
{
ri L"'�'fir• � rf7 4t i., � >'�P` a _
71
� •, '• � 11. I .,�•'�
- - _ .- . � ..
�
,
- y��i Lu •a � . r- ` c^_
s - •"•;r—• f«k-t 1c ,�i
.i1 /
1�
' al .,i i�;`""�r �
.• .r �. � F y r .` . �
� i' •ice
�
tl ,�. � /_�' -• ' � r '.� � /
iii�� i• 1 (,lam ° — ,
'4j � si I
�r1
--
;
+ ` l
• d '�. f/ ey �'• r '$.� A. R+« `r
j ` / ����' �`� ..rl�
;
�. - .tj. / _ % I-
b
.. �� --. y � ' { �:%..
e� °�.'�-�.... .!'�'`• � f 1
�
,� _ i ; �'R"-il J ' � pl -
�,
1�• 1 � � , ` i � � �' �; �
r •. z,
{'e�lxi • '�h�•..
_ _
# :4y E s 'rtrr}"v� { } _'ti
-
+ r'
`
I . } I •' i� i,�t L '` ,il
•
t .�• 7''s-.- .f`i1
C
y+n` e F:Tf
/y ! -, e ir'�• �.9 i.-
7"-.J' F' 1 t- .T + • �, r
I .� a ' , ,y .. ,' ' 1..�• s
JA
_ _1. -1
` 1.�, •- • •.•..._.. --i ... -. _. _ , ii _
Epp
! ° i , 1
�-,— + '.. 111 , • E I
A„ t 4•
er i l I Ar. j
_1 1 '�'L15.. 1►•, .�i
A{T F . >' !{,
M'
�
�
,�.
f 4
•:� .< t �
-ems- _ 7 - i
F _ _ �' �t _ ( _
�e � � 1
O
tY rp
i f 3 `` i
- s 1 u: 4 _ - �r
.,,. •"`�
`
�
e`''�a.=� 1 _ _.--..>n1.•� •
i. �� � .. CE � • � f -�3 -' � - � �.-
� J � �T �'�� _
�
• • ^-ti'r`� 1 S ._ -'♦i.� A ; . .
1
� '�
i •� 3_
• E ;�
:�y5..�+•. _ .. .L �.' ,Y��.-2 �.raGl �
e/ . .f i•�
_ � -
•�
�
i
pr
1
�o„+�,., a �jj' j.
�1�; `F !
I
�v �� � .r fr I � .+
� � `1 yy' i• : '
�. � m �
� , � i .,r-P; 1 ` E t• . p
r �'� ';„. I 1 � }tea
}
f �' r sc �
.. �` .: i
� ! � ; � k
�`
��) '
;.�'1# Je S+
�� � -e•. ll± � -
Jam-• �
.,r' 11� � .;r+� .�
__ , ,j��l - I_ is ,^>-1 Y.
�
«• t- � � I "• ,'
� ! -'E"• e.
i ' -
b
Y
4
1 i
i � �j
Pt, �.r ''4 I rri t�' e 1 i �,.I'•(
�"' - - �--..� �• *� + ,e. , tt1
• i' 1. F �..•,,, i • to °•.D
. Iy � e; ,, ,i•
i 1 Y
', fir'
fr .
_..�
pf • i y ti i .�• r
! �C-
d Ip P t i
!�
� I /� �
�s
� ,�
.+ _ t'
r
L. 1 -� � 'J--ai.^...
Y
� fr �"��
V
J�r,
- �-
,•i q���"'~
I
j
J
:•,
1 ! f.�l �
•T
� -
�.'�i �s' ;z4�.0•
o
� .. ;�•',.. _ +
( +f �_
i=',+^ �T - s. .. - :a_
� � ti �`+ �ixis ' i 1.A. 't' . ',�,,.,, _
s• -
I �'9 .�
. � � f , • "' _ � � � ^ ,
1 s� �,°
r
•rf
_ �,,• . c,. � 1 - x � �
•
,*- �.. �y (_ X`. '":�e �. � 1�_ e 'r�i �1
" .'.' -
- :; j{.,'.-._ ,L
�
�oT
^. !
! #
�2
�r• ..1�7. i - .f /'
At. t• ' • r
i• #.
t, �� ,'.: d J., .i I• �' + .! f
+ fjj
L^ 034• 4S
0.00• N WC 50
0.00" N I 034•
O.w N

PR
F"
I"
M
Division of Water Quality
January 23, 2008
MEMORANDUM
To: Elizabeth Kountis
From: Harold Quidley
Laura Spell
Through: Jimmie Overto
Subject: Cape Fear River Reclassification Study 2007
(subbasins 03-06-15 and 03-06-16)
Findings: 1. Based on fecal coliform sampling (5 events in 30 days), one-time chemical sampling and
review of historical DWQ Ambient Monitoring data, the Cape Fear River in the designated study
area will meet Water Supply IV standards during normal seasonal flow conditions.
2. A single parameter (Bromodichloromethane) was found at levels slightly above the DWQ
water quality standard of 0.55 µg/L in 3 volatile organic (VOA) samples collected in the lower
study reach.
3. It should be noted that the reduction of dilution of the Cape Fear River, in association with the
ongoing drought might have attributed to the slightly increased Bromodichloromethane levels
detected during the study.
Background:
MR At your request, the Intensive Survey Unit (DWQ) conducted a reclassification study in an approximate 10-mile
reach of the Cape Fear River in Bladen and Cumberland Counties. The Lower Cape Fear River Water and
Sewer Authority (LCFWASA) has requested that the section be reclassified from C to Water Supply -IV [WS-IV
PM CA and WS-IV (PA)]. The request states that the reclassification is needed in order to install a raw water
(supply) intake. If approved, the raw water intake would supply a 4 MGD surface water treatment plant
(SWTP). The initial water to be withdrawn would be used by Smithfield Packing for all requirements of pork
r•q processing and employee use. The study area includes a 9.97 mile river segment from (Lat34.96011 l Long —
78.815278) downstream to (Lat 34.771389 Long-78.797778) near Tar Heel. The proposed intake is located
approximately 1 mile upstream from SR1316 (Myers St. Tar heel).
Drought and hydrology information:
The Cape Fear River reclassification study request was received by the ISU during March 2007, however due to
the extreme drought persisting throughout the summer and fall, field sampling was repeatedly postponed to
assure that study results would reflect water quality in the Cape Fear River during normal seasonal conditions.
During October 2007 it was decided to proceed with a preliminary study even though extreme drought and
unusually low water levels continued to affect the region. On 12/04/07 ISU staff completed the 5-week study
f" that included physical profiles and chemical sampling at 7 sites in the requested reclassification reach of the
Cape Fear River, (Station Locations Table I and Map Figure 1). Resulting data from the study will also be used
as part of the ongoing drought monitoring effort being conducted by DWQ during 2007-2008. A review of 25-
,,,,,, years of USGS data for William O'Huske Lock and Dam #3 indicates that the mean of monthly discharges for
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section

the month of November is 3,020 cfs with a range from 978.3 cfs to 10,190 cfs. Preliminary data from the USGS
site for the month of November 2007 (Cape Fear Reclassification Study) indicates that the mean monthly
discharge was < 600 cfs. A total of 0.23 inches of precipitation was recorded at the Lock during the study with
a maximum of 0.17 inches occurring during one event on 11/15/07. River stage remained relatively stable
throughout the study with gage height measurements fluctuating within a relatively narrow range of 0.17 inches.
Mean discharge, gage height (stage) and precipitation data (USGS 02105500 Cape Fear River at William 0'
Huske Lock nr Tar Heel, NC) for the month of November 2008 can be found in Table 2.
Table 1. Cape Fear River Reclassification Study Site Locations
CPF 1 Cape Fear River at upper boundary of requested reclassification reach. Cumberland Co.
Lat 34.906111 Long-78.815278
CPF2 Cape Fear River 0.3 miles downstream from the mouth of Grays Creek. Cumberland Co.
Lat 34.887694 Long-78.815639
CPF3 Cape Fear River 1.5 miles upstream from Willis Creek.
Lat 34.872028 Long-78.819444
Cumberland Co.
CPF4 Cape Fear River 250 feet upstream William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3. Bladen Co.
Lat 34.837083 Long-78.823111
CPFS Cape Fear River 0.73 miles downstream from Georgia Branch. Bladen Co.
Lat 34.807056 Long-78.813611
CPF6 Cape Fear River 0.48 miles downstream from UT Bladen Co.
Lat 34.78911 l Long-78.801167
CPF7 Cape Fear River at lower boundary of requested reclassification reach. Bladen Co.
Lat 34.771389 Long-78.797778
Study Parameters:
1. Physical profiles (dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH and conductivity) measured at the surface, mid -depth
and bottom at each site during each sampling event.
2. Fecal coliform samples collected weekly at each site during study, (5 sampling events conducted during a 30-
day period).
3. A one-time sampling event at each site for water chemistry consisting of the following parameters:
Nitrogen & Phosphorus, (NH3, TKN, NO2 + NO3, NO3, P-Total)
Sulfate
Methylene -Blue -Active Substances (MBAS)
Metals (nickel, calcium and magnesium)
Organochlorine Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neutral & Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA)
4. Review of DWQ Ambient Monitoring Station Summary (B8305000 Cape Fear River at SR1316 at Tar Heel).
Environmental Sciences Branch
Water Quality Section
r

a"
tR
t"
T"
M
M
PR
n
tM
T"
MR
a4
Figure 1
Cape Fear River Reclassification Study Sites - 2007
CPF 1
CPF2_
Fb
19 -
.0/c'
' - i�"�` - - _.e,G/ yr�+,w.++a..r ' v.+u+.wawr.r/�+..r�..r w�rr-�aa.' syra+•�
Lock and. Dam #3-
`'r pF1j�
04,
pq
CPFB 1
N"
CPFi!,
Tar Heel Landing at SR 1316
1 Ambient Station: B830SOM
y i ..-
N
oaks

Study Results and Discussion:
s
Physical Parameters
Physical measurements, (temp, dissolved oxygen, pH and conductivity) were taken at the surface, mid -depth and
bottom during each sampling event at all sites during the study (Table 3). Physical parameters were measured
using a Hydrolab Quanta multi -parameter meter. Meters were calibrated (initial and terminal) using the DWQ
ISU Standard Operating Procedures for Physical and Chemical Monitoring, Version 1.3. Physical profiles
1
indicated all values to be within acceptable seasonal levels with temperatures gradually decreasing throughout
the month of November. Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.) ranged from 8.01 mg/L to 9.89 mg/L in the study reach with
, R
% saturation levels reaching 90.7% well within the 110% water quality standard. Conductivity values were
t
typical for this area of the Cape Fear River ranging from 108 umhos/cm to 180 umhos/cm with the lowest values
recorded during the first week of sampling. A storm event occurred during the week proceeding 11/06/07 (is'
sampling event) resulting in an increase in flow and dilution and a subsequent reduction in conductivity values
i
in the Cape Fear River. Decreasing flow and stage can be seen at Lock and Dam #3 during the first week of the
study (Discharge, Gage Height and Precipitation, Table 2). Values for pH ranged from 6.0 su to 7.9 su at the 7
sites with slightly higher values measured at the surface. These higher values at the surface are likely the result
7
of minimal algal productivity resulting from increased sunlight in the upper portion of the water column. A
review of DWQ Ambient- Monitoring System Station Summaries (Table 4) for station B8305000 (Cape Fear
River at SR1316 at Tar Heel) found that all physical parameters measured during the Cape Fear River
reclassification study were typical of water conditions occurring during the period from 01/15/02 through
12/06/06. DWQ ambient monitoring station B8305000 is located 2.07 miles downstream from CPF7.
i
Fecal Coliform
7
One focus of the 2007 study was to assess whether the section of the Cape Fear River would meet fecal coliform
bacteria requirements of a geometric mean of less than 200/100 ml (MF count) based on at least five consecutive
samples examined during any 30-day period. The 7 sampling sites were sampled five consecutive times during a
"R
i.
thirty -day period between 11/06/07 and 12/04/07. The resulting data (Table 3) indicated that the geometric
mean for all six sites did not exceed 200/100 ml and did not exceed 400/100 ml in more than 20% of the
samples. Geometric means for each site were well below the limits and ranged from 5.86 /100 ml to 44.7 with
the highest mean detected at CPF1, the uppermost site. The lowest geometric means occurred at the 3 most
downstream sites CPF5 through CPF7 with geometric means ranging from 5.86 to 8.16/100 mi. These values
are consistent the DWQ Ambient Monitoring System Station Summary for station B8305000 (Table 4) which
provides a geometric mean of 47/100 ml for a total of 58 samples (02/01/31 to 06/12/12).
Chemical Parameters
7
Chemical sampling was conducted at sites CPF5, CPF6 and CPF7 on 12/03/07 and at sites CPF1, CPF2, CPF3
j
and CPF4 on 12/04/07. The DWQ Chemistry Laboratory performed all chemical analyses for the Cape Fear
River reclassification study.
Metals samples collected during the Cape Fear River reclassification study included nickel (Ni), calcium (Ca)
7
and magnesium (Mg). All nickel values were reported as "not detected". Calcium and magnesium results were
used to calculate hardness data for the study. Resulting hardness values ranged from 26.35 mg/L to 27.77 mg/L,
below the water quality standard of 100 mg/L. The DWQ Ambient Monitoring System Station Summary for
r
station B8305000 at Tar Heel (01/] 5/02 through 12/06/06) indicated 17 sampling events for the following
metals; aluminum (A1), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel
(Ni) and zinc (Zn). Results of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead and nickel were reported as "non
7
detect" for all samples. A total of 17 copper samples resulted in 2 "non detect" and 2 samples above the action
level standard of 7 µg/L. A total of 17 iron samples resulted in 5 samples greater than the 1.0 mg/L action level
standard. Analysis for Zinc resulted in 11 samples as "non detect" with the remaining 6 samples below the
water quality standard of 50 µg/L. Metals data for the Cape Fear River reclassification study can be found in
Table 4 (Ambient Monitoring System and Station Summary) and Table 5 (Cape Fear River Water Samples —
Nutrients, Metals, MBAS, Sulfate and Hardness).
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section

fm
Chlorinated Pesticides
Pesticide samples were collected at each site with analysis resulting in all 51 target compounds reported as "non
detect" (Table 6). All 7 sites, had additional unidentified peaks ranging in numbers from 1 to 9. Unidentified
peaks are usually found in pesticide scans and are not considered significant.
Acid Herbicides
Herbicide sample analysis for each site resulted in all 15 target compounds reported as "non detect" with the
number of unidentified peaks ranging from 5 to <10 (Table 6). Unidentified peaks are usually found in
herbicide scans and are not considered significant.
Semivolatile Organics BNA's)
Semivolatile Organics samples were collected at each site with analysis resulting in all 66 target compounds
reported as "non detect" with 0 unidentified peaks (Table 6).
Volatile Organics (VOA's)
Volatile organic samples were collected at each site and were analyzed for 60 targeted compounds (Table 6);
Chloroform was detected in all samples and ranged from 0.1 µg/L to 0.91 µg/L with the lowest value detected at
CPF7, the most downstream site. Chloroform is commonly used as a solvent, a reagent and may also be used in
the production of dyes and pesticides. Chloroform values reported for the Cape Fear River reclassification are
below the DWQ water quality standard of 5.6 µg/L.
Bromodichloromethane was detected in VOA samples from all of the Cape Fear River sites with the exception
of CPF4. Reported values for bromodichloromethane were 0.46 µg/L (CPFI), 0.33 µg/L (CPF2), 0.34 µg/L
rim (CPF3), 0.60 µg/L (CPF5), 0.58 µg/L (CPF6) and 0.61 µg/L (CPF7). Sample results from 3 of the sites listed
above were slightly higher than the DWQ water quality standard of 0.55 µg/L. Most bromodichloromethane is
formed as byproduct when chlorine is added to water -supply systems to kill bacteria.
Im
VOA analysis detected 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene in samples from Sites CPF6 and CPF7. Trimethylbenzene is
primarily used as a gasoline additive. Trimethylbenzene was detected at 0.37 µg/L at site CPF6 and 0.39 µg/L
,q at site CPF7, both values well below the DWQ water quality standard of 850 µg/L.
Toluene was detected in very low levels in VOA samples collected at CPF6 (0.12 µg/L) and CPF7 (0.14 µg/L).
Both sample results were qualified as (N3) = Estimated concentration is <PQL and >MDL. Also detected at
very low levels at CPF6 and CPF7 was m,p-Xylene (0.41 and 0.42 respectively). Both sample results were
qualified as (N3) = Estimated concentration is <PQL and >MDL.
I"+ Nutrients
Nutrient levels for NH3, TKN, NO2 + NO3, Nitrate and P total were collected at each of the seven sites (Table
5). NH3 values ranged from 0.03 mg/L to 0.05 mg/L and may be considered lower than typically measured in
�., this reach of the Cape Fear River. This is evident when comparing these values to DWQ Ambient Monitoring
System Station Summaries for station B8305000 (Cape Fear River at SRI316 at Tar Heel) Table 4. This range
of NH3 values fall between the l 0`h and 25`h percentile of total observations at the Tar Heel ambient site. This
was likely the result of the drought conditions occurring during the study that provided residence time necessary
for nitrification to take place. This can also be seen in moderately low TKN values (ranging from 1.2 mg/L to
1.5 mg/L) and relatively higher than expected NO2 + NO3 values (ranging from 1.2 mg/L to 1.5 mg/L). Values
for TKN fall between the 10`h and 501h percentile while NO2 +NO3 values fall in the 901h percentile indicating
little localized drainage entering the system resulting from low flow conditions. Total phosphorus values ranged
from 0.17 mg/L to 0.23 mg/L and were found at levels normally detected in the area. Nitrate values ranged from
1.2 mg/L to 1.5 mg/L, below the 10.0 mg/L water quality standard for Class WS-IV waters.
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section
Im

Additional Chemical Parameters(Sulfate, MBAS, Fluoride and Chloride)
Sulfate levels were detected in a relatively narrow range of 18 mg/L to 20 mg/L at the study sites, below the 250
mg/L water quality standard for Class WS-IV. MBAS results were found to be at "non detect" levels or at 0.1
mg/L with the water quality standard for Class WS-IV at 0.5 mg/L. Fluoride levels were "non detect" or 0.4
mg/L within the Class WS-IV standard of 1.8 mg/L. Chloride results were reported at 19 mg/L or 20 mg/L at all
sites, below the 250 mg/L water quality standard for Class WS-IV. Sulfate, MBAS, fluoride and chloride data
can be found in Table 5.
cc: Belinda Henson (FRO)
Dianne Reid (Basinwide Plannng Program Unit)
Danny Strickland (FRO)
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section

f"
P"
Table 2.
William O'Huske Lock and Dam #3 USGS Site 02105500
Mean Daily Discharge, Gage Height and Precipitation
Date
Mean Discharge
Mean Gage Height
Precipitation
mm/dd/yy
cfs
ft (stage)
in. daily total
11 /06/07
669
1.08
0.00
11 /07107
578
0.99
0.00
11 /08/07
533
0.94
0.00
11 /09/07
506
0.91
0.00
11/10/07
520
0.93
0.00
11 /11 /07
528
0.93
0.00
11 /12/07
518
0.92
0.00
11 /13/07
503
0.91
0.00
11/14/07
506
0.91
0.00
11/15107
517
0.92
0.17
11/16/07
528
0.93
0.00
11 /17/07
542
0.95
0.00
11/18/07
546
0.95
0.00
11/19/07
552
0.96
0.00
r�
11 /20/07
542
0.95
0.00
11 /21107
540
0.95
0.00
11 /22107
546
0.95
0.02
11 /23/07
560
0.97
0.00
11 /24/07
539
0.95
0.00
11 /25/07
519
0.92
0.01
11 /26/07
558
0.97
0.01
11 /27/07
623
1.03
0.01
n•s
11 /28/07
651
1.07
0.00
11 /29/07
1.05
0.00
11 /30/07
630
1.04
0.00
�4
12/01 /07
615
1.03
0.00
12/02/07
601
1.01
0.00
12/03/07
603
1.01
0.01
MR
12/04/07
558
1.00
0.00
P" • no discharge data available for this day
MR
a4
MR

Table 3. Cape Fear River Physical Data (surface, mid, bottom) and Coliform (surface only, 6 samples In 30 days)
1
Station
Date
Depth
Time
Temp
DO
pH
Cond
Fecal Coliform
Geometric Mean
mm/ddmyy
s/m/b
hrs
(°C)
(mg/L)
(su)
umhos/cm
#/100 ml
Fecal #/100 for Site
Cape Fear River
11/06/07
surface
1105
14.5
8.16
6.9
112
38
Site: CPF1
11/06/07
mid
1105
14.5
8.01
6.8
112
11/06/07
bottom
1105
14.5
8.06
6.9
112
11/14/07
surface
1115
11.9
8.70
6.6
149
70 (134)
11/14/07
mid
1115
11.9
8.65
6.7
150
11/14/07
bottom
1115
11.9
8.69
6.5
149
11/19/07
surface
1050
11.6
8.61
7.4
168
150
t••i
11/19/07
mid
1050
11.6
8.78
7.3
168
I
11/19/07
bottom
1050
11.6
8.67
7.2
169
11/28/07
surface
1120
11.8
8.66
7.0
172
41
11/28/07
mid
1120
11.8
8.59
7.0
172
11/28/07
bottom
1120
11.8
8.85
6.9
172
12/04/07
surface
1200
10.4
9.24
7.4
179
11
12/04/07
mid
1200
10.4
9.26
7.3
179
1•w
12/04/07
bottom
1200
10.4
9.23
7.2
179
44.77
Cape Fear River
11/06/07
surface
1045
14.8
8.01
6.9
114
36
Site: CPF2
11/06/07
mid
1045
14.6
7.80
6.8
114
11/06/07
bottom
1045
14.6
7.95
6.8
114
MR
11/14/07
surface
1055
12.3
8.41
6.7
148
9
11/14/07
mid
1055
12.0
8.42
6.8
150
11/14/07
bottom
1055
12.0
8.41
6.6
150
11/19/07
surface
1030
11.7
8.60
7.5
169
150
11/19/07
mid
1030
11.7
8.62
7.4
170
11/19/07
bottom
1030
11.7
8.60
7.4
170
11/28/07
surface
1100
11.9
8.66
7.2
165
5
I
11/28/07
mid
1100
11.8
8.70
7.1
165
11/28/07
bottom
1100
11.8
8.58
7.0
165
12/04/07
surface
1120
10.6
8.86
7.5
169
15
r
12/04/07
mid
1120
10.6
8.82
7.4
169
12/04/07
bottom
1120
10.6
8.84
7.3
169
20.52
Cape Fear River
11/06/07
surface
1020
14.8
7.77
6.8
108
39
Site: CPF3
11/06/07
mid
1020
14.7
7.70
6.8
109
11/08/07
bottom
1020
14.7
7.77
6.8
109
11/14/07
surface
1025
12.1
8.41
6.7
146
20
11/14/07
mid
1025
12.0
8.40
6.8
148
{
11/14/07
bottom
1025
12.0
8.45
6.6
146
1
11/19/07
surface
1015
11.9
8.40
7.7
167
150
11/19/07
mid
1015
11.8
8.47
7.6
168
11/19107
bottom
1015
11.8
8.37
7.5
168
7
11/28107
surface
1045
11.7
8.69
7.2
166
39
11/28/07
mid
1045
11.8
8.66
7.1
166
bottom
1045
11.7
8.57
7.0
167
711/28/07
12/04107
surface
1115
10.8
8.74
7.5
172
17
12/04/07
mid
1116
10.8
8.83
7.3
172
12/04/07
bottom
1115
10.8
_8.51
_ 7.3
172
37.83
r
r

P"
Table 3 (continued)
Cape Fear River Physical Data (surface, mid, bottom) and Coltform (surface only, b samples in 30 days)
Station Date Depth Time Temp DO pH Cond Fecal Coliform Geometric Mean
mm/ddmyy s/m/b hrs VC) (mg/L) (su) umhos/cm #/100 ml Fecal #/100 for Site
I�1
Cape Fear River 11/06/07
surface
1000
15.1
7.43
6.9
108
43 (131)
Site: CPF4 11/06/07
mid
1000
15.0
7.45
6.8
108
11/06/07
bottom
1000
15.0
7.58
6.8
108
11/14/07
surface
1005
12.5
8.51
6.9
135
20
11/14/07
mid
1005
11.9
8.14
6.8
138
11/14/07
bottom
1005
11.9
8.17
6.6
137
11/19/07
surface
0955
12.0
8.79
8.1
160
61
11/19/07
mid
0955
11.8
8.40
7.9
159
11/19/07
bottom
0955
11.8
8.40
7.7
159
11/28/07
surface
1020
12.1
8.06
7.3
167
10
11/28/07
mid
1020
12.0
8.04
7.2
167
11/28/07
bottom
1020
12.1
7.90
7.1
167
12/04/07
surface
1000
11.0
8.49
7.8
171
12
12/04/07
mid
1000
11.0
8.50
7.9
171
12/04/07
bottom
1000
11.0
8.61
7.8
171
22.89
Cape Fear River 11/07/07
surface
1050
14.3
8.60
6.3
118
11
Site: CPF5 11/07/07
mid
1050
14.3
8.64
6.3
117
11/07/07
bottom
1050
14.3
8.69
6.0
118
11/20/07
surface
1055
12.1
9.43
7.1
174
7
r"
11/20/07
mid
1055
12.1
9.42
7.0
175
11/20/07
bottom
1055
12.1
9.40
6.9
175
11/26/07
surface
1010
11.9
9.72
7.6
178
5
11/26/07
mid
1010
11.8
9.68
7.6
180
��►
11/26107
bottom
1010
11.8
9.82
7.6
180
11/29/07
surface
1015
11.9
9.65
7.8
172
9
11/29/07
mid
1015
11.9
9.65
7.6
172
til
11/29/07
bottom
1015
11.9
9.70
7.6
172
r�
11/30/07
11/30/07
11/30/07
12/03/07
12/03/07
12/03/07
surface
mid
bottom
surface
mid
bottom
0915
0915
0915
1000
1000
1000
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.4
11.3
11.3
9.81
9.82
9.89
9.57
9.56
9.55
7.1
7.1
6.9
7.7
7.6
4.4
173
173
173
176
176
175
2
'
5.86
ram►
Cape Fear River 11/07/07
surface
1035
14.4
8.80
6.3
122
18
Site: CPF6 11/07/07
mid
1035
14.4
8.73
6.4
122
11/07/07
bottom
1035
14.4
8.70
6.1
122
MR
11/20/07
surface
1030
12.4
9.51
7.1
172
4
11/20/07
mid
1030
12.4
9.39
6.9
172
11/20/07
bottom
1030
12.4
9.50
6.9
172
11/26/07
surface
1030
11.9
9.64
7.5
180
9
11/28/07
mid
1030
11.9
9.65
7.4
180
11/26/07
bottom
1030
11.9
9.65
7.3
180
11/29/07
surface
1035
12.1
9.52
7.6
173
8
11/29/07
mid
1035
12.0
9.51
7.3
173
11/29/07
bottom
1036
12.0
9.61
7.3
173
11/30/07
surface
0936
11.7
9.80
7.3
173
7
t■a
11/30/07
mid
0936
11.7
9.83
7.2
173
11/30/07
bottom
0936
11.7
9.84
7.1
173
12/03107
surface
1030
11.4
9.57
7.6
174
'
12/03/07
mid
1030
11.3
9.56
7.4
175
12/03107
bottom
1030
11.3
9.56
7.3
175
8.16
we

Table 3 (continued)
Cape Fear River Physical Data (surface, mid, bottom) and Coliform
(surface only, 5 samples in 30 days)
j
Station Date
Depth
Time
Temp
DO
pH
Cond
Fecal Coliform Geometric Mean
mm/ddmyy
s/m/b
hrs
(°C)
(mg/L)
NO
umhos/cm
#/100 ml Fecal #/100 for Site
11/07/07
surface
1015
14.6
8.81
6.3
122
33
11/07/07
mid
1015
14.6
8.63
6.3
122
11/07/07
bottom
1015
14.6
8.60
6.1
122
11/20/07
surface
1005
12.2
9.38
7.3
168
8
i
11/20/07
mid
1005
12.2
9.40
7.1
169
11/20/07
bottom
1005
12.2
9.51
6.9
168
11/26/07
surface
1055
12.0
9.36
7.4
180
10
11/26/07
mid
1055
11.9
9.46
7.2
180
i
11/26/07
bottom
1055
11.9
9.43
7.2
180
11/29/07
surface
1055
12.2
9.51
7.5
173
1
11/29/07
mid
1055
12.3
9.52
7.3
173
11/29/07
bottom
1055
12.3
9.50
7.3
173
11/30/07
surface
0950
11.7
9.65
7.3
173
20
I*+
11/30/07
mid
0950
11.7
9.66
7.2
173
11 /30/07
bottom
0950
11.7
9.70
7.1
173
12/03/07
surface
1105
11.6
9.51
7.4
175
12/03/07
mid
1105
11.4
9.54
7.3
176
12/03/07
bottom
1105
11.4
9.54
7.2
176
8.8
'
Qualifier Codes:
131 - Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
84 - Filters have counts of both <60 or 80 and <20; Estimated
" - No sample needed
ON
r

r■■t
Ambient Monitoring System Station Summaries
Table 4
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment Report
Location: CAPE FEAR RIV
AT SR 1316 AT TAR HEEL
Station #: B8305000
Subbasin:
CPF16
Latitude: 34.74477
Longitude:-78.78563
Stream
class:
C
r•►
Agency: NCAMBNT
NC stream
index:
18-(26)
Time period: 01/15/2002 to 12/06/2006
#
#
Results not meeting
EL
Percentiles
r" t
result
ND
EL # % %Conf
Min
loth
25th
50th
75th
90th
Max
Field
D.O. (mgtL)
49
0
<4 1 2
3
5.1
5.9
7.7
10
10.9
14.9
49
0
<5 4 8.2
3
5.1
5.9
7.7
10
10.9
14.9
pH (SU)
48
0
<6 2 4.2
5.4
6.2
6.3
6.7
6.9
7.1
7.3
48
0
>9 0 0
5.4
6.2
6.3
6.7
6.9
7.1
7.3
Spec. conductance
49
0
N/A
53
79
98
118
150
181
289
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
49
0
>32 0 0
5.9
7.9
11.2
18.1
24.7
27.7
29.6
Other
TSS (mg/L)
16
0
N/A
7
7.7
9
14
20.8
27.6
29
Turbidity (NTU)
48
0
>50 3 6.2
1.9
8.1
9.9
16
22.8
36.9
90
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum. total (M)
17
0
N/A
230
318
360
570
660
2080
2400
Arsenic. total (As)
17
17
>10 0 0
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
apt
Cadmium, total (Cd)
17
17
>2 0 0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Chromium, total (Cr)
17
17
>50 0 0
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Copper, total (Cu)
17
2
>7 2 11.8 76.2
2
2
2
3
4
8
9
Iron, total (Fe)
17
0
>1000 5 29.4 99.5
370
482
670
840
1100
2400
2400
r�
Lead. total (Pb)
17
17
>25 0 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Mercury, total (Hg)
17
17
>0.012 0 0
0.2
02
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
02
Nickel, total (Ni)
17
17
>88 0 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Zinc, total (Zn)
17
11
>50 0 0
10
10
10
10
13
17
20
r�
Fecal coliform (#/]00mL)
# results: Geomean
# > 400: % > 400: %Conf:
45 82
8
18
req
.
a"
rnq
>K
MR # result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level, appilcable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent stattstecal confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Wq Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statlstical confidence
wq
R�q
P"

Ambient Monitoring System Station Summaries
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Table 4(continued)
Basinwide Assessment Report
Location: CAPE FEAR R1V
AT SR 1316 AT TAR HEEL
Station #: B8305000
Subbasin:
CPF16
Latitude: 34.74477
Longitude:-78.78563
Stream
class:
C
Agency: MCFRBA
NC stream Index:
18-(26)
Time period: 01/31/2002 to 12/12/2006
#
#
Results not meeting
EL
Percentiles
result
ND
EL # % %Conf
Min
loth
25th
50th
75th
90th
Max
Field
D.O. (mg/L)
84
0
<4 1 1.2
2.9
5.8
6.4
7.5
8.8
10.8
13.1
84
0
<5 4 4.8
2.9
5.8
6.4
7.5
8.8
10.8
13.1
PH (SU)
84
0
<6 2 2.4
5.6
6.3
6.5
6.8
7
7.2
7.9
84
0
>9 0 0
5.6
6.3
6.5
6.8
7
7.2
7.9
Spec. conductance
84
1
N/A
57
90
106
124
158
194
371
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
84
0
>32 0 0
3
7.6
15.3
23.3
27
29.1
30.6
Other
Chlorophyll a (ug/L)
35
6
>40 0 0
1
1
2
3
4
8
17
TSS (mg/L)
59
0
N/A
4
5.3
7.3
12
16
28.3
98
Turbidity (NTU)
59
0
>50 2 3.4
4
6
7.5
10
16
30
130
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
59
4
N/A
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.09
0.17
0.33
NO2 + NO3 as N
57
0
N/A
0.36
0.51
0.71
0.93
1.12
1.4
3.44
TKN as N
59
3
N/A
0.1
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
3.1
Total Phosphorus
59
1
N/A
0.01
0.11
0.13
0.16
0.26
0.34
0.93
Fecal coliform (#/100mL)
# results: Ceomeen
# > 400:
% > 400: %Conf:
58 47
5
9
# result: number of observations
0 ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level: applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedences is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Cotlform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

Table 5
Cape Fear River Water Samples -
Nutrients, Metals, MBAS, Sulfate,
Hardness, Fluoride and Chloride
Station
Date
Time
NH3
TKN
NOX
Nitrate
P Total
Ni
Ca
Mg
MBAS
Sulfate
Hardness
Fluoride
Chloride
mmIdd/YY
hrs.
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Cape Fear River
12/04/07
1135
0.04
0.50 (J2)
1.5
1.5
0.23
10 (U)
6.3
2.8
0.1 (U)
19
27.61
0.4 (U)
20
Site: CPF1
Cape Fear River
12/04/07
1100
0.03
0.42 (J2)
1.2
1.2
0.19
10 (U)
6.5
2.8
0.1
18
27.77
0.4 (U)
19
Site: CPF2
Cape Fear River
12/04/07
1035
0.03
0.47 (J2)
1.3
1.3
0.20
10 (U)
6.3
2.7
0.1
18
26.85
0.4 (U)
20
Site: CPF3
Cape Fear River
12/04/07
1000
0.04
0.53
1.2
1.2
0.20
10 (U)
6.3
2.8
0.1
18
26.61
0.4 (U)
20
Site: CPF4
Cape Fear River
12/03/07
1000
0.06
0.49
1.3
1.3
0.19
10 (U)
6.2
2.8
0.1 (U)
20
27.01
0.4
19
Site: CPF5
Cape Fear River
12/03/07
1030
0.05
0.36
1.3
1.3
0.17
10 (U)
6.1
2.7
0.1 (U)
20
26.35
0.4
19
Site: CPF6
Cape Fear River
12/03/07
1105
0.05
0.42
1.3
1.3
0.17
10 (U)
6.2
2.8
0.1 (U)
20
27.01
0.4
19
Site: CPF7
WS-IV 8 C Standards
-
-
-
10 mg/L
25 ug/L
-
-
0.5 mg/ L
250 mg/L
100 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
250 m/L
Qualifier Codes:
(U) - Samples analyzed
for this compound but
not detected
(J2) - Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
I I I I I I F I I I i I I C I I I I I

Table 6
Cape Fear River Water Samples
Pesticides, Herbicides and Semlvolatile Organics, Volatile Organics (VOAs)
Pesticldes and Organics
Cape Fear River - CPF1
Cape Fear River - CPF2
Cape Fear River - CPF3
12/04/07 1136
12/04/07 1100
12/04/07 1100
mmlddl
mm/dd/
mm/dd
Chlorinated Pesticides
all 51 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 51 target comp
ounds pounds (U) not defaced
all 51 target compounds (U) not defaced
3 unidentified peaks detected
3 unidentified peaks detected
3 unidentified peaks detected
Acid Herbicides
all 15 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 15 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 15 target compounds (U) not deteced
<10 unidentified peaks detected
<70 unidentified peaks detected
<10 unidentified peaks detected
Semivolatile Organics (BNAs)
all 66 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 66 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 66 target compounds (U) not deteced
0 unidentified peaks detected
0 unidentified peaks detected
0 unidentified peaks detected
Volatile Organics (VOAs)
58 target compounds (U) not detected
58 target compounds (U) not detected
58 target compounds (U) not detected
identified peaks:
identified peaks:
identified peaks:
Chloroform 0.79 ug/L
Chloroform 0.57 ug/L
Chloroform 0.57 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane 0.46 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane 0.33 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane 0.34 ug1L
sample not analyzed for this compound:
sample not analyzed for this compound:
sample not analyzed for this compound:
Chlorcethyl vinyl ether
Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Table 6 (continued)
Cape Fear River Water Samples
Pesticides, Herbicides and Semivolatile Organics, Volatile Organics (VOAs)
Pesticides and Organics
Cape Fear River - CPF4
Cape Fear River - CPFS
Cape Fear River - CPF6
12/04/07 1000
12/03/07 1100
12/03/07 1030
mm/dd/
mm/dd!
mm/dd1yy
Chlorinated Pesticides
au 51 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 51 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 51 target compounds (U) not deteced
9 unidentified peaks detected
3 unidentified peaks detected
1 unidentified peaks detected
Acid Herbicides
all 15 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 15 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 15 et compo
unds pounds (U) not deteced
<10 unidentified peaks detected
5 unidentified peaks detected
<10 unidentified peaks detected
Semivolatile Organics (BNAs)
all 66 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 66 target compounds (U) not deteced
all 66 target compounds (U) not dateced
0 unidentified peaks detected
0 unidentified peaks detected
0 unidentified peaks detected
Volatile Organics (VOAs)
59 target compounds (U) not detected
57 target compounds (U) not detected
55 target compounds (U) not detected
identified peaks:
identified peaks:
identified peaks:
Chloroform 0.59 ug/L
Chloroform 0.85 ug/L
Chloroform 0.91 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane 0.60 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane 0.68 uglL
sample not analyzed for this compound:
1,2,4-Trimethyibenzene 0.36 ug/L
Toluene (N3) 0.12 ug/L
Chloroethyl vinyl ether
m,p-Xylene (N3) 0.41 ug/L
sample not analyzed for this compound:
1.2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.37 ug/L
Chloroethyl vinyl ether
sample not analyzed for this compound:
Chloroethyl vinyl ether
%dualmul vuuca.
(U) - Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
(Nt) - The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
(N3) - Estimated concentration is <POL and >MDL
Table 6 (continued on the following page)

Table 6 (continued)
Cape Fear River Water Samples
Pesticides, Herbicides and Semivolatlle Organics, Volatile Organics (VOAs)
Pesticides and Organics
Cape Fear River - CPF7
12/03/07 1115
mm/ddlyy
Chlorinated Pesticides
ail 51 target compounds (U) not deteced
<3 unidentified peaks detected
Acid Herbicides
all 15 target compounds (U) not deteced
<10 unidentified peaks detected
Semivolatile Organics (BNAs)
all 66 target compounds (U) not deteced
0 unidentified peaks detected
Volatile Organics (VOAs)
55 target compounds (U) not detected
identified peaks:
Chloroform 1.0 ug/L
Bromodichloromethane 0.61 uglL
Toluene (N3) 0.14 ug/L
m.p-Xylene (N3) 0.42 ug/L
1,2,4-Trimethytbenzene 0.39 ug/L
sample not analyzed for this compound:
Chloroethyl vinyl ether
uuaimer Codes:
(U) - Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
(N1) - The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
(N3) - Estimated concentration is <POL and >MDL

1C� CF DEW
EL t013
■
t`RC1r 4vzlyz 6
PUMP VA11UN —
X. LL i(Aftll
101 TEAq FLC50
A PPN34 Q 4
NMAL
ram FEAR main SUREAS
I NA
YAWS
TWA[ EL 17>_S r,Ni 113.ir O—R - t
ft 1190
F1RUAE
i t5'00 _
FUZZ
XCIDLIIALS GL`C4 CO±Fw2Cf
OJVP 5€Ah09 Fes# C3'Met RE4u PAL CA
A D FilTi Vtll'.=.ti"S;,L .SV.9ATE4�4E7
IYAA NATO iA;
OYDAKT
s;5,�u ,�Fkwtl�t4.►
it WO 146 I 410 try fl
9 d 6Ea I q�4 `55 11i ae: ago "ki 4 E qa t4` o
S.g vr. 1411
F. I
SAUPIPC
FENkC
P� ?nPER
TrlOSLZFAiE
lro
-`fie aIS:NA�T'
WCATIM
NPDES #1
010 0.9 MIGD
NOM CAROLINA
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
aw CT os) r
r FtattrpE P>�M
C!EAR4.fLt 4
1 r
4YOaLM --0 ft mow*
ttA
{dt w°�oLaTrF
7w:
O ST
N FdPN ft✓
�Fc9X
TQ FUruBL
� �I F ��• -��- ClSY6v:As
1 "1
Aet"IrfYt 5EA9E�
1=
lftmftLIv pmvkt +lftfIL4 BOW wFa 44 fvr &+• NS A } S{IIt
ETPNNS RE W SERY CE AN¢ i i�LTCR 15CUT (, 3,W.:E. IF A UtX
OR FLOC MUM 15 CUT, %AaCa SCTTt56 YA!ER t;•gipiNEL gAnS AS
grMD to 3tRLwm 4YERnall IN R PO Ytl.
MO VALVES Of Sk0.f1'N: W 1 NIN bKol tomn. `YKyCroAcf"
CQL-NtHtq 4640 7ALWtS, IKOUAID.
s. At NA> MWV KWA W,A1EX ]LEVEL W=L0 BE ALUST Uft MOR
="Tw TLi7A TG ft"t

11 /81
/4,
IS'
-FQIJ RE TREATMENT
7c\ L
v - -,r / t
'R T EAJ-M8-Avlv MOMILE
Tj
0�vl IN G oo ]--fflv
J
/- , / , f - -
FUIURE CHEMICAL
ST
TUR P VIP -
N
FUTUR Ll 8tLS NPDES #1 Lined Ditch
VNIONGTOM
U? p Discharge Point
TIM 34*45'53" N; 78'48'16" W
rl
YATE 1) 1� �ENT
E STATIO
WO
EX13T11 `'3
CLGARW I E Lr
U APB I O
0
7— NA
�
+ .4,
13 1AW r
X
WA 4WPOURO op
TO, 4
7 E tA AP A710N
41 F
eel
LWARCAKFURWATICRANDAMMAUTHMM
= I mTp".o4 WAT" "MWA
MIS 1�dl it- BLAOU BLUFFS REGIONAt SITE LAYOUT PLAN w9rf 14
t..743 V--� SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT �t — — IM 9TALF v4, C- I

ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
DISCHARGE OF
THE DECANT AND BACKWASH OPERATIONS
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Tar Heel, N.C.
SUBMITTED TO:
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/Eastern NPDES Program
Mr. Gil Vinzani
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
T: gig.807.6395 F:919.807.6495
SUBMITTED BY:
Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
Executive Director: Don Betz
1107 New Pointe Blvd, Suite 17
Leland, North Carolina, 28451
i 910.383.1919 I 910.383.1949
Prepared By:
Morella Sdnchez-King, Ph.D., P.E.
Hobbs, Upchurch &Associates, P.A.
Consulting Engineers
14878 US Hwy 17
P.O. Box 1400
Hampstead, NC 28443
I: 910-270-5520;1:910-270-5548

f=1
Pq
M
FNI
M
M
M
I"
fm
I"
M"
Im
pot
Wr
PNr
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERALINFORMATION................................................................................................1
A. Facility Identification................................................................................................1
EVALUATE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES......................................................................... 3
A. Connecting to a Sewer Collection System............................................................... 3
B. Land Based Disposal................................................................................................ 5
C. Recycle Backwash Water......................................................................................... 8
D. Surface Water Discharge......................................................................................... 8
E. Disposal Combinations............................................................................................ 8
FINALCOMMENTS........................................................................................................... 9
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A. Present Value Analysis of Alternatives
Exhibit A- 1. Backwash Water Land Based Disposal
Exhibit A- 2. Backwash Water Re -cycle
Exhibit A- 3. Surface Water Discharge of Backwash Water
Exhibit B. Smithfield Packing Company WWTP- Daily Monitoring Records for 2007 and
2008
MR

fag
rR
F"
M
M
M"
[L--=
M
P"
rat
PR
L6.LM
M
MR
l�
LIST OF TABLES
Table i. Smithfield Packing Company WWTP Average and Maximum Daily Flows.
Period: 2003-2008............................................................................................................. 3
Table 2. Town of Elizabethtown WWTP Average and Maximum Daily Flows .................. 4
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure i. Location of the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant, in
BladenCounty, NC.............................................................................................................. 2
Figure 2. Soils at the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant Site ......... 7
an

W
Bladen Bluffs Regional
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
A. Facility Identification
October 2oo8
SECTION I
GENERAL INFORMATION
• Facility: Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
■ Location: NC Highway 87 northeast of Tar Heel in Bladen County
■ EAA Preparer: Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
• 14878 US Hwy 17, Suite 5, P.O. Box 140o, Hampstead, NC 28443•
Phone # [phone]
The Facility requiring a discharge is a surface water treatment plant that will be
operated by the Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority ("Authority") between NC
Hwy 87 and the Cape Fear River (Figure i). The capacity of the plant will be 4.4 up to
6.o MGD. The maximum discharge from the facility will be o.9 MGD (15% of the
maximum flow rate of 6 MGD).
1. Environmental Assessment and FONSI: An Environmental Assessment (EA) was
prepared in accordance with the North Carolina State Environmental Policy Act (NC
SEPA), N.C. General Statute Section ii3A-1. et seq., N.C. General Statute 143-215.1
(b)(2) and other applicable laws, for the purpose of evaluating the environmental
consequences of completing the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water System including
the WTP described above. The Bladen Bluffs system is developed, constructed and
operated by the Authority. The EA received the Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) on June 11, 20o8.
2. Treatment Process for the Raw Water: Item 7 of the enclosed NPDES Permit
Application describes the treatment process for the raw water.
3. Treatment for Wastewater Generated by the Facility: Item 8 of the enclosed
NPDES Permit Application describes the treatment process for wastewater generated by
the Bladen Bluffs WTP.
The analysis of alternatives for the backwash water disposal follows. Alternatives
analyzed included: connection to an existing sewer system, land based disposal, recycle
of backwash water, surface water discharge, and disposal combinations.
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 1 NJ

0
L
IR
w
w
Bladen Bluffs Regional
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
October 2008
-ed co'
INIp hIT Voe r o11717
'
b
Pa�nf
� I
f
1p
1
1'p
z
Dwd
BM 151 1
)
M13
z
L
�l
ES Disclwr": 34�653-
'\
'
Doh. KIV
\
c !
2
1" 1
1
reb'
MP ischa o f I
1,
1, , ♦ l.I
G 6 NX6V
1
1
1
1 9 _
C
1 fi'
Magnauc Dadinmioa 1 A\s I = 1316 '
a
J SL F
'1
1
SCALE I 1.yCp
1� L1i 0 Ip]0 YARDS
1 KaoLurEx
8•w
B1
OB d' OBd' 03
Figure i. Location of the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant, in
Bladen County, NC
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, PA. Page 2 HJ

W
Bladen Bluffs Regional October 2008
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
SECTION II
EVALUATE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES
A. Connecting to a Sewer Collection System
1. Closest Existing Sewerage System: The closest NPDES permit holder is the
Smithfield Packing Company (SPC) facility (Permit No. NC 0078344)• The
discharge location of the SPC WWTP is located less than i mile downstream
from the future Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant.
Although both plants are close, the permitted capacity of the SPC WWTP
makes the connection unfeasible without the expansion or modification of its
process.
The permitted capacity of the SPC WWTP is 3.0 MGD. The average flow in the
2003-2oo8 period has been in the range of 1.6-2.2 MGD and the maximum
flow in the range of 1.70 to 3.21 MGD. Therefore, an increased flow of o.9
MGD from the Bladen Bluffs WTP would cause the discharge flow from
Smithfield to surpass 8o% of its average permitted capacity, even when a low
flow year is considered (i.e. the year 2oo6, when the flow was 1.59 MGD).
Below are tabulated the average and maximum [annual] flows from the daily
monitoring records (DMRs) of the SPC WWTP for the period 2003-2oo8.
Exhibit B contains the DMR from SPC for the years 2007 and 2oo8. Records
from 2003 to 2oo6 were obtained from the DENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit Fact
Sheet for NPDES Permit Development.
Table 1. Smithfield Packing Company WWTP Average and Maximum Daily Flows. Period:
2003-2oo8
Year
Average
Flow
(MGD)
Max Daily
Flow
(MGD)
2003
2.27
2.66
2004
1.83
2.14
2005
1.73
2.16
2oo6
1.59
1.70
2007
1.99
3.21
2008
1.97
3.15
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 3 10

so
•
N
r_1
so
Bladen Bluffs Regional
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
�. (1w�( I] ,I ��sf��m(SI'C C'unt'�ll
October 2oo8
SPC is a private company that had a significant task renewing their NPDES
permit and would not consider expansion of their WWTP. SPC has stated that
their outfall cannot accommodate additional flow (this fact is substantiated
with the DMR records summarized in Table 1). A present value analysis was
not performed for this alternative since expansion of the SPC WWTP is not
feasible.
2. Publicly Owned Sewerage System: The closest publicly owned WWTP is the
Elizabethtown WWTP (Permit No. NC oo6671).
Connection to the Elizabethtown WWTP is not feasible: (1) the o.9-MGD
discharge from Bladen Bluffs WTP would overcome the capacity of the
system, which is designed and permitted for 1.275 MGD and currently has an
average annual daily discharge of o.634 MGD; (2) the distance from Bladen
Bluffs WTP site to the Elizabethtown WWTP is approximately 15 miles.
These two reasons make this connection unfeasible. A present value analysis
was not performed for this alternative.
Table 2. Town of Elizabethtown WWTP Average and Maximum Daily Flows
Permitted
Permit
Design
Average Annual
Maximum
Day Receiving
Capacity
Number
Capacity
Daily Discharge
Receiving Basin
Discharge Stream
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
(MGD)
NCoo6671 1.275
1.275
o.634
m61 Cape Fear River Cape Fear River
(02-3)
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 4 NJ

C,
me
Bladen Bluffs Regional
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
B. Land Based Disposal
October 20o8
The Bladen Bluffs WTP is being constructed on the perimeter of N.C. Hwy 87
in a ~65 acre tract, property of Smithfield Packing Company. The distance
between the proposed WTP and the Cape Fear River will be approximately
2,000 ft. To protect the River's water quality, a Zoo-ft buffer will be observed.
Soils at the site are depicted and listed in Figure 2. The most prevalent soil
types are the Wickham fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (WmB), Norfolk
loamy fine sand, o to 2 percent slopes (NoA) and Dystrochrepts, steep (DyF).
These types of soils —an all listed in Figure 2- have limited capacity for land
application. In addition, soil types were researched in an extended area
(9,55o acres) at the west of NC Hwy 87. In this area, all types of soils, except
for the Duplin Sandy Loam DuA, which was rated as "somewhat limited",
were rated "limited" for land application. The Duplin Sandy Loam is present
in 1.5 acres of the 9,550-acre tract investigated.
Soil types in the vicinity of the WTP severely restrict the availability of water
disposal by land application. An application rate of 0.5 in/acre/week was
selected as representative for the types of soils present.
Land Required for Application
900,00o g/day x 7 days= 6,300,00o gpw
(0.5 in/ac/week _ 12 in/ft) x 43,56o ft2/ac x 7.49 9/ft3 - 13,594 gpw'/ ac
6,300,000 gpw _ 13,594 = 463 ac
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 5 NJ

L]
M
so
Bladen Bluffs Regional October 20o8
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
i;. Land llascd Disposal Wont"d)
A backwash flow of o.9 MGD would require 463 acres of land application
area. With a requirement for t00% reserve area for future land application,
access to the land application facility, etc., and setbacks of 150 feet. The
required acreage would be 926 acres.
Land disposal of the decant will require that the flow be transferred to a
remote site and then land applied. The additional equipment required will be
a pump station located on the outlet of the equalization lagoon, a forcemain
with a capacity of o.9 MGD to the application area, the land application
system, and controls. The capital costs involved in this alternative will also
include purchase of the land and the preparation of the site for land
application.
A Present Value Cost Analysis (PVCA) was performed for this alternative
taking into consideration that land would be purchased on adjacent properties
not owned by Smithfield Packing Company.
Land in the area costs approximately $2,000 per acre. The cost of the land
for this option would be $1,852,000, the total construction cost are estimated
as $2,448,500. The annual O&M cost was estimated as $77,953• The PVCA
was calculated, with a discount rate of 6 o and a 20-year planning period, and
resulted in a PVCA of $3,342,613 (Exhibit A-i).
1 The PVCA was calculated using the formula recommended in the Engineering Alternative Analysis
(EAA) Guidance Document published by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality/ NPDES Unit -
June 23, 2005 :
PV = Co + C [ (1+r)n-i/ r"(i+r)n]
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 6 NJ

Bladen Bluffs Regional
October 2008
r
r
r
r
M
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
Map Unit
Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres
in AOI
Percent of
AOI
WmB
Wickham fine sandy loam, i to 6 percent slopes
71.6
25.40%
NoA
Norfolk loamy fine sand, o to 2 percent slopes
42.1
14.90%
DyF
Dystrochrepts, steep
40.9
14.50%
Ch
Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded
27.2
9.6o%
Cn
Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded
19.2
6.8o%
We
Wahee loam
19.1
6.8o%
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
16.9
6.00%
Ra
Rains fine sandy loam
12.3
4.30%
NoB
Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
12.2
4.30%
GbA
Goldsboro sandy loam, o to 3 percent slopes
11.4
4.00%
Ro
Roanoke loam
7.5
2.70%
Ca
Cape Fear loam
1.1
0.40%
Wo
Woodington loamy sand
1
0.30%
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI)
1 282.4
1 100.00%
Figure 2. Soils at the Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant Site
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 7 V

M
r
on
No
r
r
r
I
M
Bladen Bluffs Regional
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
C. Recycle Backwash Water
October 20o8
Recycle was considered as an option. The backwash water from the facility might be
returned to the front-end (flash mix) of the water treatment plant. This practice is not
promoted by the Water Supply Section of DENR since once contaminants are removed;
it is preferred to avoid their re -introduction into the water treatment cycle.
A Present Value Analysis was performed and is included in Exhibit A- 2. The capital
cost for this alternative was estimated as $197,500; the O&M cost was estimated as
$50,050. The PVCA was calculated with a discount rate of 6% and a 20-year planning
period, and resulted in a PVCA of $771,570.
D. Surface Water Discharge
The backwash flow from the residual basins is proposed to be discharge into a ditch -
downstream of the intake- and ultimately to the Cape Fear River. Downstream of the
raw water intake, the surface water classification of the river is "C" with a 7Q10 flow of
585 cfs. Excerpts from the Environmental Assessment included in Appendix A
summarize information regarding the stream flow at the site (See Appendix A, pages 10
and 11). The backwash water from the water treatment plant will be metered prior to
discharge. The meter shall consist of a parshall flume including an automatic sampler to
ensure that the backwash water complies with the NPDES effluent limits.
A Present Value Analysis for this option was performed and is included in Exhibit A- 3.
The capital cost for this alternative was estimated as $42,500; the O&M cost was
estimated as $14,146. The PVCA was calculated with a discount rate of 6% and a 20-
year planning period, and resulted in a PVCA of $204,754•
E. Disposal Combinations
A combination of disposal options is not feasible due to the cost of equipment (and land)
required to make each option operational. In either case, the equipment (and land)
must be properly sized for the system and must be maintained for operation at all times,
including maintenance of the land application area.
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. Page 8 NJ

up
M
Bladen Bluffs Regional
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Waste Stream Discharge
Engineering Alternative Analysis
October 20o8
SECTION III
FINAL COMMENTS
There are three options available for disposing the backwash water generated by the
Bladen Bluffs Regional Surface Water Treatment Plant:
■ land Based Disposal
■ Recycle of Backwash Water
■ Surface Water Discharge
The option of land based discharge is severely limited by soils adjacent to and in the
vicinity of the WTP property. The limitations of the soil and the cost of equipment for
the land application, coupled with the required maintenance of the system make it
unfeasible.
The two options being considered at this time include recycle of the waste stream and
surface water discharge. DENR Plan Review Branch requires that any recycle be limited
to io%, but recycle in any amount is discouraged. For this reason, the surface water
discharge is requested.
The option of surface water discharge will not present an environmental concern to the
waters of the Cape Fear River. The discharge will eliminate the potential for increasing
the organics load to the WTP.
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, PA Page 9 NJ

Tom
MR
m
m
MR
m
P"
RR
MR
rm
f"
MR
m
P"
I"
Exhibit A-1 Present Value Analysis
Backwash Water Land Based Disposal
M,

BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
PRESENT VALUE LAND BASED DISPOSAL (0.9 MGD FLOW)
EVALUATION PERIOD
20 Years
DISCOUNT RATE
6.o%
CAPITAL COST
$2,448,500
ANNUAL O&M COSTS
$77,953
PRESENT VALUE LAND BASED DISPOSAL=
$3,342,613
CAPITAL COSTS
i. LAND
926 AC @ $2000 PER ACRE
$1,852,000
2. TRANSFER PUMP STATION
PUMP STATION AT WTP
$235,000
_
3. FORCE MAIN
EST. DISTANCE: 50oo LF @ $20/LF
$100,000
_
4. LAND PREPARATION AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM
463 ACRES @ $5oo/AC
8231,500
5. CONTROLS
SOLENOIDS, RTU, RADIOS, ETC.
$30,000
6. TOTAL
$2,448,500

M"
t"
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
�+ ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
LAND BASED DISPOSAL (o.9-MGD FLOW'')
P"
P"
P"
P"
F"
P"
P"
��
I"
MR
1.Energy
a. Transfer Pump Station
b. Total Demand Load
c. Cost per kw
d. Total Cost of Energy
2. Chemicals
a. Acid
b. PAC
c. Alum
d. Caustic
e. Fluoride
f. Polymer
g. Chlorine
h. Corrosion Inhibitor
i. Ammonia
j . Annual chemical cost
3. Personnel (Salaries plus Benefits)
a. Operators
Chief Plant Operator
Class IV
Class II
Class I
b. Mechanic
c. Lab Tech
d. Total Labor Cost
4. Contract Services
a. Professional Services
b. Maintenance contracts
c. Equipment rental
d. Total Contract Services
5. Repair Parts and Lubricants
a. Water Treatment Plant
b. Total Vehicles
125 kw
125 kw
.055 / kw
$15,056.25
Annual Cost
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$0.00
0 $ 0.00
O $0.00
O $ 0.00
O $0.00
0.5 $22,000.00
0 $ 0.00
$222000.00
$42000.00
$22000.00
$1,500.00
$7,500.00
$32500.00
$3;500.00

AI
F"
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
LAND BASED DISPOSAL (o.9-MGD FLOW) - (CONT'D)
6. Vehicles
a. Water Treatment Plant
$2,000.00
b. Total Vehicles
$2,000.00
7. Annual Permit Renewal Fee
a. Permit Renewal Fee
Mom
b. Total Renewal Fee
$81o.00
8. Laboratory Cost
a. Laboratory supplies
$1,000.00
b. Sub -contracted testing
$12000.00
c. Total Laboratory Cost
$2,000.00
9. Maintenance of Spray Field
a. Maintenance of Spray Field
W,000.00
b. Total Cost
$18,000.00
io. Subtotal
$702866.25
11. Contingency (estimated io%)
$706.63
12. Total O&M Costs
$77,952.88

F"
!"
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
I'm
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
LAND BASED DISPOSAL (o.9-MGD FLOW)
PRESENT VALUE OF COSTS
PV= A + B
A= Capital Costs
B= Recurring Costs * {[(1+r)^n-1]/[r(1+r)^n]}
Capital Costs (A)
$2,448,500
Initial O & M Costs=
$77,953
Year
Year No.
A
B
PV
2oo8
0
$2,448,5oo
$0
$2,448,500
2009
1
$2,448,5oo
$77,953
$2,526,453
2010
2
$2,448,500
$142,9i8
$2,591,418
2011
3
$2,448,50o
$208,369
$2,656,869
2012
4
$2,448,500
$270,115
$2,718,615
two
2013
5
$2,448,500
$328,366
$2,T76,866
2014
6
$2,448,500
$383,320
$2,831,820
2015
7
$2,448,500
$435,i63
$2,883,663
2016
8
$2,448,500
$484,071
$2,932,571
2017
9
$2,448,500
$530,211
$2,978,711
2018
10
$2,448,500
$573,740
$3,022,240
2019
11
$2,448,5oo
$614,805
$3,o63,305
2020
12
$2,448,500
$653,545
$3,102,045
2021
13
$2,448,500
$69o,092
$3,138,592
2022
14
$2,448,500
$724,571
$3,173,071
2023
15
$2,448,500
$757,098
$3,205,598
2024
16
$2,448,500
$787,784
$3,236,284
2025
17
$2,448,500
$816,733
$3,265,233
2026
18
$2,448,500
$844,043
$3,292,543
2027
19
$2,448,500
$869,807
$3,3i8,307
2028
20
$2,448,500
$894,113
$3,342,613
Pv
P"
OR
rAt
MR

m
MR
P"
P"
F*w
P"
faq
Fit
p"
r"
MR
Pq
F"
m
m
pm
Exhibit A-2 Present Value Analysis
Backwash Water Recycle
F.

BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
PRESENT VALUE RECYCLE of o.9 MGD BACKWASH WATER
EVALUATION PERIOD 20 Years
DISCOUNT RATE 6.o%
PRESENT VALUE (CAPITAL COST) $197,500
_ ANNUAL O&M COSTS $50,050
PRESENT VALUE RECYCLE= $771,570
PRESENT VALUE CAPITAL COSTS
i. RECYCLE PUMP STATION $175,000
2. RECYCLE MAIN AND INSTALLATION (5oo ft- io" PVC pipe) $22,500
3. TOTAL $197,500
w

BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
RECYCLE of o.9 MGD BACKWASH WATER
i.Energy
a. Transfer Pump Station
5o kw
b. Total Demand Load
5o kw
c. Cost per kwh
.o55 / kwh 8030
d. Total Cost of Energy
2. Chemicals
Annual Cost
a. Acid
$0.00
b. PAC
$0.00
c. Alum
$0.00
d. Caustic
$0.00
e. Fluoride
$0.00
f. Polymer
$0.00
g. Chlorine
$0.00
h. Corrosion Inhibitor
$0.00
i. Ammonia
$0.00
j. Annual chemical cost
$0.00
3. Personnel (Salaries plus Benefits)
a. Operators
Chief Plant Operator
o
$0.00
Class IV
o
$0.00
Class II
o
$0.00
Class I
o
$0.00
b. Mechanic
0.5
$242000.00
c. Lab Tech
o
$0.00
d. Total Labor Cost
$242000.00
4. Contract Services
a. Professional Services
$23,000.00
b. Maintenance contracts
$22000.00
c. Equipment rental
$12500.00
d. Total Contract Services
$52500.00
5. Repair Parts and Lubricants
a. Water Treatment Plant
$5,000.00
b. Total Vehicles
$52000.00
6. Vehicles
a. Water Treatment Plant
$0.00
b. Total Vehicles
$0.00

ran
r"
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
RECYCLE of o.9 MGD BACKWASH WATER FLOW (CONT'D)
t"
7. Office Supplies and Telephone
a. Permit Renewal Fee
rQ b. Total Renewal Fee
c. Uniforms
d. Telephone
e. Postage
f. Dues, subscriptions, travel, etc.
g. Total Office Supplies and Telephone
8. Laboratory Cost
a. Laboratory supplies
�+ b. Sub -contracted testing
c. Total Laboratory Cost
io. Subtotal
�•, ii. Contingency
12. Total O&M Costs
P"
P"
MR
W
$0.00
$6,000.00
$5,000.00
$11,000.00
$45,500.00
$42550.00
$502050.00

Fm
INV
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
RECYCLE of 0.9 MGD BACKWASH WATER
PRESENT VALUE OF COSTS
PV= A + B
mm A= Capital Costs
B= Recurring Costs * {[(l+r)^n-1]/[r(1+r)^n]}
fm Capital Costs (A) $197,500
Initial O & M Costs= $50,050
nit
Year
Year No.
A
B
PV
20o8
0
$197,500
$0
$197,500
2009
1
$197,500
$50,050
$247,550
2010
2
$197,500
$91,761
$289,261
2011
3
$197,500
$133,784
$331,284
2012
4
$197600
$173429
$37%929
2013
5
$197,500
$21o,829
$4o8,329
�► 2014
6
$197,500
$2462112
$4432612
2015
7
$197600
$279,398
$476,898
2016
8
$197,500
$31o,800
$508,300
2017
9
$197600
$3402425
$53M25
2018
10
$1972500
$368,372
$5652872
2019
11
$197600
$3942738
$592,238
2020
12
$197,500
$419,611
$617411
2021
13
$197,500
$4432077
$640,577
2022
14
$1972500
$4652214
$662,714
2023
15
$197,500
$486,o98
$68&598
2024
16
$197,500
$505,800
$7032300
2025
17
$197,500
$5242387
$721,887
2026
18
$197,500
$5412922
$739422
2027
19
$1972500
$558464
$7552964
2028
20
$197,500
$574,070
$771,570
wo
P"
w"

L-.0
p"
MR
sm
MR
I-m1
m
p"
MR
MR
MR
IR
p"
Exhibit A-3 Present Value Analysis
Surface Water Discharge of Backwash Water
F"
F,
MR
MR

r
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
r ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
PRESENT VALUE SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE
EVALUATION PERIOD 20 Years
r DISCOUNT RATE 6.o%
PRESENT VALUE (CAPITAL COST) $42,500
ANNUAL O&M COSTS $14,146
PRESENT VALUE SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE= $204,754
r PRESENT VALUE CAPITAL COST
i. PIPING AND VALVES FROM RECYCLE PUMP AND INSTALLATION (500 ft-10" PVC pipe) $22,500
2. RIP -RAP AT OUTLET (ESTIMATED $35/TON; ioo TON) $3,500.00
3. PARSHALL FLUME $13,200
4. SAMPLER oo
m 5. TOTAL $42,500
ow
w
ow
r
go
r

MR
P"
M
r"
Im
��
MR
VUR
7�-�
FM
go
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
o.9-MGD SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE
1.Energy
a. Transfer Pump Station
b. Total Demand Load
c. Cost per kw
d. Total Cost of Energy
2. Chemicals
a. Acid
b. PAC
c. Alum
d. Caustic
e. Fluoride
f. Polymer
g. Chlorine
h. Corrosion Inhibitor
i. Ammonia
j . Annual chemical cost
3. Personnel (Salaries plus Benefits)
a. Operators
Chief Plant Operator
Class IV
Class II
Class I
b. Mechanic
c. Lab Tech
d. Total Labor Cost
4. Contract Services
a. Professional Services
b. Maintenance contracts
c. Equipment rental
d. Total Contract Services
5. Repair Parts and Lubricants
a. Water Treatment Plant
b. Total Vehicles
o kw
o kw
.o 5/kw
Annual Cost
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$ 0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$ 0.00
0.0
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$4,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00

ON
F�q
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
o.9-MGD SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE (CONT'D)
6. Vehicles
a. Water Treatment Plant $0.00
b. Total Vehicles $0.00
7. Annual Permit Renewal Fee
a. Permit Renewal Fee $86o.00
b. Total Renewal Fee $86o.00
8. Laboratory Cost
a. Laboratory supplies $22000.00
b. Sub -contracted testing $5,000.00
c. Total Laboratory Cost $72000.00
9. Maintenance of Spray Field
a. Maintenance of Spray Field $0.00
b. Total Cost $0.00
1o. Subtotal $12,86o.00
11. Contingency $1,286.00
12. Total O&M Costs $14,146.00

an
pw
BLADEN BLUFFS REGIONAL SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
o.9-MGD SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE
PRESENT VALUE OF COSTS
m"
P4 PV= A + B
A= Capital Costs
B= Recurring Costs * {[(1+r)^n-1]/[r(1+r)^n]}
ma Capital Costs (A) $422500
Initial O & M Costs= $14,146
m
Year
Year No.
A
B
PV
2008
0
$42,500
$0
$42,500
2009
1
$42,500
$14,146
$56,646
2010
2
$42,500
$25,935
$68,435
2011
3
$42,500
$37�812
$80,312
2012
4
$42,500
$49,017
$91,517
2013
5
$42,500
$59,588
$102,088
2014
6
$42,500
$69,560
$112,060
2015
7
$42,500
$78,968
$121,468
2016
8
$42,500
$87,844
$1302344
2017
9
$42,500
$96,217
$138,717
2018
10
$42600
$104,116
$146,616
2019
11
$42,500
$111,568
$154,068
2020
12
$42,500
$118698
$161,o98
2021
13
$42,500
$125,230
$167,730
2022
14
$42,500
$131,487
$173,987
2023
15
$42,500
$137,389
$179,889
2024
16
$42,500
$142,958
$185458
2025
17
$42,500
$148,211
$1902711
2026
18
$42,500
$153,167
$195,667
�+ 2027
19
$42,500
$157,843
$200,343
2028
20
$42,500
$162,254
$204,754
fa
9"
MR

OR
Mr
rM
Pq
rsi
r-•r
TJ1
OR
rAw
F1#
M
M
M
TOR
P"
Exhibit B Smithfield Packing Company P- Daily
Monitoring Records for 2007 and 20o8
OR

M
M
REV
MR
lR
p1
(MR
M
M
Tom
q"
01 NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DiSvHARGE No001 MONTH JANUARY YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR 1N RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC;RANDY CLARK GRADE IVPHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL. and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Division of Water Quality2L
fS`'
NCDENR (SIGNA71 OF OPERATOR IN RES N IBLE CHARGE) opippe
1617 Mail Service Center BY THIS SIGNATURE CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT 15
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
D
T
E
opeabr
Time
lira
Openisor
On
Sne
lira
ORC
onSlic
5W50
00010
00400
5W80
OW10
00610
31616
00300
00600
00665
W545
C0605
00310
CO53D
00610
00556
FLOW
EH
R ne
U6D
T9W
C
pH
8U
Residual
Chbdm
MGIL
Bap S
21C
MGIL
Armaga
Nbown
MGM
Fecal
cdvorm
e }
0100MI.
Dissolved
OxNM
MGIL
Told
Ntko en
USDA
Tow
Plus-
pis
MGIL
5@0-
a"
F, Aft
MU1L
Orparic
Nlibym
MGA
DOD 5
20 C
LBIDAY
TOW
Suspended
Residue
LSMAY
Amm ft
18�
LBIDAY
00 b
Graase
LSMAY
1
0800
24
Y
0.00
HOLD
Y
2
0800
24
Y
1.32
24.6
7.11
2.4
0.17
6
8.03
26.3
186.6
1.9
3
0500
24
Y
1.79
25.1
7.40
1.8
OAS
5
7.93
26.9
254.2
6.7
4
0800
24
Y
Z18
26A
7.65
2.4
0.30
6
7.59
43.7
245.8
5.5
5
0800
24
Y
2.51
27.9
7.71
2.6
0.28
5
8.90
< 278.4
52.5
< 0.1
< 1.121
54.5
220.1
5.8
<21.0
6
0800
24
N
2.66
1.3
< 0.10
28.9
266.5
2.2
7
0800
24
N
Z87
2.1
< 0.10
50.2
287.1
< 24
9
9
0800
0800
24
24
Y
NIB
1.87
242
27.8
25.2
7.50
7.48
1.6
Z.5
028
0.29
3
2
7.88
7.07
< DA
25.0
50.5
211.0
454.7
4.3
6.8
<15.6
10
0800
24
NM
2.45
24.6
7.58
3.7
• •0.45
4
7.73
75.7
378.6
9.1
11
DOW
24
Y
1.84
26.0
7.5/
&0
< 0.10
< 1
7.78
45.5
371.9
1.6
12
14
16
DODO
0800
0800
OB00
24
24
24
24
Y
N
N
NIB
Z43
8
3.56
3.03
225
26.3
26.0
7.50
7.55
3A
2-613
3.5
5.1
0.25
0.14
0.27
0.27
1
2
7.69
7.39
65.8
77.7
88.3
05.8
263.2
388.E
340.7
441A
5.0
4.3
6.8
5.1
16
0800
24
Y
Z13
27.1
7.39
4.3
0.13
46
7.57
< 0.1
76.3
399.3
23
<17.7
17
DODO
24
Y
202
24.8
7.60
6.9
0.17
43
7.77
116.5
545A
29
18
DODO
24
Y
2.44
24.0
7.58
4.9
0.23
8
7.23
99.0
438.2
4.6
19
20
0800
0800
24
24
Y
N
2.32
3.51
24.9
7.37
4.8
4.1
0.10
0.13
6
7.56
92.9
120.1
164.9
671.3
2.0
3.8
21
0800
24
N
254
4.2
< 0.10
89.1
636.3
< 2.1
22
DODO
24
Y
1.95
23.1
7.52
2.4
0.27
< 1
6.24
39.0
292.4
4.4
23
0800
24
Y
ZOO
23.5
7.82
3.0
0.30
10
8.00
49.9
357.9
5.0
24
0800
24
Y
2.29
24.2
7.44
3.9
0.18
27
7.99
< 0.1
74.4
257.0
3A
25
DODO
24
Y
2.57
252
7.41
3.4
0.12
10
7.68
73.0
171.7
25
26
C800
24
Y
2.11
24.2
7.54
2.0
0.20
8
7.99
35.2
185.0
3.8
27
0800
24
N
3.11
2.4
0.13
62.3
363.5
3.5
28
0800
24
N
2.77
2.4
OA7
55.4
265.4
3.8
29
0800
24
Y
1.72
21.1
7.71
3.1
0.42
< 1
8.77
44.6
208.5
6.1
30
OBOO
24
Y
1.69
22.2
7.34
3.5
6.35
24
8.56
49.4
183.4
4.9
31
0600
24
Y
1.74
22.1
7.58
2.2
0.32
15
8.33
31.85
28233
4.6
AVERAGE
2.26
24.8
7.71
7.11
G
3.2
0.23
6
7.79
< 278A
52.5
< 0.1
< 1.121
62.4
321.2
4.2
< 18.4
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
Comp(C)/Grab {G)
3.58
0.00
27.9
21.1
G
G
6.9
1.3
C
0.45
< 0.10
C
45
< 1
G
8.77
6.90
G
c 278.4
< 278.4
52.5
62.6
C
< 0.1
< 0.1
G
< 1.121
< 1.121
120.1
25.0
C
636.3
154.9
C
9.1
< 1.6
C
< 21.0
< 15.6
G
Monthly UMN
3.00
6.0<9.
2O0
>5.0
q
<5.0
500.0
998.7
60.0
319.E
NIB Denotes Backup Operator on Site
• Denotes sample did not meet the rule of 2 ppm DO depletion. MaXlmum sample volume was used
MR

01 NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH FEBRUARY YEAR 2D07
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC:RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mai! ORIGINAL arc{ ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Division of Water Quality 1
NCDENR (sl TrIGUATURE)-CERTIFY
OF OPE R IN REs ONs1BLE CHARGE) DATE:
1617 Mail Service Center BY THIS THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 ACCURATE MD COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
D Operator
* Arrival
T Time
T
Operator
The
On
Sita
ORC
CA
Sit$
600SO
OOOfO
00400
50060
CM10
00610
31616
003DO
0060D
00655
00545
00606
00310
OD530
D0610
00556
FLOW
EN
D*
Temp
pH
Residual
Waft
SW 5
20C
Ammaala
Mkogen
Fecal
C �
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Total
Nkragen
Tate!
PhD �
Rham
sett.
eaw
Sows
Orgark
Mk ngan
BCD 5
20 C
Total
Suspended
ReGidue
Atrmmnto
Nitrogen
Olt 6
Fvease
Fire
Hra
MGD
C
SU
mm.
Na&
MGIL
191COML
MGIL
MGM
MGIi.
MUL
MGIL
LB/DAY
LemAY
LBmAY
LSMAY
1 0800
24
Y
220
23.3
7.44
c2.0 ' 0.17
15
7.73
209.0
4B.8
< 0.1
0.832
< 36.7
229.1
3.1
<18.3
2 0800
24
Y
2.34
23.7
7.27
4.0
0.12
4
8.29
78.2
176.0
2A
3 0800
24
N
2.83
2.5
< 0.10
59.1
378.2
< 2.4
4 0800
24
N
3.16
2.2
< 0.10
58.1
290.3
< 2.6
5 0800
24
Y
2.16
24.3
7.40
3.8
0.19
12
7.39
88.3
341.6
3.6
6 0800
24
Y
2.33
22.9
7.43
3.8
0.45
43
8.41
73.8
339.0
8.8
7 0800
24
Y
2.26
23.0
7.35
4.9
0.20
26
8.27
92.3
348.4
3.7
a 0800
24
Y
2.13
23.9
7.58
3.5
< 0.10
3
7.65
62.0
354.5
< 1.8
9 0800
24
Y
2.22
24.4
7.60
3.1
0.21
7
7.28
< 0.1
57.3
231.1
4.0
<18.5
161 08D0
24
N
3.26
2.3
0.10
81.4
283.7
2.7
111 0800
24
N
2.70
420
0.10
< 45.0
359.9
2.3
12 0800
24
Y
1.89
23.1
7,49
3.2
-0.24
4
8.08
< 0.1
50.5
201.9
3.7
<15.9
13 D800
24
Y
1.87
24.5
7.14
22
< 0.10
26
8.01
34.4
101.6
< 1.6
44 0800
24
Y
1.79
24.0
7.52
1.6
0.20
58
7.78
23.8
67.0
2.9
15 0500
24
Y
1.83
22.6
7.64
2.0
0.23
> 6,000
7.97
30.8
130.0
3.4
150800
.24
Y
211
23.0
7.81
2.4
0.28
16
7.52
42.2
123.1
5.0
17 0800
24
N
3.18
2.6
< 0.10
68.9
153.7
< 27
18 0800
24
N
282
3.3
< 0.10
77.6
188.2
c 2.4
19 0800
24
Y
201
23.7
6.56
5.2
< 0.10
1
9.36
87.0
305.2
< 1.7
201 0800
24
Y
1.97
23.3
7.78
4.8
0.16
215
7.91
< 0.1
79.0
161.3
2.6
416.5
211 080D
24
Y
2.20
24.5
7.15
3.4
0.12
76
7.38
62.4
165.2
2.3
221, 0E30D
24
Y
1.97
25.7
7.20
3.7
0.16
78
7.22
60.8
115.0
2.6
23 0800
24
Y
Z22
24.6
7.44
4.3
0.15
5
7.29
79.8
241.1
27
24 0800
24
N
3.27
5.1
c 0.10
139.2
349.3
< 2.7
25 0800
24
N
1.71
4.0
0.10
57.0
142A
1.5
26 08D0
24
Y
1.96
24.7
6.90
4.9
< 0.10
2
7.62
80.3
344.0
< 1.8
27 0800
24
Y
1.70
24.5
7.51
4.6
0.11
53
7.76
65.1
346.7
1.5
28 0800
24
Y
1.76
24.3
8.D0
6.0
0.28
44
7.39
< 0.1
87.9
270.9
4.1
<14.6
AVERAGE
2.28
23.9
3.3
0.16
21
7.82
209.0
46.8
< 0.1
0.832
65.0
244.3
29
16.7
MAKKMUM
3.27
25.7
8.00
6.0
OA5
> 6000
9.36
209.0
46.8
< 0.1
0.832
139.2
378.2
8.8
< 18.5
MINIMUM
1.70
228
6.68
1.6
0.10
1
7.22
209.0
46.8
< 0.1
0.832
23.8
67.0
1.5
14.6
Comp(C)IGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
3.00
8.0<91
200
1 }5.0
<5.0
500.0
998.7
60.0
319.6
PUB Denotes Backup Operator on Site
' Denotes sample did not meet the rule of 2 ppm DO depiction. Maximum sample volume was used

L-J
,.� 01 NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH MARCH YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC:RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
MR
f"
MR
PEI
MR
ki .]
P"
RXI
OR
IMT
�P
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1017
(SIGNATURE O PERATOR IN RES SIBLE CHAR )
BY THIS SiGNA RE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
tg4 &- 1)
DATE '
D
A
T
E
Opmabr
Arrhral
Tlaw
DDer�o►
Time
On
Su
ORC
on
Stec
50050
ODD10
00400
50060
00310
00510
31616
0030D
00600
00665
00545
00605
00310
00530
00610
00W6
FLOW
Ep
MY
Rate
Temp
pH
Residual
C* dne
BCD 5
20C
Anm ada
Nllrom
Feral
Coi llorm
IGco
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Total
Htim m
Total
Phm-
phormrs
Sett-
cable
Solids
awric
Mogen
SOD 5
2D C
TOW
Suspended
R@sfduE
Amrorda
Nttragen
Oi 8
Grease
Hrs
NO
MGO
C
SU
MiGJL
MGB.
MGM
SnvO ML
MAGA
MG1L
MiGFL
Mill.
MGM
UWAY
LSdDAY
LBIDAY
LEWAY
1
0800
24
Y
2.00
24.4
7.88
3.7 0.13
30
7A6
61.7
241.9
2.2
2
0800
24
Y
2.39
26.6
7.55
4.4
a 0A0
3
7.43
87.6
190.2
< 2.0
3
0800
24
N
3.42
4.4
c 0.10
125.5
285.1
c 2.9
4
0800
24
N
2.49
3.3
c 0.10
BOA
259.2
< 2.1
5
0800
24
Y
1.37
24.9
6.99
22
0A4
2
7.45
252
206.3
1.6
6
0800
24
Y
1.52
24.5
7.28
3.8
0.18
33
7.70
51.3
290.3
2.4
7
0800
24
Y
1.92
24.4
7.87
3.9
< 0.10
37
7.25
62.6
329.1
< 1.8
B
0800
24
Y 1
1.75
24.1
7.75
3.3
< 0.10
4
7.64
293.2
47.6
< 0.1
4.100
48.1
313A
c 1.5
04.6
9
OBOD
24
NIB
2.03
23.9
7.88
3.3
0.16
9
7.93
56.0
458.2
2.7
10
080D
24
N
2A2
3.1
< 0.10
72.9
411.4
< 2.4
11
0800
24
N
Z19
2.8
< 0.10
47.4
292.0
< 1.8
12
0800
24
Y
2.04
25.3
7.53
2.7
< 0.10
1
7.10
46.0
366.5
< 1.7
1S
OB00
24
Y
2.16
24.9
7.80
4.0
< 0.10
2
7.55
72.0
360.1
< 1.8
14
0800
24
Y
2.19
26.5
7.82
4.9
< 0.10
3.700
6.90
89.6
301.8
< 1.8
16
0800
24
Y
2.07
27.0
7.93
4.1
< 0.10
330
5.94
70.6
266.9
< 1.7
19
0800
24
Y
218
28.3
7.66
3.1
0.10
> 6.000
6.28
< 0.1
56.4
205.4
< 1.8
<182
17
0800
24
N
2.39
2.3
< 0.10
45.9
409.0
14 2.0
18
0800
24
N
3.16
2.9
c 0.10
76.4
4612
j< 2.6
19
0800
24
Y
1.87
26.0
7.39
2.7
< 0.10
6
7.08
< 0.1
42.2
210.8
< 1.6
<15.6
20
0800
24
Y
208
24,7
7.93
3.5
< 0.10
11
7.50
160.7
320.6
< 1.7
21
0800
24
Y
2.25
26.1
8.02
3.1
< 0.10
11
7.00
58.0
383.8
< 1.9
22
0800
24
Y
Z13
28.4
7.86
2.6
< 0AO
2
6.86
48.1
363.3
< 1.8
23
0800
24
Y
2.37
27.2
7.76
3.3
< 0A0
1
6.47
65.3
454.E
c 2.0
24
C800
24
N
3.14
2.3
< 0.10
60.1
457.6
< 2.0
25
0800
24
N
207
2.5
c 0.10
43.2
196.7
< 1.7
26
0600
24
Y
1.79
26.1
8.25
2.8
< 0.10
2
6.98
41.8
246.5
< 1.5
27
0800
24
Y
1.80
27.0
8.22
2.7
4 0.10
25
6.79
c 0.1
40.6
$38.6
< 1.5
<15.0
28
OBOO
24
Y
1.74
28.2
8.21
2.9
< 0.10
15
6.26
42.0
224.7
< 1A
29
080D
24
Y
219
27.1
7.73
3.0
< 0.10
24
6.11
54.8
410.8
< 1.8
30
0800
24
Y
1.95
26.0
8.10
3.5
c 0.10
8
6.87
57.0
135.1
< 1.6
31
0800
24
N
2.71
2.6
< 0.10
58.85
248.98
c 2.3
AVERAGE
2.20
25.9
3.2
0.11
14
7.03
293.2
47.6
< 0.1
4.100
50.2
31l.3
1.9
15.9
MAXIMUM
3A2
28.3
8.26
4.9
0.1a
> 6000
7.93
293.2
47.8
< 0.1
4.100
125.5
461.2
.2.9
< 18.2
MINIMUM
1.37
23.9
6.99
2.2
< 0.10
1
5-84
293.2
47.6
< 0.1
4.100
25.2
135.1
1.4
< 14.6
Corrtp(CYGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
CT
C
G
C
C
C
G
Monthly UmI1
1 3.00
1
V6.0<9.(200
>5.0
1
1 <5.0
S00.0
9S8.7
60.0
319.6
NIB Denotes Backup Operator on Site
aw

. r
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH APRIL YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED • PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Atin: CENTRAL F[LES
Dtrltston of Wafer QuaEty
NCDENR (SGNATUR OF OPERATOR IN REMNSiBLE. CHARGE) DATE
1617 Mad Service Canter BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH. NC 27899=1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY IWOWLEDGE r
0 operator
A Operator Tnme
T Arrival On
E Ttme Site
6DD50
00010 0040D WOOD
00310
00610
MOD
003W
00600
00685
W546
00605
OD310
0053D
00010
ODS56
FLOW
Fecal
ORC Eft Temp PH Residual SOD 5 Ammonle Cdtfaan
On Daily CNadrse 20C Nitrogen (Geo
Site Rate Mean)
DtswW Total
Oxygen N*ogen
Total
phos-
phomus
Sett-
eahle OrpeNc Nitrogen
Sdids
BOD 5
20 C
Tote)
Suspended
Ammonia
N11rogen
Oa &
Gress
His
Firs
MGD
C
SU MGIL
MGIL
MGIL
#110D ML
MGIL
MGIL
MGIL
MLIL
MOIL
LBIDAY
L81GAY
LB/DAY
LBIDAY
1
0800
24
N
1-SO
3.1
< 0.10
61:2
239A
< 1�7
2
0800
24
Y
1.51
27.6
7.60
32
< 0.10
4
6.65
482
263.6
< 1.5
3
OBOD 1
24
Y
1.97
28.3
7.99
33
c 0.10
5
SAS
543
164.6
< 1.6
41
0800 1
24
Y
1.84
28.4
828
2.4
0.12
16
6.53
101.0
44.6
< 0.1
Dim
35.9
161.4
1.8
< 15.4
5
DOW
24
Y
1.88
26.9
8.08
2.2
< DAD
24
5.37
34.5
242.0
c 1.6
6
CM
24
NIB
2.06
26.4
0.10
3.2
< DAD
B
SAS
54.8
219.4
< 1.7
7
0800
24
N
1.70
6.1
1.62
72.3
233.8
23.0
8
OWD
24
H
0.07
4.7
023
33.9
169.5
1.7
9
0800 1
24
H
1.72
2.0
< 0.10
28.7
179.1
< 1 A
10
0800 1
24
Y
1 1.84
24.1
7.57
2.9
< DAD
1
TAG
44.4
329.4
< 1.5
III
0800 1
24
Y
2.06
24.6
7AD
3.0
< 0.10
3
7.37
S1.4
231.5
< 1.7
12
0800
24
Y
209
26A
8.02
2.5
< DA0
18
.7.59
< DA
46.9
349.3
< 1.7
< 17.5
13
0800
24
Y
Z03
25.4
8.09
2.9
< OAD
7
7AB
49A
177.7
< 1.7
14
OBDO
24
N
2.60
5.3
< 0.10
114.7
422.2
< 22
15
0800
24
N
293
1.9
< 0.10
46.4
305.2
< 2.4
161
0600
24
Y
1.64
25A
7.55
5.6
< 0.10
1
7.36
76.8
1989
< 1.4
171
0800
24
Y
1.83
28A
7.58
5.9
0.14
1
7.83
BD2
203.9
1.9
1 B 1
0800
24
Y
1.68
26.9
7.50
3.0
0.17
5
7.25
42.0
272.9
2.3
191
DBOD
24
Y
1.80
20.5
7.81
43
< 0.10
3
TAB
62.9
334.E
< 1.3
t6l
DODO
24
Y
1.79
27.1
7.88
< 2.0
0.18
< 1
7.34
< 0.1
< 29.9
166.8
2.7
< 149
21
0800
24
N
020
3.4
0.18
8.2
39.9
DA
22
DOW
24
N
2.34
3A
< 0.10
6DA
214.9
c ZO
23
0600 1
24
Y
159
2V
7.59
4.0
OA2
2
739
< 0.1
BSA
323J6
1.9
< 99.6
241
0800 1
24
NB
190
27.1
7.82
4.0
< 0.10
62
6.77
63A
278.0
< 1.6
25
DODO
24
NIB
1.70
2B.0
7.66
2.9
c 0.14
11
7A9
41.0
360.0
< 1A
26
D800
24
NIB
1 1.76
2&1
822
2.9
< 0.10
8
721
42.7
151.E
< 1.5
27
0800
24
NIB
2.07
29.0
8.07
2.9
< 0.10
2
6.61
50.0
177.7
< 13
2B
0800
24
N
269
5A
< 0.10
1299
252.E
a 2A
29
0800
24
N
2.01
5.0
< DA0
833
217.7
< 1.7
30
0800
24
Y
1.43
282
7.86
1.8
0.15
1
730
21.5
WA
1.9
31
AVERAGE
1.87
26.9
35
0.17
4
7.09
181.0
44.6
< 0.1
0.683
543
235A
2A
< 36.9
MAXMUM
2.93
29.0
82B
5.9
1.62
82
7.0
181.0
44.6
0.1
0483
129.9
422.2
23.0
< 99.6
MWIMUM
029
24.1
7.50
1.8
< 0.10
< 1
6.37
181.0
44.6
c 0.1
0.883
8.2
39.9
CA
< 14.9
Comp(CpGrab (G)
G
G G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
O
Monthly U dt
3.00
6.0<9.
2D0
>5.0
<S.0
250.0
998.7
30.D
W9.8
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
* Sample did not meet the rule of 2 ppm DO depletion. Maximum sample volume was used.

no
ran
FAR
OR
RR
MR
�I
r�I
MR
MR
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH May YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Atirc CENTRAL. FILES
Division d Water Oually F ic
NCDENR (IGNATURE OF ERATOR N RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)'DATE
1617 Mail Service Center BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFYTHAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH. NC 27689.11617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
D
A
T
E
Operator
Arrival
Time
Operator
Time
On
Site
50050
FLOW
ORC Efr
on Daffy
Site Rate
00010 OD400
50080
0031D
00610
31616
00300
00600
COWS
00545
00605
OD310
00530
00610
00556
Temp pH
Residual
Ctdortne
SOD 5
20C
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Fecal
Ca form
(Geo
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Total
Nitrogen
TOW
Phas-
phorous
Sett-
eable
Sailds
Organic
NllrWen
SOD 5
20 C
Totat
Suspended
Restdue
Ammonia
N UNan
Oil &
Gress
e
Hr5
Hrs
MG0
C SU
MGL
MG& _
MGIL
41100 ML
MGIL
MGIL
A1G1L
MUL
MGIL
L19DAY
LOMY
LBiDAY
LBIDAY
1
0800
24
Y 1A7
26.0 820
3.0
0.13
1
6.62
166.0
44A
< 0.1
0.872
36.7
201.7
1.0
< 61A
2
0600
24
Y 2.07
MIS 7.70
3A
< 0.10
45
5.41
58.7
302.1
< 17
3
0800
24
Y 1.93
29.1 T.88
2.1
0.16
8
6.20
33.9
265.0
2.6
4
OM
24
Y 2.13
27.9 7.86
1.8
0.11
1
6.63
320
188.7
20
6
0800
24
N 3.36
2.6
< 0.10
70.4
280.1
< 2.8
6
0600
24
N 2.66
2.8
< 0A0
622
299.9
< 22
7
0800
24
Y 1.92
25.6 8.iO
2.1
< 0.10
< 1
7.59
33.7
240.7
< IS
a
OSOD
24
Y 1.78
25.5 7S9
23
< 0.10
2
7.71
34.1
192.9
< 1.5
9
0800
24
Y 1.64
26.9 8.10
2.6
0.13
4
7.16
4 0.1
3&4
222.8
2.0
< 76.8
10
0800
24
Y 2A0
28.1 8.11
32
< 0.10
< 1
7.09
53 5
242.3
< 17
Ti-
OBOO
24
NIB 2.23
29.4 7.99
2.7
< 0.10
< 1
7.10
5D_i
1022
< 1.9
12
0800
24
N 323
< 2.0 '
< 0.10
< 53.8
262.7
< 2.7
13
0500
24
N 290
C 2.O •
< 0.10
< 48A
20.9
< 2A
14
ONO
24
Y 1.62
28.1 7.38
1.3
0.11
< 1
7.02
16.4
215A
1.4
15
caw
24
Y 1.78
27.9 7.62
1.9
< 0.10
10
7.13
28.2
200.5
< 1.5
16
0800
24
Y 1.89
283 8.39
3.2
< 0.10
1
7.17
50.5
291.8
c 1.8
17
0800
24
Y 1.74
28A a41
3.1
< 0.10
2
7.24
0.1
45.1
188.1
< 1.5
101.8
18
0800
24
Y 205
27.6 8.43
2.5
0.18
2
7.07
42.6
341.1
3A
19
OBOD
24
N 3.38
2.1
< 0.10
59.1
436.3
< 2.0
20
0800
24
N 3.11
2.9
< 0.10
75.3
272.7
< 2$
21
0800
24
Y 1.91
282 S33
3.3
< 0.10
1
7.10
52.5
248A
c 1.8
22
0800
24
Y 1.64
20.1 8.48
3.5
< 0.10
< 1
6.70
47.9
184.8
< 1.4
23
OBW
24
Y 1.69
28A 856
3.2
0.17
10
ex
452
102.3
2A
24
GOOD
24
Y 1.76
20A SAO
2.8
0.21
< 1
6.59
0.1
146S
3.1
25
0800
24
Y 1.92
211.E 826
is
0.21
1
6.50
< 0.1
25.6
56.0
33
112.0
26
0600
24
N "1
3.9
020
942
128.6
4.8
27
0800
24
N Lis
5.5
0.22
100.2
i73A
4.0
28
0800
24
N 2.76
Hddaj
4.7
0.18
1082
2992
4A
29
0800
24
Y IA4
30.1 7.86
e.i
0.11
2
6.99
< 0.1
78.1
128.0
13
89.6
30
0800
24
Y 133
30.9 7.82
2.5
< 0.10
10
6.01
36A
i94.A
< IA
J31
0600
24
NIB 1.61
302 8.10
4.8
0.12
4
0.15
613
207.9
is
AVERAGE 2.15
28.3
22
0.13
2
6.T5
166.0
44.4
c 0.1
0.872
522
223.7
23
683
iA1WMUM 3.38
30.9 0.55
6.1
022
45
7.71
166.0
44.4
c 0.1
0.872
10&2
438.3
4.8
1120
MINIMUM 1.47
25S 7.38
13
< 0.10
c 1
b.41
166.0
44.4
< OA
0.672
16A
560
< 13
c 61.1
CamppyGreb (G)
G G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
MonOW Linit �3OD
.0-9.
200
>5.0
<5.0
250.0
8911.7
30.0
319.E
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
t�R * Sample did not meet the rule of 2 ppm DO depletion. Maximum sample volume was used.
**GGA standard was outside of acceptalbe range of 198+/- 30.5ppm
ow

NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH June YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED ❑ PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Man ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Alto: CENTRAL FILES
Division of Water Quality -"x
NCDENR (SIGN REQF-0PERATbRTN RESPONSIBL ARGE) DATE
1617 Mai SeMce Center BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
D
A
T
E
Operator
Atstval
T1ma
Operator
'lima
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
NOW
00010
004M
SOOM
W310
D061D
31616
C0300
0=0
00665
00545
00605
OD310
00530
00610
00556
FLOW
Temp
pH
Residual
CNOMs
SODS
20C
AmmoNa
NR Men
Fecal
Cordarm
(Goo
Mean)
Diss6ved
Oxygen
Total
Nfftmgen
Total
phos-
ptsaraus
Sett-
sable
SoBds
Organk
Nitrogen
Boos
20 C
Total
Suspended
Residue
Army arde
Nitrogen
03 &
Greas
e
Eff
D*
Rate
His
Firs
MGD
C
SU
MGIL
MGIL
MGIL
01100 ML
MG&
MGIL
MSIL
MLIL
MOIL
LBIDAY
LR Y
LINDAY
LBIDAY
4
-0800
24
NIB
1.89
29.8
.028
7A 1
0:12
7
6:62
122.9
157A
2.0
2
0800
24
N
3.06
33
< 0.10
$4.3
305.6
c 2.6
3
080D
24
N
2.69
3.7
< 0.10
83A
247.1
c 2.2
41
0800 1
24
NIB
1.86
28.6
SAO
11.4
< 0.10
< 1
6.95
1772
178.8
< 1.6
5
0800
24
NIB
199
30.2
8.20
12.5
< 0.10
< 1
7A8
105.6
186.6
< 1.6
6
0800
24
NIB
1.80
30.3
8.41
132
< OAO
< 1
734
263.1
43.6
< 0.1
0.8D0
1879
179.8
c 1.5
< 74.9
7
0800
24
NIB
1.49
31.1
SA2
152
< OAO
4
8.58
I
18&9
167.8
< 12
8
0800
24
NIB
1.82
30.8
8.06
7.6
< 0.10
10
5.96
114.0
532
< 1.6
9
0800
24
N
3.14
8.9
< 0.10
180.9
275.3
< 2.6
10
0800
24
N
2.81
7.1
< 0.10
166,6
316.8
c 2.3
11
0800
24
Y
1.57
31.0
732
10.5
< 0.10
2
7.04
INN
215.5
< 1.3
12
OBOO
24
Y
' M
30.3
7.B5
10.4
< 0.10
2
8.30
INN
i05.4
c 1.3
13
0900
24
Y
1.85
30.0
820
7.0
< 0.10
< 1
7.12
< 0.1
107.9
154.1
c 1.5
< 77.i
14
OWD
24
Y
1.77
30.3
8.54
17.7
c 0.16
c 1
7.10
261.0
221.2
< 1.5
15
DOW
24
Y
i.83
28.1
8.52
10.6 '
< 0.10
2
7A6
160.5
152.9
< 1.5
16
0800
24
N
2.88
4.7
a 0.10
116.8
2982
a 2.5
17
am
24
N
2.62
4.2
c 0.10
91.9
197.0
c 2.2
18
am
24
Y
1.58
32.3
7.84
2.8
< 0.10
1
6A7
36.8
144.8
< 1.3
19
0800
24
N
1.64
32.6
7,86
&1
c 0.10
2
638
42.6
287.8
< 1.4
20
OS00
24
N
1.67
319
7.88
7.6
< 0.10
2
SAO
106.1
187.5
< 1A
21
0800
24
Y
1 A7
30.8
8.14
4.9
< 0.10
1
6.83
60.0
140.9
< 12
221
COW
24
Y
1.96
WA
8.10
3.6
< 0.10
c 1
6.53
< 0.1
682
79A
< 15
< 81.8
231
MW
24
N
7-06.8
< 9.10
164.3
472.8
< 2.5
241
0800
24
N
2.59
7.4
< 0.10
169.7
215.8
c 22
25
0800
24
Y
7.60
33.1
7.01
IA
< OAO
7
6.21
< 0.1
15.7
288.5
c 1.3
c SSA
26
0800
24
Y
1.69
1 330
7.13
2.1
< 0.10
1
6.01
293
1MS.S
< iA
27
0800
24
Y
13a
33A
7.76
i.7
< 0.10
1
6.55
25.2
74.1
< 1.5
28
0800
24
Y
1.78
33.0
7.92
1.0
c 0.10
3
7A7
26.6
1332
< IS
29
0600
24.
NIB
225
321
827
2.8
< 0.10
3
6.15
S2.5
107.4
< 1.9
30
08DD
24
N
3.10
2.0
< 0.10
S1.7
381.7
c 2.6
AVERAGE
2.09
31.3
8.W
6.7
0.10
2
6.84
263.1
43.6
c 0.1
0.900
111.9
204.2
1.8
< 75.1
MAXIMUM
3.14
33A
173
0.13
10
8.30
263.1
43.6
< 0.1
0.900
261.0
472.8
c 2A
< 81.6
L41NMLRW
1A7
29.1
7.01
1A
< 0.10
< 1
6.01
2631
43:8
0.1
0.900
18.7
53.2
< 12
< 66.6
Cor*CyGirab (G)
1 G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
Mond* Limit
300
6.dc8
200
>S.0
55.0
250.0
986.7
300
319.E
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
* Polyseed and GGA standard was outside of acceptable range.
7

NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH July YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED . PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
r�r Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Divtstan or Water Quality
or gr
NCDENR (SIGNX,wP^F OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
1617 Mal Ser" Cuter BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFYTR4TTHIS REPORT IS
mm RALEIGH. NC 27699.1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF FAY KNOWLEDGE
r"
MR
F"
MR
OR
1q
wA
P�1
law
AR
D
A
T
E
Operator
Arrival
Time
OpeFew
Time
Oa
Site
ORC
On
Site
5OD50
00010 100400
50060
00310
00610
W80
0030D
006M
ODS65
W545
D0605
00310
W530
00610
W556
FLOW
Temp
PH
Residual
Chbdne
130D 5
20C
Ama o da
Mtmgen
Fecal
Celifarm
(Geo
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Taal
Nitroger
Total
phorous
Sett-
Solids
MIC
Nitrogen
8005
20 C
TOW
Suspended
Residue
Ammonia
Nitrogen
03 &
Greas
e
Etf
Daly
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
MGD
C
SU
MG&
MGIL
MGIL
8►10D ML
MGiL
MGIL
MGIL
i+41L
MGIL
LBIDAY
LBIDAY
UMAY
LB/DAY
1
L 0800
24
N
3A2
22
< 0.10
57.3
WO.2
< 2B
2
0800
24
Y
1.67
31.9
7.62
2.5
OA4
< 1
6.69
38.9
184.5
22
3
DOW
24
Y
2.20
313
Q02
2.6
c 0.10
11
6.39
214.0
47.3
0.1
0.900
46.0
248A
< 1.8
< 919
4
0800
24
N
1.95
2.2
< OAD
35.9
212.0
< 1.6
S
0600
24
Y
1.34
W.7
7.e9
2.3
< 0.10
< 1
0.78
26.8
112A
< 1.1
6
0800
24
NIB
1.94
32.0
8.31
23
< OA0
< 1
8.81
43.9
81 A
< 1.6
7
0800
24
N
2.49
2.6
Lc 0.10
53.9
321.2
c 2.1
8
01100
24
N
215
3.0
< 0.10
63.7
223.0
c 2.1
9
0800
24
Y
1.61
32.9
7.72
3.2
< 0.10
2
6.04
42.9
194.S
c 1.3
10
D600
24
Y
1A8
33.3
7.69
29
< OA0
c 1
7.08
35.9
129.9
< 1.2
i1
0800
24
Y
i.43
32.0
821
4.7
< OAD
c 1
7.00
< 0.1
58.0
244.3
< 12
< 59.6
12
OBDO
24
Y
158
32.7
7.75
3.0
< 0.10
c 1
6.93 1
39.6
283.5 14
1.3
13
0800
24
Y
1.%
W-6
7.74
3.0
< 0.10
< 1
6.86
40A
2492
< 1.3
14
OBOD
24
N
3.03
3.6
c 0.10
91.1
75.9
< 2.5
15
0800
24
N
2.61
3A
< 0.10
79.7
140A
< 29
1B
OBOD
24
Y
1.89
32A
7.77
3.3
< 0.10
< 1
6.72
295.0
< 0.1
0.900
52.1
131.0
< 1.0
< 76.9
17
0800
24
Y
1.74
32.3
7.91
3.1
< OAO
< 1
SAO
217.1
1.000
45.1
240JO
c 1.5
18
0800
24
Y
1.62
329
8.06
&a
< 0.10
4
7.83
213.5
2.400
487
1=
c 1 A
19
0800
24
Y
130
32.9
8.17
2.9
< 0.10
4
7.09
168.6
0.500
41A
170.0
< 1A
20
am
24
Y
2.07
33A
SA7
3.0
< 0.10
2
6.39
176.6
0.500
51.7
232.7
< 1.7
21
0800
24
N
3.16
2.5
< OA0
65.8
381.7
< 2.6
22
0600
24
N
271
2.0
< DAD
452
294.4
< 2.3
23
mm
24
Y
1.67
30.5
82a
4.1
0.16
< 1
0.94
261.0
< 0.1
0.822
57.2
209A
2.5
< OU
24
080D
24
Y
136
302
732
3.7
< 0.10
1
7.12
54.3
213.1)
< 14
25
0800
24
Y
2AO
31.9
?AS
3.1
< 0.10
30
7.33
54A
1842
< 1.8
26
0m
24
Y
1.50
322
7.89
23
< 0.10
< 1
7.05
40.6
203.0
< 1.5
27
0800
24
Y
190
32Z
SM
4.0
< DAD
1
0.60
63A
i68,5
< 1.6
28
DOW
24
N
3.03
2.8
< 0.10
70.8
316.1
c 2.5
29
0800
24
N
Z63
2.6
< 0,10
57.0
2412
< 22
30
DSOD
24
Y
1.88
32.3
823
22
< DAD
< 1
0.65
142.0
<0.1
D.900
36A
289A
< 1.7
< 82.7
31
MOD
24
Y
1.82
322
0.18
2.8
< OA0
c 1
624
44.9
160A
< 1.6
AVERAGE
2.09
32.2
3.0
0.10
2
6.93
209.7
47.3
< 0.1
0.990
51.0
220.6
1.8
< 76.6
MAXIMUM
3.16
33A
8.47
4.7
0.15
30
8.84
295.0
47.3
< 0.1
2A00
91.1
560.2
< Z.6
< 919
MINIMUM
1.34
302
7.62
2.0
< 0.10
< 1
6.24
142A
47.3
< 0.1
0.500
25.8
75.9
< 1.1
< 69.6
Camp(C)IGmb (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
j G
C
C
C
C
G
MonWy Lima
3AD
07w
200
-5.0
250.0
998.7
30.0
319.6
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
I
aw

NPDES PERMIT NO. NC00783" DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH AUGUST YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR 1N RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to.
Aft CENTRAL FILES
Difton or Water Quality 'Zdv vo 7
NCDENR (3IGNA7U OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) ATE
1617 MeH SeMce Center 6Y THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THATTHIS REPORT lS
RALEIGK NC 27899-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
5OD50
OOD1D
OD40D
5006D
00310
DD"oiO
31616
OD300
00600
0060
OD545
OW05
00310
00530
0OS10
OD556
FLOW
D
T
E
Operator
Time
Openita
Own
OnSilo
ORC
On
TOP
PH
Red"
SOD 5
200
Ammnia
Nitrogen
Fecal
Co$form
(Goo
MM)
Dlssetmi
07pw
Total
NYagpn
Toles
Phm-
phorous
Sell-
sable
Solids
Orgar►Ic
BOD 5
20 C
Total
Suspended
Residue
Ammonia
Nitrogen
00 &
Greer
e
f
Rats
Hra
Hra
[1iGD
C
SU
MGJL
MOIL
MGJL
#/100 ML
MGJL
MOIL
MG&
MUL
MGiL
LBJDAY
LBJDAY
LBJAAY
LBJQAY
1
0800
24
Y
136
32.8
8.21
1.9
< 0.10
14
^
6.76
_- -
27.9
146.8
< 1.5
2
C800
24
Y
1.66
32.9
8.17
1.9
c 0.10
12
6.65
28.3
228.3
< 1.4
3
0300
24
Y
1.97
32.7
7.83
2A
c 0.10
1
6.04
39.3
172.1
c 1.6
4
0800
24
N
I 298
3A
< 0.10
1
839
2818
c 2.5
5
0800
24
N
262
2.7
< 0.10
595
426.E
< 2.2
6
0800
24
Y
1.65
34.2
7.82
+ 4.3
< 0.10
2
6A7
162.0
49.1
c 0.1
0.90D
Sal
21&0
c 1.4
< 68.7
7
0800
24
Y
1.93
34.1
7.98
t 2.7
c 0.10
78
8.37
43.4
441.7
< 1.6
8
0800
24
Y
212
34.1
635
0.17
70
6.93
lose
&0
9
080D
24
Y
1.79
34.3
822
c 0.10
8
5.60
149.2
c 1.5
10
oam
24
Y
IJW
34.0
7.79
n 3.6
< 0.10
1
6.59
48.1
2072
< 1.3
11
COW
24
N
2.57
" 25
c 0.10
53.6
311.2
c 2.1
12
0800
24
N
3.04
• 2.5
< 0.10
63.3
240.5
< 1.3
13
08W
24
Y
1.77
33.3
7.77
A 3.1
< OAD
1
6.36
2e4.0
< 0.1
0.900
45.8
214.3
c 1.6
< 73.9
14
COW
24
Y
127
32.9
7.78
^ 28
< 0.10
3
62D
45.3
1S6.1
< 1.6
15
OBOO
24
Y
1.68
33.6
521
5A
c 0.10
5
6.38
75.5
132.9
< 1.4
16
D800
24
Y
1.81
33.7
&DS
4 SA
c 0.10
2
6.07
726
188.2
< 1.3
17
DOW
24
Y
1.85
33.2
820
2,2
< 0.10
3
6.42
342
155.5
< 1.6
18
Dow
24
N
118
22
0.13
58.0
461.2
3.3
18
OB00
24
N
2.73
1.9
c 0.10
43.2
2729
< 2.3
2O
woo
24
Y
1.36
32.4
7.79
2.2 Jc
0.10
1
6.88
35D.0
a 0.1
Q900
24.9
192.8
< i.1
c 56.5
21
0800
24
Y
11M
33.3
BA0
2.0
c 0.10
2
6.13
269.1
0.000
27.8
3004
< 1.4
22
0800
24
Y
1.80
33.8
8.17
2.7
c 0.10
6
7.08
254.1
0.000
40.6
210.3
< 1.5
23
0800
24
Y
1.87
34.0
8.16
25
< 0,10
106
6.22
26D.3
0.180
39.0
179.3
< 1.6
24
0800
24
Y
1.62
34.0
8A7
20
c 0.10
3
6.16
30Q1
O.0OD
27.1
142.0
< 1A
25
0800
24
N
2AS
1.7
c OAO
231.1
mow
34.9
431.0
c 2.1
26
0800
24
N
2.97
1.6
< 010
226.0
2D.900
39.6
334.4
< 2.5
27
COW
24
Y
1.77
33.0
7.81
1.6
< 0.10
1
8.61
247.1
c 0.1
0.000
222
155.1
< 1.5
< 73.9
28
OBW
24
Y
1.83
33.3
7.76
22
< 0.10
35
6.45
243.1
0.00D
33.5
205.6
< 1.6
29
0000
24
Y
1.78
33.1
8.19
21
< 0.10
5
0.62
216.1
0.000
31.1
155.5
c 1.5
30 OB00 24 Y
1.611
33.3
Moo
2.8
< 0.10
3
8.35
231.1
0.000
36.0
219.2
c 1.6
31 =0 24 NIB
1.61
32.7
8.18
2.2
c 0.10
c 1
6.05
194.1
0.000
29.5
53.6
c 1.3
AVERAGE
203
33A
, t
26
0.10
5
SAO
246.3
49.1
c 0.1
1.699
43.6
231.4
1.7
c 68.3
MAXtaALIM
3.18
34.9
8AO
5,4
0.17
IDS
7.06
35MO
49.1
c 0.1
20.900
83.9
481.2
< 3.3
< 79.0
MINIMUM
1.36
32.4
717
1.5
< 0.10
< 1
5.50
162.0
49.1
0.1
O.OW
222
5a6
a 1,1
< 56.5
CwWCyGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monm Llmlt
3.00
Oc9.
200
>&0
25A
c50
250.0 +
998.7
i
30.0
319.E
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
' SEED WAS OUT OF RANGE
t GGA WAS OUT OF RANGE
SEED & GGA & BLANK WAS OUT OF RANG
SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BEFORE MEASUREMENT DUE TO EXTREME LOW BLANK
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM TIME
Page 1 of 1

NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH SEPTEMBER YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGI AL. and ONE COPY is
1w Mm CENTRAL FILES
Division o[ Water Quality114'mzd
NCDENR (SIG TURQ OPERA IN RE5PON 1F GE) DATE
1617 Mal Service Center 9Y THIS Sf TURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ram RALE03K NO 27699-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF W KNOWLEDGE
f+el
1R
fAR
MN
WR
e•R
f"
Pt
pI
MR
D
A
T
E
Opernbar
Arrival
Tlme
Opmraw
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
50050
00010 00400
50080
00310
00610
31616
00300
DOB00
00565
OOS45 00605
W310
00530
00610
00555
FLOW
Temp pH
Residual
Chtorine
ROD 5
20C
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Feed
Cclitorrrt
(Goo
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Total
Mrogan
Total
Phos•
p-orous I
Sett-
eable Organic
Solids Nilmgsn
SOD 5
20 C
Total
Srrspeaded
Residue
An wria
Nitrogen
Oil &
Gress
6
Eft
Daly
Rate
Hm
lira
MOD
C SU
MGIL
MCdL
MGA.
0100 ML
MGIL
MGIL
MGIL
MLiL mWL
LBfDAY
LB/DAY
LBJDAY
LBIDAY
1
0800
24
N
3.01
1.7
< 0.10
222.3
02W
+ 42.7
251.2
< 2.5
2
0600
24
N
3.05
+ 1.6
< 0.10
240.1
0.000
+ 40.7
305.3
< 2.5
3
•0800
24
N
222
1
23
< 0.10
221.1
O.00D
42.6
342.5
< 1.9
4
0800
24
Y
1.70
31.7 8.18
2.4
< MID
25
7.17
29al
46.1
< 0.1 O.00D
34.0
2124
< IA
c 70.8
5
0900
24
Y
1.82
31.7 7.BB
1.s
< 0.10
54
6.65
293.1
0.000
24.3
212.7
c 1.5
8
080D
24
Y
1.80
31.8 8.34
2.0
< 0.10
120
6.82
0.000
30.1
202.9
< is
7
0600
24
Y
1.93
33.0 7.00
+ 1.3
< 0.10
7
6.37
C.000
+ 20.9
i85.0
< 1.6
8
MOD
24
N
1.57
• 0.6
< OA0
224.0
0.900
9.4
286.7
< 1.6
9
0800
24
N
2.84
' 0.1
< 0.10
149.0
0.OW
24
272.3
< 2.4
10
0600
24
Y
1.62
31.7 6.10
2.0
< 0.10
10
6.84
219.0
0.1 DAD0
27.0
142.0
< 1.4
< 67.6
11
GOOD
24
Y
1.74
31.2 8.25
1.0
< CAD
3
BAB
171.0
0.900
27.6
209.9
< 1.4
12
0600
24
Y
1.55
32.4 8.27
A 1.3
< 0.10
6
6.65
200.0
0.900
A 21.2
358.3
< 1.3
13
COW
24
Y
1.87
31.9 820
A 1.6
< 0.10
460
6.54
142.0
0:900
A 25.0
212-7
< 1.6
14
68M
24
Y
1.78
32.2. &16
1.7
< 0.10
848
6.49
137.0
0.900
25.0
147.0
< 1.5
15
OBOD
24
N
2A9
1.9
< 0.10
217.0
0.900
39.6
22ILS
< 21
16
0900
24
N
3.OQ
1A
< 0.10
58.0
0.9DO
S52
< 25
17
OBW
24
Y
1.62
30.0 7.70
2.3
< 0.10
16
6.98
133.0
< 0.1 0.900
31.0
175.3
< 1.3
< 67.4
18
0800
24
Y
1.05
30.5 7.70
1
3.4
< Q10
110
6.61
143.0
0.900
62.6
239.7
< 1.5
19
080D
24
Y
1.75
30.4 7.86
4 3.5
I< OAG
17
B.63
01.2
0200
61.0
327.8
< 1.5
20
OOOD
1 24
Y
1.70
W2 9A5
4 3.7
< 0.10
7
6.45
109.7
0.900
+ 52.6
4121
{ 1A
21
OWD
24
Y
1.37
31.9 8.10
2.8
< 0.10
16
6.32
77.9
0.900
32.0
3O&B
< 1.1
22
0800
24
N
3.19
1
2.6
< OAO
78.2
0.900
we
3WA
< 27
23
COW
24
N
1.13
3.8
< 0.10
82.6
0.900
35..9
161.2
< 0.9
24
0800.
24
Y
1.14
32.2 7.65
3.7
< 0.10
8
6.45
113.0
< 0.1 0.900
85.3
176.7
< 1.0
< 47.7
266
0800
24
Y
1.62
31.3 7.78
2-9<
0.10
7
8.61
I=
0.800
39.3
209.9
< 1A
28
0800
24
Y
1.55
31.9 7.90
3.1
< 0.10
B
6.63
111.9
0.200
40.0
245.1
< 1.3
27
=0
24
Y
1.57
32.4 7.9D
24
< 0.10
4
6.68
138.0
0.90D
31.5
131.3
< 1.3
28
0800
24
Y
2.04
3&0 7.94
3.4
< 0.10
3
6 30
112.6
0.900
57.9
221.4
< 1.7
29
0600
24
N
0.83
6.1
2.16
1W4-
0.230
352
932
< 14.9
30
0800
24
N
0.OD
31
AVERAGE
1.87
31.7
23
0.17
18
6.61
155.2
46.1
< OA 0.667
34.8
230.3
2.1
< 63.4
MAXtNtLIM
3.19
33.0 8.34
5.1
216
84a
7.17
293.1
4&1
< al 0.900
66.6
4121
(< 14.9
< 70.8
WHIMUM
MOD
30A 7.65
0.1
< 0.10
3
6.30
5B.0
46.1
< 0.1 0.000
24
93.2
< 0.9
< 47.7
Cm*KC)lGrab (G)
G G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G C
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
100
¢6 0<9.
200
>S.O
2W
<5-0
250.0
988.7
30.0
319 8
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
A SEED WAS OUT OF RANGE
+ GGA WAS OUT OF RANGE
,�. * DO DEPLETION WAS <2MGIL
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TL'YO YEAR INTERIM TiliflE
Page 1 of 1
so

P------- %
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH OCTOBER YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED Q PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail OR113INAL end ONE COPY to:
Alin: -CENTRAL FILES
DMstoncivft auatlty l 9
NCOENR (SIGMA F OPERATOR IN RESP N_ SIBLECHARGE) DATE
1617 Mal Service Center BY THIS Si"TURE t CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEI64, j4C 27699.1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
D
A
T
9
Operator
Atrfval
71mb
Operator
Time
On
She
S
ORC
On
Site
SW50
00010
00400
50060
00310
ODS10
31616
OD30D
00600
COBB5
00545
00605
OD310
C0530
W610
ODSW
FLOW
Temp
pH
Residual
Chlorin
BOD 5
20C
Ammonia
Nltmgen
Fecal
Corderm
(Sao
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
TOW
Nlmgen
Total
Phos-
phomus
SeU-
sable
Solids
Organic
Mlrope^
SODS
20 C
T4ta1
Suspended
Residue
Ammonla
N Itrogen
011&
Gress
e
Eff
Dally
Rate
Hrr,
Hm
MGD
C
SU
MG1L
MG/L
MG&
91100 ML
MGIL
M GfL
MGIL
M L L.
MG/L
LBIDAY
LBIDAY
LBIDAY
LB/DAY
1
0600
24
Y
0.62
5A
0.18
280A
-0:080
202
64.3
0.9
2
OBDO
24
Y
1.98
30A
7.67
3.7
< 0.10
< 1
6.37
45.6
< 0.1
01.0
18i.3
< 1.6
< 82.4
3
t)800
24
Y
1.73
31A
7.75
3.3
0.17
10
6.69
308.1
-0.D72
47.5
194.3
2.6
4
0800
24
Y
iA1
32.1
7.97
2.8
< 0.10
1
6.71
20&1
O.DDD
26.0
97.5
< 0.9
5
0B00
24
Y
1.22
32A
7.75
Z7
< 0.10
c 1
8.67
315.1
0.0DO
21.4
SIA
< 1.0
6
013W
24
N
2.23
4A
0.22
2711
-0.123
812
632.3
4A
7
08W
2
N
Z75
4.8
028
364.1
-0.177
110.0
663.4
6A
6
0800
24
Y
1.64
323
7-63
4.8
< 0.10
Ic 1
629
371A
< 0.1
0.000
618
470.0
< 1.3
< 64.4
9
•.0800
•
24
Y
1.45
325
7.60
BI
0.14
3
6.94
327.1
-0.041
81.0
18iA
1.7
10
0600
.24
Y
1.43
$23
7.89
5.6
0.11
1
6.61
255A
-0.005
68.7
180.9
1.3
11
0800
24
Y
1.58
29A
7.W
7.7
< 0.10
< 1
7.02
263A
0.000
101.6
29D.3
< 13
12
0800
24
Y
1.40
28B
715
8.7
< 0.10
< 1
7.12
228A
0400
101 A
274.0
< 1.3
13
am
24
N
1.68
8.9
0.18
256.1
-0.080
138.1
302.7
2.8
14
0800
24
N
1.82
8A
0.23
218.1
.0.127
121.1
3482
3A
15
- COW
1 24
Y
1.00
27.1
7.80
52
0.18
1
7.60
219.1
< CA
-OMD
51.9
133.5
1.5
< 41.8
161
0800
1 24
Y
0A1
29.0
7.60
5.7
0.55
2
7.07
323.1
-0AS7
19.5
70.1
22
171
0800
24 1
Y
0.00
i8
0800
24
Y
0.00
19
0800
24
Y
0.00
20
OBOD
24
N
1.14
6.2
0.48
2861
-OZ76
59.1
233.5
45
21
DOW
24
N
2.97
3.0
< 0.10
224 i
0.000
94.0
446.1
< 2.5
22
COW
24
Y
1.81
30.8
7.50
$A
c 0.10
4
7.28
276.1
< 0.1
0.000
51.4
2B4.8
< 15
< 75.60
23
0800
24
Y
1.58
30.8
7.54
3.1
< 0.10
1
7.18
242.1
0.000
40.7
2BZ6
c 1.3
24
COW
24
Y
2.96
31.9
805
3.1
< 0.10
1
6.49
144.0
1.860
76S
4662
< 25
25
0800
24
Y
1 A2
31.9
7.90
2.9
< 0.10
7
7.08
144.7
1.580
243
123.6
< 0.9
26
0600
24
Y
1 0.39
29.3
7.75
3A
< 0.10
4
7.12
84A
0.740
11.1
323
< 0.3
27
0WO
24
N
0.00
211
0900
24
N
0.00
29
0800
24
Y
0.08
21.6
7.82
2.8
< 0.10
< 1
7.45
96.3
0.040
1.5
4.3
c 0.1
30
0800
24
Y
0.08
19.2
751
1.4
< 0.10
2
8.77
81.6
1 AW
0.9
3.3
< 0.1
31
0800
24
Y
0.08
19.0
7.44
1.9
< CAD
< i
GAS
81.9
3.010
1.2
3.4
< 0.1
AVERAGE
1.17
29.1
4.7
0.17
2
7.15
238.5
45.8
< 0.1
0.20
572
2302
1.8
< 66.1
MAXIMUM
2.97
326
8.05
8.9
0.66
9.15
371.1
45.6
0.1
3.0i0
138.1
653.4
6.4
< 82A
MINIMUM
0.00
1&0
7A4
1A
c 0.10
c
J2W
629
81.6
45.$
0.1
-O.SS7
0.9
3.3
< 0.1
< 41.8
Cornp(C)IC•�rab (G)
G
G
•Oc9.
G
C
C
G
>S.0
C
250
C
G
c5.0
C
C
250.0
C
99B.7
C
3OA
G
319.6
mordy LMril
3-�
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM TIME page 1 of i

01 NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH NOVEMBER YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC; RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO, -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FM14
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
Inv 1617 Mall Service Center
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
Rq
me
I"
Fit
L--]
em
04
Fs"
eat
>"
(81GNATU OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE)
BY THIS S467NATURE WERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
DATE
D
A
T
!:
C=
Thm
Operalar
'lime
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
50050
00D10
W400
60060
00310
00610
31616
003DD
00600
00665 I
00545
00605
=10
00530
00610
00556
FLOW
Eli
D*
Rale
Trip
pH
RosidMI
Cldorirte
8005
2W
Anuttonie
Rihogan
Fiscal
Cotitarm
((ppao
I►lettlo
Mosalmd
Oxygen
Toes)
litilragen
ToW
Phos-
photons
Seth
cable
scaft
Omcde
Mogen
BOOS
200
TOW
Wsponded
ReshiuO
Antenonie
Nftpn
Of6
Glem
Has
His
EGO
C
8u
MGB.
WwL
MOIL
*100 PdL
1RGIL
VA&
MG&
MLA.
MGIL
LBIDAY
LBIDAY
LBIOAY
LMAY
1
0800
24
Y
1.84
28.9
7.76
3.2 0.11
2
7.62
200.0
< 0.1
1.846 1
49.1
214.8
1.7
<76.7
2
0800
24
Y
2.04
2-7.7
7.67
4.9
0.35
1
7.68
21&0
1.610
83.2
263.2
6.9
3
0800
24
N
2.35
3.7
020 1
184.0
0.797
72.4
381.6
4.0
4
0800
24
N
3.09
6.1
0.56
183.0
OA77
157.3
844.7
14.6
S
0600
24
Y
1.34
27.0
7.65
6.7
0.87
51
7.56
i99.1
< 0.1
1214
74.9
240.5
93
<55.9
8
0800
24
Y
1.66
27.0
7.62
3.7
< 0.10
64
7.65
332.0
0.900
SI A
$10.4
< 1 A
7
0800
24
Y
1.94
26.2
7.68
4.3
0.16
10
7.7B
360.0
0.839
00.6
347.3
2.6
8
08DO
24
Y
1 r41
25.7
T.61
4.0
0.35
1
7.60
356.0
0.851
47.0
276.0
4.1
9
0800
24
Y
1.50
26.3
7.74
4.6
0.13
1
8.02
24B.0
0.867
57.6
260.0
1.7
1fl
0800
24
N
221
6.2
0.26
324.0
0.718
95.7
497.0
52
11
0800
24
N
1.87
6.5
028
180.0
0.721
101.6
413.7
4A
12
OBOO
24
Y
1.09
2S.5
7.70
6.5
1J9
1
7.73
217.9
< 0.1
0.120
60.2
228.1
18.3
<45.6
13
0800
24
Y
1.93
26.3
7.83
6.7
2.33
174
7.60
197.6
0.270
107.7
482.4
37.5
14
0800
24
Y
1.64
27.3
7.65
6.2
1.66
159
7.47
1793
0.020
112.4
356.6
22.8
16
0800
24
Y
1.58
27.2
7.83
7.6
0.32
2B
7.86
167.0
0.684
100.0
408.0
4.2
16
0500
24
Y
1.83
25.1
7.62
9.0
0.26
57
8.75
215.0
0.752
137.4
825.8
3.8
17
08DO
24
N
2.09
8.6
0.53
217.0
0.473
190.0
1011.5
0.2
48
0800
24
N
1.12
9.6
3.39
205.0
0.610
89.6
424.2
31.6
19
08DO
24
Y
0.39
26.0
7.88
7.7
10.40
28
7.20
107.9
2.700
24.9
20e.6
33.6
20
0800
24
Y
1.66
23.2
7.82
7.2
3.77
20
7.67
189A
43.80
< 0.1
0.580
99.6
681.1
62.2
<69.2
21
WOO
24
Y
2.13
26.1
7A6
6.2
0.53
12
7.53
216.3
0.788
110A
8342
9.5
22
0800
24
N
225
6.9
0.67
224.0
0.432
129.6
338.1
10.7
23
0800
24
Y
226
25.2
7.63
0.5
0.76
18
7.20
231.0
0.237
178.E
470.0
14.3
24
0800
24
N
7-73
8.0
1.02
181.9
454.7
232
26
0800
24
N
Z83
9.0
1.05
212.5
580.3
24.8
26
0800
24
Y
278
24.0
739
83
1.89
3
7.16
< 0.1
2D1.6
532.9
43.0
27
0800
24
Y
2.46
24.8
7.94
10.7
1.76
200
7.76
108.1
0.350
219.3
451.0
36.1
28
0800
24
Y
2.65
24.6
7.68
8.2
2.08
675
722
86.3
0.090
181.2
562.6
46.0
29
0800
24
Y
1.77
24.2
7.84
8.2
1.84
279
7.53
121 A
302A
27.1
30
0600
24
Y
1.60
24.0
7.94
9.6
1.60
20
7.61
128.4
133.8
21.4
<68.9
AVERAGE
1.93F23.27.46
6.0
1.36
19
7.62
213.1
43.8
< DA
0.750
1132
417.7
17A
< 62.9
MAXIMUM
3.09
10.7
10.40
575
8.75
366.0
43.8
< 0.1
2.700
219.3
1011.5
52.2
< 76.7
MINIMUM
0.38
3.2
< 0.10
1
7.16
85.3
43.8
< 0.1
0.020
24.9
133.8
< 1.4
� 45.6
Cornp(Q/Greb (G)
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
3.OD
200
>5.0
<5.0
600.0
998.7
60.0
3i9.6
NIB Denotes Backup Operator an Site

01 NPDES PERMIT NO. N00078344 DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH DECEMBER YEAR 2007
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC;RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED r7 PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILE
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
i
- 4
(S(GNATUR F OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE}
BY THIS $ GNATURE 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT 1S
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KKOWLEDGE
/;�Y.�9 f
{SATE
D operator
A ArtWal
T Tkm
E
Operator
Tkee
On
511e
ORC
On
ate
50050 00010 004DD SM
00310
00610
31616
00300
0WW
00665
D0545
OW05
D0310
OD530 1
00610
00556
FLOW
EA Temp pH Reaidaal
Daly Chlorins
Rae
BOD 5
20C
Ammonia
Ngmpn
Fecal
Calfam
M �
01m)md
Orptgen
Ta i
Mogen
Told
Phos-
ph=us
890.
eable
Solids
Organic
Magen
BCD a
20 C
Toil
8uepended
Reddee
Ammonla
MLropen
oil &
Grease
Hm
Hrs
UGD C 8SJ fdOlL
64GJ1
IdGdl.
MOD UL
MWL
mm
MG&
MUrL
MGIL
LBIDAY
LOMAY
LEMAY
L.BIDAY
1 0600
24
N
252
7.3 0.88
117.1
1.256
153.4
367.8
18.6
2 0800
24
N
2.74
8.0
0.75
171.0
0.262
182.8
388.5
17.1
3 0800
24
Y
1.66 24.9 7.49
8.8
1.04
14
6.53
224.1
0.080
122.1
270.5
14.4
4 0800
24
Y
1.45 22.0 7.57
8.6
1.23
36
8.00
42.7
< 0.1
104.1
217.8
14.9
460.5
5 0800
24
Y
1.45 21.5 7.59
11.8
1.21
9
8.97
142.8
278.3
14.8
6 0800
24
Y
1.72 21.3 7.68
12.8
1.10
44
8.75
103.9
445.5
15.8
7 0s00
24
Y
1.56 21.3 7.56
17.5
0.62
55
8.61
242.3
567.6
6.6
8 D800
24
N
1.07
17.7
< 0AO
158.6
577.7
< 0.9
9 0800
24
N
1.48
9.9
0.10
122.4
3832
< 1.2
10 0800
24
Y
123 25.7 7.81
7.4
0.14
8
7.49
289.0
< 0.1
0.857
76.2
282.4
1.5
<S1.5
11 0800
24
Y
1.59 26.3 7.85
82
< 0.10
1
7.84 1
287.0
0.800
109.1
345.9
c 1.3
12 0800
24
Y
2.07 0.3 7.78
11.6
0.37
1,600
7.04
230.5
1.175
200.5
708.6
6.3
13 CM
24
Y
1.70 25.8 7.67
7.2
0.57
15
7.45
102.2
390A
8.0
14 0800
24
Y
224 28.0 7.84
8.2
0.85
38
728
163A
420.9
122
1s 0800
24
N
2.66
4.6
0.16
282.0
1
0.838
99.9
433.1
3.6
16 0800
24
N
3.00
5.5
< 0.10
231.0
0.900
137.4
762.1
< 2.5
47 0800
24
Y
2.44 22.0 7.32
8.4
0.91
3D
B.21
285.0
< 0.1
0.093
171.1
397.3
18.5
4101.9
18 0800
24
Y
1.28 21.2 7.55
7.2
1.16
20
8.34
117.E
310.4
18.8
16 0800
24
Y
1.54 21.3 7.72
8.7
1.08
6
8.08
112.1
206.2
13.E
20 0800
24
Y
1.72 21.5 7.87
7.3
0.96
21
8.09
104.4
2432
13.6
21 0800
24
Y
2.11 22.0 7.81
14.7
0.63
53
7.80
258.4
465.9
11.1
22 0800
24
N
2.52
12.9
c 0.10
271.1
441A
< 2.1
23 0800
24
N
252
8.7
< 0.10
183.0
231.4
< 2.1
24 0800
24
N
275
11.E
< 0.10
2702
615.3
< 2.3
26 0800
24
N
1.68
9.4
1.86
_
130A
249.6
25.7
26 0600
24
Y
2.1E 19.9 7.34
>28.6
1.76
36
8.04
220.8
< 0.1
0.050
6212
`213.8
7927
32.1
491.1
27 0800
24
Y
1.87 20.7 7.25
13.7
0.81
3,60D
6.10
209.0
0.187
374.5
12.7
28 0600
24
Y
1.81 23.3 7.56
9.1
< 0.10
3,800
7.78
164.1
1.000
137.7
317.7
< 1.5
28 08D0
24
N
1.76
10.6
< 0.10
153.7
270.E
< 1.5
~
30 MO
24
N
Y
1.70
12.5
2.14
177A
283.4
30.3
34 0806
24
1.71 24.7*7.79
6.1
< 0.10
4
7AS
142.0
< 0.1
0.900
86.84
227.78
c 1A
<712
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
1.95 23.1
3.00 27.3
10.6
8.6
0.68
2.14
36
$800
7.98
8.75
216A
289.0
42.7
42.7
c 0.1
< 0.1�
0.651
1.256
187.7
5212
391.9
792.7
10.6
32.1
� 75.2
< 101.9
MINIMUM
1.07 19.9 7.25
4.5
< 0.10
1
7.04
117.1
42.7
< 0.1
0.050
76.2
206.2
< 0.9
< 61.6
Comp(CyfGrab (G)
G G G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
G
Monthly I.irYllt
3.0D .0<9.
200
>5.
I
I.0
500.0
5<5L
998.7
60.0
3i9.6
NIB Denotes Backup Operator on Site

�+a
�. 01 NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH JANUARY YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC',RANDY CLARK GRADE IV 'PHONE [phone]
a, CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR (XATURE OPERA N RESPONSI LE CHARGE)
tea
Al
rim
par
PI
f"
r=1
Cot
OR
f"
1617 Mad Service Center
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
00400
50080
BY THIS
ACCURATE
00310
SIGNATURE
AND COMPLM
00610
I CERTIFY
TO
31618
T4tAT THIS
THE BEST
00300
REPORT IS
OF MY KNOWLEDGE
00600
00665 00545
00605
00310
00530
00610
i
50050
00010
FLOW
0 Operator Operator ORC
A Arrh at Tate On024
Etf
Tety
PH
Itesuw
Chadne
ems
Anatorr<a
Fecal
0bwhed
Total
Total Sell-
Orgorde
BODE
TOW
Ammtwh
T Mae On Site
Role
20C
t�ktrogen
C(Geo
Oxypett
Kltogen
Ras- came
(frtogen
20C
3cnpended
M�g+n
I
E Silo
Mean Mean)
photos Solids
Ro9due
Hrs lira
j MUD
C
j SU
MGL
j MG&
Melt
91100 MIL
MBJL
Me91
M6A LtLJL
MGB.
LBMAY
LBIDAY
Lemy
L
1 0800 24 N
1.82
6.2
0.16
131.0
0.839
94.1
325.3
2.4
2 0800 24 Y
1.56
21A
7.62
6.1
0.21
8
8.53
79.4
289.2
17
3 0800 24 Y
1.95
21.8
7.75
9.6
0.11
23
8.06
133.2
1.118
156.1
406.6
1.8
4 08M 24 Y
1.74
27-3
7.96
12.6
0.59
26
8.91
182.8
457.1
8.6
5 0800 24 Y
1.99
17.1
1.53
283.8
481.3
25.4
8 0800 24 N
2.91
124
1.31
216.2
0.840
300.8
958.6
31.8
7 0800 24 Y
1.77
25.2
7.82
5.9
0.62
10
7.21
45.6 < OJ
87.1
273.1
9.1
8 0800 24 Y
2.03
26.5
7.45
4.1
0.79
4
6.80
69.4
279.3
13.3
9 ONO 24 Y
1.83
26.8
7.95
3.4
< 0.10
6
7.33
M.9
221.3
c 1.5
10 0800 24 Y
1.74
26.7
7.31
3.6
0.46
7
7.66
240.0
0.643
52.2
304.7
6.6
11 0800 24 Y
1.46
27.1
7.51
6.5
0.21
1
7A9
79.1
213.1
2.6
12 0800 24 Y
2.43
8.7
1.54
272.0
-0.540
178.3
415.5
31.2
13 0800 24 N
1.64
14.0
4.62
279.0
-3.620
191.5
383.0
63.2
14 0800 24 Y
2.08
24.5
7.45
10.1
0.95
11
7.88
285.0
< 0.1
0.053
175.2
364.3
16.4
is WOO 24 Y
2.11
23.5
7.60
8.4
0.41
13
8.44
147.8
446.7
7.1
16 0000 24 Y
242
23.5
7.62
12.8
1.78
22
7A9
258.3
605.5
35.9
1T 0800 24 Y
220
23.4
7.64
8.5
0.37
10
7.40
156.0
467.9
6.7
18 0800 24 Y
2.16
23.7
7.55
8.6
c 0.10
5
8.03
117.1
261.2
< 1.8
19 0800 24 Y
2.69
7.7
0.22
172.7
314.1
4.9
20 0800 24 N
3.11
6A
< 0.10
166.0
363.1
< 2.6
21 0800 24 Y
2.71
5.7
c 0.10
197.7
0.900
128.8
384.2
< 2.3
22 080D 24 Y
2.07
21.5
7.55
7.6
0.70
2
8.58
< 0.1
1312
388.4 1
121
23 0800 24 Y
2.34
21.6
7.66
8.0
1.46
6
8.52
219.0
-0.460
156.1
487.9
28.5
24 0800 24 Y
2.45
22.0
7.73
7.9
1.38
13
828
161.4
439.3
28.2
25 0800 24 Y
2.20
20.4
7.72
0.90
21
7.95
223.0
0.101
78.9
302.7
16.5
26 0800 24 Y
2.19
4.2
0.26
76.7
219.2
4.7
27 0890 24 N
2.91
E4.3
5.8
< 0.10
140.8
548.1
< 2A
28 0800 24 Y
2.34
22.1
7.68
9.9
0.81
4
8.69
268.0
< 0.1
0.194
193.2
439.1
15.7
-cc
29 0800 24 Y
2.43
21.7
7.50
12.3
0.85
20
8.28
249.3
597.9
17.3
30 0800 24 Y
2.40
22.6
7.58
10.4
0.70
< 1
7.91
208.2
520.4
14.0
31 0800 24 Y
242
21.8 1
7.58
9.1
0.62
13
8.00
172.0
0.378
183.66
615.58
12.6
AVERAGE
2.20
23.3
8.3
0.78
8
7.95
219.7
45.6 < 0.1
0.029
151.8
412.4
13.9
c K
MAXIMUM
3.11
27.1
77.311
17.1
4.62
28
8.60
285.0
45.6 < 0.1
1.118
300.9
958.6
63.2
E
MINIMUM
1.46
214
3.4
< 0.10
< 1
6.80
131.0
45.6 < 0.1
-3.620
51.9
213.1
< 1.5
< i
Comp(CxGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C G
C
C
C
Monthly Umit
3-00
.0c9.
200
>5.0
<5.0
500-01
998.7
60.D
3
t;aq NAB Denotes Backup Operator on Site
tv�

01 NPDES PERMIT NO.
NCO078344
DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH FEBRUARY
YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME
SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS
COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC;RANDY
CLARK
GRADE 1V
PHONE (910)
862-7675
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES
(1) SMITHFIELD
PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED
PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES:
PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Division of Water Quality
�10
NCDENR
(ssGmATrF OPERATOR [N RESPONStBLE CHARGE)
D1617
Mall Service Center
BY THISTURE'I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGHr NC 27699A617
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TOTHE BEST OFMYKNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
OD400 50060
003i0
00610
31616
OOCi00 00600 00665 1 00545
OD605
OD310
0053D
00510 0DS56
FLOW
D Operator Operaiar ORC
Tune On
Elf
D
Temp
pH Residual
cmoodme
SOD 5
20C
Amrwa
Focal
01molved Tote! Total Sets.
Organic
800 5
Tow
Aamoye 01 a
T Time
Ride
�egen
CORI=
omen Nhgm PhD& Cote
Nm�logen
20C
Snspertded
Mkogen Grease
t: Site
tom)
phomus Gdds
Residue
Mrs Hra
MOD
c
8U UG(L
MGdL
MOIL
040D ML
MOIL MGfL faml. VUL
MGfL
LSlDAY
LEWAY
UWAY UMDAY
1 080D 24 Y
2.44
226
7.57
9.7
0.48
19
8.19 152.0
0.524
197.4
417.2
9.7
2 Dam 24 Y
2.60
8.5
0.51
184.3
769.8
11.0
3 0800 24 N
3.07
8.6
OA2
144.0
0.584
220.2
883.3
10.7
4 08M 24 Y
2.09
23.2
7.72
6.2
OA3
5
7.77 40.7 a 0.1
108.1
322.5
7.5 <97.2
5 0800 24 Y
2.38
24.5
7.70
4.3
0.35
15
7.08 187.0
0.650
85.4
526.0
6.9
a 080D 24 Y
2.51
25.0
7.73
4.5
0.30
4
7.33 144.0
0.702
94.2
303.5
6.2
7 080D 24 Y
2.23
24.0
TAB
4.4
020
2
7.81
81.8
325.5
3.6
8 0800 24 Y
2.28
23.4
7.58
3.5
0.38
< 1
7.81
66.8
294.7
6.8
9 0800 24 Y
2.76
3.7
0.21
05.2
345.3
4.9
10 080 24 N
2.82
4.9
021
84.3
0.795
i 15.2
352.8
4.8
11 0800 24 Y
2.28
22.2
AT
6.8
< 0AO
< 1
7.96 < 0.1
120.3
209.2
1.9 200.2
12 0800 24 Y
2.38
22.0
7.68
6.6
0.34
< 1
7.59
131.0
$97.0
6.7
13 ONO 24 Y
2.48
24.3
7.67
5.1
0.11
27
7.03 182.0
0.888
105.5
237.9
2 3
14 0800 24 Y
2.55
23.1
7.69
3.6
< 0.10
1
7.71 156.0
0.900
76.6
255.2
a 2.1
15 0800 24 Y
2.49
23.0
7A9
6.0
0.30
4
7.99
124.6
207.7
6.3
16 caw 24 Y
3.D4
4.1
< 0.10
103.9
671.9
< 2.6
17 OBOO 24 N
3.52
6.1
< 0.10
179.1
66D.5
< 2.9
To- ORO 24 Y
2.63
24.6
7.68
6.6
0.35
< 1
7.09 179.0 < 0.1
0.649
144.8
394.8
7.7 009.7
19 0800 24 Y
2.85
23.4
7.50
7.4
0.29
17
7.24
178.9
582.i-T
6.9
20 WOO 24 Y
2.54
22.7
7A4
8.0
0.40
12
7.45 143.0
0.605
182.2
640.2
8.4
21 0800 24 Y
2.82
22.7
7.59
9.5
0.35
19
8.41
172.0
0.654
223A
45B.6
8.1
22 0800 24 Y
2.57
211.5
T.64
7.6
0.60
14
8.27
162.0
482.3
10.7
23 OBOO 24 Y
2.74
8.2
0.56
187.4
628.4
12.8
24 0800 24 N
2.72
6.8
0.38
149.7
40B.3
8.6
28 OBOO 24 Y
229
22-21
7.71
6.4
0.28
< 1
8.04
221.0
< 0.1
0.724
122.2
467.9
5.3
495.5
Y8 0800 24 Y'
2.37
23.5
7.63
7.1
0.27
10
7A3
140.3
533.7
5.4
27 0800 24 Y
2.41
229
7.73
187
7.7
< 0.10
14
7.82
186.0
0.900
154.8
472.3
< 2.0
28 0800 24 Y
2A9
21A
7.62
8.2
0.44
1
8.34
170.3
654A
9.2
29 ONO 24 Y
2.62
21.3
7.70
8.0
0.44
c 1
8.28
174.8
458.9
9.5
30
31
6.6
125A
AVERAGE
2.59
23.0
187
6.5
0.31
4
7.73
161.7
40.7
< 0.1
0.715
140.6
467.3
MAXIMUM
3.52
25.0
7.73
187
9.7
0.56
27
8.41
221.0
40.7
< 0.1
0.800
223.4
883.3
12.8
209.2
MINIMUM
2.09
21.3
7.44
187
3.5
< 0.10
< 1
7.03
94.3
40.7
< OA
0.524
68.6
207.7
< 1.9
87.2
Comp(CyGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
3.00
O<9.
28
200
>5.0
1
1<5.0
500.0
998.7
60.0
319.E
NIS Denotes Backup Operator on Site

rs�
01 NPDES PERMIT NO. NC00783" DISCHARGE No 001 MONTH MARCH YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC; RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSONS) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL F1LEE
jo) �/o 0 /40 e
Division of Water Quality F'.0 % / J, /-4 4 I-f- �V
NCDENR (81GNAT // F OP TOR IN R ONSIBLE CHWGE) DAT
1° 1617 Mail Service Center BY THIS 8iGNATURE (CERTIFY THAT TMIS REPORT 15
RALEI G H, NC 27699-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
MR
tit
MR
tm
m"
n
f'"
Rol -
MR
an
0
A
T
E
Operator
Arrhrd
Tkne
operator
Tine
On
Site
CRC
On
Site
50050
00010
OD400
5=0
00310
00610
W615
00300
00600
00665
00545
00605
6510
00530
00610
00556
FLOW
Elf
Dafip
Rnte
Temp
pti
R"wuet
Chlorine
BODS
20C
AmmONa
N togcn
Focal
Cdtbrm
(000
Mean)
G!stolved
Oxygen
Tool
Nbvgen
Total
"w,
phomm
Set:-
Dome
saws
Otgatte
Nkbpen
BOOS
20 C
Total
Suspended
Residue
Ammonia
Nkagen
cog
Grease
Firs
wa
M60
C I
SU
USIL I
MG/L
MWL
0100 ML
MM
MOIL
MGfL
MUL
MQ&
LBMAY
LBIOAY
WMAY
LOWAY
1
0600
24
Y
3.12
62 0.21
135.0
0.791
161.3
6133.5
5.4
2
0800
24
Y
2-25
72
0.28
135.1
609.9
5.3
3
0800
24
N
1.93
20.9
B.10
8.0
0.35
3
8.02
39.9
< 0.1
0.654
96.6
434.E
5.6
480.6
4
0800
24
Y
2A5
23A
7.74
7.9
0.25
110
7.13
191.0
0.717
161.4
582.3
5.8
5
0800
24
Y
2.11
23.3
7.65
73.00
8.8
0.34
47
7.98
151.3
545.5
6.0
6
0600
24
Y
1.83
23.1
7.78
7.3
OA2
28
7.96
188.0
0.580
111.4
511.3
6.4
7
0800
24
Y
2.07
23.7
7.83
7.3
0.30
5
7.53
126.0
492.0
6.2
8
0800
24
Y
3.04
6.2
0.20
157.2
760.6
5.1
9
0800
24
Y
2.77
6.2
0.21
143.2
820.1
4.7
10
DBOD
24
N
2.05
27-1
7.63
8.9
0.30
7
0.05
192.0
< 0.1
0.705
152.2
658.2
5.0
<85.5
11
OB00
24
Y
1.88
23.2
7.67
9.6
0.25
88
7.28
222.9
1.603
149.0
610.3
4.0
12
0800
24
Y
1.38
22.9
7.79
99.00
8.6
0.23
4
8.11
99.0
464.6
2.6
13
OBOD
24
Y
1.47
23.2
7.77
8.2
0.20
3
7.54
100.5
429.1
2.4
14
0800
24
Y
1.62
23.8
7.81
8.5
0.13
3
8.11
114.8
472.9
1.7
15
0800
24
Y
240
7.6
< 0.10
136.0
0.9DD
152.1
790.E
< 2.0
16
0800
24
Y
1.98
7.9
< 0.10
130.5
627.5
< 1.7
17
0800
24
N
1.20
23.0
7.60
6.8
0.18
< 1
8.01
< 0.1
0.826
68.1
345.3
1.8
<60.0
10
08DO
24
Y
1.76
23.2
7.72
7.0
0.21
1B
7.65
245.0
0.791
1022
621.6
3.1
19
0500
24
Y
1.76
25.2
7.65
280.00
7.3
< 0.10
385
F
84.9
0.800
1072
594.5
< 1.5
20
OB00
24
Y
1.65
24A
7.72
5.6
0.12
86
7AB
T7.1
474.8
1.6
21
0800
24
Y
1.85
24A
7.58
9.9
0.15
4
7.55
152.7
408.9
2.2
22
08W
24
Y
2.01
6.4
< 0.10
107.3
352.0
< 1.7
2a
-WOO
24-•-
V
4:59
-
-0z9
< •0A0
_
• 65.0
285A
< - 1.8
'L
N
1.39..
4
< 0.19_
-�9�
_4.130Q
__4.75
-202.9
.< 9_
25
0800
24
Y
120
22.2
7.77
25D.001
4.1
025
3
8.66
< 0.1
41.0
155.1
2.5
60.0
26
08DD
24
Y
129
23.2
7.62
3.9
0.18
14
8.16
42.0
215.2
1.9
27
0800
24
Y
1.34
24.0
7.65
4.0
0.20
34
7.95
44.7
111.8
2.3
28
0800
24
Y
129
26.8
7.76
3.8
DAII
112
7.93
40.9
118.3
1.9
29
08DO
24
Y
1.62
3.7
< 0.10
50.0
222.9
< 1.4
30
08M
24
Y
2.75
3.3
< 0.10
75.7
321.1
< 2.3
31
0800
24
Y
2.01
24.3
7.75
2.2
c 0.10
< 1
8.01
< 0.1
0.900
36.88
17B.02
< 1.7
<83.B
AVERAGE
1.90
23.6
178
6.4
0.20
13
7.92
183.2
39.9
< 0.1
0.856
103.2
454.3
3A
70.0
MAXIMUM
3.12
25.8
8.10
280
9.9
0.42
3B5
9.05
246.0
39.9
< 0.1
1.608
161.4
82D.1
8.4
85.6
MINIMUM
1.20
20.9
7.58
73
12
< 0.10
< 1
7.13
74.3
39.9
< 0.1
0.580
3B.9
111.8
c 1.2
< 5D a
Cump(CYGrab (0)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
I C
C
I G
Monthly Limn
3.00I
tS.".q28
200
>5.0
<5.0
500.0
998.7
60.0
1 319.8
rs*o NIB Denotes Backup Operator on Ske
ow

NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH APRIL YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIRONIENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED[7] PER80N(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
IW ORIGINAL end ONE COPY to:
Attn: CENTRAL FILES
Rivislon of Water Oualky
c
NCDENR (IG TIiREf OPERA R IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
1617 Mall Service Center BY THIS SIG ATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 27W9 4617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TOTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
60050
00010
00400
WM
1 00310
00610
31616
C0300
OD600
0OB65
00545
0606
00310
00530
00610
00556
FLOW
D
Operator
Fecal
A
Operator
Tlme
ORC
Elf
Temp
pH
Residual
BOO 6
Ammonia
Cdhrrn
DisseNed
Total
TOW
Seib
SOD 5
Total
Ammonia
01I &
r*
Chlorine
20C
Hitregen
(Geo
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Phos•
cable
Orgart�
20 C
Suspended
Nitrogen
Greas
E
SOile
She
Rats
Mean)
phomus
Solids
^
Nitrogen
.MOIL
ReWue
e
Hrs
Hm
MOO
C
SU
MOIL
MOIL
MGiL
XMCD ML
MOIL
MGIL
MOIL
MUL
LBIDAY
LSMAY
LBIDAY
LBIDAY
1
Dow
24
Y
2.16
27.2
7.56
63
2.2
a CAD
2
?As
39.6
162.1
a 1.8
2
0800
24
Y
2.38
27.9
7.64
2.6
a 0.10
3
7.53
189.0
0.800
61.6
1092
< 2.0
3
0800
24
Y
225
26A
7.74
2.7
c 0.10
3
7.74
184.0
0.900
50.7
2B15
c 1.9
4
COW
24
Y
220
254
7.67
2.5
c 0.10
3
7.69
46.9
229A
a 1.8
5
0800
24
Y
2.53
1.9
< 0.10
40.1
221.6
< 2.1
6
DOW
24
N
2.98
1.0
< 0.10
!
47.2
248.5
< 2.5
7
0800
24
Y
2.01
25.8
7.61
2.1
0.15
2
7.82
19ZO
42A
< 0.1
0.550
35.2
2012
Z5
< 83 8
6
0800
24
Y
2.01
25A
7.63
is
2.6
DA4
11
7.89
41.9
157.6
24
9
am
24
Y
1.71
26.0
7.70
2.5
0.12
3
7.55
35.7
184.0
1.7
10
Caw
24
Y
1.81
26.1
Tin
2.2
< D.10
1
7.40
29.5
203.1
c 1.3
11
0t100
24
Y
1.84
27.7
7.79
2.4
0.12
2
7A4
35.6
76.7
1.9
12
0800
24
Y
2.50
2.6
c 0.10
222.0
0400
52A
183B
< 1.3
13
0800
24
N
0.83
2.9
D.19
20.1
69.2
1.3
14
0800
24
Y
1.73
25.7
7.77
2.8
D.21
1
7.69
< 0A
37.5
115A
3.0
< 72.14
16
0800
24
Y
130
25.3
7.65
60
2.2
0.12
7
7.63
31.2
163.0
1.7
16
0800
24
Y
1.70
26.1
7.74
32
D.15
20
8.05
45A
248A
2.1
17
0600
24
Y
1.85
25.S
7.76
32
0.11
12
7.67
52A
243.9
1.8
18
0800
24
Y
1.95
26.8
7.78
63
23
< 0.10
4
7.51
197.0
0.900
43.9
VIA
< 1.6
19
0600
24
N
2.46
3.1
< 0.10
155.0
O SOD
63.6
336.5
< 2.1
20
0800
24
N
3.06
3.1
< 0.10
79.1
433.8
< Z6
21
0800
24
Y
1.03
27A
7.67
4.5
0.16
1
7.30
c 0A
72.4
233A
26
1288
22
0800
24
Y
1.65
27.4
7.67
101
4.9
0.16
13
7.08
67.4
323A
22
23
0800
24
Y
2AS
2SA
7.79
4.6
0.18
28
6.81
0.971
78.6
200.6
3.1
24
0800
24
Y
1.74
25.2
7.62
4.5
0.21
8
6.B9
158.5
1.266
69.7
3264
3.1
25
0600
24
Y
1.78
28.9
7.71
5.6
0.17
2
6.99
i80.0
0.832
83.1
29.6
25
26 0600 24 N
2.64
4.6
0.20
97.4
370.7
42
27 Cm 24 N
3.00
5.3
0.16
132.6
600.6
3.8
28 C500 24 Y
2.33
29.6
7.36
2.7
0.16
< 1
6.03
< 0.1
62.5
272.1
3.11
< 072
29 0800 24 Y
1.91
27.6
7A3
312
2A
0.13
2
7bD
44.6
199.1
Zi
30 0800 24 Y
1.97
26.7
724
3.6
0.21
16
728
69.1
304.0
3A
31
AVERAGE
2.08
25.8
101
3.1
0.14
4
7.36
1822
42A
< 0.1
0.936
54.6
2412
2.3
< 955
MAXIMUM
3.09
29.6
7.86
312
5.6
021
28
6.05
222.0
42A
< 0.1
1288
132.0
600.5
c 42
128.8
MINIMUM
0.83
25.1
7.24
16
1.9
< 0.10
< 1
S.O3
156.0
42A
0.1
O.B32
20.1
692
< 12
< 7Zi
Canp(C)AGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monthly Limit
3.00
A<9
200
>6.0
250
,5.0
250.0 1
998.7
30.0 1
3116
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM TIME Page 1 of 1

no
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH MAY YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES ('I) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED 0 PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mau ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
OR Attn: CENTRAL FILES L
Otwrsion of Water Quality A?4144
NCDENR (SIGNATURE OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
1617 Mal Service Center BY THIS SS NATURE I CERTIFYTHATTHIS REPORT IS
MR RALEIGR NC 27699-1517 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
FA"
fm
901
P*f
P"
tam
P■q
MR
F"
am
6"
50D5D
00010
OD400
50060
00310
00s10
31616
0D300
0080D
00665
00545
00605
C0310
00530
00510
00558
FLOW
Fecal
A
Operator
Time
ORC
Eff
Temp
pH
Residual
BOD 6
Ammeaia
Coliform
Dissolved
Total
Total
Sea-
BOD 5
TOW
Ammonia
Os S
T
AnWel
On
On
Daly
Chlortne
20C
Nitrogen
(Goo
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Phos-
eeble
Organic
20 C
Suspended
Nkrogen
Gress
E
Time
Site
Ste
Rafe
Mean)
phorous
Solids
Nitrogen
Residue
a
Htrs
Mrs
MGD
C
SU
MG/L
MOIL
MG/L
91100 ML
MG/L
mra
MGIL
MUL
MG/L
LBIDAY
LBIDAY
LB/DAY
LB/DAY
i
OBOO
24
Y
1.91
27A
723
3.0
0.16
4
7:09
200.0
OB53
611
231.0
2.3
2
0800
24
Y
1.94
273
727
2A
0.19
1
6.98
201.0
0.813
34.0
218A
3.0
3
0800
24
N
2S2
2.2
OA3
194.0
0.689
48.1
218.6
2.9
4
0800
24
N
222
1.9
0.13
46.3
255.7
3.3
5
08D0
24
Y
1.90
29.3
TAT
2A
0.10
1
6.85
33.6
< 0.1
33.3
221.E
3.1
< 792
6
0800
24
Y
206
28.7
6.97
26
1.7
0.14
3
7.50
184.0
0.664
29.2
223.3
2.3
7
COW
24
Y
1.92
28.9
7.03
1.5
0.13
7
6.80
1600
0.969
24.0
2242
2.1
B
C800
24
Y
2.10
29.6
7.17
1.6
0.11
2
6.98
167.0
j 0.694
28.0
ill"
1.9
9
0800
24
Y
Z.12
29.8
722
2.4
0.15
3
7.16
42.4
327.1
2.7
10
0800
24
N
1.67
3.5
4.32
48.7
289A
60.2
11
0800
24
N
i AS
3.1
1.33
38.3
2592
16A
12
Oe00
24
Y
1.39
25.4
7.35
2.6
029
c 1
7.31
135.0
< 0.1
0.715
30.1
2492
1.3
< 68.0
is
DODO
24
Y
iAD
28.5
7.12
66
2.2
021
2
7.30
i41A
1.085
33.0
157.E
4.6
14
0800
24
Y
1.81
27.2
7.15
2.5
0A6
2
8.12
39.4
2522
2.3
1&
0800
24
Y
1.75
27.0
72D
3.6
0.10
2
7.35
51.1
197.0
1.5
16
am
24
Y
1.75
29.0
725
2.2
0.13
1
6.99
134.0
0.868
32.1
73.0
1.9
17
0300
24
N
3.00
2.8
< 0.10
70.1
6B3.0
< 2.6
16
0800
24
N
227
1.9
< 0.10
36.0
255.E
< 1.9
19
0800
24
Y
1.42
27.9
72D
22
023
1
7.29
< 0.1
33.2
171.7
2.7
< 592
2D
0800
24
Y
1.46
28.4
6.92
242
3.3
026
1
7.11
40.7
123.4
3.1
21
0600
24
Y
12B
282
7.13
2.6
023
3
7.04
25.3
126.1
2A
22
0800
24
Y
134
Z7A
7.31)
2.7
0.18
1
7,09
194.0
0.820
30.2
17U
2.0
23
0800
24
Y
1.61
28.2
7.32
3.0
0.18
2
720
40.3
134.3
2.5
24
0000
24
N
2.83
3A
< OLIO
80.2
1156.5
< 2A
25
08DD
24
N
1.86
65
1.01
169.0
-0.010
91A
207.7
14.0
26
OWD
24
N
203
2.9
041
138A
0.895
49.1
245.5
1.8
27
0800
24
Y
1.06
28.0
TAR
163
22
< 0.10
< 1
7.15
< 0.1
23.0
150.3
< 0.9
< 442
28
0800
24
Y
136
202
6.84
2.8
036
4
7.07
41.1
2862
5.3
29
0800
24
Y
1.61
27.9
6.9t
3S
0.52
B
7.12
47.0
134.3
7.0
30
0800
24
N/8
1.38
29.1
7.06
3.8
0 A9
1
645
43.7
402
5.7
31
1.69
33
026
46.6
160.3
3.5
AVERAGE
1.88
282
124
2.B
029
2
7.15
169.6
33.6
< 0.1
0.795
428
246.2
5.5
< 6D2
MA)5iMIUM
3.00
29.8
7.35
242
6.6
432
a
8.12
201.0
33.6
< 0.1
1.085
9iA
11505
60.2
< 792
ktt/dWM
1.08
25.4
5.84
25
1.6
< 030
< 1
ass
134.0
33.9
< 0.1
-0A10
23.9
402
< 0.9
< 442
Comp(CyGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
itiilortthly Limit
3.00
S.0<9.
200
>5.0
260
<5.0
250.0
988.7
300
31"
B Denotes Backup Operator on Site
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM TIME
Page 1of1
on

f"
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH JUNE YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED' f7 PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL 4
Mau ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to.
Attn: CENTRAL FILES '
DlvWon a water Ouattty i
NCDENR (S GNATURE 0 PERATCR IN RESPO SIBLE CHARGE) DATE
IW7 Mai Service Center BYTHIS SIGWATURE 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEISK NC 27899.1847 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE �
50050
00010
00400
SMSO
00310
00610
31616
OD300
o0600
0066S
00545
00606
00310
00530
00610
00556
FLOW
D
Operator
Fecal
A
T
Operator
Arrival
Time
ORC
EIi
Temp
pH
Residual
BOD 5
Ammoris
Coltiorm
Diasclww
Total
Total
$ett-
SOD 5
Total
Ammonia
Oil &
E
Time
On
Site
On
Site
Rate
Chlorine
20C
Nitrogen
(690
Oxygen
K t wn
Rhos-
eable
OrOWC
20 C
Suspended
NtUo@en
Greas
Mean)
phorous
Solids
Nitrogen
Residue
e
Hrs
Hrs
MGD
C
SU
MG►L
MOIL
MGIL
W100 ML
MGIL
MC-JL
MG&
MUL
MGIL
LBIDAY
LI10AY
LBIDAY
LB►DAY
1
am
24
N
2.33
32
0.30
621
1so.4
5.8
2
0800
24
Y
0.91
30.4
7.oB
2.7
1.69
1
6b7
121.9
39.0
< 0.1
0.180
20b
45.6
12.8
< 37.8
3
0800
24
Y
O.DO
4
0800
24
Y
0.00
6
0800
24
Y
1.01
31.0
897
3A
0.47
6
6.18
28.6
172.7
4.0
6
080D
24
Y
1.58
31.0
7.06
500,
3.7
D.48
1
6.76
48.8
131.E
6.3
7
D80D
24
Y
2.94
3.5
0.11
85.8
284.2
2.8
B
0800
24
N
2.76
4.6
0.22
105.9
483A
5.1
9
1 0800
24
Y
1.04
31.2
6.68
2.7
D.30
1
6.82
< 0.1
23A
156.1
2.6
c 43.4
101
OB00
24
Y
122
31D
6.83
260
22
D.31
1
622
22A
173.0
32
111
0800
24
NIB
1.30
31.0
Sol
42
0.72
1
7D7
148.0
0.279
45.6
151.E
7.8
12
01300
24
NIB
1.65
31.0
692
52
0.73
e 1
7.14
72A
129.3
1.3
13
0600
24
NM
1.92
30.2
7W
4.1
0.68
< 1
7A2
65.7
2482
10.8
14
0800
24
N
3.10
63
DAII
127.0
0.592
162.9
659.3
10.5
15
0800
24
N
2.85
3A
0.13
BOB
483.5
3.0
lei
0800
24
NO
1 A4
302
7.00
2.3
0.23
5
7.24
139.0
a 0.1
0.774
27.6
138.1
2.7
< 60.0
17
0800 1
24
NIB
139
3o.s
G.99
92
2-7
DAI
6
7.10
31.3
179.7
4.7
18
0800
24
NIB
1-62
28.4
7.12
2.0
029
3
738
27.0
236A
3.9
19
am
24
Y
1.43
2&8
7.17
2.7
0.26
4
728
322
214.7
3.1
20
0800
24
Y
2.15
29.0
725
3.0
0.22
1
7A2
53.6
233.1
4.0
21
0800
24
Y
3A2
4.3
< 0.10
1002
0200
111.9
676.5
< 2,6
22
D800
24
N
1.74
3.1
0.22
45A
319.3
3.1
23
D80D
24
Y
am
282
7.37
>
2.5
0,12
1
736
176.0
< 0.1
Ob85
17.7
1023
0.8
< 35.4
24
0000
24
Y
0.96
26.4
7.23
28
2.6
0.42
< 1
7.12
193.0
Ob78
20.8
128.1
3.4
25
0500
24
Y
1A6
29.8
7.15
2.o
029
1
727
17.7
132.E
2.5
28
011m
24
Y
0.77
30.7
721
2.2
0.24
16
6.66
14.1
122.0
1.6
27
0600
24
Y
0.85
29.6
7.32
1.6
025
< 1
633
11.6
165.0
1.8
28
0800
24
Y
1A4
1.6
0.37
139
177.8
32
29 0800 24 N
am
30 0600 24 Y
0AD
31
AVERAGE
IA3
30.0
220
3.2
0.36
2
6.97
143.6
39.0
0A
0.598
48.1
236.6
4.4
< 442
MAXIMUM
3.12
312
7.37
500
5.3
1.69
16
-TA-2
193.0
39.0
0A
02130
162.9
676.5
12.8
a 60.0
MIMMURd
0.0D
282
6.83
28
0.0
< 0.10
< 1
6.18
100.2
39.0
0.1
0.180
11.5
45.S
< 0.8
< 35.4
Car*CpGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
Monthly limit
3.00
6.0®.
200 1
>5.0
250
<5.0
250.0
enj
30.0
319.6
NIB Backup Operator on site
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM TIME Page I of 1

am
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO078344 DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH JULY YEAR 2008
req FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
am Attn: CENTRAL FILES0
DfvWon of Water QrralEty'02
o
NCDENR (SIGNATIiRt,P OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARG ATE
1617 Man service center BYTHiB 81 NATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH. NC 27SE-1617 ACCI)RATEAND COMB ETE TO THE BESTOF MY KKOV LEDGE
rR
ran
Fes-=
MR
MR
Ill
ft"
IV"
P"
f"
PM
am
oft
A
T
E
Operator
Arrival
Tune
pefator
OT me
On
She
ORC
On
Site
5tM
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
3161E
00300
00800
00665
00545
00505
00310
0wM
00610
0055E
FLAW
TanV
pH
Residual
Chtorirte
SOD 5
20C
A unoNa
Nitrogen
Fecal
Ca orm
(Ge0
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phos-
ow=
Sett-
sable
Sdws
Organic
Nitrogen
BOA 5
20C
Total
SuspwuW
Residue
Ammonia
Nitrogen
On &
Gr+eas
e
Of
Daily
Rate
HM
Hrs
MGD
C
SU
MG1L
MGIL
MG/L
#1100 ML
MGFL
MG&
MGIL
MUL
MGIL
LEFDAY
LHIDAY
LBIOAY
LSIDAY
1
-Dow
24
Y
0.00
2
3
0600
0800
24
24
Y
Y
0.94
1.55 129.9
30.1
6.74
6.91
10
1.5
0.27
0.24
< 1
< 1
6.93
7.22
147.2
41 A
0.1
0.939
"
19.39
172.5
284.4
2.1
32
< 39Z
4
OWD
24
N
2.13
1A
015
24.9
373.0
2.6
5
0800
24
N
1.74
a 2.0.
0.47
< 29A
72.6
6.8
6
0800
24
N
224
3.0
0.17
11 &0
OJ828
56A
355.0
3.2
7
01i00
24
Y
1.53
29.6
6.97
3.2
0.20
< 1
6.75
< 0.1
40.8
2042
2.6
< 03.8
8
6800
24
Y
1.6E
30.8
8.79
29
2.6
0.15
18
6.1E
36.4
322.3
2.1
9
10
0600
DOW
24
24
Y
Y
1.51
1.90
30.E
31.1
7.03
6.88
5.6
6.9
c 0.10
0.16
10
5
627
6.0E
112.6
2A53
70.6
109.3
314.8
1109
< 13
2.6
11
0aw
24
Y
Zia
312
7.11
4.3
0.20
1
5.88
76.5
310.6
3.6
12
0600
24
N
3.19
2.7
0.16
71.8
5182
1.3
13
08w
24
N
2.62
2.7
0.19
122.0
0.815
59.0
513.6
4.0
14
OBW
24
N
1.15
31.6
6.81
2.8
1.98
9
5.0E
136.0
a 0.1
-0.980
26.9
211.0
19.0
< 47.95
15
cow
24
N
1.11
31A
639
10
2.6
0.74
2
8.65
24.1
245.3
6a
16
caw
24
Y
1.05
30.E
6.94
2.4
031
8
BAT
21.0
201 A
2.7
17
0800
24
Y
120
30.3
7.11
3.3
0.26
1
0.86
133.0
0.737
33.0
200.2
2.6
18
Dew
24
Y
1.40
312
7A8
3.0
035
3
835
37.3
248.E
4.3
19
0800
24
N
2.09
22
1.08
453
287.E
18.8
20
0900
24
N
1.1E
2.6
0.50
252
135A
4.9
21
09w
24
Y
1.84
32.9
6.87
2.6
021
< 1
8.76
< 0.1
38A
2692
3.3
c 7%7
22
0800
24
Y
1 A0
33.1
6.78
62
1.5
0.74
47
6.51
17.5
18113
89
23
06w
24
Y
1.34
33.1
6.74
2.0
0.58
2
8.55
22.4
223.5
6.6
24
0800
24
Y
1A0
32.3
7.09
2A
0.16
2
6.74
128.0
0.838
30.4
167.6
1.9
25
0800
24
Y
223
WA
8.W
16
0.15
5
6.61
27.9
ZMJ0
2.8
26
0600
24
N
320
< 2.0 •
< 0.10
109.0
0.9D0
< 54.9 A
397.9
c 2.7
27
0500
24
N
2.58
< 20 •
< 0.10
a 43.0
408.8
a 2.2
28
OWO
24
Y
1.5E
33.2
677
13
0.13
< 1
8.62
c 0.1
22.1
143.1
1.6
< 68.1
29
0800
24
Y
1.77
33.E
7�05
is
17
< 0.10
27
6.00
25.1
177.1
< 1.5
30
0800
24
Y
2.03
33.1
7.14
1 A
0.12
9
6.69
23.70
169.3
2.1
31
0800
24
Y
1.5E
32-6
720
1A
0.19
< 1
636
117.0
0.015
162
182.1
2.4
AVERAGE
1.72
317
25
2.6
0.34
3
6.51
124.4
41.4
c 0.1
0.81E
39.0
2562
4.3
< 68.6
MAXIMUM
320
33.6
726
62
6.9
1.98
47
7.22
147.2
41.4
< 0.1
2A53
109.3
518.E
19.0
< 767
MINIMUM
0.00
29A
674
4 i0
0.0
< 0A0
< 1
5.0E
109.0
41.4
c 0.1
-0.960
17.5
72.E
< 1.3
< 392
Camp(C)IGrab (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
G
Morrttrq Ltmit
3.00
6.0<9.
200
:,5.0
250
<5.0
2 00.0
998.7
30.0
1 319.E
NIB Backup Operator on site
Samples did not use 2mg/I DO over 5-Day period.
"* Lab error with samples
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM! TIME
Page 1 of I

NPDES PERMIT NO. NC00783" DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH AUGUST YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY SLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED . PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Man ORIGINAL and 014E COPY to
Attn: CENTRAL FILES wM� `
Divof Water Water Quality
NCDENR (SIGNATURERPbPEMTOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) TE
1617 Mail Service Center 13YTMS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY T14ATTHIS REPORT IS
RALEIGH, NC 27899-1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF NAY KNOWLEDGE
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00810
316iS
OWO0
OC600
00665
O054S
00605
W310
00530
00610
00556
FLOW
D
A
i
E
Operator
Arrival
Tlmo
Operator
Tlaite
On
Me
ORC
On
Site
Temp
pH
Residual
CNcdne
BOD 5
20C
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Fecal
Cotitarm
(Geo
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phos-
pherous
sell-
eable
Solids
Organic
r
BOD 5
20 C
Total
Suspended
Residue
JMmonla
Nitrogen
00 &
Greas
e
Elf
Daily
Rate
Hrs
Hrs
24
Y
MGD
1.68
C
32.8
SU
7.00
UGIL
MGIL
iA
MG/L
0.16
01100 ML
2
MG&
631
iiii
MGIL
ML/L
MG&
LBIDAY
19.82
LBIDAY
154.1
LBJDAY
22
LBIDAY
1
080D
2
6800
24
N
2.72
< 2.0 •
< 0.10
< 45.37 $
306.2
< 2.3
3
0800
24
N
2 59
c 2.0 •
< Di
c 4320 *
313.2
< 2.2
4
caw
24
Y
1.08
32.9
MU
19
0.20
c 1
7.03
47A
< 0.1
16.2
162.1
12
< 45.0
5
0800
24
Y
1.50
32.9
6.SO
28
2.0
0.16
3
7.03
25.0
203.4
1.9
61
C800
1 24
Y
1.69
33.9
617
c 2.0 •
0.12
13
6.82
c 262
211A
1.7
7
e
0800
OB00
24
24
Y
Y
1.66
1.85
32.8
32A
6.68
6.80
2A
12
c 0.10
0.13
2
2
7.02
6.99
201
0.90D
38.0
'18.5
242.3
123.4
< IA
2.0
9
0800
24
N
2.30
< 2.1)
< D.10
< 38A t-
191.8
c i1l
10
0800
24
N
223
1.0
c D.10
1750
OXOD
18A
204.6
c 12
ii
12
13
0800
0800
08M
24
24
24
N!B
NIB
NIB
1.79
1.55
1.97
31.0
30A
312
880
7.01
6.94
20
< 2.0
< 2.0 •
< 2.0
0.10
0.12
< 0.10
< 1
2
5
748
7.43
724
127.0
c 0.1
0.896
< 29.9
c 30.0
< 32.94
149.3
138.9
147.9
1.6
1.3
< IS
< 74.6
14
15
161
17
18
19
OBDO
01300
OBOD
O80D
0800
0800
24
24
24
24
24
24
NIB
NM
N
N
Y
Y
137
2A7
3.17
2.72
1.57
1.62
29.9
30.9
30.2
31.3
7.18
7.13
7.17
7.16
{ 10
< 2.0
< 2.0
< 2.0 •
2A
< 2.0 •
< 2.0 •
0.11
0.13
c D.10
< 0.10
c D.10
< 0.10
10
1
c 1
c 1
7.38
7.57
7AO
6.87
IOU
c 0.1
OSDO
< 29.5 *
< 34.5 #
< 52.9 #
< 45.4
< 26.2 #
< 27.0 f
147.8
215.8
IS
2.2
304.0
2302
144A
< 2.6
< 2.3
t 1.3
< 65.5
182A
< IA
20
211
22
23
24
25
25
OB00
OWO
GOOD
COW
OM24
0800
0800
24
24
24
24
24
24
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
132
Ike
1.38
2.82
2.88
1.54
1.73
31.2
31.0
302
31.8
31.7
722
720
7.38
7.04
7A7
14
12
2.7
c 2.0 •
< 2.0 •
2.0 •
< 2.0
< 21D
< D.10
0.15
D.16
< D.10
< D.10
0.13
023
3
3
2
t 1
7
7A3
7.12
726
7A3
7.23
c 0.1
25.8
362
< 23.0 *
< 47.0 *
c 48.0 Jr
c BUT
< 28.9
2152
139.2
2072
341.0
444A
199.1
202.0
< 1.4
1.9
1.9
< 2A
c 2A
1.7
3.3
< 642
27
0600
24
Y
1.67
31.6
7.05
c 2.0 •
D.28
1
6.65
< 27.9
200.9
3.3
2.1
28 OBW 24 Y
1AD
31.7
62e
2.0
0,18
2
703
180.0
0.816
< 23.4 t
93.4
29 0800 24 Y
30 0800 24 N
31 0800 24 N
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
1.71
2.74
2.0
3.1
2.8NG
I.
32.1
7.05
7.38
6.54
18
28
C 10
20
< 2.0
a 2.0
OAS
2.7
1.0
0.20
0.14
< 0.10
0.13
0.28
c 0.10
21
2
21
t 1
7.05
7.15
7.46
S 65
174.0
1742
2070
127.0
47.4
47.4
47A
< 0.1
< 0.1
< OA
OSDO
0.885
0.900
0216
< 28.5
c 45.70
142.6
182.8
2.0
3.1
< 48.0 4
32.5
52.9
16.2
240.2
206.4
444.4
93A
< 24
2.1
3.8
< 1.3
c 62.3
c 74.5
c 45.0
COmp(C�ab (G)
Monthly Unit
3.00
G
OQ
G
C
C
G
200
G
2-5.0
C
250
C
G
<5.0
C
C
250.0
C
C
G
988,7
30.0
319.6
Nlti t3aCKUp Operator on Site
* Samples did not use 2mpll DO over 5-Day period.
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT 15 FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM TIME Page 1 of 1

M
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCa0783" DISCHARGE No. 001 MONTH SEPTEMBER YEAR 2008
FACILITY NAME SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL DIVISION CLASS COUNTY BLADEN
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE(ORC) RANDY CLARK GRADE IV PHONE [phone]
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. -TAR HEEL (2) ENVIROMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC.
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: PLANT PERSONNEL
Mall ORIGWAL and ONE COPY to:
Altn: CENTRAL FILES
Olvishm of Water Qualtly
NCDENR (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESPONSBLE CHARGE) DATE
1817 Mad Service Center BY THIS SIGNATURE I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
Qw RALEIGH. NC 27699.1617 ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
MR
of
M1
MR
M1
MM
rot
MR
M4
am
air
D
A
T
E
Opetater
Arrival
Time
Operator
Time
On
Site
ORC
On
Site
50050
ODWO
00400
50060
00310
00610
31616
OD300
00600
OD865
00645
OOM
C0310
00530
00610
00656
FLOW
Temp
pH
Residual
Chlorine
SOD 5
20C
Arnmorda
Nilroeen
Fecal
CohTonn
(Gea
Mean)
Dissolved
Oxygen
Tatal
Nitrogen
Total
Pho3-
phcmw
Sett-
eable
Sodids
OrgaNc
NtmWn
BOD 5
20 C
Total
Suspended
Residue
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Ott &
Greas
e
Ei(
Dally
Rate
Hn.
Hrs
MGD
C
SU
UG/L
MG/L
MC;k
V1100 ML
MG/L
MG/L
MGIL
ML/L
MGIL
LB/DAY
LBIDAY
LB/DAY
LBIDAY
1
0800
24
Y
1.97
c 2.0
E 0.10
c 32M
238.2
< 1.6
2
0800
24
Y
1.62
30.3
7.06
< 2.0
0.13
1
7.48
167.8
70.5
c 0.1
1.705
< 27.02
202J
1.7
< 67.6
3
0800
24
Y
1.73
30.0
7.07
2.0 •
c 0.10
7
7.49
< 28.88
161.6
< 1.4
4
0800
24
Y
1.90
30.6
7.04
c 2.0
0.20
9
7.21
< 31.7
158.5
3.1
5
0800
24
Y
223
31.0
7.23
10
< 2.0
020
13
7 49
< 372
55.8
3.7
6
08DO
24
N
2.64
c 2.0 '
< 0.10
c 42A
137.7
c 2.1
7
am
24
N
3.34
1.5
< GAO
412
153.2
< 2.8
8
0800
24
Y
2.05
322
6.98
1.4
0.16
1
7.26
< 0.1
232
136.8
2.6
65.5
9
0800
24
Y
2.21
32.3
7A3
18
< 2.0 0
< 0.10
3
7.09
c 36S
022
< 1.8
10
0800
24
Y
1.98
32.1
8.90
< 2.0 •
0.12
2
7.11
< 33.0
49.5
2.0
11
0800
24
Y
1.89
31.5
7.05
< 2.0 '
0.12
< 1
7.51
198.0
0.682
< 30.5
64.1
1.8
12
0800
24
Y
1.72
30.8
7.17
c 2.0
< OAD
c 1
T.35
< 28.7
67A
< 1.3
13
0800
24
N
2.83
< 2.0
< OAD
< 47.2
217.1
< 2.4
14
OWO
24
N
2.24
< 2.0
c 0.10
< 37A
822
< 1.9
i5
0800
24
Y
1.02
WA
1.19
< 2.0
0.13
c 1
7.27
< OA
< 27D
432
1.8
< 67.8
16
0800
24
Y
1.66
31.1
7.i5
10
< 2.0
c 0.10
45
7.25
< 31.0
58.9
c 1.6
17
MOO
24
Y
2A2
30D
7.i1
2.0
c 0.10
38
?.47
177A
0-900
< 40.4
96.9
c 2.0
18
0"
24
Y
7-35
29A
7.08
< 2.0
0.11
25
7.25
< 39.2
902
22
19
0600
24
Y
2.32
29.8
7.11
1.5
< 0.10
17
7.36
29.0
89.0
< 1.9
20
0800
24
N
2.93
c 2.0 `
c 0.10
< 48.9
132.0
c 2.4
21
ONO
24
N
2.03
< 2.0 `
c 0.10
< 33.9
60.8
< 1.7
22
0600
24
Y
1.05
29.5
7.02
< 2.0 •
< 0.10
c 1
7.57
a 0.1
< 32.5
97.6
< 1.6
< 81.32
23
0800
24
Y
1.64
29.5
729
410
1.8
0.12
18
720
24.6
95.7
1.6
24
0800
24
Y
1.64
272
7.43
2.5
0.11
35
7.38
34.2
177.8
1.5
25
0800
24
Y
1.66
26.9
7.52
2.2
< 0.10
10
7.62
188.0
0.900
30.3
165.1
< 1.4
26
0600
24
Y
1.98
27.9
7.57
2.3
< OAO
10
7.57
37$
171.6
< 1.6
27
0800
24
N
2.81
12
c OAO
18d.0
0.900
44.6
1B9.2
< 2.3
20
0800
24
N
2.45
1.6
< 0.10
30.6
122A
c 2.0
29
0800
24
Y
1.53
29.1
7.66
1.2
0.14
< 1
7.10
< 0.1
15.3
93A
1.8
< 63.8
30
0000
24
Y
1.80
292
7.62
18
1.9
< 0.10
14
7.13
28.62
112.6
< 1.5
31
AVERAGE
2.11
30.1
13
0.77
0.11
5
7.34
179.0
70.5
< 0.1
1.057
33.8
119.8
2.0
c 732
MAM UM
3.34
323
7.86
18
2.5
0.20
45
7.62
198-0
70.5
< 0.1
1.705
402
2382
3.7
as.5
MINIMUM
1.53
26D
6.90
10
1.2
< 0.10
c 1
7.09
164.0
70.5
< 0.1
0.882
15.3
43.2
< I A
< 63.8
Comp(CyGmb (G)
G
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
C
G
C
C
C
C
6
Monthly tail _
3.00
.0<9.
no
>5 0
26D
<&O
2V
938 7
30.0
319 E
NIB Backup Operator on site
* Samples did not use 2rm/I DO over3-Day period,
NOTE: TOTAL NITROGEN LIMIT IS FOR THE TWO YEAR INTERIM[ TIME
Page 1 of 1