20231490 Ver 1_Parker Townhomes Residential Development (NWP#29) PCN Application(r)_20231101

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Parker Townhomes
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The property owner is proposing the construction of a residential development on the Site and is seeking a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination and verification to use Nationwide Permit #29 to impact a portion of an on -Site stream.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Bethel Road Partners, LLC c/o Beauxwright
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
1409 Bethel Chapel Road (Lat/Long: 35.218946,-80.880252)
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: See attached table
9. Project Location— County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location —Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Irwin Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

hart 'ti hickman
a
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via Email
November 1, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Ste. 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attention: Mr. Doug Perez
Re: Jurisdictional Determination Request & Pre -Construction Notification
Parker Townhomes
Parker Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BWR.017
Dear Doug:
On behalf of Beauxwright, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting the attached request for
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) and Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the proposed
construction of a multifamily residential development in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(Site or subject Site). The Site consists of seventeen (17) parcels of land that total
approximately 12.2 acres. H&H is submitting the PCN application in order to receive
verification to use Nationwide Permit (NWP) #29. In addition, H&H is requesting a
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) to confirm the approximate jurisdictional
boundaries of on -Site features.
H&H conducted a stream and wetlands survey at the Site on August 11, 2022 and August 15,
2023. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request is included with this PCN
application as Appendix E.
There is one stream on the Site: Stream Channel "A" (SCA). SCA originates as a perennial
stream at a culvert in the northern portion of the Site and flows in a southeasterly direction
off -Site. SCA totals approximately 937 linear feet of on -Site length.
2923 South Tryon Street, 5uite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Mr. Doug Perez
November 1, 2023
Page 2
There is one forested wetland on the Site: Wetland Area "A" (WAA). The on -Site wetland is
a headwater forest wetland with ultimate discharge into SCA. WAA encompasses
approximately 0.0036 acre of on -Site area.
The developer is proposing to permanently impact 0.03 acre (179.3 linear feet) of SCA.
Impacts are not proposed to the on -Site wetland area. Impacts to SCA are proposed for the
construction of a road crossing to access the southern portion of the Site. Due to the NWP
#29 mitigation threshold 0.02 acre for stream impacts, mitigation is proposed via the NC
Division of Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Program. The developer is not proposing
additional impacts to on -Site streams or wetlands.
H&H is seeking a Nationwide Permit #29 verification for this development. A copy of the PCN
submittal package has also been submitted to the NC DEQ DWR via ePCN.
https://harthick.shmepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwright (BWR)/BWR-017 Bethel Road
Assemblage/Task-004 - Wetland Permitting/PCN/02_Cover _letter.doc
hart ► hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Doug Perez
November 1, 2023
Page 3
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Dan
McCauley at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
11�r
Matt Ingalls
Sr. Project Manager
Attachments
Dan McCauley, PWS
Sr. Project Environmental Scientist
• PCN Form
• Figure 1 — Site Location Map
• Figure 2 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map
• Appendix A — Agent Authorization
• Appendix B — Stream Impact Exhibit prepared by Landworks Design Group
• Appendix C — Avoidance & Minimization
• Appendix D — Supplemental Documents
• Appendix E — Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
• Appendix F — Mitigation Acceptance Letter
• Appendix G — NC SAM Form
cc: Ms. Morgan Rushnell, Beauxwright (via email)
Mr. Andrew Pitner, P.G., DEQ DWR (via ePCN)
https://harthick.shmepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwright (BWR)/BWR-017 Bethel Road
Assemblage/Task-004 - Wetland Permitting/PCN/02_Cover _letter.doc
hart ► hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

❑�C� W A rE�%
O qqqc:� ^C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Parker Ridge Townhomes
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
see attached table
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Morgan Rushnell
3d.
Street address:
1900 West Morehead Street, Ste 201
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28208
3f.
Telephone no.:
941-812-8538
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Site Developer
4b.
Name:
Morgan Rushnell
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Beauxwright
4d.
Street address:
1900 West Morehead Street, Ste 201
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28208
4f.
Telephone no.:
941-812-8538
4g.
Fax no.:
N/A
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Dan McCauley, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hart and Hickman, PC
5c.
Street address:
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See table attached
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.218946 Longitude:-80.880528
1 c.
Property size:
12.2 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Irwin Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba River
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of 17 parcels of land located west of Bethel Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Site currently exists as
residential and undeveloped land. The surrounding area consists of residential and undeveloped property.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0036
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 937
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project proposes to develop a multifamily residential development to serve Mecklenburg County and surrounding areas.
3e.
The
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
planned development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare a level building pad. Stormwater BMPs are included.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: PAD request attached to this permit application
q p pp
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dan McCauley
Agency/Consultant Company: Hart & Hickman, PC
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream Channel "A"
PER
Corps
7.47
179.3
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
179.3
3i. Comments:
The permanent stream impact involves a single road crossing over Stream Channel "A" required to access to the southern portion of the Site
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Not Applicable
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
Not Applicable
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Not Applicable
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Appendix C
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Appendix C
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
359 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments: The applicant proposes 2:1 mitigation ratio for 179.3 linear feet of permanent stream impact
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Not applicable.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Not applicable.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
50 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
This
project includes 3 separate, above ground, dry detention ponds with sand filters to treat all impervious runoff on the site. The BMP's will meet
NCDEQ and City of Charlotte Stormwater and Post Construction Ordinances by attenuating the 1 year/24
hour and 10 yr, 25 yr and 50 yr 6 hour
storms
events while providing minimum of 85% TSS from all treated waters.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Charlotte -Mecklenburg
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: CMSWS
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other: NCDEQ
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed site plan will develop the majority of the parcels and additional development is not anticipated. Additional phases and/or impacts to
Waters of the U.S. are not planned or proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
Wastewater
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
be to Charlotte treatment
will piped an off -site city of wastewater plant.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes 0 No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
DEQ Natural Heritage Program and Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) on-line databases and on -Site reconnaissance (See information
in Appendix D).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office databases and on -site reconnaissance (See
information in Appendix D).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID 3710453400J and 3710453300J
Dan McCauley
10-31-2023
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

RC T"Ej pr, ..
7 _
I
4w .. . .
I" f
_ s
ur)yslr�riln �-� p,A I I �'rF;
s,7
I `4. .i
�_-.� � 7'� .. .Q' •�=�.-�� � � of
MQRfI•IEAD 5T
JJ
r �
r I
SITE *V
G
USGS The National Map./National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,
and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.
Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;
U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA
National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief
Model. Data refreshed April, 2023.iiii
0 2,000 4,000
NSCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE EAST AND CHARLOTTE WEST
NORTH CAROLINA 2022
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAA)
i
l�
'r
ti
A
1
�r
P -
# c 4
s.r, at Ai J
LEGEND
—SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
_ H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL STREAM
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
® WETLAND
TEST PIT
— PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE
CULVERT
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL LENGTH
STREAM CHANNEL 10
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (LF)
STREAM CHANNEL "A" (SCA)
1 937
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
WETLAND AREA I❑
IAPPROXIMATE AREA (AC)
WETLAND AREA"A" (WAA)
I 0.003
NOTES:
1.
SC - STREAM CHANNEL
LF - LINEAR FEET
WA -WETLAND AREA
2.
DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 8/11/22 AND
4_
8/15/23.
3.
SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
ATRIMBLE GPS UNIT.
4.
FLAGGED BOUNDARIES OF FEATURES ARE SUBJECT
-
TO THE REVIEW OF A US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY BE ALTERED DURING A
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SITE VISIT, WHICH
COULD CHANGE SIZES AND/OR LOCATIONS OF
FEATURES.
5.
PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2022. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2022.
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER
OF THE U.S. (SCA)
APPROXIMATE
0 120 240
iiia
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
PROJECT RESIDENTIALAND UNDEVELOPED LAND
BETHEL ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart 'No hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
w 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMARTER fNVIRIDNMEN-FAL SOLUT10N5 License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 8/24/2023 REVISION NO. 0
d the GIS User Community JOB NO: BWR-017 FIGURE NO. 2

Appendix A
Agent Authorization
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E63AD00-83A0-4686-83B2-F85D38A77BAE
Agent Certification of Authorization
Paul Cooper Morrison Jr
I, , representing the prospective developer of the residential and
forested properties located at various addresses on Remount Road, Parker Drive, Bethel Road, and
Sims Drive which are represented by Parcel Numbers 11902120, 11902127, 11902129, 11902130,
11902131, 11902133, 11902134, 11902135, 11902136, 11902137, 11902138, 11902139,
11902140, 11902141, 11902142, 11902329, and 11902124 in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina (approx. 12 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart & Hickman, PC to act on the
prospective developer's behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and
acceptance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Section 404/401 permits for this
property.
E(DocuSig ned by:
hbr r fit. M-Sbw
B613370C146042B...
Prospective Applicant's Signature
Name/Title: Manager
Company: Bethel Road Partners LLC
8/29/2023
Date
Agent's Signature
Dan McCauley, PWS
Hart & Hickman, PC
08-11-2023
Date

Appendix B
Stream Impact Exhibit prepared by Landworks Design Group
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

QUEEN GRIER WHALEY
DB 01015, PG 525
1401 PARKER DR
TAX PARCEL ID:11902125 I
EXISTING USE: INDUSTRIAL
ZONED: ML-1 I
SLAYTON 1349 LLC
DB 33164, PG 727
1349 PARKER DR
TAX PARCEL ID:11902128
EXISTING USE: INDUSTRIAL
ZONED: ML-1 & N1-B
/ STREAM SECTION
'A': 179.3 L.F.
Oa Oi 30 _ \ I ' �- X _X _
- PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 1339
S.F. (OR 0.03 AC) S.F.- 179.3 L.F.
PROPOSED STREAM
" SCM #3 �� I CROSS I G AND CULV RT I I I I I
J L.1�
CC,, \ of
U
WAA-02 A WMAND \ LOG �Od
7 WAA-Ot\
J I
a•x1Dnt
/ WETLAND AREA "A"
(157.1 S.F.) J
o
y TOP OF
/e BANK (TYP) LOG ❑OUd��O
"-OG OHW MARK \ JJd
(TYP) of
/ 40 Jd
35' PCCO
/ BUFFER(TYP)
LIMITS OF
\ / \ 40 G GRADING, TYP.
OJJd
400
J
SCM #2
.LC I
HAUSMAN HOMES
J96 CONSTRUCTION LLC &
: LIVE OAK HOMES &
NGLE / RDB 30 950I VATONS PG 178 LLC
\. r
1508 TAX PARCEL ID: KIMBERLY RD �111JJJ
JTIAL / LABRON L & HELEN R / \
3 CRAWFORD
11902109 DB 08938, PG 924
/ EXISTING USE: SINGLE 1504 KIMBERLY RD
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONED: N1-B TAX PARCEL ID:
11902108 / \
EXISTING USE:
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ' LEROY BENNETT /
ZONED: N1-13 DB 36235, PG 428 /
/ 1500 KIMBERLY RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
11902107
EXISTING USE: SINGLE J2g2S PROPERTIES LLC
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DB 37188, PG 775
ZONED: N1-13 /� 1436 KIMBERLY RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
11902106 LLIZABETH A SIMPSON \ /
/ EXISTING USE: SINGLE ' DB 36150, PG 944
- - ®
- -
-
SS
SS -
I o
Ov
O-
J
C,-
U
CENTERLINE OF STREAM
ON SITE: 937 L.F. TOTAL
U
O
I
I
STREAM
CENTERLINE
(TYP)
I I
r
O
c�
O
J
r
O
' \ BRONSYN HOLDINGS LLC I U
I DB 37300, PG 349 (Q U
1421 PARKER DR Q-
TAX PARCEL ID: 11902123 -
/EXISTING USE: INDUSTRIAL O
ZONED: ML-1 G�
❑ �, o U
PARKER EIGHTS LLC
DB 24481, PG 651
1826 REMOUNT RD
TAX PARCEL ID:11902117
EXISTING USE: MULTI FAMILY A�
ZONED: N2-13
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1432 KIMBERLY RD
/ ZONED: N1-B /
v TAX PARCEL ID:
11902105 /
/ EXISTING USE: SINGLE SELL IT QUICK REAL
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ESTATE LLC
\ ZONED: N1-13 DB 3 720 /
/ 1428 KIMBERLY
Y RD
TAX PARCEL ID: JAMES M & GLORIA M
11902104 HUNTLEY
/ EXISTING USE: SINGLE / DB 08814, PG 039
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1424 KIMBERLY RD
ZONED: N1-13 /
/ TAX PARCEL ID:
11902103 GLORIA HUNTLEY &
EXISTING USE: SINGLE PATRICK LIVINGSTON
/ FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / DB 32027, PG 386
ZONED: N1-13 1420 KIMBERLY RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
11902102 I/ E
EXISTING USE: SINGLE
/ FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED: N1-13 MICHAEL H & BRENDA P LEMMOND
DB 05736, PG 289
/ 1416 KIMBERLY RD
^ TAX PARCEL ID:11902101
-f- -I - T _
I I I I r
I I I I
I
I I I
I
\ I
U �CCE CCE-------PCCE
PCCE - CCE--------PCC
3DD 3ODd
m -
a
U
SCM #1
CC \
O�
�G
AUSTIN SNYDER \
DB 36146, PG 630
1300 FORDHAM RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
11902306
EXISTING USE: SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
\
WILLIAM G DUNLAP SR
& RENEE
PRIDE-DUNLAP
DB 30046, PG 310
1308 FORDHAM RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
\
11902305
\
EXISTING USE: SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONED: N1-13
TAYLOR BYRD
DB 36563, PG 629
\
/ 1314 FORDHAM RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
11902304
EXISTING USE: SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONED: N1-B
FUTURE REALTY LLC
DB 37894, PG\
RD
1320 FORDHAM RD
TAX PARCEL ID:
11902303
EXISTING USE: SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONED: N1-13
l \
0
�o
WIRINSON BLVD
74
PARKER DR PARKER DR SKYVIEW RD
BETHEL RD 'W 0yV
O T ly
O
0 kGyeFR<yRo FORDHAM RD N
UJ
V��g'C g�•j0
N
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
bI It UHIH:
SITE AREA:
12.26 AC (534,039 SF)
TAX PARCELS:
11902142, 11902141, 11902140, 11902139, 11902138, 11902137, 11902136,
11902135, 11902134, 11902133, 11902131, 11902129, 11902127,
&11902120, 11902127, 11902124
EXISTING ZONING:
N1-B & ML-1
EXISTING USE:
VACANT, SINGLE FAMILY
'ROPOSED USES:
TOWNHOMES
L X ---/
TOTAL WETLANDS & STREAM IMPACT TABLE:
/TOTAL WETLANDS AREA: 0.0036 AC (157.1 SF)
TOTAL STREAM AREA (OHW MARK): 0.1234 AC (5,379.04 SF)
TOTAL ON -SITE STREAM LENGTH: 937 L.F.
DCW REAI TOTAL WETLANDS PERMANENT
70 C
O 1 MPACT AREA: 0 S.F.
J TAXI
/ EXISTIN TOTAL STREAM IMPACT AREA: 0.0307 AC (1,339 S.F.)
/ ERMANENT STREAM IMPACT LENGTH: 179.3 L.F.
I EMPORARY IMPACT LENGTH: 0 L.F.
<'O ERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS: NONE
G BETHEL RO TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS: NONE
40' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-
MB 1166 PG 13 WETLAND, BUFFER, AND FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. NO MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILE WITHIN DESIGNATED WETLANDS OR PCCO BUFFER.
SS SS - 2. LIMIT STREAMBANK CLEARING TO PRE -APPROVED EASEMENT WIDTH TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE.
3. FORESTED WETLANDS WITHIN TEMPORARY EASEMENTS AND EDGE OF PERMANENT EASEMENT SHALL BE
RESTORED AS FOLLOWED: NO PLANTINGS SHALL OCCUR ON 10' CORRIDOR CENTERED OVER PIPE.
A. PLANTINGS: REFER TO APPROVED PCCO MITIGATION PLANS FOR PLANTING PLANS
B. PLANTINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 1-YEAR OLD BARE ROOT TREES 20-30 INCHES TALL.
' C. PLANTINGS SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN NOVEMBER THROUGH JANUARY.
4. WETLANDS WITHIN TEMPORARY EASEMENTS: STUMPS SHALL BE CUT AT GRADE.
5. ALL WETLAND SOILS EXCAVATED SHALL BE STOCK PILED ON MATS AND RETURNED TO PRECONSTRUCTION
J CONDITIONS. THE MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOILS WITHIN WETLANDS SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE GREATEST
I I EXTENT PRACTICAL.
6. INGRESS AND EGRESS THOUGH WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10, CORRIDOR CENTER OVER PIPE
CENTERLINE.
jTIFFANY
ANGELA MARIE
ANDERSON & ALAINA
BYRD
DB 37480, PG 407
1361 BETHEL RD
TAX PARCEL ID: 11902328
EXISTING USE: SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONED: N1-13
c
I
I
CHRISTOPHER LEON NGUYEN
LIVING TRUST & JIN HUA LIN
LIVING TRUST
I
OOKS STIKELEATHER LLC
CHRISTOPHER LEON NGUYEN DB 37480, PG 407
DB 35664, PG 316
LIVING TRUST & JIN HUA LIN 1256 FORDHAM RD
1 8 FORDHAM RD
\
LIVING TRUST I TAX PARCEL ID: 11902309
TAX PARCEL ID: 11902307
DB 37480, PG 751 EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY
1262 FORDHAM RD RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
308
TAX PARCEL ID: 11902ZONED: N1-B
I
ZONED: N1-B
EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
ZONED: N1-13
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
- -
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
This Plan Is A
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
Preliminary Design.
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
NOT Released For
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
Construction.
N
ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
TOP OF BANK
-PCCO-
EXISTING PCCO BUFFER
- - - - - -
EXISTING T.O.B.
0 50 100 200
S1_
EXISTING SEWER LINE
SD-
EXISTING STORM LINE
-
ROAD CENTERLINE
SCALE: 1 "=50'
- -
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
REVISIONS:
-------- OE
EXISTING POWER LINE
No.
Date
By
Description
wv
LIMITS OF GRADING
POWER LINE EASEMENT
..
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
L CL°
z
O � a
OY
L O
W
C
• 00
WVf
JDUW
a
a
Vf
U
Z
H
a
W
GC
V
1* It
00
%O %O
Go Go
00
O
M
GO
CA
C� CA
G V
Z
3 0
o�
N L
V
O
C)
2
J
J
z
au
�ozw
lcl�
Ow
�Q
p
=oa
Lu
J
<
0
00
0
LU
J
W
�
�
w
=
m
STREAM
IMPACT
EXHIBIT
OVERVIEW
� C A
` N
qp l
�pPE
�,0" l Ai 1 li lt
N„CgRo*'
ND SCgA/tii�i
:w 2189
ti
11 6 % Q4v6_
CORPORATE CERTIFICATIONS
NC PE: C-2930 NC LA: C-253
SC ENG : NO. 3599 SC LA: NO. 211
Project Manager: MDH
Drawn By: ADD
Checked By: MDH
Date: 10/30/23
Project Number: 22041
Sheet Number:
WETL-1

71
7C
We
IM
3
a \\ \\\ \\ \ I \\
IMITS OF /
GRADING,
_TYP.
\ PROPOSED I
SITE WALL I
77
0 4711111 \ \ N\ \ r I I
10 \c� 10 �\\ \� \ \ TOP OF \ \ \
/ / / / / / \ \ \ I I I� BANK (T \P)
WAA-02 WETLAND\\��\\°GI �'�o \
00 \ \ d \ - \3� TH AREA "q„ \� \ �\ \STRE M \
CENTERLINE \ \ \
i
\ \ 3D ,� / / \ \ d WA -A - 01 6 \
_ / 8
2-4 C T P P
G
4�
O 6
\� - \ 68 3 WI D TH
WETLAND AREA "A" 88S
\/ \ \ \ \ v \ 1(157.1 S.F.)- NO IMPAC \ \ \• \�
N
0' 10, 20' 40'
SCALE: 1 "=20'
WETLAND, BUFFER, AND FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN ALL GRADES TO PRECONSTRUCTION GRADES. NO MATERIAL SHALL BE
STOCKPILE WITHIN DESIGNATED WETLANDS.
2. LIMIT STREAMBANK CLEARING TO PREOPOSED EASEMENT WIDTH TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE.
3. FORESTED WETLANDS WITHINK TEMPORARY EASEMENTS AND EDGE OF PERMANENT EASEMENT SHALL BE
RESTORMED AS FOLLOS. NO PLANTINGS SHALL OCCUR ON 10' CORRIDOR CENTERED OVER PIPE.
A. PLANTINGS: INCLUDE RANDOM MIX OF CHERRYBARK OAK, ROGUHLEAF DOGWOOD, RED MAPLE,
SYCAMORE, SUGARBERRY, WATER OAK, AND WILLOW OAK TO BE PLANTED AT A DENSITY OF 450 PLANTS
PER ACRE.
B. PLANTINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 1-YEAR OLD BARE ROOT TREES 20-30 INCHES TALL.
C. PLANTINGS SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN NOVEMBER THROUGH JANUARY.
4. WETLANDS WITHIN TEMPORARY EASEMENTS: STUMPS SHALL BE CUT AT GRADE.
5. ALL WETLAND SOILS EXCAVATED SHALL BE STOCK PILED ON MATS AND RETURNED TO PRECONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS. THE MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOILS WITHIN WETLANDS SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE
GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
6. INGRESS AND EGRESS THOUGH WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10, CORRIDOR CENTER OVER PIPE
CENTERLINE.
p M
1-1 Z
U) O
3048
o 2-01
ch
54
2-0 51
m �r 51
p
FILL FACE
254
51 �51
II
z
O N
F- Q
Q Q� .
H
y 1� O �
T
0 B
2-VI @ 229mm FILL FACE
FILL FACE
Z 2
HOCOU
m Z 2 A
N
1-V1 STR. FACE
SEE l V, & 229mm
@WING WALL
V @ 229mm
"V" @ 457mm
LL J d
O U 2
=�Dym
(D �\
B2
N DETAIL
0) N1 @ 229mm
"H"
-
WQQLL2
N
HU�00
Z = � O O0
F 1 r
ODO
F� rn
a Op CM
N
76mm DIA. DRAINS
152mmABOVE
V1 @ 457mm 20 457
@ WING WALL
Itz"
Z
I T4
F- 2 ~ Z W
U) F- LL O
JN
F
y
o _
FLOW LINE
(0 1111
3
O
zH>2E
au
457 T4
to
U z
'152
152mm-"T" 1 I 5 @ 152mm
2032-N1
CL
O9 WQ O
O
CONSTJT. B1
94
SECTION
A-Av
B
SECEION6-B
ELEVATION
NOT SHOWN
SEE STD.#838.45 FOR GENERAL
NOTES.
762 1524 r1
TOP a BorroM
102
BILL OF MATERIAL FOR ENDWALL
J
m
I
8 SPA. @ 229mm
�
REINF.
STEEL
1 PIPE
�294
Z" BARS IN
BAR
SIZE LENGTH
NO.
WEIGHT
Q s
W
Z
I
TOP OF FOOTING
U)LU rn
c LU LU
B1
#13 1676
4
7
oC 3 Y
0)Q
LO
y t; PIPE NOT
SHOWN
B2
#13 1372
4
6
LL N Z
Z -�
v
T4
w
a
>..
G1
#22 2946
2
18
N.Ir o
O O
G) C.)C-)
- - -
SLOPE a
H1 1
#13 1 2184
10
22
Z 0)
m m cn
_- N q Io \
H2
#13 1676
2
3
LU w
-` D
n '�� " IN
127
H3
#13 1041
4
4
oQC LLI 1—I
o C') z
� Z >
so / I ^�� I
I
TAPER DETAI L
N1
N2
#16 1194
#13 1041
14
8
26
8
a
Z E
2S 178 1053
@
q
8 SPA. 229mm
"N"
Q0 O
991 I
?g
BARS IN TOP AND
BOTTOM OF FOOTING
8 SPA.@ 229mm FILL FACE
2 SPA.@ 762mm STR. 3-V2, 2-V3, 2-V4 2-V5
T1
#13 4420
6
26
Q O
Z 0 QO
I I m
_q D
987
PLAN
FACE 2-H1 , 1 -H3
4 SPA.@ 457mm
T4
#13 2057
6
12
Q T
HID
M4
SPA.@ 381mm FILL H3 STR. FACE
T5
#13 762
40
30
0) W
(0m z
FACE 3-H1,1-H2,1-H3 V2 2-V2, 1-V3,
V1
#13 2210
6
13
U V 00
O
o M89
N
Z Z
zi 1219 203
H2 H2 1-V4, 1-V5
V2
#13 1778
10
18
H Z
oC
� 0 p
��
178
V3
V3
#13 1524
6
9
w LLL
t 7
z2 1041
V4
V4
#13 1245
6
7
Z CC
°0 n
Z3 864 152
H1 V5
V5
#13 965
6
6
WLL
r'
H1 2007
H2 1499 I-T
330 4�
HK.
—�
_ _
Z1
#19 1422
6
19
H3 864
T4 rrZn
Z2
#16 1219
6
11
„ „ „ „
H BARS N BARS
„ „
Z BARS
5-N1 4-N2
Z3
#13 1016
6
6
Note:
s sPA.
This drawing is dimensioned in
millimeters unless otherwise
depicted within the drawing.
@ 229mm
WING ELEVATION
REINF. STEEL k
CON./C.S. m3
251
5.7
SHEET 2 OF 2
SHEET 2 OF 2
838-.39
838-.39
NCDOT ENDWALL
7
PROPOSED GRADE PROP. R/W LINE
EXISTING STREAM BED
ELEVATION
BETHEL ROAD
54' PUBLIC R/W
LOCAL RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM
7
72" RCP PIPE
NCDOT HEADWALL PER
NCDOT STD 838.39
INVERT OF PIPE TO BE 1'
:1
NCDOT HEADWALL PER
NCDOT STD 838.39
MPX
2 1
w
>O
U
n7
ELOW EXISTING STREAM
BED ELEVATION
— — — — — — — _ —
F,
z
INVERT OF PIPE I U BE V
BELOW EXISTING STREAM
BED ELEVATION
PROPOSED RIP -RAP, TYP.
�
-
1=1-u-w=ul
iL-w=u-1=1
u I -I I -I = I� iL � — —=1 11= II
_ _-_ _-
___ = I 1=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I
III III I, III III I
_
III-1, -- —
20' RIP RAP
123'-6" OF 72" RCP
20' RIP RAP
179.3' L.F.OF TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
rn mch
co
co NN
o0
09
rnrn
V V
V M
M co
M co
M N
N cc
(O CO
(O cfl
co cfl
co cfl
co cfl
co (0
(0
0+00
1+00
2+00
101
Ell
70
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
— —
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
This Plan Is A
MAJOREXISTING
"-10'
Preliminary Design.
SCALE: 1
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
NOT Released For
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
CULVERT CROSS SECTION A-A
ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
Construction.
TOP OF BANK
PCCD
EXISTING PCCO BUFFER
— — — — —
— EXISTING T.O.B.
___SS
EXISTING SEWER LINE REVISIONS:
SD—
EXISTING STORM LINE
No.
Date
By
Description
—
ROAD CENTERLINE
— —
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
------ElE
EXISTING POWER LINE
LIMITS OF GRADING
POWER LINE EASEMENT
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
V It
00
%O %O
GoGo
00
P%% r*%
O
C)
2
J
J
za��
�ozw
O
w
Q
p
=oa
J
0
00
0
LLJ
J
W
w
=
m
IMPACT
EXHIBIT
CULVERT
* w 2189
ti
CORPORATE CERTIFICATIONS
NC PE: C-2930 NC LA: C-253
SC ENG : NO. 3599 SC LA: NO. 211
Project Manager: MDH
Drawn By: ADD
Checked By: MDH
Date: 10/30/23
Project Number: 22041
Sheet Number:
WETL-2

CENTERLINE OF
/ L
EA SECTION
�a
m
l
:/ o (0
1
L-001
\ \ \ /
/
�� i Ilili�lliliilllllll IIII IIIII / �\ \\ \\ \ o \ \ \ \ \ -----
III I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I IIII \\ `\�
III I I II (IIIIIII I I I I I I I I I III III \\ \ �\ \ \ \ r \\ \\ \ \ 1
IIII II (IIIIIII III \ \ \ M03 J'�
Z E:X \ D0o
AM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /III \ \ \\ r-
ill \ \ \ \ \ \
IIIII IIIIIIIIIII 1//1 /II \ o \\ W \ \ \
\ \ \ 1 \ \
11`II, \\ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ F \
\001
\\
CIO/
co
PERMANE
NT IMPACT AREA: 1339
S.F. (OR 0.03 AC) S.F.- 179.3 L.F. \ \ \ \
\ \ \\ \\\ \ \\ \ \\ w\� \ 11 \\ \\� z PROPOSED STREAM ' \
CROSSING AND CULVERT
\ o� --- --
SCM #3 \ 1 I \ \::. \ \ \ \ \
STREAM CROSSING PLAN
SITE AREA:
12.26 AC (534,039 SF)
TAX PARCELS:
11902142,11902141,11902140,11902139,11902138,11902137,11902136,
11902135,11902134,11902133,11902131,11902129,11902127,
&11902120,11902127,11902124
EXISTING ZONING:
NI-B & ML-1
EXISTING USE:
VACANT, SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED USES:
TOWNHOMES
WETLAND, BUFFER, AND FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. NO MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILE WITHIN DESIGNATED WETLANDS OR PCCO BUFFER.
2. LIMIT STREAM BANK CLEARING TO PRE -APPROVED EASEMENT WIDTH TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE.
3. FORESTED WETLANDS WITHIN TEMPORARY EASEMENTS AND EDGE OF PERMANENT EASEMENT SHALL BE
RESTORED AS FOLLOWED: NO PLANTINGS SHALL OCCUR ON 10' CORRIDOR CENTERED OVER PIPE.
A. PLANTINGS: REFER TO APPROVED PCCO MITIGATION PLANS FOR PLANTING PLANS
B. CONTRACTOR TO LINE STREAM BANK WITH COCONUT LINING WITH STAKING FOR SOIL STABILIZATION AFTER
PLANTING.
C. PLANTINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 1-YEAR OLD BARE ROOT TREES 20-30 INCHES TALL.
D. PLANTINGS SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN NOVEMBER THROUGH JANUARY.
4. WETLANDS WITHIN TEMPORARY EASEMENTS: STUMPS SHALL BE CUT AT GRADE.
5. ALL WETLAND SOILS EXCAVATED SHALL BE STOCK PILED ON MATS AND RETURNED TO PRECONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS. THE MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOILS WITHIN WETLANDS SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE GREATEST
EXTENT PRACTICAL.
6. INGRESS AND EGRESS THOUGH WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10' CORRIDOR CENTER OVER PIPE
CENTERLINE.
NOTE: THE STREAM BUFFER PRESERVATION AREA SHOWN IS TO BE PRESERVED IN
PERPETUITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE "CHARLOTTE/MECKLENBURG WATER QUALITY
BUFFER IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES MANUAL". ANY DISTURBANCE OF THIS AREA MUST
BE APPROVED BY CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES.
AREAS USED FOR BUFFER PRESERVATION WILL NOT BE USED TO MEET TREE SAVE,
NATURAL AREA, OR OTHER REQUIRED SAVE AREAS.
\\\\\ \ \ \ \ 4oc
FsipFNTgR�
`OOOd \
\ 696 66
=TLA AREA "A" (157.1
) TC) RF I INIf11CTl IRRFn \
6 3 WIDTH
88.
N
0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1 "=20'
NOTES:
REMOVE WIRE AND NYLON TWINE FROM BALL AND CANOPY.
SOAK ROOT BALL AND PLANT PIT IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION.
STAKING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES IN R.O.W. OR UPON —
REQUEST OF ARBORIST. 3/4" NYLON MAP —
REMOVE EXCESS SOIL FROM SITE AND DISPOSE OF IN A
LEGAL MANNER.
ROOT CROWN TO
RESEED UNMULCHED, DISTURBED AREAS. BE AT FINISH GRADE
4" HIGH / 6" WIDE MAXIMUM
BERM OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALLL
3 — 1"zYn18' WOOD STAKES
NTH CENTERED 3/8" HOLE
DRIVEN IN UHE WITH STRAP
EQUALLY SPACED AROUND TREE
72
71
7C
6�
720
\
\ INSTALL, SEED, PLANT LIVE
CUTTINGS AND SOIL EROSION
FABRIC AS APPROPRIATE
LARGE BOULDERS CAN BE
PLACED ALONG THE TOE FOR
EDGE ROUGHNESS AND
\ ENHANCED EDGE COVER
EXISTING BANKS TO BE
GRADED TO EXISTING
GRADE OR NO STEEPER
THAT 3:1 SLOPE WHERE
FEASIBLE WITH WOVEN
7
OIR FIBER MAT OR01
APPROVED EQUAL
7
NORMAL WATER LEVEL
E (STING STREAM
HANNEL
0V DLO
77
�m
r- ��
(0(0
0+00
2
L-001
STREAM CROSSING SECTION
Sym Quantity Botanical name
1+00
E
)0
)0
0 10 20 40
SCALE: 1 "=10'
Common Name Root Cal. Height Remarks
Trees
AN
7
Acer negundo
Box Elder
B&B
2 1/2" min.
12' min.
AR
9
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
B&B
2 1/2" min.
12'-14'
BP
8
Betula populifolia
Gray Birch
B&B
2 1/2" min.
10' min.
LS
7
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
B&B
2 1/2" min.
12'-14'
MV
3
Magnolia virginiana
Sweet Bay Magnolia
B&B
2 1/2" min.
12'-14'
LIMITS SN
7
Salix nigra
Willow Oak
B&B
2 1/2" min.
12' min
GRADINGG,, TYP.
Shrubs & Groundcovers
A
64
Hamamelis virginiana
Common Wich Hazel
3 gal.
24" min.
6' o.c.
B
69
Ilex verticillata 'Winter Red'
Winterberry
3 gal.
24" min. or
18" min. spread, 5' o.c.
C
51
Euonymus americana
Strawberry Bush
5 gal.
24" min. or
18" min. spread, 5' o.c.
D
65
Myrica pennsylvanica
Northern Bayberry Bush
3 gal.
24" min. or
18" min. spread, 5' o.c.
E
56
Sorbus arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
3 gal.
24" min. or
18" min. spread, 5' o.c.
F
89
Itea virginica 'Henry's Garnet'
Virginia Sweetspire
3 gal.
24" min.
18" min. spread, 3' o.c.
3
L-001
I" SUP KNOT N1TH STOP KNOT.
6" URGER THAN TREE DIAMETER
KEEP MULCH AWAY FROM
TRUNK 1" TO 2"
—4" MAXIMUM LAYER OF MULCH
FINISH GRADE
REMOVE TYPICAL EXCESS SOIL Y T' BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED
FROM ROOT CROWN
lull 1011111
REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP UNDISTURBED SOIL
AND ANY NAILS/PINS, ETC.
ROOT BALL DIA. 12"
REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF WIRE VARIES
BASKET WHERE PRESENT
RAISE PIT BOTTOM TO SET ROOT CROWN
AT THE CORRECT HEIGHT. FIRM SOIL UNDER ROOT BALL.
1 All trees are to be nursery grown, ball and burlap (B&B) preferred. Minimum tree size is 2" caliper (measured 6" above root
ball), 8' minimum height.
2 Staking is optional. Rubber hose and rope or wire for staking is not recommended. No wire or rope is to be in direct
contact with trunk. Remove all trunk wrap, tree straps, and staking wire or rope after one growing season.
3. Guy wires are not permittd in street right-of-way.
4. All trees shall meet American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI, 1990, Part 1, "Shade and Flowring Trees").
FOR EXAMPLE:
ALL TREES SHALL MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2004)
CALIPER HEIGHT (RANGE) MAX. HEIGHT MIN. ROOT BALL DIA. MIN. ROOT BALL DEPTH
2" 12-14' 16: 24" 16"
3" 14-16' 18' 32" 21"
TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
RECOMMENDED PLANTINGS
CLDSM #40.01
LEGEND
WILKINSON BLVD
74
PARKER DR PARKER DR SKYVIEW RD
m
BETHEL RD vi
O T O
k/MBFR yRo FORDHAM RD N
LU
N��g'C 6�J0
N
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
— — -70a — —
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
— — —700• — -
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
•
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
TOP OF BANK
PCC[]
EXISTING PCCO BUFFER REVISIONS:
— — — — — —
EXISTING T.O.B.
No.
Date
---sS
EXISTING SEWER LINE
SD
EXISTING STORM LINE
ROAD CENTERLINE
— —
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
�E
EXISTING POWER LINE
LOG —
LIMITS OF GRADING
POWER LINE EASEMENT
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
L Q.°
z
O � Q
OY
L O
W
C •�"�o
H
Vf
JD W
U
Q
IL
Vf
U
Z
Q
W
W
V
C/)
W
%O %O
Go Go
00
a
�Go
Go
CL
G Z
Z
3 O
2
N L
V
O
�
2
J
J
�ozw
Ow�Q
p
=oLJJ
J
J
Ir—
W
�
w
=
m
STREAM
RESTORATION
SECTION
CORPORATE CERTIFICATIONS
NC PE: C-2930 NC LA: C-253
SC ENG : NO. 3599 SC LA: NO. 211
Project Manager: MDH
Drawn By: SCi
Checked By: MDH
Date: 10/24/23
Project Number: 22041
Sheet Number:
L-00 1

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Multifamily Residential Development
Parker Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BWR-017
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed development is located south of Parker Drive and west of Bethel Road in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Site consists of seventeen (17) parcels that total
approximately 12.2 acres.
H&H reviewed State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species databases for the Site and
conducted a screening survey of the Site and surrounding area in July and August 2023 for Federal
Threatened and Endangered Species, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National
Registry of Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and
surrounding area via visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic, cultural, and/or
archeological sites. The NC SHPO GIS viewer identifies the one on -Site National Register (NR)
listing in the northern portion of the Site. The residence at 1403 Parker Drive is listed on the NR
as an ineligible house (MK ---- ) surveyed in 2011. Additional recorded sites or significant
structures were not observed on -Site. H&H requested comment on the Site from the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), and NC SHPO in
July and August 2023. Agency responses are included in Appendix D.
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable. The building lots, roadways, and stormwater management areas
have been designed to primarily occupy upland areas, and retaining walls are proposed to prevent
additional impacts to the on -Site wetland and stream. Stream Channel "A" bisects the Site, and
road access is currently unavailable to the southern portion of the Site. The developer is proposing
a single stream crossing to reduce impacts to the on -Site stream. No impacts are proposed to the
on -Site wetland area.
1
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (B)VR)/BWR-017 Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-004 - 14
Wetland Permitting/PCN/09_C_Awid and Minirnue.docx hart h i c k m a n
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

During Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed. Extensive
silt fencing will be used on the construction Site perimeter and along stream and wetland
boundaries.
Mitigation
Mitigation is typically required by the USACE Nationwide Permit 29 for impacts greater than 0.1-
acre of wetlands and 0.02 acre of stream. Due to the proposed impacts to 0.03 acre (179.3 linear
feet) of on -Site stream channel, compensatory mitigation is proposed in the form of purchasing
stream mitigation credits from the Division of Mitigation Service In -Lieu Fee Program. The
mitigation acceptance letter is included in Appendix F.
A North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (SAM) form has been conducted for SCA. The
SAM form is attached in Appendix G. The overall SAM rating for the stream channel is medium
quality. Because the stream is of medium quality, a mitigation ratio of 2:1 is proposed. At a 2:1
mitigation ratio, 359 linear feet of mitigation is proposed for impacts to streams via the In -Lieu
Fee Program.
4
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (B)VR)/BWR-017 Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-004 - 14
Wetland Permitting/PCN/09_C_Avoid and Minimize.docx hart h i c k m a n
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix D
Supplemental Documents
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

QPQ'(MeNT OF WISH & WILDLIFE
SERVICE
United States Department of the Interior
o
9 ' FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�gRCH 3, * Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
September 21, 2023
Ms. Julia McGuire
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Subject: Parker Townhomes Residential Development in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina.
Dear Ms. McGuire:
On August 31, 2023, we received (via email) your information requesting our review of the subject
project. We have reviewed the information that you presented for this request and the following
comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C.§ 4321 et seq.); the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703); the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 - 1543) (Act).
Proiect Description
According to the information provided, an undisclosed project proponent proposes to construct a multi-
family residential development and associated infrastructure on approximately 12 acres at 1403 and 1407
Parker Drive and 1367 and 1400 Bethel Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Federally Listed Species
An assessment of suitable habitat and potential impacts to six species was conducted by environmental
specialist with Hart & Hickman, PC on July 17, 2023. The findings were compiled and included in the
information submitted to our office on August 31, 2023. The following species and their associated
habitats were evaluated.
Species
Status'
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Carolina heelsplitter
Lasmigona decorata
E
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Rusty -patched bumble bee
Bombus affinis
E
Schweinitz's sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
E
Smooth coneflower
Echinacea laevigata
T
lE = endangered, T = threatened, and BGPA = Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) Information for Planning and Consultation system (IPAC)
identifies proposed and listed species, and proposed and designated critical habitat that may occur within

the proposed project's action area. Only those species identified on the official species list generated by
IPAC need analysis during project review. Carolina heelsplitter and rusty -patched bumble bee are not
identified on the official species list for this project; therefore, consultation is not needed for these
species.
The review request states that no eagles or eagles' nest were observed on site. Based on the information
provided, we agree with the assessment that the proposed project is not likely to disturb nesting bald
eagles.
The review request states that no suitable habitats are present for Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's
sunflower, or smooth coneflower. Based on the information and photographs provided, we agree with the
assessment that no suitable habitats are present for these species. Should the lead federal action agency
make a "no effect" determination for these species, consultation is not required.
Suitable habitat for tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) may be present at the site. On September 14,
2022, the Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to list the tricolored bat as endangered
under the Act. Species proposed for listing are not afforded protection under the Act; however, as soon as
a listing becomes effective (typically 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register),
the prohibitions against jeopardizing its continued existence and "take" will apply. Therefore, if you
suspect your future or existing project may affect tricolored bats after the potential new listing goes into
effect, we recommend analyzing possible effects of the project on tricolored bats and their habitat to
determine whether consultation under section 7 of the Act is necessary. Conferencing procedures can be
followed prior to listing to ensure the project does not jeopardize the existence of a species. Projects with
an existing section 7 biological opinion may require re -initiation of consultation to provide uninterrupted
authorization for covered activities. Please contact our office for additional guidance or assistance.
We believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled for the federally listed species
discussed above. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new
information reveals impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a
manner not previously considered, (2) the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was
not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed, or critical habitat is determined that may be
affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resource Recommendations
We offer the following general recommendations for the benefit of fish and wildlife resources:
Equipment Use in Riparian Areas and In -Stream. Equipment should be operated from the
streambank. If in -stream work is necessary, stone causeways, work bridges, or mats (designed for
the specific location and type of equipment) should be used. Work pads on streambanks or
approaches to in -stream work areas should minimize disturbance to woody vegetation. Equipment
operated in riparian areas and in/near aquatic resources should be inspected daily and maintained
regularly to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials. Construction staging, toxic material storage, and equipment
maintenance, including refueling, should occur outside of the riparian area. The project proponent
should report any toxic material spills in riparian areas and/or aquatic resources to the Service
within 24 hours.
• Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction activities near aquatic resources, streams,
and wetlands have the potential to cause bank destabilization, water pollution, and water quality
degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed and maintained. In order
to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts, best management practices specific to
2

the extent and type of construction should be designed and installed prior to land -disturbing
activities and should be maintained throughout construction. Natural fiber matting (coir) should
be used for erosion control as synthetic netting can trap animals and persists in the environment
beyond its intended purpose. Land disturbance should be limited to what can be stabilized
quickly, preferably by the end of the workday. Once construction is complete, disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native riparian grass and tree species as soon as possible. For
maximum benefits to water quality and bank stabilization, riparian areas should be forested;
however, if the areas are maintained in grass, they should not be mowed. The Service can provide
information on potential sources of plant material upon request.
A complete design manual that is consistent with the requirements of the North Carolina
Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and Administrative Rules, can be found at the following
website: https:lldeq.nc.govlabout/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources.
Impervious Surfaces/Stormwater/Low Impact Development (LID). Increased development
contributes to the increased quantity and decreased quality of stormwater entering project area
waterways. Additionally, increased development outside the floodplain increases stormwater
flows already caused by the lack of or loss of riparian buffers and floodplain development. Recent
studies' have shown that areas of 10 percent to 20 percent impervious surface (such as roofs,
roads, and parking lots) double the amount of stormwater runoff compared to natural cover and
decrease deep infiltration (groundwater recharge) by 16 percent. At 35 — 50 percent impervious
surface, runoff triples, and deep infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Above 75 percent
impervious surface, runoff is 5.5 times higher than natural cover, and deep infiltration is
decreased by 80 percent. Additionally, the adequate treatment of stormwater at project sites is
essential for the protection of water quality and aquatic habitat. Impervious surfaces also collect
pathogens, metals, sediment, and chemical pollutants and quickly transmit them (via stormwater
runoff) to receiving waters. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, this
nonpoint-source pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the United States, posing
one of the greatest threats to aquatic life, and is also linked to chronic and acute illnesses in
human populations from exposure through drinking water and contact recreational.
Increased stormwater runoff also directly damages aquatic and riparian habitat, causing
streambank and stream channel scouring. Additionally, impervious surfaces reduce groundwater
recharge, resulting in even lower than expected stream flows during drought periods, which can
induce potentially catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and other aquatic life. To avoid any
additional impacts to habitat quality within the watershed, we recommend that all new
developments, regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area created, implement
stormwater retention and treatment measures designed to replicate and maintain the hydrograph at
the preconstruction condition.
We recommend the use of low impact development techniques,2 such as reduced road widths,
grassed swales in place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention areas, for retaining
and treating stormwater runoff rather than the more traditional measures, such as large retention
'Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (15 federal agencies of the United States Government).
Published October 1998, Revised August 2001. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices.
GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2: EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3.
2We recommend visiting the Environmental Protection Agency's Web site (http://www.gpa. ooLlpolluted-rung f
nonpoint-source pollution/urban-runoff-low-impact-development) for additional information and fact sheets
regarding the implementation of low -impact -development techniques.

ponds, etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce environmental impacts
from development.
Where detention ponds are used, stormwater outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior to
reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow for
the slow discharge of stormwater, attenuating the potential adverse effects of stormwater surges;
thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges. Also, because the purpose of
stormwater control measures is to protect streams and wetlands, no stormwater control measures
or best management practices should be installed within any stream (perennial or intermittent) or
wetland.
We also recommend that consideration be given to the use of pervious materials (i.e., pervious
concrete, interlocking/open paving blocks, etc.) for the construction of roads, driveways,
sidewalks, etc. Pervious surfaces minimize changes to the hydrology of the watershed and can be
used to facilitate groundwater recharge. Pervious materials are also less likely to absorb and store
heat and allow the cooler soil below to cool the pavement. Additionally, pervious concrete
requires less maintenance and is less susceptible to freeze/thaw cracking due to large voids within
the concrete.
Use of any of the proposed stormwater collection devices described above will dramatically
decrease the quantity and increase the quality of stormwater runoff.
Stream Buffers. Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems.
They accomplish the following:
o Catch and filter runoff, thereby helping to prevent nonpoint-source pollutants from
reaching streams.
o Enhance the in -stream processing of both point- and nonpoint-source pollutants.
o Act as "sponges" by absorbing runoff (which reduces the severity of floods) and by
allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels (which maintains stream
flows during dry periods).
o Catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and creating
logjams.
o Stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology.
o Provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved organic
carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web.
o Maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.
Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain, whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained adjacent to all aquatic areas. Within the watersheds
supporting federally listed aquatic species, we recommend undisturbed, forested buffers that are
naturally vegetated with trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation. These buffers should extend a
minimum of 200 feet from the banks of all perennial streams and a minimum of 100 feet from
the banks of all intermittent streams (or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain, whichever is
greater.) Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas, transmission,
etc.), and other infrastructure that requires maintenance, cleared rights -of -way and/or compromise
the functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.
• Stream Crossings. Bridges or spanning structures should be used for all permanent roadway
crossings of streams and associated wetlands. Structures should span the channel and the
floodplain in order to minimize impacts to aquatic resources, allow for the movement of aquatic
4

and terrestrial organisms, and eliminate the need to place fill in streams, wetlands, and
floodplains.
Bridges should be designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the stream,
approaches and abutments do not constrict the stream channel, and the crossing is perpendicular
to the stream. Spanning some or all of the floodplain allows stream access to the floodplain,
dissipates energy during high flows, and provides terrestrial wildlife passage. When bank
stabilization is necessary, we recommend that the use of riprap be minimized and that a
riprap-free buffer zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for wildlife movement. If fill in
the floodplain is necessary, floodplain culverts should be added through the fill to allow the
stream access to the floodplain during high flows.
If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option, we suggest using bottomless culverts.
Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate, create less disturbance during
construction, and provide a more natural post -construction channel. Culverts should be of
sufficient size to leave natural stream functions and habitats at the crossing site unimpeded.
Culvert installation and presence should not change water depth, volume (flow), or velocity levels
that permit aquatic organism passage; and accommodate the movement of debris and bed material
during bankfull events. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
• Utility Line Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources, utility crossings
(i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructure
(including manholes) should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility crossing is necessary,
we recommend that you first consider the use of directional boring. Directional boring under
streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method,
every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are minimized and
stabilized upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open -trench crossings
indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream
(which could undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of such problems could
result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as
much work as possible should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should
not exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In -stream work should
avoid the spring fish spawning season and should consider forecasted high flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in
order to identify any additional impact -minimization measures. The Service may be available to
assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least every 3
months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures for
the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing (should any streambank erosion
or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.

The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Rebekah Reid of
our staff at [e-mail], if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning
this project, please reference Log Number 4-2-23-722.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
0

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
September 6, 2023
Julia McGuire
Hart Hickman
3921 Suset Ridge Road, suite 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
jmc ug iregharthickman.com
Re: Construct townhomes, Bethel Road and Parker Drive, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 23-1787
Dear Ms. McGuire:
Thank you for your letter of August 4, 2023, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.review&dncr.nc.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Q North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Cameron Ingram, Executive Director
Via email
29 September 2023
Mr. Dan McCauley
Hart & Hickman PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Ste. 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
Subject: Request for Environmental Review
1407 Parker Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. McCauley,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) received your email on 31
August 2023. Biologists with NCWRC have reviewed the subject information. Comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information on the potential impacts to threatened and
endangered species and critical habitats at or near a proposed land redevelopment project at 1407 Parker
Drive in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The 0.78-acre site consists of a lawn and gravel
lot used for the storage of wooden pallets, and forested land with a stream in the western portion of the
site. The unnamed tributary to Irwin Creek is in the Catawba River basin.
We have no current known records of federal or state listed rare, threatened, or endangered species at or
adjacent to the site. The lack of records from the site does not imply or confirm the absence of state -listed
species. An on -site survey is the only means to determine if the proposed project may impact state rare,
threatened, or endangered species. H&H surveyed the site for federally threatened and endangered species
and their suitable habitat on 15 August 2023, and no individuals or their habitat were observed during the
field survey. Please note that the state endangered tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) is proposed for
listing as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). We recommend contacting the
USFWS to ensure any potential issues related to these species are addressed when the listing of the
tricolored bat has become effective.
We offer the following preliminary recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife resources.
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

29 September 2023 Page 2
1407 Parker Drive
Mecklenburg County
1. We recommend not clearing the entire site, but rather maintaining the maximum amount of native
vegetation as possible.
2. Currently, we recommend minimizing clearing of living, dying, or dead mature trees, particularly
if they are hardwoods, and avoid tree clearing activities during the active period for tricolored
bats (April 1 — November 14).
3. Native plants should be used for seeding disturbed areas. Specifically, avoid using Bermudagrass,
redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-native. A list of alternatives to
non-native species has been attached. Alternatively, use grains, such as oats, wheat, or rye for
temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant seeding. We recommend planting native,
wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the project boundary. Avoid using
invasive, non-native plants in landscaping plants
(http://www.ncwildflower.org//plant ,galleries/invasives_list).
4. We recommend using green construction techniques to improve water, waste, and energy
efficiency, such as environmental -friendly building techniques, construction waste management,
and energy efficient building materials.
Use non-invasive native species and Low Impact Development (LID) technology in landscaping.
Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain the predevelopment hydrologic
regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of the site. LID techniques include
bioretention areas that can collect stormwater from driveways and parking areas. Additional
alternatives include narrower roads and swales versus curbs/gutters. Compared to conventional
developments, implementing appropriate LID techniques can be more cost-effective, increase
property values, provide space -saving advantages, reduce runoff, and protect water quality
(https://owl.cwp.org/mdocs-posts/roseen-et-al-2011-forging-the-link/). Also, additional
information on LID can be found at the NC State University LID guide:
http://www.onsiteconsortium.org/npsdeal/NC_LID_Guidebook.pd£
NCWRC's Green Growth Toolbox provides information on nature -friendly planning
(hitp://www.ncwildlife.org/Conservin /g Programs/GreenGrowthToglbox.aspx).
6. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing activity.
Incorporate the following elements into erosion and sediment control plans: minimize clearing
and grading, protect waterways, phase construction for larger construction sites (>25 acres),
stabilize soils as rapidly as possible (<2 weeks), protect steep slopes, establish appropriate
perimeter controls, employ advanced settling devices, implement a certified contractors program,
and regularly inspect erosion control measures.
7. Matting used for stabilization should be free of nylon or plastic mesh, as it frequently entangles
wildlife and it is slow to degrades, resulting in a hazard that may last for years.
At this time, the information provided is not sufficient for our staff to make definitive recommendations
or conclusions concerning this project. If I can be of additional assistance, please call [phone] or
email olivia.munzer(c-r�,ncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

Appendix E
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Sent Via Email
October 31, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attn: Mr. Doug Perez
Re: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Proposed Development
Remount Road, Parker Drive, Bethel Road, and Sims Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BWR-017
Dear Doug:
On behalf of Beauxwright, please find the enclosed Preliminary Stream and Wetlands Survey for the
above Site in Charlotte, NC. We are seeking a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) for
this property. Hart & Hickman, PC conducted a preliminary stream and wetland survey on August
11, 2022 and August 15, 2023. Access authorizations signed by representatives of the property
owners are included with this request. A Jurisdictional Determination Request form and associated
documents are attached in PDF format.
If needed, we would like to schedule a site visit as soon as possible. Please contact us if you have
any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart and Hickman, PC
99�
Matt Ingalls
Sr. Project Manager
Attachments
cc: Ms. Morgan Rushnell, Beauxwright (Via Email)
Dan McCauley, PWS
Sr. Project Environmental Scientist
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Bethel Road Assemblage
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Hart & Hickman, PC conducted a preliminary stream and wetland survey on the Site and is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination as an initial step to potential permitting activities.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: see attached table
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Remount Road, Parker Drive, Bethel Road, and Sims Drive, Charlotte, NC 28208 (Lat/Long:
35.218946,-80.880528)
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: see attached table
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Irwin Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re u�ryPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Pagc 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Remount Rd. Parker Dr. Bethel Rd and Sims Dr
City, State:
Charlotte, NC
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): see attached table
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Dan McCauley - Hart & Hickman, PC
Mailing Address: 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Ste 301
Raleigh, NC
Telephone Number: 704-998-1864
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
W1I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: see attached table
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

PARCEL: 11902124
jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name .... ._..-........ _.....,........----...
rCaapaci : ❑� er ElAuthorizedAgent'
C! 0/( -;/.
E. REAS04 FOR Jn REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
►I❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each addition! parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization fnrmlletter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: E4C9E3CE-E7CB-46A0-822F-35786D5B64B5
Parcel Number: 11902129
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Kenn D. Huston
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner
8/3/2023
tpgcu Signed by:
❑ Authorized Agent'
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Parcel Numbers: 11902127 and
11902134
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Srikanth Mannava
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Parcel Numbers: 11902120, 11902130, 11902131, 11902133,
11902135,11902136,11902137,11902138,11902139,11902140,
11902141,11902142,11902329
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
STSB Holdings LLC
Print Name
Capacit : ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
922 Z
Date /. _
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 12.20 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Pagc 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.218946
-80.880528
F7A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
✓❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hgp://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re"latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Anyroved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
F4 Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
✓0 USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
W1Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.aLmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/re2ulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02 Ann A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.g=.mil/Missions/RegulatoKy-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E63AD00-83A0-4686-83B2-F85D38A77BAE
Agent Certification of Authorization
Paul Cooper Morrison Jr
I, , representing the prospective developer of the residential and
forested properties located at various addresses on Remount Road, Parker Drive, Bethel Road, and
Sims Drive which are represented by Parcel Numbers 11902120, 11902127, 11902129, 11902130,
11902131, 11902133, 11902134, 11902135, 11902136, 11902137, 11902138, 11902139,
11902140, 11902141, 11902142, 11902329, and 11902124 in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina (approx. 12 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart & Hickman, PC to act on the
prospective developer's behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and
acceptance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Section 404/401 permits for this
property.
E(DocuSig ned by:
hbr r fit. M-Sbw
B613370C146042B...
Prospective Applicant's Signature
Name/Title: Manager
Company: Bethel Road Partners LLC
8/29/2023
Date
Agent's Signature
Dan McCauley, PWS
Hart & Hickman, PC
08-11-2023
Date

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: August 2023
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Dan McCauley (H&H) 3921 sunset Ridge Rd, suite sot, Raleigh, NC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Willmington TBD
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg city: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.218946 Long.:-80.880528
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Irwin Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SCA
35.219115
-80.880528
937 if
Non -Wetland Waters
Section 404
WAA
35.21918
-80.88074
0.003 ac.
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map prepared by H&H dated 8/24/23
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Charlotte East and West NC 2022, 1:24,000
❑W Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey Version 3.1, 8/25/23
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS Wetlands, 9/1/22
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps: 3710453400J AND 3710453300J dated 9/2/2015
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, BWR-017 8/11/2022
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑■ Other information (please specify): Hard copy soil survey, Mecklenburg County, 1980
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
1
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Cowardin_Code I HGM Code ma NWPR_Determine_Code Local Waterway
SCA NORTH CAROLINA R3 Linear 937 FOOT A2TRIBPER 35.21911500-80.88052800
WAA NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area 0.003 AC MWETABUT 35.89250100-81.55691100

TABLE 1: SITE PARCELS & PROPERTY OWNERS
PARCEL NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER
ADDRESS
11902120
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
1830 REMOUNT ROAD
11902124
PHILBRICK LEROY LEWIS
1407 PARKER DRIVE
11902127
SRIKANTH MANNAVA
1403 PARKER DR
11902129
KENN D HUSTON
1400 BETHEL ROAD
11902130
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
BETHEL ROAD
11902131
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
1405 BETHEL ROAD
11902133
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
BETHEL ROAD
11902134
SRIKANTH MANNAVA
BETHEL ROAD
11902135
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
SIMS DRIVE
11902136
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
REMOUNT ROAD
11902137
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
2633 SIMS DRIVE
11902138
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
1821 SIMS DRIVE
11902139
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
SIMS DRIVE
11902140
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
2620 SIMS DRIVE
11902141
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
SIMS DRIVE
11902142
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
SIMS DRIVE
11902329
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
1367 BETHEL ROAD

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902124 111902124
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L1 M1214-277
Land Area
0.779 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
08/28/2023
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
PHILBRICK LEROY LEWIS
5405 SOUTH MINISTER LN
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
23423-133
02/26/2008
$30,000.00
01214-274
09/16/1946
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Water Quality Buffer Post Construction District
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain District Central Catawba
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
1407 PARKER DR CHARLOTTE
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902120 111902120
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.315 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-420
01/25/2019
$32,500.00
32804-506
07/02/2018
$1,500.00
25960-666
10/05/2010
25821-818
08/12/2010
25084-055
09/16/2009
22888-717
10/02/2007
18184-74
12/30/2004
$0.00
15725-124
07/18/2003
$2,500.00
05575-880
09/11/1978
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel Stream Watershed Districts
1830 REMOUNT RD CHARLOTTE Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902127 111902127
Property Characteristics
Legaldesc
L3 U/M
Land Area
0.6 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
ICHARLOTTE
Property Use
I INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
1403 PARKER DR CHARLOTTE
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
SRIKANTH MANNAVA
PLOT 38
OVERSEASGARDENS108
COLONY VAMPUGUDA
KAPRA HYDERABAD TS
INDIA 500062
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
35132-43
10/02/2020
$90,000.00
30401-518
11 /06/2015
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
136
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902129 111902129
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.339 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
KENN D HUSTON
7721 COMPTON CT
CHARLOTTE NC 28270
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
22851-149
09/25/2007
$71,000.00
21600-516
01 /03/2007
$0.00
19626-288
11/14/2005
$40,000.00
19626-285
11/14/2005
$40,000.00
19222-67
08/23/2005
$44,000.00
16633-160
12/31/2003
$72,500.00
16317-822
10/22/2003
1 $47,000.00
05936-328
12/27/1988
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
1400 BETHEL RD CHARLOTTE
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BETHEL RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902130 111902130
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.534 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-417
01 /25/2019
22888-717
10/02/2007
18867-315
06/10/2005
03737-638
01/02/1975
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902131 111902131
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
M1166-425
Land Area
0.765 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
P1405 BETHEL RD CHARLOTTE
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-713
01 /25/2019
30790-307
05/03/2016
27964-401
01/04/2013
21921-899
03/16/2007
$0.00
21921-895
03/16/2007
$0.00
21921-890
03/16/2007
$8,000.00
05189-664
03/11/1986
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
mmunity Flood
Fne
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BETHEL RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902133 111902133
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
2.36 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-417
01 /25/2019
22888-717
10/02/2007
18110-458
12/10/2004
$2,500.00
05875-288
10/06/1988
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902134 111902134
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
1.08 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453400J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BETHEL RD CHARLOTTE
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
SRIKANTH MANNAVA
1403 PARKER DR
CHARLOTTE NC 28208
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
37372-346
05/26/2022
$55,000.00
32774-939
06/22/2018
$0.00
22888-717
10/02/2007
18867-315
06/10/2005
03737-638
01/02/1975
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902135 111902135
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
M6-108
Land Area
1.67 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-713
01 /25/2019
30790-307
05/03/2016
27964-401
01/04/2012
25661-960
06/01 /2010
$0.00
04337-197
08/28/1980
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
REMOUNT RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902136 111902136
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.953 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-417
01 /25/2019
22888-717
10/02/2007
18328-714
02/07/2005
$2,500.00
03020-588
01 /01 /1975
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902137 111902137
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
2633 SIMS DRIVE
Land Area
0.374 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer Jurisdiction Charlotte
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo District I Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
211 E BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
35873-933
03/30/2021
$27,000.00
04407-610
03/12/1981
$1,500.00
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�2633 SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902138 111902138
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.382 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-411
01 /25/2019
32627-182
04/25/2018
03422-384
09/18/1972
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Water Quality Buffer Post Construction District
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer No Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain District Central Catawba
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�1821 SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902139 111902139
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.371 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-411
01 /25/2019
32627-182
04/25/2018
03422-383
09/22/1972
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Water Quality Buffer Post Construction District
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer No Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain District Central Catawba
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�2620 SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902140 111902140
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.411 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-411
01 /25/2019
33244-463
01/24/2019
32627-185
04/25/2018
$7,500.00
11068-355
02/04/2000
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902141 111902141
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.359 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer Jurisdiction Charlotte
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo District I Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-411
01 /25/2019
32627-208
04/25/2018
$7,500.00
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902142 111902142
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
0.352 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 E WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
33245-411
01 /25/2019
32627-182
04/25/2018
04360-770
10/20/1980
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Water Quality Buffer Post Construction District
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer No Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain District Central Catawba
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�SIMS DR CHARLOTTE
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
11902329 111902329
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L1 B2 M1166-13
Land Area
0.529 GIS Calc. Acres
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning
Contact Post Construction District
appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer Jurisdiction Charlotte
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo District Central Catawba
09/20/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
STSB HOLDINGS LLC
804 WORTHINGTON AVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
34386-401
03/19/2020
$170,000.00
04334-120
08/18/1980
$20,000.00
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710453300J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
1367 BETHEL RD CHARLOTTE
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
36
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name IRWIN
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

Sent Via Email
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Beauxwright
601 S Cedar Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Attn: Ms. Morgan Rushnell
Re: Preliminary Stream and Wetlands Survey
Residential and Undeveloped Land
Bethel Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BWR-017
Dear Morgan:
1.0 Introduction
hart 'ti hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is pleased to present this preliminary stream and wetlands survey
for an assemblage of residential and undeveloped land located west of Bethel Road in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site consists of seventeen (17)
parcels of land that total approximately 12.20 acres. The Site is developed with three residences
(1403 Parker Drive and 1354 and 1367 Bethel Road), one empty lot used for storage, and the
remainder of the Site consists of undeveloped land. A Site location map is provided as Figure 1,
and the Site and surrounding area are shown in Figure 2.
H&H personnel visited the Site and conducted the preliminary stream and wetlands survey
activities on August 11, 2022 and August 15, 2023. The purpose of the preliminary survey
activities was to identify potential jurisdictional streams and wetlands at the Site prior to
potential development activities. A summary of the preliminary stream and wetlands survey
activities and results is provided in the following sections.
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 2
2.0 Preliminary Stream and Wetland Survey Activities
H&H conducted a preliminary stream and wetlands survey of the subject Site, which consisted of
1) a desktop review of maps and environmental documents; and 2) a Site -specific survey for
streams, wetlands, and surface water features. A summary of the survey activities is provided
below.
2.1 Map and Environmental Document Review
In order to evaluate the potential presence of streams and wetlands on the subject Site, H&H
performed the following:
• reviewed the Charlotte East and Charlotte West, North Carolina (2022) US Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic maps with coverage of the subject Site;
• reviewed the Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G Geographical Information System (GIS)
website for the presence of water bodies, floodplains, and environmental buffers on the
subject Site (https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.govo;
• reviewed the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
map for the presence of potential jurisdictional wetlands and surface water features on the
subject Site (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html);
• reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey website for potential hydric soil series
present on the subject Site (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm);
• reviewed the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Published Soil Survey of
Mecklenburg County (1980) for soil series and the presence of water bodies on the
subject Site; and
• reviewed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate
Maps (FIRM) for the presence of floodplains
(https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search).
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
on the subject Site
hart ` hiekman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 3
A copy of the USGS topographic maps is included as Figure 1, and copies of the GIS
information, NWI map, soil survey maps, and flood map are included in Appendix A.
Information obtained from our review of these documents is summarized below.
USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps
H&H reviewed the USGS 7.5-minute topographic maps with coverage of the subject Site. The
USGS maps depict an unnamed tributary of Irwin Creek transecting the central portion of the
Site. The topographic gradient and surface drainage at the Site generally slope toward the
unnamed tributary of Irwin Creek located in the central portion of the Site. The unnamed
tributary of Irwin Creek directs flow off -Site in a southeasterly direction.
Mecklenburg County GIS
H&H reviewed the Mecklenburg County GIS website to determine if surface water bodies,
floodplains, or environmental buffers are depicted on the subject Site. The Mecklenburg County
GIS website depicts an unnamed tributary of Irwin Creek and an associated 35-foot Post -
Construction (PC) buffer transecting the central portion of the Site from the northwest to
southeast. The Mecklenburg County GIS website does not depict other surface water features,
buffers, or floodplains on the Site.
Environmental buffers are regulated by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
(CMSWS). The buffers are applied to intermittent and perennial streams identified in the field
and consist of undisturbed vegetated buffers to protect the natural function of a stream system.
The PC buffer is applied to intermittent and perennial streams that drain less than 50 acres of
area. In accordance with CMSWS regulations, the buffers apply when intermittent or perennial
streams are identified during a field survey.
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017 hart _ d hiekman
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 4
NWI Map
H&H reviewed the NWI map for potential jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters on the US
FWS NWI Mapper website. An unnamed tributary of Irwin Creek is depicted in the central
portion of the Site. NWI classifies the stream as R5UBH, which is defined as a permanently
flooded perennial stream with an unconsolidated bottom.
USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey
H&H reviewed soil survey information and did not identify potentially hydric soil series on the
Site. Hydric soil series are typically associated with consistently saturated soil such as in
wetland areas.
USDA SCS Published Soil Survey
H&H reviewed soil information on the published soil survey and identified the Cecil -Urban land
complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes (CuB), and the Cecil -Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
(CuD), soil series throughout the subject Site. These soil series typically exhibit characteristics
of a non-hydric soil. The soil survey does not depict surface water features on the Site.
RRT4 0 RTT? A/T
H&H reviewed the FEMA FIRM panel on the FEMA website, which does not depict
floodplains on the Site.
2.2 Site -Specific Survey
On August 11, 2022 and August 15, 2023, H&H performed a preliminary stream and wetlands
survey on the Site in accordance with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Manual
and the Regional Supplement to the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual — Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality Division of Water Resources (DEQ DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (Version 4.11). Hydric soil, wetland hydrology, and
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017 hart _ d hiekman
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 5
wetland vegetation must be present to classify an area as a wetland. A summary of the survey
activities is provided below.
Stream Survey
H&H surveyed the Site for potential streams or surface water features. H&H observed the
following potentially jurisdictional stream on the subject Site:
• Stream Channel `A" (SCA) — SCA originates at a culvert in the northwestern portion of
the Site. SCA transects the central portion of the Site, flowing in a generally
southeasterly direction, before flowing off -Site to the southeast. H&H observed strong
bed and bank and discernable baseflow within SCA, and SCA appears to intersect the
water table throughout the majority of the year. H&H used DEQ DWR's Stream
Identification Form (version 4.11), which indicates that SCA appears to maintain
characteristics consistent with a perennial stream (Appendix B). SCA is an unnamed
tributary of Irwin Creek identified in the background mapping resources discussed above.
SCA totals approximately 937 linear feet of on -Site length.
The stream feature is depicted on Figure 2, and a representative data form and photos are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.
Wetland Survey
During our Site visit, H&H investigated potential wetland areas for the presence of hydrology
indicators, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil indicators. H&H delineated one potentially
jurisdictional wetland area on the Site. H&H advanced test pit borings in the potential wetland
area to document the wetland criteria and noted that soils sampled in the wetland area exhibited
characteristics consistent with those of a hydric soil. H&H also observed the primary hydrologic
indicators and sufficient obligate to facultative wetland vegetation located at the wetland test pit
borings within the potential wetland area. In addition, a test pit boring was advanced in an
upland area at the Site to document upland conditions. H&H observed the following potentially
jurisdictional wetland area on the subject Site:
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017 hart _ d hiekman
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 6
• Wetland Area "A " (WAA) — WAA is a linear wetland located in the central portion of the
Site. WAA directs flow in an easterly direction into a SCA. WAA encompasses
approximately 0.003 acre of on -Site area. Vegetation consists of sparse herbaceous
vegetation and vines.
The wetland area is depicted on Figure 2, and representative data forms and photos are provided
in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.
Open Water Survey
H&H surveyed the Site for potential surface water features other than streams and wetlands and
did not observe open waters on -Site during our survey.
3.0 Permitting for Stream and Wetland Impacts
Proposed impacts to streams, wetlands, and/or surface water features require Section 404/401
permits from the Corps and DWR, respectively. H&H recommends that the stream and wetland
be verified by the Corps during a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Site visit. Only
the Corps can determine if jurisdictional features exist. Please note that a recent Supreme Court
ruling may affect the Corps' interpretation of jurisdictional features, and sizes and/or locations of
features identified during the survey may be altered during a Site visit with the Corps. If the
Corps concurs with the preliminary findings of the survey, Section 404/401 permits will be
required if future development plans include impacts to the on -Site stream or wetland.
The Corps has recently published NWPs including NWP #39, which went into effect on March
15, 2021. The NWP #39 allows for cumulative impacts of 0.5 acre to both streams and wetlands
for commercial and industrial developments. In response to NWP #39, the North Carolina DEQ
DWR has published a corresponding Water Quality Certificate (WQC) #4263, which also went
into effect on March 15, 2021. According to the WQC #4263, an Individual 401 WQC will be
required if impacts exceed 150 linear feet of stream or 0.1 acre of wetland. The Individual 401
14
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017 hart _! hiekman
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMAKMR ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 7
WQC requires the publication of an electronic Public Notice, which is published by DEQ DWR
during their review timeframe. Finally, the Corps Wilmington District has recently finalized
regional conditions associated with the NWPs, which limits the loss of stream bed to 0.05 acre
under the NWT program. As noted above, the NWP #39 allows up to 0.5 acre of cumulative
wetland, stream, and open water impact with potential mitigation provided the applicant can:
1) justify avoidance of wetland/stream impacts where practicable, and 2) minimize impacts to
wetland/streams where impacts cannot be avoided.
As noted above, PC buffers are applied to intermittent and perennial stream channels identified
during a field survey. The Mecklenburg County GIS website depicts a 35-foot PC along the
unnamed tributary of Irwin Creek in the central portion of the Site. For projects that propose
impacts to the environmental buffers, stormwater controls that continue to protect the water
quality of a stream are typically required to off -set loss of the buffer. Other mitigation
techniques can include stream restoration, stream preservation, wetland restoration, bottomland
hardwood preservation, controlled impervious cover, open space development, and the purchase
of mitigation credits. In accordance with CMSWS regulations, the jurisdictional boundary of the
buffers is measured from the top of the stream bank and extends landward to the designated
buffer width. On a stream origin or endpoint, such as a culvert, the buffer is applied as a "semi-
circle" and extends landward to the designated buffer width.
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017 hart _ d hiekman
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Ms. Morgan Rushnell
September 1, 2022
Revised: August 29, 2023
Page 8
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please contact us should you have
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart and Hickman, PC
11 )�
Matt Ingalls
Sr. Project Manager
Julia McGuire
Asst. Project Environmental Scientist
Attachments Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map
Appendix A — Support Documents: Mecklenburg County GIS Map, NWI Map,
Soil Survey Maps, and FEMA Flood Map
Appendix B — Survey Filed Forms: DEQ DWR Stream Identification Form and
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Forms
Appendix C — Site Photographs
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Beauxwrlght (BWR)/BWR-017 hart _ d hiekman
Bethel Road Assemblage/Task-002 - Wetlands/Updated Wetlands Report/draft Stream & Wetlands Survey.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Figures
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

RC T"Ej pr, ..
7 _
I
4w .. . .
I" f
_ s
ur)yslr�riln �-� p,A I I �'rF;
s,7
I `4. .i
�_-.� � 7'� .. .Q' •�=�.-�� � � of
MQRfI•IEAD 5T
JJ
r �
r I
SITE *V
G
USGS The National Map./National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,
and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.
Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;
U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA
National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief
Model. Data refreshed April, 2023.iiii
0 2,000 4,000
NSCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE EAST AND CHARLOTTE WEST
NORTH CAROLINA 2022
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

POTENTIAL WETLAND WATER OF THE U.S. (WAA)
l�
'r
ti
1
�r
P -
11-4
# c
A
POTENTIAL STREAM (NON -WETLAND) WATER
OF THE U.S. (SCA)
LEGEND
—SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
_ H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL STREAM
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
® WETLAND
TEST PIT
— PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE
CULVERT
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL LENGTH
STREAM CHANNEL ID
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (LF)
STREAM CHANNEL "A" (SCA)
1 937
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
WETLAND AREA I❑
APPROXIMATE AREA (AC)
WETLAND AREA "A" (WAA)
0.003
NOTES:
1. SC - STREAM CHANNEL
LF - LINEAR FEET
WA -WETLAND AREA
2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 8/11/22 AND
8/15/23.
3. SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
ATRIMBLE GPS UNIT.
4. FLAGGED BOUNDARIES OF FEATURES ARE SUBJECT
TO THE REVIEW OF A US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY BE ALTERED DURING A
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SITE VISIT, WHICH
COULD CHANGE SIZES AND/OR LOCATIONS OF
FEATURES.
5. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2022. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2022.
w
APPROXIMATE
0 120 240
iiia
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
PROJECT RESIDENTIALAND UNDEVELOPED LAND
BETHEL ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
4 2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
hart 'No hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
w 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMARTER fNVIRIDNMEN-FAL SOLUTION5 License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DATE: 8/24/2023 REVISION NO. 0
lunity JOB NO: BWR-017 FIGURE NO. 2

Appendix A
Support Documents
• Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G GIS Map (Figure Al)
• NWI Map (Figure A2)
• Soil Survey Maps (Figures A3 & A4)
• FEMA Flood Map (Figure A5)
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

0 500 1,000
iiiii
N SCALE IN FEET
MECKLENBURG COUNTY POLARIS 3G GIS
OPEN MAPPING DATA

0 500 1,000
iiiii
N SCALE IN FEET
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE 03050103
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY (NWI)

CuB
WILKINS. BOULEVARD
0
O
J
J
}
LLI
m
PARKER DRIVE o PARKER DRIVE
SKY -VIEW -ROAD O
L
SITE j
w
Cu
BETHEL-ROAD
WATSON-DRIVE
C B
kiMBFR<y FORDHAM-ROAD CuD
""Na
CuD
WESTREET BOULEVARD
Ur
eD
BRENTWOOD-PL-ACE BPRFt�NGER�RN
O
CuB SOP
Oyu MO
v
TITLE
0 500 1,000 WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP
N SCALE IN FEET PRa E T RESIDENTIALAND UNDEVELOPED LAND
BETHEL ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100
USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (SCS) hart 'hickman Charlotte, North Carolina28203
0-` 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMAIMq ENVI RO NNI ENTAL SOLUTIONS License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC119
DATE: 8/25/2023 REVISION NO: 0
WEB SOIL SURVEY JOB NO: BWR-017 FIGURE NO: A3

2
Iva do..-
pk ,
oD •
T-E
0 500 1,000 PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY MAP
iiii
N SCALE IN FEET PROJECT
RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED LAND
BETHEL ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (SCS) 'I 2923 South Tryon street- suite 100
` hart 'hickman Charlotte, North Carolina28203
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, SHEETS 6AND 7, �oass #C-1-0007 2p9�oa--245 Geology
$MRIRTER FNVIRONM�NTA4 $fl4UTlC1N5 L1CCn5C i� C-1269 � # C-245 GCOlOgy
PUBLISHED 1980
DATE: 8/24/2023 REVISION NO: 0
PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY
JOB NO: BWR-017 FIGURE NO: A4

0 500 1,000
iiiii
N SCALE IN FEET
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGMENTAGENCY (FEMA)
PANEL 3710453400J AND 3710453300J,
REVISED 9/2/2015
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM)

Appendix B
Survey Field Forms
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11
Date: 8/11/22
Project/Site: BWR-017
Latitude:
35.218719
Evaluator: JKM
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude:
-80.880021
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
38
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
Stream A
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
17.5
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Tin -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
2
1 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes =
3
*artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
1 AN
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
8_5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
Emmor
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: BWR-017 City/County: Mecklenburg/Charlotte Sampling Date: 8-11-22
Applicant/Owner: Beauxwright State: NC Sampling Point: TP-1
Investigator(s): JKM Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.218569 Long:-80.880658 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil -Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, (CuD) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional wetland area A
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
—Surface Water (Al)
—True Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Woodwardia areolata
5 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Hedera helix
3 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Campsis radicans 3 Yes FAC
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
6 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
66.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist)
%
Type
Loc
Texture
Remarks
0-3
5YR 4/2
75
5YR 4/4
20
C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
5YR 6/8
5
C
M
Prominent redox concentrations
3-10
10YR 5/1
75
5YR 4/4
20
C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
5YR 6/8
5
C
M
Prominent redox concentrations
10-20
10YR 6/1
95
5YR 6/8
5
C
M
Sandy
Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: BWR-017 City/County: Mecklenburg/Charlotte Sampling Date: 8-11-22
Applicant/Owner: Beauxwright State: NC Sampling Point: TP-2
Investigator(s): JKM Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.218569 Long:-80.880658 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil -Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, (CuD) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-2
HDsoiute
uominant
indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus alba
40
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Acer rubrum
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Magnolia grandiflora
10
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
100
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Elaeagnus umbellata
80
Yes
UPL
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Nandina domestica
15
No
UPL
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Ilex opaca
5
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
100
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Carex blanda
5
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
9
m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
33.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: TP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 5/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-20 5YR 6/8 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators of hydric soils are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Appendix C
Site Photographs
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Photograph 1: General view of SCA in the south-central portion of the Site
Photograph 2: General view of Wetland `A' in the central portion of the Site
14 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart W_%W hiekman Charlotte, NC 28203 BETHEL ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

mt
6
Photograph 3: General view of upland area in the eastern portion of the Site
Photograph 4: Hydric soils observed in the central portion of the Site
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart 'to hickman Charlotte, NC28203 BETHEL ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

0
m
Photograph 5: Upland soils observed throughout the Site
14 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED LAND
hart P-%W hiekman Charlotte, NC 28203 BETHEL ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

Appendix F
Mitigation Acceptance Letter
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Morgan Rushnell
Beauxwright
1900 West Morehead Street, Ste. 201
Charlotte, NC 28208
Project: Bethel Road Townhomes
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 17, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/17/2024
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Catawba
03050103
Warm Stream
179
*DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Dan McCauley, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Qpaltry I Division of Mitigation Services
EQ
4�i-.nani iw, 217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I RaIetgh. North Carolina 27699-1652
117,
919.707.8976

Appendix G
NC SAM Form
hart 1 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

user manual version c.i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Parker Townhomes 2. Date of evaluation: 08/15/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Beauxwright 4. Assessor name/organization: Julia McGuire - Hart and Hickman
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Irwin Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.21843,-80.879804
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SCA 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 180
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): .5 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 7 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? [;Yes r, No
14. Feature type: F, Perennial flow [-, Intermittent flow [;Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) [-,Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for a �� �; b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miZ) [-,Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miZ) [-,Size 4 (? 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? F;Yes [, No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water F Classified Trout Waters F Water Supply Watershed ( [;I [III [;III [HIV [,V)
r Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area r High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish r 303(d) List r CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
r Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
I- Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? [;Yes F, No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
[*;A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
F,B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
�A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
[;B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
[,A < 10% of channel unstable
[; B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
[;A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
[; C [ C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)

r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
r F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
r H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
r I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
r J Little to no stressors
Recent Weather- watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
;C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
(";Yes F, No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. F, Yes �' No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m N r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F_ m r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o T r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation o r I Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) L m r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots O r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*************************** ...REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. (';Yes F, No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
r B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach -whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but <- 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 -4096 mm)
Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. [-,Yes F, No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. [-, No Water F Other:
12b. ;Yes �' No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r r Adult frogs
r r Aquatic reptiles
r r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r r Beetles (including water pennies)
r F Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r Asian clam (Corbicula )
r F Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r F Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r F Dipterans (true flies)
r F_ Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r f Midges/mosquito larvae
r j- Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r j""- Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
17- F Other fish
r r Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
r r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r r Tipulid larvae

r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB
RB
;A
A
Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B
; B
Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C;
C
Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water> 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
r B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
r D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
r E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
r F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
r A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
r C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
r D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
r E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
r F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider 'leaf-on"condition.
�A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB
RB
LB RB
;A
A
A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B
; B
B+, B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C;
C;
C; C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D;
D;
D ; D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E;
E
E [; E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
�A
A
Mature forest
B
B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E; E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB
RB
LB RB LB RB
;A
A
A A [;A Row crops
B;B
B B B Maintained turf
C;C
[;C C [;C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D
D [;D D [;D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem
Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
�A
A
Medium to high stem density
B
B
Low stem density
C
C
No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer- streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)

Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
E.;A E.;A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
;A;A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B; B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ' ;Yes F;No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. r, No Water F Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
�' A <46 r-, B 46 to < 67 r2C 67 to < 79 �' D 79 to < 230 n E ? 230

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Parker Townhomes
Stream Category Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Date of Evaluation 08/15/2023
Assessor Name/Organization a McGuire - Hart and Hickr
USACE/
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
OMITTED
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
NCDWR
Intermittent